Search Results

Take a good long look at this map of Germany, with the colours of each area mapping the incidence of something - yellow meaning less, red meaning more. Very clearly, we can see the colours highlight the old West and east Germany, made clearer by the green line. Do the hot spots map political opinion? Does the map represent the preference for a particular type of German sausage? Or, just maybe, this is a map that calculates the likelihood of finding relics of the Stazi (old german state police) in the attic, or, or finding a classic East German-built Lada car in an abandoned barn? No, none of the above. I'm sure you have probably guessed the reality, however improbable. The map incredulously represents the covid 19 hotspots, which leaves only one burning question. How can a pathogen, that has caused lockdowns and worldwide pandemania, stop transmission at old national borders that have not even existed since the early 90s? by eugyppius This (map above) is the Omicron BA.5 wave in central Europe, and it is attended by a curious phenomenon: Every day, you can see more clearly the borders of the old DDR in the district-level data. I’ve traced these in green just to make the phenomenon clearer. Yes yes, there are systematic demographic differences between East and West Germans, and there are probably some differences in testing rates, but above all, there is an important difference in vaccine uptake. In this map of triple vaccination rates across my country, the old DDR borders are also evident: This map details the vaccination uptake of the German regions East Germans have direct experience with government propaganda and have proven more resistant to the vaccination campaign than Westerners. Their reward, after being much maligned by state media, is now higher levels of natural immunity and lower rates of BA.5 infection, which appears to prefer vaccinated populations. As the effects of vaccine failure grow clearer, you have to wonder how long the pandemicists will be able to publish even simple infection statistics, without raising extremely awkward questions. SOURCE: https://www.eugyppius.com/p/omicron-ba5-prefers-hypervaccinated

Story by Cristina Laila Dr. Simone Gold on Thursday was sentenced to two months in prison for speaking with a megaphone inside of the US Capitol on January 6. In March Dr. Simone Gold pleaded guilty to a class A misdemeanor count, “entering and remaining in a restricted building charge.” Dr Gold: “I was paid a visit by the FBI in a Roger Stone kind of takedown moment, which is quite uncalled for. You know, if anybody wanted to get a hold of me, they could have picked up the phone and called. I’m very easy to find. But there were literally twenty guys with guns blazing, [and they] broke down my door,” Gold narrated. NBC News reported: U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper in Washington, D.C., also sentenced Dr. Simone Gold to 12 months of supervised release after her 60-day prison term and ordered her to pay a $9,500 fine. She can report to prison at a date to be determined. The judge told Gold that her anti-vaccine activism wasn’t a factor in her sentencing. Cooper said Gold wasn’t a “casual bystander” on Jan. 6. The judge also said Gold’s organization has misled supporters into believing her prosecution was politically motivated and trampled on her free speech rights. Cooper called it “unseemly” that America’s Frontline Doctors has invoked the Capitol riot in raising money, including for her salary. “I think that is a real disservice to the true victims of that day,” he said. Dr. Simone Gold was in Washington DC on January 5th and 6th and spoke on the 5th at Freedom Plaza. Dr. Simone later entered the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 and delivered her same medical speech with a bullhorn from inside the U.S. Capitol. Dr. Simone committed no acts of violence. She only wanted to push her medical opinion on the coronavirus. For this Dr. Gold was placed in the front row of the FBI’s most wanted release. Life Site News reported: In a recent interview with Michelle Malkin, Dr. Simone Gold, founder of American Frontline Doctors (AFLD) discussed the lack of authentic informed consent with regards to experimental vaccines, censorship as a “crime against humanity,” and how she was subjected to a massive swat team raid upon her home by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in order to arrest her for being present in the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6th. In describing this incident, Gold said, “I was paid a visit by the FBI in a Roger Stone kind of take down moment, which is quite uncalled for. You know, if anybody wanted to get a hold of me, they could have picked up the phone and called. I’m very easy to find. But there were literally twenty guys with guns blazing, [and they] broke down my door,” Gold said. “It was dramatic and what I want to say is that I weep for our country. If you can pull in a person like me … [and] have the FBI break down your door with 20 guns, shackle you [in] handcuffs [and] drag you off, I mean it was really terrible … I’m telling you America, this can happen to you.” Dr. Simone Gold led a team of doctors called America’s Frontline Doctors, a group that challenged COVID prevention strategy in America, back in July 2020 in Washington DC. The Frontline Doctors from across the country met in Washington DC to dispel the coronavirus’s misinformation and myths. The group was concerned with the disinformation campaign being played out in the far-left American media today. Read More at Gateway Pundit

This is Not On The Beeb's 64th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. However, things are changing. This has just been published by the MHRA MHRA Update on publication frequency The weekly summary of Yellow Card reporting has provided timely and relevant information to patients and healthcare professionals on the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines as they were deployed in the UK throughout the pandemic. In line with the wider government’s Living with COVID-19 agenda strategy, the frequency of publication of the updated summary will be changing to every other week, before transitioning to once per month from August. Our robust safety monitoring and surveillance will continue in the normal way between publications and we will continue to communicate promptly on any updated safety information. Here is the breakdown of the most recent report. As of the 8th of June there are 2,182 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 8th June 2022. (there is a one-week + time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.8 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m 1st doses = 53,515,843 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,039,615 Boosters = 39,809,826 (30.5m Pfizer, 57,600 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,365,284 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 171,400 (Last week 170,867) AZ 245,530 (last week 245,305) Moderna 39,337 . (last week 38,756) Unknown 1736 ( last week 1,7080 TOTAL = 458,003 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 789 AZ 1286 Moderna 60 Unknown 47 TOTAL = 2182 Blood Disorders - 17,163 (Pfizer) + 7870 (AZ) + 2559 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,657 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1647 Acute Cardiac - 13,508 (Pfizer) + 11,554 (AZ) + 3479 (Moderna) + 117 (Unknown) = 28,658 Eye Disorders - 8169 (Pfizer) + 15,020 (AZ) + 1626 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,909 Blindness - 169 (Pfizer) + 329 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 544 Deafness - 308 (Pfizer) + 433 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 801 Infections - 12,702 (Pfizer) + 20,550 (AZ) + 2538 (Moderna) + 193 (Unknown) = 35,983 Herpes - 2256 (Pfizer) + 2708 (AZ) + 269 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5260 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,844 (Pfizer) + 81,151 (AZ) + 11,506 (Moderna) + 420 (Unknown) = 135,921 Spontaneous Abortions - 495 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 236 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 809 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,068 (Pfizer) + 183,398 (AZ) + 21,278 (Moderna) + 933 (Unknown) = 287,677 Bell’s Palsy - 652 (Pfizer) + 644 (AZ) + 105 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1404 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 106 (Pfizer) + 500 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 633 Paralysis - 527 (Pfizer) + 903 (AZ) + 121 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1562 Seizures - 1151 (Pfizer) + 2091 (AZ) + 300 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3565 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,387 (Pfizer) + 18,540 (AZ) + 2637 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,694 Respiratory Disorders - 22,138 (Pfizer) + 29,990 (AZ) + 4552 (Moderna) + 233 (Unknown) = 56,913 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1118 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 208 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3640 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1454 (Pfizer) + 2792 (AZ) + 347 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 4632 Skin Disorders - 34,672 (Pfizer) + 53,548 (AZ) + 13,572 (Moderna) + 380 (Unknown) = 102,172 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,492 (Pfizer) + 20,910 (AZ) + 5267 (Moderna) + 237 (Unknown) = 57,906 Vascular Disorders - 7680 (Pfizer) + 14,017 (AZ) + 1385 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 23,196 Please note this: Footnote 8 - The decrease in these numbers compared to the previous report is due to the incorrect inclusion of breastfeeding and pregnancy-related reports in the previous publication. Details of reports of suspected ADRs relating to exposure during pregnancy and breastfeeding can be found in the earlier sections of this report. CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,300,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3841 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 265 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1800 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 30 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 30 Yellow Cards Total = 4,013,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,526,600 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4166 MHRA states re Under 18s Yellow Cards - Footnote 8 - 'The decrease in these numbers compared to the previous report is due to the incorrect inclusion of breastfeeding and pregnancy related reports in the previous publication.' For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. SOURCE: For full reports including 361 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

The holy grail to end all discussion on vaccine safety has always been a simple vaccinated versus jab-free study. In February 2019 Oregon Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas was challenged by his state local Medical Board to prove his alternative care plan was safer than the standard 70 jab + CDC schedule. He hired an outside expert to analyse his patients data, a pool of resources from 2700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated children. The graphs are measuring office visits against the age of the children per condition. I.e presuming the more times the child visits the doctor about a condition, the worse they were with that condition. On the graphs below, the orange lines represent the vaccinated and the blue line represents the jab-free children. The ADHD graph shows that not one jab-free child made a single visit to the doctor concerning ADHD during the ten years covered by the data. This information is critical to understand where the surge of SEN (Special Educational Need) children has originated. How did the Oregon Medical Board respond when presented with the data, graphs and proof of comparative safety they had requested of Dr. Paul Thomas? Due to the embarrassing truths, the foot soldiers of the pharmafia stripped him of his medical licence, with media hit jobs articles such as this: https://www.wweek.com/news/state/2020/12/05/prominent-anti-vaccine-pediatrician-dr-paul-thomas-has-license-suspended-by-the-oregon-medical-board/ However, as you can see below, the graphs speak for themselves... DOWNLOAD THE ABOVE SLIDES HERE: Dr. Paul Thomas points out that his study might be seen as weak alone. But they are not alone. The work of the US founded Control group (not to be confused with the also superb UK based control group) are below. The graphs speak for themselves. (The full PDF presentations can be downloaded at end) DOWNLOAD THE ALL 21 CONTROL GROUP SLIDES HERE DOWNLOAD DR PAUL THOMAS FULL PDF PRESENTATION HERE (The video is a short clip form the presentation) Find Dr Paul's work here: https://www.doctorsandscience.com/presentations.html An interesting paper mentioned by Dr Paul Thomas by Hooker and Miller. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated pediatric populations. Methods: Using data from three medical practices in the United States with children born between November 2005 and June 2015, vaccinated children were compared to unvaccinated children during the first year of life for later incidence of developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders. All diagnoses utilized International Classification of Diseases–9 and International Classification of Diseases–10 codes through medical chart review. Subjects were a minimum of 3 years of age, stratified based on medical practice, year of birth and gender and compared using a logistic regression model. Results: Vaccination before 1 year of age was associated with increased odds of developmental delays (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.47–3.24), asthma (OR = 4.49, 95% CI 2.04–9.88) and ear infections (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.63–2.78). In a quartile analysis, subjects were grouped by number of vaccine doses received in the first year of life. Higher odds ratios were observed in Quartiles 3 and 4 (where more vaccine doses were received) for all four health conditions considered, as compared to Quartile 1. In a temporal analysis, developmental delays showed a linear increase as the age cut-offs increased from 6 to 12 to 18 to 24 months of age (ORs = 1.95, 2.18, 2.92 and 3.51, respectively). Slightly higher ORs were also observed for all four health conditions when time permitted for a diagnosis was extended from ⩾ 3 years of age to ⩾ 5 years of age. Conclusion: In this study, which only allowed for the calculation of unadjusted observational associations, higher ORs were observed within the vaccinated versus unvaccinated group for developmental delays, asthma and ear infections. Further study is necessary to understand the full spectrum of health effects associated with childhood vaccination.

This is Not On The Beeb's 63rd report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. As of the 25th of May there are 2,161 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines, in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 25th May 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.6 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m (minus 100k on last weeks figures!) 1st doses = 53,445,102 (all brands) 2nd doses = 49,938,085 Boosters = 39,679,182 (30.4m Pfizer, 57,300 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,062,369 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 171,109 (Last week 170,867) AZ 245,400 (last week 245,305) Moderna 39,055. (last week 38,756) Unknown 1,720 ( last week 1,7080 TOTAL = 457,284 people reported an adverse reaction Currently published - From 25th May 2022 - An approximate 1.7 million first doses and approximately 1.5 million second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have also now been administered…. (Boosters)…. and 9.3 million doses of COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have been given. Total = 12.5m - 25th May 2022 From wayback machine - From 19th May 2022 - An approximate 1.7 million first doses and approximately 1.5 million second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have also now been administered…. (Boosters)…. and 9.4 million doses of COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have been given. Total 12.6m - 19th May 2022 Fatal Pfizer 778 AZ 1277 Moderna 59 Unknown 47 TOTAL = 2161 Blood Disorders - 17,139 (Pfizer) + 7863 (AZ) + 2547 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,614 Anaphylaxis - 664 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1645 Acute Cardiac - 13,407 (Pfizer) + 11,504 (AZ) + 3438 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 28,463 Eye Disorders - 8130 (Pfizer) + 14,997 (AZ) + 1605 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,826 Blindness - 168 (Pfizer) + 326 (AZ) + 40 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 538 Deafness - 306 (Pfizer) + 433 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 799 Infections - 12,601 (Pfizer) + 20,507 (AZ) + 2507 (Moderna) + 188 (Unknown) = 35,803 Herpes - 2246 (Pfizer) + 2704 (AZ) + 266 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 5244 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,747 (Pfizer) + 81,119 (AZ) + 11,371 (Moderna) + 419 (Unknown) = 135,656 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,941 (Pfizer) + 45,589 (AZ) + 6818 (Moderna) + 215 (Unknown) = 73,563 Spontaneous Abortions - 491 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 236 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 805 miscarriages Skin Disorders - 34,539 (Pfizer) + 53,508 (AZ) + 13,474 (Moderna) + 376 (Unknown) = 101,897 Nervous System Disorders - 81,800 (Pfizer) + 183,247 (AZ) + 21,019 (Moderna) + 917 (Unknown) = 286,983 Tremor - 2218 (Pfizer) + 9972 (AZ) + 733 (Moderna) + 52 (Unknown) = 12,975 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4323 (Pfizer) + 7029 (AZ) + 785 (Moderna) + 44 (Unknown) = 12,181 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 817 (Pfizer) + 2377 (AZ) + 67 (Moderna) + 20 (Unknown) = 3281 Paralysis - 520 (Pfizer) + 900 (AZ) + 117 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1548 Seizures - 1145 (Pfizer) + 2088 (AZ) + 294 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3548 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,326 (Pfizer) + 18,511 (AZ) + 2604 (Moderna) + 129 (Unknown) = 31,570 Headaches & Migraines - 35,942 (Pfizer) + 94,081 (AZ) + 9839 (Moderna) + 350 (Unknown) = 140,212 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,454 (Pfizer) + 20,897 (AZ) + 5251 (Moderna) + 237 (Unknown) = 57,839 Respiratory Disorders - 22,050 (Pfizer) + 29,960 (AZ) + 4491 (Moderna) + 231 (Unknown) = 56,732 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 3,900,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,300,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3890 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 330 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-35 • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1800 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 48 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 31 Yellow Cards Total = 3,913,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,426,600 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4299 For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. SOURCE For full reports including 359 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

This is Not On The Beeb's 62nd report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. As off the 26th April there are 2,148 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 18th May 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.1 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.6 m 1st doses = 53,398,518 (all brands) 2nd doses = 49,895,254 Boosters = 39,585,631 (30.1m Pfizer, 56,600 AZ & 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 142,879,403 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 170,867 AZ 245,305 Moderna 38,756 Unknown 1,708 TOTAL = 456,636 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 773 AZ 1273 Moderna 56 Unknown 46 TOTAL = 2148 Anaphylaxis - 663 (Pfizer) + 886 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1645 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 3,900,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,200,000 second doses & 300,000 boosters resulting in 3761 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.800 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 262 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1700 second doses & 3100 boosters resulting in 30 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 27 Yellow Cards Total = 3,913,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,427,300 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4080 SOURCE For full reports including 359 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

