Search Results

This is Not On The Beeb's 76th Adverse event report. MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 29th MARCH 2023 New interactive format data Adult & Child - Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent) Government data up to 11th Sept 2022 - UK-wide (latest) • 1st doses received = 53.8 million people • 2nd doses - 50.7m people • 3rd doses - one or more booster - 40.6m (up to Feb 2023) Additional all-brand doses given in last 5 weeks - 324 (Pfizer-mono) + 9453 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna-mono) + 1655 (Moderna-bivalent) = 11,441 65.7% (15,098,879 out of 22,970,162) people aged over 50 years old (England only) had an Autumn booster since Sept 2022 (UKHSA National Flu & Covid-19 Surveillance Report - week 14) Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports - 176,495 (Pfizer-mono) + 4237 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 247,764 (AZ) + 42,863 (Moderna-mono) + 5165 (Moderna-bivalent) + 66 (Novavax) + 2372 (Unknown brand) = 478,962 people impacted (increase of 633 in 5 weeks) Reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 74.4% of all reports 124,777 (Pfizer-mono) + 3242 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 191,793 (AZ) + 30,959 (Moderna-mono) + 3735 (Moderna-bivalent) + 46 (Novavax) + 1716 (Unknown) = 356,268 Over 45,936 of the above serious reports are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 9.6% of all reports Reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 25.1% 50,848 (Pfizer-mono) + 962 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 54,603 (AZ) + 11,815 (Moderna-mono) + 1389 (Moderna-bivalent) + 20 (Novavax) + 584 (Unknown) = 120,221 Overall 1-in-112 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event (assuming one person submits only one report) 1-in-151 reports are classified as SERIOUS* 1-in-194 reports are associated with a fatality, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Reactions - 508,972 (Pfizer-mono) + 11,257 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 878,138 (AZ) + 140,628 (Moderna-mono) + 14,060 (Moderna-bivalent) + 215 (Novavax) + 7340 (Unknown) = 1,560,610 Fatal - 870 (Pfizer-mono) + 33 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1368 (AZ) + 89 (Moderna-mono) + 41 (Moderna-bivalent) + 72 (Unknown) = 2473 = 0.5% of reports (increase of 14 reports with fatal outcome in 5 weeks) Over 390 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 15.8% of all fatalities, and 135 are of ‘Unknown Sex’ = 5.5% of all fatalities CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Last available data set for Under 18s in Nov 2022 • 4,213,500 children (1st doses) - majority Pfizer • 2,910,500 (2nd doses) - majority Pfizer • 485,900 boosters Yellow Card Adverse Events Reported - Below combined 0-19yrs - many categories retracted (^) due to less than 5 reports in line with MHRA duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters” 0-19yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 71.4% 4658 (Pfizer-mono) + 36 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1457 (AZ) + 517 (Moderna-mono) + 7 (Moderna-bivalent) + 33 (Unknown) = 6708 0-19yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA >10 (Pfizer-mono) + zero (Pfizer-bivalent) + <5 (AZ) + <5 (Moderna-mono) + <5 (Moderna-bivalent) + <5 (Unknown brand) = greater than 10 20-29yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 73.2% 19,975 (Pfizer-mono) + 110 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 14,544 (AZ) + 4973 (Moderna-mono) + 128 (Moderna-bivalent) + < 5 (Novavax) + 91 (Unknown) = 39,821 20-29yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA 15 (Pfizer-mono) + <5 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 28 (AZ) + zero (Moderna-mono) + zero (Moderna-bivalent) + zero (Novavax) + zero (Unknown brand) = greater than 43 * MHRA definition of ‘serious’ - patient died, life threatening, hospitalisation, congenital abnormality, persistent or significant disability or capacity, deemed medically significant by MHRA medical dictionary or reporter For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps Compiled by Jenny Brown. ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

I think we'd all agree on the answer. Here is a new petition to support. "Require MPs and parliamentary candidates declare any links with lobbying groups. We want MPs and parliamentary candidates to be required to declare any links with lobbying groups. This must be provided alongside and in addition to the existing requirements that parliamentary candidates declare the party they stand for, and MPs declare financial interests. Declaration of any previous, current or planned association with any lobbying organisations (public or private) must include but not be limited to any form of: affiliation, attendance, training, graduation or actual membership. We believe the British Electorate have a legitimate expectation of being made fully aware of all current MPs and parliamentary candidates associations with lobbying groups. These associations could influence the actions of current and future MPs, and this information should therefore be available to inform the voting decisions of the British electorate." https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/634735 Please sign and share very widely: Note: All MPs will be emailed to ensure that they are made aware that this Petition focuses on any associations with the World Economic Forum and Common Purpose (neither of which can be specifically named in the wording of a Parliamentary Petition). Do email your own MP yourself with the petition link to let them know that this Petition focuses on associations etc with the World Economic Forum and Common Purpose.

This is a biggie. The tide is turning, even if it feels controlled and curated. There seems to be a move afoot to slowly drip-feed the horrific realities of the C19 vaccine injuries and deaths, The facts that so many of us have been screaming about from the rooftops since day one. The question is why now as we enter the year's second quarter with April's Fool's day? On the 30th of March, a small report on the BBC regional Look North programme acknowledged lawyer's efforts to prosecute on behalf of the victims of the Astra Zeneca jab - nicknamed the "Clot Shot". BTW - The NOTB video comparing the BBC's report to NOTB's previous reports was banned immediately on youtube earlier today. VIDEO - THE BBC REPORTS ON V-INJURY 21 MONTHS AFTER NOTB REPORTS FROM VACCINE INJURY DAY IN JUNE 2021 OUTSIDE BBC Sign our petition here >>>www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/999 ONS INSIDER WHO HAS SEEN THE DATA CLAIMS BLOOD CLOTS ARE THE LEAST OF THE WORRY... The screenshots below are from an informal chat with an ONS insider. They hint that the 'The National Big Vaccine Injury Reveal' is aimed for the 6th of April. These informal messages were posted on the 17th of February 2023. TRANSCRIPT 02/17/23 (Fri)06:31:45 "...ONS bod here. This decision was made because of money not health sadly. There will be data being released by the ONS (Government Office of National Statistics) at the start of April that-shows not only are the mRNA vaccines not safe and effective but that it basically doesn't work. UK data shows that it's only mildly effective at reducing symptoms and even then only for a period of 2-6 weeks. It also has zero effect on transmission The primary reason for banning the boosters and reducing the availability of the mRNA vaccines to highly at-risk people only is that it's costing the NHS MUCH more to treat vaccine side effects than it costs to vaccinate. It's not a health the decision, it's purely about money.." TRANSCRIPT 02/17/23 (Fri)07:29:42 "...Its actually much worse than that, the clots are a very small problem compared to the reduction in fertility and the 2 big health issues. We basically have immune system failure in 30-35% of the vaccinated and heart problems in 10-15% of them. The UK government will have to acknowledge this when the data gets released at the start of Q2, usually 6th April. Or maybe they won't acknowledge, maybe they will just ignore and hope people don't notice as has been the modus operandi so far..." TRANSCRIPT 02/17/23(Fri)08:40:23 "..I'm not trolling, I actually work for the ONS as a Sys Admin and I'm responsible for the systems that store and analyse the data. The data release are compiled 3 months in advance so I get the chance to have a look and see the reports before they get published.."

They are at it again. The British Public have said no thanks to ID cards multiple times. Yet in the winter of 2023, as the British people are distracted by crippling fuel bills and rising food costs, the UK government are stealthily moving forwards to imposing the most draconian surveillance system seen to date, of which digital Identity cards are a key part alongside the upcoming central bank digital currency (CBDC) (More on the CBDC in upcoming articles and newsletters. Subscribe to them for free here) The 'powers-that-be' want digital identity cards introduced for the very reasons we don't want them. We want privacy, personal independence and freedom - the cornerstones of what we expect within a liberal western democracy. They want control. These authorities want total surveillance in the same way a possessive partner might wish to track their other half's location, spending and messages. Privacy and independence are basic human rights. “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Article 1 In the UK we value our basic rights where we are innocent until proven guilty. This is the foundation of our society. ID cards, digital surveillance and CBDC (digital government-tracked money) are systems designed to monitor, track and control us based on a presumption of mistrust. The irony is that the very individuals within our society, who have left trails of destruction deserving the highest levels of mistrust, are the very same politicians and 'uncivil' servants attempting to bring in these new laws. We all appreciate basic levels of privacy. We keep our bank accounts private for a reason. Few of us broadcast our locations unless it involves pride like sharing pictures from a good holiday or sharing our witnessing of a key event. If we don't wish even our most loved ones to have constant access to our finances, location and health/education/work records, why would we let any licensed governmental department or 3rd party have access to search our records? Of course, these infringements on our freedoms are sold as if for our benefit. Vague notions of safety, fears of (often fabricated) terrorism, or disgust with paedophilia, are emotions that are manipulated to gain our capitulation to this creep towards totalitarianism. Historically, in the UK there have been two national ID schemes. In WW1 the national register was used to conscript young men to face the machine guns of the mud trenches of the western fronts. In WW2, the ID scheme was sold to the public as a way to stop bigamy. We are now in WW3 whose main weapons are propaganda and information whose target is not to win territory old school style, but to 'win' and gain the minds of the human race. The reason behind this power grab is for one group of people enacting a power grab to control another. “An equal has no dominion over an equal.” (Par in parem imperium non habet. – Black’s Law Dictionary 7th Edition page 1673) It appears that the civil servants we elected to divvy up our taxes and spend them wisely for the good of the nation's people, have become control freaks with dangerous superiority complexes. It also seems apparent they are working for the interests of corporations and unelected 'invisible' third parties shamefully alongside our own intelligence agencies developed to protect our interests. If 'the government' and 'the people' were a married couple who turned up for counselling, the government would quickly have a restraining order placed on them and be packed off for rehabilitation whilst scholars would be updating the historical archive with the record-breaking boundary-smashing depravity of the mass gas-lighting of millions of innocents. Sadly, the government are not going to enter the counselling they need, and the British people now need to stand together and stamp out these embers of tyranny before the fire of despotism spreads. WHAT IS THE DIGITAL IDENTITY PROPOSAL? The full 'proposal' can be read here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification It is unsurprisingly long-winded and over-complicated, to say the least. In the next section, I am drawing attention to one small area under the DBS. First, here are the governmental bodies that will have access. Note the possible provision for the data to be accessed by "...An organisation which provides services to a specified public authority in connection with the specified objective..." Is this a backdoor allowing third-party organisations and companies to access our data? WHO WILL CURRENTLY SHARE THIS DATA English and UK-wide bodies Home Office Ministry of Justice The Lord Chancellor Ministry of Defence HM Revenue and Customs Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities Department for Education Department for Work and Pensions Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. HM Land Registry An organisation which provides services to a specified public authority in connection with the specified objective A county council in England A district council in England A London borough council A combined authority established under section 103 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 The Common Council of the City of London in its capacity as a local authority The Council of the Isles of Scilly The Greater London Authority Welsh bodies The Welsh Ministers The Welsh Revenue Authority A county council in Wales A county borough council in Wales A community council in Wales A person providing services in connection with a specified objective (within the meaning of section 35) to a specified person who (a) falls within this part of this Schedule; and (b) is a public authority. Scottish bodies The Scottish Ministers A council constituted under section 2 of the Local Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. A person providing services in connection with a specified objective (within the meaning of section 35) to a specified person who (a) falls within this Part of this Schedule; and (b) is a public authority. New public authorities to be added to Schedule 4 The Cabinet Office Department for Transport Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Disclosure and Barring Service Disclosure and Barring Service These guys are interesting Please pay attention to the last words of condition 3. condition 1: the purpose is the improvement or targeting of a public service provided to individuals or households, or the facilitation of the provision of a benefit (whether or not financial) to individuals or households; condition 2: the purpose is the improvement of the well-being of individuals or households; and condition 3: the purpose is the supporting of the delivery of a specified person’s functions, or the administration, monitoring or enforcement of a specified person’s functions This incorporates what they call an individual's right to work or rent. The "The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS)" will be one of the new bodies accessing the sharing of data. Employers and landlords will retain obligations that they must comply with under the Schemes, including to satisfy themselves that the IDSP has carried out an identity check on the employee/tenant, and to retain copies of the check. SOURCE The right to work and pay for a roof over our heads is fundamental and independent of all other factors. This is not a rating system of good tenants - we already have such measures in place - this is about cancelling individuals from society. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article23 Who else will be targeted? They will tell you criminals or terrorists, but even these definitions are being blurred as we speak. Vaccine-injury-awareness activists such as myself have been labelled anti-vaxxers and are now facing attempts to be labelled as terrorists. "...Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers..." Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article 19 If this doesn't alarm you, best research the developments in existing social credit systems and see how it will affect everyone within the 'social-credit-society', QUOTE: "....China's 'social credit' system ranks citizens and punishes them with throttled internet speeds and flight bans if the Communist Party deems them untrustworthy. The exact methodology is a secret — but examples of infractions include bad driving, smoking in non-smoking zones, buying too many video games, and posting fake news online, specifically about terrorist attacks or airport security. Other potential punishable offenses include spending too long playing video games, wasting money on frivolous purchases, and posting on social media. China has already started punishing people by restricting their travel, including banning them from flights. Authorities banned people from purchasing flights 17.5 million times by the end of 2018, according to the National Public Credit Information Centre, as the Guardian reported. They can also clamp down on luxury options — many are barred from getting business-class train tickets, and some are kept out of the best hotels. According to Rachel Botsman, an author who published part of her book on tech security on Wired in 2017, the government will throttle your internet speeds as a punishment, though the exact mechanics still haven't been made clear. According to Foreign Policy, credit systems monitor whether people pay bills on time, much like financial credit trackers — but also ascribe a moral dimension. You or your kids could also miss out on the best jobs and schools — seventeen people who refused to carry out military service in 2017 were barred from enrolling in higher education, applying for high school, or continuing their studies, Beijing News reported. And in July of 2018, a Chinese university denied an incoming student his spot because the student's father had a bad social credit score for failing to repay a loan. You could also get your dog taken away. The eastern Chinese city of Jinan started enforcing a social credit system for dog owners in 2017, whereby pet owners get points deducted if the dog is walked without a leash or causes public disturbances...." SOURCE Investigative Journalists have also been placed under what is basically house arrest by local corrupt politicians by having their access to digital money and travel curtailed -all without a trial. WHAT CAN WE DO? Here are three ways to voice your opinion regarding the UK gov proposals. 1 - OFFICIAL GOV FEEDBACK SURVEY This survey has a set list of questions that can only be answered by multiple choice https://surveys.domains.gov.uk/s/c0zd81 Save Our Rights have made a step-by-step template that suggest certain answers to the survey. "...All answers presented are merely suggestions on the basis that the person completing the consultation is opposing the Digital IDs. "Please use the written answers as inspiration and starting points." https://saveourrights.uk/digital-id-consultation/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=how_to_digital_id_consultation&utm_term=2023-02-08 However, the survey via the curated questions forces a narrative, meaning many of you might prefer to voice your protest independently. Here below, is a suggested email template to get you started... 2 - EMAIL SIDE STEPPING OFFICIAL SURVEY dea-data-sharing@digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk Suggested letter format template. (Credit: This I believe was compiled by Anna de Buisseret) To the man / woman / artificial intelligence at dea-data-sharing@digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk Regarding: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-legislation-to-help-more-people-prove-their-identity-online/consultation-on-draft-legislation-to-support-identity-verification Add date here: 2023 I the living man/ woman name: surname notice you and let it be known on record that; I do not consent to Digital ID I do not consent to Central Bank Digital Currency I do not consent to Digital Passports therein embedded vaccine passports, track and trace, mandatory vaccination, coercion, torture, genocide and terrorism. I do not consent to filling in this heavily biased online survey form that does not allow me to express my full opinions/objections to this draconian, tyrannical and evil slave tagging system. I am no slave, I am a living man/woman All of the above are designed to remove my God given freedoms and inalienable rights that no man shall take away. I require acknowledgement that my notice to you on this matter be placed on record and included in your survey. By: ___________________________ name :surname ALL-RIGHTS-RESERVED. WITHOUT-RECOURSE. NON-ASSUMPSIT - NON ASSUMPTIVE. “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). “An equal has no dominion over an equal.” (Par in parem imperium non habet. – Black’s Law Dictionary 7th Edition page 1673) 3 - WRITE & EMAIL MP Another powerful way to get the message across is meet, call or write to your own MP. Your own words are the most powerful. Here is a letter template that has been prepared by Save our Rights to use directly or to inspire your own version. To whom it may concern, I’m writing to express my significant concerns about the proposed digital ID verification system because I think it seriously jeopardises people’s fundamental human rights and liberties. I choose to draw attention to how inaccessible the consultation process is in the first place. It is unacceptable that those who are unable to access the online form—whether because they lack computer skills or have insufficient internet connectivity—cannot make their opinions known. Additionally, the survey’s questions are complex and beyond the expertise of the majority of respondents. Because of this, it is challenging for the general public to properly comprehend the ramifications of this proposal and effectively communicate their opinions. The government must make sure that everyone, regardless of technical proficiency or understanding, may participate in the consultation process. This consultation, in my opinion, violates the values of accountability and transparency, and adds to the concerns I have about the Digital ID itself. Moving on to the proposed system itself, I want to address a number of major concerns. Firstly, I have serious concerns about the types of data items the government plans to collect, access, store and share as part of this Digital ID. Having our personal information shared with the authorities, including name, address, date of birth, photographs, passport and licence numbers, and transaction data, is a clear infringement of the right to privacy guaranteed by the Human Rights Act of 1998. Furthermore, there is no assurance that this private data will be protected from hackers, data breaches, or other nefarious organisations, and I worry about the effects such a breach might have on people. Additionally, while it is not a named objective, the proposed system would enable the government to deploy facial recognition and Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras to track people’s movements while also monitoring their online habits. Both the right to privacy and the freedom of expression would be violated by this. The development of facial recognition and ANPR technology makes it possible for the government to have unprecedented control over people’s lives and to monitor and limit their behaviour, potentially through sanctions and restricted access to benefits and services. The effect that this proposal will have on vulnerable and marginalised communities also concerns me a great deal. Data sharing in this manner could result in discrimination and sanctions, especially for people who identify with any of the protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. The government must make sure that its plans adhere to the Equalities Act 2010 and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and do not perpetuate or exacerbate current imbalances. However, I see little to suggest that the Equalities Act and GDPR will truly be taken into account therefore the conclusion is that the most vulnerable in our society are at risk from this proposal. I also doubt the true motivations behind this proposal. The government asserts that the digital ID verification system will enhance service delivery and decrease fraud, but I don’t consider that these are good enough justifications to infringe on people’s freedoms and human rights. Furthermore, I don’t think the proposal achieves its own objectives because the method by which the data would be gathered, stored, and used lacks transparency and accountability and any measure to assess its suggested benefits to individuals. Finally, I encourage the government to safeguard people’s freedoms and human rights by reconsidering this proposal. In my opinion, the proposed digital ID verification system must be considerably changed or abandoned entirely because it poses a serious risk to people’s rights and privacy. Thank you for your time and consideration, [Your Name] With this opening when forwarded to your local MP: Dear [MP] I’m writing to you today to let you know how deeply concerned I am about the most recent consultation on the suggested digital ID verification system. After carefully weighing the implications of this idea, I am convinced that it jeopardises our fundamental human rights and liberties. As a result, I vehemently disagree with this proposal, and I urge you to do the same. For your information, I’ve included a copy of my response to the consultation. I sincerely hope you’ll take my concerns into account. I hope you will stand up for the defence of our liberties and the safeguarding of our human rights as my elected representative. I want to draw your attention, in particular, to how difficult it was to access this consultation. Despite the significance of this consultation, it is clear that not all residents’ needs were taken into consideration while designing the online survey. I believe the complexity of the questions and the wording used in the online survey will have made it extremely difficult for many respondents to comprehend the full implication of the question and therefore their own response. This not only prevents a sizeable segment of the population from taking part, but it also casts doubt on the reliability of the findings. In a democratic society everyone must have an equal opportunity to share their opinions and participate in the decision-making process. I hope that you will consider these issues in your review of the consultation results and work to ensure that future consultations are more inclusive and accessible to all. Kind regards [Your Name] [Your Postcode] 4 - WORD OF MOUTH. TALK! Explain what is happening to your loved ones, friends and family. This is by far the most important thing you can do and what the powers that be fear the most. 5 - SHARE THIS INFORMATION Gain mass visibility to the issues. Share this post (or the work of other freedom fighters and organisations) adding a small personal introduction with your feelings and thoughts, as widely as you can. We are many. They are few. We can win this. Dream, live and fight for our freedoms. Defend our children's future. The seemingly impossible is possible. With best wishes Mark Playne 10-2-2023 DEADLINE FOR THIS ACTION IS 28th FEBRUARY MORE LINKS This is a massive attack on our privacy 2006 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_Cards_Act_2006 A historical look at UK identity cards https://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/identity-cards-in-britain-past-experience-and-policy-implications Obesity and social credit https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/07/chinas-social-credit-system-arrives-on-british-shores/

The parents of the vaccine injured have been doing their best to help other parents avoid repeating their mistakes. Gaslighted by the very industry that caused these injuries, who in turn then paid the world's most powerful marketing companies to invent and push the propaganda term "Anti vaxxer" in an attempt to quieten the parent's voices. This short little film was made by the parents of the injured children in 2012. If their voice had been heard 11 years ago, we might not have 80% of the population contributing to record-breaking excessive deaths as we are now seeing in 2023. A gentle loving tool to plant a seed of curiosity in parents considering vaccinating their babies. This was created by parents in the international Vaccine Injury community in 2012. Please share. English version See on youtube here: Arabic version See on youtube here Indonesian version

A member was asking me about his recent diagnosis and things he could do. I've sent similar 'leads' to many so figured it's about time to put them in a single post. Please bare in mind I'm not a doctor, meaning the below should not be taken as advice, besides it's against the law to say anything other than chemo or radio cure cancer. So, the below is just a collection of links to complement your research and conclusions. 😊 This is a work in progress as will take time to fill the sections. Please feel free to send me any relevant links/posts of your own. SUGAR & KETO https://naturalsociety.com/starving-cancer-death-removing-refined-sugar/ OXYGEN Hyperbaric chambers increase the blood's O2 levels. Cheap sessions can be booked in the UK via the SUPERB MS Society network of resources. This is one of the very few charities I'd back. https://www.mssociety.org.uk/about-ms/treatments-and-therapies/complementary-and-alternative-therapies/hyperbaric-oxygen-therapy https://killcancercells.com/cancer-researchers/warburg/ INDUCED FEVER Fever takes away cancer's protective camouflage enabling the immune system to tackle the growths. You can induce fever-like states with a long sauna or steam room stints. This is powerful https://bookinghealth.com/blog/diagnoses-and-treatment/diagnosis-and-treatment/501584-hyperthermia-effective-cancer-treatment-method-in-germany.html CLEAN SPRING WATER Way more powerful than you'd believe. Access it, use it, then reaearch to understand the whys. We all need 'structured' water! GLUTATHIONE Start here and ask me if you get lost on the trail... Www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/jg Tip: Don't buy Glutathione Don't buy NAC Do watch the above video and follow the links... VITAMIN C IV is best. Few can access it. Take small regular doses e.g 250mg Spread out small doses is very effective. If you can afford it buy liposomal ViT C If you cant afford it, make it! VITAMIN D3 High doses are needed. 4000iu is seen as the best daily amount,. Most people take tiny amounts. Nearly everyone in the western world is deficient.... Sunlight helps, but is not enough! B17 Apricot Kernels. More later... HEMP CBD was legalised for a reason. But why take one isolated cannabinoid when the plant has 120+? https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/hemp-versus-cbd ESSIAC More coming soon https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/patient/essiac-pdq TUMERIC https://www.turmericforhealth.com/turmeric-benefits/turmeric-for-cancer CHEMO The Greek Test There are 2000+ types of chemo poisons used to kill cancer cells... That also kills other cells and is one reason it is illegal to dispose of chemo down the loo! Many chemos are blindly given to each condition, yet many might be more effective on some people than others. The greek test works out which chemo your cancer is most susceptible to. The NHS will not use this as they have signed contracts. This needs to be a private test. IPT Chemo works by poisoning the cancer cells. The body is also poisoned. The hope is that as cancer cells are 'more hungry' and will consume more, they will be affected more. The limit is set by what your body can tolerate. The body needs 5 weeks to recover from this 'near-death' experience hence the time lag before your body is healthy enough to experience more chemo poisoning. Imagine a simple technique that targets the cancer cells and only uses 10-15% of the chemo. This is what IPT is. https://kotsanisinstitute.com/blog/what-is-insulin-potentiation-therapy Further research TRUTH ABOUT CANCER SERIES https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/ DIRT CHEAP PROTOCOL https://supplementpolice.com/dirt-cheap-protocol-for-cancer/

This is Not On The Beeb's 74th Adverse event report. The data concerned includes yellow card reports up until December 28th 2022. MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY 25th JANUARY 2023 Adult & Child - Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent) Government data up to 11th Sept 2022 - UK-wide (latest) • 1st doses received = 53.8 million people • 2nd doses - 50.7m people • 3rd doses/one or more booster - 40,598,344 people (up to end Jan 2023) All boosters = 67.16 million doses • Pfizer - 33.1m(monovalent) & 11.4m (bivalent) • Astrazeneca - 60,800 • Moderna - 13.3m (monovalent) & 9.3m (bivalent) • Novavax - 1,000 All-brand doses given in last 4 weeks - 9714 (Pfizer-mono) + 253,960 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1 (AZ) + 128 (Moderna-mono) + 11,333 (Moderna-bivalent) + approx. 1000 (Novavax) + ? (Unknown) = 276,136 Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports - 176,123 (Pfizer-mono) + 3882 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 247,410 (AZ) + 42,788 (Moderna-mono) + 5030 (Moderna-bivalent) + 48 (Novavax) + 2272 (Unknown brand) = 477,553 people impacted (increase of 1286 in 4 weeks) Reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 74.3% 124,449 (Pfizer-mono) + 2956 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 191,479 (AZ) + 30,891 (Moderna-mono) + 3616 (Moderna-bivalent) + 33 (Novavax) + 1628 (Unknown) = 355,052 Reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 25.7% 51,674 (Pfizer-mono) + 926 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 55,931 (AZ) + 11,897 (Moderna-mono) + 1414 (Moderna-bivalent) + 15 (Novavax) + 644 (Unknown) = 122,501 Overall 1-in-113 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event, 1-in-152 reports are classified as SERIOUS*, 1-in-196 reports are fatal, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. TOTAL DOSES administered (approx.) = 171,738,100 doses including all booster programmes Reactions - 507,529 (Pfizer-mono) + 10,271 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 876,636 (AZ) + 140,149 (Moderna-mono) + 13,648 (Moderna-bivalent) + 137 (Novavax) + 7084 (Unknown) = 1,555,454 Fatal - 861 (Pfizer-mono) + 23 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1357 (AZ) + 86 (Moderna-mono) + 40 (Moderna-bivalent) + 69 (Unknown) = 2436 (increase of 32 reports with fatal outcome in 4 weeks) Over 378 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Last available data set for Under 18s in Nov 2022 • 4,213,500 children (1st doses) - majority Pfizer • 2,910,500 (2nd doses) - majority Pfizer • 485,900 boosters Yellow Card Adverse Events Reported - Below combined 0-19yrs - many categories retracted (^) due to less than 5 reports in line with MHRA duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters” 0-19yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 71.3% 4634 (Pfizer-mono) + >29 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1457 (AZ) + 518 (Moderna-mono) + >6 (Moderna-bivalent) + >32 (Unknown) = >6685 0-19yr old reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 28.6% 1990 (Pfizer-mono) + >6 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 400 (AZ) + 265 (Moderna-mono) + <5 (Moderna-bivalent) + 16 (Unknown) = 2677 0-19yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA >10 (Pfizer-mono) + zero (Pfizer-bivalent) + <5 (AZ) + <5 (Moderna-mono) + zero (Moderna-bivalent) + <5 (Unknown brand) = greater than 10 20-29yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 73.2% 19,952 (Pfizer-mono) + 99 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 14,536 (AZ) + 4972 (Moderna-mono) + 124 (Moderna-bivalent) + < 5 (Novavax) + 90 (Unknown) = 39,773 20-29yr old reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 26.7% 8428 (Pfizer-mono) + 47 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 3873 (AZ) + 2065 (Moderna-mono) + 51 (Moderna-bivalent) + 27 (Unknown) = 14,491 20-29yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA 14 (Pfizer-mono) + zero (Pfizer-bivalent) + 28 (AZ) + zero (Moderna-mono) + zero (Moderna-bivalent) + zero (Novavax) + zero (Unknown brand) = 42 * MHRA definition of ‘serious’ - patient died, life threatening, hospitalisation, congenital abnormality, persistent or significant disability or capacity, deemed medically significant by MHRA medical dictionary or reporter For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps Compiled by Jenny Brown. ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

