We have all seen the assurance from the Prime Minister, Government ministers and TV doctors that the vaccine is safe for pregnant women.
This is a screenshot from a BBC promotional video using the NHS, JCVI, Royal College, the US's CDC and MHRA to persuade the British public that the vaccine is safe for those pregnant or breastfeeding post jab.
But is the C19 jab still considered by the Gov as safe and effective for pregnant women?
Before we look at the BBC video, this is the current NHS advice.
This was backed by more comprehensive information on the jab here as of 31st March
PM BACKS JAB FOR PREHNANT WOMEN
BORIS'S WIFE EVEN JOINED IN
Carrie Johnson ‘feeling great’ after second Covid jab as she reassures pregnant women
"...Carrie, 33, is expecting her second child after having a miscarriage earlier this year.
She wrote on her Instagram account: “Just had my second jab and feeling great!
“I know there are lots of pregnant women who are anxious about getting their Covid vaccine but the evidence is incredibly reassuring.”
She continued: “Most importantly, the data shows there is no increased risk of miscarriage, something I was definitely concerned about...."
GOVERNMENT QUIETLY CHANGES ADVICE ON JAB FOR PREGNANT WOMEN
The government seems to have updated their website on a page tagged "information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-PfizerBiontech-covid-19-vaccine" with some key information that is clearly contradictory to the advice given to the public. Or, at the very least it is contradictory to the NHS and BBC advice.
We have been using web archives to try and work out when this advice was published and it now seems possible that the advice has been there all along.
Meaning all the propaganda pushing the vaccine is at the very best, dodgy.
This is HUGE!
Does this mean the health professionals giving the vaccination had not done their due diligence and will be scapegoated?
The changes spotted on the UK government website have gone viral.
Here is the Government's advice on vaccinating the pregnant or those breastfeeding... advice that not only contradicts the NHS advice but the words of the prime minister, BBC doctors and countless others used in the coercion.
This is a direct quote from the main government website on a page listed as designed for health professionals giving the vaccine.
Let's read that again....
Toxicology conclusions - .In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.
Compare and contrast the two contradictory images below
THE ROLE OF THE BBC IN THE COERCION OF MOTHERS
The government and pharma's main propaganda outlet is the BBC.
This is a screenshot from a BBC video persuading pregnant women that the jab is safe.
I have made a transcript of the video, as the tone and words used are interesting in their technique.
The full 2.41 minute video is here.
BBC GOV PROPAGANDA VIDEO PROMOTING THE JAB FOR PREGNANT WOMEN
9th May 2021
Regarding the jab and pregnancy
"....It's understandable to be a little bit confused, a little bit anxious about it and just not sure what to do.
If you're pregnant or breastfeeding or just thinking about having a baby, then the advice from the experts is you should be offered the COVID vaccine.
I'm Dr. Stephanie Jen Chyi Oii,, I'm a GP and I had my baby during the lockdown.
There is a history of having vaccines given to pregnant women, every pregnant woman is recommended to have the flu vaccine and whooping cough vaccine and these are known to be safe in pregnancy.
Research from the USA involving more than 90,000 pregnant people who had mainly the Pfizer or Maderna shot found no safety concerns.
And now we're beginning to see similar data here in the UK.
All the data that we've had so far suggests that there is not an increased risk of miscarriage.
And in fact, there is no biological mechanism by which that could happen because we don't think that the vaccine actually crosses the placenta and affects the baby.
But in the UK, only the Pfizer and Moderna shots are being recommended so far, but that may change in the future.
The experts say you can have your shots at any stage of your pregnancy, as you can become ill with covid at any time.
However, a lot of women do feel more vulnerable in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.
So I don't think there's any problem in delaying your vaccination till after 12 weeks if you feel more comfortable doing so.
So if you decided to wait until after your 12-week scan, then you would still be able to get your second shot before entering the third trimester, which is the period where COVID is more likely to cause the most harm.
Your baby's not helping you at that point. Because it's stopping the diaphragm from moving your lungs aren't working in the way that they usually would. And so then if you get an infection of a bad infection on top of that it can cause more significant problems.
What if you've already had a dose of Oxford AstraZeneca and you were fine?
Well, then the recommendation is you still go get your second dose.