The New UK Polio Fear campaign has ramped up its marketing efforts targeting parents. This is a copy of one such email being sent to parents. QUOTE: "...Urgent: Poliovirus Dear Parent / Carer Poliovirus has been detected in a number of London sewage samples, the advice from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) is to urge anyone who isn’t up to date with their polio vaccines to get immunised. The combined Tetanus, diphtheria and polio (Td/IPV) booster vaccine is offered to all pupils in Year 9, If your child did not receive their vaccine in the last 2 years, please contact the South Warwickshire school age immunisation team to arrange vaccination. Kind Regards, South Warwickshire Immunisation and Vaccination..." So other than the transparent pharma sales drive, is there a real Polio outbreak, or could there be other factors at play? As a reminder, this is last week's UK government announcement. "...Polio found in UK for first time since 1984 as Government declares national incident. The UK Health Security Agency has declared a national incident after discovering the virus that causes polio in the UK for the first time in nearly 40 years. There are not yet any confirmed cases but the samples found appear to confirm the first “transmission event” in the UK since 1984, when the last case of polio was detected. Parents of children who are not up to date with their polio vaccine course are urged to make an appointment with their GP as soon as possible, but the UKHSA says the risk to the wider population is low..." Samples taken from a sewage treatment works in east London between February and May suggest the virus has spread between a small number of people, possibly in an extended family in the capital...." This needs repeating: There are not yet any confirmed cases but the samples appear to confirm the first “transmission event” ...Parents of children who are not up to date with their polio vaccine course are urged to make an appointment with their GP as soon as possible...." SOURCE: https://inews.co.uk/news/health/polio-found-in-uk-for-first-time-since-1984-as-government-declares-national-incident-1700359 What is vaccine-derived polio? The WHO definition. Oral polio vaccine (OPV) contains an attenuated (weakened) vaccine-virus, activating an immune response in the body. When a child is immunized with OPV, the weakened vaccine-virus replicates in the intestine for a limited period, thereby developing immunity by building up antibodies. During this time, the vaccine-virus is also excreted. In areas of inadequate sanitation, this excreted vaccine-virus can spread in the immediate community (and this can offer protection to other children through ‘passive’ immunization), before eventually dying out. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/poliomyelitis-vaccine-derived-polio How could the polio have been found in London's sewerage system? It is important to understand how these 'polio samples' might have been found. Could children being vaccinated with Polio have shed the Polio virus via faeces as shown in this 2015 paper? Poliovirus vaccine strains detected in stool specimens of immunodeficient children in South Africa. Pavlov DN, Van Zyl WB,, Kruger M, Blignaut L, Grabow WO, Ehlers MM STUDY ABSTRACT "...After exposure to the oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), immunocompetent persons excrete poliovirus (PV) vaccine strains for a limited period. In contrast, immunodeficient individuals remain sometimes chronically infected, and in some cases, PV excretion times as long as 10 years have been reported....The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of OPV (oral poliovirus vaccine) strains in stools of immunodeficient children...These results suggested that immunodeficient patients vaccinated with OPV might excrete potentially pathogenic VDPVs for a prolonged period. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of OPV strains in stools of immunodeficient children from a selected area in South Africa, as a first step toward future research on the prevalence and potential health impact of VDPVs. In a period of 1 year, a total of 164 stool samples of HIV-positive children aged 4 months to 8 years were studied for the excretion of OPV strains. In addition, 23 stool samples from healthy immunocompetent children were analyzed after receiving their OPV immunization. By applying a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in combination with a nested PCR, a total of 54 enteroviruses (EVs) were detected in the stool specimens of the immunodeficient children. Using restriction enzyme analysis, 13 PVs were distinguished from 41 nonpolio EVs (NPEVs). A Sabin-specific RT-triplex PCR confirmed the presence of 7 Sabin PV type 1, 4 Sabin PV type 3, and 2 Sabin PV type 2 isolates. The majority of the NPEV group was made up of 7 coxsackievirus B3 (CBV3), 6 echovirus 11 (ECV11), 5 ECV9, and 3 coxsackievirus A6 (CAV6) isolates. According to the results, two of the immunodeficient patients (P023 and P140) who had received their last OPV immunization more than 15 months before (vaccinated at 14 weeks of age) tested positive for Sabin PVs types 3 and 1, respectively. A 5-year-old immunodeficient patient (P052) who had received her last OPV immunization more than 42 months before (vaccinated at 18 months of age) tested positive for Sabin PV type 1. These VDPVs may circulate in the community, resulting in possible infections in the unvaccinated population. Therefore, the information obtained in this study would be essential for strategies aimed at the protection of both immunodeficient as well as immunocompetent individuals against complications of vaccination with OPV." https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16290028 Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/2263/2410/1/Pavlov_Polioviruses%282006%29.pdf RELEVANT PAPERS Poliovirus vaccine strains in sewage and river water in South Africa https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16917529/ Prevalence of vaccine-derived polioviruses in sewage and river water in South Africa. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15996707/ Molecular evolution of oral poliovirus vaccine strains during multiplication in humans and possible implications for global eradication of poliovirus "...Although there are many advantages in using attenuated OPV strains in the campaign to eradicate poliomyelitis, several studies have demonstrated that there are some disadvantages such as (a) excretion by vaccines of OPV-derived polioviruses with genomic modifications known to increase the neurovirulence, (b) appearance of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) and other adverse effects in vaccinees, (c) occurrence of persistent infections caused by OPV-derived strains in immunodeficient patients with VAPP, (d) transmission of OPV-derived polioviruses to susceptible individuals which develop VAPP, and (e) detection of OPV-derived polioviruses in the environment, which could be a source of infection for humans in the future. Different studies indicate that it is important to consider the possibility of persistent infections and excretion of OPV-derived polioviruses for long periods by humans, and also the survival in the environment of OPV-derived polioviruses excreted by humans, which could be transmitted and circulate in a non-immune population after stopping poliovirus vaccination. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10989702/ Vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV): Impact on poliomyelitis eradication. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19428874/ Vaccine poliovirus shedding and immune response to oral polio vaccine in HIV-infected and -uninfected Zimbabwean infants Background: With prolonged replication, attenuated polioviruses used in oral polio vaccine (OPV) can mutate into vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) and cause poliomyelitis outbreaks. Individuals with primary humoral immunodeficiencies can become chronically infected with vaccine poliovirus, allowing it to mutate into immunodeficiency-associated VDPV (iVDPV). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23661792/

BY ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH INTERNATIONAL An international survey of a health-aware, ‘Control Group’ that includes over 300,000 people who have chosen to avoid COVID-19 vaccination, shows participants place minimal burden on health systems through their strong reliance on natural immunity, self-care and the use of natural health supplements to help prevent or even treat COVID-19. Yet this group faces unfounded discrimination, job losses and mental health issues intensified by its marginalisation by mainstream society. The survey of participants in the ‘Control Group’ includes a sub-group from the over 305,000 participants from more than 175 countries who have joined the citizen-led project and opted to not receive COVID-19 vaccines. The findings just uploaded to the preprint server ResearchGate, show that during the 5-month survey period (September 2021 through to February 2022 inclusive), participants suffered low rates of severe COVID-19 disease, were infrequently hospitalised, and used natural health products extensively both for prevention and for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. Data from these first five months of the Control Group survey were analysed and interpreted by an independent, international team led by Robert Verkerk PhD, a multi-disciplinary scientist and the founder, executive and scientific director of the non-profit Alliance for Natural Health International. Co-authors included three practicing clinicians, Dr Naseeba Kathrada from South Africa, Christof Plothe DO from Germany and Dr Katarina Lindley from the USA. The authors came together to assess the survey data through their collaboration in recent months with the World Council for Health, a non-profit, global coalition of health-focused organizations and civil society groups. The survey findings were based on a sub-cohort of approximately 18,500 Control Group participants who had completed questionnaires on a monthly basis over the first five months of the survey. Among the wide-ranging data collected, the survey captured reasons why participants avoided vaccines, with distrust of governments and pharmaceutical companies as well as concerns over adverse reactions from insufficiently tested vaccines being high on the list. Participants reported extensive mental health problems that may have been compounded by the stigmatisation and discrimination facing those who shunned COVID-19 vaccines. It also found that women, despite being unvaccinated for COVID-19, suffered menstrual and bleeding abnormalities that may have been associated with viral exposure, shedding, spike protein exposure or pandemic-related behavioural changes. Those who never wore masks reported the lowest levels of COVID-19 disease. Given the participants are self-selected and have self-reported, the survey findings need to be interpreted with care when comparing them with national statistics or studies based on randomly selected populations. The UK-based Control Group project was established in mid-2021 as a citizen-led cooperative that aims to evaluate long-term health outcomes among the COVID-19 vaccine-free as well as linking its members to country support networks and online community groups. The full survey report can be downloaded from ResearchGate here. CONTACT For further information about the survey and findings, contact Rob Verkerk PhD using one of the following methods: Telephone: +44 (0)1484 646 600 Email: science@anhinternational.org https://www.anhinternational.org/news/breaking-news-unvaxxed-control-group-first-release-of-survey-data/

This is Not On The Beeb's 61st report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. As off the 19th April there are 2,140 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 11th May 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.1 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.6 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) 1st doses = 53,337,395 (all brands) 2nd doses = 49,844,562 Boosters = 39,474,656 (30.1m Pfizer, 56,468 AZ & 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 142,656,613 doses Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 170,625 AZ 245,206 Moderna 38,464 Unknown 1695 TOTAL = 455,990 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 767 AZ 1272 Moderna 54 Unknown 47 TOTAL = 2140 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 3,800,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,200,000 second doses & 300,000 boosters resulting in 3729 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.800 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1700 second doses & 3100 boosters resulting in 29 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 27 Yellow Cards Total = 3,813,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,327,300 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 404 For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 stat accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Since nearly all other mammals can make their own VIT C, and humans can't, I'd always wondered how as a species we had survived when the crucial VIT C is often not found in sufficient levels within many diets internationally, or during certain seasons. It was not until my interview with Dr Jimmy Gutman that I learnt that our body can recycle vitamin C using Glutathione. This was especially interesting as I'd noticed since boosting my glutathione levels, I'd noticed lower urge for taking VIT C compared to the quantities I had previously. Having sufficient VIT C levels is critical for all health conditions as I posted here in spring 2020. (This page was made before NOTB, but still contains some good info, especially on making DIY Liposomal VIT C) Having sufficient Glutathione is critical within the context of what we are experiencing in 2022, with approximately two thirds of the UK population alone have accepted the C19 jabs. Detoxing and replenishing glutathione levels has never been more important in the history of the human race. Getting the correct balance between Glutathione and VIT C, two of our greatest anti-oxidants is important, hence the mirroring of this interesting report by Chris Masterjohn PHD below. (see his original article in link at end) Beyond a certain dose, vitamin C can begin taxing glutathione and rendering excess nitric oxide toxic. Here's how to prevent that. by Chris Masterjohn, Phd While I was writing my last post, Protecting Against Spike Protein Toxicity With Sulfur, Selenium, and Sunlight, I came across this paper from 2002 showing that, in dopamine-responsive brain cells, vitamin C worsens nitric oxide toxicity, while glutathione and N-acetyl-cysteine protect against it. The context of this study was an investigation into the damage of dopamine-responsive brain cells in the context of Parkinson’s. However, I believe this paper demonstrates a much more broadly applicable general principle: high doses of vitamin C need to be properly balanced with glutathione support in any context where nitric oxide toxicity might be important. That includes COVID and vaccine-induced spike protein toxicity, and it should be broadly applicable to inflammation in general. I am working on a much more extensive report tying this together with vitamin C research in the context of COVID, general immunity, and cancer. I will likely release this report at the end of next week. For now, I wanted to leave you with my preliminary take-home points so that you can take them under consideration now if you use high-dose vitamin C for any purpose. This post will remain available until the final report is out next week. At that point, it will be integrated into the final report. Since the final report will be contributing to my upcoming Vaccine Guide as well as version 8 of the COVID Guide (the last update I will make before returning full-time to finishing my book), it will be available to everyone for the first 48 hours and become paid-only afterwards. In Figure 7A, we see that in these dopamine-responsive brain cells, a nitric oxide donor (2nd column) increased the percent of cells that were dying compared to the control (1st column), and that neither 200 nor 400 micromoles per liter (μmol/L) of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) had any effect alone (columns 3 and 4), but actually increased cell death in response to the nitric oxide donors (columns 5 and 6). The asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the control, while the crosses indicate a statistically significant difference from the nitric oxide donor alone. So, we see that only 400 μmol/L produced a statistically significant worsening. However, the mean cell death with 200 μmol/L is about 15% higher on a relative basis than with the nitric oxide donor alone. This suggests to me that the effect is beginning slightly under 200 μmol/L but becomes more meaningful after 400 μmol/L. As seen in Figure 4A, by contrast, 600 μmol/L of either glutathione or N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) completely abolishes the increase in cell death: Overall, these results are consistent with the following explanation: As explained in my last post, glutathione prevents excessive S-nitrosylation of proteins, and a deficiency of glutathione can lead nitric oxide to engage in nitration of proteins. S-nitrosylation is a regulatory modification that occurs under inflammatory stress, and nitration may play a regulatory role but is often associated with irreversible damage to proteins. Thus, glutathione shifts nitric oxide away from inflammatory and damaging roles, and toward useful roles like vasodilation. Antioxidant protection occurs in a very defined order: vitamin E is recycled by vitamin C, vitamin C is recycled by glutathione, glutathione is recycled using energy from the pentose phosphate pathway using derivatives of niacin and riboflavin. This is a one-way street. Glutathione recycles vitamin C, but vitamin C does not recycle glutathione. To say “glutathione recycles vitamin C” means that vitamin C oxidizes glutathione. If vitamin C oxidizes glutathione faster than glutathione can be recycled itself, vitamin C will tax the glutathione pool and thereby render nitric oxide more likely to hurt than help. Overall, this paper suggests that vitamin C may begin to meaningfully tax the glutathione pool at concentrations close to 200 μmol/L and begins doing so in earnest by the time we arrive at concentrations of 400 μmol/L. In my final report, I will integrate this with data on oral and intravenous vitamin C in humans. Suffice it to say for now that my review of that literature so far does not contradict using 200-400 μmol/L as benchmark plasma levels where we need to start getting concerned about balancing vitamin C with glutathione. This paper provides a basis for translating this into oral and intravenous doses of vitamin C: A vitamin C-rich diet containing 300 mg per day will generally raise plasma levels to 70-85 μmol/L. Single doses of 1-2 grams will raise plasma levels to 150 to just shy of 200 μmol/L at the 5-hour mark and keep them around or above 100 μmol/L for about ten hours. Dosing 2.5 or 3 grams every four hours will keep plasma levels sustainably at or above 200 μmol/L. Intravenous doses of 3 or more grams consistently reach plasma levels well above 1000 μmol/L and 100 grams intravenously reaches over 15,000 μmol/L. Doses at or below 10 grams keep plasma levels elevated for about two hours, whereas 50 or 100 grams keep them elevated for 4-6 hours. This study did not look at time points earlier than 5 hours, so it might be underestimating the peak concentrations reached. The study also did not look at repeat dosing with less than 2.5 grams, so it is quite possible that repeated dosing with 1 gram would also keep plasma levels at or above 200 μmol/L. In the absence of a specific reason to use high-dose vitamin C, I think it is best to shoot for up to 400 milligrams per day of food-based vitamin C in at least two divided doses. Two studies (here and here) have shown that long-term consumption of 200 milligrams twice a day provides plasma and intracellular levels of vitamin C in the most beneficial range, with plasma levels in the high but sub-100 μmol/L range. They also show that this dose is well below the dose (1000 mg/d) required to raise urinary levels of urate and oxalate. Here is the critical preliminary finding I wish to highlight now: When using repeated doses of one gram or more, or long-term use of greater than 400 milligrams per day, for any concern relating to nitric oxide toxicity that includes anything inflammatory, it is critical to follow best practice for maintaining good glutathione status. For your convenience, I have copied below the glutathione-specific recommendations from the last post: Make sure to consume at least one gram of protein per kilogram of bodyweight or at least a half gram of protein per pound of bodyweight. Consider supplementing with 20-40 grams of whey protein, with anywhere from 500 mg each to 10 grams each of N-acetylcysteine and glycine, or anywhere from 500 mg to 5 grams of glutathione. My personal preference is for whey protein, supported by additional glutathione. I would stay toward 1500 mg of NAC or glutathione without a compelling reason to use higher doses, but consider what I’ve written here the top of the range to experiment with. Keep diabetes well treated, and reverse type 2 diabetes if possible, and reverse any signs of emerging pre-diabetes. Keep any thyroid, adrenal, or other metabolic disorder well treated. Eat a diet that keeps postprandial blood sugar under 140 mg/dL (7.7 mmol/L). Within that constraint, eat freely of whole fruit and unrefined sweeteners, but use moderation and steer very far away from 42% of Calories coming from simple sugar. Within these constraints, any increase in carbohydrate is likely to improve glutathione status by increasing insulin. Don’t start a new milk habit. If you use dairy products habitually, however, no need to stop. Manage your vitamin and mineral status properly, with special emphasis on selenium, thiamin, niacin, riboflavin, iron, magnesium, and calcium. My Vitamins and Minerals 101 Cliff Notes are a great place to start (paid subscribers can access them for free here). I have a comprehensive system for managing nutritional status focused on lab work outlined in the Cheat Sheet, which is 50% off for Masterpass members, and paid subscribers get 50% off the Masterpass membership. When vitamin C is 400 milligrams per day or less, spread throughout meals or at least spread across two divided doses, it is unlikely to tax the glutathione pool. In fact, avoiding suboptimal vitamin C status is actually good for the glutathione pool because it lowers the burden glutathione has to fulfill to keep it recycled. It is still a good thing to support glutathione status. However, it is at doses above this that spike plasma levels to 200 μmol/L or greater where robustly supporting glutathione status might make or break whether vitamin C helps or hurts. At minimum, robustly supporting glutathione status will remove one of the concerns about vitamin C and shift it more clearly to the point of net benefit. Disclaimer I am not a medical doctor and this is not medical advice. My goal is to empower you with information. I will not take a position on whether you should or should not get vaccinated. Please make this decision yourself, consulting sources you trust, including a caring health care professional. SOURCE: https://chrismasterjohnphd.substack.com/p/balancing-vitamin-c-and-glutathione?s=r

