Search Results

The Inquirer is one of the biggest daily newspapers by circulation in The Philippines, and is one of the most visited news websites in the country. Here is a reprint of their article written by Rafael Castillo M.D. and published on 27th June 2022. Data suggests sudden adult death syndrome due to vaccines By: Rafael Castillo-M.D. Philippine Daily Inquirer / 07:21 PM June 27, 2022 From time to time, our commentaries stir up a hornet’s nest in our readers and in several health-oriented Viber groups. We wrote of the recent phenomenon of increased incidence of sudden unexpected deaths in healthy adults and those with previously stable medical conditions, and many physicians and health experts are now questioning the government’s continued campaign for anti-COVID vaccination and boostering. This is despite the unresolved question linking the vaccines to heart and other serious complications. Dr. Benny Tiangco, one of the country’s top experts on medicolegal issues, echoed the concerns on seniors suffering from heart attacks getting second booster jabs. Vaccine-related injuries He wrote: “I’ve been hearing such (sudden or unexpected adult deaths) but mostly from non-MDs so I took them with a grain of salt. Kaso medyo marami-rami na ngayon (The problem is that the cases are increasing). “The concern is that many seniors who have cardiac comorbidities (previous heart attack, ischemic heart, myopathies, etc.) are the ones targeted for the never-ending boosters. “I’m no anti-vaxxer, but this proclivity fomented by government and industry for never-ending booster shots is akin to a scam of the highest order. We’re selling short our innate natural immunity. Who knows, the long-COVID effect may wreak havoc on the heart and other organ systems. I pray no analogous post ‘thalidomide-like’ effect happens with these vaccines.” Thalidomide was a popularly prescribed drug for nausea and vomiting in pregnant women in the late 1950s to early 1960s, only to be found out later to be the cause of severe birth defects in thousands of children. The head of the Concerned Doctors and Citizens of the Philippines (CDCPh) working group researching on various vaccine-related injuries, and who goes by the name of SuperSally 888 in her newsletter (supersally.substack.com), explained in her rejoinder why she believes the anti-COVID vaccines have a strong link with these unexpected deaths. SuperSally 888 wrote: “Thank you for raising this topic in an environment that doesn’t countenance any COVID-19 vaccine narrative outside that of the safe, effective and necessary for everyone. “My first reaction upon reading your statement that no one can say for sure that SADS (sudden adult death syndrome) is vaccine-related, was that, of course, we can say it is linked! Maybe not in all cases, but in many; we only need to look for a plausible biological mechanism and time frame. “In medicine and forensics, if you don’t look in the right place, the right way at the evidence, you will not find anything. Young healthy people do not just die unexpectedly, there is always a cause! It just needs to be found. “Cardiac experts say sudden deaths in otherwise healthy people must be assumed to be due to cardiac arrhythmia unless proven otherwise and should be properly investigated as such. Thus, more correctly, SADS must be referred to as sudden arrhythmic death syndrome. “A gross examination of a heart and its surrounding blood vessels will not reveal the biochemical and microscopic abnormalities that could have triggered an electrical failure and resulted in sudden death; a more detailed analysis is needed. There is a plausible biological mechanism for cardiac injury. The spike protein is now known to be the pathogenic (disease-causing) component of the COVID-19 virus. Excess mortality “Among other impacts, it has strong affinity for ACE2 receptors, which are abundant in the heart, particularly those of younger people, athletes and boys. While the spike protein from natural COVID-19 infection does cause illness, it is typically cleared rapidly, though some cases of ‘long COVID’ do occur. “The spike protein was selected as the target for vaccine-generated immunity and was modified to be more stable to give time for an anti spike immune response to be generated. “Japanese biodistribution studies have shown that the mRNA lipid nanoparticles distribute rapidly to all cells, including the heart. The vaccine-induced spike production is sustained for as long as researchers have looked. “If heart muscle cells are co-opted to spike protein production, not only is their normal function disrupted, but they will be targeted for destruction by the immune system and ultimately replaced by scar tissue which does not conduct electricity. “Dr. Peter A. McCullough, a world-leading cardiologist, has described the mechanisms of electrical disruption and cardiac death, and recently other experts have described and presented histological evidence of cardiac amyloidosis, which can be fatal, following COVID-19 vaccination. “There’s a plausible time scale. Prior to 2021, year-on-year population death rates were typically very stable with minimal percent changes over time. Suddenly in 2021 there was mass unprecedented excess mortality in countries concurrent with their vaccine roll-out. “Prior to 2021, sudden and unexplained deaths in young, healthy adolescents and adults were vanishingly rare. Now in 2021 and 2022, there are many cases being reported in sports people and celebrities, and surely far more unreported in regular folks. “There were no excess deaths in 2020 in the Philippines. There were no excess respiratory deaths, which plummeted in March of 2020 and only returned to normal range when COVID-19 deaths were included in 2020 … the first year of lockdown was effectively a control year for 2021 and the vaccine rollout. Vital statistics “In 2021, excess deaths (an astounding 40 percent) started in March, exactly concurrent with the start of vaccine rollout and soared as the year progressed … Nothing else happened in March except the vaccine rollout. Nothing else accelerated in 2021, except the vaccine rollout! Deaths increased with increasing doses. If excess deaths are divided by the vaccine doses delivered for 2021, there are about 19 excess deaths per 10,000 doses of vaccine. “Central Visayas, Region VII, presents an interesting case … They were slow and delayed in vaccine rollouts, their spikes in excess deaths were also delayed and did not start until June 2021. “I am sure such findings could be replicated on a by-region basis with the start of excess deaths always matching the start of the vaccine rollout! What else will it take to prove a temporal link? “Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA) has not yet released vital statistics with age breakdown for 2021 so we cannot see the age groups contributing to the excess deaths. PSA has also not released sufficient data for 2022 to see if trends of excess deaths continue. PSA data has never been so important as now in the middle of this population experiment! I pray they will release accurate and timely data. “All these data should raise a very high suspicion that the excess deaths, of which SADS cases are part, are due to the COVID-19 vaccines. It is not premature to link these deaths with the vaccines, it is already time! “I agree with you, Dr. Castillo, and the CDCPh doctors that an immediate halt of vaccine rollout, and a thorough investigation is called for.” Next week, we’ll print the informative and insightful rejoinders of Dr. Marivic Villa, the current CDCPh president who is based in Florida, USA, and Dr. Homer Lim, the immediate past president of CDCPh. The original article is available here: https://lifestyle.inquirer.net/409269/data-suggests-sudden-adult-death-syndrome-due-to-vaccines/

Paypal launched a new set of T&Cs allowing them to confiscate $2,500 per instance of what they term misinformation. The backlash via social media was immediate and huge. Not On The Beeb was defunded by Paypal in early June 2022 Our account has not been reinstated or the monthly donations. PayPal to expand its speech restriction rules in November An updated policy that pulls financial services from those that don't adhere to its arbitrary speech limitations. By Christina Maas - October 1st 2022 On the heels of its censorship spree in the UK – that received backlash so great it got the attention of lawmakers – PayPal is rolling out a new agreement that gives itself more censorship powers and the ability to strip income from those who don’t abide to its speech rules. Violation of the “Acceptable Use Policy constitutes a violation of the PayPal User Agreement and may subject you to damages, including liquidated damages of $2,500.00 U.S. dollars per violation,” PayPal writes. PayPal’s clause about taking users’ funds for a violation of its rules has long been established. But, as published on September 26th and to be effective on November 3rd, 2022, PayPal will add restrictions to its acceptable use policy that go beyond illegal activities and fraud and into the realm of policing speech. The updated policy prohibits users from using PayPal for activities that: “Involve the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials that, in PayPal’s sole discretion, (a) are harmful, obscene, harassing, or objectionable … (e) depict, promote, or incite hatred or discrimination of protected groups or of individuals or groups based on protected characteristics (e.g. race, religion, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation, etc.) … (g) are fraudulent, promote misinformation … or (i) are otherwise unfit for publication.” Big Tech platforms are increasingly finding ways to punish people’s speech under the guise of banning “misinformation,” and making themselves as the arbiters of truth in deciding what is and isn’t true. Backlash at PayPal in the last week caused it to backtrack on its censorship of the Free Speech Union, its founder Toby Young, and his news website The Daily Sceptic after pushback from both sides of the British political spectrum. Critics argued that the removal of the accounts was view-point discrimination. PayPal never gave a specific reason for the suspension of the accounts. They only said that the accounts had violated the acceptable use policy. After the accounts were removed, a spokesperson for the financial services provider said: “Achieving the balance between protecting the ideals of tolerance, diversity and respect for people of all backgrounds and upholding the values of free expression and open dialogue can be difficult, but we do our best to achieve it.” PayPal was accused of ignoring the fact that defending someone’s right to free speech is not the same as promoting their views. “Forgive me if I don’t leap for joy,” Young told The Telegraph after the accounts were reinstated. “The last two weeks have been a nightmare as I’ve scrabbled to try to stop The Daily Sceptic and Free Speech Union going under. PayPal’s software was embedded in all our payment systems, so the sudden closure of our accounts was an existential threat.” PayPal has a strong history of censorship. In June, it banned the account of evolutionary biologist Dr. Colin Wright who researches the differences between the sexes. Free speech advocacy groups have criticized PayPal for the lack of transparency and its lack of due process when freezing or closing accounts. The groups argue that the company should give users with details on the policy that has been violated and an opportunity to appeal the decision. When Dr. Wright asked why his account was suspended, he was told to “submit a subpoena.” SOURCE: https://reclaimthenet.org/paypal-to-expand-its-speech-restriction-rules/ The Daily Wire took up the above story and got the story the attention it needed. NEW PAYPAL POLICY LETS COMPANY STEAL $2,500 FROM USERS’ ACCOUNTS IF THEY PROMOTE ‘MISINFORMATION’ By Ben Zeisloft Oct 7, 2022 A new policy update from PayPal will permit the firm to sanction users who advance purported “misinformation” or present risks to user “wellbeing” with fines of up to $2,500 per offense. The financial services company, which has repeatedly deplatformed organizations and individual commentators for their political views, will expand its “existing list of prohibited activities” on November 3. Among the changes are prohibitions on “the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials” that “promote misinformation” or “present a risk to user safety or wellbeing.” Users are also barred from “the promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory.” The company’s current acceptable use policy does not mention such activities. The Daily Wire reached out to PayPal for definitions of the added terms, although no response was received in time for publication. The policy applies to actions taken using PayPal’s platform. Deliberations will be made at the “sole discretion” of PayPal and may subject the user to “damages” — including the removal of $2,500 “debited directly from your PayPal account” per offense. The company’s user agreement contains a provision in which account holders acknowledge that the figure is “presently a reasonable minimum estimate of PayPal’s actual damages” due to the administrative cost of tracking violations and damage to the company’s reputation. “Under existing law, PayPal has the ability as a private company to implement this type of viewpoint-discriminatory policy,” Aaron Terr, a senior program officer at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, explained to The Daily Wire. “Whatever motivation PayPal has for establishing these vague new categories of prohibited expression, they will almost certainly have a severe chilling effect on users’ speech. As is often the case with ill-defined and viewpoint-discriminatory speech codes, those with unpopular or minority viewpoints will likely bear the brunt of these restrictions.” The move comes days after PayPal canceled three accounts linked to Toby Young, a commentator who runs a nonprofit called Free Speech Union. The organization has defended clients such as actor and comedian Russell Brand, who recently moved his show from YouTube to Rumble in reaction to censorship from the former platform. Roughly one-third of Free Speech Union members rely upon PayPal to process their membership dues — although the company gave no explanation to Young for the suspension beyond mentioning a breach of the acceptable use policy. PayPal later restored the accounts after receiving criticism from lawmakers and apologized to Young for “any inconvenience caused,” according to a report from The Telegraph. Platforms such as Amazon, Twitter, and Facebook have formerly censored conservatives and others who subscribe to heterodox positions on controversial social issues, including transgenderism and homosexuality. GoFundMe seized millions in funds raised for trucker protests in Canada earlier this year, while Google recently began suppressing search results for crisis pregnancy centers. “These kinds of policies are unwise, threaten free speech, and invite legal risk,” Jeremy Tedesco, vice president of corporate engagement at Alliance Defending Freedom, told The Daily Wire. “When companies apply policies to restrict the religious speech of their customers, they could run afoul of prohibitions on religious discrimination that exist in many state and federal laws.” PayPal has also sanctioned Gays Against Groomers, a group that opposes the sexualization of children, as well as evolutionary biologist Colin Wright and journalist Ian Miles Cheong. The company featured a rainbow-colored banner on its social media platforms during the month of June affirming that the platform is “open for all” — and PayPal U.K. still sports the banner. “Whatever PayPal’s intentions may be, censorship and chilling free speech is precisely the effect of these kinds of vaguely worded policies,” Tedesco added. “We’ve seen social media companies use similar policies to stifle free speech on their platforms. We can expect a similar outcome with PayPal.” SOURCE: https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-paypal-policy-lets-company-pull-2500-from-users-accounts-if-they-promote-misinformation

The #boycottpaypal push to get everyone to close their paypal accounts in protest over the Papal T&C updates on fines for misinformation has worked. The T&C update allowed them to fine users $2,500 per transgression. On seeing the social media storm, Paypal made a fast U-turn, claiming the T&Cs were a minor error. Paypal has reinstated the accounts of some large players who got main-stream media attention over their PayPal de-financing, but the smaller players such as ourselves at Not On The Beeb remain banned–even if reinstated, we would not work if this company again in any capacity. Social media has been flood with videos such as this one from Australia By Greg Wilson A red-faced PayPal walked back a shocking new policy announcement that users who advance “misinformation” could face fines of $2,500 per offence, saying it was all a mistake. The financial services company, which has repeatedly deplatformed organizations and individual commentators for their political views, announced Saturday. “An [Accepted Use Policy] notice recently went out in error that included incorrect information,” a PayPal spokesperson said. “PayPal is not fining people for misinformation and this language was never intended to be inserted in our policy. We’re sorry for the confusion this has caused.” The original announcement said PayPal would expand its “existing list of prohibited activities” on November 3. Among the changes were prohibitions on using the platform for “the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials” that “promote misinformation” or “present a risk to user safety or wellbeing.” Users were also barred under the policy from “the promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory.” Before posting its initial story, The Daily Wire reached out to PayPal for definitions of the added terms but received no response. The report sparked outrage online, with many people tweeting pledges to dump the online payment facilitator. Particularly chilling was the fact that the policy said determinations of what could be deemed “misinformation,” or a threat to the “wellbeing” of other users was to be at the “sole discretion” of PayPal. The now-aborted policy said users could be liable for “damages” — including the removal of $2,500 “debited directly from your PayPal account” per offence. “Under existing law, PayPal has the ability as a private company to implement this type of viewpoint-discriminatory policy,” Aaron Terr, a senior program officer at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, told The Daily Wire. “Whatever motivation PayPal has for establishing these vague new categories of prohibited expression, they will almost certainly have a severe chilling effect on users’ speech. As is often the case with ill-defined and viewpoint-discriminatory speech codes, those with unpopular or minority viewpoints will likely bear the brunt of these restrictions.” The announcement and reversal comes days after PayPal cancelled three accounts linked to Toby Young, a commentator who runs a nonprofit called Free Speech Union. The organization has defended clients such as actor and comedian Russell Brand, who recently moved his show from YouTube to Rumble in reaction to censorship from the former platform. Platforms such as Amazon, Twitter, and Facebook have censored conservatives over their positions on controversial social issues, including transgenderism, vaccination mandates, and homosexuality. GoFundMe seized millions in funds raised for trucker protests in Canada earlier this year, while Google recently began suppressing search results for crisis pregnancy centres. PayPal has also sanctioned Gays Against Groomers, a group that opposes the sexualization of children, as well as evolutionary biologist Colin Wright and journalist Ian Miles Cheong. The company featured a rainbow-coloured banner on its social media platforms during the month of June affirming that the platform is “open for all” — and PayPal U.K. still sports the banner. “Whatever PayPal’s intentions may be, censorship and chilling free speech is precisely the effect of these kinds of vaguely worded policies,” Tedesco added. “We’ve seen social media companies use similar policies to stifle free speech on their platforms. We can expect a similar outcome with PayPal.” Source: https://www.dailywire.com/news/paypal-reverses-plan-to-fine-users-2500-for-misinformation-after-daily-wire-report Even the mainstream media have commented with this article from Yahoo. PayPal Pulls Back, Says It Won’t Fine Customers $2,500 for ‘Misinformation’ after Backlash PayPal has backtracked on a published policy that would have fined users $2,500 for spreading “misinformation,” claiming the update had gone out “in error.” “An AUP notice recently went out in error that included incorrect information. PayPal is not fining people for misinformation and this language was never intended to be inserted in our policy. Our teams are working to correct our policy pages. We’re sorry for the confusion this has caused,” a spokesperson told National Review in a written statement. The course reversal comes after the policy changes had started to attract media scrutiny as well as criticism on Twitter. Former PayPal president David Marcus even blasted the company over the implication that it could seize customers’ money for finding their views objectionable. “It’s hard for me to openly criticize a company I used to love and gave so much to. But @PayPal’s new AUP goes against everything I believe in,” the cryptocurrency entrepreneur said Saturday. “A private company now gets to decide to take your money if you say something they disagree with. Insanity.” Tech titan Elon Musk replied, “Agreed,” in a comment that got thousands of likes. The policy update had appeared to authorize the company to pull a significant sum of money from the accounts of users who spread “misinformation,” among other newly listed offenses. The new conditions were scheduled to be added to the restricted activity section of the PayPal User agreement effective November 3, the Daily Wire first reported. Changes included prohibitions on “the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials” that “promote misinformation.” While the prior policy already forbade “hate,” “intolerance,” and discrimination, the new one would have explicitly applied to specific “protected groups” and “individuals or groups based on protected characteristics.” Identities under this umbrella included race, religion, gender or gender identity, and sexual orientation. The firm’s current rulebook doesn’t list these terms. It’s unclear whether PayPal will also pull back these specific prohibitions on “discriminatory” language, or if it is only scrubbing the “misinformation” clause. Breaking the rule against misinformation and hate speech “may subject you to damages, including liquidated damages of $2,500.00 U.S. dollars per violation, which may be debited directly from your PayPal account,” the company had originally warned. In a user agreement, account holders accept and attest that the penalty is “presently a reasonable minimum estimate of PayPal’s actual damages” due to the expense the firm incurs by accounting for the violations as well as damage to its reputation. PayPal was founded by Peter Thiel, who has invested in a number of GOP rising stars and “conservative” business ventures. Ebay acquired the company in 2002 and has managed it since. In recent years, PayPal has been known to censor or deplatform organizations or individuals for certain political commentary, particularly that which is considered right-wing. It recently banned Gays Against Groomers, a group composed of LGBT-identifying people that claims to call attention to the sexualization and medicalization of children via gender ideology and the transgender movement. Minutes later, PayPal’s subsidiary Venmo reportedly barred the organization from access. Evolutionary biologist Colin Wright and journalist Ian Miles Cheong, who regularly expose the dangers of transgenderism for minors, have also been removed. SOURCE: https://news.yahoo.com/paypal-policy-permits-company-fine-143946902.html The #boycottpaypal push to close paypal accounts over the Papal T&C update for misinformation has worked. The T&C update allowed them to to fine users $2,500 per transgression. O)mn seeing the social media storm, Paypal made a fast U-turn, claiming the T&Cs were a minor error.