It's often not hard to work out 'who did it', though proving the real culprit is difficult unless you are a trusted Pulitzer-winning journalist with a superb track record and multiple high-level insider sources. Few of us believed the official narrative claiming Russia blew up its own natural gas pipeline and important source of foreign reserve income. Many of us guessed the real culprits. As Hersh says himself at the start of the video below, all he really did was lay down stronger foundations 'by deconstructing the obvious'. Just as in Obama's redline speech that foretold how the west would justify invading Syria, Biden has said simply - "we will shut down Nord stream 2 if Russia invades Ukraine." Biden threatens he'll shut down Nord Stream 2 pipeline if Russia further invades Ukraine VIDEO - 38 secs Also see on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWUuhNd37WI One of the most important reveals in Hersh's report is that the US laid plans for the blowing up of the pipeline 2 months before Russia invaded Ukraine. See the full interview with a concise summary and introduction by Democracy Now Pulitzer-winning journalist Seymour Hersh on "How America Took Out the Nord Stream Pipeline" Interview by Democracy Now VIDEO 33 mins Also see on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4BuMaGlKp0 These are Hersh's key articles on Substack exposing the culprits and anticipating the backlash of denials and smears. How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline Seymour Hersh on substack 8th Feb 2023 QUOTE: "...The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now. The U.S. Navy’s Diving and Salvage Center can be found in a location as obscure as its name—down what was once a country lane in rural Panama City, a now-booming resort city in the southwestern panhandle of Florida, 70 miles south of the Alabama border. The center’s complex is as nondescript as its location—a drab concrete post-World War II structure that has the look of a vocational high school on the west side of Chicago. A coin-operated laundromat and a dance school are across what is now a four-lane road. The center has been training highly skilled deep-water divers for decades who, once assigned to American military units worldwide, are capable of technical diving to do the good—using C4 explosives to clear harbors and beaches of debris and unexploded ordinance—as well as the bad, like blowing up foreign oil rigs, fouling intake valves for undersea power plants, destroying locks on crucial shipping canals. The Panama City center, which boasts the second largest indoor pool in America, was the perfect place to recruit the best, and most taciturn, graduates of the diving school who successfully did last summer what they had been authorized to do 260 feet under the surface of the Baltic Sea. Last June, the Navy divers, operating under the cover of a widely publicized mid-summer NATO exercise known as BALTOPS 22, planted the remotely triggered explosives that, three months later, destroyed three of the four Nord Stream pipelines, according to a source with direct knowledge of the operational planning...." read more here SOURCE The Crap on the Wall Feb 15th Seymour Hersh on substack QUOTE: "...This a brief combat report from the battlefield here and abroad in the aftermath of the release last Wednesday of my story about Joe Biden’s decision to blow up the Nord Stream pipelines. First, many thanks for your interest in what the pipeline story was all about: a very dangerous Presidential decision. You are careful readers. I’m an old hand at dropping bombshell stories that are based on the disclosures of sources I do not, and cannot, name. There is a pattern to the response by the mainstream media. It dates back to my breakthrough story: the My Lai massacre revelation. That story was published in five installments, over five weeks in 1969, by the underground media group Dispatch News. I had tried to get the two most important magazines in America, Life and Look, to publish the story, with no success. Editors at both publications had earlier invited me to do some freelance writing for them, but they wanted nothing to do with a story about a massacre committed by American soldiers. It was a frightening time for me, in terms of my faith in the profession I had chosen. I was allowed to read and copy by hand much of the Army’s original charge sheet accusing a sad sack 2nd Lieutenant named William L. Calley Jr. of the premeditated murder of 109 “Oriental” human beings. I also had tracked Calley, the Army’s only suspect, and interviewed him at.... read more here. SOURCE WHY IS A PULITZER PRIZE-WINNING JOURNALIST USING SUBSTACK? Feb 8th Seymour Hersh on substack QUOTE: "...I’ve been a freelancer for much of my career. In 1969, I broke the story of a unit of American soldiers in Vietnam who had committed a horrific war crime. They were ordered to attack an ordinary peasant village where, as a few officers knew, they would get no opposition—and told to kill on sight. The boys murdered, raped and mutilated for hours, with no enemy to be found. The crime was covered up at the top of the military chain of command for eighteen months—until I uncovered it. I won a Pulitzer Prize for international reporting for that work, but getting it before the American public was no easy task. I wasn’t an established journalist working for an established outfit. My first story, published under a barely existent wire service run by a friend of mine, was initially rejected by the editors at Life and Look magazines. When the Washington Post finally published it, they littered it with Pentagon denials and the unthinking skepticism of the rewrite man. I’ve been told my stories were wrong, invented, outrageous for as long as I can remember—but I’ve never stopped. In 2004, after I published the first stories about the torture of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib, a Pentagon spokesman responded by calling my journalism “a tapestry of nonsense.” (He also said I was a guy who “threw a lot of crap against the wall” and “expects someone to peel off what’s real.” I won my fifth George Polk Award for that work.) I’ve put in my time at the major outlets, but was never at home there. More recently, I wouldn’t be welcome anyway. Money, as always, was part of the problem. The Washington Post and my old newspaper, The New York Times (to name just a few), have found themselves in a cycle of dwindling home delivery, newsstand sales, and display advertisements. CNN and its offspring, like MSNBC and Fox News, battle for sensational headlines over investigative journalism. There are still many brilliant journalists at work, but so much of the reporting has to be within guidelines and constraints that did not exist in the years I was turning out daily stories for the Times. That’s where Substack comes along. Here, I have the kind of freedom I’ve always fought for. I’ve watched writer after writer on this platform as they’ve freed themselves from their publishers’ economic interests, run deep with stories without fear of word counts or column inches, and—most importantly—spoken directly to their readers. And that last point, for me, is the clincher. I’ve never been interested in socializing with pols or cozying up to money types at the self-important cocktail get togethers—the star-fucking parties, I always liked to call them. I’m at my best when I swig cheap bourbon with the servicemen, work over the first-year law firm associates for intel, or swap stories with the junior minister from a country most people can’t name. That’s always been my style. And as it turns out, it’s the ethos of this online community as well. What you’ll find here is, I hope, a reflection of that freedom. The story you will read today is the truth as I worked for three months to find, with no pressure from a publisher, editors or peers to make it hew to certain lines of thought—or pare it back to assuage their fears. Substack simply means reporting is back . . . unfiltered and unprogrammed—just the way I like it..." Seymour M. Hersh Washington, DC SOURCE JOIN SEYMOUR HERSH ON SUBSTACK HERE Is there another reason this story is being publicized? This is unverified but here for your interest.

This is a recent email from Dr Andrew Goldsworthy who is himself C19 vaccine injured. Hi Mark, Thanks for declaring yourself as an anti-vaxxer. (Andrew is referring to my comments in this article) You have a good reason for this. See the following link to today's John Campbell interview. It gives definite proof that, at least in some people, the COVID vaccines damage the brain and heart (and God knows what more) even in the absence of the COVID virus itself. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZhzWzoPB3M Best wishes Andrew Goldsworthy Jabs causing brain injury or neurological conditions? Nothing new here for those of us working in vaccine damage awareness. See the latest UK vaccine injury report here Here is a more defined glimpse of vaccine-Injury data from November 2022 JOHN CAMPBELL'S VIDEO: JAB CAUSING BRAIN INJURY

This is Not On The Beeb's 73rd Adverse event report compiled by the dedicated and fantastic Jenny Brown. Jenny is an independent healthcare professional with significant nursing experience. The data concerned includes yellow card reports up until December 28th 2022. Jenny has spent months of her personal time with her head deep in the MHRA stats producing easy-to-understand reports that NOTB have published from the start. These are her words on the new changes the MHRA have made to their reporting format as published in the CW. "...Just before Christmas, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) changed their manner of reporting of Yellow Card adverse events.In the first ‘Coronavirus vaccine – summary of Yellow Card reporting’ update of this year, published on January 13, the ‘suspected’ side effects of the ‘vaccines’ are presented in ‘interactive Drug Analysis Profiles’ (iDAPs), which they describe as ‘a new enhanced format of data visualisations’. They claim this provides ‘improvements in format, accessibility and data protection whilst allowing access to more data than has been published previously.’ Stripping away the jargon, charts, graphs and interactive selections have replaced the previous 387 pages of adverse event listing documents for all Covid ‘vaccines’. Delving into this new format with anticipation, my hope was to find more useful information to continue creating reports to help raise awareness of the impact of these therapies. Would this so-called upgrade in data representation provide more clarity, reassurance and transparency or create more concerns and obfuscation of the situation? I have been surprised and disturbed in equal proportions. Several themes emerge which I discuss before presenting an overview breakdown of data as can now be gleaned. 1. The MHRA has drawn a line under the initial ‘vaccine’ campaign Although the overall report and reaction totals are cumulative from the initial roll-out, the written information now almost solely focuses on the autumn 2022 boosters. Most of the previously regularly updated text and tables, with important historical data points from the last two years, are no longer available, meaning that important comparisons and context are archived. his obscures the deeper picture, as the MHRA introductory text continues confidently to report that there is no cause for concern in pregnant women, for fertility, when breastfeeding or for under-18s, and acknowledges only a very rare potential association for menstrual bleeding, myocarditis/pericarditis and reports which have a fatal outcome. Given the growing body of peer-group-published scientific research that arrives at a contrary conclusion, along with ever more concerned doctors and scientists calling a halt to the entire programme, this seems incredibly misleading. Once again, we are being asked to place blind trust in health authorities as the MHRA reassure us that ‘robust safety monitoring and surveillance continues to be carried out between publications’ and that they will ‘continue to communicate promptly on any updated safety advice when needed’ without any proof that this is happening at all, or how. 2. The MHRA finally admits that the majority of adverse effects are serious The new interactive format does provide a new and valuable insight into, and admitting the severity of, and is a belated disclosure of, the vast majority of individual reports submitted. This runs directly counter to what MHRA have consistently maintained that ‘Safety monitoring throughout the deployment showed that the most common adverse reactions for all the Covid-19 vaccines were mild and self-limiting “reactogenicity”-type events such as fever, fatigue and injection site pain.’ More than two years of close monitoring of MHRA’s own published data and summarising the Yellow Card reports has shown the numbers of adverse events rising beyond the tens of thousands for blood and nervous system disorders, for cardiac conditions including heart attacks and peri/myocarditis, for eye conditions, infections, for respiratory and immune conditions, for skin, reproductive and breast disorders, for psychiatric distress, and thousands of cases of anaphylaxis, strokes, haemorrhages and thrombosis, seizures and paralysis. Hundreds of people have become deaf or blind. Hardly mild reactions. In direct conflict with their ‘low risk’ reassurances, the MHRA explain their definition of ‘seriousness criteria for ADR reporting’, determined by a working group of the Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), ‘as 6 possible categories which are documented on the Yellow Card’. These are: · Patient died due to reaction · Life-threatening · Resulted in hospitalisation or prolonged inpatient hospitalisation · Congenital abnormality · Involved persistent or significant disability or incapacity · If the reaction was deemed medically significant. In addition to this, seriousness of reaction terms has been defined by the MHRA. According to this seriousness definition, the MHRA is now acknowledging that, overall, the Yellow Card Reports for all Covid ‘vaccines’ are classified as serious, totalling 74.3 per cent, with non- serious at just 25.2 per cent. The mismatch between this and their previous declarations that most Yellow Card reactions are mild is quite mind-boggling. 3. Data disguised under the pretext of confidentiality Prolific throughout the new format is the use of the symbol ^. MHRA explains ‘Where there are less than 5 reports, numbers have been replaced with a ^ in order to prevent patient/reporter identification in line with our duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters’. However, as no identifiable context is disclosed it would seem highly unlikely that confidentiality could or would be breached. This retraction of numerical information means that, for example, alongside the five suicides that we can see have been reported in association with the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’, we can no longer see the two suicides that we know are associated with Pfizer. 4. The new format obscures child data Although the new interactive format looks good and can be used to explore different combinations of reported information, it is a lot less accessible in many ways, most critically for data relating to children. The ‘under 18s’ category has been replaced with 0-9yrs, 10-19yrs, which mixes the outcomes for young school age children before the age of Gillick Competence (under 16), through that potential consenting framework in teen years, with the ‘fully competent’ young adult data. The under-18s category was never adequate and this is not the improvement we have been looking for. The public and medical community urgently require more transparency around the data impacting children, not least because, disturbingly, 71.3 per cent (a total of 6,673)of the 0 -19yr old reports are classified as serious against 28.6 per cent non-serious (2,675). Also alarming is the 0.1 per cent of 0-19yr old reports classified as fatal by MHRA, equivalent to greater than ten (see below). In addition, we still have more than 370 deaths reported as being ‘Age Unknown’. Why? How can the age of a person who has died be unknown? 5. Downplaying real-world relevance of ‘people’ negatively impacted By primarily commenting on the bivalent ‘vaccine’ reporting prevalence, the impression given is that the adverse event reporting rate is low at around 0.5 Yellow Cards per 1,000 doses administered. However, if we consider real-world terms, although 53.8million first doses have been administered across the UK, these are ‘people’ who have received one or more doses of a Covid ‘vaccine’. Although over 171million doses have been given, 476,267 Yellow Card reports – that represents nearly half a million people – have been filed, nearly 75 per cent of which, by the MHRA’s own definition, are serious. That’s nearly 354,000 people. With the presumption that one person completes one report regardless of dose number, approximately 1-in-113 people have been negatively impacted and 1-in-152 people having an experience classified as serious. Yet this reporting rate may well be less than 10 per cent of actual figures according to MHRA itself, especially given the bureaucratic difficulties and time-consuming nature of Yellow Card reporting, as well as ignorance of its existence. 6. The MHRA still proclaims the effectiveness of the ‘vaccines’ despite the evidence Within the latest updated Yellow Card reporting introductory text, the MHRA persists with the statement: ‘Vaccination is the single most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from Covid-19.’ How can this possibly be when the UKHSA’s own data summary clearly demonstrates the ‘vaccine’ effectiveness drops significantly just months after a booster dose? Surely there are other valid ways to support our health and well-being? They also state that ‘The benefits of the vaccines in preventing Covid-19 and serious complications associated with Covid-19 far outweigh any currently known side effects in the majority of patients.’ And ‘Vaccines are the best way to protect people from Covid-19 and have already saved tens of thousands of lives.’ From our experiences in the real world, where is the evidence for these statements? And where is the evidence that the current excess mortality, running at 20.7 per cent above the five-year average (2,493 excess deaths for the third week in December 2022), and excess all-cause mortality in the most heavily vaccinated age groups, are completely unrelated to this topic? By implication, it appears to be expected and acceptable for a sizeable minority of people to experience a serious adverse event up to and including death and with long-term outcomes as yet completely unknown. Just how much more ‘serious’ does it need to get? MHRA Yellow Card reporting summary up to December 28, 2022 (Data published January 13, 2023) New interactive format Adult & Child – Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent) Government data up to September 11, 2022 – UK-wide (latest) · 1st doses received = 53.8million people · 2nd doses – 50.7m people · 3rd doses/one or more booster – 40,576,925 people All boosters = 66.86million doses · Pfizer – 33.1m (monovalent) & 11.1m (bivalent) · AstraZeneca – 60,800 · Moderna – 13.3m (monovalent) & 9.3m (bivalent) Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports 175,724 (Pfizer-mono) 3,538 (Pfizer-bivalent) 247,157 (AZ) 42,706 (Moderna-mono) 4,860 (Moderna-bivalent) 52 (Novavax) 2,230 (Unknown brand) TOTAL = 476,267 people impacted (increase of 2,249 in 5 weeks) Reports classified as serious by MHRA = 74.3 per cent 124,114 (Pfizer-mono) 2,667 (Pfizer-bivalent) 191,252 (AZ) 30,825 (Moderna-mono) 3,472 (Moderna-bivalent) 34 (Novavax) 1,592 (Unknown) TOTAL = 353,956 Reports classified as non-serious by MHRA = 25.2 per cent 50,757 (Pfizer-mono) 852 (Pfizer-bivalent) 54,557 (AZ) 11,796 (Moderna-mono) 1,356 (Moderna-bivalent) 18 (Novavax) 571 (Unknown) TOTAL = 119,907 Overall 1 in 113 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event 1 in 152 classified as SERIOUS* which may be less than 10 per cent of actual figures according to MHRA. Total doses administered (approx) = 171,360,000 including all booster programmes Reactions 506,216 (Pfizer-mono) 9,319 (Pfizer-bivalent) 875,826 (AZ) 139,933 (Moderna-mono) 13,131 (Moderna-bivalent) 106 (Novavax) 6,838 (Unknown) TOTAL = 1,551,263 Fatal 853 (Pfizer-mono) 19 (Pfizer-bivalent) 1348 (AZ) 85 (Moderna-mono) 32 (Moderna-bivalent) 67 (Unknown) TOTAL = 2,404 (increase of 42 reports with fatal outcome in 5 weeks) 370 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ Children & young people special report Last available dose numbers dataset for under-18s in November 2022 · 4,213,500 children (1st doses) – majority Pfizer · 2,910,500 (2nd doses) – majority Pfizer · 485,900 boosters Yellow Card adverse events reported now 0-9yrs : 10-19yrs segments Below Combined 0-19yrs – many categories retracted (^) due to less than 5 reports ‘in line with MHRA duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters’ 0-19yr old reports classified as serious by MHRA = 71.3 per cent 4,634 (Pfizer-mono) >26 (Pfizer-bivalent) 1,457 (AZ) 518 (Moderna-mono) >6 (Moderna-bivalent) >32 (Unknown) TOTAL = 6,673 0-19yr old reports classified as non-serious by MHRA = 28.6 per cent 1,989 (Pfizer-mono) >5 (Pfizer-bivalent) 400 (AZ) 265 (Moderna-mono) <5 (Moderna-bivalent) 16 (Unknown) TOTAL = 2,675 0-19yr old reports classified as fatal by MHRA = 0.1 per cent >10 (Pfizer-mono) zero (Pfizer-bivalent) <5 (AZ) <5 (Moderna-mono) zero (Moderna-bivalent) <5 (Unknown brand) TOTAL = greater than 10 Full IDAP adverse event reports are HERE https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mhra-admits-74-of-vaccine-injuries-are-serious-but-still-insists-jabs-are-safe/ ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

Tired of important emails going into your junk folder? Follow these simple instructions to add me (or anyone else) to your safe contacts list. ​ Please remember I only want you to get my emails if you really want them. There is an easy one-click unsubscribe button at the bottom of every email. ​ Gmail - Mark messages as ‘Not spam’ Has Gmail has marked emails you wish to keep as spam? Tell Gmail the emails are not spam. 1. In Gmail, navigate to the spam folder.
 2. Select the email.
 3. Click More and then Not spam. ​ ​ How to add an email contact to your safe sender list. ​ Gmail 1. Open the email I've sent you. 2. Click on the little down-pointing-triangle-arrow next to “reply.” 3. Click Add mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk to contacts list to finish iOS Devices – iPad, iPhone, iPod Touch 1. On any message, tap the sender and add to either a new contact or an existing contact. ​​ Android Devices – Samsung, Google Nexus, others 1. In the default email client, touch the picture of the sender. 2. Click OK to add to contacts. ​​ Apple Mail 1. Open the email I've sent you. 2. In the email header, click on Mark Playne and choose 'add to contacts' from the dropdown menu. ​ Yahoo! Mail 1. Open the email from me. 2. Click Add to contacts next to Gabriel Lea 3. On the Add Contact popup, add additional information if needed. 4. Click Save to finish. ​ Windows Live Hotmail 1. Open the email from me. 2. In the email header, click on Gabriel Lea and choose 'add to contacts' from the dropdown menu. ​ AOL Mail 1. Click Contacts in the right toolbar. 2. Click Add Contact. 3. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 4. Click Add Contact button in the popup to finish. ​ Comcast 1. Click Preferences from the menu. 2. Click Restrict Incoming Email. 3. Click Yes to Enable Email Controls. 4. Click Allow email from addresses listed below. 5. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 6. Click Add. 7. Click Update to finish. ​ Earthlink 1. Click Address Book. 2. Click Add Contact. 4. Save mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk as a contact. 5. Click save. NetZero 1. Click the Address Book tab on the top menu bar. 2. Click Contacts. 3. Click Add Contact. 4. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 5. Click Save to finish. ​ Microsoft Outlook 2003 1. Open the email message from me. 2. Right-click Click here to download images in the gray bar at the top of the message. 3. Click Add Sender to Senders Safe List to finish. ​ Outlook 2007 1. Right-click on the email you received (in the list of emails). 2. Click Junk E-mail. 3. Click Add Sender to Safe Senders List to finish. ​ Outlook 2010 1. Click the Home tab. 2. Click Junk. 3. Click Junk E-mail Options. 4. Click Safe Senders. 5. Click Add. 6. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 7. Click OK to finish. ​ Mac Mail 1. Click Address Book . 2. Click File. 3. Click New Card. 4. Enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 5. Click Edit to finish ​ Mozilla Thunderbird for PC 1. Click Address Book. 2. Make sure Personal Address Book is highlighted. 3. Click New Card. This will launch a New Card window that has 3 tabs: Contact, Address & Other. 4. Under Contact, enter mark@markplayne.com 5. Click OK to finish. Mozilla Thunderbird for Mac 1. Click Address Book. 2. Make sure Personal Address Book is highlighted. 3. Click New Card. This will launch a New Card window that has 3 tabs: Contact, Address & Other. 4. Under Contact, enter mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk 5. Click OK to finish

Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Biological Safety Officer and Professor at University College London (retired) sent his recent thoughts on the EMF link to Obesity. As always golden information... Hi Mark, I was struck by an article in the "New Scientist" that said that there has been a massive increase in obesity in the last few decades. There may be more than one reason for this, the most obvious being that we are spending too much time in front of our computers and have less exercise. But there is another and much more intriguing possibility. That is that electromagnetic radiation (especially at high frequencies) opens voltage-gated ion channels VGCCs) in the insulin-secreting cells of the pancreas. See https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/138/9/3735/2988096?login=false The effect of this would be to increase the amount of insulin in the bloodstream, which would in turn promote the more rapid uptake of glucose into our cells. Some would go into muscle cells, but there is a limit to what these can absorb. By far most will go into adipose tissue and make us fat and we could also become  Type 2 diabetics. Most type 2 diabetics can manage by taking carefully adjusted but lifelong doses of metformin, which blocks the uptake of glucose into their cells. In some cases, it may even make them lose weight but don't bet on it. An overdose may cause a hypoglycemic attack in which you may faint, go into a coma or worse. The take-home story is if you want to stay thin and healthy, steer well clear of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation. Best wishes Andrew Goldsworthy

"...Health officials are investigating whethe 'Although the totality of the data currently suggests that it is very unlikely that the signal … represents a true clinical risk, we believe it is important to share this information with the public, as we have in the past, when one of our safety monitoring systems detects a signal,' a joint statement from the CDC and FDA said...." The CDC have now moved to squash this 'signal' that went viral. "...A preliminary link between Pfizer's Covid vaccine and an increased stroke risk in seniors cannot be stood up in further datasets, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have said. On Friday the CDC and FDA announced one of the four main databases used to track Covid vaccine injuries had detected an association between the updated bivalent shot and ischemic strokes in over-65s. The find came from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a near real-time surveillance system monitoring the safety of vaccines containing health records of more than 12 million Americans. It found that 130 seniors had the stroke within 21 days of the shot — representing 0.02 per cent of the roughly 550,000 seniors who received the shot. The agencies said it was 'very unlikely' the signal represents 'a true clinical risk' because it was only a tiny proportion of the group and the finding was not stood up in four other large databases that had a much larger sample size....' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11640813/Why-Pfizer-Covid-shots-stroke-link-flagged-CDC-FDA-likely-just-statistical-anomaly.html The CDC has played with data before producing more digestible statistics for the public as the film Vaxxed proved via a CDC whistleblower concerning the MMR vaccine. To look at the UK data see our translation of the MHRA yellow card reported reactions to the C19 vaccines here. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/1st-dec-2022-uk-vaccine-injury-report-for-adults-children-notb-s-72nd-ae-report

This time last year you might remember I was working providing expert and vaccine injury witness evidence for the case with lawyers Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland working alongside Dr Samuel White and Mark Sexton known as police crime number: 6029679/21 Over 60 NOTB members that are vaccine-injured also submitted witness statements. Several key Doctors also submitted expert witness evidence. Multiple scientists submitted expert witness evidence. Thank you. Over 16,000 of you have also kindly backed Not On The Beeb petition (started in the summer of 2021) calling for a pause to the roll-out and investigation into the ingredients that we supplied to the legal team, as a public push backing the evidence. Thank you! (We are gathering momentum and will have more news on how the petition will again be used in the upcoming weeks.) LOIS IS NOW BEING HOUNDED BY HER LEGAL REGULATORY BODY. We need to let this body the SRA know that we believe all her work was for the good of the people of this nation. DETAILS OF SRA COMPLAINT Many of you will remember the 2022 winter push of Not On The Beeb using Lois's template letter calling for a stop to the C19 roll-out at schools. With your help 1000s of schools received countless letters. This work was crucial in awakening the headmasters and teachers to the impending crisis...and as we all know, this warning was highly accurate. THE LETTER 3rd February 2022 Dear Sir/Madam School Immunisation Service Visit: I write in connection with the visit or any proposed visit of the school immunisation service. As you will be aware whilst children are in school, the school’s legal position is “in loco parentis.” You owe a legal obligation to each child in your care. We ask that you do the following: Write to the SIS and inform them that the vaccination session or any proposed vaccination session is cancelled and that the reason for cancellation is that the SARS CoV2 injection is under police investigation. Should you fail to cancel the immunisation session you will render yourself liable for any losses sustained as a result of the visit and liability could include criminal liability. Informed consent is impossible to obtain as the SIS vaccinators are not: Informing the patient that the roll out of the SARS CoV2 injections are under Police investigation pursuant to crime reference number: 6029679/21. Most parents, if given that information, would decline to give consent for their child. Please ensure this letter is communicated to all parents. Part of the Police investigation revolves around the alleged unlawful suppression of alternative treatments which have a far better safety profile. Informed consent is not possible if there is no discussion around safer alternatives. Informing the patient of how much active ingredient is in each vial. The amount of active ingredient in each vial varies and it is a matter of public record that some batches kill and maim disproportionately. Witness statements will be considered by the Police from bad batch victims. By way of example; one of them is now infertile, others have been suffering with mobility and paralysis of the face and limbs and many others are suffering from serious heart conditions such as myocarditis/pericarditis/myopericarditis. These people have medical evidence which states that the injection caused the infertility, immobility, paralysis and heart conditions. It is a fact that they received bad batches. As informed consent is impossible to obtain, anyone injected on site has suffered a battery, regardless of any injury sustained. Can you come back to me confirming that the visit has been cancelled. Yours faithfully Lois Bayliss Broad Yorkshire Law loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk SRA CLAIM Lois sent three such letters to Schools, GPs and Vaccine centres The SRA are planning a tribunal based on: The letters were 'reckless' The letters were 'against the public interest' The letters were 'anti-covid legislation and anti-government.' The letters' claims were unsubstantiated. HOW CAN YOU HELP LOIS? Please send an email as a complaint to the SRA Only a few words are needed, yet more detail adds more punch. Write as you see valid. Each and every complaint will help her greatly. Email details are below The deadline has been shifted to the 17th January 2023. TAKE ACTION Please send an email to the SRA using these details. (You can also click the link on Lois's page here to launch an email: http://stellion.com/loisbayliss/) Email: contactcentre@sra.org.uk complaintsreview@cedr.com Essential to CC Lois in: claims@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk If you'd like Mark & NOTB to get a copy to publish with your intials CC in: NOTB-ACTION@pm.me Subject line: Official complaint against SRA & demand to withdraw actions re: SRA ref: RGC-000072045 Text: (These are suggested words as an introduction but please feel free to use your own) I hereby lodge an official complaint against the SRA on the basis detailed below. Further, I wish to demand that the SRA withdraw their current and any proposed actions against Lois Bayliss. Details of Complaint: WHO IS LOIS BAYLIS? Lois Bayliss is a solicitor in England who has for almost two years been a champion of the people. She has worked throughout that time on a pro bono basis, receiving no payment whatsoever for the sterling work which she has carried out in providing a voice for those who have felt disadvantaged, forgotten and who have all but lost hope, when few others in her position would step up to help Here are just some of the things Lois has done; Gathered an immense amount of expert evidence which calls into serious doubt the Governments policies relating to the management of C19 and the C19 injections and their rollout Spoken up in support of those injured by C19 injections Assisted families in Court proceedings seeking to prevent C19 injections Delivered evidence and witness statements relating to harms and deaths likely to have been caused by C19 injections to UK police forces Submitted whistleblower and expert evidence to police Facilitated letters concerning injections and masking to schools, injection centres and GP surgeries Assisted PJH Law with care worker jab mandates, NHS mandates and assisted on the High Court case of Dr Sam White Was prepared to assist in the representation of NHS workers receiving 1324 enquiries prior to the withdrawal of the C19 injection mandate Was very active in the case against the MHRA with PJH Law Provided guidance to individuals and families based upon the expert opinions and evidence in her possession, as well as her professional legal expertise as a solicitor at no charge whatsoever Has on several occasions paid barristers fees herself in order to assist those less well off financially and who have required Court actions THE REGULATOR STEPS IN A body which regulates the legal profession in England, The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), placed Lois under investigation early in 2022, after claiming to have received a number of complaints about the work she has been doing for people. To date, the SRA have failed to provide Lois with copies of any of these apparent complaints received. In November 2022, the SRA served a Notice on Lois, advising that they were proposing to refer Lois to The Solicitors Discipliniary Tribunal (SDT) due to the work which she has carried out. The SRA have notified Lois that she may be responsible for their investigation fees, which could run to hundreds of thousands of pounds. In fact a relatively recent such case, levelled a costs claim of over £300,000 on a solicitor. Many people believe that what the SRA are subjecting Lois to is wrong and that their action should be withdrawn immediately. If you think the SRA should withdraw their action and instead commend and support Lois for the great work she has done in the public interest, please send them an email (which will auto-copy to Lois’s Law Firm, Broad Yorkshire Law) by using the link below…and let them know your views… PETITION TO STOP JAB ROLL-OUT We are calling for an injunction to pause the vaccine rollout due to the following questions. ​ 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, most of the adverse reactions can be attributed to a few of the batches. This clearly indicates at the best suspect manufacturing. THANK YOU - PLEASE SHARE THIS PAGE AND PETITION