In late Ma, the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) edited their Monkeypox page to alter the narrative in a few key ways. Firstly, they removed a paragraph from the “How do you get Monkeypox?” section. Up until a few days ago, according to archived links, the Monkeypox page said this, regarding person-to-person tranmission [emphasis added]: It’s very uncommon to get monkeypox from a person with the infection because it does not spread easily between people. …this has now been totally removed. Secondly, they’ve removed this paragraph, which was present up until at least November of 2021 (and maybe much more recently, there are no archives between November and May) [emphasis added]: [Monkeypox] is usually a mild illness that will get better on its own without treatment. Some people can develop more serious symptoms, so patients with monkeypox in the UK are cared for in specialist hospitals. The new “treatment” paragraph reads [again, emphasis added]… Treatment for monkeypox aims to relieve symptoms. The illness is usually mild and most people recover in 2 to 4 weeks […] You may need to stay in a specialist hospital, so your symptoms can be treated and to prevent the infection spreading to other people. So, they remove that it will “get better on its own”, and again reinforce the idea of spreading the disease despite this being described as “very uncommon” as recently as last week. They even add a line about self-isolating, which was never mentioned before: as monkeypox can spread if there is close contact, you will need to be isolated if you’re diagnosed with it. Finally, they now include a warning you can get Monkeypox by eating undercooked meat, which will doubtless feed into the anti-meat narrative too (oh, wait, it already is). To sum up, history is being re-written a little here. Before, monkeypox “did not spread easily between people”. Now it does. Before, monkeypox would “get better on its own without treatment”. Now it won’t. It’s early days to say that Monkeypox is going to be the “new Covid”, and maybe this rollout will stall and be forgotten in a couple of weeks, but there’s no doubt they are taking some tips from the Covid playbook so far. CHECK THE INTERNET ARCHIVE HERE: https://web.archive.org/web/20220507132152/https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/monkeypox/ https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/24/the-nhs-just-edited-their-monkeypox-page-to-make-it-scarier/?

By Enrico Trigoso John Pierce Law has filed a lawsuit against Atlas Air, on behalf of US Freedom Flyers (USFF) and Atlas employees, and plans to sue all major airlines, 18 altogether, plus the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT), contending that the vaccine mandates imposed by these agencies on the airlines’ employees infringed on their constitutional, religious, and medical liberties. The lawsuit against Atlas Air was filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida, with over 100 plaintiffs pursuing litigation. “Fundamentally, this case is about whether Americans should be required to choose between their livelihoods and being coerced into taking an experimental, dangerous medical treatment,” reads the lawsuit (pdf). Plaintiffs are mostly unvaccinated pilots, flight attendants, as well as other Atlas staff. “It is also about the safety of America’s airline industry. Should pilots—under federal regulation required to be among the healthiest workers in the United States—who have taken an experimental ‘vaccine’ that is now shown to have potentially deadly, long-term side effects, be allowed to fly massive aircraft in our skies? While those who have (smartly) refrained from such a course be forced out of their jobs?” it states. Atlas Air is one of the industry’s largest cargo carrier companies and the world’s largest operator of the Boeing 747 aircraft. The law firm was founded by Att. John Pierce, who founded the National Constitutional Law Union. He previously represented George Papadopoulos in connection with the 2016 “Russia Hoax,” reaching a dismissal of the DNC’s case and helping secure a presidential pardon. He is also currently representing defendants being charged in connection to the Jan. 6 Capitol breach. “So the complaint has been filed. We’re in the process of serving everyone. And then, we’ll likely be looking for some kind of injunctive relief here soon to make sure that all the COVID-related mandates stop immediately. And then we’ll proceed [with] litigation, motion, practice, and discovery and then onward to trial eventually,” Pierce told The Epoch Times. This week, John Pierce Law plans to file another lawsuit against United Airlines. “We’ll be hitting basically all of them in sequence, and then we’ll be going after the FAA as well. We’re gonna get these vaccine mandate type of rules and COVID restrictions ruled unconstitutional. And we’re gonna get findings that there was discrimination under Title Seven. We’re gonna get punitive damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress and things like that,” Pierce said. “It’s going to require a big fix, ultimately. And that’s probably going to require legislation and kind of getting all the stakeholders at the table, but the first step is civil litigation.” Airlines, which are government contractors, are affected by President Joe Biden’s order from September of last year that states all employees of those companies have to be vaccinated against the Chinese Communist Party virus. Pierce said that as soon as he heard about the airline mandates he predicted that it would be the next big wave of litigations. “[These lawsuits are] absolutely crucial. It’s a very, very red line—If you get to the point where you have to choose between getting an experimental drug shot in your arm and your paycheck, that’s just unAmerican, it’s unconstitutional, it’s outrageous, it’s sickening.” “If that’s not the hill to die on when it comes to liberty, that’s about as close as I can imagine it,” Pierce said. Josh Yoder, a major airline pilot and a spokesperson for Freedom Flyers who recently supported the trucker-led “The People’s Convoy,” says that there has been harassment, threats, intimidation, vaccine injuries, and even “suicides that have come out of these mandates.” “We’re not doing class action. We’re doing individual litigants. And the reason we’re doing it that way is because so many people have been harmed and people have experienced different levels of harm. We have the unvaccinated who have been harassed, threatened, and intimidated into getting vaccinated. Then we have many people as well who got vaccinated against their will, who were coerced and forced into doing it under threat of losing their employment,” Yoder said. “And then, in addition, we have the vaccine-injured, and the numbers of vaccine-injured are growing by the day,” Yoder went on, “It’s just incredible what’s happening with pilots.” Pilots have to maintain a flight physical in order to maintain their licenses. The Epoch Times recently reported that a pilot for American Airlines, one of the top 3 largest airlines in the country, suffered a cardiac arrest between two flights, about 6 minutes after landing. “And so what we’re seeing is many pilots are experiencing health conditions. Specifically, cardiac issues [are] what we’re seeing a lot of. And many of these pilots are afraid to come forward because if they come forward they lose their flight physical, they lose their flight medical. So they’re continuing to fly. We have a lot of pilots that are flying with chest pain and neurological conditions, because if they come forward they lose their careers,” Yoder said. Freedom Flyers is now acting as an advocacy group between the pilots, the FAA, and the companies in order to assist them in coming forward and speaking out on their conditions. “We have a massive team of medical professionals who are helping these people, but we’re asking everyone to come forward. While it’s absolutely devastating to their careers, we need them to come forward because this is the safety of the American public that we’re talking about,” Yoder said. According to a group of attorneys, doctors, and other experts—and a pilot who says his career ended due to adverse reactions from a vaccine—the FAA has been breaking its own rule that states pilots should not fly after having taken medications that have been approved for less than a year, The Epoch Times reported in December. source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/18-major-airlines-faa-and-dot-to-be-sued-over-covid-vaccine-mandates_4484295.html? Enrico Trigoso REPORTER Follow Enrico Trigoso is an Epoch Times reporter focusing on the NYC area.

2,200 famous Spanish personalities have been caught buying false C19 vaccination certificates. The more known they were, the more they were charged. The names of the rich and famous include the president of one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in Spain Why would the president of large pharma company choose not to take a 'safe and effective' C19 vaccine? The “Jenner Operation” has uncovered at least 2,200 famous people with false Covid-19 vaccination certificates after these were bought from a nurse. Amongst those that have been investigated are leading singers, musicians, football stars, business people, politicians and top medical personnel. The scandal involved people being added to the National Immunisation Registry in exchange for money, with many of them familiar faces and household names. The latest of these to be charged is the President of PharmaMar José María Fernández Sousa-Faro, an IBEX 35 company, and one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in Spain. The company is dedicated to researching drugs including cancer, Alzheimer’s and yes... Covid-19. José María Fernández Sousa Faro The 76-year-old businessman, who has not yet been summoned to testify, was included in the lists to reflect that he had received the third dose. The leader of the network was a nursing assistant at the La Paz University Hospital, where he is accused of charging more than €200,000 euros for fraudulently registering 2,200 people as vaccinated in the National Registry against Covid-19. He has been arrested and is currently in custody.... Among those accused are Bruno González Cabrera, a defender who played for Betis, Getafe, Levante and Valladolid. Fabio Díez Steinaker in beach volleyball, runner-up in Europe and fifth in the Sydney Olympic Games. The former Valencian boxer and wrestler José Luis Zapater, alias Titín, who starred in more than a thousand fights. The famous people investigated so far includes: José María Fernández Sousa-Faro, President of Pharma Mar Trinitario Casanova, one of the richest men in Spain Kidd Keo, trap singer in English and Spanish Anier, rap singer Jarfaiter, rap singer Veronica Echegui, actress Bruno Gonzalez Cabrera, soccer player Fabio Díez Steinaker, former beach volleyball Olympian José Luis Zapater, alias Titín, former boxer Camilo Esquivel, recognised and prestigious doctor. According to the police who are investigating the 2,200 over false Covid-19 vaccination certificates, the fee was dependent on your social standing. The more important you were, the higher the price. SOURCE: https://euroweeklynews.com/2022/05/24/2200-prominent-spanish-personalties-investigated-for-false-covid-19-vaccination/ José María Fernández Sousa Faro Fernández-Sousa is Professor of Biochemistry and founded PharmaMar in 1986. He has been in the pharmaceutical industry for over 35 years and was a member of the boards of directors of Antibiotics, Penibérica, Pescanova and Cooper-Zeltia, among other companies. The company he chairs, PharmaMar, is one of the leading Spanish pharmaceutical companies and emerged from the absorption of Zeltia in 2015. In 2021 it made a profit of 92.82 million, and in the first quarter of this year it earn 22 million euros, according to its own data. PharmaMar is listed on the Ibex 35 and is dedicated to researching drugs obtained from marine resources to fight different types of cancer and Alzheimer's. On its website, the company is defined as "a company focused on oncology and committed to research and development that is inspired by the sea for the discovery of molecules with antitumor activity. "Among other drugs, PharmaMar markets Aplidin for patients with multiple myeloma. This drug is now being tested, in the testing phase and pending authorization from the Ministry of Health, to treat precisely covid patients. Last March, the president of PharmaMar said in an interview with El Español that he had suffered from coronavirus and had been treated with his company's drug "with positive results".