This 6th of August 2020 letter by John Stone to the BMJ is worth re-printing. Dear Editor Thank you Karyse Day [1] for drawing attention to the problem of the bias and intimidation inherent in the term "anti-vaxxer". The term has been around perhaps since the 19th century but has evolved a new context. Three years ago I drew attention to the remarks of Seth Berkley, director of the vaccine lobby organisation GAVI, in the Spectator proposing that "anti-vaxxers" be excluded from social media, which meant in effect not only that certain people should not be allowed on social media but that criticism of vaccines should not be allowed on a generic basis - an extremely serious matter[2]. Unfortunately, this has also been a hobby-horse of the present Prime Minister. In August last year Reuter's recorded Boris Johnson as saying [3]: “I’m afraid people have just been listening to that superstitious mumbo-jumbo on the internet, all that anti-vax stuff..." On 24 September 2020 he told the UN [4]: “There are today people who are still actually anti-science, a whole movement called ‘the anti-vaxxers’ who refuse to acknowledge the evidence that vaccinations have eradicated smallpox and who by their prejudices are actually endangering the very children they want to protect." By February this year the Sunday Telegraph was reporting [5]: "Posting anti-vaccine propaganda on social media could become criminal offence, Law Commissioner says New Law Commissioner Penney Lewis is leading wide-ranging review into whether UK's offence and abuse laws are fit for the Social Media age..." And once again the Prime Minister was quoted last month [6]: “There’s all these anti-vaxxers now,” Johnson told medical workers at a doctor’s surgery in London. “They are nuts, they are nuts.” While there are a lot of very fed up people I am extremely dubious there is a movement called "the anti-vaxxers" or that they are posting propaganda: at the very best this is a simplistic claim [7,8]. At a time when the government is supposedly trying to earn trust for a range of potential SAR-CoV-2 vaccines the continued disparagement and repression of people who raise questions about a class of products - which after all cannot be inherently safe - speaks for itself. It creates an atmosphere of prejudice and intimidation - such as described in the Cumberlege review [9] and should be seen and understood for what it is. SOURCE: https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3099/rr-5 REFERENCES [1] Karyse Day, 'Re: Cumberlege review exposes stubborn and dangerous flaws in healthcare', 25 August 2020, https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3099/rr-3 [2] John Stone, ' The Shadow War on Disease: Arbitrary, Oppressive and Unaccountable Medicine', 9 July 2017, https://www.bmj.com/content/357/bmj.j2449/rr-13 [3] 'UK's Johnson slams 'mumbo-jumbo' about vaccines after measles rates rise', Reuter's 19 August 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-health/uks-johnson-slams-mumb... [4] United Kingdom - Prime Minister Addresses General Debate, 74th Session (UN 24 September 2019) @ 8.30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf4YEyh7erE&app=desktop [5] Mike Wright, 'Posting anti-vaccine propaganda on social media could become criminal offence, Law Commissioner says', 1 February 2020 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/02/01/posting-anti-vaccine-propaga... [6] 'Johnson says anti-vaxxers 'are nuts'', Reuter's 24 July 2020 https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-vaccinatio-... [7] John Stone, 'An appeal to authority is not the same as an appeal to knowledge', 15 May 2019, https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l2144/rr-0 [8] John Stone, 'Brave new World', 17 May 2019, https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l2144/rr-5 [9] Helen Haskell, 'Cumberlege review exposes stubborn and dangerous flaws in healthcare' BMJ 2020; 370 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3099 (Published 06 August 2020)

Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Biological Safety Officer for Imperial College London (retired) sent in this fascinating article which might just link to certain aspects of the vaccine-induced magnetism that we have been investigating. Hi Mark, I think this may interest you. I'm pretty sure you will not find it on the BEEB https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2021.652617/full In nature, these bacteria live just below the surface of the mud in fresh and saltwater, where they happily feed on organic materials. They contain magnetite, that make them point like compass needles along the angle of dip of the Earth's magnetic field so that they swim diagonally downwards to find their way back into the mud. But, the conditions in the small intestine are nearly anaerobic with an abundance of food so your gut is an ideal place for them to live too. When these bacteria are exposed to alternating magnetic fields they either vibrate or rotate and drill their way through the intestine wall. From there they can enter the nervous system and spread throughout the body where they could cause a variety of disorders, including Parkinson's Disease, Motor Neuron Disease and perhaps many others. I'm sure we are going to hear a lot more about this in the not-too-distant future. Most magnetic bacteria belong to the Archaebacteria and differ from other bacteria (Eubacteria) and higher organisms in that the Archaebacteria have a fundamentally different membrane structure based on terpenoids. See https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/archaea/archaeamm.html This may make it more difficult to design antibiotics and vaccines to combat them, since most of these target specific proteins in the membrane and these are fundamentally different in the Archaebacteria. It seems possible that Black Seed Oil (which may disrupt the archaebacterial membrane but doesn't depend on specific proteins for its bactericidal activity) may be more effective than traditional treatments and may even cure the disease whereas NHS treatments just do not work and even the NHS admits this For what it's worth, I have been taking. Black seed oil capsules, three times a day for at least two months and the hand tremors, which I believed to be the beginnings of Parkinson's, have now almost disappeared. Best wishes Andrew Goldsworthy Magnetism and Parkinson's Disease As I mentioned in my earlier email, there appears to be a link between magnetic particles in the brain and nervous system and Parkinson's Disease. This has been confirmed using MRI scans. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/11/181127171413.htm But the problem I have with this is that the intense magnetic fields within the scanner (circa 2-3 Tesla) wil draw these particles through the brain cell membranes and so do more damage than the condition they were investigating. Now may be the time to publish a questionnaire asking anyone who has had an MRI scan, for whatever reason, whether their mental health has been affected. Best wishes Andrew See our warning on MRI's for people suffering vaccine-induced magnetism. ARTICLE EXCERPTS Introduction Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the most prevalent movement disorder known and predominantly affects the elderly. It is a progressive neurodegenerative disease wherein α-synuclein, a neuronal protein, aggregates to form toxic structures in nerve cells. The cause of Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains unknown. Intestinal dysfunction and changes in the gut microbiota, common symptoms of PD, are evidently linked to the pathogenesis of PD. Although a multitude of studies have investigated microbial etiologies of PD, the microbial role in disease progression remains unclear. Here, we show that Gram-negative sulfate-reducing bacteria of the genus Desulfovibrio may play a potential role in the development of PD. Conventional and quantitative real-time PCR analysis of feces from twenty PD patients and twenty healthy controls revealed that all PD patients harbored Desulfovibrio bacteria in their gut microbiota and these bacteria were present at higher levels in PD patients than in healthy controls. Additionally, the concentration of Desulfovibrio species correlated with the severity of PD. Desulfovibrio bacteria produce hydrogen sulfide and lipopolysaccharide, and several strains synthesize magnetite, all of which likely induce the oligomerization and aggregation of α-synuclein protein. The substances originating from Desulfovibrio bacteria likely take part in pathogenesis of PD. These findings may open new avenues for the treatment of PD and the identification of people at risk for developing PD. Discussion Our results established a significant correlation between DSV bacteria and PD. The quantity of DSV bacteria in fecal samples correlated with the severity of the disease, and higher amounts of DSV were found in PD samples compared to control samples. All fecal samples of PD patients were positive for the DSV-specific [FeFe]-hydrogenase gene. DSV bacteria, D. desulfuricans, D. fairfieldensis, and D. piger, were significantly more common in PD samples than in control samples. Previous attempts to correlate DSV abundance with different intestinal diseases have failed to show correlations (Zinkevich and Beech, 2000; Fite et al., 2004; Scanlan et al., 2009). In our study, all PD patients harbored DSV, but as the primers used for hydA detection were not suitable for qPCR (results not shown), we cannot exclude the possibility that the patients with low levels of the four examined DSV species may have high levels of other DSV species. As 20% of the PD patients had unknown DSV species, these bacteria must be isolated and characterized to enable the development of primers suitable for qPCR. Together, the data strongly suggests that DSV play a role in the pathogenesis of PD. DSV have an ability to bind to human colonic mucin, and they are found at high levels (approximately 104 to 106 bacteria/g feces) in mucosal samples of the large intestine (Zinkevich and Beech, 2000; Nava et al., 2012; Earley et al., 2015). An important characteristic of DSV is its ability to perform dissimilatory sulfate reduction by utilizing sulfate as an electron acceptor for respiration, thereby producing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) (Carbonero et al., 2012). H2S can also be produced from cysteine degradation catalyzed by L-cysteine desulfhydrase, present in intestinal pathogens such as Salmonella Typhimurium, Helicobacter pylori, Escherichia coli and in pathogens belonging to genera of DSV, Clostridium, Enterobacter, Klebsiella and Streptococcus. Additionally, Bilophila wadsworthia and D. desulfuricans can produce H2S through a third pathway as a byproduct of taurine catabolism (Carbonero et al., 2012). H2S displays Janus-faced characteristics by carrying physiologic signaling events in neuronal cells and showing neuroprotective properties while also being highly toxic at high concentrations (Panthi et al., 2018; Haouzi et al., 2020). In humans, an acute low-dose H2S gas exposition can cause eye irritation and olfactory dysfunction whereas a high-dose exposition can lead to severe central nervous system dysfunction and even death (Rumbeiha et al., 2016; Haouzi et al., 2020). As a diffusible gas that is more soluble than CO2 or O2, H2S can enter the blood circulation from the gut (Tomasova et al., 2016; Haouzi et al., 2020). It is reasonable to assume that H2S concentrations are raised in the gastrointestinal wall structures in cases where the gut harbors an increased amount of H2S-producing DSV. Elevated H2S concentrations in these structures may result in constipation due to the compound’s ability to inhibit gastrointestinal motility (Singh and Lin, 2015). In the present study, the constipation prevalence among PD patients was as high as 70%. Notably, constipation is a prevalent ailment in PD and it can precede the motor features of PD and form a risk for PD onset (Abbott et al., 2001; Lin et al., 2014; Stirpe et al., 2016). In one study, constipation was reported to associate with increased quantities of DSV, Cristensenellaceae and Firmicute bacteria in fecal samples of non-PD subjects (Jalanka et al., 2019). However, whether DSV species are a cause or a consequence of constipation in PD remains an unanswered question. Possibly, DSV species take part in the evolution of PD after their quantity exceeds a certain threshold level. Hydrogen sulfide has been demonstrated to alter intracellular biochemistry to favor α-Syn aggregation. Hydrogen sulfide can release iron from mammalian ferritin in cells and raise iron levels in the cytosolic labile iron pool (Cassanelli and Moulis, 2001; Hälldin and Land, 2008). The resultant effect on α-Syn-expressing nerve cells is of concern as both ferric and ferrous iron are capable of inducing α-Syn aggregates, the main neuropathologic feature of PD (Joppe et al., 2019). Overexpression of endogenously produced H2S can also release mitochondrial cytochrome c into the cytosol, where this cytochrome has been observed to form α-Syn radicals and subsequently induce α-Syn oligomerization, an early stage in α-Syn aggregation (Guo et al., 2015; Kumar et al., 2016; Li et al., 2019). The colonic mucosa is normally protected from H2S by the sulfide oxidation pathway, including the enzymes sulfide quinone oxidoreductase, persulfide dioxygenase, rhodanese and sulfide oxidase (Picton et al., 2002; Ramasamy et al., 2006; Libiad et al., 2014). If DSV, the dominant SRB in the intestinal mucosa (Zinkevich and Beech, 2000; Nava et al., 2012; Earley et al., 2015), increase in number, H2S will likely be produced at higher levels that may exceed the capacity of the detoxifying enzymes. In addition, inflammation decreases the detoxification capacity of the mucosal tissue, resulting in an increased level of H2S (Flannigan et al., 2013). The observation that smoking induces a causally protective effect on PD occurrence lends support for the role of H2S and its interaction with detoxifying enzymes in PD pathogenesis (Mappin-Kasirer et al., 2020). It is known that cyanide, present in variable amounts in cigarette smoke, reacts with H2S under the influence of rhodanese to form thiocyanate, thus resulting in lowered H2S levels (Picton et al., 2002). The enteroendocrine cells of the gut, which display neuron-like properties and are connected to autonomous enteric nerves, express α-Syn (Chandra et al., 2017). Anatomically, enteroendocrine cells extend their apical cytoplasmic processes towards the gut luminal surface. Thus, it is reasonable to argue that this feature will increase the DSV-borne H2S exposure risk. In addition, overgrowth of DSV may induce colonic mucosal barrier dysfunction by influencing the metabolism of butyrate, a short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), which has been reported to be the major energy substance for the colonic epithelium (Chapman, 2001). Overgrowth of H2S-producing bacteria such as DSV poses an apparent threat to this barrier function, as sulfides impair the oxidation of butyrate (Babidge et al., 1998). In this context, it has been shown that PD patients exhibit increased intestinal permeability correlating with increased intestinal mucosa staining for α-Syn (Forsyth et al., 2011). In addition, lipopolysaccharides produced by DSV can apparently increase intestinal permeability and α-Syn expression (Kelly et al., 2014; Fuke et al., 2019; Gorecki et al., 2019). Notably, the mucin layer of the colon consists primarily of glycoproteins, which carry sulfate residues, and degradation products of these sulfomucins serve as a source of sulfate for SRB such as DSV (Derrien et al., 2008). Further, Akkermansia muciniphila and Bifidobacterium, abundant inhabitants of the human gut, can degrade mucin (Derrien et al., 2008; Ruas-Madiedo et al., 2008). Several studies on gut microbiota in PD have shown increases in the relative abundance of these bacteria (Chiang and Lin, 2019; Shen et al., 2021). Bifidobacteria are commonly available as commercial products, and their abundance in the gut is reported to correlate to the levodopa dose in PD (Wallen et al., 2020). A. muciniphila, in addition to its ability to degrade mucin, seems to promote mucus thickness and stimulate mucus turnover rate, thus apparently freeing considerable amounts of sulfate for SRB (Zhou, 2017). Support for this interaction between A. muciniphila and SRB is provided by a study on the metabolome profile of PD patients wherein significant changes in sulfur metabolism, including H2S, were verified through computational modeling, and the observed changes were driven by A. muciniphila and B. wadsworthia (Hertel et al., 2019). As a pathogenetic model, it is justifiable to propose that excessive production of H2S by gut DSV, cross-fed by A. muciniphila, leads to α-Syn oligomerization and aggregation in the adjacent enteroendocrine cells. From there, α-Syn oligomers may make their way to the brain via the vagus nerve. This proposed model agrees with the initial proposal by Braak and colleagues that PD is caused by a pathogen capable of passing through the mucosal barrier of the gastrointestinal tract (Braak et al., 2003). Routes other than the vagal route for α-Syn oligomer transport come into consideration as well. Elevated levels of oligomeric α-Syn have been detected in plasma samples of PD patients, and it has been documented that α-Syn can cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) in both the blood-to-brain and brain-to-blood direction (El-Agnaf et al., 2006; Sui et al., 2014). If DSV-produced H2S plays a central role in the pathogenesis of PD, it is reasonable to presume that, in addition to DSV, other H2S-producing bacteria, such as H. pylori and Clostridium species, may also induce PD (Murros, 2021). In fact, people with PD have an increased prevalence of H. pylori infections, and eradication of this pathogen has been reported to improve motor functions in PD patients (McGee et al., 2018). Recently, a population-based cohort showed that Clostridium difficile infections temporarily elevate the risk of PD (Kang et al., 2020). Although increased production of H2S may play a pivotal role in PD pathogenesis, inflammation caused by DSV and other infective agents like curli-producing E. coli and Proteus mirabilis evidently play a role as well (Chen et al., 2016; Choi et al., 2018). Experimentally, an exposure to bacteria that produce the curli protein results in α-Syn depositions in both the gut and the brain (Chen et al., 2016). Furthermore, it has been shown that LPS can accelerate the synthesis of curli fibrils (Swasthi and Mukhopadhyay, 2017). After a primary inflammatory event, a sustained low-level inflammation may develop, resulting in increased intestinal permeability, leakage of inflammatory agents, and ultimately a chronic systemic immune response that may weaken the BBB (Houser and Tansey, 2017). The potential capability of DSV to produce magnetite (Fe3O4) deserves special attention, as uncoated magnetite nanoparticles can accelerate α-Syn aggregation (Joshi et al., 2015). Most of the DSV contain a [FeFe]-hydrogenase metalloenzyme system, which catalyzes both the oxidation and reduction of molecular hydrogen and protons, respectively (Pereira et al., 2011). Based on studies on D. vulgaris, it has been suggested that the reduction of soluble ferric iron to ferrous iron is a periplasmic process that requires the presence of a [FeFe]-hydrogenase (Park et al., 2008). An interaction between ferrous iron and amorphous ferric hydroxide can result in magnetite formation, and it has been shown that magnetite can be formed from amorphous ferric hydroxide in the presence of iron- and sulfate-reducing bacteria (Chistyakova et al., 2004; Lenders et al., 2016). D. desulfuricans has the ability to synthesize magnetite (Lovley et al., 1993), and this DSV species was the most frequently found DSV species in the patients included in this study. Notably, magnetite production in anaerobic condition by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria is coupled with energy-metabolism and the produced magnetite is extracellular (Konhauser, 1997). Magnetite nanoparticles can be absorbed into intestinal cells and blood circulation by endocytosis (Fröhlich and Roblegg, 2012; Bergin and Witzmann, 2013). In a study on skin samples of patients having PD, low-temperature magnetometric measurements revealed apparent superparamagnetic magnetite particles in the dermal layer of several PD patients, and it was proposed that these particles were probably gut-borne and produced by DSV (Murros et al., 2019). Support for the ability of magnetite to accumulate in the brain is provided by a study on 822 brain specimens sampled from seven human cadaver brains (Gilder et al., 2018). However, the possible connection between bacterial magnetite nanoparticles and PD pathogenesis is still speculative; magnetometric data from stool samples and biopsy specimens from the colon and brain of PD patients are currently unavailable. In the present study, specific DSV species were identified in most of the fecal samples of PD, with the quantities of DSV correlating with the PD severity. In addition, the DSV-specific [FeFe]- hydrogenase gene was found in all PD samples indicating an existence of other unidentified DSV species. These findings suggest that DSV may be an etiological agent promoting microbiome-related PD pathogenesis. We present the following pathogenetic model. First, DSV colonize the intestine permanently, increase in numbers and produce hydrogen sulfide in amounts exceeding the H2S detoxification capacity of the mucosal sulfide oxidation pathway (especially the rate-limiting sulfide quinone oxidoreductase), while also producing LPS and magnetite (in at least some DSV species) near the enteroendocrine cells. These agents subsequently induce α-Syn oligomerization and aggregation in the intestinal enteroendocrine cells. Secondly, toxic α-Syn oligomers spread in a prion-like manner, traveling from enteroendocrine cells to the brain mainly via the vagal nerve and possibly via the bloodstream, where they ultimately cause damage to the brain dopaminergic system. In addition, magnetite nanoparticles produced by DSV may pass into the bloodstream from the intestine, cross the BBB, and accelerate α-Syn aggregation in the brain. This proposed model should be further evaluated in future research. Future studies could, in the prevention and treatment of PD, focus on developing methods to eradicate DSV from the human intestine by antibiotics, phage therapy, fecal transplantation, diet changes, or a combination of these interventions. Isolation of DSV from the human intestine is critical, as it allows for designing better primers, antibiotic profiling and phagotype screening. Isolation of these bacteria also enables genome sequencing of PD-associated DSV and genomic comparison to environmental and healthy-carrier isolates of DSV, potentially aiding in the identification of therapeutic targets among the gene products specific to PD-associated DSV. FULL ARTICLE HERE: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2021.652617/full SEE NOTB FILM ON NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE POST JAB

Vaccination status 297,544 views 2 Oct 2022 John gives full disclosure on his vaccine status... and also on others! This video is a priceless gem, as Dr Campbell walks on glass to navigate youtube's pit-traps around free discussion around vaccines. Watching Dr J Campbell, who is one of the west's leading jab-advocates , wake up to the terrible truth is something as spell-binding, as it is agonising, as we will him on to reach the point of full awareness and disclosure. Not only is the elephant in the room of the vaccine holocaust making itself visible, he is simultaneously realising the lobster-trap that he is now caught in. A one-way ticket where he can't unlearn what he has now realised. Where his loyalty to his followers means he is left with no option but to warn his listeners. As he Desperately trying to avoid the censor's knife, he presents tit-bits enabling many to join the dots. In this video, John realises something is amiss as he lists famous vaccine advocates getting ill with the very disease the 'vaccine' was meant to treat. 60 year old Pfizer Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Albert Bourla ast staturday tested positive for COVID-19. He has received four doses of Pfizer / BioNTech yet not yet taken the new bivalent booster John mentions that he keeps an eye on his comments for thought-provoking insights, which is of course an invitation to post vital information. Dr J Campbell will not only be remembered as the man who step by step translated the available pandemic data to his 2.5 million followers, but as a man who upon his awakening, glided over shards of glass with the grace of a bolshie ballet dancer.... even if some might be more reminded of 'Dad's army' taking in Hitler. Whatever the stage of awakening, every voice for the truth and freedom counts. Watch, listen and applaud the man for his honesty... and gently feed him what he needs. VIDEO YOUTUBE VERSION, - add your comments

NEW MOVES TO BOYCOTT PAYPAL You probably remember that Not On then Beeb was hit by Paypal 'withdrawal of services' in late May 2022 "...We have recently reviewed your usage of PayPal's services, as reflected in our records and on your website notonthebeeb.co.uk. Due to the nature of your activities, we have chosen to discontinue service to you in accordance with PayPal's User Agreement. As a result, we have placed a permanent limitation on your account..." They not only took down NOTB but also my film accounts, my author accounts and all my personal accounts. As many of you know I have up all my other work to concentrate on getting vital information, forming NOTB in August 2020, so losing the author/film accounts were not so serious, even though they were limited companies, which I suspect is illegal. They were clearly after me as an individual, since my film and author accounts feature love stories and talking ducks! Their reason for my blanket ban was "...your activities with Not On The Beeb..." The attack stung, setting NOTB back as the monthly donations were cancelled, making the enterprise more vulnerable. Some payments using Paypal were missed setting off other losses and problems Since then, Paypal have hit many other media outlets and organisations providing vital information. TOBY YOUNG ON GB NEWS RE: PAYPAL DEFUNDING THE NEW MEDIA Message from Miri, a professional writer with a background in health, Miriam studied Community Health and Professional Writing at the State University of New York, and went on to train as a copywriter with a top London agency. "Just over a week ago, I was banned from PayPal - my main source of income - with no notice or warning, and with no actual explanation as to why this ban had occurred, other than a vague assertion from the organisation that I had "violated their acceptable use policy" (please note they also banned an old PayPal of mine for the same ostensible reason, despite the fact this account was under a different name, associated with a different email, and hadn't actually been used for anything in years, so in reality, the only "violation" that account could possibly have been guilty of, is being owned by me). Obviously, this was a deep and significant shock and very damaging to my finances - but did seem to be an isolated event. I assumed it had probably resulted from one of my ever-fomenting hate fans reporting me to PayPal. I never expected for a minute that this was indicative of the fact that all alternative and dissenting voices were imminently in for the same fate...." Message from Liz Evans at the UKMFA Following the permanent suspension of UK Medical Freedom Alliance PayPal account a couple of weeks ago, we now find that Not on The Beeb, UsforThem, Law or Fiction and The Expose have also had the same treatment, along with Toby Young and his Free Speech Union and Daily Sceptic. This blatant attack on free speech and lawful campaigning in the UK by a foreign corporation is completely unacceptable and cannot be tolerated. CALLS TO ACTION: #BoycottPayPal - let's defund them. Close your account to make your views heard Register a Complaint with Paypal here https://www.paypal.com/uk/smarthelp/complaints

