Search Results

This is Not On The Beeb's 60th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. (Data published 13th May 2022) FATALITIES There are now 2,132 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 80.8m AZ 49.06 m (down!?) Moderna 12.5m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 142,390,214 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 170,337 AZ 245,089 Moderna 38,197 Unknown 1672 TOTAL = 455,295 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 763 AZ 1272 Moderna 53 Unknown 44 TOTAL = 2132 Blood Disorders - 17,097 (Pfizer) + 7850 (AZ) + 2522 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 27,532 Anaphylaxis - 662 (Pfizer) + 884 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1642 Acute Cardiac - 13,266 (Pfizer) + 11,433 (AZ) + 3356 (Moderna) + 112 (Unknown) = 28,167 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1324 (Pfizer) + 448 (AZ) + 350 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2130 Eye Disorders - 8084 (Pfizer) + 14,962 (AZ) + 1569 (Moderna) + 89 (Unknown) = 24,704 Blindness - 166 (Pfizer) + 325 (AZ) + 39 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 534 Deafness - 306 (Pfizer) + 432 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 797 Infections - 12,462 (Pfizer) + 20,439 (AZ) + 2415 (Moderna) + 183 (Unknown) = 35,499 Herpes - 2238 (Pfizer) + 2700 (AZ) + 258 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5223 Nasopharyngitis - 1186 (Pfizer) + 1948 (AZ) + 322 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 3467 Spontaneous Abortions - 490 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 235 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 68 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 799 miscarriages Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,582 (Pfizer) + 81,065 (AZ) + 11,102 (Moderna) + 410 (Unknown) = 135,159 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,862 (Pfizer) + 45,575 (AZ) + 6672 (Moderna) + 214 (Unknown) = 73,323 Immune System Disorders - 2520 (Pfizer) + 3441 (AZ) + 637 (Moderna) + 36 (Unknown) = 6634 Nervous System Disorders - 81,422 (Pfizer) + 183,026 (AZ) + 20,569 (Moderna) + 897 (Unknown) = 285,914 Bell’s Palsy - 646 (Pfizer) + 639 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1391 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 803 (Pfizer) + 2369 (AZ) + 64 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) = 3252 Paralysis - 519 (Pfizer) + 896 (AZ) + 114 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1540 Seizures - 1135 (Pfizer) + 2083 (AZ) + 275 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3514 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 9327 (Pfizer) + 17,794 (AZ) + 1855 (Moderna) + 103 (Unknown) = 29,079 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,270 (Pfizer) + 18,466 (AZ) + 2550 (Moderna) + 121 (Unknown) = 31,407 Respiratory Disorders - 21,919 (Pfizer) + 29,894 (AZ) + 4392 (Moderna) + 227 (Unknown) = 56,432 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1101 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 201 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3616 Headaches & Migraines - 35,843 (Pfizer) + 94,040 (AZ) + 9681 (Moderna) + 347 (Unknown) = 139,911 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1424 (Pfizer) + 2776 (AZ) + 325 (Moderna) + 37 (Unknown) = 4562 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,372 (Pfizer) + 20,867 (AZ) + 5217 (Moderna) + 235 (Unknown) = 57,691 Vascular Disorders - 7607 (Pfizer) + 13,950 (AZ) + 1335 (Moderna) + 107 (Unknown) = 22,999 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4302 (Pfizer) + 7015 (AZ) + 765 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 12,124 Muscle & Tissue Disorders - 56,150 (Pfizer) + 104,623 (AZ) + 14,301 (Moderna) + 574 (Unknown) = 175,648 Skin Disorders - 34,354 (Pfizer) + 53,452 (AZ) + 13,287 (Moderna) + 364 (Unknown) = 101,457 For full reports including 353 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 3,800,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,200,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3683 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 Moderna - 2000 children (1st doses) and 1600 second doses & 3000 boosters resulting in 28 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 27 Yellow Cards Total = 3,813,600 children jabbed Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,226,900 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4,001 For full reports including 353 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

May, 2022 New Pfizer Documents Released - Part 2 Page 9 • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031111.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031111.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031113.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031113.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031149.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031149.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031186.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031186.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031197.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031197.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031207.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031207.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051047.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051047.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011093.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1001-10011093.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011100.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1001-10011100.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011135.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1001-10011135.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031038.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031038.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051054.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051054.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051069.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051069.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051214.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051214.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051293.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051293.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051347.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051347.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051387.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051387.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051411.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051411.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061020.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061020.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061040.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061040.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061052.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061052.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061094.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061094.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061098.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061098.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061176.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061176.pdf) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058316 to 0058458_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A Supp define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058316-to-0058458_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-Supp-define.xml) Page 10 • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058459 to 0058478_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A Supp define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058459-to-0058478_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-Supp-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058479 to 0058594_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058479-to-0058594_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058595 to 0058614_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058595-to-0058614_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058615 to 0058652_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S Supp define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058615-to-0058652_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-Supp-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058653 to 0058675_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S Supp define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058653-to-0058675_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-Supp-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058676 to 0058794_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 A define.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058676-to-0058794_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-A-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058795 to 0058828_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 A define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058795-to-0058828_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-A-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058829 to 0058954_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058829-to-0058954_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-S-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058955 to 0058999_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058955-to-0058999_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-S-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0065774 to 0066700_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A D addv.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0065774-to-0066700_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-addv.xpt) • FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0059000 to -0065773_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adcevd.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0059000-to-0065773_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adcevd.xpt) • FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0066701-to-0123167_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adfacevd.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0066701-to-0123167_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adfacevd.xpt) • FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0123168-to-0126026_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adva.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0123168-to-0126026_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adva.xpt) Source: Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/)

A new 'early-stage paper shows thats shedding happens with C19 vaccines. There has been much discussion on shedding. Due to personal observations, I believe it happens. Many papers show scientists have been trying to make vaccines that spread, some with the excuse that this is the way to vaccinate wild populations of animals. I have been mulling on the real reason the western Governments have pulled back on the vaccine drive. We know they want 100% coverage. They achieved 'vaccinating' about two thirds in the UK. One reason that has crossed my mind is, had that achieved their goals? Was two thirds the critical mass they were after? Does having two in every three people jabbed, mean that the other third will also be affected by the vaccine that is more accurately described as a bioweapon against the freewill of humanity? Moreover as anyone who read the Pfizer leaked trial papers, would be forgiven for thinking that Pfizer themselves expected shedding. This is a little reminder from that paper. 8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if: A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention (trial participant) by inhalation or skin contact. Are the findings in the paper below devalued by the paper not being peer reviewed? 2022 is the time of man where we have no time to wait for the authority of 'experts' to catch up and tick boxes. We need peer review, and more importantly replication of these results, however whilst the lumbering monster of official proof stumbles forwards, trying to dodge all industry attempts to derail it - it would be advisable for everyone to take heed and keep healthy. Time to: Power up the immune system. Detoxify. Become immune to fear Destress the mind and body Smile, dance and be happy There are some useful tips and products here. THE PAPER Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity (This paper has not been per reviewed) Authors Ross M. Kedl, PhD*, Elena Hsieh, MD, Thomas E. Morrison, PhD, Gabriela Samayoa-Reyes, PhD, Siobhan Flaherty, PhD, Conner L. Jackson, PhD and Rosemary Rochford, PhD. Abstract. Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated. The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non- immune hosts. Introduction The vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have maintained remarkable efficacy against severe disease and death in those vaccinated regardless of variant emergence, Omicron included 1 . Less appreciated than the systemic immunity generated by the vaccines are the high levels of antibody (IgG and IgA) found within the nasal cavity and saliva of vaccinees. This outcome is found in both humans and primates, and in response to both mRNA and protein-based vaccines 2,3. Respiratory transmission of viral infection is proof that oral/nasal cavity constituents can be communicated through aerosols and/or respiratory droplets. As such, it would stand to reason that antibody present within the oral/nasal environment may also be aerosolized to some degree. Methods A Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay (MMIA) was constructed and performed as previously described 4. Under IRB # 20-1279, serum samples were obtained from first-responder adults in Arapahoe County, CO 5. Antibody was eluted 4 from punches taken from the center of surgical masks anonymously donated by laboratory workers. Nasal swabs were obtained by convenience sampling both parents and their children at the Colorado Tricountry vaccine center in Aurora, CO who were attending vaccine appointments, not limited to SARS-CoV2. Antibody from swab tips was eluted as described for DBS 4. The log transformed IgA and IgG values from the children’s samples were modeled using linear regression with a single binary covariate corresponding to high or low antibody levels from their parent. Residual plots were used to check violations of linear regression assumptions and a Wilcoxon rank sum test was conducted if assumptions were violated. A linear mixed effects model was evaluated to assure that the correlation within household did not significantly contribute to the data or alter the conclusions drawn from the fixed effect linear regression model. Cytometry was performed using a Beckman Coulter Cytoflex cytometer and analyzed using FloJo v.10 software (Treestar, Inc.). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 4.0.2). Results The extended mandates for mask wearing in both social and work environments provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the possibility of aerosolized antibody expiration from vaccinated individuals. Utilizing a flow cytometry-based Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay (MMIA) to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (Fig 1A and B) 4,5 and a method previously used to elute antibody from rehydrated dried blood spots (DBS), we identified anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies eluted from surgical face masks worn by vaccinated lab members donated at the end of one workday. Consistent with the results reported by others, we identified both IgG and IgA in saliva from vaccinated individuals (Fig 1C and D). It was therefore not surprising to detect both IgG and IgA following elution of antibody from face masks (Fig 1C and D). Given these observations, we hypothesized that droplet/aerosolized antibody transfer might occur between individuals, much like droplet/aerosolized virus particles can be exchanged by the same route. To evaluate this hypothesis, we obtained nasal swabs from children living in households in which parents or family members had varying degrees of SARS-CoV2-specifc immunity, including those unvaccinated, vaccinated and COVID-19+. Initial comparison of nasal swabs acquired from children living in vaccinated households revealed readily detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG (Fig 1E), especially when compared to the complete deficit of SARSCoV-2-specific antibody detected in the few nasal swabs we obtained from children in nonvaccinated households. We then used the variation in parents’ levels of intranasal IgG as the basis of stratification across all children’s samples. Log transformation of the data from thirty four adult-child pairs established antibody cut-offs for high vs low parental intranasal antibody levels. Evaluation of samples in this fashion revealed that high intranasal IgG in vaccinated parents was significantly associated (p-value = 0.01) with a 0.38 increase in the log transformed intranasal IgG gMFIs within a child from the same household (Fig 1F). This significant positive relationship was observed using either parametric or non-parametric analysis, and adjustments for the correlation within household did not alter the conclusion. Though not statistically significant, a similar trend of elevated IgA was found in the same samples. SOURCE: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full-text ↵Garcia-Beltran, W. F., St Denis, K. J., Hoelzemer, A., Lam, E. C., Nitido, A. D. et al. mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine boosters induce neutralizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Cell 185, 457–466 e454, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.033 (2022). CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar ↵Corbett, K. S., Nason, M. C., Flach, B., Gagne, M., O’Connell, S. et al. Immune correlates of protection by mRNA-1273 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in nonhuman primates. Science 373, eabj0299, doi:10.1126/science.abj0299 (2021). AbstractGoogle Scholar ↵Nahass, G. R., Salomon-Shulman, R. E., Blacker, G., Haider, K., Brotherton, R. et al. Intramuscular SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicit varying degrees of plasma and salivary antibody responses as compared to natural infection. medRxiv, 2021.2008.2022.21262168, doi:10.1101/2021.08.22.21262168 (2021). Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵Schultz, J. S., McCarthy, M. K., Rester, C., Sabourin, K. R., Annen, K. et al. Development and Validation of a Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay Using Dried Blood Spots for SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence: Application in First Responders in Colorado, USA. J Clin Microbiol 59, doi:10.1128/JCM.00290-21 (2021). Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵Sabourin, K. R., Schultz, J., Romero, J., Lamb, M. M., Larremore, D. et al. Risk Factors of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Arapahoe County First Responders-The COVID-19 Arapahoe SErosurveillance Study (CASES) Project. J Occup Environ Med 63, 191–198, doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002099 (2021). CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar ↵Hayek, S., Shaham, G., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Kepten, E., Dagan, N. et al. Indirect protection of children from SARS-CoV-2 infection through parental vaccination. Science, eabm3087, doi:10.1126/science.abm3087 (2022). CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This is Not On The Beeb's 59th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. (Data published 28th Apr 2022) FATALITIES There are now 2,096 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.8 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.2 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 169,660 AZ 244,908 Moderna 37,478 Unknown 1,634 TOTAL = 453,680 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 747 AZ 1263 Moderna 45 Unknown 41 TOTAL = 2087 Blood Disorders - 17,065 (Pfizer) + 7844 (AZ) + 2497 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 27,469 Anaphylaxis - 658 (Pfizer) + 883 (AZ) + 88 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1632 Acute Cardiac - 13,156 (Pfizer) + 11,403 (AZ) + 3273 (Moderna) + 108 (Unknown) = 27,940 Eye Disorders - 8043 (Pfizer) + 14,932 (AZ) + 1541 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 24,602 Blindness - 165 (Pfizer) + 324 (AZ) + 36 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 529 Deafness - 305 (Pfizer) + 430 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 794 Hepatic (liver) Disorders - 263(Pfizer) + 528 (AZ) + 44 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 840 Infections - 12,355 (Pfizer) + 20,385 (AZ) + 2354 (Moderna) + 174 (Unknown) = 35,268 Spontaneous Abortions - 489 + 1 premature baby death / 1 foetal growth restriction death + 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 235 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 67 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 797 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 81,077 (Pfizer) + 182,884 (AZ) + 20,145 (Moderna) + 878 (Unknown) = 284,984 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 790 (Pfizer) + 2366 (AZ) + 58 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) = 3230 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,421 (Pfizer) + 81,032 (AZ) + 10,878 (Moderna) + 395 (Unknown) = 134,726 Immune System Disorders - 2445 (Pfizer) + 3323 (AZ) + 609 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 6401 Seizures - 1119 (Pfizer) + 2081 (AZ) + 268 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 3487 Paralysis - 515 (Pfizer) + 892 (AZ) + 107 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1525 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1314 (Pfizer) + 447 (AZ) + 334 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 2112 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,226 (Pfizer) + 18,451 (AZ) + 2495 (Moderna) + 118 (Unknown) = 31,290 Respiratory Disorders - 21,807 (Pfizer) + 29,859 (AZ) + 4285 (Moderna) + 216 (Unknown) = 56,167 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1096 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 199 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3609 Metabolic Disorders - 2762 (Pfizer) + 8965 (AZ) + 710 (Moderna) + 61 (Unknown) = 12,498 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,794 (Pfizer) + 45,565 (AZ) + 6552 (Moderna) + 206 (Unknown) = 73,117 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 102 (Pfizer) + 495 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 620 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,297 (Pfizer) + 20,849 (AZ) + 5194 (Moderna) + 225 (Unknown) = 57,565 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 3,600,000 children (1st doses) + 2,100,000 (2nd doses) & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3558 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) + 8,700 (2nd doses) & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 Moderna - 1900 children (1st doses) + 1600 (2nd doses) & 2800 boosters resulting in 26 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 26 Yellow Cards Total = 3,613,500 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 5,926,600 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3873 A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

SPECIAL REPORT FOCUS - ADVERSE VACCINE IMPACTS AFFECTING SMELL Olfactory Nerve Disorder (Cranial Nerve I) including anosmia, hyposmia & parosmia - 688 (Pfizer) + 799 (AZ) + 86 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1580 Olfactory Hallucinations - 15 (Pfizer) + 14 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 30 Nasal Congestion & Inflammation - 374 (Pfizer) + 518 (AZ) + 71 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 966 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1096 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 199 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3609 Intranasal Hypoaesthesia/paraesthesia - 3 (Pfizer) + 1 (AZ) = 4 Nasal Crusting & Dryness - 38 (Pfizer) + 77 (AZ) + 4 (Moderna) = 119 Nasal Odour - 7 (Pfizer) + 2 (AZ) = 9 Nasal Oedema - 8 (Pfizer) + 17 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 27 Nasal Polyps & Ulcers - 4 (Pfizer) + 5 (AZ) = 9 Nasal Pruritus - 13 (Pfizer) + 12 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) = 28 Paranasal Sinus Disorders (excl infections & neoplasms) - 104 (Pfizer) + 141 (AZ) + 22 (Moderna) = 267 Nasal Discomfort & Obstruction - 14 (Pfizer) + 118 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 141 Sinus Pain - 252 (Pfizer) + 612 (AZ) + 75 (Moderna) = 939 Sneezing - 467 (Pfizer) + 532 (AZ) + 58 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 1062 Rhinitis - 56 (Pfizer) + 58 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) = 122 Nasal Herpes - 5 (Pfizer) + 16 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 22 Nasopharyngitis - 1181 (Pfizer) + 1948 (AZ) + 311 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 3451 Sinusitis - 206 (Pfizer) + 410 (AZ) + 36 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 653 Nasal Injury - 2 (Pfizer) + 2 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 5 This data is from the UK's MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 20TH APR 2022 (Data published 28th Apr 2022) Overall 1-in-117 have reported injuries to the UK's Yellow Card reporting system. Official sources admit under10% of events are reported. * TOTAL Reactions = 1,485,059 * TOTAL Reports = 453,680 people impacted * TOTAL Fatalities = 2096 For full reports including 352 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

This is Not On The Beeb's 58th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. ARE THE NUMBERS BEING MANIPULATED Of note this week, the MHRA now claim 1,500 less doses of the AZ vaccine were given to the Under 18s. This data was released last week, but were wanted to see if it was a typo that was to be corrected this week. This is a vaccine that after testing on the public, was withdrawn for use in the under 18s 200 doses were also removed from last week's Moderna stats FATALITIES There are now 2,087 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.8 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.2 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 168,927 AZ 244,667 Moderna 36,941 Unknown 1620 TOTAL = 452,155 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 746 AZ 1255 Moderna 44 Unknown 42 (which is one less than last week! It must be Easter!) TOTAL = 2087 Blood Disorders - 17,029 (Pfizer) + 7837 (AZ) + 2490 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,421 Anaphylaxis - 657 (Pfizer) + 881 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1628 Acute Cardiac - 13,054 (Pfizer) + 11,365 (AZ) + 3228 (Moderna) + 103 (Unknown) = 27,750 Eye Disorders - 8016 (Pfizer) + 14,895 (AZ) + 1519 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 24,516 Blindness - 163 (Pfizer) + 324 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 525 Deafness - 300 (Pfizer) + 428 (AZ) + 52 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 785 Infections - 12,228 (Pfizer) + 20,332 (AZ) + 2319 (Moderna) + 168 (Unknown) = 35,047 Herpes - 2217 (Pfizer) + 2694 (AZ) + 252 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5190 Spontaneous Abortions - 489 + 1 premature baby death / 1 foetal growth restriction death + 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 233 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 66 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 794 miscarriages Psychiatric Disorders - 10,179 (Pfizer) + 18,422 (AZ) + 2449 (Moderna) + 117 (Unknown) = 31,167 Skin Disorders - 33,967 (Pfizer) + 53,375 (AZ) + 13,027 (Moderna) + 355 (Unknown) = 100,724 Nervous System Disorders - 80,737 (Pfizer) + 182,740 (AZ) + 19,898 (Moderna) + 871 (Unknown) = 284,246 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 101 (Pfizer) + 493 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 617 Seizures - 1103 (Pfizer) + 2070 (AZ) + 262 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 3454 Paralysis - 511 (Pfizer) + 887 (AZ) + 105 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1514 Headaches & Migraines - 35,671 (Pfizer) + 93,975 (AZ) + 9395 (Moderna) + 338 (Unknown) = 139,379 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4229 (Pfizer) + 6953 (AZ) + 725 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 11,946 Respiratory Disorders - 21,683 (Pfizer) + 29,817 (AZ) + 4236 (Moderna) + 216 (Unknown) = 55,952 Immune System Disorders - 2437 (Pfizer) + 3316 (AZ) + 604 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 6381 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,262 (Pfizer) + 80,996 (AZ) + 10,733 (Moderna) + 394 (Unknown) = 134,385 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,195 (Pfizer) + 20,825 (AZ) + 5171 (Moderna) + 222 (Unknown) = 57,413 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,709 (Pfizer) + 45,558 (AZ) + 6464 (Moderna) + 205 (Unknown) = 72,936 For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 stat accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 30th March 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old PFIZER 3,400,000 (dose 1) 2,000,000 (dose 2) 200,000 (boosters 3424 Yellow Cards * AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8,700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 * NOTE: 1500 doses (1000 children - 1st doses) removed from last two weeks reporting * Moderna - 1900 children (1st doses) and 1400 second doses & 2500 boosters resulting in 24 Yellow cards * NOTE: 200 children (1st doses) removed from last two weeks reporting * Brand Unspecified - 24 Yellow Cards Total = 3,413,500 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 5,626,100 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3735 A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

UNITED FREE PRESS LAUNCH - A NEW ALTERNATIVE TO THE NUJ AND MAIN STREAM MEDIA The United Free Press is a voluntary and independent press standards body, run by its members and dedicated to promoting high-quality journalism and opposing state censorship and misinformation. Alongside providing a code of conduct for its members, the UFP issues Press IDs, enables networking, supports and promotes member content conducts outreach, aids new journalists to the field, promotes decentralised new-tech and combats misinformation within the industry. UNITED FREE PRESS Launch Video: https://www.unitedfreepress.org/ https://youtu.be/k3KgykO49e8 Press Standards The UFP, as its first and foremost principle, helps to maintain fundamental standards in journalism. Members and provisional members are expected to uphold the code in their practice of the profession. Where a journalist has breached the code, please contact the outlet in question first and give a reasonable amount of time to respond. If your complaint has not been resolved in a satisfactory manner, forward your complaint on to us for review. Where a journalist is found to have breached our code, they will be sanctioned. Sanctions for offending journalists may range from simple warnings to cancellation of UFP membership and press accreditation. Press ID Easily recognisable Press IDs will be produced issued to members sometime after launch. Members are generally expected to carry them whilst working, to identify them as press. Journalists 16-18 will receive junior Press IDs. The UFP will seek official recognition of these from UK Police Forces & HM Courts. Networking Networking and support of colleagues helps to enable independent journalists, many of whom may not have had any prior experience in the fields other than as a consumer. By talking and sharing tips and advice, UFP members are able to learn and grow faster than journalists acting alone. Call for Coverage Individually, many journalists can’t cover certain stories due to location, expertise, or time constraints. The UFP will, over time, develop its function to act as a central hub for tips on items to cover so that all members are able to cover as many events, topics, or stories as they can New Tech Support The UFP supports the development of new talent within both journalism and the wider media industry. As such the UFP helps to support journalism and other media (such as musicians, comedians and other groups or individuals) facing censorship in gaining a foothold on platforms which support free speech. It helps in the following ways: Decentralised Platforms Support Vital to a free press and wider media are decentralised platforms resistance to censorship. Where promising creators are moving to LBRY/Odysee (or other decentralised web3 platforms), the UFP will notify members, who can boost outlets to enable them to livestream. The guild will also help with queries about the platform and other new-tech sites. Censorship Awareness Where promising creators (journalistic or non-journalistic) have been censored and cancelled, the UFP will help to raise awareness so that their audiences can move to alternative platforms. Exclusive Content Members, where practicable, try to make exclusive content for platforms supporting free speech and help to signpost to each other’s exclusive content. Journalistic Support & Content Promotion The UFP promotes the best work of its members alongside promising up-and-coming independent journalists and provides some of the training and tools to develop the next generation of journalism. Monthly Round-up The monthly round-up reviews and signposts different videos which represent quality work by members, alongside notable submissions. Featured Submissions Submissions of high quality or promising news-journalism are passed around for their members to promote at their discretion and are also occasionally featured in the monthly round-up. MEMBERS Organisation : Kerry Murray Photography Name : Kerry Social Links : https://www.kerrymurrayphoto.com https://www.instagram.com/kerrymurrayphotography/ https://t.me/freedominpictures Organisation : Oracle Films Name : Phil Social Links : https://www.oraclefilms.com/ https://twitter.com/oraclefilmsuk Organisation : Resistance GB Name : Will & Laura Social Links : https://www.resistancegb.org/ Organisation : One Man Reports Name : Cesar Social Links : https://twitter.com/onemanreports Organisation : Citizen Syd Name : Syd Social Links : https://youtube.com/c/CitizenSyd1 Organisation : SCUM MEDIA Name : Nick Social Links : https://www.wearescum.com/ https://twitter.com/ed_unwa Organisation : CHASING DISSENT Name : Benn & John Social Links : https://chasingdissent.com/ https://twitter.com/cdpressco Organisation : News Fist Name : Chris Social Links : https://odysee.com/@News_Fist https://t.me/News_Fist https://rumble.com/c/c-1562203 Organisation : Ickonic Name : Jemma Social Links : https://www.ickonic.com/ Organisation : REBEL NEWS Name : Lewis Social Links : https://www.rebelnews.com/ https://www.youtube.com/c/RebelMediaTV/videos Organisation : Not on the Beeb Name : Mark & Dina Social Links : https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/ Organisation : Another Alternative Name : Louis Social Links : https://www.youtube.com/c/AnotherAlternative Organisation : Subject Access Name : Heiko Social Links : https://www.youtube.com/c/SubjectAccess Kerry Murray Founder of UFP United Free Press Web: https://www.unitedfreepress.org/ Telegram: https://t.me/UnitedFreePress FB https://www.facebook.com/UnitedFreePress Odysee: https://odysee.com/@UnitedFreePress: Gab: https://gab.com/tags/unitedfreepress Tiktok: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMLpmA6wR/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/UnitedFreePress Twitter: https://twitter.com/UnitedFreePres Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/unitedfreepress/

Australia and Niger both have populations of 25 million. One country has a high covid death rate and the other a low covid death rate. One country also has a high vaccination rate and the other a low vaccination rate. Are the rates connected? Niger Population: 25,789,297 (rise of 6% since pandemic!) 8,908 cases 309 deaths Fully vaccinated: 1,547,552 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 5,000 Doses administered: 2,689,995 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,705 Australia Population: 26,034,737 (rise of 2% since pandemic!) 54,137 cases 6,893 deaths Fully vaccinated: 21,280,501 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 3,000 Doses given: 56,587,064 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,209 The difference in the death rate per dose is 6% which due to errors in reporting is statistically insignificant. (This does not correlate across other nations, so seems a coincidence. More on other nations calc later) Source: https://covid19.who.int/region/wpro/country/au 8,908 cases 309 deaths Fully vaccinated: 1,547,552 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 5,000 Doses administered: 2,689,995 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,705 Australia 54,137 cases 6,893 deaths Fully vaccinated: 21,280,501 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 3,000 Doses given: 56,587,064 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,209 The difference in the death rate per dose is 6% which due to errors in reporting is statistically insignificant. (This does not correlate across other nations, so seems a coincidence. More on other nations calc later) Source: https://covid19.who.int/region/wpro/country/au

“Stop what you are doing and speak out" Dr Sam White: This is Dr Sam White's plea to fellow doctors. . DR SAM WHITE has submitted a case to the police complaints authority in his battle against the Government over alleged crimes in relation to lockdowns and Covid injection harm. In an interview with journalistic group Holding The Line this week, it was revealed that Dr White and his PJH Law legal team have made the move after the Metropolitan Police informed him there was no evidence of a crime taking place – despite the submission to the police of thousands of pages of evidence supported by more than 40 national and international expert witnesses, none of whom were contacted by the police. If unsuccessful at the Independent Office for Police Conduct, Dr White plans to take his case to the High Court so the evidence he has gathered can be heard. Dr White describes the Government’s conduct as “evil” and is calling on doctors still administering Covid jabs to stop what they are doing and to speak out about the dangers involved. He said: “You will find that as soon as you speak out you are incredibly well supported. On the flip side of that, if you’re still injecting people, if you are still part of this, history will not judge you well because you only need to take a cursory look at the [MHRA] Yellow Card system to understand the harm and death you are causing.” In the UK alone, more than 2,000 Covid jab-associated deaths have been recorded in the Government’s own Yellow Card reporting scheme – with the real figure likely to be in excess of 20,000 because of the scheme’s acknowledged underreporting factor Dr White said that the NHS still has no official treatment for Covid and doctors were barred from recommending or prescribing Vitamin D as a preventive nutrient that he claimed could massively reduce Covid mortality rates. Treatments like ivermectin that he said would have saved tens of thousands of lives in the UK alone were blocked to ensure the emergency authorisation of the Covid injections would be granted Speaking to Holding The Line spokesperson Rusere Shoniwa, Dr White said: “Come forward, stop what you are doing and speak out. You will be more than amply supported.” For more information about Dr Sam White and his campaigning, visit www.drsamwhite.com VIDEO - DR T's CALL FOR ALL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS JULY 7th 2021 Source: https://uncut.substack.com/p/dr-sam-white-stop-what-you-are-doing?s=r

Like many, I was shocked when the Dalai 'Pharma', as I've now named my old hero, backed the vaccination programme. Many excused him. However, I'm stuck with the sad thought that any man devoting his life to preserving and defending a unique culture against the destruction of the Tibetan people and culture, should have a sixth sense for genocide. I would have also thought he had key and competent advisors covering many fields including medicine - but then again, many have been fooled. There are other men of religion who have not been taken in. Someone passed me the letter below from a pastor to his delegation. I enjoyed his measured words, logic and wisdom. Dear Friends, Government Decision to vaccinate children for Covid: I write to you about the current situation concerning vaccinations against covid for children aged 12-15, which will affect directly some of our families with teenagers at school. Some parents have asked me to say something on this, and I believe it is an issue that affects us all, because we all have a shared responsibility to nurture and to protect the young in our midst. The Government’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) is the regulative body in charge of decisions on vaccination and immunisation: who should receive all vaccines, when, and how. This body some time ago, very hesitantly and half-heartedly, extended the use of just half-vaccination (a single dose) to 16-18 year olds. (This followed great political pressure, and only after several dissenting members were quietly ‘retired’ from the committee). It was a controversial decision given that previously the JCVI had repeatedly said there was no reason to vaccinate healthy youngsters who were at ‘vanishingly small risk’ of any severe disease from coronavirus, and they produced no new evidence to suggest this had changed. Just 0.001% of covid deaths in the UK have been in people under the age of 25, and the vast majority (perhaps even all) were among those with serious and life-threatening illnesses like cancers, and likely terminally ill or otherwise extremely immune-compromised. So, whereas there was already provision to vaccinate those deemed at particular risk, it was at best contentious (and in my view unethical) to make this recommendation for 16-18 year olds. But the JCVI has refused to go further and endorse vaccination for under 16s. They stated very clearly that the benefit to children themselves of receiving this vaccine (which is still only useable under emergency-use authorisation - EUA) is virtually zero, whereas the already-known risk of serious harms though small, is not negligible. On a population-wide scale, it would risk significant numbers of children becoming seriously ill, and some dying. Just one known very serious adverse effect of these novel vaccines is that of myocarditis – inflammation of the heart. This has been reported in many countries, and much more commonly the younger the age group: in Israel 1 in 10,000 21-24 year olds vaccinated, rising to 1 in 6000 in 16-19 year olds. Despite claims that many of these cases were ‘mild’ and resolved, from my own background in cardiology I can tell you categorically that the use of the term ‘mild’ is misleading, and that in virtually every single case of this there will be lasting damage to some degree in the heart. Some of these cases being studied in the USA show persistent changes on MRI scan on follow up, and it is still very early days with long-term effects unknown. However, myocarditis has a high rate of progressing to heart failure, and is one of the reasons some younger people end up needing heart transplants. Heart muscle damage is something you do not want to have, however it is caused, whether it is through inflammation (myocarditis) or a blocked vessel causing a heart attack. Obviously a ‘mild’ heart attack is far better than a severe one, and if you are in your 70s, the small lasting damage to your heart muscle may not have a huge effect on your heart function, health and longevity. But if you are in your teens, your heart has a whole lifetime of hard work ahead of it, and any damage will be lasting. The degree to which this may prove extremely serious or even fatal in the medium to long term is simply not known. To quote from a recent article in the British Medical Journal, “COVID-19 vaccine side-effects are well recognized, but incidence is poorly monitored and understood. The US voluntary reporting system (VAERS) has higher rates of vaccination-associated death than all other vaccines combined over the past 20 years”. So, given the already-known potential harms (of which myocarditis is just one), and the entirely unknown potential long-term adverse effects, which may come to light only after many months or years (as, for example, with the dreadful permanent neurological effects of the Pandemrix Swine-Flu vaccine in 2009), the decision by the Chief Medical Officers to go against the JCVI advice and vaccinate under 16s is plainly not scientific; as the BMJ article concluded, “From a public health standpoint, it makes poor sense to impose vaccine side-effects on people at minimal risk of severe COVID-19.” This is clearly a political decision, not a medical one. Nor is it moral or ethical. A helpful article from the Oxford Centre for Practical Ethics (which is worth reading in full) says the Government and Chief Medical Officers have made a double ethical mistake here. First, it treats children as mere means to an end: the vaccine has nothing to offer them in terms of benefit, and we are using them supposedly to protect others – adults. This would be wrong even if there were significant benefits to adults, but since we know that the vaccines do little to prevent transmission in any case (very little, if anything, indeed, for the now predominant delta variant) it is even more reprehensible. But the second ethical mistake is that, in giving the reasoning for vaccination as preventing the disruption in school education, “we are assuming that the appropriate, or even inevitable, response to children getting infected is closing schools and isolating children.” But there is no reason to simply assume that we should isolate an entire classroom or even school when some child in it tests positive. This is absurd behaviour which has never been a feature of epidemic management in the past, and is not the way most other countries have dealt with schools during this one. It has far more to do with the weaponising of the situation by militant unions who have shamelessly used covid as means to further their own self-serving ends, to the detriment of our children. As the paper goes on: “Isolating healthy children that we have no good enough reason to believe are infected and infectious is a choice we make, it’s not something caused by the virus. We could and arguably we should choose otherwise if we think that the harms to children of isolation and school closure outweighs any harm that COVID-19 poses on them.” To this, I would add a third ethical mistake, which is the most concerning of all: that it has been made quite clear children will be able to receive the vaccine without, or even against, their parent’s consent on their behalf. Resort has been made to so-called ‘Gillick Competency’, which refers to the infamous case from 1985 where the Law Lords ruled that a 15-year-old girl could be prescribed the contraceptive pill without her parent’s consent. That was a controversial ruling, but it dealt with the very specific, complicated circumstances of contraception for an already sexually-active girl. It involved weighing up many complex issues, including the possibility of abortion should contraception be denied. The judgment thus made provisions for exceptional situations; it did not simply override the norms of parental responsibility for minors. It is entirely inappropriate to transpose such specific case law into the context of mass vaccination, and as a justification to sweep parental authority aside for every underage child in the nation. Furthermore, assessing Gillick Competency is a demanding and specialist medical task, not just a matter of a quick chat with a ‘Vaccinator’ at school or in a vaccination centre. It also clearly stated in all guidelines that consent for any procedure can never be valid if a young person is being pressured or influenced by someone else. It would be very hard to argue that teenagers in a school setting, surrounded by peers and the vast media noise about covid, are in a situation entirely free of pressure or influence. Indeed, quite the reverse is likely to be the case. All this is yet another deeply sinister sign of the onward march of the secular state into entirely unwarranted intrusions in the realm of family life which we have seen in our country in recent years, and sadly in Scotland in an even more pronounced way: think of the recent Scottish Government’s recommendations for schools stating that children as young as four years old should be allowed to change their gender identity in school life without any recourse to parents’ views. We should recall also the Scottish Government’s nefarious ‘Named-Person’ legislation, which similarly tried to sideline parents’ rightful place as guardians of their children, but was vigorously opposed in the courts (by a broad coalition spearheaded by Christians) and, mercifully, eventually struck down by the UK Supreme Court. It is worth noting the very strong language used by the Supreme Court Justices in that judgment, exposing the Government’s totalitarian ambitions and specifically condemning its chilling actions seeking to drive a wedge between children and parents: “The first thing that a totalitarian regime tries to do is to get at the children, to distance them from the subversive, varied influences of their families, and indoctrinate them in their rulers’ view of the world.” My view, then, is that the decision made by our Governments to allow vaccination of those under the age of 16, even potentially undermining the express wishes of parents, is unscientific, unethical and immoral – and downright dangerous: both potentially to children, and certainly to the very structure and sanctity of family life in our nation. However, given that this decision has been made, each family with teenage children will now themselves be faced with decisions to make. As your pastor, it is not my place to intrude into your family life or seek to coerce you into what decision you should make for your children in this circumstance any more than it is the business of the state to do so. Nevertheless, I do have responsibilities toward you all, including our children. It is my responsibility to remind children that our Lord commands them to ‘obey their parents in the Lord’, and not to defy them, ‘for this is right.’ (Eph 6:1). It would be quite wrong for teenagers to defy their parents and take the injection against their wishes (just as it would be quite wrong for a parent to ‘provoke’ their child by coercing or pressurising them to take it). It is also my responsibility to make clear to parents that Scripture is clear: it is they (not the Government or its advisors) who are responsible before God for their children’s welfare in all things, both physical and spiritual. So it is the responsibility of parents to think this through very seriously, particularly given that the whole machinery of government (and its allies in the supplicant mainstream media) is throwing its whole weight behind the campaign to vaccinate all youngsters, and also given the sheer power and influence of peer pressure among teenagers. Parents are the adults responsible here. Whatever you decide is for you to think through clearly, before God, and act on accordingly. People may come to different conclusions, and we need to be careful about condemning others’ decisions if they differ from our own. I echo Paul: each should be 'fully convinced in their own mind’, and each should seek to act in conscious faith, and not sin, in whatever decision is made, ‘for whatever does not proceed from faith is sin’. (Romans 14:5,23) Given the mass media’s very one-sided reporting of these matters, and also the many pressures which will come on parents from Government letters, advertising, and perhaps from schools themselves and other parents and school friends, I would personally encourage us all, by way of gaining some balance, to read these articles linked to below, each of which I can recommend as being honest, rigorous, and presenting things in a non-politicised way. Yours earnestly in love, William J U Philip Further Reading: Covid-19 Vaccination Information for Parents and Teens - from the Medical Freedom Alliance Two articles from HART (Health Advisory & Recovery Team) of which I am privileged to be a member and serve alongside some outstanding professionals I greatly respect i.Chris Whitty ignores JCVI advice ii.COVID-19 vaccines: unnecessary for healthy 12 to 15-year-olds JCVI opts not to recommend universal vaccination of 12-15 year olds – from a recent British Medical Journal article Sweetening the Covid Kool-Aid - Incentivising vaccination calls medical ethics into question - A recent article I was asked to write for The Critic which I would particularly encourage all those involved in Healthcare professions to ponder carefully. Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? – a recently published peer-reviewed paper, also for medics, as well as others who want to take a serious look at what the clinical trials of the vaccines actually did and did not establish. SOURCE: https://www.tron.church/update-letter

All-Cause Mortality by Vaccination Status "Excess Burden" on substack has noticed a key data release by The ONS. The explosive data they have analysed is represented clearly by these two comparative graphs. This is the all-cause mortality just after the C19 vaccines were released. The black bar represents the jab-free. This is the all-cause mortality a year later after the C19 V-release. The black bar represents the jab-free. ....of course, the graphs should show the opposite effect of the vaccines. If the jabs worked to save lives. Analysis of United Kingdom Office for National Statistics Data by 'EXCESS BURDEN' ON SUBSTACK THE ARTICLE The United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics “the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics and its recognised national statistical institute” has quietly released substantial data on the COVID-19 vaccines. Despite containing some of the most detailed breakdowns of the relationship between the COVID-19 vaccines and mortality available, it has gone almost unnoticed. I will try to present this data here using easily understood and transparent methods. I am not a professional. I encourage anyone reading this to verify the data and methods themselves. My goal is to get the attention of professionals so they can analyze this data using their expertise, and in a more public manner than this. There is always the possibility of a confounding variable or error. All that said, the official UK Government data indicates substantially increased mortality rates in many individuals vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines, over the unvaccinated. Table 1 of the dataset, “Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for all deaths, deaths involving COVID-19 and deaths not involving COVID-19, per 100,000 person-years, England; deaths occurring between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022”, looks as follows. The significant column is “age-standardised mortality rate / 100,000 person years”. It is age standardized to minimize statistical problems with different amounts of vaccine uptake in different age brackets (more on that shortly). The number was calculated using person years, so it can be understood as the expected number of deaths yearly per 100,000 population within the appropriate category. There is data in this document for all-cause, COVID-19, and non-COVID-19 deaths. Looking at all cause deaths shows if vaccines are having a net positive or negative effect, so that is what we will do. As an extreme example if per 100,000 people vaccines killed 999 from adverse events, but saved 1000 from COVID-19, the vaccinated group still would have a lower all cause mortality rate than the unvaccinated. If the January rate charted above held for a year, we would expect: 2502.9 deaths over the year per 100,000 unvaccinated 1,330.1 deaths over the year per 100,000 with 1 dose less than 21 days ago 1,718.5 deaths over the year per 100,000 with 1 dose at least 21 days ago 265.6 deaths over the year per 100,000 with 2 doses less than 21 days ago 166.1 deaths over the year per 100,000 with 2 doses at least 21 days ago This is the effect nearly everyone expects the COVID-19 vaccines to have. The data shows an over 90% reduction in mortality rate for those who took 2 doses at least 21 days ago. Keep in mind these are all-cause deaths. At the time there was a substantial likelihood COVID-19 would have been the expected cause of death, for any unvaccinated deaths. That was the earliest data in the set, January 2021. Now look at the chart of latest data in the set, January 2022. The all-cause mortality rate is substantially higher in those with 1 or 2 doses than those unvaccinated. That does not seem like it could possibly be correct. Was it just some type of year-end accounting artefact? Let's plot the entire dataset as a timeline. As we know in January 2021, those vaccinated with 1 and 2 doses have lower mortality rates than unvaccinated. But then in May 2021 those vaccinated with 1 dose ‘at least 21 days ago’, start to have a higher mortality rate than unvaccinated. In October 2021, those vaccinated with 2 doses ‘at least 6 months ago’ start to have a higher mortality rate than unvaccinated. They are followed in November 2021 by those with 2 doses ‘at least 21 days ago’. In addition, the mortality rate of those vaccinated with 3 doses is consistently getting closer to that of unvaccinated. All these trends continue through the end of the dataset in January 2022. This clearly isn’t an accounting issue, so the obvious variable to look at is age. Even though the Office for National Statistics says its data is age standardized, the data must not account for age in a manner that shows what is really happening. Table 2 has exactly what you need to look at this more closely. The same mortality by vaccination status data is broken down into age bands of 18-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, and 90+. I charted it the same way as above, but I removed the ‘less than 21 days ago’ categories as they add a lot of noise and people will be in those groups only a short time compared to the ‘at least 21 days ago’ categories. Additionally the Office for National Statistics combined the ‘between 21 days and 6 months ago’ category with ‘at least 6 months ago’. This data shows a few interesting things. First that the effect seems to be real and consistent. Second that the effect occurs progressively later as age groups get younger. Third that in ages 18-39 the vaccine seems to have had a negative effect from the start. I would like to display all the above data in one chart, but the mortality rates are wildly different with 90,000 being the peak for 90+ while 120 is the peak for 18-39. For this reasons the data must be standardized first, which I do as ‘rate vs unvaccinated’. For example, in January the 18-39 mortality rate of 120 for 1 dose vs 60 for unvaccinated, could be displayed as the 1 dose rate being 2x the unvaccinated rate. For 90+ the 30,000 rate for 1 dose vs 60,000 rate for unvaccinated, could be displayed as the 1 dose rate being 0.5x the unvaccinated rate. When the data is organized in that way and combined, you get the following chart. This data is all very alarming. A poorly functioning vaccine should still have at least a small positive effect. A non-functioning vaccine should have no effect. Yet we see a negative effect in all age groups for both 1 or 2 doses taken ‘at least 21 days ago’, and it is most cases the negative effect is quite large. The fact that the pattern is consistent and predictable, meaning it moves smoothly from month to month and age bracket to age bracket, gives even more credibility to the pattern. As I have said, I am not an expert, and there is always the possibility of a reasonable explanation. However since there is potentially a health concern that the data indicates may be larger than COVID-19 itself, it deserves immediate further analysis in a transparent and public way. Please help get this in front of the right people. SOURCE: https://excessburden.substack.com/p/all-cause-mortality-by-vaccination?s=r I have copied and pasted their article to extend its reach ONS DATA: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

This is data from the UK adverse event reporting system published by the MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SYSTEM UP TO 30th March 2022 (Data published 7th April 2022) We have five senses that connect us to our beautiful world. Any loss of these senses denies us our experience. We are compiling special focus data on each. Sight Hearing Taste Touch Smell Each sense is not only crucial for our well being but is needed for navigating our environment. Below represents the data of some of the TASTE RELATED REACTIONS recorded, not forgetting the MHRA/VAERS institutions themselves have admitted that under 10% of people report adverse reactions. TASTE RELATED REACTIONS = OVER 100,000 Below represents TASTE RELATED ADVERSE EFFECTS experienced, not exhaustively listed. Benign Neoplasms - Mouth & Tongue Cysts/Polyps - 12 (Pfizer) + 22 (AZ) = 34 Dental Pain & Sensation Disorders - 255 (Pfizer) + 445 (AZ) + 47 (Moderna) = 747 Dysphagia (swallowing) - 241 (Pfizer) + 306 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) = 581 Oesophageal Spasm - 5 (Pfizer) + 9 (AZ) = 14 Gingival Disorders incl. blisters, oedema, pain, swelling, ulceration & pruritus - 231 (Pfizer) + 393 (AZ) + 33 (Moderna) = 657 Gingival Bleeding - 83 (Pfizer) + 184 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) = 281 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,665 (Pfizer) + 45,552 (AZ) + 6413 (Moderna) = 72,630 Altered Oral Saliva & Dryness - 658 (Pfizer) + 1356 (AZ) + 129 (Moderna) = 2143 Oral Haemorrhages - 44 (Pfizer) + 121 (AZ) = 8 (Moderna) = 173 Oral Soft Tissue Symptoms incl. scabs, eruptions, blisters, burning, pain & discolouration - 1964 (Pfizer) + 2272 (AZ) + 228 (Moderna) = 4524 Oral Soft Tissue Swelling & Oedema - 1026 (Pfizer) + 1184 (AZ) + 237 (Moderna) = 2447 Salivary Gland Pain, Enlargement, Infection & Inflammation - 42 (Pfizer) + 43 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) = 95 Stomatitis & Ulceration - 636 (Pfizer) + 973 (AZ) + 111 (AZ) = 1720 Tongue Disorders - 122 (Pfizer) + 107 (AZ) + 22 (Moderna) = 251 Tongue Symptoms incl. stiffness, swollen, blisters, dryness, spasm & erythema - 1012 (Pfizer) + 1169 (AZ) + 151 (Moderna) = 2332 Oral Candidiasis - 41 (Pfizer) + 64 (AZ) + 6 (Moderna) = 111 Dental & Oral Soft Tissue Infections - 65 (Pfizer) + 109 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) = 181 Oral Herpes - 341 (Pfizer) + 725 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna = 1159 Mumps Viral Infection - 9 (Pfizer) + 13 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 23 Upper Respiratory Tract Infections involving tonsillitis, laryngitis, pharyngitis & throat abscess - 220 (Pfizer) + 178 (AZ) + 28 (Moderna) = 426 Pain In Jaw - 435 (Pfizer) + 635 (AZ) + 98 (Moderna) = 1168 Appetite Decreased - 1514 (Pfizer) + 6501 (AZ) + 419 (Moderna) = 8434 Facial Nerve Disorder incl paralysis & spasms - 1290 (Pfizer) + 1241 (AZ) + 180 (Moderna) = 2711 ** Cranial Nerves VIIth (facial), IXth (glossopharyngeal), Xth (vagus) & XIIth (hypoglossal) innervate the tongue Tongue Paralysis - 1 (Pfizer) + 6 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 8 Tongue Biting - 8 (Pfizer) + 10 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 20 Taste Disorder - 314 (Pfizer) + 530 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) = 895 For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

