Search Results

Overall, for every 118 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. Some of my calculations suggest it could be as low as 0.5% The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 16TH FEB 2022: DATA for doses 1 & 2 Pfizer - 26million people - 49.2m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-157 people impacted Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49.1m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-102 people impacted Moderna - 1.6m people - 3.1m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-45 people impacted DATA for 3rd dose (known as the booster) Total = 37,911,067 jabbed Booster Yellow Card Reports 29,261 (Pfizer) 477 (AZ) 16,019 (Moderna) 153 (Unknown) Total = 45,910 BREAKDOWN Reports i.e. This is number of people who did fill out an adverse reaction with Yellow Card system It is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported 165,379 (Pfizer) 243,655 (AZ) 35,810 (Moderna) 1538 (Unknown) Total = 446,382 people Fatal 720 (Pfizer) 1225 (AZ) 38 (Moderna) 39 (Unknown) TOTAL = 2022 Blood Disorders - 16,805 (Pfizer) + 7798 (AZ) + 2437 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 27,103 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 879 (Pfizer) + 3036 (AZ) + 109 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) = 4050 Anaphylaxis - 651 (Pfizer) + 871 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1611 Acute Cardiac - 12,407 (Pfizer) + 11,185 (AZ) + 3063 (Moderna) + 95 (Unknown) = 26,750 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1210 (Pfizer) + 431 (AZ) + 322 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1970 Eye Disorders - 7808 (Pfizer) + 14,802 (AZ) + 1470 (Moderna) + 84 (Unknown) = 24,164 Blindness - 155 (Pfizer) + 317 (AZ) + 32 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 508 Deafness - 290 (Pfizer) + 424 (AZ) + 50 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 769 Spontaneous Abortions - 474 + 1 premature baby death / 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (13 recorded as fatal) (Pfizer) + 229 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 62 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 771 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 79,123 (Pfizer) + 182,117 (AZ) + 19,322 (Moderna) + 840 (Unknown) = 281,402 Headaches & Migraines - 35,141 (Pfizer) + 93,943 (AZ) + 9156 (Moderna) + 331 (Unknown) = 138,571 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 41,594 (Pfizer) + 80,805 (AZ) + 10,410 (Moderna) + 376 (Unknown) = 133,185 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 762 (Pfizer) + 2300 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) + 15 (Unknown) = 3128 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4103 (Pfizer) + 6907 (AZ) + 687 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 11,736 Seizures - 1068 (Pfizer) + 2053 (AZ) + 254 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3393 Paralysis - 497 (Pfizer) + 872 (AZ) + 98 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 1475 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 9025 (Pfizer) + 17,653 (AZ) + 1757 (Moderna) + 97 (Unknown) = 28,532 Infections - 11,694 (Pfizer) + 20,123 (AZ) + 2180 (Moderna) + 152 (Unknown) = 34,149 Skin Disorders - 33,228 (Pfizer) + 53,191 (AZ) + 12,704 (Moderna) + 332 (Unknown) = 99,455 Respiratory Disorders - 21,064 (Pfizer) + 29,613 (AZ) + 4062 (Moderna) + 202 (Unknown) = 54,941 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1343 (Pfizer) + 2746 (AZ) + 283 (Moderna) + 32 (Unknown) = 4404 Psychiatric Disorders - 9921 (Pfizer) + 18,306 (AZ) + 2355 (Moderna) + 107 (Unknown) = 30,689 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 30,469 (Pfizer) + 20,675 (AZ) + 4967 (Moderna) + 209 (Unknown) = 56,320 Immune System Disorders - 2382 (Pfizer) + 3277 (AZ) + 596 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 6276 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Seem at LONDON freedom protest 22nd Jan 2022 PLEASE NOTE HOW THE NUMBERS OF CHILDREN JABBED ARE STILL ROUNDED UP. This suggests poor record-keeping Pfizer - 3,200,000 children (1st doses) plus 1,600,000 second doses resulting in 3111 Yellow Cards (up 67 since last week) AZ - 12,400 children (1st doses) plus 9,200 second doses resulting in 254 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-49 Moderna - 2000 children (1st doses) and 1300 second doses resulting in 21 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 19 Yellow Cards Total = 3,214,400 children jabbed Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3405 For full reports including 346 pages of specific reaction listings: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions 13 REASONS TO NOT VACCINATE 5-11 YEAR OLDS Reason No. 1 - 86% of 12-15-year old Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine in the Clinical Trial Reason No. 2 - 1 in 9 Children suffered a Severe Adverse Reaction leaving them unable to perform daily activities in the Pfizer Clinical Trial Reason No. 3 - Just 17 deaths associated with Covid-19 have occurred in Teenagers & Children since March 2020 Reason No. 4 - The risk of children developing serious illness due to Covid-19 is extremely low Reason No. 5 - The Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine is experimental and still in Clinical Trials Reason No. 6 - Three Scientific Studies conducted by the UK Government, Oxford University, & CDC, which were published in August have found the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work Reason No. 7 - Public Health England Data shows the majority of Covid-19 Deaths are among the Vaccinated and suggests that the Vaccines worsen disease Reason No. 8 - There had been at least 1.18 million Adverse Reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccines in the UK alone up to September 1st Reason No. 9 - There were more deaths in 8 months due to the Covid-19 Vaccines than there have been due to all other available Vaccines combined since the year 2001 Reason No. 10 - The risk of Myocarditis (Heart Inflammation) in Children due to the Pfizer Vaccine Reason No. 11 - Children have died and are dying due to the Covid-19 Vaccines Reason No. 12 - Who profits from your Child getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? Reason No. 13 - The Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation refused to recommend the Pfizer Vaccine be offered to Children aged 12-15 SOURCE: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/23/13-reasons-why-children-5-to-11-should-not-have-the-covid-vaccine/ PLEASE SEND THIS LEGAL LETTER TO YOUR SCHOOLS NOW! This is an easy, quick and effective action. INSTRUCTIONS There are two options to deliver the letter EMAIL 1 - copy and paste the text into an email, ALSO attaching the downloaded letter 2 - CC the email to Lois loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk 3 - Click send DOWNLOAD THE LETTER HERE A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you have suffered any form of adverse reaction and are a UK citizen please fill in a witness statement for the case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Dr John Campbell gives his classically eloquent analysis of the Pfizer documents, which leaves him almost lost for words. The post-marketing Pfizer analysis data, known as 'the Pfizer docs" titled "CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021: was force released under an FOI by a judge. Pfizer tried to withhold this data for 75 years. Further documents are being drip-fed to the public. The sheer number of serious adverse reactions within the data paints such a clear picture that Dr John Campbell realises that his trusting profession has been tricked into believing the C19 vaccines were 'safe and effective.' Now that the C19 story has vanished from the nation's screens, this humble and frank video sets foundations for all those who have been under the spell of the media narrative, especially as even the most deeply hypnotised are now wondering where the deadly pandemic suddenly went. Please share widely. We are pasting the video and some comments below for preservation. Source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YOD9drZasM We have been making warnings since vaccine day one, publishing the yellow card reports pointing out the numbers shown are barely a drop in the ocean. Hundreds of thousands have marched through each of the world's cities attempting to warn their fellow people to the vaccine dangers. Often with tragic personal connections to vaccine injury, raising awareness of the realities, yet getting name-called 'anti-vaxxers'. Dr John Campbell is a nurse with a doctorate, but his previous pro-vaccine thinking has matched many doctors and health professionals. The Hippocratic oath makes doctors duty-bound to do the due diligence before backing products and advising trusting patients. Ignorance is not an excuse in the court of law, nor will it be in the minds of patients who trusted their priests of medicine. Dr Campbell talks of how the documents will forge a new distrust of 'authorities.' Yet in turn, they be matched by a new distrust of pharma trained doctors, which in turn, will herald in a new era of real medicine designed not to reap profits, but to actually heal. Meanwhile every day, more people are getting vaccinated, including the most vulnerable who depend on our bravery the most - the youngest of our children. We urge all doctors and medical professionals to make an urgent stand. To share the information amongst colleagues and enrol assistance in stopping the vaccine programme with immediate effect. We also ask all health professionals to back our call for an immediate injunction to stop the vaccine rollout by signing our petition. 1,000+ health professionals have signed already YOU TUBE COMMENTS The video above, within 2 days has racked 1.5m views and 28,000 comments. Here are a few. DarkHorse Podcast Clips (7.6k likes) Again, thank you Dr. John Campbell for approaching this in an honest way. Some of us have been trying to raise alarm bells to friends and family for a year now that have fallen on deaf ears. I hope that the medical authorities wake up and aren't as corrupt as they seem. VV this is painful to watch. The internet has been flooded with accounts of adverse reactions ever since the vaccination campaign began, yet it was all dismissed as right wing and racist. Turns out the people who are supposed to watch over our safety are doing the exact opposite, and now there's documents to prove it Angi R Unfortunately john was pushing the v and very mocking of anti vaxxers.. Patriot May Dear Dr Campbell, I worked as a paramedic in Ontario Canada for several years until mid 2018 when I was diagnosed with PTSD. Since the onset of this COVID-19 "pandemic" I have observed the complete obliteration of my once trusted & respected profession due to what I can only describe as a state of mass psychosis within all realms of medicine & emergency care. Only a select few were able to stand against & resist the total onslaught of vaccine marketing and medical propaganda that I personally now. Efforts of dire warnings to co workers and loved ones resulted in terrible criticism, bullying, threats & other defamatory attacks. Even now with this new evidence available most turn blind eyes in our medical systems. It has been stunning & literally nauseating to see them ignore this new data. As I struggle through a bout of depression from the masses' willful ignorance, professionals lack of accountability, humility, ethics & integrity I wish to thank you kindly for making this video in an attempt to show the people the truth. Without informed consent we are but experiments in a petri dish. Michael Colins Thank you Dr. Campbell. Many, many people felt governments and certain medical agencies were not being honest, or divulging the truth. It was, and is a deep seated unease that most sane people have been feeling for a long, long time. The condemnation of opposing opinions, and cancelling of medical professionals and destruction of their careers for questioning what has been going on says it all. There are organizations and people out there that should be taken to task for this. Reckless Rodent John you're a kind, caring, wonderful human being - the best of us - however we've been telling you all this from the start - the data was out there (VAERS etc.) it was obvious there was something very, very wrong - we've been screaming at the top of our lungs. The world chose not to listen because people cannot face the fact that some people mean us harm if they can make a buck. Petition requesting urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines Petition requesting urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines To the British Police, Judiciary, Crown Prosecution Service and members of Parliament. The people of Britain (and the world) request the British police seize multiple sample vials of the C19 vaccines and conduct an immediate open, independent and detailed analysis of the contents. ​ The signatories of this petition back the work of lawyers Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland working alongside Dr Samuel White, Mark Sexton and team submitting evidence under Hammersmith Police crime number: 6029679/21 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public. ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the various batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6 - With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Health expert's petition I, the undersigned, request the British police seize samples of the vaccine and instigate an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are causing widespread serious adverse reactions post-COVID-19 vaccination. ​ Concerning the vaccination of our children, we request an immediate injunction forcing a pause on the school's vaccine programme until we have clear answers from the police investigations. VIDEO SOURCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YOD9drZasM See the Pfizer docs here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/pfizer-cumulative-analysis-of-post-authorization-adverse-event-reports-of-bnt162b2-28-feb-21 See the endless list of adverse reactions here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/pfizer-list-of-adverse-reactions-and-a-game

Official Biochemical and Statistical Evidence 100% confirms Moderna created Covid-19 Before reading the below it's worth remembering that David E Martin within the film Plandemic 2 announced that he had found the Moderan Patent for their C19 Vaccine that was dated in May.... ....not May 2020 as would be expect for a virus that was discovered hitting the news in early 20202, but the patent was filed in May 2019. Do we need more evidence to suggest that the pandemic was engineered by man? In the artcile below you'll find that the Covid 19 was several years in the making. - Genetic match discovered in Covid's unique furin cleavage site on spike protein - Matched genetic sequence patented by Moderna for cancer research purposes - Researchers say one in 3 trillion chance Covid developed the code naturally "....Evidence has emerged which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the pharmaceutical giant Moderna, the company that has made billions through the sale of an experimental Covid-19 injection, actually created the Covid-19 virus. Covid-19 was not made in 2019. It was made from the 19 nucleotides Moderna specific chimeric (CGG for AGA) furin cleavage site which does not occur anywhere in nature. On February 23 the Daily Mail ran an article showing that Moderna has patented the 19 base letter (nucleotide) sequence which codes for the Furin Cleavage site in Covid-19. They cited a Paper by Scientists in India, Switzerland, Italy and the US (cautiously entitled: MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site) in which they calculated that the chances of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna randomly appearing in Covid-19 in circumstances where it does not appear anywhere else in nature are 1 in 3 trillion. Furthermore they did not merely apply for a patent on 2016 February 4 with US9587003B2: as reported in the Daily Mail. They actually applied on 2013 December 16 for 4 patents with US9149506B2, US9216205B2, US9255129B2, US9301993B2:as well. So Moderna had developed the 19 nucleotide gene sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Site which gives Covid19 its infectivity to humans by patented gain of function research as early as 2013, 6 years before the Wuhan outbreak took place. Not 3 as reported in the Daily Mail and virally elsewhere.. By The Exposé on March 3, 2022 On February 23 the Daily Mail ran an article showing that Moderna has patented the 19 base letter (nucleotide) sequence which codes for the Furin Cleavage site in Covid-19. By a concerned reader They cited a Paper by Scientists in India, Switzerland, Italy and the US (cautiously entitled: MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site) in which they calculated that the chances of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna randomly appearing in Covid-19 in circumstances where it does not appear anywhere else in nature are 1 in 3 trillion. But they failed to make the obvious deduction there from. Had they made said obvious deduction I fear that might have been the last scientific deduction they ever got published! They decided to investigate the RNA sequence for the Furin cleavage site in the Covid-19 Spike Protein to see if it occurred anywhere else in nature. . Fortunately the NCBI/NIH have produced the wonderful BLAST database which catalogues every gene sequence in nature known to man and every synthetic patented gene sequence known to the patent office. The researchers chose the Furin Cleavage sequence because it is the only continuous gene letter sequence (nucleotide sequence) in Covid-19 with more than 3 nucleotides, that differs from the respective letters in its closest natural relative the Bat Coronavirus RaTG13 (all other differences are 3 letters or less long). So it was by far the best candidate for determining whether or not Covid-19 was man made. The reader might consider it more likely that a Furin Cleavage Site would appear in the Sun than in the Daily Mail. But this cleavage refers to the separation of spike from virus rather than pillow from pillow. Furthermore the Furin Cleavage Site is key to the pathogenicity of Covid-19. So if there was to be some man made gain of function included in the virus, this is where one might expect to find it. The Amino Acid sequence of the Furin Cleavage Site is PRRA (Proline Argenine Argenine Alanine). Each Amino Acid is coded for by a Codon, consisting of 3 nucleotides (genetic sequence letters). So all the differences in the genetic code between Covid-19 and RaTG13 are at most one Codon long, one amino acid long, other than the Furin Cleavage Sequence, which is… CCT CGG CGG GCA The complimentary sequence (the opposing DNA strand of the double helix is (GGAGCCGCCCGT) because C binds with G and A binds with T The reverse compliment (the same thing written backwards) is therefore TGCCCGCCGAGG The researchers did a BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) alignment search (which means they search for the gene sequence, the reverse gene sequence, the complimentary gene sequence and the reverse complimentary gene sequence) through every gene sequence in nature known to man for CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG which is the 19 nucleotide sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Sequence, which also appears in Covid-19, and which is found actually in the reverse compliment form CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG patented by Moderna. Source: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/03/evidence-confirms-moderna-created-covid-19/

Pfizer The information contained in this document is proprietary and confidential. Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution, or other dissemination of this information outside of Pfizer, its Affiliates, its Licensees, or Regulatory Agencies is strictly prohibited. Except as may be otherwise agreed to in writing, by accepting or reviewing these materials, you agree to hold such information in confidence and not to disclose it to others (except where required by applicable law), nor to use it for unauthorized purposes. Under the Nuremberg Code of Informed Consent we Not On The Beeb is publishing this paper under the interest of public safety. Some excerpts. Please downlaod the full paper for accurate and full context ......Pfizer is responsible for the management post-authorization safety data on behalf of the MAH BioNTech according to the Pharmacovigilance Agreement in place. Data from BioNTech are included in the report when applicable.... .....The limitations of post-marketing adverse drug event reporting should be considered when interpreting these data: Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown. Some of the factors that may influence whether an event is reported include: length of time since marketing, market share of the drug, publicity about a drug or an AE, seriousness of the reaction, regulatory actions, awareness by health professionals and consumers of adverse drug event reporting, and litigation. Because many external factors influence whether or not an AE is reported, the spontaneous reporting system yields reporting proportions not incidence rates. As a result, it is generally not appropriate to make between-drug comparisons using these proportions; the spontaneous reporting system should be used for signal detection rather than hypothesis testing. In some reports, clinical information (such as medical history, validation of diagnosis, time from drug use to onset of illness, dose, and use of concomitant drugs) is missing or incomplete, and follow-up information may not be available. An accumulation of adverse event reports (AERs) does not necessarily indicate that a particular AE was caused by the drug; rather, the event may be due to an underlying disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant medication. • Among adverse event reports received into the Pfizer safety database during the cumulative period, only those having a complete workflow cycle in the safety database (meaning they progressed to Distribution or Closed workflow status) are included in the monthly SMSR. This approach prevents the inclusion of cases that are not fully processed hence not accurately reflecting final information. Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, the MAH has prioritised the processing of serious cases, in order to meet expedited regulatory reporting timelines and ensure these reports are available for signal detection and evaluation activity. The increased volume of reports has not impacted case processing for serious reports, and compliance metrics continue to be monitored weekly with prompt action taken as needed to maintain compliance with expedited reporting obligations. ......Non-serious cases are entered into the safety database no later than 4 calendar days from receipt. Entrance into the database includes the coding of all adverse events; this allow for a manual review of events being received but may not include immediate case processing to completion. Non-serious cases are processed as soon as possible and no later than 90 days from receipt. Pfizer has also taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports. This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues. To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately (b) (4) additional full- time employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than (b) (4) additional resources by the end of June 2021....... 3.1.1. General Overview It is estimated that approximately (b) (4) doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021. Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866) and Spain (756); the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries. DOWNLOAD FULL PAPER HERE

Shane Warne, the greatest leg-spinner in the history of cricket and an Australian icon who transcended the sport, has died of a suspected heart attack at the age of 52. A statement from MPC entertainment to the UK media said: “It is with great sadness we advise that Shane Keith Warne passed away of a suspected heart attack in Koh Samui, Thailand today, Friday 4 March. “Shane was found unresponsive in his villa and despite the best efforts of medical staff, he could not be revived. The family requests privacy at this time and will provide further details in due course.” Coming just 24 hours after Australian cricket had lost former wicketkeeper Rod Marsh to a heart attack aged 74.... In Early Autumn 2021 Warne called on all Australians to get vaccinated to ensure major sporting events can continue to take place. Shane Warne 24 Sep 2021 "Let's go and get double-vaxxed everyone, because that means we might not get locked down and we can travel and have a little bit more normality," he said.. Members of the current Australia team learned of the news while travelling back from day one of the first Test against Pakistan in Rawalpindi. David Warner, the opener, tweeted: “Two legends of our game have left us too soon. I’m lost for words, and this is extremely sad. My thoughts and prayers go out to the Marsh and Warne family. I just cannot believe it. rip, you will both be missed.” Viv Richards, the former West Indies captain who like Warne was named one of Wisden’s five cricketers of the 20th century, tweeted: “Unbelievable. I am shocked to the core. This can’t be true. Rest In Peace, @ShaneWarne. There are no words to describe what I feel right now. A huge loss for cricket READ MORE ON OUR DEDICATED SPORT VACCINE INJURY AND DEATH WEBSITE ➡️ ➡️ https://www.notb-sports.org/ Dr. McCullough Provides an Explanation as to Why Athletes Are Collapsing on the Pitch. "When you have a surge in adrenaline and you have vaccine-induced myocarditis... that's what triggers the sudden death." SOURCE: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/mar/04/shane-warne-australian-cricket-legend-dies-aged-52