‘The withdrawal of banking services from an individual or an organisation because they aren’t toeing the right political line is something you’d expect to happen in Communist China or North Korea – but not in a supposedly free country,’ Mr Young said. Paypal under public pressure from the main-stream media and senior politicians has backed down and reinstated Us For Them's Paypal account. Not On The Beeb was one of the first organisations to be targeted by Paypal and we have NOT had our accounts or monthly donations restored. If you'd like to support Not On The Beeb with a small monthly donation you can here This appeared in the DAILY MAIL Michael Gove among senior Tories urging ministers to hold PayPal to account after the US online payment giant abruptly cancelled the accounts of free speech campaigners Leading figures in Conservative Party are demanding PayPal is held to account Michael Gove, Iain Duncan Smith and Sir Graham Brady among senior Tories wanting PayPal to be accountable after cancelling a freedom of speech group PayPal has so far refused to say which of its rules the accounts had broken Last week, comedian Jack Dee and football pundit Matt Le Tissier took to social media to announce that they were closing their own PayPal accounts in protest Leading figures in the Conservative party including Iain Duncan Smith, Michael Gove and Sir Graham Brady have demanded ministers hold PayPal to account after it abruptly cancelled a group which campaigns for freedom of speech. Toby Young, who set up the Free Speech Union and the Daily Sceptic news blog said three of his PayPal accounts were closed by the American online payments giant without explanation last week for an alleged violation of its policies. The FSU defends victims of so-called ‘cancel culture’ and academics accused of holding ‘un-woke’ opinions, while the Daily Sceptic was set up to scrutinise lockdown policies and their impact. PayPal has so far refused to say which of its rules the accounts had broken. Now dozens of Tory party grandees and peers from across the political divide have now written to Business Secretary Jacob Rees Mogg accusing PayPal of censorship, claiming it was ‘hard to avoid construing its actions as an orchestrated, politically-motivated move to silence critical or dissenting views’. The letter, signed by 42 MPs and peers, warns that PayPal appears to be using ‘its dominant position in the market’ to ‘impose private economic sanctions on organisations of whose views it disapproves and thus to restrict their ability to engage in political debate in the public square’. The politicians – who include Labour MP Graham Stringer – are urging ministers to demonstrate the Government’s commitment to free speech by demanding an explanation from PayPal for its actions. They also call for the company to release any remaining donations or payments that it has confiscated unfairly from Mr Young’s accounts. Speaking to The Mail on Sunday, Mr Young said he believed his organisation’s critical stance against lockdown policies – and, in particular, how they may have negatively affected the nation’s children – prompted PayPal to shut down the accounts. And he has likened the company’s actions to those of a despotic political regime. ‘The withdrawal of banking services from an individual or an organisation because they aren’t toeing the right political line is something you’d expect to happen in Communist China or North Korea – but not in a supposedly free country,’ Mr Young said. ‘As the move towards a cashless society gathers speed, we need to put laws in place to stop financial services companies like PayPal from engaging in this kind of political censorship. SOURCE A message from Us For Them Dear Supporters, We have been overwhelmed by the support we have received from you - thank you. We can report that PayPal have, according to The Times, accepted that they were “over zealous” and have reinstated our account. There has been no explanation or apology to UsForThem and no guarantee that this will not happen again - just an anonymous email saying that our access has been restored and thanking us for our patience! Needless to say, we will be closing our account forthwith, and we would ask you do the CALL TO ACTION below. The story of UsForThem, The Free Speech Union and others being cancelled by PayPal touched a nerve amongst our Parliamentarians, celebrities and the media as well as among like minded groups such as Together who galvanised their supporters. On Thursday, Danny Kruger MP asked a question in Parliament to Penny Mordaunt MP about his concern that PayPal had shut UsForThem’s account without any warning. This was followed by Jack Dee cancelling his account in disgust, #BOYCOTTPAYPAL was trending  and media coverage even included the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 (7.45 am) And yesterday, 42 Parliamentarians led by Miriam Cates - including Michael Gove, Sir Iain Duncan-Smith, Sir Graham Brady, and Robert Halfon -  wrote to Jacob Rees-Mogg as Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Andrew Griffith as Financial Secretary to the Treasury to express their concerns. They have urged them to request the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority address PayPal’s ability to impose private economic sanctions, and to look at whether legislative safeguards are needed to protect individuals and groups. You can read about this in the Mail on Sunday and the Sunday Telegraph. This has been shocking and whilst our account has been reinstated we are not aware that anyone else's has been.  It cannot be the case that in a liberal democracy private financial service providers are able to withdraw critical services for political ends and at the swish of a pen silence dissenting views. If you decide to close your account we would urge you to write to PayPal and let them know why you have done so. Again, thank you all so much for your support. We shall now carry on fighting for our children and the kind of future we bequeath to them. With thanks, The UsForThem team If you'd like to support Not On The Beeb with a small monthly donation you can here

Father: She [my wife] told me that she was not told that was a potential side effect. So why wouldn’t you have told her that? Pharmacist: Okay — sorry. So it’s quite a rare side effect as well. Father: No, it’s not. No, it’s not because I’ve been doing research; it’s common. In the US, there’s tens of thousands of them [myocarditis cases] reported to the CDC site. So why are you not telling parents this? Pharmacist: We might scare the parents, and they don’t want to get their child vaccinated. AUDIO RECORDING HERE FULL TRANSCRIPT Father: Are you a pharmacist? Pharmacist: Yes, how can I help? Father: Yeah. Hey, I’ve got a question. My wife, against my wishes, brought my seven-year-old son a few days ago for a COVID jab, and he’s now in the hospital with myocarditis. And I was obviously not very happy with you guys or with my wife. She told me that she was not told that was a potential side effect. So why wouldn’t you have told her that? Pharmacist: Okay — sorry. So it’s quite a rare side effect as well. Father: No, it’s not. No, it’s not because I’ve been doing research; it’s common. In the US, there’s tens of thousands of them [myocarditis cases] reported to the CDC site. So why are you not telling parents this? Pharmacist: We might scare the parents, and they don’t want to get their child vaccinated. Father: So you don’t want to scare the parents with something that is actually happening, that’s happened to my kid? Are you out of your mind? Are you out of your mind? You don’t want to scare them? You need to give them the right information so they can make a proper decision! What is wrong with you? You don’t want to scare them. I’m recording this conversation as well, and this is going to a lawyer next. Thank you for admitting that. So why don’t you tell them? When someone comes in there and says, “Hey, what can go wrong?” What do you say? “Sore arm”? Have you seen the amount of dead people? Have you seen it? Pharmacist: Has your wife asked before giving consent to give [the child the shot]? Father: She asked what the side effects are! Pharmacist: She asked? I’m not sure because I wasn’t there. Father: It doesn’t matter! You’re supposed to tell people this can happen. So you know what the prognosis is? You know what it is? Possible death within five years. 20% of people with myocarditis die! It is a permanent, damaged heart. It is not temporary! He’s facing a heart transplant because of you! Because you didn’t want to scare her! You know no kids have died from COVID, not a single healthy kid, and you’re giving this stuff out, and you’re not warning people? What is wrong with you? Pharmacist: So there are information online that you can look up — Father: No! No! You gave the shot. When someone comes in there and asks what the side effects are, you don’t NOT say because it might scare them from the shot. What is wrong with you? Pharmacist: So the benefit of getting a vaccination is — solely giving a vaccination because the benefits outweigh the risks. Father: No, it isn’t! Do you know I’m looking at a Johns Hopkins study? There have been 400 people under 18 die in the United States. 330 million people. Not one of them was healthy. They had cancer, leukemia, obesity, something wrong with them. Not one kid has died or ended up in the hospital. So the benefits are ZERO to my kid! Why did you not tell them? It’s up to you to tell them. Then we make a decision. Not you! You tell us, “Okay, it’s rare, but it happens. You didn’t tell her that, did you? Pharmacist: I’m not sure. I wasn’t the vaccinator — Father: You said you’re not doing it. So when the next kid walks in there with a mother for a shot, are you going to tell them, “Hey, I just got a call from someone; their kid’s heart is destroyed. Keep that in mind; that can happen.” Are you going to tell them that? Are you? Pharmacist: I cannot answer you that. Father: Well, why can’t you because it’s going to go in a court, and you’ll answer it. You just admitted that you don’t tell people because you don’t want to scare them. It’s recorded; I’ve recorded everything. Pharmacist: Sorry, I wasn’t the pharmacist that did the vaccination. Father: It doesn’t matter; you just said it! You just said that you don’t tell people. Pharmacist: I don’t know what the situation is, so I don’t know what she told in the vaccination error. I’m not sure. I cannot speak on behalf of the pharmacist that vaccinated. Father: You just told me you don’t tell people because you might scare them. I have it on a recording. You want me to play it back? Every call — because I’m in finance — every call is recorded. Every email I sent is recorded. Every message I sent must be recorded because I work out of New York, and I live in New Zealand. It’s all recorded because the SFC requires it. You are recorded. So you’re telling people — you’re not telling them they could get damaged, so in case you scare them from taking a shot that can kill them, right? Is that correct? Are you brain dead? What is wrong with you? Pharmacist: Sorry, I don’t think we should con — continue this conversation. Father: No, we should because are you going to tell people this is a risk when they come through there? My kid’s screwed! You screwed him. What about everyone else? What are you going to do? You ruined a life! It’s on you for the rest of your life. This kid is screwed because of you because your policy there is to not tell people that these vaccines are dangerous and deadly. Have you seen all the people dying in their sleep? Hundreds of them? Have you seen yesterday? An NFL first-round draft pick, 24 [years old] died? An NBA first-round draft pick died four days ago, dead after the shot. Are you seeing that? Are you sitting there in your bubble collecting your 50 bucks every shot you give, you murderer? So what are you going to do? Are you going to tell parents? Are you going to say, “Look, this is what can happen; it’s not a sore shoulder”? That’s usual, but they can ruin their lives. How do you feel about that you’re ruining lives? Are you going to tell them or not? Are you going to continue to do this? Pharmacist: Um — that’s not the decision that I make. Father: It isn’t? So you’re just going to tell people, “Oh, nothing can go wrong,” and more kids are going to end up in the hospital with ruined hearts, right? That’s the plan? Because you can’t make that decision. And you’d hate for them not to take the shot, eh? Because then you don’t get your 50 bucks, do you? Pharmacist: So we always ask consent for the parent before we do the vaccinations. Father: Yeah, but you don’t tell them what can go wrong! Of course, you asked consent. The parent came there with that kid. It’s obvious consent. Why are you not telling them what can go wrong? I’m sure they’re asking. But you’re like, “Oh, no. Nothing goes wrong. Just a sore shoulder.” Right? You don’t tell them that the crazy guy called you and said his kid’s life is ruined because of what you did a few days ago. Do you or will you? You are sick! You are sick! You are twisted. You are evil. You’re a monster. You’re wrecking lives. You’re killing babies. You’re killing children. You’re killing mothers. You’re disgusting. Totally disgusting. Do you not see that? You need to at least tell them “This can go wrong,” because when you don’t, this happens! Don’t you see that? In the next part the father loses his cool. Imagine if your child was damaged by this negligence.... Father: Are you so f*cking stupid? You f*cking murdering bitch! F*ck! And you’re going to continue to do it! “Oh, I don’t make that.” You f*cking moron. You are f*cking sick in the brain. You are f*cking mentally retarded. SOURCE SEE FULL NOTB MYOCARDITIS REPORT HERE https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/notb-special-report-on-myocarditis-pericarditis-blood-clotting

One of my favourite segments at Tess Lawrie's 'The Better Way Conference' in Bath, was the section by Nickita Starck on the work of Doulas and natural birth. So much so, I invited Nickita for an interview. A must-watch for all prospective parents. And a deep insight for those considering training in natural births - including traditionally trained midwives. I found the interview not only entertaining but funny and deeply insightful. Catch a glimpse on the 98 second segment below TRAILOR (98 seconds) THE FULL INTERVIEW If the video fails see it here on Odysee: https://odysee.com/@NotOnTheBeeb:5/Push-to-Shove:c When Push Comes To Shove A message from Nickita Systemic childbirth sabotage is very real & the number cause of birth trauma. Trauma is common but NOT normal. Birth is a natural process that very occasionally needs medical intervention, NOT a medical process that happens occasionally if you are lucky. If you are passionate about birth but have become disenchanted by the system, join the fastest-growing alternative maternity structure in the world. When Push Comes To Shove is leading the way to the childbirth revolution. Come and train with us and help birth the new earth. Make a difference, empower women, realise there is choice and find your tribe with the most unique community of birth workers. This truly is a dream job! 60% of our students are working within 2 months of certification! Enrol today and start to change lives! COURSES The October course is now sold out. 👉 Enrol for our January course https://wpcts.samcart.com/products/doula-course-january-2023 For a 10% discount on all courses use code: NOTB 👉 Study in your own time (digital course) https://wpcts.samcart.com/products/digitaldoulacourse For a 10% discount on all courses use code: NOTB KEY LINKS MENTIONED IN THE INTERVIEW In Your Own Time by Dr Sarah Wickham https://geni.us/own-time Go fund me https://www.gofundme.com/f/wwtd9-when-push-comes-to-shove? Brewer's diet http://www.drbrewerpregnancydiet.com/id96.html Nickita’s book https://wpcts.samcart.com/products/wpctsguidetosocialservices Telegram https://t.me/awakenedbirth Instagram https://www.instagram.com/when.pushcomestoshove/

A few years ago it would have been said that all parents of soon-to-be teenage girls must see this film and companying reports concerning the HPV 'cervical-cancer' vaccine. However, now it's being given to boys too. The logic is mindboggling and the pharma-cynical will say the move was to simply to double the vacicnes sales reach overnight by targetting both sexes. Whatever the reason, the call is now that all parents of young children need to watch this multi-award-winning 30 minute-documentary. Informed choice involves evaluating risk. What is the risk from the disease? What is the risk from the cure? Which is more dangerous? The children below wish they had understood the risks... THE FILM The film gives vital information that enables parents to make a truly informed decision. Whether to agree to your child being given the HPV, or a firm "No thank you". How young girls are being seriously damaged by the vaccine with the highest reported adverse reactions of any existing vaccine A documentary written and narrated by Joan Shenton and directed by Andi Reiss The Human Papilloma Vaccine (HPV) is a treatment in widespread use but its efficacy in preventing cancer is medically unproven, while unintended, adverse reactions are blighting and even ending the lives of girls and young women across the world. However, pharmaceutical manufacturers and many health authorities are refusing to acknowledge there is a problem and the medical community is continuing to offer the vaccine. Sacrificial Virgins – so named because the vaccine is often given to girls before they become sexually active – exposes increasing evidence of serious neurological damage following the HPV injections. It calls for the vaccine to be withdrawn in the hope that this will help to halt another global tragedy. Click to play If the film above does not play, see the video here. https://vimeo.com/241198047 SOURCE: https://www.sacrificialvirgins.org/ SEE NOTB FILM ON NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE POST JAB

VIDEO

Are you wondering if it’s a good idea to give your kid the COVID shot? I know there’s an ocean of mis/dis/mal/information out there to navigate, so I’ve compiled this handy list of reasons you’ll want to rush your child to the nearest injection site stat. by Margaret Anna Alice 1) Your child wants to play a real-life guinea pig. 2) You’re too busy to research the potential risks of a novel gene therapy that lacks long-term safety data. 3) You weighed the zero-mortality rate and microscopic risks of serious complications from COVID to children and thought, why not increase the likelihood of being hospitalized by 74 percent, being injured by twenty-five times, and dying by twenty times? 4) You’d like to boost your child’s chances of catching COVID—multiple times. 5) You want to downgrade your child’s natural immunity to antibody-dependent enhancement. 6) You think keeping your child’s vaxxport up-to-date with the latest injection (Germany is encouraging every ninety days—as is Canada) will circumvent the need for masking. 7) You believe informed consent is passé. 8) You Trust The Experts™—not science. 9) You think life is boring and want to spice it up with some tragedy. 10) You’d like to add to the 54,697 adverse event reports received for children (out of 1,394,703 reports) through August 26, 2022, for conditions such as encephalitis, Bell’s palsy, aneurysms, cerebral hemorrhage, myocarditis, thrombocytopenia, Guillain-Barré syndrome, appendicitis, heart disease, and death. 11) You wish your child could enjoy a life of chronic illness from a progressively damaged immune system. 12) You think your toddler would benefit from periodic seizures. 13) You believe less than a month of efficacy after the second dose is worth giving your teen myocarditis. 14) You would like to go bankrupt covering the medical bills the government is shielding pharmaceutical companies from. 15) You want to keep protecting manufacturers from liability once their emergency use authorizations expire thanks to Reagan’s 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Act, which gives them a pass as long as the product is administered to kids. 16) You think it would be fun if your child developed turbo cancer. 1 7) You believe becoming paralyzed from the waist down and relying on a feeding tube like Maddie de Garay would be a good life lesson for your kid. 18) You’d like your child to go from looking like this: … to this: 19) You wish you could feel like this father did after his son got vaxx-induced myocarditis, which comes with a five-year life expectancy. VIDEO & TRANSCRIPT: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/father-of-son-with-v-induced-myocarditis-gets-pharmacist-to-admit-coverup 20) You want your child to experience the adventure of a heart attack. https://rumble.com/vt7tnf-registered-nurse-nicole-sirotek-shares-what-she-saw-on-the-front-lines-in-n.html 21) You think playing Russian Roulette with your child’s life is exciting and are already planning the funeral. 22) You want casket manufacturers to sell even more bulk orders of child-sized coffins so they can surpass the 400-percent increase since December 2021 reported by one North American company. https://rumble.com/v1bwqm3-casket-salesman-blows-whistle-child-caskets-being-ordered-in-bulk-never-see.html 23) You want your child to wind up like three-year-old Ámbar Suárez, thirteen-year-old Jacob Clynick, nineteen-year-old Simone Scott, seventeen-year-old Sean Hartman, and sixteen-year-old Ernesto Ramirez Jr. so you don’t have to worry about paying for college or any other expenses associated with being alive. 24) You think you could use a good, lifelong cry like this Trinidad mom who lost her son: https://rumble.com/vn5xai-theyre-killing-us-mourns-pastor-marva-peschier-of-trinidad-after-her-son-di.html 25) You feel the government has the right to sacrifice your child for the “greater good.” 26) You think Denmark’s decision to stop injecting children based on the data is recklessly scientific. 27) You’re cool with medical tyranny. 28) You’ve decided it’s easier to believe the Big Lie than to acknowledge it’s occurring and do something about it. 29) You’re terrified of being branded the enemy. 30) You’d rather endanger your child than be called an anti-vaxxer, science-denier, conspiracy theorist, or right-wing extremist. 31) You feel it’s more important for your child to fit in at school than to be healthy or alive. 32) You’re positive pharmaceutical corporations would never lie; commit fraud; manipulate research findings; skew clinical trials; keep deadly products on the market; blackmail governments; or bribe, bully, and pressure others into covering up their crimes. 33) You believe everything the media tells you, even though three-quarters of their advertising budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry. 34) You also believe their later-retracted smears about a Nobel Prize–winning medication that would have negated the demand for the billion-dollar injectables because it reduces COVID mortality by 92 percent. 35) You think Big Bird is a more reliable source than the scientist who holds nine patents on mRNA technology. https://rumble.com/vqq7gc-dr.-robert-malone-before-you-inject-your-child.html 36) You don’t care if it turns out your child can’t produce grandchildren. 37) You’re sure Big Tech has your best interests at heart when they threaten, silence, and censor counter-narrative voices at the behest of the government and megacorporations. 38) You trust the government more than the million or so scientists, physicians, researchers, whistleblowers, data analysts, statisticians, cats, and other knowledgeable individuals risking their careers, grant monies, reputations, and quiet lives to expose corruption, harm, and the lethal consequences of the experimental injections. 39) You’re certain the agencies that make billions from reviewing, approving, and recommending these injections would never prioritize their profits over your child’s life. 40) You don’t think there’s anything sinister about the WHO attempting to seize one-world dictatorial powers for its unelected almost-certainly-a-war-criminal director-general. 41) You don’t care that Pfizer manipulated its clinical trial data for children to secure FDA approval or that the FDA tried to prevent the public from viewing Pfizer’s clinical trial data for seventy-five years. https://rumble.com/v18s66i-bombshell-dr.-clare-craig-exposes-how-pfizer-twisted-their-clinical-trial-d.html 42) You can never be fooled too many times. 43) You succumbed to the “greatest psychological fear campaign in human history.” 44) You would rather gain the acceptance of your peers than avoid traumatizing your child. https://www.bitchute.com/video/kxcU8h4YaUzI/ 45) You believe intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the willingness to question are dangerous qualities that should be stigmatized and discouraged. 46) You think your child is expendable and can be replaced if something goes wrong. 47) You’d prefer to remain bamboozled than admit you’ve failed your child. 48) You “reject the evidence of your eyes and ears” because you are a faithful Covidian. 49) You want to help the colluders fulfill the philanthropaths’ and tyrants’ dreams. 50) You don’t think your child is worth fighting for. SOURCE WATCH TO THE END Adults... teens... and the newborn... Share this video by this link: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/censored THIS IMAGE BY BOB MORAN IS ON MY PHONE AS A DAILY REMINDER OF OUR MISSION - Mark