WIRELESS RADIATION AND OSTEOPOROSIS Arthur has done it again. After suffering a fracture himself he did a deep dive discovering research that bones are breaking at an unprecedented rate, By Arthur Firstenberg I was astonished by the number of people who contacted me after I broke my arm telling me they had broken theirs too -- some of them this year, and others within the last few years. It occurred to me to wonder: has there been a significant increase in osteoporosis and bone fractures around the world? and if so, is this yet another health effect caused by the use of cell phones and their infrastructure irradiating our bones as well as the rest of our bodies? I remembered reading some fascinating facts about bones in the groundbreaking 1985 book, The Body Electric, written by orthopedic surgeon Robert O. Becker. Bones, he discovered, are semiconductors, and they owe their electrical properties to being doped with tiny amounts of copper. The atoms of copper, he found, bond electrically to both apatite crystals and collagen fibers -- the two main components of bone -- and hold them together, “much as wooden pegs fastened the pieces of antique furniture to each other.” “Osteoporosis,” wrote Becker, “comes about when copper is somehow removed from the bones. This might occur not only through chemical/metabolic processes, but by a change in the electromagnetic binding force, allowing the pegs to ‘fall out.’ It’s possible that this could result from a change in the overall electrical fields throughout the body or from a change in those surrounding the body in the environment.” I also remembered, from the old Soviet Union literature, summarized in my 1997 book, Microwaving Our Planet, that radio frequency radiation redistributes metals throughout the body. With these facts in mind, I have searched the world’s medical literature for studies on the incidence of both osteoporosis and fractures, and the evidence seems fairly conclusive: (1) There has been an enormous increase in the incidence of both osteoporosis and bone fractures of all types throughout the world in children and adults since about 1950; (2) the incidences of both continue to rise, worldwide; (3) most studies published in the past couple of decades have found that osteoporosis in children is correlated with the amount of time spent daily looking at screens; (4) rates of osteoporosis do not correlate with the amount of time children spend sitting but not looking at screens; and (5) these trends are independent of the amount of exercise people get. The authors of these studies have been at a loss to explain their findings, but they are easily explained when one remembers the electrical properties of bones, and the effects that cell phone and computer screens, all emitting radiation, are likely to have on bones and on the copper atoms within them -- and that exposure to radiation from radio, TV, radar, and (more recently) cell tower antennas has increased tremendously since World War II. Here is a sampling of the studies I have collected: Louis V. Avioli reviewed the world’s literature in 1991. During the second half of the twentieth century, he found, both osteoporosis and fracture rates had risen dramatically in the United States, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Spain, Italy, the UK, Belgium, Australia, and elsewhere. The incidence rate of hip fractures in the United States had been increasing by about 40% per decade. (1) M.L. Grundill and M.C. Burger, in 2021, found that the incidence rate of hip fractures in a population in South Africa had more than doubled in men and almost sextupled in women compared to what had been reported in 1968. (2) Emmanuel K. Dretakis et al. found that the annual number of hip fractures in Crete increased 21% in just four years, from 1982 to 1986, while the population over 50 remained the same. (3) Hiroshi Koga et al. examined the records of children aged 6 to 14 in Niigata, Japan. The incidence rate of all fractures more than doubled from the early 1980s to the early 2000s in both girls and boys, and almost tripled in girls in junior high school. (4) ​ P. Lüthje et al. found that the incidence rate of hip fractures throughout Finland quadrupled between 1968 and 1988. (5) ​ In 2012 Ambrish Mithal and Parjeet Kaur found that hip fracture rates had increased two- to three-fold throughout Asia during the previous 30 years. (6) ​ Hiroshi Hagino et al. found that hip fracture rates in Tottori Prefecture, Japan had risen by almost 40% between 1986 and 1992, and by more than 60% in men and about 50% in women between 1986 and 2001. Increases in fracture rates occurred not only in the elderly, but in people in their 30s and 40s. (7) ​ In 1989 Karl J. Obrant et al. did an analysis of fracture trends in Malmö, Sweden, where all X-rays have been saved since the beginning of the twentieth century. They found that the yearly number of fractures in that city had increased seven-fold between 1951 and 1985, and the incidence rate of fractures among children had doubled between 1950 and 1979. “There are signs that there is a deterioration of the quality of the skeleton in successive generations,” wrote the authors. “With the same or even diminished trauma, we sustain more serious and more comminuted fractures today than previously.” The increase had nothing to do with changing estrogen levels, because fracture rates had increased even more in men than in women. The daily consumption of both calcium and Vitamin D had increased during that time. But the incidence of hip fractures was higher in cities than in rural environments where, we know, there was less radiation. (8) Haiyu Shao et al., in 2015, looking at hours per day spent playing video games by Chinese adolescents, found that adolescents with longer video game time were more likely to have lower bone mass density in their legs, trunk, pelvis, spine, and whole body. (9) Anne Winther et al., studying 15- to 18-year-olds in Tromsø, Norway in 2010-2011, found that longer screen time was associated with lower bone mass density in both boys and girls, regardless of the amount of daily physical activity, calcium intake, vitamin D, alcohol consumption, smoking habits, height or weight. (10) Sebastien Chastin, examining youths aged 8 to 22 in the U.S. in 2005-2006, found that screen-based sitting was associated with lower bone mass density in hips and spine. Non-screen-based sitting was not associated with lower bone mass density. (11) Natalie Lundin et al. found that annual incidence rates of pelvic and hip socket fractures in Sweden increased 25% from 2001 to 2016, and that increasing incidence rates were seen in all age groups. (12) Daniel Jerrhag et al. found that the incidence rate of forearm fractures in Sweden was 23% higher in 2010 compared with 1999, and that the increase was greater in men and women 17 to 64 years of age than in the elderly. (13) Michiel Herteleer et al. found that the incidence rate of pelvic and hip socket fractures in Belgium doubled between 1988 and 2006, and rose another 26% by 2018. (14) Neeraj M. Patel found that the annual incidence rate of fractures in children aged 6 to 18 in New York State almost quadrupled between 2006 and 2015. (15) A reader alerted me to research proving that electromagnetic radiation causes osteoporosis. A 2016 study in Turkey by Kunt et al. found that electrical workers had significantly lower bone mass density, as well as an increased tendency to severe osteoporosis, than a control population. The average age of both groups was 38. Sieroń-Stołtny et al., in an astounding experiment in Poland, kept 10 young rats in a plastic cage for 28 days and put one Nokia 5110 mobile phone underneath the cage. The phone operated in silent mode and was only turned on for 15 seconds every half hour between 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. and again between 2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. In other words, the animals were exposed for a total of four minutes per day for 28 days. Ten control animals were in an identical cage but without a mobile phone beneath it. At the end of the experiment, the rats were sacrificed and examined. The vertebrae of the exposed rats weighed on average 12.5% less than the vertebrae of the unexposed rats. The leg bones of the exposed rats had on average 12.44% less calcium and fractured more easily. Most of the calcium loss occurred during the first week of exposure. Blood analysis also indicated that collagen was lost from the bones. In 2013, Ahmet Aslan et al., in Turkey, exposed 30 five-month-old rats, whose legs had been broken, to mobile phone radiation for 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks. At the end of 8 weeks, healing was significantly delayed in the exposed compared to the unexposed rats. In 2011, Fernando Saraví, in Argentina, found that carrying a mobile phone on your hip causes osteopenia in that hip. Men who carried their phone on their right hip had lower bone mass density in their right hip than in their left hip. Men who carried their phone on their left hip had lower bone mass density in their left hip. And from readers: Marie-Reine, in Québec, broke her left humerus in three pieces on April 2. A friend of hers in Nova Scotia broke her humerus in March. Jackie, in Wisconsin, writes that she developed osteoporosis after she moved into a house with radio towers outside her bedroom window. Leonore, in Massachusetts, writes: “A friend who never broke a bone in his life, recently broke his femur when he tripped playing basketball.” Sara, age 55, wonders why she suddenly became susceptible to breaking bones in 2018. She broke a bone in her right foot that year, and then in 2021 she broke a bone in her left foot. “The thing that was so odd about both of these incidents is that I did almost nothing to provoke it. In one case I was trying to keep my sandal from getting sucked off my foot by the current during a rafting trip. All I was doing was flexing my foot. The second time I just tripped while inside my house, walking on a flat surface and I ended up with a fracture.” Denise, age 66, broke her hip on April 19. Her father and mother, in their eighties, both broke hips several years ago, and this March her mother broke her other hip. Marilyn, in California, writes that “Despite a strong exercise history and a strong healthy diet, I have been plagued with two broken hips (femur necks) and a fractured shoulder” since “a cluster of cell towers were installed 100 feet from my bedroom.” WIFI ROUTERS AND MICROWAVE OVENS Don, in Idaho, writes: “This year we relocated our seedlings next to the router in our pantry for convenience. We have experienced an across-the-board failure with them. Skinny plants, some of them dead. This includes tomato seedlings. Your email really struck a chord with me. Thank you!” Carolyn, in France, writes: “This is the first time I have ever heard anyone else say that they had stomach pain from eating restaurant food that had been microwaved! I have realized the same thing -- that foods that I normally eat with no problem, cause me stomach pain, often severe when I eat it in a restaurant in which it has most likely been cooked or reheated in a microwave. I can usually sense it with the first bite I take as well -- it just doesn’t feel right… I have to be so careful about ordering things that will be definitely cooked fresh, and request that nothing be heated in a microwave. Sometimes I forget though, and then I pay for it.” Read Arthurs ground breaking book INVISIBLE RAINBOW Here is a brief book summary https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/invisible-rainbow The last 39 newsletters, including this one, are available for viewing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force. Some of the newsletters are also available there in German, Spanish, Italian, French, Norwegian, and Dutch. References (1) Louis V. Avioli, “Significance of osteoporosis: A growing international health problem,” Calcified Tissue International 49:S5-S7 (1991) (2) M.L. Grundill and M.C. Burger, “The incidence of fragility hip fractures in a subpopulation of South Africa,” South African Medical Journal 111(9):896-902 (3) Emmanuel K. Dretakis et al., “Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Crete,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 63(2):150-151 (1992) (4) Hiroshi Koga et al., “Increasing incidence of fracture and its sex difference in school children: 20 year longitudinal study based on school health statistic in Japan,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 23(1):151-155 (2018) (5) P. Lüthje et al., “Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Finland,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 112:280-282 (1993) (6) Ambrish Mithal and Parjeet Kaur, “Osteoporosis in Asia: A call to action,” Current Osteoporosis Reports 10:245-247 (2012) (7) Hiroshi Hagino et al., “Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Tottori Prefecture, Japan: Trend from 1986 to 2001,” Osteoporosis International 16:1963-1968 (2005) (8) Karl J. Obrant et al., “Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures,” Calcified Tissue International 44:157-167 (1989) (9) Haiyu Shao et al., “Association between duration of playing video games and bone mineral density in Chinese adolescents,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry 18(2):198-202 (2015) (10) Ann Winther et al., “Leisure time computer use and adolescent bone health -- findings from the Tromsø Study, Fit Futures: a cross-sectional study,” BMJ Open 5:e006665 (2015) (11) Gadi Lissak, “Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: Literature review and case study,” Environmental Research164:149-157 (2018) (12) Sebastian FM Chastin et al., “The frequency of osteogenic activities and the pattern of intermittence between periods of physical activity and sedentary behaviour affects bone mineral content: the cross-sectional NHANES study,” BMC Public Health 14:4 (2014) (13) Natalie Lundin et al., “Increasing incidence of pelvic and acetabular fractures. A nationwide study of 87,308 fractures over a 16-year period in Sweden,” Injury 52:1410-1417 (2021) (14) Daniel Jerrhag et al., “Epidemiology and time trends of distal forearm fractures in adults -- a study of 11.2 million person-years in Sweden,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders18, Article number 240 (2017) (15) Michiel Herteleer et al., “Epidemiology and secular trends of pelvic fractures in Belgium: A retrospective, population-based, nationwide observational study,” Bone153:116141 (2021)

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explains Pfizer's new tech to the Davos crowd gathering in Switzerland 22-26 May 2022 "Ingestible pills" A pill with a tiny chip that sends a wireless signal to relevant authorities when the pharmaceutical has been digested. "Imagine the compliance," he says. Understanding that this is a goal - that 'compliance' is the motive - will help us understand the true intentions of what we are witnessing with the C19 v-campaigns. Watch more here: https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2022 To follow the story of the real motives, join Not On The Beeb for the real news Www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/join

SPECIAL REPORT FOCUS - ADVERSE VACCINE IMPACTS AFFECTING TOUCH TOUCH RELATED REACTIONS = MANY 100,000s Some people may have reported more than one type of reaction per report. Our ability to offer and receive touch is fundamental to our experience of being human, to show care and attention, and experience the world. When our sense of touch is disturbed there can be immense impacts on our relationships, communication abilities, mental health, intimate connections, our ability to work, as well as a vast spectrum of influences on our daily activities and life choices. Below represents TOUCH RELATED ADVERSE EFFECTS experienced, not exhaustively listed. Lip Swelling, Ulceration, Oedema & Pain - 996 (Pfizer) + 1108 (AZ) + 237 (Moderna) = 2341 Peripheral Swelling (arms, legs, fingers, toes) - 4459 (Pfizer) + 6078 (AZ) + 2223(Moderna) = 12,760 Dyskinesia & Movement Disorders - 397 (Pfizer) + 612 (AZ) + 72 (Moderna) = 1081 Mononeuropathies incl. Carpal Tunnel & Nerve Compression - 117 (Pfizer) + 157 (AZ) + 13 (Moderna) = 287 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 9327 (Pfizer) + 17,794 (AZ) + 1855 (Moderna) = 28,976 Paralysis - 519 (Pfizer) + 896 (AZ) + 114 (Moderna) = 1529 Peripheral Neuropathies - 214 (Pfizer) + 391 (AZ) + 26 (Moderna) = 631 Sensory Abnormalities - 3597 (Pfizer) + 6383 (AZ) + 659 (Moderna) = 10,639 Tremor - 2206 (Pfizer) + 9963 (AZ) + 711 (Moderna) = 12,880 Hyperhidrosis, Cold Sweats & Night Sweats - 4589 (Pfizer) + 13,000 (AZ) + 1608 (Moderna) = 19,197 Dermatitis & Eczema - 1264 (Pfizer) + 1294 (AZ) + 338 (Moderna) = 2896 Pruritus (stinging, burning & tickling) - 6469 (Pfizer) = 8457 (AZ) + 2573 (Moderna) = 17,499 Psoriatic Conditions - 301 (Pfizer) + 328 (AZ) + 39 (Moderna) = 668 Rashes - 10,916 (Pfizer) + 15,231 (AZ) + 5102 (Moderna) = 31,249 Urticaria (hives) - 2466 (Pfizer) + 2786 (AZ) + 760 (Moderna) = 6012 In addition, several 10,000s of touch related adverse effect types that could significantly impact quality of life including infections, pain, skin conditions, vaccine site injury, muscles and tissue disorders, fatigue conditions and reproductive health. How many adults and children in the UK are experiencing disturbances in their daily lives and their ability to connect with others through TOUCH due to vaccine adverse events? For full reports including 353 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

A breathtaking investigation in the buying of ballots in the world's number one democracy. Here is a clip. IMDB: 2000 MULES: Documentary on the alleged criminal voter fraud and ballot stuffing during the 2020 USA presidential election, which may have changed the legitimate outcome. 2000 MULES is a documentary by Christian, conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza. The movie shows that at least 2000 people were caught red-handed in stuffing standalone ballot drop boxes in swing states during the 2020 presidential election, an illegal practice called ballot harvesting. The movie uses tons of video evidence and GPS data to show that this ballot stuffing augmented Joe Biden’s vote totals in 2020. The Democrat Party’s support for this fraudulent system were aided by about $590 million from Democrat supporters like Marc Zuckerberg, George Soros, Warren Buffet, and others. 2000 MULES is a shocking, disturbing exposé of a Democrat, leftist campaign to get Joe Biden illegitimately elected as President. At the very least, it shows that a full investigation of the ballot trafficking mules, including the sources of their illegal ballots, should occur. 2000 MULES also makes an excellent case for the end of early voting, mail-in ballots and drop-boxes, which mostly have been supported by Democrat Party leaders. It also makes a strong case for a nationwide Voter ID law, which can be geared to people’s driver licenses and state identifications. YOU TUBE You tube banned the film which very clearly shows YouTube's interest. Watch and make up your own mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=B6P7uH7Geo4 BUY THE FILM HERE BUY THE BOOK Watch the film online here https://dinesh.locals.com/post/2083099/2000-mules This is a pirated version on Telegram. If you watch it, please donate to the filmmakers See the full film here: https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb/5319

This is Not On The Beeb's 60th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. (Data published 13th May 2022) FATALITIES There are now 2,132 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 80.8m AZ 49.06 m (down!?) Moderna 12.5m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 142,390,214 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 170,337 AZ 245,089 Moderna 38,197 Unknown 1672 TOTAL = 455,295 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 763 AZ 1272 Moderna 53 Unknown 44 TOTAL = 2132 Blood Disorders - 17,097 (Pfizer) + 7850 (AZ) + 2522 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 27,532 Anaphylaxis - 662 (Pfizer) + 884 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1642 Acute Cardiac - 13,266 (Pfizer) + 11,433 (AZ) + 3356 (Moderna) + 112 (Unknown) = 28,167 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1324 (Pfizer) + 448 (AZ) + 350 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2130 Eye Disorders - 8084 (Pfizer) + 14,962 (AZ) + 1569 (Moderna) + 89 (Unknown) = 24,704 Blindness - 166 (Pfizer) + 325 (AZ) + 39 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 534 Deafness - 306 (Pfizer) + 432 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 797 Infections - 12,462 (Pfizer) + 20,439 (AZ) + 2415 (Moderna) + 183 (Unknown) = 35,499 Herpes - 2238 (Pfizer) + 2700 (AZ) + 258 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5223 Nasopharyngitis - 1186 (Pfizer) + 1948 (AZ) + 322 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 3467 Spontaneous Abortions - 490 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 235 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 68 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 799 miscarriages Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,582 (Pfizer) + 81,065 (AZ) + 11,102 (Moderna) + 410 (Unknown) = 135,159 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,862 (Pfizer) + 45,575 (AZ) + 6672 (Moderna) + 214 (Unknown) = 73,323 Immune System Disorders - 2520 (Pfizer) + 3441 (AZ) + 637 (Moderna) + 36 (Unknown) = 6634 Nervous System Disorders - 81,422 (Pfizer) + 183,026 (AZ) + 20,569 (Moderna) + 897 (Unknown) = 285,914 Bell’s Palsy - 646 (Pfizer) + 639 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1391 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 803 (Pfizer) + 2369 (AZ) + 64 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) = 3252 Paralysis - 519 (Pfizer) + 896 (AZ) + 114 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1540 Seizures - 1135 (Pfizer) + 2083 (AZ) + 275 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3514 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 9327 (Pfizer) + 17,794 (AZ) + 1855 (Moderna) + 103 (Unknown) = 29,079 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,270 (Pfizer) + 18,466 (AZ) + 2550 (Moderna) + 121 (Unknown) = 31,407 Respiratory Disorders - 21,919 (Pfizer) + 29,894 (AZ) + 4392 (Moderna) + 227 (Unknown) = 56,432 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1101 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 201 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3616 Headaches & Migraines - 35,843 (Pfizer) + 94,040 (AZ) + 9681 (Moderna) + 347 (Unknown) = 139,911 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1424 (Pfizer) + 2776 (AZ) + 325 (Moderna) + 37 (Unknown) = 4562 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,372 (Pfizer) + 20,867 (AZ) + 5217 (Moderna) + 235 (Unknown) = 57,691 Vascular Disorders - 7607 (Pfizer) + 13,950 (AZ) + 1335 (Moderna) + 107 (Unknown) = 22,999 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4302 (Pfizer) + 7015 (AZ) + 765 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 12,124 Muscle & Tissue Disorders - 56,150 (Pfizer) + 104,623 (AZ) + 14,301 (Moderna) + 574 (Unknown) = 175,648 Skin Disorders - 34,354 (Pfizer) + 53,452 (AZ) + 13,287 (Moderna) + 364 (Unknown) = 101,457 For full reports including 353 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 3,800,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,200,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3683 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 Moderna - 2000 children (1st doses) and 1600 second doses & 3000 boosters resulting in 28 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 27 Yellow Cards Total = 3,813,600 children jabbed Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,226,900 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4,001 For full reports including 353 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