Because if you're fine the first time, you should be fine the second time as well.
It's okay to have questions about the vaccine, and talking to your GP or your midwife will help you make a decision that's right for you.
You know, it's not like pregnant women are being told you must all have the vaccine.
Ultimately, it's your decision you do what you feel is right for you and you're making sure you're getting your information from the right resources..." (end of transcript)
The video above was transcribed so you can see the clever use of language. See how the word "offered' is used here. Many will hear this as "you should have the vaccine".
QUOTE: "...If you're pregnant or breastfeeding or just thinking about having a baby, then the advice from the experts is you should be OFFERED the COVID vaccine..."
The word used is 'offered,' meaning the patient is liable for their own choice, yet the feeling of the sentence is different, giving a sense that the vaccine is recommended by experts.
The use of images and words is designed to ensure people watching feel convinced the jab is safe.
The BBC end their sales pitch with a clever caveat that you might be mistaken for thinking was added by lawyers - "make sure you're getting your information from the right resources."
The BBC sales video was released on 9th May 2021, but what are the BBC saying on vaccination during pregnancy now?
I did this little search on the BBC website, using the phrase "covid vaccination pregnant" to see what they had on offer for the curious.
Here are brief summaries of the two articles found within the search
BBC 10th January 2022
Pregnant women are being urged not to delay getting their Covid jab or booster in a government campaign.
More than 96% of pregnant women admitted to hospital with Covid symptoms between May and October last year were unvaccinated, according to the UK Obstetric Surveillance System.
The campaign will share testimonies of pregnant women who have had the jab on radio and social media.
The government said the vaccine was safe and had no impact on fertility.
BBC 5th August 2022
A mother who lost her baby after getting Covid-19 while she was pregnant has urged other pregnant women to get vaccinated.
"We know what you can lose and it's just not worth the risk, so I would urge every pregnant woman to get that vaccine."
As seen from these articles, the agenda is clear.
There is not one mention of possible negative effects, or any mention of the MHRA injury reports, of which we have published sixty-eight.
The BBC to date have hidden all vaccine injury data from the public that we highlighted here
They use clever and subtle methods to coerce the public, including even using tragedies as above to push an agenda.
The use of language is subtle NLP-based coercion which persuades, yet cleverly limits liability.
History shows this BBC video, alongside the ministers and TV doctors proclaiming the vaccine was safe for those pregnant, was not only dangerous disinformation but contradicted the official website advice for Doctors and health professionals.
The public have clearly been deceived.
'Not On The Beeb', alongside other vaccine damage awareness organisations, has been warning of the dangers for pregnant women for well over a year.
(see links below)
The BBC are correct on one thing.
When they said, "do what you feel is right for you and you're making sure you're getting your information from the right resources..." Clearly, we must choose our sources of information carefully.
WHY THE VACCINE SHOULD BE BANNED FOR PREGNANT WOMEN
Pfizer court-ordered, released data reveals the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial.
NOT ON THE BEEB ARTICLES WARNING OF CONCERNS FOR THOSE PREGNANT
27 August 2021 - NOTB ALERTS ON BREASTFEEDING POST JAB
7 September 2021 BREASTFEEDING MOTHER BELIEVES HER 6WK BABY DIED DUE TO VACCINE
13 September 2021 NEWBORN SUFFERS 'ADVERSE EVENT' VIA MOTHER'S VACCINATION WHEN PREGNANT
See video and article here:
20 August 2021 - HOW TO SEARCH VAERS DATABASE OF VACCINE INJURY
To check the 68 UK MHRA injury reports we have published tap 'vaccine injury' into the NOTB search bar
Could the vaccine be damaging newborn babies?
This video on C19 vaccine-induced tremours ends on a very worrying image....
(the video of the baby was published online by a worried aunty clearly pointing at the mother's vaccination profile as most probable culprit)
To learn about natural births watch this interview with Nickita from When Push Comes to Shove
As sent by a reader: THANK YOU
The gov document is from 2020 but the date is not on it. Instead it is marked "updated 16 Aug 2022". Updating seems to mean simply repeating the original document.
Norman Fenton was mislead by this, so you and I are in good company.
This FactCheck also explains: