Search Results

As of the end of last week, there are now 1,612 vaccine-caused reported deaths in the UK. There are 1,609 meters in a mile. A stride is about one meter. Imagine running a mile, knowing that every footstep hitting the ground, represents a person dying. Many sources, inc the governmental health establishments themselves, indicate the real number could be ten times higher, or more. So, imagine finishing that mile, then being asked to run another nine miles - with each stride now representing an unrecorded British vaccine-fatality. That’s the reality. UPDATED REPORT PUBLISHED 2ND SEPT 2021 (due to MHRA ‘processing delays’ it only includes data collected up until 25th Aug 2021) • Pfizer - 21.6million people - 38.9m doses Yellow Card reporting rate 1-in-197 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.8m people - 48.7m doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-108 people impacted • Moderna - 1.4m people - 2.2m doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-96 people impacted Reports - 109,660 (Pfizer) + 229,913 (AZ) + 14,641 (Moderna) + 1054 (Unknown) = 355,268 (total people filing injuries. They report about 3 each.) Fatal - 509 (Pfizer) + 1060 (AZ) + 15 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 1612 Acute Cardiac - 5003 (Pfizer) + 9163 (AZ) + 523 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 14,727 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 405 (Pfizer) + 252 (AZ) + 75 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 735 Anaphylaxis - 472 (Pfizer) + 813 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1320 Blood Disorders - 10,557 (Pfizer) + 7394 (AZ) + 861 (Moderna) + 44 (Unknown) = 18,856 Infections - 7299 (Pfizer) + 18,192 (AZ) + 776 (Moderna) + 89 (Unknown) = 26,356 Headaches - 22,056 (Pfizer) + 83,626 (AZ) + 2746 (Moderna) + 232 (Unknown) = 108.660 Migraine - 2547 (Pfizer) + 8044 (AZ) + 304 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 10,924 Eye Disorders - 5162 (Pfizer) + 13,776 (AZ) + 519 (Moderna) + 56 (Unknown) = 19,513 Blindness - 101 (Pfizer) + 283 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 402 Deafness - 189 (Pfizer) + 365 (AZ) + 15 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 571 Psychiatric Disorders - 6312 (Pfizer) + 17,109 (AZ) + 936 (Moderna) + 76 (Unknown) = 24,433 Skin Disorders - 21,748 (Pfizer) + 50,407 (AZ) + 6879 (Moderna) + 214 (Unknown) = 79,248 Spontaneous Abortions - 294 + 6 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 200 + 2 stillbirth (AZ) + 27 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 523 + 9 (figures now imply 11 related maternal deaths) Vomiting - 3337 (Pfizer) + 11,365 (AZ) + 540 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 15,284 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 714 (Pfizer) + 874 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1649 Nervous System Disorders - 54,154 (Pfizer) + 174,416 (AZ) + 7173 (Moderna) + 612 (Unknown) = 236,355 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 507 (Pfizer) + 2010 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 2543 Guillian Barre Syndrome - 44 (Pfizer) + 393 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 445 Tremor - 1319 (Pfizer) + 9683 (AZ) + 166 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 11,206 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 616 (Pfizer) + 2729 (AZ) + 28 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3391 Respiratory Disorders - 13,284 (Pfizer) + 27,552 (AZ) + 1198 (Moderna) + 112 (Unknown) = 42,146 Seizures - 734 (Pfizer) + 1880 (AZ) + 124 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 2749 Paralysis - 305 (Pfizer) + 742 (AZ) + 38 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1091 Haemorrhage (All types) - 2677 (Pfizer) + 4766 (AZ) + 335 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 7807 Vertigo/Tinnitis - 2745 (Pfizer) + 6354 (AZ) + 284 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 9408 Reproductive/Breast - 17,786 (Pfizer) + 16,897 (AZ) + 2334 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 37,147 SOURCE: www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting

ENGLISH ITALIAN SPANISH HIGHLIGHT: "...Wherever It (the magnetism) goes, it could wreak havoc with cell permeability and have all sorts of biological effects, including heart failure, premature Alzeimer's disease and, when the mitochondria are affected, chronic fatigue...." Dr Andrew Goldsworthy is a retired lecturer and Biological Safety Officer from Imperial College London. Yesterday, we had an enlightening conversation around the mechanisms of vaccine-induced magnetism Dr Andrew Goldsworthy is not only a true gentleman, but generously and fearlessly offers his knowledge and insights in this statement below. Please read to the end. What could cause this magnetism? Hypothesis by Dr Andrew Goldsworthy The vaccine-induced magnetism hinges around the possibility that a graphene-like compound was used as an adjuvant to increase the rate of uptake of the mRNA. This is based on electron microscopy, where graphene oxide was found to be in the vaccine. See here It has been difficult to obtain further samples for investigation because the manufacturers insist that all unused vials and used syringes have to be returned after the shots are delivered. Why the secrecy? This may be the reason. Follow this link to an open-access review on the toxicity of the graphene family (including graphene oxide). It looks pretty horrific. Also, see this. But how could this have happened since neither graphene or graphene oxide are magnetic? The answer is that both graphene and graphene oxide, can conduct enough electricity across the cell membranes to magnetise nearby superparamagnetic particles such as ferritin and magnetite to cause a widespread magnetisation of people receiving the vaccine. It's just as the iron core of an electromagnet becomes magnetised when an electric current is passed through the coil of wire wound around it. To make this argument more quantitative; the electrical conductivity of graphene on the nano scale is two orders of magnitude greater than copper See here What does this mean for living cells? The answer is that the transmembrane voltage gradient of living cells is of the order of ten million volts per metre (100 mV across a 10 nm membrane). This means that a transmembrane strand of graphene or graphene oxide (from the vaccine) could carry a huge electric current and be likely to magnetise any superparamagnetic materials such as ferritin or magnetite that may be close by. This effect could spread like wildfire across the membrane as each magnetized particle magnetizes its neighbours and then to those of the next cell, so that the magnetic effect increases and Ultimately, it could spread to all parts of the body via the bloodstream, starting with the blood cells themselves, including those white cells needed for our immune system, then the veins, then the heart, followed by the lungs and finally the brain. Wherever It goes, it could wreak havoc with cell permeability and have all sorts of biological effects, including heart failure, premature Alzeimer's disease and, when the mitochondria are affected, chronic fatigue. Another effect is that membrane damage to our sensory cells could make them hyperactive and send false signals to the brain to give symptoms very similar to electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) resulting in headaches whenever we use a mobile phone, pins and needles when straying too close to a WiFi router dizziness and nausea, to name but a few. Perhaps the most serious danger is if you have an MRI scan, when the extremely powerful magnet in the machine would try to pull these magnetised particles out of your body and, in the case of the brain or spinal cord scan, immediate and possibly permanent damage could result. When other parts of the body are scanned, the results may be less noticeable in the short term, but become apparent later as an unexplained "idiopathic" illness. This needs careful monitoring by an independent observer. Best wishes, Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Lecturer and Biological Safety Officer (retired) Imperial College London To learn more about vaccine-induced magnetism explore the films and resources here Please see our urgent MRI warning letter for doctors here https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/mri-scans

Please download the full paper below EXTRACT: Dr Campra Background • Mr. Ricardo Delgado Martín requests PROVISION OF RESEARCH SERVICES to the UAL named: "DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN AQUEOUS SUSPENSION SAMPLE" - On 06/10/2021 1 vial was received by courier, labeled with the following text: - “COMIRNATY™ .Sterile concentrate. COVID-19 mRNA. 6 doses after dilution. - Discard date / time: PAA165994.LOT / EXP: EY3014 08/2021 ” - Origin and traceability: unknown - State of conservation: refrigerated - Maintenance during the study: refrigerated - Coding of the problem sample to be analyzed: RD1 Preliminary observations of the test sample RD1 Description: - Sealed vial, with rubber and aluminum cap intact, of 2 ml capacity, containing a 0.45 ml cloudy aqueous suspension. - RNA extraction and quantification is performed - Presence of uncharacterized nanometric microbiology is observed, visible at 600X in optical microscope Sample processing 1. Dilution in 0.9% sterile physiological saline (0.45 ml + 1.2 ml) 2. Polarity fractionation: 1.2 ml hexane + 120 ul of RD1 sample 3. Extraction of hydrophilic phase 4. Extraction and quantification of RNA in the sample 5. Electron and optical microscopy of aqueous phase Preliminary analysis: extraction and quantification of Rna in the sample 1. RNA extraction: Kit https://www.fishersci.es/shop/products/ambion-purelink-rna-mini-kit- 7/10307963 2. Quantification of total UV absorbance in spectrophotometer NanoDrop™ https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/ND-2000#/ND-2000 3. Specific quantification of Rna by fluorescence QUBIT2.0: https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/references/newsletters-and-journals/bioprobes-journal-of-cell-biology-applications/bioprobes-issues-2011/bioprobes-64-april-2011/the-qubit-2-0-fluorometer-april- 2011.html UV absorption spectrum of the aqueous phase of the RD1 sample (Nano- drop team) Maximum absorption of SAMPLE RD1 (260-270 nm) - RNA. It presents usual maximums at 260 nm. Total concentration estimated by QUBIT2.0 fluorometry: 6 ng / ul - The spectrum reveals the presence of a high quantity of substances or substances other than Rna with maximum absorption in the same region, with a total estimated at 747 ng / ul (uncalibrated estimate) - Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) has absorption maxima at 270 nm, compatible with the spectrum obtained (Thema et al, 2013. Journal of Chemistry ID 150536) - The maximum absorption obtained DOES NOT ALLOW TO DISCARD the presence of graphene in the sample. The minimum amount of RNA detected by QUBIT2.0 only explains a residual percentage of the total UV absorption of the sample. OBJECTIVE: Microscopic identification of graphene derivatives METHODOLOGY: 1. Imaging in optical and electron microscopy 2. Comparison with literature images and reduced graphene oxide standard sample TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (TEM) Electron microscope JEM-2100Plus Voltage: 200 kV Resolution 0.14 nm Magnification up to x1,200,000 2 TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (TEM) Electron microscopy (TEM) is commonly used to image graphene nanomaterials. It has become a fairly standard and easy to use an instrument that is capable of imaging individual layered graphene sheets.

A new report has just been released by The Scientists Club collating research on the real contents of the C19 'vaccines'. This article features a few highlights - to read the full report please download the PDF at the end. NB - In anticipation of the many emails I will get asking about The Scientists Club yes, they are keeping their identities quiet for now. I understand the frustration, but the gravity of the overall situation needs to be understood. In 1920s New York, would someone spilling incriminating evidence about Al Capone, have given their name, photo and home address to a newspaper? Or, would they have required anonymity? Options were to publish without names or, withhold the content. As you can see, I chose the former, and hope you can appreciate the situation. 😁 Here are some of the highlights from the report.... Introduction The Covid-Sars2 pandemic induced industries to develop new drugs that they called vaccines. The mechanism of action of these drugs (as declared by the pharmaceutical industries coupled with what is reported in the products’ data sheet) is clearly proves these products are not vaccines, but nanotechnological drugs working as a genetic therapy. The 'vaccines' have been labelled vaccines to circumnavigate rules on basic 'medicines' which are in place for all drugs most especially novel experimental biotech. The 'vaccines' are patented and the real ingredients held secret from the public and government buyers using taxpayers money. Consumers are kept in the dark from the nanotechnological processes involved, the side effects and from the possible nano-bio-interactions that can happen. By analysis with nano-tech instruments, this study provides information on the real content. Materials and methods Four “vaccines” were analyzed developed for Corona Virus disease (Comirnaty di Pfizer-BioNtech, Vaxzevria by Astrazeneca, Janssen by Johnson & Johnson), Moderna) using different instrumentation and protocols of preparation according to new nanotechnological approaches. Optical Microscope, Dark-Field Microscope, UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscope, Scanning Electron Microscopes, Transmission Electron Microscope, Energy Dispersive Spectroscope, X-ray Diffractometer, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments were used to verify the “vaccines”’ morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results. ANALYSIS: Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System MODERNA A mixed entity (organic-inorganic) identified in a Moderna “vaccine”. It is a Carbon-based substrate where some nanoparticles are embedded. The nanoparticles are composed of Aluminium-Copper-Iron-Chlorine. Many foreign bodies were identified with a spherical morphology with some bubble-shaped cavities. They are composed of Silicon- Lead-Cadmium-Selenium. This highly-toxic composition reminds that of quantum dots (Cadmium selenide). A 100-micron entity that reminds that of graphene. It is composed of Carbon and Oxygen with contamination of Nitrogen, Silicon, Phosphorus, Chlorine. Carbon-based entities in a Moderna “vaccine” (see below) mixed with aggregates filled with Aluminium-silicate particles PFIZER Sharp debris of 20micron of length identified in a Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of Carbon, Oxygen Chromium, Sulphur, Aluminium, Chloride, Nitrogen. A strange foreign body, surely engineered with strange holes on the surface. The white debris are composed of Carbon, Oxygen, Aluminium, Silicon, Calcium, Magnesium, Chlorine and Nitrogen. Debris identified in a Pfizer “vaccine”. The white 2-micron-long particle is composed of Bismuth, Carbon, Oxygen, Aluminium, Sodium, Copper, Nitrogen. An organic (Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen) aggregate with embedded nanoparticles of Bismuth-Titanium-Vanadium -Iron-Copper Silicon-Aluminium embedded in Pfizer “vaccine” The 50-micron long body (see image below) is a mysterious presence in a vaccine. It could be a trypanosoma parasites several variants of which are lethal’ (the bold italic text is missing form original {PDF) JANSSEN Shows an organic-inorganic aggregate (see below) identified in a Janssen “vaccine”. The particles are composed of stainless steel and are glued together with a “Carbon-based glue”. This aggregate is magnetic and can trigger biological problems inside the blood circulation due to possible interactions with other dipoles. (EDITOR'S NOTE: PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO VACCINE INDUCED MAGNETISM HERE: ) ASTRAZENECA An engineered aggregate of Iron-Chromium-Nickel (stainless steel) nanoparticles embedded identified in an Astrazeneca “vaccine” ANALYSIS: XRF Instrumentation ASTRAZENECA Histidine Sucrose, PEG (poly-ethylene glycol) Ethylene alcohol. Only the presence of PEG is declared in the data sheet of this “vaccine”. ANALYSIS: OPTICAL MICROSCOPE - These are the work of Dr Campra from Almeria University see his full report here PFIZER These images were obtained using 100X and 600X optical microscopy (normal microscopes) On the left we see the images obtained from the Pfizer vaccine On the right we see a visual match from known sources. Aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and from reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical microscopy, 100X Aqueous fraction images from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and sonicated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical microscopy, 600X ANALYSIS: ELECTRON MICROSCOPE - These are the work of Dr Campra from Almeria University see his full report here PFIZER TEM microscope observation where particles of graphene in a Pfizer” vaccine” are present. The X-ray diffractometry reveals their nature of crystalline Carbon-based nanoparticles. Aqueous fraction from ComirnatyTM sample. Electronic microscope (TEM), JEM-2100Plus, at 200 kV ANALYSIS: SPECTROPHOTOMETER PFIZER The spectrum was compatible with the peak of rGO at 270nm. Most of this absorbance might be due to graphene-like sheets, abundant in suspension in the sample. This thesis was further supported by high fluorescence from the sample with maximum at 340 nm, in accordance with peak values for Graphene Oxide. SUMMARY The analyzed “vaccines” present components that are not mentioned in the technical data sheet and whose presence does not seem to have to do with the concept of vaccine. Since they are not included in the documentation presented to the Governmental organizations (FDA, EMA, etc.) for the legal approval aimed at the commercialization and the human use, they seem to be a contamination probably due to the industrial process of manufacturing. It seems that nobody controlled the final product before its distribution - that means that consumers are not informed of the real content of the products. Possible side effects may be due to the injection of those contaminants into the body. It must be observed that the components that are not declared but we identified are not biocompatible and some have also a mechanical impact once they are inside the blood circulation, especially in contact with the vascular endothelium. The entities present in Pfizer and Astrazeneca “vaccines”, identified by the ESEM images, can represent a risk for the human body. They can be responsible of the formation of thrombi, since they are thrombogenic. A further risk is represented by the extravasation of the particles with an ensuing possible haemorrhage. Once in the blood circulation, the particles can be carried also to the brain. In this case the patient can suffer from a stroke, and/or a cerebral haemorrhage. If the damage of the endothelium caused by the particles occurs in the heart, there is a high probability of contracting myocarditis. In addition to all that, the toxicity of graphene is well-known. The presence of non-biocompatible organic-inorganic foreign bodies in the blood circulation can be responsible of a nano-bio-interaction that can induce severe health problems. References Graphene Oxide discovery - Dr Campra from Almeria University see his full report https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/englis-translation-of-the-graphene-oxide-almeria-paper Bano, I. et al , 2019. Exploring the fluorescence properties of reduced graphene oxide with tunable device performance, Diamond and Related Materials, Volume 94,59-64,ISSN 0925- 9635 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2019.02.021. Biroju, Ravi & Narayanan, Tharangattu & Vineesh, Thazhe Veettil. (2018). New advances in 2D electrochemistry—Catalysis and Sensing. 10.1201/9781315152042-7. Choucair, M., Thordarson, P. & Stride, J. Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nature Nanotech 4, 30–33 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.365 Kim et al, Seeing graphene-based sheets, Materials Today,Volume 13, Issue 3,2010,Pages 28- 38,ISSN 1369-7021 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70031-6 Xu et al, (2019) Identification of graphene oxide and its structural features in solvents by optical microscopy, RSC Adv., 9, 18559-18564 1-Extracction RNA Kit https://www.fishersci.es/shop/products/ambion-purelink-rna-mini-kit- 7/10307963 2- NanoDropTM https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/ND-2000#/ND-2000 3- QUBIT2.0: https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/references/newsletters-and- journals/bioprobes-journal-of-cell-biology-applications/bioprobes-issues-2011/bioprobes-64-april- 2011/the-qubit-2-0-fluorometer-april-2011.html DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL AND FULL REPORT BELOW NOTE: the original document has been translated, leading to quirky use of English and a couple of confusingly labelled images. SIGN OUR PETITION CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO VACCINE-INDUCED MAGNETISM HERE >>> JAPANESE SUSPENSION OF MODERNA VACCINE DUE TO PARTICLES THAT 'REACT TO MAGNETS' : HERE

Did you think that only COVID vaccines contained graphene? Well, now this nanomaterial has been also found in the flu vaccine Vaxigrip Tetra. La Quinta Columna revealed this information today in its 84th program. This vial's analysis is being carried out by a researcher, for the moment anonymous, who is in contact with the Spanish team. It's impressive that La Quinta Columna's suspicions regarding the composition of the vaccines produced during the last few years have been correct in every way. The analyses that are being carried out confirm that Big Pharma has been exposing people to graphene for a long time, intoxicating them in silence. Orwell City has rushed to get the scoop today and, as usual, brings you the key excerpt from the program. In it, you can see the optical microscopy photographs and note the similarity of the detected nanomaterial to the graphene oxide described in the scientific literature. Read more here watch video

AS children, we all played with magnets. Delighted to see them jump and spin. To test what they stuck to, and what objects they didn’t. And, when we let go of them, no magnet ever stuck to our fingers. When I first saw a video of a magnet sticking to the arm of somebody, I smiled and quickly flicked by to something of real interest. Then someone sent me another magnet video. I hesitated slightly and moved on to something else. That evening, two friends called me to confirm their findings. Anne had been at a dinner party and had waited until the guests were relaxed on their second bottle of wine before pulling her magnet out. Carl had filmed himself attaching a magnet to the arm of his mother and it had gone viral. A quick search on the internet found the usual suspect ‘fact checkers’ debunking this magnet phenomenon - a clear telltale sign of a cover-up. My ‘favourite’ fact checker of all, Snopes, had featured Carl’s video of his mother, calling it fake. There was only one thing to do - I packed my camera, jumped on the train down to the South Coast to find out for myself whether a magnet would be attracted to his mother’s arm, or not.Carl quickly demonstrated the spot of magnetism on his mother. Even though I was inches away, I asked Carl to take the camera so I could try for myself. Feeling a magnet being tugged out of your hand, by a subtle yet defined magnetic force from under the skin of a living human being, is quite a shock.Sensing the magnet being repelled, and trying to flip so that the correct polarity was in contact with the skin, was mind-blowing. We had just established the basics on camera. The magnet had stuck to Carl’s mother’s arm due to an indisputable magnetic attraction. The fact checkers, including Snopes, Reuters, the BBC reality check and Fact Check–alongside a multitude of US main stream TV channels–were deceiving the public. You can see the short documentary we made via the website called ‘The Magnet Challenge - True or False? ’The call out for people to take up the #magnetchallenge using neodymium magnets was working and the videos were appearing on social media from all over the world. Our next step was to take a team to St James Park, London on the day of the 29th of May Freedom protest to ask random people to take part in the Magnet Challenge on film. We were joined by Dr T. As we were setting up, news came in that the BBC had made a joint announcement with the NHS, calling for the banning of neodymium magnets claiming they were now deemed a risk to children. A coincidence? Maybe. However, we suspected that drawing such flack with such precise timing, confirmed that we were over the target. Our walk-about challenge within the park caused mixed reactions. Some were near tears, two young Israelis refused to accept the fact staring them in the face and others laughed it off - even if nervously. Importantly, Dr T., a UK trained doctor, had now verified our findings on camera.You can also see the short film ‘The Magnet Challenge with Dr T’ on our website. DOWNLOAD THE LIGHT NEWSPAPER HERE www.NotOnTheBeeb.co.uk

Sally Beck interviewed DR T and I for this article on our work exposing the syndrome of vaccine-induced magnetism. FACT checkers at the BBC, Reuters and Snopes have been busy debunking the Covid vaccine ‘magnet challenge’. Social media including TikTok, Facebook and Instagram have been awash with videos showing people with magnets sticking to the exact spot on their arms where they had received a Covid jab. See some independently verified examples here. All three companies went to great lengths to explain why a magnet cannot possibly cling to your skin, without experimenting on a single vaccinated person to see what would happen. BBC fact checker Jack Goodman spoke to many who said the magnet challenge worked for them and ‘were genuinely curious as to why’. He didn’t provide them with answers; instead he focused on one TikTok prankster called Emily who admitted she’d licked a magnet as a joke and stuck it to her arm. It has been left to independent associations, doctors and journalists to test the phenomenon. Not On The Beeb founder and award-winning director Mark Playne tracked down a woman called Lorraine whose Instagram post of a magnet sticking to the Pfizer vaccine site on her left arm went viral. The fact-checkers said the video was fake but none of them bothered to visit her and test for themselves. Playne told me: ‘Lorraine’s son Carl demonstrated the spot of magnetism on his mother. Even though I was inches away, I asked Carl to take the camera so I could.... READ MORE HERE

The biosecurity technological panopticon constructed by NSF-led PPP with big tech will create, host and facilitate outer wireless network of the panopticon, while NSF-funded IntraBioNets program builds inner network, through the interoperable biocyber wireless network between humans and the Internet, granting health care providers access to critical, private health information to conduct mass disease surveillance of the population. The system engineers in the outer network formed the Resilient & Intelligent NextG Systems (RINGS), which consist of a public-private partnership (PPP) led by the National Science Foundation (NSF), other federal agencies (including the DoD) and multiple private sector actors, including Apple, Ericsson, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, Qualcomm Technologies and VMware. The RINGS program seeks to “accelerate research in areas that will potentially have a significant impact on emerging Next Generation (NextG) wireless and mobile communication, networking, sensing, and computing systems, along with global-scale services.” A total investment of $40 million includes contributions from each of the private partners. Approximately 40 awards were anticipated, each up to $1 million and up to 3 years in duration. NextG systems are “future versions of today’s cellular, Wi-Fi and satellite networks that are expected to connect billions of people and revolutionize the relationship between users’ devices and cloud services.” The RINGS program initially appears harmless but, when combined with the IntraBioNets program, the spurious gathering of this PPP alludes to a more sinister intent, when hosting an application that can track and monitor the health of living organisms, including humans, and deliver drug treatments back into the body. In 2018, NSF, Division Of Computer and Network Systems (CNS), awarded a $300,000 grant of taxpayer dollars to the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, to fund the IntraNetsBio program. This IntraNetsBio program forms the inner network that connects the RINGS program’s work to the biosensor wireless network in the human body. The goal of the IntraBioNets program was to solve challenges in developing a self-sustainable and bio-compatible network infrastructure that exploits the natural mechanisms of biological communication, on the cellular level, in the human body. The program models biological embedded computing devices that have the capability to gather and transfer information within the biological domain through an interface with the electrical domain of the Internet. Read more here... https://essentialliberties.com/2021/07/01/intrabionets-and-nsf-led-rings-programs-with-big-tech-form-the-wireless-network-to-connect-humans-the-internet/

This is for all MP’s who STILL think that wearing masks is a good idea. Below are over 30 links to published studies and resources that show the risks from masks and that they offer NO protection! Please let your MP’s know if they are still confused about this! Find your MP here If you have not signed our petition calling for an investigation into vaccine-induced magnetism yet, please do. This is urgent. www.NotOnTheBeeb.co.uk/magnetism-land Links on Masks: 1. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.full 2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/ 3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500410/ 4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/ 5. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00173017 6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18331781/ 7. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-35797-3 8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31479137/ 9. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577#T1 10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21477136/ 11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28039289/ 12. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.long 13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20584862/ 14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22188875/ 15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31479137/ 16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27531371/ 17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29855107/ 18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29678452/ 19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25806411/ 20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23108786/ 21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25858901/ 22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5333967/ 23. https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744 24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27531371/ 25. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2 26. https://vimeo.com/424254660 27. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0t84p6H4XA 28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/ 29. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x 30 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness/article/testing-the-efficacy-of-homemade-masks-would-they-protect-in-an-influenza-pandemic/0921A05A69A9419C862FA2F35F819D55? 31. https://m.facebook.com/flx/warn/?u=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs12560-011-9056-7%3Ffbclid