May, 2022 New Pfizer Documents Released - Part 2 Page 9 • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031111.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031111.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031113.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031113.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031149.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031149.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031186.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031186.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031197.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031197.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031207.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031207.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051047.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051047.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011093.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1001-10011093.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011100.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1001-10011100.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011135.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1001-10011135.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031038.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031038.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051054.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051054.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051069.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051069.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051214.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051214.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051293.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051293.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051347.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051347.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051387.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051387.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051411.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051411.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061020.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061020.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061040.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061040.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061052.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061052.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061094.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061094.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061098.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061098.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061176.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061176.pdf) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058316 to 0058458_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A Supp define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058316-to-0058458_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-Supp-define.xml) Page 10 • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058459 to 0058478_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A Supp define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058459-to-0058478_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-Supp-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058479 to 0058594_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058479-to-0058594_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058595 to 0058614_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058595-to-0058614_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058615 to 0058652_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S Supp define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058615-to-0058652_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-Supp-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058653 to 0058675_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S Supp define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058653-to-0058675_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-Supp-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058676 to 0058794_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 A define.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058676-to-0058794_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-A-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058795 to 0058828_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 A define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058795-to-0058828_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-A-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058829 to 0058954_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058829-to-0058954_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-S-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058955 to 0058999_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058955-to-0058999_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-S-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0065774 to 0066700_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A D addv.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0065774-to-0066700_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-addv.xpt) • FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0059000 to -0065773_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adcevd.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0059000-to-0065773_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adcevd.xpt) • FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0066701-to-0123167_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adfacevd.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0066701-to-0123167_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adfacevd.xpt) • FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0123168-to-0126026_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adva.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0123168-to-0126026_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adva.xpt) Source: Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/)

A new 'early-stage paper shows thats shedding happens with C19 vaccines. There has been much discussion on shedding. Due to personal observations, I believe it happens. Many papers show scientists have been trying to make vaccines that spread, some with the excuse that this is the way to vaccinate wild populations of animals. I have been mulling on the real reason the western Governments have pulled back on the vaccine drive. We know they want 100% coverage. They achieved 'vaccinating' about two thirds in the UK. One reason that has crossed my mind is, had that achieved their goals? Was two thirds the critical mass they were after? Does having two in every three people jabbed, mean that the other third will also be affected by the vaccine that is more accurately described as a bioweapon against the freewill of humanity? Moreover as anyone who read the Pfizer leaked trial papers, would be forgiven for thinking that Pfizer themselves expected shedding. This is a little reminder from that paper. 8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if: A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention (trial participant) by inhalation or skin contact. Are the findings in the paper below devalued by the paper not being peer reviewed? 2022 is the time of man where we have no time to wait for the authority of 'experts' to catch up and tick boxes. We need peer review, and more importantly replication of these results, however whilst the lumbering monster of official proof stumbles forwards, trying to dodge all industry attempts to derail it - it would be advisable for everyone to take heed and keep healthy. Time to: Power up the immune system. Detoxify. Become immune to fear Destress the mind and body Smile, dance and be happy There are some useful tips and products here. THE PAPER Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity (This paper has not been per reviewed) Authors Ross M. Kedl, PhD*, Elena Hsieh, MD, Thomas E. Morrison, PhD, Gabriela Samayoa-Reyes, PhD, Siobhan Flaherty, PhD, Conner L. Jackson, PhD and Rosemary Rochford, PhD. Abstract. Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated. The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non- immune hosts. Introduction The vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have maintained remarkable efficacy against severe disease and death in those vaccinated regardless of variant emergence, Omicron included 1 . Less appreciated than the systemic immunity generated by the vaccines are the high levels of antibody (IgG and IgA) found within the nasal cavity and saliva of vaccinees. This outcome is found in both humans and primates, and in response to both mRNA and protein-based vaccines 2,3. Respiratory transmission of viral infection is proof that oral/nasal cavity constituents can be communicated through aerosols and/or respiratory droplets. As such, it would stand to reason that antibody present within the oral/nasal environment may also be aerosolized to some degree. Methods A Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay (MMIA) was constructed and performed as previously described 4. Under IRB # 20-1279, serum samples were obtained from first-responder adults in Arapahoe County, CO 5. Antibody was eluted 4 from punches taken from the center of surgical masks anonymously donated by laboratory workers. Nasal swabs were obtained by convenience sampling both parents and their children at the Colorado Tricountry vaccine center in Aurora, CO who were attending vaccine appointments, not limited to SARS-CoV2. Antibody from swab tips was eluted as described for DBS 4. The log transformed IgA and IgG values from the children’s samples were modeled using linear regression with a single binary covariate corresponding to high or low antibody levels from their parent. Residual plots were used to check violations of linear regression assumptions and a Wilcoxon rank sum test was conducted if assumptions were violated. A linear mixed effects model was evaluated to assure that the correlation within household did not significantly contribute to the data or alter the conclusions drawn from the fixed effect linear regression model. Cytometry was performed using a Beckman Coulter Cytoflex cytometer and analyzed using FloJo v.10 software (Treestar, Inc.). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 4.0.2). Results The extended mandates for mask wearing in both social and work environments provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the possibility of aerosolized antibody expiration from vaccinated individuals. Utilizing a flow cytometry-based Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay (MMIA) to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (Fig 1A and B) 4,5 and a method previously used to elute antibody from rehydrated dried blood spots (DBS), we identified anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies eluted from surgical face masks worn by vaccinated lab members donated at the end of one workday. Consistent with the results reported by others, we identified both IgG and IgA in saliva from vaccinated individuals (Fig 1C and D). It was therefore not surprising to detect both IgG and IgA following elution of antibody from face masks (Fig 1C and D). Given these observations, we hypothesized that droplet/aerosolized antibody transfer might occur between individuals, much like droplet/aerosolized virus particles can be exchanged by the same route. To evaluate this hypothesis, we obtained nasal swabs from children living in households in which parents or family members had varying degrees of SARS-CoV2-specifc immunity, including those unvaccinated, vaccinated and COVID-19+. Initial comparison of nasal swabs acquired from children living in vaccinated households revealed readily detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG (Fig 1E), especially when compared to the complete deficit of SARSCoV-2-specific antibody detected in the few nasal swabs we obtained from children in nonvaccinated households. We then used the variation in parents’ levels of intranasal IgG as the basis of stratification across all children’s samples. Log transformation of the data from thirty four adult-child pairs established antibody cut-offs for high vs low parental intranasal antibody levels. Evaluation of samples in this fashion revealed that high intranasal IgG in vaccinated parents was significantly associated (p-value = 0.01) with a 0.38 increase in the log transformed intranasal IgG gMFIs within a child from the same household (Fig 1F). This significant positive relationship was observed using either parametric or non-parametric analysis, and adjustments for the correlation within household did not alter the conclusion. Though not statistically significant, a similar trend of elevated IgA was found in the same samples. SOURCE: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full-text ↵Garcia-Beltran, W. F., St Denis, K. J., Hoelzemer, A., Lam, E. C., Nitido, A. D. et al. mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine boosters induce neutralizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Cell 185, 457–466 e454, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.033 (2022). CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar ↵Corbett, K. S., Nason, M. C., Flach, B., Gagne, M., O’Connell, S. et al. Immune correlates of protection by mRNA-1273 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in nonhuman primates. Science 373, eabj0299, doi:10.1126/science.abj0299 (2021). AbstractGoogle Scholar ↵Nahass, G. R., Salomon-Shulman, R. E., Blacker, G., Haider, K., Brotherton, R. et al. Intramuscular SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicit varying degrees of plasma and salivary antibody responses as compared to natural infection. medRxiv, 2021.2008.2022.21262168, doi:10.1101/2021.08.22.21262168 (2021). Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵Schultz, J. S., McCarthy, M. K., Rester, C., Sabourin, K. R., Annen, K. et al. Development and Validation of a Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay Using Dried Blood Spots for SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence: Application in First Responders in Colorado, USA. J Clin Microbiol 59, doi:10.1128/JCM.00290-21 (2021). Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵Sabourin, K. R., Schultz, J., Romero, J., Lamb, M. M., Larremore, D. et al. Risk Factors of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Arapahoe County First Responders-The COVID-19 Arapahoe SErosurveillance Study (CASES) Project. J Occup Environ Med 63, 191–198, doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002099 (2021). CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar ↵Hayek, S., Shaham, G., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Kepten, E., Dagan, N. et al. Indirect protection of children from SARS-CoV-2 infection through parental vaccination. Science, eabm3087, doi:10.1126/science.abm3087 (2022). CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This is Not On The Beeb's 59th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. (Data published 28th Apr 2022) FATALITIES There are now 2,096 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.8 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.2 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 169,660 AZ 244,908 Moderna 37,478 Unknown 1,634 TOTAL = 453,680 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 747 AZ 1263 Moderna 45 Unknown 41 TOTAL = 2087 Blood Disorders - 17,065 (Pfizer) + 7844 (AZ) + 2497 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 27,469 Anaphylaxis - 658 (Pfizer) + 883 (AZ) + 88 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1632 Acute Cardiac - 13,156 (Pfizer) + 11,403 (AZ) + 3273 (Moderna) + 108 (Unknown) = 27,940 Eye Disorders - 8043 (Pfizer) + 14,932 (AZ) + 1541 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 24,602 Blindness - 165 (Pfizer) + 324 (AZ) + 36 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 529 Deafness - 305 (Pfizer) + 430 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 794 Hepatic (liver) Disorders - 263(Pfizer) + 528 (AZ) + 44 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 840 Infections - 12,355 (Pfizer) + 20,385 (AZ) + 2354 (Moderna) + 174 (Unknown) = 35,268 Spontaneous Abortions - 489 + 1 premature baby death / 1 foetal growth restriction death + 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 235 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 67 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 797 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 81,077 (Pfizer) + 182,884 (AZ) + 20,145 (Moderna) + 878 (Unknown) = 284,984 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 790 (Pfizer) + 2366 (AZ) + 58 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) = 3230 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,421 (Pfizer) + 81,032 (AZ) + 10,878 (Moderna) + 395 (Unknown) = 134,726 Immune System Disorders - 2445 (Pfizer) + 3323 (AZ) + 609 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 6401 Seizures - 1119 (Pfizer) + 2081 (AZ) + 268 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 3487 Paralysis - 515 (Pfizer) + 892 (AZ) + 107 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1525 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1314 (Pfizer) + 447 (AZ) + 334 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 2112 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,226 (Pfizer) + 18,451 (AZ) + 2495 (Moderna) + 118 (Unknown) = 31,290 Respiratory Disorders - 21,807 (Pfizer) + 29,859 (AZ) + 4285 (Moderna) + 216 (Unknown) = 56,167 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1096 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 199 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3609 Metabolic Disorders - 2762 (Pfizer) + 8965 (AZ) + 710 (Moderna) + 61 (Unknown) = 12,498 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,794 (Pfizer) + 45,565 (AZ) + 6552 (Moderna) + 206 (Unknown) = 73,117 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 102 (Pfizer) + 495 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 620 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,297 (Pfizer) + 20,849 (AZ) + 5194 (Moderna) + 225 (Unknown) = 57,565 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 3,600,000 children (1st doses) + 2,100,000 (2nd doses) & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3558 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) + 8,700 (2nd doses) & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 Moderna - 1900 children (1st doses) + 1600 (2nd doses) & 2800 boosters resulting in 26 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 26 Yellow Cards Total = 3,613,500 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 5,926,600 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3873 A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

SPECIAL REPORT FOCUS - ADVERSE VACCINE IMPACTS AFFECTING SMELL Olfactory Nerve Disorder (Cranial Nerve I) including anosmia, hyposmia & parosmia - 688 (Pfizer) + 799 (AZ) + 86 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1580 Olfactory Hallucinations - 15 (Pfizer) + 14 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 30 Nasal Congestion & Inflammation - 374 (Pfizer) + 518 (AZ) + 71 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 966 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1096 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 199 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3609 Intranasal Hypoaesthesia/paraesthesia - 3 (Pfizer) + 1 (AZ) = 4 Nasal Crusting & Dryness - 38 (Pfizer) + 77 (AZ) + 4 (Moderna) = 119 Nasal Odour - 7 (Pfizer) + 2 (AZ) = 9 Nasal Oedema - 8 (Pfizer) + 17 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 27 Nasal Polyps & Ulcers - 4 (Pfizer) + 5 (AZ) = 9 Nasal Pruritus - 13 (Pfizer) + 12 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) = 28 Paranasal Sinus Disorders (excl infections & neoplasms) - 104 (Pfizer) + 141 (AZ) + 22 (Moderna) = 267 Nasal Discomfort & Obstruction - 14 (Pfizer) + 118 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 141 Sinus Pain - 252 (Pfizer) + 612 (AZ) + 75 (Moderna) = 939 Sneezing - 467 (Pfizer) + 532 (AZ) + 58 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 1062 Rhinitis - 56 (Pfizer) + 58 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) = 122 Nasal Herpes - 5 (Pfizer) + 16 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 22 Nasopharyngitis - 1181 (Pfizer) + 1948 (AZ) + 311 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 3451 Sinusitis - 206 (Pfizer) + 410 (AZ) + 36 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 653 Nasal Injury - 2 (Pfizer) + 2 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 5 This data is from the UK's MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 20TH APR 2022 (Data published 28th Apr 2022) Overall 1-in-117 have reported injuries to the UK's Yellow Card reporting system. Official sources admit under10% of events are reported. * TOTAL Reactions = 1,485,059 * TOTAL Reports = 453,680 people impacted * TOTAL Fatalities = 2096 For full reports including 352 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