Defender of the people Lois Bayliss is under attack by her solicitors regulatory body the SRA over letters she wrote to schools, GPs and Vaccination centres. Read the post 'Lois Baylis needs our help' to understand the issue Lois is facing. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/lois-bayliss-needs-our-help (You also see how to file a complaint here) Would you like to register your disdain for the SRA actions and make an official complaint? See how to do so here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/lois-bayliss-needs-our-help Below are a few sample complaints filed against the SRA by NOTB members. ----------------------------------- Dear sir or madam I am writing to express my disgust that you wish to discipline Lois Bayliss in front of a tribunal. In my opinion the SRA is undermining legal authority in this jurisdiction. Law and government is based on consent, and the removal of rights and freedoms of people will directly lead to the removal of their consent to be governed, in a manner that is not in accordance with human nature. The actions of the SRA are 'reckless' and against the public interest. The actions of the SRA are in favour of corporate interests, could there be any possible reasons as to why the legal system favors corporate interests over the interests of the ones the government and corporations are supposed to serve? The letters written by Lois were 'anti-covid legislation and not anti-government. If government legislation is flawed, discriminatory and dangerous, writing a letter is upholding ones moral duties? It is my understanding that the opinions of SRA are unsubstantiated, and not based on the best scientific research protocols whereby all sources of information are taken into account. Please provide information as to how the STA bases its decisions on science? It is incredibly worrying and suspect that our moral and legal authority can so readily be put in the hands of a few industrial scientists with many conflicting interests. It is even more worrying that this is encouaged by bodies that are supposed to protect a sound legal system. I would welcome a public discussion as to why it has been chosen to arrange a tribunal, who was responsible for this decision, and what the rules are within the SRA for this course of action. Yours faithfully WR ----------------------------------- Madam/ sir, I wish to request that the SRA withdraw their current, and any proposed actions against Lois Bayliss. I was an NHS GP for nearly 50years, in different roles. Lois Bayliss drew attention to the dreadful way in which many people were treated during the covid troubles.  UK law ( Montgomery judgement of the UK Supreme Court ), medical ethics ( GMC advice on decision making and consent ) and the Nuremberg Code were all disregarded, in more ways than one.I have pointed this out to many worthies, and suggested to them that they report me to the GMC if I am spreading misinformation.                                                                       They have not done so, nor replied to me. The fact that this is not common knowledge is because the media and governments used censorship to support their 'case '.Lois Bayliss helped to overcome some of the consequences of that censorship.You should be proud that Lois Bayliss is a solicitor.Instead you are taking action against her. Yours sincerely Noel Thomas. MA  MB ChB DCH. DObsRCOG DTM&H. MFHom. ----------------------------------- Hello SRA I hope you are all well. Re: SRA ref: RGC-000072045 I am dismayed to learn that Lois Baylis is under investigation by the SRA alleging that it has received a number of complaints about Lois. Unfortunately the SRA has failed to substantiate its claims with evidence of the apparent complaints received.I hereby lodge an official complaint against the SRA on the points detailed below. Further, I wish to demand that the SRA withdraw their current and any proposed actions against Lois Bayliss.It is essential to consider that Lois Bayliss is a solicitor in England who has for almost two years during, which our human rights and access to information has been severely curtailed, been a champion of the people. Lois has worked throughout that time on a pro bono basis, receiving no payment whatsoever for the sterling work which she has carried out in providing a voice for those who have felt disadvantaged, forgotten and who have all but lost hope, when few others in her position would step up to help KH ------------------------------------ Dear SRA representatives, Please withdraw the current and any proposed action against Lois Bayliss. I believe her work is for the good of people of this nation. Kind regards, J ----------------------------------- Dear SRA You will no doubt recognize my note as a copy & paste of a supporting campaign for the above-mentioned solicitor, whom I write to offer my complete support. To the details below, I would add the following comments, and respectfully & strongly urge you to desist from taking any punitive measures against this champion of the public. Her efforts to discover the details in this extraordinary situation should be supported, not condemned at any level. The management of the so-called Covid pandemic appears to me to be grotesque & deliberate government disinformation, manipulation of the public, concealment of important facts, and refusal to permit investigation of the terrible consequences. Consequently, you should support her efforts and her attempts to properly inform the public, and I trust you will do precisely that. Yours sincerely JHR ----------------------------------- Dear Sir/Madam, What on earth do you think you are doing, running a campaign of intimidation against Lois Bayliss, simply because she is working freely instead of charging ridiculous fees (thereby setting an example to other solicitors in what is, frankly, a profession that is devoid of transparent competition and characterised by protective regulation)? Have the SRA and its directors taken leave of their senses and become captive to governmental policy? Lois Bayliss is courageous and acts on principle. She is to be commended, in the same way as those who resisted, at the time, the govt propaganda and policies in Nazi Germany and the Eastern bloc countries. Why is the SRA intimidating her? For whom are you acting and on what grounds? Are the SRA and the profession not sufficiently aware of the deterioration in the manner in which they are regarded? The public need to know why the SRA are engaging in tyrannical activities of this nature, as an agency of government. Regards AM ----------------------------------- Dear Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) I am aware that you are investigating anonymous complaints against Lois Baylis as a result of the work Lois may have been carrying out. I find it hard to accept that to my understanding Lois has not been given the full details of the alleged anonymous reports against her to respond to prior to any investigations or cases being held against her. As a named woman I would like to say a few words in support of Lois Bayliss/Broad Yorkshire Law and the work they have completed during the COVID-19 Pandemic. I know Lois to be a very conscientious and caring individual, who has worked tirelessly to support people that have been subjected to difficult circumstances during the pandemic. Lois has worked courageously to support those people subject to Vaccination as a Condition of Deployment both within the care industry and NHS, she has ensured those people affected adversely by the COVID-19 experimental vaccines had a voice and were supported to complete witness statements (which can be a traumatic process for all those involved). I know Lois did this from a good place of caring and supporting those individuals that otherwise could not have afforded to be represented by a solicitor to address matters of great importance to them. On behalf of myself and the people of England I feel it important to say Lois represents as an ethical person who takes on anything to help people obtain the support and recognition that they need in their time of need. As a result I feel Lois should be commended for her tireless efforts to support the people of England in matters arising as a result of the policies and procedures adopted and encouraged by the UK Government, which at times meant people were under undue influence to either get vaccinated to keep their jobs or be dismissed. In addition, I know many people that have suffered adverse effects or worse as a result of taking the experimental jab. Lois had the ability and tenacity to represent people legally and lawfully. I would ask the question of how many people has Lois supported throughout these very difficult and trying times since 2021...there will be many many. I would strongly ask that the SRA takes into consideration recent events and data (amongst other things) which you are able to view as detailed below prior to coming to any conclusions on Lois case; - The Supreme Court in finding an outcome that this was not a vaccine (COVID-19) but 'gene therapy'. - Consider the increasing Yellow Card reporting data for adverse events and deaths. - Consider the amount of Employment Tribunal claims ACAS have settled early as a result of VCOD and/ or any claims within any UK courts for the mass harms of the COVID-19 policies including lockdowns etc. - Applications sent to the vaccine damage payments scheme in the UK. I hope following this case hearing Lois is allowed to continue to practice in her legal capacity to support those that need her help and to represent those people which otherwise are often left unrepresented with little access to the support afforded to them by Lois in there time of need. You never hear from people that wish to praise the work completed by Lois, I'm sure if you took the time to investigate thoroughly you would find the praise far outweighs anything of an anonymous negative nature against Lois. Kind regards NM Without ill will, vexation or frivolity ----------------------------------- Dear sir /madam , I read with dismay that Lois Bayliss has been vindicated by the establishment for her couragous work in the fight against the obvious tyranny of our treacherous government. I have forwarded a recent email I have now sent to the cheif executive of the NHS in Scotland . Please read the original email ( obviously the long one ) to see why Lois Bayliss has taken this route against what more and more citizens are wakening up to . I am just a normal 60 year old man with no affiliation to any political party or religon or any other movement for that matter. If you read my email you will find that everything I have written is true , truth is truth and cannot be manipulated despite what we are being asked to believe . When someone like Lois opens up the governments pandoras box they come down hard on them to destroy their character and their ability to carry on, that is not justice , that is treason and more and more citizens know what is and has been forced on us. Do the right thing today , if you have a moral compass, follow it, if not pay the price as the people will rise and the power will change direction against those hell democidal demons. Lois is brave ,are you ? respectfully , KM ----------------------------------- Dear Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Without ill will vexation or frivolity Notice to principal and or agent, is notice to principal and agent Reference: Lois Bayliss Solicitor Broad Yorkshire Law As a member of the public, I have been made aware that Lois Bayliss is currently subject to a Disciplinary Tribunal Panel. From the information I am in receipt of, I am of the understanding that the SRA has been in apparent receipt of a number of complaints all directed at Lois Bayliss since early 2022, of which you have elected to progress to disciplinary. It is my understanding that all the complaints share a parallel theme pertaining to her dedicated professional work pertaining to covid-19 vaccines and their ramifications that have a materialised timeline. I have been made aware that to current date you have not provided (and thus in effect have knowingly and recklessly failed to provide) Lois Bayliss with copies of these apparent complaints that have been raised against her. To proceed to disciplinary in the absence of providing the detail and evidence of the alleged complaints, is in essence subjecting Lois Bayliss to a Kafka's trial and Kangaroo Court. In the interests of justice this cannot be allowed to happen. It is a matter of public interest for people to know that such an important regulatory body abide by fair transparent process in matters of any investigation it elects to undertake and make judgment upon. The notable lack of impartiality with this disciplinary tribunal proceedings, suggests that the SRA is either not fit for purpose in being able to safely and fairly conduct disciplinary proceedings against any solicitor, or has a targeted agenda against Lois Bayliss as an individual for her work and time she has dedicated to serious issues pertaining to Covid-19 vaccines which are 100% matters of vital public interest to the people of this country. Subjecting Lois Bayliss to what in essence are anonymous allegations which could potentially be non- existent, false, and or fraudulent (unless proven otherwise with full disclosure of substantive and justifiable complaint information in writing) is painting a reasonable scenario to the everyday person that the SRA is attempting to serve back door detriment upon Lois Bayliss for being an exceptional solicitor who has helped so many people in matters pertaining to the catastrophic impact Covid-19 vaccines have had to so many people in the country in one form or another. Lois Bayliss has the right to help the people of this country in her professional capacity and private capacity, and should not be targeted for doing so. Lois along with other professionals nationally have collectively whistle blown on serious Covid-19 vaccine issues. It appears glaringly obvious to the reasonable person that the SRA's inability to abide by best practice with disciplinary investigative process with Lois's case, is demonstrating until proven otherwise a notable, targeted and underhand detriment at her for her dedication and commitment to helping as many people in this country as possible. In the interests of justice and the complete absence of any complaint evidence having been disclosed to Lois Bayliss , the SRA must cease and desist its disciplinary tribunal immediately. Continuation of the tribunal under such circumstances would lead the public to be reasonable in their opinion of the SRA being knowingly reckless in adopting unfair and prejudicial investigative practice skills to achieve a form of back door underhand punishment of Lois Baylis for her services to the people of this country, in the form of disciplinary and or loss of professional registration and or livelihood, and or being subject to paying the apparent costs of the SRA investigation process into her. One has to raise an obvious question, if you cant provide the evidence of apparent complaint, what has the SRA actually managed to investigate in respect to being able to try to recover any potential SRA investigative costs?? It therefore strongly appears that the SRA cannot be seen to be a trusted position of authority, because the sabotage of safe and best tools of investigative practice often points to abuse of positions and avenues of corruption. Having met Lois Bayliss personally, I have observed her professional conduct to be impeccable and would recommend her services to any friends and family as a result. As a solicitor, Lois is 100% a people person, which is a rare find in the legal arena. Her work ethics are genuine and responsive to individuals and their needs. RW -------------------------------- Dear Sir The SRA's reputation hangs in the balance because, as I understand, the SRA is planning a tribunal of Lois Bayliss based on her letters calling for a stop to the C19 roll-out at schools. The SRA is asserting that: 1.   The letters were 'reckless.' 2.   The letters were 'against the public interest.' 3.   The letters were 'anti-covid legislation and anti-government.' 4.   The letters' claims were unsubstantiated. Some years ago, I became unwittingly and innocently embroiled at the centre of the UK's largest corporate fraud case. I learned much from this experience, but above all else, I realised that analysing prima facia evidence takes significant effort and courage to highlight meaningful conclusions when it contests the mainstream. Given your organisation's profession and reputation, I am patronising you in making this last point. Still, I hope you understand my concern that you exercise discretion and review the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) own data about mRNA vaccines provided under FOI, links for which I have provided below my signature and a simple explanation for which I attached to this email. Covid vaccinations and injuries, according to the CDC's data, on which the UK government has relied, cause severe and fatal vaccine reactions, including cardiovascular, neurological and immunological reactions. Because of this, the risk-benefit ratio of covid vaccination in healthy children and adults under 50 years of age remains, at the very least, controversial and, some would argue, criminal. Please carefully consider the attached data regarding the COVID vaccines and recognise that there is a coming day when those in positions of authority, such as the SRA, who have failed to consider the data and are found to be on the wrong side of history, will be held to account. As a result of my analysis and those of many experts in their field, I now lodge an official complaint against the SRA on the basis detailed below. Further, I request that the SRA withdraw their current and any proposed actions against Lois Bayliss. Details as I understand them: Lois Bayliss is a solicitor in England who has been a champion of the people for almost two years. She has worked on a pro bono basis throughout that time, receiving no payment for the sterling work she has carried out in providing a voice for those who have felt disadvantaged, forgotten, and who have all but lost hope when few others in her position would step up to help. Here are just some of the things I am informed Lois has done; Gathered an immense amount of expert evidence which calls into serious doubt the Government’s policies relating to the management of C19 and the C19 injections and their roll-out: Spoken up in support of those injured by C19 injections Assisted families in Court proceedings seeking to prevent C19 injections Delivered evidence and witness statements relating to harms and deaths likely to have been caused by C19 injections to UK police forces Submitted whistle-blower and expert evidence to police Facilitated letters concerning injections and masking to schools, injection centres and GP surgeries Assisted PJH Law with care worker jab mandates, and NHS mandates and assisted on the High Court case of Dr Sam White Was prepared to assist in the representation of NHS workers receiving 1324 enquiries before the withdrawal of the C19 injection mandate Was very active in the case against the MHRA with PJH Law Guided individuals and families based upon the expert opinions and evidence in her possession, as well as her professional legal expertise as a solicitor at no charge whatsoever Has on several occasions paid barristers' fees herself to assist those less well off financially and who have required Court actions I look forward to your informed reply. Thank you Ian Black (UK) +44 (0)7887 642054 Sources: Professor Fenton’s explanation You Tube analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr5tGOGkquc Epoch Times: https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/exclusive-cdc-finds-hundreds-of-safety-signals-for-pfizer-and-moderna-covid-19-vaccines_4956733.html Children’s Health Defence: CDC Finds Hundreds of Safety Signals for Pfizer, Moderna COVID Vaccines https://childrenshealthdefense.org/de... CDC Data revealed under FOI: 7.29.22 Table3 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Pfizer Compared to Moderna 7.29.22 Table 4 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Moderna Compared to Pfizer 7.29.22 Table 5 PRR of PTs for COVID19 mRNA Compared to Non-COVID 7.22.29 Table 3 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Pfizer Compared to Moderna 7.22.29 Table 4 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Moderna Compared to Pfizer 7.22.29 Table 5 PRR of PTs for COVID19 mRNA Compared to Non-COVID 7.15.22 Table 3 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Pfizer Compared to Moderna 7.15.22 Table 4 PRR of PTs for COVID19 Moderna Compared to Pfizer 7.15.29 Table 5 PRR of PTs for COVID19 mRNA Compared to Non-COVID UK gov: https://swprs.org/covid-vaccine-adverse-events/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0n-hUJM5n4&t=4s https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update... https://www.gov.uk/government/publica... Would you like to register your disdain for the SRA actions and make an official complaint? See how to do so here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/lois-bayliss-needs-our-help

STORY AT-A-GLANCE Twitter documents released by Elon Musk reveal the lawlessness of our intelligence agencies and the psychological warfare against the American public is far worse than expected Between October 2019 and February 2021 alone, FBI paid Twitter 3.4 million to censor certain views and stories on its behalf, including the damning Hunter Biden laptop story, which likely would have sunk Joe Biden’s bid for the presidency had it received the attention it deserved The FBI, Twitter and Facebook even ran a tabletop exercise about “hacked” information relating to Hunter Biden one month before the real story broke. During that exercise, they practiced the narrative that weeks later became “official truth” A large number of current and/or former FBI agents work at and with Twitter to keep the online narrative in check. More than 100 supposedly “former” intelligence agents also work in Facebook’s content moderation department While hunting down and banning covert propaganda accounts tied to foreign governments, Twitter worked with the U.S. Department of Defense to promote and protect American propaganda accounts, and aided U.S. intelligence agencies in their efforts to influence foreign governments using fake news, computerized deepfake videos and bots If you're still under the naively mistaken belief that there is no Deep State, the Twitter file dumps1 from Elon Musk detailing how Twitter, before his acquisition of the company, was coerced into doing the FBI's bidding, with actual FBI agents on its staff to control the online narrative, ought to set the record straight. In fact, the lawlessness of our intelligence agencies and the psychological warfare against the American public is far worse than most people ever expected. FBI paid Twitter huge sums of money — your tax dollars, might I add — to censor certain views and stories, such as the damning Hunter Biden laptop story, which likely would have sunk Joe Biden's bid for the presidency had it received the attention it legitimately deserved. The FBI even ran a tabletop exercise about "hacked" information relating to Hunter Biden ONE MONTH before the real story broke. During that exercise, they practiced the narrative (i.e., lies) that weeks later became "official truth." There is a Deep State running the show, and they're doing whatever they damn well please, without regard for the law or the U.S. Constitution. They're acting completely outside the rules of our Constitutional Republic and the laws of the land, and they've weaponized the very agencies that are supposed to protect us and act in the public's best interest and turned them against us. The Twitter files saga is expanding by the day, so I won't be able to cover every last detail here. Books will be needed to cover this scandal in depth. In the meantime, I suggest you review the references cited and keep your eyes peeled for later updates. FBI Used Twitter to Track and Spy on Americans In the video above, investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald reviews how Washington has expanded the war state and the Democrat’s censorship regime. About 39 minutes in, he begins reviewing evidence showing the FBI was not only censoring social media content, but the agency was also, on a regular basis, asking Twitter to reveal the location of specific Twitter users — for what purpose, no one knows. As noted by independent journalist Matt Taibbi in a December 17, 2022, Twitter post: "What 'law enforcement' objective is served by asking for Billy Baldwin's location information? Why is the FBI/DHS [Department of Homeland Security] in the business of analyzing and flagging social media content at all? When were these programs created and who approved them?" These are all good questions. Historically, the FBI's job has been to monitor and address criminal activity, not "misinformation." Somewhere along the way, and it's unclear exactly when the mandate changed and by whom, the DHS/FBI (the FBI supports the DHS by investigating threats) and other agencies tasked themselves with illegally suppressing free speech and shaping public narratives through public-private partnerships with Big Tech. The Biden administration's Orwellian "Ministry of Truth," revealed in the summer of 2022, was one of the first indicators we had that something was horribly amiss. And even though that agency was quickly disbanded after public outcry (and no small amount of mockery), the policing of mis- and disinformation was simply shifted elsewhere within the federal government. Moreover, as reviewed by Greenwald, internal DHS memos, emails and documents show the DHS has worked on expanding its influence over tech platforms for YEARS. So, government censorship is not something that "just happened" in response to the COVID crisis. Nor is the censorship limited to COVID or public health information in general. We now have evidence showing the FBI has actively interfered in multiple elections, for example — activity that Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) accurately warns is "the biggest threat to our constitutional democracy today."2 FBI Invented 'Foreign Interference' Narrative Not surprisingly, the FBI invented the narrative that foreign nations were interfering in U.S. elections, which is precisely what they were doing. As reported by Taibbi and attorney Jeff Childers,3 the FBI asked Twitter to investigate "malicious actors" spreading election disinformation on Twitter. Twitter looked into the matter and reported there was no evidence of foreign interference. The FBI was none too pleased with that answer and made it clear that Twitter better find some. As "evidence" that Twitter's investigation was flawed, the FBI cited mainstream media articles and think-tank reports that claimed foreign interference was indeed taking place.4 In response, Twitter's former censorship head Yoel Roth did an about-face and informed the team that "official state propaganda is DEFINITELY A THING ON TWITTER." How Media Have Been Weaponized to Provide False Evidence The FBI's tactic appears to be a variation of what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi calls the "wrap-up smear," where they leak a lie to the media, and then they use that media report as "evidence" that the lie is true, and it just goes in circles from there. Here, the FBI used reports — which were based on leaked information from anonymous intelligence agents5 — to pressure Twitter into making something up to further support the fiction the FBI itself invented and leaked to the sources they cited. As noted by Childers, this variant on the political wrap-up smear is also being used by U.S. health agencies:6 "It's a nifty trick … The NIH or CDC needs evidence to support some guidance they want to issue, like masking. So they fund some studies intended to show masks work. The pay-for-play scientists publish cartoonish, anti-scientific clown studies 'proving' cotton masks can somehow magically filter nanoscale virus particles. Then the NIH and CDC cite those same studies — the same ones they procured — to 'recommend' unconstitutional mask mandates, or even outright order mandates, like for air travel and on cruise ships. Ditto vaccines … It's a closed loop." Twitter-FBI Exercise: Managing the Hunter Biden Laptop Story We now also have evidence showing it was the FBI that quenched the Hunter Biden laptop story. They, in collaboration with Twitter, Facebook and the Aspen Institute, even held a tabletop exercise in October 2020 to practice the shaping of the media's coverage of a potential "hack and dump" operation involving Hunter Biden material.7,8 National security reporters from The New York Times and The Washington Post were also in attendance.9 As reported by the New York Post:10 "The exercise by the 'Aspen Digital Hack-and-Dump Working Group' involved an 11-day scenario in October 2020 that began with the imaginary release of falsified records related to Hunter Biden's controversial employment by the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, which paid him as much as $1 million a year to serve on its board when his father was vice president. 'The goal was to shape how the media covered it — and how social media carried it,' Shellenberger wrote. But the drill was put into practical use weeks later, when The Post broke the news about Hunter Biden's infamous laptop — which was either ignored or downplayed by most mainstream news outlets and suppressed by both Twitter and Facebook." In the video below, independent journalist Matt Taibbi speaks with Russell Brand about the Twitter files and the kinds of censorship tactics Twitter secretly engaged in on the government's behalf. However, it turns out the FBI didn't just attempt to sideline the Hunter Biden story a month in advance. No. They've been shielding it and working with social media to shield it for them, since 2018. As reported by Childers:11 "In December 2020, Twitter's former censorship head Yoel Roth explained in a sworn statement that for almost two years leading up to the leak, the FBI told him, over and over, to expect a Russian leak about Hunter Biden in October 2020: 'During these weekly meetings [since 2018], the federal law enforcement agencies communicated that they expected 'hack-and-leak operations' by state actors might occur in the period shortly before the 2020 presidential election, likely in October. I was told in these meetings that … those hacking attacks would likely be disseminated over social media platforms, including Twitter … [and] that there were rumors that a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden.' Facebook's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, made comments on a podcast suggesting he'd had similar conversations with the FBI." FBI Agents Assigned to Twitter Censorship Duty As reported by attorney Jeff Childers,12 FBI field agent Elvis Chan was one of the agents assigned to work with Twitter. He was recently deposed in the Missouri v. Biden case about his role in Twitter's censoring of Americans. Below is just one of Chan's emails to Twitter in which he directs them to ban specific accounts for imagined "crimes." As noted by Childers:13 "Note that Chan only provided a list of accounts. He didn't bother to say WHICH terms of service were violated. He didn't say anybody broke the law. He didn't even say WHICH tweets were problematic." Still, within 48 hours, Twitter had obliged, and the accounts listed by Chan had either been suspended or banned. Below is Twitter censorship employee Patrick Conlon's reply to Chan. As you can see, a long list of other FBI employees were also carbon copied. Another FBI "plant" is Jim Baker.14 Before becoming Twitter's head lawyer, he spent three decades with the FBI, most recently as its Deputy General Counsel. He too used his authority at Twitter to censor the Hunter Biden story. While his comment (see email below) may seem innocuous enough — just a polite suggestion — it's clear, with facts in hand, that Baker was trying to influence the situation. Intelligence Agencies Have Weaponized Social Media For the record, Facebook also employs no less than 115 "former" employees of the FBI, CIA, NSA and other intelligence agencies.15 Most of them now work in Facebook's content moderation department, which seems like a massive career slide, if you ask me, but what do I know? As noted by Childers:16 "The inescapable conclusion of what we're seeing from the Twitter Files is that our country's intelligence agencies, by and through the FBI, now control all the large social media outlets … and are using them to manipulate American public opinion and change the outcome of domestic elections. But for whom?" My answer would be they're doing it on behalf of the Deep State, the same unelected globalists that so doggedly push for a Great Reset and Fourth Industrial Revolution (i.e., eugenics rebranded as transhumanism). Childers continues:17 "If Elon Musk hadn't spent $44 BILLION DOLLARS to buy Twitter, nobody would have ever believed the extent to which the intelligence community has absorbed private social media platforms in this country and turned them against the people. It's literally unbelievable. Exposure will probably be fatal. The Constitution does not provide for any internal security service in the United States. The agencies are WAY off the reservation, well into criminal territory, no matter how clever their lawyers are … Of course, we still have the teensy-weensy little problem of 'who' will charge and arrest these people, since they're in control of the entire federal law enforcement apparatus. Don't worry, there ARE answers. But let's wait a little bit and see how things play out." FBI Paid Twitter Millions As mentioned, the FBI was also using taxpayer dollars to pay Twitter for their censorship services — $3,415,323 to be exact, between October 2019 and February 2021 alone.18 FBI and other intelligence agencies were also trying to gain even greater and more direct influence over Twitter. In a January 2020 email, Carlos Monje wrote to Roth, warning that a "sustained effort by the IC [intelligence community] to push us to share more information and change our API policies." Apparently, the FBI wanted direct access into Twitter's database.19 Lies and More Damn Lies Investigative journalist Lee Fang with The Intercept20 has also provided us with some real bombshells. While Twitter has publicly insisted that it was cracking down on ALL covert government propaganda accounts, that was only partially true. Twitter worked with the U.S. Department of Defense to promote and protect American propaganda accounts, and aided U.S. intelligence agencies in their efforts to influence foreign governments using fake news, computerized deepfake videos and bots. In reality, Twitter worked with the U.S. Department of Defense to promote and protect American propaganda accounts, and aided U.S. intelligence agencies in their efforts to influence foreign governments using fake news, computerized deepfake videos and bots.21 They only hunted down the foreign government-affiliated propaganda accounts. As reported by Fang:22 "Behind the scenes, Twitter gave approval and special protection to the U.S. military's online psychological ops. Despite knowledge that Pentagon propaganda accounts used overt identities, Twitter did not suspend many for around two years or more. Some remain active … In 2017 a U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) official sent Twitter a list of 52 Arab language accounts 'we use to amplify certain messages.' The official asked for priority service for six accounts, verification for one and 'whitelist' abilities for the others." Whitelisted accounts have a "validated" status similar to that of the blue check mark, which ensures they are promoted in searches. These accounts also don't get shadow-banned or limited by other means. In closing, I think Childers makes an excellent and accurate observation:23 "Combine all this Twitter censorship, influence peddling, and pure propaganda with the vast budget for pushing vaccines by buying scientists and influencers during the pandemic, and we can begin to see the outlines of a vast private market for censorship and fake news created by the deep state, which then became its biggest customer." As for the FBI, it released a single-sentence "rebuttal" on December 21, 2022 — on Twitter — to the mountain of scandalous evidence presented against it.24 Orginal article: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/01/02/twitter-files.aspx?cid_source=dnlsubstack&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1Bttn&cid=20230102_si Sources and References 1, 7 Twitter Michael Shellenberger December 19, 2022 2 Rumble Glenn Greenwald December 19, 2022 Timestamp: 44:23 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13 Coffee & Covid 2022 December 19, 2022 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19 Coffee & Covid December 20, 2022 9, 10 New York Post December 19, 2022 18 Meryl Nass Substack December 20, 2022 20, 22 The Intercept December 20, 2022 21, 23 Coffee & Covid December 21, 2022 24 Coffee & Covid December 22, 2022

Youtube Influencer Dr John Campbell with 2.6m followers, who was pro-C19-vaccine during the initial C19 vaccine release, has finally come full circle calling for an end to the C19 vaccinations. Here is his video statement. To date, 53,813,491 or 78% of the British population has had one C19 jab or more. The injury rate is reported as 1 in 114 but we believe it is much closer to 1 in 10. Sign our petition We are calling for an injunction to pause the vaccine rollout due to the following questions. ​ 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing Who is Dr John Campbell? This was a trailer video for his channel. Listen to what he said about finding the truth... My question is why were we two years ahead of such an expert?