How many specific cases of an injury are needed before a drug or vaccine are withdrawn? In the UK, as of 24th August, we have 2,219 cases of Myocarditis and Pericarditis that have been reported as C19 vaccine side effects by the Yellow card reporting system. (See data below) It must be remembered that MHRA and CDC have previously admitted that only 2-10% of adverse events are reported, meaning the real number of these cases could be nearer to 20,000. Is this possible? Let's take a deeper look... WHAT IS MYOCARDITIS? WHAT ARE THE SYMPTOMS OF MYOCARDITIS? WHAT IS THE TREATMENT FOR MYOCARDITIS? CAN C19 VACCINES CAUSE MYOCARDITIS? COULD C19 VACCINATION INCREASE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS BY 38%? Some more information & related studies C19 JAB - HIGH RISK OF HEART-RELATED ISSUES TO TEENS FATHER OF SON WITH MYOCARDITIS GETS PHARMACIST TO ADMIT THEY'RE OMITTING THE TRUTH GOVERNMENT WARNING ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITY POST JAB VACCINE DAMAGE IN SPORTS WITHIN PLAIN SIGHT 94% OF VACCINATED HAVE ABNORMAL BLOOD STRUCTURES INJURY WITHIN SPORTS DISCUSSION GROUP CONCLUSION UK MYOCARDITIS ADVERSE EVENT DATA (1st Sept 2022) WHAT IS MYOCARDITIS? Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle (myocardium). The inflammation can reduce the heart's ability to pump blood. Myocarditis can cause chest pain, shortness of breath, and rapid or irregular heart rhythms (arrhythmias). Infection with a virus is one cause of myocarditis. Sometimes a drug reaction or general inflammatory condition causes myocarditis. Severe myocarditis weakens the heart so that the rest of the body doesn't get enough blood. Clots can form in the heart, leading to a stroke or heart attack. Treatment for myocarditis may include medications, procedures or surgeries. WHAT ARE THE SYMPTOMS OF MYOCARDITIS? Some people with early myocarditis don't have symptoms. Others have mild symptoms. Common myocarditis symptoms include: Chest pain Fatigue Swelling of the legs, ankles and feet Rapid or irregular heartbeat (arrhythmias) Shortness of breath, at rest or during activity Light-headedness or feeling like you might faint Flu-like symptoms such as headache, body aches, joint pain, fever or sore throat Sometimes, myocarditis symptoms are like a heart attack. If you are having unexplained chest pain and shortness of breath, seek emergency medical help. SOURCE This image is a warning from the US collective of Doctors speaking out, known as America's Front Line Doctors. WHAT IS THE TREATMENT FOR MYOCARDITIS? Patients should rest until symptoms settle. Patients with heart failure and arrhythmia must stay in hospital for treatment of these (see the section on dilated cardiomyopathy). Steroids may be used in specific forms of myocarditis. Patients should not take part in any exercise or sports until all symptoms have settled and the ECG and ECHO are back to normal. Over three-quarters of people will improve within two weeks without any complications. Around 1 in 10 patients may then develop dilated cardiomyopathy and require lifelong treatment for heart failure...." SOURCE If 1 in 10 develops heart failure, then using the MHRA yellow card numbers alone, the vaccine will have to date induced heart failure in approximately 200 young people. CAN C19 VACCINES CAUSE MYOCARDITIS? This is a special warning on the UK gov website for health professionals concerning the Pfizer jab SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine COULD C19 JAB INCREASE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS BY 38%? THE RISK ACCORDING TO THE GOVERNMENT "...As of 16 February 2022, there have been 721 reports of myocarditis and 483 reports of pericarditis following the use of the Pfizer vaccine. There have been 206 reports of myocarditis and 115 reports of pericarditis following the use of the Moderna vaccine...."' SOURCE As of early September 2022 the above numbers have over doubled with 1,296 reports of myocarditis and 923 reports of Pericarditis. The guidelines for health professionals go on to list the risk as below. SOURCE These stats are a confusing way of saying that in the first 7 days after vaccination there is an extra case of myocarditis per 37,700 people or after 28 days there is an extra case per 17,500 people. These two rudimentary statistics infer the risk of heart injury post jab increases as time proceeds. This is worrying and warrants urgent investigation. In this NCBI report report they say the "Incidence (of myocarditis) is usually estimated between 10 to 20 cases per 100,000 persons" which is 1-2 per 10,000 people - for sake of argument let's call it 1.5 per 10,000, The above figures show that 28 days post-jab the risk of myocarditis rises by 0.57 per 10,000. If the baseline is 1.5 per 10,000 Then the risk of getting myocarditis post-jab has risen by 38%. NOTE: These are my personal calculations. I'm not a statistician or a professional in the medical field, so please do send in any observations and calculations, or add comments below this article, C19 JAB - HIGH RISK OF HEART-RELATED ISSUES TO TEENS New preliminary study shows the risk of heart injury in the young could be close to 1 in 3. 7th AUG 22 SOURCE: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1 "The most common cardiovascular effects were: Tachycardia (7.64%) Shortness of breath (6.64%) Palpitation (4.32%) Chest pain (4.32%) Hypertension (3.99%). Seven participants (2.33%) exhibited at least one elevated cardiac biomarker or positive lab assessments. Cardiovascular effects were found in 29.24% of patients, ranging from tachycardia, palpitation, and myopericarditis. Under the article, there is a key comment by Dr Paul Spradbery Received: 12 August 2022 Commenter: Dr Paul Spradbery, MRSB Comment: The sentence, "The clinical presentation of myopericarditis after vaccination was usually mild, with all cases fully recovering within 14 days" could be misleading. Myopericarditis leads to cardiac tissue scarring and hence impaired ability to pump blood. Given that long-term prognosis is often poor, a "full recovery" would be unlikely and, therefore, dangerous to predict. The data in general is quite disturbing, particularly in the light of the facts that: (a) the risk of SARS-CoV-2 to adolescents is statistically zero; and (b) the drugs are not vaccines, prevent neither infection nor transmission, do not reduce individual viral load and are proven uniquely dangerous. It is, in my view, about time the entire medical and scientific professions echoed the admirable Christine Anderson, Member of the European Parliament: "This vaccine campaign will go down as the biggest scandal in medical history. Moreover, it will be known as the biggest crime ever committed on humanity." FATHER OF SON WITH MYOCARDITIS GETS PHARMACIST TO ADMIT THEY'RE OMITTING THE TRUTH Father: She [my wife] told me that she was not told that was a potential side effect. So why wouldn’t you have told her that? Pharmacist: Okay — sorry. So it’s quite a rare side effect as well. Father: No, it’s not. No, it’s not because I’ve been doing research; it’s common. In the US, there’s tens of thousands of them [myocarditis cases] reported to the CDC site. So why are you not telling parents this? Pharmacist: We might scare the parents, and they don’t want to get their child vaccinated. See video below Full transcript and video here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/father-of-son-with-v-induced-myocarditis-gets-pharmacist-to-admit-coverup GOVERNMENT ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITY POST JAB The Government guidelines interestingly go on to mention physical activity post-vaccination. The first sentence is worth reading slowly, as the subtext (the use of which is shown in this article,) is alarming. "....If the individual feels well after receiving their COVID-19 vaccination then there is no need to pre-emptively restrict physical activity post-vaccination and individuals can continue with their pre-existing level of physical activity. In the unlikely event that they experience chest pain, palpitations, unexpected shortness of breath, or fainting, then they should seek medical attention. Such individuals should be investigated and managed according to the clinical management guidelines. This advice applies to both adults and children. Strenuous physical activity should be avoided until symptoms improve....' SOURCE ALARMING EVIDENCE OF VACCINE-INDUCED HEART INJURY IN PLAIN SIGHT. POST JAB SURGE OF MYOCARDITIS, HEART ISSUES & SUDDEN DEATH AMONG THE WORLD'S PRIME ATHLETES In November 2021 our article inspired by German research on injury within sports went viral with over 300,000 views, helping kick off international awareness to this subject. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/surge-of-sports-people-worldwide-suffering-unexpected-ill-health Last winter NOTB built a dedicated website to sports injuries. NOTB-SPORTS.ORG The site offers a tiny glimpse of the 1,000+ sports people who have 'died suddenly' since the vaccine roll-out. The injury to each of the Athletes, many at the top of their game, is labelled within the black box under thor image. See them here. We collated more of the faces here (Please note the data is only up until Feb 2022 as we ran out of resources to maintain the website) This video provides the scale of the atrocity are witness to. VIDEO COMPILATION OF V-INJURY 94% OF VACCINATED HAVE ABNORMAL BLOOD STRUCTURES. From this peer-reviewed study, we highlight the findings of abnormal blood of an athlete. The study found similar irregularities within the blood of 94% of those examined post-Pfizer jab. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/94-of-those-vaccinated-have-abnormal-blood-peer-reviewed-study HASHTAG The tag #diedsuddenly has gone viral. Look out for it on FB, Twitter a Telegram. CONCLUSION How can we gauge the scale of the issue? Injuries and sudden deaths within sports personalities, due to their high profiles, are recorded in the public domain. If we multiply the factor of these injuries within the sport's worlds to the general population, then we can build a mental picture of the scale. At the start of the article, we suggested 20,000 vaccine-related cases of heart injury mentioned were possible and the real-world evidence via media reports of a death within sports, scaled to the public, backs this This issue urgently needs proper, professional and in-depth research. The results must be then openly presented to the public via the large-scale media organisations The risk must be accurately explained to each person before they receive any jab. Only then can the public make an informed choice, evaluating the risk, on whether any booster campaign is right for them. Meanwhile, before the cogs of the 'expert machine' needed even start to turn, do we really need to resurrect Sherlock Holmes to put two and two together for us? Or, shall we use our common sense and intuition? DISCUSSION GROUP Please leave a comment below this article, and/or join our dedicated Telegram group for the latest sports sudden collapse & death stories to join in with the discussion : https://t.me/+M1FOq7bXdjA4YjY0 UK MYOCARDITIS ADVERSE EVENT DATA (1st Sept) MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING UP TO 24th AUGUST 2022 (Data published 1st Sept 2022) TOTAL Reactions = 1,510,694 TOTAL Reports = 461,479 people impacted which is 1-in-116 people TOTAL Fatalities = 2,240 Myocarditis 825 (Pfizer) 242 (AZ) 229 (Moderna) TOTAL = 1,296 Pericarditis 562 (Pfizer) 224 (AZ) 137 (Moderna) TOTAL = 923 Deep Vein Thrombosis 382 (Pfizer) 1,319 (AZ) 66 (Moderna) TOTAL = 1,767 Haemorrhages 1518 (Pfizer) 1674 (AZ) 261 (Moderna) TOTAL= 3,453 Non-Site Specific Embolism & Thrombosis 657 (Pfizer) 2351 (AZ) 84 (Moderna) TOTAL= 3,092 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages 843 (Pfizer) 2401 (AZ) 76 (Moderna) TOTAL = 3,320 Pulmonary Embolism 586 (Pfizer) 1780 (AZ) 86 (Moderna) TOTAL = 2,452 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) 1126 (Pfizer) 2303 (AZ) 213 (Moderna) TOTAL = 3,642 Menstruation With Increased Bleeding 7503 (Pfizer) 5612 (AZ) 1273 (Moderna) TOTAL= 14,388 SEE OUR FULL REPORT ON 1st September 2022 YELLOW CARD ADVERSE EVENTS HERE https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/1st-september-2022-uk-vaccine-injury-report-for-adults-children SOURCE: For full reports including 363 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

ABSTRACT: Students at North American universities risk disenrollment due to third dose Covid-19 vaccine mandates. We present a risk-benefit assessment of boosters in this age group and provide five ethical arguments against mandates. We estimate that 22,000 - 30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one Covid-19 hospitalisation. Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per Covid-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities. Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable. University booster mandates are unethical because: 1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group 2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission 4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes 5) mandates create wider social harms. We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialisation and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support. Finally, we discuss the relevance of our analysis for current 2-dose Covid-19 vaccine mandates in North America. DOWNLOAD PAPER HERE. SOURCE: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4206070

FINALLY! Months of work have been validated. Over the past year we have lined up labs and spent months trying to get a sample vial of the vaccine - but failed. Meanwhile, someone in the UK has just succeeded! The results are in. Graphene is confirmed! A UK lab has analysed a sample using RAMAN Spectroscopy and found Graphene. (RAMAN Spectroscopy is the same technique used by Dr Campra in Spain to confirm GO in Spanish samples) The sample was obtained by a UK doctor who kept the vital chain of evidence intact meaning the analysis will stand up in the UK courts. The case briefing can be downloaded below. Here are some key excerpts. (The actual report will come later) EXCERPT A British Medical Practitioner came forward in December 2021 offering to assist in an investigation to ascertain whether the results discovered by Dr’s Noack and Campra could be replicated in the UK and also to examine the COVID-19 injection vials for the discovery of toxins or unexpected contents. The medical practitioner seized an injection vial from the fridge housed in the surgery in which she works and handed it to an independent investigator assisting in investigating cases relating to injury sustained as a result of injections given as part of the rollout. Further vials have since been obtained which cover the three main manufacturers in the UK: Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca. Defendants identified AstraZeneca Pfizer Moderna National Health Service (NHS) Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) Her Majesty’s Government Chain of Evidence Injection vial delivered to GP surgery Injection vial collected from the GP surgery refrigerator Injection vial delivered to Investigation team Injection vial delivered to the Laboratory Injection vial forensically examined Injection vial retained for disclosure purposes A summary of the findings detailed in the attached quality assured report is as follows: RAMAN Spectroscopy discovered the following particles - Graphene SP3 Carbon Iron Oxide Carbon derivatives Glass shards Download the full case briefing here. (Please note the actual lab analysis has not been released to the public yet) Angry? Want to do something? Sign our petition calling for a full inquiry Role of Graphene Oxide in the evidence submission towards the UK police investigation Yesterday 7th Feb Lawyer Lois Bayliss not only handed in our petition to investigate magnetism, Lois also handed in our key research below around graphene oxide as being the cause. The disclosed Pfizer Ingredients The redacted Pfizer ingredients Luxembourg report backing the magnetism findings Dr Andrew Goldsworthy's theory explaining how Graphene flakes could be causing the magnetism Dr Campra's initial 'visual-match' report suggesting Graphene Oxide within the vaccine The Scientists Club report confirming Graphene Oxide and contaminants The German team's investigation confirming contaminants UKMFA paper warning of dangers of using the disclosed ingredients of Cationic lipids German lawsuit regarding the disclosed cationic lipid ingredients that are illegal ingredients as certified not fit for human use, Dr Campra's secondary report confirming Graphene Oxide via Raman spectrometry. Graphene Toxicity (the symptoms might remind you of something!) Vaccine-Induced Magnetism If you missed our previous email, on the 7th of February lawyer Lois Bayliss handed in the NOTB petition requesting an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are making people magnetic post-COVID-19 vaccination. - 5,352 People signed the People's Petition - 350 Experts signed the Expert's Petition - Doctors, Nurses, scientists and health professionals signed it Our call has been simple since May 2021 Since the start of time, no plant, animal or human has ever been magnetic. Since the vaccination rollout, people are now showing clear and proven magnetic properties. The disclosed ingredients can't cause the magnetism we have witnessed and documented on film. This means there have to be undisclosed ingredients. Undisclosed ingredients, or undisclosed biotechnology, are illegal involve the mass deception of the public. Graphene oxide's toxicity is well known. The effects of graphene toxicity produce symptoms that match the array of symptoms associated with the pandemic. This crime against humanity is the greatest in human memory. This is HUMANICIDE Call for action from UK parliament Summer 20201 We made two applications to the UK parliament for an official petition to debate the issues on the causes behind the magnetism. REQUEST: We request an urgent public parliamentary review regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and biotechnology that are making people magnetic post C19 vaccination. REASON: It is a medically established fact that thousands of British citizens have discovered parts of their bodies have become magnetic after receiving one of the Covid vaccinations. The disclosed ingredients contain water, sugar, salts and fats. None of these ingredients are magnetic. Undisclosed ingredients are illegal. Undisclosed biotechnology involves the deception of the public. This was an application for a governmental petition was rejected using fact-checkers (the same fact-checkers that we had we debunked) as evidence, since according to them vaccine-magnetism did not exist. Dear Mark Playne, ​ Sorry, we can’t accept your petition – “Review the effect of C19 vaccinations inducing cellular magnetism.”. It included confidential, libellous, false, unproven or defamatory information, or a reference to a case where there are active legal proceedings. ​ We cannot publish petitions that contain false or unproven statements. This includes unsubstantiated claims that Covid-19 vaccines make people magnetic. ​ You can read an article debunking these claims here: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-emf-covid19-vaccine-idUSL2N2NC0LL We only reject petitions that don’t meet the petition standards: https://petition.parliament.uk/help#standards ​ If you want to try again, click here to start a petition: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/check ​ Thanks, The Petitions team UK Government and Parliament MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD! ​Since our official petitions have been scuppered we launched our own independent NOTB petition.. Our new petition requests an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? I, the undersigned, request the British police seize samples of the vaccine and instigate an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are causing widespread serious adverse reactions post-COVID-19 vaccination. ​ We also request an immediate injunction on the vaccine programme, most especially for our children, until we have clear answers from the police investigations. NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition

More than 55% of children ranging in age between 6 months and 2 years had a “systemic reaction” after their first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, according to data released Sept. 1 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. By Margaret Menge More than 55% of children ranging in age between 6 months and 2 years had a “systemic reaction” after their first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, according to data released Sept. 1 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In addition, almost 60% had a reaction to the second dose of the Moderna vaccine, in the CDC survey of more than 13,000 children. A systemic reaction is a response beyond the injection site. While the most common systemic reactions were fatigue, fever, irritability and crying, parents of more than 6% of the children in the study said their child was unable to perform normal activities after the second dose of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine. The CDC collected the data through a program called V-Safe — a smartphone-based monitoring system that operates through an app that parents download to their phones. Between June 18 and Aug. 21, parents of more than 10,000 young children reported reactions to the CDC through V-Safe in the seven days after their child had received a COVID-19 vaccination. Parents of 8,338 children ages 6 months to 2 years who received the Moderna vaccine reported information through V-Safe, with 55.7% reporting a systemic reaction after the first dose and about 58% after the second dose. For the Pfizer vaccine, parents of 4,749 children ages 6 months to 2 years submitted reports showing that 55.8% had a systemic reaction after the first dose and about 47% after the second dose of the vaccine. The most frequently reported reactions for children 6 months to 2 years were irritability or crying, sleepiness and fever. The most common reactions for children aged 3 to 5 years were injection site pain, fatigue and fever. Health impacts The data also showed a more serious reaction category labeled “any health impact.” About 10% of all children 6 months to 2 years were reported to have a “health impact” after getting their first dose of either the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine. For the Moderna vaccine, slightly more children had a health impact after the second dose; for the Pfizer vaccine, it was slightly less. The information was presented to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on Sept. 1 as part of an overview of all data related to the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition to V-Safe, data was presented summarizing reports from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Data Link (VSD), which includes data from several large health maintenance organizations in the United States. All three systems look at the safety of vaccines after they’ve already gone to market and have been administered to large numbers of people. Tom Shimabukuro, the head of the CDC’s vaccine safety team, headed the presentation and told committee members that no “statistical signals” of COVID-19 vaccine reactions were found for young children in the VSD data. Shimabukuro also said that systemic reactions were “commonly reported” following vaccines. However, other medical professionals such as Dr. Meryl Nass of Children’s Health Defense have expressed caution over the reported reactions, pointing to the high number of systemic reaction reports among very young children. She told The Epoch Times on Sept. 2 that she was questioning why the government doesn’t collect and present more information on these cases. “That stuff is not considered by the CDC to be very important … It’s assumed that all those side effects go away after a few days and leave the people perfectly well,” she said, mentioning the fevers and fatigue. “Those reactions may, in fact, be harbingers of more serious reactions, but nobody to my knowledge has published anything looking at whether these acute local or systemic reactions are indicators of a later problem.” The FDA approved the emergency-use authorization of COVID-19 vaccines for children aged 6 months to 5 years on June 17. According to the CDC, about 599,460 children in that age group have received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and about 440,770 have received the Moderna vaccine. From June 18 through Aug. 31, about 1 million doses of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were administered to children in this age group. In a review of the VAERS data on young children from June 18 to Aug. 31, the CDC had 496 reports of adverse events for children aged 6 months to 4 years who received the Pfizer vaccine and 521 for children aged 6 months to 5 years who received the Moderna shot, with an adverse event defined as a possible side effect. More than 98% of reports were for what the CDC considers non-serious events. There are 220 reports of persons aged 5 months to 5 years of age being taken to the emergency room following a COVID-19 vaccine. In one case involving a 2-year-old boy in Arizona, the VAERS report says he was given the Pfizer vaccine on July 29 and on July 30 had a “life-threatening episode.” The report lists his symptoms as “clammy skin and vomiting leading (8 minutes) to difficulty breathing.” The boy “turned blue,” was “limp” and “non-responsive” and “fully stopped breathing for two minutes,” according to the report. He was revived after chest compressions SOURCE:: The Epoch Times

7th AUG 22 - a preliminary study on 300+ young people shows the risk of heart injury could be close to 1 in 3. SOURCE: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1 "The most common cardiovascular effects were: Tachycardia (7.64%) Shortness of breath (6.64%) Palpitation (4.32%) Chest pain (4.32%) Hypertension (3.99%). Seven participants (2.33%) exhibited at least one elevated cardiac biomarker or positive lab assessments. Cardiovascular effects were found in 29.24% of patients, ranging from tachycardia, palpitation, and myopericarditis. Under the article, there is a key comment by Dr Paul Spradbery Received: 12 August 2022 Commenter: Dr Paul Spradbery, MRSB Comment: The sentence, "The clinical presentation of myopericarditis after vaccination was usually mild, with all cases fully recovering within 14 days" could be misleading. Myopericarditis leads to cardiac tissue scarring and hence impaired ability to pump blood. Given that long-term prognosis is often poor, a "full recovery" would be unlikely and, therefore, dangerous to predict. The data in general are quite disturbing, particularly in the light of the facts that: (a) the risk of SARS-CoV-2 to adolescents is statistically zero; and (b) the drugs are not vaccines, prevent neither infection nor transmission, do not reduce individual viral load and are proven uniquely dangerous. It is, in my view, about time the entire medical and scientific professions echoed the admirable Christine Anderson, Member of the European Parliament: "This vaccine campaign will go down as the biggest scandal in medical history. Moreover, it will be known as the biggest crime ever committed on humanity." DISCUSSION GROUP Please leave a comment below this article, and/or join our dedicated Telegram group for the latest on stories of injuries to our young. Join in with the discussion : https://t.me/notb_under18_deaths_adverseevent

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna Franco Giovannini Giampaolo Pisano Abstract The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94% of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing. EXCERPT MALE OF 33 YEARS, WHO FORMERLY WAS AN ATHLETE This individual is a male of 33 years, who formerly was an athlete, apparently healthy before inoculation with an mRNA Pfizer injection. One month after receiving the first dose of the Pfizer “vaccine”, he showed marked asthenia, a constant gravitational headache (i.e., one sensitive to the position and movements of his head and body such that the pain was increased by movement of the head up or down). The headaches were unresponsive to common pain killers. Diffuse rheumatic arthralgia with dyspnea on exertion were noted.Figure 5. A highly structured fibro-tubular configuration of structures that can coalesce together, reaching dimensions ten times their initial size. In (a) and (b) at 40x magnification, we see what appears to be a laminar linkage. In (c), at 120x magnification (3x magnification digitally produced), there is a composite which is 166.54 μm (DeltaPix Software)in length. DOWNLOAD FULL PAPER HERE SOURCE: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47 Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

This is a huge step forwards. Sixteen months after the first graphene within vax findings, the Epoch Times has stepped forwarding published reports on graphene and the 'bad-blood' being caused by the jab. They seem to have gained courage from a peer-reviewed study, that although tame, does open up vital questions. Horrifying, they point out that 94% of the vaccinated have abnormal blood. Abstract The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94% of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing. Peer-Reviewed: 94 Percent of Vaccinated Patients With Subsequent Health Issues Have Abnormal Blood, Italian Microscopy Finds BYJENNIFER MARGULIS AND JOE WANGTIMESEPTEMBER 2, 2022 for EPOCH TIMES Physicians in Italy studied the blood of patients who had been injected with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and found foreign matter long after vaccination, a new study shows. The three doctors, all of whom are surgeons—Franco Giovannini, M.D., Riccardo Benzi Cipelli, M.D., and Giampaolo Pisano, M.D.—examined freshly drawn blood of more than a thousand patients using direct observation under microscopes to see what was happening in the blood. Their results were published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research in August 2022. For this study, the Italian doctors used optical microscopy, that is, regular light microscopes, to examine the blood. Blood cells are easily visible under a microscope. Their shape, type, and how and if they are aggregated—clumped together—can help the skilled physician better understand the patient’s health. In their 60-page peer-reviewed study, the Italian researchers did not draw any conclusions. They just reported case studies from their observations. Although they could not explain what they observed, they noted in the study that what they saw was so strange that they felt the need to alert the medical community. Dark-Field Microscopy The light or optical microscope uses visible light and a series of lenses to magnify small images. Unlike electron microscopy, light microscopy provides a direct image of what is under the lens. With light microscopy, scientists can either use a bright white background behind the cells, with the light shining from behind the slide, or they can use a dark background. This technique, which is called dark-field or dark-ground microscopy, works by blocking the backlighting and bouncing the light around from the side in order to make the slide stand out from the dark background. Dark-field microscopy uses a special aperture to focus the light so the background stays dark. The light will not pass directly through the sample, and no staining is required, so living cells do not need to be killed to be studied. For this research, the doctors used dark-field microscopy. Abnormal Blood Of the 1006 patients, 426 were men and 580 were women. One hundred and forty-one received only one dose of an mRNA vaccine, 453 got two doses, and 412 received three doses in total. The patients ranged in age from 15 to 85. The average age of the patients was 49. All 1,006 patients were seeking healthcare because they were not feeling well: presenting with a wide variety of health issues. On average, the patients whose blood was examined had been vaccinated about one month prior. Of the 1,006 patients, after vaccination, only about 5 percent—just 58 people—had blood that looked normal. The doctors were able to examine the blood of 12 of the patients before they had received any vaccines. At that time, previous to being vaccinated, all 12 patients presented with normal, healthy blood, according to the researchers. The authors did not reveal how many people were vaccinated in total, so the percentage of vaccinated people who developed abnormal blood is unknown. This is a shortcoming of their research. What is known, however, is that 94 percent of the patients surveyed in this study, who developed subsequent symptoms, had abnormal blood. Each of the patients was being reviewed for symptoms, a wide range of which had arisen since their vaccinations. The images are dramatic. Side-by-side pictures of a patient’s blood before and after vaccination show stark differences. Before vaccination, the red blood cells are separate from each other and are round, while the blood drawn after vaccination shows red blood cells that are deformed, and that cluster in coagulation around visible foreign matter that was not present before. Foreign Material Aggregated in the Blood This foreign material seemed to collect itself into structures, sometimes forming crystals and other times forming long tubes or fibers. The foreign-body structures in the patients’ blood, which had not been there before vaccination, certainly look unusual in the photos included in the study. The large shapes seemed to the doctors to have aggregated in the blood, and they observed shapes that suggest the way graphene can self-assemble into structures. Graphene is a form of carbon that occurs when the atoms are arranged in hexagons, making a flat crystal, like a sheet. In this form, though the carbon is not a metal, it behaves chemically like a metallic compound. The two shapes they noticed in the blood stream were crystal-like chunks and tube-like lengths. While the researchers could not confirm that what they saw was graphene, they pointed out that graphene can aggregate into shapes similar to those the doctors observed. Is It Graphene? Graphene has been used in nasal-delivery flu vaccinations, and is being developed for use in other medicines. However, it is not listed as an ingredient in any of the mRNA vaccines. The Italian doctors did not chemically test for graphene. They only speculated that graphene may be a component of the structures. Graphene can self-assemble tiny nano-structures, making it useful for carbon nanotubes and carbon fiber. However, as the authors mentioned, graphene self-assembling into structures in the bloodstream could provide something for blood to clot on, potentially causing large-scale blood clots. These speculations raise more questions than answers, as neither graphene nor other metallic compounds were supposed to have been used in the vaccines. So why did over 950 people experiencing post-vaccination health issues present with foreign material in their blood? This is not the only study to find blood abnormalities post-mRNA vaccination. In a previously published study in the same journal, a Korean team also showed that mRNA-vaccinated blood contained metallic objects that should not have been there. The Korean scientists analyzed samples of centrifuged blood from eight people who had received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against two people who did not receive any COVID-19 vaccines. The team of three South Korean medical doctors, Young Mi Lee, Sunyoung Park, and Ki-Yeob Jeon, explained that: “The preponderance of evidence suggests that the foreign materials found in the COVID-19 vaccine recipients … were injected into their bodies when they received one or more doses of the COVID-19 vaccines.” According to this study: “From the 8 COVID-19 vaccine recipients: 6 plasma samples contained a multilayered disc of unidentified composition; 3 samples contained beaded coil-like materials; 1 plasma sample contained a fibrous bundle of similar appearing beaded foreign material; and a different group of 3 samples had crystal-like formations of foreign material. The various shapes and sizes of foreign materials in the centrifuged plasmas of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals closely resembled the shapes and sizes of foreign materials previously observed directly in the vaccines themselves.” The Italian study, which analyzed over 10 times as many blood samples, appears to confirm the findings from Korea. However, it is difficult to extrapolate from their findings. It would be easier to confirm that the vaccines were indeed the cause of the blood abnormalities if the Italian researchers had also analyzed the blood of a control group of patients presenting with similar unusual symptoms (or lack thereof) who had not been previously vaccinated. Clotting Problems Clotting problems are one of the hallmark complications seen after COVID-19 vaccination. As the subject pool was of people who had been recently vaccinated and subsequently had health problems arise, this new science suggests that these structures in the blood and the abnormal clotting behavior of the blood cells could be a major part of why clinical doctors are seeing so many unusual health issues consequent to mRNA vaccination. Indeed, large clots have even been found in the bodies of the deceased since the vaccine program started. An embalmer in Alabama noticed that large clots of a sort he had never seen in his 20-year career started to become commonplace once the vaccine program started, according to a non-profit Alabama news agency. Richard Hirschmann told 1819 News that he has collected pictures of over a hundred cases of these blood clots. Hirschmann also alerted local labs and has been working with a radiologist, Phillip Triantos, M.D., to better understand why and how patients are presenting with large-scale slow-forming blood clots. Other doctors, including Ryan Cole, M.D., a dermatopathologist (which is a doctor who uses a microscope to examine samples of skin, hair, and nails to diagnose diseases) and founder of the Idaho-based company, Cole Diagnostics, have also seen large blood clots becoming an emerging phenomenon since widespread vaccination campaigns started, according to 1819 News. Microscopes in Medicine It used to be common for medical doctors to have microscopes in their offices and to examine their patients’ blood (and other bodily fluids) themselves, according to Barron Lerner, M.D., author of “The Good Doctor: A Father, a Son, and the Evolution of Medical Ethics.” While medical doctors today, with some exceptions, almost always send tests off to outside laboratories for analysis, Barron Lerner described how senior physicians used to feel it was their duty to teach their younger colleagues and medical students how to do testing themselves: Gram stains to test for bacterial infections, urine analysis under the microscope, and centrifuging blood to check for anemia and other issues. Akin to medical doctors of past eras, the Italian team of doctors who published these new findings explained that they have looked at the blood of patients over their entire careers, including after every other sort of vaccination. But they have never seen foreign bodies of this sort before. Post-market surveillance of medical devices, new medications, and vaccinations is of the utmost importance to ensure safety. These unusual and widespread findings of abnormalities in the blood post-mRNA vaccination should be of global concern. If 94 percent of patients with adverse health problems have occlusions in their blood that were not present before they were vaccinated, these scientists may have uncovered an unanticipated and dangerous side effect of mRNA vaccines. SOURCE: https://www.theepochtimes.com/italian-study-blood-patients-after-mrna-shot_4708049.html?

IMPORTANT UPDATE & ERROR ADMISSION AT END: We have all seen the assurance from the Prime Minister, Government ministers and TV doctors that the vaccine is safe for pregnant women. This is a screenshot from a BBC promotional video using the NHS, JCVI, Royal College, the US's CDC and MHRA to persuade the British public that the vaccine is safe for those pregnant or breastfeeding post jab. But is the C19 jab still considered by the Gov as safe and effective for pregnant women? Before we look at the BBC video, this is the current NHS advice. SOURCE: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/pregnancy-breastfeeding-fertility-and-coronavirus-covid-19-vaccination/ This was backed by more comprehensive information on the jab here as of 31st March PM BACKS JAB FOR PREHNANT WOMEN BORIS'S WIFE EVEN JOINED IN Carrie Johnson ‘feeling great’ after second Covid jab as she reassures pregnant women "...Carrie, 33, is expecting her second child after having a miscarriage earlier this year. She wrote on her Instagram account: “Just had my second jab and feeling great! “I know there are lots of pregnant women who are anxious about getting their Covid vaccine but the evidence is incredibly reassuring.” She continued: “Most importantly, the data shows there is no increased risk of miscarriage, something I was definitely concerned about...." https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1476990/carrie-johnson-pregnant-covid-vaccine-boris-johnson GOVERNMENT QUIETLY CHANGES ADVICE ON JAB FOR PREGNANT WOMEN The government seems to have updated their website on a page tagged "information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-PfizerBiontech-covid-19-vaccine" with some key information that is clearly contradictory to the advice given to the public. Or, at the very least it is contradictory to the NHS and BBC advice. We have been using web archives to try and work out when this advice was published and it now seems possible that the advice has been there all along. Meaning all the propaganda pushing the vaccine is at the very best, dodgy. This is HUGE! Does this mean the health professionals giving the vaccination had not done their due diligence and will be scapegoated? The changes spotted on the UK government website have gone viral. Here is the Government's advice on vaccinating the pregnant or those breastfeeding... advice that not only contradicts the NHS advice but the words of the prime minister, BBC doctors and countless others used in the coercion. This is a direct quote from the main government website on a page listed as designed for health professionals giving the vaccine. SOURCE: http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine Let's read that again.... Toxicology conclusions - .In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. TOXICOLOGY LINK https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/summary-public-assessment-report-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine Compare and contrast the two contradictory images below THE ROLE OF THE BBC IN THE COERCION OF MOTHERS The government and pharma's main propaganda outlet is the BBC. This is a screenshot from a BBC video persuading pregnant women that the jab is safe. I have made a transcript of the video, as the tone and words used are interesting in their technique. The full 2.41 minute video is here. BBC GOV PROPAGANDA VIDEO PROMOTING THE JAB FOR PREGNANT WOMEN 9th May 2021 TRANSCRIPT Regarding the jab and pregnancy "....It's understandable to be a little bit confused, a little bit anxious about it and just not sure what to do. If you're pregnant or breastfeeding or just thinking about having a baby, then the advice from the experts is you should be offered the COVID vaccine. I'm Dr. Stephanie Jen Chyi Oii,, I'm a GP and I had my baby during the lockdown. There is a history of having vaccines given to pregnant women, every pregnant woman is recommended to have the flu vaccine and whooping cough vaccine and these are known to be safe in pregnancy. Research from the USA involving more than 90,000 pregnant people who had mainly the Pfizer or Maderna shot found no safety concerns. And now we're beginning to see similar data here in the UK. All the data that we've had so far suggests that there is not an increased risk of miscarriage. And in fact, there is no biological mechanism by which that could happen because we don't think that the vaccine actually crosses the placenta and affects the baby. But in the UK, only the Pfizer and Moderna shots are being recommended so far, but that may change in the future. The experts say you can have your shots at any stage of your pregnancy, as you can become ill with covid at any time. However, a lot of women do feel more vulnerable in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. So I don't think there's any problem in delaying your vaccination till after 12 weeks if you feel more comfortable doing so. So if you decided to wait until after your 12-week scan, then you would still be able to get your second shot before entering the third trimester, which is the period where COVID is more likely to cause the most harm. Your baby's not helping you at that point. Because it's stopping the diaphragm from moving your lungs aren't working in the way that they usually would. And so then if you get an infection of a bad infection on top of that it can cause more significant problems. What if you've already had a dose of Oxford AstraZeneca and you were fine? Well, then the recommendation is you still go get your second dose. Because if you're fine the first time, you should be fine the second time as well. It's okay to have questions about the vaccine, and talking to your GP or your midwife will help you make a decision that's right for you. You know, it's not like pregnant women are being told you must all have the vaccine. Ultimately, it's your decision you do what you feel is right for you and you're making sure you're getting your information from the right resources..." (end of transcript) The video above was transcribed so you can see the clever use of language. See how the word "offered' is used here. Many will hear this as "you should have the vaccine". QUOTE: "...If you're pregnant or breastfeeding or just thinking about having a baby, then the advice from the experts is you should be OFFERED the COVID vaccine..." The word used is 'offered,' meaning the patient is liable for their own choice, yet the feeling of the sentence is different, giving a sense that the vaccine is recommended by experts. The use of images and words is designed to ensure people watching feel convinced the jab is safe. The BBC end their sales pitch with a clever caveat that you might be mistaken for thinking was added by lawyers - "make sure you're getting your information from the right resources." The BBC sales video was released on 9th May 2021, but what are the BBC saying on vaccination during pregnancy now? I did this little search on the BBC website, using the phrase "covid vaccination pregnant" to see what they had on offer for the curious. Here are brief summaries of the two articles found within the search BBC 10th January 2022 Pregnant women are being urged not to delay getting their Covid jab or booster in a government campaign. More than 96% of pregnant women admitted to hospital with Covid symptoms between May and October last year were unvaccinated, according to the UK Obstetric Surveillance System. The campaign will share testimonies of pregnant women who have had the jab on radio and social media. The government said the vaccine was safe and had no impact on fertility. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59930786 BBC 5th August 2022 A mother who lost her baby after getting Covid-19 while she was pregnant has urged other pregnant women to get vaccinated. "We know what you can lose and it's just not worth the risk, so I would urge every pregnant woman to get that vaccine." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-62439289 As seen from these articles, the agenda is clear. There is not one mention of possible negative effects, or any mention of the MHRA injury reports, of which we have published sixty-eight. SUMMARY The BBC to date have hidden all vaccine injury data from the public that we highlighted here They use clever and subtle methods to coerce the public, including even using tragedies as above to push an agenda. The use of language is subtle NLP-based coercion which persuades, yet cleverly limits liability. History shows this BBC video, alongside the ministers and TV doctors proclaiming the vaccine was safe for those pregnant, was not only dangerous disinformation but contradicted the official website advice for Doctors and health professionals. The public have clearly been deceived. 'Not On The Beeb', alongside other vaccine damage awareness organisations, has been warning of the dangers for pregnant women for well over a year. (see links below) The BBC are correct on one thing. When they said, "do what you feel is right for you and you're making sure you're getting your information from the right resources..." Clearly, we must choose our sources of information carefully. WHY THE VACCINE SHOULD BE BANNED FOR PREGNANT WOMEN Pfizer court-ordered, released data reveals the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/why-the-covid-vaccine-should-be-banned-for-pregnant-women NOT ON THE BEEB ARTICLES WARNING OF CONCERNS FOR THOSE PREGNANT 27 August 2021 - NOTB ALERTS ON BREASTFEEDING POST JAB https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/did-a-baby-die-due-to-his-mother-s-vaccine-contaminated-breastmilk 7 September 2021 BREASTFEEDING MOTHER BELIEVES HER 6WK BABY DIED DUE TO VACCINE https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/breastfeeding-mother-believes-her-6wk-baby-died-due-to-vaccine 13 September 2021 NEWBORN SUFFERS 'ADVERSE EVENT' VIA MOTHER'S VACCINATION WHEN PREGNANT See video and article here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/newborn-suffers-adverse-event-via-mother-s-vaccination-when-pregnant 20 August 2021 - HOW TO SEARCH VAERS DATABASE OF VACCINE INJURY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/how-to-unravel-the-secrets-of-the-vaers-data-base To check the 68 UK MHRA injury reports we have published tap 'vaccine injury' into the NOTB search bar CENSORED Could the vaccine be damaging newborn babies? This video on C19 vaccine-induced tremours ends on a very worrying image.... (the video of the baby was published online by a worried aunty clearly pointing at the mother's vaccination profile as most probable culprit) https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/censored NATURAL BIRTHS To learn about natural births watch this interview with Nickita from When Push Comes to Shove https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/doula IMPORTANT UPDATE. As sent by a reader: THANK YOU The gov document is from 2020 but the date is not on it. Instead it is marked "updated 16 Aug 2022". Updating seems to mean simply repeating the original document. Norman Fenton was mislead by this, so you and I are in good company. https://www.normanfenton.com/post/breaking-news-uk-government-says-vaccine-not-safe-for-pregnant-or-breastfeeding-women This FactCheck also explains: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid19-vaccines-women/fact-check-screenshots-do-not-show-pfizer-declaring-vaccines-unsafe-idUSL2N2WX1IL

"The Gates Foundation has become a major force in both traditional and nontraditional media. A recent Seattle Times analysis found the foundation has spent nearly $70 million on direct grants to media organizations, media training and media research, with the goal of boosting and shaping coverage of global health and development." - The Seattle Times, 3rd March 2011 BBC Media Action (formerly known as the BBC World Service Trust) has received funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2011 (a five year grant) and during the financial year 2019-2020. The Guardian newspaper has also received funding from the Gates Foundation, continuously since 2011. Other News Organisations that have received grants from the Gates Foundation include ABC and PBS, both in the US. Sources: https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/about/funding https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/gates-foundation-awards-20-million-to-bbc-world-service-trust https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/gates-foundation-gives-20m-to-bbc-charity-arm/ https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2010/sep/14/about-this-site

As of the 24th of August, there are 2,240 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. Although it appears that there have been 14 new deaths since the last report 28 days ago, there have actually been 19 newly registered vaccine-related fatalities and 5 previously recorded fatalities have been removed from the totals. This is Not On The Beeb's 69th report translating the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The stats are collated up to the 24th of August, but are released to the public a week later, so in this case on the 1st of September. It then takes the NOTB contributors a further few days to sift through and publish our report. TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 83 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.7 m 1st doses = 53,769,032 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,646,995 Boosters = 40,304,702 (30.9m Pfizer, 58,700 AZ & 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 144,720,729 doses BREAKDOWN Here is the breakdown of the most recent report with comments and observations on the data below Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death 172,901 Pfizer 246,183 AZ 40,576 Moderna 1,819 Unknown TOTAL = 461,479 Overall 1-in-116 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Is the 1 in 116 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11 Fatal Pfizer 820 AZ 1,301 Moderna 70 Unknown 49 TOTAL = 2,240 NOTE: Although it appears that there have been 14 new deaths since the last report 28 days ago, there have actually been 19 newly registered vaccine-related fatalities and 5 previously recorded fatalities have been removed from the totals. Blood Disorders - 17,229 (Pfizer) + 7897 (AZ) + 2602 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,793 Anaphylaxis - 667 (Pfizer) + 887 (AZ) + 95 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 1653 Acute Cardiac - 13,733 (Pfizer) + 11,655 (AZ) + 3573 (Moderna) + 119 (Unknown) = 29,080 Eye Disorders - 8248 (Pfizer) + 15,056 (AZ) + 1684 (Moderna) + 99 (Unknown) = 25,087 Blindness - 172 (Pfizer) + 330 (AZ) + 44 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 550 Deafness - 311 (Pfizer) + 440 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 811 Infections - 13,045 (Pfizer) + 20,735 (AZ) + 2648 (Moderna) + 215 (Unknown) = 36,643 Herpes - 2277 (Pfizer) + 2720 (AZ) + 280 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5304 Spontaneous Abortions - 500 + 16 stillbirths/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 239 + 5 stillbirths (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 818 miscarriages Nausea & Vomiting - 21,079 (Pfizer) + 45,635 (AZ) + 7104 (Moderna) + 216 (Unknown) = 74,034 Nervous System Disorders - 82,654 (Pfizer) + 183,800 (AZ) + 21,889 (Moderna) + 953 (Unknown) = 289,296 Paralysis - 536 (Pfizer) + 911 (AZ) + 128 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1586 Seizures - 1166 (Pfizer) + 2107 (AZ) + 305 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 3605 Tremor - 2251 (Pfizer) + 9995 (AZ) + 781 (Moderna) + 51 (Unknown) = 13,078 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4391 (Pfizer) + 7082 (AZ) + 814 (Moderna) + 49 (Unknown) = 12,336 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 843 (Pfizer) + 2401 (AZ) + 76 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3341 Respiratory Disorders - 22,366 (Pfizer) + 30,099 (AZ) + 4706 (Moderna) + 238 (Unknown) = 57,409 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1126 (Pfizer) + 2303 (AZ) + 213 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3654 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,484 (Pfizer) + 18,606 (AZ) + 2706 (Moderna) + 131 (Unknown) = 31,927 Skin Disorders - 34,985 (Pfizer) + 53,687 (AZ) + 13,817 (Moderna) + 399 (Unknown) = 102,888 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,587 (Pfizer) + 20,952 (AZ) + 5307 (Moderna) + 239 (Unknown) = 58,085 Vascular Disorders - 7762 (Pfizer) + 14,083 (AZ) + 1428 (Moderna) + 116 (Unknown) = 23,389 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,200,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,800,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 4075 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,500 children (1st doses) plus 8,700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 266 Yellow Cards (reporting rate 1-in-43) • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 2100 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 35 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 35 Yellow Cards Total = 4,213,600 children injected (under 18s) Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 7,226,800 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4411 For full reports including 363 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions WHAT CHANGED SINCE LAST MONTH? In the 28 days since the previous summary for 27 July 2022 we have received a further: • 425 Yellow Cards for the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech (SEVEN fatal minus TWO removed fatalities = FIVE fatalities) • 187 for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca (FIVE fatal minus ONE removed fatality = FOUR fatalities) • 306 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna (SIX fatalities minus ONE removed fatality = FIVE fatalities) • 28 where the brand was not specified (ONE fatality, minus ONE removed fatality = ZERO fatalities) PFIZER - SEVEN extra deaths minus TWO fatalities removed • Cardiac Disorders x 3 one myocardial infarction one cardiomegaly one cardiac arrest • General Disorders category x 1 o one death • Infections x 1 one sepsis • Neoplasms x 1 one throat cancer • Respiratory Disorders x 1 one chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder Removed Fatalities • Immune Disorders x 1 one anaphylaxis • Pregnancy Conditions x 1 one spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) NOTE: One brain death and one cardiac death noted under ‘death and sudden death’ sub-category but not recorded as fatal ASTRAZENECA - FIVE extra deaths minus ONE fatality removed • General Disorders Category x 1 one adverse drug reaction • Infections x 1 one COVID-19 pneumonia • Neoplasms x 1 one pancreatic carcinoma • Nervous System Disorders x 2 one cerebral infarction one cerebral venous sinus thrombosis Removed Fatalities • Infections x 1 one pneumonia NOTE: Three brain deaths, one cardiac death, one death, one drowning and one hanging noted under ‘death and sudden death’ sub-category but not recorded as fatal MODERNA - SIX extra deaths minus ONE fatality removed • Cardiac Disorders x 2 one pericardial haemorrhage one cardiac arrest • General Disorders category x 1 one death • Infections x 1 one pneumonia aspiration • Nervous System Disorders x 2 one guillain barre syndrome one haemorrhagic stroke Removed Fatalities Nervous System Disorders x 1 o One cerebral haemorrhage BRAND UNSPECIFIED - (ONE fatality, minus ONE removed = zero fatalities recorded) • Muscle & Tissue Disorders x 1 One costochondritis Removed Fatality • Pregnancy Conditions one abortion spontaneous (miscarriage) ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? Child vaccination must be halted until MHRA clarifies its confusing new under-18 fatality reports By Kathy Gyngell August 8, 2022 According to Table 11 of the latest Medicines and Health products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) ‘Coronavirus vaccine – summary of Yellow Card reporting’ update, it appears that six children have died from the vaccine. The MHRA slipped out these shocking figures in a new table last Thursday without any explanation or highlighting in the accompanying text. Nothing about when these children died or what age and sex they were, or what the catalyst was, for example myocarditis or a thromboembolic event and no indication given as to whether there have there been inquests into these Yellow Card reported children’s deaths. All that appeared to be communicated was contained in one new, inadequate and confusing table, copied below, from the sub-section Reports with a fatal outcome: Table 11* /* *: Number of UK reports with a fatal outcome received for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech, COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and Vaccine brand unknown by patient age up to and including 27 July 2022 Table 11* /* *: Number of UK reports with a fatal outcome received for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech, COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and Vaccine brand unknown by patient age up to and including 27 July 2022 It was the first time in the MHRA updates (published regularly since the start of the vaccine rollout) that fatality numbers have been added for under-18s. Though the table is unclear it reads that ‘Brand unspecified’ equals a total of SIX deaths which at first glance looked to include 1 x Moderna plus 5 x Pfizer or AZ (exact numbers retracted), as below: Under 18 AZ – fewer than 5 fatalities – retracted for privacy (could be zero, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 depending on Pfizer total) Pfizer – less than 5 fatalities – retracted for privacy (could be zero, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 depending on AZ total) Moderna – one fatality However another interpretation was that the (website) table is incorrectly aligned in which case the MHRA may have meant it to read: the 1st column Astra-Zeneca ^ (ie 1-4), 2nd column Pfizer also ^, 3rd column Moderna ‘-‘ (ie 0), then 4th column is Brand unspecified =1 and 5th column becomes the total =6. It made more sense as the totals add up correctly across all the different age groups and also that the bottom row total for ‘brand unspecified’ (currently in the Moderna column) for all ages would equal 49 which is the same as in the assets report of individual AEs as of published data 4th Aug. Further searching today indicates that this latter interpretation looks indeed to be the case. The PDF of the Summary text that they publish as well as the web page shows the table, presumably correctly aligned, on P38 here. But this is not all that is unsatisfactory. Looking further at the table it is possible that the child fatality rate could be far worse than indicated as per the (incorrectly) aligned UNKNOWN row (spliced here): It shows 344 non-age classified deaths in the latest update total of 2,226 vaccine associated fatalities. We know that SIX fatalities of the 2,226 are under 18, but what about the 344 UNKNOWN? Under 18 fatalities are not explicitly excluded from this part of the tabulation so could make up some of these numbers too. Why don’t the MHRA know the age breakdown; or why can’t they tell us? We urgently request the MHRA to bring clarity to the information provided here. It is imperative that this data is clear and understandable for the public. There is a broader context for concern. It is the scandalous inadequacy of child vaccine adverse event information published by MHRA since the under-18 rollout began. They say they are monitoring reactions carefully yet provide no evidence to suggest that they are. The MHRA are still not reporting the 4,000-plus child adverse events to the public in the same way they do as with the adult data. No breakdown of categories (whether cardiac, nervous or skin disorder for example) is provided for children. It is as though they are of less importance and there is no need for us to know. There is also a lack of transparency regarding their vaccine-related fatality reporting over all. They still don’t specify whether booster-related figures are included in or excluded from certain totals, or whether there have been any booster-related fatalities for adults and children. Why, apart from just one identified fatality ‘disorder category’ (thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) ) comprising 80 deaths do they not provide any specific or across-the-board age breakdown data? There were also 4 such deaths for Pfizer but no age breakdown was provided beyond an 18-91yrs age bracket. (Up to 27 July 2022, the MHRA reports it had received Yellow Card reports of 32 cases of major thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) in the UK following use of the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech. These events occurred in 13 females, and 18 males aged from 18 to 91 years, and the overall case fatality rate was 13% with four deaths reported.) Their failure to provide age-related data for the ‘Seven suspected myocarditis or pericarditis reports with a fatal outcome reported following the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech and six reports with a fatal outcome following the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca’ is deeply worrying. This is of key concern given the special warnings circulated to healthcare professionals of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in children, raising the question of whether any or all of these 13 myocarditis deaths were in the under-18 age group. We still do not know. But the question now that looms above all others is why have these ‘Under-18’ deaths in the new Table 11 only now been reported and included? We have to assume, if the table says what it appears to say, that all six deaths have not just happened in the last two weeks. Was the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation kept informed as each Card came in? Will it, as it should, demand an urgent moratorium on and halt to the child vaccine programme given this public uncertainty? If these are longer known fatalities then every mainstream media outlet ought to be asking just how long. My concern is whether the MHRA’s stated decision to turn from vaccine watchdog to vaccine enabler has made this body more dismissive of the data they are duty-bound to report and clouded its judgement on what should be a priority – that is to take all Yellow Card reports extremely seriously. The main emphasis of all the accompanying text to their injuries and fatalities tables is to underplay them and say the Yellow Card reports indicate nothing more than ‘a temporal association’ and not causality. Well, it is one heck of a lot of temporal associations, affecting nearly half a million people, to be sanguine about. Dr June Raine, the MHRA’s chief executive, has some serious explaining to do. For, if, as the MHRA themselves state, Yellow Cards are likely to be under-reported by a factor of ten, the real figures are very much higher and if the six child fatalities tabulated are indeed such, then some 60 children may already have died from a vaccine they never needed in the first place and which has demonstrably proved to be neither safe nor effective. SOURCE : https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/child-vaccination-must-be-halted-until-mhra-clarifies-its-confusing-new-under-18-fatality-data%EF%BF%BC/

“I couldn't rest. My heart rate was much higher than usual, without playing any long runs. That is to say, during the break, I felt that I was breathing fast and it did not allow me to think clearly, nor to act logically on what my usual standards are. It was a consequence of doing things too badly for a good game time. A very complicated, not to say catastrophic, start to the match against Fabio Fognini in the second round of the US Open , Rafael Nadal panicked a bit. He confided in his anxiety at a press conference, reported precisely by the Spanish media AS . NADAL: “I couldn't rest. My heart rate was much higher than usual, without playing any long runs. That is to say, during the break, I felt that I was breathing fast and it did not allow me to think clearly, nor to act logically on what my usual standards are. It was a consequence of doing things too badly for a good game time. Many things can explain this. We have had a difficult few months because of things that we have tried to manage as best we can. I am to still be alive and to be able to give myself a chance. These are things that happen in life, injuries or other things, and in the end they are sometimes difficult to deal with. I am happy, I still have hope and confidence. The only way to advance is to win the matches, that's what I did. I hope I will fight well and give myself chances. Even if things are not going very well, I don't give up on my chances because in sport you never know, things change very quickly. What I have to do is what I have always done: be ready”. The Majorcan will face an old acquaintance for a place in the round of 16: a certain Richard Gasquet, who defeated Miomir Kecmanovic in four sets. Translated from : https://www.welovetennis.fr/us-open/nadal-mon-rythme-cardiaque-etait-beaucoup-plus-eleve-que-dhabitude

Pfizer court-ordered, released data reveals the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial. By Dr. Joseph Mercola Story at-a-glance: Since the rollout of the experimental COVID-19 shots, U.S. health officials have adamantly claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women and their unborn babies. Meanwhile, now-released Pfizer court-ordered, released data — which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration wanted to hide for 75 years — reveals the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored study that was widely used to support the claim that the shot is safe during pregnancy misreported the data. The actual miscarriage rate in that paper was 82%. As of Aug. 12, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID-19 jab. For comparison, the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years is 2,239. Israeli research found the Pfizer COVID-19 jab impairs male fertility for three months after each dose, dropping sperm concentration by 15.4% and total motile count by 22.1%, compared to baseline. Since the rollout of the experimental COVID-19 shots, U.S. health officials have adamantly claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women and have been urging all pregnant women to get the jab “to protect themselves and their babies.” To this day, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends the COVID-19 shot for: “… people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future.” The CDC further recommends: “People who are pregnant should stay up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines, including getting a COVID-19 booster when it’s time to get one.” And claims: “Evidence continues to build showing that: COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective. There is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems in women or men.” All the while, they’ve had Pfizer data showing the shots cause shocking rates of miscarriage which, adding insult to injury, have been blatantly miscategorized as a “recovered/resolved” adverse effect. Who in their right mind would consider DEATH a resolved side effect unless they had a depopulation agenda in mind all along? I don’t see how this could be described as anything but a criminal cover-up. The only reason we know any of this is because U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release Pfizer documents at a rate of 55,000 pages per month. The FDA and Pfizer had asked to release the documents at a pace of 500 pages per month, which meant it would take 75 years to disclose them all. Criminal cover-up Dr. Naomi Wolf recently reported that an analysis of Pfizer data revealed that 44% of the women in the trial suffered miscarriages. That statistic turns out to have been the result of a miscalculation, as Pfizer listed the miscarriages in two separate columns, resulting in them being counted twice. We’ve repeatedly found Pfizer’s data collection and reporting to be all over the place, and seemingly on purpose, to make hazards more difficult to ascertain. Wolf admitted the error and took down the original report. However, while fact-checkers are gloating over the perceived victory, there’s plenty of other evidence in the Pfizer material to demonstrate these shots should be banned for all time. In an Aug. 20 Substack article, Dr. Pierre Kory addressed other, “absolutely horrifying,” findings on miscarriages found in the Pfizer data dumps: “… let’s do a dive on just one page of the many thousands. See below, Section 5.3.6, Page 12 of the document called ‘Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.’ “Looking at the first bullet under the header: Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including: “In this paragraph, at first read, it is just a list of adverse events and numbers, detailed in a way that is confusing at best, and obfuscating at worst. I think it is the latter because, if you do some simple arithmetic trying to parse that paragraph, you end up with this: “270 pregnancies were reported in vaccinated women during the first 12 weeks of the vaccine campaign. In 238 of them, ‘no outcome was provided.’ So, they only knew the outcome of 32 pregnancies reported. What happened in those 32 pregnancies they followed up on? “My hands are literally trembling as I write this, but here goes. In these 32 pregnancies, there were: 23 spontaneous abortions 2 spontaneous abortions with intra-uterine death So, 25 of the 32 pregnancies with known outcomes resulted in a miscarriage, a rate of 78%. Note that miscarriage normally occurs in only 12-15% of pregnancies 2 premature births with neonatal death 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death 1 normal outcome “Note that this only adds up to 29 known outcomes, but then they note that ‘two different outcomes were reported for each twin’ and then they talk about ‘fetus/baby cases as separate from mother cases.’ I have no idea how to interpret this explanation of outcomes, so it may have been one or two less (or more) deaths then. “So, of the 32 pregnancies they knew the outcome of, 87.5% resulted in the death of the fetus or neonate. Burying this data in the way and not alerting the world to what they found, is criminal activity …” To be perfectly clear, the failure to record and report the outcomes of 238 out of 274 pregnancies during a drug trial is simply unheard of. It’s shockingly unethical. And the fact that both the FDA and the CDC accepted this, and claim there’s “no evidence” of harm to pregnant women and their babies is proof positive of reprehensible maleficence. There’s no fixing what’s gone wrong at the FDA and CDC. Their credibility with the public is ruined beyond any possible recovery. The CDC can review and reorganize itself all it wants, but it changes nothing. They are, to this day, urging pregnant women to take a shot that they KNOW will cause babies to die. Calling it a dystopia of epic proportions is a profoundly serious understatement. Need more evidence? How about the fact that the CDC-sponsored study published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in April 2021 — which was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected — also obfuscated data to hide a shockingly elevated miscarriage rate. According to this paper, the miscarriage rate within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy was 12.5%, which is only slightly above the normal average of 10%. (Looking at statistical data, the risk of miscarriage drops from an overall, average risk rate of 21.3% for the duration of the pregnancy as a whole, to just 5% between weeks 6 and 7, all the way down to 1% between weeks 14 and 20) However, there’s a distinct problem with this calculation, as highlighted by Drs. Ira Bernstein, Sanja Jovanovic and Deann McLeod, HBSc, of Toronto. In a May 28, 2021, letter to the editor, they pointed out that: “In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 completed pregnancies). However, this rate should be based on the number of women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine receipt and should exclude the 700 women who were vaccinated in their third-trimester (104/127 = 82%).” In other words, when you exclude women who got the shot in their third trimester (since the third trimester is after week 20 and therefore should not be counted when determining the miscarriage rate among those injected before week 20), the miscarriage rate is 82%. (The errors in that NEJM article were also reviewed in a Science, Public Health Policy and the Law paper published in November 2021.) Of those 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred before 13 weeks of gestation, which strongly suggests that getting a COVID shot during the first trimester is an absolute recipe for disaster. So, here was yet another attempt to hide the fact that more than 8 in 10 pregnancies may be terminated as a result of the jab. As of Aug. 12, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID-19 jab. For comparison, the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years is 2,239. Birth rates are suddenly plummeting worldwide In addition to miscarriages, we’re also looking at abruptly plummeting birth rates, suggesting the COVID-19 jabs are having an adverse impact on future fertility as well. Kory notes: “They are large drops, and they are occurring, almost like clockwork, approximately 9 months after pregnant women around the world started to be vaccinated.” For example, Germany recently released data showing a 10% decline in the birth rate during the first quarter of 2022. The live birth rate graph for Sweden looks much the same, with a 14% drop: According to Gunnar Andersson, a Swedish professor in demographics at Stockholm University: “We have never seen anything like this before, that the bottom just falls out in just one quarter.” Between January and April 2022, Switzerland’s birth rate was 15% lower than expected, the UK’s was down by 10% and Taiwan’s was down 23%. In Hungary, MP Dúró Dóra has expressed concern about a 20% drop in the birth rate during January 2022, compared to January 2021. The U.S. is also showing signs of a drop in live births. Provisional data from North Dakota show a 10% decline in February 2022, a 13% reduction in March and an 11% reduction in April, compared to the corresponding months in 2021. In a July Counter Signal article, Mike Campbell reported that in the five countries with the highest COVID-19 jab uptake, fertility has dropped by an average of 15.2%, whereas the five countries with the lowest COVID-19 jab uptake have seen an average reduction of just 4.66%. Below is a chart from Birth Gauge on Twitter comparing live birth data for 2021 and 2022 in a large number of countries. Many women report menstrual irregularities post-jab High rates of menstrual irregularities post-jab are also a warning sign that reproductive capacity may be impacted. As of Aug. 12, there were 31,443 VAERS reports of menstrual disorders. Changes include heavier and more painful periods and changes in menses length, as well as unexpected breakthrough bleeding or spotting among women on long-acting contraception or those who are postmenopausal and haven’t had a period in years or even decades. Health officials have tried to brush off the reports, but a study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology — funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institutes of Health’s Office of Research on Women’s Health — confirmed an association between menstrual cycle length and COVID-19 shots. According to the authors, it’s possible that the immune response created by the mRNA shots affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, which plays a well-known role in the timing of a woman’s cycle. The authors stated: “Our findings for individuals who received two doses in a single cycle supports this hypothesis. Given the dosing schedule of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the United States (21 days for Pfizer and 28 days for Moderna), an individual receiving two doses in a single cycle would have received the first dose in the early follicular phase. “Cycle length variability results from events leading to the recruitment and maturation of the dominant follicle during the follicular phase …” Other disturbing evidence A Japanese biodistribution study for Pfizer’s jab also showed the COVID-19 spike protein from the shots accumulate in female ovaries and male testes, and there’s credible concern that the COVID-19 jabs will cross-react with syncytin (a retroviral envelope protein) and reproductive genes in sperm, ova and placenta in ways that may impair fertility and reproductive outcomes. A Pfizer-BioNTech rat study revealed the injection more than doubled the incidence of preimplantation loss (i.e., the risk of infertility), and led to mouth/jaw malformations, gastroschisis (a birth defect of the abdominal wall) and abnormalities in the right-sided aortic arch and cervical vertebrae. As noted by The Exposé: “With this being the case, how on earth have medicine regulators around the world managed to state in their official guidance that ‘Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy’? And how have they managed to state ‘It is unknown whether the Pfizer vaccine has an impact on fertility’? “The truth of the matter is that they actively chose to cover it up. We know this thanks to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request36 made to the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).” You can read more about that in The Exposé’s July 19 article, “FOIA Reveals Pfizer & Medicine Regulators Hid Dangers of COVID Vaccination During Pregnancy After Study Found It Increases Risk of Birth Defects & Infertility.” We’re also seeing a sudden uptick in infant mortality. The Exposé highlighted data from Scotland, showing neonatal deaths were 119% higher above the annual norm in March 2022. COVID jab affects male fertility too Male fertility is also under attack by these bioweapons. Israeli research published in the journal Andrology found the Pfizer COVID-19 jab temporarily but significantly impairs male fertility, dropping sperm concentration by 15.4% and total motile count by 22.1%, compared to baseline pre-jab. Both eventually recovered, some three months after the last jab, but if you destroy a man’s sperm for three months every time he gets a COVID shot, you’re significantly reducing the probability of him fathering a child for a good part of any given year and the stats reviewed above support this. Remember, the mRNA shots are recommended at three-month intervals for the original series, and boosters are now being recommended at varying intervals thereafter. Amy Kelly, project director for the Daily Clout’s Pfizer document analysis team, reviews this study and other post-jab male fertility concerns (video below). End the COVID shots now, before it’s too late to recover In October 2021, when the FDA was voting on whether to authorize the COVID jab for children aged 5 through 11, Dr. Eric Rubin, an FDA advisory panel member, Harvard professor and editor-in-chief of the NEJM, stated: “We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes … And I do think we should vote to approve it.” So, in this and other instances, they’ve openly admitted that anyone who takes the jab is part of an experiment. Yet at the same time, the FDA and CDC have insisted that the jabs are perfectly safe — all while in possession of data showing they’re anything but! In conclusion, I agree with Kory, who writes: “… when a new medicine or device is introduced, you must first assume any adverse effects or deaths reported to be related to the intervention until proven otherwise. That is what I am doing here. “We must assume the vaccines are impacting fertility unless some other provable or credible explanations for a sudden drop in month to month birth rates. So stop the shots until you can prove they are not … “Too many young people dying, too many becoming disabled, too many pregnancies resulting in fetal or neonatal death as above, and now we find out that if we continue with this vaccine obsession, they will not be replaced. This is a humanitarian catastrophe heaped atop the one caused by dangerous gain-of-function research. “When will the world wake up to this rapidly unfolding horror? For those of us who know what is going on, it is hard not to feel helpless as we are forced to watch increasingly apparent and widespread needless death. But we will continue to try to get these truths out despite the massive censorship and propaganda overwhelming the globe. “We have a moral and ethical obligation and take that responsibility seriously no matter what befalls us. Stop the vaccines, now. And if we can’t stop them, we must try to convince everyone we know to no longer agree to get vaccinated. Their lives and our future depend on it.” Originally published by Mercola. NOT ON THE BEEB ARTICLES WARNING OF CONCERNS FOR THOSE PREGNANT 27 August 2021 - NOTB ALERTS ON BREASTFEEDING POST JAB https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/did-a-baby-die-due-to-his-mother-s-vaccine-contaminated-breastmilk 7 September 2021 BREASTFEEDING MOTHER BELIEVES HER 6WK BABY DIED DUE TO VACCINE https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/breastfeeding-mother-believes-her-6wk-baby-died-due-to-vaccine 13 September 2021 NEWBORN SUFFERS 'ADVERSE EVENT' VIA MOTHER'S VACCINATION WHEN PREGNANT See video and article here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/newborn-suffers-adverse-event-via-mother-s-vaccination-when-pregnant 20 August 2021 - HOW TO SEARCH VAERS DATABASE OF VACCINE INJURY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/how-to-unravel-the-secrets-of-the-vaers-data-base To check the 68 UK MHRA injury reports we have published tap 'vaccine injury' into the NOTB search bar CENSORED Could the vaccine be damaging newborn babies? This video on C19 vaccine-induced tremours ends on a very worrying image.... (the video of the baby was published online by a worried aunty clearly pointing at the mother's vaccination profile as most probable culprit) https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/censored NATURAL BIRTHS To learn about natural births watch this interview with Nickita from When Push Comes to Shove See full interview here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/doula

Amy Kelly examines the Pfizer trial documents and results. Pfizer's own documents showed that they thought vaccine ingredients could be transferred between people via skin to skin contact inhalation and sexual intercourse. They mandated that men participating in the Pfizer trials abstain from sex, or if they were going to have sexual intercourse, they had to use a condom, as well as another means of strong protection. In this video, Project Director Amy Kelly delves into findings so far on male fertility post-mRNA vaccine. As well as effecting sperm count and quality, reproductive toxicity in men was not tested. “Anti-sperm antibodies” from the mRNA is an adverse event following vaccination that treats sperm as “invaders,” and attacks them, leading to male infertility. TRANSCRIPT Hi, my name is Amy Kelly and I am the programme director for the Warren daily cloud Pfizer documents analysis project. I recently wrote a report related to male fertility and the vaccines and I'd like to share some of the information from that with you today. Pfizer's own documents showed that they thought vaccine ingredients could be transferred between people via skin to skin contact inhalation and sexual intercourse. They mandated that men participating in the Pfizer trials abstain from sex, or if they were going to have sexual intercourse, they had to use a condom, as well as another means of strong protection. Pfizer also did not test something called reproductive toxicity. And this has to do with adverse events or negative impacts of the vaccine on reproduction, as well as on the offspring of the men who have been vaccinated. Additionally, Pfizer and all of the medical community and the public health agencies told us that when the vaccine was injected, it stayed in the deltoid muscle. However, their own studies show that the vaccine ingredients and back travel throughout the body in the blood, and then they get into different organs, and they are lodged in there. And at this point, we don't know if those will come out of the body in the organs, or if they are just there permanently. The testes are one of the organs that the lipid nanoparticles and other vaccine ingredients are lodged in. And we don't know what the long-term effects will be from that. Moreover, Pfizer was aware of an adverse event called anti-sperm antibodies that occurs. And what that means is that the body starts seeing sperm as an invader, and it attacks and kills the sperm leading to infertility in men mRNA vaccine ingredients have been shown to cause a cause a staggering decrease in men's fertility up to 22%. And that means both in the sperm concentration as well as something called the total motile count, which has to do with how fast sperm can move around. Despite knowing all of these problems with the vaccine and men's fertility, Big Pharma and the medical community and public health agencies have continued to push men to get vaccinated. And they've also hidden these adverse events and potentially bad side effects from men. And what that means is that men don't have the information they need to give informed consent prior to taking these vaccines, several men's reproductive societies including the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Society for male reproduction, and the Society for male reproduction, and urology have all come out with statements encouraging men to get vaccinated and not highlighting these issues that are known. Even the authors of the study that showed the 22% drop in fertility, still wrapped up the study by saying that men should still get vaccinated. That study was based on just two vaccine doses and did not include boosters. So we are left with so many questions around that. Is the decline going to continue from that? At approximately six months out, there was still a significant decline. How do boosters impact that approximately 29% of the population has received boosters, and it seems there would be even additional negative impacts based on those how are these vaccines going to affect the long-term sexual health and development of the pre-pubescent and adolescent males that have received them? As has been previously documented, there is a baby-die-off. Excuse me baby-die-off going from vaccinated mothers. And we wonder also, how have the vaccination of men impacted that potential are potentially impacted that baby die off public health officials, governments, public health agencies, medical doctors have had this information and yet they have withheld it from men so men cannot make an informed decision. Why did they not raise the alarm and go to men and let them have this information so that they could make a fully informed decision? The public needs to demand answers to things like this and many other questions. There is an assault on human reproduction going on. Both men and women need to demand answers from officials so that we can understand why this information has been withheld from the public.

Written By JANET McCONNAUGHEY NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The U.S. Department of Agriculture has begun scattering millions of packets of oral rabies vaccine from helicopters and planes over 13 states from Maine to Alabama. The major aim is to keep raccoons from spreading their strain of the deadly virus to states where it hasn't been found or isn't widespread, said field trial coordinator Jordona Kirby. The USDA is also continuing tests of a vaccine approved in Canada to immunize skunks as well as raccoons, said Kirby of Wildlife Services, which is part of the agriculture department's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Rabies is spread through an infected animal’s saliva, usually through bites. However, saliva that gets into the eyes, nose or mouth can also infect someone, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Thirteen people in South Carolina were considered potentially exposed in March because they had bottle-fed or given medicine to a sick calf that turned out to have rabies, said Dr. Michael Neault, the state veterinarian. Globally, the virus kills 60,000 people a year, most bitten by dogs, the World Health Organization states. That's about the same number that get shots to prevent rabies in the U.S. after being bitten or scratched by an infected or possibly infected animal, according to the CDC. State and local pet vaccination laws mean the virus is mostly spread by wildlife in the U.S. The national rabies control program started in 1997 in Texas, where coyotes were spreading the canine variant of the virus, Kirby said. She said vaccine drops eliminated that variant in 2004. Three years later, the CDC declared the nation free of canine rabies. That doesn’t mean unvaccinated pets are safe. Canine rabies is among more than 20 variants — seven found in terrestrial mammals and more than 13 in species of bats, said rabies control program coordinator Richard Chipman. A bite from an animal infected with any variant can make any other mammal sick. Scratches occasionally do so, since animals lick their paws. A three-year program in Arizona and New Mexico eliminated a bat rabies strain in foxes, Kirby said. And Texas, with help from USDA, dropped 1.1 million baits along the Mexican border in January to keep coyotes from bringing the canine variant back. Raccoons are the main rabies reservoir in 18 states along and near the East Coast and skunks in 21 others, according to data from 2020, the latest year available. Bats made up 31% of the nearly 4,500 animals found with rabies in 2020. But since nearly all of the 40-plus bat species found in the U.S. eat insects and the rest drink nectar or eat fruit, oral vaccines would be much trickier. Some scientists have speculated that bats could be vaccinated during hibernation, perhaps with a fine mist or with a gel that could be transferred from bat to bat, Chipman said. Early research is testing the idea in vampire bats, which live in Mexico and Central and South America and might spread such a vaccine within a colony by grooming each other. Rabid wildlife isn't just a rural problem. A rabid fox on Capitol Hill was caught less than 24 hours after the first report in April. By then, about a half-dozen people had reported bites or nips to U.S. Capitol Police, but others may have gone to other agencies, a Capitol Police spokesperson said by email. Raccoon rabies campaigns started in August in parts of northern Maine, western Pennsylvania, West Virginia and southwestern Virginia. The 348,000 Raboral V-RG baits in Maine and 535,000 in the three other states are being dropped from planes in rural areas and from vehicles in urban and suburban areas. In all, about 3.75 million packets — coated with a fishmeal attractant or encased in 1-inch (2.5-centimeter) fish meal cubes — will be distributed in nine states, ending when 1.1 million are dropped in Alabama in October. The vaccine has been found safe for more than 60 kinds of animals including domestic dogs and cats. Eating a large number of vaccine packets might give dogs an upset stomach but wouldn't cause any permanent problem, APHIS says. About 3.5 million doses of the experimental vaccine Onrab are being distributed in parts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Tennessee — which also are getting the approved vaccine — plus four other states. Onrab comes in blister packs with green, marshmallow-flavored coating. Wildlife Services hopes it may be approved next year in spite of lingering pandemic-related delays. SOURCE

By Megan Redshaw for CHD A preprint study of adolescents conducted during Thailand’s national COVID-19 vaccination campaign showed what one physician described as a “stunning” association between myocarditis and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. A prospective study in Thailand conducted during the country’s national COVID-19 vaccination campaign for adolescents showed what one physician described as a “stunning” association between myocarditis and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The preprint, accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, involved 314 participants ages 13-18 who were healthy and without abnormal symptoms after receiving their first vaccine dose. Participants with a history of cardiomyopathy, tuberculous pericarditis or constrictive pericarditis and severe allergic reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine were excluded from the study. Although the study included 314 adolescents, 13 were excluded from the findings as they were “lost to follow-up.” Of the 301 remaining participants, 202 (67.1%) were male. Researchers found that 18% of the 301 teens analyzed had an abnormal electrocardiogram, or EKG after receiving their second dose of Pfizer, 3.5% of males developed myopericarditis or subclinical myocarditis, two were hospitalized and one was admitted to the ICU for heart problems. Cardiovascular adverse events observed during the study included tachycardia (7.64%), shortness of breath (6.64%), palpitation (4.32%), chest pain (4.32%) and hypertension (3.99%). Fifty-four adolescents had abnormal electrocardiograms after vaccination, three patients had minimal pericardial effusion with findings compatible with subacute myopericarditis and six patients experienced mitral valve prolapse. Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle that can lead to cardiac arrhythmia and death. According to the National Organization for Rare Disorders, myocarditis can result from infections, but “more commonly the myocarditis is a result of the body’s immune reaction to the initial heart damage.” Pericarditis is inflammation of the tissue surrounding the heart that can cause sharp chest pain and other symptoms. According to the study, the most common symptom was chest pain, followed by chest discomfort, fever and headache. Three patients between the ages of 13 and 18 reported chest pain and biomarkers were evaluated. All three reported the symptoms within 24-48 hours of receiving the second dose of Pfizer. Four patients had no symptoms but had elevated biomarkers. All patients were male and had abnormal electrocardiograms, particularly sinus tachycardia. The clinical course was mild in all cases. The majority of the participants (257/301 or 85.38%) had no underlying diseases prior to being vaccinated. As part of the study, participants received a diary card to record cardiac symptoms. Those who developed side effects from the vaccine could call the principal investigator and be transferred to a medical team at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases for assessment. If the participant developed abnormal EKG, echocardiographic findings or increased cardiac enzymes, the principal investigator scheduled patients for follow-up per the study’s protocol and for day 14 lab assessments. Individuals were monitored with laboratory tests including cardiac biomarkers, ECG and echocardiography at three clinical visits — baseline, day 3, day 7 and day 14 after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The diagnostic criteria for myocarditis were classified as either probable cases or confirmed cases and were based on clinical symptoms and medical tests. The researchers concluded the clinical presentation of myopericarditis after vaccination was “usually mild,” with all cases fully recovering within 14 days and recommended adolescents receiving mRNA vaccines be monitored for side effects. Dr. Tracy Høeg, an epidemiologist, in a tweet said the study is “unique & impressive because of the extensive workup both pre and post vaccination” as the study could “detect pre-existing cardiac abnormalities.” Independent journalist Jordan Schachtel noted in a tweet the cardiac events witnessed during the study occurred after only one shot of Pfizer, as children with heart conditions had been excluded. According to the most recent data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022, there were 1,292 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis in the 12-17 age group. Of the 1,292 reports, 1,145 cases were attributed to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. SOURCE: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-myocarditis-teens-study/?

The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis The COVID-19 vaccination programmes must be stopped immediately. The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis has made its initial findings publicly available in a wide-ranging report: 1. Toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines - without exception. 2. The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes. 3. The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects. 1. In all samples of COVID-19 vaccines, without exception, components were found, using several methods of measurement, that: - are, in the quantities found, toxic according to medical guidelines, - had not been declared by the manufacturers as present in the vaccines, - are for the most part metallic, - are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes, - can only partially be explained as a result of crystallisation or decomposition processes, - cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process. 2. The comparison of blood samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals by means of dark-field microscopy showed noticeable changes in the blood of each person who had been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines. This was evident even if those people hadn’t at that point displayed any visible reaction to the vaccinations. Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated. Using artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis, the difference between the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people was confirmed. 3. The stability of the lipid nanoparticle envelope is closely correlated with the incidence of vaccine side effects and injury. The more stable this envelope, the greater the amount of mRNA that penetrates cells, where the production of spike proteins then takes place. These results correspond with the findings of pathologists who have carried out autopsies on people who died due to vaccine injury. Spike proteins were detected in damaged tissue. Researchers suspect that the spike protein is, in itself, toxic. The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analysing the contents and the effects of the novel COVID-19 vaccines. The group consists of independent scientists, including physicians, physicists, chemists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and alternative health practitioners, supported by lawyers, psychologists, analysts and journalists. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis uses modern medical and physical measuring techniques, the results of which have confirmed and complemented each other: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), Mass Spectroscopy (MS), Inductively Coupled Plasma Analysis (ICP), Bright Field Microscopy (BFM), Dark Field Microscopy (DFM) and Live Blood Image Diagnostics, as well as analysis of images using Artificial Intelligence. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis continues to work in close cooperation with several international groups that are carrying out similar investigations and who have obtained results consistent with our own. The results from our analysis of the vaccines can, consequently, be regarded as cross-validated. There are questions that need to be satisfactorily answered by the vaccine manufacturers and, in Germany, by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (the agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health responsible for the regulation of vaccines in that country). Possible causal links between the vaccines and fatalities need to be investigated. In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the COVID-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately. DOCUMENT: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140176-report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany by Emerald Robinson One of the most important reports in the world has been released by a group of German scientists who call themselves The Working Group For COVID Vaccine Analysis. The members of the group have chosen to remain anonymous at the moment because vaccine critics “have been publicly defamed, ostracized, and economically ruined.” That’s a wise decision — considering the contents of this report. This working group has made several preliminary discoveries that will reverberate around the world. The conclusion of this group’s report is simple and stark: all COVID vaccine programs must be halted immediately. Why? Because every COVID vaccine that was tested was toxic to human beings. To make matters worse: the blood of vaccinated individuals has been corrupted in terrible ways, including deformed red blood cells, blood clots, elevated blood viscosity, and the presence of “novel structures” made of strange materials that “cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.” Let me repeat: all COVID vaccines that were tested contained “substances the purpose of which cannot be determined.” (Figures 4 & 5 from the report) The inescapable conclusion from this report will send shockwaves throughout the world: the COVID vaccines are toxic to humans and they were designed to be toxic. Dangerous substances and toxic metals that were never disclosed by Pfizer or Moderna or AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson are found consistently in blood samples and, therefore, cannot be “accidental contaminants” but rather ingredients that were secretely and deliberately included in the vaccines. I want to highlight four of the group’s discoveries: The first discovery: toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines — without exception. The second discovery: The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes. The third discovery: The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects. The fourth discovery: The vaccines consistently contain substances the purpose of which cannot be determined. Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the COVID-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes. The first discovery: toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines — without exception. From the report: “In all samples of COVID-19 vaccines, without exception, components were found, using several methods of measurement, that: — are, in the quantities found, toxic according to medical guidelines, — had not been declared by the manufacturers as present in the vaccines, — are for the most part metallic, — are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes, — can only partially be explained as a result of crystallisation or decomposition processes, — cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.” What this means: the COVID vaccines are toxic to humans, and they are deliberately toxic. Let me repeat: The vaccines were designed to be toxic to humans. The second discovery: The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes. From page 9 & 10 of the report: “The blood from vaccinated patients (specifically those having had either the BioNTech/Pfizer or the Moderna vaccines) stands out mainly because of the following differences: Novel structures that we have previously only seen in the vaccines themselves directly (sealed vaccines were analysed, at least 3 batches with over 12 vials), e.g. rectangular and square crystal shapes, spirals, etc., these kinds of structures have never been found in human blood before. These structures were most frequently found in the Comirnaty vaccine from BioNTech/Pfizer (size up to 25 μm, erythrocyte has approx. 7.5 μm diameter). There is a clear deformation of the cell membranes of erythrocytes, which we otherwise only encounter in chronically ill people and people with severe degenerative diseases. Blood clots, lamellar structures that can occlude small vessels (size up to 40 μm), are also frequently seen. The blood viscosity (reduced flow capacity of the blood) in vaccinated people is significantly elevated. We normally only see this evidence in people who are at risk of stroke or thrombosis. Observation of the decomposition process (blood from healthy people can live actively on the slide for days) shows a rapid progression, the blood sometimes only lives for a few hours. However, the decay processes of erythrocytes, so-called ghosts/erythrocyte shadows, can also be seen at the beginning, which we normally only see in patients with severe chronic inflammatory processes and chronically ill patients. What is striking is that one does not necessarily have to know whether the patient has been vaccinated or not. This can be recognised by the conspicuous changes in the patient's blood.” What this means: The vaccines contaminate human blood itself — causing blood clots and red blood cell damage and elevated blood viscosity. The third discovery: The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects. According to the report: “The mRNA needs a protective envelope to enter the cells. This protective envelope consists of nanolipids. The nanolipids are stabilised by layers of polyethylene glycol (PEG). The PEG is formed from chains of different lengths.” “Based on the observations, it can be assumed that the PEG quality has a long-term influence on the functioning of the vaccine. Accordingly, batches with a very broad mass spectrum and longer chains would protect the mRNA less effectively. The nanolipids are more unstable and can disintegrate early and before penetrating the cell, thus releasing the mRNA outside the cell.” What happens when mRNA is released outside the cell? “…numerous lipid crystal particles can be observed in the dark field as tiny solids, the occurrence of which in the blood vessels can lead to blockages and consequent damage of many kinds.” The fourth discovery: The vaccines consistently contain substances the purpose of which cannot be determined. Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the COVID-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes. According to the report: “Evidence of alterations in the blood — regardless of the method of blood analysis — resulting from the COVID-19 vaccinations is increasing at an alarming rate and is being increasingly reflected in the relevant statistics.” Let me finish this post with some thoughts on the fourth discovery: the vaccines consistently contain substances the purpose of which cannot be determined. What are these “metallic” substances and “novel structures” meant to do? The key is to remember that the COVID “vaccines” are actually part of a new system of global biometric surveillance. The intellectual guru of the New World Order, professor Yuval Noah Harari, has explained this new system in detail. Perhaps this new system is why the U.S. government wants your children — at no risk from COVID — to take the COVID “vaccines.” Perhaps that’s why Western governments are still busy trying to illegally coerce their own people into getting injected — long after the “vaccines” have failed in every conceivable way. Perhaps this new system is why hostile countries such as China and Russia and Iran developed their own “vaccines” rather than taking ours. That’s why Big Pharma “vaccine” companies were allowed to sign highly suspicious legal contracts with various governments (like this one allegedly between Pfizer and Albania) that essentially held Big Pharma harmless for their “vaccines” while transferring all legal liability to the governments. Under the cover of vaccinating people, we are really preparing to track and control people. The once free nations of the West are testing a new authoritarian system under the guise of public health. Our military and intelligence agencies are not confronting China — they're copying China. A totalitarian nightmare is being imported into America using a needle and syringe. You have been warned. SOURCE: https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/the-covid-vaccines-corrupt-human?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Who is in charge of Britain's Overseas Territories? The Spider's Web: Britain's Second Empire | Documentary Film Michael Oswald's film The Spider's Web reveals how at the demise of empire, City of London financial interests created a web of secrecy jurisdictions that captured wealth from across the globe and hid it in a web of offshore islands. Today, up to half of global offshore wealth is hidden in British jurisdictions and Britain and its dependencies are the largest global players in the world of international finance. Watch our new documentary about an intelligence officer who blew the whistle on fake news and was framed for a murder here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8FDP... Share this documentary with your friends, and ask sites to feature it: https://twitter.com/spiderswebfilmhttps://www.facebook.com/Spiderswebfilm/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6483026/ The Spider's Web was substantially inspired by Nicholas Shaxson's book Treasure Islands you can read an extract of it here: https://www.theguardian.com/theguardi... Translate this documentary here on youtube or contact us for the .srt file contact@independentpov.org Review on Filmotomy: https://filmotomy.com/the-spiders-web... Review on Open Democracy: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/open... Website: www.spiderswebfilm.com German Version: https://youtu.be/1ZZR8vBKqwc Spanish Version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85dsT... French Version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hizj_... Italian Version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwmvX... Subtitles: French, Spanish, German, Italian, Russian, Arabic, Korean, Hungarian, English, Turkish, Portugese, Chinese, Croatian, Japanese. 0:00 Introduction 2:22 The British Empire 4:33 The Eurodollar Market 6:54 The Last Remnants of Empire 9:37 The Corporation of London 13:28 The Bank of Credit and Commerce International 16:53 Trusts 23:27 Who is in charge of Britain's Overseas Territories? 28:35 Global Financial Centers and Empire 37:15 How America Embraced Offshore Finance 42:15 Growth of Offshore Finance and Corruption 48:05 Whistleblowers 54:54 Politicians and Financial Secrecy 1:01:35 Accountants 1:07:20 Protesters Confront Dave Hartnett 1:10:27 Private Finance Initiative 1:13:42 Conclusion

This is another must-watch to help understand the real power brokers This is simply one of the top 5 most important videos ever produced and seen.” “This is the shot that needs to be heard around the Globe!” “Should be required viewing by all humans on earth.” “What a brilliant documentary.” “This is a brilliant piece of work.”

INFAMOUS PRO VAXXER DR JOHN CAMPBELL GETS DELETED ON YOUTUBE FOR DARING TO DISCUSS THE REASON BEHIND THE SURGE IN UK EXCESS DEATHS. If John Campbell is catching on, maybe many more are....? Campbell even dares suggest the real numbers might be higher than those reported. Where does he get these figures? Yes, the same as us, the official gov websites. We have been highlighting the real reason since day one.... Watch the video that was deleted by youtube here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/nluYnAcVbzBF/

In his latest set of slides of blood samples taken from both “vaccinated” and unvaccinated people, Dr. Philippe van Welbergen demonstrated that the graphene being injected into people is organising and growing into larger fibres and structures, gaining magnetic properties or an electrical charge and the fibres are showing indications of more complex structures with striations. He also demonstrated that “shards” of graphene are being transmitted from “vaccinated” to vaccine-free or unvaccinated people destroying their red blood cells and causing blood clots in the unvaccinated. Dr. Philippe van Welbergen (“Dr. Philippe”), Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics, was one of the first to warn the public of the damage being caused to people’s blood by Covid injections by releasing images last year of blood samples under the microscope. At the beginning of July 2021, Dr. Philippe, was interviewed on a South African community channel, Loving Life TV. He explained that when his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, even sometimes paralysis and late onset of heavy menstruation (women in their 60s upwards), he took blood samples. Their blood had unusual tube-like structures, some particles which lit up and many damaged cells. Few healthy cells were visible. Until three months earlier, he had never seen these formations in blood. We now know these tube-like structures are graphene. Since then, Dr. Philippe has been a regular guest on Loving Life TV: blowing the whistle on the experimental Covid injection roll-out; providing updates on the increasing damage being done to blood by the experimental Covid injections over time; and, giving updates on the Covid situation in the UK and South Africa. On 12 February 2022, Dr. Philippe returned again to Loving Life TV to release images of his latest slides of blood samples. The live stream was lengthy so Loving Life TV separated it into two parts. Part One is a discussion including answers to the audience’s questions. In Part Two, Dr. Philippe presents the images of his latest blood slides and explains what the images are showing. He discusses nearly 100 blood slides from both “vaccinated” and vaccine-free patients. His slides show that vaccine-free patients have been “infected with vaccine toxins through shedding.” Below is a short clip from Part Two courtesy of The Timeline Post channel on Telegram. https://t.me/The_Timeline_Post/2754 Below is an image of typical healthy red blood cells as seen with a microscope, what blood should look like. There is no coagulation or foreign objects in it. The next image is of a person who has been injected with the experimental Covid drug. The blood is coagulated, the misshapen red blood cells are clumped together. The cell encircled in the image is a healthy red blood cell, one of the few in the image, sitting alongside the graphene fibres. You can see the size of the graphene fibres in relation to the size of a red blood cell. Fibres of this size will block capillaries. You can also see the graphene fibres are hollow and contain red blood cells. A couple of weeks before the video below was made, Dr. Philippe began noticing a magnetic or electrical polarity effect on different sides of the graphene fibres. In the image below, to the right of the fibre the cells are coagulated and on the left-hand side is what looks like a gap or roughly backwards “C” shaped spacing. Dr. Philippe says that this “behaviour” was not seen before but now, all of a sudden, it is being seen in almost every sample. It is an indication that “these things have changed, their reaction with surrounding blood cells has changed … and I don’t know what triggered it,” he said. The image below is of a blood sample from a vaccine-free, or unvaccinated, three-year-old child. It shows pieces or “shards” of graphene that “are the result of shedding,” in other words the graphene has been transmitted from “vaccinated” parents to their unvaccinated child. Below is the image of a blood sample from an eight-year-old unvaccinated child whose blood has been contaminated and destroyed by the transmission of graphene from those around him/her who have had a Covid injection. The child’s right arm and upper right leg are basically paralysed, the child is unable to lift his/her right arm and the thigh is not functioning properly. Dr. Philippe’s presentation is truly eye-opening and horrifying – a must-watch, especially for those who proclaim Covid injections are “safe” and are insisting people be injected. The Covid injections are weapons of genocide and how the people who have designed them are still walking free is incredible. This is Part Two of Dr Philippe’s Live Stream from 12 February 2022 where we discuss nearly 100 blood slides from vaccinated and unvaccinated patients – the unvaccinated patients have been infected with vaccine toxins through shedding. WATCH FULL PRESENTATION HERE: https://lovinglifetv.com/dr-philippe-part-two-the-blood-slides-12-february-2022/ SOURCE: https://expose-news.com/2022/08/24/graphene-transmitted-to-unvaccinated/

It's well known that multi-action kids' jabs are more dangerous than single shots. In the same way that walking into a bar and asking for a shot of tequila will get someone less drunk than lining up a vodka, whisky, tequila, rum and sambuca then downing them in one go. Due to this, some parents asked for each component of the MMR separately, giving the body time to recover in-between - though strangely single shots were soon not available. The MMR is three jabs in one, Measles, Mumps and Rubella. It's sad to note that many child MMR deaths happen around day ten. This article is proposing a 4-in-1 jab that might end up being called the MMRC. Would this nomenclature be a way to disguise the unpopular C19 jab, and the trojan horse it in under deeply ingrained measles scare stories? Worse, the delivery method is nasal, meaning shedding will occur, cross-contaminating jab-free children. Is this intentional? When the nasal flu vaccines are being used in schools many parents keep their children at home for at least three days, so they are safe from the shedding. It's also worth noting that the scientists in this article admit that the normal C19/jab produces no antibodies in the nasal passages, meaning even by the industry's (faulty/dodgy) stats and data, the C19 jab is ineffective. QUOTE: "......New research has advanced COVID-19 vaccine work in several ways: using a modified live attenuated mumps virus for delivery, showing that a more stable coronavirus spike protein stimulates a stronger immune response, and suggesting a dose up the nose has an advantage over a shot. Based on these combined findings in rodent experiments, Ohio State University scientists envision one day incorporating a coronavirus antigen into the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine as a way to produce COVID-19 immunity in kids. "We were pushing to make a vaccine for infants and children with the idea that if we could incorporate the mumps COVID vaccine into the MMR vaccine, you'd have protection against four pathogens – measles, mumps, rubella and SARS-CoV-2 – in a single immunization program." Jianrong Li, senior author of the study and professor of virology in Ohio State's Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Infectious Diseases Institute..." "If infants and children could develop immunity against COVID infection with the MMR vaccine, that would be great – no extra immunization needed." The research is published today (July 27, 2022) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. To create the antigen that stimulates immunity in this vaccine candidate, researchers used a prefusion version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein – the shape it is in on the surface of the virus before the virus infects a cell. The spike was locked into this form by changing six of its amino acids to prolines, an inflexible amino acid. Experiments comparing the six-proline protein, 6P, to a spike protein with two prolines, 2P, showed that the 6P induces significantly more neutralizing antibodies in mice and golden Syrian hamsters than the 2P version. These are the first published results showing the 6P antigen is more effective than the 2P spike protein with which the existing mRNA and adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines were created, the researchers said. "The 6P antigen is about 8 1/2 times better than 2P. That's a big deal – that's a lot more antibody production, which may become important since it looks like the virus is going to keep on evolving," said study co-author Mark Peeples, professor of pediatrics at Ohio State and a researcher at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus. Li, in collaboration with Peeples and Veterinary Biosciences Professor Stefan Niewiesk, previously led development of a measles-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate, but found that the mumps virus genome is even more amenable than measles to insertion of the spike protein gene. The study used a mumps vaccine strain that has been a component of the current MMR vaccine used in children since the 1960s. Once the 6P spike protein gene is inserted into the genome, the recombinant mumps virus replicates more slowly but is genetically stable and grows well in a World Health Organization-approved cell line for vaccine production. In animals, the live attenuated mumps vaccine modified in this way generated high levels of the 6P protein antigen, which triggered a strong immune response. Researchers compared the 6P spike protein vaccine candidate's effectiveness to a 2P version in mumps, and to mumps without the spike protein, in mice engineered to be highly susceptible to mumps infection and in golden Syrian hamsters, a standard animal model for SARS-CoV-2 studies. In all experiments, the 6P vaccine produced the best results: higher concentrations of neutralizing antibodies after vaccination and, after introduction of a SARS-CoV-2 virus challenge a few weeks later, protection from lung damage and significantly fewer viral particles in the lungs and nasal cavity. "We didn't test the omicron variant for this paper, but the 6P vaccine induced neutralizing antibodies and T cell activity against several variants of concern and offered complete protection from disease caused by the parent SARS-CoV-2 virus and the delta variant," Li said. "That's very important and suggests that if we use the 6P spike protein for vaccine protection in the future, we can enhance a vaccine's ability to protect humans." In addition, the Li laboratory developed a rapid recombination system that enables the insertion of any antigen into a mumps or measles virus in a week. "With this technique, the MMR vaccine can be rapidly updated to protect against new SARS-CoV-2 variants as they emerge," said study first author Yuexiu Zhang, a major contributor to this technology in Li's lab. Researchers vaccinated study animals by both injections and by drops into the nose, an attractive needle-free option that, the results suggested, provides superior protection against the coronavirus by inducing not only system-wide antibodies, but a broad response of specialized antibodies called IgA on mucosal surfaces of the airways as well, Li said. "Like most of the injected vaccines, current mRNA and adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines primarily induce antibodies in the bloodstream. Unfortunately, antibodies in the bloodstream do not protect the mucosal site of the airways very well, which is the initial site of infection with SARS-CoV-2. In contrast to injected vaccines, our new intranasal vaccine may be the next generation of COVID-19 vaccine because it can induce robust IgA, which directly neutralizes the SARS-CoV-2 in the nose and airways tissues," said co-author Prosper Boyaka, professor of mucosal immunology and chair of veterinary biosciences at Ohio State. Added Peeples, "Having those antibodies on the surface of the airways could be a real advantage compared to hoping that some of the antibodies in the bloodstream will end up in the respiratory tract." The study findings also suggest that existing immunity to mumps from vaccination or previous infection may slow the initial stimulation of antibodies by the mumps-based COVID-19 vaccine, but does not prevent a strong, protective antibody response. "That finding suggests this candidate can be used not only in infants, but also in adults who have mumps antibodies," Li said. The team began work on this mumps-based vaccine almost a year ago, long before the June 17 federal approval of COVID-19 vaccines for children 6 months or older. Given the MMR's 50-plus-year history as a safe childhood vaccine, the scientists are now evaluating ways to modify the MMR with coronavirus antigens from multiple variants. This study was supported by startup fund and bridge funding from Ohio State's Department of Veterinary Biosciences and College of Veterinary Medicine, a seed grant from Nationwide Children's Hospital and grants from the National Institutes of Health. Jason McLellan of the University of Texas at Austin provided the stabilized spike genes for this study. Additional co-authors include Mijia Lu, Eunsoo Kim, Mohamed Shamseldin, Michelle Chamblee, Jesse Hall, Adam Kenny, Xueya Liang, Jacob Yount and Purnima Dubey of Ohio State; Mahesh K C, Piyush Dravid, Sheetal Trivedi, Supranee Chaiwatpongsakorn, Satyapramod Srinivasa Murthy, Himanshu Sharma and Amit Kapoor of Nationwide Children's Hospital; and Chengjin Ye, Jun-Gyu Park and Luis Martinez-Sobrido of the Texas Biomedical Research Institute. The Ohio State Research Foundation and the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital have filed an invention report for the mumps virus-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220727/Incorporating-a-coronavirus-antigen-into-MMR-vaccine-to-produce-COVID-19-immunity-in-kids.aspx Source: Ohio State University Journal reference: Zhang, Y., et al. (2022) A highly efficacious live attenuated mumps virus-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate expressing a six-proline stabilized prefusion spike. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201616119.

"...They saw a 270% increase in myocardial infarction in 2021, a 300% increase in incidence of Bell’s palsy and of certain neurologic complaints...and a 300% increase in cancer..." Post C19 vaccination push, the risk to young adults of certain serious illnesses or diseases has risen by 3 times. Since the data is inclusive of all young adults independent of vaccine status the actual risk to those vaccinated will be higher than triple. By Kyle Becker In late 2021, a surge in insurance claims had indicated a mysterious spike in deaths among young adults ages 18-49 years old that could not be entirely explained by the Covid pandemic. They saw a 270% increase in myocardial infarction in 2021, a 300% increase in incidence of Bell’s palsy and of certain neurologic complaints.” Insurance companies were reporting an “overwhelming” and “unexplained” increase in claims for 18-49 year-olds, according to a KUSI report. DR KELLY ANALYSING THE DATA KUSI interviewed Dr. Kelly Victory, who explained the concerning rates of increase in reported myocardial infarction, Bell’s palsy, and certain neurological conditions. “This information became available to me or on my radar… following a hearing with Senator Ron Johnson, who was looking at sort of what he calls a second opinion on the entire response to the COVID pandemic,” Dr. Victory said. “The medical data was released by three career military physicians who got the information from the military database that collects what we call ICD codes, which are diagnosis codes. And these physicians had a feeling, they believed based on their own observation, that they were seeing a significant uptick in certain conditions.” “So, they actually went back and called the database from the military on certain conditions over a five year period from 2016 through 2020,” she continued. “So they looked at 2016, ’17, ’18, ’19, and ’20 at the prevalence of certain conditions, including things like heart attack, blood clots, to the long miscarriages, those sorts of things. And they compared it to the incidents of those same things in the calendar year 2021, and saw an alarming increase in certain things. For example, they saw a 270% increase in myocardial infarction in 2021, a 300% increase in incidence of Bell’s palsy and of certain neurologic complaints.” According to one insurance company, there was a 40% increase in deaths among young adults from pre-pandemic levels, despite the prevalence of Covid vaccinations that were supposed to drastically reduce overall mortality rates. “The head of Indianapolis-based insurance company OneAmerica said the death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people,” The Center Square earlier reported. “We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica,” the company’s CEO Scott Davison said during an online news conference. “The data is consistent across every player in that business.” “OneAmerica is a $100 billion insurance company that has had its headquarters in Indianapolis since 1877,” The Center Square added for background. “The company has approximately 2,400 employees and sells life insurance, including group life insurance to employers nationwide.” Davison said the increase in deaths were “huge, huge numbers,” and added that’s it’s “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who were dying, and not just the elderly. Covid-19 is a disease that presents a mortality risk overwhelmingly to the elderly and to at-risk groups, such as the immunocompromised. “And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said. “Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.” In late January, the Epoch Times performed a multivariate analysis of the uptick in excess deaths among young adults to try to ascertain the cause of the spike. “Among those aged 18 to 49, mortality rose dramatically in the first half of 2020, then somewhat plateaued before increasing again in the third quarter of 2021,” analyst Petr Svab reported. “With COVID-19 deaths being excluded and assuming drug overdoses, alcohol, and homicide deaths continued in 2021 at a similar intensity as 2019, there were still about 50,000 excess deaths in the 18-64 age group,” Svab added. In March, the Epoch Times reported that the trend in excess deaths had appeared to “wane,” although a lag in reporting means the numbers are subject to updates and revision. SOURCE: https://beckernews.com/insurance-companies-reported-unexplained-spike-in-young-adult-deaths-amid-covid-vaccine-push-in-late-2021-46193/