This is Not On The Beeb's 58th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. ARE THE NUMBERS BEING MANIPULATED Of note this week, the MHRA now claim 1,500 less doses of the AZ vaccine were given to the Under 18s. This data was released last week, but were wanted to see if it was a typo that was to be corrected this week. This is a vaccine that after testing on the public, was withdrawn for use in the under 18s 200 doses were also removed from last week's Moderna stats FATALITIES There are now 2,087 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.8 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.2 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 168,927 AZ 244,667 Moderna 36,941 Unknown 1620 TOTAL = 452,155 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 746 AZ 1255 Moderna 44 Unknown 42 (which is one less than last week! It must be Easter!) TOTAL = 2087 Blood Disorders - 17,029 (Pfizer) + 7837 (AZ) + 2490 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,421 Anaphylaxis - 657 (Pfizer) + 881 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1628 Acute Cardiac - 13,054 (Pfizer) + 11,365 (AZ) + 3228 (Moderna) + 103 (Unknown) = 27,750 Eye Disorders - 8016 (Pfizer) + 14,895 (AZ) + 1519 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 24,516 Blindness - 163 (Pfizer) + 324 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 525 Deafness - 300 (Pfizer) + 428 (AZ) + 52 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 785 Infections - 12,228 (Pfizer) + 20,332 (AZ) + 2319 (Moderna) + 168 (Unknown) = 35,047 Herpes - 2217 (Pfizer) + 2694 (AZ) + 252 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5190 Spontaneous Abortions - 489 + 1 premature baby death / 1 foetal growth restriction death + 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 233 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 66 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 794 miscarriages Psychiatric Disorders - 10,179 (Pfizer) + 18,422 (AZ) + 2449 (Moderna) + 117 (Unknown) = 31,167 Skin Disorders - 33,967 (Pfizer) + 53,375 (AZ) + 13,027 (Moderna) + 355 (Unknown) = 100,724 Nervous System Disorders - 80,737 (Pfizer) + 182,740 (AZ) + 19,898 (Moderna) + 871 (Unknown) = 284,246 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 101 (Pfizer) + 493 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 617 Seizures - 1103 (Pfizer) + 2070 (AZ) + 262 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 3454 Paralysis - 511 (Pfizer) + 887 (AZ) + 105 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1514 Headaches & Migraines - 35,671 (Pfizer) + 93,975 (AZ) + 9395 (Moderna) + 338 (Unknown) = 139,379 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4229 (Pfizer) + 6953 (AZ) + 725 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 11,946 Respiratory Disorders - 21,683 (Pfizer) + 29,817 (AZ) + 4236 (Moderna) + 216 (Unknown) = 55,952 Immune System Disorders - 2437 (Pfizer) + 3316 (AZ) + 604 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 6381 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,262 (Pfizer) + 80,996 (AZ) + 10,733 (Moderna) + 394 (Unknown) = 134,385 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,195 (Pfizer) + 20,825 (AZ) + 5171 (Moderna) + 222 (Unknown) = 57,413 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,709 (Pfizer) + 45,558 (AZ) + 6464 (Moderna) + 205 (Unknown) = 72,936 For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 stat accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 30th March 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old PFIZER 3,400,000 (dose 1) 2,000,000 (dose 2) 200,000 (boosters 3424 Yellow Cards * AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8,700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 * NOTE: 1500 doses (1000 children - 1st doses) removed from last two weeks reporting * Moderna - 1900 children (1st doses) and 1400 second doses & 2500 boosters resulting in 24 Yellow cards * NOTE: 200 children (1st doses) removed from last two weeks reporting * Brand Unspecified - 24 Yellow Cards Total = 3,413,500 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 5,626,100 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3735 A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

UNITED FREE PRESS LAUNCH - A NEW ALTERNATIVE TO THE NUJ AND MAIN STREAM MEDIA The United Free Press is a voluntary and independent press standards body, run by its members and dedicated to promoting high-quality journalism and opposing state censorship and misinformation. Alongside providing a code of conduct for its members, the UFP issues Press IDs, enables networking, supports and promotes member content conducts outreach, aids new journalists to the field, promotes decentralised new-tech and combats misinformation within the industry. UNITED FREE PRESS Launch Video: https://www.unitedfreepress.org/ https://youtu.be/k3KgykO49e8 Press Standards The UFP, as its first and foremost principle, helps to maintain fundamental standards in journalism. Members and provisional members are expected to uphold the code in their practice of the profession. Where a journalist has breached the code, please contact the outlet in question first and give a reasonable amount of time to respond. If your complaint has not been resolved in a satisfactory manner, forward your complaint on to us for review. Where a journalist is found to have breached our code, they will be sanctioned. Sanctions for offending journalists may range from simple warnings to cancellation of UFP membership and press accreditation. Press ID Easily recognisable Press IDs will be produced issued to members sometime after launch. Members are generally expected to carry them whilst working, to identify them as press. Journalists 16-18 will receive junior Press IDs. The UFP will seek official recognition of these from UK Police Forces & HM Courts. Networking Networking and support of colleagues helps to enable independent journalists, many of whom may not have had any prior experience in the fields other than as a consumer. By talking and sharing tips and advice, UFP members are able to learn and grow faster than journalists acting alone. Call for Coverage Individually, many journalists can’t cover certain stories due to location, expertise, or time constraints. The UFP will, over time, develop its function to act as a central hub for tips on items to cover so that all members are able to cover as many events, topics, or stories as they can New Tech Support The UFP supports the development of new talent within both journalism and the wider media industry. As such the UFP helps to support journalism and other media (such as musicians, comedians and other groups or individuals) facing censorship in gaining a foothold on platforms which support free speech. It helps in the following ways: Decentralised Platforms Support Vital to a free press and wider media are decentralised platforms resistance to censorship. Where promising creators are moving to LBRY/Odysee (or other decentralised web3 platforms), the UFP will notify members, who can boost outlets to enable them to livestream. The guild will also help with queries about the platform and other new-tech sites. Censorship Awareness Where promising creators (journalistic or non-journalistic) have been censored and cancelled, the UFP will help to raise awareness so that their audiences can move to alternative platforms. Exclusive Content Members, where practicable, try to make exclusive content for platforms supporting free speech and help to signpost to each other’s exclusive content. Journalistic Support & Content Promotion The UFP promotes the best work of its members alongside promising up-and-coming independent journalists and provides some of the training and tools to develop the next generation of journalism. Monthly Round-up The monthly round-up reviews and signposts different videos which represent quality work by members, alongside notable submissions. Featured Submissions Submissions of high quality or promising news-journalism are passed around for their members to promote at their discretion and are also occasionally featured in the monthly round-up. MEMBERS Organisation : Kerry Murray Photography Name : Kerry Social Links : https://www.kerrymurrayphoto.com https://www.instagram.com/kerrymurrayphotography/ https://t.me/freedominpictures Organisation : Oracle Films Name : Phil Social Links : https://www.oraclefilms.com/ https://twitter.com/oraclefilmsuk Organisation : Resistance GB Name : Will & Laura Social Links : https://www.resistancegb.org/ Organisation : One Man Reports Name : Cesar Social Links : https://twitter.com/onemanreports Organisation : Citizen Syd Name : Syd Social Links : https://youtube.com/c/CitizenSyd1 Organisation : SCUM MEDIA Name : Nick Social Links : https://www.wearescum.com/ https://twitter.com/ed_unwa Organisation : CHASING DISSENT Name : Benn & John Social Links : https://chasingdissent.com/ https://twitter.com/cdpressco Organisation : News Fist Name : Chris Social Links : https://odysee.com/@News_Fist https://t.me/News_Fist https://rumble.com/c/c-1562203 Organisation : Ickonic Name : Jemma Social Links : https://www.ickonic.com/ Organisation : REBEL NEWS Name : Lewis Social Links : https://www.rebelnews.com/ https://www.youtube.com/c/RebelMediaTV/videos Organisation : Not on the Beeb Name : Mark & Dina Social Links : https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/ Organisation : Another Alternative Name : Louis Social Links : https://www.youtube.com/c/AnotherAlternative Organisation : Subject Access Name : Heiko Social Links : https://www.youtube.com/c/SubjectAccess Kerry Murray Founder of UFP United Free Press Web: https://www.unitedfreepress.org/ Telegram: https://t.me/UnitedFreePress FB https://www.facebook.com/UnitedFreePress Odysee: https://odysee.com/@UnitedFreePress: Gab: https://gab.com/tags/unitedfreepress Tiktok: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMLpmA6wR/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/UnitedFreePress Twitter: https://twitter.com/UnitedFreePres Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/unitedfreepress/

Australia and Niger both have populations of 25 million. One country has a high covid death rate and the other a low covid death rate. One country also has a high vaccination rate and the other a low vaccination rate. Are the rates connected? Niger Population: 25,789,297 (rise of 6% since pandemic!) 8,908 cases 309 deaths Fully vaccinated: 1,547,552 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 5,000 Doses administered: 2,689,995 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,705 Australia Population: 26,034,737 (rise of 2% since pandemic!) 54,137 cases 6,893 deaths Fully vaccinated: 21,280,501 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 3,000 Doses given: 56,587,064 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,209 The difference in the death rate per dose is 6% which due to errors in reporting is statistically insignificant. (This does not correlate across other nations, so seems a coincidence. More on other nations calc later) Source: https://covid19.who.int/region/wpro/country/au 8,908 cases 309 deaths Fully vaccinated: 1,547,552 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 5,000 Doses administered: 2,689,995 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,705 Australia 54,137 cases 6,893 deaths Fully vaccinated: 21,280,501 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 3,000 Doses given: 56,587,064 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,209 The difference in the death rate per dose is 6% which due to errors in reporting is statistically insignificant. (This does not correlate across other nations, so seems a coincidence. More on other nations calc later) Source: https://covid19.who.int/region/wpro/country/au

“Stop what you are doing and speak out" Dr Sam White: This is Dr Sam White's plea to fellow doctors. . DR SAM WHITE has submitted a case to the police complaints authority in his battle against the Government over alleged crimes in relation to lockdowns and Covid injection harm. In an interview with journalistic group Holding The Line this week, it was revealed that Dr White and his PJH Law legal team have made the move after the Metropolitan Police informed him there was no evidence of a crime taking place – despite the submission to the police of thousands of pages of evidence supported by more than 40 national and international expert witnesses, none of whom were contacted by the police. If unsuccessful at the Independent Office for Police Conduct, Dr White plans to take his case to the High Court so the evidence he has gathered can be heard. Dr White describes the Government’s conduct as “evil” and is calling on doctors still administering Covid jabs to stop what they are doing and to speak out about the dangers involved. He said: “You will find that as soon as you speak out you are incredibly well supported. On the flip side of that, if you’re still injecting people, if you are still part of this, history will not judge you well because you only need to take a cursory look at the [MHRA] Yellow Card system to understand the harm and death you are causing.” In the UK alone, more than 2,000 Covid jab-associated deaths have been recorded in the Government’s own Yellow Card reporting scheme – with the real figure likely to be in excess of 20,000 because of the scheme’s acknowledged underreporting factor Dr White said that the NHS still has no official treatment for Covid and doctors were barred from recommending or prescribing Vitamin D as a preventive nutrient that he claimed could massively reduce Covid mortality rates. Treatments like ivermectin that he said would have saved tens of thousands of lives in the UK alone were blocked to ensure the emergency authorisation of the Covid injections would be granted Speaking to Holding The Line spokesperson Rusere Shoniwa, Dr White said: “Come forward, stop what you are doing and speak out. You will be more than amply supported.” For more information about Dr Sam White and his campaigning, visit www.drsamwhite.com VIDEO - DR T's CALL FOR ALL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS JULY 7th 2021 Source: https://uncut.substack.com/p/dr-sam-white-stop-what-you-are-doing?s=r