In 1912 the Titanic sinks with 1,502 fatalities making instant world headlines. In 2021, the experimental 'vaccine' roll out kills 1,517 Brits and the BBC brush the numbers under a carpet... The social media giants censor anyone daring to publish these numbers below, obtained from the UK governmental MHRA website. CURRENT 30th July MHRA Yellow Card Reporting which only includes data up until 21st July 2021 (please scroll to bottom to download the full precise lists) * Pfizer - 20.4million people - 33.3m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-215 people impacted * Astrazeneca - 24.7m people - 47.9m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-110 people impacted * Moderna - 1.3m people - 1.6m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-118 people impacted Overall 1-in-140 people experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Industry expected 1 in 10 people to have a reaction meaning real numbers could be 14X higher. To learn about the unexpected and unrecorded side effects of vaccine-induced magnetism see more at www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetism Reports (total people reporting injury) 95,040 (Pfizer) + 224,252 (AZ) + 10,990 (Moderna) + 958 (Unknown) Total = 331,240 (on average having about three of the below reactions) Fatalities 466 (Pfizer) 1018 (AZ) 8 (Moderna) 25 (Unknown jab) Total = 1,517 Acute Cardiac 4020 (Pfizer) + 8814 (AZ) + 320 (Moderna) + 30 (Unknown) Total = 13,184 Myocardial Infarction & Heart Failure 208 (Pfizer) + 467 (AZ) + 11 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) Total = 692 Anaphylaxis 437 (Pfizer) + 793 (AZ) + 27 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) Total = 1258 Blood Disorders 8707 (Pfizer) + 7202 (AZ) + 646 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) Total = 16,593 Infections 6341 (Pfizer) + 17,575 (AZ) + 518 (Moderna) + 84 (Unknown) Total = 24,518 Herpes 1479 (Pfizer) + 2390 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) Total = 3,933 Head pain 19,629 (Pfizer) + 82,697 (AZ) + 1716 (Moderna) + 213 (Unknown) Total = 104,255 Migraines 2164 (Pfizer) + 7857 (AZ) + 197 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) Total = 10,244 Eye Disorders 4407 (Pfizer) + 13,339 (AZ) + 339 (Moderna) + 45 (Unknown) Total = 18,130 Blinded 81 (Pfizer) + 266 (AZ) + 9 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) Total = 359 Deaf 167 (Pfizer) + 342 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) Total = 519 Psychiatric Disorders 5224 (Pfizer) + 16,555 (AZ) + 620 (Moderna) + 69 (Unknown) Total = 22,468 Skin Disorders 19,044 (Pfizer) + 49,260 (AZ) + 5553 (Moderna) + 188 (Unknown) Total = 74,045 Spontaneous Abortions 197 + 7 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 167 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) + 16 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) Total = 381 + 11 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy 612 (Pfizer) + 811 (AZ) + 37 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) Total = 1,465 Nervous System Disorders 47,255 (Pfizer) + 170,969 (AZ) + 4904 (Moderna) + 551 (Unknown) Total = 223,679 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages 467 (Pfizer) + 1892 (AZ) + 13 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) Total = 2,378 Guillian Barre Syndrome 38 (Pfizer) + 362 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) Total = 407 Loss of balance 443 (Pfizer) + 23,850 (AZ) + 1067 (Moderna) + 80 (Unknown) Total = 32,440 Tremors 133 (Pfizer) + 9581 (AZ) + 109 (Moderna) + 36 (Unknown) Total = 10,859 Pulmonary Embolism 313 (Pfizer) + 1471 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) Total = 1,800 Deep Vein Thrombosis 197 (Pfizer) + 1087 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) Total = 1,299 Respiratory Disorders 11,516 (Pfizer) + 26,785 (AZ) + 824 (Moderna) + 93 (Unknown) Total = 39,218 Seizures 629 (Pfizer) + 1808 (AZ) + 79 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) Total = 2,524 Paralysis 256 (Pfizer) + 693 (AZ) + 25 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) Total = 978 Vertigo/Tinnitis 2367 (Pfizer) + 6074 (AZ) + 207 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) Total = 8667 Muscle & Tissue Disorders 32,555 (Pfizer) + 96,523 (AZ) + 3444 (Moderna) + 323 (Unknown) Total = 132,845 Reproductive/Breast 13,599 (Pfizer) + 15,366 (AZ) + 1688 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) Total = 30,747 Reproductive/Breast 13,599 (Pfizer) + 15,366 (AZ) + 1688 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) Total = 30,747 Online Source DOWNLOAD FULL PDF OF THE ADVERSE REACTIONS PER BRAND UK - ASTRAZENECA ADVERSE REACTIONS UK - PFIZER ADVERSE REACTIONS UK - MODERNA ADVERSE REACTIONS UK - UNSPECIFIED ADVERSE REACTIONS Have you suffered an adverse event? Have you suffered a magnetic adverse event?

Plans to use GO as part of UK water filtering process. Will it contaminate, or clean our water supply? QUOTE: "...UK technology business G2O Water Technologies has landed its first commercial contract for the enhancement of water filtration membranes with graphene oxide. This is particularly significant for both the technology company as well as the water sector globally, as it is the first commercially successful application of the recently developed material for water treatment. The advantages of using graphene oxide lie in the enhancement of membrane performance, as it mitigates the effects of fouling – one of the biggest challenges operators of membrane-based water filtration systems face. With a coating of graphene oxide, successfully developed and piloted by the company in the northwest of England in collaboration with Hydrasyst Limited, operators can improve operational efficiency, reduce energy consumption and decrease chemical usage. It is anticipated that this will extend the lifetime of the membranes, as well as significantly reducing the cost and environmental impact of water treatment. Hydrasyst, the earliest adopter of the technology, is a British turnkey solution provider of advanced membrane technology systems, particularly in industrial processes. Commenting on its work with G2O, Managing Director Kyle Wolff said, “We’re thrilled to have been closely...". Read more here https://www.watertechonline.com/industry/article/14207913/g2o-water-technologies-contract-approved-to-use-graphene-oxide-to-coat-water-filtration-membranes

As we wonder about the mechanism that has lead to vaccine-induced magnetism, this study and article are of interest. Do PEGulated iron oxide nanoparticles ring a bell? Does the guiding of these particles into place using magnets, or Electro-Magnetic Fields feel like deja-vu? The PEG (polyethyleneglycol) component, is a lipid used to disguise a nanoparticle from the protective human biosphere, within a Trojan-horse-like liposomal coating. . The magnetic field that can then draw the substance (iron oxide will respond to magnetic fields) to the target area. PEG however is known to cause varying degrees of allergic reactions. And of course, in a modern world where we are have polluted our environment with invisible EMFs, particles will also be attracted by competing EMF fields, for instance, those emitted by a mobile or a laptop. Anyone that has used an EMF reader to test a laptop, will the frequencies generated are highest in the area of the groin - which ironically will probably enforce the effect these researchers are after - drawing the PEGlated nanoparticles to that area. But what happens if someone places a mobile by their head? Or, lies down and places their mobile on their chest as they talk via loudspeaker, as many of us do? Will these actions pull the PEGlated nanoparticles towards our heads, or our hearts? QUOTE: "... For men looking to avoid getting their partner pregnant, there are basically two options — condoms or a vasectomy. Now, scientists are experimenting with an unlikely third option, magnets. A team in China has developed a long-lasting and biodegradable male contraceptive that uses injections of nanoparticles and magnetic fields to keep men from reproducing. Their study tested this concept on male mice, examining the effectiveness of two different kinds of nanomaterials entering the body. The process involves heating the nanoparticles after magnets help to guide these tiny particles down into the testes. Once there, they act as a contraceptive as the heat shrinks the testes and inhibits spermatogenesis. Heat is no good for sperm It’s no secret that high temperatures are not good for the health of a man’s sperm. Even a guy’s clothing — such as tight-fitting pants or underwear — can decrease their sperm count. With that in mind, previous studies have looked at using heated nanomaterials injected right into the testes as a form of birth control. Unfortunately, scientists have found that the injections are too painful, the heating damages the skin, and some of the nanoparticles tried out are not biodegradable. Researchers Weihua Ding and Fei Sun led a team that’s taking on this approach from a completely new angle. The new contraceptive doesn’t involve a direct injection into the testes of males. Instead, after two days of injecting coated nanoparticles into the bloodstream of mice, scientists guided them into position using magnets. From there, they applied an alternating magnetic field to the area for 15 minutes. Researchers used two types of iron oxide nanoparticles, one coated with polyethene glycol (PEG) and others coated with citric acid. Although the team could heat the PEG particles, they couldn’t effectively move them using magnets. On the other hand, researchers successfully moved and heated citric acid-coated nanoparticles in the testes — forming a barrier to pregnancy for several days. Results show mice treated with this concept could not father any pups for seven days. Moreover, the shrinking of the testes gradually reversed after 30 to 60 days. “The nanoparticles were non-toxic to cells and were gradually eliminated from the body, offering new possibilities for male contraception,” the researchers write in a media release. Source is here Abstract Mild testicular hyperthermia by the photothermal effect of gold nanorods could realize controllable male contraception. However, associated limitations, such as testicular administration and infrared laser inflicting severe pain, and the nondegradability of nanoparticles potentially causing toxicity, have restricted further clinical application. Inspired by the excellent physicochemical properties of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs), and the finding that testicular injection of PEG-coated IONPs with a diameter of 50 nm (PEG@Fe3O4-50) following an alternating magnetic field (AMF) could achieve controllable male contraception; here we propose a noninvasive, targeting approach for male contraception via intravenous administration. The magnetic properties and testes targeting of IONPs were proven to be greatly affected by their surface chemistry and particle size. After systemic administration, citric acid stabilized IONPs with size of 100 nm (CA@Fe3O4-100) were found to be the best ideal thermoagent for realizing the noninvasive contraception. This study offers new strategies for male contraception. ACS Nano Letters Source is here

(updated with correction) Huge news as Canadian Patrick King collapses a $1200 court case. He was being fined for breaking the corona-rules. He subpoenaed local health officials asking them to prove the existence of the virus. They of course failed. A must watch. 4 key court documents below 👇👇👇 CORRECTION: The show incorrectly said King had won the case, whereas his victory was the admission that the prosecutors had no evidence. Watch the clarification here: (Thanks Maurizio and Andy for highlighting the error) This reminds me of a letter I was printing off and handing out to my local shops a few months back. This is on FOI that was made to UK Government Criminal Presecution Service in the winter, asking how many people had been prosecuted nationally for breaking the UK's corona rules? The Result might surprise you. Yes, it confirms all cases in the UK up until later Feb were dropped as they had been 'incorrectly charged" and due to "insufficient evidence." Here are the 4 key court documents King used below 👇👇👇

If we presume the same vaccination rate and fatality rate for kids as we've seen for adults, we can expect a minimum of 300 child C19 experimental vaccine deaths within the UK. Are you ready for one these deaths to be your child? These are the adverse reactions and death stats for adults as published Friday. UPDATED REPORT PUBLISHED 6TH AUG 2021 MHRA Yellow Card Reporting up to 28th July 2021 Pfizer - 20.46million people - 34.26m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-208 people impacted. Astrazeneca - 24.8m people - 48.4m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-110 people impacted Moderna - 1.3m people - 1.7m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-110 people impacted Overall 1-in-138 people experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event and this may be approximately a 10% reporting rate according to MHRA. Reactions (one person on average reports 3 reactions) 275,820 (Pfizer) + 806,085 (AZ) + 35,207 (Moderna) + 2897 (Unknown) Total = 1,120,009 Reports - 98,432 (Pfizer) + 225,871 (AZ) + 11,783 (Moderna) + 978 (Unknown) Total = 337,064 Fatal - 478 (Pfizer) + 1024 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) Total = 1547 Acute Cardiac 4238 (Pfizer) + 8893 (AZ) + 370 (Moderna) + 30 (Unknown) Total = 13,531 Myocardial Infarction & Heart Failure 215 (Pfizer) + 473 (AZ) + 11 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) Total = 705 Anaphylaxis 444 (Pfizer) + 799 (AZ) + 28 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) Total = 1272 Blood Disorders 9137 (Pfizer) + 7252 (AZ) + 690 (Moderna) + 40 (Unknown) Total = 17,119 Infections - 6531 (Pfizer) + 17,706 (AZ) + 563 (Moderna) + 85 (Unknown) Total = 24,885 Headaches 20,173 (Pfizer) + 82,989 (AZ) + 1913 (Moderna) + 214 (Unknown) Total = 105,289 Migraine - 2247 (Pfizer) + 7910 (AZ) + 221 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) Total = 10,406 Eye Disorders 4570 (Pfizer) + 13,449 (AZ) + 368 (Moderna) + 47 (Unknown) Total = 18,434 Blindness - 86 (Pfizer) + 269 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) Total = 368 Deafness 174 (Pfizer) + 345 (AZ) + 12 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) Total = 532 Psychiatric Disorders 5459 (Pfizer) + 16,701 (AZ) + 681 (Moderna) + 70 (Unknown) Total = 22,911 Skin Disorders 19,681 (Pfizer) + 49,638 (AZ) + 5814 (Moderna) + 200 (Unknown) Total = 75,333 Spontaneous Abortions 217 + 6 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 171 + 2 stillbirth (AZ) + 18 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) Total = 407 + 9 (figures imply 12 related maternal deaths) Vomiting 2987 (Pfizer) + 11,277 (AZ) + 366 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) Total = 14,729 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy 635 (Pfizer) + 830 (AZ) + 43 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) Total = 1,513 Nervous System Disorders 48,833 (Pfizer) + 171,971 (AZ) + 5384 (Moderna) + 557 (Unknown) Total = 226,745 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 476 (Pfizer) + 1926 (AZ) + 13 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) Total = 2421 Guillian Barre Syndrome 39 (Pfizer) + 372 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) Total = 418 Dizziness 7688 (Pfizer) + 23,965 (AZ) + 1158 (Moderna) + 61 (Unknown) Total = 32,872 Tremor 1163 (Pfizer) + 9606 (AZ) + 120 (Moderna) + 36 (Unknown) Total = 10,925 Arthralgia, Myalgia & Muscle Spasms 15,617 (Pfizer) + 51,684 (AZ) + 1475 (Moderna) + 125 (Unknown) Total = 68,901 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis 529 (Pfizer) + 2605 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) Total = 3,170 Thrombocytopenia 235 (Pfizer) + 1090 (AZ) + 15 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) Total = 1,350 Nosebleeds 693 (Pfizer) + 2178 (AZ) + 58 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) . Total = 2937 Respiratory Disorders 11,903 (Pfizer) + 27,001 (AZ) + 893 (Moderna) + 96 (Unknown) Total = 39,893 Seizures - 647 (Pfizer) + 1835 (AZ) + 88 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) Total = 2578 Paralysis 271 (Pfizer) + 701 (AZ) + 30 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) Total = 1,006 Haemorrhage (All types) 2254 (Pfizer) + 4664 (AZ) + 282 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) Total = 7221 Vertigo/Tinnitis 2461 (Pfizer) + 6148 (AZ) + 223 (Moderna) + 20 (Unknown) Total = 8,852 Reproductive/Breast 14,553 (Pfizer) + 15,856 (AZ) + 1829 (Moderna) + 99 (Unknown) Total = 32,337 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting300