This is Not On The Beeb's 57th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. There are now 2,082 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 stat accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 30th March 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.8 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.1 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 168,462 AZ 244,525 Moderna 36,682 Unknown 1608 TOTAL = 451,277 people reported an adverse reaction ONLY INCREASE OF 538 on last week Fatal Pfizer 744 (no change last week) AZ 1252 Moderna 43 (no change last week) Unknown 43 TOTAL = 2082 Blood Disorders - 17,007 (Pfizer) + 7831 (AZ) + 2485 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,388 Anaphylaxis - 656 (Pfizer) + 881 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1627 Acute Cardiac - 12,983 (Pfizer) + 11,330 (AZ) + 3182 (Moderna) + 105 (Unknown) = 27,600 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1297 (Pfizer) + 440 (AZ) + 335 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2080 Eye Disorders - 7989 (Pfizer) + 14,886 (AZ) + 1505 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 24,466 Blindness - 160 (Pfizer) + 324 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 522 Deafness - 298 (Pfizer) + 427 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 781 Infections - 12,151 (Pfizer) + 20,307 (AZ) + 2295 (Moderna) + 166 (Unknown) = 34,919 Spontaneous Abortions - 484 + 1 premature baby death / 1 foetal growth restriction death + 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 233 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 66 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 789 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 80,512 (Pfizer) + 182,637 (AZ) + 19,755 (Moderna) + 867 (Unknown) = 283,771 Bell’s Palsy - 640 (Pfizer) + 631 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1377 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 783 (Pfizer) + 2344 (AZ) + 57 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3201 Seizures - 1097 (Pfizer) + 2068 (AZ) + 257 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 3441 Paralysis - 509 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 104 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 1507 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 9224 (Pfizer) + 17,747 (AZ) + 1810 (Moderna) + 102 (Unknown) = 28,883 Immune System Disorders - 2433 (Pfizer) + 3314 (AZ) + 603 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 6373 Respiratory Disorders - 21,613 (Pfizer) + 29,788 (AZ) + 4205 (Moderna) + 212 (Unknown) = 55,818 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,133 (Pfizer) + 18,395 (AZ) + 2438 (Moderna) + 116 (Unknown) = 31,082 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,665 (Pfizer) + 45,552 (AZ) + 6413 (Moderna) + 203 (Unknown) = 72,833 Skin Disorders - 33,845 (Pfizer) + 53,350 (AZ) + 12,964 (Moderna) + 348 (Unknown) = 100,507 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,115 (Pfizer) + 20,796 (AZ) + 5149 (Moderna) + 220 (Unknown) = 57,280 Vascular Disorders - 7494 (Pfizer) + 13,867 (AZ) + 1276 (Moderna) + 107 (Unknown) = 22,744 For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

🇲🇽 Mexico 🇩🇴 Dominican Republic 🇳🇴 Norway 🇮🇸 Iceland 🇸🇮 Slovenia 🇧🇭 Bahrain 🇯🇴 Jordan 🇮🇪 Ireland 🇭🇺 Hungary 🇷🇴 Romania 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia 🇲🇪 Montenegro 🇨🇼 Curaçao 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England 🇦🇼 Aruba 🇲🇻 Maldives 🇲🇳 Mongolia 🇲🇩 Moldova 🇬🇦 Gabon 🇾🇪 Yemen 🇨🇷 Costa Rica Madeira From April 1st, all international travellers won’t be subject to any entry requirements to visit Sweden. The Swedish government released a statement on Friday saying that the current ban on travellers from outside the EU/EEA (European Economic Area) will not be extended. As the ban expires on March 31, 2022, this will subsequently lift all restrictions for travellers coming to Sweden from outside the EU. Proof Of Vaccination Or Test No Longer Required As Of April 1 Once the new travel rules go into effect, it also means that starting April 1st, all proof of vaccination and Covid tests for entry will no longer be required to travel to Sweden, regardless of what country the traveller is coming from. With the restrictions that currently stand, only travellers from the list of approved third countries (non EU/EEA) can enter Sweden with a valid Covid vaccination certificate. This will no longer be the case once the ban expires at the end of the month. Sweden Another European Nation To Drop Covid Travel Restrictions The news will make Sweden the 22nd nation to drop all Covid-related travel requirements. It will end two years of restrictions on international travelers to Sweden due to the pandemic, which was put in place back in March 2020. Swedish Minister for Justice and Home Affairs, Morgan Johansson, made this statement following this week’s news: “We have already lifted the entry ban within the EU. Now the Government has decided not to extend the entry ban from third countries. This will make it much easier for everyone who has been prevented from coming to Sweden in recent years due to the pandemic.” Find out more about the countries you can easily travel to. Below is a list of countries in 2022 with no testing, no quarantines, no countries banned, and no vaccine requirements. Mexico Mexico is open to all international tourists with no testing or quarantines. Mexico has truly been the king of tourism during the pandemic, as they have never closed their borders, have never enacted a testing protocol, and have kept almost everything inside the country open for tourism. Beaches, gyms, hotels, restaurants, and in some parts even nightclubs and bars, are open. Here is everything you need to know about Mexico reopening its borders for tourism. El Salvador New entry as of November 15, 2021 El Salvador has now joined Mexico in being the second country in the WORLD in late 2021 to have no entry requirements or vaccine passports. El Salvador originally reopened in September 2020 but was requiring all arrivals to bring proof of a negative PCR test. Then, on April 21, 2021, they also added proof of being fully vaccinated as a way to avoid testing. However, now as of November 15, 2021, all requirements have been dropped. Norway New entry as of February 12, 2022 Norway becomes the first European country to fully remove ALL covid-19 entry requirements, including all forms, testing and quarantine rules, proof of vaccination, country ban lists, and all other border restrictions. Visiting Norway as of February 12, 2022, is like visiting in pre-pandemic times. In combination with the removal of all entry requirements, Norway has also removed all internal covid restrictions like mask-wearing, isolation periods, social distancing, and all use of vaccine passports. Slovenia New entry as of February 21, 2022 Slovenia is the 4th country in the world to remove all entry requirements, allowing foreign travelers to enter like pre-pandemic times. Slovenia’s RVT program (recovered/vaccinated/tested) has been discontinued at the border as well as internally. Now, visitors will not have to show proof of a negative test, being recently recovered or even vaccinated to enter, nor to access things like museums, restaurants, resorts, or other activities. Visitors should be aware that while Slovenia has removed almost all covid-related restrictions, masks are still mandatory in indoor public settings. Iceland New entry as of Feb 25, 2022 Iceland is the 5th country to remove all entry requirements, including internal rules, starting February 25. Now, anyone can enter Iceland, regardless of vaccination status. They have also fully abolished all tests, quarantines, and online health forms to enter the country. Once inside, mask mandates have been removed, as have limits on gatherings and even early closing hours for bars and restaurants. Bahrain New entry as of Feb 26, 2022 Bahrain has removed all their covid-related entry requirements, along with most internal restrictions, as the Middle Eastern nation returns to normal. Proof of pre-flight testing, on arrival testing, and all vaccination requests are now discontinued, including internal vaccine passports. Now all travelers, regardless of vaccination status, can enter Bahrain like pre-pandemic times. Jordan New entry as of March 1, 2022 The kingdom of Jordan has removed PCR testing, proof of vaccination, and all other covid-related entry requirements. Now travelers can enter without testing, quarantines, or vaccine passports. The only small requirement left is the obligation to fill out an online health form, which strangely doesn’t ask any covid-related questions. Ireland New entry as of March 7, 2022 Ireland was one of the first nations to discontinue most internal covid-related rules in January 2022, which now harmonize with their new entry requirement removal. From March 7, 2022, there will be zero travel restrictions for any traveler entering Ireland. Travelers from any country can enter Ireland without testing, proof of vaccination, quarantines, health forms, or any other covid-related entry requirement. All have been removed. Hungary New entry as of March 7, 2022 Hungary removes all its border restrictions, continuing the trend throughout Europe. As of March 7, 2022, travelers will no longer need tests or proof of vaccination to enter Hungary – they can simply enter like pre-pandemic times. Most internal restrictions are also removed, like vaccine passports, mask mandates, etc., but a few rules still exist in health care settings. Romania New entry as of March 9, 2022 Romania just removed all their covid-related entry requirements at the border, as well as internal restrictions, on March 9, 2022. Tourists will no longer need to show a negative test or proof of vaccination to enter. All that’s left is a simple form, but it doesn’t ask any covid-related questions. Once inside Romania, the mask mandates, all vaccine passports, and things like capacity limits have been discontinued. Saudi Arabia New entry as of March 9, 2022 Saudi Arabia has removed their entry requirements, qualifying them for this list, but a few small requirements still remain that travelers should be aware of. Gone are the important ones including proof of vaccination, quarantines, and testing. Still in place are online health forms, proof of travel health insurance, and a contact tracing app. Montenegro New entry as of March 10, 2022 Montenegro has become the latest country worldwide to drop all COVID-19 travel restrictions. Travelers will no longer need to show proof of vaccination or present a negative COVID-19 test upon arrival. Internally the nation will no longer require vaccine passports or testing to enter cinemas, museums, restaurants, bars, galleries, hotels, theaters, and gyms. However, there is still an indoor mask mandate for now. Curaçao New entry as of March 10, 2022 Curaçao has removed all its testing, quarantine, and vaccination entry requirements as of March 10, 2022. Travel to the Caribbean island will look much like it did in pre-pandemic times. Curaçao did keep a few simple entry requirements like an online digital form and proof of travel health insurance, but nothing that is a barrier to entry. United Kingdom New entry as of March 14, 2022 Officially starting at 4:00 am on March 18th, England will join the list of nations that have removed all entry requirements, and they certainly removed all of them. Not even forms will remain. England dropped most of its entry requirements and internal restrictions earlier in 2022, but they still had a few requirements in place that did not qualify them for this list, chiefly, 2 tests needed for unvaccinated passengers. Now, all requirements have been removed completely. Entry is exactly how it was pre-pandemic. Maldives New entry as of March 15, 2022 The Maldives have relaxed all their pandemic-related entry requirements, ended the state of emergency period, and removed mask mandates. Travelers no longer need to show tests, proof of vaccination, or even have travel health insurance to enter. Aruba New entry as of March 16, 2022 The small island nation of Aruba joins neighboring Curaçao, and removes Covid entry requirements as of March 19, 2022. The only rules that remain are the digital passenger card, now being used more as a customs/immigration form, and the requirement to have travel insurance. Mongolia New entry as of March 17, 2022 Mongolia showed up on this list on March 1, but was quickly removed after confusion within the nation about entry rules. Two weeks later, it seems as if the internal conflict over the entry rules has come to a close, with requirements officially removed as of March 15, 2022. Moldova New entry as of March 17, 2022 Moldova made the announcement on its Ministry of Interior page that they’ve removed entry requirements as of March 16, 2022. Gabon New entry as of March 18, 2022 Yemen New entry as of March 18, 2022 Both new entries of Gabon and Yemen have removed all covid-related entry requirements for travelers, but little data is provided other than no testing, proof of vaccination or quarantines have all been removed. Costa Rica New Entry as of March 24, 2022 Costa Rica will once again be included on this list, as they’ve decided to drop their internal Vaccine Passport system starting April 1, 2022. While Costa Rica has had very liberal entry requirements throughout the pandemic, recent internal use of proof of vaccine to enter restaurants and hotels kept it from being recommended as a restriction-free nation. Also on April 1st, they will drop the requirement for unvaccinated tourists to purchase travel health insurance and the online health form. Sweden New entry as of March 26, 2022 Sweden is dropping all their remaining covid-related entry requirements on April 1, 2022. All proof of vaccination and tests for entry will no longer be required to travel to Sweden, regardless of what country the traveler is coming from. Masks and internal vaccine passports were dropped back in February 2022. Poland New entry as of March 28, 2022 As of March 28th, Poland has removed all of its Covid-related entry requirements, as well as most internal restrictions including lifting its indoor mask mandate and the requirement to quarantine. Denmark New entry as of March 29, 2022 As of March 29, travelers from every nation can again visit Denmark under pre-pandemic rules, while inside the country all social curbs, including mandatory vaccine passes and mask usage, no longer apply as well. Grenada New entry as of March 31, 2022 Starting April 4, 2022, Covid proof of entry will no longer apply to foreign visitors visiting the tri-island nation of Grenada, as it fully reopens to tourism under pre-pandemic regulations. This means both the vaccinated and unvaccinated are welcome without testing, quarantine, or any further requirements. Latvia New entry as of April 1, 2022 As of April 1, 2022, Latvia removed all entry requirements including proof of vaccination, COVID-19 testing, and passenger locator forms to enter the nation. Argentina New Entry as of April 3, 2022 The Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Health of Argentina confirmed that within the next few days, the nation will remove all entry requirements and return to ‘normal’ pre-pandemic entry rules. Slovakia New entry as of April 6, 2022 Slovakia is the latest EU nation to remove entry requirements. As of April 6, 2022, all travelers—regardless of vaccination status—no longer need to quarantine or complete the eHranica passenger locator form. This makes entry just as it was prior to the pandemic. Czech Republic New entry as of April 9, 2022 Joining neighbors Slovakia and Poland, Czechia has removed all entry requirements as of April 9th. All proof of testing, vaccination and even the passenger locator form is now discontinued. As for masks, officials in Czechia relaxed the country’s mask mandates from March 14, 2022 Switzerland & Cuba Notes Switzerland almost made this list mid-Feb 2022. The federal government of home affairs along with the federal health authority removed all entry requirements, however, the border police are keeping them in full effect for now. Cuba was a hopeful entry as of April 6, 2022, however, it cannot be added to this list for keeping one very important restriction in place, the random on-arrival testing. Although they are removing all tests and proof of vaccination, they will keep in a random PCR test on arrival, based on the flow of incoming tourists and the current epidemiological situation. IF a tourist tests positive, they will be hospitalized for 10-14 days, making this too big of a barrier. Looking for countries without mask mandates? We have another article, updated frequently, that lists countries that no longer have mask mandates in place as well as an article listing which airlines have removed mask mandates Egypt. Now requires a 72-hour negative PCR test Kosovo. Now requires a 72-hour PCR test from most nations. Serbia. Now requires a 48-hour PCR test from all. Brazil. Now requires a 72-PCR test from all arrivals. Turkey. Now requires a 72-hour PCR test from all passengers. Haiti – Now requires a 72-hour PCR or antigen test from all passengers Tanzania – As of May 4, 2021 requiring a 72-hour PCR test North Macedonia – As of September 1, 2021, requiring a 72-hour PCR test, proof of vaccination or proof of recent recovery Albania – As of September 1, 2021, requiring a 72-hour PCR test, 48-hour antigen test, proof of vaccination or proof of recent recovery Colombia – Removed November 20, 2021. Vaccine passport in effect for businesses, restaurants, events, etc. Dominican Republic – Still requires PCR testing from select countries, as well as random breathalyzer tests on arrival. Countries with NO Testing/Quarantines El Salvador Mexico Norway Slovenia Iceland Bahrain Jordan Ireland Hungary Romania Saudi Arabia Montenegro Curaçao United Kingdom Maldives Aruba Mongolia Moldova Gabon Yemen Costa Rica Sweden Poland Denmark Grenada Latvia Argentina Slovakia Czechia SOURCE AND FOR RECENT UPDATES PLEASE GO TO TRAVEL OFF PATH https://www.traveloffpath.com/countries-without-any-travel-restrictions-or-entry-requirements/

HEART BREAKING V-INJURY TESTIMONIES AT US SENATOR RON JOHNSON'S ROUND TABLE HEART BREAKING V-INJURY TESTIMONIES AT US SENATOR RON JOHNSON'S ROUND TABLE

Putting a face to the numbers and stats is crucial. We helped bring the subject of vaccine injury within sports to awareness with our 300k view article in early November 2021. Scroll down to see our dedicated sports site. OAN delivers a good summary on sports injury in this short clip The average age of the players suffering cardiac arrest is just 23 years old. How many 23-year-old athletes were collapsing and suffering heart attacks before this year? Do you know any 23-year-old people who [have] had heart attacks before now? Nearly 800 athletes, young fit people in the prime of [their] life, falling down on the field. In fact, 500% more soccer players in the EU are dropping dead from heart attacks than just one year ago. We have made a website putting a Face to the injuries. These are only a fraction of the real number and the site needs updating. (any volunteers wishing to help with the sports site please make contact) THE FACES DETAILS Click through to see the incidents here

1 Month - 17 Years 1,317 More Injuries Of Children Reported After Covid-19 Vaccine In 2 Weeks 3,505 Cardiac Disorders In Children Aged 1 Month-17 Years There Are 96,834 Injuries Reported Of Unspecified Age SOURCE: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#

A doctor's group in New Zealand called NZSOS, which stands for NEW ZELAND DOCTOR'S SPEAKING OUT with SCIENCE, have made a presentation that they have delivered to the New Zealand Health Select Committee and the New Zealand Police. "....We are wanting to get this into the hands of as many police as possible. We have been told that the vaccine is safe and effective but what are these objects in the vaccine? Given the number of adverse effects and deaths, along with similar findings from other groups, we are calling for urgent investigation.... We want to remind the New Zealand Police that they have a duty to investigate evidence of harm and that following orders, protecting reputation and “sticking with the team” has never been an excuse to turn a blind eye. The professionals at NZDSOS are risking their careers, reputations and incomes to honour our oaths and our callings. We call upon the rest of New Zealand Professionals to do the same. Together we are stronger in truth and freedom..." If you are in NZ please present this to your local station, and talk the officers through the details. For everyone else internationally please add this clear and concise presentation to your portfolio of evidence for your police force, judiciary and politicians. THE PRESENTATION DOWNLOAD PRESENTATION HERE SOME HIGHLIGHTS New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (“NZDSOS”) is a group of concerned doctors, dentists and other medical scientists. Our purpose is to question “the narrative”, advocate for public health, tell the truth as best as we can discern it, and try to chart a way forward. Why are we risking our careers, professional reputations and incomes? We wish to honour our oaths, as we genuinely entered our professions to do good, and we must try to prevent harm to our fellow citizens. We believe we have proof of health risks from the vaccine and microscopically visible artificial technology (“microtechnology”). We do not claim as to the purpose of the microtechnology - though we believe there is a real urgency to find out. We have our grave suspicions, and we allow for a nano-chance that there is a reassuring explanation. We are not presenting this information to be frivolous or disruptive but come from a genuine concern as to what is represented by the images. If these images concern you, please share with others. In particular, any police, teachers, employers and your friends and family. Four teams in New Zealand have taken images. So far, only our team and one other scientist are prepared to speak out. ▪ The other teams are anxious for their safety since we all believe what we see is indicative of an unimaginable crime. ▪ Billions of people are oblivious to the alleged microtechnology. ▪ NZDSOS has asserted a much higher injury and death toll from the vaccine than we have seen before (including the smallpox vaccine, considered too dangerous at several in a million deaths). We suspect somewhere nearer 1 in several thousand from Comirnaty. ▪ All passive reporting systems worldwide are flagging extremely high death and injury rates – to near silence from regulators. We know the post-marketing Pfizer documents showed huge death and injury early on and that mRNA can be reverse-transcribed to DNA. ▪ Will the people have to act to protect themselves from being coerced to take the vaccine if our police and elected representatives will not investigate? HISTORY 28 January 2022 Crown Law, Ministry of Health and Medsafe declined meeting No choice but to gate crash the select committee process the same day. We presented verbally and were met with silence 30 January 2022 A hastily cobbled initial version of this presentation with a covering letter was sent to the above parties In total, we and our lawyers made 5 attempts over 2 weeks from 28 January 2022 to communicate w ith Government, including three formal letters. Single dismissive reply. NZDSOS presented the first “nano-tech”* finding from Spain to the Government and Medsafe on 27 September 2021 , in our report on possible magnetism. Again, a lockstep silence, which has been the unifying response to all our attempts to engage on issues upon which we have been shown repeatedly correct. THE ROAD AHEAD WILL BEAN UNCOMFORTABLE RIDE The images are shocking, and it is easy to succumb to “cognitive dissonance” (i.e., the mind rejects new information that would force it to change internal beliefs about one’s world). The images are real, and we do offer some interpretation as best we can. We do acknowledge that you may have been vaccinated and find a reluctance to examine this information. Police, defence, medical and border personnel, teachers and parents - in fact, everyone should demand answers to these images from the Government, their employers and the mainstream media. Their advice may amount to practising medicine without a license. The information has been presented to the Police in case we have evidence of crime since Government have refused to discuss it. THERE ARE STRONG PRECEDENTS FOR LOOKING AT OUR VIALS For almost a year, NZDSOS have been writing to the government regarding: Deaths and injury toll Strong science undermining the “safe and effective” narrative Failing efficacy Rising all-cause mortality Informed consent Ethical issues On 22 February 2022 a powerful presentation was made to the Human Rights Commission and Police: Regarding the true state of harm from the vaccine which is markedly at odds with government and media messaging. Presented by doctors, scientists, lawyers and injured jab recipients, and this presentation was repeated for some media on 26 February 2022 https://www.hrc.co.nz/news/human-rights-commission-listens- protesters/ FIRST REPORT OF GRAPHENE BY SPANISH SCIENTISTS Spanish science group La Quinta Columna, who research and present vaccine analysis and commentary on the background science www.laquintacolumna.net English translation site http://www.orwell.city Www.corona2inspect.net details the state of the science of Graphene- based Microtech in humans. Recommended reading SciencereportbyDrCampra -NEW - DR CAMPRA PROVES GRAPHENE OXIDE IN COVID VACCINES (notonthebeeb.co.uk) short video introduction to the work includes chain-of -custody proof, obviating any fraud. First published September 2021, follow-up report December 2021. Raman spectroscopy consistent with GRAPHENE OXIDE (GO), a known toxin, which causes blood clots amongst other things. TEAM TWO: SWITCH TO DARK FIELD MICROSCOPY ◾ Images from the dark field (DF) microscopy team in NZ (more to be seen on https://lifeoftheblood.com/ ). ◾ Some images are phone shots taken in order to break the metadata ID. The originals were taken December 2021 to January 2022. ◾ We visited the scientists on January 24th, 2022, and we subsequently swore an affidavit regarding our observations. ◾ These scientists are understandably concerned re repercussions, given the contradiction of the narrative. ◾ The dark field condenser lens lights up borders particularly and shows contrast; the same principle explains why we can see the moon even though it is in shadow. Sunlight refracts and converges around the sides of the earth and is reflected back by the moon. The DF images tend to appear very 2- dimensional. ◾ There are many images, and we present (and guess at) a small cross-section of many things that should never be seen in shots. This science crew have taken extensive and quite amazing images which are uploaded onto their website, www.lifeoftheblood.com, with some explanations and, of course, asking the same reasonable questions that the rest of us do. Please note the absolute consistency of technology showing up for the multiple groups, across different microscopes and techniques. URGENT QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ANSWERED Why are these structures in the vaccine? Do our regulators know what the structures are? If our regulators are unable to explain the structures, shouldn’t they investigate? How can our regulators rely on Pfizer’s explanation? Pfizer has incurred $10,193,896,333 in fines since 2000 and its sales have increased by 133%. Shouldn’t the Police investigate too, given the possibility of deliberate tampering? How can the rollout of a vaccine under provisional approval be allowed to continue, and down to 6 months of age? ALL NATIONALITIES - PLEASE SIGN OUR UK BASED PETITION HERE >>>> DOC SOURCE: https://nzdsos.com/2022/04/03/presentation-on-micro-tech-in-comirnaty/

The tipping point towards mass consciousness to the extent of the severe vaccine injury, is now another important step closer. TV hosts put two and two together and air their views on national television Shockingly, one of the hosts is also visibly showing signs of his vaccine-induced Bells Palsy. Bells Palsy is a known (apparently rare) vaccine side effect that causes temporary paralysis to the facial muscles on one side of the face. As you can see one side of the host's face is drooping. Whilst many recover from this condition, many others are left with partial paralysis leaving the person with a lopsided smile for life. SHORT VIDEO CLIP: Australian Sunday Footy Show has addressed the Ollie Wines myocarditis issue... Ollie Wines was pulled from Port’s awful loss to Melbourne with HEART PALPITATIONS that left him hospitalised with nausea and dizziness - to pile more misery on injury-hit Power after a terrible start to the season Port Adelaide have confirmed that Ollie Wines suffered heart palpitations during their embarrassing defeat by Melbourne, resulting in his withdrawal in the first half of the game. Wines, 27, left the field of play and was taken to hospital after a bout of nausea and dizziness during the crushing loss by the premiers, having played just 27 minutes on Thursday night. Further tests have found that the Brownlow medal winner also suffered heart palpitations and the Power confirmed he will undergo further tests to monitor the situation. .... ...'He is currently still in hospital with a heart irregularity – the cause of which is undetermined and will be investigated over the coming days.... SOURCE: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/afl/article-10698977/Ollie-Wines-pulled-Ports-awful-loss-Melbourne-HEART-PALPITATIONS.html

Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts exposes nanotech found in the Covid ‘vaccines’ and says they are genocide. He is the first politician to expose this! SEE FULL ARTICLE AND VIDEO OF FINDINGS HERE>>>>https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/australian-whistleblower-scientists-provide-evidence-of-nanotech-graphene-oxide