Numbers versus Words versus pictures If a picture is worth a 1,000 words, is a graph worth a million? This is the graph that in 2015 caused me to see through the "vaccines-have-saved-humanity-from-disease" myth and diverted my life-path. The graph shows that these diseases were falling dramatically before any vaccination was used. Scarlet fever is the perfect control, as no vaccine has ever been invented for it, yet the data shown proves the disease has followed the same exponential decline. What caused the declines? It was awareness of hygiene, clean water and sewerage that caused these declines. Plumbers not vaccines. Town planners not doctors. It was the labourers who built the water pipelines and those who managed and cleaned the sewers, not nurses. Not this... But this... Let's look at this recent graph on sudden deaths within Germany, paying attention to two key dates. When did Covid start? When did the vaccination programme start? Do we rest our case? I wish. Sadly war has never been waged on us involving facts, data or good science. It has been an information war using hypnosis and the most advanced propaganda techniques, run by government, military intelligence, media specialists and industry to produce 'religious-extremists', to whom science has become a concept, and real data an inconvenience, to beliefs backed by words not numbers and fact. Yet, in this case, the picture wins. The data presented graphically is demystified The graph speaks the truth that we need to know. We have written, spoken and screamed millions of words in apparent vain. A graph is worth a million of these words. Thank you for your analysis and graph Tom Lausen History of Silence Is this graph a surpise? Not at all. In the late Spring and summer of 2020 many of us 'medical activists' or 'freedom fighters' were number crunching the government data via the excess death figures, proving covid was not the direct killer that the media and government were having us believe. We now know 'end of life' protocols had been adapted using Midazolam to end many of our elderly's lives prematurely. The almost misuse of ventilators and the accompanying drugs in hospitals amounted to euthanasia in plain sight. Those of us deep in the research of prior vaccines, and aware of the wider agendas at play in 2020, warned of the danger of the upcoming 'vaccines'. Once released, we analysed the ingredients calling foul on illegal and undisclosed ingredients. We screamed about NOTB alongside other entities published every Yellow card report screaming as loud as we could that the data alone was shocking yet we knew the data represented barely 10% of the real injuries and deaths. Yet most of this fell on death or frightened ears. Why? We were heavily censored and not seen as authoritative sources. We called for Doctors to assist us in speaking out. Very very few did. They were afraid. They had money, jobs, pensions, private school funds and most of all, status to lose. More are now speaking out. We salute you. We need more of you to speak out, and quickly. Here is an excellent overview of the crisis and new data produced form Germany by Tom Lausen, explained by the Midwestern Doctor The Most Important Dataset of the Pandemic Was Just Released Germany Has Provided The Means To Quantify The Human Cost Of The Experimental Vaccination Program "...Most sane people believe that the burden of proving safety should lie on the party conducting a questionable action, rather than their victim. For example, if a criminal shot someone, the prosecution would not be required to prove that the victim’s sudden death after the gunshot wound was not just a spontaneous coincidence, a result of extreme stress from the situation, or due to a pre-existing medical condition. Unfortunately, the pharmaceutical industry has been able to establish a special type of privilege within the legal system which has made it very difficult to demonstrate that vaccines (along with many other pharmaceuticals) can ever be at fault for anything. Because of this, we recently had a flood of experimental vaccines mandated upon the population, which were never tested for safety (despite many serious concerns with their design), whose (likely fraudulent) clinical trial data was never made accessible to the public. We then had, as far as I know, the most aggressive propaganda campaign in history, and I watched the majority of my colleagues lose the ability to recognize any problems related to the vaccines. Instead, they developed an almost surreal religious devotion to the coming salvation of the vaccines becoming available. Once the vaccines entered the market, a variety of red flags began going off indicating that these vaccines were killing people, and rather than address these concerns, the government—in concert with the media—chose to deny any of this was occurring. Instead they mandated the vaccines upon the entire population. I was understandably worried that the vaccines would cause problems and tried to do my part to head this off in 2020, but I did not expect anything on the scale of what we have encountered since then. I personally became involved in all of this because soon after the vaccines entered the market, I began to have many friends and patients reach out to ask me if the vaccine could kill as someone they knew had had a tragic sudden death after vaccination. Once the magnitude of the problem dawned on me, I realized that even though my available options were limited, I could at least do my best to document each case sent my way so that someone would bear witness to what had happened. Otherwise, the dead had no voice. Beyond knowing I had a duty to compile this list however, I was not sure what to do with it. Later after someone kindly helped launch this Substack, I decided to post it, it ended up being seen by a lot of people…and that is how I ended up writing here. Because of how long it took to verify each case, I realized that I had to end it a year in (at which point I knew of 45 individuals who had either critical or fatal injuries of a similar nature in close proximity to vaccination). Since that time, I still continue to hear reports I periodically document and discuss. For example, a good friend is a nurse in a cardiac unit and has told me many of the patients she sees now with heart failure are much younger than they were a few years ago. I previously advised her against getting the vaccine due to her history of rheumatic fever (a condition where the immune system attacks and damages part of the heart). This was because I had noticed both COVID-19 and especially its vaccine seemed to cause inflammatory flares at previous sites of injuries or inflammation (Lyme is also known for doing this). The vaccine also has a remarkably high rate of exacerbating pre-existing autoimmune conditions—such as the 24.2% rate found in a recent Israeli survey which is comparable to what a few colleagues have observed, and I suspect exacerbation of preexisting inflammation within the circulatory system, like what this study of 566 patients found, is a key mechanism behind vaccine deaths. A month ago, the nurse informed me that she had decided to vaccinate and had subsequently developed a heart condition. Additionally, she shared that the same had also happened to her mother following vaccination and that her sibling's partner is suffering longterm complication from a large stroke that immediately followed receiving a booster. Looking back on it, the thing I found the most disappointing about my own documentation project was that once it went viral, it should have triggered the drug regulators evaluating the vaccines to take preventative action. Instead, due to the meticulously planned campaign of mass censorship that we all found ourselves in, more red flags than I can count were ignored by the “very rigorous” vaccination surveillance systems that were allegedly ensuring there were no safety issues with these vaccines. Because of the immense power behind the medical-industrial complex, those debating this program have been stuck fighting an uphill battle. However, despite the immense degree of corruption, withholding of critical data, and censorship, these vaccines are dangerous enough that more and more evidence is nonetheless emerging of their danger, and the public is beginning to recognize it (e.g., consider how resistant the public has been to get COVID boosters). The previous article here discusses polling that shows this appears to be happening: The Forgotten Side of Medicine We Now Have A Clear Estimate Of The Rate Of Vaccine Injuries Throughout my entire life, I’ve always found that trying to argue against Big Business is like fighting with one or both hands tied behind your back because large industries can always co-opt and buy out every authoritative source on the subject, and then censor any inconvenient facts that still persist. This is an immensely challenging situation to be … Read more 9 days ago · 396 likes · 397 comments · A Midwestern Doctor Immediately after it was published, I was informed by a reader that possibly the most important dataset over the last two years was released today. For those interested, much of the context for today’s article can be found in the article above. German Data One of the depressing realizations one gains from studying the evidence-based literature is discovering how many issues exist within it and how difficult it is to know which data sources can be trusted. One of my favorite authors, Dr. Malcom Kendrick, devoted a book to addressing this subject and shared a pertinent anecdote for today’s events: “In truth, the figures on vaccine damage are exceedingly difficult to analyse, because causality is very difficult to prove on a case by case basis. However, when it comes to negative findings I always like to go to Germany. It has been demonstrated many times that the Germans are the most likely to report negative findings accurately. Yes I know, terrible racial stereotyping, but a fact is a fact. What do the Germans have to say on the matter? “Between 1978 and 1993 approx. 13,500 cases of undesired effects resulting from medications for vaccinations was reported to the Paul Ehrlich-Institute [PEI]…the majority was reported by the pharmaceutical industry. In 40% [5,400] of these cases the complications were severe, 10% [1,350] pertained to fatalities on account of effects.” Additionally, as I learned from Kendrick, since early 2001, the federal infection protection law has mandated that specific severe vaccine injuries be immediately reported directly to the PEI (Germany’s equivalent of the FDA for vaccines and biologics). The German’s list of reportable injuries is much broader than what I have seen acknowledged by many other countries (e.g., those which are possible to receive compensation for within the United States) and includes the previously discussed complications of DPT along with many of the reactions typically associated with the COVID-19 vaccines. However, while that historical trend exists, Germany has not been one of the best countries for reporting COVID vaccine injuries (which I suspect is due to the political direction their government has moved in). (The above graph illustrates why many of my German friends are not happy with their government) Because of their tradition of reporting adverse reactions to vaccination, Germans (or at least some of them) have been more resistant to toeing the party line on concealing the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines than citizens of many other countries (my friends there are enraged by the egregious concealment of critical safety data by the German government). In turn, some of the most critical vaccine data available comes from the German people as many of them have retained their intellectual integrity throughout the pandemic. For instance, although autopsies should always be conducted on those who died suspiciously after vaccination, due to the global climate of intimidation against conducting any type of research that challenges the COVID vaccine program, it is rarely done. Instead, almost every autopsy has been performed by a few brave pathologists in Germany, and I have tried to detail the pathologist’s work throughout my postings (e.g., see here). Some of the most important contributions of these autopsies include: •Demonstrating that there is highly unusual tissue inflammation in those who died after vaccination. Pathologists had not observed this phenomena before the COVID-19 vaccines, and stated the inflammation they observed would likely be fatal. •Demonstrating that the COVID spike protein could also be found in the tissues of those who died. •Demonstrating that another key part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not present, meaning that the only possible source of the spike protein was the vaccine. The most definitive study on this subject was recently completed. It examined 35 individuals who died within 20 days of vaccination, and after a lengthy examination excluded 10 who had a potential cause of death other than vaccination. Of the remaining 25, most had causes of death that frequently been linked to vaccination, and of those, 5 were found to have myocarditis potentially linked to the vaccine, and in 3 cases the vaccine was determined to be the definitive cause of their myocarditis and death. These results are very important for convicting the vaccines if it can also be proven that a large number of unexpected deaths are occurring following vaccination. The Religion of Data Every group needs to have some type of ideology to unite behind. Presently, one of the fixations within the Western world is on more and more data being the solution to everything. In turn, there are many concerns with this approach (e.g., it dehumanizes people, its “necessity” is used to justify violating citizen’s right to privacy while collecting it and it is being used to build an infrastructure that controls every aspect of our lives). Although data is often claimed to be our salvation, and I will admit sometimes is quite helpful, in many other cases, it fails abysmally to address our problems. A major reason for this failure is that no one wants to critically analyze data this is gathered if that data suggests we should stop supporting an entrenched financial interest. I am most aware of this in healthcare, as I know of numerous systems which were designed to analyze electronic medical records and either identify which pharmaceutical worked best for a condition, or if a pharmaceutical (or vaccine) was unsafe. Not surprisingly, all of these systems were never adopted, and the endless data we collect in healthcare (e.g., all the diagnostic coding data which medical insurance providers provide as a condition of reimbursement to healthcare providers) is rarely utilized to improve the public good. However, while prevailing biases frequently produces flawed analyses of data, data itself does not lie and has immense potential to expose dangerous health care practices if people are willing to look at it. The largest insurance provider in Germany, BKK, provides coverage to approximately 10.9 million Germans. A board member, Andreas Schöfbeck, observed some very concerning signs in their data, and unlike everyone else, had the courage to disclose it in a letter to the German government (e.g. he addressed the PEI), after which, he was dismissed from his position. The BKK dataset (discussed by Jessica Rose) was the one which showed 2.05% of vaccine recipients subsequently sought medical care with a healthcare provider (others estimated it demonstrated 3.5% were struggling with persistent vaccine side effects). This concerning safety signal prompted one German Political Party, the AFD (a controversial right wing party that has gained appeal through opposing the mandates) to file the German equivalent of FOIA for the rest of the insurance data (note: a few friends in Germany who are lifelong liberals joined AFD told me they believe “conservative” is a more appropriate label for AFD). Recently AFD obtained AOK Sachsen-Anhalt’s data, which once analyzed, demonstrated that many of the conditions we associate with COVID-19 injuries noticeably increased when the vaccination campaign initiated. According to this interview and Google translate, the conditions which rose five-fold or more were: AFD’s FOIA Request AFD also submitted a FOIA request to KBV, the association which represents all physicians who receive insurance in Germany and thus the largest insurance dataset available. The official response to their FOIA request reads as follows (this was my attempted translation): ”Dear Mr. Sichert, With an e-mail dated October 27th, 2022 you have submitted an application to the KBV after the Freedom of Information Act (IFG) on access to data of the diagnostic codes by law health-insured patients. You have asked for the following data packages to be sent by email: Package 1: Filtering of all insured persons who will have an ICD coding in 2021 had vaccine side effects. You have applied for the codes T88.1, T88.0, U12.9 and Y59.9 apply. Package 2: You request the transmission of a list of the frequency of all ICD codes of the insured persons from package 1 for the period 2016 to 2021, if proportionately available also for 2022, by quarter. The data query should after your request with V and G. Package 3: You request the transmission of a listing of the frequency of all ICD codes of all insured persons - without the number of insured persons from package 1 - for the period from 2016 to 2021, if proportionately available also for 2022 quarters. The data query should be done with V and G. The KBV corresponds to your application and includes a tabular overview as an attachment with the desired information about the frequency of at. The abbreviations used in the table have the following meaning: nw= number of patients with “vaccination side effects” (defined according to requested Filtering 1 in 2021) onws= patient numbers "without vaccination side effects" (defined according to requested Filtering 2 in 2021) Quarters of the reporting period are set as YYYYQ (e.g. 20214=Q4 2021). The small font size in the printout is again unavoidable, since we want to make it easier to compare wanted to show all quarters of the two comparison groups on one sheet (the pdf document). However, like last time, it can be enlarged. Today, the AFD hosted a press conference to unveil the data of those 72 million patients (the 90% of Germans with statutory health insurance) AFD had obtained from KBV. This data summarizes the number of times all ICD-10 (an international standard) diagnostic codes were used by German healthcare providers for these patients (outside of hospitals) from the first quarter of 2016 to the first quarter of 2022. Tom Lausen is a data activist who had previously revealed the PEI and the RKI (the German equivalent of the CDC) were concealing concerning vaccine safety data and was allowed to analyze both BKK and AOK’s data. For this presentation, Lausen was able to provide a preliminary summary of the KBV data a few days after it was released: A rough translation of this presentation can be found here (additionally YouTube now will translate the subtitles). If this video is deleted it can also be found here. A few of the points emphasized in this presentation include: •The PEI, the RKI and the German government have failed in their duty by federal law to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine injuries. Many of my friends and readers likewise believe they have done an atrocious job by attempting to conceal the vaccine injuries, and these agencies are frequently chastised by the German people for their conduct. Many of the arguments against the validity of this data must be viewed in the context of the fact it would be very easy to the government agencies to access and analyze this data, but despite many requests to over the last two years, they have all adamantly refused to, which is why AFD had to force them to act with its FOIA. •It is estimated that 90% of the suspicious deaths that occur after vaccination are not reported to the PEI, and approximately 90% of those reported come from the patient themselves or their relative (which again demonstrates that German healthcare providers are failing in their duty to report vaccine injuries). •The PEI has nonetheless received over 3,000 reports of suspicious deaths following vaccination, but has refused to perform any autopsies on those deaths. The excuse the PEI has used for their inaction is not having the explicit authority to order the autopsies (which is a spurious excuse). Fortunately as noted above, other groups without any official authority to order autopsies have nonetheless taken the initiative to perform them. For this press conference, a presentation was put together detailing Lausen’s preliminary findings and the correspondences with the regulatory agencies, all of which can be found here. To the best of my ability, I translated and slightly modified the key portions of the presentation so that they could be accessible to English speakers, but I am certain more will be translated in the upcoming days. The KBV Data All of the KBV data can be reviewed with a simple search tool here, although it does not seem to work for certain ICD-10 codes. Due to the importance of this data, for data preservation purposes, I am also providing a copy of the raw data the AFD received: This PDF file was supplied in a manner that makes the data quite difficult to analyze. Fortunately, one of my readers was able to move the above file into an easily sortable spreadsheet and thereby address some of the challenges with the PDF: Finally, the above sheet was sorted by that reader into a smart spreadsheet which allows you to easily observe which codes had the greatest increase in 2021-2022 (e.g. to sort them or create graphs). For those of you who are data inclined, you will likely want to create this sheet yourself, but for everyone else this is an excellent reference to start with). They were also able to use a script to put about one third of the names for the ICD-10 codes, but since there are fifteen thousand of them, it wasn’t practical for us to manually add in the rest and you will frequently need to directly look up the codes themselves (if a group wants to add the other codes in, I will be happy to repost that). When Lausen presented the data, for each time period (e.g., 2016 quarter 1), he chose to add two different values together (code_20161 and nocode_20161). As best as I can tell from reviewing the FOIA request and the provided data, these categories represent those who also received a vaccine injury code and those who did not (as a result the majority of Germans belong to the “nocode” category). I believe Lausen’s rationale for presenting the data in this manner was that a large number of vaccine injuries will go unreported and many vaccine injured patients are thus within the “nocode” category. Conversely, the total number of medical conditions observed in the country is not dependent upon accurate recognition of vaccine injuries. Separating the patients by (the somewhat inaccurately classified) vaccine injury status is nonetheless a helpful means for evaluating vaccine injuries (I saw a variety of interesting trends in my preliminary examination). However, for the reasons outlined in this article, for the initial spreadsheet presented below, those result are combined. Additionally, some of the extreme outliers exist because new ICD-10 codes are added each year and thus did not exist prior to 2021/2022. Finally, some of the codes you would expect to have large changes may not show in this dataset if they are codes typically used in a hospital setting as this dataset does not include hospital code submissions. In the coming days, I know many will use this data to verify our work identifying which codes in 2021-2022 had the greatest increase (you can also do that piece by piece with the already available tool), and then cross reference those to the increases reported in VAERS or other datasets. There is an immense amount to be ascertained here, and I believe it represents the credible evidence we have been looking for since the start of the pandemic to have an objective metric for quantifying the impact of vaccine injury. However, it is also critical we determine which of the observed trends are not due to artifacts within the data. This is probably the most important graph of Lausen’s presentation. We have all heard stories of individuals dying suddenly after vaccination (I’ve even read a report of an individual who appeared to be in good health making a thump in another room and being found dead shortly after by their spouse). This issue was recently brought to the public’s attention with Died Suddenly, a documentary that effectively brought attention to this issue, but also had factual errors which were counterproductive for persuading the public that this issue is real. However, while some of the proof that Died Suddenly provided to assert the existence of the sudden death phenomenon could not stand up to outside scrutiny, the same cannot be said of the KBV data. Additionally, one way that individuals have analyzed the unusual changes in health following the vaccination campaigns has been to assess how far they fall outside of the expected range of variation (this was also done for the final spreadsheet). I did a quick calculation for the above graph and found that 2021’s increase from 2016-2020 was 37.7σ, while 2022’s was 41.0σ. This is quite a big deal (the rarity of an event happening by chance increases exponentially as the σ increases). For context, a 7σ event has a 1/390,632,286,180 chance of spontaneously occurring (it is thought to occur once in a billion years), a 10σ event happens spontaneously once every 5.249e+020 years, and a 25σ event happens by chance every 1.309e+135 years (I was not able to find a reference on the probabilities for the even higher σ events observed here). Given these numbers, it is very difficult to argue that these events were not caused by something. In this regard, we are also quite fortunate that while the vaccines were rushed to the market over a period of time far too short to establish safety, that process still took a year. Because of this lag, it is possible to refute the reflexively cited counterargument that these changes were due to COVID-19 or the lockdowns, as these only occurred in 2020 (the only possible exception I can think of is that Delta emerged near the end of 2020, but the spike started well before Delta became prevalent in Europe later in 2021). This is a similar graph to the previous one, but include sudden cardiac death, which as many of you know also “unexpectedly” increased. Many authoritative sources have argued Lausen made a mistake to correlate vaccine injuries with the spike in sudden death because very few vaccines were given at the start of 2021 and thus if a correlation was there, it should have been not emerged until the second quarter. For context, this was the rate of COVID vaccination in Germany: As you can see, many vaccines were given in the first quarter of 2021. COVID-19 is not the only vaccination regularly received. For example in Germany in 2019, it was estimated that 39% of those 65 and older received an influenza vaccination. However, unlike previous vaccines, the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine caused far more people to require medical care for a vaccine side effect. Given that Germany has a longstanding practice of evaluating vaccine injuries, this graph makes a very important point. An actual increase in vaccine injuries is occurring and it is not a result of a bias leading to over-reporting; it is a result of the vaccines being dangerous and patients needing medical care for the injuries. Additionally, an outside team which looked at this data concluded approximately 5% of vaccine recipients subsequently required medical care, which is in line with the 7.7% discovered in V-Safe’s data and required a court order to be released as the CDC understandably did not wish to disclose this information. Note: I believe this discrepancy could be partially explained by the undercounting of vaccine codes highlighted in this article. The general correlation between these two datasets is important. V-safe monitored 10 million vaccine recipients for a few specific things and was arguably the best surveillance system in place for tracking the side effects of these vaccines as it had a large but defined sample who were provided an easy way to report the chosen side effects. Since one of its key metrics matches the KBV data, this argues that at least some of the KBV data is valid. Note: I am not sure if this specific dataset is referring to the total number of patients who sought care or the total number of times codes were submitted for vaccine injuries (which would mean a smaller number in total were injured). Given that there are thousands of ICD codes that I could search the database for (many other increases, such as those of certain cancers, were highlighted in Lausen’s presentation), I had to put some thought into which of those many increases would be the best to show for this article (there were a lot of compelling candidates). Previously, I proposed a model for the unusual fibrous clots observed in Died Suddenly that revolved around spike proteins causing protein misfolding. In support of this model, I highlighted an observed increase of an extremely rare protein misfolding disease which continues to be reported in VAERS. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease typically develop over years and occurs in approximately one in a million people annually, making its occurrence immediately after vaccination rare to the point that suggests causation (and as Jessica Rose noted, new reports are continuing to arrive in VAERS). The increase I proposed was a key point of contention for those who did not agree with my misfolded clot hypothesis, so I was eager to see if a current dataset could evaluate what was occurring. This increase is also quite large, and for all practical purposes impossible to have occurred by chance (although I will mention the authors who published the original case series linking COVID vaccination to 26 cases of CJD also determined that Delta appeared to have an increased capacity to trigger protein misfolding but I do not believe that can explain the above trend). Since this article was published, one reader has now attempted to present a longer analysis of this data which shows multiple interesting trends (e.g., many of the side effects commonly attributed to COVID vaccination appeared to have increased) along with raising additional questions about this data. It is my hope others will also do so! Citizen’s Substack Analysis of the recently published German insurance data A dataset listing ICD-10 disease codes for all insurance claims filed by German doctors (outside of hospitals) for publicly insured Germans from 2016–1Q22 was recently published (more information). I’ll start with the obvious charts: chest pain, myocarditis and pericarditis increased by 17.8%, 48.5% and 25%, respectively, in 1Q22 compared to 1Q19… Read more 4 days ago · 1 like · 2 comments · Citizen Scientist Finally, the presentation on the KBV data proposes a fatality rate for the COVID vaccines. This chart was compiled by Lausen from the officially reported adverse events to the vaccines and likely are significantly undercounting the vaccine fatality rate. Is This Data Valid? Following the AFD’s press conference, the leading medical research institute in Germany, ZI, acted as a third party to present a rebuttal of how AFD interpreted KBV’s data. I did not agree with their argument (that there results were an artifact of AFD also requesting for everyone who specifically died in 2021), but did note that their response acknowledged the authenticity of this data. The primary argument presented by ZI was that since the FOIA request selected for all patients who were vaccine injured in 2021-2022, the rise in deaths observed in 2021-2022 was simply due to the fact anyone who was vaccinated in 2021-2022 could not have died prior to 2021-2022 and thus the increase in deaths observed in 2021-2022 compared to what occurred prior to this time was due to the cohort effect. On the surface this seems like a credible way to dismiss anyone who would make such an elementary mistake and believe in this data. However, the German authorities have a long track record of attempting to cover up evidence of COVID vaccine harm (in addition to the points discussed above, the German government has been perpetually delaying releasing the death statistics for 2021), so these arguments require a critical evaluation. In turn, there is a few major issue with it: First, the “nocode” group should not suffer from the cohort effect and it was this group that comprised the majority of the increase in sudden deaths (review the wording of the FOIA request shown above). If the “code” group were to be removed (which potentially suffers from the cohort effect), an almost identical trend would still be present. Lausen presented his data by merging the code and nocode groups together which invalidated this counterargument, and I cannot see how a “cohort effect” is present in the combined data unless KBV failed to fulfill the FIOA in the manner that was requested (Lausen also subsequently provided an interview addressing the government criticisms of his analysis). An outside analyst also looked at this data and demonstrated that other fatal conditions (which should be vulnerable to same the cohort effect ZI is asserting) did not have the same 2021 spike: Second, the large σ found for many, (but by no means all) non-fatal conditions in the dataset indicates that something besides artifacts relating to time of death is causing the changes observed. I acknowledge that it is very possible some of the discrepancies present are due to not yet identified artifacts within the data, but at this point in time I have not been able to identify them. I believe that since KBV was focused on debunking the rise in sudden death codes, they did not focus on the rise in other codes for conditions associated with COVID vaccine injuries that were also observed. However, while this was not their focus, this point must nonetheless be considered since it does negate their counterargument. Additionally, The death argument ZI made was also inconsistent with the death codes in question nonetheless being reported prior to 2021, which they attributed to “coding errors or unaddressed billing fraud.” To some extent this is hand-waving that many others have contested (and something any type of auditing algorithm should have caught years before), but I do not believe it is as important as the first two points. Conversely, the strongest argument ZI put forward to establish that a cohort effect was occurring for the reported deaths was this spreadsheet. I have not yet been able to discern how the data in it was derived as it does not match the other things I looked at, so I cannot comment on if this is correct (an independent analyst arrived at the same conclusion I did). This spreadsheet is the one source of data that could refute AFD’s argument so I would greatly appreciate any additional thoughts on this one). However, I must also note that if this data is actually correct, it still does not negate the non-fatal complications of vaccination being observed. A German rebuttal of ZI’s arguments was posted here. AFD also discussed the above rebuttal in a thread here stating: "Hello all. The death-numbers that we have published are being hotly debated right now. Now the Central Institute for the KBV has joined in has said that the data we presented were quite easy to explain: 'The data is only for people who have accessed a medical service in 2021 and only such people had been billed and therefore would be in the data and everything in the years before are statistical runaways. There are also different causes of death that were significantly higher in the years before such as I46.9 (heart attack without successful reanimation). ' All together 104 000 people have been coded as deaths in the years 2016-2020 of whom the Central Institute of the KBV now says that they were billed medical services in 2021. Now we have a question: If this is really true, we demand an explanation from the Central Institute of the KBV how 104 000 persons that have died in the years 2016-2020 have been billed medical services in 2021.” [Translated courtesy of a reader] The following was also written in the tweet: “Allegedly, the figures from the KBV are only for patients with health insurance, for whom services were billed in 2021. However, the causes of death were coded for 104,000 patients in previous years. Do we have a data scandal or a billing scandal?” This table also refutes ZI’s argument that only those who were able to see a doctor and thus were alive in 2021 comprised the cohort of the insurance data. Many of the German commentators I saw online were also skeptical of the official rebuttals to this data. I was recently sent a detailed summary of the events after the press conference which demonstrated that the rationale for debunking the data changed as time went forward. As best as I can tell, no clear reason was presented for why Lausen’s analysis was flawed given. Instead it was insinuated either that Lausen incorrectly filtered the data (my team and others however arrived at the same results Lausen did) or that there was a data transmission error from the KBV (which is possible but would have had to have been deliberate or inconceivable incompetence). KBV also issued an astonishing statement refuting AFD’s presentation: The KBV board clarifies: Based on the billing data transmitted by the KBV to the AfD or. ICD-10 codes cannot be used to establish causal relationships between COVID-19 vaccinations and deaths. From the KBV's point of view, the increase in deaths shown in quarters I-IV 2021 and quarter I 2022 is largely pandemic-related mortality. This once again illustrates the importance of COVID 19 vaccination as an effective measure to prevent serious forms of progress up to deaths. Without the vaccination, mortality would probably have been much higher. This statement also cited the previously referenced ZI letter and another one which noted: •The codes in this database do not include codes entered on death certificates and thus cannot be assigned as the cause of death [however all of these codes cannot be entered unless the patient died; also as the statement above shows KBV is admitting an increase in deaths did occur]. •The codes in this database cannot be correlated with vaccination status because many people received the COVID vaccines in settings that did not result in codes being submitted and coding for COVID vaccination has not yet been included in the dataset due to special regulations [I agree with this point, but it fails to refute this dataset since Lausen chose to combine the code and nocode groups; instead, it simply argues that vaccine injuries are underreported in this dataset]. •This database was not created for the purpose of conducting medical research and therefore no conclusion can be drawn from it [I don’t believe this is a valid argument; a lot can be inferred from it and it is the best available database we have, so until the government chooses to make a better database available, it is “the evidence.” Additionally, this is a very similar argument to what is said for VAERS, but unlike VAERS there is not an over or underreporting issue present with this dataset]. I do not believe any of the above points refute the sudden increases in submitted billing codes (hypothesized to correlate with vaccine injuries) that occurred a year after the pandemic started at the exact same time the vaccination campaign began. However, I also believe some type of not yet identified artifact could account for at least some of what was observed and I have spent the last week revising this article to account for the additional information I come across. If anyone can provider a stronger refutation of the data presented here (preferably, at the pinned comment), I would greatly appreciate it. We need to help each other stay honest and I will gladly retract this article if a critical mistake was made. Note: An independent analyst who reviewed the entire dataset found that it showed many other signs of being plausible. Conclusion Given the extremely concerning implications of the German data, it is not surprising that governments around the world and healthcare systems or insurance providers have been reluctant to release their own data. It is my sincere hope that this release will open the flood gates to additional disclosures and I am in complete agreement with the conclusion of this presentation: I wish we had an American political party stating the same. There are signs of hope however; today Ron DeSantis did something incredible and requested a grand jury against Pfizer and Moderna, an essential step a few leaders in our movement have been working to lay the groundwork for over the last two years. I am also hopeful that this grand jury will compel the state of Florida to release similar data that can be used to assess the safety of these vaccines. I strongly encourage those of you who who are able to begin looking through the KBV dataset and identifying important trends that can be correlated to other observations we have made over the last two years. I believe there are many excellent articles that could be written on them. I sincerely thank all of you for your continued support! My primary goal is to draw attention to this data so numerous independent parties can objectively analyze it and independently verify if the trends it shows correlate to “controversial” increases observed in other datasets like VAERS. This data is extremely important as it is the only access we have ever been given to observe the changes in illness that follow the COVID vaccination campaigns. I also suspect the most important use of this data will be to establish causality for specific vaccine injuries. This matters because typically when someone suffers a pharmaceutical injury, it is not acknowledged by the the government and the courts because “there is no evidence the product is associated with that injury,” and as you might expect, the pharmaceutical industry work tirelessly to make sure the evidence that could implicate their product never emerges. At this point I’ve lost track of how many sad instances I’ve seen where this happened to a medically injured patient (in some cases to the point the gaslighted victim gives up and ends their lives), so I greatly support having an independent means to assess causality for vaccine injuries. Those injured by the COVID-19 vaccines are profoundly suffering and they really need help (on the bright side however, recently Senator Johnson and shortly after Governor DeSantis gave a voice to these victims). Postscript: It appears a similar rise in unexplained deaths is occurring in Canada. SOURCE: https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-most-important-dataset-of-the

This is Not On The Beeb's 72nd report publishing the translation of the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The stats are collated up to the 23rd of November but are released to the public a week later, so in this case on the 1st of December. It then takes the NOTB contributors a further few days to sift through and publish our report. MHRA: People in UK who have received one or more dose of a C19 vaccine = 53,813,491 (Up to 11th Sept 2022) UK population 68,760,539 Percentage of people jabbed with the experimental 'vaccine' = 78% TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 94.4 (83.2m last month) AZ 49.16m (49.16 m last month) Moderna 25.3m Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports 177,925 (Pfizer) 246,866 (AZ) 47,045 (Moderna) 52 (Novavax = N) 2130 (Unknown) TOTAL = 474,018 people impacted incl. bivalent vaccines (increase of 3,995 in 4 weeks) BOOSTERS All boosters = 64,259,700 • Pfizer - 32.5m (mono) & 9.7m (bivalent) • Astrazeneca - 59,700 • Moderna - 13.1m (mono) & 8.9m (bivalent) Booster Yellow Card Reports 35,028 (Pfizer) 655 (AZ) 21,956 (Moderna) 280 (Unknown) TOTAL = 57,919 BREAKDOWN Here is the breakdown of the most recent report with comments and observations on the data below Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death Pfizer- 177,925 (175,426 last month) AZ. - 246,866 (246,638 last month) Moderna 47,045. (45,946 last month) Novavax 52 (68 last week!) 474,018 people impacted incl. bivalent vaccines (increase of 3,995 in 4 weeks) TOTAL = 464,072 incl. bivalent vaccines (an increase of 5951 or 1.28% over 5 weeks) Overall 1-in-114 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Is the 1 in 114 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11 Fatal Pfizer 857 (844 last month) AZ 1334 (1,327 last month) Moderna 111 (104 last month) Unknown 60 (55 last month) TOTAL = 2362. (2,330 last month) Blood Disorders - 17,677 (Pfizer) + 7938 (AZ) + 2862 (Moderna) + 75 (Unknown) = 28,552 Anaphylaxis - 687 (Pfizer) + 888 (AZ) + 102 (Moderna) + 2 (N) + 3 (Unknown) = 1682 Acute Cardiac - 14,375 (Pfizer) + 11,813 (AZ) + 4177 (Moderna) + 5 (N) + 161 (Unknown) = 30,531 Eye Disorders - 8461 (Pfizer) + 15,107 (AZ) + 1939 (Moderna) + 105 (Unknown) = 25,612 Blindness - 180 (Pfizer) + 330 (AZ) + 46 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 561 Deafness - 331 (Pfizer) + 447 (AZ) + 70 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 854 Infections - 13,600 (Pfizer) + 20,951 (AZ) + 3160 (Moderna) + 5 (N) + 263 (Unknown) = 37,979 Herpes - 2341 (Pfizer) + 2725 (AZ) + 363 (Moderna) + 2 (N) + 30 (Unknown) = 5461 Spontaneous Abortions - 505 + 19 stillbirths/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 240 + 6 stillbirths/foetal deaths (AZ) + 74 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) +11 (Unknown) = 830 miscarriages Gastrointestinal Disorders - 44,248 (Pfizer) + 81,396 (AZ) + 13,828 (Moderna) + 6 (N) + 506 (Unknown) = 139,984 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 878 (Pfizer) + 2429 (AZ) + 108 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 27 (Unknown) = 3443 Nervous System Disorders - 84,728 (Pfizer) + 184,225 (AZ) + 24,827 (Moderna) + 16 (N) + 1088 (Unknown) = 294,884 Seizures - 1201 (Pfizer) + 2113 (AZ) + 340 (Moderna) + 34 (Unknown) = 3688 Paralysis - 553 (Pfizer) + 916 (AZ) + 148 (Moderna) + 15 (Unknown) = 1632 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4426 (Pfizer) + 6935 (AZ) + 925 (Moderna) + 56 (Unknown) = 12,342 Respiratory Disorders - 23,064 (Pfizer) + 30,230 (AZ) + 5592 (Moderna) + 3 (N) + 279 (Unknown) = 59,168 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1148 (Pfizer) + 2307 (AZ) + 240 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3707 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,798 (Pfizer) + 18,699 (AZ) + 3025 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 158 (Unknown) = 32,681 Skin Disorders - 35,879 (Pfizer) + 53,819 (AZ) + 15,036 (Moderna) + 7 (N) + 464 (Unknown) = 105,205 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,789 (Pfizer) + 20,983 (AZ) + 5438 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 271 (Unknown) = 58,482 Bell’s Palsy - 677 (Pfizer) + 646 (AZ) + 127 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 3 (Unknown) = 1454 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,200,000 children (1st doses) + 2,900,000 (2nd doses) + 400,000(mono)/52,500(bivalent) boosters resulting in 4205 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,400 children (1st doses) + 8.500 (2nd doses) + ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 267 Yellow Cards (reporting rate 1-in-43) • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) + 2000 (2nd doses) + 32,400(mono)/1000(bivalent) boosters resulting in 39 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 37 Yellow Cards Total = 4,213,700 children injected (under 18s) Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 7,609,900 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4548 For full reports including 387 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