EDITOR COMMENT: Is there a link between vaccine-induced magnetism, GBS and the vaccine? WHAT IS Guillain-Barré Syndrome? QUOTE: "...Guillain-Barré (pronounced ghee-yan bar-ray) syndrome is a very rare and serious condition that affects the nerves. It mainly affects the feet, hands and limbs, causing problems such as numbness, weakness and pain. It can be treated and most people will eventually make a full recovery, although it can occasionally be life-threatening and some people are left with long-term problems. Guillain-Barré syndrome affects people of all ages but it is more common in adults and males...." Read more here BMJ LETTER SUMMARY: Regulators warn that rare Guillain-Barré cases may link to J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines Autoimmune damage to the nerves following Covid vaccines: EMA issued warning to patients and healthcare professionals Re: Covid-19:<>>>" Dear Editor EMA recently investigated the cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) following Covid vaccine AstraZeneca (AZ) and have issued a warning to raise awareness of healthcare professionals and the public about GBS cases following Covid vaccinations and recommended revising the product information for Covid vaccine AZ [1]. MHRA later also concluded that as a precautionary measure they will also be adding a warning for GBS in the product information [2]. A similar warning has been issued by the United States FDA for the GBS followed by Janssen (J&J) Covid vaccine [3]. GBS is a rare but serious condition in which the immune system starts attacking the body’s healthy nerve cells in the peripheral nervous system that can result in pain, numbness, muscle weakness usually in the feet, hands and limbs) that can also spread to the chest and the face. EMA has advised people to seek immediate medical attention if they develop weakness and paralysis in the extremities progressing to the chest or face following the Covid vaccine. The EMA could not find enough evidence to confirm the association of GBS with the vaccine, however, this may be explained by the vaccine biodistribution to the nerves following intramuscular injection. The vaccine transfection and translation in the nerves may spur an immune response against nerve cells potentially resulting in autoimmune nerve damage. The preclinical evaluation of Covid vaccine AZ (study 514559) evidenced vaccine distribution) to various body tissues beyond injection site including sciatic nerves [4]. Study 514559 showed that the Covid vaccine AZ was distributed to sciatic nerves in almost all animals and the distributed fractions did not clear throughout the study. The last sample was taken on 29 days post-administration and sciatic nerves of 70% of animals were still tested positive at the end of the study. The vaccine distribution to the sciatic nerves may lead to conditions like sciatica that has been previously linked to the viral infection of the sciatic nerve, such as herpes. The MHRA pharmacovigilance database reported ~187 cases of sciatica post-Covid vaccine AZ as of 28th July 2021. There were at least 127 other instances of nerve injury and 301 cases of various forms of neuropathies (including 207 cases of peripheral neuropathy) listed in the MHRA database [2]. The biodistribution of the vaccine to other nerves is not known as the study 514559 checked for sciatic nerves only being anatomically closer to the injection site (hind limb) in mice. The facial (cranial) nerves, on the contrary, are anatomically closer to the vaccine injection site in humans (deltoid muscle). The MHRA database listed ~1031 cases of facial cranial nerve disorders (527 cases of Bell’s palsy and 457 cases of facial paresis/paralysis), 20 cases of Miller Fisher syndrome and additional 372 cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome (2 fatal) following AZ vaccine up until 28th July 2021. It is worth noting that the Covid vaccine AZ clinical trials were paused twice and, on both occasions, the trial subjects developed a neurological condition, transverse myelitis. One of the subjects was later diagnosed with multiple sclerosis [5], declared unrelated to the vaccine. Surprisingly, as of 28th July 2021, there are 77 cases of transverse myelitis, 16 cases of myelitis and another 13 cases of encephalomyelitis following Covid vaccine AZ in the MHRA database. Moreover, there are additional 56 cases of multiple sclerosis and another 49 cases reporting a relapse of multiple sclerosis within the MHRA database. The vaccine-induced multiple sclerosis (if proven) may also be an autoimmune response to the vaccine distribution and transfection to the nerves. The biodistribution (study 514559) also evidenced the vaccine distribution via blood circulation to other tissues notably bone marrow, liver, mammary glands and spleen. The vaccine encoded gene transfection to distant tissues is likely to attract an immune response against various body tissues that can manifest into various autoimmune conditions. Recently, vaccine distribution to the vasculature and interaction with circulatory platelets have been proposed as a likely mechanism for thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) [6]. These autoimmune responses may well be transient in many healthy subjects, and the immune response is likely to be very selective towards vaccine transfected cells only, however, the possibility of developing a chronic autoimmune condition in some individuals cannot be overruled. The regulatory authorities are, therefore, requested to review the cases of GBS in association with various other neuropathies and vaccine biodistribution data from preclinical trials. This will not only help in explaining a causal link but will also help take necessary precautionary measures in time for public safety. A similar issue has been reported with Janssen (J&J) Covid vaccine [7], and we anticipate other viral-vector Covid vaccines such as CanSinoBIO (China) and Sputnik V (Russia) are likely to pose a similar risk. The detailed tissue-specific distribution of mRNA vaccines encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins (Pfizer or Moderna) is not fully known that could offer invaluable insights into the long-term safety of mRNA vaccines. However, the surrogate studies using similar formulations by Pfizer [8] and Moderna [9] did confirm a biodistribution of mRNA vaccines beyond the injection site. We urge regulatory authorities to mandate manufacturers to perform adequate biodistribution studies on vaccine formulations and request further data to better understand the implications of vaccine transfection in distant tissues before mass vaccine rollout in children or recommending additional adult booster doses. MHRA is requested to investigate the cases of post-vaccine GBS and related signals of nerve damages in association with wider signals of auto-immune reactions in their database. Most of the adults in UK are already vaccinated, therefore, early recognition of post-vaccine autoimmune conditions like GBS may help in offering early therapeutic interventions to those who are potentially affected with the condition that can help to prevent disease progression and chronic illness. GBS case reports following Covid vaccines [10, 11] also emphasise the importance of early therapeutic intervention. Novel Covid vaccines work on the premise of gene delivery and their long-term safety must be assessed if genetic vaccines were to be sustained beyond the CoViD-19 pandemic. READ SOURCE HERE References [1] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/meeting-highlights-pharmacovigilance-risk-assessment-committee-prac-5-august-2021 [2] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting) [3] https://www.fda.gov/media/150723/download [4]https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1003840/CMA_UKPAR_COVID_19_Vaccine_AstraZeneca_PAR_16.07.2021.pdf (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1003840/CMA_UKPAR_COVID_19_Vaccine_AstraZeneca_PAR_16.07.2021.pdf) [5] https://www.statnews.com/2020/09/09/astrazeneca-covid19-vaccine-trial-hold-patient-report/ https://www.statnews.com/2020/09/09/astrazeneca-covid19-vaccine-trial-hold-patient-report/) [6] https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.29.450356 [7] https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19vaccine/93537 [8]https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/944544/COVID- [9(https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/977367/UKPAR_COVID_19_Vaccine_Moderna_07.04.2021_CMA_Reliance_PAR__-__final.pdf) [10] https://casereports.bmj.com/content/bmjcr/14/4/e242956.full.pdf [11] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ncn3.12537 14 August 2021 Hamid Merchant Subject Leader in Pharmacy University of Huddersfield United Kingdom @HamidMerchant https://twitter.com/@HamidMerchant

During the c19 vaccine roll out, 1 in 137 people’s doctors have registered a Yellow Card Adverse event on UK's official gov database. Since the expected results were expected by the manufacturers to be 1 in 10 - this means people are failing to report their reactions. Is this due to a lack of information given at the vaccine centre? Is this due to doctor’s cognitive dissonance, in recognising the true reasons behind symptoms? Is it because most symptoms appear several days, or weeks, after the vaccination, meaning patients rarely connect the dots? Since before this ‘pandemic’, the CDC admitted that only 1-10% of vaccine adverse reactions are reported, so we can expect all of the above to play a part in the under reporting As you read through the numbers below, it’s worth considering the very real possibility that they are only 7% of the real total, or, are 13 times greater. This would make the 1,559 registered fatalities closer to 20,000. Is it possible that around 18,500 deaths in the UK have been misdiagnosed as heart attacks, renal failure, strokes or other reasons behind ‘sudden adult deaths’? Deaths can easily be misdiagnosed in adults, though we would imagine it would be harder for such inaccuracy to encompass children's adverse event data. Many parents whose children have suffered, or died from, childhood vaccines will scream “Yes, they can hide and deny the deaths, it happened to us.” However, the scale of what we are about to walk into this winter 2021/22 is potentially horrific. Just using the numbers reported in adults as an indicator, some simple calculations suggest that 300 children in the UK alone will become reported C19 vaccine fatalities. If the underreporting remains at the levels seen in adults, the real expected carnage amongst our children could reach 4,000. So, how many children need to die before mass vaccine-damage awareness is reached? To get an idea of the answer, there is recent case that we can look at. In 2017, even after trials indicated the vaccine had serious safety issues, Sanofi’s Dengvaxia vaccine was released in the Philippines, 600 children died before it was pulled. This fact was well documented and the information was available online until recently. I have just searched for a link to back the above info and surprise surprise.... the Wiki page has been altered and other articles have vanished, being replaced with dengue disease fear-inducing and pro-vaccine stories. (here is one surviving article) More on this to follow in future news feeds. Meanwhile, here is the latest set of data - released Friday 13th August - containing reports up until 4th August. MHRA Yellow Card Reporting up to 4th Aug 2021 • Pfizer - 20.8million people - 35.5m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-205 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.8m people - 48.6m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-109 people impacted • Moderna - 1.4m people - 1.9m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-111 people impacted Reactions - 284,776 (Pfizer) + 806,489 (AZ) + 38,285 (Moderna) + 3029 (Unknown) = 1,132,579 Reports - 101,483 (Pfizer) + 226,959 (AZ) + 12,569 (Moderna) + 1003 (Unknown) = 342,014 Fatal - 486 (Pfizer) + 1036 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 1559 Acute Cardiac - 4425 (Pfizer) + 8964 (AZ) + 417 (Moderna) + 32 (Unknown) = 13,838 Myocardial Infarction & Heart Failure - 219 (Pfizer) + 476 (AZ) + 11 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 712 Anaphylaxis - 453 (Pfizer) + 803 (AZ) + 30 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1287 Blood Disorders - 9545 (Pfizer) + 7283 (AZ) + 734 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 17,604 Infections - 6718 (Pfizer) + 17,843 (AZ) + 617 (Moderna) + 87 (Unknown) = 25,265 Headaches - 20,686 (Pfizer) + 83,141 (AZ) + 2150 (Moderna) + 223 (Unknown) = 106,200 Migraine - 2319 (Pfizer) + 7948 (AZ) + 245 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 10,541 Eye Disorders - 4711 (Pfizer) + 13,526 (AZ) + 404 (Moderna) + 50 (Unknown) = 18,691 Blindness - 93 (Pfizer) + 271 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 377 Deafness - 177 (Pfizer) + 348 (AZ) + 13 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 539 Psychiatric Disorders - 5692 (Pfizer) + 16,802 (AZ) + 759 (Moderna) + 73 (Unknown) = 23,326 Skin Disorders - 20,211 (Pfizer) + 49,841 (AZ) + 6102 (Moderna) + 207 (Unknown) = 76,361 Spontaneous Abortions - 242 + 6 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 177 + 2 stillbirth (AZ) + 21 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 441 + 9 (figures imply 14 related maternal deaths) Vomiting - 3069 (Pfizer) + 11,299 (AZ) + 404 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 14,811 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 658 (Pfizer) + 843 (AZ) + 44 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 1550 Nervous System Disorders - 50,230 (Pfizer) + 172,644 (AZ) + 5891 (Moderna) + 576 (Unknown) = 229,341 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 484 (Pfizer) + 1945 (AZ) + 13 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 2448 Guillian Barre Syndrome - 39 (Pfizer) + 377 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 423 Dizziness - 7892 (Pfizer) + 24,041 (AZ) + 1252 (Moderna) + 81 (Unknown) = 33266 Tremor - 1198 (Pfizer) + 9636 (AZ) + 132 (Moderna) + 37 (Unknown) = 11,003 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 549 (Pfizer) + 2630 (AZ) + 23 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3219 Nosebleeds - 705 (Pfizer) + 2189 (AZ) + 61 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2963 Respiratory Disorders - 12,238 (Pfizer) + 27,129 (AZ) + 978 (Moderna) + 105 (Unknown) = 40,450 Seizures - 668 (Pfizer) + 1841 (AZ) + 94 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2611 Paralysis - 282 (Pfizer) + 719 (AZ) + 33 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 1039 Haemorrhage (All types) - 2332 (Pfizer) + 4605 (AZ) + 114 (Moderna) + 22 (Unknown) = 7073 Vertigo/Tinnitis - 2535 (Pfizer) + 6199 (AZ) + 238 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 8993 Reproductive/Breast - 15,471 (Pfizer) + 16,103 (AZ) + 1969 (Moderna) + 108 (Unknown) = 33,651 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting GOV.UK (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting) Coronavirus vaccine - weekly summary of Yellow Card reporting

We know that vaccinations are leaving people magnetic. Is it possible that the effect is spreading to the jab-free? Or, is something else at play? Meet Zack and Gwen. This mind-blowing 4-minute film gives a taster of the upcoming interview with the lovely Gwen and Zacharia. If you would like to see the full interview join our newsletter IS THE VACCINE SHEDDING? READ THIS REPORT ON THE PFIZER VACCINE TRIAL PAPER. Please sign our petition calling for an investigation into Vaccine-induced magnetism.