L’arcobaleno invisibile: Una storia dell’elettricità e della vita di Arthur Firstenberg L’arcobaleno invisibile: Una storia dell’elettricità e della vita (2017) di Arthur Firstenberg Riassunto informativo The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life di Arthur Firstenberg READ IN: ENGLISH - FRENCH - ITALIAN - SPANISH - GERMAN (see other languages at end of summary) Introduzione Sull’autore Arthur Firstenberg è uno scienziato e giornalista che è in prima linea nel movimento globale impegnato ad abbattere il tabù sul tema degli effetti dei campi elettromagnetici sugli esseri viventi. Dopo essersi diplomato in matematica all’Università di Cornell, ha frequentato l’Università della California, Irvine School of Medicine dal 1978 al 1982. Ha dovuto interrompere la sua carriera medica a causa di problemi di salute derivanti da overdose da raggi X. Negli ultimi 37 anni è stato ricercatore, consulente e conferenziere sugli effetti delle radiazioni elettromagnetiche sulla salute e sull’ambiente, come pure un praticante di diverse arti curativa. Sul libro Questo libro straordinariamente ben documentato è una pietra miliare nel senso che traccia l’utilizzo dell’elettricità nella nostra civilizzazione in relazione alla sua interazione con gli organismi viventi, dalla sua scoperta iniziale negli anni 1740 fino ai giorni nostri, con una possibile proiezione nel futuro. Da notare il fatto che il titolo si riferisce all’intero spettro elettromagnetico comprendente i colori dell’arcobaleno come pure le frequenze invisibili quali le frequenze radio ed i campi che si generano intorno ad un filo conduttore. Prima parte Dall’inizio… Catturata in una bottiglia Nel 1746 ci furono le prime scoperte sull’elettricità in Europa. L’esperimento di Leyden consisteva nel rivelare il fluido elettrico sfregando la mano su di un globo di vetro che ruotava rapidamente sul suo asse. L’elettricità statica prodotta in questo modo faceva una grande impressione nelle scuole, nelle fiere e sulle persone che avevano i mezzi economici per acquistare l’apparecchio, producendo archi elettrici o brevi scosse elettriche. Il fenomeno era così popolare che non era socialmente accettabile suggerire che l’elettricità potesse essere pericolosa, malgrado il fatto che le scosse causavano mal di testa, sangue dal naso e stanchezza in alcuni sperimentatori e negli animali usati nei test. La società era pervasa da elettromania e gli esponenti più appassionati ad avere un elettroshock in buona compagnia tra un bicchiere di champagne e l’altro cominciarono a mostrare sintomi dannosi. Malgrado ciò, l’establishment medico si munì di una bottiglia di Leida (l’antenato del condensatore) con lo scopo di fare esperimenti medici sull’aborto ed altre applicazioni. In questo modo emerse un campo completamente nuovo di conoscenza riguardo agli effetti dell’elettricità sulle persone, sulle piante e sugli animali – conoscenza che allora era molto più ampia rispetto a quella dei medici contemporanei, i quali vedono giornalmente gli effetti dell’elettricità senza riconoscerli per quello che sono, e che generalmente ignorano l’esistenza stessa di queste conoscenze. Il sordo sente, lo zoppo cammina Notando gli effetti raramente positivi e molto più spesso negativi dell’applicazione di voltaggi elettrici ad organismi viventi, i ricercatori ed i medici conclusero che gli organismi viventi fanno uso dell’elettricità. Vennero sviluppate delle cure che utilizzavano l’elettricità, come per esempio nel 1851 quando il neurologo Duchenne curò decine di pazienti con l’applicazione locale di impulsi elettrici. Vennero fatti esperimenti da Volta ed altri ricercatori nel mondo occidentale che mostrarono come il sistema nervoso, quello cardiaco, quello cardiovascolare, quello gustativo ed altri sistemi potessero essere stimolati dall’utilizzo di elettricità prodotta da una coppia galvanica. Fu scoperto che il numero di effetti curativi era significativamente inferiore di quelli dannosi, che includevano i sintomi dell’elettrosensibilità (ES) conosciuta oggi, quali mal di testa, capogiri, nausea, confusione mentale, stanchezza, depressione, insonnia, ecc. Sensibilità elettrica Il botanico francese Thomas-François Dalibard, che fece esperimenti elettrici con organismi viventi, confidò in una lettera a Benjamin Franklin datata 1762 che non era in grado di continuare il suo lavoro perché il suo corpo aveva sviluppato un’intolleranza all’elettricità. Fu uno dei primi uomini ad essere ufficialmente dichiarato elettroipersensibile (EHS). Se si legge il suo resoconto, è chiaro che questo botanico deve esserne stato affetto in modo grave. Altri professori e ricercatori ebbero la stessa esperienza e furono obbligati ad interrompere il loro lavoro. Pure il famoso Benjamin Franklin contrasse una malattia neurologica durante le sue ricerche sull’elettricità a partire dal 1753, ed i sintomi ricordavano quelli dell’elettroipersensibilità. Tutto ciò portò, alla fine del diciottesimo secolo, al riconoscimento del fatto che l’elettricità poteva far ammalare le persone, a seconda del sesso, della morfologia e delle condizioni fisiche dell’individuo. In modo simile era stato osservato che alcuni individui reagivano fortemente ai cambiamenti del tempo, che spesso erano correlati a cambiamenti elettrici nell’atmosfera. I nomi di alcuni di questi individui sono famosi ancora oggi – tra questi Cristoforo Colombo, Dante, Charles Darwin, Benjamin Franklin, Goethe, Viktor Hugo, Leonardo da Vinci, Martin Lutero, Michelangelo, Mozart, Napoleone, Rousseau e Voltaire. La strada non intrapresa Durante gli anni 1790 la scienza ebbe una crisi d’identità riguardo l’interpretazione e l’unificazione dei quattro fluidi: elettricità, luce, magnetismo e calore. In riferimento all’elettricità, da un lato c’era Luigi Galvani, che considerava l’elettricità come parte integrante dell’organismo vivente, e dall’altra c’era la teoria di Volta secondo la quale l’elettricità era solo un effetto secondario delle reazioni chimiche interne dell’organismo vivente. Volta, l’inventore della batteria elettrica che aveva il potenziale di diventare una miniera d’oro, vinse la discussione contro la visione più globale dell’interazione tra elettricità e organismo vivente. Malattia elettrica cronica A partire dalla fine del diciannovesimo secolo i territori urbani vennero trasformati dall’istallazione delle linee telegrafiche in tutti i paesi industrializzati. Questa tecnologia utilizzava voltaggi nell’ordine di 80 Volt in un singolo conduttore, con il ritorno che passava attraverso la terra. In quel periodo emersero le prime correnti “randagie” a cui gli esseri viventi erano esposti. Fu allora che apparvero le malattie della civilizzazione quali la neurastenia, che afflisse Frank Lloyd Wright e Theodor Roosevelt, oltre ad altri personaggi famosi. È importante notare che la neurastenia è molto simile all’elettroipersensibilità, il termine più moderno per lo stesso disturbo di sensibilità all’elettricità. Circa la metà dei telegrafisti impiegati per manipolare l’elettricità inviata attraverso le linee, e quindi esposti a campi elettromagnetici molto forti, erano affetti dalla malattia telegrafica. Nuovamente, i sintomi erano gli stessi dell’EHS. Più tardi, intorno al 1915, gli operatori telefonici cominciarono a vivere gli stessi sintomi, perché erano esposti per ore ai campi elettromagnetici dei sistemi di comunicazione. Nel 1989, si rilevò che a Winnipeg il 47% degli operatori telefonici soffrivano degli stessi sintomi. Ma nel 1894 il famoso psichiatria viennese Sigmund Freud scrisse un articolo il cui effetto fu disastroso per tutti gli sfortunati che soffrivano della malattia telegrafica, la neurastenia, la sindrome delle microonde o EHS. Piuttosto di riconoscere la causa esterna – che era l’inquinamento elettromagnetico – attribuì questi sintomi a pensieri disordinati e ad emozioni mal controllate. Il risultato è stato che oggi milioni di cittadini affetti dallo smog elettromagnetico vengono curati con medicine invece di ridurre la loro esposizione a questo inquinante. Sigmund Freud rinominò la neurastenia – che era risaputo essere causata dall’elettricità – in ansia neurotica, attacco di ansia o attacco di panico. Questo permise alla sconsiderata elettrificazione di continuare senza intoppi. Va notato il fatto che in Russia la neurastenia è catalogata come malattia ambientale, perché la ridefinizione dannosa di Freud fu rigettata. Il comportamento delle piante Sir Jagadis Chunder Bose e altri ricercatori condussero numerosi esperimenti elettrici su piante ed altri organismi viventi, i cui risultati mostravano effetti chiari. Scoprì che i nervi di piante ed animali mostrano comportamenti variabili e che la loro resistività può variare considerevolmente, a seconda dell’applicazione della corrente e della sua polarità. Notò pure che l’intensità di corrente necessaria per modificare la conduttività dei nervi è infinitesimale in termini di voltaggi applicati – nell’ordine di 0.3 microampère (0.3 x 10-6). Questa corrente è significativamente inferiore alla corrente indotta tramite una conversazione telefonica mentre si usa un telefono cellulare. Bose scoprì anche che la soglia dell’attività biologica di una corrente e di 1 femtoampère (1 x 10-15)! Visto che era anche pratico di trasmissioni radio, fece esperimenti in cui una pianta veniva esposta ad un segnale radio di 30 MHz ad una distanza di circa 200 metri, e scoprì che la crescita della pianta veniva ritardata durante il tempo di emissione. Mostrò inoltre che la circolazione della linfa della pianta rallentava quando questa veniva irradiata dallo stesso segnale radio. Malattia elettrica acuta Durante gli anni 1880, Londra era rifornita con corrente continua, ma alcuni fisici avevano scoperto che la distribuzione di corrente alternata generava minore perdita Ohmica nei fili. Ne seguì la guerra delle correnti malgrado il fatto che molti scienziati, tra cui Edison, criticavano fortemente gli effetti pericolosi della corrente alternata. Ironicamente è proprio il fatto che la corrente alternata è più pericolosa che ha fatto sì che venga utilizzata nella sedia elettrica. E, come tutti sappiamo, la corrente elettrica nella rete di distribuzione è … alternata! Nel 1889 gli Stati Uniti vissero il processo di elettrificazione in grande scala e, poco dopo, ciò avvenne in Europa. Quello stesso anno, quasi per caso, i dottori subirono un’inondazione di casi di influenza che, fino ad allora, erano stati solo poco frequenti. I sintomi delle vittime erano di natura neurologica, simili alla neurastenia, e non includevano disturbi di respirazione. La pandemia durò 4 anni e uccise almeno un milione di persone. Nel 2001, l’astronomo canadese Ken Tapping mostrò che le pandemie di influenza negli ultimi 3 secoli erano correlate con i picchi dell’attività magnetica solare in un ciclo di 11 anni. È stato pure scoperto che alcune ondate di influenza si diffusero su ampie aree in pochi giorni – un fatto difficilmente spiegabile tramite contagio da una persona ad un’altra. Inoltre, numerosi esperimenti che tentarono di provare il contagio diretto tramite contatto, gocce di muco ed altri processi si sono dimostrati infruttuosi. Dal 1933 ad oggi i virologi non sono stati in grado di presentare alcuna prova sperimentale che l’influenza si diffonda tramite il contatto ordinario tra le persone. Tutti i tentativi di fare ciò sono falliti. Il mistero dell’isola di Wight Nel 1904 le api cominciarono a morire sull’isola di Wight (Inghilterra n.d.T.) in conseguenza all’istallazione di trasmettitori radio da parte di Marconi. Questi trasmettitori lavorano con frequenze vicine ai megahertz. Dall’altra parte del Canale della Manica, Jacques-Arsène d’Arsonval mostrò che i segnali elettromagnetici “acuti e uncinati” sono molto più tossici dei segnali sinusoidali. La verità era che dopo un anno e mezzo di sperimentazioni con trasmettitori radio, Marconi, all’età di 22 anni e in piena salute, cominciò a sviluppare delle febbri. Questi attacchi continuarono per il resto della sua vita. Nel 1904, mentre lavorava per costruire un trasmettitore sufficientemente potente per la comunicazione transatlantica, queste febbri divennero così intense che si pensava fossero malaria. Nel 1905 sposò Beatrice O’Brien e dopo la loro luna di miele, si sistemarono sull’isola vicino al trasmettitore. Non appena Beatrice si trasferì sull’isola, cominciò ad avere l’acufene. Dopo 3 mesi si ammalò gravemente di itterizia. Dovette tornare a Londra per partorire un bambino che visse solo alcune settimane e morì per “cause sconosciute”. Durante lo stesso periodo, Marconi soffrì per parecchi mesi di febbre e delirio. Tra il 1918 ed il 1921 soffrì di depressione suicida mentre lavorava ad un trasmettitore a onde corte. Nel 1927, mentre era in luna di miele del suo secondo matrimonio, collassò a causa di dolore al petto e gli furono diagnosticati seri disturbi cardiaci. Tra il 1934 ed il 1937, mentre sviluppava la tecnologia a microonde, ebbe 9 infarti. L’ultimo lo uccise all’età di 63 anni. Sulla stessa isola, a Osborne House, la Regina Vittoria soffrì di emorragia cerebrale e morì la sera del 22 gennaio 1901, proprio mentre Marconi istallava un nuovo trasmettitore a meno di 13 miglia di distanza. Nel 1901 c’erano “solo” 2 trasmettitori, mentre nel 1904 ce n’erano 4, rendendo l’isola il luogo più irradiato del pianeta, e causando la morte di tutte le api. Nel 1906 una indagine mostrò che il 90% delle api erano scomparse senza una ragione apparente. Vennero portate sull’isola nuove colonie, ma anche queste perirono entro una settimana. Questa epidemia si diffuse in tutta l’Inghilterra e poi in tutto il mondo occidentale, per poi stabilizzarsi gradualmente, finché gli eserciti si equipaggiarono con vari trasmettitori radio ad alta potenza verso la fine della Prima Guerra Mondiale – scatenando (come abbiamo visto) la pandemia dell’Influenza spagnola nel 1918 che cominciò in realtà negli Stati Uniti, alla scuola Naval Radio School di Cambridge, Massachusetts, con 400 casi iniziali. Questa epidemia si diffuse rapidamente a 1’127 soldati a Funston Camp (Kansas) dove erano stato installate connessioni wireless. Ciò che incuriosiva i dottori era che mentre il 15% della popolazione civile soffriva di sangue dal naso, tra i soldati della Navy era il 40%. C’erano anche altri tipi di emorragie, e in un terzo di coloro che morirono furono constatate emorragie nei polmoni e nel cervello. Di fatto era cambiata la composizione del sangue, con tempi di coagulazione misurati in più del doppio del normale. Questi sintomi sono incompatibili con gli effetti dei virus dell’influenza respiratoria, ma totalmente allineati con i devastanti effetti dell’elettricità. Un’altra incongruenza era che due terzi delle vittime erano giovani in salute. Un’ulteriore sintomo atipico per un’influenza era che il battito cardiaco rallentava a livelli tra 36 e 48, un sintomo comune nell’esposizione a campi elettromagnetici. Inoltre era possibile curare con successo alcuni malati con dosi massicce di calcio. Il medico militare Dr. George A. Soper testimoniò che il virus si diffondeva più rapidamente del movimento delle persone. Vennero fatti vari esperimenti nel tentativo di infettare persone sia tramite contatto diretto che tramite inoculazione di muco e sangue – ma gli sperimentatori non furono in grado di dimostrare alcune infezione tramite questi metodi. Si può vedere come ogni nuova pandemia di influenza corrisponda ad un nuovo avanzamento nella tecnologia elettrica, come per esempio per l’influenza asiatica del 1957-58, che si manifestò in conseguenza di un potente sistema di sorveglianza radar, e l’epidemia dell’influenza di Honk Kong nel luglio 1968, che seguì la messa in funzione di 28 satelliti militari per la sorveglianza dello spazio all’altezza delle fasce di Van Allen, che ci proteggono dalla radiazione cosmica. L’involucro elettrico della terra Con un nucleo che si compone principalmente di ferro, la terra ruotante è protetta dalla ionosfera, poi la plasmasfera – delimitata dalle fasce di Van Allen ad un altitudine tra i 1’000 ed i 55’000 km – e dalla sua coda: la magnetosfera, che è esposta ai venti solari che originano nel nostro sole e costituiscono una sorta di dinamo, un sistema elettrico complesso. Gli scambi di elettricità tra la crosta terrestre, l’atmosfera e anche la ionosfera sono permanenti e costanti. Si trovano in un equilibrio delicato, ed una sorta di “respirazione” elettrica di tutto il sistema ha permesso alla vita di svilupparsi sul nostro pianeta, che è caricato con ioni negativi ed equilibrato dalla ionosfera che è carica positivamente. È possibile misurare un campo elettrico medio dell’ordine di 130 volt per metro con valori che possono salire fino a 4’000 volt al metro durante una tempesta. Nel 1953 fu scoperto uno dei parametri principali dell’oscillazione elettrica del nostro ambiente nella forma delle frequenze di (Winfried) Schumann, che “respirano” a 7.83 Hertz, con armoniche a 14, 20, 26, 32 Hz, chiamate frequenze molto basse (Very Low frequencies – VLF). Non c’è da stupirsi che gli organismi che vivono in questo ambiente sono permeati da questi valori fisici e che, per esempio, i ritmi del nostro cervello si trovano in queste bande frequenziali – come le onde Alfa che si trovano tra gli 8 ed i 13 Hz. Gli uomini percepiscono le frequenze visibili – tra il blu ed il rosso – dello spettro elettromagnetico, ma alcuni animali sono capaci di vedere altre frequenze elettromagnetiche – come le api, che possono vedere le frequenze ultraviolette, o le salamandre e i pesci gatto che possono vedere frequenze elettriche basse, mentre i serpenti possono vedere l’infrarosso. Esperimenti di laboratorio su criceti, per esempio, hanno mostrato che ridurre la temperatura e accorciare la durata della luce diurna non era sufficiente per farli andare in letargo. In maniera analoga, criceti cresciuti in gabbie di Faraday si rifiutavano di andare in letargo, anche se i parametri di luce e temperatura corrispondevano a quelli dell’inverno, finché la protezione non veniva rimossa. Vennero fatti altri esperimenti, come quelli fatti all’istituto Max Planck nel 1967 dal fisiologo Rütger Wever, che utilizzava due stanze interrate senza finestre o altri contatti esterni – una schermata da campi elettromagnetici naturali, l’altro no. Venne mostrato come nella stanza schermata, i ritmi circadiani dei volontari si desincronizzavano e potevano variare tra le 12 e le 65 ore, accompagnati da disturbi metabolici, mentre i soggetti nella camera immersa nel campo terrestre mantenevano un ritmo coerente di circa 24 ore ed il loro metabolismo continuava a funzionare in modo più normale. È stato dimostrato scientificamente che un organismo vivente ha bisogno di essere immerso nel sistema elettromagnetico del nostro ambiente naturale per funzionare correttamente. Inoltre, l’agopuntura, il metodo antico utilizzato nella medicina tradizionale cinese, funziona utilizzando le nostre proprietà elettriche e modificando il flusso energetico dei meridiani. Si sa da un po’ di tempo (dagli anni 1950) che questi meridiani corrispondono a circuiti elettrici e che il Chi (Qi) cinese corrisponde al concetto di elettricità. Questi meridiani hanno due funzioni: non solo trasportano informazione ed energia da un organo interno del corpo all’altro, ma fungono anche da antenne che rilevano i flussi dell’energia elettromagnetica ambientale. All’inizio degli anni 1970, fisici atmosferici scoprirono che il campo magnetico terrestre era significativamente disturbato dall’attività elettrica umana. Inviando un segnale nello spazio e catturando il suo eco, fu scoperto che il segnale iniziale era di fatto stato modificato da multipli dei 60 Hz della rete elettrica utilizzata in nord America. Malgrado ciò, questa scoperta non impedì la realizzazione del progetto HAARP, atto a modificare deliberatamente le proprietà elettromagnetiche del nostro pianeta. In maniera simile, le fasce di Van Allen che ci proteggono dai raggi cosmici sono già state modificate dalla nostra attività elettrica – e potrebbe essere che queste doppie fasce originariamente fossero una fascia singola la quale, sotto l’influenza delle emissioni umane di cariche elettriche nello spazio, sia stata distrutta nel suo centro. Osservazioni satellitari mostrano che la radiazione emessa dalle linee di alta tensione spesso ha l’effetto di sopprimere la radiazione naturale dei fulmini. Alla luce di questi fatti è logico concludere che le pandemie di influenza nei recenti decenni sono collegate all’attività elettrica umana. Le porfirine e la base della vita Qualsiasi trasformazione di energia nel dominio della biologia implica le porfirine (pigmenti composti da quattro molecole di pirrolo). Il fatto che i nostri nervi sono in grado di funzionare in modo adeguato è grazie alle porfirine che giocano un ruolo nei processi cellulari. Sono molecole speciali che fungono da interfaccia tra l’ossigeno e la vita. Queste molecole sono altamente reattive e interagiscono con metalli tossici o elementi sintetici derivati dal petrolio, e con campi elettromagnetici i quali, quando sono in eccesso, causano porfiria, che è piuttosto una sensibilità ambientale che non una malattia. Le ricerche del dottor William E. Morton mostrarono che il 90% delle persone con sensibilità chimica multipla (MCS) hanno deficienza in uno o l’altro tipo di enzimi di porfirina, come pure le persone elettroipersensibili – il che significa che le due forme di sensibilità sono solo diverse manifestazioni, ma hanno la stessa causa. La porfiria, che fu scoperta nel 1891, affligge circa il 10% della popolazione ed apparve nello stesso periodo in cui avvenne l’elettrificazione generale del mondo occidentale a partire dal 1889. Le porfirine hanno un ruolo centrale negli effetti dell’elettrosmog perché non solo causano EHS, MCS o porfiria, ma sono responsabili anche delle malattie cardiovascolari, del cancro, del diabete, come pure in una moltitudine di processi energetici biologici. Negli anni 1960, i biologi Allan Frey e Wlodzimierz Sedlak mostrarono che il nostro organismo ha senza dubbio una componente bioelettronica, e che alcune delle nostre cellule talvolta si comportano come conduttori o condensatori o semi-conduttori (transistor), come i componenti che si trovano negli apparecchi elettronici. Questo è il caso con la mielina – la guaina che ricopre i nervi – che contiene porfirina legata a zinco. Se veleni ambientali come prodotti chimici o metalli tossici colpiscono questo equilibrio, la guaina mielinica viene danneggiata alterando l’eccitabilità dei nervi che racchiude. L’intero sistema nervoso diviene quindi iper-reattivo a stimoli di ogni genere, quali i campi elettromagnetici. Il sistema entra in uno stato di instabilità divergente, l’effetto diviene la causa. Contrariamente alla visione che considera i mitocondri quali elementi della cellula che producono energia, il concetto della guaina mielinica quale mitocondrio gigante sta iniziando ad acquistare credito. La connessione tra porfiria e zinco è stata scoperta negli anni 1950 da Henry Peters della Wisconsin Medical School. I pazienti che soffrivano di porfiria e con sintomi neurologici espellevano grandi quantità di zinco nelle urine, fatto che lo condusse all’idea che la chelazione dello zinco potesse migliorare le loro condizioni. Riuscì effettivamente ad osservare dei miglioramenti, malgrado la diffusa credenza che la deficienza da zinco fosse in relazione a disturbi specifici. In modo analogo, alcuni esperimento hanno mostrato che la chelazione dello zinco migliora il morbo di Alzheimer. Un team di medici australiani ha dimostrato in autopsie che il cervello dei pazienti con il morbo di Alzheimer contenevano 2 volte la quantità di zinco rispetto a quello di persone sane. Seconda parte …fino al giorno d’oggi Cuore irritabile Nel 1980 l’arresto cardiaco in giovani atleti era una cosa rara, con solo 9 casi all’anno. Da allora, i casi sono costantemente aumentati del 10% all’anno fino al 1996, quando la crescita è raddoppiata con 64 casi, salendo ulteriormente a 66 l’anno seguente e a 76 nell’ultimo anno dello studio. La comunità medica americana non riuscì a trovare alcuna spiegazione per questo, mentre in Europa nel 2002 medici tedeschi lanciarono un appello chiedendo una moratoria sulle antenne e sui ripetitori dei cellulari, perché le onde che emettevano causavano disturbi cardiovascolari. Era l’Appello di Freiburg. Il dottor Samuel Milham, un epidemiologo al Washington State Department of Health, mostrò col suo lavoro che le malattie cardiovascolari, il diabete ed il cancro sono principalmente, se non completamente causati dall’elettricità. Paradossalmente, studi sul colesterolo fatti all’inizio del ventesimo secolo non mostravano che livelli alti di colesterolo fossero correlati con un maggior rischio di malattie al cuore – contrariamente a quanto viene oggi considerato un fatto. Uno studio sugli animali dello Zoo di Filadelfia mostrò come tra il 1916 ed il 1964 i livelli di colesterolo nei mammiferi e negli uccelli crebbe di un fattore tra 10 e 20 volte anche se la loro dieta era rimasta completamente invariata! L’unico parametro che era cambiato drammaticamente era l’aumento delle frequenze radio. Durante la Seconda Guerra Mondiale, una certa quantità di soldati cominciarono a lamentare sintomi simili a quelli della neurastenia. Inizialmente si credette, in accordo con la dottrina di Freud, che questi soldati soffrissero di problemi di ansia; ma uno studio di 144 casi fa condotto dal dottor Mandel Cohen. Lo studio rivelò che i soldati erano di fatto fisiologicamente meno resistenti e soffrivano di cuore irritabile. Avevano difficoltà ad assimilare ossigeno e dovevano respirare due volte più rapidamente dei loro compagni in migliori condizioni di salute per assorbire sufficiente ossigeno. Emerse che i loro mitocondri non funzionavano in modo efficiente. Alla fine lo studio mostrò che questi soldati erano ipersensibili in senso generale, ma in particolar modo all’elettricità. A partire dal 1950 scienziati nell’Unione Sovietica osservarono che le frequenze radio alteravano gli elettrocardiogrammi di individui che vi erano esposti, e modificavano l’efficienza dei mitocondri. Grafici che mostrano le statistiche dei tassi di mortalità a causa di malattie del cuore in relazione al grado di elettrificazione degli stati americani tra il 1931 ed il 1940 sono molto espliciti e non lasciano dubbi sulla tossicità dei campi elettromagnetici per il cuore, esonerando in questo il colesterolo e le diete considerate troppo ricche di grassi. La trasformazione del diabete A Thomas Edison, che era coinvolto in scoperte relative alla tecnologia elettrica e quindi era molto più esposto a campi elettromagnetici dei suoi contemporanei, venne diagnosticato il diabete – una malattia rara nel 1889. Un altro ricercatore, Alexander Graham Bell, che lavorava nel campo delle telegrafia e inventò il telefono, era risaputo lamentarsi costantemente dei sintomi della neurastenia, conosciuta oggi come EHS. Nel 1915 anche a lui venne diagnosticato il diabete. Nel 1876 il libro Disease of Modern Life (Malattie della vita moderna) di Ward Richardson descrive il diabete come una rara malattia moderna causata dall’esaurimento mentale a causa del troppo lavoro o a causa di uno shock al sistema nervoso. L’eccessiva assunzione di zuccheri tossici che creano dipendenza nella nostra dieta moderna naturalmente fornisce una spiegazione conveniente del perché il diabete, incluso il pre-diabete, interessa più della metà degli americani oggi. Ma questa spiegazione è troppo semplicistica. Il dottor Even Joslin mostrò che tra il 1900 ed il 1917 l’assunzione di zuccheri era aumentata del 17% mentre la mortalità da diabete era raddoppiata. Più tardi, nel 1987, uno studio sui nativi americani mostrò tassi di mortalità da diabete molto diversi, a seconda del territorio, e che andavano dal 7 per mille nel nord-ovest fino a 380 per mille in Arizona! Durante quegli anni, né lo stile di vita come neppure la dieta potevano spiegare una tale divergenza. Un fattore ambientale però può spiegare questa differenza: l’elettrificazione delle riserve dei nativi americani procedeva a velocità diversa, e quelle del nord-ovest erano solo state elettrificate molto più avanti. In contrasto, la riserva dell’Arizona si trova nelle immediate vicinanze di Phoenix. Inoltre, questa comunità di nativi americani aveva il suo proprio impianto di generazione di elettricità ed il suo proprio sistema di telecomunicazione. Un altro esempio è la popolazione del Brasile – uno dei principali produttori di zucchero per secoli, dove il diabete era ancora sconosciuto nel 1870, quando era già emerso come malattia della civilizzazione in nord America. Pure oggi, i brasiliani consumano 70 kg di zucchero raffinato all’anno a persona, di più dei nord-americani: malgrado ciò, hanno ancora due volte e mezzo meno casi di diabete che gli USA. In Bhutan il diabete era virtualmente inesistente fino al 2002, data dopo la quale è iniziata l’elettrificazione del paese. Nel 2004, furono annunciati 634 nuovi casi di diabete, nel 2005 – 944, nel 2006 – 1’470 e nel 2007 – 2’540 con 15 morti. Nel 2012 ci furono 91 morti ed il diabete era l’ottava causa di morte nel paese, anche se la dieta della gente non era cambiata! Come abbiamo visto nel capitolo precedente, l’elettrosmog quando agisce sui mitocondri previene l’efficiente utilizzo degli zuccheri assorbiti, cioè la combustione dello zucchero. Lo zucchero che non può essere convertito in energia meccanica viene accumulato come grasso dal corpo. Grafici statistici per i tassi di mortalità del diabete, valutati sulla base del grado di elettrificazione degli stati americani tra il 1931 ed il 1940 sono anche molto espliciti e non lasciano dubbi sul ruolo dei campi elettromagnetici nell’apparizione del diabete su larga scala, parzialmente esonerando in questo modo il consumo di zuccheri. Nel 1997 c’è stato un aumento del 31% nel numero di casi di diabete negli Stati Uniti in un singolo anno, che coincide precisamente con l’introduzione di massa dei telefoni cellulari nel paese. Il cancro e il deficit della vita Nel febbraio 2011 la Corte Suprema d’Italia ha accusato il cardinale Roberto Tucci, presidente uscente di Radio Vaticano, di avere creato un disturbo pubblico inquinando l’ambiente con frequenze radio per negligenza. Infatti, nel periodo dal 1997 al 2003 i bambini che vivevano entro 12 km di raggio dalle antenne della radio avevano tassi di leucemia, di linfoma e di mieloma otto volte più alti di coloro che vivevano più lontano. Lo stesso valeva per gli adulti, con tassi 7 volte più alti. Il dottore e professore tedesco Otto Heinrich Warburg, vincitore del Premio Nobel per la medicina nel 1931, mostrò che il cancro è una regressione delle cellule private di ossigeno, fatto che le porta a moltiplicarsi in modo anarchico, come in un mondo primordiale dove l’ossigeno non era presente ai livelli di oggi. La privazione iniziale di ossigeno è dovuta ad una disfunzione dei mitocondri – fatto che, come abbiamo visto, può essere causato da campi elettromagnetici ed altri inquinanti quali il fumo, i pesticidi, gli additivi alimentari e l’inquinamento dell’aria. Lo stesso principio di deficienza di ossigeno nelle cellule si applica al diabete, ragione per la quale vi è un tasso di cancro maggiore tra i diabetici che nel resto della popolazione. Nello Zoo di Filadelfia, tra il 1901 ed il 1955, si osservò un aumento dei tassi di tumori maligni tra i mammiferi. Questi variavano tra il doppio e 22 volte di più durante quel lasso di tempo. Le statistiche di morti per cancro mostrano una chiara correlazione tra l’elettrificazione delle nazioni ed i tassi di cancro. Per esempio, negli USA il tasso era 6.6 per mille dal 1841 al 1850. In seguito è più che raddoppiato tra il 1851 ed il 1860, con un tasso di 14 per mille. La vera spiegazione di ciò può essere trovata con la diffusione di massa del telegrafo nel 1854. Nel 1914 c’erano 2 casi di morti per cancro nella popolazione di 63’000 nativi americani che vivevano nelle riserve non elettrificate, mentre nel resto del paese la mortalità per cancro era 25 volte maggiore. Tra il 1920 ed il 1921, in seguito all’introduzione delle prime stazioni radio AM, la mortalità per cancro crebbe tra il 3 ed il 10% nei paesi occidentali. I ricercatori svedesi Olle Johansson e Orjan Hallberg hanno mostrato una chiara correlazione tra i tassi di cancro al seno, alla prostata ed ai polmoni e l’esposizione della popolazione alle frequenze radio. Mostrano significativi incrementi nei tassi negli anni 1920, 1955, 1969 ed una diminuzione (!) nel 1978, date che corrispondono rispettivamente all’aumento dell’elettrosmog dovuto all’introduzione delle radio AM, della radio FM e TV1, l’arrivo del colore con TV2, e poi l’interruzione delle trasmissioni AM. Gli stessi ricercatori hanno anche trovato una chiara correlazione lineare tra il numero di trasmettitori FM in ogni regione e l’incidenza di melanomi, con le zone più esposte che hanno 11 volte più melanomi rispetto alle “zone bianche”. Scoprirono anche che i melanomi appaiono raramente in quelle parti del corpo più esposte al sole, come la fronte, il naso, le spalle ed i piedi, ma più spesso in quelle aree del corpo normalmente protette dal sole. Inoltre, la proliferazione del cancro alla pelle avvenne prima dell’introduzione della moda delle vacanze al mare, durante le quali l’esposizione al sole è intensa. Questo mostra che i melanomi non sono causati principalmente dal sole, ma dalle frequenze radio. I grafici statistici dei tassi di mortalità per cancro come pure per diabete e malattie cardiovascolari, analizzati in base al grado di elettrificazione degli stati americani nel 1931 e nel 1940 sono anche molto espliciti e non lasciano alcun dubbio che i campi elettromagnetici hanno avuto un ruolo nell’aumento dei casi di cancro. Dati genuini sui tumori al cervello sono difficili da trovare perché le lobby dei telefoni cellulari hanno infiltrato questo campo per decenni onde fornire studi tendenziosi. Uno dei loro studi mostra addirittura una diminuzione dell’incidenza di tumori in relazione all’utilizzo intensivo dei telefoni cellulari! Ma l’università di Calgary ha trovate evidenze di un aumento del 30% nell’incidenza di tumori maligni del cervello nel periodo tra il 2012 ed il 2013, e Lennart Hardell, professore di oncologia all’ospedale universitario di Örebro in Svezia ha dimostrato che 2’000 ore di utilizzo del telefono cellulare aumentano il rischio di sviluppare un tumore di un fattore tra 3 e 8, a seconda dell’età del soggetto e delle sue abitudini di uso del telefono. Nel 2000, Neil Cherry analizzò i tassi infantili di cancro a San Francisco in relazione alla distanza tra la casa dei bambini ed i trasmettitori FM e televisivi sulla Sutro Tower. I bambini che vivevano su colline e sui promontori erano più colpiti. Quelli che vivevano entro 1 km dall’antenna avevano un incidenza di leucemia 9 volte maggiore, un’incidenza di linfoma 15 volte maggiore ed un’incidenza di cancro al cervello 31 volte maggiore. In generale, un’incidenza 18 volte maggiore di coloro che vivevano al di fuori di 1 km di raggio dall’antenna. Animazione sospesa A practical Treatise on Nervous Exhaustion (Un Trattato pratico sull’esaurimento nervoso) (1880) di George Miller Beard, elettroterapista e amico di Thomas Edison, contiene un’osservazione interessante: Anche se queste difficoltà non sono direttamente fatali, e quindi non appaiono nelle tavole di mortalità; anche se, al contrario, possono tendere a prolungare la vita ed a proteggere il sistema contro malattie febbrili e infiammatorie, cionondimeno il grado di sofferenza che causano è enorme. Quelli che soffrono di più sono relativamente giovani. Inoltre, Beard notò che una rara malattia sembrava apparire con maggiore frequenza nei malati di neurastenia che nel resto della popolazione: la malattia era il diabete. Beard aveva già osservato che l’aumento nell’aspettativa di vita non procedeva a pari passo con la qualità di vita. La correlazione misteriosa tra le sofferenze delle persone neurasteniche – i cui sintomi erano gli stessi di coloro che oggi sono elettroipersensibili – ed il prolungamento della loro vita indicava una disfunzione grave. In aggiunta, si è osservato da lungo tempo che uno stile di vita ascetico con una dieta povera in calorie può aumentare l’aspettativa di vita e la salute. Questo è il caso, per esempio, per la popolazione di Okinawa, dove il numero di centenari è 40 volte maggiore di quello delle popolazioni di prefetture più benestanti più a nord. Ricercatori nel campo dell’invecchiamento hanno messo in evidenza che la forza che traina e sostiene le nostre vite è il sistema di trasporto di elettroni nei mitocondri delle nostre cellule. È qui che l’aria che respiriamo ed il cibo che mangiamo vengono combinati, ad una velocità che determina la nostra velocità di invecchiamento e quindi la nostra aspettativa di vita. Se da un canto il risultato di rallentare il processo di combustione all’interno delle nostre cellule moderando la quantità di energia fornita può essere benefico, un altro modo di rallentarlo può essere disastroso. Questo è l’avvelenamento della catena elettronica di trasporto. Un possibile modo di essere avvelenata è l’esposizione cronica a campi elettromagnetici artificiali. Quest’inquinamento costantemente in aumento sottopone gli elettroni dei nostri mitocondri a forze esterne, rallentandoli, privando le nostre cellule di ossigeno e causando sintomi di EHS. Intendi dire che puoi udire l’elettricità? Nel 1962 una donna contattò l’università di Santa Barbara (CA, USA) chiedendo aiuto per trovare la causa di un suono misterioso che udiva ovunque in casa, anche se viveva in un quartiere residenziale tranquillo. Questo suono la teneva sveglia ed era deleterio per la sua salute. Misurazioni mostrarono che i conduttori elettrici emettevano forti campi elettromagnetici, non solo dalla rete pubblica ma anche da radiatori ed altri elementi metallici, ma lo stetoscopio non rilevava alcun suono. Gli ingegneri fecero quindi un esperimento, registrarono il campo misurato su una cassetta e la riprodussero in presenza della donna che aveva il problema. Essa confermò che era il suono che lei udiva. Quindi, questa donna era in grado di udire i campi elettromagnetici nella sua casa. Vennero istallati sistemi di messa a terra e filtri elettronici per ridurre il disturbo a livelli accettabili. Ma già Volta ed altri ricercatori avevano fatto esperimenti in cui erano riusciti a produrre con successo diversi suoni applicando voltaggi alle orecchie. Molto più tardi, alla fine degli anni 1960, il biologo Allan Frey pubblicò degli articoli sulla capacità di alcuni soggetti di udire le emissioni di un’installazione radar. Il modello meccanico del funzionamento dell’orecchio come viene insegnato nelle scuole non fornisce alcuna spiegazione per questi fenomeni osservati. Dopo aver constatato ciò, il biochimico Lionel Naftalin sviluppò un nuovo modello di funzionamento dell’orecchio umano, prendendo in considerazione il noto fenomeno della piezo-elettricità (una forza utilizzata dagli elettrotecnici), che scoprì esistere nel gel che ricopre le ciglia dell’orecchio interno. In questo gel, che non si trova in alcun altro luogo nel corpo umano e che possiede proprietà elettriche particolari, era presente un voltaggio tra 100 e 120 millivolt, valori considerati alti nell’ambito della bioelettronica. Questo gel piezo-elettrico trasforma le onde sonore in un segnale elettrico che viene comunicato alle ciglia dell’orecchio interno. Questo nuovo modello revisionato del funzionamento dell’orecchio umano non solo spiega la capacità di certe persone di udire un segnale elettromagnetico in certe condizioni, ma anche perché al giorno d’oggi così tante persone soffrono di acufene, e perché certi gruppi di persone, tra il 2 e l’11% della popolazione mondiale, sentono un brusio globale intorno al pianeta. Al giorno d’oggi circa il 44% degli americani adulti soffre di acufene a vari livelli di intensità, mentre in Svezia il numero di giovani affetti era il 12% nel 1997 ed il 42% nel 2006. Questi suoni parassiti sono in gran parte il risultato di vivere in un ambiente che è pesantemente inquinato con tutti i tipi di campi elettromagnetici artificiali. Api, uccelli, alberi e umani Alfonso Balmori Marinez, un biologo spagnolo, ha creato una correlazione tra la densità di popolazione dei passeri e le radiazioni di radiofrequenze nel loro habitat. I passeri non possono sopravvivere nei luoghi più irradiati, dove i livelli eccedono i 3 V/m, mentre ci sono ancora 42 uccelli per ettaro a livelli di 0.1 V/m. Ha anche osservato un marcato cambiamento di comportamento nelle cicogne, in cui coppie di cicogne litigano invece di costruire il nido o incubare le uovo se si trovano a meno di 200 m da un ripetitore del cellulare. Il Regno Unito ha classificato il passero comune come specie a rischio dopo che la popolazione è calata del 75% tra il 1994 ed il 2002 – un periodo che coincide con la diffusione della tecnologia cellulare. Gli allevatori di piccioni viaggiatori su diversi continenti hanno scoperto che, una volta rilasciati, il 90% dei piccioni non sono più in grado di tornare alla loro piccionaia, quando questo valore dovrebbe normalmente essere molto piccolo. Nel 2000, allevatori inglesi tentarono di ridirigere una razza in modo che evitasse i ripetitori del cellulare e avere in questo modo una maggiore possibilità di tornare a casa. Nel 2004 quegli stessi allevatori promossero maggiore ricerca sull’impatto delle microonde sui piccioni. Nel 2002, il US National Park Service emesse una nota per i biologi che studiavano il comportamento degli animali selvaggi, spiegando che i chip RFID attaccati a quegli animali per seguirne gli spostamenti tramite l’utilizzo di frequenze radio possono radicalmente alterare il comportamento a causa delle frequenze radio generate. In ambienti inquinati con campi elettromagnetici, i tordi non riescono a trovare le vie di migrazione – mentre se si trovano in una gabbia di Faraday ci riescono. Un esperimento sui girini messi in due vasche separate posizionate entro 140 m da un ripetitore del cellulare, una senza e l’altra con schermo elettromagnetico, mostra tassi di mortalità del 90% e del 4% rispettivamente. Lo stesso tipo di effetti nocivi si riscontrano negli insetti quando vengono esposti all’elettrosmog che incontriamo giornalmente, ed il dottor Panagopoulous, che ha condotto esperimenti sulla mosca della frutta, riporta che l’esposizione a microonde a livelli ordinari – anche solo per alcuni minuti al giorno per alcuni giorni – è la peggiore fonte di stress conosciuta nella nostra vita, peggiore delle sostanze chimiche o dei campi elettromagnetici a basse frequenze. Anche le api hanno subìto un impatto negativo, come abbiamo visto sull’Isola di Wight all’inizio di questa sintesi. Il Dr. Daniel Favre (Svizzera) ha dimostrato che in presenza di microonde, le api emettono il suono tipicamente sentito quando sciamano, il che suggerisce che gli insetti vogliono sfuggire alla fonte di emissione. L’acaro della varroa è generalmente incolpato della sindrome del collasso delle colonie; tuttavia, dimentichiamo che questo acaro convive con le api da molto tempo. Inoltre, si può spesso osservare che oggi anche una colonia morta non è infestata da parassiti, anche se questo era il caso “prima”. La colpa è anche dei pesticidi – eppure, come abbiamo visto, il 90% delle api sull’Isola di Wight è scomparso senza che in quella zona siano stati usati pesticidi. La vera causa del collasso delle colonie si trova nei campi elettromagnetici generati dall’uomo, in particolare nella tecnologia dei telefoni cellulari. Negli anni ’80 è emersa una questione scottante: la morte delle foreste. La colpa è stata attribuita alle piogge acide, ma anche le zone più remote con l’aria più pulita sono state colpite in egual misura. In Germania e in Svizzera sono state condotte ricerche e, sebbene il suolo delle foreste colpite si sia rivelato effettivamente acido, l’osservazione e la sperimentazione hanno dimostrato che tale acidità poteva essere anche il risultato della lenta elettrolisi del suolo attraverso gli alberi esposti alle onde radar, ad esempio. Inoltre, gli alberi sui crinali sono stati colpiti più gravemente, essendo più esposti ai nuovi radar installati negli anni Settanta. Un’altra osservazione è stata fatta al momento della caduta del Muro di Berlino. I giganteschi radar russi di Skruda, che irradiavano pesantemente l’intera regione nel loro compito di monitoraggio dell’Occidente, non solo avevano causato danni alla foresta, ma anche agli animali e agli esseri umani. Dopo numerosi studi, si è scoperto che gli anelli di crescita degli alberi durante gli anni in cui i radar erano in funzione erano molto più piccoli di quelli di prima o dopo quel periodo. A Schwarzenburg, in Svizzera, nel 1939 fu installata un’antenna radio a onde corte e la potenza di trasmissione fu successivamente aumentata a 450 kW nel 1954. A ciò seguì un deterioramento della salute della popolazione locale, che lamentava sintomi di EHS. I bambini del villaggio avevano difficoltà a scuola e sembravano incapaci di passare all’istruzione superiore, a differenza dei bambini dei villaggi vicini meno esposti. Infine, nel 1992, è stato condotto uno studio che ha confermato che, in un raggio di 900 metri dall’antenna, i parametri di analisi fisiologica delle persone e degli animali del luogo erano anomali. Si è anche scoperto che gli anelli di crescita degli alberi erano compressi – ma solo sul lato rivolto verso la fonte di radiazione. Il 28 marzo 1998, il trasmettitore è stato spento ed è stato effettuato uno studio “prima e dopo”, che ha dimostrato che i livelli di melatonina dei 58 soggetti testati erano di nuovo aumentati. Un abitante del villaggio di 50 anni fu finalmente in grado di dormire per una notte intera senza interruzioni per la prima volta nella sua vita. Il 29 maggio 1996, Philippe Roch, direttore dell’Ufficio per l’ambiente, ha dichiarato che esisteva “una comprovata correlazione tra i disturbi del sonno e le operazioni di comunicazione”. Nel Paese dei ciechi Quanto ancora dobbiamo aspettare prima di poter dire “Il tuo cellulare mi sta uccidendo” piuttosto che “Sono elettroipersensibile”? Eppure il numero di persone che soffrono di mal di testa a causa dell’uso del cellulare è enorme. Nel 2010, due terzi degli studenti universitari ucraini intervistati hanno ammesso che non è socialmente accettabile discutere apertamente di questo problema. Gro Harlem Brundtland aveva l’EHS quando era a capo dell’Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità. Era abbastanza aperta sul fatto, ma è stata costretta a dimettersi dal suo incarico un anno dopo. Questo ha dissuaso altre figure pubbliche di alto rango dal seguire il suo esempio. Solo una minoranza di persone che soffrono di inquinamento elettromagnetico sa di cosa soffre, mentre la grande maggioranza non ne ha idea. L’intera popolazione viene fulminata da remoto e si deve quasi scusare di essere elettrosensibile o, per la precisione, elettroipersensibile, proprio come se ci si dovesse scusare di essere “cianuro-ipersensibile”. La verità è che l’elettricità, così come viene attualmente utilizzata, è tossica. Inoltre, i grafici statistici mostrano chiaramente un aumento del tasso di mortalità degli abitanti di nove città americane poco dopo la messa in funzione delle prime stazioni di base. Questo aumento della mortalità varia dal 25 a oltre l’80%. Un’indagine condotta da un quotidiano, che ha chiesto ai newyorkesi di riferire se avevano iniziato a soffrire di una serie di sintomi di EHS dopo il 15 novembre 1996, ha raccolto centinaia di testimonianze da una vasta gamma di classi razziali e sociali. La data in questione era il giorno in cui è entrata in funzione la prima rete di telefonia mobile. La Cellular Phone Task Force, un’organizzazione fondata da Arthur Firstenberg nel 1996, è sommersa da richieste di aiuto da parte di persone danneggiate da frequenze radio nella gamma delle microonde. Proliferano così tanti emettitori di ogni tipo – da WiFi, WiMAX, stazioni radar e radiazioni emesse nel cielo dai satelliti per telecomunicazioni, che sembra che presto non ci sarà più nessun posto dove fuggire. Il Prof. Olle Johansson del prestigioso Istituto Karolinska, famoso per aver assegnato il premio Nobel per la medicina, dal 1977 si occupa di dimostrare gli effetti dell’elettrosmog sugli organismi viventi. Il successo dei suoi studi lo ha portato ad essere emarginato nel suo istituto, a far sparire i finanziamenti per le sue ricerche e a ricevere minacce di morte; in un’occasione è sfuggito per un pelo a un attentato alla sua vita attraverso il sabotaggio della sua moto. Nonostante tutto, continua a informare il mondo della verità per difendere, tra gli altri, coloro che soffrono di EHS, le cui vite sono diventate un inferno sulla terra. È disgustato dal modo in cui i governi dei paesi cosiddetti “democratici” hanno semplicemente abbandonato al loro destino le vittime delle radiofrequenze. La dottoressa Erica Mallery-Blythe, che ha doppia nazionalità britannica e americana, ha completato i suoi studi nel 1998. Nel 2007, dopo aver seguito il marito pilota di F-16 negli Stati Uniti, è stata gravemente colpita da EHS senza rendersene conto. Le sue ricerche su internet le hanno finalmente permesso di capire cosa le stava succedendo. Come medico, era perplessa su come una condizione così profonda e invalidante potesse esistere senza che lei ne avesse mai sentito parlare nella sua professione. Per tranquillizzarsi, decise di sottoporsi a una risonanza magnetica per escludere il rischio di cancro al cervello. Credeva che la sua morte fosse imminente quando era soggetta alle pulsazioni ad alta frequenza, ma recuperò piena salute e vitalità nella Valle della Morte, lontano dalle frequenze radio. Da allora, si è dedicata a informare e aiutare il 5% (almeno) della popolazione che è affetta di EHS e che è stata totalmente abbandonata dalle autorità. Yury Grigoriev, che è generalmente considerato il capostipite della ricerca elettromagnetica in Russia, è estremamente preoccupato soprattutto per i giovani, e ha dichiarato che questa è la prima volta nella storia dell’umanità che il cervello delle persone viene esposto apertamente alle microonde – cosa estremamente grave agli occhi di un radiobiologo. In particolare, cita uno studio coreano che dimostra che il disturbo da deficit di attenzione e iperattività (ADHD) nei bambini è collegato all’uso dei telefoni cellulari. Alla fine degli anni Novanta, il neurochirurgo svedese Leif Salford e il suo team hanno dimostrato che i telefoni cellulari rendono permeabile la barriera emato-encefalica, causando il morbo di Alzheimer. Nel 2003 hanno dimostrato che una singola esposizione di sole due ore provoca danni permanenti al cervello. Nel 2015, gli scienziati turchi hanno irradiato ratti per un’ora al giorno per un mese, utilizzando le tipiche onde dei telefoni cellulari. I ratti irradiati avevano il 10% di cellule cerebrali in meno rispetto a quelli che erano stati risparmiati da quel trattamento. Lo stesso team ha sperimentato su ratti incinti per 9 giorni allo stesso livello di radiazioni. La progenie dei ratti ha mostrato una degenerazione del cervello, del midollo spinale, del cuore, dei reni, del fegato, della milza, del timo e dei testicoli. Lo stesso esperimento ripetuto su ratti giovani ha causato l’atrofia del midollo spinale insieme alla diminuzione della mielina, come si osserva nella sclerosi multipla. Nel settembre 1998 sono entrati in funzione i primi 66 satelliti per la telefonia spaziale, causando un aumento del tasso di mortalità nazionale negli Stati Uniti di quasi il 5% nelle due settimane successive. Durante lo stesso periodo, si è osservato che gli uccelli non volavano più e che i malati di sclerosi multipla si ammalavano in modo particolare. Oggi, circa 1’100 satelliti artificiali si muovono sopra di noi, ma diverse aziende – Google, Facebook, SpaceX, OneWeb e Samsung – hanno in programma di lanciare fino a 4’600 nuovi satelliti per le comunicazioni ciascuno entro il 2020, in modo da coprire l’intero pianeta con l’accesso a Internet ad alta velocità. Nel 1968, già la prima piccola flotta di 28 satelliti militari ha scatenato una pandemia di influenza a livello mondiale. A differenza di un’antenna terrestre, la cui radiazione è altamente attenuata quando raggiunge la magnetosfera, i satelliti agiscono direttamente su di essa attraverso meccanismi ancora poco conosciuti, compromettendo così la vita sulla terra. Dimentichiamo gli avvertimenti di Ross Adey, il nonno della bioelettromagnetica, e del fisico atmosferico Neil Cherry, che siamo elettricamente regolati dal mondo che ci circonda e che il livello di esposizione alle radiofrequenze è quindi pari a zero. Questa iniziativa potenzialmente catastrofica deve essere contrastata e l’organizzazione leader è la Global Union Against Radiation Deployment from Space (GUARDS; www.stopglobalwifi.org/). Nel 2014 il medico Tetsuharu Shinjyo ha pubblicato uno studio “prima e dopo”. Egli ha valutato la salute di 122 abitanti di un edificio su cui erano state installate le antenne della stazione base. Ventuno di loro soffrivano di stanchezza cronica, 14 di vertigini o di malattia di Ménière, 14 di mal di testa, 17 di dolori o infezioni agli occhi, 14 di insonnia e 10 di epistassi cronica. Cinque mesi dopo la rimozione delle antenne, sono rimasti solo 2 casi di insonnia, 1 caso di vertigini e 1 caso di mal di testa! Questa emergenza dei diritti umani, che colpisce centinaia di milioni di persone su scala planetaria, e l’emergenza ambientale che minaccia l’estinzione di innumerevoli specie di piante e animali, devono essere affrontate con una risoluzione lungimirante e risolutiva. 50,000 copies sold! Cell towers, Wi-fi, 5G: Electricity has shaped the modern world. But how has it affected our health and environment? Over the last 220 years, society has evolved a universal belief that electricity is ‘safe’ for humanity and the planet. Scientist and journalist Arthur Firstenberg disrupts this conviction by telling the story of electricity in a way it has never been told before—from an environmental point of view—by detailing the effects that this fundamental societal building block has had on our health and our planet. In The Invisible Rainbow, Firstenberg traces the history of electricity from the early eighteenth century to the present, making a compelling case that many environmental problems, as well as the major diseases of industrialized civilization—heart disease, diabetes, and cancer—are related to electrical pollution.