STORY AT-A-GLANCE September 29, 2021, Google deleted my YouTube account for “violating community guidelines” they’d implemented that same morning September 28, 2022, I filed a lawsuit against Google, YouTube and Alphabet Inc. for breach of contract. YouTube unilaterally amended the contract without notice, which is a violation of its own terms, and then used this last-minute amendment to remove my content YouTube’s terms of service also include a “three strikes” policy, where users are supposed to be given three warnings and opportunities to remove content that violates the guidelines BEFORE being banned. I had no “strikes” against my channel on the day I was deplatformed and deleted We’re also suing YouTube for unjust enrichment, as for the last 16 years, my video content, having generated in excess of 50 million views, has been of great financial benefit to YouTube, allowing them to increase advertising revenue on the site November 8, 2021, I sued U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, both in her official and personal capacities, for violating my First Amendment rights, as she tried to force Amazon.com to ban my book, “The Truth About COVID-19” September 29, 2021, Google deleted my YouTube account for “violating community guidelines” — guidelines they’d implemented that very same morning. September 28, 2022, I filed a lawsuit1 against Google, YouTube and Alphabet Inc. for breach of contract.2 As detailed in my complaint, YouTube unilaterally amended the contract without notice, which is a violation of its own terms, and then used this last-minute amendment to remove my content, which went back to 2005, the same year YouTube was founded. At the time YouTube deleted my content, I had more than 300,000 subscribers, and my videos had collectively garnered more than 50 million views. While I disagreed with YouTube’s censorship, when its “COVID-19 misinformation” policy was implemented back in April 2021, I carefully avoided posting any content on YouTube that might violate that guideline. In fact, over 16 years on the platform, I never once received notice of any “strike” against my channel for violation of community guidelines. Clear Breach of Contract Then, on the morning of September 29, 2022, at 9 a.m. EDT, The Washington Post published an article titled “YouTube Is Banning Joseph Mercola and a Handful of Other Anti-Vaccine Activists.” According to the WaPo: “YouTube is taking down several video channels associated with high-profile anti-vaccine activists including Joseph Mercola ... As part of a new set of policies aimed at cutting down on anti-vaccine content on the Google-owned site. YouTube will ban any videos that claim that commonly used vaccines approved by health authorities are ineffective or dangerous. The company previously blocked videos that made those claims about coronavirus vaccines, but not ones for other vaccines like those for measles or chickenpox.” Six minutes AFTER the publication of that WaPo article, at 9.06 a.m. EDT, I received an email from YouTube informing me that my entire channel had been deplatformed and banned. They didn’t just take down old videos where I discussed vaccines. They took down my whole channel, including thousands of videos that were completely unrelated to vaccines. So, as described in my complaint, the evidence suggests YouTube had considered this new guideline for some time — to not allow disparaging views against ANY approved vaccine — and they worked with a reporter from The WaPo to create that article ahead of time. The WaPo article was then embargoed until the morning of September 29 in order to not allow me (or anyone else affected by this change) to review the new policy, take steps to bring my channel into compliance, or move my content to another platform. Instead, they simply deleted 16 years’ worth of intellectual property, without warning. This is a clear violation of its own terms of service, which state that YouTube “will provide reasonable advance notice” of any changes to the terms of service, and that users will have “the opportunity to review them” and to remove content if they do not agree to the new terms. Government, Media and Social Media Collude to Censor The WaPo article coinciding with YouTube’s action is also a blatant illustration of how government, social media platforms and media collude and coordinate attacks to censor people and organizations with whom they do not agree, or who pose a threat to their propaganda narrative. In a September 29, 2021, “News & Events” article posted by YouTube on its website, YouTube admitted they were “working closely with health authorities,” including “local and international health organizations” to come up with this new guideline. YouTube Violated Its Own Three Strikes Policy YouTube’s terms of service also include a “three strikes” policy, where users are supposed to be given three warnings and opportunities to remove content that violates the guidelines BEFORE being banned. I had no “strikes” against my channel on the day I was deplatformed and deleted. The fact that YouTube had to use underhanded tactics to create an excuse to get rid of us only goes to show how compliant we had actually been all along. YouTube Profited From the Content It Stole I’m also suing YouTube for unjust enrichment, as for the last 16 years, my video content, having generated in excess of 50 million views, has been of great financial benefit to YouTube, allowing them to increase advertising revenue on the site. Additionally, they’ve refused to allow me to retrieve any of this content, which they still have in their possession. So, YouTube has unjustly benefited at my expense. Sen. Elizabeth Warren Sued for First Amendment Violation The YouTube lawsuit isn’t the only legal complaint we’ve filed to protect our rights in this new age of illegal censorship. November 8, 2021, I, along with Ronnie Cummins, founder and director of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) and the coauthor of my best-selling book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” our publisher, Chelsea Green Publishing, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who wrote our foreword, also sued U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, both in her official and personal capacities, for violating our First Amendment rights. The lawsuit was filed in response to Warren’s attempts to force Amazon.com to ban our book. In early September 2021, Warren sent a letter3 to Andy Jassy, chief executive officer of Amazon, demanding an “immediate review” of Amazon’s algorithms to weed out books peddling “COVID misinformation,” stressing that Amazon’s sale of such books was “potentially unlawful.”4,5,6 While she didn’t spell out what laws Amazon might be breaking, she appeared to be warning Jassy that the company may be held legally responsible for wrongful death and homicide by selling books that “misinform” readers about COVID-19, its treatment and COVID shots. She singled out my book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” as a prime example of “highly-ranked and favorably-tagged books based on falsehoods about COVID-19 vaccines and cures” that she wanted banned. She wrote:7 “Dr. Mercola has been described as ‘the most influential spreader of coronavirus misinformation online. Not only was this book the top result when searching either ‘COVID-19’ or ‘vaccine’ in the categories of ‘All Departments’ and ‘Books’; it was tagged as a ‘Best Seller’ by Amazon and the ‘#1 Best Seller’ in the ‘Political Freedom’ category. The book perpetuates dangerous conspiracies about COVID-19 and false and misleading information about vaccines. It asserts that vitamin C, vitamin D and quercetin … can prevent COVID-19 infection … And the book contends that vaccines cannot be trusted ...” Government Officials Cannot Legally Censor Anyone As a government official, it is illegal for Warren to violate the U.S. Constitution, and pressuring private businesses to do it for her is not a legal workaround. As noted in our complaint: “Once upon a time, the First Amendment was understood to guarantee that books challenging governmental orthodoxy could be sold without fear of governmental intimidation or reprisal. Almost sixty years ago, in Bantam Books v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 (1963), the Supreme Court held that state officials violated the First Amendment by sending letters to booksellers warning that the sale of certain named books was potentially unlawful. The ‘vice’ in such letters and in the ‘veiled threat’ of legal repercussions they communicated, explained the Court, is that they allow government to achieve censorship while doing an end-run around the judiciary, ‘provid[ing] no safeguards whatever against the suppression of ... constitutionally protected’ speech, thus effecting an unconstitutional ‘prior restraint.’ It made no difference that the officials who sent the letter lacked the ‘power to apply formal legal sanctions’ — i.e., that the officials did not themselves have the power to sanction or prosecute the booksellers in any way. Indeed this fact made the unconstitutionality more apparent. The officials ‘are not law enforcement officers; they do not pretend that they are qualified to give or that they attempt to give distributors only fair legal advice ... [T]hey acted ... not to advise but to suppress.’ It also made no difference, the Court expressly found, that the letters were framed as mere ‘exhort[ation]’ or that the booksellers were in theory ‘free’ to ignore the letters, because the officials had ‘deliberately set about to achieve the suppression of publications deemed ‘objectionable’,’ and ‘people do not lightly disregard public officers’ veiled threats.’ Today, certain members of the United States Congress have apparently forgotten, or think they are above, the law set forth in Bantam Books.” If We Lose Free Speech, We Lose Everything There’s no doubt our book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” is constitutionally protected speech, and that Warren’s letter is calling on Amazon to suppress protected speech. Yet, ever since the start of the pandemic, government has systematically sought to suppress the kind of information shared in our book, using the same tactic as Warren used against us here — warning internet-based companies that if they don’t censor these views, the full weight of the government’s wrath will be turned against them. While lawsuits like these are time consuming and costly, they are necessary. Free speech is worth fighting for, because if we lose that, then we lose everything. As discussed in “The Biggest Casualty of COVID-19,” individual rights have been repeatedly trampled and violated ever since the beginning of this pandemic, and it’s only going to get worse from here if we don’t fight back. It’s now clear that we have only two choices: Freedom, or life under authoritarian rule. There’s no middle ground. As the old adage goes, “Give an inch and they’ll take a mile.” It’s true that the judicial system has in many ways been weaponized against us as well, but it is still our best chance at setting the record straight and reining in these egregious rights violations. SOURCE: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/10/15/mercola-sues-google-youtube.aspx?

The utter hypocrisy is beyond breathtaking. After three years of draconian state and social media censorship of independent journalists for warning of the vaccine dangers to the world's children, the European Union, UN, BBC and MSM are up in arms because one of world's richest people Musk has suspended some mainstream media journalists' personal accounts. What did Musk do? His 'crime' was to suspend the accounts of those who 'doxxed' him or were associated with it. 'Doxxing' is a new internet phenomenon of intimidation, where people release the personal data of someone they don't like. Publishing a target's home address, alongside images of their children and names of their schools is very effective at causing stress and anxiety. Musk banned those accounts. He caused the outrage by also suspending the accounts of journalists that had published links through to the original doxxers-which of course is effectively doxxing via a third party Whether Musk's reaction was right or wrong, the backlash has been stunning and eye wateringly hypocritical. The EU and UN reacted under the banner of free speech. In an amazing step earlier on Friday, EU commissioner Vera Jourova threatened Twitter with sanctions under Europe's new Digital Services Act which she said requires: "the respect of media freedom and fundamental rights”. The UN tweeted that: "media freedom is not a toy" Melissa Fleming, the UN's under-secretary-general for global communications said, "A free press is the cornerstone of democratic societies and a key tool in the fight against harmful disinformation." This is all being said against the background of multiple mainstream and independent journalists having had their accounts on social media platforms, from Twitter to Facebook to Youtube, restricted or suspended for daring to publish facts and figures contradicting the governmental and industry pro-‘vaccine’ agenda. The BBC article then goes on to explain the depth of the planned retribution. “Any sanctions placed on Mr Musk's business over the account suspensions could be applied under the bloc's (EU's) new Digital Services Act, which was approved by the EU earlier this year. Under the terms of the proposed new law, the EU Commission will be allowed to impose fines of up to 6% of the global turnover of a firm that it finds breaks its rules.” In extreme cases, the EU could ask a court to suspend a rogue service, but only if it is "refusing to comply with important obligations and thereby endangering people's life and safety”. This is astounding news. Music to the ears of many of us that have been fighting to provide critical life-saving information regarding vaccine safety and expose the real extent of vaccine-injury. Now the EU and UN have set these lines in the sand, the question we must ask is, do these rules apply to everyone, or just apply to journalists working for an accredited media agency? And if so, what about the journalists and frontmen who have lost their jobs due to their ‘free speech’ and have also been de-platformed from multiple social media platforms? Also, do these rules only apply to Twitter, now that Musk owns it? Or, do these rules also apply to Facebook, Youtube, Instagram and financial institutions playing the same game like Paypal? If free speech is so important, then do the UN standards and EU rules apply and protect all of us from social media censorship? i.e. do we all have the right to free speech or is free speech reserved just for the selected few? The state of recent censorship has been so desperate, that many of us within the new media space that has risen from the ashes of blatant state-sponsored propaganda and deceit have set up a new media organisation called the United Free Press. To give a personal example of the level of 'silencing', Not On The Beeb has been heavily censored and shadow banned by YouTube, Facebook and Instagram. We have been financially de-platformed by Paypal and had our services with email provider Mailerlite withdrawn. (Interestingly when Toby Young's Free Speech Union made a stand against his Paypal ban the backlash resulted in multiple closing of accounts and a stock price fall. This is the people-power we have.) What did we do to attract this censorship? We stood outside the BBC and asked the simple question to camera: “Why are the BBC not providing the public with the C19 vaccine injury data?” To back our question, we published the government’s own MHRA yellow card data on UK vaccine injury. Why was the resulting film banned and NOTB de-platformed/shadow banned by FB and YT? Was the official data controversial? The reported vaccine injury rate in the UK now stands at 1 in 114 people. The MHRA and CDC have both admitted the real figures on vaccine injury will be approximately 10 times higher than what is reported. Part of this underreporting is due to ignorance on behalf of the professionals and public who don't realise their obligations due to the C19 vaccine's black triangle status, and half due to logistics. As one Belgian Doctor personally told me admitting her shame: "Yes, we (Doctors) know there are many (Covid vaccine) injuries. But I don't file them anymore. They take me 30-40 minutes each and many times after entering all the data and pressing enter, I get an error message meaning I'd have to start again. Yes, I have given up." These failures in reporting mean the real figure will be closer to 1 in 14 people of those accepting the C19 jabs becoming injured. I suspect that these injury stats will steadily worsen, since it will take time for people and doctors to link multiple and varying health issues to the experimental jab. Another example of censorship is the use of fake yet convincing fact-checkers. Not On The Beeb released ground-breaking films exposing post-vaccine magnetism. Reuters and multiple fact-checkers tried to jump on us, even though we had clearly proved the phenomena with doctors as witnesses. The BBC even made a very low-quality disinformation film to try and quell the fire. The BBC film was a series of 'experts' claiming there was no way a vaccine could induce magnetism. Their key mistake? The one thing they didn't do was pick up a magnet and try. A major schoolboy error that would almost be laughable, except for its intention to deceive over a life-threatening issue. You can see our work on vaccine-induced-magnetism and the associated MRI warning on our website. The issue is simple. As the EU puts it, have the social media giants via their censorship endangered people's life and safety? Were the 55 million British people that accepted the jab told of all they needed to know to make a well-informed choice? The answer is clearly no. For instance, the Astra Zeneca jab, known on the street as the Clott-Shot, was quietly banned from the under-18s and slowly withdrawn from the adult population. This lack of information was from the top down. Ministers barely knew what they were talking about, showing themselves as self-interested puppets content with fat back pockets and promises of once-retired endless highly paid speaking engagements. In the truly British post-Blair way, sterilised bribes in kind. TV doctors and famous Youtube nurses who steered the public towards the jab have now done u-turns claiming they were fooled. Ironical as it was their job to follow due diligence before recommending life-changing jabs they didn't understand, whilst laymen and women all over the country delved deep, read the paperwork and screamed their warnings from the roof tops-and kept screaming whilst muffled by the social media censorship. Huge public protests topping 100s of thousands were ignored by the BBC. Protesters with placards detailing the injuries were bundled into the back of police vans and people dropping leaflets door to door were arrested. State players like MI5 and the 77th brigade wasted the public's money targetting anti-state propagandists. I know. They tampered with my phones and computer in attempts to stop me from interviewing doctors with different opinions to those 'Doctors' spouting their repetitive teleprompter, scripted, nonsense on the nation's TV channels, hypnotising busy parents into compliance. Who did the public rely on, other than these TV 'media' stars? Most GPs didn’t even know, or understand, the ingredients and simply trusted the industry and regulators. Alongside the industry, the UK government, BBC and other media outlets clearly colluded in the deception that fooled the public, doctors and health professionals alike. The nation was tricked. Many of us saw through the hypnotic nonsense. Some of us were silenced by our fears, confusion and split loyalties. Some of us were silenced by our families and employers. Others, like NOTB and the others at the United Free Press, were more worryingly silenced, or muffled, by state and social media censorship. Although Melissa Fleming, the UN's under-secretary-general for global communications said: "A free press is the cornerstone of democratic societies and a key tool in the fight against harmful disinformation," I think she meant, "A free Independent press is the cornerstone of democratic societies and a key tool in the fight against harmful effects of highly funded governmental and pharma industry disinformation." As a basic first step, before the mass prosecutions of the civil servants that failed the electorate, we need to ask EU commissioner Vera Jourova to gain some perspective. She might be outraged that one of the richest men in the world might be worried about his child's kidnapping when so-called professional journalists effectively point out the location of his children to billions world wide. Is she not outraged that medical experts and investigative journalists have been silenced when trying to warn of the vaccine dangers affecting hundreds of millions of children world wide... what I and others have called an impending medically induced holocaust? EU commissioner Vera Jourova must ask the EU courts to immediately suspend or fine heavily rogue services such as Facebook, Youtube and Instagram as they have clearly, in the words of the EU: "have failed to comply with important obligations (of free speech) and have hereby endangered people's life and safety.” Under the terms of the proposed new law, the EU Commission will be allowed to impose fines of up to 6% of the global turnover of a firm that it finds breaks its rules.” These monies can then be used towards compensation for the families of the ill-informed who have been killed or injured. What can you do to help? 1 - Reply to Vera Jourova on Twitter 2 - Add your name to the over 15,000 people who have already signed our petition calling for a ban and investigation into the C19 'vaccines'. Please sign. Please share this article and the petition widely. Vaccine Injunction We are calling for an injunction to pause the vaccine rollout due to the following questions. ​ 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing We have two petitions running, calling for urgent analysis. The People's petition and the Doctor's Health/expert's petition by https://t.me/bobmoran

Are you buying CBD oil bought off the high street? If so, you might be wasting your money. Why? CBD Isolate has 1 compound. Full Spectrum CBD Oil has around 62 compounds on average, while whole plant full spectrum hemp has the CBD component and 500 or more other compounds Let's tackle some basic questions. What is Hemp? What is CBD? What are hemp's potential medical benefits? Is isolated CBD effective? What is the Entourage Effect? HEMP PASTE SHOP HEMP PASTE CREAM SHOP FAQs What is Hemp? Hemp is the common name for a variety of the fiber plant Cannabis sativa. It is the non-psychoactive cousin of marijuana. To be classified as hemp, a cannabis plant cannot contain more than 0.3% of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The high amount of THC in marijuana is what makes people feel high. Because both are cannabis, many people mistakenly think that hemp and marijuana are the same, when they are not. In the United States, the main difference between both is that hemp is federally legal, while marijuana is not. Hemp in the USA is ONLY classified as hemp if it contains less than 0.3% THC. In most US states, if the hemp tests over 0.3% it will then be called marijuana. In UK the limit is 0.16% What is CBD? Cannabidiol (CBD) is a phytocannabinoid found in industrial hemp that is safe, non-psychotic and offers a robust therapeutic profile. CBD oil is a safe alternative to pharmaceuticals that could have harsh side effects and has been studied for its potential in treating many common health issues. Is isolated CBD as effective as it could be? Traditional CBD oils are chemically extracted. Isolates and falsely claimed full-spectrum CBD oils use only a small portion of the hemp plant. These oils only contain partial components of the healing plant, meaning, you’ll never achieve the entourage effect. ⁃ CBD Isolate has 1 compound ⁃ Full Spectrum CBD Oil has around 62 compounds on average ⁃ Whole Plant/Hemp Spectrum/Hemp Paste™ has 500 + compounds CBD Isolate works alone only targeting some CB2 receptors and has fewer benefits. It does not have as big of an impact as full and broad-spectrum hemp extracts do. The whole plant delivers the full range of medicinal benefits. The entire CBD oil industry removes critically important constituents from the plant to make CBD oil. The magnitude of this mistake is truly a billion-dollar blunder. What are hemp's potential medical benefits? The claimed benefits of CBD are wide-ranging. CBD is believed to help manage anxiety, depression, inflammation, insomnia, and chronic pain. The benefits of Hemp paste with full content CBD plus all the other synergistic compounds will be even greater. What is the Entourage Effect? Scientists call the synergy of the different cannabinoids, terpenes, and flavonoids found in hemp working together the “entourage effect.” These components interact with the human body to produce a stronger therapeutic influence than any one of these components alone. A large part of alternative medicine revolves around using the entire plant for medicinal purposes rather than isolating the main active ingredient. The effects of many cannabinoids found in broad-spectrum and full-spectrum CBD formulas work together and have far better results than an isolated cannabinoid such as CBD working alone. When you take broad or full-spectrum hemp extracts, the variety of cannabinoids seek out areas of the body out of balance. The entourage effect occurs as the cannabinoids support each other on their mission to restore homeostasis and maintain wellness. Why is Hemp Paste recommended? Unlike CBD oil, Hemp Paste™ is NOT chemically extracted from the hemp plant. Instead, the whole hemp plant is ground up and mixed with MCT oil (Coconut Oil) that helps transfer as many Phytoconstituents into the bloodstream as possible. Both CBD oil and Hemp Paste come from the same plant, but CBD oil goes through an unnecessary extraction process using either Co2, Ethanol, Alcohol, or Butane. All these methods cause medicinal damage and product waste. The whole hemp flower (Hemp Spectrum) contains cannabinoids, terpenes, flavanoids, cannflavins, enzymes, nutrients, and a whole array of phytochemical constituents. All these naturally occurring compounds work together making synergistic results within the body. ⁃ CBD Isolate has 1 compound ⁃ Full Spectrum CBD Oil has around 62 compounds on average ⁃ Whole Plant/Hemp Spectrum/Hemp Paste™ has 500 + compounds VIDEO - HEMP v CBD HEMP PASTE PRODUCTS Delicious peppermint-flavoured full spectrum paste. It melts under the tongue. Tried, tested and recommended. Available in two sizes of pots 5oo mg and 2000mg We also sell small trial pouches of 60 mg or 100 mg HEMP PASTE TRIAL PACKET Easy use affordable sachet to sample the product from £5.99. HEMP PASTE CREAM We have partnered with Plant Therapy which is one of the top producers of essential oils in the world. They have perfected blends of essential oils for specific therapeutic treatments. Then, we blend micron ground Hemp Paste with the essential oils to create very effective Hemp Cream treatments. MULTIPLE PARTICLE SIZES INGREDIENTS Cocoa Butter, Hemp Seed Oil, Coconut Oil, Virgin Olive Oil, Beeswax, Hemp Paste™, Frankincense, Neem Oil, Myrrh Oil, Cassia Oil, Cinnamon Oil, EMU Oil. When milling the hemp flower, we leave a small number of large particle sizes of hemp fibers to help stimulate the blood flow to the skin surface. This helps draw the micron size phytocannabinoids through the dermal layer for better absorption. Hemp Paste™ is NOT EXTRACTED. Meaning all of the naturally occurring compounds can work synergistically together. This creates a more balanced system for your body, while remaining cost-effective and eco-friendly. FAQs WHAT IS THE RECOMMENDED AMOUNT TO TAKE? So how much should I take? Users of Hemp Paste™ commonly claim that it takes less Hemp Paste™ than CBD oil to see results. In his presentation, Sidarta Ribeiro explained how this is possible. Watch here: https://youtu.be/lpPBB3o8krA. Mr. Ribeiro said, “you can increase the amount of CBD and it will not make the product more effective. It will only become more effective when you have all the compounds together.” This means with Hemp Paste™ you spend less money and receive better results. The FDA does not allow us to prescribe a daily dose. A popular method is to calculate milligrams by half of your body weight. Example: If you weigh 180 lbs. then half of that is 90 or 90 mg dose. That is about 4.5 dosing spoons as 1 dosing spoon is about 20 mg of Phytocannabinoids. Each dosing spoon is 1/8th of a teaspoon. That is the popular dosage on the internet BUT because Hemp Paste™ takes fewer milligrams per product, you might not need so much. That must sound like good news to your ear. Before you choose the ½ of your body weight suggestion, we highly recommend starting out slow. Start out slow with one scoop on day 1 and each day add another scoop to the total until you get the results you want. For example: Day 1 = 1 Scoop Day 2 = 2 Scoops Day 3 = 3 Scoops Day 4 = 4 Scoops Day 5 = 5 Scoops and then maybe keep increasing OR decreasing intake based on how you feel. IMPORTANT NOTE The amount of cannabinoids you take is based on what illness you have. For preventive reasons, most people would take a lower dose compared to stage 4 cancer. One of the most common mistakes is taking only one scoop a day and wondering why it doesn’t work. Another common mistake is not taking it regularly. HOW SHOULD I TAKE IT? CAPSULE VS SUBLINGUAL The best bang for the buck (get your money’s worth) is to administer it sublingually but some people dislike the natural bitter flavor of the plant. If the taste bothers you, you may put it in a gel capsule or chase it down with water. I TAKE CBD OIL, DO I NEED HEMP PASTE? Yes! Even if you’ve tried “pure” isolates, full-spectrum, and/or nano CBD and regardless of the result, you NEED to try Hemp Past Not only does CBD oil create serious waste but there is also serious damage that occurs through chemical extraction. Extraction destroys MOST of the medicinal phytoconstituents. So why wouldn’t you want to try Hemp Paste, which isn’t extracted at all? WHY DOES HEMP HELP WITH SO MANY ILLNESSES? It is a well-known fact that inflammation is associated with almost every known disease. Hemp/CBD/Hemp Paste is a billion-dollar industry because it is known as the #1 anti-inflammatory product on planet earth. WHERE CAN I BUY HEMP PASTE? Available in two sizes of pots 5oo mg and 2000mg We also sell small trial pouches of 60 mg or 100 mg We have the Hemp paste cream to be used direct on the skin. See all the products here: https://www.notb.co.uk WARNING This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice or to take the place of medical advice or treatment from a personal physician. All viewers of this content are advised to consult their doctors or qualified health professionals regarding specific health questions. Neither Mark Playne, NOTB nor the publisher of this content takes responsibility for possible health consequences of any person or persons reading or following the information in this educational content. All viewers of this content, especially those taking prescription or over-the-counter medications, should consult their physicians before beginning any nutrition, supplement or lifestyle program. ​ Mark Playne NOT MD, NOT PHD, NOT ON THE BEEB §

Moderna Vaccine Injury reports have raised by 8% on last month. Last month I called the 4.5% rise significant. 8% is astounding. Moderna-induced fatalities have risen by an astounding 26% from 82 to 104. This is Not On The Beeb's 71st report translating the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The stats are collated up to the 26th of October but are released to the public a week later, so in this case on the 3rd of November. It then takes the NOTB contributors a further few days to sift through and publish our report. TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 83.2m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.7 m 1st doses = 53,813,490 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,762,968 Boosters = 40,373,987 (30.9m Pfizer, 59,000 AZ, 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 144,950,445 doses EXCLUDING the autumn booster programme Autumn Booster Programme = 11,257,434 (England only - over 50s) Adverse event report figures below INCLUDE both mono- and bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. WEEKLY FLU AND COVID REPORT BREAKDOWN Here is the breakdown of the most recent report with comments and observations on the data below Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death 175,426 Pfizer 246,638 AZ 45,946 Moderna (ALERT: +8% in the last month, a significant increase 42,436 to 45,946) 68 Novavax 1976 TOTAL = 464,072 incl. bivalent vaccines (an increase of 5951 or 1.28% over 5 weeks) Overall 1-in-114 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Is the 1 in 114 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11 Fatal Pfizer 844 AZ 1,327 Moderna 104 (26% rise on last month's figures. A huge increase from 82 to 104) Unknown 55 TOTAL = 2,330 Blood Disorders - 17,428 (Pfizer) + 7915 (AZ) + 2811 (Moderna) + 74 (Unknown) = 28,228 Anaphylaxis - 683 (Pfizer) + 888 (AZ) + 101 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 3 (Unknown) = 1676 Acute Cardiac - 14,028 (Pfizer) + 11,762 (AZ) + 4046 (Moderna) + 5 (N) + 142 (Unknown) = 29,983 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1413 (Pfizer) + 470 (AZ) + 391 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 9 (Unknown) = 2284 Eye Disorders - 8343 (Pfizer) + 15,080 (AZ) + 1894 (Moderna) + 104 (Unknown) = 25,421 Blindness - 179 (Pfizer) + 330 (AZ) + 46 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 559 Deafness - 324 (Pfizer) + 446 (AZ) + 65 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 841 Infections - 13,361 (Pfizer) + 20,871 (AZ) + 3034 (Moderna) + 4 (N) + 241 (Unknown) = 37,511 Spontaneous Abortions - 504 + 17 stillbirths/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 239 + 5 stillbirths (AZ) + 72 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 823 miscarriages Nausea & Vomiting - 21,345 (Pfizer) + 45,661 (AZ) + 7994 (Moderna) + 2 (N) + 243 (Unknown) = 75,245 Headaches & Migraines - 36,529 (Pfizer) + 94,234 (AZ) + 11,297 (Moderna) + 2 (N) + 276 (Unknown) = 142,338 Nervous System Disorders - 83,688 (Pfizer) + 184,069 (AZ) + 24,317 (Moderna) + 12 (N) + 1026 (Unknown) = 293,112 Paralysis - 543 (Pfizer) + 913 (AZ) + 142 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 1611 Seizures - 1189 (Pfizer) + 2113 (AZ) + 332 (Moderna) + 30 (Unknown) = 3664 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 858 (Pfizer) + 2420 (AZ) + 100 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 25 (Unknown) = 3404 Tremor - 2294 (Pfizer) + 10,010 (AZ) + 897 (Moderna) + 53 (Unknown) = 13,254 Respiratory Disorders - 22,700 (Pfizer) + 30,171 (AZ) + 5415 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 251 (Unknown) = 58,538 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,650 (Pfizer) + 18,657 (AZ) + 2955 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 149 (Unknown) = 32,412 Skin Disorders - 35,431 (Pfizer) + 53,783 (AZ) + 14,809 (Moderna) + 7 (N) + 439 (Unknown) = 104,469 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,714 (Pfizer) + 20,985 (AZ) + 5400 (Moderna) + 1 (N) + 250 (Unknown) = 58,350 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4356 (Pfizer) + 6923 (AZ) + 896 (Moderna) + 52 (Unknown) = 12,227 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,200,000 children (1st doses) + 3,000,000 (2nd doses) + 200,000 boosters resulting in 4170 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,500 children (1st doses) + 8.700 (2nd doses) + ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 267 Yellow Cards (reporting rate 1-in-43) • Moderna - 2200 children (1st doses) + 2200 (2nd doses) + 2400 boosters resulting in 38 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 36 Yellow Cards Total = 4,213,700 children injected (under 18s) Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 7,427,000 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4511 For full reports including 384 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

Many health issue orginate from the gut. Keeping the right balance of the correct bacteria is crucial. When we eat somethjng the digestive process triggers the production of strong stomach acid, The acid is not only part of the digestive process but a defence process protecting us. Therefore good and bad bacteria are unlikely to survive unless in a large quantity This unique water-based formula is packed full of live, active bacteria. Because it is water-based, it doesn’t trigger digestive acids. More live and active bacteria survive the passage through the stomach, meaning a better opportunity to colonise the gut. This ability to deliver thriving bacteria is what makes this product so special. University College London carried out an independent study on products containing bacteria. This product came out top. DOWNLOAD RESEARCH HERE VIDEO INTRODUCTION SHOP HERE What's Symprove made of? Symprove boasts 10-billion live and activated colony-forming CFUs – basically, it's full of lovely bugs. Water Extract of germinated barley (produced to be gluten-free) Sodium citrate Potassium sorbate Sucralose (in mango and passion fruit flavour only) Vitamin C Natural flavourings (in mango and passion fruit flavour only) THE STORY BEHIND THE SCIENCE HOW IT STARTED 10 probiotic-containing foods to try Loading up your diet with fermented foods and foods that help your gut is just as good an idea as investing in a probiotic supplement. Here are some probiotic foods to consider adding into your diet. Yoghurt Kefir Sourdough Kimchi Sauerkraut Kombucha Pickles / pickled food Kimchi Tempeh Some cheeses Everyone's microbiome is different. If you experience any symptoms that upset your daily routine (tummy troubles or digestion issues), lower the amount or volume you're consuming. A little every day will serve you better than a large dose every so often.