When thousands of homing pigeons get lost, why are major questions not asked? Was this caused by freak weather as the article claims, or by a disruption to the earth's magnetic fields that pigeons rely on? Has 5G been switched on in these areas? Have the new 5G satellites affected the bird's navigational abilities? Canaries were used in coal mines to alert the miners of dangerous gasses. In the same way, the sensitivity of animals can give us clues to the effects of EMF pollutants from new technology and rollouts that could have devastating impacts on us. We need to watch this space, keeping an eye on animals that use guidance to navigate like homing pigeons and honey bees. QUOTE: "...Up to 250,000 birds were released in some 50 races all across Britain on Saturday, June 19, but only a small fraction of the birds managed to return. Indeed, many are still missing and have subsequently been spotted as far away as Holland and Majorca, prompting some to dub the date "the worst day in the sport's history". You can read more about that story here. The mysterious Bermuda Triangle phenomenon was first highlighted via a recent report about a race from Peterborough to the North East in which more than half of the 9,000 pigeons taking part went AWOL.." https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/pigeon-group-blame-freak-weather-20920258 Read about animals homing abilities here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetoreception Magnetic fields affecting cells. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidbressan/2021/01/08/scientists-observe-cells-responding-to-magnetic-fields-for-first-time/?sh=57a30e124c87 Join our telegram channel: https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb

Right Said Fred, brothers Fred and Richard Fairbrass, hit the UK news yesterday with their plucky stance in a Daily Mail article, creating shockwaves as Richard declared – even though he's been ill with C19 symptoms – he’d never touch the vaccine. DAILY MAIL QUOTE: "... 'I've had a bit of Covid, it wasn't too bad. I was a little breathless, I felt very tired. This vaccine is only for experimental use, it's on trial until 2023, there is no long-term data on it - anyone who takes it is foolish. Come 2023 and if everything is fine, I'll do it then. I'm absolutely not going to have one now.' The nineties star and his brother Fred, who sold over 30million records during a career spanning three decades, also attended an anti-lockdown protest in Trafalgar Square last September and supported anti-mask campaigners via the duo's official Twitter account..." I had the great pleasure of interviewing Right Said Fred for Not On The Beeb, in partnership with The Light Newspaper, shortly after the epic 2oth March London protest. After a long dark winter, the atmosphere of the record-breaking Freedom protest was electrifying. There is a short clip of a special moment that became viral at the end of the interview. The interview starts with two classic songs - one old and one new - warming everyone to the brilliant music these guys have brought us over the years. Richard and Fred are not only talented musicians - they are good fun fellas. Turn the video up loud. Enjoy!

Japan has suspended use of the Moderna Vaccine pulling 1.6 million doses after visible particulates(7) were found in vials. Particles that reacted to magnets. QUOTE: “… NHK, in a report published late on Thursday, cited ministry sources as saying the particle reacted to magnets and was therefore suspected to be a metal….” So are they one of the magnetic metals? Stainless steel? Iron Oxide? Or Nickel? Which we’d hope it is not in the manufacturing process, since it is highly toxic. Since normal metal contaminants would be easily and quickly identifiable, has something else been revealed? Since Graphene, Graphene Oxide (GO) and Reduced Graphene Oxide (RDO) have paramagnetic properties, could GO nano particulates have gathered together to form visible lumps that have responded to magnetic forces? The basics. Since the start of time no plant, animal or human has ever been naturally magnetic (1) People accepting the Moderna, Pfizer or J&J C19 jabs are showing clear magnetic properties at the injection site, or worse, over the upper chest and head. (2) One of the top suspected candidates for causing this vaccine-induced magnetism is Graphene Oxide. Although GO is not on any of the declared ingredient lists, we have found countless papers (3) detailing research that enables mRNA to get into cells more easily, with GO as an agent within the liposomal delivery mechanism, often in conjunction with PEG. Is it possible that GO has been added into the vaccine, yet omitted from the ingredient lists and patents? The suspicion of GO has been now been backed by reports from Spain (4), Germany and the Scientists Club (5). More importantly, understand the symptoms of toxic effects (6) of Graphene Oxide is crucial for they match a condition that we are hearing a lot about. Daily. See our magnetism films: Please sign our petition calling for an investigation into vaccine-induced magnetism More to follow. Meanwhile here is the full article. FULL REUTERS ARTICLE: “….TOKYO, Aug 27 (Reuters) - A contaminant found in a batch of Moderna Inc's (MRNA.O) COVID-19 vaccines delivered to Japan is believed to be a metallic particle, Japanese public broadcaster NHK reported, citing sources at the health ministry. Japan on Thursday suspended the use of 1.63 million doses shipped to 863 vaccination centres nationwide, more than a week after the domestic distributor, Takeda Pharmaceutical (4502.T), received reports of contaminants in some vials. NHK, in a report published late on Thursday, cited ministry sources as saying the particle reacted to magnets and was therefore suspected to be a metal. Moderna has described it as "particulate matter" that did not pose a safety or efficacy issue. A health ministry official said the composition of the contaminant has not been confirmed. Takeda did not immediately respond to a request for comment by Reuters. News of the contaminant could provide a fresh setback for Japan's inoculation drive as it struggles to persuade many - particularly young people - to get vaccinated. On Friday, eight more prefectures entered a state of emergency, meaning about 80% of Japan's population is under coronavirus restrictions. The government reported nearly 25,000 new infections and severe cases at a record 2,000 for Thursday. The ministry has said the suspension of the Moderna batches was a precaution but it prompted several Japanese companies to cancel worker vaccinations and the European drugs regulator to launch an investigation. Airline ANA Holdings Inc (9202.T) said it had secured more Moderna supplies and would resume inoculations on Saturday after a two-day suspension of the shots. Spanish pharma company Rovi (ROVI.MC), which bottles Moderna vaccines for markets other than the United States, said the contamination could be due to a manufacturing issue on a production line. A spokesperson said the company could not say anything more while it was investigating. Moderna put the lot in question and two adjacent ones on hold. Another health ministry official said it would take "some time" to confirm how many shots from the contaminated batch had been administered in Japan. Kyodo News reported that at least 176,000 shots have been used based on its own tally of figures reported by municipalities. About 54% of Japan's population has received at least one dose, according to a Reuters tracker. Taro Kono, the minister in charge of the vaccination programme, said he did not expect the contamination issue to have an impact on the government's goal of fully inoculating the adult population by November….” SOURCE: https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/contaminant-moderna-vaccines-suspected-be-metallic-powder-nhk-2021-08-27/ (1 ) Since the roll out people who are jab-free are also showing signs of magnetism. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/are-the-vaccinated-shedding (2) Worms that have eaten rust Iron Oxide can be magnetic. Religious gurus in India have developed magnetic properties. (3) See some of our collection of Graphene Oxide research https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/100-links-on-graphene-magnetism (4) Spanish Research finding Graphene Oxide in Vaccine: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/englis-translation-of-the-graphene-oxide-almeria-paper (5) Scientists Club: Read about the Graphene Oxide found in the Pfizer vaccine. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/what-is-really-in-the-c19-vaccines (6) Graphene toxicity https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/graphene-toxocity (7) I read an article claiming these particulates were “millimetres in size” hence visible, but it has now been deleted. WATCH FILM ON MAGNETISM SIGN OUR PETITION HERE FOR SOME LIGHT RELIEF, FANCY ONE OF THESE T-SHIRTS? 40 SECOND VIIDEO HERE

This sounds like a nightmare dystopian medical disaster, yet the Pfizer Trials paper itself suggests such possibilities. PFIZER TRIAL REPORT These are some excerpts from the Pfizer trial paper named: A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS QUOTE: 8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. 8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if: A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention. A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception. A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy: • A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. Page 67 PF-07302048 (BNT162 RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines) Protocol C4591001 • A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception. The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy). ..... ......Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows: Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion; Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention..... 8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if: A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention. A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.... " END QUOTE The full report is worth a read. If you have little time start at 8.3.5 DOWNLOAD THE PFIZER DOCUMENT BELOW ARE THE VACCINATIONS SHEDDING? THIS SHORT VIDEO ON MAGNETISM WITH ZACK AND GWEN WILL BLOW YOUR MIND SIGN OUR PETITION CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO VACCINE-INDUCED MAGNETISM SEE OUR NEW TSHIRTS IN THIS 40 SECOND VIDEO SUPPORT THE WORK HERE

Ivermectin originates from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Institute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil. It has been shown to have a huge impact in treating covid symptoms. Like HCQ, it has a long history of safety, has shown great success in treating covid symptoms, is very cheap and has been (strangely) withdrawn from use in western societies. Even though it's widely available for use in pets, famously used for horses. Ivermectin has been used with great success in India. Back in Feb in Japan, the home of Ivermectin, Haruo Ozaki, the president of the Tokyo Metropolitan Medical Association, made a public announcement on live Television calling for its use. He used some basic stats to prove his point. Ivermectin has been widely used in Africa with some countries distributing it as an anti-parasitic. This has given some vital 'accidental' data of C19 symptoms, cases and deaths. In African countries that DON'T use it Cases 950.6 per 100,000 Deaths 29.3 per 100,000 In African countries that DO use it Cases 134.4 per 100,000 Deaths 2.2 per 100,000 This is reminiscent of the 'accidental' Italian study with HCQ involving 65,000 rheumatoid arthritis patients who were on HCQ during the first Italian 'wave' in 2020. Even though many suffered multiple co-morbidities their rate of infection was dramatically lower. Dr. James Todara, MD. The Italian Society for Rheumatology studied 65,000 patients on long-term hydroxychloroquine for RA and Lupus. Only 20 patients tested positive for COVID-19. No ICU, no deaths. This is a 90% reduction in infection rate compared to the rest of Italy.https://t.co/Pta97oBA8O — James Todaro, MD (@JamesTodaroMD) April 28, 2020 Here is the video of Haruo Ozaki, the president of the Tokyo Metropolitan Medical Association calling for Ivermectin. Japanse News Article Feb 2021 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOFB25AAL0V20C21A1000000/ TRANSLATED: "..Haruo Ozaki, president of the Tokyo Metropolitan Medical Association, proposed the urgent use of the drug at a press conference mainly with the aim of preventing the seriousness of home recuperators in order to respond to the spread of the new coronavirus. He stressed that anti ivermectin parasitic drugs such as ivermectin should be administered to coronal infected people, as they have been shown to prevent serious diseases overseas. In addition to ivermectin, the government has asked for the use of the steroid-based anti-inflammatory drug dexamethasone. Mr. Ozaki said, "[Both] have few side effects; I want the government to consider it so that it can be treated at the level of a family doctor...." IVERMECTIN "...Discovered in the late-1970s, the pioneering drug ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin--originating solely from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Institute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil--has had an immeasurably beneficial impact in improving the lives and welfare of billions of people throughout the world. Originally introduced as a veterinary drug, it kills a wide range of internal and external parasites in commercial livestock and companion animals. It was quickly discovered to be ideal in combating two of the world's most devastating and disfiguring diseases which have plagued the world's poor throughout the tropics for centuries. It is now being used free-of-charge as the sole tool in campaigns to eliminate both diseases globally. It has also been used to successfully overcome several other human diseases and new uses for it are continually being found. This paper looks in depth at the events surrounding ivermectin's passage from being a huge success in Animal Health into its widespread use in humans, a development which has led many to describe it as a "wonder" drug...." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21321478/ MORE ON IVERMECTIN IN FUTURE ARTICLES SIGN UP FOR THE NOT ON THE BEEB NEWSLETTER HERE SIGN OUR MAGNETISM PETITION SEE OUR FILMS ON VACCINE-INDUCED MAGNETISM SEE OUR NEW T-SHIRT COLLECTION VIDEO

A VAERS REPORT OF GREAT CONCERN. A doctor in the USA has made a VAERS entry that suggests the death of a 5-month-year-old baby–that a blood test revealed had elevated liver enzymes–was due to the breastfeeding mother having been vaccinated the day before. VAERS ID 1166062 https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/covid-full-data/1166062 QUOTE: "...Patient received second dose of Pfizer vaccine on March 17, 2021(sic) while at work. March 18, 2021 (sic) her 5-month-old breastfed infant developed a rash and within 24 hours was inconsolable, refusing to eat, and developed a fever. Patient brought baby to local ER where assessments were performed, blood analysis revealed elevated liver enzymes. Infant was hospitalized but continued to decline and passed away. Diagnosis of TTP. No known allergies. No new exposures aside from the mother's vaccination the previous day..." SOURCE Below is a snapshot of the single entry. (NOTE: please note the date typo is by the doctor the doctor notes says 2020 but the report is clearly 2021 This is a website I’ve just found to search reports. https://www.openvaers.com Some might think the answer is not to breastfeed, yet we are seeing mounting and horrifying evidence that ‘side-effects of the vaccines can be passed by touch. This sounds like a nightmare dystopian medical disaster, yet the Pfizer Trials paper itself suggests such possibilities. (Please note that although the products have been released for the public due to 'Pandemic Emergency regulations', it must be noted that we are still in stage three trials.) PFIZER TRIAL REPORT - Could vaccines shed? These are some excerpts from the Pfizer trial paper named: A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS QUOTE: 8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. 8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if: A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention. A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception. A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy: • A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. Page 67 PF-07302048 (BNT162 RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines) Protocol C4591001 • A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception. The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy). ..... ......Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows: Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion; Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention..... 8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if: A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention. A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.... " END QUOTE The full report is worth a read. If you have little time start at 8.3.5 DOWNLOAD THE PFIZER DOCUMENT BELOW SIGN OUR PETITION CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO VACCINE-INDUCED MAGNETISM SEE OUR NEW TSHIRTS IN THIS 40 SECOND VIDEO SUPPORT THE WORK HERE