NOTB 'BOOK OF THE CENTURY' The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (2017) by Arthur Firstenberg TRANSLATIONS OF THE SUMMARY AVAILABLE IN: ENGLISH - FRENCH - ITALIAN - SPANISH - GERMAN (see other languages at end of this English version) I've bought 5 copies of The Invisible Rainbow for friends and family. However, it is a doorstopper of a book, that I know a few friends admire on the coffee table, but have not read. A large proportion of the book is the extensive reference section to back every droplet of fact, as we are taken on a wild journey through the history of electricity to a world-view changing conclusion. For those that don't have time, or would just like a taster, here is a 20 min fast-read summary of the key points within the book. The whole book in a few easy to consume bite-size chunks. But first here are two forewards to whet your appetite. The first is from Dr T and the second from Dr Andrew Goldsworthy DR T - RETIRED GP It is hard to comprehend how systematic and deliberate the silencing of the harm that electromagnetic radiation causes has been. It is not accidental that the very youngest have been 'educated' into regarding many of the devices that have incredibly high EMF radiation as essential for their lives. Whatever age we are we have been programmed to accept more and more EMF radiation into our lives. The other side of this is that those canaries in the coal mines that have been suffering from severe effects of the EMF radiation have been mocked and dismissed by all forms of the biased media. Startling instances of men, women and children suffering harm have been suppressed. Moving forward to our present time we can now see that so many of these devices that are causing harm are also part of surveillance capitalism. It is little wonder that this agenda of 'smart' everything would be pushed forward regardless of any harm it may be causing. This book is so valuable in that it tells the story from the beginning and is immensely readable (yes, I know it's long), and then has all that evidence to back up what is written. I knew this book was important when it arrived as a gift from Mark, and I have been recommending it to others ever since. Knowledge is power. Dr T DR ANDREW GOLDSWORTHY RETIRED BIOLOGICAL SAFETY OFFICER IMPERIAL COLLEGE - LONDON This is an excellent summary of Arthur Firstenberg's book "The Invisible Rainbow", which is itself a much longer summary of the timeline linking the exposure of animals (especially humans) and plants to a wide range of illnesses and metabolic disorders. These include microwave sickness (aka electromagnetic hypersensitivity) diabetes, heart attacks, cancer and many more. The villain of the piece is pulsed and other alternating electromagnetic fields in the environment that interfere with electric currents used by our own bodies and, in particular, the electric currents that flow through our cell membranes. Their main effect is to make these membranes leak. This short circuits and reduces the normal voltage (trans-membrane potential) that provides the energy for most of our bodily functions In effect, they starve us of our energy and this can have all sorts of unexpected effects. For example, the mitochondria (the cells' powerhouses) use an electrochemical gradient across their membranes generated from the food we eat to make ATP, which is the main energy currency of our cells. But this ATP is used by the external membrane of the cell to absorb nutrients and excrete toxic byproducts, So, not only do these electromagnetic fields starve us of energy (giving, among other things, symptoms of chronic fatigue) they also poison us with our own toxins. Also, since ATP is needed by our immune systems, we become more susceptible to disease and also to cancer, which arises from the inability of the immune system to weed out precancerous cells. That said, the body does try to fight back. In particular, the inflow of calcium ions through our leaking cell membranes stimulates metabolic activity in general and repair mechanisms in particular. If you think about it, this is the only way that a cell can "know" that its membrane has been damaged. But the increased metabolic activity needed to repair the damage has side effects, particularly on the cells of the nervous system. Here the extra activity makes our sensory cells send false signals to the brain to give us the symptoms of electrical hypersensitivity, including ADHD as our brain cells become hyperactive and pain and false feelings of heat or cold anywhere on our body. When the inner ear is affected, we may experience tinnitus, loss of balance and all the symptoms of motion sickness, including nausea. It is not nice to be electrosensitive and no one knows this more than Arthur Firstenberg, who is the most electrosensitive person that I have ever come across Please read on to see more details and the observations and experiments that inspired Arthur to write his book, "The Invisible Rainbow". Andrew Goldsworthy PhD Lecturer (retired) Imperial College London To read the quick read summary, keep reading below.... To buy the book click here To get the opening 10% of the book in ebook format choose 'send free sample'. About Arthur Firstenberg the author Arthur Firstenberg is a scientist and journalist who is at the forefront of a global movement to tear down the taboo surrounding this subject. After graduating Phi Beta Kappa from Cornell University with a degree in mathematics, he attended the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine from 1978 to 1982. Injury by X-ray overdose cut short his medical career. For the past thirty-seven years he has been a researcher, consultant, and lecturer on the health and environmental effects of electromagnetic radiation, as well as a practitioner of several healing arts. About the Book This remarkably well-documented and -referenced book is a cornerstone in the sense that it traces the deployment of electricity in our civilization, in terms of its interaction with living organisms, from its initial discovery in the 1740s all the way to our time, and even projected into the future. It should be noted that the title refers to the entire electromagnetic spectrum comprising the colors of the rainbow, including the invisible frequencies such as radio frequencies and the fields generated around conducting wires. THE SUMMARY PART 1 1. Captured in a Bottle 1746 saw the first discoveries involving electricity in Europe. Leyden’s experiment consisted of revealing the electric fluid by means of rubbing the hand on a glass globe spun rapidly on its axis. The static electricity thus produced made a great impression in the schools, fairs and on private persons who had the financial means to acquire this device, with some producing electrical arcs and others brief electric shocks. The phenomenon was so popular that it was not socially acceptable to suggest that electricity could be dangerous, even though the shocks caused headaches, nosebleeds and fatigue in certain experimenters and in the animals used in the tests. Society was taken over by electromania and the most fervent exponents of being electroshocked in good company between two glasses of champagne began to perceive harmful symptoms. In spite of this, the medical establishments equipped themselves with the Leyden flask (the forerunner of the condenser), for the purpose of carrying out medical experiments for abortions or other applications. In this way a completely new field of knowledge emerged concerning the biological effects of electricity on people, plants and animals – knowledge that was then much more extensive than that of our contemporary physicians, who daily see patients suffering from the effects of electricity without recognizing them for what they are, and who are generally ignorant of the very existence of this knowledge. 2. The Deaf to Hear, and the Lame to Walk Noting the – rarely positive, and far more often negative – effects of the application of electrical voltage on living organisms, the researchers and physicians concluded that living organisms function in conjunction with electricity. Certain cures were brought about using electricity – as for example in 1851, when the neurologist Duchenne treated deafness in dozens of patients by means of locally applied electrical impulses. Experiments were carried out – notably by Volta in Italy, as well as other researchers in the western world – which found evidence that the nervous, cardiac, cardiovascular, gustatory, sudatory and other systems could be stimulated using the electricity produced by galvanic couples. It was found that the number of curative effects were significantly fewer than the harmful effects that were listed, which include the symptoms of electro-sensitivity (ES) known today, such as headaches, dizziness, nausea, mental confusion, fatigue, depression, insomnia, etc. 3. Electrical Sensitivity The French botanist Thomas-François Dalibard – who carried out electrical experiments on living organisms – confided in a letter to Benjamin Franklin dated 1762 that he was unable to continue his work as his own organism had developed an intolerance to electricity. He was one of the first people to be officially declared electro-hypersensitive (EHS). Reading that account, it is clear that this botanist must have been severely affected. Other professors and researchers had the same unfortunate experience and were thus forced to stop their work. Even the famous Benjamin Franklin was affected by a neurological illness during his researches on electricity from 1753 onwards, and the symptoms are largely reminiscent of electro-hypersensitivity. So much so that, at the end of the 18th century, it was generally acknowledged that electricity could make people ill, depending on the sex, the morphology and the physical condition of the individual concerned. It had similarly been observed that certain individuals reacted strongly to changes in the weather, which often correlated with electrical changes in the atmosphere. The names of some of those individuals are still famous today – among them Christopher Columbus, Dante, Charles Darwin, Benjamin Franklin, Goethe, Victor Hugo, Leonardo da Vinci, Martin Luther, Michelangelo, Mozart, Napoleon, Rousseau and Voltaire. 4. The Road Not Taken During the 1790s, science was faced with an identity crisis regarding the interpretation and unification of the four different fluids – electricity, light, magnetism and heat. Where electricity was concerned, on the one hand there was Luigi Galvani, who regarded electricity as an integral part of the living organism, and on the other Volta's theory that electricity was only a “secondary” effect of internal chemical reactions in the living organism. Volta, the inventor of the extremely useful electric battery, which had the potential to become a great money-spinner, succeeded in winning the argument against the more global view of the interaction between electricity and the living organism. 5. Chronic Electrical Illness From the end of the 19th century onwards, urban landscapes were transformed by the installation of telegraph lines throughout the industrialized countries. This technology used voltages of the order of 80 volts on a single conductor, with the return current being earthed. That period saw the emergence of the first stray currents to which living beings were exposed. It was then that one saw the appearance of diseases of civilization such as neurasthenia, which afflicted Frank Lloyd Wright and Theodore Roosevelt, among other well-known figures. It should be noted in passing that neurasthenia is very similar to electrohypersensitivity, which is the more modern term for the same sensitivity to electricity. Around half of the telegraphists who were employed to manipulate the electrical current sent through the lines, and were thus exposed to very strong electromagnetic fields, were afflicted by telegraphic sickness. Once again, the symptoms were the same as those of EHS. Later on, in around 1915, it was the telephone operators who were experiencing the same symptoms – for they were exposed to electromagnetic fields from the communications for hours on end at their desks. In 1989, it was noted that in Winnipeg 47% of the telephone operators were suffering from the same symptoms. However, in 1894, the noted Viennese psychiatrist Sigmund Freud wrote an article whose effect was disastrous for all the unfortunates who suffered from telegraphic sickness, neurasthenia, microwave syndrome or EHS. Rather than seeing the external cause ‒ which was electromagnetic pollution – he attributed these symptoms to disordered thoughts or poorly controlled emotions. As a result, today millions of citizens affected by electronic smog are being medicated instead of reducing their exposure to this pollutant. Sigmund Freud renamed neurasthenia – which was known to be caused by electricity – as a neurosis anxiety, an anxiety attack or a panic attack. This opened the way for the reckless deployment of electrification to continue unimpeded. It should be noted that in Russia, neurasthenia is listed as an environmental illness, as Freud's damaging redefinition was rejected there. 6. The Behavior of Plants Sir Jagadis Chunder Bose and other researchers conducted numerous electrical experiments on plants and other living organisms, whose results showed definite effects. He discovered that the nerves of plants or animals display variable behavior and that their resistivity can vary considerably, depending on the application of the current and its polarity. He also noted that the intensity of current necessary to modify the conductivity of the nerves is infinitesimal in terms of the voltage applied – something in the order of 0.3 microamperes (0.3*10-6). That current is significantly less than the current that is induced through a telephone conversation using a cell phone. Bose likewise discovered that the threshold of a current’s bioactivity is 1 femtoampere (1*10-15)! As this researcher was also familiar with radio-frequency transmissions, he carried out an experiment in which a plant was exposed to a radio signal of 30 MHz at a distance of about 218 yards (200 meters) and found that the plant's growth was retarded during the emission period. He likewise showed that the circulation of sap in the plant slowed down when it was irradiated by the same radio signal. 7. Acute Electrical Illness During the 1880s, London was supplied with direct current, but certain physicists had discovered that the distribution of alternating current generated fewer ohmic losses in the wires. There followed a battle of the currents, even though many scientists, including Edison, strongly criticized the more dangerous effects of alternating current. Ironically, it’s precisely because alternating current is more harmful that it is used in the electric chair. And as everyone knows, the electrical current of the power grid is... alternating! In 1889, full-scale electrification was carried out in the USA and, shortly thereafter, in Europe. That same year, as if by chance, doctors were inundated with cases of flu, which had until then appeared only infrequently. The victims’ symptoms were far more neurological in nature, resembling neurasthenia, and did not include respiratory disorders. The pandemic lasted for four years and killed at least a million people. In 2001, Canadian astronomer Ken Tapping showed that the influenza pandemics over the previous three centuries correlated with peaks in solar magnetic activity, on an 11- year cycle. It has also been found that some outbreaks of influenza spread over enormous areas in just a few days – a fact that is difficult to explain by contagion from one person to another. Also, numerous experiments seeking to prove direct contagion through close contact, droplets of mucus or other processes have proved fruitless. From 1933 to the present day, virologists have been unable to present any experimental study proving that influenza spreads through normal contact between people. All attempts to do so have met with failure. 8. Mystery on the lsle of Wight In 1904, bees began to die on the Isle of Wight following the installation of radio transmitters by Marconi. These transmitters work at frequencies close to megahertz levels. On the other side of the Channel, Jacques-Arsène d'Arsonval showed that “sharp and hooked” electromagnetic signals are far more toxic than sinusoidal signals. The truth was that, after a year and a half of experimenting with radio transmitters in full health at the age of 22, Marconi began to develop fevers. These attacks continued for the rest of his life. In 1904, while working on setting up a transmitter powerful enough for transatlantic communications, these fevers became so intense that they were thought to be malaria. In 1905, he married Beatrice O'Brien and after their honeymoon, they settled on the island close to a transmitter. As soon as Beatrice had settled in, she began to complain of tinnitus. After three months, she fell ill with severe jaundice. She had to return to London to give birth to a baby who only lived for a few weeks and died of “unknown causes.” During the same period, Marconi spent several months suffering from fever and delirium. Between 1918 and 1921, he suffered suicidal depression while working on a shortwave transmitter. In 1927, while on his honeymoon from his second marriage, he collapsed with chest pain and was diagnosed with serious cardiac disorders. Between 1934 and 1937, while he was developing microwave technology, he had nine heart attacks – the final one killing him at the age of 63. On the same island, at Osborne House, Queen Victoria suffered cerebral hemorrhages and died on the evening of January 22nd 1901, just as Marconi was putting a new transmitter into operation less than 13 miles away. In 1901 there were “only” two transmitters, while in 1904 there were four, making this island the most irradiated place on the planet, leaving bees no room for survival. In 1906, a survey revealed that 90% of the bees had completely disappeared for no apparent reason. New colonies were brought to the island, but these likewise died within a week. This epidemic spread across England and then across the western world, and then gradually stabilized, until the armies equipped themselves with various high-powered radio transmitters towards the end of the First World War – triggering (as we have seen) the Spanish flu pandemic in 1918, which actually began in the United States, at the Naval Radio School of Cambridge, Massachusetts, with 400 initial cases. This epidemic rapidly spread to 1,127 soldiers at Funston Camp (Kansas), where wireless connections had been installed. What intrigued the doctors was that while 15% of the civilian population were suffering from nosebleeds, 40% of the Navy suffered from them. Other bleeding also occurred, and a third of those who died did so due to internal hemorrhaging of the lungs or brain. In fact, it was the composition of the blood that had been altered, as the measured coagulation time was more than twice as long as normal. These symptoms are incompatible with the effects of the influenza respiratory viruses, but totally consistent with the devastating effects of electricity. Another incongruity was that two-thirds of the victims were healthy young people. A further atypical flu symptom was that the pulse slowed to rates of between 36 and 48, whereas this is a common result of exposure to electromagnetic fields. In addition, it was possible to successfully treat some sufferers with massive doses of calcium. The military physician Dr George A. Soper testified that the virus was spreading faster than the speed of movement of people. Various experiments were conducted attempting to infect subjects either by direct close contact or by inoculation with mucus or blood – but the experimenters were unable to demonstrate any infection by this means. It can be seen that each new influenza pandemic corresponds to a new advance in electrical technology, such as the Asian flu of 1957-58, following the installation of a powerful radar surveillance system, and the outbreak of Hong Kong flu from July 1968 onwards, following the commissioning of 28 military satellites for space surveillance at the altitude of the Van Allen belts, which protect us from cosmic radiation. 9. Earth’s Electric Envelope With a core consisting mainly of iron, the rotating earth is primarily protected by the ionosphere, then the plasma sphere – delimited by the Van Allen radiation belts at an altitude of between 1,000 and 55,000 km – and by its tail: the magnetosphere, which is exposed to solar winds originating from our sun and constitutes a kind of dynamo, a complex electrical system. The exchanges of electricity between the earth's crust, the atmosphere and even the ionosphere are permanent and constant. They are in a delicate balance, and a kind of electrical “respiration” of the entire system has allowed life to develop on our planet, which is charged with negative ions, balanced by the positively charged ionosphere. An average vertical electrical field of the order of 130 volts per meter can be observed, with values that can, for example, rise to 4,000 volts per meter during storms. In 1953, one of the primary parameters of this electrical oscillation of our environment was discovered, in the form of (Winfried) Schumann’s frequencies, which “respire” at 7.83 hertz, with harmonics at 14, 20, 26, 32 Hz, called very low frequencies (VLF). It is no wonder that the organisms living in this environment are imbued with these physical values and that, for example, our brain rhythms lie within these frequency ranges – such as the alpha rhythm, which lies between 8 and 13 Hz. While we perceive the visible frequencies – ranging from blue to red – of the electromagnetic spectrum, some animals are able to see other electromagnetic frequencies – such as bees, which can see ultraviolet frequencies, or those salamanders or catfish which can see the low electrical frequencies, while snakes are able to see the infrared frequencies. Laboratory experiments on hamsters, for example, showed that reducing the temperature and shortening the duration of daylight was not enough to put them into hibernation. Similarly, hamsters raised in Faraday cages refused to hibernate, even though the light and temperature parameters corresponded to those of winter, until the Faraday protection was removed. Other experiments were conducted, such as that carried out at the Max Plank Institute in 1967 by the physiologist Rütger Wever, using two buried rooms without windows or outside contact – one shielded from natural electromagnetic fields, the other one not. It was shown that in the shielded chamber, the circadian rhythms of the volunteers became desynchronized and could vary between 12 and 65 hours, accompanied by metabolic disorders, while the subjects in the chamber immersed in the earth's fields kept a coherent rhythm of around 24 hours and their metabolism continued to function more normally. It has been scientifically demonstrated that a living organism needs to be bathed in the electromagnetic system of our natural environment in order to function well. Moreover acupuncture, the ancient method used in Traditional Chinese Medicine, works by using our own electrical properties and modifying the energy flow of the meridians. It has been known for some time (since the 1950s) that these meridians actually correspond to electrical circuits and that the Chinese Qi corresponds to the concept of electricity. These meridians serve dual functions: they not only transport information and energy internally from one organ of the body to another, but also serve as antennas for picking up the flow of environmental electromagnetic energy. In the early 1970s, atmospheric physicists discovered that the earth's magnetic field was significantly disturbed by human electrical activity. By injecting a signal into space and capturing its echo, it was established that the initial signal had in fact been modified by multiples of the 60 Hz power grid used in North America. However, this discovery did not prevent the HAARP project from being launched to deliberately modify the electromagnetic properties of our planet. Similarly, the Van Allen belts that protect us from cosmic rays have already been altered by our electrical activity – and it may be that these double belts were originally only a single belt which, under the influence of the human emission of electric charges into space, has been depleted at its centre. Satellite observations show that the radiation emitted by high voltage lines often has the effect of suppressing the natural radiation of lightning. In light of this fact, it is logical to conclude that the influenza pandemics of recent decades are linked to human electrical activity. 10. Porphyrins and the Basis of Life Any transformation of energy in the biological domain involves porphyrins [pigments made up of four pyrrole molecules]. The fact that our nerves are able to function properly is thanks in part to porphyrins, which play a role in our cell processes. These are special molecules that function as the interface between oxygen and life. These molecules are highly reactive and interact with toxic metals or synthetic elements derived from oil, and with electromagnetic fields – which, in excess, cause porphyria, which is more an environmental sensitivity than a disease. Dr. William E. Morton's research showed that 90% of people with multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) are deficient in one form of porphyrin enzyme or another, as are electro- hypersensitive individuals – which means that the two forms of sensitivity are only different manifestations, with one and the same cause. Porphyria, which was discovered in 1891, afflicts about 10% of today’s population and first appeared at the same time as the general electrification of the western world from 1889 onwards. Porphyrins are central to the effects of electronic smog, because they not only cause EHS, MCS or porphyria, but also cardiovascular diseases, cancer and diabetes, as they are involved in a multitude of energetic biological processes. In the 1960s, the biologists Allan Frey and Wlodzimierz Sedlak showed that our organisms definitely have a bioelectronic component, and that some of our cells sometimes behave like conductors or capacitors or semi-conductors (transistors), like the components that we find in our electronic devices. This is the case with myelin – the sheath that covers our nerves – which contains porphyrin bonded to zinc. Should environmental poisons such as chemical products or toxic metals affect this equilibrium, the myelin sheath will be damaged, which alters the excitability of the nerves it surrounds. The entire nervous system then becomes hyperresponsive to stimuli of all kinds, such as electromagnetic fields. The system enters a state of divergent instability, the effect becoming the cause. Contrary to the view that mitochondria are the elements of our cells that produce energy, the concept of the myelin sheath as being one giant mitochondrion is beginning to gain credence. The connection between porphyria and zinc was discovered in the 1950s by Henry Peters, at Wisconsin Medical School. Patients suffering from porphyria and neurological symptoms were excreting a great deal of zinc in their urine, which led him to the idea that zinc chelation might improve their condition. He did indeed see an improvement, despite the widespread belief that zinc deficiency is related to those specific disorders. Similarly, certain experiments have shown that zinc chelation improves Alzheimer's disease. An Australian medical team demonstrated in autopsies that the brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease contained twice as much zinc as those of healthy patients. Part2 ...to the presentday 11. Irritable Heart In 1980, cardiac arrest in young athletes was rare, with only nine cases a year. From then on, cases steadily increased by 10% per year until 1996, when the rate suddenly doubled to 64 cases, rising to 66 in the following year and 76 in the last year of the study. The American medical community could find no explanation for this, while in Europe in 2002, German environmental physicians launched an appeal calling for a moratorium on antennas and cell towers, as the waves they were emitting were causing cardiovascular disorders. That was the Freiburg Appeal. Dr. Samuel Milham, an epidemiologist at the Washington State Department of Health, showed through his work that cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer are largely, if not entirely, caused by electricity. Paradoxically, studies of cholesterol dating from the early 20th century did not show that cholesterol levels correlated with a higher risk of heart disease – contrary to what is commonly regarded as fact nowadays. A study of animals at the Philadelphia Zoo showed that from 1916 to 1964, cholesterol levels in mammals and birds increased by a factor of between 10 and 20 even though their diet had remained completely unchanged! The only parameter that had dramatically changed was the increase in radio frequencies. During the Second World War, a number of soldiers complained of symptoms similar to those of neurasthenia. It was initially believed, in accordance with Freud’s doctrine, that these soldiers were suffering from anxiety problems: however, a study of 144 cases was then conducted by Dr. Mandel Cohen. This study revealed that the soldiers were in fact physiologically less resistant and suffered from irritable heart. They had difficulty in assimilating oxygen and had to breathe twice as fast as their comrades in better health in order to get enough oxygen. It emerged that their mitochondria were not functioning efficiently. In the end, the study showed that these soldiers were hypersensitive in a general sense, but particularly to electricity. From the 1950s onwards, scientists in the Soviet Union also observed that radio frequencies altered the electrocardiograms of individuals exposed to them, as they modified mitochondrial efficiency. Graphs showing the statistics for death rates from heart disease broken down by the degree of electrification of the American states in 1931 and 1940 are also very explicit and leave no doubt as to the toxicity of electromagnetic fields for the heart, thus exonerating cholesterol and diets deemed too high in fat. 12. The Transformation of Diabetes Thomas Edison, who was involved in discoveries relating to electrical technology and was therefore exposed to electromagnetic fields to a far greater extent than his fellow citizens of the time, was diagnosed with diabetes – a disease that was very rare in 1889. Another researcher, Alexander Graham Bell, who worked in the field of telegraphy and invented the telephone, was known to constantly complain of the symptoms of neurasthenia, known as EHS today. In 1915, he too was diagnosed with diabetes. In 1876, the book Diseases of Modern Life by Ward Richardson described diabetes as a rare modern disease caused by mental exhaustion due to overwork or by a shock to the nervous system. The excessive intake of toxic, addictive sugar in our modern diet naturally provides a convenient explanation of why diabetes, including prediabetes, affects more than half of all Americans today. However, this explanation is too simplistic. Dr. Even Joslin showed that between 1900 and 1917, sugar intake had increased by 17% while mortality from diabetes had doubled. Later, in 1987, a study of Native Americans showed radically different rates of death from diabetes, depending on territory, ranging from 7 per thousand in the North-West to 380 per thousand in Arizona! During those years, neither lifestyle nor diet could explain such a divergence. One environmental factor, however, can indeed explain such a difference: the electrification of Native American reservations proceeded at different paces, and those in the North-West were only electrified much later. By contrast, the Arizona reservation lies in the immediate vicinity of Phoenix. Moreover, this Native American community had its own power plant and its own telecommunications system. Another example is the population of Brazil – a major sugar producer for centuries, where diabetes was still unknown in 1870, after it had already emerged as a disease of civilization in North America. Even today, Brazilians consume 70 kg of refined sugar per year and per person – more than North Americans: and yet they still have two and a half times fewer cases of diabetes than the USA. In Bhutan, diabetes was virtually non-existent until 2002, after which the electrification of the country began. In 2004, 634 new cases of diabetes were announced, in 2005 – 944, in 2006 – 1,470, and in 2007 – 2,540, with 15 deaths. In 2012, there were 91 deaths and diabetes was the eighth leading cause of death in the country, even though people’s diet had not changed! As we saw in the previous chapter, electronic smog acting on mitochondria prevents the efficient use of absorbed sugar – i.e. the combustion of sugar. The sugar which cannot be converted into mechanical energy is stored as fat by the body. Statistical graphs for diabetes death rates, broken down by the degree of electrification of the American states in 1931 and 1940, are also very explicit and leave no doubt as to the role played by electromagnetic fields in the appearance of large-scale diabetes, thus exonerating sugar consumption to some extent. In 1997, there was a 31% increase in the number of cases of diabetes in the United States in a single year, which precisely correlated with the mass introduction of cell phones in the country. 13. Cancer and the Starvation of Life In February 2011, the Supreme Court of Italy accused Cardinal Roberto Tucci, the outgoing president of Vatican Radio, of having created a public nuisance by polluting the environment with radio frequencies through negligence. In fact, in the period from 1997 to 2003, the children living within a 12 km radius of the radio antennas had an eight times higher rate of leukemia, lymphomas or myelomas than those who lived further away. The same held true for adults, with a rate seven times higher. The German doctor and professor Otto Heinrich Warburg, winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1931, showed that cancer is a regression of oxygen-deprived cells, which drives them to multiply anarchically, as in a primeval world where oxygen was not present to the extent that it is today. The initial oxygen deprivation is due to a malfunction of the mitochondria – which, as we have seen, can be caused by electromagnetic fields or other pollutants, such as smoke, pesticides, food additives and air pollution. The same principle of cellular oxygen deficiency applies to diabetes, which is why there is a higher rate of cancers among diabetics than in the rest of the population. At Philadelphia Zoo, from 1901 to 1955, a rise in the rate of malignant tumors was noted in mammals, varying from twice to 22 times more between those dates. Cancer death statistics show a clear correlation between the electrification of countries and cancer rates. For example, in the USA, the rate was 6.6 per thousand from 1841 to 1850. It subsequently more than doubled from 1851 to 1860, with a rate of 14 per thousand. The true explanation for this can be found in the mass deployment of the telegraph in 1854. In 1914, there were two deaths from cancer among the 63,000 Native Americans living in reserves without electrification, while in the rest of the country the cancer mortality rate was 25 times higher. Between 1920 and 1921, following the introduction of the first AM radio stations, cancer mortality increased by between 3 and 10% in western countries. The Swedish researchers Olle Johansson and Orjan Hallberg have shown a clear correlation between breast, prostate and lung cancer rates and the exposure of the population to radio frequencies. They point to a significant increase in rates in 1920, 1955, 1969 and a decrease (!) in 1978, corresponding respectively to the increase in radio frequency smog due to the introduction of AM radio, FM radio and TV1, the arrival of color TV2, and then the cessation of AM radio broadcasts. These same researchers have likewise found a very clear linear correlation between the number of FM radio transmitters per region and the incidence of melanomas, with the exposed locations having 11 times more melanomas than the “white zones”. They also found that melanomas rarely appear on those areas of the body most exposed to the sun, such as the forehead, nose, shoulders and feet, but more often in those areas of the body usually protected from the sun. Moreover, the proliferation of skin cancers occurred before the coming into fashion of seaside holidays, during which sun exposure is intense. This shows that melanomas are not predominantly caused by the sun, but by radio frequencies. The statistical graphs of death rates from cancer, as well as from diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, broken down by the degree of electrification of American states in 1931 and 1940, are likewise very explicit, leaving no doubt whatever that electromagnetic fields play a role in the increase in cancers. Genuine data on brain tumors is hard to find, as the cell phone lobby has been infiltrating this field for decades in order to commission biased studies. One of their studies even shows a decrease in the incidence of tumors, correlating with the intensive use of cell phones! However, the University of Calgary has found evidence of a 30% increase in the incidence of malignant brain tumors in the period from 2012 to 2013, and Lennart Hardell, Professor of Oncology at the University Hospital of Örebro in Sweden, has demonstrated that 2,000 hours of cell phone use increases the risk of developing a tumor by a factor of between three and eight, depending on the age of the subject and their phone habits. In 2000, Neil Cherry analyzed the cancer rates of children in San Francisco in relation to the distance between their home and the television and FM radio transmitters on Sutro Tower. Children living on hills or ridges were more affected. Those who lived within 1 km of the antenna had a 9 times higher incidence of leukemia, a 15 times higher incidence of lymphoma and a 31 times higher incidence of brain cancer — overall, an 18 times higher rate than those living outside that 1 km radius. 14. Suspended Animation A Practical Treatise on Nervous Exhaustion (1880) by George Miller Beard, the electrotherapist and friend of Thomas Edison, contains an intriguing observation: Although these difficulties are not directly fatal, and so do not appear in the mortality tables; although, on the contrary, they may tend to prolong life and to protect the system against febrile and inflammatory disease, yet the degree of suffering they cause is enormous. Those who suffered the most seemed rather young for their age. Furthermore, Beard noted that one rare disease seemed more likely to afflict the neurasthenic subjects than the rest of the population: that disease was diabetes. Beard had already observed that the increase in life expectancy did not go hand in hand with life quality. The mysterious correlation between the sufferings of neurasthenic people – whose symptoms were the same as those of contemporary electro-hypersensitive people – and the prolongation of their lives pointed to a major dysfunction. In addition, it has long been observed that an ascetic lifestyle with a low-calorie diet can increase life expectancy and health. This is the case, for example, with the population of Okinawa, where the number of centenarians is forty times greater than those in the population of richer prefectures further to the north. Researchers in the field of ageing have pointed out that the force that drives and sustains our lives is the system of electron transport in the mitochondria of our cells. It is here that the air we breathe and the food we eat are combined, at a rate that determines our rate of ageing and hence our life expectancy. Whereas the achievement of a slowing down of the combustion process within our cells through moderating the amount of energy delivered may be beneficial, another way of slowing down may conversely be disastrous. This is the poisoning of the electron transport chain. One possible way of being poisoned is chronic exposure to artificial electromagnetic fields. This ever-increasing pollution subjects the electrons of our mitochondria to external forces, slowing them down, depriving our cells of oxygen and causing EHS symptoms. 15. You mean you can hear electricity? In 1962, a woman contacted the University of Santa Barbara (CA, USA) asking for help in finding the source of the mysterious sound that she was hearing everywhere at home, even though she lived in a quiet residential district. This sound was keeping her awake and was detrimental to her health. Measurements did indeed show that particularly strong electromagnetic fields were emanating from all electrical conductors, not only from the grid but also from the radiators and other metallic elements, yet the stethoscope itself detected no sound at all. The engineer carried out an experiment, recording the measured fields on tape and playing them to the woman affected by these noises. She confirmed that that was what she was hearing. So, this woman was able to hear the electromagnetic fields in her environment. Grounding facilities and electronic filters were installed to reduce disturbances to an acceptable level. However, long before that, Volta and other researchers had already conducted experiments in which they had successfully produced various sounds by applying voltage to the ears. Much later, in the late 1960s, the biologist Allan Frey published articles on the ability of some subjects to hear emissions from a radar installation. The mechanical model of the functioning of the ear as taught in schools does not provide any explanation for these observed phenomena. Noting this, the biochemist Lionel Naftalin developed a new model of the functioning of the human ear, taking into account the well-known phenomenon of piezo-electricity (a force utilized by electronicians), which he discovered in the gel covering the cilia of the inner ear. In this gel, which is found nowhere else in the human body and has special electrical properties, a voltage of 100 to 120 millivolts was present – which is considered high in the field of bioelectronics. This piezo-electric gel transforms sound waves into an electrical signal that is communicated to the cilia of the inner ear. This new, revised model of the functioning of the human ear not only explains the ability of certain subjects to hear an electromagnetic signal under certain conditions, but also why so modern-day people suffer from tinnitus, and why certain groups of people, amounting to 2 to 11% of the world's population, are hearing a global humming all around the planet. Today, about 44% of American adults suffer from tinnitus at various levels of intensity, while in Sweden the number of young people affected was 12% in 1997 and 42% in 2006. These parasitic sounds are largely the result of living in an environment that is heavily polluted with all kinds of artificial electromagnetic fields. 16. Bees, Birds, Trees, and Humans Alfonso Balmori Marinez, a Spanish biologist, has correlated the population density of sparrows with the radio-frequency radiation values in their habitats. Sparrows cannot survive in the most irradiated places, where levels exceed 3 V/m, whereas there are still 42 birds per hectare at levels of 0.1 V/m. He has also observed a marked change in the behavior of storks, whereby stork pairs will fight instead of building the nest or incubating the eggs if they are within 200m of a cell tower. The United Kingdom classed the house sparrow as an endangered species after its population declined by 75% between 1994 and 2002 – a period that coincided with the deployment of cell phone technology. Homing pigeon breeders on several continents have found that, when released, up to 90% of pigeons fail to find their way back to the dovecote, whereas this percentage should normally be tiny. In 2000, English breeders tried to reroute a race so as to avoid cell towers, in order to give the pigeons a better chance of homing successfully. In 2004, those same breeders commissioned more extensive studies on the impact of microwaves on pigeons. In 2002, the US National Park Service issued a note to biologists studying wild animal behavior, explaining that RFID chips attached to those animals to track them with radio frequencies can radically alter their behavior due to the radio frequencies generated. In environments polluted by electromagnetic fields, robins cannot find their bearings for migration – whereas when they are in a Faraday cage, they are able to do so. An experiment on frog tadpoles reared in two separate pools within 140m of a cell tower, one without and the other with electromagnetic shielding, displayed mortality rates of 90% and 4% respectively. The same type of harmful effects are found in insects when they are exposed to the electronic smog that we encounter on a daily basis, and Dr. Panagopoulous, who has experimented on fruit flies, reports that exposure to microwaves at common levels – even for just a few minutes a day for a few days – is the worst known stressor in our daily lives, even worse than chemicals or low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Bees are also being negatively impacted, as we saw on the Isle of Wight at the beginning of this summary. Dr. Daniel Favre (Switzerland) has demonstrated that in the presence of microwaves, bees emit the sound typically heard when they swarm, which suggests that the insects want to escape the emission source. The varroa mite is generally blamed for colony collapse syndrome; however, we forget that this mite has cohabited with bees for a long time. In addition, it can often be observed that nowadays even a dead colony is not infested with parasites, even though this used to be the case “before”. The finger of blame is also levelled at pesticides – yet, as we have seen, 90% of the bees on the Isle of Wight disappeared without any pesticides having been used in that area. The true cause of colony collapse is found in human-generated electromagnetic fields, especially cell phone technology. In the 1980s, a burning issue emerged: the death of forests. This was blamed on acid rain – yet the most remote areas with the cleanest air were equally affected. Research was carried out in Germany and Switzerland, and although the soil in the affected forests did indeed prove to be acidic, observation and experimentation showed that such acidity could also be the result of the slow electrolysis of the soil via trees exposed to radar waves, for example. Moreover, trees on ridges were more severely affected as they were more exposed to the new radars installed in the 1970s. Another observation was made at the time of the fall of the Berlin Wall. The gigantic Russian radars at Skruda, which were heavily irradiating the whole region in their task of monitoring the West, had not only caused harm to the forest, but also to animals and human beings. After numerous studies, it was found that the growth rings of the trees during the years when the radars were operating were much smaller than those from either before or after that period. In Schwarzenburg in Switzerland, a shortwave radio antenna was installed in 1939, and the transmission power was subsequently increased to 450 kW in 1954. This was followed by a deterioration in the health of the local inhabitants, who complained of EHS symptoms. The village children had difficulties at school and seemed unable to advance to higher education, unlike the children of less exposed neighboring villages. Finally, in 1992, a study was carried out which confirmed that, within a radius of 900m of the antenna, the physiological analysis parameters of the people and animals at the site were abnormal. It was also found that the tree growth rings were compressed – but only on the side facing the radiation source. On March 28th 1998, the transmitter was shut down and a “before-and- after” study was carried out; this demonstrated that the melatonin levels of the 58 subjects tested had increased again. A 50-year-old villager was finally able to sleep for a full night without interruption for the first time in his life. On May 29th 1996, Philippe Roch, Director of the Office for the Environment, stated that there was “a proven correlation between the sleep disorders and communications operations". 17. In the Country of the Blind How much longer do we have to wait before being able to say "Your cell phone is killing me!” rather than "I'm electro-hypersensitive”? And yet the number of people suffering from headaches due to using cell phones is huge. In 2010, two-thirds of Ukrainian university students interviewed admitted the fact that it is not socially acceptable to openly discuss this issue. Gro Harlem Brundtland was EHS when she was head of the World Health Organization. She was quite open about the fact, but was forced to resign from her post one year later. This deterred other high-ranking public figures from following her example. Only a minority of people suffering from electromagnetic pollution know what they are suffering from, while the great majority have no idea. The entire population is being electrocuted by remote control and one almost has to apologize for being electro-sensitive or, to be precise, electro-hypersensitive, just as if one had to apologize for being "cyanide- hypersensitive". For the truth is that electricity, as it is currently being used, is toxic. Moreover, statistical graphs clearly show an increase in the mortality rate of the inhabitants of nine American cities shortly after the first base stations were put into operation. This increased mortality ranges from 25 to over 80%. A survey conducted by a daily newspaper, which asked New Yorkers to report whether they had begun suffering from a number of EHS symptoms after November 15th, 1996, gathered hundreds of testimonies from a wide range of racial and social classes. The date in question was the day when the first cell phone network went into operation. The Cellular Phone Task Force, an organization started by Arthur Firstenberg in 1996, is inundated with requests for help from people harmed by microwave radio frequencies. So many emitters of all kinds proliferate – from WiFi, WiMAX, radar stations and irradiation emitted from the sky by telecommunications satellites, that it seems as if soon there will be nowhere to escape to. Prof. Olle Johansson of the prestigious Karolinska Institute, who is famous for awarding the Nobel Prize for Medicine, has focused on demonstrating the effects of electronic smog on living organisms since 1977. The success of his studies led to his being marginalized at his institute, the funding for his research disappearing and to his receiving death threats; on one occasion, he narrowly escaped an attempt on his life through the sabotage of his motorcycle. Despite everything, he continues to inform the world of the truth in order to defend, among others, those suffering from EHS, whose lives have become hell on earth. He is disgusted by the way in which the governments of so-called “democratic” countries have simply abandoned the victims of radio frequencies to their fate. Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe, who has dual British and American nationality, completed her studies in 1998. In 2007, after following her F-16 pilot husband to the USA, she became severely affected by EHS without realizing it. Her internet researches finally enabled her to understand what was happening to her. As a doctor, she was puzzled as to how such a profound and disabling condition could exist without her ever having heard of it in her profession. To set her mind at rest, she decided to undergo an MRI to rule out the risk of brain cancer. She believed that her death was imminent when the high frequency pulsations were engaged, but recovered full health and vitality in Death Valley, far from radio frequencies. Since then, she has dedicated herself to informing and helping the 5% (at least) of the population who are EHS and have been totally abandoned by the authorities. Yury Grigoriev, who is generally regarded as the grandfather of electromagnetic research in Russia, is extremely concerned about young people above all, and has stated that this is the first time in the history of humanity that people’s brains are being openly exposed to microwaves – which is extremely serious in the eyes of a radiobiologist. In particular, he cites a Korean study which shows that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children is connected to the use of cell phones. In the late 1990s, the Swedish neurosurgeon Leif Salford and his team proved that cell phones make the blood-brain barrier permeable, causing Alzheimer's disease. In 2003 they showed that a single exposure of only two hours causes permanent damage to the brain. In 2015, Turkish scientists irradiated rats for an hour a day for a month, using typical cell phone waves. The irradiated rats had 10% fewer brain cells than those that had been spared that treatment. The same team experimented on pregnant rats for 9 days at the same radiation level. The rats’ progeny showed degeneration of the brain, spinal cord, heart, kidneys, liver, spleen, thymus and testicles. The same experiment repeated on young rats caused atrophy of the spinal cord together with decreased myelin, like that seen in multiple sclerosis. In September 1998, the first 66 satellites for space telephony went into operation, causing an increase in the USA’s national mortality rate of nearly 5% in the two subsequent weeks. During the same period, it was observed that birds were no longer flying and that EHS people became particularly ill. Today, about 1,100 artificial satellites fly over us, but several companies – Google, Facebook, SpaceX, OneWeb and Samsung – are planning to launch up to 4,600 new communications satellites each by 2020, in order to blanket the entire planet with high-speed Internet access. In 1968, even the first small fleet of 28 military satellites precipitated a worldwide flu pandemic. Unlike a ground-based antenna, whose radiation is highly attenuated when it reaches the magnetosphere, satellites act directly on it through mechanisms that are still poorly understood, thus compromising life on earth. We forget the warnings of Ross Adey, the grandfather of bioelectromagnetics, and of the atmospheric physicist Neil Cherry, that we are electrically regulated by the world surrounding us and that the safe level of exposure to radio frequencies is therefore zero. This potentially catastrophic initiative must be opposed and the organization leading the way is the Global Union Against Radiation Deployment from Space (GUARDS; www.stopglobalwifi.org/). In 2014, the physician Tetsuharu Shinjyo published a "before-and-after" study. He evaluated the health of 122 inhabitants of a building on which base station antennas had been installed. Twenty-one suffered from chronic fatigue, 14 from dizziness or Ménière’s disease, 14 from headaches, 17 from eye pain or infections, 14 from insomnia and 10 from chronic nosebleeds. Five months after the antennas were removed, only 2 cases of insomnia, 1 case of vertigo and 1 case of headaches remained! This human rights emergency, which affects hundreds of millions of people on a planetary scale, and the environmental emergency that threatens the extinction of countless species of plants and animals must be faced with clear-sighted and unflinching resolutions. YOU CAN ORDER THE PAPERBACK/EBOOK VERSION HERE ONLINE HERE: https://geni.us/inresolutionsvisiblerainbow The Invisible Rainbow Arthur Firstenberg A History of Electricity and Life 5g is being rolled out across the country, despite growing evidence that it is disruptive to our health, our safety, and the environment. The Invisible Rainbow is the groundbreaking story of electricity as it’s never been told before—exposing its very real impact on the biosphere and human health. DOWNLOADS OF THIS SUMMARY IN MULTIPLE LANGUAGES ARABIC- INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY CZECH- INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY CHINESE - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY HUNGARY - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY PORTUGESE - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY BULGARIAN - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY If you can, please order all paperbacks through your local high street bookshop. SEE MORE RECOMMENDED BOOKS >>> SOURCE: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Frequently-Asked-Questions.pdf

Australian scientists have provided evidence replicating the findings of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 Vaccines. The scientists for reasons of fear of Pharma mafia-style reprisals have withheld their identities. These findings replicate those of many others internationally as we have documented. It is imperative that everyone with the ability to investigate does so NOW. This must not be left to the few brave scientists, and doctors in getting this information about the 2021 vaccine holocaust to the masses. The more people across borders replicate findings, the more persuasive the evidence becomes until it snowballs into the mass consciousness. The more professional voices that speak out, sticking their heads above the parapet, the safer it is for those who have made the first moves. And the evidence of this human-a-cide breaks into the mass consciousness - we defeat this evil. Everyone with the ability to help needs to now. This affects every single human being on this planet. The perpetrators are few. We are many. We will win. AUSTRALIAN SCIENTISTS PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF NANOTECH & GRAPHENE OXIDE Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts talks about nanotech found in the Covid ‘vaccines’ and says they are genocide. He is the first politician to expose this! "In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends" Martin Luther King URGENT CALL OUT FROM DR T JULY 2021 Please sign our petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines To the British Police, Judiciary, Crown Prosecution Service and members of Parliament. The people of Britain (and the world) request the British police seize multiple sample vials of the C19 vaccines and conduct an immediate open, independent and detailed analysis of the contents. ​ The signatories of this petition back the work of lawyers Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland working alongside Dr Samuel White, Mark Sexton and team submitting evidence under Hammersmith Police crime number: 6029679/21 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public. ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the various batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6 - With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Health expert's petition I, the undersigned, request the British police seize samples of the vaccine and instigate an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are causing widespread serious adverse reactions post-COVID-19 vaccination. ​ Concerning the vaccination of our children, we request an immediate injunction forcing a pause on the school's vaccine programme until we have clear answers from the police investigations. PLEASE ADD YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE BELOW....