Insurers are in the business of risk evaluation. A German health insurer made some simple calculations weighing up the risk of vaccine-injury risk and came up with some surprising numbers that contradict the official narrative. With simple data analysis being released, we again witness the first tentative steps towards realising the full and true impact of the C19 vaccination programme on the public. QUOTE: "......A German health insurer BKK ProVita said an analysis of data collected from more than 10 million people suggests COVID vaccine side effects are “significantly” underreported. The company said its analysis revealed a “significant alarm signal” and said "a risk to human life cannot be ruled out.” EXTRACT "....PEI, the German federal health agency that monitors the safety of vaccines and biomedicines announced in a press release there were 244,576 suspected cases of vaccine side effects reported in 2021 following COVID vaccination... but BKK said its analysis revealed more than 400,000 cases....if figures are extrapolated over a year for the entire German population of 83 million people, it is likely 2.5 – 3 million people in Germany received medical treatment for COVID vaccine adverse events..." This simple find suggests 63% more injuries than those reported. But the insurer's numbers only calculate Doctor's visits where vaccine issues were discussed. The vast majority of vaccine injuries are not realised as vaccine injuries e.g. a spontaneous heart attack in a 60-year-old person two weeks after the vaccine is seen by the majority as just an unlucky heart attack. Here at NOTB, as we've been saying from the start, we believe the real number of injuries and deaths to be at least 1,000% more than those recorded - ie. a bare minimum of a ten-fold increase. By Megan Redshaw for CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENCE A German health insurance company this week said an analysis of data collected from more than 10 million people suggests COVID vaccine side effects are “significantly” underreported. The company, BKK ProVita (BKK), said its analysis revealed a “significant alarm signal” and that “a risk to human life cannot be ruled out.” Based on the data collected, BKK said the number of vaccine side effects is many times higher than the number officially announced by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), Germany’s federal health agency that monitors the safety of vaccines and biomedicines. The PEI announced in a press release there were 244,576 suspected cases of vaccine side effects reported in 2021 following COVID vaccination, but BKK said its analysis revealed more than 400,000 cases. BKK board member Andreas Schöfbeck told WELT, a German news publication, “The numbers determined are significant and urgently need to be checked for plausibility.” BUY TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci' In a letter, Schöfbeck said BKK analyzed doctors’ billing data from 10.9 million insured people and found 217,000 people received medical treatment due to vaccine side effects. “In our opinion, there is a significant underreporting of the side effects of the vaccination,” said Schöfbeck. “According to our calculations, we consider 400,000 visits to the doctor by our insured persons due to vaccination complications to be realistic to date.” Schöfbeck said if figures are extrapolated over a year for the entire German population of 83 million people, it is likely 2.5 – 3 million people in Germany received medical treatment for COVID vaccine adverse events. “The data available to our company gives us reason to believe that there is a very considerable under-recording of suspected cases of vaccination side-effects after they received the [COVID-19] vaccine,” Schöfbeck wrote. Schöfbeck sent the letter to PEI President Dr. Klaus Cichutek, the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds, the German Medical Association, National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, the Standing Vaccination Commission and BKK’s umbrella organization. In another letter, the company suggested vaccine side effects across Germany are at least 10 times more common than what was reported by the PEI, the German newspaper Nordkurier reported Wednesday. The letters did not disclose symptoms, the severity of adverse events or which vaccines caused the side effects. Germany’s drug regulator approved COVID vaccines from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax and Moderna. Federal health officials in the U.S. and Germany have emphasized the benefits of COVID vaccines outweigh the potential risks, and side effects are rare. In the U.S. last month, an executive at an Indiana life insurance company reported a “stunning” 40% increase in the death rate among 18- to 64-year-old adults compared to pre-pandemic levels, The Defender reported. During the same call, OneAmerica’s CEO J. Scott Davison also described a major uptick in both short- and long-term disability claims. The insurance executive rated the extraordinarily high death rate as “the highest … we have seen in the history of this business,” adding the trend is “consistent across every player in that business.” To further underscore the import of his statements, Davison said, “Just to give you an idea of how bad [40%] is, a … one-in-200 catastrophe would be a 10% increase over pre-pandemic. So 40% is just unheard of.” Contrary to what the public might assume — given the media’s unremitting coverage of COVID-19 — Davison reported most of the death claims listed causes of death other than COVID. Commenting on the news, Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, wrote, “It would take something REALLY BIG to have an effect this big.” Moreover, Kirsch said, the culprit would have to be something first introduced in 2021 — “something new … that a huge number of people would be exposed to” — such as COVID shots. Vaccine scientist Dr. Robert Malone and statistician Jessica Rose, Ph.D., agreed that experimental COVID injections should be considered prime suspects...." SOURCE: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-injuries-german-health-insurer/ FOR GREAT NEWS FROM RFK'S SUPERB ORGANISATION 'CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENCE', SUBSCRIBE TO THEIR FREE NEWSLETTER ,'THE DEFENDER' HERE >>>>

On the 22nd February, the UK Metropolitan Police dismissed the evidence that the legal team Philip Hyland and Lois Bayliss, alongside Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and the people of Britain, have been submitting under crime ref: 6029679/21. This was a monumental failure in the UK justice system that will go down in history. The evidence was clear and damning. A line in the sand has been drawn. The Police are now guilty of obstructing justice. When submitting the files, our worry was simple: so much watertight and sometimes complex evidence had been submitted that the police might delay the obviously needed injunction for months as they sifted through the volumes. Since there is a rush to 'vaccinate' 5-11 year olds, speed is of utmost importance to halt this programme. To give an idea of the scale of the evidence, 500 witness and expert statements were submitted. In the time between submission and the Met Police statement, there was not enough time to review the vaccine damage statements or the complex science reports and data analysis submitted by some of the most qualified and trusted experts of Britain and abroad. 906 health professionals have signed our petition backing crime ref: 6029679/21 pause of the vaccination programme. 9,776 more people back the above health professionals and the lawyers. 10,682 people in total. Please copy and paste this link and share our petition widely. If everyone shares to 5 people who sign, we can soon reach 50,000. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/petition-police Philip Hyland has published this public letter as a response to the police dismissal of crime ref: 6029679/21: FULL LETTER - RESPONSE BY PHILIP HYLAND OF PH LAW Jane Connors Assistant Deputy Metropolitan Police Commissioner By email: 014/PH/2477/ 25 February 2022 Dear Ms Connors Re: Crime Reference Number:6029679/21 I am instructed by Doctor Sam White to request that you review your decision to take no further action in relation to the above crime reference number [CRN]. The letter is an open letter given the public interest in the issues raised as well as the need for transparency. The Complainants have 80 years of unblemished regulated service in regulated professions. Since reporting the crimes and obtaining a CRN, the Complainants have had untrue statements made about them in the mainstream media. All Complainants have reason to believe that their personal safety is under threat. All Complainants have reason to believe that concerted attempts are being made to undermine and denigrate the messengers rather than deal with the message. The letter covers the following: 1. An accurate chronology of events for the record as communications from the press office of the Metropolitan Police [the Met] have not aligned with the facts known to the Complainants and have not aligned with what the Complainants have been informed by Police Officers at Hammersmith Police station. Whether the evidential threshold was met for the Met to take action. A rebuttal of statements made by the Met. The statements made by the Met in our view are designed to frame the CRN and the Complainants in a particular way. Whether any Police Officers have misconducted themselves by their actions and or omissions. Chronology: Your press release is inaccurate as to what crimes were reported and what evidence was supplied. 1. On 20 December 2021 Doctor Sam White, Philip Hyland, Solicitor, Mark Sexton, retired Police Officer, and Lois Bayliss, Solicitor, [the Complainants] attended Hammersmith Police Station. The crimes of serious misconduct in public office, gross negligence causing injury and death, and or corporate manslaughter were reported. The reported crimes covered the government’s response to the pandemic declared by the WHO in March 2020. The details of the reported crimes in summary were: Scientists in the UK being complicit in and or assisting with the creation of a gain of function spike protein in Wuhan, China. The creation of such a spike protein breaches International Conventions on bioweapons. A grossly negligent failure by government to evidence that a virus has been purified and isolated. The grossly negligent authorisation and use of PCR and LFT tests as a method to identify whether an individual has a live SARS CoV2 infection. 2 The requirement to take LFT and or PCR tests without clinical diagnosis to access goods and services in breach of the fundamental human right to decline a medical intervention without penalty. The grossly negligent presentation of data which had the effect of inflating the material risk posed by SARS CoV2. The grossly negligent and unprecedented use of non-pharmaceutical interventions such as lockdowns which had little or no benefit but caused harm, loss, suffering and death. The grossly negligent and or corrupt suppression of safe and effective therapeutics such as Ivermectin and HCQ and Zinc. Safe and effective alternatives were suppressed in order to maintain the declared emergency status as well as pave the way for emergency use authorised SARS CoV2 injections. The grossly negligent failure to communicate the benefits of Vitamin D and or the immune system. The NICE Covid-19 rapid guidance stating that Vitamin D should not be used solely to treat Covid-19, except as part of a clinical trial. Clinical trials for Vitamin D were not undertaken or funded. It is clear that Vitamin D deficiency translates to increased morbidity and mortality in Covid-19 patients. The misuse of clinical pathways such as Remdesivir and Midazolam. The misuse and abuse of government communications, nudging and psychology which had the reasonably foreseeable impact of causing psychiatric harm and division within England and Wales. Abuse of statutory powers by the GMC to silence Doctors who spoke out against the harms being caused and the risks posed to patients. 