Like many, I was shocked when the Dalai 'Pharma', as I've now named my old hero, backed the vaccination programme. Many excused him. However, I'm stuck with the sad thought that any man devoting his life to preserving and defending a unique culture against the destruction of the Tibetan people and culture, should have a sixth sense for genocide. I would have also thought he had key and competent advisors covering many fields including medicine - but then again, many have been fooled. There are other men of religion who have not been taken in. Someone passed me the letter below from a pastor to his delegation. I enjoyed his measured words, logic and wisdom. Dear Friends, Government Decision to vaccinate children for Covid: I write to you about the current situation concerning vaccinations against covid for children aged 12-15, which will affect directly some of our families with teenagers at school. Some parents have asked me to say something on this, and I believe it is an issue that affects us all, because we all have a shared responsibility to nurture and to protect the young in our midst. The Government’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) is the regulative body in charge of decisions on vaccination and immunisation: who should receive all vaccines, when, and how. This body some time ago, very hesitantly and half-heartedly, extended the use of just half-vaccination (a single dose) to 16-18 year olds. (This followed great political pressure, and only after several dissenting members were quietly ‘retired’ from the committee). It was a controversial decision given that previously the JCVI had repeatedly said there was no reason to vaccinate healthy youngsters who were at ‘vanishingly small risk’ of any severe disease from coronavirus, and they produced no new evidence to suggest this had changed. Just 0.001% of covid deaths in the UK have been in people under the age of 25, and the vast majority (perhaps even all) were among those with serious and life-threatening illnesses like cancers, and likely terminally ill or otherwise extremely immune-compromised. So, whereas there was already provision to vaccinate those deemed at particular risk, it was at best contentious (and in my view unethical) to make this recommendation for 16-18 year olds. But the JCVI has refused to go further and endorse vaccination for under 16s. They stated very clearly that the benefit to children themselves of receiving this vaccine (which is still only useable under emergency-use authorisation - EUA) is virtually zero, whereas the already-known risk of serious harms though small, is not negligible. On a population-wide scale, it would risk significant numbers of children becoming seriously ill, and some dying. Just one known very serious adverse effect of these novel vaccines is that of myocarditis – inflammation of the heart. This has been reported in many countries, and much more commonly the younger the age group: in Israel 1 in 10,000 21-24 year olds vaccinated, rising to 1 in 6000 in 16-19 year olds. Despite claims that many of these cases were ‘mild’ and resolved, from my own background in cardiology I can tell you categorically that the use of the term ‘mild’ is misleading, and that in virtually every single case of this there will be lasting damage to some degree in the heart. Some of these cases being studied in the USA show persistent changes on MRI scan on follow up, and it is still very early days with long-term effects unknown. However, myocarditis has a high rate of progressing to heart failure, and is one of the reasons some younger people end up needing heart transplants. Heart muscle damage is something you do not want to have, however it is caused, whether it is through inflammation (myocarditis) or a blocked vessel causing a heart attack. Obviously a ‘mild’ heart attack is far better than a severe one, and if you are in your 70s, the small lasting damage to your heart muscle may not have a huge effect on your heart function, health and longevity. But if you are in your teens, your heart has a whole lifetime of hard work ahead of it, and any damage will be lasting. The degree to which this may prove extremely serious or even fatal in the medium to long term is simply not known. To quote from a recent article in the British Medical Journal, “COVID-19 vaccine side-effects are well recognized, but incidence is poorly monitored and understood. The US voluntary reporting system (VAERS) has higher rates of vaccination-associated death than all other vaccines combined over the past 20 years”. So, given the already-known potential harms (of which myocarditis is just one), and the entirely unknown potential long-term adverse effects, which may come to light only after many months or years (as, for example, with the dreadful permanent neurological effects of the Pandemrix Swine-Flu vaccine in 2009), the decision by the Chief Medical Officers to go against the JCVI advice and vaccinate under 16s is plainly not scientific; as the BMJ article concluded, “From a public health standpoint, it makes poor sense to impose vaccine side-effects on people at minimal risk of severe COVID-19.” This is clearly a political decision, not a medical one. Nor is it moral or ethical. A helpful article from the Oxford Centre for Practical Ethics (which is worth reading in full) says the Government and Chief Medical Officers have made a double ethical mistake here. First, it treats children as mere means to an end: the vaccine has nothing to offer them in terms of benefit, and we are using them supposedly to protect others – adults. This would be wrong even if there were significant benefits to adults, but since we know that the vaccines do little to prevent transmission in any case (very little, if anything, indeed, for the now predominant delta variant) it is even more reprehensible. But the second ethical mistake is that, in giving the reasoning for vaccination as preventing the disruption in school education, “we are assuming that the appropriate, or even inevitable, response to children getting infected is closing schools and isolating children.” But there is no reason to simply assume that we should isolate an entire classroom or even school when some child in it tests positive. This is absurd behaviour which has never been a feature of epidemic management in the past, and is not the way most other countries have dealt with schools during this one. It has far more to do with the weaponising of the situation by militant unions who have shamelessly used covid as means to further their own self-serving ends, to the detriment of our children. As the paper goes on: “Isolating healthy children that we have no good enough reason to believe are infected and infectious is a choice we make, it’s not something caused by the virus. We could and arguably we should choose otherwise if we think that the harms to children of isolation and school closure outweighs any harm that COVID-19 poses on them.” To this, I would add a third ethical mistake, which is the most concerning of all: that it has been made quite clear children will be able to receive the vaccine without, or even against, their parent’s consent on their behalf. Resort has been made to so-called ‘Gillick Competency’, which refers to the infamous case from 1985 where the Law Lords ruled that a 15-year-old girl could be prescribed the contraceptive pill without her parent’s consent. That was a controversial ruling, but it dealt with the very specific, complicated circumstances of contraception for an already sexually-active girl. It involved weighing up many complex issues, including the possibility of abortion should contraception be denied. The judgment thus made provisions for exceptional situations; it did not simply override the norms of parental responsibility for minors. It is entirely inappropriate to transpose such specific case law into the context of mass vaccination, and as a justification to sweep parental authority aside for every underage child in the nation. Furthermore, assessing Gillick Competency is a demanding and specialist medical task, not just a matter of a quick chat with a ‘Vaccinator’ at school or in a vaccination centre. It also clearly stated in all guidelines that consent for any procedure can never be valid if a young person is being pressured or influenced by someone else. It would be very hard to argue that teenagers in a school setting, surrounded by peers and the vast media noise about covid, are in a situation entirely free of pressure or influence. Indeed, quite the reverse is likely to be the case. All this is yet another deeply sinister sign of the onward march of the secular state into entirely unwarranted intrusions in the realm of family life which we have seen in our country in recent years, and sadly in Scotland in an even more pronounced way: think of the recent Scottish Government’s recommendations for schools stating that children as young as four years old should be allowed to change their gender identity in school life without any recourse to parents’ views. We should recall also the Scottish Government’s nefarious ‘Named-Person’ legislation, which similarly tried to sideline parents’ rightful place as guardians of their children, but was vigorously opposed in the courts (by a broad coalition spearheaded by Christians) and, mercifully, eventually struck down by the UK Supreme Court. It is worth noting the very strong language used by the Supreme Court Justices in that judgment, exposing the Government’s totalitarian ambitions and specifically condemning its chilling actions seeking to drive a wedge between children and parents: “The first thing that a totalitarian regime tries to do is to get at the children, to distance them from the subversive, varied influences of their families, and indoctrinate them in their rulers’ view of the world.” My view, then, is that the decision made by our Governments to allow vaccination of those under the age of 16, even potentially undermining the express wishes of parents, is unscientific, unethical and immoral – and downright dangerous: both potentially to children, and certainly to the very structure and sanctity of family life in our nation. However, given that this decision has been made, each family with teenage children will now themselves be faced with decisions to make. As your pastor, it is not my place to intrude into your family life or seek to coerce you into what decision you should make for your children in this circumstance any more than it is the business of the state to do so. Nevertheless, I do have responsibilities toward you all, including our children. It is my responsibility to remind children that our Lord commands them to ‘obey their parents in the Lord’, and not to defy them, ‘for this is right.’ (Eph 6:1). It would be quite wrong for teenagers to defy their parents and take the injection against their wishes (just as it would be quite wrong for a parent to ‘provoke’ their child by coercing or pressurising them to take it). It is also my responsibility to make clear to parents that Scripture is clear: it is they (not the Government or its advisors) who are responsible before God for their children’s welfare in all things, both physical and spiritual. So it is the responsibility of parents to think this through very seriously, particularly given that the whole machinery of government (and its allies in the supplicant mainstream media) is throwing its whole weight behind the campaign to vaccinate all youngsters, and also given the sheer power and influence of peer pressure among teenagers. Parents are the adults responsible here. Whatever you decide is for you to think through clearly, before God, and act on accordingly. People may come to different conclusions, and we need to be careful about condemning others’ decisions if they differ from our own. I echo Paul: each should be 'fully convinced in their own mind’, and each should seek to act in conscious faith, and not sin, in whatever decision is made, ‘for whatever does not proceed from faith is sin’. (Romans 14:5,23) Given the mass media’s very one-sided reporting of these matters, and also the many pressures which will come on parents from Government letters, advertising, and perhaps from schools themselves and other parents and school friends, I would personally encourage us all, by way of gaining some balance, to read these articles linked to below, each of which I can recommend as being honest, rigorous, and presenting things in a non-politicised way. Yours earnestly in love, William J U Philip Further Reading: Covid-19 Vaccination Information for Parents and Teens - from the Medical Freedom Alliance Two articles from HART (Health Advisory & Recovery Team) of which I am privileged to be a member and serve alongside some outstanding professionals I greatly respect i.Chris Whitty ignores JCVI advice ii.COVID-19 vaccines: unnecessary for healthy 12 to 15-year-olds JCVI opts not to recommend universal vaccination of 12-15 year olds – from a recent British Medical Journal article Sweetening the Covid Kool-Aid - Incentivising vaccination calls medical ethics into question - A recent article I was asked to write for The Critic which I would particularly encourage all those involved in Healthcare professions to ponder carefully. Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? – a recently published peer-reviewed paper, also for medics, as well as others who want to take a serious look at what the clinical trials of the vaccines actually did and did not establish. SOURCE: https://www.tron.church/update-letter

All-Cause Mortality by Vaccination Status "Excess Burden" on substack has noticed a key data release by The ONS. The explosive data they have analysed is represented clearly by these two comparative graphs. This is the all-cause mortality just after the C19 vaccines were released. The black bar represents the jab-free. This is the all-cause mortality a year later after the C19 V-release. The black bar represents the jab-free. ....of course, the graphs should show the opposite effect of the vaccines. If the jabs worked to save lives. Analysis of United Kingdom Office for National Statistics Data by 'EXCESS BURDEN' ON SUBSTACK THE ARTICLE The United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics “the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics and its recognised national statistical institute” has quietly released substantial data on the COVID-19 vaccines. Despite containing some of the most detailed breakdowns of the relationship between the COVID-19 vaccines and mortality available, it has gone almost unnoticed. I will try to present this data here using easily understood and transparent methods. I am not a professional. I encourage anyone reading this to verify the data and methods themselves. My goal is to get the attention of professionals so they can analyze this data using their expertise, and in a more public manner than this. There is always the possibility of a confounding variable or error. All that said, the official UK Government data indicates substantially increased mortality rates in many individuals vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines, over the unvaccinated. Table 1 of the dataset, “Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for all deaths, deaths involving COVID-19 and deaths not involving COVID-19, per 100,000 person-years, England; deaths occurring between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022”, looks as follows. The significant column is “age-standardised mortality rate / 100,000 person years”. It is age standardized to minimize statistical problems with different amounts of vaccine uptake in different age brackets (more on that shortly). The number was calculated using person years, so it can be understood as the expected number of deaths yearly per 100,000 population within the appropriate category. There is data in this document for all-cause, COVID-19, and non-COVID-19 deaths. Looking at all cause deaths shows if vaccines are having a net positive or negative effect, so that is what we will do. As an extreme example if per 100,000 people vaccines killed 999 from adverse events, but saved 1000 from COVID-19, the vaccinated group still would have a lower all cause mortality rate than the unvaccinated. If the January rate charted above held for a year, we would expect: 2502.9 deaths over the year per 100,000 unvaccinated 1,330.1 deaths over the year per 100,000 with 1 dose less than 21 days ago 1,718.5 deaths over the year per 100,000 with 1 dose at least 21 days ago 265.6 deaths over the year per 100,000 with 2 doses less than 21 days ago 166.1 deaths over the year per 100,000 with 2 doses at least 21 days ago This is the effect nearly everyone expects the COVID-19 vaccines to have. The data shows an over 90% reduction in mortality rate for those who took 2 doses at least 21 days ago. Keep in mind these are all-cause deaths. At the time there was a substantial likelihood COVID-19 would have been the expected cause of death, for any unvaccinated deaths. That was the earliest data in the set, January 2021. Now look at the chart of latest data in the set, January 2022. The all-cause mortality rate is substantially higher in those with 1 or 2 doses than those unvaccinated. That does not seem like it could possibly be correct. Was it just some type of year-end accounting artefact? Let's plot the entire dataset as a timeline. As we know in January 2021, those vaccinated with 1 and 2 doses have lower mortality rates than unvaccinated. But then in May 2021 those vaccinated with 1 dose ‘at least 21 days ago’, start to have a higher mortality rate than unvaccinated. In October 2021, those vaccinated with 2 doses ‘at least 6 months ago’ start to have a higher mortality rate than unvaccinated. They are followed in November 2021 by those with 2 doses ‘at least 21 days ago’. In addition, the mortality rate of those vaccinated with 3 doses is consistently getting closer to that of unvaccinated. All these trends continue through the end of the dataset in January 2022. This clearly isn’t an accounting issue, so the obvious variable to look at is age. Even though the Office for National Statistics says its data is age standardized, the data must not account for age in a manner that shows what is really happening. Table 2 has exactly what you need to look at this more closely. The same mortality by vaccination status data is broken down into age bands of 18-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, and 90+. I charted it the same way as above, but I removed the ‘less than 21 days ago’ categories as they add a lot of noise and people will be in those groups only a short time compared to the ‘at least 21 days ago’ categories. Additionally the Office for National Statistics combined the ‘between 21 days and 6 months ago’ category with ‘at least 6 months ago’. This data shows a few interesting things. First that the effect seems to be real and consistent. Second that the effect occurs progressively later as age groups get younger. Third that in ages 18-39 the vaccine seems to have had a negative effect from the start. I would like to display all the above data in one chart, but the mortality rates are wildly different with 90,000 being the peak for 90+ while 120 is the peak for 18-39. For this reasons the data must be standardized first, which I do as ‘rate vs unvaccinated’. For example, in January the 18-39 mortality rate of 120 for 1 dose vs 60 for unvaccinated, could be displayed as the 1 dose rate being 2x the unvaccinated rate. For 90+ the 30,000 rate for 1 dose vs 60,000 rate for unvaccinated, could be displayed as the 1 dose rate being 0.5x the unvaccinated rate. When the data is organized in that way and combined, you get the following chart. This data is all very alarming. A poorly functioning vaccine should still have at least a small positive effect. A non-functioning vaccine should have no effect. Yet we see a negative effect in all age groups for both 1 or 2 doses taken ‘at least 21 days ago’, and it is most cases the negative effect is quite large. The fact that the pattern is consistent and predictable, meaning it moves smoothly from month to month and age bracket to age bracket, gives even more credibility to the pattern. As I have said, I am not an expert, and there is always the possibility of a reasonable explanation. However since there is potentially a health concern that the data indicates may be larger than COVID-19 itself, it deserves immediate further analysis in a transparent and public way. Please help get this in front of the right people. SOURCE: https://excessburden.substack.com/p/all-cause-mortality-by-vaccination?s=r I have copied and pasted their article to extend its reach ONS DATA: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

This is data from the UK adverse event reporting system published by the MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SYSTEM UP TO 30th March 2022 (Data published 7th April 2022) We have five senses that connect us to our beautiful world. Any loss of these senses denies us our experience. We are compiling special focus data on each. Sight Hearing Taste Touch Smell Each sense is not only crucial for our well being but is needed for navigating our environment. Below represents the data of some of the TASTE RELATED REACTIONS recorded, not forgetting the MHRA/VAERS institutions themselves have admitted that under 10% of people report adverse reactions. TASTE RELATED REACTIONS = OVER 100,000 Below represents TASTE RELATED ADVERSE EFFECTS experienced, not exhaustively listed. Benign Neoplasms - Mouth & Tongue Cysts/Polyps - 12 (Pfizer) + 22 (AZ) = 34 Dental Pain & Sensation Disorders - 255 (Pfizer) + 445 (AZ) + 47 (Moderna) = 747 Dysphagia (swallowing) - 241 (Pfizer) + 306 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) = 581 Oesophageal Spasm - 5 (Pfizer) + 9 (AZ) = 14 Gingival Disorders incl. blisters, oedema, pain, swelling, ulceration & pruritus - 231 (Pfizer) + 393 (AZ) + 33 (Moderna) = 657 Gingival Bleeding - 83 (Pfizer) + 184 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) = 281 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,665 (Pfizer) + 45,552 (AZ) + 6413 (Moderna) = 72,630 Altered Oral Saliva & Dryness - 658 (Pfizer) + 1356 (AZ) + 129 (Moderna) = 2143 Oral Haemorrhages - 44 (Pfizer) + 121 (AZ) = 8 (Moderna) = 173 Oral Soft Tissue Symptoms incl. scabs, eruptions, blisters, burning, pain & discolouration - 1964 (Pfizer) + 2272 (AZ) + 228 (Moderna) = 4524 Oral Soft Tissue Swelling & Oedema - 1026 (Pfizer) + 1184 (AZ) + 237 (Moderna) = 2447 Salivary Gland Pain, Enlargement, Infection & Inflammation - 42 (Pfizer) + 43 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) = 95 Stomatitis & Ulceration - 636 (Pfizer) + 973 (AZ) + 111 (AZ) = 1720 Tongue Disorders - 122 (Pfizer) + 107 (AZ) + 22 (Moderna) = 251 Tongue Symptoms incl. stiffness, swollen, blisters, dryness, spasm & erythema - 1012 (Pfizer) + 1169 (AZ) + 151 (Moderna) = 2332 Oral Candidiasis - 41 (Pfizer) + 64 (AZ) + 6 (Moderna) = 111 Dental & Oral Soft Tissue Infections - 65 (Pfizer) + 109 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) = 181 Oral Herpes - 341 (Pfizer) + 725 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna = 1159 Mumps Viral Infection - 9 (Pfizer) + 13 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 23 Upper Respiratory Tract Infections involving tonsillitis, laryngitis, pharyngitis & throat abscess - 220 (Pfizer) + 178 (AZ) + 28 (Moderna) = 426 Pain In Jaw - 435 (Pfizer) + 635 (AZ) + 98 (Moderna) = 1168 Appetite Decreased - 1514 (Pfizer) + 6501 (AZ) + 419 (Moderna) = 8434 Facial Nerve Disorder incl paralysis & spasms - 1290 (Pfizer) + 1241 (AZ) + 180 (Moderna) = 2711 ** Cranial Nerves VIIth (facial), IXth (glossopharyngeal), Xth (vagus) & XIIth (hypoglossal) innervate the tongue Tongue Paralysis - 1 (Pfizer) + 6 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 8 Tongue Biting - 8 (Pfizer) + 10 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 20 Taste Disorder - 314 (Pfizer) + 530 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) = 895 For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