MHRA Yellow Card Reporting up to 11th Aug 2021 released to the public on 19TH AUG 202 Reports 347,032 (total people reporting injury or death) Respiratory Issues 41,055 Fatal 1,596 Blinded 389 Eye Injury 19,026 Deaf 555 Vertigo/Tinnitis 9,177 Guillian Barre Syndrome 432 Paralysis 1,067 Seizures 2,661 Tremor 11,087 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy 1,576 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages 2,489 Acute Cardiac 14,189 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) 647 Myocardial Infarction & Heart Failure 726 Anaphylaxis 1,300 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis 3,282 Psychiatric Disorders 23,747 Spontaneous Abortions 465 Maternal deaths figures imply 16 related Haemorrhage 7,504 Renal & Urinary Disorders 3,378 Reproductive/Breast 35,010 Headaches 107,156 Migraine 10,682 Vomiting 14,957 Infections 25,685 Herpes 4,102 Swelling Face 1,727 Blood Disorders. 18,089 Skin Disorders 77,431 Nervous System Disorders 231,995 1-in-136 people have filed a Yellow Card Adverse Event. The vast majority don’t even know about the duty to report reactions. It is estimated by the authorities that ONLY 0.5-10% of reactions are reported. TOTAL UPTAKE ACCORDING TO GOV STATS • Pfizer - 21million people - 36.5m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-201 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.7m people - 48.6m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-108 people impacted • Moderna - 1.4m people - 2m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-105 people impacted Across the four UK countries, about 91% OF ADULTS received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine and about 77% have had two doses. This means approx. 14% of people with first dose have not had a second dose. Are 14% of these that had the first dose, refusing the second dose, or have they just not had it yet? A conservative guess would suggest 10% of people will not be having second dose. Will they now be called anti-vaxxers? Then, can we expect 10% to not take the 3rd dose? Another 10% to not take the 4th dose. The French Vaccine passport has 8 slots for 8 new doses or boosters which gives a hint of the pharma plans ahead. But will it succeed? Could we expect the uptake to decline as suggested in this theoretical 10%-reduction-per-dose as below? 1st dose: 91% 2nd dose: 82% 3rd dose: 74% 4th dose: 66% 5th dose: 59% 6th does: 53% 7th dose: 48% (At this point, will the majority still be branded anti-vaxxers?) 8th dose: 43% MHRA data here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting BREAKDOWN BY VACCINE TYPE: UPDATED REPORT PUBLISHED 19TH AUG 2021 MHRA Yellow Card Reporting up to 11th Aug 2021 Reactions - 293,779 (Pfizer) + 813,622 (AZ) + 41,274 (Moderna) + 3093 (Unknown) = 1,151,768 Reports - 104,446 (Pfizer) + 228,239 (AZ) + 13,325 (Moderna) + 1022 (Unknown) = 347,032 Fatal - 501 (Pfizer) + 1053 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 1596 Acute Cardiac - 4640 (Pfizer) + 9053 (AZ) + 463 (Moderna) + 33 (Unknown) = 14,189 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 339 (Pfizer) + 245 (AZ) + 61 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 647 Myocardial Infarction & Heart Failure - 225 (Pfizer) + 484 (AZ) + 11 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 726 Anaphylaxis - 461 (Pfizer) + 808 (AZ) + 30 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1300 Blood Disorders - 9933 (Pfizer) + 7327 (AZ) + 785 (Moderna) + 44 (Unknown) = 18,089 Infections - 6920 (Pfizer) + 17,995 (AZ) + 682 (Moderna) + 88 (Unknown) = 25,685 Herpes - 1557 (Pfizer) + 2463 (AZ) + 69 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 4102 Headaches - 21,193 (Pfizer) + 83,366 (AZ) + 2370 (Moderna) + 227 (Unknown) = 107,156 Migraine - 2400 (Pfizer) + 7989 (AZ) + 264 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 10,682 Eye Disorders - 4872 (Pfizer) + 13,649 (AZ) + 453 (Moderna) + 52 (Unknown) = 19,026 Blindness - 96 (Pfizer) + 279 (AZ) + 11 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 389 Deafness - 181 (Pfizer) + 359 (AZ) + 13 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 555 Psychiatric Disorders - 5929 (Pfizer) + 16,930 (AZ) + 815 (Moderna) + 73 (Unknown) = 23,747 Skin Disorders - 20,741 (Pfizer) + 50,087 (AZ) + 6395 (Moderna) + 208 (Unknown) = 77,431 Swelling Face - 606 (Pfizer) + 1051 (AZ) + 60 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 1727 Spontaneous Abortions - 258 + 6 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 185 + 2 stillbirth (AZ) + 21 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 465 + 9 (figures imply 16 related maternal deaths) Vomiting - 3151 (Pfizer) + 11,320 (AZ) + 447 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 14,957 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 675 (Pfizer) + 850 (AZ) + 46 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 1576 Nervous System Disorders - 51,628 (Pfizer) + 173,431 (AZ) + 6348 (Moderna) + 588 (Unknown) = 231,995 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 489 (Pfizer) + 1978 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2489 Guillian Barre Syndrome - 42 (Pfizer) + 383 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 432 Tremor - 1247 (Pfizer) + 9659 (AZ) + 144 (Moderna) + 37 (Unknown) = 11,087 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 573 (Pfizer) + 2666 (AZ) + 25 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3282 Respiratory Disorders - 12,581 (Pfizer) + 27,299 (AZ) + 1066 (Moderna) + 109 (Unknown) = 41,055 Seizures - 686 (Pfizer) + 1857 (AZ) + 109 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 2661 Paralysis - 296 (Pfizer) + 730 (AZ) + 36 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 1067 Haemorrhage (All types) - 2483 (Pfizer) + 4672 (AZ) + 313 (Moderna) + 36 (Unknown) = 7504 Vertigo/Tinnitis - 2618 (Pfizer) + 6275 (AZ) + 259 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 9177 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 775 (Pfizer) + 2495 (AZ) + 85 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3378 Reproductive/Breast - 16,336 (Pfizer) + 16,460 (AZ) + 2102 (Moderna) + 112 (Unknown) = 35,010

ITALIAN ENGLISH SPANISH AVVISO URGENTE relativo a: RISONANZE MAGNETICHE MRI. Riteniamo che le scansioni MRI stiano causando gravi problemi fisici, compresa la paralisi, in pazienti vaccinati per il Covid-19. I pazienti mostrano chiari segni di avere particelle magnetizzate al loro interno dopo la vaccinazione. L'ipotesi è che nano particelle lipidiche magnetizzate all'interno del paziente migrano sotto gli enormi campi magnetici utilizzati all'interno di una risonanza magnetica causando danni su una scala nanometrica equivalente a ferite multiple da schegge. Questi due casi chiave sono stati registrati. CASO 1: Una giovane madre di 20 anni si è presentata in ospedale con oggetti di metallo tra cui posate che si attaccavano alle sue braccia, al petto e alla fronte dopo aver fatto la vaccinazione Covid-19 Moderna. E´stata ammessa, e nel tentativo di capire il magnetismo, è stato sottoposta a diverse scansioni MRI. Le sue condizioni sono peggiorate ed entro una settimana dal suo ingresso in ospedale, era incapace di muoversi senza l'uso di un deambulatore. CASO 2: Una ragazza di 12 anni che faceva parte della sperimentazione della vaccinazione Pfizer Covid-19 e´ stata affetta da una paralisi parziale, che si stava risolvendo, contemporaneamente a una ritenzione urinaria in corso, grave stitichezza e incapacità di assumere cibo per bocca portandola al posizionamento di un sondino nasogastrico. E´ deteriorata subito dopo una risonanza magnetica con mezzo di contrasto ed ora e´ora relegata alla sedia a rotelle. Sua madre descrive l'evento. "Non poteva camminare e poi poteva, poi ha fatto una risonanza magnetica con contrasto e ora è di nuovo su una sedia a rotelle e non so il perché”. PRENDERE L'INIZIATIVA Ci rendiamo conto che molti non avranno mai sentito parlare del magnetismo indotto dai vaccini prima, quindi consigliamo di leggere e guardare quanto segue. 1 - Il magnetismo post-vaccino può essere visto in questa serie di brevi documentari https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnet-challenge sul fenomeno. 2 – Il Documento da Lussemburgo che conferma il magnetismo indotto dal vaccino https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/the-luxembourg-report-on-vaccine-induced-magnetism 3 - Il dottor Mike Yeadon conferma il magnetismo indotto dal vaccino 
 https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/mike-yeadon-magnetism 4 - Il Dottor T fa una telefonata urgente https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/help a tutti gli operatori sanitari. 5 - Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Imperial College Londra A causa dei fenomeni inspiegabili, fino a quando non ci sarà una completa indagini e spiegazioni, consigliamo vivamente a tutti gli operatori sanitari di controllare TUTTI i pazienti per il magnetismo prima di indirizzarli per le scansioni MRI. Abbiamo scoperto che la maggior parte dei pazienti dopo la vaccinazione contro il Covid-19 mostra chiaramente segni di magnetismo, qualcosa che puoi facilmente testare in pochi secondi, usando una calamita al neodimio. 1 - Il magnetismo è più facile da rilevare nel punto della vaccinazione. 2 - A volte può essere visto sulla parte superiore del torace o intorno al ponte nasale. Promemoria: se trovi magnetismo, inviare un paziente per una risonanza magnetica potrebbe portare le particelle che stanno causando la sindrome, ad essere tirate dallo scanner MRI verso la periferia del loro corpo danneggiando importanti strutture lungo il percorso. Questo potrebbe essere estremamente grave nel caso di una risonanza magnetica al cervello. Tradizionalmente nessuno che abbia anche la possibilità del più piccolo dei frammenti di metallo dovrebbe entrare negli scanner MRI come mostrato nella guida citato qui. https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info/safety-mr CITAZIONE: "...Se hai un proiettile o qualsiasi altro frammento metallico nel tuo corpo c'è un potenziale rischio che possa cambiare posizione e possibilmente causare un infortunio….” Per vedere il potere della risonanza magnetica su oggetti metallici guarda questo video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BBx8BwLhqg UK GOV MRI. Linee guida per la risonanza magnetica MRI del governo britannico. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/958486/MRI_guidance_2021-4-03c.pdf Se hai scoperto che i tuoi pazienti stanno soffrendo gli effetti negativi appena scoperti di magnetismo indotto dal vaccino, si prega di segnalare questo e tutte le altre reazioni avverse al Covid-19 Yellow Card Scheme. https://coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk Poiché non esiste una categoria definit per il magnetismo indotto dal vaccino, suggeriamo denunciarlo come "corpo estraneo". Si prega di firmare la petizione degli esperti in campo https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/petition-experts 
‘domandando un'indagine urgente. Per i non professionisti della salute abbiamo qui una petizione popolare https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/petition-peoples SOMMARIO URGENTE Ogni giorno in Inghilterra, stimiamo che 200 persone che mostrano magnetismo 
post-vaccinazione contro il Covid-19, stiano facendo una risonanza magnetica. Esortiamo tutti a presentare questo avviso ai loro medici di base senza indugio. PERICOLO! MAGNETISMO INDOTTO DAL VACCINO per maggiori informazioni andare a: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetism Link di riferimento, notizie e aggiornament. i possono essere trovati qui: 
https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/ Una versione PDF di questa lettera e´disponibile qui: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/mri-italian Si prega di tener presente che quanto sopra sono osservazioni e ipotesi preliminari e richiedono una propria e profonda indagine..Affidavit per il medico di famiglia, medico, infermiere, professionista sanitario che testimonia: DOWNLOAD PDF DOWNLOAD PDF AFFIDAVIT Download the full letter in English and Affidavit

ENGLISH ITALIAN SPANISH HIGHLIGHT: "... Dondequiera que vaya (el magnetismo), podría causar estragos en la permeabilidad celular y tener todo tipo de efectos biológicos, como insuficiencia cardíaca, enfermedad de Alzheimer prematura y, cuando las mitocondrias se ven afectadas, fatiga crónica..." El Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy es un conferencista jubilado y Oficial de Seguridad Biológica del Imperial College de Londres. Ayer, tuvimos una conversación esclarecedora sobre los mecanismos del magnetismo inducido por vacunas. El Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy no solo es un verdadero caballero, sino que ofrece generosamente y sin miedo sus conocimientos y percepciones en esta declaración a continuación. Por favor lea hasta el final. ¿Qué podría causar este magnetismo? Hipótesis del Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy El magnetismo inducido por la vacuna gira en torno a la posibilidad de que se haya utilizado un compuesto similar al grafeno como adyuvante para aumentar la tasa de captación del ARNm. Esto se basa en microscopía electrónica, donde se encontró óxido de grafeno en la vacuna. Mira aquí Ha sido difícil obtener más muestras para la investigación porque los fabricantes insisten en que todos los viales sin usar y las jeringas usadas deben devolverse después de la administración de las inyecciones ¿Por qué el secreto? Ésta puede ser la razón. Siga este enlace para una revisión de acceso abierto sobre la toxicidad de la familia del grafeno (incluido el óxido de grafeno). Parece bastante horrible. Además, mira esto. Pero, ¿cómo pudo haber sucedido esto si ni el grafeno ni el óxido de grafeno son magnéticos? La respuesta es que tanto el grafeno como el óxido de grafeno pueden conducir suficiente electricidad a través de las membranas celulares para magnetizar las partículas superparamagnéticas cercanas, como la ferritina y la magnetita, para causar una magnetización generalizada de las personas que reciben la vacuna. Es igual que el núcleo de hierro de un electroimán se magnetiza cuando una corriente eléctrica pasa a través de la bobina de alambre enrollada a su alrededor. Para hacer este argumento más cuantitativo; la conductividad eléctrica del grafeno en la nanoescala es dos órdenes de magnitud mayor que la del cobre Ver aquí ¿Qué significa esto para las células vivas? La respuesta es que el gradiente de voltaje transmembrana de las células vivas es del orden de diez millones de voltios por metro (100 mV a través de una membrana de 10 nm). Esto significa que una hebra transmembrana de grafeno o óxido de grafeno (de la vacuna) podría transportar una enorme corriente eléctrica y es probable que magnetice cualquier material superparamagnético como ferritina o magnetita que pueda estar cerca. Este efecto podría extenderse como un reguero de pólvora a través de la membrana a medida que cada partícula magnetizada magnetiza a sus vecinas y luego a las de la siguiente célula, de modo que el efecto magnético aumenta y aumenta. En última instancia, podría extenderse a todas las partes del cuerpo a través del torrente sanguíneo, comenzando con las células sanguíneas mismas, incluidos los glóbulos blancos necesarios para nuestro sistema inmunológico, luego las venas, luego el corazón, luego los pulmones y finalmente el cerebro. Dondequiera que vaya, podría causar estragos en la permeabilidad celular y tener todo tipo de efectos biológicos, como insuficiencia cardíaca, enfermedad de Alzheimer prematura y, cuando las mitocondrias se ven afectadas, fatiga crónica. Otro efecto es que el daño de la membrana a nuestras células sensoriales podría hacerlas hiperactivas y enviar señales falsas al cerebro para dar síntomas muy similares a la hipersensibilidad electromagnética (EHS), lo que resulta en dolores de cabeza cada vez que usamos un teléfono móvil, alfileres y agujas cuando nos alejamos demasiado. un enrutador WiFi, mareos y náuseas, por nombrar solo algunos. Quizás el peligro más grave es si tiene una resonancia magnética, cuando el imán extremadamente poderoso en la máquina intentaría sacar estas partículas magnetizadas de su cuerpo y, en el caso de la exploración del cerebro o de la médula espinal, daño inmediato y posiblemente permanente. podría resultar. Cuando se escanean otras partes del cuerpo, los resultados pueden ser menos notables a corto plazo, pero luego se hacen evidentes como una enfermedad "idiopática" inexplicable. Esto necesita un seguimiento cuidadoso por parte de un observador independiente. Los mejores deseos, Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy Conferencista y oficial de seguridad biológica (jubilado) Colegio Imperial de Londres Para obtener más información sobre el magnetismo inducido por vacunas, examina las películas y los recursos aquí. Consulte nuestra carta de advertencia urgente de resonancia magnética para médicos aquí DOWNLOAD HERE: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/mri-italian