3 l. The negligent authorisation and roll out of the SARS CoV2 injections where the regulator has failed to act on known and realised risks and taken no or inadequate steps to suspend authorisation to investigate those risks. That the conflicts of interest of those making decisions suggested corruption at worst and undue influence at best. The Police were requested to investigate direct and indirect financial interests of those making the decisions. A report was made that information had been received by one Complainant that one cabinet minister is said to have borrowed £500,000.00 from a Russian Investment Bank to buy Moderna shares in 2019. That the Guidance on the SARS CoV2 injections issued by the Department of Health and Social Care unlawfully breached the fundamental human right of every citizen resident in England and Wales. The breach was the unlawful fettering of each citizen’s right to decline treatment without penalty. The Guidance inverted the human rights of citizens by requiring a citizen to request an exemption from having an injection. An exemption was very difficult to obtain. The position in law is that the clinician has to ask the citizen for consent for a medical intervention. Exemption from all medical interventions is the default position. The Guidance therefore exerted unlawful third party influence on citizens to have an injection that many citizens did not want or need. Many care home and NHS workers had the injection to keep a job. This pressure and unlawful undue influence caused psychiatric injury, harm and or economic losses. Perpetrators were named to the Police Officer and a request was made to investigate any links those perpetrators had with Common Purpose, the freemasons and the World Economic Forum as the Complainants had cogent information that all these groups were complicit. Having heard the evidence the Police Officer was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that crimes had been committed and issued a CRN. 4 Contrary to what has been reported by the Metropoliltan Police, the BBC, Full Fact and Reuters no evidence was handed over on 20 December 2021 other than a list of names of witnesses who had agreed that they could be contacted to give the Police information. These witnesses included Robert F Kennedy Junior, Doctor Peter McCullough, Doctor Pierre Kory, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi and over 40 other eminent academics, scientists and clinicians. On 24 December 2021 the Complainants were supplied with a secure Metropolitan Police document upload facility [DUF] by a Detective from Hammersmith CID. This upload facility is still open as at 25 February 2022. On 5 January 2022 Mark Sexton attended Hammersmith Police station and verbalised the details of the reference made to the International Criminal Court [ICC] by Mark Sexton and others on 6 December 2021 under ICC reference number: OTP-CR-473-21. Mark Sexton made reports of breaches of International law and Convention Rights. A further 21 offences were identified and recorded. 1100 pages of evidence were also accepted by the detectives. Perpetrators were named including media organisations who have suppressed the facts and smeared those who have questioned the narrative. Mark Sexton was informed by the Police Officers that this was one of the biggest crimes recorded and investigations were ongoing. Mr Sexton was also informed that the investigation is so big that outside agencies would be considered for some of the investigative work. On 13 January 2022 Mark Sexton attended Hammersmith Police station and handed in 115 witness statements. Mark Sexton was informed by a member of CID that a Detective Chief Inspector was in charge of the investigation. On 25 January 2022 PJH Law Solicitors wrote to Cressida Dick, Met Commissioner, requesting that an adequate number of Police Officers should be assigned to the CRN and pointing out a number of conflicts of interest at the senior level of the Met and requesting that those identified as having a conflict have no access to the CRN file and take no decisions in relation to the CRN. 5 On 27 January 2022 the Complainants and JJ, a journalist and researcher, attended Hammersmith Police station and verbalised in more detail the suppression of HCQ and zinc. On 28 January 2022 Mark Sexton submitted a lengthy complaint to the IOPC against Warwickshire Police Force, the Met, and West Midlands Police. This complaint was acknowledged on 4 February 2022. The IOPC sent the complaint to the three forces on the same day and the Police forces were given 15 working days until 28 February 2022 to respond. On 7 February PJH Law Solicitors wrote to Hammersmith CID stating that there was sufficient evidence to arrest, caution and interview a very senior Police Officer at the Met for serious misconduct in public office. On 10 February 2022 Philip Hyland from PJH Law Solicitors received a telephone call from the Met in connection with correspondence recieved asking what outcome was wanted. On 12 February 2022 the Complainants attended Hammersmith Police station and explained that a lab analysis of a number of SARS Cov2 injection vials had been conducted and that analysis showed the presence of graphene, graphene oxide and carbon. Such materials are not listed as ingredients of any SARS CoV2 injection and are not authorised by any regulator. It was reported that Japan suspended the use of Moderna’s SARS CoV2 injection following a similar analysis.1 The Police Officer who attended confirmed that an investigation was ongoing and that over 70 pages of case notes generated by detectives were on file. On each visit in 2022 one or more of the Complainants were informed by the Police Officer who attended them that an investigation was ongoing. 1 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58405210 6 On 22 February 2022 all the Complainants received a letter dated 21 February 2022 from a Detective Superintendent stating that no further action would be taken by the Met in relation to the CRN. The Complainants were unaware that a Detective Superintendent had been assigned to the CRN. Between 20 December and 22 February 2022 a substantial volume of evidence has been uploaded to the DUF on all strands of the crimes recorded under the CRN. The following were uploaded to the DUF: Witness statements from experts. Witness statements from whistle blowers. Witness statements from eye witnesses. Witness statements from Doctors. Witness statements from workers suffering psychiatric injury and harm to their well being through unlawful undue influence and the exertion of third party pressure to have a SARS CoV2 injection or lose their income and or vocation and or career and or participation on an undergraduate course. Witness statements from victims. Documents to support the recorded crimes. Videos. The independent laboratory analysis showing the presence of graphene, graphene oxide and carbon in vials of SARS CoV2 injections. 2. Evidential Threshold: It is the Complainants’ view that the evidential threshold has been met to at least arrest, caution and interview named suspects. It may be helpful to remind ourselves of the constituent components of the offences alleged when the CRN was issued on 20 December 2021. The crime of serious misconduct in public office is defined as a public officer acting as such; wilfully neglects to perform his or her duty and/or wilfully misconducts him or herself; to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder; without reasonable excuse or justification. 7 The crime of gross negligence is the conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or both. The crime of corporate manslaughter is defined as the defendant is a qualifying organisation and the organisation owed a relevant duty of care to the deceased; there was a gross breach of that duty by the organisation; the way in which its activities were managed or organised by its senior management was a substantial element in the breach; and the gross breach of the organisation’s duty caused or contributed to the death. In the Complainants’ view the evidential threshold was met and this view was arrived at by talking to former Police Officers and benchmarking the evidence supplied against the constitutuent components of the crimes reported. The Complainants fully accept that the crime suspects may have explanations for their actions and omissions and that any individual accused of a crime is presumed innocent. If we take three strands of the CRN as an illustration. a) Strand 1 g) Suppression of safe and effective therapeutics: Ivermectin: Facts not in dispute: a. Ivermectin is very safe. Ivermectin has 6195 adverse events recorded at the WHO since 1993 as at 24 February 20222 3. 2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/ 3 http://www.vigiaccess.org/ 8 Ivermectin has substantial clinical evidence to prove safety and efficacy for the prevention of symptoms and the treatment of symptoms of SARS CoV2.4 Witness statements were uploaded to the DUF from Doctors Pierre Kory and Peter McCullough detailing the safety and efficacy of Ivermectin for patients at the early onset of SARS CoV2 symptoms. A witness statement was uploaded to the DUF from Doctor Tess Lawrie an eminent and independent evidence based medicine scientist detailing her research on Ivermectin and correspondence with Government ministers and officials in early 2021. Doctor Lawrie has no conflicts of interest. Video evidence was uploaded to the DUF showing Doctor Tess Lawrie’s video call with Doctor Andrew Hill where Doctor Hill was questioned on why he had not recommended Ivermectin, despite the evidence and despite being positive about Ivermectin’s safety and efficacy in correspondence. 5 Correspondence between Doctor Tess Lawrie and Doctor Andrew Hill was uploaded to the DUF. Doctor Andrew Hill is associated with Liverpool University as a Senior Visiting Research Fellow.6 Doctor Andrew Hill is an advisor to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [BAMGF]. 4 https://ivmmeta.com/ 5https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-vaccine-gold-rush-and-the-damning-ivermectin- tape/ 6 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrew-Hill 9 Liverpool University received $40 million from UNITAID which is funded by the BAMGF.7 The MHRA has been sponsored by the BAMGF. 8 That the BAMGF provided grant funding for Moderna.9 Moderna patented a genetic sequence in 2017 that matches with one found in the spike protein said to cause SARS CoV2. 10 That NICE and or the MHRA relied on Doctor Andrew Hill’s recommendation despite that recommendation not being backed by a peer reviewed paper and despite the acknowledged pressure from a sponsor. That Doctor Lawrie’s written evidence to the Parliamentary select committee detailed that senior officials, ministers and MPs refused to answer concerns over the non-approval of Ivermectin, in particular concerns that the Government and officals had ignored their own guidelines. 11 That Bill Gates is an investor in vaccines and expects a 20 fold return. 12 7https://unitaid.org/news-blog/unitaid-funding-sees-launch-of-worlds-first-long-acting- medicines-centre-at-university-of-liverpool/#en 8 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra-awarded-over-980000-for-collaboration-with-the- bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-and-the-world-health-organisation 9 https://www.modernatx.com/ecosystem/strategic-collaborators/foundations-advancing-mrna- science-and-research 10 https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US9587003#section=Full-Text 11 https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/36858/pdf/ 12https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/bill-gates-turns-10-billion-into-200-billion-worth-of- economic-benefit.html 10 That Bill Gates has been seen in the company of many UK politicians and is associated with the WEF as are many UK politicians.13 That part of the CRN was an unverified claim that a cabinet minister had borrowed £500,000.00 from a Russian Investment Bank to buy shares in Moderna. Had Ivermectin been authorised for treatment of SARS CoV2 there would have been no need for an emergency use authorised SARS CoV2 injection. Had Ivermectin been approved the adverse events from SARS CoV2 injections including death and injuries recorded on the MHRA’s yellow card system would have been avoided. Had Ivermectin been authorised for treatment of SARS CoV2 the emergency declared by the Government could have ended thereby avoiding the collateral health and economic harms of lockdowns. Strand 1 g) Suppression of safe and effective therapeutics HCQ and Zinc: Facts not in dispute: HCQ has a very safe profile with 33485 adverse events recorded at Vigiaccess since 1968 as at 24 February 2022. There is substantial clinical evidence that HCQ and Zinc is safe and effective prophylaxsis and or early treatment for SARS CoV2. 13 https://www.weforum.org/agenda/authors/bill-gates 11 Expert evidence was uploaded via the DUF demonstrating the safety and efficacy of HCQ and Zinc from the Zelenko, Raoult and American Front Line Doctors protocols.14 15 The MHRA and or NICE declined to authorise HCQ and Zinc based on the results of the Horby and Landray HCQ trial. The Horby and Landray clinical trial protocol was flawed as the dosage for the trial was set at 2400mg per 24 hours and the dosage was applied at the wrong stage of disease progression. The safe dosage of HCQ is between 200 and 400mg.16 A contact name and address was given to you of a person who had written to the Principal Investigators of the Recovery Trial, Professors Landray and Horby. That letter pointed out before the clinical trial commenced that the dosage was too high and potentially dangerous. These concerns were not adequately addressed in response. The HCQ trial was directly or indirectly sponsored by BAMGF as well as the Wellcome Trust. More patients died on the non-placebo arm of the trial than on the placebo arm. 14 https://c19study.com 15 https://hcqmeta.com/ 16 https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drug/hydroxychloroquine-sulfate.html 12 The HCQ trial has been extensively reported in the international press as a national scandal. Up to 90 patients died in NHS hospitals from what is described as a toxic overdose. The clinical trial set a record for the number of patients dying on the non-placebo arm, put at 27% or approximately 90 deaths of which between 18 and 48 deaths can be attributed to the overdose. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25. HCQ if given at regular dosage of 200 to 800mg per 24 hours is not toxic. 26 An HCQ study that was published by the Lancet had to be retracted. 27 The Met were given contact details of relevant witnesses as well as a summary of evidence those witnesses had including audio recordings. Experts were prepared to travel from France to meet with the Met. The Met was informed by a witness, JJ, a person who takes HCQ daily for a chronic condition for over 15 years, that a dosage of 2400 mg would have hospitalised her, despite her HCQ tolerance built up over 15 years. https://www.fortunejournals.com/articles/shunt-due-to-hydroxychloroquine-sublethal- dosage-resulted-in-excess-transfer-to-mechanical-ventilation-and-death-in-hospitalized-p.htm 18 https://www.francesoir.fr/politique-monde/oxford-etude-recovery-ou-sont-les-mort 19 https://www.francesoir.fr/societe-science-tech/oxford-recovery-are-data-hiding-death 20 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2035374 22https://www.francesoir.fr/politique-monde/oxford-recovery-et-solidarity-overdosage-two- clinical-trials-acts-considered 25https://www.palmerfoundation.com.au/systemic-discouragement-of-hydroxychloroquine-is-a- national-scandal/ 26https://www.fortunejournals.com/articles/shunt-due-to-hydroxychloroquine-sublethal- dosage-resulted-in-excess-transfer-to-mechanical-ventilation-and-death-in-hospitalized-p.htm 27 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext 13 17 21https://www.francesoir.fr/politique-monde/oxford-recovery-good-news-decoy-hide- inconsistencies-and-serious-faults 23https://youtu.be/GojPyrYllPw 24https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6194885914001 That the Police have often charged care workers and clinicians where death has arisen because of a grossly negligent administration of an incorrect dose which causes death. Robert F Kennedy Junior has detailed the criminality of the suppression of safe and effective therapeutics in his book on Doctor Fauci and has also detailed the regulatory capture involved where those taking the decisions stood to benefit directly and indirectly from the decisions taken. 28 It is our view that the failure to approve and or authorise Ivermectin and or HCQ and Zinc for use in the early treatment of SARS CoV2 amounts to a crime. The failure to approve and or authorise was despite the clinical evidence of safety and efficacy from independent sources and despite ample evidence of safety and efficacy in clinic. Both therapeutics are safe when dosed correctly. Both therapeutics have excellent safety profiles established over 30 and 50 years respectively. When considering authorisation of therapies the MHRA should have patient safety at the forefront of their considerations. The MHRA should also be alive to the possibility that commercial interests may skew scientific research. There is ample evidence that what happened with Ivermectin, HCQ and Zinc is a pattern of criminality where safe and effective treatments are denied to the public in favour of new therapies which are more lucrative but lack the safety profile. Robert F Kennedy has detailed the similarities between the approval of AZT for AIDS and the suppression of cheaper and safer alternatives and the approval of SARS CoV2 injections and the suppression of safe and effective alternatives. 28 https://www.spin.com/2022/01/robert-f-kennedy-jr-interview-2022/ 14 There is ample evidence that the funders of HCQ and Ivermectin research relied on by the regulators benefitted from the outcomes of the research. A regulator properly conducting itself should have been alive to the possibility that the funders of the research required the outcome that was delivered by the research and should have identified the conflicts of interest present. No regulator and or government official properly conducting themselves could have relied on the Landray/Horby trial as the dosage was obviously too high and dangerously so. Had the regulator conducted itself properly then one or both of the Ivermectin and or HCQ and Zinc would have been authorised and that authorisation would have prevented the following which were all avoidable: 1. The harms and losses associated with lockdowns. 2. The huge number of SARS CoV2 injection adverse events logged with Vigiaccess. Strand 1 l) The grossly negligent authorisation and roll out of of SARS CoV2 injections: Any investigation of the SARS CoV2 injection authorisation and roll out cannot be sensibly considered in isolation. Informed consent requires alternatives to be explained and considered. If alternatives have not been authorised despite the evidence, any investigative review has to look at that context. In order for the SARS CoV2 injections to be emergency use authorised there has to be no available effective therapeutic. If there is an available therapeutic there is no emergency and no emergency use authorisation. There is a common denominator on the funding of research which knocked out the alternatives, the BAMGF. That fact in and of itself should have raised major alarm bells and red flags. 15 The circumstances surrounding how the alternatives Ivermectin and HCQ were discarded are crucial for understanding the process of authorisation and roll out for the SARS CoV2 injections. From the evidence presented there are major concerns surrounding why these alternatives were not authorised. It is apparent that Ivermectin, HCQ and Zinc had different and higher standards applied to them than the SARS CoV2 injections. HCQ was not authorised following 90 deaths on a trial conducted at a toxic dose, yet over 2000 deaths are reported on the yellow card system from the SARS CoV2 injections. It is accepted by the MHRA that the yellow card system only records 10% of all adverse events. Deaths from SARS Cov2 injections appear to be a matter of grossly negligent indifference to the regulator. Authorisation: Pfizer has a record fine for criminal conduct involving fraud.29 The mRNA mode of action is novel.30 The mRNA mode of action is described as gene therapy and usually requires years of follow up studies.31 The mRNA is described as an operating system on the Moderna website; “ we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that is can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.” 31 29 https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/sep/02/pfizer-drugs-us-criminal-fine 30 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html 31 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html 31 https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development 16 At the point of authorisation the time from proof of concept to authorisation was 9 months. At the point of authorisation the MHRA knew or should have known that there was evidence that the spike protein was man made and the makers and or funders of the makers of the spike protein may be the same group of people who stood to benefit from a vaccine that incorporated a patented spike protein. That group of people also stood to benefit from the elimination of the competition, Ivermectin and HCQ and zinc. The evidence supplied to the Met supports the interpretation that the group of people who created the problem, the spike protein, also funded the solution, the SARS Cov2 injection. That same group of people also funded the research that elimnated the safe and effective alternatives that constituted the competition and a barrier to emergency use authorisation of the SARS CoV2 injections, the injections that they had funded and invested susbtantial sums of money in. This modus operandi has the hallmarks of an illegal cartel that has captured the regulator and puts money ahead of the lives and health of the public. Expert witness Hedley Rees provided a witness statement uploaded via the DUF which stated that in his opinion 12 years was the average time between proof of concept and authorisation for a biologic drug or therapy and that 9 months was too short a time to conduct adequate trials. Expert witness Hedley Rees stated that in his opinion the MHRA did not have the requisite experience to consider the authrorisation application. The civil servants at the European Medicines Agency [EMA] leaked documents which were then uploaded via the DUF which showed substantial concerns relating to any authorisation. Nine objections to authorisation were identified in November 2020 including the fact that the vaccine product used for the clinical trials would not necessarily be the same product administered to the public. 17 Expert evidence was uploaded to the DUF detailing the flaws in the design of the SARS CoV2 trial protocols. The Pfizer trial protocol enrolled trial participants based on one symptom and the results of a PCR test, which is itself inherently flawed. Statements were uploaded from two scientists involved in the Corman Drosten review. An expert statement from Professor Sucharit Bhakdi detailing the mRNA mode of action as eliciting the wrong immune response meaning that ADE is likely to result. Thereisnoevidencethatabio-distributionstudywasconsideredbythe MHRA. Had a bio-distribution been considered it is probable that the SARS CoV2 would not have been authorised given the findings of the Japanese bio-distribution as well as expert evidence from Doctor Bryam Brindle and Professor Arne Burkhardt detailing his pathology findings and build up of spike proteins in body organs. Until follow up safety studies are complete the SARS CoV2 injections are still in clinical trial under the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004. 32 The duty of care is higher and the standards for informed consent are stricter where the drug is still in clinical trial and involves a novel or experimental mode of action. Post-authorisation: The number of deaths recorded on the VAERS system post SARS CoV2 injection is 91 times higher than the number of deaths recorded post flu vaccine. 32 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1031/contents/made 18 The Met has whistle blower evidence from staff in the NHS detailling the lack of training in and awareness of reporting adverse events via the yellow card system. The Met has evidence of the lack of advertising of the yellow card system to victims of adverse events. The Met has whistle blower evidence from GPs detailing the lack of training in and awareness of reporting adverse events via the yellow card system. The GPs have reported seeing statistically significant increases of rare diseases as well as aggressive cancers. The Met has expert pathology reports showing the build up of spike proteins in the organs of 17 deceased and vaccinated persons. The Met has evidence that the Japanese bio-distribution study was brought to the attention of the MHRA in July 2021. There is no evidence that the MHRA took any action. The Met has expert evidence from an actuary and data analysyts showing that the 10% increase in all cause male mortality in some age cohorts in 2021 is 99% likely to be SARS CoV2 injection related. The Met has no evidence that the MHRA has taken any action to investigate whether the statistically significant increase in deaths in some age cohorts is SARS CoV2 injection related. TheMethasexpertevidencethatsomebatchnumberscausefarmore adverse events than others. That fact has been known since the start of the roll out and there is no evidence that the MHRA has taken any action to investigate and or suspend authorisation pending investigation. You have witness evidence from two vaccine injured both of whom received SARS CoV2 injections from batches that have a disproportionate number of adverse events. 