PRESS RELEASE Wireless Technology Not Adequately Assessed for Hazards to Human Health and Environment. (ICBE-EMF New peer-reviewed paper presents scientific case for revision of limits TUCSON, AZ – October 17, 2022 The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) is challenging the safety of current wireless exposure limits to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) and is calling for an independent evaluation. Published today in the journal Environmental Health, “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation. Demonstrates how the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) have ignored hundreds of scientific studies documenting adverse health effects at exposures below the threshold dose claimed by these agencies, which was used to establish human exposure limits. The authors argue that the threshold, based on science from the 1980s – before cell phones were ubiquitous – is wrong, and these exposure limits based on this threshold do not adequately protect workers, children, people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, and the public from exposure to the nonionizing radiation from wireless data transmission. “Many studies have demonstrated oxidative effects associated with exposure to low-intensity RFR, and significant adverse effects including cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, DNA damage, neurological disorders, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, and sperm damage,” explains Dr. Ronald Melnick, Commission chair and a former senior toxicologist with the U.S. National Toxicology Program at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. “These effects need to be addressed in revised and health-protective exposure guidelines. Furthermore, the assumption that 5G millimeter waves are safe because of limited penetration into the body does not dismiss the need for health effects studies.” Dr. Lennart Hardell, former professor at Örebro University Hospital in Sweden and author of more than 100 papers on non-ionizing radiation, added, “Multiple robust human studies of cell phone radiation have found increased risks for brain tumors, and these are supported by clear evidence of carcinogenicity of the same cell types found in animal studies.” The Commission believes that an independent evaluation based on the scientific evidence with attention to the knowledge gained over the past 25 years is needed to establish lower exposure limits. The Commission is also calling for health studies to be completed prior to any future deployment of 5G networks. Elizabeth Kelley, the Commission's managing director, noted that “ICBE-EMF was commissioned by the advisors to the International EMF Scientist Appeal, a petition signed by more than 240 scientists who have published over 2,000 papers on EMF, biology, and health,” and that “The commissioners have endorsed the Appeal’s recommendations to protect public and environmental health.” For background on the paper and its co-authors, see: http://www.icbe-emf.org/activitie DOWNLOAD PAPER SEE AND DOWNLOAD SLIDE PRESENTATION https://drive.google.com/file/d/13Xr2SZbMHaKspB1YCc5lpzJRrre9Bwd2/view FACT SHEET Many questions need answers before we move forward with assurance that wireless technologies are safe for human health and the environment. Radiofrequency radiation (RFR) exposures are associated with a range of adverse health effects including cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, DNA damage, neurological effects, increased permeability of the blood brain barrier and sperm damage. Since 20022, multiple robust epidemiologic studies of cell phone radiation have found increased risks for brain tumors3 which are supported by evidence of carcinogenicity of the same cell types (glial cells and Schwann cells) from animal studies.4,5 Based on very limited research conducted 40 years ago (before most people had cell phones), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for the U.S., and the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) for many other countries, determined in the 1990s and again in 2020 that there are no adverse health effects from RFR exposure below the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram (W/kg) for frequencies ranging from 100 kHz to 6 GHz. The assumed safe level is based on a behavioral effect observed in acute studies (up to 1 hour) conducted with small numbers of rats and monkeys in the 1980s. 6,7 The FCC and ICNIRP state that any biological effect observed at exposures above the putative 4 W/kg threshold is due to tissue heating.8-11 However, a large and growing number of peerreviewed experimental studies have found adverse biological and health effects at lower doses or for longer durations of exposure, demonstrating that an SAR of 4 W/kg is not a threshold for effects of RFR.12 The current RFR exposure limits do not consider potential synergistic effects that reflect modern day exposures to multiple environmental agents. There is insufficient information on health effects of 5G radiation. Neurological effects, some of which are acknowledged by ICNIRP and are currently being experienced by persons with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS), are health effects that can be mitigated with radiation-free areas for hypersensitive individuals. ___________________________________________________________ About the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields Founded in 2021, ICBE-EMF was commissioned by the advisors to the International EMF Scientist Appeal. The Commission is dedicated to ensuring the protection of humans and other species from the harmful effects of non-ionizing radiation. Our primary purpose is to make recommendations, based on peer-reviewed scientific research, that includes and goes beyond establishing numerical exposure guidelines to ensure safety. ICBE-EMF is made up of a multidisciplinary consortium of scientists, doctors and related professionals who are, or have been, involved with research related to the biological and health effects of electromagnetic frequencies up to and including 300 GHz ICBE-EMF is a sponsored project of the Electromagnetic Safety Alliance, Inc. (“ESA”). ESA is a United States nonprofit corporation domiciled in Arizona that is qualified as exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The main office of ICBEEMF is in Arizona with field representation in Europe. This office is responsible for funding, media relations and governance activities. References 1. International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF). Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G. Environ Health (2022) 21:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9. 2. Hardell et al. Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for brain tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002 Aug;11(4):377-86. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200208000-00010. 3. Choi et al. Cellular Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 2;17(21):8079. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218079 4. National Toxicology Program (NTP). NTP technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones, Technical report series no. 595. Research Triangle Park: National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2018. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/lt_rpts/tr595_508.pdf 5. Falcioni et al. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission. Environ Res. 2018 Aug;165:496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.037. 6. De Lorge & Ezell. Observing-responses of rats exposed to 1.28- and 5.62-GHz microwaves. Bioelectromagnetics. 1980;1:183–98. 7. De Lorge. Operant behavior and colonic temperature of Macaca mulatta exposed to radio frequency fields at and above resonant frequencies. Bioelectromagnetics. 1984;5:233–46. 8. ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 2020;118:483–524. 9. ICNIRP. ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 1998;74:494–522. 10. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Biological effects and exposure criteria for radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. NCRP Report No. 86, 1986. https://ncrponline.org/publications/reports/ncrp-report-86/ 11. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz., ANSI/IEEE C95.1–1992. https://emfguide.itu.int/pdfs/c95.1-2005.pdf 12, ICBE-EMF. Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G. Appendix 1, Table 1. Studies demonstrating increased oxidative DNA damage and other indicators of oxida

Here is the source he refers to, summarising 1000's of referenced studies indicating there is NO climate change: http://climatechangereconsidered.org/climate-change-reconsidered-ii-fossil-fuels/

By Prof. Federico A. Nazar https://uca-ar.academia.edu/FedericoANazar Apparently, heat-related deaths in the UK could increase to 7,040 deaths per year by 2050 according to CCRA3 Technical report. 1 Yet, a heat-period is suspiciously defined as days when a Level 3 Heat Health Alert is issued or when the mean Central England temperature is greater than only 20°C (68 F). Following the illogic, anybody traveling to a warm vacation is a climate kamikaze, committing suicide (besides being a climate terrorist for using an airplane). How did they manage to show more heat deaths than cold deaths, when it should be the other way round?: Bogus definitions: “if a heat-period lasts three days we would compare deaths on those three days, with three days before and three days after. UKHSA compare the number of deaths during a heat-period to the average of the 14 non-heat-period days before and 14 non-heat-period after the heat-period. there were 5,017 deaths above average in those aged 70 years and over, compared with 1,749 deaths below average in those aged under 70 years.”: 2 Estimated excess mortality (excluding COVID-19 and adjusted for registration delays) for aged 65 years and over in 2022 compared to +/- two-week baseline deaths for each heat-period, England Defining heat-days as at least 3 days with temperatures over 20° Reducing the period of analysis to only 2 months in the summer, where non-heat days are also pretty warm but not 3 in a row. Comparing deaths in a heat period with at least twice a non-heat period (3 to 16 days before and 3 to 16 after). Climate deaths are the new COVID deaths. As with COVID deaths, they hide the primary cause of deaths to hide the real reasons, especially vaccination. Correlation is not causation. Heat-deaths are in fact deaths of 70+ elderly, mainly because some can’t drink enough water or take off clothes by themselves when they are hot. Unlike tropical countries, in colder countries like the UK, cold-deaths are much higher than heat-deaths, because cold periods are longer and respiratory diseases are more severe in cold weather, being the leading cause of death related to temperature. This graph shows that something is not right, considering they seem to claim that heat causes diseases which we know have zero relation to higher temperatures (like diabetes, dementia, respiratory, intestinal cancer), of course, they wouldn’t include the vaccination status: “daily mortality rates remained elevated during less warm temperatures after the heat-periods; the excess mortality during Autumn and Summer 2021 and Spring and Summer 2022 was above the five-year average, even when temperatures were typical for England.”: https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/why-did-climate-change-kill-so-many What happened in the 2021 vaccine year? Even subtracting COVID deaths, excess death jumped like never before both in heat and non-heat periods. It would be ironic if climate scientists come up with the theory that vaccines were too hot. Finally, there’s no need to instill fear when heat deaths could be easily prevented: “The main risks posed by a heatwave are: not drinking enough water (dehydration) overheating, which can make symptoms worse for people who already have problems with their heart or breathing heat exhaustion and heatstroke “the most vulnerable people are: older people – especially those over 75 and female those who live on their own or in a care home people who have a serious or long-term illness including heart or lung conditions, diabetes, kidney disease, Parkinson's disease or some mental health conditions people who are on multiple medicines that may make them more likely to be badly affected by hot weather those who may find it hard to keep cool – babies and the very young, the bed bound, those with drug or alcohol addictions or with Alzheimer's disease people who spend a lot of time outside or in hot places – those who live in a top-floor flat, the homeless or those whose jobs are outside” 3 Why were so many headlines wasted on heat-deaths without giving simple solutions to the above problems like hydration, avoiding excercise in heatwaves, avoid haccination, taking care of the homeless, etc.? “The total estimated excess mortality (excluding COVID-19) during heat-periods in those aged 65 years and over was estimated to be 2,803, the highest number in any given year.” Out of 180 000 deaths 4 this is only 1.7%, but the majority belong to 70+ y.o., where the primary cause of death is an underlying comorbidity and still, they would have died from anything in the next few years, with low public health / epidemiological impact, low global burden of disease, low QALY (Quality-Adjusted Life Years) and DALY (Disability-Adjusted Life Years): Weekly number of deaths in England and Wales from January 2020 to September 2022 The two huge 2021 peaks correlate with vaccination, not heat. Deaths from extreme temperatures are not the main problem from natural disasters: https://ourworldindata.org/century-disaster-deaths #ClimateFreedom organizations Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) http://climatechangereconsidered.org/ Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) http://www.sepp.org/ Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change http://www.co2science.org/ Heartland Institute http://www.heartland.org/ Independent Committee on Geoethics http://geoethic.com/ Collectif des Climato Réalistes http://skyfall.fr International Climate Science Coalition https://www.icsc-canada.com/ New Zealand Climate Science Coalition http://www.nzclimatescience.org/ Friends of Science https://friendsofscience.org/ Climate Audit https://climateaudit.org/ Watts Up With That https://wattsupwiththat.com/ CLEXIT – Climate Exit Coalition http://clexit.net/ Climate Depot https://www.climatedepot.com/ ICECAP http://icecap.us/index.php The Global Warming Challenge https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349237629_The_Global_Warming_Challenge_Evidence-based_forecasting_for_climate_change Personal carbon allowances (PCAs) In 2019 Mastercard with Doconomy issued the DO card for a “climate impact cap”. 5 World Economic Forum wrote: “we need to reduce our (individual) carbon footprint… DO monitors and cuts off spending, when we hit our carbon max.” 6 A WEF video by the, “A feast for the future” 7, required to “save the planet”, that each adult reduced consumption per week to: 1 beef burger 2 portions of fish 1 egg Before 2050, they plan to ban beef and lamb. 8 It could be much sooner: they are trying in Oregon9 and failed in Switzerland 2022 for a low margin: 2 out of 5 voted to ban factory farming. 10 2021, “A PCA scheme would entail all adults receiving an equal, tradable carbon allowance that reduces over time in line with national targets … encompassing individuals’ carbon emissions… Allowances were envisioned to be deducted from the personal budget with every payment for transport fuel, home-heating fuels and electricity bills. People in shortage would be able to purchase additional units in the personal carbon market from those with excess to sell. 72 Targets across the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) inclusion of food-related emissions high-carbon foods, which on average use more land per calorie provided, will be less favoured transition to lower-carbon living support the transition to clean energy while reducing emissions negative impacts on high-carbon sectors including embedded emissions in goods and services integrated with land-based carbon sequestration schemes robust carbon accounting, monitoring, verification and reporting other lessons that could be drawn (from the pandemic) relate to the public acceptance in some countries of additional surveillance and control in exchange for greater safety.” 11 This will be worse than the Chinese Communist Party “Social Credit System”, where people scores go up with compliance and down with resistance, including who one meets. 12 “The worldview promoted by the green agenda, the health dictatorship, and the globalist oligarchy is devoted to dismantle the remnants of state sovereignty, and the subjugation and colonization of the last strongholds of human identity: the body (now transformed into another commodity) and the family. [It] allows large corporations to penetrate even the most intimate aspects of the human being: sexuality, family and the very body of each individual who will not have the right to exist outside the rules and controls imposed by the dystopian regime born of the Green Agenda and the New Normal.” 13 Net zero emissions means decarbonisation. Decarbonization means depopulation. Life is emissions, targeting emissions is targeting life: We exhale carbon dioxide (so do animals). We eat products that produce emissions. We flatulate greenhouse gases. 14 We excrement 20% of methane. 15 We are 20% carbon.16 The bodies of our descent will eventually release it when they die. We emit by burning fuel (even renewable ones) but also by producing and using renewable energy. In their twisted minds, we are all presumed eco-terrorists just by living (i.e. carbon footprint). The decarb plan is to murder us by gradual economic strangling. The decarbon fanatics won’t stop until we cease to breath. For the eco-maniacs, we are carbon ticking bombs: the best man is a dead one. They want us dead… but they refuse to give an example and go first. In 2013, Rick Heede found that 90 companies were responsible for two-thirds of all industrial carbon dioxide, more than most countries. Nearly all of those companies are owned by the globalist funds like BlackRock, Vanguard, etc.: “Do as I say, not as I do.” Of course, they’ll never stop using private jets or rockets. Life is carbon: just as trees are carbon sinks, so are we (and all the biosphere, including cows), but that argument destroys the carbon lethal ideology. Life is a cycle and that includes carbon. Yet, they refuse to accept the whole picture: what we sink now, it’s going to be released sooner or later. Carbon is life. By destroying the carbon cycle they foster death. One proof of their insanity is Carbon Capture tech. 18 They spend millions in techie solutions which has a much lower decarb-return-on-investment than planting trees (or even using the wood to replace carbon-energy-intensive competing materials such as ceramics). The landmark of ideology is that ideas are detached from rational economic analysis. Globalist UN Secretary General António Guterres disclosed their plans "The bottom line is, by 2030, we must cut global emissions by 45% compared to 2010 levels to get to net zero emissions by 2050. That is how we will keep the hope of 1.5 degrees alive." 19 Under the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) resulting in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, carbon credits were invented as a result of the fake idea of controlling greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide There’s even an EU Parliamentary commission studying a 100% digital payment system where for every purchase you’ll be deducted from your monthly carbon quota. Carbon quotas will be lowered year after year to achieve extinction. Kids are presumed guilty of generating a carbon footprint (the intolerable crime of breathing). Parents’ quotas will be reduced by their children’s carbon footprint, to extinction levels (breeding crime). The globalist rich will be able to buy carbon credit from the poor or Government auctions. 20 In their depopulation illogic, the best way to prevent “useless eaters” (as they call us) is by preventing their birth (not preventing their existence, because satanists need the abortion sacrifice to Satan); only the fittest (to their model) will be needed; thus only genetically screened and enhanced test tube babies will be promoted, the rest will be vanished like the 20 million Chinese heihaizi 21. The movie Gattaca came short. Organs will be graciously exchanged for carbon credit. It will be considered a non-profit transaction although carbon credits will be more than money: power. Their idea is to increase the cost of living to unbearable pain, so that it will be impossible to raise children. Religions abused for Climate Action 1986 in Assisi in Italy, all the major conservation and environmental groups met with members of the five major religions. 2009 over 60 faith groups around the world developed long-term Faith Commitments on the environment as part of the Many Heavens One Earth programme initiated by the Alliance of Religions and Conservation. 2012 Second group of commitments launched in Nairobi, Kenya. Money is being poured down to bribe religious groups into the decarb agenda and promotes divesting fossil fuels, through FaithInvest.org, for example, Christian groups. 22 Also, they use the organization called “Global Catholic Climate Movement”, now LaudatoSiMovement.org, behind the “YouTube Originals” documentary TheLetterFilm.org, staging Pope Francis and promoting the lies of carbon global warming increasing the sea levels, being the leading cause for migration and “climate refugees”. 23 1https://www.ukclimaterisk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CCRA3-Chapter-5-FINAL.pdf 2Office for National Statistics (ONS), released 7 Month 2022, ONS website, statistical article, Excess mortality during heat-periods: 1 June to 31 August 2022 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/excessmortalityduringheatperiods/englandandwales1juneto31august2022 3https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/seasonal-health/heatwave-how-to-cope-in-hot-weather/ 4https://www.statista.com/statistics/1111804/weekly-deaths-in-england-and-wales/ https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales 5https://doconomy.com/sv/klarna-teams-up-with-doconomy-2/ 6https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/05/this-credit-card-has-a-carbon-emission-spending-limit/ 7https://www.facebook.com/worldeconomicforum/videos/353404092040895/ 8http://www.ukfires.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Absolute-Zero-online.pdf 9https://oregonfb.org/ip13/ 10https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/swiss-reject-initiative-to-ban-factory-farming_4754253.html 11 Fuso Nerini, F., Fawcett, T., et al. Personal carbon allowances revisited. 16 Aug 2021 Nature Sustainability 4, 1025–1031 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00756-w 12https://www.wired.co.uk/article/china-social-credit-system-explained 13https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/personal-carbon-allowances-surveillance-capitalism/ 14https://www.healthtap.com/questions/1224096-the-flatulence-contain-methane-gas-and-butane-gas-or-only-methane/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatulence 15https://medium.com/foot-notes-by-footprint/the-us-is-making-a-historic-push-to-slash-climate-warming-methane-emissions-94b802e579d8 https://medium.com/climate-conscious/do-humans-fart-more-methane-than-cows-a0f48c590fb0 16https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_of_the_human_body 17https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/02/SR15_Chapter2_Low_Res.pdf https://theconversation.com/cop24-heres-what-must-be-agreed-to-keep-warming-at-1-5-c-107968 https://blog.mcc-berlin.net/post/article/what-the-paris-agreement-means.html 18https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_capture_and_storage climeworks.com https://chanzuckerberg.com/blog/interactive-carbon-dioxide-removal 19 20“It doesn’t matter. Even the policy doesn’t change, as long as you have enough money to buy through, you can always have second or third kid.” https://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/11/i-was-an-illegal-second-child-in-china/281873/ Few rich parents could “pay the fine and register the birth (thereby lifting the restrictions which characterize the lives of heihaizi.)” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Heihaizi 21https://thediplomat.com/2015/03/chinas-hidden-children/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heihaizi 22https://www.faithinvest.org/2009-christian-commitments 23http://www.catholic365.com/article/23066/carbon-climate-change-wrong.html

#BOYCOTTPAYPAL wins! PayPal Value Down $6 Billion ‘Delete PayPal’ Searches Soar 1,300% Then, Christina Maas posting for reclaimthenet.org discovered Paypal's new T&C's on the 1st October, that aimed to fine users of Paypal $2,500 per transgression. The updated policy prohibits users from using PayPal for activities that: “Involve the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials that, in PayPal’s sole discretion, (a) are harmful, obscene, harassing, or objectionable … (e) depict, promote, or incite hatred or discrimination of protected groups or of individuals or groups based on protected characteristics (e.g. race, religion, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation, etc.) … (g) are fraudulent, promote misinformation … or (i) are otherwise unfit for publication.” This was taken up by The Daily Wire on the 7th of October reaching a wider audience helping the #BoycottPaypal hashtag to go viral. Not On The Beeb was defunded by Paypal in early June. The NOTB founder Mark Playne had his personal accounts, alongside other unrelated business accounts taken down as well. The push to #boycottpaypal started when in September Paypal targeted Toby Young's Free Speech Union. Toby didn't take this lying down and soon garnered mainstream media attention. Since then, top politicians and personalities from Brand to Musk have joined in the call to #boycottpaypal See Toby Young's introductory video to the Free Speech Union here PAYPAL SHARES PLUMMET By Ben Zeisloft Google searches for phrases such as “delete Paypal” were soaring as much as 1,300% days after a report from The Daily Wire highlighted the company’s attempt to penalize users $2,500 for spreading “misinformation” through the platform. PayPal, which has deplatformed multiple entities and commentators for their political and social views, had unveiled an upcoming change to its acceptable use policy that would have banned the promotion of “misinformation,” as well as “hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory.” Within one day of The Daily ire breaking news of the policy change, PayPal claimed that the new guidelines were published “in error” and apologized “for the confusion this has caused.” PayPal trended on Twitter over the weekend as thousands of customers expressed their disdain for the policy on social media and announced that they intended to cancel their accounts. Google searches for phrases such as “how to cancel PayPal” were still trending as of Monday morning, according to an analysis of Google Trends data from MarketWatch. The phrase “delete PayPal” surged 1,392% after the acceptable use policy announcement and retraction. Customers reacted strongly as PayPal said users found in violation of the new policy could be liable for “damages,” including the removal of $2,500 “debited directly from your PayPal account” per offense, with cases deliberated at the “sole discretion” of the company. Before posting its initial story, The Daily Wire contacted PayPal for definitions of the added terms but received no reply. The company’s stock price fell more than 6% on Monday as the intense backlash appeared to spook investors, causing PayPal to lose over $6 billion in market capitalization. Shares closed at $84.52 on Monday, marking a 6.3% decline from $90.18 on Friday. In comparison, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.3% and the technology-heavy Nasdaq fell 1% as of market close. Among the individuals who criticized PayPal over the policy were a number of lawmakers, commentators, and investors, as well as former PayPal President David Marcus and PayPal co-founder Elon Musk. “It’s hard for me to openly criticize a company I used to love and gave so much to,” Marcus said on social media, arguing that the nixed policy update “goes against everything I believe in.” The announcement and reversal occurred days after PayPal canceled three accounts linked to Toby Young, a commentator who runs a British nonprofit called Free Speech Union. The organization has defended clients such as actor and comedian Russell Brand, who recently moved his show from YouTube to Rumble in reaction to censorship from the former platform. PayPal has also sanctioned Gays Against Groomers, a group that opposes the sexualization of children, as well as evolutionary biologist Colin Wright. The company featured a rainbow-colored banner on its social media platforms during the month of June affirming that it is “open for all,” while the company’s British subsidiary still sports the banner. Platforms such as Amazon, Twitter, and Facebook have sanctioned conservatives over their positions on controversial social issues, including transgenderism, vaccination mandates, and homosexuality. GoFundMe seized millions in funds raised for trucker protests in Canada earlier this year, while Google recently began suppressing search results for crisis pregnancy centers. SOURCE: https://www.dailywire.com/news/paypal-value-down-6-billion-delete-paypal-searches-soar-1300-after-daily-wire-report-exposes-misinformation-policy TOBY YOUNG opening introduction to the Free Speech Union As a member, we’ll invite you to “speakeasies” (social events in pubs) and offer you discounted tickets to FSU debates. You’ll also receive regular newsletters updating you on the work we’re doing to defend free speech. In addition, members may be defended by the FSU if they are penalised for exercising their legal right to free speech. For instance, if you find yourself being targeted by a digital outrage mob on social media for having exercised your legal right to free speech, we may mobilise an army of supporters. If a petition is launched calling for you to be fired, when you’ve done nothing other than exercise your legal right to free speech, we may help you organise a counter-petition. If you’re no-platformed by a university, we’ll encourage you to fight back and members of our advisory councils may be able to tell you what remedies are available to you. If you’re a student or an academic being investigated by your university for breaching a speech code, we may take up your case with the university. If you’re punished by your employer because you’ve exercised your lawful right to free speech, we’ll do our best to provide you with assistance or refer you to specialists who can help. You will also have access to the bespoke legal expenses insurance policy set up by Keystone Legal specially for FSU members. Some membership benefits are discretionary, such as pro bono legal advice, pro bono media/PR advice, public support and campaigning, and will be conferred at the discretion of the Free Speech Union, depending on the case and the broader interests of the Union. To qualify for the concessionary rate you must be either 16 or over and enrolled at an educational institution, 65 or over, or on benefits. If you fall outside those categories—or fall within them but can afford to pay more—please apply for full membership. The concessionary rate is also available for overseas members, but they won’t have access to the legal insurance scheme or specialist legal and media/PR support. Residents of the United States aren’t eligible.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau considers investigating PayPal over fining people for legal speech “I’ve never actually never heard of a payment system thinking that it could fine someone for legal expression that their users are making,” Chopra told CNBC. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) director Rohit Chopra said he was considering investigating PayPal over a now-retracted update to the user agreement that said users would be fined $2,500 for spreading misinformation. “I’ve never actually never heard of a payment system thinking that it could fine someone for legal expression that their users are making,” Chopra told CNBC. “We have ordered most of the Big Tech firms for information about how they are making decisions about who they kick off their platforms,” Chopra added. “But we also need to look into whether they believe they can be fining users for illegal activity.” PayPal said that the updated policy was sent in error. “An AUP notice recently went out in error that included incorrect information,” a PayPal spokesperson said. “PayPal is not fining people for misinformation and this language was never intended to be inserted in our policy. Our teams are working to correct our policy pages. We’re sorry for the confusion this has caused.” Though, PayPal is still saying that it will fine users $2,500 for promoting “intolerance that is discriminatory.” Despite retracting the policy, PayPal has been criticized, with Sen. Tim Scott saying that he would investigate the issue further. The CFPB agency was originally proposed in 2007 by then Harvard Law School professor Elizabeth Warren, who is now a US senator. If you're tired of censorship, cancel culture, and the erosion of civil liberties subscribe to Reclaim The Net. SOURCE: https://reclaimthenet.org/cfpb-considers-paypal-investigation/

The Free Speech Union is a non-partisan, mass-membership public interest body that stands up for the speech rights of its members. How might we protect you? If you find yourself being targeted by a digital outrage mob on social media for having exercised your legal right to free speech, we may mobilise an army of supporters. If a petition is launched calling for you to be fired, when you’ve done nothing other than exercise your legal right to free speech, we may help you organise a counter-petition. If you’re no-platformed by a university—a feminist professor who challenges trans orthodoxy, for instance—we’ll encourage you to fight back and members of our advisory councils may be able to tell you what remedies are available to you. If you’re a student or an academic being investigated by your university for breaching a speech code, we may take up your case with the university. If you’re punished by your employer because you’ve exercised your lawful right to free speech, we’ll do our best to provide you with assistance or refer you to specialists who can help. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaMgf5ZxuWg&feature=emb_imp_woyt