ITALIAN ENGLISH SPANISH ADVERTENCIA URGENTE re: MRI SCAN. Creemos que las imágenes por resonancia magnética están causando lesiones graves, incluida la parálisis, en pacientes vacunados con Covid-19. Los pacientes muestran signos claros de tener partículas magnetizadas dentro de ellos después de la vacunación. La hipótesis es que las nanopartículas lipídicas magnetizadas dentro del paciente migran bajo los enormes campos magnéticos utilizados dentro de una resonancia magnética causando daños a nanoescala equivalente a múltiples heridas de metralla. Estos dos casos clave se han registrado. CASO UNO Una joven madre de unos 20 años se presentó al hospital con objetos de metal, incluidos cubiertos, pegados a sus brazos, pecho y frente después de la vacuna Moderna Covid-19. Fue admitida y, en un intento por comprender el magnetismo, se le realizaron varias resonancias magnéticas. Su condición se deterioró y una semana después de ingresar al hospital, no podía moverse sin el uso de un andador. CASO DOS Una niña de 12 años que participó en el ensayo de vacunación Pfizer Covid-19. Sufría de parálisis parcial, que se estaba resolviendo, junto con retención urinaria continua, estreñimiento severo e incapacidad para ingerir alimentos, lo que llevó a la colocación de una sonda nasogástrica. Se deterioró inmediatamente después de una resonancia magnética con contraste y luego quedó en silla de ruedas. Su madre describe el evento. "Ella no podía caminar y luego pudo, luego se hizo una resonancia magnética con contraste ahora está de vuelta en una silla de ruedas y no sé por qué". TOMANDO ACCIÓN Sabemos que muchos nunca antes habían oído hablar del magnetismo inducido por vacunas, por lo que recomendamos leer y observar lo siguiente. 1 - El magnetismo posvacunal puede verse en esta serie de cortos documentales sobre los fenómenos. 2 - Documento de Luxemburgo que confirma el magnetismo inducido por la vacuna . 3 - El Dr. Mike Yeadon confirma el magnetismo inducido por la vacuna. 4 - El Dr. T hace una llamada urgente a todos los profesionales sanitarios. 5 - Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Imperial College London Debido a los fenómenos inexplicables, hasta que haya una investigación y una explicación exhaustivas, recomendamos encarecidamente que todos los profesionales de la salud examinen a TODOS los pacientes en busca de magnetismo antes de referirlos a una resonancia magnética. Hemos descubierto que la mayoría de los pacientes después de la vacunación con Covid-19 muestran signos claros de magnetismo, algo que se puede probar fácilmente en segundos, utilizando un imán de neodimio. 1 - El magnetismo es más fácil de detectar en el lugar de la vacunación. 2 - A veces se puede ver en la parte superior del pecho o alrededor del puente de la nariz. Recordatorio: si encuentras magnetismo, enviar a un paciente a una resonancia magnética podría llevar a que las partículas que están causando el síndrome sean arrastradas por el escáner de resonancia magnética hacia la periferia de su cuerpo dañando estructuras importantes en el camino. Esto podría ser extremadamente grave en el caso de las imágenes cerebrales. Tradicionalmente, nadie que tenga la posibilidad de tener el más pequeño de los fragmentos de metal debe ingresar a los escáneres de resonancia magnética como se ve en la guía que se cita aquí. CITA: "... Si tiene una bala o cualquier otro fragmento metálico en su cuerpo, existe el riesgo potencial de que cambie de posición y posiblemente cause una lesión ..." Para ver el poder de la resonancia magnética en objetos metálicos, vea este video Directrices de MRI del GOV del Reino Unido. Si ha descubierto que sus pacientes están sufriendo el evento adverso recientemente descubierto del magnetismo inducido por la vacuna, informe esta y todas las demás reacciones adversas al Programa de Tarjeta Amarilla de Covid-19. Como no existe una categoría definida para el magnetismo inducido por vacunas, sugerimos archivar bajo "cuerpo extraño". Firme la petición del experto que pide una investigación urgente. Para los profesionales que no son de la salud, tenemos una petición popular aquí. RESUMEN URGENTE Cada día en Inglaterra, estimamos que 200 personas que exhiben magnetismo después de la vacunación Covid-19 se someten a una resonancia magnética. Instamos a todos los gerentes de práctica a presentar esta alerta a sus médicos de cabecera para su consideración, sin demora. Puede encontrar enlaces de referencia, noticias y actualizaciones aquí: NotOnTheBeeb.co.uk Aquí puede encontrar una versión en PDF de esta carta. Tenga en cuenta que lo anterior son observaciones e hipótesis preliminares y requieren una investigación completa y adecuada. DOWNLOAD PDF DOWNLOAD PDF AFFIDAVIT Download the full letter in English and Affidavit

ENGLISH ITALIAN SPANISH HIGHLIGHT: "...Ovunque vada, potrebbe devastare la permeabilità cellulare e avere tutti i tipi di effetti biologici, tra cui insufficienza cardiaca, malattia di Alzeimer prematura e, quando i mitocondri sono colpiti, stanchezza cronica...." Il dottor Andrew Goldsworthy è un docente in pensione e il responsabile della sicurezza biologica dell'Imperial College di Londra. Ieri abbiamo avuto una conversazione illuminante sui meccanismi del magnetismo indotto dai vaccini. Il dottor Andrew Goldsworthy non è solo un vero gentiluomo, ma offre generosamente e senza paura le sue conoscenze e intuizioni in questa dichiarazione di seguito. Si prega di leggere fino alla fine. Cosa potrebbe essere la causa di questo magnetismo? Ipotesi del dottor Andrew Goldsworthy. Il magnetismo indotto dal vaccino ruota intorno alla possibilità che un composto simile al grafene sia stato utilizzato come adiuvante per aumentare la velocità di assorbimento dell'mRNA. Questo si basa sulla microscopia elettronica, dove si è scoperto che l'ossido di grafene era nel vaccino. Vedere qui: È stato difficile ottenere ulteriori campioni per l'indagine perché i produttori insistono sul fatto che tutte le fiale e le siringhe usate devono essere restituite dopo aver fatto la vaccinazione. Perché la segretezza? Questo potrebbe essere il motivo. Segui questo link per vedere una recensione sulla tossicità della famiglia del grafene (incluso l'ossido di grafene). Ma come è potuto accadere questo dato che né il grafene né l'ossido di grafene sono magnetici? 
La risposta è che sia il grafene che l'ossido di grafene possono condurre abbastanza elettricità attraverso le membrane cellulari per magnetizzare le particelle superparamagnetiche vicine come ferritina e magnetite per causare una magnetizzazione diffusa nelle persone che ricevono il vaccino. 
È proprio come il nucleo di ferro di un elettromagnete si magnetizza quando una corrente elettrica viene fatta passare attraverso la bobina di filo avvolto attorno ad esso. Per rendere questo argomento più quantitativo; la conduttività elettrica del grafene su scala nanometrica è di due ordini di grandezza maggiore del rame. Vedi qui: Cosa significa questo per le cellule viventi? La risposta è che il gradiente di tensione transmembrana delle cellule viventi è dell'ordine di dieci milioni di volt per metro (100 mV attraverso una membrana di 10 nm). Ciò significa che un filamento transmembrana di grafene o ossido di grafene (dal vaccino) potrebbe trasportare un'enorme corrente elettrica ed è probabile che magnetizzi qualsiasi materiale superparamagnetico come ferritina o magnetite che potrebbe essere nelle vicinanze. Questo effetto potrebbe diffondersi a macchia d'olio attraverso la membrana poiché ogni particella magnetizzata magnetizza i suoi vicini e quindi quelli della cellula successiva, in modo che l'effetto magnetico aumenti e In definitiva, potrebbe diffondersi a tutte le parti del corpo attraverso il flusso sanguigno, a partire dalle cellule del sangue stesse, compresi quei globuli bianchi necessari per il nostro sistema immunitario, 
quindi le vene, quindi il cuore, quindi i polmoni e infine il cervello. Ovunque vada, potrebbe devastare la permeabilità cellulare e avere tutti i tipi di effetti biologici, tra cui insufficienza cardiaca, malattia di Alzeimer prematura e, quando i mitocondri sono colpiti, stanchezza cronica. Un altro effetto è che il danno alla membrana delle nostre cellule sensoriali potrebbe renderle iperattive e inviare falsi segnali al cervello per dare sintomi molto simili all'ipersensibilità elettromagnetica (EHS) con conseguente mal di testa ogni volta che usiamo un telefono cellulare, spilli e aghi quando ci avviciniamo troppo a un router WiFi vertigini e nausea, solo per citarne alcuni. Forse il pericolo più serio è se hai una risonanza magnetica, quando il magnete estremamente potente nella macchina cercherebbe di estrarre queste particelle magnetizzate dal tuo corpo e, nel caso della scansione del cervello o del midollo spinale, potrebbe risultare danni immediati e possibilmente permanenti. Quando vengono scansionate altre parti del corpo, i risultati possono essere meno evidenti a breve termine, ma diventano evidenti in seguito come una malattia "idiopatica" inspiegabile. Ciò richiede un attento monitoraggio da parte di un osservatore indipendente. Grazie per l´attenzione, Dott. Andrew Goldsworthy Docente e Responsabile della Sicurezza Biologica (in pensione) Imperial College di Londra Il link della lettera completa è qui Sono sicuro che dopo aver letto quanto sopra si può vedere l'importanza di diffondere la consapevolezza. Per favore stampa una copia della lettera di quattro pagine e portala/spediscila al tuo dottore... idealmente con un magnete al neodimio attaccato! GRAZIE! Gentile dottore, DOWNLOAD HERE: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/mri-italian

ITALIAN ENGLISH SPANISH (a full copy of this letter can be downloaded here) We believe MRI scans are causing serious injuries including paralysis in Covid-19 vaccinated patients. Patients are showing clear signs of having magnetised particles within them post- vaccination. The hypothesis is that magnetised lipid nanoparticles within the patient migrate under the huge magnetic fields used within an MRI causing damage on a nanoscale equivalent to multiple shrapnel wounds. These two key cases have been recorded. CASE ONE A young mother in her 20s presented to the hospital with metal objects including cutlery sticking to her arms, chest and forehead after the Moderna Covid-19 vaccination. She was admitted, and in an attempt to understand the magnetism, was given several MRI scans. Her condition deteriorated and within a week of walking into the hospital, she was unable to move without the use of a walking frame. CASE TWO A 12-year-old girl who was part of the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccination trial. She was suffering from partial paralysis, which was resolving, alongside ongoing urinary retention, severe constipation and an inability to take food by mouth leading to the placement of a nasogastric tube. She deteriorated immediately after an MRI scan with contrast and became wheelchair-bound afterwards. Her mother describes the event. "She couldn't walk and then she could, then had MRI with contrast now she's back in a wheelchair and I don't know why.” TAKING ACTION We realise many will never have heard of vaccine-induced magnetism before, so we advise reading and watching the below. 1 - Post-vaccine magnetism can be seen in this series of short documentaries on the phenomena. 2 - Paper from Luxembourg confirming the vaccine-induced magnetism 3 - Dr Mike Yeadon confirms vaccine-induced magnetism 4 - Dr T makes an urgent call to all health professionals. Due to the unexplained phenomena, until there is a comprehensive investigation and explanation, we strongly advise that all health professionals check ALL patients for magnetism before referring them for MRI Scans. We have found that the majority of patients post Covid-19 vaccination show clear signs of magnetism, something that you can easily test within seconds, using a neodymium magnet. 1 - The magnetism is easiest to detect at the site of the vaccination. 2 - Sometimes it can be seen on the upper chest or around the bridge of the nose. Reminder: If you find magnetism, sending a patient for an MRI scan could lead to whatever particles that are causing the syndrome, to be pulled by the MRI scanner towards the periphery of their body damaging important structures along the way. This could be extremely serious in the case of brain imaging. Traditionally no one who has even the possibility of the tiniest of metal fragments should be going into MRI scanners as seen in the guidance as quoted here. QUOTE: “...If you have a bullet or any other metallic fragment in your body there is a potential risk that it could change position and possibly cause an injury....” To see the power of the MRI on metal objects see this video UK GOV MRI Guidelines. If you have found your patients to be suffering the newly discovered adverse event of vaccine-induced magnetism, please report this and all other adverse reactions, to the Covid-19 Yellow Card Scheme. As there is not a defined category for vaccine-induced magnetism, so we suggest filing under ‘foreign body.’ Please sign this expert’s petition calling for an urgent investigation. For non-health professionals, we have a people’s petition here. Each day in England, we estimate 200 people exhibiting magnetism post-Covid-19 vaccination are having an MRI scan. We urge everyone to present this alert to their GPs for their consideration. Reference links, news and updates can be found here: NotOnTheBeeb.co.uk A PDF version of this letter can be found here. The below is an affidavit that you can request your GP (or any professional) to sign as a witness for any future need in time. We suggest getting two copies signed. One for the GP and one for the person presenting. Download the full letter and Affidavit below Please bear in mind the above are preliminary observations and hypotheses and require full and proper investigation.