19 The Met has evidence that the UK yellow card system is inadequate and fails to identify and or publish details of batch numbers which is vital in identifying those who have had bad batches. Expert statement from Doctor Urso detailing the risk from the SARS- CoV-2 injection of ADE subsequently borne out by clinical data from the PHE and Public Health Scotland. The risk of ADE from SARS CoV2 injections was known about before authorisation yet no action has been taken to suspend authorisation pending investigation when that risk materialised. A statement from a former Civil Servant on FOIs to MHRA which related to his reporting to MHRA in April and August 2021 reports of vaccine induced spontaneous abortion and hearing loss. The MHRA took no action. A statement from a member of the public confirming that she informed the MHRA of the risk the spike protein may go beyond the injection site. The MHRA took no action. bb. A statement from a vaccine injured witness who attests to partial paralysis following a SARS-CoV2 injections, with a condition related to the spinal cord. cc. You have expert evidence showing that there is a statistically significant increase in the incidence of pericarditis and myocarditis in some age cohorts with such an increase being well above the background rate. You have no evidence that the MHRA has taken any action to suspend and investigate this issue despite the fact that the age cohort where the increases are occurring are statistically least at risk from death or hospitalisation from SARS CoV2. dd.You have a summary of evidence from Attorney Renz from the department of defence in USA showing that post injection roll out there 20 has been a statistically significant increases in many disabling conditions as well as spontaneous abortions. ee.You have evidence that the Pfizer trial is alleged to have been conducted fraudulently. You were given the phone number for Brook Jackson, the whistleblower from the Clinical Research Organisation who witnessed irregularities and fraudulent activity during the Pfizer RCT. ff. You have a copy of Brook Jackson’s US court filing which sets out the alleged breaches of trial protocol. gg.You have been given the name of a witness that can show that exclusions from one Pfizer RCT may have materially altered the results and had the exclusions not been excluded from the non-placebo arm, that arm is highly likely to have had a worse safety profile than the placebo arm. There were said to be 10 times more exclusions from the non-placebo arm than from the placebo arm. hh.You have witness statements from women reporting menstrual problems following vaccination. You have no evidence that the MHRA has followed up on reports of menstrual and fertility concerns reported to the MHRA. The Japanese bio-idstribution study reported spike proteins being found in the ovaries. ii. Irregularities in the Pfizer trial were known about since at least 2 November 2021 as those concerns were published in the BMJ. You have no evidence that the MHRA took any action to suspend the authorisation pending investigation of those concerns. jj. You have a laboratory analysis report showing the presence of graphene, graphene oxide and carbon in SARS CoV2 injections. None of these materials are authorised or legal. All are toxic. 21 kk. The MHRA has or should have known about the presence of unauthorised matter in SARS CoV2 injections since at least June 2021 when reports first emerged yet has taken no action. 33 ll. There is substantial evidence that most of these issues and concerns have been brought to the attention of legislators and members of the cabinet by members of the public but no evidence that any action has been taken. mm.There is evidence supplied that the SARS CoV2 injections appeared to have negative efficacy from at least November 2021 based on figures from Public Health Scotland, withdrawing the product at that point would have carried little or no risk. nn. There is substantial evidence that proof of vaccination is a political issue and required for the introduction of digital identities and that such a concept was initiated in 2019. oo.That exerting undue influence on citizens to have an injection is unlawful, particularly where the objective is political and or commercial rather than health related. From the evidence supplied to the Met it is clear that: 1. There is evidence that the process of authorisation was grossly negligent as: The clinical trial protocol was flawed including being unblinded too early. The clinical trial process is subject to allegations of fraud. The clinical trials were run over an inadequate period of time. 32 https://trialsitenews.com/forums/reply/65263/ 22 There is no long term safety data and no basis for anyone being able to say that the SARS CoV2 injections are safe as the purpose of follow up studies is to gather data on any safety issues. The raw data is only now being released and such a release is being contested by Pfizer, contesting the release of raw data infers and or implies that there is something to hide. The FDA had originally asked for 75 years to fully release Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine data to the public. There is no evidence that the MHRA examined the raw data. The elimination of the competition has the modus operandi of an illegal, mafia type cartel. 2. There is substantial evidence that the post roll out vigilance is either absent or conducted in a grossly negligent way as: There is no evidence of any rigorous process for reporting of adverse events. There are a significant number of serious adverse events reported under VAERS and the yellow card system resulting from the vaccines including a statistically signifcant increase in myocarditis and pericarditis and a statistically significant increase in death in some age cohorts. There is no evidence that the MHRA has taken any action to suspend authorisation and investigate the statistically significant increases in deaths and serious conditions, above the background rate, in some age cohorts. There is substantial evidence that some vials of the SARS CoV2 injections have unauthorised and toxic materials in and materials which resulted in the product being withdrawn in one other jurisdiction, Japan. There is evidence that Germany is taking legal action against Pfizer on the basis that the vials contain nanolipids (ALC-0315 and ALC – 0159) 23 which are substances that are not to be used on or in humans, but exclusively for research purposes. There is no evidence of any rigorous process for reporting of adverse events. Given that there is data that suggests the SARS CoV2 injections had negative efficacy since at least November 2021 withdrawing the products from the market at that point carried little to no risks. 3. Rebuttal of points made by the Met Police: The Met has sought to frame the CRN as solely around suppression of information regarding the SARS CoV2 injection. That is not how the crimes were reported. The crimes that were reported are detailed at 1. In relation to the injections the crimes were based on the fact that even on the inadequate data from the yellow card system and VAERS the SARS CoV2 injections were causing injury and death to people who had very limited risk from SARS CoV2. Those people had felt compelled to have the SARS Cov2 injection based on an illegal fettering of the fundamental human right to decline a medical intervention. That fettering was implemented by the executive inverting the fundamental human right to informed consent by executive action, the issuing of guidance. It is established law that human rights cannot be removed by executive action. Instead of having the absolute right to decline a medical intervention for any reason, declining the SARS CoV2 medical intervention saw a reduction in rights to travel freely and to hold down an occupation. The government and agencies exerted unlawful undue influence on individuals’ decision making. We all know someone who has had the SARS CoV2 injection to keep a job or to not have to self-isolate on return from air travel. The Met has also sought to argue that the SARS CoV2 injections have been subject to “stringent approval processes.” The Met has produced no evidence of these stringent approval processes. We assume the Met means authorisation process as the vaccines are emergency use authorised rather than approved. Any emergency use authorisation is conditional on there being 24 no safe and effective alternatives. The Met has failed to mention this in any public statement. The evidence supplied to the Met shows that had a stringent approval process been conducted by the MHRA the fraud reported by the BMJ would have been uncovered at the approval stage rather than 9 months later. Stringent approval processes unearth fraud. Further, a stringent approval process would have queried the mode of action of the SARS CoV2 injections which elicit the wrong immune response according to Professor Sucharit Bhakdi. A stringent approval process would have required the production of a bio- distribution study to ensure that post-injection the spike protein remained at the injection site rather than be present in vital body organs. A stringent approval process would have examined the raw RCT trial data with a fine toothed comb. The fact that Pfizer is contesting the release of the raw data suggests that there is something to hide. The Met appears also not to have grasped that emergency use authorisation is subject to constant vigilance post authorisation. Regulation is constant rather than fixed. Had stringent post authorisation vigilance been conducted by the MHRA the MHRA would have set up a robust adverse event reporting system. All the evidence in the Met’s possession shows no such system was set up as NHS staff had not been trained in using such a system and evidence from GPs showed that yellow card reporting of adverse events was a difficult process. Had stringent post authorisation vigilance been conducted by the MHRA SARS CoV2 injections would have been suspended to allow for investigation of serious adverse events, including bad batches and the presence of 25 unauthorised and toxic materials in vials. There is no evidence that the MHRA has taken any action to suspend authorisation pending further investigation. 10. The Met in their public statement also suggested “In recent months, the existence of a crime reference number in relation to these allegations has been widely misrepresented as evidence of a criminal investigation or of findings of wrongdoing”. The Police Officers at Hammersmith Police station informed the Complainants on numerous occasions that an investigation was ongoing. At least two of those statements are recorded. There is no evidence that any of the Complainants have suggested that an investigation equates to findings of wrongdoing. The Complainants understand the process to be that if the evidence collected during a Police investigation is sufficient, that evidence is presented to the CPS for a decision on charging. If a suspect is charged and goes to trial a jury finds whether the evidence presented to the court establishes whether any defendant is guilty or not guilty of wrongdoing. 4. The conduct of the certain Met Police Officers: The following statements are made. If you disagree with any of them please give a reason for any disagreement: The Met is required to act in accordance with the law. The rule of law entails we are all equal before the law. In discharging the Met’s duties Police Officers are: Required to act without fear or favour. This means investigating any crime suspect no matter what position they hold. Required to honour their oath to uphold fundamental human rights. 26 iii. Required to investigate crimes involving breaches of Convention Rights. The right to decline a medical intervention for any reason is a fundamental human right. It is unlawful for a government and or a government agency to subject an individual to unlawful undue influence to take a medical intervention. The fundamental human right to decline a medical intervention is even more important when the intervention in question is experimental, still in clinical trial and has been subject to numerous adverse events and when one of the makers of the intervention has been subject to criminal penalties for fraud. That the laws on informed consent are both national and international and are International Convention rights. That Met Commissioner Dick received an open letter dated 2 July 2021 to Sir Simon Stevens alleging criminal gross negligence and illegal conflicts of interest by the government in responding to the pandemic declared by the WHO. Met Commissioner Dick took no action on that letter. That the Met is in receipt of many witness statements from victims who complain of being subjected to either physical or psychiatric harm as a result of inhumane and or degrading requirements to have a medical intervention which is still in clinical trial, is experimental or novel and has caused numerous reports to be made on the Yellow Card system of serious adverse events. Adverse events following an injection are recorded as 1 in 50 by a German insurer. That alleged breaches of Convention Rights place a positive obligation on the Met to investigate particularly where those breaching Convention 27 rights are the state or agents of the state.34 Any failure to investigate renders the Met liable for such a failure. Police Officers at Hammersmith Police station informed the Complainants that an investigation was ongoing. A Police Officer at Hammersmith Police station made an untrue statement on the CRN file on 27 January 2022. That none of the witnesses or Complainants have been contacted by the Met to be interviewed. That the Complainants have not been informed that any Police Officer has recused themselves from the investigation or evidence review owing to a conflict of interest, for example belonging to the freemasons or being a graduate of Common Purpose. That senior officers within the Met have a policy to encourage vaccination of Police Officers with the SARS CoV2 injection and are therefore aligned with government policy which is subject to an ICC referral as well as a CRN. There is no evidence that that bias has been recognised. That the Complainants have evidence that Police Officers who query a Police Force’s policy on SARS CoV2 injections are marginalised and their detailed criticisms of the policy are not dealt with by senior officers. That the Complainants have not been informed whether or not the Met has sought guidance from the Crown Prosecution Service. 