In my interview with world glutathione expert Dr Jimmy Gutman I accidentally asked a question. that had deeper implications than I realised. I asked "If we call the outcome of low Vitamin D is Rickets, and the outcome of low vitamin C is called Scurvy, what do we call the outcome of low Glutathione?" These are excerpts from a recent paper (Sept 28th 2022) nailing the connection between illness and low glutathione. Low glutathione levels are associated with these 90 + diseases or conditions. Acetaminophen poisoning / toxicity ADD Addison's Disease Aging AIDS Alopecia Areata ALS Alzheimer's Disease Anemia (hemolytic) Ankylosing Spondylitis Arteriosclerosis (hardening of the arteries) Arthritis (rheumatoid) Asthma Autism (ASD) Autoimmune disease Behcet’s Disease Blepharitis Buerger's Disease Burns Cachexia Cancers Candida infection cardiomyopathy (idiopathic) cardiovascular disease Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Colitis COPD Coronary artery disease Cystic fibrosis Diabetes Crohn’s disease Eczema Emphysema Epstein Barr Viral Syndrome (EBV) Fibromyalgia Free Radical Overload Goodpasture Syndrome Graves' Disease Heavy Metal Toxicity Hepatic dysfunction (liver disease) Hepatitis B Hepatitis C Some day to be added to the list... Hepatitis D Hepatitis E Hepatitis G Hepatitis I Hepatitis TT Hepatitis SMA1 Hypercholesterolemia (high blood cholesterol) Herpes HIV Aid's Huntington's Disease/ Huntington's Chorea Infections (bacterial, viral, fungal) Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Influenza Liver Disease Lyme Disease Lupus Macular Degeneration (diabetic macular degeneration) Malnutrition Meniere’s Disease Methylmercury poisioning Multiple sclerosis (MS) Myasthenia Gravis Neurogenerative diseases Noise Induced Hearing Loss Nutritional Disorders Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Parkinson's disease Pemphigus Vulgaris Polycystic kidney disease Polycystic ovary syndrome Primary Billary Cirrhosis Progeria Psoriasis Rheumatic Fever Sarcoidosis Scleroderma Shingles Stroke Surgery Thalassemia Trichotillomania (Hair Pulling) Toxic poisoning Trauma Unverricht-Lundborg Disease Vasculitis Veisalgia (when combined with vitamin C and B1) Vitiligo Wegener’s Granulomatosis There are many more diseases which are not listed above, that are also associated with low glutathione. To find out more on how to raise glutathione levels naturally, click for more info here. The Role of Glutathione Metabolism in Chronic Illness Development and Its Potential Use as a Novel Therapeutic Target Abstract Low GSH levels have been associated with many chronic pro-inflammatory conditions, such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic disease, as well as neurodegenerative conditions and autoimmune diseases. Several large prospective studies support this hypothesis by demonstrating that higher GGT levels are correlated with the risk of developing metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease in a dose-dependent fashion. Human and animal trials utilizing GSH augmentation using precursor supplementation in chronic conditions, including metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, hepatic disease, renal disease, and neurodegenerative conditions, were also reviewed. There is strong evidence that GSH supplementation leads to improved outcomes in all of these chronic conditions. This review seeks to highlight the role of GSH in chronic disease progression because a simple and cost-effective strategy can be created to screen for, track, and intervene in susceptible patients at the earliest possible time in the disease process. Such a novel strategy would impact the majority of chronic diseases contributing to the bulk of morbidity and mortality in the Western world, and, thus, even minor benefits across many conditions may substantially impact population-wide health and longevity. ​ The biochemical role of glutathione as a driver of chronic illness Low total GSH levels and elevated ratios of oxidized to reduced GSH are common in chronic illnesses as well as advanced age. While these relationships have been known for years, most literature has overlooked these findings as the predictable result of increased inflammation and oxidative stress similar to other biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP). Few, if any, studies have explored the possibility of low GSH levels as a potentially important causative driver of disease pathology in itself ​ ​Papers Conclusions GSH is a key thiol antioxidant in the human body which, among its many functions, serves as a major mitochondrial protector, and through this function is linked to many chronic illnesses which make up the bulk of the healthcare burden in Western societies today. Studies presented in this review show that low GSH levels have a demonstrable correlation to the faster onset of these chronic diseases and increased mortality. ​ SOURCE: https://www.cureus.com/articles/92153-the-role-of-glutathione-metabolism-in-chronic-illness-development-and-its-potential-use-as-a-novel-therapeutic-target? The study above mentions NAC which is basically manmade cysteine. Most NAC is made from recycled human hair. NAC can become toxic, having the reverse effect becoming oxidative. ​ There is a better way of introducing natural highly bioavailable cysteine - more info here. References to the paper above Owen JB, Butterfield DA: Measurement of oxidized/reduced glutathione ratio. Methods Mol Biol. 2010, 648:269-77. 10.1007/978-1-60761-756-3_18 Nuhu F, Gordon A, Sturmey R, Seymour AM, Bhandari S: Measurement of glutathione as a tool for oxidative stress studies by high-performance liquid chromatography. Molecules. 2020, 25:4196. 10.3390/molecules25184196 Lutchmansingh FK, Hsu JW, Bennett FI, et al.: Glutathione metabolism in type 2 diabetes and its relationship with microvascular complications and glycemia. PLoS One. 2018, 13:e0198626. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198626 Sekhar RV, McKay SV, Patel SG, Guthikonda AP, Reddy VT, Balasubramanyam A, Jahoor F: Glutathione synthesis is diminished in patients with uncontrolled diabetes and restored by dietary supplementation with cysteine and glycine. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34:162-7. 10.2337/dc10-1006 Lapenna D, de Gioia S, Ciofani G, et al.: Glutathione-related antioxidant defenses in human atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation. 1998, 97:1930-4. 10.1161/01.cir.97.19.1930 Ceballos-Picot I, Witko-Sarsat V, Merad-Boudia M, et al.: Glutathione antioxidant system as a marker of oxidative stress in chronic renal failure. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996, 21:845-53. 10.1016/0891-5849(96)00233-x Sian J, Dexter DT, Lees AJ, et al.: Alterations in glutathione levels in Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders affecting basal ganglia. Ann Neurol. 1994, 36:348-55. 10.1002/ana.410360305 Mischley LK, Standish LJ, Weiss NS, Padowski JM, Kavanagh TJ, White CC, Rosenfeld ME: Glutathione as a biomarker in Parkinson's disease: associations with aging and disease severity. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016, 2016:9409363. 10.1155/2016/9409363 Wei Z, Li X, Li X, Liu Q, Cheng Y: Oxidative stress in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018, 11:236. 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00236 Perricone C, De Carolis C, Perricone R: Glutathione: a key player in autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2009, 8:697-701. 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.02.020 Kennedy L, Sandhu JK, Harper ME, Cuperlovic-Culf M: Role of glutathione in cancer: from mechanisms to therapies. Biomolecules. 2020, 10:1429. 10.3390/biom10101429 Morris D, Ly J, Chi PT, et al.: Glutathione synthesis is compromised in erythrocytes from individuals with HIV. Front Pharmacol. 2014, 5:73. 10.3389/fphar.2014.00073 Vairetti M, Di Pasqua LG, Cagna M, Richelmi P, Ferrigno A, Berardo C: Changes in glutathione content in liver diseases: an update. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021, 10:364. 10.3390/antiox10030364 Ben-Shachar R, Chen Y, Luo S, Hartman C, Reed M, Nijhout HF: The biochemistry of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity and rescue: a mathematical model. Theor Biol Med Model. 2012, 9:55. 10.1186/1742-4682-9-55 Kaplowitz N: Acetaminophen hepatoxicity: what do we know, what don't we know, and what do we do next?. Hepatology. 2004, 40:23-6. 10.1002/hep.20312 Mak TW, Grusdat M, Duncan GS, et al.: Glutathione primes T cell metabolism for inflammation. Immunity. 2017, 46:675-89. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.03.019 Hammarström S: Leukotrienes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1983, 52:355-77. 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.002035 Hayden RE, Paniello RC, Yeung CS, Bello SL, Dawson SM: The effect of glutathione and vitamins A, C, and E on acute skin flap survival. Laryngoscope. 1987, 97:1176-9. 10.1288/00005537-198710000-00011 Jain SK, Parsanathan R, Achari AE, Kanikarla-Marie P, Bocchini JA Jr: Glutathione stimulates vitamin D regulatory and glucose-metabolism genes, lowers oxidative stress and inflammation, and increases 25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels in blood: a novel approach to treat 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018, 29:1792-807. 10.1089/ars.2017.7462 Sedlak TW, Paul BD, Parker GM, et al.: The glutathione cycle shapes synaptic glutamate activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019, 116:2701-6. 10.1073/pnas.1817885116 Bjørklund G, Peana M, Maes M, Dadar M, Severin B: The glutathione system in Parkinson's disease and its progression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021, 120:470-8. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.004 Sharma S, Sehrawat A, Deswal R: Asada-Halliwell pathway maintains redox status in Dioscorea alata tuber which helps in germination. Plant Sci. 2016, 250:20-9. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.05.013 Winkler BS, DeSantis N, Solomon F: Multiple NADPH-producing pathways control glutathione (GSH) content in retina. Exp Eye Res. 1986, 43:829-47. 10.1016/s0014-4835(86)80013-6 Dunning S, Ur Rehman A, Tiebosch MH, et al.: Glutathione and antioxidant enzymes serve complementary roles in protecting activated hepatic stellate cells against hydrogen peroxide-induced cell death. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013, 1832:2027-34. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.07.008 Moreno-Sánchez R, Marín-Hernández Á, Gallardo-Pérez JC, Vázquez C, Rodríguez-Enríquez S, Saavedra E: Control of the NADPH supply and GSH recycling for oxidative stress management in hepatoma and liver mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2018, 1859:1138-50. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2018.07.008 Zhang H, Forman HJ, Choi J: Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in glutathione biosynthesis. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 401:468-83. 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)01028-1 Lee DS, Evans JC, Robins SJ, et al.: Gamma glutamyl transferase and metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and mortality risk: the Framingham Heart Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007, 27:127-33. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000251993.20372.40 Ndrepepa G, Colleran R, Kastrati A: Gamma-glutamyl transferase and the risk of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2018, 476:130-8. 10.1016/j.cca.2017.11.026 Fine A, McIntosh WB: Elevation of serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in end-stage chronic renal failure. Scott Med J. 1975, 20:113-5. 10.1177/003693307502000309 Akaydın SY, Salihoğlu EM, Güngör DG, Karanlık H, Demokan S: Correlation between gamma-glutamyl transferase activity and glutathione levels in molecular subgroups of breast cancer. Eur J Breast Health. 2020, 16:72-6. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.5147 Pinkham CA, Krause KJ: Liver function tests and mortality in a cohort of life insurance applicants. J Insur Med. 2009, 41:170-7. Palmier J, Lanzrath BJ: Laboratory and biometric predictors of cancer-related mortality in an insured population. J Insur Med. 2012, 43:162-8. Monami M, Bardini G, Lamanna C, et al.: Liver enzymes and risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease: results of the Firenze Bagno a Ripoli (FIBAR) study. Metabolism. 2008, 57:387-92. 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.10.015 Paschalis V, Theodorou AA, Margaritelis NV, Kyparos A, Nikolaidis MG: N-acetylcysteine supplementation increases exercise performance and reduces oxidative stress only in individuals with low levels of glutathione. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018, 115:288-97. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.12.007 Prescott LF, Newton RW, Swainson CP, Wright N, Forrest AR, Matthew H: Successful treatment of severe paracetamol overdosage with cysteamine. Lancet. 1974, 1:588-92. 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)92649-x Smilkstein MJ, Knapp GL, Kulig KW, Rumack BH: Efficacy of oral N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of acetaminophen overdose. Analysis of the national multicenter study (1976 to 1985). N Engl J Med. 1988, 319:1557-62. 10.1056/NEJM198812153192401 Nabi T, Nabi S, Rafiq N, Shah A: Role of N-acetylcysteine treatment in non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: a prospective study. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017, 23:169-75. 10.4103/1319-3767.207711 Lee WM, Hynan LS, Rossaro L, et al.: Intravenous N-acetylcysteine improves transplant-free survival in early stage non-acetaminophen acute liver failure. Gastroenterology. 2009, 137:856-64, 864.e1. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.006 Ozaras R, Tahan V, Aydin S, Uzun H, Kaya S, Senturk H: N-acetylcysteine attenuates alcohol-induced oxidative stress in the rat. World J Gastroenterol. 2003, 9:125-8. 10.3748/wjg.v9.i1.125 Wang ML, Yin XJ, Li XL, et al.: Retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021, 8:724224. 10.3389/fmed.2021.724224 Khoshbaten M, Aliasgarzadeh A, Masnadi K, et al.: N-acetylcysteine improves liver function in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepat Mon. 2010, 10:12-6. Rani M, Aggarwal R, Vohra K: Effect of N-acetylcysteine on metabolic profile in metabolic syndrome patients. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2020, 18:341-6. 10.1089/met.2020.0017 Kumar P, Liu C, Hsu JW, Chacko S, Minard C, Jahoor F, Sekhar RV: Glycine and N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) supplementation in older adults improves glutathione deficiency, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, genotoxicity, muscle strength, and cognition: results of a pilot clinical trial. Clin Transl Med. 2021, 11:e372. 10.1002/ctm2.372 Alnahdi A, John A, Raza H: Mitigation of glucolipotoxicity-induced apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and metabolic stress by N-acetyl cysteine in pancreatic β-cells. Biomolecules. 2020, 10:239. 10.3390/biom10020239 Pasupathy S, Tavella R, Grover S, et al.: Early use of N-acetylcysteine with nitrate therapy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction reduces myocardial infarct size (the NACIAM trial [N-acetylcysteine in acute myocardial infarction]). Circulation. 2017, 136:894-903. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027575 Marian AJ, Tan Y, Li L, et al.: Hypertrophy regression with N-acetylcysteine in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HALT-HCM): a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot study. Circ Res. 2018, 122:1109-18. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312647 Wu XY, Luo AY, Zhou YR, Ren JH: N-acetylcysteine reduces oxidative stress, nuclear factor‑κB activity and cardiomyocyte apoptosis in heart failure. Mol Med Rep. 2014, 10:615-24. 10.3892/mmr.2014.2292 Cui Y, Narasimhulu CA, Liu L, et al.: N-acetylcysteine inhibits in vivo oxidation of native low-density lipoprotein. Sci Rep. 2015, 5:16339. 10.1038/srep16339 Subramaniam RM, Suarez-Cuervo C, Wilson RF, et al.: Effectiveness of prevention strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2016, 164:406-16. 10.7326/M15-1456 Tsai JP, Yang FL, Wang CH, Fang TC, Lee RP, Hsu BG: Effect of intravenous N-acetylcysteine on plasma total homocysteine and inflammatory cytokines during high flux hemodialysis. Tzu Chi Med J. 2010, 22:90-5. 10.1016/S1016-3190(10)60047-X Thaha M, Yogiantoro M, Tomino Y: Intravenous N-acetylcysteine during haemodialysis reduces the plasma concentration of homocysteine in patients with end-stage renal disease. Clin Drug Investig. 2006, 26:195-202. 10.2165/00044011-200626040-00003 Giannikouris I: The effect of N-acetylcysteine on oxidative serum biomarkers of hemodialysis patients. Hippokratia. 2015, 19:131-5. Ahmadi F, Abbaszadeh M, Razeghi E, Maziar S, Khoidaki SD, Najafi MT, Lessan-Pezeshki M: Effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine for preserving residual renal function in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: multicenter randomized clinical trial. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017, 21:342-9. 10.1007/s10157-016-1277-5 Amore A, Formica M, Giacchino F, et al.: N-Acetylcysteine in hemodialysis diabetic patients resets the activation of NF-kB in lymphomonocytes to normal values. J Nephrol. 2013, 26:778-86. 10.5301/jn.5000167 Di Giorno C, Pinheiro HS, Heinke T, Franco MF, Galante NZ, Pacheco-Silva A, Camara NO: Beneficial effect of N-acetyl-cysteine on renal injury triggered by ischemia and reperfusion. Transplant Proc. 2006, 38:2774-6. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.08.178 Monti DA, Zabrecky G, Kremens D, et al.: N-acetyl cysteine is associated with dopaminergic improvement in Parkinson's disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019, 106:884-90. 10.1002/cpt.1548 Adair JC, Knoefel JE, Morgan N: Controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine for patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 2001, 57:1515-7. 10.1212/wnl.57.8.1515 Garg G, Singh S, Singh AK, Rizvi SI: N-acetyl-l-cysteine attenuates oxidative damage and neurodegeneration in rat brain during aging. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018, 96:1189-96. 10.1139/cjpp-2018-0209 Berk M, Copolov D, Dean O, et al.: N-acetyl cysteine as a glutathione precursor for schizophrenia--a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2008, 64:361-8. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.004 Lee TM, Lee KM, Lee CY, Lee HC, Tam KW, Loh EW: Effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021, 55:196-206. 10.1177/0004867420952540 Amrein K, Schnedl C, Holl A, et al.: Effect of high-dose vitamin D3 on hospital length of stay in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency: the VITdAL-ICU randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014, 312:1520-30. 10.1001/jama.2014.13204