NOTB 'BOOK OF THE DECADE' El arco iris invisible : Una historia de la electricidad y de la Vida (2017) por Arthur Firstenberg (en Ingles) READ IN: ENGLISH - FRENCH - ITALIAN - SPANISH - GERMAN (see other languages at end of summary) Sobre el autor Arthur Firstenberg es un científico y periodista a la vanguardia de la demolición del tabú concerniente a la inocuidad de los campos electromagnéticos sobre lo Vivo. Es licenciado en matemáticas por la Universidad de Cornell y frecuentó la Universidad de California, Irvine School of Medicine, de 1978 a 1982, estudios que debió interrumpir a causa de secuelas a consecuencia de una dosis excesiva de rayos-X. Luego, se consagró a la investigación, al asesoramiento, como autor y como orador, en el campo de los efectos medioambientales y de las radiaciones electromagnéticas. Sobre la obra Este libro extraordinariamente documentado y bien referenciado es una piedra angular en el sentido de que traza el desarrollo de la electricidad en nuestra civilización, en el día a día de su interacción con la materia Viva, desde los mismos principios de su descubrimiento en los años 1750 hasta nuestros días, incluyendo incluso proyecciones de futuro. Hay que remarcar que el título se refiere al conjunto del espectro electromagnético, comprendiendo los colores del arco iris, pero igualmente todas las frecuencias invisibles, como lo son la radiofrecuencia o los campos generados alrededor de los cables conductores. 1. Capturada en una botella En 1746, los primeros descubrimientos asociados a la electricidad tuvieron lugar en Europa. El experimento de Leyde, consistente en poner en evidencia el fluido eléctrico gracias al frotamiento de la mano con un globo de vidrio rotando rápido. La electricidad estática producida impresionaba enormemente en las escuelas, en las ferias y en los hogares privados que tenían los medios financieros para adquirir este dispositivo, produciendo tanto arcos eléctricos como electrocuciones pasajeras. El fenómeno estaba tan de moda que era mal visto pensar que esta electricidad pudiera ser peligrosa, aunque las electrocuciones produjeran cefaleas, sangrado de nariz o fatigas en algunos investigadores, así como en los animales utilizados en los tests. La sociedad sufría electromanía y los más fervientes en hacerse electrocutar en buena compañía, entre dos copas de champán, comenzaron a percibir síntomas nefastos. A pesar de todo, los establecimientos médicos se equiparon con la funda de Leyde (antepasado del condensador) con fines de experimentación médica para los abortos y otras aplicaciones. Así nació todo un nuevo dominio de conocimientos concerniente a los efectos biológicos de la electricidad sobre la gente, las plantas, los animales, conocimientos que eran entonces con mucho superiores a los de nuestros médicos contemporáneos que ven en la vida cotidiana a pacientes afectados por efectos de la electricidad sin siquiera reconocerlos y cuya mayoría ignoran incluso la existencia de esos conocimientos. 2. El sordo oye y el cojo anda Notando los efectos -raramente positivos- más a menudo negativos de la aplicación de tensiones eléctricas en los organismos vivos, los investigadores y médicos concluyeron que los organismos vivos funcionan en conjunción con la electricidad. Se obtuvieron algunas curaciones utilizando la electricidad, como por ejemplo en 1851, el neurólogo Duchenne, quien trató la sordera de algunas decenas de pacientes por medio de impulsos eléctricos aplicados localmente. Fueron experimentadas otras destacadas estimulaciones de los sistemas nervioso, cardíaco, cardiovascular, gustativo, sudatorio y otros, por la electricidad producida en pares galvánicos, principalmente por Volta, en Italia, entre otros científicos en occidente. Se constató que el número de los efectos curativos era netamente menor que el de los efectos nocivos, de los cuales se puede leer la lista y que incluyen los sínttomas de electro- sensibilidad (ES) conocidos hoy, tales como cefaleas, vértigo, náuseas, confusión mental, fatiga, depresión, insomnio, etc. 3. Sensibilidad eléctrica El botánico francés Thomas-François Dalibard -que llevó a cabo experimentos eléctricos sobre lo Vivo-, confía a Benjamin Franklin en una carta fechada en 1762 que no puede ir más allá a causa de la intolerancia eléctrica de su organismo. Fue uno de los primeros electro-hipersensibles (EHS) declarado formalmente. Leyendo el contenido de la carta, este botánico debió estar fuertemente afectado. Otros profesores e investigadores tuvieron la misma y triste experiencia y tuvieron que cesar sus trabajos. Incluso el tan famoso Benjamin Franklin sufrió una enfermedad neurológica crónica durante sus investigaciones sobre la electricidad, desde 1753, y los síntomas inducen a pensar claramente en la electro-hipersensibilidad. Tanto fue así que, a finales del siglo XVIII, tuvo fama popular el hecho de que la electricidad podía enfermar, según el sexo, la morfología y la condición física de los individuos. Igualmente, se había observado que algunos individuos reaccionaban fuertemente a los cambios meteorológicos, a menudo correlacionados con modificaciones eléctricas de la atmósfera. Algunos de esos sujetos son conocidos hasta nuestros días, como Cristóbal Colón, Dante, Charles Darwin, Benjamin Franklin, Goethe, Victor Hugo, Leonardo DaVinci, Marin Luther, Michel-Ange, Napoleón, Rousseau y Voltaire. 4. La pista descuidada Durante los años 1790, la ciencia se encontró frente a una crisis de identidad en cuanto a la interpretación y a la unificación de los cuatro diferentes fluidos que son la electricidad, la luz, el magnetismo y el calor. Respecto a la electricidad, había por un lado la percepción según Luigi Galvani, quien consideraba que la electricidad era parte integrante de lo Vivo, y por otro lado Volta, quien pensaba que la electricidad no era más que un efecto “secundario” de las reacciones químicas internas de lo vivo. Volta, inventor de la muy útil pila eléctrica y que podía ser potencialmente una fuente de consecuencias pecuniarias, tuvo éxito contra la visión más global de la interacción entre la electricidad y lo vivo. 5. Enfermedad eléctrica crónica Desde finales del siglo XIX, el paisaje de las ciudades se transformó con la instalación de líneas de telégrafo por doquier en los países industrializados. Esta tecnología utilizaba tensiones eléctricas del orden de 80 voltios en un solo conductor, haciéndose por Tierra el retorno de la señal. En aquel entonces nacieron las primeras corrientes vagabundas a los que fue expuesto lo Vivo. Aparecieron enfermedades de civilización tales como la neurastenia, de la cual fueron afectados Frank Lloyd Wright y Theodore Rooseevelt entre otras personalidades. Destaquemos de paso que la neurastenia se parece mucho a la electro-hipersensibilidad, término más moderno para designar la misma sensibilidad a la electricidad. Los telegrafistas empleados en manipular la corriente eléctrica enviada por las líneas, expuestos pues a campos electromagnéticos importantes, fueron golpeados por el mal telegráfico, la mitad de ellos aproximadamente. Una vez más, los síntomas eran los mismos que los de la EHS. Más tarde, hacia 1915, serán las telefonistas quienes afrontarán los mismos síntomas, pues estaban expuestas durante muchas horas a los campos electromagnéticos de las comunicaciones, ante su escritorio. En 1989 se constató que, en Winnipeg, un 47% de las operadoras telefónicas sufrían los mismos síntomas. Sin embargo, en 1894, un célebre psiquiatra vienés escribió un artículo cuya influencia fue nefasta en gran medida para todos los desgraciados que sufrían del mal telegráfico, neurastenia, síndrome de las micro-ondas o EHS. En lugar de ver la causa exterior de la contaminación electromagnética, atribuyó esos síntomas a pensamientos desordenados o a emociones mal controladas. Así, se medicalizó a millones de ciudadanos afectados por el smog electrónico en lugar de reducir su exposición a este contaminante. Sigmund Freud renombró la neurastenia -cuyo origen eléctrico se conocía bien- como neurosis de angustia o ataque de ansiedad, o incluso como ataque de pánico. Así pues, el desarrollo sin precaución de la electrificación pudo continuar sin trabas. Hay que remarcar que, en Rusia, la neurastenia fue clasificada como enfermedad medioambiental, pues la redefinición abusiva de Freud fue rehusada. 6. El comportamiento de las plantas Sir Jagadis Chunder Bose, así como otros investigadores, llevaron a cabo numerosos experimentos eléctricos en las plantas y en otros organismos vivos, con resultados que mostraron claros efectos. El descubrió que los nervios vegetales o animales tienen comportamientos variables y que la resistencia de éstos puede variar enormemente en función de la corriente aplicada y de su polaridad. También notó que la intensidad de corriente necesaria para modificar la conductividad de los nervios, respecto a las tensiones aplicadas, es infinitesimal, del orden de 0,3 microamperios (0,3x10-6). Encuentra que esta corriente es netamente inferior a la corriente inducida por una conversación telefónica por medio de un celular. Bose descubrió igualmente que el umbral de bio-actividad de una corriente es de un femtoamperio (1x10-15)! Como este investigador estaba igualmente familiarizado con las transmisiones por radiofrecuencias, ensayó someter a una planta a una señal de radio de 30 MHz a 200 metros de distancia y constató que la planta atrasó su crecimiento durante el tiempo de emisión. Mostró también que la circulación de la savia en la planta se ralentizaba cuando era irradiada por la misma señal de radio. 7. Enfermedad eléctrica aguda En los años 1880, Londres fue alimentada con corriente continua, pero algunos físicos habían descubierto que la distribución de la corriente alterna generaba menos pérdidas óhmicas (de resistencia) a través de los hilos. A consecuencia de ello tuvo lugar una batalla de corrientes, aunque numerosos científicos denunciaban los efectos más peligrosos de la corriente alterna, entre ellos Edison. De todos modos, irónicamente, es la corriente alterna la que se utiliza en la silla eléctrica, precisamente porque es más nociva. Todo el mundo sabe que la corriente eléctrica general es... alterna! En 1889, la electrificación a gran escala debutó en los EEUU, y poco después en Europa. Este mismo año, como por azar, los médicos se vieron asaltados por enfermos de la gripe, que hasta entonces sólo aparecía raramente. Los síntomas de las víctimas eran más bien neurológicos, del estilo de la neurastenia, excluyendo desórdenes respiratorios. Esa pandemia duró cuatro años y ocasionó al menos un millón de muertos. En 2001, el astrónomo canadiense Ken Tapping demostró que los tres últimos siglos de pandemias gripales estaban relacionado con picos de actividad solar magnética, con ciclos de once años. Constató asimismo que ciertas epidemias de gripe se expanden sobre enormes regiones en tan sólo unos días, hecho difícilmente explicable por el contagio persona a persona. Igualmente, numerosos experimentos ligados al contagio persona a persona por contacto, por proyección de mucus u otras procedencias, se revelaron infructuosos. Desde 1933 hasta nuestros días, los virólogos no pueden presentar ningún estudio experimental demostrando que la gripe se propaga por contacto normal entre personas. Todas las tentativas han fracasado. 8. El misterio de la isla de Wight En 1904, las abejas empezaron a morir en la isla de Wight, a raíz de la instalación de emisoras de ondas de radio por Marconi. Esas emisoras trabajaban en frecuencias próximas al megaherzio. Al otro lado de la Mancha, Jacques-Arsène d’Arsonval demostró que las señales electromagnéticas “agudas y enganchadas” son mucho más tóxicas que las señales sinusoidales. De hecho, Marconi, tras un año y medio de experimentación con emisores de radio, en plena salud a los 22 años, empezó a desarrollar fiebres. Estos accesos no desaparecieron hasta el fin de su vida. En 1904, mientras estaba ocupado realizando un emisor potente para las comunicaciones transatlánticas, esas fiebres fueron tan intensas que pensaron en la malaria. En 1905 se casó con Béatrice O’Brien, y tras su luna de miel se instalaron en la isla, cerca de un emisor. Tan pronto como Béatrice se instaló, notó tinnitus (acúfenos). Después de tres meses, cayó enferma de una terrible ictericia. Tuvo que volver a Londres para dar a luz un bebé que no sobrevivió más que algunas semanas y que murió por “causas desconocidas”. En ese mismo lapso de tiempo, Marconi pasó algunos meses con fiebre y delirios. Entre 1918 y 1921, sufrió de depresión suicida, mientras trabajaba en una emisora de onda corta. En 1927, estando en viaje de luna de miel de su segundo matrimonio, se vino abajo por dolores torácicos y fue diagnosticado de problemas del corazón. Entre 1934 y 1937, estando desarrollando la tecnología de microondas, sufrió nueve crisis cardíacas; la última lo mató a la edad de 63 años. En la misma isla, en Osborn House, la reina Victoria sufrió hemorragias cerebrales y murió la tarde del 22 de junio de 1901, justo en el momento en que Marconi puso en marcha una nueva emisora a menos de veinte kilómetros de allí. En 1901 sólo había dos emisoras, mientras que en 1904 había cuatro, convirtiendo con ello esa isla en el lugar más irradiado del planeta, no dejando lugar alguno a las abejas para sobrevivir. En 1906 se llevó a cabo un estudio que constató que el 90% de las abejas habían desaparecido verdaderamente sin razón aparente... Fueron traídas nuevas colonias a la isla pero esas sucumbieron igualmente en una semana. Esa epidemia se propagó a través de Inglaterra, luego a través del mundo occidental, para estabilizarse poco a poco, hasta que los ejércitos se equiparon de diversos emisores de radio de alta potencia, hacia el fin del primer conflicto mundial, en 1918, provocando, como vimos más arriba, la pandemia de gripe española que en realidad debutó en los Estados Unidos, en la Radio Escuela Naval de Cambridge, Massachusetts, con 400 casos. Esa epidemia se propagó rápidamente a 1.127 militares en Camp Funston (Kansas), donde se habían introducido las conexiones sin hilo. Lo que intrigó a los médicos fue que el 15% de la población civil estaba afectada de sangrado de nariz, mientras que un 40% de la Navy sufría de lo mismo. Otros sangrados aparecieron igualmente y un tercio de los muertos lo fueron por hemorragia interna en los pulmones o en el cerebro. De hecho, era la composición de la sangre la que era modificada, medida por un tiempo de coagulación de más del doble. Estos signos concuerdan poco con los efectos de los virus respiratorios de la gripe, pero son totalmente coherentes con los nefastos efectos de la electricidad. Otra incoherencia era que las víctimas eran en sus dos tercios jóvenes con buena salud. Todavía otro síntoma atípico de la gripe, el pulso descendía a valores entre 36 y 48, siendo este género de situaciones corrientes cuando se ha estado expuesto a los campos electromagnéticos. Así pues, algunos pudieron ser curados con administración masiva de calcio.. El Dr. Militar George A. Soper testificó que el virus se propagaba más rápido que la velocidad de desplazamiento de las personas. Fueron llevados a cabo diferentes experimentos para contaminar a sujetos persona a persona, por contacto directo o inoculación de mucus o de sangre, sin poder demostrar la contaminación. Se observa que cada nueva pandemia de gripe corresponde a un nuevo avance tecnológico eléctrico, como la gripe asiática de 1957-58 subsiguiente a la instalación de un potente sistema de vigilancia por radares, la gripe de Hong-Kong de julio de 1968, a raíz de la puesta en servicio de 28 satélites militares de vigilancia espacial a la altura de los cinturones de Van Allen para protegernos de los rayos cósmicos. 9. La envoltura eléctrica de la Tierra La Tierra en rotación con su centro constituido en su mayor parte por hierro, protegida por la ionosfera en primer lugar, luego la esfera de plasma -delimitada por los cinturones de radiación de Van Allen a una altura entre 1.000 y 55.000 km.-, y su continuación que es la magnetosfera, expuesta a los vientos solares procedentes de nuestra estrella del día, constituye una especie de dinamo, un sistema eléctrico complejo. Los intercambios eléctricos entre la corteza terrestre y la atmósfera, es decir la ionosfera, son permanentes y constantes. Están en equilibrio precario y una especie de “respiración” eléctrica de todo el sistema ha permitido que la vida se desarrolle sobre nuestro planeta cargada de iones negativos, por oposición a la ionosfera cargada positivamente. Se nota un campo eléctrico vertical medio del orden de 130 voltios por metro, con valores que pueden elevarse hasta los 4.000 voltios por metro en las tormentas, por ejemplo. En 1953 se descubrió uno de los primordiales parámetros de esta oscilación eléctrica de nuestro medio ambiente con las frecuencias de Schumann (Winfried) respirando a 7.83 hertz, con armónicas a 14, 20, 26, 32 Hz, llamadas Very Low Frequencies, muy bajas frecuencias. No sorprende que los organismos que viven en este ambiente se hayan impregnado de estos valores físicos y que, por ejemplo, nuestros ritmos cerebrales se sitúen en estos rangos de frecuencias, como el ritmo alfa entre 8 y 13 Hz. Si percibimos las frecuencias visibles (del azul al rojo) del espectro electromagnético, algunos animales pueden llegar a ver otras frecuencias electromagnéticas, como las abejas, que ven los ultra-violetas, o las salamandras o peces gato que pueden ver las bajas frecuencias eléctricas, mientras las serpientes ven las infra-rojas. Experimentos en laboratorio con los hamsters, por ejemplo, demostraron que la reducción de la temperatura y de la duración del día no bastaban para hacerlos hibernar. Además, hamsters criados en jaula de Faraday rehusaban hibernar aunque los parámetros de luz y de temperatura eran invernales, hasta el momento en que la protección de Faraday fue suprimida. Se realizaron otros experimentos, por ejemplo en 1967, en el instituto Max Plank, a cargo del fisiólogo Rütger Wever, utilizando dos cámaras enterradas, sin ventanas ni contacto exterior, una blindada electromagnéticamente, la otra no. Se demostró que en la cámara blindada los ritmos circadianos de los sujetos voluntarios se desincronizaban y podían variar entre 12 y 65 horas, con desórdenes metabólicos, mientras que los sujetos de la cámara sumergida en los campos terrestres mantenían un ritmo coherente cercano a las 24 horas y que su metabolismo continuaba funcionando más normalmente. Se demostró científicamente que lo Vivo necesita estar bañado en el sistema electromagnético de nuestro ambiente natural para funcionar bien. Por otra parte, la acupuntura, medicina tradicional milenaria china, utiliza nuestras propiedades eléctricas modificando las conexiones de los meridianos. Se comprobó recientemente, en los años 1950, que estos meridianos corresponden verdaderamente a circuitos eléctricos y que el Qi chino corresponde a la noción de electricidad. Los meridianos tienen doble función, por una parte transportan las informaciones y la energía interna del organismo de un órgano a otro, pero además sirven de antenas para captar los flujos electromagnéticos ambientales. Al principio de los años 1970, los físicos atmosféricos descubrieron que el campo magnético terrestre había sido bastante perturbado por la actividad eléctrica humana. En efecto, enviando una señal al espacio y captando su eco, se dieron cuenta que la señal inicial había sido modificada por múltiples de los 60 Hz de la red eléctrica utilizada en Norteamérica. Eso no impidió el lanzar el proyecto HAARP para deliberadamente modificar las propiedades electromagnéticas de nuestro planeta. Asimismo, los cinturones de Van Allen que nos protegen de los rayos cósmicos, han sido ya alterados por nuestra actividad eléctrica y podría ser que inicialmente ese cinturón doble hubiera sido un cinturón simple que, ante la emisión de cargas eléctricas humanas en el espacio se hubieran deteriorado en su parte central. Observaciones satelitales muestran que las radiaciones producidas por las líneas de alta tensión ocultan a menudo las radiaciones naturales de las iluminaciones. En este contexto, es lógico pensar que las pandemias de gripes conocidas estos últimos decenios estén ligadas a la actividad eléctrica humana. 10. Las porfirinas y la base de la Vida En toda transformación de energía en el dominio biológico están implicadas las porfirinas (pigmentos formados por cuatro moléculas de pirrol). Si nuestros nervios pueden hacer su función es gracias entre otras cosas a las porfirinas que están implicadas en el funcionamiento de nuestras células. Son moléculas especiales que constituyen en vínculo entre el oxígeno y la vida. Estas moléculas son altamente reactivas e interactúan con los metales tóxicos o con los elementos sintéticos procedentes del petróleo, con los campos electromagnéticos, que si son excesivos provocan la porfiria, mayormente una sensibilidad medioambiental que una enfermedad. Los estudios del Dr. William E Morton demostraron que las personas que sufren sensibilidad química múltiple (SQM) son igualmente deficientes en un 90% en una u otra forma de enzimas de pórfido, como las personas electro- hipersensibles, lo cual significa que las dos formas de sensibilidad no son sino manifestaciones diferentes de una misma causa. La porfiria descubierta en 1891 afecta alrededor de un 10% de la población moderna y su aparición es coincidente con la electrificación general de Occidente desde 1889. Las porfirinas son algo central en el smog electrónico, no sólo a causa de la EHS, el SQM o la porfiria, sino igualmente en lo que concierne a las enfermedades cardiovasculares, el cáncer, la diabetes, por el hecho de que están implicadas en multitud de procesos energéticos biológicos. El biólogo Allan Frey, así como Wldzimierz Sedlak, demostraron en los años 1960 que nuestros organismos tienen ciertamente un componente bio-electrónico y que algunas de nuestras células se comportan a veces como conductores, o capacitancias, o semiconductores (transistores), como los compuestos que encontramos en nuestros aparatos electrónicos. Así sucede con la mielina (la funda de nuestros nervios), que contiene la porfirina intrincada con el zinc. Si venenos medioambientales como los productos químicos o metales tóxicos afectan este equilibrio, la funda es alterada, lo cual cambia la excitabilidad de los nervios que envuelve. El sistema nervioso por entero se convierte entonces en hiper-reactivo a los estímulos de toda clase, como los campos electromagnéticos. El sistema entra en un estado de inestabilidad divergente, donde el efecto se convierte en la causa. Contrariamente a la concepción de que las mitocondrias son los elementos de nuestras células productoras de energía, aparece la idea de que la vaina de mielina es una mitocondria gigante. La conexión entre la porfiria y el zinc fue descubierta en los años 1950 por Henry Peters en la Medical School de Wisconsin. Los pacientes que sufrían de porfiria y de síntomas neurológicos excretaban mucho zinc en la orina, así tuvo la idea de que una quelación del zinc podría mejorar su estado. Constató una mejora, a pesar de la idea extendida de que una carencia de zinc estaba asociada a las perturbaciones citadas. Asimismo, algunos experimentos muestran que la quelación del zinc mejora la condición del Alzheimer. Un equipo médico australiano demostró por autopsia que los cerebros de sujetos afectados de Alzheimer contenían dos veces más zinc que los de pacientes sanos. 2a parte En la actualidad. Corazón irritable En 1980, las paradas cardíacas de los jóvenes atletas eran raras, sólo nueve casos anuales. A partir de esta fecha, los casos aumentaron constantemente un 10% cada año hasta 1996, cuando de repente esta tasa se dobló para alcanzar 64 casos, luego 66 el año siguiente y 76 el último año del estudio. La comunidad médica americana no tenía explicación para ello, mientras en Europa, en 2002, una alerta de los médicos medioambientales alemanes pedía una moratoria para los relés de antena, pues sus ondas provocaban disfunciones cardiovasculares. Era la Alerta de Freibourg. El Dr. Samuel Milham, epidemiólogo del departamento americano de salud, demostró en sus trabajos que las enfermedades cardiovasculares, la diabetes y el cáncer son considerablemente, si no enteramente, provocadas por la electricidad. Paradójicamente, los estudios sobre el colesterol fechados al inicio del siglo XX no mostraban un riesgo más elevado de enfermedades cardiovasculares correlacionados a la tasa de colesterol, contrariamente a lo que se admite generalmente en nuestros días. Un estudio sobre los animales del zoo de Filadelfia muestra que, entre 1916 y 1964, la tasa de colesterol en mamíferos y pájaros aumentó en un factor de 10 a 20, mientras que su régimen alimentario se había mantenido estrictamente igual! El parámetro que había cambiado drásticamente era claramente el aumento de las radiofrecuencias. Durante la segunda guerra mundial, cierto número de soldados se quejaron de síntomas parecidos a la neurastenia. En principio se pensó, según la doctrina de Freud, que estaban afectados por problemas de ansiedad, luego un estudio sobre 144 casos fue realizado por el Dr. Mandel Cohen. Este estudio reveló que, efectivamente, esos soldados eran fisiológicamente menos resistentes, con un corazón irritable. Sufrían de una dificultad de asimilación del oxígeno y debían respirar dos veces más que sus colegas más saludables para captar suficientemente el oxígeno. Resultó que sus mitocondrias no eran eficientes. En última instancia, se demostró que los soldados eran hipersensibles en general, pero en particular a la electricidad. En la Unión Soviética, desde los años 1950, se observó también que las radiofrecuencias modificaban los electrocardiogramas de las personas expuestas, por la modificación de la eficacia de las mitocondrias. Los diagramas de las estadísticas del número de muertos por enfermedades cardíacas en función del grado de electrificación de los estados americanos en 1931 y 1940 son además muy explícitos, no dejando ninguna duda en cuanto a la toxicidad de los campos electromagnéticos sobre el corazón, exonerando al colesterol y a la alimentación juzgada demasiado rica en grasas. 12. La transformación de la diabetes Thomas Edison, implicado en los descubrimientos asociados a la tecnología eléctrica y por tanto sumergido más que el resto de sus conciudadanos de la época en campos electromagnéticos, fue diagnosticado en 1882 de una enfermedad muy rara, la diabetes. Otro investigador, Graham Bell, activo en el campo de la telegrafía e inventor del teléfono, era conocido por sus incesantes quejas concerniendo a sus síntomas de neurastenia, llamados hoy EHS. En 1915 también fue diagnosticado con diabetes. En 1876, la obra Maladie des temps modernes de Ward Richardson describe la diabetes como una enfermedad moderna rara, causada por el agotamiento en el trabajo mental o por shock del sistema nervioso. Naturalmente, el excesivo aporte a nuestra alimentación moderna de azúcar tóxico y adictivo tiene el mayor motivo para explicar que hoy la diabetes, incluida la pre-diabetes, golpee a más de la mitad de los americanos. Pero esa explicación es simplista. Even Joslin mostró que entre 1900 y 1917 el aporte en azúcar había aumentado un 17%, mientras que la mortalidad por diabetes se había duplicado. Más tarde, en 1987, se llevó a cabo un estudio sobre los amerindios, demostrando dimensiones radicalmente diferentes de muerte por diabetes según los territorios, variando de 7 por mil en el noroeste a 380 por mil en Arizona! Durante esos años, ni el modo de vida ni el régimen alimentario podían justificar tal brecha. Sin embargo, un factor medioambiental puede explicar tal diferencia. En efecto, la electrificación de las reservas indias se realizó de manera desigual, y las del noroeste fueron electrificadas mucho más tardíamente. Por el contrario, la reserva de Arizona está situada en los inicios inmediatos del programa Phoenix. Además, esta comunidad india tenía su propia instalación eléctrica y su empresa de telecomunicaciones. Otro ejemplo está en la población brasileña, productora importante de azúcar desde hace siglos, que no conocían la diabetes en 1870, mientras que aparecía ya como enfermedad de civilización en América del Norte. Todavía hoy, los brasileños consumen 70 kg. de azúcar refinado por año y por persona, más que los norteamericanos y, a pesar de eso, han tenido dos veces y media menos diabetes que en los USA. En Bután, la diabetes era prácticamente inexistente hasta 2002, cuando empezó la electrificación del país. En 2004 se anunciaron 634 nuevos casos de diabetes, 944 en 2004, 1.470 en 2006, 2.540 en 2007 con 15 muertos. En 2012, contaron 91 muertos y la diabetes era la octava causa de mortalidad en el país, aunque el régimen alimentario no había cambiado! El smog electrónico, actuando sobre las mitocondrias, como lo vimos en el capítulo precedente, impide una buena utilización del azúcar absorbido, es decir la combustión del azúcar. Este, no pudiendo ser convertido en energía mecánica, es almacenado en forma de grasa por el organismo. Los diagramas estadísticos de la mortandad por diabetes en función del grado de electrificación de los estados americanos entre 1931 y 1940 son además igualmente muy explícitos, no dejando ninguna duda en cuanto a la implicación de los campos electromagnéticos en la aparición de la diabetes a grande escala, eximiendo, en cierta medida, al consumo de azúcar. En 1997, en USA, se constata un aumento de los casos de diabetes en un 31% en un año. Corresponde exactamente a la introducción masiva de teléfonos celulares en ese país. 13. Cáncer y déficit de Vida En febrero del 2011, la Corte Suprema de Italia acusó al cardenal Roberto Tucci, presidente saliente de Radio Vaticana, de haber ocasionado por negligencia un problema público al contaminar el medio ambiente con radiofrecuencias. En efecto, en el periodo entre 1997 y 2003, los niños habitando en un radio de 12 kilómetros de las antenas tuvieron tasas de leucemia, linfomas o mielomas ocho veces superiores a los que residían a una mayor distancia. Lo mismo se encontró en relación a los adultos, con una tasa siete veces superior. Otto Heinrich Warburg, doctor y profesor alemán, premio Nobel de medicina en 1931, demostró que el cáncer es una regresión de las células privadas de oxígeno, empujándolas a multiplicarse anárquicamente como en un mundo primitivo en el cual el oxígeno no estaba presente como lo está en la actualidad. La privación de oxígeno inicial era debido a un mal funcionamiento de las mitocondrias, lo cual se ha visto más arriba que puede ser provocado por los campos electromagnéticos u otros contaminantes tales como el humo del tabaco, los pesticidas, los aditivos alimentarios y la polución del aire. El mismo principio de déficit de oxígeno en las células es válido para la diabetes y es la razón de que se encuentre una tasa de cáncer más elevada en los diabéticos que en el resto de la población. En el zoo de Filadelfia, en el periodo de 1901 a 1955, se constató un aumento de la tasa de tumores malignos en los mamíferos, variando entre 2 veces más y 22 veces más entre las dos fechas. Estadísticas de mortandad por cáncer muestran una clara correlación entre la electrificación de los países y la tasa de cáncer. Por ejemplo en EEUU, en el periodo que va de 1841 a 1850, la tasa era de 6,6 por mil. En el siguiente periodo de 1851 a 1860 hizo más que duplicarse, con una tasa de 14 por mil. La explicación la proporciona el despliegue masivo del telégrafo en 1854. En 1914, entre los 63.000 amerindios que vivían en reservas sin electrificar, contamos dos muertes por cáncer, mientras que en el resto del país la tasa de mortalidad por cáncer fue 25 veces mayor... Entre 1920 y 1921 la mortalidad por cáncer aumentó entre un 3 y un 10% en los países occidentales, a raíz de la introducción de las primeras estaciones emisoras de radio AM. Los investigadores suecos Olle Johansson y Orjan Hallberg acreditaron una clara correlación entre las tasas de cáncer de mama, de próstata y de pulmón, con la exposición de la población a las radiofrecuencias. Consignaron un aumento significativo de esas tasas en 1920, 1955 y 1069, y una disminución (!) en 1978, lo cual corresponde a la evolución del smog provocado por las radiofrecuencias, respectivamente por la introducción de la radio AM, la de la radio FM y la T1,la llegada de la TV2 en color, luego el cese de las emisiones de radio AM. Estos mismos estudiosos descubrieron igualmente una excelente correlación lineal entre el número de las emisoras de radio FM por unidad de superficie y la incidencia de los melanomas, con 11 veces más melanomas los lugares expuestos en relación con las zonas no expuestas. Además, pusieron en evidencia que los melanomas aparecen sólo raramente en las zonas corporales más expuestas al sol, como la frente, la nariz, los hombros y los pies, sino más bien en los lugares del cuerpo habitualmente protegidos del sol. Es más, la proliferación del cáncer de piel llegó antes de la moda de las vacaciones en balnearios cuando la exposición solar es intensa. Se demuestra que los melanomas no tienen como causa principal el sol, sino las radiofrecuencias. Igualmente explícitos son los diagramas de estadísticas de mortalidad por cáncer en función del grado de electrificación de los estados americanos entre 1931 y 1940, así como lo son para la diabetes y las enfermedades cardiovasculares, no dejando ninguna duda en cuanto a la implicación de los campos electromagnéticos en la proliferación del cáncer. Los datos honestos concernientes a los tumores cerebrales son raros, pues el lobby de la telefonía móvil está infiltrada desde hace decenios en estos medios para ordenar estudios sesgados. Uno de ellos mostraba incluso una disminución de la incidencia de tumores correlativa al uso intensivo del teléfono celular! Por otra parte, la Universidad de Calgary puso en evidencia un aumento del 30% en la incidencia de tumores cerebrales malignos entre el periodo de 2012 a 2013 y Lennart Hardell, profesor en oncología del hospital universitario de Orebro en Suecia, demostró que 2.000 horas de uso de un celular aumenta el riesgo de tumor en un factor comprendido entre tres y ocho, dependiendo de la edad del sujeto y de sus hábitos telefónicos. En el 2000, Neil Cherry analizó las tasas de cáncer de los niños de San Francismo en función de la distancia entre su residencia y la emisora de televisión y radio FM Sutro Tower. Los niños que vivían en colinas o crestas se vieron más afectados. Los que habitaban a menos de un kilómetro de la antena tuvieron incidencias 9 veces mayores de leucemias, 15 veces más linfomas, 31 veces más tumores cerebrales. En conjunto, un porcentaje 18 veces superior a los que vivían fuera de este radio de un kilómetro. 14. Vida deficiente En el Tratado práctico del agotamiento nervioso de George Miller Beard, electroterapeuta y amigo de Thomas Edison, en 1889, se puede leer una observación intrigante: Incluso si estas dificultades no son directamente fatales, aunque no aparezcan directamente en las tablas de mortalidad, al contrario, podrían tender a prolongar la vida y a proteger al organismo de enfermedades inflamatorias, a pesar de todo el sufrimiento es enorme. Los que más sufrían parecían ser más jóvenes que su edad real. Llendo más lejos, Bearn constata que una enfermedad rara parece más bien afectar a los sujetos neurasténicos que al resto de la población, se trata de la diabetes. Bearn ya había observado que el aumento de la esperanza de vida no era pareja con la calidad de la misma. La misteriosa relación entre el sufrimiento de los neurasténicos (cuyos síntomas son los mismos que los de las personas electro-hipersensibles contemporáneas), y el alargamiento de su vida, mostraba de hecho una disfunción mayor. Además, durante mucho tiempo se ha observado que un modo de vida ascético, con una alimentación pobre en calorías, tenía la facultad de prolongar la esperanza de vida y la salud. Es el caso por ejemplo de la población de Okinawa, donde el número de personas centenarias es cuarenta veces superior a la población de las prefecturas más ricas, situadas más al norte. Investigadores en el estudio del envejecimiento han subrayado que el motor de nuestra vida es el sistema de transporte de los electrones en las mitocondrias de nuestras células. Es allí donde se combinan el aire que respiramos y lo que comemos, a un ritmo que determina nuestra tasa de envejecimiento, es decir nuestra esperanza de vida. Si una disminución de la combustión realizada en el seno de nuestras células moderando la cantidad de energía canalizada puede incluso ser benéfica, otra clase de reducción podría contrariamente ser nefasta. Se trata del desgaste en la cadena de transporte de los electrones. Una de las posibilidades de intoxicación es la exposición crónica a los campos electromagnéticos artificiales. Esta contaminación que no para de crecer ejerce unas fuerzas exteriores sobre los electrones de nuestras mitocondrias, ralentizándolos, privando a nuestras células de oxígeno y provocando síntomas de EHS. 15. ¿Dicen que entienden la electricidad? En 1962, una mujer contactó con la universidad de Santa Bárbara (CA, USA) para que la ayudaran a encontrar la fuente del misterioso sonido que ella oía por todas partes en su casa, en un barrio sin embargo tranquilo. Eso le impedía dormir y lastimaba su salud. Unas mediciones mostraron efectivamente campos electromagnéticos particularmente fuertes emanando de todas las conducciones eléctricas, tanto de la red como de los radiadores u otros elementos metálicos, pero el estetoscopio guardaba silencio. El ingeniero participó en un experimento, registrando en una cinta los campos medidos, y los enseñó a la mujer afectada por los sonidos. Le confirmó que era lo mismo que ella oía. Así pues, esa mujer oía los campos electromagnéticos de su ambiente. Se instalaron tomas a tierra y filtros electrónicos con el fin de reducir las perturbaciones a un nivel aceptable. Pero previamente Volta, entre otros estudiosos, ya había experimentado con éxito la producción de sonidos variados aplicando una tensión al nivel de las oídos. Mucho más tarde, igualmente en los años 1960, el biólogo Allan Frey publicó artículos sobre la capacidad de algunos individuos de escuchar las emisiones de una instalación de radar. El modelo mecánico de funcionamiento del oído tal como se enseña en las escuelas no permite explicar esos fenómenos observados. Constatando eso, el bioquímico Lionel Naftalin desarrolló un nuevo modelo de funcionamiento del oído humano, teniendo en cuenta el fenómeno de piezo-electricidad, bien conocido y utilizado por los electrónicos, que descubrió en el gel que recubre las pestañas del oído interno. En este gel que no se encuentra en ninguna otra parte del cuerpo humano y que tiene unas propiedades eléctricas muy particulares, se manifestaba un voltaje de 199 a 120 milivoltios, lo cual es mucho en el campo de la bio-electrónica. Este gel piezo- eléctrico transforma las ondas sonoras en una señal eléctrica comunicada a las pestañas del oído interno. Este nuevo modelo revisado del funcionamiento del oído humano permite entonces explicar que, no sólo algunos individuos en ciertas condiciones puedan llegar a escuchar una señal electromagnética, sino también que tantos ciudadanos contemporáneos sufran de acúfenos, o incluso que algunos grupos de ciudadanos escuchen el Om, un poco en todas partes del planeta, a razón de entre el 2 y el 11% de la población. Actualmente, alrededor de un 44% de los adultos americanos tienen acúfenos a diversos nieles de intensidad, mientras que en Suecia el número de jóvenes afectados era de un 12% en 1997 y del 42% en 2006! Estos ruidos parásitos son en gran parte el resultado de un medio ambiente enormemente polucionado por campos electromagnéticos artificiales de toda naturaleza. 16. Abejas, pájaros, árboles y humanos Alfonso Balmori Martínez, biólogo español, relacionó la densidad de población de los gorriones con los valores de radiaciones en radiofrecuencias en sus lugares de vida. En los lugares más irradiados, por encima de 3 V/m, los gorriones no podían vivir, mientras que todavía hay 42 individuos por hectárea si el nivel es de 0,1 V/m. Observó igualmente una clara modificación del comportamiento de las cigueñas, que se pelean con su pareja antes que construir el nido o incubar los huevos, si están próximas (200 m) a una antena transmisora. El Reino Unido clasificó al gorrión doméstico como especie en vías de extinción después de que su población declinó un 75% entre 1994 y 2002, período que coincide con el despliegue de la telefonía móvil. Los criadores de palomas viajeras de varios continentes constatan que hasta un 90% de volátiles liberados no reencuentran el camino de retorno al palomar, cuando tradicionalmente el porcentaje era despreciable. En el 2000, los criadores ingleses intentaron modificar el trayecto de la carrera para evitar las antenas transmisoras, con el fin de darles una mejor oportunidad. En 2004 estos mismos criadores mandaron más amplios estudios sobre el impacto de las microondas sobre las palomas. En 2004, el US National Park Service difundió una nota a los biólogos que estudian el comportamiento de los animales salvajes, explicando que los chips RFID de localización por radiofrecuencia adheridos a esos animales podían modificar radicalmente su comportamiento, a causa de las radiofrecuencias generadas. En ambientes contaminados por campos electromagnéticos, los pinzones no consiguen orientarse para migrar, mientras que sí lo consiguen si están dentro de una jaula de Faraday. Un experimento con renacuajos de sapo criados en dos piscinas separadas, a 140 metros de una antena transmisora, una sin blindaje electromagnético y la otra con él, mostró una tasa de mortalidad de, respectivamente, 90% y 4%! El mismo género de efectos peligrosos se encuentra en relación con los insectos, cuando son sometidos al smog electrónico que encontramos en la vida cotidiana, y el Dr. Panagopoulous, que experimentó con las drosofilas, nos informa que las exposiciones a las microondas a niveles corrientes, no más que algunos minutos por día durante varios días, son el peor agente estresante del que tenemos conocimiento en nuestra vida corriente. Peor que los productos químicos o los campos electromagnéticos de baja frecuencia. Las abejas son afectadas igualmente, como lo vimos al principio de este resumen al tratar sobre la isla de Wight. El Dr. Daniel Favre (Suiza) demostró que en presencia de microondas las abejas emiten el sonido típico que se oye cuando enjambran, hecho que lleva a creer que los insectos quieren huir de la fuente de emisión. Comúnmente se incrimina a la varroa en el síndrome de colapso de las colonias, pero se olvida que esta polilla ha cohabitado durante largo tiempo con las abejas. Además, se observa que incluso una colonia muerta no es actualmente tomada por asalto por los parásitos, cuando ése era el caso “antes”. Se acusa igualmente a los pesticidas, pero como se ha visto más arriba las abejas de la isla de Wight habían desaparecido en un 90% sin que el lugar hubiera sido tratado con pesticidas. La verdadera causa del colapso de las colonias son los campos electromagnéticos humanos, especialmente la telefonía móvil. En la década de 1980 surgió un nuevo tema de noticias: la muerte de los bosques. Se echó la culpa a la lluvia ácida, pero las regiones más remotas, no bañadas más que por aire puro, fueron golpeadas igualmente. Se emprendieron investigaciones en Alemania y en Suiza. Efectivamente, el suelo de los bosques afectados era ácido, pero se determinó tanto por observación como por experimentación que esta acidez puede igualmente proceder de una electrolisis lenta del suelo debido a los árboles expuestos a ondas de radar, por ejemplo. Por otra parte, los árboles de las cimas estaban más afectadas pues estaban más expuestas a los nuevos radares instalados en la década de 1970. Cuando la caída del muro de Berlín se observó algo más. Los gigantescos radares rusos en Skruda, que irradiaban enormemente toda la región en su función de vigilancia del oeste, habían provocado daños, no solamente al bosque, sino también a los animales y a los humanos. Tras múltiples estudios, se encontró especialmente que los anillos de crecimiento de los árboles durante los años de funcionamiento de los radares eran claramente menos espesos que antes o después de aquéllos. En Schwarzenbourg, en Suiza, una antena de radio de onda corta fue instalada en 1939, luego se aumentó la potencia de emisión en 1954. A continuación siguió un degradación de la salud de los habitantes, que se quejaron de los síntomas propiosde la EHS. Los niños de ese pueblo tenían dificultades en la escuela y al parecer no podían acceder a una formación superior, contrariamente a los niños de pueblos vecinos menos expuestos. Finalmente, en 1992 se realizó un estudio, confirmando que los parámetros de los análisis fisiológicos de las personas y de los animales del lugar eran anormales, dentro de un radio de 900 metros alrededor de la antena. También se constató que los anillos de crecimiento de los árboles estaban comprimidos, pero sólo del lado de donde llegaban las radiaciones. El 28 de marzo de 1998 se paró el emisor y se realizó un estudio “antes-después”, demostrando que la tasa de melatonina de los 58 individuos testados había remontado. Un aldeano de 50 años pudo por fin dormir una noche entera sin interrupción, por primera vez en su vida. El 20 de mayo de 1996, Philippe Roch, director de la Oficina del Medio Ambiente, declaró que “se había probado una correlación entre los disturbios del sueño y las operaciones de transmisiones”. 17. En el país de los ciegos ¿Cuánto tiempo habrá que esperar todavía para poder decir “¡tu celular me está matando!”, en lugar de “soy electro-hipersensible”? Y sin embargo la cantidad de gente que sufre cefaleas a causa del uso de sus celulares es enorme. En 2010, dos tercios de los estudiantes en una universidad ucraniana interrogados admitieron este hecho. El problema está en que no es aceptable socialmente el admitirlo abiertamente. Madame Gro Harlem Brundtland era EHS cuando asumió las riendas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. No lo ocultaba, pero un año más tarde tuvo que dejar su lugar. Los otros personajes públicos de alto rango no repetirán su experiencia. Unicamente una minoría de las personas que sufren por la contaminación electromagnética saben por qué sufren, mientras una gran mayoría lo ignora. La población entera es electrocutada a distancia y casi tiene que disculparse por ser electro-sensible o más exactamente electro-hipersensible, como si uno debiera disculparse por ser “cianuro-hipersensible”, pues la verdad es que la electricidad tal como se está usando actualmente es tóxica. Al fin y al cabo, las estadísticas gráficas muestran claramente un aumento de la mortalidad de los ciudadanos de nueve ciudades americanas, poco después de la puesta en servicio de las primeras antenas transmisoras. Esta sobre-mortalidad va del 25 a más del 80%. Una encuesta preguntando a los neoyorquinos si habían aparecido en sus casas algunos síntomas relativos a la EHS a partir del 15 de noviembre de 1996, a través de un periódico, recogió cientos de testimonios, de toda mezcla de clases raciales o sociales. La fecha en cuestión era la de la puesta en servicio de la primera red de telefonía móvil celular. La organización Cellular Phone Task Force que inauguró Arthur Firstenberg en 1996 se inunda de peticiones de ayuda de personas lesionadas por las microondas de radiofrecuencia. Parece que pronto no quedará ningún sitio a donde ir, tanto han proliferado las emisoras de toda naturaleza, tanto WiFi como WiMAX, estaciones de radar o incluso radiaciones que llegan del cielo, como los satélites de telecomunicación. El profesor Olle Johansson, del célebre instituto Karolinska que concede los premios Nobel de Medicina, se ocupa desde 1977 en demostrar los efectos del smog electrónico sobre lo Vivo. El éxito de sus estudios lo llevó a ser marginado en su instituto, desaparecieron los presupuestos para sus investigaciones, recibió amenazas de muerte y, en una ocasión, escapó por los pelos a una tentativa de asesinato por sabotaje de su moto. A pesar de todo, continúa informando al mundo sobre la verdad para defender, entre otros, a los EHS cuya vida es un infierno en la Tierra. Está disgustado por la manera en que las autoridades de países que se declaran “democráticos” dejan hundirse a las víctimas de las radiofrecuencias. La Dra. Erica Mallery-Blythe, con doble nacionalidad inglesa y americana, terminó sus estudios en 1998. En 2007, siguiendo a su marido piloto de un F-16 en EEUU, fue afectada severamente de EHS, sin saberlo. Sus búsquedas por internet le permitieron finalmente comprender lo que le sucedía. En tanto que médico, se preguntó cómo podía existir un ataque tan profundo e invalidante sin que ella hubiera oído hablar jamás de ello en su profesión. Por cuestión de conciencia, decidió someterse a un IRM, con el fin de eliminar todo riesgo de tumor cerebral. Creyó que llegaba su fin cuando se activaron las pulsaciones de alta frecuencia. Reencontró toda su salud y su vitalidad cuando se alejó de las radiofrecuencias. En adelante, se consagró a informar y ayudar a la minoría del 5% de personas EHS, totalmente abandonadas a su suerte por las autoridades. Yury Grigoriev, considerado como el abuelo de los estudios sobre los CEM en Rusia, está muy preocupado por los jóvenes en particular, mencionando que es la primera vez en la historia de la humanidad que se expone abiertamente su cerebro a las microondas, algo muy grave a los ojos de un radio-biólogo. Cita principalmente un estudio coreano que demuestra que el desorden del déficit de atención (ADHD) en los niños va aparejado al uso del celular conectado. Leif Salford, un neurocirujano sueco, y su equipo, probaron a finales de los años 1990 que el celular convierte en permeable la barrera hemato-encefálica, provocando la enfermedad de Alzheimer. En 2003 demostraron que una exposición única de solamente dos horas deja daños permanentes en el cerebro. En 2015, científicos turcos irradiaron unas ratas, una hora diaria durante un mes, por medio de las ondas típicas de un teléfono celular. Las ratas irradiadas tenían un 10% menos de células cerebrales que las que se había mantenido alejadas. El mismo equipo experimentó en ratas con crías, durante 9 días, con el mismo nivel de radiaciones. Su descendencia mostraba degeneraciones en su cerebro, en la médula espinal, el corazón, riñones, bazo, timo y testículos. El mismo experimento repetido en ratas jóvenes provocó una atrofia de la médula espinal con disminución de mielina, de manera similar a lo que se observa en la esclerosis en placas. En septiembre de 1998 fueron puestos en servicio los 66 primeros satélites de la telefonía espacial, causando un crecimiento de la mortalidad nacional americana de cerca del 5%, durante las dos semanas siguientes. Durante el mismo periodo, se observó que los pájaros no volaban y que las personas EHS estaban especialmente enfermas. Hoy en día nos sobrevuelan alrededor de 1.100 satélites artificiales, pero algunas empresas proyectan lanzar hasta 4.600 nuevos satélites de comunicación cada una de aquí al 2020, para cubrir todo el planeta con acceso a internet rápido. Se trata de Google, Facebook, SpaceX, OneWeb y Samsung. En 1968, tan sólo la primera flotilla de 28 satélites militares provocó una pandemia de gripe mundial. Contrariamente a las antenas transmisoras, cuyas radiaciones están muy atenuadas cuando llegan a la magnetosfera, los satélites actúan directamente sobre ésta, según mecanismos todavía mal comprendidos, comprometiendo la Vida sobre la Tierra. Estamos olvidando las advertencias de Ross Adey, el abuelo del bio-electromagnetismo y del físico atmosférico Neil Cherry, de que estamos ajustados eléctricamente para el mundo que nos rodea y que el nivel de exposición a las radiofrecuencias seguro es cero. La necesidad urgente de actuar contra esta iniciativa potencialmente catastrófica se puede lograr conectando con la asociación Global Union Against Radiation Deployment from Space (GUARDS). En 2014, el médico Tesuharu Shinjyo publicó un estudio “antes-después”. Evaluó la salud de 122 habitantes de un inmueble en el cual se habían instalado antenas transmisoras. De ellos, 21 sufrían fatiga crónica, 14 vértigos o enfermedad de Menière, 14 cefaleas, 17 dolores o infecciones oculares, 14 insomnios, 10 sangrado de nariz crónica. Cinco meses después que las antenas fueron eliminadas, no persistían más que 2 casos de insomnio, 1 caso de vértigo y 1 caso de cefaleas! La urgencia en materia de derechos humanos que concierne a centenares de millones de ciudadanos a escala planetaria y la urgencia medioambiental amenazando de extinción a tantas numerosas especies vegetales y animales deben ser afrontadas con clarividencia. YOU CAN ORDER THE PAPERBACK/EBOOK VERSION HERE ONLINE HERE: https://geni.us/invisiblerainbow The Invisible Rainbow Arthur Firstenberg A History of Electricity and Life 5g is being rolled out across the country, despite growing evidence that it is disruptive to our health, our safety, and the environment. The Invisible Rainbow is the groundbreaking story of electricity as it’s never been told before—exposing its very real impact on the biosphere and human health. DOWNLOADS OF THIS SUMMARY IN MULTIPLE LANGUAGES ARABIC- INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY CZECH- INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY CHINESE - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY HUNGARY - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY PORTUGESE - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY RUSSIAN - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY {lease try and order paperbacks through your local high street bookshop. MORE RECOMMENDED BOOKS

“COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is not recommended for children aged below 18 years.” MHRA SOURCE - Why was AstraZeneca given to 12,600 children? _ Why didn't the original AZ 'safe and effective' trial data reveal the AZ danger for children? - Were these 12,600 children unwitting participants in a next-stage trial within the general population? - Are the 262 children injured receiving adequate care and compensation? - Since only 1 in 10 reactions are reported, have any efforts been made to track the other 2,000+ children who have possibly also been injured? - Will they be being looked for, cared for - and will their injuries be compensated? - Or will AZ alongside the MHRA brush this under the carpet and hope the children's GP's don't put 2 + 2 together? MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 23RD MAR 2022 (Data published 31st Mar 2022) How many and what types of adverse events have been reported in children? PFIZER - 3,300,000 children - 1st doses 1,900,000 - 2nd doses 200,000 boosters 3,366 YELLOW CARD REPORTS 1 in ASTRAZENECA 12,600 children - 1st doses 9,200 - 2nd doses 262 YELLOW CARD REPORTS 1 in 48 injured MODERNA 2100 children - 1st doses 1400 - 2nd doses 24 YELLOW CARD REPORTS 1 in 105 injured Brand Unspecified 22 YELLOW CARD REPORTS TOTAL JABS = 3,314,700 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3,621 A CLOSER LOOK 🦋 ASTRAZENECA As of 23/03/22 12,600 children have received one or more doses of Astrazeneca, resulting in a Yellow Card reporting rate of 1 in 48 children Official government guidance is available for patients & healthcare professionals, updated 26/01/22: • “COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is not recommended for children aged below 18 years. No data are currently available on the use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in children and adolescents younger than 18 years of age.” SOURCE • “The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in children and adolescents (aged <18 years old) have not yet been established.” SOURCE Why were these doses given & are the 262 children adversely impacted receiving adequate care and support? MYOCARDITUS & PERICARDIAL EFFECTS IN CHILDREN The only specific adverse effects data published for children = 70 cases (Pfizer) of myocarditis and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart). There are 3621 Yellow Card Reports up to this week for under 18s. What are the other adverse effects our children are experiencing? POTENTIAL OTHER ADVERSE EFFECTS “The experience reported in under 18s is similar to that identified in the general population” - MHRA SOURCE Extrapolating from adult population data on the prevalence of different types of reported suspected adverse effects experienced, we could deduce that children and young people MAY be experiencing a selection of the following: • Lymph node pain & swelling • Anaphylaxis & heart palpitations • Fever, chills & fatigue • Ear pain, tinnitus & vertigo • Nausea, vomiting & allergies • Eye pain, swelling & photophobia • Blurred vision & visual impairment • Diarrhoea & abdominal pain • Lip, mouth & facial swelling • Pain in arm, chest, bones & jaw • Respiratory infection & herpes • Joint/muscle pain & swelling • Muscle spasms & twitching • Balance disorders & arthralgia • Fainting, dizziness & hair loss • Facial palsy, headaches & migraines • Skin sensations, burning & numbness • Seizures & tremors • Anxiety, depression & insomnia • Confusion & disorientation • Breast pain & menstrual disorders • Breathlessness, wheezing & coughing • Sweating, blisters, rashes & itching • Haemorrhages & nosebleeds • Embolisms & thrombosis No further age-specific detail has been published for the 3.3 million children injected thus far. We do not know what is being experienced as adverse effects. Is consent truly informed? POTENTIAL BARRIERS TO REPORTING ADVERSE EFFECTS • Child or parental recognition of symptoms as vaccine-related • Lack of understanding of potential longer-term issues • Healthcare professionals lack of awareness of vaccine adverse effects • Young people not seeking help and support especially if made vaccine decisions themselves • Yellow Card System awareness and accessibility Are the 3,621 Yellow Card Reports for under 18s less than 10% of actual figures as indicated may be the case by MHRA? PLANS AHEAD "All children aged 5 to 11 will be eligible for vaccination in the coming weeks.” - MHRA CDC Cannot Provide an Instance of a Single Confirmed COVID-19 Death in a Child Younger Than 16 SOURCE Where is the long term safety data? Who will be liable for any harm caused? Full reports incl. 350 pages of specific reaction listings, offering very limited information on child-related data HERE We are calling for an injunction to pause the vaccine rollout due to the following questions. ​ 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing Or SIGN HERE https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/petition-police

This is data from the UK adverse event reporting system published by the MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SYSTEM UP TO 23RD MAR 2022 (Data published 31st Mar 2022) We have five senses that connect us to our beautiful world. Any loss of these senses denies us our experience. We are compiling special focus data on each. Sight Hearing Taste Touch Smell Each sense is not only crucial for our well being but is needed for navigating our environment. Deafness not only isolates people, it incurs uneducated responses as people associate deafness with being stupid, made famous by the idiom "Does he take sugar?" Anyone who has drunk too much knows how losing the ability to keep balance is not only disabling but becomes illegal when it comes to driving or operating machines. Tinnitus and the associated constant ringing in the ears can put pressure on mental heatlh. Al these injuries have occurred for supposed protection from an illness that has barely touched the population to the point the pushers of 'the solution' needed to falsify data. Numbers inflated by the culling of the elderly in the old people's homes with midazolam or via the criminal misuse of ventilators with a near 100% death rate in the hospitals. All occurred in the name of man-made money-spinning protection from an illness that is best dealt with for free by the body's own natural immune system. Man's marketing sales copy "Safe and Effective" The data tells a different story... "Fake and Defective" Below represents the data of some of the EAR DISORDERS recorded, not forgetting the MHRA/VAERS institutions themselves have admitted that under 10% of people report adverse reactions. Ear related fatalities = 1 (AZ) Deaf - 296 (Pfizer) + 427 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) = 774 Sudden Hearing Loss - 52 (Pfizer) + 86 (AZ) + 12 (Moderna) = 150 Tinnitis - 2443 (Pfizer) + 4437 (AZ) + 407 (Moderna) = 7287 Balance Disorders (from nervous system disorders category) - 498 (Pfizer) + 1011 (AZ) + 86 (Moderna) = 1595 Vertigo - 1751 (Pfizer) + 2505 (AZ) + 304 (Moderna) = 4560 Ear Congestion - 39 (Pfizer) + 34 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) = 81 Ear Discomfort - 104 (Pfizer) + 126 (AZ) + 9 (Moderna) = 239 Ear Haemorrhage - 15 (Pfizer) + 19 (AZ) = 34 Ear Pain - 1169 (Pfizer) + 2115 (AZ) + 292 (Moderna) = 3576 Ear Pruritis, Swelling & Discharge - 59 (Pfizer) + 92 (AZ) + 6 (Moderna) = 157 Eustachian Tube Disorders - 21 (Pfizer) + 21 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 43 Hyperacusis (noise sensitivity) - 80 (Pfizer) + 177 (AZ) + 9 (Moderna) = 266 Inner Ear Disorders incl. Meniere’s Disease & Vestibular - 44 (Pfizer) + 49 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 94 Motion Sickness - 70 (Pfizer) + 131 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) = 220 Tympanic Membrane Perforation - 3 (Pfizer) + 7 (AZ) = 10 TOTAL EAR DISORDER RELATED REACTIONS Pfizer 6,538 AZ 10,721 Moderna 1,185 TOTAL = 18,444 For full reports including 5 pages of ear disorders specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

There are now 4 teams working on this in New Zealand and Dr Robin Wakeling has agreed to go public with his findings. He compares the Pfizer jab to other vaccines and discusses the startling findings with Dr Mark Bailey.... The bandwidth has been failing with too many views Join our Odysee channel. The video is posted here https://odysee.com/$/invite/@NotOnTheBeeb:5 Some visual highlights...

This is Not On The Beeb's 56th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. There are now 2,075 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 statistic accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 23rd March 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) DOSE 1 Pfizer - 26.2 million AstraZeneca - 24.9m Moderna - 1.6m TOTAL 1ST DOSE = 52.7 m DOSE 2 Pfizer - 23.6 million AstraZeneca - 24.2m Moderna - 1.5m TOTAL 2ND DOSE = 49.3 m DOSE 3 Pfizer - 29.5 million AstraZeneca - 0.05m (55,000) Moderna - 9 m TOTAL 3RD DOSE BOOSTERS = 38.6 m (38,576,876) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.3 m AZ 49.2 m Moderna 12.1 m TOTAL DOSES = 140.5 m ( 140,553,130) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 168,028 AZ 244,415 Moderna 36,530 Unknown 1594 TOTAL = 450,567 people reported an adverse reaction ONLY INCREASE OF 538 on last week Fatal Pfizer 738 (no change last week) AZ 1251 Moderna 43 (no change last week) Unknown 43 TOTAL = 2075 (+4 on last week) Blood Disorders - 16,984 (Pfizer) + 7831 (AZ) + 2482 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,362 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 900 (Pfizer) + 3051 (AZ) + 118 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 4096 Anaphylaxis - 656 (Pfizer) + 881 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1627 Acute Cardiac - 12,914 (Pfizer) + 11,316 (AZ) + 3163 (Moderna) + 103 (Unknown) = 27,496 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1291 (Pfizer) + 439 (AZ) + 335 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2073 Eye Disorders - 7969 (Pfizer) + 14,873 (AZ) + 1501 (Moderna) + 85 (Unknown) = 24,428 Blindness - 160 (Pfizer) + 324 (AZ) + 32 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 520 Deafness - 296 (Pfizer) + 427 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 779 Infections - 12,067 (Pfizer) + 20,282 (AZ) + 2281 (Moderna) + 164 (Unknown) = 34,794 BCG Scar Reactivation - 67 (Pfizer) + 38 (AZ) + 52 (Moderna) = 157 Spontaneous Abortions - 483 + 1 premature baby death / 1 foetal growth restriction death + 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 232 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 66 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 787 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 80,331 (Pfizer) + 182,572 (AZ) + 19,702 (Moderna) + 864 (Unknown) = 283,469 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 779 (Pfizer) + 2340 (AZ) + 57 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3193 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 101 (Pfizer) + 491 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 615 Myelitis Transverse - 36 (Pfizer) + 121 (AZ) + 4 (Moderna) = 161 Vomiting - 5224 (Pfizer) + 11,644 (AZ) + 1762 (Moderna) + 60 (Unknown) = 18,690 Seizures - 1096 (Pfizer) + 2067 (AZ) + 256 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3437 Paralysis - 508 (Pfizer) + 883 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 1503 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,072 (Pfizer) + 80,959 (AZ) + 10,609 (Moderna) + 389 (Unknown) = 134,029 Headaches & Migraines - 35,534 (Pfizer) + 93,947 (AZ) + 9310 (Moderna) + 337 (Unknown) = 139,128 Immune System Disorders - 2430 (Pfizer) + 3313 (AZ) + 600 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 6366 Bell’s Palsy - 638 (Pfizer) + 631 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1375 Skin Disorders - 33,770 (Pfizer) + 53,337 (AZ) + 12,931 (Moderna) + 345 (Unknown) = 100,383 Confusion & Disorientation - 1385 (Pfizer) + 2971 (AZ) + 300 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 4679 Respiratory Disorders - 21,543 (Pfizer) + 29,769 (AZ) + 4190 (Moderna) + 211 (Unknown) = 55,713 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1381 (Pfizer) + 2762 (AZ) + 294 (Moderna) + 33 (Unknown) = 4470 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,105 (Pfizer) + 18,382 (AZ) + 2425 (Moderna) + 115 (Unknown) = 31,027 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,050 (Pfizer) + 20,792 (AZ) + 5135 (Moderna) + 215 (Unknown) = 57,192 Metabolic Disorders - 2720 (Pfizer) + 8955 (AZ) + 691 (Moderna) + 60 (Unknown) = 12,426 Vascular Disorders - 7468 (Pfizer) + 13,856 (AZ) + 1270 (Moderna) + 106 (Unknown) = 22,700 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Seem at LONDON freedom protest 22nd Jan 2022 ....still being calcualated For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions 13 REASONS TO NOT VACCINATE 5-11 YEAR OLDS Reason No. 1 - 86% of 12-15-year old Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine in the Clinical Trial Reason No. 2 - 1 in 9 Children suffered a Severe Adverse Reaction leaving them unable to perform daily activities in the Pfizer Clinical Trial Reason No. 3 - Just 17 deaths associated with Covid-19 have occurred in Teenagers & Children since March 2020 Reason No. 4 - The risk of children developing serious illness due to Covid-19 is extremely low Reason No. 5 - The Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine is experimental and still in Clinical Trials Reason No. 6 - Three Scientific Studies conducted by the UK Government, Oxford University, & CDC, which were published in August have found the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work Reason No. 7 - Public Health England Data shows the majority of Covid-19 Deaths are among the Vaccinated and suggests that the Vaccines worsen disease Reason No. 8 - There had been at least 1.18 million Adverse Reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccines in the UK alone up to September 1st Reason No. 9 - There were more deaths in 8 months due to the Covid-19 Vaccines than there have been due to all other available Vaccines combined since the year 2001 Reason No. 10 - The risk of Myocarditis (Heart Inflammation) in Children due to the Pfizer Vaccine Reason No. 11 - Children have died and are dying due to the Covid-19 Vaccines Reason No. 12 - Who profits from your Child getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? Reason No. 13 - The Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation refused to recommend the Pfizer Vaccine be offered to Children aged 12-15 SOURCE: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/23/13-reasons-why-children-5-to-11-should-not-have-the-covid-vaccine/ A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Tennis world reacts to bizarre news of 15 withdrawals and retirements during the Miami Open. To many of us, this is of course no surprise. Novak remained jab-free for a reason. See more here: www.NOTB-sports.org QUOTE: “…..With both Badosa and Sinner retiring in the first set, ticket holders for the Stadium seats didn't witness a full set for the day session. In total, there has been 15 withdrawals/retirements during the Miami Open. Fans were left shocked at the double retirement from two stars in a bizarre day of tennis. The tennis world has reacted with shock after both favourites Paula Badosa and Jannik Sinner retired from their Miami Open quarter-finals during the day session. Soon to be World No.3, Badosa was in tears as she was forced to bow out of the quarter-final after not feeling well against American Jessica Pegula. On Monday, Badosa admitted she wasn't sure if she could compete in her fourth-round match that she subsequently won. However, the Spaniard was in obvious discomfort when she retired sick at 4-1 in unfortunate circumstances for the in-form star…..” SOURCE https://nz.news.yahoo.com/tennis-2022-viewers-shocked-bizarre-miami-open-carnage-004007552.html?