34 https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2015-0166-press-summary.pdf 28 That senior officers within the Met have aligned themselves with and supported government policy which is now subject to both an ICC referral as well as a CRN. That the first time the Complainants knew a Superintendent was allocated to the CRN was on 22 February 2022 when the Superintendent sent the letter stating that no further action was to be taken. That making untrue statements to Complainants amounts to misconduct. That communicating publicly that the CRN only relates to suppression of information relating to the SARS CoV2 injection amounts to misconduct. That failing to investigate where there is a positive obligation to investigate amounts to misconduct. That Police Officers failing to declare interests and recuse themselves from being involved in the review of evidence amounts to misconduct given that members of certain organisations such as freemasons and or Common Purpose are within scope of the CRN. 29 Could you come back to me with a response within 14 days on: Whether you will now investigate the reported crimes under the CRN. What if anything you disagree with in 4 a to w. Many thanks and have a great weekend. Yours sincerely Philip Hyland Principal DOWNLOAD THE FULL LETTER HERE - PLEASE KEEP A COPY AND DISTRIBUTE This Police dismissal of crime ref: 6029679/21 was broadcast by the mainstream press, which was a victory for us, as until then any mention of the case had been suppressed. The great work of UK activists had raised the barrier to a point where there had to be a response. Thank you to everyone who sent warning letters to the schools, letting teachers know about the case number, kicking up a storm. The fight for justice does not stop here. This is just the start. PLEASE ADD YOUR NAME TO OUR PETITION AND PLEASE SHARE WITH A PERSONAL MESSAGE TO FIVE OF YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/petition-police

Overall, for every 118 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. Some of my calculations suggest it could be as low as 0.5% The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 9TH FEB 2022: DATA for doses 1 & 2 Pfizer - 25.9 million people - 49 million doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-157 people impacted Astrazeneca - 24.9 million people - 49.1 million doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-102 people impacted Moderna - 1.6 million people - 3 million doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-45 people impacted DATA for 3rd dose (known as the booster) Total = 37,650,239 jabbed Booster Yellow Card Reports 28,941 (Pfizer) 466 (AZ) 15,870 (Moderna) 151 (Unknown) TOTAL = 45,428 BREAKDOWN Reports i.e. This is number of people who did fill out an adverse reaction with Yellow Card system It is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported 164,679 (Pfizer) 243,491 (AZ) 35,566 (Moderna) 1,520 (Unknown) TOTAL = 445,256 people have made a report Fatal 718 (Pfizer) 1221 (AZ) 38 (Moderna) 40 (Unknown) Total = 2017 Blood Disorders - 16,759 (Pfizer) + 7793 (AZ) + 2428 (Moderna) + 62 (Unknown) = 27,042 Anaphylaxis - 649 (Pfizer) + 871 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1609 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 875 (Pfizer) + 3029 (AZ) + 106 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 4035 Acute Cardiac - 12,273 (Pfizer) + 11,147 (AZ) + 3009 (Moderna) + 90 (Unknown) = 26,519 Eye Disorders - 7772 (Pfizer) + 14,797 (AZ) + 1460 (Moderna) + 83 (Unknown) = 24,112 Blindness - 155 (Pfizer) + 317 (AZ) + 31 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 507 Deafness - 288 (Pfizer) + 424 (AZ) + 50 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 767 Spontaneous Abortions - 471 + 1 premature baby death / 15 stillbirth/foetal deaths (11 recorded as fatal) (Pfizer) + 229 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 60 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 765 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 78,872 (Pfizer) + 182,030 (AZ) + 19,215 (Moderna) + 839 (Unknown) = 280,956 Seizures - 1068 (Pfizer) + 2050 (AZ) + 250 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3385 Paralysis - 495 (Pfizer) + 871 (AZ) + 98 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 1472 Tremor - 2117 (Pfizer) + 9925 (AZ) + 637 (Moderna) + 50 (Unknown) = 12,729 Headaches & Migraines - 35,041 (Pfizer) + 93,844 (AZ) + 9112 (Moderna) + 331 (Unknown) = 138,328 Vomiting - 5134 (Pfizer) + 11,631 (AZ) + 1727 (Moderna) + 59 (Unknown) = 18,551 Infections - 11,611 (Pfizer) + 20,089 (AZ) + 2160 (Moderna) + 150 (Unknown) = 34,010 Herpes - 2149 (Pfizer) + 2676 (AZ) + 240 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 5088 Immune System Disorders - 2369 (Pfizer) + 3274 (AZ) + 593 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 6257 Skin Disorders - 33,094 (Pfizer) + 53,154 (AZ) + 12,637 (Moderna) + 330 (Unknown) = 99,215 Respiratory Disorders - 20,950 (Pfizer) + 29,585 (AZ) + 4015 (Moderna) + 196 (Unknown) = 54,746 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1063 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 188 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 3564 Psychiatric Disorders - 9876 (Pfizer) + 18,289 (AZ) + 2339 (Moderna) + 108 (Unknown) = 30,612 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 30,236 (Pfizer) + 20,649 (AZ) + 4905 (Moderna) + 199 (Unknown) = 55,989 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Seem at LONDON freedom protest 22nd Jan 2022 PLEASE NOTE HOW THE NUMBERS OF CHILDREN JABBED ARE STILL ROUNDED UP. This suggests poor record-keeping Pfizer - 3,200,000 children (1st dose) plus 1,500,000 second dose 3044 Yellow Cards AZ - 12,400 children (1st dose) 254 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-49 Moderna - 2000 children (1st dose) 18 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified 18 Yellow Cards Total = 3,214,400 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3334 For full reports including 346 pages of specific reaction listings: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions 13 REASONS TO NOT VACCINATE 5-11 YEAR OLDS Reason No. 1 - 86% of 12-15-year old Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine in the Clinical Trial Reason No. 2 - 1 in 9 Children suffered a Severe Adverse Reaction leaving them unable to perform daily activities in the Pfizer Clinical Trial Reason No. 3 - Just 17 deaths associated with Covid-19 have occurred in Teenagers & Children since March 2020 Reason No. 4 - The risk of children developing serious illness due to Covid-19 is extremely low Reason No. 5 - The Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine is experimental and still in Clinical Trials Reason No. 6 - Three Scientific Studies conducted by the UK Government, Oxford University, & CDC, which were published in August have found the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work Reason No. 7 - Public Health England Data shows the majority of Covid-19 Deaths are among the Vaccinated and suggests that the Vaccines worsen disease Reason No. 8 - There had been at least 1.18 million Adverse Reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccines in the UK alone up to September 1st Reason No. 9 - There were more deaths in 8 months due to the Covid-19 Vaccines than there have been due to all other available Vaccines combined since the year 2001 Reason No. 10 - The risk of Myocarditis (Heart Inflammation) in Children due to the Pfizer Vaccine Reason No. 11 - Children have died and are dying due to the Covid-19 Vaccines Reason No. 12 - Who profits from your Child getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? Reason No. 13 - The Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation refused to recommend the Pfizer Vaccine be offered to Children aged 12-15 SOURCE: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/23/13-reasons-why-children-5-to-11-should-not-have-the-covid-vaccine/ PLEASE SEND THIS LEGAL LETTER TO YOUR SCHOOLS NOW! This is an easy, quick and effective action. INSTRUCTIONS There are two options to deliver the letter EMAIL 1 - copy and paste the text into an email, ALSO attaching the downloaded letter 2 - CC the email to Lois loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk 3 - Click send DOWNLOAD THE LETTER HERE A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you have suffered any form of adverse reaction and are a UK citizen please fill in a witness statement for the case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Overall, for every 118 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. Some of my calculations suggest it could be as low as 0.5% The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 2nd Feb 2022 DATA fo doses 1 & 2 * Pfizer - 25.8million people - 48.7m doses Yellow Card reporting rate 1-in-158 * Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49.1m doses Yellow Card reporting rate 1-in-102 * Moderna - 1.6m people - 3m doses Yellow Card reporting rate 1-in-45 DATA for 3rd Dose known as the booster. Total = 37,419,104 jabbed. Booster Yellow Card Reports 28,481 (Pfizer) 452 (AZ) 15,682 (Moderna) 148 (Unknown) Total = 44,763 BREAKDOWN Reports i.e. number of people who did fill out an adverse reaction with yellow card system NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported 163,709 (Pfizer) 243,279 (AZ) 35,302 (Moderna) 1509 (Unknown) Total = 443,799 reports of injury or death Fatal 717 (Pfizer) 1218 (AZ) 37 (Moderna) 38 (Unknown) Total = 2010 Blood Disorders - 16,694 (Pfizer) + 7787 (AZ) + 2405 (Moderna) + 62 (Unknown) = 26,948 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 871 (Pfizer) + 3026 (AZ) + 100 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 4022 Anaphylaxis - 648 (Pfizer) + 870 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1607 Acute Cardiac - 12,094 (Pfizer) + 11,095 (AZ) + 2965 (Moderna) + 88 (Unknown) = 26,242 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1200 (Pfizer) + 428 (AZ) + 306 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1941 Eye Disorders - 7700 (Pfizer) + 14,776 (AZ) + 1445 (Moderna) + 83 (Unknown) = 24,004 Blindness - 153 (Pfizer) + 316 (AZ) + 31 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 504 Deafness - 284 (Pfizer) + 423 (AZ) + 48 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 760 Spontaneous Abortions - 467 + 1 premature baby death / 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 227 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 60 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 759 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 78,444 (Pfizer) + 181,941 (AZ) + 19,095 (Moderna) + 834 (Unknown) = 280,314 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 749 (Pfizer) + 2286 (AZ) + 46 (Moderna) + 15 (Unknown) = 3096 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 1084 (Pfizer) + 998 (AZ) + 148 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2240 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4047 (Pfizer) + 6888 (AZ) + 671 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 11,645 Seizures - 1061 (Pfizer) + 2048 (AZ) + 248 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3374 Paralysis - 493 (Pfizer) + 869 (AZ) + 97 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 1467 Disturbances in Consciousness - 7241 (Pfizer) + 10,897 (AZ) + 2090 (Moderna) + 73 (Unknown) = 20,301 Infections - 11,449 (Pfizer) + 20,029 (AZ) + 2121 (Moderna) + 146 (Unknown) = 33,745 Herpes - 2139 (Pfizer) + 2674 (AZ) + 237 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 5073 Skin Disorders - 32,887 (Pfizer) + 53,107 (AZ) + 12,551 (Moderna) + 326 (Unknown) = 98,871 Respiratory Disorders - 20,802 (Pfizer) + 29,550 (AZ) + 3971 (Moderna) + 189 (Unknown) = 54,512 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 30,019 (Pfizer) + 20,606 (AZ) + 4859 (Moderna) + 199 (Unknown) = 55,683 Psychiatric Disorders - 9806 (Pfizer) + 18,268 (AZ) + 2320 (Moderna) + 106 (Unknown) = 30,500 Vomiting - 5109 (Pfizer) + 11,629 (AZ) + 1710 (Moderna) + 58 (Unknown) = 18,506 Tremor - 2107 (Pfizer) + 9920 (AZ) + 630 (Moderna) + 50 (Unknown) = 12,707 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Seem at LONDON freedom protest 22nd Jan 2022 Pfizer - 3,100,000 children (1st doses) plus 1,400,000 second doses 2962 Yellow Cards (up 104 since last