Condolences to all of those affected. NOTE: If you see any more articles in your local or national news that we have missed here, please add them to the comments below, or best to our dedicated telegram group here: https://t.me/joinchat/M1FOq7bXdjA4YjY0 Thank you. UPDATE: Vaccine injured professional mountain biker Kyle Warner (see links to his story below) has just left this emotional video testimony on his Instagram account. After pressing play, click the full screen button (next to volume symbol) to watch properly. USA Kyle Warner, a 29-year-old professional mountain bike racer, developed pericarditis, POTS and reactive arthritis following his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot. About two weeks after the shot, Warner experienced extremely elevated heart rates; an ER doctor refused to believe it was an adverse reaction to the jab and instead blamed it on a “psychotic episode.” After visiting another hospital due to more heart trouble, Warner was referred to a cardiologist who diagnosed him with pericarditis, an inflammation of the outer lining of the heart. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/kyle-warner-vaccine-injuries-pfizer-covid-shot NORWAY One of Norway’s greatest cross-country skiing talents is ‘knocked out’ by the COVID-19 vaccine. Daniel Aakervik, 17-years-old, has to suspend his season after a severe reaction to the jab. Daniel Aakervik is described as one of Norway’s greatest talents in cross-country skiing and biathlon. The 17-year-old has won Hovedlandsrennet (cross-country skiing competition) twice as a 15 and 16-year-old. He has also taken victories in biathlon. Daniel’s health problems first started several months ago after he had received his first dose of the COVID vaccine: “I immediately felt something was wrong after the first dose. I took blood samples right after that, which initially showed nothing out of the ordinary. But I still noticed that something was wrong with my body and decided to take new blood samples. These indeed showed that there is something wrong. The doctors now tell me that it might be a side-effect of the vaccine.” https://thecovidworld.com/daniel-aakervik-one-of-the-greatest-talents-in-cross-country-skiing-suffers-severe-reaction-to-covid-vaccine-i-immediately-felt-something-was-wrong/ ITALY. Vaccinated Footballer Dies Two Months After Brother — Both From Cardiac Arrests QUOTE: "...The 23-year-old sportswoman, well-known in the Sicilian city, died of a cardiac arrest on November 1st after being rushed to hospital emergency. Her 25-year-old brother had been found dead on September 1st after he had gone to take a nap. Initially, his sudden death was speculated to have been from an ingested toxin or an illicit drug. Ultimately, an autopsy determined his cause of death to be cardiac arrest. His friends then revealed that he had in fact been vaccinated just a few days prior to his untimely death. Their grief-stricken father confirmed that both siblings have received the COVID shots...." https://www.hollywoodlanews.com/soccer-player-cardiac-arrest-brother/ AUSTRIA Vaccinated ice-hockey player Boris Sádecký dies after cardiac arrest Professional ice-hockey player Boris Sadecky died Wednesday in the wake of his cardiac arrest last Friday during an ice-hockey match in Austria. The death of the striker was announced by his team, the Bratislava Capitals. Last Friday, Boris Sadecky collapsed in the middle of the ice during the match in Dornbirn. Even after days of intensive treatment, Sadecky passed away. “It is with deep sadness in our hearts and with regret that we announce the death of our player Boris Sadecky. Our condolences to family and friends,” wrote the Capitals. Sadecky was only 24 years old. He was born in Slovakia on April 20, 1997. His death is listed as occuring on November 3, 2021, in Austria. The Capitals are part of the Central European hockey league that also serves as the top-tier ice hockey league in Austria. It currently features additional teams from Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, Slovakia and Slovenia. As of September 25, over 80 percent of the league’s players had received COVID shots. https://www.hollywoodlanews.com/ice-hockey-player-boris-sadecky-dies-cardiac-arrest/ ARGENTINA Argentine footballer dies from blood clots after 2nd dose of COVID vaccine QUOTE: ",....Ronald Biglione, a soccer player with Deportivo Club Independencia in Argentina’s General Levalle league, has died a week after being diagnosed with blood clots. Media outlets initially reported that he was suffering from a “rare disease” at the time of his death. Later it was revealed that the cause of his death was actually ITP (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura) resulting from his second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine..." SOURCE https://www.hollywoodlanews.com/footballer-dead-blood-clots-vaccine/ 18th October 2021 Lexi Riggles, a Hanover College senior and 2018 Danville High School graduate who played basketball for the Panthers and Warriors, died unexpectedly Sunday. “No coach ever wants to experience the loss of a current or former player. They mean the world to us as people, become part of our family, and give us so much pride as they get older,” Danville girls basketball coach Kaley May posted on social media. “Lexi Riggles was one of the sweetest, most pure people you could meet. She had a genuine smile and a contagious laugh. I was so proud of the person and leader she was becoming at Hanover and it breaks my heart to think I’ll never see her walk in the gym again to give me a big hug. My heart goes out to her family; please say a prayer for them and hug your loved ones a little tighter.” https://24update.net/lexi-riggles-cause-of-death/ https://celebsaga.com/lexi-riggles-cause-of-death-obituary-and-age/ https://medsfit.com/lexi-riggles-cause-of-death/ UK - 8th November Champion jockey Tom Greenway dies at 38 https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/horseracing/16674421/jockey-tom-greenway-dead-aged-38/ SPAIN 8th November 2021 21-year-old footballer dies from heart-attack. https://www.abc.com.py/deportes/futbol/2021/11/08/se-descuidaron-y-no-tuvieron-paramedicos-y-ambulancia/ USA 6 November 2021 Professional bodybuilder and former Mr. Olympia, Shawn Rhoden (46), has died of an apparent heart attack. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/16655812/shawn-rhoden-dead-mr-olympia-champion/ Danish 24 yr old player - 6th November AUTO TRANSLATE QUOTE: "....FCK player Luther Singh has been hospitalized. That's what the club writes on its website. 'Our South African winger, Luther Singh, has been admitted to a hospital after a course of illness.' 'Singh's symptoms of illness increased while the rest of the team was in Greece for the match against PAOK, which is why he has been hospitalised for observation and further tests.' 'Everyone at the club wishes Luther a speedy recovery and has no further comment at this time,' FCK writes. For the match against Vejle on Sunday he sat out due to illness, FCK stated on its website when they announced the squad for the match..." https://ekstrabladet.dk/sport/fodbold/dansk_fodbold/superligaen/fc_koebenhavn/fck-spiller-indlagt/8960710 ITALY 4th November 2021 (not sports, but a reader sent to me, so adding ) A MISS World contestant has been found dead at a house in Italy after failing to show up for work. Cops are investigating the mysterious death of Layla da Costa in Bologna, where the 24-year-old had travelled to for a job https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/16637606/miss-world-contestant-dies-suddenly/ USA USA 7 October 2021 Star bodybuilder George Peterson III, known as 'Da Bull,' has been found dead in his Florida hotel room just two days before he was scheduled to compete in the prestigious Mr Olympia contest. He was 37. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10069841/Bodybuilder-George-Peterson-37-dead-face-Florida-hotel-room.html NORWAY - November 2, 2021 STOCKHOLM: Icelandic midfielder Emil Palsson collapsed during a football game in Norway's second division Monday evening after suffering a cardiac arrest, his football club Sogndal said. The 28-year-old midfielder suddenly fell over in the 12 minute of the game against Stjordals-Blink at the Fosshaugane Campus stadium in western Norway. "Emil Palsson had a cardiac arrest in the 12th minute of play. Palsson was successfully resuscitated, and then flown to Haukeland Hospital for further examination and treatment," club Sogndal Fotball said in a statement. The match was quickly suspended and players were sent to the dressing rooms as medical staff surrounded Palsson and started resuscitation efforts. Read more here: https://www.nst.com.my/sports/football/2021/11/741933/footballer-collapses-heart-attack-during-game-norway UK - 3 November 2021 Longridge Town FC made the announcement this morning, Tweeting: "Everyone @LongridgeTownFC is devastated to hear this morning that our former player @jordantucker117 has passed away. https://www.lep.co.uk/news/people/a-great-player-and-more-importantly-a-great-lad-tributes-flood-in-for-former-longridge-town-captain-jordan-tucker-3443212 USA Kyle Warner, a 29-year-old professional mountain bike racer, developed pericarditis, POTS and reactive arthritis following his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot. About two weeks after the shot, Warner experienced extremely elevated heart rates; an ER doctor refused to believe it was an adverse reaction to the jab and instead blamed it on a “psychotic episode.” After visiting another hospital due to more heart trouble, Warner was referred to a cardiologist who diagnosed him with pericarditis, an inflammation of the outer lining of the heart. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/kyle-warner-vaccine-injuries-pfizer-covid-shot/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=6bd95175-d91d-4171-891d-b4dac87f455a INDIA 16 October 2021 Saurashtra batter Avi Barot, a former India Under-19 captain and a member of the Ranji Trophy-winning team in the 2019-20 season, has died after suffering a cardiac arrest at a shockingly young age of 29. Read more here... https://www.thehindu.com/sport/cricket/young-saurashtra-cricket-player-avi-barot-dies-after-suffering-cardiac-arrest/article37015873.ece) USA - 30 October 2021 New York State is set to begin examining cases of unexpected cardiac arrest in student-athletes under a new law signed by Gov. Kathy Hochul. https://dailyvoice.com/new-york/mountpleasant/schools/ny-state-examining-cases-of-sudden-cardiac-arrest-in-student-athletes/818942/ ANTIGUA Two West Indies Players – Chinelle Henry, Chedean Nation Collapse on Field: In an absolute freak incident, West Indies players – all-rounder Chinelle Henry and batswoman Chedean Nation collapsed on the ground in separate incidents, during the second T20I against Pakistan Women in Antigua on Friday. Henry and Nation were immediately taken to the hospital, where they were ‘conscious and stable’, according to a Cricket West Indies spokesperson. Both the incidents took place within a span of 10 minutes and despite that, the match was not forfeited. Though the reasons for the sudden collapse is still unknown, it is reported that both the players are stable now https://www.india.com/sports/cricket-two-west-indies-players-chinelle-henry-chedean-nation-collapse-on-field-during-2nd-t20i-against-pakistan-women-watch-video-4785827/ World-famous freediver suffers Myocarditis 6 October 2021 Florian Dagoury, currently the world’s top static breath-hold free diver, has been diagnosed with myocarditis and pericarditis 40 days following his second dose with the Pfizer vaccine. He is known for the fact he officially held his breath for 10 minutes and 30 seconds. The elite Freedriver, of French origin and based in Thailand, experienced a significant decrease in his breath-hold ability and went to a cardiologist who told him that it’s a common side effect of the Pfizer vaccine. In his words from his Instagram post. (apparently his twitter was deleted) QUOTE: "...Myocarditis, Pericarditis and Trivial Mitral regurgitation! Thank you Pfizer. Just want to share my annoying experience after vaccination and perhaps have some testimonials from similar stories amount Freedivers. Did you get better? After my 2nd dose I noticed that my heart rate was way higher than normal and my breath hold capacities went down significantly. During sleep I’m at 65-70bpm instead of 37-45bpm. During the day I’m now always over 100bpm instead of 65bpm, even when I sit down and relax. Once I even reach 177bpm while having dinner with friends !!!! 10 days after my 2nd jab, I went to see a cardiologist and he told me it’s a common side effect of Pfizer vaccine, nothing to worry about, just rest it will pass. 40days after 2nd jab, I had no progress so I went to see another cardiologist and got diagnosed with Myocarditis, Pericarditis and Trivial Mitral regurgitation! Which is basically an inflammation of the heart muscles cause by the immune system and some tiny leaks of blood from the valves that no longer close properly. I’m now struggling to reach 8min breath hold, 150m dive and I even have a strong urge to breathe doing 40m dives. 30% decrease on my diving performance roughly. https://www.instagram.com/p/CUrJkJ-FuFd/ Gold Coast soccer community rallies around girl, 14, after suffering heart attack on field 18 October 2021 A healthy and active Gold Coast girl who suffered a heart attack during a soccer game has emerged from a coma, but is facing a long recovery. Ava Azzopardi, 14, was playing for Runaway Bay in the under-14/15s grand final against Magic United on Friday night when she collapsed on field, going into cardiac arrest. https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/7news.com.au/sport/soccer/gold-coast-soccer-community-rallies-around-girl-14-after-suffering-heart-attack-on-field-c-4269085.amp Autopsy: 15 yr old Football player died from heart problem, not heat. 6 November 2021 MACON, Ga. (AP) — An autopsy finds that a 15-year-old high school football player who died in July after collapsing at practice in Georgia was the victim of an “abnormal heart rhythm” and not heat-related illness. Bibb County Coroner Leon Jones tell The Telegraph of Macon that the autopsy by a Georgia Bureau of Investigation medical examiner found Joshua Ivory Jr. died July 26 of cardiac dysrhythmia, which triggered “sudden cardiac arrest.” Jones said Ivory suffered from an “abnormal heart rhythm that sent him into cardiac arrest.” The 15-year-old collapsed on the first day of fall football practice at Macon’s Southwest High School. Coaches called an ambulance after recognizing that Ivory was in distress, said Bibb County Athletic Director Barney Hester. Ivory died in a hospital emergency room. Georgia rules call for a five-day period for players to get used to heat and physical exertion while practicing in shorts and helmets. Bibb County Superintendent Curtis Jones said the school took extra precautions beyond those required. The district reviewed its rules after Ivory’s death. Macon reached a high of 97 degrees (36 degrees Celsius) before the practice started. Southwest High head coach Joe Dupree was placed on administrative leave in August while school officials investigated, but was reinstated less than a week later. “It’s good to get the results back, but this is still a sad day because a family has lost a loved one,” Jones said. “Our thoughts continue to be with the family of Joshua Ivory.” https://apnews.com/article/sports-football-health-education-georgia-ac022c310080895f3ab8875610917740 UK -October 23rd One UK football match and two collapses within crowd. (not strictly to article's theme, but sent in by a reader and striking as we know how rare this is) QUOTE The start of the match was delayed by 15 minutes after a West Brom supporter collapsed in the West Stand. Paramedics and ambulance staff were quickly on the scene to treat the man, before he was placed on a stretcher and taken to hospital. The second-half was also delayed after a Bristol City fan collapsed in the away end, with a defibrillator taken into the stands. Bristol City tweeted: "The start of the second half will be delayed due to an ongoing medical emergency in the Bristol City supporters' end. Our thoughts are with those affected." https://www.joe.co.uk/sport/west-brom-vs-bristol-city-suspended-twice-due-to-medical-emergencies-in-the-crowd-295772 UK - 13 July 2021 29-year-old boxer son of famous boxer Chris Eubank dies of heart attack The son of former middleweight boxing champion Chris Eubank died on Friday, a month after becoming a father. His widow, Salma Abdelati, said the 29-year-old had a heart attack while in the sea in Dubai. She said she was grateful "he was able to spend a few short and happy weeks with his son before his death".son" before his death. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57828270 The list goes on... Dembele, 29, Atletico Madrid striker collapses in training, requires medical attention https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-R2_5LMobXc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-R2_5LMobXc%C2%A0) Alex Apolinario, 24, Brazilian soccer player dies after collapsing on pitch during match. https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/brazilian-soccer-player-alex-apolinario-dies-after-collapsing-on-pitch-during-match-in-portugal/ Britain's Jack Draper, 19, collapses at Miami Open: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDuOP0V1nUw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDuOP0V1nUw%C2%A0) Mirko Kido, 36, Olympic gold medalist dies of heart attack during game: https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/indonesian-doubles-star-kido-dies-heart-attack-36-2021-06-14/ Ghanaian referee collapses during AFCON Match: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvPQO44NzN4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvPQO44NzN4%C2%A0 Referee Bert Smith collapses on court due to blood clot during Gonzaga-USC men's Elite Eight game https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/31222546/referee-bert-smith-says-blood-clot-lung-caused-fall-ncaa-tourney https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/31222546/referee-bert-smith-says-blood-clot-lung-caused-fall-ncaa-tourney%C2%A0) Josh Downie, 24, cricketer dies after heart attack at practice: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-57058626 Giuseppe Perrino, 29, ex-Parma footballer dies at memorial match after collapsing https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/15151824/giuseppe-perrino-dead-29-parma-brother/ Raymond van Barneveld collapses and receives paramedic attention during PDC Championship: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/darts/pdc-players-championship-8-suspended-23759939 Devaraj Anchan, 33, volleyball player collapses during game, dies: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Mangalore/volleyball-player-collapses-during-game-dies/article34185430.ece Garissone Innocent, 20, fell unconscious due to abnormal electrical impulse in heart during game: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/13901939/goalkeepers-rushed-hospital-collapsing/ Ethan Jovani Trejo, 16-year-old soccer player, collapsed on the field during training: https://eu.cincinnati.com/story/news/2021/06/25/teen-dies-after-medical-incident-princeton-high-school-field/5344293001/ Samuel Kalu, 24, Bordeaux star collapses minutes into football game: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/58228778 Roy Butler, 23, Irish footballer Watford FC dies after Jansen: https://twitter.com/NewsForAllIre/status/1428301909715296263?s=20 Dylan Rich, 19, FA Youth Cup - player suffered sudden cardiac arrest on the field, passes away: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-58496077 Vinny Curry, 33, out for season due to blood clots: https://nypost.com/2021/08/25/jets-vinny-curry-out-after-rare-blood-disorder-diagnosis/ Cameron Dale, 29, record breaking Australian sailor dies after catastrophic stroke 1 September 2021 QUOTE: "..The long-term partner of Jessica Watson - the Australian who became the youngest solo sailor to circumnavigate the globe - has died in hospital weeks after suffering a “catastrophic” stroke. Cameron Dale, 29, died at Gold Coast University Hospital on Monday, Watson confirmed via Instagram. “On Monday, 30 August 2021 we lost our Cam – my long-term partner in every aspect of life and planned future,” she wrote. Read more here... https://7news.com.au/sport/sailing/australian-sailor-jessica-watson-reveals-sudden-death-of-partner-cameron-dale-c-3845979 Two young Columbia High school footballers die: https://www.wistv.com/2021/09/04/he-would-love-it-donadrian-robinsons-family-reacts-tribute-wj-keenan-high-school/?outputType=apps Bollywood’s star, 40, dies following heart attack https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9950385/Indian-TV-film-star-Siddharth-Shukla-40-dies-heart-attack.html#reader-comments Tom Felton, 34, collapses during golf game: https://bbc.in/3i4YpI5?fbclid=IwAR0aZBaXpiX9ky34g3eLiG3pcMs5r2udih4kRGUIi7GOBK3iciefX1-qoXk Francis Perron, 25, Ottawa footballer dies after game: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/usports-ottawa-gee-gees-francis-perron-dies-1.6182332 Parys Haralson, 37, former Saints line backer dies: https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2021/09/13/parys-haralson-former-49-ers-and-saints-lb-dies-37/8328669002/ Jimmy Hayes, 31, former Bruins player unexpectedly dies: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/08/23/sports/jimmy-hayes-former-bruin-boston-college-hockey-champ-dies-31/ Sage Canaday a marathon runner aged 35 dies June 2021 Sage Canaday, a super runner, Ive been following him for several years. He has a „healthy” lifestyle, almost vegan, was actually raised almost vegetarian. His problem started last month when he returned by plane from a flight. He did the Pfizer booster, after which he started to have difficulty breathing. For a month he thought he had pneumonia and tried to run like that, with light running, his sponsors needing his running posts on Strava. Eventually he arrived at the hospital with the diagnosis: bilateral pulmonary embolism and blood clots. The poor man does not even consider the possibility that it is because of the vaccine. He says that he has confidence in science and these are just speculations. “It’s a mystery that caused the clots ...”. Come on Sage, really? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFlwPofQeA0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwuSSHEX3-Y SOURCE: https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/sage-canaday-runner-pulmonary-embolism-after-pfizer-booster.40792/#post-650985 Nuis, 31, Dutch professional skater admitted to hospital with inflamed heart: https://www.rtlboulevard.nl/entertainment/news/artikel/5243606/kjeld-nuis-vaccinatie-ziek-update John Stokes, 21, athlete at Tennessee Uni hospitalized with heart inflammation: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/student-athlete-john-stokes-myocarditis-covid-vaccine-002451374.html?guccounter=1 Jake Ehlinger, 20, found dead - cause unknown: https://usdaynews.com/celebrities/celebrity-death/sam-ehlinger-brother-death-cause/ Jeremy Chardy, 34, tennis pro cannot train or play after vaccine: https://www.tennisworldusa.org/tennis/news/Tennis_Interviews/102836/jeremy-chardy-i-regret-getting-vaccinated-i-have-series-of-problems-now/ Francesca Marcon, 38, volleybal professional can’t play, has pericarditis post vaccine: https://www.lapressa.it/notiziario/sport/la-campionessa-di-volley-ho-una-pericardite-post-vaccino Yusuke Kinoshita, 27, baseball pro dies 7 weeks post vaccine: https://thecovidworld.com/yusuke-kinoshita-27-year-old-japanese-professional-baseball-player-dies-7-weeks-after-covid-19-vaccine/ Alex Stalock, 34, NHL Oilers goalie out for the season due to heart condition: https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/nhl-oilers-goalie-alex-stalock-miss-entire-season-with-heart-condition-covid-19-related-191817673.html Ceylin Alvarado, 23, pro cyclists out for season due to blood complications: https://www.nu.nl/sport-overig/6160296/veldrijdster-alvarado-voorlopig-niet-in-actie-door-verstoord-bloedbeeld.html Greg van Aevermat, 36, pro cyclist, loss of form since vaccine: https://www.indeleiderstrui.nl/wielrennen/van-avermaet-wijst-naar-vaccin-als-oorzaak-vormdip-op-deze-manier-heeft-wk-geen-zin/amp?__twitter_impression=true Three young Belgian cyclists suffer heart issues following race: https://rtv.be/artikels/jonge-kempense-wielrenners-krijgen-hartklachten-na-vaccinatie-a102612 Kamila Label-Farrel, 19, Uni Basketball Star died unexpectedly: https://www.baytoday.ca/obituaries/lebel-farrell-kamila-3884874 Jacob Downey, 19, Queens Uni Hockey player passes away after medical emergency: https://www.kawartha411.ca/2021/10/01/local-teen-queens-university-student-passed-away-suddenly-after-medical-emergency/ Christian Eriksen, 29, Collapses at Euros due to heart issue https://youtu.be/s0B03LSzXvo Josh Archibald, 28, Oilers hockey forward out indefinitely due to myocarditis: https://www.si.com/hockey/.amp/news/oilers-forward-josh-archibald-out-indefinitely-with-myocarditis Jen Gouveia, 38, suffered cardiac arrest during a run: https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/husband-of-toronto-mother-who-died-suddenly-on-run-says-he-lost-his-everything-1.5501767 Kyle Warner, pro BMX cyclist has pericarditis post vaccine: https://youtu.be/aebtcTi7EaA 16 year old youth suffered cardiac arrest after weightlifting: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/16-year-old-suffers-cardiac-arrest-following-strenuous-weightlifting-session-six Brandon Goodwin, 26, Atlanta Hawks star, career over due to blood clots: https://www.peachtreehoops.com/2021/10/3/22706769/former-atlanta-hawks-guard-brandon-goodwin-claims-covid-19-vaccine-ended-his-season Ewan Fraser, 30, Glasgow hockey player suffered cardiac arrest, passes away: https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/7832060/glasgow-hockey-player-died-collapse-life/amp/?__twitter_impression=true David Jenkins, 31, Olympic silver medalist diver unexpectedly passes away: https://metro.co.uk/2021/10/12/david-jenkins-dead-at-31-tributes-pour-in-for-team-gb-olympic-diving-coach-15404658/amp/?__twitter_impression=true Paul Zisper, 27, Munich basketball pro, has emergency surgery after brain hemorrhage related to J and J: https://www.fr.de/sport/drama-um-zipser-90801217.html Filip Ingebrigsten, 28, Norwegian runner suffers loss of form post vaccine: https://norwaytoday.info/sport/filip-ingebrigtsen-is-back-in-training-after-experiencing-long-corona-vaccination-side-effects/ Avi Barot, 29, Saurashtra cricketer suffers cardiac arrest, passes away: https://www.thehindu. (https://www.thehindu.com/sport/cricket/young-saurashtra-cricket-player-avi-barot-dies-after-suffering-cardiac-arrest/article37015873.ece) Young cricketer dies. https://www.thehindu.com/sport/cricket/young-saurashtra-cricket-player-avi-barot-dies-after-suffering-cardiac-arrest/article37015873.ece Abou Ali, 22, professional footballer collapses on pitch during game: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/16118079/footballer-wessam-abou-ali-awake-hospital-collapse/ Fabrice NSakala, 31, Besiktas defender collapses on pitch during game: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/aug/22/fabrice-nsakala-besiktas-collapse Jens De Smet, 27, footballer collapses on field, passes away of heart attack: https://newswep.com/jens-27-collapses-on-the-football-field-and-dies-this-is-not-maldegem/ Jente van Genechten, 25, footballer collapses on field due to heart attack: https://www.sudinfo.be/id411745/article/2021-08-18/25-ans-un-joueur-belge-de-football-fait-un-arret-cardiaque-sur-le-terrain-avant Frederic Lartillot, French footballer collapses in changing room, passes away due to heart attack after game: https://www.leprogres.fr/culture-loisirs/2021/09/11/deces-d-un-joueur-de-foot-apres-un-match-ses-coequipiers-ont-tout-tente-pour-le-sauver Benjamin Taft, 31, German footballer collapses after game, passes away due to heart attack: https://www.anpfiff.info/mobile/sites/cms/artikel.aspx?SK=2&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;Btr=96044&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;Rub=390 (auto-translated) His girlfriend, family, friends and soccer players reacted with great sadness to the death of the popular Benjamin "Benny" Taft. The 33-year-old had numerous requests for improvement in the hospital last week after he had suddenly suffered a faint attack and finally a heart attack in Berngau after the game of his SV Unterferrieden, which he had headed as player-coach since the beginning of the season. After treatment in the intensive care unit, the hospital was transferred to the normal ward with an early prospect of discharge and rehabilitation measures. But on Monday morning the absolutely surprising and so sad news followed. https://www.anpfiff.info/mobile/sites/cms/artikel.aspx?SK=2&Btr=96044&Rub=390 Rune Coghe, 18, Belgian footballer suffers cardiac arrest on pitch: https://www.sudinfo.be/id409738/article/2021-08-07/rune-jeune-joueur-de-18-ans-secroule-sur-le-terrain-du-rds-plus-le-temps-passe Helen Edwards, referee taken off court during World Cup qualifier due to heart issues: https://www.rtl.de/cms/dfb-spiel-unterbrochen-linienrichterin-vom-platz-getragen-4834888.html Dimitri Lienard, 33, FC Strasbourg midfielder collapses during game: https://madeinfoot.ouest-france.fr/infos/article-rc-strasbourg-dimitri-lienard-a-ete-victime-d-un-malaise-354221.html Sergio Aguero, 33, Barecelona star striker admitted to hospital for cardiac exam after match: https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/31/football/sergio-aguero-barcelona-chest-pain-spt-intl/index.html Emil Palsson, 28, Sognal midfielder collapses due to cardiac arrest during game: https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/norway-footballer-emil-palsson-cardiac-arrest-b1949583.html Antoine Méchin, 31, French triathlete suffers pulmonary embolism following Moderna: https://www.sudouest.fr/sport/course-pedestre/triathlon/le-triathlete-saintais-antoine-mechin-met-un-terme-a-sa-saison-et-ne-se-referait-pas-vacciner-si-c-etait-a-refaire-6234090.php Luis Ojeda, 20, Argentine football player unexpectedly passes away: https://www.antena3.com/noticias/deportes/futbol/emotiva-carta-lola-ortiz-muerte-novio-futbolista-luis-ojeda-soporto-idea-volver-ver-verte-nunca-mas_20210426608696616e5d5b0001eb20e9.html Greg Luyssen, 22, Belgian pro cyclist ends career due to heart issues: https://kw.be/sport/wielrennen/wielerbelofte-greg-luyssen-22-uit-de-panne-over-gedwongen-afscheid-door-hartprobleem-dat-akelig-gevoel-wil-ik-nooit-meer/ Pedro Obiang, 29, ex-West Ham star suffers myocarditis post vaccine: https://thecovidworld.com/pedro-obiang-29-year-old-professional-footballer-suffers-myocarditis-after-covid-19-vaccine/ Cienna Knowles, 19, equestrian star hospitalized due to blood clots: https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/teen-equestrian-star-cienna-knowles-hospitalised-with-blood-clots-after-pfizer-vaccine/news-story/286e7cd42e896b091e4b257322296a05 Boris Sadecky, 24, Slovak hockey player dies of heart attack during hockey game: https://www.rt.com/sport/539312-bruno-sadecki-hockey-player-khl-death/ REPORT 24 Germany Long list of athlete deaths and links within German channel REPORT 24 https://report24.news/ab-13-jahren-lange-liste-ploetzlich-verstorbener-oder-schwerkranker-sportler/ WIKIPEDIA Wikipedia article on association footballer deaths https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_association_footballers_who_died_while_playing NOTE: If you spot more articles that we have missed, please add them to the comments or dedicated telegram group here: Sports people https://t.me/joinchat/M1FOq7bXdjA4YjY0 IS MYOCARDITIS NORMAL IN YOUNG PEOPLE? "...Prof. Linda Wastila Gives Testimony on Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis: “I am stunned when I hear people dismiss myocarditis as an acceptable side-effect, especially for young people” Dr. Linda Wastila, Professor at the University of Maryland Baltimore School of Pharmacy, gave her testimony during a three-hour panel discussion hosted by U.S. Senator Ron Johnson on 3 November in Washington D.C. The expert panel included doctors and medical researchers who treat Covid injection injuries and they were joined by patients who have experienced…" https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/08/prof-linda-wastila-gives-testimony-on-vaccine-induced-myocarditis-i-am-stunned-when-i-hear-people-dismiss-myocarditis-as-an-acceptable-side-effect-especially-for-young-people/ Videos of the headlines above... Video credit Dr Doug Corrigan https://twitter.com/ScienceWDrDoug/status/1457008317398663171 A haunting video summary of the cases and links listed below. Video by J Wilderness

Studies paint concerning chain of evidence suggesting COVID- and vaccine-produced spike proteins can affect brain health. BY DR. SHERRI TENPENNY OCTOBER 4, 2022 The list of complications, conditions, and diseases resulting from the COVID shots is nearly endless and can affect any organ system in the body. Pfizer knew. Here’s their document. Look at the last 8 pages, which lists more than 1100 serious side effects and life-threatening illnesses Pfizer knew would happen from the first shot. We posted an article on The Tenpenny Reports about it: They All Knew. Neurologic Injury This study published by Philip Oldfield in January 2022, is eye-opening. Here is the abstract, edited lightly for clarity: “This mini-review focuses on the mechanisms of how SARS-CoV-2 affects the brain, with an emphasis on the role of the spike protein in patients with neurological symptoms. “Following infection, patients with a history of neurological complications may be at a higher risk of developing long-term neurological conditions associated with the alpha-synuclein prion, such as Parkinson’s disease and Lewy body dementia. “Compelling evidence has been published to indicate that the spike protein, which is derived from SARS-CoV-2 and generated from the vaccines, is not only able to cross the blood–brain barrier but may cause inflammation and/or blood clots in the brain. “Consequently, should vaccine-induced expression of spike proteins not be limited to the site of injection and draining lymph nodes there is the potential of long-term implications following inoculation [vaccination] that may be identical to neurological complications seen in patients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2.” It is important to mention, we now know the spike proteins do not remain localized in the arm. Let’s drill down on this article, starting with some definitions: Alpha-Synuclein: These are the major component of Lewy bodies, which are characteristic of Parkinson’s disease and Lewy body dementia. There is much speculation on what the primary function of alpha-synuclein may be under healthy conditions. However, the accumulation of this protein when it has folded abnormally seems to be central to neurodegeneration. Since the culprit of chronic illness has been widely described as being the spike protein, a 2021 study of monkeys provided compelling evidence that the spike protein associated with SARS-CoV2 is responsible for Lewy body formation. Parkinson’s disease: A long-term degenerative disease of the central nervous system, affecting the motor system. The most obvious early signs are resting tremor, rigidity, slowness of movement, and difficulty walking. Lewy body dementia: This type of dementia is associated with difficulty thinking, slowed movement along with changes in behavior and mood. Lewy body dementia is one of the most common causes of dementia, affecting more than 1 million individuals in the United States and millions more around the world. Both Parkinson’s disease and Lewy body dementia are characterized by groups of misfolded alpha-synuclein proteins in brain. The two diseases together are the second most common cause of neurodegenerative dementia, only surpassed by Alzheimer’s disease. The Oldfield article goes on to say: “…many of the serious neurological symptoms associated with COVID-19 are due to hypoxia, cytokine storms, and blood clots, all of which contribute to damaging neurons in the brain. Some of the symptoms of brain injury include loss of smell and taste (anosmia), severe headaches, debilitating fatigue, trouble thinking clearly (brain fog), seizures, strokes, and various degrees of paralysis.” We know that these symptoms can be attributed to the spike protein, which can enter the brain by two primary entryways: Through the Vasculature: All of the blood vessels in the brain have ACE2 receptors. The spike protein binds to this receptor, which essentially ‘opens the door’ and allows the spike protein to enter. Once inside the cell, the spike proteins promote and contribute to micro-thrombi, leading to small and large blood clots. By directly damaging the blood brain barrier: The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is part of the microvasculature of the central nervous system. The tight junctions in these specialized blood vessels control what is allowed to pass from the general circulation into the brain. The BBB protects the central nervous system from toxins, pathogens, and other pro-inflammatory molecules. Spike proteins tested in vitro caused significant changes to the properties of the BBB with loss of barrier integrity. When the BBB is destabilized, the spike protein—and many other destructive substances—can freely pass into the brain, leading to the neurological complications seen in both those who have experienced the infection and those who have received a COVID vaccine. A separate mouse study showed that spike (S1) proteins tagged with iodine (I-S1) crossed the BBB very quickly. In fact, more than 50 percent of I-S1 proteins crossed the capillary wall and entered into the brain and interstitial fluid spaces within 30 minutes of the IV injection. The spike protein was taken up by all 11 areas of the brain that were tested, which could explain the wide variety of different neurological symptoms that are observed clinically. This article, “Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients” clearly lays out the ramification of the COVID shots on brain tissue: “These data show that S1 antigen production after the initial vaccination can be detected by day one and is present beyond the site of injection site and the associated regional lymph nodes.” “It was observed that the spike protein S1 subunit was detectable in the systemic circulation up to approximately two weeks post-injection in eleven out of thirteen healthcare workers. Although concentration of the S1 subunit was low, this study provides proof-of-principle that spike proteins can get into circulation following inoculation.” Can it be any clearer that the pathology observed after a COVID injection is from the spike proteins produced by the mRNA, gene-modification technology that came through that needle? Will those who had the shots and experienced now immediate side effects be at greater risk of Parkinson’s disease or Lewy body dementia in 10 or 20 years? Is brain dysfunction already starting to appear? Although it seems we’ve been talking about this pandemic and its shots forever, the Pfizer and Moderna shots were unleashed on the world December 2020; the J&J and AstraZenca shots were released in February 2021. In reality, it’s been less than two years. We are in the middle of a great experiment, and the final results will not be known for many years. Additional articles reviewed (not in any particular order) The Blood–Brain Barrier https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292164/ SARS-CoV-2 causes brain inflammation and induces Lewy body formation in macaques – https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.23.432474v2.abstract The SARS-CoV2 spike protein alters the human blood-brain barrier (BBB) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547916/ Neurological Complications Associated with the Blood-Brain Barrier Damage Induced by the Inflammatory Response During SARS-CoV-2 Infection https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7518400/ Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a board-certified osteopathic medical doctor. She is the founder ofTenpenny Integrative Medical Center,Tenpenny Health Restoration Center, LLC, medical clinics located near Cleveland, Ohio and several online educational businesses that can be found atDrTenpenny.com She writes two Substacks per week. The first,EyeOnTheEvidenceare educational pieces to help the general public understand complex medical concepts. The second, released on Sundays, are inspiration piecesOnWalkingWithGod . COULD C19 VACCINES CAUSE PARKINSON'S OR TREMORS? This short film is a compilation of C19 Vaccine injuries shared online.

The race to produce and use mRNA 'vaccines' continues. The press release below could be interesting to read in conjunction with the government's brochure on the race to implement human augmentation. Read and download here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/human-augmentation UK GOV PRESS RELEASE: 7 October 2022 Government’s Vaccine Taskforce has granted £10.65 million in additional funding to support the launch of Darlington RNA vaccine innovation centre. Government’s Vaccine Taskforce has granted £10.65 million in additional funding to support the launch of Darlington RNA vaccine innovation centre the ‘RNA Centre of Excellence’, hosted by technology innovation organisation CPI, will support the development, scale-up and manufacture of new RNA therapies and vaccines, the same technology used for the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccinations CPI has also established an RNA Training Academy, to support companies by providing the industry with the skills required in RNA technology The government has today (Friday 7 October) announced £10.65 million in funding to boost the development of RNA technology, the vaccine innovation that protected millions around the world from COVID-19. The funding will support the launch of a new innovation centre by CPI in Darlington, advancing the technology that is currently under development for the treatment of various cancers, flu vaccines and personalised medicines including gene therapy. The Vaccine Taskforce granted the funding – administered by Innovate UK – for CPI’s RNA Centre of Excellence, which has the potential to make homegrown breakthroughs in the fight against a number of diseases, producing RNA material for clinical trials which will be crucial to future vaccine development. The Centre is the only site in the UK currently able to develop and manufacture messenger and self-amplifying RNA vaccines and therapies with the capability to manufacture millions of doses of a vaccine, if required for a future healthcare emergency. It will provide state-of-the-art equipment and world-leading expertise to support industry with the testing, scale-up and clinical production of RNA technologies – showcasing the UK’s capability in this area and helping to promote the UK as an attractive destination for further investment. Minister for Science and Investment Security Nusrat Ghani said: The UK’s exceptional capabilities in Life Sciences were showcased on the world stage when we became the first nation globally to approve a working COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic. We are now committed to boosting these capabilities even further, ensuring we are thoroughly prepared for future health emergencies and remaining at the forefront of the development of new therapies. This is why we are making this significant investment in CPI’s brilliant RNA facility in Darlington, a site with the potential to make enormous homegrown breakthroughs in the fight against disease. The Centre will also form an important part of the UK’s commitment to future pandemic preparedness, as the government will retain priority access to the facility for up to 10 years. This will allow vaccine developers to utilise the site as required to provide additional manufacturing capacity in the event of a future health emergency or pandemic. As part of the Centre, CPI has also established the RNA Training Academy, providing interactive courses in RNA technology alongside bespoke training at CPI facilities to ensure that companies can access the industry skills they require in the UK. The Academy has already gained accreditation to provide continuing professional development. Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen said: CPI is a fantastic example of a local organisation at the cutting-edge of biosciences and its new Centre of Excellence will be another string to the bow of the growing cluster on Darlington’s Central Park and our world-leading life sciences sector. This latest boost comes on the back of the amazing work of the sector in the fight against coronavirus. This funding will help our scientists make even more leaps forward and breakthroughs, having a huge impact on lives across the UK and beyond. Funding of our research centres, labs and manufacturing space will help create high-quality, highly-skilled and well-paid jobs in the innovative industries of the future for local people. While we’re seeing difficulties across the globe which are making times tough for many, our region continues to move forward and make huge progress thanks to investments like these - meaning the long-term future of Teesside, Darlington and Hartlepool is bright. This funding illustrates the proactive steps the government is taking to realise the 2021 Life Sciences Vision, and to continue furthering its ambitions to secure the UK’s reputation as a life sciences superpower. The investment also delivers on the government’s levelling up agenda, supporting highly skilled jobs and helping bring greater prosperity and productivity in the north-east region. The Vaccine Taskforce previously supported the construction and development of CPI’s centre with funding of £26.48 million, and to date, the government has invested over £405 million to secure and scale up the UK’s vaccine manufacturing capabilities, supporting the UK’s ability to respond to future pandemics. Notes to editors Innovate UK is part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) The Vaccine Taskforce has now transferred its core functions to the UK Health Security Agency and the Office for Life Sciences

This is Not On The Beeb's 70th report translating the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The stats are collated up to the 28th of September but are released to the public a week later, so in this case on the 7th of October. It then takes the NOTB contributors a further few days to sift through and publish our report. Moderna Vaccine NOTE: Fatalities and Adverse Event reporting for the MODERNA VACCINE have risen significantly during the last month The figure this month is 82 reported deaths for the Moderna vaccine. Last month the reported deaths were 70 meaning an increase of 17% over the last few weeks. Let's keep an eye on the Moderna figures over the upcoming months. There have been 12.7m doses of Moderna given in the UK. There are 82 reported deaths meaning there is 1 reported death per 155,000 doses. Since official CDC and MHRA sources admit reporting is between 1 and 10%, this means the real death rate could be somewhere between 1 death per 1,550 doses or 15,500 doses. Is this acceptable? Do people realise the risk of taking the vaccine? Do they have informed consent? Are the C19 vaccines Safe and Effective? or Faked and Defective? TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 83.1 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.7 m 1st doses = 53,832,410 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,800,539 Boosters = 40,453,549 (30.9m Pfizer, 59,000 AZ, 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 145,086,498 doses NOT INCLUDING autumn booster Adverse event report figures below INCLUDE both mono- and bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. BREAKDOWN Here is the breakdown of the most recent report with comments and observations on the data below Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death 173,381 Pfizer 246,393 AZ 42,436 Moderna (+4.5% in the last month, a significant increase) 14 Novavax 1848 Unknown TOTAL = 464,072 incl. bivalent vaccines (increase of 2,593 over 5 weeks) Overall 1-in-116 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Is the 1 in 116 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11 Fatal Pfizer 826 AZ 1,314 Moderna 82 (+17% on last month's figures. A huge increase.) Unknown 50 TOTAL = 2,272 Blood Disorders - 17,255 (Pfizer) + 7911 (AZ) + 2669 (Moderna) + 66 (Unknown) = 27,901 Anaphylaxis - 669 (Pfizer) + 888 (AZ) + 99 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1659 Acute Cardiac - 13,815 (Pfizer) + 11,700 (AZ) + 3694 (Moderna) + 123 (Unknown) = 29,332 Eye Disorders - 8276 (Pfizer) + 15,069 (AZ) + 1755 (Moderna) + 99 (Unknown) = 25,199 Blindness - 175 (Pfizer) + 330 (AZ) + 45 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 554 Deafness - 313 (Pfizer) + 446 (AZ) + 58 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 823 Infections - 13,157 (Pfizer) + 20,797 (AZ) + 2779 (Moderna) + 223 (Unknown) = 36,956 Spontaneous Abortions - 503 + 17 stillbirths/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 239 + 5 stillbirths (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 821 miscarriages Gastrointestinal Disorders - 43,196 (Pfizer) + 81,298 (AZ) + 12,500 (Moderna) + 4 (Novavax) + 429 (Unknown) = 137,427 Nervous System Disorders - 82,865 (Pfizer) + 183,917 (AZ) + 22,746 (Moderna) + 9 (Novavax) + 974 (Unknown) = 290,511 Headaches & Migraines - 36,198 (Pfizer) + 94,199 (AZ) + 10,561 (Moderna) + 2 (Novavax) + 360 (Unknown) = 141,320 Nausea & Vomiting - 21,124 (Pfizer) + 45,645 (AZ) + 7446 (Moderna) + 218 (Unknown) = 74,433 Paralysis - 537 (Pfizer) + 912 (AZ) + 132 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1592 Seizures - 1173 (Pfizer) + 2109 (AZ) + 313 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 3622 Tremor - 2256 (Pfizer) + 10,000 (AZ) + 821 (Moderna) + 52 (Unknown) = 13,129 Respiratory Disorders - 22,420 (Pfizer) + 30,133 (AZ) + 4883 (Moderna) + 238 (Unknown) = 57,674 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 847 (Pfizer) + 2410 (AZ) + 83 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3363 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,538 (Pfizer) + 18,628 (AZ) + 2794 (Moderna) 5 1315(Unknown) = 32,095 Skin Disorders - 35,093 (Pfizer) + 53,722 (AZ) + 14,117 (Moderna) + 3 (Novavax) + 405 (Unknown) = 103,340 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,632 (Pfizer) + 20,969 (AZ) + 5330 (Moderna) + 1 (Novavax) + 239 (Unknown) = 58,171 Vascular Disorders - 7795 (Pfizer) + 14,107 (AZ) + 1480 (Moderna) + 1 (Novavax) + 122 (Unknown) = 23,505 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,200,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,900,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 4121 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,500 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 266 Yellow Cards (reporting rate 1-in-43) • Moderna - 2200 children (1st doses) and 2100 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 37 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 35 Yellow Cards Total = 4,213,700 children injected (under 18s) Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 7,326,900 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4459 For full reports including 375 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?