NOTB 'BOOK OF THE CENTURY' L'arc-en-ciel invisible Une histoire de l'électricité et de la Vie Résumé informatif Résumé subséquent à la lecture de : The Invisible Rainbow A History of Electricity and Life by Arthur Firstenberg READ IN: ENGLISH - FRENCH - ITALIAN - SPANISH - GERMAN (see other languages at end of summary) Concernant l'auteur Arthur Firstenberg est un scientifique et journaliste à l'avant-garde de la démolition du tabou concernant l'innocuité des champs électromagnétique sur le Vivant. Il est diplômé en mathématique de l'Université de Cornell et a fréquenté l'Université de Californie, Irvine School of Medicine, de 1978 à 1982, études qu'il a dû interrompre à cause de séquelles subséquentes à une dose excessive de rayons-X. Depuis, il s'est consacré à la recherche, à la consultation, comme auteur et comme orateur dans le domaine des effets environnementaux des radiations électromagnétiques. Concernant l'ouvrage Ce livre remarquablement documenté et bien référencé est une pierre angulaire dans le sens qu'il retrace le déploiement de l'électricité dans notre civilisation, sous le jour de son interaction avec le matériel Vivant, depuis les tout débuts de sa découverte dans les années 1750, jusqu'à nos jours comprenant même des projections dans le futur. À noter que le titre se réfère à l'ensemble du spectre électromagnétique comprenant les couleurs de l'arc-en-ciel, mais également toutes les fréquences invisibles, comme le sont les radiofréquence ou les champs générés autour des fils conducteurs. Depuis le commencement – 1ère partie Capturée dans une bouteille En 1746, les premières découvertes liées à l'électricité virent le jour en Europe. L’expérience de Leyde consistait à mettre en évidence le fluide électrique grâce au frottement de la main sur un globe de verre mis en rotation rapide. L'électricité statique produite faisait grande impression dans les écoles, les foires et chez les privés qui avaient les moyens financiers d'acquérir ce dispositif, en produisant qui des arcs électriques, qui des électrocutions passagères. Le phénomène de mode était tel qu'il était mal vu de penser que cette électricité pouvait être dangereuse, même que les électrocutions produisait céphalées, saignements de nez, fatigues chez certains expérimentateurs ainsi que chez les animaux utilisés dans les tests. La société était prise d'électromania et les plus fervents à se faire électrocuter en bonne compagnie, entre deux coupes de champagne commencèrent à percevoir des symptômes néfastes. Malgré tout, les établissements médicaux s'équipèrent de la fiole de Leyde (ancêtre du condensateur) à des fins d’expérimentations médicales pour les avortements ou d'autres applications. Ainsi naquit un tout nouveau domaine de connaissances concernant les effets biologiques de l'électricité sur les gens, les plantes, les animaux, connaissances qui étaient alors bien plus vastes que celles de nos médecins contemporains qui voient au quotidien des patients atteints des effets de l'électricité sans même les reconnaître et qui pour la plupart ignorent jusqu'à l’existence de ces connaissances. Le sourd entend et le boiteux marche Notant les effets –rarement positifs– plus souvent négatifs de l'application de tensions électriques aux organismes vivants, les chercheurs et médecins en ont conclu que les organismes vivants fonctionnent en conjonction avec l'électricité. Certaines guérisons ont été obtenues en utilisant l'électricité, comme par exemple en 1851, le neurologiste Duchenne qui traita la surdité de quelques dizaines de patients au moyen d'impulsions électriques appliquées localement. D'autres mises en évidence de la stimulation des systèmes nerveux, cardiaque, cardiovasculaire, gustatif, sudatoire et autres, par l'électricité produite dans des couples galvaniques furent expérimentées, notamment par Volta en Italie, parmi d'autres chercheurs en occident. Il fut constaté que le nombre des effets curatifs était nettement moindre que les effets délétères dont on peut lire la liste et qui comprennent les symptômes de l'électro-sensibilité (ES ) connus aujourd'hui, comme céphalées, vertiges, nausées, confusion mentale, fatigue, dépression, insomnie, etc. Sensibilité électrique Le botaniste français Thomas-François Dalibard –qui a mené des expériences électriques sur le Vivant– confie à Benjamin Franklin dans une lettre datée de 1762 qu'il ne peut plus aller de l'avant pour cause d'intolérance électrique de son organisme. C'est un des premiers électro-hypersensibles (EHS) déclaré formellement. A en lire le contenu, ce botaniste devait être fortement affecté. D'autres professeurs et chercheurs font la même et triste expérience et doivent cesser leurs travaux. Même le si renommé Benjamin Franklin fut atteint d'une maladie neurologique chronique durant ses recherches sur l'électricité, dès 1753, et les symptômes font largement penser à de l'électro-hypersensibilité. Tant et si bien qu'à la fin du 18ème siècle, il fut de renommée populaire que l'électricité pouvait rendre malade, selon le sexe, la morphologie et la condition physique des individus. De même, on avait observé que certains individus réagissaient fortement aux changements de météo, souvent corrélés à des modifications électriques de l'atmosphère. Certains de ces sujets sont connus jusqu'à nos jours, comme Christophe Colomb, Dante, Charles Darwin, Benjamin Franklin, Goethe, Victor Hugo, Leonardo DaVinci, Martin Luther, Michel-Ange, Mozart, Napoléon, Rousseau, et Voltaire. La route délaissée Durant les années 1790, la science se trouva face à une crise d'identité quant à l'interprétation et l'unification des quatre différents fluides que sont l'électricité, la lumière, le magnétisme et la chaleur. Pour ce qui est de l'électricité, on avait d'un côté la perception selon Luigi Galvani qui considérait que l'électricité faisait partie intégrante du Vivant et de l'autre Volta qui pensait que l'électricité n'était qu'un effet « secondaire » des réactions chimiques internes au vivant. Volta, inventeur de la pile électrique fort utile et pouvant potentiellement être la source de retombées pécuniaires, eut gain de cause contre la vision plus globale de l’interaction entre électricité et vivant. Maladie électrique chronique Dès la fin du 19ème siècle, le paysage des villes fut métamorphosé par l'installation de lignes de télégraphe partout dans les pays industrialisés. Cette technologie utilisait des tensions de l'ordre de 80 volts sur un seul conducteur, le retour du signal se faisant par la Terre. Alors naissent les premiers courants vagabonds auxquels le Vivant fut exposé. On vit alors apparaître des maladies de civilisation telle que la neurasthénie dont furent affectés Frank Lloyd Wright et Theodore Roosevelt parmi d'autre personnalités. Notons au passage que la neurasthénie s'apparente de très près à l'électro-hypersensibilité, terme plus moderne pour désigner la même sensibilité à l'électricité. Les télégraphistes employés à manipuler le courant électrique envoyé dans les lignes, donc exposés à des champs électromagnétiques importants furent frappés du mal télégraphique pour la moitié d'entre-eux environ. Encore une fois, les symptômes étaient les mêmes que ceux de l'EHS. Plus tard, vers 1915, ce furent les téléphonistes qui seront confrontés aux même symptômes, car exposés durant de longues heures aux champs électromagnétiques des communications, devant leur pupitre. En 1989, il fut noté qu'a Winnipeg, 47% des opérateurs téléphoniques étaient atteints des mêmes symptômes. Toutefois, en 1894, un célèbre psychiatre viennois écrivit un article dont l'influence fut grandement néfaste à tous les malheureux qui souffraient du mal télégraphique, de neurasthénie, du syndrome des micro-ondes ou d'EHS. Au lieu de voir la cause extérieure de la pollution électromagnétique, il attribue ces symptômes à des pensées désordonnées ou à des émotions mal contrôlées. Ainsi, on médicalise des millions de citoyens affectés par le smog électronique au lieu de réduire leur exposition à ce polluant. Sigmund Freud renomma la neurasthénie –dont on connaissait bien l'origine électrique– en névrose d'angoisse ou attaque d'anxiété ou encore attaque de panique. Ainsi, le déploiement sans précaution de l'électrification put continuer sans entrave. A noter qu'en Russie, la neurasthénie est listée comme maladie environnementale car la redéfinition abusive de Freud fut refusée. Le comportement des plantes Sir Jagadis Chunder Bose ainsi que d'autres chercheurs menèrent de nombreuses expérimentations électriques sur les plantes et d'autres organismes vivants, avec des résultat démontrant de nets effets. Il découvrit que les nerfs végétaux ou animaux ont des comportements variables et que la résistivité de ceux-ci peut fortement varier en fonction du courant appliqué et de sa polarité. Aussi, il nota que l'intensité de courant nécessaire à modifier la conductivité des nerfs, respectivement la tension appliquées est infinitésimale, de l'ordre de 0.3 microampères (0.3*10-6). Il se trouve que ce courant est nettement inférieur au courant induit par une conversation téléphonique au moyen d'un cellulaire. Bose découvrit également que le seuil de bio-activité d'un courant est de un femtoampère (1*10-15)! Comme ce chercheur étaient également versé dans les transmissions par radiofréquences, il essaya de soumettre une plante à un signal radio de 30 MHz à 200 mètres de distance et constata que la plante retarda sa croissance durant le temps de l'émission. De même il démontra que la circulation de la sève dans la plante était ralentie lorsque celle-ci était irradiée par le même signal radio. Maladie électrique aiguë Dans les années 1880, Londres fut alimentée en courant continu, mais certains physiciens avaient découvert que la distribution du courant alternatif générait moins de pertes ohmiques dans les fils. Il s'en suivit une bataille des courants malgré que de nombreux scientifiques dénonçaient les effets plus dangereux du courant alternatif, dont Edison. D'ailleurs, ironiquement, c'est bel et bien du courant alternatif qui est utilisé dans la chaise électrique, justement parce qu'il est plus nocif. Tout le monde sait que le courant électrique de secteur est... alternatif ! En 1889, l'électrification à grand échelle débuta aux États-Unis et peu après en Europe. Cette même année, comme par hasard, les médecins furent pris d'assaut par des malades de la grippe qui jusque là n'apparaissait que rarement. Les symptômes des victimes étaient bien plus neurologiques, du style neurasthénie, à l'exclusion de troubles respiratoires. Cette pandémie dura quatre ans et fit au moins un million de morts. En 2001, l'astronome canadien Ken Tapping démontra que les trois derniers siècles de pandémies grippales étaient corrélés à des pics d'activité solaire magnétique, sur un cycle de onze ans. Il a également été constaté que certaines épidémies de grippe se répandent sur des contrées énormes en juste quelques jours, fait difficilement explicables par la contagion de proche en proche. De même, de nombreuses expériences liées à la contagion de proche en proche par contact, par projections de mucus ou autres procédés se révélèrent infructueuses. Depuis 1933 à nos jours, les virologues ne peuvent présenter aucune étude expérimentale démontrant que la grippe se propage par contact normal entre personnes. Toutes les tentatives ont échoué. Le mystère de l'île de Wight En 1904, les abeilles commencèrent à mourir sur l’île de Wight, suite à l'installation d'émetteurs d'ondes radio par Marconi. Ces émetteurs travaillent sur des fréquences proches du mégahertz. De l'autre côté de la Manche, Jacques-Arsène d'Arsonval démontra que les signaux électromagnétiques « pointus et crochus » sont beaucoup plus toxiques que les signaux sinusoïdaux. En fait, Marconi, après un an et demi d'expérimentation avec des émetteurs radio, en pleine santé à 22 ans, a commencé à développer des fièvres. Ces accès ne disparurent pas jusqu'à la fin de sa vie. En 1904, alors qu'il était occupé à réaliser un émetteur puissant pour des communications transatlantiques, ces fièvres étaient si intenses qu'on a pensé à la malaria. En 1905, il se maria à Beatrice O'Brien et après leur lune de miel, ils s'installèrent sur l’île, à proximité d'un émetteur. Aussitôt que Béatrice fut installée, elle nota des acouphènes. Après trois mois, elle tomba malade d'une mauvaise jaunisse. Elle dut rentrer à Londres pour donner naissance à un bébé qui ne vécut que quelques semaines et mourut de « causes inconnues ». Dans le même laps de temps, Marconi passa plusieurs mois dans la fièvre et le délire. Entre 1918 et 1921, il souffrit de dépression suicidaire, alors qu'il travaillait sur un émetteur à ondes courtes. En 1927, alors qu'il était en voyage de noce de son deuxième mariage, il s'effondra de douleurs thoraciques et fut diagnostiqué de graves troubles cardiaques. Entre 1934 et 1937 alors qu'il développait la technologie micro-ondes, il subit neuf crises cardiaques, la dernière le tua à l'age de 63 ans. Sur la même île, à Osborn House, la reine Victoria fut atteinte d’hémorragies cérébrales et mourut le soir du 22 janvier 1901, juste au moment ou Marconi mit en marche un nouvel émetteur à moins de vingt kilomètres de là. En 1901 il n'y avait « que » deux émetteurs alors qu'en 1904, il y en avait quatre, faisant de ce cette île l'endroit le plus irradié de la planète, ne laissant plus aucune place aux abeilles pour survivre. En 1906, une enquête fut menée pour constater que 90% des abeilles avaient bel et bien disparu sans raison apparente... De nouvelles colonies furent apportés sur l’île mais celle-ci succombèrent également en une semaine. Cette épidémie se propagea à travers l'Angleterre puis à travers le monde occidental pour se stabiliser peu à peu, jusqu'à ce que les armées s'équipent de divers émetteurs radio de haute puissance, vers la fin du premier conflit mondial, en 1918, provoquant comme on l'a vu ci-dessus, la pandémie de grippe espagnole qui en réalité débuta aux États-Unis, dans la Naval Radio School de Cambridge, Massachusetts avec 400 cas. Cette épidémie se propagea rapidement à 1'127 militaires au Camp Funston (Kansas), où on avait introduit les connexions sans fil. Ce qui intrigua les médecins fut que 15% de la population civile était affectée de saignements de nez alors que 40% de la Navy en souffraient. D'autres saignements apparurent également et un tiers des morts l'étaient par hémorragie interne des poumons ou du cerveau. En fait, c'est la composition du sang qui était modifiée, mesurée par le temps de coagulation plus que doublé. Ces indications jurent avec les effets des virus respiratoires de la grippe, mais sont totalement cohérents avec les effets néfastes de l'électricité. Une autre incohérence était que les victimes étaient pour deux tiers des jeunes en bonne santé. Encore un symptôme atypique de la grippe, le pouls descendait à des valeurs de 36 à 48, alors que ce genre de situation sont courantes lorsqu'on est exposés aux champs électromagnétiques. Aussi, certains purent être soignés par des administrations massives de calcium. Le Dr. Militaire George A. Soper, témoigna que le virus se propageait plus vite que la vitesse de déplacement des personnes. Différentes expériences furent menées pour contaminer des sujets de proche en proche, par contact direct, ou inoculation de mucus ou de sang, sans pouvoir démontrer la contamination. On observe que chaque nouvelle pandémie de grippe correspond à une nouvelle avancée technologie électrique, comme la grippe asiatique de 1957-58 subséquente à l'installation d'un puissant système de surveillance par radars, la grippe de Hong-Kong dès juillet 1968, subséquente à la mise en service de 28 satellites militaires de surveillance spatiale à la hauteur des ceintures de Van Allen nous protégeant des rayonnements cosmique. L'enveloppe électrique de la Terre La Terre en rotation avec son centre constitué en majorité de fer, protégée par, en premier lieu la ionosphère, puis la plasma-sphère –délimitée par les ceintures de radiation de Van Allen entre 1'000 et 55'000 km d'altitude–, et sa traîne qu'est la magnétosphère, exposée aux vents solaires en provenance de notre astre du jour, constitue une sorte de dynamo, un système électrique complexe. Les échanges électriques entre la croûte terrestre et l’atmosphère, voire la ionosphère sont permanents et constants. Ils sont en équilibre précaire et une sorte de « respiration » électrique, de tout le système a permis à la vie de se développer sur notre planète chargée de ions négatif, par opposition à la ionosphère chargée positivement. On note un champ électrique vertical moyen de l'ordre de 130 volts par mètres, avec des valeurs pouvant s'élever à 4'000 volts par mètre dans les orages par exemple. En 1953, on a aussi découvert un des paramètres primordiaux de cette oscillation électrique de notre environnement, avec les fréquences de Schumann (Winfried) respirant à 7.83 hertz, avec des harmoniques à 14, 20, 26, 32 Hz, appelées Very Low Frequencies, très basse fréquences. Pas étonnant que les organismes vivant dans cet environnement se soient imprégnés de ces valeurs physiques et que par exemple nos rythmes cérébraux se situent dans ces plages de fréquences, comme le rythme alpha entre 8 et 13 Hz. Si nous percevons les fréquences visible –du bleu au rouge–, du spectre électromagnétique, certains animaux sont en mesure de voir d'autres fréquences électromagnétiques, comme les abeilles qui voient les ultra-violets ou ces salamandres ou poissons-chat qui peuvent voir les basses fréquences électriques, alors que les serpents voient les infra-rouges. Des expériences en laboratoire sur les hamsters, par exemple, démontrèrent que la réduction de la température et de la durée du jour ne suffisait pas à les mettre en hibernation. De même, des hamsters élevés en cage de Faraday refusaient d'hiberner même que les paramètres de lumière et de température étaient hivernaux, jusqu'au moment où la protection de Faraday fut supprimée. D'autres expériences furent menées, par exemple en 1967, à l'institut Max Plank, par le physiologiste Rütger Wever, en utilisant deux chambres enterrées, sans fenêtre ni contact extérieur, l'une blindée électromagnétiquement, l'autre non. Il fut démontré que dans la chambre blindée, les rythmes circadiens des sujets volontaires se désynchronisaient et pouvaient varier entre 12 et 65 heures, avec des troubles métabolique, alors que les sujets de la chambre immergée dans les champs terrestres gardaient un rythme cohérent proche de 24 heures et que leur métabolisme continuait de fonctionner plus normalement. On a démontré scientifiquement que le Vivant a besoin d'être baigné dans le système électromagnétique de notre environnement naturel pour bien fonctionner. D'ailleurs, l'acupuncture, médecine traditionnelle millénaire chinoise utilise nos propriétés électriques en modifiant les connexions des méridiens. Il fut démontré récemment, dès les années 1950, que ces méridiens correspondent bel et bien à des circuits électriques et que le Qi chinois correspond à la notion d'électricité. Ces méridiens ont double fonctions, d'une part ils transportent les informations et l'énergie interne à l'organisme d'un organe à l'autre, mais encore, ils servent d'antennes pour capter les flux électromagnétiques environnementaux. Au début des années 1970, les physiciens atmosphériques découvrirent que le champ magnétique terrestre était passablement dérangé par l'activité électrique humaine. En effet, en injectant un signal dans l'espace et en captant son écho, on s’aperçut que le signal initial avait été modifié par des multiples des 60 Hz du réseau électrique utilisé en Amérique du Nord. Ceci n’empêcha pas de lancer le projet HAARP pour délibérément modifier les propriétés électromagnétiques de notre planète. De même, les ceinture de Van Allen nous protégeant des rayons cosmiques, ont été déjà altérées par notre activité électrique et il se pourrait qu’initialement, ces ceintures double n'aient été qu'une ceinture simple qui, face à l'émission de charges électriques humaines dans l'espace se soient détériorées en son milieu. Des observations satellites montrent que les rayonnements produits par les lignes de haute tensions occultent souvent les rayonnements naturels des éclairs. Dans ce contexte, il est logique de penser que les pandémies de grippes connues ces dernière décennies soient liées à l'activité électrique humaine. Porphyrines et la base de la Vie Dans toute transformation d'énergie dans le domaine biologique, les porphyrines [pigments formés de quatre molécules de pyrrole] sont impliquées. Si nos nerfs peuvent fournir leur office, c'est grâce entre autre aux porphyrines qui sont impliquées dans le fonctionnement de nos cellules. Ce sont des molécules spéciales qui sont l'interface entre l'oxygène et la vie. Ces molécules sont hautement réactives et elles interagissent avec les métaux toxiques ou les éléments synthétiques issus du pétrole, les champs électromagnétiques, qui s'ils sont en excès provoquent la porphyra, plus une sensibilité environnementale qu'une maladie. Les recherches du Dr William E. Morton démontrèrent que les personnes atteintes de sensibilité chimique multiples (MCS) sont également à 90% déficientes en l'une ou l'autre formes d'enzymes porphyriques, de même que pour les personnes électro-hypersensible, ce qui signifie que les deux formes de sensibilités ne sont que des manifestations différentes d'une même cause. La porphyrie découverte en 1891 affecte environ 10% de la population moderne et son apparition est concomitante avec l'électrification générale de l'Occident dès 1889. Les porphyrines sont centrales dans le smog électronique non pas seulement à cause de l'EHS, la MCS ou la porphyrie, mais également en ce qui concerne les maladies cardiovasculaires, le cancer, le diabète, du fait qu'elles sont impliquées dans une multitude de processus énergétiques biologiques. Le biologiste Allan Frey ainsi que Wlodzimierz Sedlak démontrèrent dans les années 1960 que nos organismes ont bien une composante bio-électronique et que certaines de nos cellules se comportent tantôt comme des conducteurs, ou des capacitances, ou des semi-conducteurs (transistors) comme les composant que nous trouvons dans nos appareillages électroniques. Ainsi, il en va de la myéline –gaine de nos nerfs–, qui contient de la porphyrine intriquée avec du zinc. Si des poisons environnementaux comme les produits chimiques ou métaux toxiques affectent cet équilibre, la gaine est altérée, ce qui change l'excitabilité des nerfs qu'elle entoure. Le système nerveux entier devient alors hyper-réactif au stimulus de toutes natures, comme les champs électromagnétiques. Le système entre dans un état d'instabilité divergente, l'effet devenant la cause. Contrairement à la conception que les mitochondries sont les éléments de nos cellules produisant l'énergie, l'idée que la gaine de myéline est une mitochondrie géante voit le jour. La connexion entre porphyrie et zinc a été découverte dans les années 1950 par Henry Peters à la Medical Schoold du Wisconsin. Les patients souffrant de porphyrie et de symptômes neurologiques excrétaient beaucoup de zinc dans les urine, ainsi il lui vint à l'idée qu'une chélation du zinc pourrait améliorer leur état. Il constata une amélioration, malgré l'idée répandue qu'une carence en zinc est liée aux troubles cités. De même, certaines expériences montrent que la chélation du zinc améliore la condition d'Alzheimer. Une équipe médicale australienne démontra par autopsie que les cerveaux de sujets atteints d'Alzheimer contenaient deux fois plus de zinc que ceux de patient sains. ...Au présent – 2ème partie Cœur irritable En 1980, les arrêts cardiaques chez les jeunes athlètes étaient rares, seulement neuf cas sur l'année. Á partir de cette date, les cas augmentèrent constamment de 10% par année jusqu'en 1996 ou soudainement ce taux doubla pour atteindre 64 cas puis, 66 l'année suivante et 76 la dernière année de l'étude. La communauté médicale américaine n'avait pas d'explication, tandis qu'en Europe, en 2002, un appel des médecins environnementaux allemands demandait un moratoire sur les antennes-relais car leurs ondes provoquaient des troubles cardiovasculaires. C'était l'Appel de Freibourg. Le Dr Samuel Milham, épidémiologiste du département de la santé américain, démontra dans ses travaux que les maladies cardiovasculaires, le diabète et le cancer sont largement, si pas entièrement provoqués par l'électricité. Paradoxalement, les études sur le cholestérol datant du début du vingtième siècle ne démontraient pas un risque plus élevé de maladies cardiovasculaires corrélées au taux de cholestérol, contrairement à ce qui est communément admis de nos jours. Une étude sur les animaux du zoo de Philadelphie montre que de 1916 à 1964, le taux de cholestérol chez les mammifères et les oiseaux augmenta d'un facteur 10 à 20, alors que leur régime alimentaire était resté strictement le même! Le paramètre qui avait drastiquement changé était bien l'augmentation des radiofréquences. Durant la seconde guerre mondiale, un certain nombre de soldats se plaignit de symptômes similaires à la neurasthénie. D'abord, on pensa selon la doctrine de Freud, qu'ils étaient affectés de trouble anxieux, puis, une étude sur 144 cas fut menée par le Dr Mandel Cohen. Cette étude révéla qu'effectivement, ces soldats étaient physiologiquement moins résistants, avec un cœur irritable. Ils souffraient d'une difficulté d'assimilation de l'oxygène et devaient respirer deux fois plus que leurs collègues en meilleure santé pour capter suffisamment d'oxygène. Il s'avéra que leurs mitochondries étaient inefficientes. Au bout du compte, il fut démontré que ces soldats étaient hypersensibles au sens général, mais en particulier à l'électricité. En Union Soviétique, dès les années 1950, il fut aussi observé que les radiofréquences modifiaient les électrocardiogrammes des personnes exposées, par la modification de l'efficacité des mitochondries. Les diagrammes des statistiques du nombre de morts par maladies cardiaques en fonction du degré d'électrification des états américains en 1931 et 1940 sont en outre également très explicites, ne laissant aucun doute quant à la toxicité des champs électromagnétiques sur la cœur, innocentant le cholestérol et l'alimentation jugée trop riche en graisses. La transformation du diabète Thomas Edison, impliqué dans les découvertes liées à la technologie électrique et donc baignait dans les champs électromagnétiques plus que le reste de ses concitoyens de l'époque fut diagnostiqué d'une maladie fort rare en 1882, le diabète. Un autre chercheur, Grahm Bell, actif dans le domaine de la télégraphie et inventeur du téléphone, était connu pour ses plaintes incessantes concernant ses symptômes de neurasthénie, appelés aujourd'hui EHS. En 1915, il fut diagnostiqué de diabète également. En 1876, l'ouvrage Maladie des temps modernes par Ward Richardson décrit le diabète comme une maladie moderne rare, causée par l'épuisement aux travaux mentaux ou par choc du système nerveux. Naturellement, l'apport excessif en sucre toxique et addictif dans notre alimentation moderne a la part belle pour expliquer qu'aujourd'hui, le diabète, incluant le pré-diabète, touche plus de la moitié des américains. Mais l'explication est simpliste. Even Joslin a montré qu'entre 1900 et 1917, l'apport en sucre avait augmenté de 17% alors que la mortalité par diabète avait doublé. Plus tard, en 1987, une étude sur les Amérindiens fut menée, démontrant des proportions radicalement différentes de mort par diabète selon les territoires, variant de 7 pour mille dans le nord-ouest à 380 pour mille en Arizona ! Durant ces années, ni le mode de vie ni le régime alimentaire ne pouvaient justifier un pareil écart. Par contre un facteur environnemental peut expliquer une telle différence. En effet, l'électrification des réserves d'indiens fut inégalement menée et celles du nord-ouest n'ont été électrifiées que bien plus tardivement. Par contre, la réserve de l'Arizona est située aux abords immédiat de Phoenix. Par ailleurs cette communauté indienne avait sa propre installation électrique et son entreprise de télécommunication. Un autre exemple étant la population brésilienne, gros producteur de sucre depuis des siècles qui ne connaissait pas le diabète en 1870 alors qu'il apparaissait déjà comme maladie de civilisation en Amérique du Nord. Aujourd'hui encore, les Brésiliens consomment 70 kg de sucre raffiné par an et par personnes, plus que les Nord- Américains, et malgré cela, ils ont passé deux fois et demi moins de cas de diabète qu'aux USA. Au Bhoutan, le diabète était pratiquement inexistant jusqu'en 2002, après que l'électrification du pays ait commencé. En 2004, 634 nouveaux cas de diabète furent annoncés, en 2005 - 944, en - 2006 1'470, en 2007 – 2'540 avec 15 morts. En 2012, on dénombra 91 morts et le diabète était la huitième cause de mortalité dans le pays, malgré que le régime alimentaire n'avait pas changé ! Le smog électronique agissant sur les mitochondries, comme nous l'avons vu au chapitre précédent, empêche une bonne utilisation du sucre absorbé, à savoir la combustion du sucre. Celui-ci, ne pouvant pas être converti en énergie mécanique est stocké sous forme de graisse par l'organisme. Les diagrammes des statistiques du nombre de morts par diabète en fonction du degré d'électrification des états américains en 1931 et 1940 sont en outre également très explicites, ne laissant aucun doute quant à l'implication des champs électromagnétiques sur l'apparition du diabète à grande échelle, innocentant la consommation de sucre, dans une certaine mesure. En 1997, on note aux USA, une augmentation des cas de diabète de 31%, sur une année. Elle correspond exactement à l’introduction massive des téléphones cellulaires dans ce pays. Cancer et le déficit de Vie En février 2011, la Court suprême d'Italie accusa le Cardinal Roberto Tucci, président sortant de Radio Vatican d'avoir créé par négligence, une nuisance publique en polluant l'environnement de radiofréquences. En effet, dans la période de 1997 à 2003, les enfants demeurant dans un rayon de 12 kilomètres des antennes eurent des taux de leucémie, lymphomes ou myélomes huit fois supérieurs à ceux qui résidaient à une plus grande distance. Il en alla de même pour les adultes, avec un taux sept fois supérieur. Otto Heinrich Warburg docteur et professeur allemand, prix Nobel de médecine en 1931, démontra que le cancer est une régression des cellules privées d'oxygène, les poussant à se multiplier anarchiquement comme dans un monde primitif où l'oxygène n'était pas présent tel qu'il l'est aujourd'hui. La privation d'oxygène initiale est elle due à un dysfonctionnement des mitochondries, dont on a vu ci-dessus qu'il peut être provoqué par les champs électromagnétiques ou d'autres polluants comme la fumée, les pesticides, les additifs alimentaires et la pollution de l'air. Le même principe de déficit d'oxygène aux cellules est valable pour le diabète et c'est pourquoi, on trouve un taux plus élevé de cancers chez les diabétiques que dans le reste de la population. Au zoo de Philadelphie, dans la période de 1901 à 1955, on nota une élévation du taux de tumeurs malignes chez les mammifères variant entre 2 fois plus et 22 fois plus entre les deux dates. Des statistiques de morts par cancer montrent une bonne corrélation entre l'électrification des pays et le taux de cancers. Par exemple aux USA, sur le période de 1841 à 1850, le taux était de 6,6 pour mille. Il fit plus que doubler pour la prochaine période de 1851 à 1860, avec un taux de 14 pour mille. L'explication est fournie par le déploiement massif du télégraphe en 1854. En 1914, parmi les 63'000 Amérindiens vivant dans des réserves sans électrification, on dénombra deux morts par cancer, alors que dans le reste du pays le taux de mortalité par cancer était 25 fois plus élevé. Entre 1920 et 1921, la mortalité par cancer augmenta entre 3 et 10% dans les pays occidentaux, suite à l'introduction des premières stations d'émission radio AM. Les chercheurs suédois Olle Johansson et Orjan Hallberg démontrèrent une nette corrélation entre les taux de cancer du sein, de la prostate et des poumons, avec l'exposition de la population aux radiofréquences. Ils ont consigné une augmentation significative de ces taux en 1920, 1955, 1969 et une diminution (!) en 1978, ce qui correspond à l'évolution du smog provoqué par les radiofréquence, respectivement l'introduction de la radio AM, celle de la radio FM et la TV1, arrivée de la TV2 en couleur, puis cessation des émission en radio AM. Ces même chercheurs ont également découvert une excellente corrélation linéaire entre le nombre d'émetteurs radio FM par unité de surface et l'incidence des mélanomes, les endroit exposés ayant 11 fois plus de mélanomes que les zone blanches. De plus, ils ont mis en évidence que les mélanomes n'apparaissent que rarement sur les zones du corps les plus exposées au soleil, comme le front, le nez, les épaules et les pieds, mais plutôt aux endroits du corps habituellement protégés du soleil. Qui plus est, la prolifération des cancers de la peau arriva avant la mode des vacances balnéaires ou l'exposition solaire est intense. La démonstration est faite que les mélanomes ne sont pas l'objet principal du soleil, mais celui des radiofréquences. Les diagrammes des statistiques de la mortalité par cancer en fonction du degré d'électrification des états américains en 1931 et 1940 sont en outre également très explicites, tels qu'ils le sont pour le diabète et les maladies cardiovasculaires, ne laissant aucun doute quant à l'implication des champs électromagnétiques sur la prolifération des cancers. Les données honnêtes concernant les tumeurs du cerveau sont rares car le lobby de la téléphonie mobile s'est infiltré depuis des décennies dans ce milieu pour mandater des études biaisée. L'une d'elle montrant même une diminution de l'incidence de tumeurs corrélée à l'usage intensif du téléphone cellulaire ! Toutefois, l'Université de Calgary mit en évidence une augmentation de 30% d’incidence de tumeur malignes du cerveau sur la période de 2012 à 2013 et Lennart Hardell, professeur en oncologie à l’hôpital universitaire de Orebro en Suède, démontra que 2'000 heures d'usage d'un cellulaire augmente le risque de tumeur d'un facteur compris entre trois et huit, dépendant de l'âge du sujet et de ses habitudes téléphoniques. En 2000, Neil Cherry analysa les taux de cancer des enfants de San-Francisco en fonction de la distance entre leur résidence et l'émetteur télévision et radio FM Sutro Tower. Les enfants vivant sur des collines ou sur des crêtes furent plus touchés. Ceux qui vivaient à moins de un kilomètre de l'antenne eurent des occurrences 9 fois supérieures de leucémies, 15 fois plus pour le lymphome, 31 fois pour le cancer du cerveau. Dans l'ensemble, un taux 18 fois supérieur à ceux qui vivaient en dehors de ce rayon de un kilomètre. Vie ralentie Dans le Traité pratique de l'épuisement nerveux de George Miller Beard, électro- thérapeute et amis de Thomas Edison, 1880, on peut lire une observation intrigante : Même si ces difficultés ne sont pas directement fatales, qu'elles n'apparaissent pas directement dans les tables de mortalité, au contraire, elles pourraient tendre à prolonger la vie et à protéger l'organisme des maladies inflammatoires, il n'en demeure pas moins que la souffrance est énorme. Ceux qui souffraient le plus semblaient plutôt jeunes pour leur âge. Plus loin, Beard note qu'une rare maladie semble plus volontiers habiter les sujets neurasthéniques que le reste de la population, il s'agit du diabète. Beard, avait déjà observé que l'extension de l’espérance de vie n'allait pas de paire avec la qualité de celle-ci. La mystérieuse corrélation entre les souffrances des neurasthéniques –dont les symptômes sont les même que ceux des personnes électro- hypersensibles contemporaines–, et l’extension de leur vie montrait du doigt un dysfonctionnement majeur. En outre, de longue date il a été observé qu'un mode de vie ascétique, doté d'une alimentation pauvre en calorie avait pour faculté de prolonger l’espérance de vie et la santé. C'est par exemple le cas de la population d'Okinawa dont le nombre de centenaires est quarante fois supérieur à la population des préfectures plus riches, situées plus au nord. Des chercheurs dans le domaine du vieillissement ont souligné que le moteur de notre vie est le système de transport des électrons dans les mitochondries de nos cellules. C'est là que se combinent l'air que nous respirons et ce que nous mangeons, à une cadence qui détermine notre taux de vieillissement, d'où notre espérance de vie. Si un ralentissement de la combustion réalisé au sein de nos cellules en modérant la quantité d'énergie acheminée peut être bénéfique, un autre mode de ralentissement peut par contre lui être néfaste. C'est l'empoisonnement de la chaîne de transport des électrons. Une des possibilités d'empoisonnement est l'exposition chronique aux champs électromagnétiques artificiels. Cette pollution qui ne cesse de croître exerce des forces extérieures sur les électrons de nos mitochondries, les ralentissant, privant nos cellules d'oxygène et provoquant les symptômes de l'EHS. Vous dites que vous pouvez entendre l'électricité ? En 1962, une femme contacta l’université de Santa Barbara (CA, USA) pour qu'on l'aide à trouver la source du son mystérieux qu'elle entendait partout chez elle, dans un quartier pourtant calme. Cela l'empêchait de dormir et nuisait à sa santé. Des mesures montrèrent effectivement des champs électromagnétiques particulièrement forts émanent de tous les conducteurs électriques, aussi bien du réseau que des radiateurs ou autres éléments métalliques, mais le stéthoscope restait quant à lui, silencieux. L'ingénieur se livra à une expérience, enregistrant sur bande les champs mesurés et les diffusa à la femme affectée par ces bruits. Elle confirma que c'est bien ce qu'elle entendait. Ainsi, cette femme entendait les champs électromagnétiques de son environnement. Des installations de mise à la terre et des filtres électroniques furent installées afin de réduire les perturbations à un niveau acceptable. Mais auparavant, entre autres chercheurs, Volta avait déjà expérimenté la production de sons variés en appliquant une tension au niveau des oreilles avec succès. Bien plus tard, dans les années 1960 également, le biologiste Allan Frey publia des articles sur la capacité de certains sujets à entendre les émissions d'une installation de radar. Le modèle mécanique de fonctionnement de l'oreille tel qu'il est enseigné dans les écoles ne permet pas d'expliquer ces phénomènes observés. Constatant cela, le biochimiste Lionel Naftalin développa un nouveau modèle de fonctionnement de l'oreille humaine, prenant en compte le phénomène de piézo-électricité, bien connu et utilisé par les électroniciens, qu'il découvrit dans le gel recouvrant les cils de l'oreille interne. Dans ce gel trouvé nul part ailleurs dans le corps humain et ayant des propriétés électriques très particulières, une tension de 100 à 120 millivolts était présente, ce qui est beaucoup dans le domaine de la bio-électronique. Ce gel piézo-électrique transforme les ondes sonores en un signal électrique communiqué aux cils de l'oreille interne. Ce nouveau modèle révisé du fonctionnement de l'oreille humaine permet alors d'expliquer que, non seulement certains sujets dans certaines conditions arrivent à entendre un signal électromagnétique, mais également que tant de citoyens contemporains souffrent d'acouphènes, ou encore que certains groupes de citoyens entendent le Hum, un peu partout autour de la planète à raison de 2 à 11% de la population. Aujourd'hui, environ 44% des adultes américains ont des acouphènes à divers niveaux d'intensité, alors qu'en Suède, le nombre de jeunes affectés était de 12% en 1997 et de 42% en 2006 ! Ces bruits parasites sont en grande partie le résultat d'un environnement fortement pollué en champs électromagnétiques artificiels de toutes natures. Abeilles, oiseaux, arbres et humains Alfonso Balmori Marinez, biologiste espagnol, a corrélé la densité de population de moineaux aux valeurs d’irradiations en radiofréquences de leurs endroits de vie. Dans les lieux le plus irradiés, au-dessus de 3 V/m, les moineaux ne peuvent plus vivre, alors qu'ils sont encore 42 sujets par hectare si le niveau est de 0.1 V/m. Il a également observé une nette modification du comportement des cigognes qui se battent au sein du couple plutôt que de construire le nid ou couver les œufs, si elle sont à proximité (200 m) d'une antenne-relais. Le Royaume-Uni a classifié le moineau domestique comme espèce en voie de disparition après que sa population ait décliné de 75% entre 1994 et 2002, période qui coïncidence avec le déploiement de la téléphonie mobile. Les éleveurs de pigeons voyageurs de plusieurs continent constatent que jusqu'à 90% des volatiles lâchés ne retrouvent pas le chemin de retour au pigeonnier, alors que traditionnellement, cette proportion était négligeable. En 2000, les éleveurs anglais tentèrent de modifier le trajet de la course afin d'éviter les antenne-relais pour laisser une meilleure chance aux pigeons. En 2004, ces mêmes éleveurs mandatèrent de plus amples études sur l'impact des micro-ondes sur les pigeons. En 2002, le US National Park Service diffusa une note aux biologistes étudiant le comportement des animaux sauvages expliquant que les puces RFID de localisation par radiofréquences attachées à ces animaux peuvent radicalement modifier leur comportement du fait des radiofréquences générées. Dans des milieux pollués par les champs électromagnétiques, les pinsons n'arrivent pas à s'orienter pour la migration, alors que s'ils sont dans une cage de Faraday, ils y parviennent. Une expérience sur les têtards de crapaud élevés dans deux bassins distincts, à 140 mètres d'une antenne-relais, l'un sans blindage électromagnétique et l'autre avec, montra un taux de mortalité de, respectivement 90% et 4% ! On trouve le même genre d'effets délétères chez les insectes, lorsqu'ils sont soumis au smog électronique que nous rencontrons au quotidien, et le Dr Panagopoulous ayant expérimenté sur les drosophiles, nous informe que les expositions aux micro-ondes à des niveaux communs, ne serait-ce que quelques minutes par jour durant quelques jours, sont le pire agent stressant dont nous ayons connaissance dans nos vies courantes. Pire que les produits chimiques ou les champs électromagnétiques basse fréquences. Les abeilles sont également impactées comme nous l'avons vu au début de ce résumé traitant de l’île de Wight. Le Dr Daniel Favre (Suisse) a démontré qu'en présence de micro-ondes, les abeilles émettent le son typique entendu lors de l'essaimage, ce qui porte à croire que les insectes veulent fuir la source d'émission. Communément, on incrimine le varroa dans le syndrome d'effondrement des colonies, mais on oublie que cette mite a cohabité durant longtemps avec les abeilles. De plus, on observe que même une colonie morte n'est aujourd'hui pas prise d'assaut par les parasite, alors que c'était le cas « avant ». On incrimine également les pesticides, mais comme on l'a vu plus haut, les abeilles de l’île de Wight avaient bien disparu à 90% sans que l'endroit n'ait été traité aux pesticides. La véritable cause de l’effondrement des colonies, ces sont les champs électromagnétiques humains, spécialement la téléphonie mobile. Dans les années 1980, un nouveau sujet d'actualité vit le jour : la mort des forêts. Le blâme fut jeté sur les pluies acides, mais les régions les plus reculées, baignées que dans de l'air pur furent touchées également. Des recherches en Allemagne et en Suisse furent entreprises. Effectivement, le sol des forêts touchées était acide, mais on détermina par observation et par expérimentation que cette acidité peut également provenir d'une électrolyse lente du sol via les arbres exposés à des ondes radar, par exemple. D'ailleurs, les arbres des crêtes étaient plus touchés car plus exposés par les nouveaux radars installés dans les années 1970. Une autre observation fut faite lors de la chute du mur de Berlin. Les gigantesques radars russes à Skruda qui irradiaient fortement toute la région dans leur tâche de surveillance de l'ouest, avaient provoqué des dégâts non seulement à la forêt, mais aux animaux et aux hommes également. Après de multiples études, on trouva notamment que les cercles de croissance des arbres durant les années de fonctionnement des radars étaient nettement moins large qu'avant ou après celles-ci. A Schwarzenbourg, en Suisse, une antenne de radio à ondes courtes fut installée en 1939, puis la puissance d'émission fut augmentée à 450 kW en 1954. S'en suivit une dégradation de la santé des habitants qui se plaignaient des symptômes propres à l'EHS. Les enfants de ce village avaient des difficultés à l’école et semblaient ne pas pouvoir accéder à une formation supérieure contrairement aux enfants des villages voisins moins exposés. Enfin, en 1992 une étude fut menée, confirmant que les paramètres des analyses physiologiques des Hommes et des animaux du lieu étaient anormales, ceci dans un rayon de 900 mètres autour de l'antenne. Il fut également constaté que les anneaux de croissance des arbres étaient compressés, mais seulement du côté d'où venaient les radiations. Le 28 mars 1998, l'émetteur fut arrêté et une étude « avant- après » fut réalisée, démontrant que le taux de mélatonine des 58 sujets testés remonta. Un villageois de 50 ans put enfin dormir une nuit complète sans interruption, pour la première fois de sa vie. Le 29 mai 1996, Philippe Roch, directeur de l'Office de l'environnement déclara « qu'une corrélation entre les troubles du sommeil et les opérations de transmissions était prouvée ». Au pays des aveugles Combien faudra-t-il encore attendre avant de pouvoir dire « ton cellulaire me tue ! » plutôt que « Je suis électro-hypersensible ». Et pourtant le nombre de gens souffrant de céphalées à cause de l'usage de leurs cellulaires est énorme. En 2010, deux tiers des étudiants à l'université ukrainienne interrogés admirent le fait. La question étant qu'il n'est pas socialement acceptable de l'admettre ouvertement. Madame Gro Harlem Brundtland était EHS, alors qu'elle prenait la tête de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé. Elle ne s'en cachait pas, mais un an plus tard, elle a dû laisser sa place. Les autres personnages publiques de haut rang ne répéteront pas son expérience. Seule une minorité des personnes souffrant de la pollution électromagnétique savent de quoi elles souffrent, alors qu'une large majorité l'ignore. La population entière est électrocutée à distance et l'on doit presque s'excuser d'être électro-sensible ou plus exactement électro-hypersensible, comme si on devait s'excuser d'être « cyanure- hypersensible », car la vérité est que l'électricité telle qu'utilisée actuellement est toxique. D'ailleurs, les graphes statistiques montrent clairement une augmentation de la mortalité des citoyens de neuf villes américaines, peu après la mise en service des premières antenne-relais. Cette surmortalité va de 25 à plus 80%. Une enquête demandant aux New-Yorkais de s'annoncer si un certain nombre de symptômes relatifs à l'EHS étaient apparus chez eux à partir du 15 novembre 1996, par le biais d'un journal quotidien, récolta des centaines de témoignages, toutes classes raciales ou sociales confondues. La date en question était celle de la mise en service du premier réseau de téléphonie mobile cellulaire. L'organisation Cellular Phone Task Force qu'Arthur Firstenberg a démarrée en 1996, croule sous les demandes d'aides de personnes blessées par les radiofréquence micro- ondes. Il semble qu'il n'y ait bientôt plus nulle-part où aller tant les émetteurs de toutes natures ont proliféré, tant WiFi, que WiMAX, stations radar ou encore les irradiations venant du ciel, comme les satellites de télécommunication. Pr Olle Johansson, du célèbre institut Karolinska décernant les prix Nobel de médecine, s'occupa dès 1977 de démontrer les effets du smog électronique sur le Vivant. Le succès de ses études le marginalisa dans son institut, les budgets pour ses recherches disparurent, il reçut des menaces de mort et à une occasion, il échappa de peu à une tentative de meurtre par sabotage de sa moto. Malgré tout, il continue d'informer le monde sur la vérité pour défendre, entre autre, les EHS dont la vie est un enfer sur Terre. Il est dégoûté de la façon dont les autorités de pays soit-disant « démocratiques » laissent tomber les victimes des radiofréquences. Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe a la double nationalité anglaise et américaine, termina ses études en 1998. En 2007, suivant son mari pilote de F-16 aux USA, elle devint sévèrement atteinte par l'EHS, à son insu. Ses recherches sur internet lui permirent enfin de comprendre ce qui lui arrivait. Elle se demanda en tant que médecin, comment une atteinte aussi profonde et invalidante pouvait exister sans qu'elle n'en ait jamais entendu parler dans sa profession. Par acquit de conscience, elle décida de se soumettre à un IRM, afin d'éliminer tous risques de cancer du cerveau. Elle crut que sa fin était imminente alors que les pulsations hautes fréquence furent enclenchées. Elle retrouva toute sa santé et sa vitalité à la Death Valley épargnée des radiofréquence. Désormais, elle se consacre à informer et aider les au moins 5% de personnes EHS, totalement laissées pour compte par les autorités. Yury Grigoriev, considéré comme le grand-père de la recherche sur le CEM en Russie, est très inquiet pour les jeunes en particulier, tout en mentionnant que c'est la première fois dans l'histoire de l'humanité que l'on expose ouvertement son cerveau aux micro- ondes, ce qui est grave aux yeux d'un radiobiologiste. Il cite notamment une étude coréenne démontrant que le trouble du déficit de l'attention (ADHD) chez les enfants va de pair avec l'usage du cellulaire connecté. Leif Salford, un neurochirurgien suédois, et son équipe, prouva dans la fin des années 1990 que le cellulaire rend perméable la barrière hémato-encéphalique, provoquant la maladie d'Alzheimer. En 2003 ils démontrèrent qu'une exposition unique de seulement deux heures laisse des dommages permanents au cerveau. En 2015, des scientifiques turcs irradièrent des rats, une heure par jour pendant un mois, au moyen d'ondes typiques de téléphone cellulaire. Les rats irradiés avaient 10% de moins de cellules cérébrales que ceux qui avaient été épargnés. La même équipe expérimenta sur des rattes portantes, pendant 9 jours au même taux de radiations. Leur descendance montrait des dégénérescences de leur cerveau, moelle épinière, cœur, reins, foie, rate, thymus et testicules. La même expérience répétée sur des jeunes rats provoqua une atrophie de la moelle épinière avec diminution de la myéline, similaire à ce que l'on observe dans la sclérose en plaque. En septembre 1998, les 66 premiers satellites de la téléphonie spatiale furent mis en service, causant un accroissement de la mortalité nationale américaine de près de 5%, durant les deux semaines suivantes. Durant la même période, on observa que les oiseaux ne volaient plus et les personnes EHS étaient spécialement malades. Aujourd'hui, nous sommes survolés par environ 1'100 satellites artificiels, mais plusieurs entreprises projettent de lancer jusqu'à 4'600 nouveaux satellites de communication chacune d'ici 2020, pour couvrir toute la planète en accès internet rapide. Il s'agit de Google, Facebook, SpaceX, OneWeb et Samsung. En 1968, même la première flottille de 28 satellites militaires provoqua une pandémie de grippe mondiale. Contrairement aux antenne-relais dont les radiations sont très atténuées en arrivant dans la magnétosphère, les satellites agissent directement sur celle-ci, selon des mécanismes encore mal compris, compromettant la Vie sur Terre. Nous oublions les avertissements de Ross Adey, le grand-père de la bio-électromagnétique et du physicien atmosphérique Neil Cherry que nous sommes électriquement réglés pour le monde nous entourant et que le niveau d'exposition en radiofréquences sûr est zéro. Le besoin urgent d'agir contre cette initiative potentiellement catastrophique peut être réalisé en s'approchant de l'association Global Union Against Radiation Deployment from Space (GUARDS). En 2014, le médecin Tesuharu Shinjyo publia une étude « avant-après ». Il évalua la santé de 122 habitants d'un immeuble sur lequel étaient installées des antenne-relais. 21 souffraient de fatigue chronique, 14 de vertiges ou maladie de Ménière, 14 de céphalées, 17 de douleurs ou infections oculaires, 14 d'insomnies, 10 de saignements de nez chroniques. Cinq mois après que les antennes aient été éliminés, il ne subsista que 2 cas d'insomnies, 1 cas de vertiges, 1 cas de céphalées ! L'urgence en matière de droits humains qui touche des centaines de millions de citoyens à l'échelle planétaire et l'urgence environnementale menaçant d’extinction de si nombreuses espèces végétales et animales doit être affrontée avec clairvoyance. YOU CAN ORDER THE PAPERBACK/EBOOK VERSION HERE ONLINE HERE: https://geni.us/inresolutionsvisiblerainbow The Invisible Rainbow Arthur Firstenberg A History of Electricity and Life 5g is being rolled out across the country, despite growing evidence that it is disruptive to our health, our safety, and the environment. The Invisible Rainbow is the groundbreaking story of electricity as it’s never been told before—exposing its very real impact on the biosphere and human health. DOWNLOADS OF THIS SUMMARY IN MULTIPLE LANGUAGES ARABIC- INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY CZECH- INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY CHINESE - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY HUNGARY - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY PORTUGESE - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY RUSSIAN - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY If you can, please order all paperbacks through your local high street bookshop. MORE RECOMMENDED BOOKS SOURCE: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Frequently-Asked-Questions.pdf

NOTB 'BOOK OF THE DECADE' Der Unsichtbare Regenbogen: eine Geschichte der Elektrizität und Ihrer Wirkung auf das Leben (2017) Informative Zusammenfassung von The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (2017) von Arthur Firstenberg (in englischer Sprache) READ IN: ENGLISH - FRENCH - ITALIAN - SPANISH - GERMAN (see other languages at end of summary) Über den Autor Arthur Firstenberg ist ein Wissenschaftler und Journalist, der an der Spitze einer globalen Bewegung steht mit dem Ziel, das Tabu rund um das Thema der Elektrizität und ihrer Auswirkungen auf das Leben zu entschleiern. Nach seinem Abschluss mit Auszeichnung (Phi Beta Kappa) im Fach Mathematik an der Cornell University besuchte er die University of California, Irvine School of Medicine von 1978 bis 1982. Verletzungen durch zu hohe Dosen Röntgenstrahlung verhinderten eine weitere medizinische Karriere. In den letzten 37 Jahren war er als forschender Wissenschaftler, als Berater und Dozent für Gesundheitsthemen und Umweltauswirkungen elektromagnetischer Strahlung sowie als Therapeut mit verschiedenen Heilmethoden tätig. Über das Buch Dieses englischsprachige, bemerkenswert gut dokumentierte und recherchierte Buch stellt ein Wissensfundament über den Einsatz von Strom und seine Interaktion mit lebenden Organismen in unserer Zivilisation dar. Das Thema wird von der ersten Entdeckung der Elektrizität in den 1740er Jahren kontinuierlich bis in unsere heutige Zeit untersucht, sowie ein Ausblick in die Zukunft gewagt. Es sei darauf hingewiesen, dass sich der Titel auf das gesamte elektromagnetische Spektrum bezieht, das die Farben des Regenbogens ebenso umfasst, wie die unsichtbaren Frequenzbereiche von Radiofrequenzen, Hochfrequenz (Mobilfunk) und den Feldern, die um elektrische Leiter (wie z.B. im häuslichen Stromnetz) entstehen. 1. Gefangen in einer Flasche 1746 wurden in Europa die ersten Entdeckungen im Bereich der Elektrizität gemacht. Leidens Experiment (Pieter van Musschenbroek von Leiden, Niederlande) bestand darin, den Stromfluss durch Reiben der Hand an einer Glaskugel sichtbar zu machen, welche sich schnell um Ihre eigene Achse drehte. Die so erzeugte statische Elektrizität mit ihren elektrischen Bögen und Stromschlägen machte in Schulen, auf Messen und bei Privatpersonen, die über die finanziellen Mittel verfügten, um solch ein Gerät zu erwerben, einen großen Eindruck. Das Phänomen war so populär, dass es gesellschaftlich nicht akzeptabel war, sich auch die Gefahren der Elektrizität einzugestehen, obwohl bei einigen Experimentierfreudigen und auch bei den Tieren, mit denen Versuche angestellt wurden, diverse Beschwerden auftraten: Kopfschmerzen, Nasenbluten und Müdigkeit. Die Gesellschaft wurde von einer wahren „Elektromanie“ ergriffen und die leidenschaftlichsten Vertreter der Mode, sich in guter Gesellschaft zwischen zwei Gläsern Champagner Elektroschocks auszusetzen, begannen bereits, schädliche Symptome wahrnehmen. Trotzdem haben sich die medizinischen Einrichtungen mit der Leidener Flasche (dem Vorläufer des Kondensators) ausgestattet, um damit medizinische Experimente, zum Beispiel mit Abtreibungen durchzuführen. Auf diese Weise entstand ein völlig neues Wissensfeld über die biologischen Wirkungen der Elektrizität auf Mensch, Pflanze und Tier – ein Wissen, das damals viel umfangreicher war als das unserer heutigen Ärzte, die täglich Patienten unter den Auswirkungen von Elektrizität leiden sehen, ohne das Phänomen als das zu erkennen, was es ist, und die im Allgemeinen nichts von der Existenz dieser Erkenntnisse wissen. 2. Taube können hören und Lahme können gehen In Anbetracht der – selten positiven und viel häufiger negativen – Auswirkungen der elektrischen Spannung auf lebende Organismen kamen die Forscher und Ärzte zu dem Schluss, dass lebende Organismen für ihr Funktionieren ebenfalls von Elektrizität Gebrauch machen. Bestimmte Heilungen wurden mit Strom herbeigeführt - wie zum Beispiel 1851, als der französische Neurologe Guillaume-Benjamin Duchenne bei Dutzenden Patienten Taubheit mit lokal angelegten elektrischen Impulsen behandelte. Es wurde Experimente durchgeführt – vor allem von Alessandro Volta in Italien, aber auch von anderen Forscher der westlichen Welt - die zeigten, dass das Nervensystem, das Herz, das Herz-Kreislauf-System, das Geschmacksorgan, die Schweißdrüsen und andere Körpersysteme durch Elektrizität stimuliert werden können, welche durch galvanische Elemente erzeugt wird. Es wurde festgestellt, dass die Anzahl der heilenden Wirkungen deutlich Der Unsichtbare Regenbogen – Zusammenfassung 3 geringer war als die schädlichen. Letztere umfassten die Symptome der Elektro-Hyper-Sensibilität (EHS), die uns auch heute bekannt sind: Kopfschmerzen, Schwindel, Übelkeit, geistige Verwirrung, Müdigkeit, Depression, Schlaflosigkeit, etc. 3. Elektrische Empfindlichkeit Der französische Botaniker Thomas-François Dalibard, der elektrische Experimente an lebenden Organismen durchführte, vertraute Benjamin Franklin 1762 in einem Brief an, dass er eine Arbeit aufgrund einer Elektro-Unverträglichkeit nicht fortsetzen könne, die sein eigener Organismus im Laufe der Zeit entwickelt habe. Er war einer der ersten Menschen, die offiziell als elektro-hypersensibel (EHS) erklärt werden. Liest man diesen Bericht, so wird klar, dass dieser Botaniker schwer betroffen gewesen sein muss. Andere Professoren und Forscher machten die gleiche unglückliche Erfahrung und waren dadurch gezwungen, Ihre Forschungsarbeit einzustellen. Auch der berühmte Benjamin Franklin war von einer neurologischen Erkrankung während seiner Forschungen über Elektrizität ab 1753 betroffen, und die Symptome erinnern weitgehend an jene der heutigen Elektro-Sensibilität. Am Ende des 18.Jahrhunderts war es schließlich eine allgemein anerkannte Tatsache, dass Elektrizität Menschen krank machen kann, abhängig vom Geschlecht, dem Körperbau und der körperlichen Verfassung des Betroffenen. Ebenso war damals schon beobachtet worden, dass bestimmte Menschen stark auf Wetterveränderungen reagierten, die oft mit elektrischen Veränderungen in der Atmosphäre korrelierten. Die Namen einiger dieser Personen sind noch heute berühmt – unter Ihnen Christoph Kolumbus, Dante, Charles Darwin, Benjamin Franklin, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Victor Hugo, Leonardo da Vinci, Martin Luther, Michelangelo, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Napoleon, Jean-Jaques Rousseau und Voltaire. 4. Ein Weg wird verpasst In den 1790er Jahren wurde die Wissenschaft mit einer Art Identitätskrise in Bezug auf die Interpretation und Vereinheitlichung der vier verschiedenen strömenden Kräfte konfrontiert: Elektrizität, Licht, Magnetismus und Wärme. Was die Elektrizität betrifft, so stand Luigi Galvani, der Elektrizität als integralen Bestandteil des lebenden Organismus ansah, Alessandro Voltas Theorie gegenüber, daß Elektrizität nur ein "sekundärer" Effekt innerer chemischer Reaktionen im lebenden Organismus sei. Volta, der Erfinder der elektrischen Batterie, die aufgrund ihrer Nützlichkeit auch das Potenzial für große unternehmerische Geschäfte besaß, behielt mit seiner Argumentation die Oberhand gegenüber der mehr ganzheitlichen Sicht auf die Wechselwirkung zwischen dem elektrischen Strom und dem lebenden Organismus. 5. Chronische Erkrankungen durch Elektrizität Ab dem Ende des 19.Jahrhunderts wurden die urbanen Landschaften der Industrieländern durch die Installation von Telegrafenleitungen grundlegend verändert. Diese Technologie verwendete Spannungen in der Größenordnung von 80 Volt auf einem einzigen Leiter, wobei der Rückstrom geerdet war. In dieser Zeit wurden auch die ersten sog. vagabundierenden Ströme beobachtet, denen Lebewesen ausgesetzt waren. Zivilisationskrankheiten wie die Neurasthenie (Nervenschwäche) traten auf, unter der neben vielen anderen Berühmtheiten auch Frank Lloyd Wright und Theodore Roosevelt litten. Nebenbei bemerkt ist die Neurasthenie in ihrer Ausprägung sehr ähnlich der Elektro-Sensibilität (EHS), die zum moderneren Begriff für die gleiche Empfindlichkeit gegenüber Elektrizität geworden ist. Rund die Hälfte der Telegraphisten, die durch ihre Arbeit mit dem durch die Leitungen gesendeten elektrischen Strom sehr starken elektromagnetischen Feldern ausgesetzt waren, litt unter der danach benannten „Telegraphistenkrankheit“. Wieder einmal waren die Symptome die gleichen wie die der heutigen EHS. Später, um 1915, waren es die Telefonisten, die die gleichen Symptome hatten, denn Sie waren stundenlang an Ihren Schreibtischen elektromagnetischen Feldern ausgesetzt. 1989 wurde festgestellt, dass in Winnipeg (Kanada) 47% der Telefonisten an denselben Symptomen litten. Im Jahre 1894 schrieb der bekannte Wiener Psychiater Sigmund Freud einen Artikel, dessen Wirkung katastrophal war für all jene Unglücklichen, die an der Telegraphistenkrankheit, der Neurasthenie, dem Mikrowellen-Syndrom oder EHS litten. Anstatt die externe Ursache, nämlich die elektromagnetische Verschmutzung zu sehen, führte er diese Symptome auf ungeordnete Gedanken oder schlecht kontrollierte Emotionen zurück. Infolgedessen werden heute Millionen von Bürger, die von Elektro-Smog betroffen sind, mit Medikamenten behandelt, statt Ihre Exposition gegenüber diesem Schadstoff zu verringern. Sigmund Freud Der Unsichtbare Regenbogen – Zusammenfassung 4 benannte die Neurasthenie, die bekanntermaßen durch Elektrizität verursacht wurde, in eine Neurose um, eine Angst- oder Panikattacke. Damit war der Weg frei für den rücksichtslosen Ausbau der Elektrizität. Es sei darauf hingewiesen, dass die Neurasthenie in Russland als Umweltkrankheit gelistet ist, da Freuds Definition dort nicht anerkannt wurde. 6. Das Verhalten von Pflanzen Der indische Naturwissenschaftler Jagadish Chandra Bose und andere Forscher führten zahlreiche elektrische Experimente an Pflanzen und anderen lebenden Organismen durch, die sehr aussagekräftig waren. Er entdeckte, dass die Nerven von Pflanzen oder Tieren ein variables Reaktionsmuster auf Reizung durch Strom zeigen und dass Ihre Widerstandskraft stark variieren kann, je nach Anwendung des Stroms und seiner Polarität. Er wies auch darauf hin, dass die tatsächliche Intensität des Stroms, also die angelegte Spannung, die notwendig war, um die Leitfähigkeit der Nerven zu ändern, extrem gering war: etwa in der Größenordnung von 0,3 Mikroampere (0,3*10-6 Ampere). Dieser Strom ist deutlich geringer als der Strom, der durch ein Telefongespräch mit einem Handy induziert wird. Bose entdeckt ebenfalls, dass die Schwelle der Bioaktivität eines Stroms nur 1 Femtoampere (1*10-15) beträgt. Da dieser Forscher auch mit Hochfrequenzübertragungen vertraut war, führte er ein Experiment durch, bei dem eine Pflanze einem Funksignal von 30 MHz in einer Entfernung von etwa 200 Metern ausgesetzt war, und stellte dabei fest, dass das Wachstum der Pflanze während der Expositionszeit verzögert war. Er zeigte auch, dass sich die Zirkulation der Pflanzensäfte verlangsamt, wenn sie durch eben dasselbe Funksignal bestrahlt wird. 7. Akute durch Elektrizität verursachte Erkrankungen In den 1880er Jahren wurde London noch mit Gleichstrom versorgt, aber einige Physiker hatten entdeckt, dass die Verteilung von Wechselstrom weniger Verluste durch den Widerstand der Kabel und Drähte verursacht. Es folgte ein „Kampf der Ströme“, obwohl viele Wissenschaftler, darunter Edison, die gefährlicheren Auswirkungen von Wechselstrom gegenüber Gleichstrom mit deutlichen Worten kritisierten. Ironischerweise ist es gerade die „Wirksamkeit“ des Wechselstrom, die dazu geführt hat, ihn im elektrischen Stuhl zu verwenden. Und bekanntermaßen ist der elektrische Strom unseres Stromnetzes ebenfalls Wechselstrom. 1889 begann die Vollelektrifizierung in den USA und kurz darauf in Europa. Im selben Jahr wurden die Ärzte wie durch Zufall mit einer Flut von Grippeerkrankungen konfrontiert, die bis dahin nur selten aufgetreten war. Die Symptome der Opfer waren viel mehr neurologischer Natur, ähnelten der Neurasthenie, und schlossen Atemwegsbeschwerden nicht ein. Die Pandemie dauerte vier Jahre und tötete mindestens eine Million Menschen. Im Jahr 2001 zeigte der kanadische Astronom Ken Tapping, dass die Grippepandemien der letzten drei Jahrhunderte mit Spitzen in der magnetischen Aktivität der Sonne korrelierten, und zwar in einem 11-Jahres- Zyklus. Es wurde auch festgestellt, dass sich einige Ausbrüche der Influenza in wenigen Tagen auf riesige Gebiete ausgebreitet haben, eine Tatsache, die durch Ansteckung von einer Person zur nächsten schwer zu erklären ist. Auch zahlreiche Versuche, die direkte Ansteckung durch engen Kontakt, durch Schleimtröpfchen oder andere Übertragungswege nachzuweisen, haben sich als erfolglos erwiesen. Von 1933 bis heute konnten Virologen keine experimentellen Studien vorlegen, die belegen, dass sich die Influenza durch normalen Kontakt zwischen Menschen ausbreitet. Alle Versuche, dies zu tun, sind gescheitert. 8. Ein Geheimnis auf der Insel Wight Im Jahr 1904 trat ein Bienensterben auf der Isle of Wight ein, nachdem Marconi dort seine Funksender installiert hatte. Diese Sender arbeiten mit Frequenzen nahe dem Megahertz-Bereich. Auf der anderen Seite des Kanals bewies Jacques-Arsène d'Arsonval, dass "spitze und hakenförmige" elektromagnetische Signale weit schädlicher sind als sinusförmige Signale. Marconi begann nach anderthalb Jahren des Experimentierens mit Radio-Sendern in voller Gesundheit im Alter von 22 Jahren Fieber zu entwickeln. Diese Fieberschübe dauerten für den Rest seines Lebens an. Im Jahre 1904, während der Arbeit an der Einrichtung eines besonders leistungsfähigen Senders für die transatlantische Kommunikation, wurde dieses Fieber so stark, dass man es für Malaria hielt. Im Jahr 1905 heiratete er Beatrice O'Brien und nach Ihren Flitterwochen ließen sie sich auf der Insel in der Nähe eines Senders nieder. Sobald Beatrice sich eingelebt hatte, begann sie über Tinnitus zu klagen. Nach drei Monaten erkrankte sie schwer an Gelbsucht. Sie musste nach London zurückkehren, um ihr Kind zu gebähren, das jedoch nach wenigen Wochen „aus unbekannter Ursache“ starb. Im gleichen Zeitraum verbrachte Marconi mehrere Monate an Fieber und Schwindsucht leidend auf der Insel. Zwischen 1918 und 1921 litt er unter suizidalen Depressionen während der Arbeit an einem Kurzwellen-Sender. Im Jahr 1927, während seiner Hochzeitsreise aus seiner zweiten Ehe, brach er mit Schmerzen in der Brust zusammen und es wurde eine schwere Herzerkrankung diagnostiziert. Zwischen 1934 und 1937, während er die Mikrowellentechnologie entwickelte, hatte er neun Herzinfarkte, der letzte tötete ihn im Alter von 63 Jahren. Auf der gleichen Insel, in ihrem Landsitz Osborne House, erlitt Königin Victoria Hirnblutungen und starb am Abend des 22. Januar 1901, gerade als Marconi einen neuen Sender in Betrieb nahm. Im Jahre 1901 gab es nur zwei Sender, während es im Jahr 1904 bereits vier gab, so dass diese Insel der am stärksten bestrahlte Ort auf dem Planeten war. Den Bienen blieb augenscheinlich kein Raum zum Überleben mehr. 1906 ergab eine Umfrage, dass 90% der Bienen ohne ersichtlichen Grund völlig verschwunden waren. Neue Kolonien wurden auf die Insel gebracht, aber diese starben ebenfalls innerhalb einer Woche. Diese Epidemie breitete sich über England und dann über die westliche Welt aus und stabilisierte sich dann allmählich bis zu dem Zeitpunkt, als sich das Militär gegen Ende des Ersten Weltkriegs mit verschiedenen Hochleistungs–Funksendern ausrüstete und damit (wie oben bereits kurz berichtet) die spanische Grippe- Pandemie des Jahres 1918 auslösten, die in den Vereinigten Staaten an der Naval Radio School of Cambridge, Massachusetts, mit 400 ersten Fällen ihren Anfang genommen hatte. Diese Epidemie breitete sich schnell auf 1.127 Soldaten im Funston Camp (Kansas) aus, in dem gerade Funksender installiert worden waren. Was die Ärzte verblüffte, war, dass 40% der Soldaten unter Nasenbluten litt, während es in der Zivilbevölkerung nur 15% waren. Andere Blutungen traten auch auf, und ein Drittel derjenigen, die ihr Leben ließen, starben aufgrund interner Blutungen der Lunge oder des Gehirns. Tatsächlich hatte sich die Zusammensetzung des Blutes geändert, da die gemessene Gerinnungszeit mehr als doppelt so lang war als normal. Diese Symptome sind mit den Auswirkungen der Influenzaviren nicht erklärbar, aber völlig im Einklang mit den verheerenden Auswirkungen künstlicher elektromagnetischer Felder. Auffällig war, dass zwei Drittel der Opfer gesunde junge Menschen waren. Der Puls der Patienten verlangsamte sich um Raten zwischen 36 und 48, was ein weiteres für die Grippe untypisches Symptom ist, jedoch eine häufige Folge der Exposition durch elektromagnetische Felder. Darüber hinaus war es möglich, einige Patienten mit massiven Dosen von Calcium erfolgreich zu behandeln. Der Militärarzt Dr. George A. Soper bezeugte, dass sich das Virus schneller ausbreitete, als es die Bewegungsgeschwindigkeit der Menschen ermöglichen konnte. Verschiedene Versuche wurden durchgeführt mit dem Ziel, Versuchspersonen entweder durch direkten engen Kontakt oder durch Impfung mit Schleim oder Blut zu infizieren, aber die Wissenschaftler waren nicht in der Lage, eine Infektion auf diese Weise auszulösen. Es zeigt sich, dass jede neue Grippepandemie einem neuen Fortschritt in der Elektrotechnik entspricht, wie etwa die asiatische Grippe von 1957-58 nach der Installation eines leistungsfähigen Radarüberwachungssystems, und der Ausbruch der Hongkong-Grippe ab Juli 1968 nach der Inbetriebnahme von 28 militärischen Satelliten für die Weltraumüberwachung auf der Höhe der Van-Allen-Gürtel, die uns vor kosmischer Strahlung schützen. 9. Die elektrische Hülle der Erde Mit einem Kern, der hauptsächlich aus Eisen besteht, wird die rotierende Erde in erster Linie von der Ionosphäre geschützt, dann von der Plasmasphäre (begrenzt durch die Van–Allen-Strahlungsgürtel in einer Höhe von 1.000 bis 55.000 km) und schließlich durch ihren Schwanz, die Magnetosphäre, die den Sonnenwinden unserer Sonne ausgesetzt ist und eine Art Dynamo, ein komplexes elektrisches System, darstellt. Der Austausch von Elektrizität zwischen der Erdkruste, der Atmosphäre und sogar der Ionosphäre ist permanent und konstant. Sie befinden sich in einem empfindlichen Gleichgewicht, und eine Art von elektrischer "Atmung" des gesamten Systems hat das Leben auf unserem Planeten ermöglicht. Dieses System ist dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass es mit negativen Ionen aufgeladen ist, die von der positiv geladenen Ionosphäre ausgeglichen werden. Es kann ein vertikales elektrisches Feld in der mittleren Größenordnung von 130 V/m (Volt pro Meter) beobachtet werden, wobei die Werte beispielsweise bei Stürmen auf 4.000 V/m ansteigen können. Im Jahre 1953 wurde einer der wichtigsten Parameter dieser elektrischen Schwingung unserer Umwelt entdeckt, und zwar in Form der Schumann-Resonanzen, die bei 7,83 Hertz „atmen“, mit Oberwellen bei 14, 20, 26 und 32 Hz, und die als „sehr niedrige Frequenzen“ (very low frequencies, VLF) bezeichnet werden. Es ist kein Wunder, dass die in dieser Umwelt lebenden Organismen von diesen physikalischen Werten durchdrungen sind und dass beispielsweise unsere Gehirnrhythmen innerhalb dieser Frequenzbereiche liegen – wie der Alpha-Rhythmus, der zwischen 8 und 13 Hertz liegt. Während wir die sichtbaren Frequenzen des elektromagnetischen Spektrums – von blau bis rot – wahrnehmen, sind einige Tiere in der Lage, andere elektromagnetische Frequenzen zu sehen – wie etwa die Bienen, die ultraviolette Frequenzen sehen können, oder Salamander oder Welse, die die tiefen elektrischen Frequenzen sehen können, während Schlangen in der, der Lage sind, die Infrarot-Frequenzen zu sehen. Laborexperimente an Hamstern zeigten zum Beispiel, dass eine Reduzierung der Temperatur und eine Verkürzung der Tageslichtdauer nicht ausreichen, um sie in den Winterschlaf zu versetzen. Ebenso weigerten sich Hamster, die in Faradayischen Käfigen gehalten wurden, den Winterschlaf zu halten, obwohl die Licht-und Temperaturparameter denen des Winters entsprachen. Sie taten dies solange, bis der Faradayische Käfig wieder entfernt wurde. Andere Experimente, wie die des Physiologen Rütger Wever 1967 am Max-Planck- Institut, wurden mit zwei unterirdischen Räumen ohne Fenster oder Außenkontakt durchgeführt, einer davon abgeschirmt von natürlichen elektromagnetischen Feldern, der andere nicht. Es wurde gezeigt, dass in der abgeschirmten Kammer die zirkadianen Rhythmen der Probanden desynchronisiert wurden und zwischen 12 und 65 Stunden schwanken konnten, begleitet von Stoffwechselstörungen, während die Probanden in der Kammer, die sozusagen in das natürliche Feld der Erde eingetaucht war, einen kohärenten Rhythmus von rund 24 Stunden bei einem normaler funktionierendem Stoffwechsel beibehielten. Es ist wissenschaftlich nachgewiesen worden, dass ein lebender Organismus im elektromagnetischen System unserer natürlichen Umwelt „baden“ muss, um gut zu funktionieren. Akupunktur, eine seit Jahrhunderten bewährte Methode der Traditionellen Chinesischen Medizin (TCM), wirkt durch das Nutzen unserer eigenen elektrischen Eigenschaften und durch das Verändern des Energieflusses der Meridiane. Es ist seit einiger Zeit (seit den 1950er Jahren) bekannt, dass diese Meridiane tatsächlich mit elektrischen Stromkreisen verglichen werden können und dass das chinesische Qi dem Konzept der Elektrizität durchaus entspricht. Diese Meridiane dienen zwei Funktionen: sie transportieren nicht nur Information und Energie intern von einem Organ des Körpers zu einem anderen, sondern dienen auch als Antennen zur Aufnahme des Flusses von elektromagnetischer Energie aus unserer Umwelt. In den frühen 1970er Jahren entdeckten Atmosphärenphysiker, dass das Magnetfeld der Erde durch die menschengemachte Elektrizität erheblich gestört wurde. Durch das Absetzen eines Signals im Weltraum und die Erfassung seines Echos, wurde festgestellt, dass das ursprüngliche Signal in der Tat durch Vielfache des in Nordamerika verwendeten 60 Hertz-Stromnetzes modifiziert worden war. Diese Entdeckung verhinderte jedoch nicht, dass das HAARP-Projekt (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, ein US-amerikanisches militärisches und ziviles Forschunsgprogramm) gestartet wurde, mit dem Ziel, die elektromagnetischen Eigenschaften unseres Planeten ganz bewusst zu verändern. Ebenso sind die Van–Allen-Gürtel, die uns vor kosmischer Strahlung schützen, bereits durch unsere elektrische Aktivität verändert worden, und es könnte sein, dass es sich bei diesem doppelten Gürtel ursprünglich sogar nur um einen einzigen Gürtel handelte, der sich unter dem Einfluss der menschlichen Emission elektrischer Ladungen in den Weltraum in seinem Zentrum „erschöpft“ (engl. depleted) hatte. Satellitenbeobachtungen zeigen, dass die von Hochspannungsleitungen ausgehende elektromagnetische Strahlung oft die Ausbreitung natürlicher Blitzstrahlung unterdrückt. Angesichts all dieser Tatsachen und Beobachtungen ist es folgerichtig, anzunehmen, dass die Grippepandemien der vergangenen Jahrzehnte mit den vom Menschen erzeugten künstlichen elektromagnetischen Feldern zumindest zusammenhängen. Der Unsichtbare Regenbogen – Zusammenfassung 7 10. Das Porphyrin und die Grundlage des Lebens Porphyrine (Pigmente aus vier Pyrrol-Molekülen) spielen im menschlichen Stoffwechsel und in unseren Zellprozessen ein zentrale Rolle. Dass unsere Nerven richtig funktionieren, ist zum Teil den Porphyrinen zu verdanken. Dabei handelt es sich um spezielle Moleküle, die als Schnittstelle zwischen Sauerstoff und dem biologischen Leben fungieren. Diese Moleküle sind hoch reaktiv und interagieren mit toxischen Metallen oder synthetischen, aus Erdöl hergestellten Stoffen ebenso wie mit elektromagnetischen Feldern. Letztere verursachen im Übermaß jedoch die Stoffwechselerkrankung der Porphyrie, die mehr eine Umweltempfindlichkeit als eine Krankheit ist. Die Forschungsarbeit von Dr. William E. Morton zeigte, dass 90% der Menschen mit multipler chemischer Empfindlichkeit (multiple chemical sensitivity MCS) einen Mangel des ein oder anderen Porphyrin- haltigen Enzyms aufwiesen, ebenso wie elektrosensitive Personen – was bedeutet, dass diese beiden Formen besonderer Empfindlichkeit nur verschiedene Manifestationen von ein und derselben Ursache sind. Die Porphyrie, 1891 erstmals beschrieben, betrifft heute etwa 10% der Bevölkerung und trat zu der Zeit auf, als die allgemeine Elektrifizierung der westlichen Welt begann, also ab 1889. Porphyrine sind zentral für die Wirkung von Elektro-Smog, weil Sie nicht nur EHS, MCS oder Porphyrie verursachen, sondern auch Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen, Krebs und Diabetes. Der Grund: sie sind in eine Vielzahl energetischer biologischer Prozesse involviert. In den 1960er Jahren zeigten die Biologen Allan Frey und Wlodzimierz Sedlak, dass unsere Organismen definitiv eine bioelektronische Komponente haben und dass einige unserer Zellen sich manchmal wie Leiter, Kondensatoren oder Halbleiter (Transistoren) verhalten, genau wie die Komponenten, die wir in unseren elektronischen Geräten finden. Dies ist der Fall für Myelin, der Hülle, die unsere Nerven umgibt, die an Zink gebundenes Porphyrin enthält. Sollten Umweltgifte wie chemische Produkte oder toxische Metalle dieses Gleichgewicht beeinträchtigen, wird die Myelinscheide beschädigt, was die Erregbarkeit der umgebenden Nerven verändert. Das gesamte Nervensystem reagiert dann überempfindlich auf Reize aller Art, wie auch auf elektromagnetische Felder. Das System tritt in einen Zustand „divergierender Instabilität“ ein, deren Wirkung zur Ursache neuer Wirkungen wird. Im Gegensatz zu der Ansicht, dass die Mitochondrien die Elemente unserer Zellen sind, die Energie erzeugen, beginnt das Konzept der Myelinscheide als ein „riesiges Mitochondrion“ an wissenschaftlicher Glaubwürdigkeit zu gewinnen. Die Verbindung zwischen der Porphyrie und dem Element Zink wurde in den 1950er Jahren von Henry Peters an der Wisconsin Medical School entdeckt. Patienten, die an Porphyrie und neurologischen Symptomen litten, schieden mit ihrem Urin viel Zink aus, was die Idee naheglegte, dass die Gabe von Zink Chelat den Zustand der Patienten verbessern könnte. Peters sah in der Tat eine Verbesserung, trotz der weit verbreiteten Überzeugung, dass Zinkmangel nur auf spezifische Erkrankungen bezogen ist. In ähnlicher Weise haben andere Experimente gezeigt, dass Zink Chelat bei Alzheimer hilfreich ist. Ein Team australischer Mediziner zeigte in Autopsien, dass die Gehirne von Alzheimer-Patienten gegenüber gesunden Patienten doppelt so viel Zink enthalten. 11. Störungen der Herzfunktion Im Jahre 1980 trat Herzstillstand bei jungen Athleten noch selten auf, mit nur neun Fällen pro Jahr. Von da an stiegen die Fallzahlen kontinuierlich um 10% pro Jahr bis 1996, als sich die Rate plötzlich auf 64 Fälle verdoppelte, dann im darauf folgenden Jahr auf 66 Fälle und im letzten Studienjahr auf 76 Fälle anstieg. Die amerikanische Medizin konnte dies nicht erklären, während in Europa im Jahr 2002 Deutsche Umweltärzte ein Moratorium für Antennen und Sendetürme forderten, da die ausgestrahlten Wellen Herz-Kreislauf- Erkrankungen verursachten. Dies war der Freiburger Appell. Dr. Samuel Milham, ein Epidemologe am Washington State Department of Health, zeigte durch seine Arbeit, dass Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen, Diabetes und Krebs weitgehend, wenn nicht vollständig, durch strombedingten Stress (künstliche elektromagnetische Felder) verursacht werden. Paradoxerweise belegten Cholesterin-Studien aus dem frühen 20.Jahrhundert nicht die Vermutung, dass der Cholesterinspiegel mit einem höheren Risiko von Herzerkrankungen korreliert – ganz im Gegensatz zu dem, was heute allgemein als Tatsache angesehen wird. Eine Studie an Tieren im Philadelphia Zoo zeigte, dass von 1916 bis 1964 der Cholesterinspiegel bei Säugetieren und Vögeln um den Faktor 10 bis 20 anstieg, obwohl ihre Ernährung völlig unverändert geblieben war. Der einzige Parameter, der sich dramatisch verändert hatte, war der Anstieg der Funkstrahlung. Während des Zweiten Weltkriegs klagten zahlreiche Soldaten über ähnliche Symptome wie bei der Neurasthenie. Zunächst glaubte man nach Sigmund Freuds Glaubenssatz, dass diese Soldaten unter Angstproblemen litten. Daraufhin wurde eine Studie von 144 Fällen von Dr. Mandel Cohen durchgeführt. Diese Studie ergab, dass die Soldaten in der Tat physiologisch weniger widerstandsfähig waren und unter einem reizbaren Herzen litten. Sie hatten Schwierigkeiten, Sauerstoff zu assimilieren und mussten, um genug Sauerstoff zu bekommen, doppelt so schnell atmen wie Ihre gesünderen Kameraden. Es stellte sich heraus, dass ihre Mitochondrien nicht effizient funktionierten. Am Ende zeigte die Studie, dass diese Soldaten überempfindlich im Allgemeinen waren und vor allem auf künstliche elektromagnetische Felder. Ab den 1950er Jahren beobachteten Wissenschaftler in der Sowjetunion, dass Funkstrahlung die Leistungsfähigkeit der Mitochondrien und damit auch die Elektrokardiogramme von Personen, die der Funkstrahlung ausgesetzt waren, veränderten. Kurven, die die statistisch erfassten Sterbeziffern durch Herzerkrankungen nach dem Grad der Elektrifizierung der amerikanischen Staaten in den Jahren 1931 und 1940 aufschlüsseln, sind ebenfalls sehr aussagekräftig und lassen keinen Zweifel an der Toxizität elektromagnetischer Felder für das Herz, wodurch Cholesterin und zu fettes Essen als Krankheitsursachen eher in den Hintergrund treten. 12. Die Transformation der Diabetes Bei Thomas Edison, der an Entdeckungen im Bereich der Elektrotechnik beteiligt war und daher elektromagnetischen Feldern weit stärker ausgesetzt war als seine damaligen Mitbürger, wurde Diabetes diagnostiziert – eine Krankheit, die 1889 noch ausgesprochen selten war. Über einen weiteren Forscher, Alexander Graham Bell, der auf dem Gebiet der Telegrafie arbeitete und das Telefon erfand, sind ständige Klagen über die Symptome der Neurasthenie, der heutigen EHS, bekannt. Im Jahr 1915 wurde auch bei ihm Diabetes diagnostiziert. Im Jahr 1876 beschrieb das Buch „Diseases of Modern Life“ von Ward Richardson Diabetes als eine seltene moderne Erkrankung, die durch geistige Erschöpfung aufgrund von Überlastung oder durch einen Schock des Nervensystems verursacht wurde. Die übermäßige Aufnahme von Zucker in unserer modernen Ernährung bietet natürlich eine naheliegende Erklärung dafür, warum Diabetes, einschließlich der Prädiabetes, heute mehr als die Hälfte aller Amerikaner betrifft. Diese Erklärung ist jedoch zu einfach. Dr. Even Joslin zeigte auf, dass zwischen 1900 und 1917 die Zuckeraufnahme um 17% gestiegen war, während sich die Sterblichkeit durch Diabetes verdoppelt hatte. Später, im Jahr 1987, zeigte eine Studie über Native Americans (Nachfahren der amerikanischen indianischen Ureinwohner) äußerst unterschiedliche Todesraten durch Diabetes je nach Gebiet: von 7 Fällen pro tausend Personen im Nordwesten bis zu 380 Fällen pro Tausend in Arizona. Für die untersuchten Jahre konnten weder der Lebensstil noch die Ernährung eine solche Divergenz erklären. Ein Umweltfaktor kann einen solchen Unterschied jedoch erklären: die Elektrifizierung der indianischen Reservate verlief in unterschiedlichem Tempo und jene im Nordwesten wurden erst viel später elektrifiziert. Im Gegensatz dazu liegt das Arizona Reservat in unmittelbarer Nähe der Großstadt Phoenix. Darüber hinaus hatte die betroffene indianische Community ein eigenes Kraftwerk und ein eigenes Telekommunikationssystem. Ein weiteres Beispiel ist die Bevölkerung von Brasilien, ein wichtiger Zuckerproduzent seit Jahrhunderten, wo Diabetes im Jahre 1870 noch völlig unbekannt war, während es in Nordamerika bereits als eine Zivilisationskrankheit bekannt war. Noch heute verbrauchen die Brasilianer 70kg raffinierten Zucker pro Jahr und Person – mehr als die Nordamerikaner. Und doch gibt es dort zweieinhalb mal weniger Fälle von Diabetes als in den USA. In Bhutan gab es bis 2002 praktisch keine Diabetes, danach begann die Elektrifizierung des Landes. Im Jahr 2004 wurden 634 neue Fälle von Diabetes bekannt, im Jahr 2005 waren es 944, im Jahr 2006 bereits 1.470 und im Jahr 2007 erkrankten 2.540, mit 15 Todesfällen. Im Jahr 2012 gab es 91 Todesfälle und Diabetes war die achte führende Todesursache im Land, obwohl sich die Ernährung der Menschen überhaupt nicht verändert hatte. Wie wir im vorigen Kapitel gesehen haben, verhindert Elektrosmog, der auf die Mitochondrien einwirkt, den effizienten Einsatz von absorbiertem Zucker – also die Verbrennung von Zucker. Der Zucker, der nicht in mechanische Energie umgewandelt werden kann, wird vom Körper als Fett gespeichert. Statistische Diagramme für Diabetes-Todesraten, aufgeschlüsselt nach dem Grad der Elektrifizierung der amerikanischen Staaten in den Jahren 1931 und 1940, sind ebenfalls sehr aufschlussreich und lassen keinen Zweifel an der Rolle, die elektromagnetische Felder in der Verbreitung von Diabetes spielt, was wiederum den Faktor des Zuckerverbrauchs in gewissem Maße in den Hintergrund treten lässt. Im Jahre 1997 gab es eine 31%ige (!) Zunahme der Diabetesfälle in den Vereinigten Staaten in einem einzigen Jahr, die genau mit der massenhaften Einführung von Mobiltelefonen in dem Land korreliert. 13. Krebs und das erstickende Leben Im Februar 2011 beschuldigte der oberste Gerichtshof Italiens Kardinal Roberto Tucci, den scheidenden Präsidenten des Vatikanischen Rundfunks, durch fahrlässige Verschmutzung der Umwelt mit Funkfrequenzen ein öffentliches Ärgernis geschaffen zu haben. Tatsächlich hatten die Kinder im Umkreis von 12 km um die Funkantennen im Zeitraum von 1997 bis 2003 eine achtmal höhere Leukämie -, Lymphom-oder Myelomrate als diejenigen, die in größerer Entfernung lebten. Das gleiche galt für Erwachsene, mit einer Rate, die sieben mal höher war. Der deutsche Arzt und Professor Otto Heinrich Warburg, 1931 Nobelpreisträger für Medizin, zeigte, dass Krebs eine Regression besonders sauerstoffarmer Zellen ist, die zu ihrer chaotischen Wucherung führt, ähnlich wie in der Ur-Welt der Erdfrühgeschichte, in der Sauerstoff nicht in dem Maße wie heute vorhanden war. Der anfängliche Sauerstoffmangel ist auf eine Fehlfunktion der Mitochondrien zurückzuführen, die, wie wir gesehen haben, durch elektromagnetische Felder oder andere Schadstoffe wie Rauch, Pestizide, Lebensmittelzusatzstoffe und Luftverschmutzung verursacht werden kann. Das gleiche Prinzip des zellulären Sauerstoffmangels gilt für Diabetes, weshalb es unter Diabetikern eine höhere Rate von Krebserkrankungen gibt als beim Rest der Bevölkerung. Im Zoo von Philadelphia wurde von 1901 bis 1955 ein Anstieg der Rate von bösartigen Tumoren bei Säugetieren festgestellt, die zwischen diesen beiden Jahren je nach Tierart zweifach bis 22-fach höher ausfiel. Statistiken über tödliche Krebserkrankungen zeigen einen klaren Zusammenhang zwischen der Elektrifizierung von Ländern und der Krebsrate. In den USA zum Beispiel lag die Rate von 1841 bis 1850 bei 6,6 Fällen pro Tausend. Von 1851 bis 1860 verdoppelt sie sich auf eine Rate von 14 pro Tausend. Eine mögliche Erklärung dafür findet sich im Masseneinsatz des Telegrafen im Jahre 1854. Im Jahre 1914 gab es zwei Todesfälle durch Krebs unter den 63.000 Indianern, die in nicht elektrifizierten Reservaten lebten, während im Rest des Landes die Krebssterblichkeit 25-mal höher war. Zwischen 1920 und 1921, nach der Einführung der ersten AM-Radiosender, stieg die Krebssterblichkeit in den westlichen Ländern um 3% bis 10%. Die schwedischen Forscher Olle Johansson und Orjan Hallberg haben einen klaren Zusammenhang zwischen Brust -, Prostata-und Lungenkrebs und der Exposition der Bevölkerung gegenüber Funkfrequenzen nachgewiesen. Sie weisen auf einen deutlichen Anstieg der Krankheitsfälle in den Jahren 1920, 1955, 1969 und einen Rückgang (!) im Jahr 1978 hin. Dies entspricht dem Anstieg der Funkbelastung aufgrund der Einführung des Mittelwellenrundfunks (MW), des UKW-Radios und des Fernsehens (TV1), der Einführung des Farbfernsehen (TV2), und dann der Einstellung der MW-Radiosendungen in Schweden. Die gleichen Forscher haben ebenfalls eine sehr klare lineare Korrelation zwischen der Anzahl der MW-Radiosender pro Region und dem Auftreten von Melanomen gefunden, wobei die exponierten Orte 11 mal mehr Melanome aufwiesen als die "weißen Zonen". Sie fanden auch heraus, dass Melanome selten auf jenen Bereichen des Körpers erscheinen, die der Sonne am meisten ausgesetzt sind, wie etwa die Stirn, Nase, Schultern oder Füße, aber häufiger in den Bereichen des Körpers, die in der Regel vor der Sonne geschützt sind. Darüber hinaus trat die Verbreitung von Hautkrebs auf, bevor „Urlaub am Meer“ in Mode gekommen war und wo die Sonneneinwirkung auf die Haut besonders intensiv ist. Dies zeigt, dass Melanome nicht überwiegend durch die Sonne, sondern auch oder vor allem durch Funkfrequenzen verursacht werden. Die statistischen Kurven der Todesfälle durch Krebs, sowie durch Diabetes und Herz-Kreislauf- Erkrankungen, dem Grad der Elektrifizierung der amerikanischen Staaten in den Jahren 1931 und 1940 zugeordnet, sind ebenfalls sehr aussagekräftig. Sie lassen keinen Zweifel daran, dass elektromagnetische Felder eine wichtige Rolle bei der Zunahme von Krebserkrankungen spielen. Echte Daten über Hirntumore sind schwer zu finden, da die Mobilfunklobby seit Jahrzehnten dieses Feld mit voreingenommene Studien zu besetzen versucht. Eine Ihrer Studien zeigt sogar eine Abnahme der Tumorhäufigkeit, korrelierend mit der intensiven Nutzung von Handys. Nichtsdestotrotz haben Forscher der Universität von Calgary einen Anstieg bösartiger Hirntumore um 30% (dreißig Prozent) im Zeitraum 2012-2013 nachgewiesen, und Lennart Hardell, Professor für Onkologie am Universitätsklinikum Örebro in Schweden, hat gezeigt, dass 2.000 Stunden Handy-Nutzung das Risiko der Entwicklung eines Tumors um den Faktor drei bis acht erhöht, je nach Alter des Probanden und den Telefongewohnheiten. Im Jahr 2000 analysierte Neil Cherry die Krebsraten von Kindern in San Francisco in Bezug auf die Entfernung zwischen ihrem Haus und den Fernseh-und MW-Radiosendern auf dem Sutro Tower. Kinder, die auf Hügeln oder Höhenzügen lebten, waren stärker betroffen. Diejenigen, die innerhalb eines Radius von 1 km rund um den Sendeturm lebten, hatten eine neun mal höhere Leukämierate, 15 mal mehr Lymphome und 31 mal mehr Hirntumore, insgesamt eine 18 mal höhere Krankheitsrate gegenüber denjenigen außerhalb des 1 km-Radius. 14. Verlangsamtes Leben Die „Praktische Abhandlung über nervöse Erschöpfung“ (1880) von George Miller Beard, Elektrotherapeut und Freund von Thomas Edison, enthält eine faszinierende Beobachtung: „Obwohl diese problematischen Wirkungen nicht direkt tödlich sind, und damit nicht in den Sterbetafeln erscheinen; obwohl sie, im Gegenteil, dazu neigen können, das Leben zu verlängern und das System gegen fieberhafte und entzündliche Erkrankungen zu schützen, ist doch das Ausmaß des Leidens, das Sie insgesamt verursachen, enorm.“ Diejenigen, die am meisten litten, schienen ziemlich jung zu sein. Außerdem wies Beard darauf hin, dass an einer seltenen Krankheit eher die neurasthenischen Probanden litten als der Rest der Bevölkerung: diese Krankheit war Diabetes. Beard hatte bereits beobachtet, dass der Anstieg der Lebenserwartung nicht Hand in Hand mit der Lebensqualität geht. Die mysteriöse Korrelation zwischen den Leiden von neurasthenischen Menschen – deren Symptome mit denen der heutigen elektrosensiblen Menschen identisch waren – und der Verlängerung Ihres Lebens deutete auf eine große Dysfunktion hin. Darüber hinaus ist es seit langem beobachtet worden, dass eine asketische Lebensweise mit einer kalorienarmen Ernährung die Lebenserwartung erhöhen und die Gesundheit verbessern kann. Dies ist beispielsweise der Fall bei der Bevölkerung von Okinawa (Japans südlichster Präfektur), wo die Zahl der Hundertjährigen vierzig mal höher ist als in den Bevölkerungen reicherer Präfekturen weiter nördlich. Forscher auf dem Gebiet des Alterns haben darauf hingewiesen, dass die Kraft, die unser Leben antreibt und erhält, das System des Elektronentransports in den Mitochondrien unserer Zellen ist. Hier werden die Luft, die wir atmen, und die Nahrung, die wir essen, in einer Geschwindigkeit kombiniert, welche dann unsere Alterungsrate und damit unsere Lebenserwartung bestimmt. Während das Erreichen einer Verlangsamung des Verbrennungsprozesses in unseren Zellen durch die Mäßigung der gelieferten Energiemenge vorteilhaft sein kann, kann eine andere Möglichkeit der Verlangsamung umgekehrt verheerend sein. Letzteres betrifft die „Vergiftung“ der Elektronentransportkette. Ein möglicher Weg, derart vergiftet zu werden, ist die chronische Exposition gegenüber künstlichen elektromagnetischen Feldern. Diese ständig zunehmende Belastung setzt die Elektronen unserer Mitochondrien externen Kräften aus, verlangsamt Sie, beraubt unsere Zellen wichtigen Sauerstoffs und verursacht EHS-Symptome. 15. Du meinst, du kannst Elektrizität hören? Der Unsichtbare Regenbogen – Zusammenfassung 11 1962 kontaktierte eine Frau die University of Santa Barbara (Kalifornien) und bat um Hilfe bei der Suche nach der Quelle eines geheimnisvollen Geräuschs, das Sie überall zu Hause hörte, obwohl Sie in einem ruhigen Wohnviertel lebte. Dieses Geräusch hielt Sie wach und schadete ihrer Gesundheit. Messungen zeigten zwar, dass von allen elektrischen Leitern, nicht nur vom Hausnetz, sondern auch von den Heizkörpern und anderen metallischen Objekten besonders starke elektromagnetische Felder ausgingen. Das Stethoskop selbst erkannte jedoch kein Geräusch. Der Mess-Ingenieur führte ein Experiment durch, machte die gemessenen Felder auf einem Tonband hörbar und spielte sie der von diesen Geräuschen betroffenen Frau ab. Sie bestätigte, dass es sich dabei um die Geräusche handelte, die sie immer gehört hatte. Diese Frau war also in der Lage, die elektromagnetischen Felder in Ihrer Umgebung zu hören. Erdungsvorrichtungen und elektronische Filter wurden in ihrem Haus installiert, um die Störungen auf ein akzeptables Niveau zu reduzieren. Lange zuvor hatten Alessandro Volta und andere Forscher jedoch bereits Experimente durchgeführt, in denen sie durch das Anlegen von Spannung am Ohr erfolgreich verschiedene Klänge erzeugt hatten. Viel später, in den späten 1960er Jahren, veröffentlichte der Biologe Allan Frey mehrere Artikel über die Fähigkeit einiger Probanden, Emissionen aus einer Radaranlage zu hören. Das mechanische Modell der Funktionsweise des Ohres, wie es in den Schulen gelehrt wird, liefert für diese beobachteten Phänomene zunächst keine Erklärung. In Anbetracht dessen entwickelte der Biochemiker Lionel Naftalin ein neues Modell der Funktionsweise des menschlichen Ohres, unter Berücksichtigung des bekannten Phänomens der Piezo-Elektrizität (eine von Elektronikern genutzte Kraft), die er im Gel (Plasma) der Zilien des Innenohrs entdeckte. In diesem besonderen Gel, das nirgendwo sonst im menschlichen Körper zu finden ist und besondere elektrische Eigenschaften aufweist, war eine Spannung von 100 bis 120 Millivolt vorhanden, ein Wert, der im Bereich der Bioelektronik als hoch gilt. Dieses piezoelektrische Gel wandelt Schallwellen in ein elektrisches Signal um, das an die Zilien des Innenohrs weitergeleitet wird. Dieses neue, überarbeitete Modell der Funktionsweise des menschlichen Ohrs erklärt nicht nur die Fähigkeit bestimmter Probanden, unter bestimmten Bedingungen ein elektromagnetisches Signal zu hören, sondern auch, warum so viele moderne Menschen an Tinnitus leiden, und warum bestimmte Gruppen von Menschen, das sind immerhin 2% bis 11% der Weltbevölkerung, eine Art globalen Brummton rund um den Planeten hören. Heute leiden etwa 44% der amerikanischen Erwachsenen an Tinnitus verschiedener Intensitätsstufen. Die Zahl der betroffenen Jugendlichen in Schweden lag 1997 bei 12% und 2006 bei 42%. Diese parasitären Geräusche sind weitgehend das Ergebnis des Lebens in einer Umgebung, die stark mit allen Arten von künstlichen elektromagnetischen Feldern verschmutzt ist. 16. Bienen, Vögel, Bäume und Menschen Alfonso Balmori Marinez, ein spanischer Biologe, hat die Populationsdichte von Spatzen mit den Hochfrequenz-Strahlungswerten (HF) in Ihren Lebensräumen korreliert. Spatzen können nicht an Orten überleben, an denen die Werte 3 V/m (Feldstärke in Volt pro Meter) übersteigen, während es noch 42 Vögel pro Hektar bei Werten von 0,1 V/m gibt. Marinez hat auch eine deutliche Veränderung im Verhalten von Störchen beobachtet: Storchenpaare kämpfen, anstatt das Nest zu bauen oder die Eier zu bebrüten, wenn sie weniger als 200m von einem Sendemast entfernt sind. Das Vereinigte Königreich stufte den Haussperling als gefährdete Art ein, nachdem seine Populationen zwischen 1994 und 2002 um 75% zurückgegangen war – ein Zeitraum, der mit dem Einsatz der Handy- Technologie zusammenfällt. Brieftauben-Züchter auf mehreren Kontinenten haben festgestellt, dass bis zu 90% der Tauben nach dem Freilassen Ihren Weg zurück zum Taubenschlag nicht mehr finden. Dieser Prozentsatz sollte unter normalen Umständen sehr gering sein. Im Jahr 2000 versuchten englische Züchter, ein Flugroute so umzuleiten, dass Sendemasten vermieden wurden, um den Tauben eine bessere Chance zu geben, erfolgreich den Weg zurück ins Gehege zu finden. Im Jahr 2004 gaben dieselben Züchter umfangreichere Studien zu den Auswirkungen von Hochfrequenzstrahlung auf Tauben in Auftrag. Im Jahr 2002 veröffentlichte der US National Park Service eine Notiz an an Wildtieren forschende Verhaltensbiologen und erklärte, dass die RFID-Ortungs-Chips (Radio Frequency Identification), die an diesen Tieren angebracht sind, ihr Verhalten aufgrund der erzeugten Funkfrequenzen radikal verändern können. In Umgebungen, die durch elektromagnetische Felder verunreinigt sind, verlieren Rotkehlchen die Orientierung für ihre Wanderung – während das in einem Faradayischen Käfig problemlos gelingt. Ein Experiment an Kaulquappen in zwei getrennten Wasserbecken, beide in 140 m Entfernung von einem Mobilfunkmast (cell tower), einer ohne und einer mit elektromagnetischer Abschirmung, zeigte Mortalitätsraten von 90% (ohne Abschirmung) gegenüber 4% (mit Abschirmung). Die gleiche Art von schädlichen Auswirkungen sind bei Insekten zu finden, wenn Sie dem gleichen Elektrosmog ausgesetzt werden, dem auch wir täglich begegnen. Dr. Panagopoulous folgert aus seinen Studien an Fruchtfliegen, dass die Exposition gegenüber Hochfrequenz-Strahlung in heute üblicher Feldstärke – sei es auch nur für ein paar Minuten pro Tag und für wenige Tage – der stärkste Stressor in unserem biologischen Leben ist, weit stärker als Chemikalien oder elektromagnetische Felder mit niedriger Frequenz. Bienen sind ebenfalls negativ betroffen, wie wir am Anfang dieser Zusammenfassung in dem Fall der Isle of Wight gesehen haben. Dr. Daniel Favre (Schweiz) hat gezeigt, dass Bienen in Gegenwart von Hochfrequenz- Strahlung das Geräusch abgeben, das typischerweise zu hören ist, wenn Sie schwärmen, was darauf hindeutet, dass die Insekten der Emissionsquelle entkommen wollen. Die Varroa-Milbe wird im Allgemeinen für das Kolonie-Kollaps-Syndrom verantwortlich gemacht, dabei wird aber vergessen, dass diese Milbe lange Zeit mit Bienen zusammenlebten. Darüber hinaus ist oft zu beobachten, dass heutzutage sogar eine tote Kolonie nicht mehr von Parasiten befallen ist, obwohl dies "vorher" der Fall war. Die Ursache für das Bienensterben liegt sicherlich auch bei den Pestiziden, doch wie wir gesehen haben sind 90% der Bienen auf der Isle of Wight verschwunden, ohne dass in diesem Gebiet irgendwelche Pestizide verwendet wurden. Eine wichtige Ursache für das Kollabieren von Bienenvölkern liegt in den vom Menschen erzeugten elektromagnetischen Feldern, insbesondere der Mobilfunk-Technologie. In den 1980er Jahren kam ein brennendes Problem auf: das Waldsterben. Dafür wurde der sogenannte saure Regen verantwortlich gemacht, doch auch die entlegensten Gebiete mit vergleichsweise sauberer Luft waren gleichermaßen betroffen. In Deutschland und der Schweiz wurde geforscht, und obwohl sich der Boden in den betroffenen Wäldern tatsächlich als sauer erwiesen hat, zeigten Beobachtungen und Experimente, dass dieser Säuregehalt auch das Ergebnis einer langsamen Elektrolyse im Boden sein kann, beispielsweise über Bäume, die Radarwellen ausgesetzt sind. Darüber hinaus waren Bäume auf Höhenzügen stärker betroffen, da Sie den in den 1970er Jahren neu installierten Radargeräten stärker ausgesetzt waren. Eine weitere Beobachtung wurde in der Zeit des Falls der Berliner Mauer gemacht. Die riesigen russischen Radaranlagen in Skruda, errichtet zur Überwachung des Westens, hatten aufgrund ihrer hohen Feldstärken nicht nur dem Wald, sondern auch Tieren und Menschen Schaden zugefügt. Nach zahlreichen Studien wurde festgestellt, dass die Wachstumsringe der Bäume in den Jahren, in denen die Radaranlagen in Betrieb waren, viel kleiner waren als jene vor und nach dieser Zeit. In Schwarzenburg in der Schweiz wurde 1939 eine Kurzwellen-Radioantenne installiert und ihre Sendeleistung im Jahre 1954 auf 450kW erhöht. Es folgte eine Verschlechterung der Gesundheit der Anwohner, die sich über EHS-Symptome beklagten. Die Dorfkinder hatten Schwierigkeiten in der Schule und schienen nicht in der Lage, eine höhere Bildung zu bewältigen, im Gegensatz zu den Kindern der weniger exponierten Nachbardörfer. Schließlich wurde 1992 eine Studie durchgeführt, die bestätigte, dass in einem Umkreis von 900m rund um die Antenne die untersuchten physiologischen Parameter bei Menschen und Tieren abnormal waren. Es wurde auch festgestellt, dass die Wachstumsringe der Bäume komprimiert wurden – allerdings nur auf der Seite, die der Strahlungsquelle zugewandt war. Am 28.März 1998 wurde der Sender abgeschaltet und eine Vorher-Nachher-Studie durchgeführt, die zeigte, dass der Melatoninspiegel der 58 Probanden wieder gestiegen war. Ein 50-jähriger Dorfbewohner konnte zum ersten mal in seinem Leben endlich eine volle Nacht ohne Unterbrechung durchschlafen. Am 29.Mai 1996 erklärte Philippe Roch, der Direktor des zuständigen Umweltamtes, dass es “eine nachgewiesene Korrelation zwischen den Schlafstörungen und den Kommunikationsvorgängen" gebe. 17. Im Land der Blinden Der Unsichtbare Regenbogen – Zusammenfassung 13 Wie lange müssen wir noch warten, bevor wir sagen können: "Dein Handy bringt mich um! "statt sagen zu müssen "Ich bin elektrosensitiv"? Und doch ist die Zahl der Menschen, die unter Kopfschmerzen durch die Verwendung von Handys leiden, sehr hoch. Im Jahr 2010 wurden die Studenten einer Universität in der Ukraine befragt und zwei Drittel gaben an, dass es gesellschaftlich nicht akzeptabel ist, dieses Thema offen zu diskutieren. Gro Harlem Brundtland war elektrosensitiv, als sie Leiterin der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) war. Sie war sehr offen gegenüber dieser Tatsache, war aber gezwungen, von ihrem Posten ein Jahr später zurücktreten. Dies hielt andere hochrangige Persönlichkeiten des öffentlichen Lebens davon ab, ihrem Beispiel zu folgen und Elektrosensibilität öffentlich zu thematisieren. Nur eine Minderheit der Menschen, die unter elektromagnetischen Belastungen leiden, weiß, woran Sie tatsächlich leiden, während die große Mehrheit keine genaue Kenntnis davon hat. Die gesamte Bevölkerung wird sozusagen „per Fernsteuerung unter Strom gesetzt“, und man muss sich fast dafür entschuldigen, „elektrosensibel“ oder, um genau zu sein, „elektro-hypersensibel“ zu sein, ganz so, als ob man sich dafür entschuldigen müsste, "Cyanid-überempfindlich" zu sein. Denn es ist eine Tatsache, dass Strom, so wie er derzeit verwendet wird, „giftig“ ist. Statistische Kurven zeigen einen deutlichen Anstieg der Sterblichkeit der Einwohner von neun amerikanischen Städten kurz nach Inbetriebnahme der ersten Mobilfunk-Basisstationen. Diese erhöhte Sterblichkeit reicht je nach Stadt von 25% bis über - sage und schreibe - 80%. Die Umfrage einer Tageszeitung, in der Bewohner von New York um Auskunft gebeten wurden, ob sie seit dem 15.November 1996 unter irgendwelchen EHS-Symptomen litten, ergab hunderte bestätigender Aussagen aus den verschiedensten sozialen Schichten und unabhängig von der Hautfarbe. Das Datum war jener Tag, an dem das erste Mobilfunknetz in Betrieb genommen wurde. Die Cellular Phone Task Force, eine Organisation, die 1996 vom Autor dieses Buches Arthur Firstenberg ins Leben gerufen wurde, wird überflutet von Hilfegesuchen von Menschen, die durch hochfrequente Funkstrahlung geschädigt werden. Die Strahlungsquellen vermehren sich weiter und werden intensiver: WiFi (WLAN), WiMAX, Radarstationen und die Bestrahlung „von oben“ durch Telekommunikationssatelliten, es scheint, als ob dem bald nirgendwo mehr zu entkommen ist. Prof. Olle Johansson vom Institut für Neurowissenschaften am renommierten Karolinska-Institut konzentriert sich seit 1977 auf die Erforschung und den Nachweis der Wirkung von Elektrosmog auf lebende Organismen. Der Erfolg seiner Studien führte bedauerlicherweise dazu, dass er an seinem Institut marginalisiert und die Finanzierung für seine Forschung entzogen wurde, und er zudem Morddrohungen erhielt. Trotz allem informiert er weiterhin die Welt über diese wissenschaftlich fundierten Erkenntnisse, um unter anderem jene zu verteidigen, die unter EHS leiden und deren Leben zur Hölle auf Erden geworden ist. Er ist empört über die Art und Weise, wie die Regierungen der sich demokratisch nennenden Länder die Opfer der Funktechnologie einfach Ihrem Schicksal überlassen. Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe, die sowohl britische als auch amerikanische Staatsbürgerin ist, schloss ihr Studium 1998 ab. Im Jahr 2007 folgte sie ihrem Ehemann, einem F-16 Kampfpiloten, in die USA und erkrankte dort schwer an EHS, ohne es jedoch gleich zu begreifen. Ihre Internetrecherchen ermöglichten es ihr schließlich zu verstehen, was mit ihr geschah. Als Ärztin war sie verwirrt darüber, wie eine so tiefgreifende und behindernde Erkrankung existieren konnte, ohne dass sie jemals davon in Ihrem Beruf gehört hatte. Um sich Klarheit zu verschaffen, beschloss sie, sich einem MRT (Magnetresonanztomographie) zu unterziehen, um das Risiko eines Hirntumors auszuschließen. Sie glaubte, sterben zu müssen, als die hochfrequenten Pulsationen des MRT aktiviert wurden, erholte sich aber zu voller Gesundheit und Vitalität im Death Valley, weitab aller Funkfrequenzen. Seitdem widmet sie sich der Information und Hilfe für jene (mindestens) 5% der Bevölkerung, die an EHS leiden und von den Behörden keinerlei Unterstützung erfahren. Yury Grigoriev, der in der Regel als „der Großvater“ der elektromagnetischen Forschung in Russland gilt, ist vor allem über junge Menschen äußerst besorgt und hat formuliert, dass zum ersten mal in der Geschichte der Menschheit die Gehirne der Menschen Hochfrequenz-Strahlung schutzlos ausgesetzt sind – was in den Augen eines Radiobiologen äußerst bedenklich ist. Insbesondere zitiert er eine koreanische Studie, die zeigt, dass die Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS) bei Kindern mit der Verwendung von Mobiltelefonen im Zusammenhang steht. Der Unsichtbare Regenbogen – Zusammenfassung 14 Ende der 1990er Jahre bewiesen der schwedische Neurochirurg Leif Salford und sein Team, dass Handystrahlung die Blut-Hirn-Schranke durchlässig macht und Alzheimer verursacht. Im Jahr 2003 zeigten Sie, dass eine einzige Exposition von nur zwei Stunden dauerhafte Schäden am Gehirn verursacht. Im Jahr 2015 bestrahlten türkische Wissenschaftler Ratten einen Monat lang für eine Stunde pro Tag mit typischen Handy-Wellen. Die bestrahlten Ratten hatten 10% weniger Gehirnzellen als die Vergleichsgruppe. Das gleiche Team experimentierte für die Dauer von 9 Tagen und bei gleichem Strahlungsniveau an schwangeren Ratten. Die Nachkommenschaft dieser Ratten zeigte eine Degeneration des Gehirns, des Rückenmarks, des Herzens, der Nieren, der Leber, der Milz, des Thymus und der Hoden. Das gleiche Experiment, an jungen Ratten wiederholt, verursachte Atrophie des Rückenmarks zusammen mit vermindertem Myelin, wie man es auch bei multipler Sklerose beobachtet. Im September 1998 nahmen die ersten 66 Weltraum-Telefonie-Satelliten ihren Betrieb auf, was in den beiden folgenden Wochen zu einem Anstieg der nationalen Sterblichkeitsrate in den USA um fast 5% führte. Im gleichen Zeitraum wurde beobachtet, dass Vögel nicht mehr flogen und EHS Menschen besonders stark erkrankten. Heute überfliegen uns rund 1.100 künstliche Satelliten, aber mehrere Unternehmen wie Google, Facebook, SpaceX, OneWeb und Samsung planen bis 2020 jeweils bis zu 4.600 neue Kommunikationssatelliten zu starten, um den gesamten Planeten mit High-Speed-Internet abzudecken. Selbst die erste kleine Flotte von 28 Militärsatelliten löste 1968 eine weltweite Grippepandemie aus. Im Gegensatz zu einer Bodenantenne, deren Strahlung stark gedämpft wird, wenn Sie die Magnetosphäre erreicht, wirken Satelliten direkt darauf ein mit Hilfe von Mechanismen, die immer noch ungenügend verstanden werden und die damit das Leben auf der Erde gefährden. Wir vergessen die Warnungen von Ross Adey, dem „Großvater“ der Bioelektromagnetik, und des Atmosphärenphysikers Neil Cherry, dass wir von der uns umgebenden Welt elektrisch „reguliert“ werden und die sichere Exposition gegenüber Funkfrequenzen daher Null beträgt. Dieser Weg mit potenziell katastrophalen Folgen muss unbedingt verlassen werden und die Organisation, die sich dafür einsetzt ist die Global Union Against Radiation Deployment from Space (GUARDS www.stopglobalwifi.org). 2014 veröffentlichte der Arzt Tetsuharu Shinjyo eine Vorher-Nachher-Studie. Er bewertete den Gesundheitszustand von 122 Bewohnern eines Gebäudes, auf dem Mobilfunk-Antennen installiert worden waren. Einundzwanzig litten an chronischer Müdigkeit, 14 an Schwindel oder der Menière-Krankheit (eine Erkrankung des Innenohrs), 14 an Kopfschmerzen, 17 an Augenschmerzen oder Infektionen, 14 an Schlaflosigkeit und 10 an chronischem Nasenbluten. Fünf Monate, nachdem die Antennen entfernt wurden, blieben nur noch 2 Fälle von Schlaflosigkeit, 1 Fall von Schwindel und 1 Fall von Kopfschmerzen. Es handelt sich um einen Notfall in Sachen Menschenrechte, von dem Hunderte Millionen Menschen auf der Erde betroffen sind. Es handelt sich auch um einen Notfall für die Umwelt, in dem das Aussterben unzähliger Pflanzen-und Tierarten droht. Was dringend nötig ist, ist eine Lösung, die mit Klarsicht und Entschlossenheit umgesetzt wird. YOU CAN ORDER THE PAPERBACK/EBOOK VERSION HERE ONLINE HERE: https://geni.us/invisiblerainbow The Invisible Rainbow Arthur Firstenberg A History of Electricity and Life 5g is being rolled out across the country, despite growing evidence that it is disruptive to our health, our safety, and the environment. The Invisible Rainbow is the groundbreaking story of electricity as it’s never been told before—exposing its very real impact on the biosphere and human health. DOWNLOADS OF THIS SUMMARY IN MULTIPLE LANGUAGES ARABIC- INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY CZECH- INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY CHINESE - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY HUNGARY - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY PORTUGESE - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY RUSSIAN - INVISIBLE RAINBOW - SUMMARY If you can, please order all paperbacks through your local high street bookshop. MORE RECOMMENDED BOOKS

Wireless technology is any means of sending information or energy through space without wires. It includes: satellites, radar, radio, television, cell towers, cell phones, cordless phones, microwave ovens smart meters, WiFi, Bluetooth, fitness trackers, smart watches, baby monitors wireless keyboards, mice, printers, headphones and speakers, wireless security systems, wireless car keys, wireless garage door openers, wireless battery chargers, remote controls, wireless microphones RFID chips in credit cards and driver’s licenses, radio collars and chips in wildlife, cattle and pets, chips in home appliances wireless hearing aids, assistive listening devices, medical alert pendants, chips in medical implants, wireless pacemakers autonomous vehicles, drones, and robots numerous other radio-enabled devices that are proliferating in today’s world ​Every one of these devices, without exception, emits radiation. What's wrong with wireless technology? By substituting radiation for wires, we are swimming in an ocean of artificial electromagnetic fields that are interfering with life itself. We are in effect electrocuting ourselves, our children, our pets, the insects, birds, animals, trees and plants around us and all of living creation. We are killing our planet. This is about long-term exposure, right? Cancer that takes years to develop? No. The effects are rapid. Heart rate changes immediately. Blood sugar rises in minutes. Having wireless devices on in your house interferes with your sleep and your memory. Using a cell phone destroys brain cells in minutes to hours, and can cause a stroke or a heart attack. Studies show that even cancer can develop within months of first exposure. When a cell tower is turned on, birds leave the area immediately. Insects disappear. Even slugs and snails vanish. Most of this takes no time at all. What types of radiation are used in wireless technology? All frequencies of radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light, lasers, sound waves, even nuclear radiation. Most home devices use microwaves. Isn’t microwave radiation natural? Don’t microwaves come from the sun and stars? Almost all the radiation we receive from the universe is the light and heat from the sun, not microwave radiation. The microwave radiation a person receives from an average cell tower is millions of times stronger than all the microwave radiation from the sun and stars. The microwave radiation a person’s brain receives from their cell phone is billions of times stronger than the microwave radiation from the sun and stars. And at any particular frequency it is trillions of times stronger than the microwave radiation he or she receives from the sun and stars at that frequency. And the faint microwaves from the sun and stars are not pulsed and modulated. It is the pulsations and modulation that cause much of the harm. Aren’t light and microwaves both electromagnetic? Therefore isn’t microwave radiation safe? No. That is like saying arsenic is safe because oxygen and arsenic are both elements, or that cyanide is safe because water and cyanide are both chemicals. But oxygen and water are necessary for life, while arsenic and cyanide are deadly poisons. It is the same with electromagnetic radiation. Visible light is necessary for life. Microwave radiation is a deadly poison. Aren’t toxic chemicals more harmful than electromagnetic radiation? Electromagnetism is more complex and more fundamental than chemistry. Electromagnetism shapes the sun and stars. Electromagnetism animates life. Electromagnetism is behind chemistry. There is no “chemical force” in the universe. Outside of atomic nuclei, there is only gravity and electromagnetism. Electromagnetism guides everything we see, including ourselves. Chemistry is an effect, not a cause. Can’t we find safe frequencies? Won’t that solve the problem? That is looking at both wireless technology and life too simplistically. Most wireless technology has only one goal: to transmit information to computers, information of great complexity and variety. It is not simple, constant radiation of one amplitude and one frequency: such radiation would carry no information. Instead, it is multiple large frequency bands, each divided into hundreds, thousands, and millions of individual frequencies of all different bandwidths, overlapping and interacting, pulsed at an enormous variety of intervals, in an enormous variety of shapes, patterns and durations, all over the world. Even a single signal from a single device has a variety of amplitudes, frequencies and pulsations, and is modulated in complex ways in order to carry all the information needed to be read by a cell phone or computer. Life has to also carry an enormous, almost infinite complexity of information in its nervous systems and its meridians, and to store and process this information in its cells, organs and chakras, and in its DNA which is shared and circulated among trillions of individuals of 50 million different species, all connected to one another and to the earth, sky and universe in a grand circuit of energy and information. The artificial cloud of energy and information is interfering with, overpowering and destroying the natural, living circuitry of energy and information. It cannot be otherwise. What about LiFi? If light is safe, why not use light instead of microwaves? Light is a nutrient. We absorb it with our eyes, and into our blood. It is necessary for health. It regulates our biorhythms. Green plants need it for photosynthesis. We absorb more of the pulsations and modulation frequencies when they are carried into our bodies by light than when they are carried into our bodies by microwaves. LiFi is more harmful to life than WiFi. Cell phones are much smaller than cell towers. Doesn’t that mean they are safer? Doesn't it mean the radiation does not travel as far? Cell phones and cell towers emit the same radiation; size has nothing to do with it. The main difference is that a cell tower emits as many signals simultaneously as there are cell phones communicating with it at that time, whereas a cell phone only emits one voice channel and one data channel. A cell tower therefore emits stronger radiation than a cell phone, but by the time it reaches your body, its radiation is much weaker than the radiation from a cell phone that you hold in your hand, near your body. And a cell phone emits signals that a cell tower does not: Bluetooth, WiFi, GPS and other signals. The radiation from a cell phone travels just as far as the radiation from a cell tower. The radiation from a cell phone will reach all people, animals, birds, insects and plants in line of sight with it, no matter how far away. It will reach a cell tower 90 miles away. It will reach a satellite 22,300 miles away. It will reach Mars 200 million miles away. With 15 billion mobile devices on the Earth, we are polluting not just our homes, our neighborhoods and our planet, but the entire solar system. My cell phone does not make me sick. Why should I stop using it? Your cell phone is damaging your health whether you are aware of it or not. It is damaging your blood-brain barrier -- the barrier that keeps bacteria, viruses and toxic chemicals out of your brain tissue; the barrier that maintains the inside of your head at a constant pressure, preventing you from having a stroke. Since brain tissue has no pain receptors, plenty of damage can occur without pain. Instead, it will cause memory loss, difficulty concentrating, anxiety, depression, sleep disorders and so forth. In rats, damage to the blood-brain barrier can be detected after just a two-minute exposure to a cell phone. After a two-hour exposure the damage is permanent. There is no reason for it to be different in humans. The radiation from your cell phone is also slowing your metabolism -- your ability to digest sugars, fats and proteins. This causes either obesity or weight loss, depending on your genetic makeup. It also causes diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Wireless technology is the cause of more obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer than any other factor. The people who are aware of the damage in real time are the people who can feel it in their nervous system or their heart. That is maybe one-third of the population. It feels to them like they are being electrocuted. And they are, but so is everyone else. The few who have heard of such a thing call themselves “electrosensitive.” Those who have not heard of it think they are suffering from anxiety, or that they have a neurological or cardiac disorder. Isn’t a flip phone safer than a smartphone? Both are digital and both emit pulsed, modulated microwave radiation. And despite what many people think, flip phones can emit as much radiation, or more, than smartphones. But safety is not determined by power level. Damage to the blood-brain barrier is greatest at the lowest power level, at least in laboratory rats. The bandwidth is more important than power level. Smartphones use more bandwidth than flip phones. The bottom line is that cell phones have been killing people since they were invented. In each city in the United States where 2G “flip phone” service was turned on for the first time in 1996 or 1997, mortality rose immediately, on the day it was turned on in each city. And the overall health of the population was damaged permanently. At least ten thousand Americans died from the radiation within three months after 2G “flip phone” service was turned on in various cities in 1996 and 1997. Whether more people died from their new phones or from the new cell towers is impossible to know: the radiation comes from both. Isn’t a cell phone safe to use as long as you hold it away from your head? About 20 years ago someone started promoting the idea of the “near field plume” which was supposed to extend out six inches from a cell phone, and that if you held your phone more than six inches from your head, you were safe. That is a complete fiction. There is no such thing as a near field “plume.” It does not exist. The region very near to a source of radiation, where the electric field and the magnetic field are separate and complex, is called the near field. The space very far from the source, where the electric and magnetic fields are tied together and diminish with distance, is called the far field. The near and far fields blend into one another. There is no dividing line where one stops and the other begins. And it is certainly not true that the radiation stops at six inches. If that were true, the radiation would never reach a cell tower and the phone would not work. And if it were true of a cell phone, it would also be true of a cell tower, which emits the same radiation. Then a cell tower would be safe if you stood more than six inches away from one. How absurd! And your body is a conductor, so if you are holding the phone in your hand, no matter how far away from your head, the microwaves are conducted into your hand and throughout your body, and your arm is an extension of the phone and is part of the radiating antenna. If you put the phone on a table in front of you and do not hold it, then the microwaves are just irradiating you and not being conducted into you. But since for some types of harm, for example damage to the blood-brain barrier, the damage increases with distance, that does not protect you either. If the radiation levels from cell phones and cell towers were reduced, wouldn’t that make them safe? No. It is the informational content, not power level, that causes the harm. A cell phone exposes the brain to microwave radiation at roughly 10 milliwatts per square centimeter. At power levels one trillion times lower than that, microwave radiation has been shown to affect ovulation, the immune system, plant growth, human brain waves, and the structure of DNA. Don’t we need more studies before we know if microwaves are dangerous? No. We already had 10,000 studies by 1980. Today we have at least 30,000 studies. There are more studies showing harm from microwaves and radio frequency radiation than from any other pollutants except tobacco smoke and mercury. How long has this been going on? How long have we known that wireless technology is harmful? For as long as wireless technology has been around. At Marconi’s first public demonstration of radio in Salisbury Plain in 1896, spectators described various nerve sensations they experienced. When Marconi turned on the first French radio station in Wimereux, one man who lived nearby “burst in with a revolver” because the waves were causing him sharp internal pains. On the evening of January 22, 1901, when Marconi fired up a new, more powerful transmitter on the Isle of Wight, Queen Victoria, in residence on the island, had a stroke and died. Within a few years, 90 percent of the bees on the island had disappeared. Marconi himself suffered from recurring fevers from the time he began experimenting with radio and for the rest of his life. He suffered nine heart attacks, the last one killing him at age 63. Even prior to Marconi, in the early 1890s, Jacques-Arsène d’Arsonval published the results of experiments on humans and animals showing that high frequencies affect blood pressure and profoundly alter metabolism. Do telecommunications company officials know their products are harmful? Are they doing this to us deliberately? They all use cell phones like the rest of the world and are as much in denial about them as everyone else. The denial, which runs deep in society, goes back to the beginning of the development of electricity in the 1700s. I keep my phone off except in emergencies. Doesn’t that protect me and others? A cell phone leaks radiation from all of its resonant circuitry, even if it is turned off, as long as the battery is in it. So does a modem or router that has WiFi, as long as it is plugged in. I have measured radiation coming out of modems in which the WiFi was disabled. I can always tell when someone is carrying a cell phone because I can feel the radiation, even if it is turned off and hidden in their pocket, even from across a room. I have never been wrong. For whatever reason you have a cell phone -- any kind of cell phone -- all of the world’s cell towers have to be there in order for it to work when you want it to. No matter how rarely you use the phone, all the cell towers have to be there. If you use it “only in emergencies,” that is even worse, because you are likely to be using it in remote places where there are no cell towers and service is not good. Every call you make from a location where there are no towers is recorded as a request for service, and your provider will eventually put up a cell tower there in response to those calls. When I am at home I use my cell phone connected by an ethernet cord to a modem. Doesn’t that protect me? It does not protect you because it is still emitting radiation. It does not protect others because when you are not at home you need all the cell towers to be there and you are irradiating everyone around you simply by carrying the phone around. There are no landlines available where I live. I need my cell phone. Unless people get rid of their cell phones, there will soon be no landlines left anywhere. The existence of landlines depends on demand. The existence of cell phones depends on demand. No one is doing this to us. We are doing it to ourselves. Is fiber the solution? Fiber enables 5G. 5G antennas are connected to each other and to the Internet by fiber optic cables. Wireless companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars laying fiber all over the world for 5G. When a fiber company or a city lays fiber optic cables, wireless companies pay for the right to use it. After the fiber is laid, they stick antennas into it and broadcast 5G. How is 5G different from 4G? 5G can use much higher frequencies (millimeter waves). But the biggest difference is that 5G towers and 5G mobile devices aim narrowly focused beams at each other instead of sending the radiation in all directions. If you are holding a 5G phone in your hand, the nearest 5G tower is tracking you and aiming a beam of radiation directly at your body. This is called phased array technology and it results in greater penetration of the radiation into your body, even at millimeter wave frequencies, than previous wireless technologies. 5G towers also send radiation in all directions because they are constantly scanning the environment looking for devices to connect with. Is 5G a weapon? No. 5G can use millimeter waves. There are also crowd-control weapons that use millimeter waves. But the weapons are a thousand times more powerful and they are not modulated and carry no information. They are different technologies that were developed by different people for different purposes. Are there devices that can protect us from these frequencies? There are many companies today that prey on the gullibility of people who are desperate to protect themselves from an assault that is coming from everywhere. They sell “protective” chips to put on your cell phone or computer, pendants and bracelets that will “neutralize” or “harmonize” the radiation, devices to plug into your wall that will “protect” an area hundreds or thousands of square feet around your house. Some advertise that they are “quantum” devices, or are based on “scalar” technology or “torsion” fields, which are sexy words that sound scientific but mean nothing. You cannot “neutralize” or “harmonize” radiation. These devices, without exception, are ineffective and most will harm you. Many of these devices emit a 7.83 Hz signal which is supposed to duplicate the first Schumann resonance of the Earth. These are point sources that cannot duplicate a natural frequency that bathes us from all sides. They make some people feel good for a couple of weeks, and they can be addictive, just like the frequencies from a cell phone or computer can be addictive, but they will harm you. What are the alternatives? The alternative is wires. Wired phones. Wired computers. There is no need to reinvent the wheel, wires are what we had before wireless and are superior in every way. Wires carry the same voices, but clearer. The same information, but more securely. And the information is contained in the wires, instead of being broadcast all over the earth in a cloud of radiation. Wireless is convenient, but for the sake of convenience we are killing ourselves in real time and destroying our planet. NOTB 'BOOK OF THE DECADE' The Invisible Rainbow Arthur Firstenberg A History of Electricity and Life 5g is being rolled out across the country, despite growing evidence that it is disruptive to our health, our safety, and the environment. The Invisible Rainbow is the groundbreaking story of electricity as it’s never been told before—exposing its very real impact on the biosphere and human health. MORE RECOMMENDED BOOKS SOURCE: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Frequently-Asked-Questions.pdf

This is a focus on injuries to people's eyesight by the C19 jabs within the UK. Data comes from the UK's yellow card reporting system. EYE DISORDER RELATED REACTIONS 7808 (Pfizer) 14,802 (AZ) 1470 (Moderna) TOTAL = 24,080 MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 16TH FEB 2022 (Data published 24th Feb 2022) Before reading the data check this key comment from the FB version of this post "...I know someone who got 2 detached retinas within a week of her first jib, she went completely blind, they did surgery but still has some loss of sight, she will not acknowledge a link at all so won't report it, how many more have not linked the 2 and not reported it 😔..." Below represents some of the most prevalently reported EYE DISORDERS experienced, not exhaustively listed. Now Blind - 155 (Pfizer) + 317 (AZ) + 32 (Moderna) = 504 Visual Impairment - 450 (Pfizer) + 832 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) = 1333 Vitreous Detachment - 21 (Pfizer) + 59 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 82 Conjunctival Haemorrhage - 51 (Pfizer) + 130 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) = 189 Corneal & Conjunctival Infections, Irritations & Inflammation - 24 (Pfizer) + 13 (AZ) = 37 Eyelid Movement Disorders - 230 (Pfizer) + 237 (AZ) + 38 (Moderna) = 505 Uveitis & Iritis - 88 (Pfizer) + 96 (AZ) + 15 (Moderna) = 199 Eyelid, Lash & Lacrimal Infections, Irritations & Inflammation - 245 (Pfizer) + 245 (AZ) + 43 (Moderna) = 533 Eye Haemorrhage - 37 (Pfizer) + 114 (AZ) + 4 (Moderna) = 155 Eye Pain & Swelling - 1918 (Pfizer) + 4047 (AZ) + 458 (Moderna) = 6423 Periorbital Swelling - 127 (Pfizer) + 109 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) = 255 Eye Allergy, Discharge, Inflammation, Irritation & Pruritis - 478 (Pfizer) + 612 (AZ) + 110 (Moderna) = 1200 Eye Movement Disorder - 42 (Pfizer) + 56 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) = 105 Ocular Sensation Disorder - 755 (Pfizer) + 1560 (AZ) + 172 (Moderna) = 2487 Pupil Disorders - 45 (Pfizer) + 81 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) = 129 Retinal Bleeding & Vascular Disorders - 76 (Pfizer) + 175 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) = 261 Visual Disorders - 1809 (Pfizer) + 3916 (AZ) + 361 (Moderna) = 6086 A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you have suffered any form of adverse reaction and are a UK citizen please fill in a witness statement for the case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. This comment was emailed in: Thank you for your article on eye disorders after the jab. I think it is happening to a lot of people who aren't connecting it to the jab. I know someone who lost 95% of his sight from several strokes after the second dose. His GP said definitely have the booster. The eye hospital said it was probably caused by the jab and if he had the booster he could lose the remaining 5% of sight. He is someone who is now aware. I know other people who have lost sight after jabs but won't connect it. It is caused by visual strokes. Blood clots behind the eyes. https://www.healthline.com/health/stroke/eye-stroke There was a discussion thread on a group about this, and a classroom helper said about 17 of the 30 children had the jab, and about a month after, nearly all of them started wearing glasses. Is this a coincidence? It could mean the jabs not only cause blindness, but also general damage to eyes. Thank you for your research. There must be optometrists who are aware of this. Kind regards A

This is Not On The Beeb's 55th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. There are now 2,071 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 statistic accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 16th March 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) DOSE 1 Pfizer - 26.2 million AstraZeneca - 24.9m Moderna - 1.6m TOTAL 1ST DOSE = 52.7 m DOSE 2 Pfizer - 23.6 million AstraZeneca - 24.2m Moderna - 1.5m TOTAL 2ND DOSE = 49.3 m DOSE 3 Pfizer - 29.5 million AstraZeneca - 0.05m (55,000) Moderna - 9 m TOTAL 3RD DOSE BOOSTERS = 38.6 m (38,576,876) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.3 m AZ 49.2 m Moderna 12.1 m TOTAL DOSES = 140.5 m ( 140,553,130) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 167,675 AZ 244,306 Moderna 36,463 Unknown 1585 TOTAL = 450,029 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 738 AZ 1248 Moderna 43 Unknown42 TOTAL = 2071 Deaf Pfizer 296 AZ 425 Moderna 51 Unknown 5 TOTAL = 777 Blind Pfizer 158 AZ 322 Moderna 32 Unknown 4 TOTAL = 516 Spontaneous Abortions Pfizer 485 AZ 231 Moderna 65 Unknown 6 TOTAL = 787 Still Births Pfizer 14 still births AZ 5 stillbirth Moderna 1 stillbirth Unknown 6 TOTAL 26 Acute Cardiac Pfizer 12,863 AZ 11,295 Moderna 3158 Unknown 102 TOTAL = 27,418 Pericarditis/Myocarditis Pfizer 1281 AZ438 Moderna 335 Unknown 8 TOTAL = 2062 Blood Disorders - 16,957 (Pfizer) + 7827 (AZ) + 2478 (Moderna) + 64 (Unknown) = 27,326 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 897 (Pfizer) + 3049 (AZ) + 118 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 4091 Anaphylaxis - 657 (Pfizer) + 876 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1623 Eye Disorders - 7943 (Pfizer) + 14,858 (AZ) + 1499 (Moderna) + 85 (Unknown) = 24,385 Infections - 12,002 (Pfizer) + 20,262 (AZ) + 2266 (Moderna) + 162 (Unknown) = 34,692 Herpes - 2197 (Pfizer) + 2691 (AZ) + 250 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) = 5164 Nervous System Disorders - 80,175 (Pfizer) + 182,490 (AZ) + 19,677 (Moderna) + 860 (Unknown) = 283,202 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 783 (Pfizer) + 2336 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3191 Seizures - 1091 (Pfizer) + 2062 (AZ) + 257 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3428 Paralysis - 507 (Pfizer) + 882 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 1501 Immune System Disorders - 2428 (Pfizer) + 3301 (AZ) + 600 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 6352 Respiratory Disorders - 21,479 (Pfizer) + 29,752 (AZ) + 4176 (Moderna) + 211 (Unknown) = 55,618 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1083 (Pfizer) + 2303 (AZ) + 193 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3591 Tremor - 2158 (Pfizer) + 9939 (AZ) + 659 (Moderna) + 51 (Unknown) = 12,807 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,082 (Pfizer) + 18,368 (AZ) + 2420 (Moderna) + 115 (Unknown) = 30,985 Skin Disorders - 33,694 (Pfizer) + 53,314 (AZ) + 12,913 (Moderna) + 345 (Unknown) = 100,266 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,002 (Pfizer) + 20,781 (AZ) + 5119 (Moderna) + 216 (Unknown) = 57,118 Amnesia & Memory Loss (excl. dementia) - 487 (Pfizer) + 896 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1481 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,018 (Pfizer) + 80,940 (AZ) + 10,591 (Moderna) + 388 (Unknown) = 133,937 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Seem at LONDON freedom protest 22nd Jan 2022 PLEASE NOTE HOW THE NUMBERS OF CHILDREN JABBED ARE STILL ROUNDED UP. This suggests poor record-keeping Pfizer 3,300,000 1st dose 1,900,000 2nd doses 100,000 3rd dose boosters 3,313 Yellow Cards AZ 12,600 1st dose 9,200 2nd dose Zero 3rd dose (why? See reporting rate) 262 Yellow Cards Reporting rate 1-in-48 The reporting rate on AZ for kids by the time the 10% reporting rate is taken into account could be as much as 1 in 5 kids suffering an AE. “Extremely limited’ use of AZ & Moderna for boosters in those under 18" - MHRA Moderna 2100 1st doses 1400 2nd dose 24 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 22 Yellow Cards Total = 3,314,700 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3,621 For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions 13 REASONS TO NOT VACCINATE 5-11 YEAR OLDS Reason No. 1 - 86% of 12-15-year old Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine in the Clinical Trial Reason No. 2 - 1 in 9 Children suffered a Severe Adverse Reaction leaving them unable to perform daily activities in the Pfizer Clinical Trial Reason No. 3 - Just 17 deaths associated with Covid-19 have occurred in Teenagers & Children since March 2020 Reason No. 4 - The risk of children developing serious illness due to Covid-19 is extremely low Reason No. 5 - The Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine is experimental and still in Clinical Trials Reason No. 6 - Three Scientific Studies conducted by the UK Government, Oxford University, & CDC, which were published in August have found the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work Reason No. 7 - Public Health England Data shows the majority of Covid-19 Deaths are among the Vaccinated and suggests that the Vaccines worsen disease Reason No. 8 - There had been at least 1.18 million Adverse Reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccines in the UK alone up to September 1st Reason No. 9 - There were more deaths in 8 months due to the Covid-19 Vaccines than there have been due to all other available Vaccines combined since the year 2001 Reason No. 10 - The risk of Myocarditis (Heart Inflammation) in Children due to the Pfizer Vaccine Reason No. 11 - Children have died and are dying due to the Covid-19 Vaccines Reason No. 12 - Who profits from your Child getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? Reason No. 13 - The Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation refused to recommend the Pfizer Vaccine be offered to Children aged 12-15 SOURCE: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/23/13-reasons-why-children-5-to-11-should-not-have-the-covid-vaccine/ A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.