(This post is a copy paste from Arthur Firstenberg's cell phone task force organisation) To forward this newsletter via social media, copy and paste this link: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Appeal-to-US-Supreme-Court-Being-Prepared.pdf APPEAL TO U.S. SUPREME COURT BEING PREPARED In the fall of 2018 the City of Santa Fe, New Mexico awarded franchises to five telecom-munications companies for the purpose of placing both fiber-optic cables and 5G antennas in the streets and on the sidewalks of our fair city. Immediately the Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety, which has been working against wireless technology since 2005, hired an attorney and filed a lawsuit against our city, our state, and the United States of America. Today, two years and eight months later, there are still no 5G antennas on the sidewalks of our city. Everyone -- the Alliance, the government defendants, the citizens of Santa Fe, those that are watching around the world, and the telecommunications companies that hold the franchises -- are waiting to see whether our lawsuit will succeed. Other organizations are also in court trying to stop 5G. Both the Environmental Health Trust and Children’s Health Defense are doing excellent work and have sued the FCC over its recent orders facilitating the rollout of antennas. But regardless of the outcome of those lawsuits, the fundamental problem will remain, and 5G antennas will continue to be built, as long as the federal law that the FCC administers remains in place. That law is the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and the provision that has been strangling all opposition to cell towers for 25 years is Section 704 of that law. Section 704 prohibits states and local governments from regulating cell towers on the basis of the environmental effects of radio-frequency radiation, and for 25 years, “environmental effects” has been interpreted by the courts to mean “health effects.” Since 1996, no city in the US has been permitted to protect the public from the radiation, or even to hear testimony about the health effects of cell towers. No lawsuit for injuries or losses caused by cell towers has been permitted to go to trial in any court. A large class of environmental refugees continues to grow as thousands lose their health, their homes and their businesses every day. Ours is the first organization to sue a city to stop 5G antennas from being built on its sidewalks. Ours is the first lawsuit ever filed that challenges the notion that “environmental effects” means “health effects.” And ours is the only lawsuit that is challenging the constitutionality of Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. We are suing to force our city and our state to protect our health, and we are asking the courts to declare that Section 704 is unconstitutional and invalid because it deprives people of life, liberty and property without due process of law. On May 27, 2021, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver decided against us, making our case ripe for appeal to the United States Supreme Court. We have retained two law firms, one on the east coast and one on the west, to draft the petition for certiorari and argue the case if the Supreme Court agrees to hear it. Both law firms have experience in constitutional and environmental law. We will also be soliciting amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs from organizations and governments. Our petition for certiorari must be filed in the Supreme Court on or before October 25, 2021. Our complaint against the City of Santa Fe, the New Mexico Attorney General, and the United States, originally filed in the district court in 2018, is here: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Doc-19-First-Amended-Complaint.pdf This important effort will be costly. Donations in any amount are welcomed and are tax-deductible for US residents. DONATE VICTORY, AT LEAST FOR NOW, IN ITALY In my last newsletter, I reported that there had been an 18-day hunger strike against 5G in Italy and that the Alleanza Italiana Stop 5G had delivered 340,000 signatures to the Minister of Health asking for a moratorium on 5G and the Internet of Things. The exposure limit in Italy for radio-frequency radiation is 6 V/m, which is ten times lower than in most of the western world, and 5G cannot be deployed where the exposure limit is that low. Therefore the Italian Parliament was proposing amendments to the National Recovery and Resilience Plan that would have raised the exposure limit to 61 V/m, which would be in line with most of the rest of Europe. On July 29, 2021, the Alleanza announced that their petition has been successful. On July 13, during the week of protests, Parliament rejected the amendments and voted, at least for the present, to keep the exposure limit at 6 V/m. SMART FOX In Lakeville, Minnesota is the Save a Fox rescue facility that rescues foxes from the local fur farm and elsewhere and prepares them for adoption. When a mother fox at the fur farm rejects one of her babies, or when one of their foxes becomes disabled or sick, they give it to Save a Fox. One day last year, Mikayla Raines, the founder of Save a Fox, was preparing to do a yoga exercise and she set her smartphone on the ground to film her while she did her yoga. Along came one of her foxes, grabbed the phone, ran a long distance away, and dug a hole in order to bury it. This is a picture of the fox: And this is the video that was captured by Mikayla’s smartphone while it was being carried in Dixie’s mouth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB6WbkPeRbU. To subscribe to my newsletters, go to cellphonetaskforce.org/newsletters or click on this link: SUBSCRIBE Arthur Firstenberg Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life P.O. Box 6216 Santa Fe, NM 87502 USA phone: +1 505-471-0129 arthur@cellphonetaskforce.org July 15, 2021 The last 22 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading and sharing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force. Some of the newsletters are also available there in German, Spanish, Italian, and French. Unsubscribe I

ENGLISH ITALIAN SPANISH HIGHLIGHT: "...Wherever It (the magnetism) goes, it could wreak havoc with cell permeability and have all sorts of biological effects, including heart failure, premature Alzeimer's disease and, when the mitochondria are affected, chronic fatigue...." Dr Andrew Goldsworthy is a retired lecturer and Biological Safety Officer from Imperial College London. Yesterday, we had an enlightening conversation around the mechanisms of vaccine-induced magnetism Dr Andrew Goldsworthy is not only a true gentleman, but generously and fearlessly offers his knowledge and insights in this statement below. Please read to the end. What could cause this magnetism? Hypothesis by Dr Andrew Goldsworthy The vaccine-induced magnetism hinges around the possibility that a graphene-like compound was used as an adjuvant to increase the rate of uptake of the mRNA. This is based on electron microscopy, where graphene oxide was found to be in the vaccine. See here It has been difficult to obtain further samples for investigation because the manufacturers insist that all unused vials and used syringes have to be returned after the shots are delivered. Why the secrecy? This may be the reason. Follow this link to an open-access review on the toxicity of the graphene family (including graphene oxide). It looks pretty horrific. Also, see this . But how could this have happened since neither graphene or graphene oxide are magnetic? The answer is that both graphene and graphene oxide, can conduct enough electricity across the cell membranes to magnetise nearby superparamagnetic particles such as ferritin and magnetite to cause a widespread magnetisation of people receiving the vaccine. It's just as the iron core of an electromagnet becomes magnetised when an electric current is passed through the coil of wire wound around it. To make this argument more quantitative; the electrical conductivity of graphene on the nano scale is two orders of magnitude greater than copper See here What does this mean for living cells? The answer is that the transmembrane voltage gradient of living cells is of the order of ten million volts per metre (100 mV across a 10 nm membrane). This means that a transmembrane strand of graphene or graphene oxide (from the vaccine) could carry a huge electric current and be likely to magnetise any superparamagnetic materials such as ferritin or magnetite that may be close by. This effect could spread like wildfire across the membrane as each magnetized particle magnetizes its neighbours and then to those of the next cell, so that the magnetic effect increases and Ultimately, it could spread to all parts of the body via the bloodstream, starting with the blood cells themselves, including those white cells needed for our immune system, then the veins, then the heart, followed by the lungs and finally the brain. Wherever It goes, it could wreak havoc with cell permeability and have all sorts of biological effects, including heart failure, premature Alzeimer's disease and, when the mitochondria are affected, chronic fatigue. Another effect is that membrane damage to our sensory cells could make them hyperactive and send false signals to the brain to give symptoms very similar to electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) resulting in headaches whenever we use a mobile phone, pins and needles when straying too close to a WiFi router dizziness and nausea, to name but a few. Perhaps the most serious danger is if you have an MRI scan, when the extremely powerful magnet in the machine would try to pull these magnetised particles out of your body and, in the case of the brain or spinal cord scan, immediate and possibly permanent damage could result. When other parts of the body are scanned, the results may be less noticeable in the short term, but become apparent later as an unexplained "idiopathic" illness. This needs careful monitoring by an independent observer. Best wishes, Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Lecturer and Biological Safety Officer (retired) Imperial College London To learn more about vaccine-induced magnetism explore the films and resources here Please see our urgent MRI warning letter for doctors here https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/mri-scans

URGENT WARNING. We believe MRI scans are causing serious injuries including paralysis in Covid-19 vaccinated patients. Patients are showing clear signs of having magnetised particles within them post-vaccination. The hypothesis is that magnetised lipid nanoparticles within the patient migrate under the huge magnetic fields used within an MRI causing damage on a nanoscale equivalent to multiple shrapnel wounds. These two key cases have been recorded within the media. CASE ONE A young mother in her 20s presented to the hospital with metal objects including cutlery sticking to her arms, chest and forehead after the Moderna Covid-19 vaccination. She was admitted, and in an attempt to understand the magnetism, was given several MRI scans. Her condition deteriorated and within a week of walking into the hospital, she was unable to move without the use of a walking frame. CASE TWO A 12-year-old girl who was part of the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccination trial. She was suffering from partial paralysis, which was resolving, alongside ongoing urinary retention, severe constipation and an inability to take food by mouth leading to the placement of a nasogastric tube. She deteriorated immediately after an MRI scan with contrast and became wheelchair-bound afterwards. Her mother describes the event "she couldn't walk and then she could, then had MRI with contrast now she's back in a wheelchair and I don't know why.” We have found that the majority of patients post Covid-19 vaccination show clear signs of magnetism, something that can easily be tested within seconds using a neodymium magnet. (This can be seen here .) We strongly advise checking all patients for magnetism before referring them for MRI Scans. The magnetism is usually easiest to detect at the site of the vaccination, the upper chest or around the bridge of the nose. Going into an MRI scan could lead to whatever particles that are causing the magnetism to be pulled by the MRI scanner towards the periphery of their body damaging important structures along the way. This could be extremely serious in the case of brain imaging. Traditionally no-one who has even tiny fragments of loose materials that could be moved by a strong magnetic field should be going into MRI scanners. QUOTE: “…The powerful magnetic field of the MR system may damage an external hearing aid or cause a heart pacemaker, electrical stimulator, or neurostimulator to malfunction or cause injury. If you have a bullet or any other metallic fragment in your body there is a potential risk that it could change position and possibly cause an injury….” https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info/safety-mr The full power of the magnetism of an MRI can be seen in this video where a chair disintegrates: UK GOV MRI Guidelines. If you have found your patients to be suffering the newly discovered adverse event of vaccine-induced magnetism, please report this and all other adverse reactions, to the Covid-19 Yellow Card Scheme. As there is not a defined category for vaccine-induced magnetism, so we suggest filing under ‘foreign body.’ Completing this short independent adverse event survey would help greatly. Here is a series of short documentaries on the phenomena of vaccine-induced magnetism. Please sign this expert's petition calling for an urgent investigation: We urge all patients to present this information to their GP for their consideration This letter can be downloaded and printed by clicking the link below. Please remember the above are preliminary observations and hypotheses and require full and proper investigation.

Journalist Willsy's assault by police in London Monday. (BTW - The man that was strangled by the police during his arrest has gained no media attention.) QUOTE: "...WHATEVER has happened to the British police? On Monday evening, a TCW reader posted a long amateur film in our Comments section, footage of the ‘Freedom Day’ Parliament Square protests. It is a disturbing and shocking watch and I found myself almost in a state of anxiety as I looked at it. I thought I was about to witness a police killing, here in the UK. If you watch, you will see a protester (presumably) held to the ground by a number of officers and a further protective cordon of police around them – designed, it seemed, to stop the possibility of anyone coming to the man’s aid, or seeing what was going on. This was no two-minute incident. From an early scene of one policeman punching the ‘body’ they had pinned down and being pulled off, it went on – later showing another astride the man’s body. It looked as though he could die there. Where was the ambulance? Why were dozens of police apparently needed to overpower this one man? How and why could that possibly be necessary? He was seen later kneeling then standing up, and did not appear to be armed. He was finally forcefully pushed into the cage of a police van...." Read more See Will's video here. Please sign out petition on vaccine-induced magnetism here ➡️ www.notonthebeeb.co.uk⬅️

Understanding the fraud of 911 is critical towards helping understand the C19 fraud. This is just one of MANY things that prove it was a well-organised set-up. It proves. - massive deceptions can be pulled off. - those involved remain silent or silenced - in the face of science, logic and physics including Newton's laws, the deception lives on in those hypnotised by repetitive images implanted at a time of shock, horror and fear. - 20 years later, even though a high percentage of the population understand the basics of the deception, no one has been arrested and people accept controlled investigations without complaint. - That even now some of you reading this will prefer to believe that this footage has been faked than take onboard they have been fooled for two decades The reality is that it is easier to fool someone, than to wake them up to the fact that they have been fooled.

Before, or after reading the article below, it's worth reading our previous post on graphene toxicity. QUOTE..... "...Health Canada decides Shandong's graphene face masks pose no health risk, still does not permit the sale of other graphene masks Health Canada recently decided that the sale of certain graphene-enhanced face masks that were considered a hazard due to their graphene content can resume, after the agency assessed the masks and found "no health risks of concern." Health Canada issued an advisory in April asking all distributors selling masks with graphene or biomass graphene to recall their products over potential inhalation risks after preliminary assessments made the agency fear a potential for inhaled graphene particles to cause lung effects, such as inflammation, in animals. These concerns made somewhat of an impact with consumers and producers alike, and various graphene-enhanced face masks responded to these claims. Now, Health Canada said it assessed four face mask models produced by Shandong Shengquan New Materials and found that the biomass graphene didn't pose a health risk to wearers. "As a result, given the evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of these products, Health Canada is permitting the sale of the four Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd. mask models to resume in Canada," the agency said in the updated advisory. Health Canada said it determined that the "filtration performance" of these masks meets the performance standard listed on the label. However, the agency said it did not find evidence that the biomass graphene in these masks provided any additional antimicrobial or antiviral protection. The agency noted that no other face masks containing graphene are currently permitted for sale in Canada. If additional graphene masks are approved, Health Canada will notify the public. "Companies wishing to sell graphene masks must first provide evidence to Health Canada demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of their models, as the risks with using graphene masks may vary depending on mask design," the agency said...." https://www.graphene-info.com/health-canada-decides-shandongs-graphene-face-masks-pose-no-health-risk-still Similar Entries Graphene masks deemed "potential health hazard" by Canadian authorities Companies respond to graphene masks "health hazard" scare Health-tech startup Flextrapower (formerly Bonbouton) launches GO-enhanced protective face masks