This is Not On The Beeb's 57th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. There are now 2,082 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 stat accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 30th March 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.8 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.1 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 168,462 AZ 244,525 Moderna 36,682 Unknown 1608 TOTAL = 451,277 people reported an adverse reaction ONLY INCREASE OF 538 on last week Fatal Pfizer 744 (no change last week) AZ 1252 Moderna 43 (no change last week) Unknown 43 TOTAL = 2082 Blood Disorders - 17,007 (Pfizer) + 7831 (AZ) + 2485 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,388 Anaphylaxis - 656 (Pfizer) + 881 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1627 Acute Cardiac - 12,983 (Pfizer) + 11,330 (AZ) + 3182 (Moderna) + 105 (Unknown) = 27,600 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1297 (Pfizer) + 440 (AZ) + 335 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2080 Eye Disorders - 7989 (Pfizer) + 14,886 (AZ) + 1505 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 24,466 Blindness - 160 (Pfizer) + 324 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 522 Deafness - 298 (Pfizer) + 427 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 781 Infections - 12,151 (Pfizer) + 20,307 (AZ) + 2295 (Moderna) + 166 (Unknown) = 34,919 Spontaneous Abortions - 484 + 1 premature baby death / 1 foetal growth restriction death + 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 233 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 66 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 789 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 80,512 (Pfizer) + 182,637 (AZ) + 19,755 (Moderna) + 867 (Unknown) = 283,771 Bell’s Palsy - 640 (Pfizer) + 631 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1377 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 783 (Pfizer) + 2344 (AZ) + 57 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3201 Seizures - 1097 (Pfizer) + 2068 (AZ) + 257 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 3441 Paralysis - 509 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 104 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 1507 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 9224 (Pfizer) + 17,747 (AZ) + 1810 (Moderna) + 102 (Unknown) = 28,883 Immune System Disorders - 2433 (Pfizer) + 3314 (AZ) + 603 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 6373 Respiratory Disorders - 21,613 (Pfizer) + 29,788 (AZ) + 4205 (Moderna) + 212 (Unknown) = 55,818 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,133 (Pfizer) + 18,395 (AZ) + 2438 (Moderna) + 116 (Unknown) = 31,082 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,665 (Pfizer) + 45,552 (AZ) + 6413 (Moderna) + 203 (Unknown) = 72,833 Skin Disorders - 33,845 (Pfizer) + 53,350 (AZ) + 12,964 (Moderna) + 348 (Unknown) = 100,507 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,115 (Pfizer) + 20,796 (AZ) + 5149 (Moderna) + 220 (Unknown) = 57,280 Vascular Disorders - 7494 (Pfizer) + 13,867 (AZ) + 1276 (Moderna) + 107 (Unknown) = 22,744 For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

🇲🇽 Mexico 🇩🇴 Dominican Republic 🇳🇴 Norway 🇮🇸 Iceland 🇸🇮 Slovenia 🇧🇭 Bahrain 🇯🇴 Jordan 🇮🇪 Ireland 🇭🇺 Hungary 🇷🇴 Romania 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia 🇲🇪 Montenegro 🇨🇼 Curaçao 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England 🇦🇼 Aruba 🇲🇻 Maldives 🇲🇳 Mongolia 🇲🇩 Moldova 🇬🇦 Gabon 🇾🇪 Yemen 🇨🇷 Costa Rica Madeira From April 1st, all international travellers won’t be subject to any entry requirements to visit Sweden. The Swedish government released a statement on Friday saying that the current ban on travellers from outside the EU/EEA (European Economic Area) will not be extended. As the ban expires on March 31, 2022, this will subsequently lift all restrictions for travellers coming to Sweden from outside the EU. Proof Of Vaccination Or Test No Longer Required As Of April 1 Once the new travel rules go into effect, it also means that starting April 1st, all proof of vaccination and Covid tests for entry will no longer be required to travel to Sweden, regardless of what country the traveller is coming from. With the restrictions that currently stand, only travellers from the list of approved third countries (non EU/EEA) can enter Sweden with a valid Covid vaccination certificate. This will no longer be the case once the ban expires at the end of the month. Sweden Another European Nation To Drop Covid Travel Restrictions The news will make Sweden the 22nd nation to drop all Covid-related travel requirements. It will end two years of restrictions on international travelers to Sweden due to the pandemic, which was put in place back in March 2020. Swedish Minister for Justice and Home Affairs, Morgan Johansson, made this statement following this week’s news: “We have already lifted the entry ban within the EU. Now the Government has decided not to extend the entry ban from third countries. This will make it much easier for everyone who has been prevented from coming to Sweden in recent years due to the pandemic.” Find out more about the countries you can easily travel to. Below is a list of countries in 2022 with no testing, no quarantines, no countries banned, and no vaccine requirements. Mexico Mexico is open to all international tourists with no testing or quarantines. Mexico has truly been the king of tourism during the pandemic, as they have never closed their borders, have never enacted a testing protocol, and have kept almost everything inside the country open for tourism. Beaches, gyms, hotels, restaurants, and in some parts even nightclubs and bars, are open. Here is everything you need to know about Mexico reopening its borders for tourism. El Salvador New entry as of November 15, 2021 El Salvador has now joined Mexico in being the second country in the WORLD in late 2021 to have no entry requirements or vaccine passports. El Salvador originally reopened in September 2020 but was requiring all arrivals to bring proof of a negative PCR test. Then, on April 21, 2021, they also added proof of being fully vaccinated as a way to avoid testing. However, now as of November 15, 2021, all requirements have been dropped. Norway New entry as of February 12, 2022 Norway becomes the first European country to fully remove ALL covid-19 entry requirements, including all forms, testing and quarantine rules, proof of vaccination, country ban lists, and all other border restrictions. Visiting Norway as of February 12, 2022, is like visiting in pre-pandemic times. In combination with the removal of all entry requirements, Norway has also removed all internal covid restrictions like mask-wearing, isolation periods, social distancing, and all use of vaccine passports. Slovenia New entry as of February 21, 2022 Slovenia is the 4th country in the world to remove all entry requirements, allowing foreign travelers to enter like pre-pandemic times. Slovenia’s RVT program (recovered/vaccinated/tested) has been discontinued at the border as well as internally. Now, visitors will not have to show proof of a negative test, being recently recovered or even vaccinated to enter, nor to access things like museums, restaurants, resorts, or other activities. Visitors should be aware that while Slovenia has removed almost all covid-related restrictions, masks are still mandatory in indoor public settings. Iceland New entry as of Feb 25, 2022 Iceland is the 5th country to remove all entry requirements, including internal rules, starting February 25. Now, anyone can enter Iceland, regardless of vaccination status. They have also fully abolished all tests, quarantines, and online health forms to enter the country. Once inside, mask mandates have been removed, as have limits on gatherings and even early closing hours for bars and restaurants. Bahrain New entry as of Feb 26, 2022 Bahrain has removed all their covid-related entry requirements, along with most internal restrictions, as the Middle Eastern nation returns to normal. Proof of pre-flight testing, on arrival testing, and all vaccination requests are now discontinued, including internal vaccine passports. Now all travelers, regardless of vaccination status, can enter Bahrain like pre-pandemic times. Jordan New entry as of March 1, 2022 The kingdom of Jordan has removed PCR testing, proof of vaccination, and all other covid-related entry requirements. Now travelers can enter without testing, quarantines, or vaccine passports. The only small requirement left is the obligation to fill out an online health form, which strangely doesn’t ask any covid-related questions. Ireland New entry as of March 7, 2022 Ireland was one of the first nations to discontinue most internal covid-related rules in January 2022, which now harmonize with their new entry requirement removal. From March 7, 2022, there will be zero travel restrictions for any traveler entering Ireland. Travelers from any country can enter Ireland without testing, proof of vaccination, quarantines, health forms, or any other covid-related entry requirement. All have been removed. Hungary New entry as of March 7, 2022 Hungary removes all its border restrictions, continuing the trend throughout Europe. As of March 7, 2022, travelers will no longer need tests or proof of vaccination to enter Hungary – they can simply enter like pre-pandemic times. Most internal restrictions are also removed, like vaccine passports, mask mandates, etc., but a few rules still exist in health care settings. Romania New entry as of March 9, 2022 Romania just removed all their covid-related entry requirements at the border, as well as internal restrictions, on March 9, 2022. Tourists will no longer need to show a negative test or proof of vaccination to enter. All that’s left is a simple form, but it doesn’t ask any covid-related questions. Once inside Romania, the mask mandates, all vaccine passports, and things like capacity limits have been discontinued. Saudi Arabia New entry as of March 9, 2022 Saudi Arabia has removed their entry requirements, qualifying them for this list, but a few small requirements still remain that travelers should be aware of. Gone are the important ones including proof of vaccination, quarantines, and testing. Still in place are online health forms, proof of travel health insurance, and a contact tracing app. Montenegro New entry as of March 10, 2022 Montenegro has become the latest country worldwide to drop all COVID-19 travel restrictions. Travelers will no longer need to show proof of vaccination or present a negative COVID-19 test upon arrival. Internally the nation will no longer require vaccine passports or testing to enter cinemas, museums, restaurants, bars, galleries, hotels, theaters, and gyms. However, there is still an indoor mask mandate for now. Curaçao New entry as of March 10, 2022 Curaçao has removed all its testing, quarantine, and vaccination entry requirements as of March 10, 2022. Travel to the Caribbean island will look much like it did in pre-pandemic times. Curaçao did keep a few simple entry requirements like an online digital form and proof of travel health insurance, but nothing that is a barrier to entry. United Kingdom New entry as of March 14, 2022 Officially starting at 4:00 am on March 18th, England will join the list of nations that have removed all entry requirements, and they certainly removed all of them. Not even forms will remain. England dropped most of its entry requirements and internal restrictions earlier in 2022, but they still had a few requirements in place that did not qualify them for this list, chiefly, 2 tests needed for unvaccinated passengers. Now, all requirements have been removed completely. Entry is exactly how it was pre-pandemic. Maldives New entry as of March 15, 2022 The Maldives have relaxed all their pandemic-related entry requirements, ended the state of emergency period, and removed mask mandates. Travelers no longer need to show tests, proof of vaccination, or even have travel health insurance to enter. Aruba New entry as of March 16, 2022 The small island nation of Aruba joins neighboring Curaçao, and removes Covid entry requirements as of March 19, 2022. The only rules that remain are the digital passenger card, now being used more as a customs/immigration form, and the requirement to have travel insurance. Mongolia New entry as of March 17, 2022 Mongolia showed up on this list on March 1, but was quickly removed after confusion within the nation about entry rules. Two weeks later, it seems as if the internal conflict over the entry rules has come to a close, with requirements officially removed as of March 15, 2022. Moldova New entry as of March 17, 2022 Moldova made the announcement on its Ministry of Interior page that they’ve removed entry requirements as of March 16, 2022. Gabon New entry as of March 18, 2022 Yemen New entry as of March 18, 2022 Both new entries of Gabon and Yemen have removed all covid-related entry requirements for travelers, but little data is provided other than no testing, proof of vaccination or quarantines have all been removed. Costa Rica New Entry as of March 24, 2022 Costa Rica will once again be included on this list, as they’ve decided to drop their internal Vaccine Passport system starting April 1, 2022. While Costa Rica has had very liberal entry requirements throughout the pandemic, recent internal use of proof of vaccine to enter restaurants and hotels kept it from being recommended as a restriction-free nation. Also on April 1st, they will drop the requirement for unvaccinated tourists to purchase travel health insurance and the online health form. Sweden New entry as of March 26, 2022 Sweden is dropping all their remaining covid-related entry requirements on April 1, 2022. All proof of vaccination and tests for entry will no longer be required to travel to Sweden, regardless of what country the traveler is coming from. Masks and internal vaccine passports were dropped back in February 2022. Poland New entry as of March 28, 2022 As of March 28th, Poland has removed all of its Covid-related entry requirements, as well as most internal restrictions including lifting its indoor mask mandate and the requirement to quarantine. Denmark New entry as of March 29, 2022 As of March 29, travelers from every nation can again visit Denmark under pre-pandemic rules, while inside the country all social curbs, including mandatory vaccine passes and mask usage, no longer apply as well. Grenada New entry as of March 31, 2022 Starting April 4, 2022, Covid proof of entry will no longer apply to foreign visitors visiting the tri-island nation of Grenada, as it fully reopens to tourism under pre-pandemic regulations. This means both the vaccinated and unvaccinated are welcome without testing, quarantine, or any further requirements. Latvia New entry as of April 1, 2022 As of April 1, 2022, Latvia removed all entry requirements including proof of vaccination, COVID-19 testing, and passenger locator forms to enter the nation. Argentina New Entry as of April 3, 2022 The Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Health of Argentina confirmed that within the next few days, the nation will remove all entry requirements and return to ‘normal’ pre-pandemic entry rules. Slovakia New entry as of April 6, 2022 Slovakia is the latest EU nation to remove entry requirements. As of April 6, 2022, all travelers—regardless of vaccination status—no longer need to quarantine or complete the eHranica passenger locator form. This makes entry just as it was prior to the pandemic. Czech Republic New entry as of April 9, 2022 Joining neighbors Slovakia and Poland, Czechia has removed all entry requirements as of April 9th. All proof of testing, vaccination and even the passenger locator form is now discontinued. As for masks, officials in Czechia relaxed the country’s mask mandates from March 14, 2022 Switzerland & Cuba Notes Switzerland almost made this list mid-Feb 2022. The federal government of home affairs along with the federal health authority removed all entry requirements, however, the border police are keeping them in full effect for now. Cuba was a hopeful entry as of April 6, 2022, however, it cannot be added to this list for keeping one very important restriction in place, the random on-arrival testing. Although they are removing all tests and proof of vaccination, they will keep in a random PCR test on arrival, based on the flow of incoming tourists and the current epidemiological situation. IF a tourist tests positive, they will be hospitalized for 10-14 days, making this too big of a barrier. Looking for countries without mask mandates? We have another article, updated frequently, that lists countries that no longer have mask mandates in place as well as an article listing which airlines have removed mask mandates Egypt. Now requires a 72-hour negative PCR test Kosovo. Now requires a 72-hour PCR test from most nations. Serbia. Now requires a 48-hour PCR test from all. Brazil. Now requires a 72-PCR test from all arrivals. Turkey. Now requires a 72-hour PCR test from all passengers. Haiti – Now requires a 72-hour PCR or antigen test from all passengers Tanzania – As of May 4, 2021 requiring a 72-hour PCR test North Macedonia – As of September 1, 2021, requiring a 72-hour PCR test, proof of vaccination or proof of recent recovery Albania – As of September 1, 2021, requiring a 72-hour PCR test, 48-hour antigen test, proof of vaccination or proof of recent recovery Colombia – Removed November 20, 2021. Vaccine passport in effect for businesses, restaurants, events, etc. Dominican Republic – Still requires PCR testing from select countries, as well as random breathalyzer tests on arrival. Countries with NO Testing/Quarantines El Salvador Mexico Norway Slovenia Iceland Bahrain Jordan Ireland Hungary Romania Saudi Arabia Montenegro Curaçao United Kingdom Maldives Aruba Mongolia Moldova Gabon Yemen Costa Rica Sweden Poland Denmark Grenada Latvia Argentina Slovakia Czechia SOURCE AND FOR RECENT UPDATES PLEASE GO TO TRAVEL OFF PATH https://www.traveloffpath.com/countries-without-any-travel-restrictions-or-entry-requirements/

HEART BREAKING V-INJURY TESTIMONIES AT US SENATOR RON JOHNSON'S ROUND TABLE HEART BREAKING V-INJURY TESTIMONIES AT US SENATOR RON JOHNSON'S ROUND TABLE

Putting a face to the numbers and stats is crucial. We helped bring the subject of vaccine injury within sports to awareness with our 300k view article in early November 2021. Scroll down to see our dedicated sports site. OAN delivers a good summary on sports injury in this short clip The average age of the players suffering cardiac arrest is just 23 years old. How many 23-year-old athletes were collapsing and suffering heart attacks before this year? Do you know any 23-year-old people who [have] had heart attacks before now? Nearly 800 athletes, young fit people in the prime of [their] life, falling down on the field. In fact, 500% more soccer players in the EU are dropping dead from heart attacks than just one year ago. We have made a website putting a Face to the injuries. These are only a fraction of the real number and the site needs updating. (any volunteers wishing to help with the sports site please make contact) THE FACES DETAILS Click through to see the incidents here

1 Month - 17 Years 1,317 More Injuries Of Children Reported After Covid-19 Vaccine In 2 Weeks 3,505 Cardiac Disorders In Children Aged 1 Month-17 Years There Are 96,834 Injuries Reported Of Unspecified Age SOURCE: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#