week) AZ - 12,400 children (1st doses) plus 9,200 second doses 254 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-49 Moderna - 2000 children (1st doses) and 1200 second doses 18 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 18 Yellow Cards Total = 3,114,400 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3252 For full reports including 346 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions 13 REASONS TO NOT VACCINATE 5-11 YEAR OLDS Reason No. 1 - 86% of 12-15-year old Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine in the Clinical Trial Reason No. 2 - 1 in 9 Children suffered a Severe Adverse Reaction leaving them unable to perform daily activities in the Pfizer Clinical Trial Reason No. 3 - Just 17 deaths associated with Covid-19 have occurred in Teenagers & Children since March 2020 Reason No. 4 - The risk of Children developing serious illness due to Covid-19 is extremely low Reason No. 5 - The Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine is experimental and still in Clinical Trials Reason No. 6 - Three Scientific Studies conducted by the UK Government, Oxford University, & CDC, which were published in August have found the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work Reason No. 7 - Public Health England Data shows the majority of Covid-19 Deaths are among the Vaccinated and suggests that the Vaccines worsen disease Reason No. 8 - There had been at least 1.18 million Adverse Reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccines in the UK alone up to September 1st Reason No. 9 - There were more deaths in 8 months due to the Covid-19 Vaccines than there have been due to all other available Vaccines combined since the year 2001 Reason No. 10 - The risk of Myocarditis (Heart Inflammation) in Children due to the Pfizer Vaccine Reason No. 11 - Children have died and are dying due to the Covid-19 Vaccines Reason No. 12 - Who profits from your Child getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? Reason No. 13 - The Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation refused to recommend the Pfizer Vaccine be offered to Children aged 12-15 SOURCE: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/23/13-reasons-why-children-5-to-11-should-not-have-the-covid-vaccine/ PLEASE SEND THIS LEGAL LETTER TO YOUR SCHOOLS NOW! This is an easy, quick and effective action. INSTRUCTIONS There are two options to deliver the letter EMAIL 1 - copy and paste the text into an email ALSO attaching the downloaded letter. 2 - CC the email to Lois loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk 3 - Click send DOWNLOAD THE LETTER HERE A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you have suffered any form of adverse reaction and are a UK citizen please fill in a witness statement for the case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

A superb short video with Dr. Rob Verkerk as he deciphers and summaries the key parts of the UK graphene report all within 10 minutes or so. Congratulations to Tess Lawrie for making it happen. My one word of comment is that although the team identify Dr Campra's work, The Scientist's club and the German work as key reason that triggered their investigation, there is not one mention of vaccine-induced magnetism that is the real-world everyday-evidence that is replicable by everyone with a 50c neodymium magnet. Evidence that points clearly at graphene oxide (or very similar material) as the key undisclosed ingredient causing such great harm. SEE FULL UK GRAPHENE REPORT AND DOWNLOAD FROM THIS ARTICLE https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/uk-lab-report Visit EbMCsquared for more information ebmcsquared.org/statement-lab-testing-on-vaccine-content https://ebmcsquared.org/statement-lab-testing-on-vaccine-content Links to recent reports 1) Spain: a. Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Janssen by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid https://www.orwell.city/2021/11/special-program.html https://www.orwell.city/2021/11/vivir-con-salud.html https://www.orwell.city/2021/11/graphene-morgellons.html https://www.orwell.city/2021/10/microbiota.html b. Report on Microtechnology found in Pfizer vials by La Quinta Columna https://www.orwell.city/2022/01/microtechnology.html https://www.orwell.city/2022/01/lqc-report.html 2) Chile: a. Sinovac / CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, Pfizer https://www.orwell.city/2021/12/chile.html https://www.orwell.city/2021/12/analysis.html b. External analysis of AstraZeneca vaccine by biophysicist Guillermo Iturriaga https://www.orwell.city/2021/09/laser-beam-technology-chile.html https://www.orwell.city/2021/09/non-ferrous-metals.html 3) Argentina a. Cansino, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sinopharm, and Sputnik https://www.orwell.city/2022/01/argentina.html https://www.orwell.city/2022/01/lqc-argentina.html

Last week, we published the latest lab report indicating that graphene compounds have been used in the C19 vaccines. This time, the report was UK based and had been organised by a group called UNIT. The people involved and the name of the lab remains anonymous, which on one hand is understandable to anyone who knows the history of those daring to publish information against the interests of the big Pharma companies, yet on the other hand, secrecy fuels doubts and suspicion. The UK report is an attempt to replicate the original findings of Dr Campra that suggested Graphene Oxide, which has since been backed by several groups worldwide. Dr Campra published two important works. The first was a visual match for Graphene Oxide under microscopy and the second report used the more conclusive Raman Spectroscopy. From our point of view at NOTB, Graphene Oxide (GO) explains the vaccine-induced magnetism that we witnessed and documented within several short films. Dr Andrew Goldsworthy, the retired biological safety officer from Imperial College London, a world-leading expert on cellular mechanisms, published his theory via NOTB explaining how the presence of GO could cause magnetism on the cellular level. To date, his theory stands the test of time with no competing hypothesis. Dr Mike Yeadon is the ex-vice president of Pfizer and has been a prominent critic of the current C19 Vaccine rollout. His opinions have been heavily criticised and censored, backed by the usual slurs to demonise him via industry controlled media and sites like Wikipedia. He is not only a loved and national treasure within the British freedom movement but has become an icon internationally as one of the very few ‘insiders’ who have dared to make a public stand. Dr Mike Yeadon’s reply to the concept of graphene derivatives being present. QUOTE: “…To be clear, to date I’ve not seen analytical evidence confirming graphene or derivatives in the injections. The claims that it’s present involve results that “are consistent with” it being present. That isn’t good enough because there is a technique that’s able to give us an unequivocal answer: transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM will show the characteristic hexagonal pattern of dots, which reflect the arrangement of carbon atoms in the material. Why are no reports using the only technique capable of proving its present? Nothing changes if it is or isn’t present. If it’s absent, it doesn’t mean the “vaccine” makers are exonerated. If it’s present, they’re not “more guilty”. Their guilt isn’t in question. It’s definitely criminal. If Tess Lawrie says she’s got new data, I’m all ears. Tess is a straight arrow. Meanwhile, I urge us all to be looking outward to what we will do to push these monsters into the sea.  Looking at every possible additional way in which crimes might be being committed is helping only the perpetrators. Best wishes Mike…” REPLY TO DR MIKE YEADON'S STATEMENT Our response is broken down to different points within Mike's message. MIKE YEADON “…To be clear, to date I’ve not seen analytical evidence confirming graphene or derivatives in the injections…” Many of us agree with Mike. The evidence is strong, but is not 100% conclusive. The UK paper according is missing some key information regarding the Raman spectroscopy. The critical chain of custody for the obtained UK samples is claimed, yet not proven/published as yet. Although Dr Campra’s Spanish reports are highly professional, he acknowledges legal chain of custody was not met and further investigation is needed. Chain of custody is the legal requirement proving that the sample has not been tampered with prior to analysis. Without it, no court will take the results seriously. Why is the ‘chain of custody’ even an issue? ‘Chain of custody’ is associated with crime scenes or the dope testing of high-level athletes. Why do the vaccine samples need to be ‘stolen’? Why are the manufacturing companies not offering samples for open and public analysis by independent facilities? Concluding question: Why are the public being mass-injected with a concoction under near mandatory conditions, where such huge efforts are being made to keep the ingredients secret? Back to Mike's reply on the independent reports. MIKE YEADON: “…The claims that it’s present involve results that “are consistent with” it being present…” We agree. But it's interesting to note that the vast majority of modern medicine operates under the guise of prescribing due to symptoms that “are consistent with” a disease/illness being present, and not actual absolute proof. It's very tempting to talk about the presumptions of the plandemic as a whole at this point... but let's stick to replying to Mike's points :) In a case of such international importance, we agree with Mike. We need further testing that produces 100% conclusive and irrefutable results. MIKE YEADON:  “….there is a technique that’s able to give us an unequivocal answer: transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM will show the characteristic hexagonal pattern of dots which reflect the arrangement of carbon atoms in the material. Why are no reports using the only technique capable of proving its present?.." The two-dimensional honeycomb structure of carbon atoms in graphene along with the high-resolution transmission electron microscopic (TEM) image. Dr Campra addressed this issue in his first report. DR CAMPRA  “….Important NOTE: For a definitive IDENTIFICATION of GRAPHENE by TEM, it is necessary to complement the observation with the structural characterization by obtaining by EDS a characteristic ELECTRON DIFFRACTION STANDARD SAMPLE (as the figure b shown below). The standard sample corresponding to graphite or graphene has a hexagonal symmetry and generally has several concentric hexagons. It has not been possible at the moment to obtain this standard sample due to the shortage of sample available for processing, and the chaotic arrangement and density of the folds...." These images are from Dr Campra's first report Matéria (Rio J.) 23 (1) • 2018 • Characterization of graphene nanosheets obtained by a modified Hummer's method. Renata Hack et al. Graphene Oxide ‘flakes’ are just one atom thick - imagine wafer-thin paper sheets but of the smallest possible scale and no compound can be thinner than something an atom thick. Dr Campra explains that in his sample, the sheets were stacked and folded. His challenge was equivalent to dropping a pile of patterned bed-sheets on the floor, and from the pile trying to deduce the fabric's pattern. A single sheet would need to be opbed sheetslat,  for in the case of the graphene oxide sheets to see the characteristic hexangular pattern arrangement of the atoms. Imagine how many times we'd need to throw the sheets in the air many times before one landed perfectly flat, enabling the fabric pattern to be observed correctly. similar issue to deducing the pattern on fabric - or from a pile of fishing net Within the reality of the vaccine analysis, many slides would need to be made until the singular flat sheet was chanced upon. Dr Campra had limited ‘stolen’ samples of the vaccine, meaning a limited number of attempts of analysis. TEM microscopes cost in the region of seven figures though a second-hand one can be picked up for the price of a London house. 1 -TEM Microscope - 2- Example of use - 3 - The classic hexangular structure carbon within Graphene This puts the vital TEM analysis that Dr Mike Yeadon requests into the hands of a very few, of whom most are easily controlled via finance or fear. This collection of images shows how various settings of the TEM microscope yields different results and clarity from a single atom thick sheet of graphene Figure 2: (a) Calculated HRTEM images of graphene for different doses and samplings with a usable aperture of 50 mrad under an acceleration voltage of 80 kV. All images are displayed with the maximum contrast, namely the image intensities are mapped on the full grayscale values ranging between 0 and 255. (b) Sharp-cutoff low-pass filtered images of (a). Source: http://www.salve-project.de/newspress/dose-dependent-image-simulation-for-tem.html Overall, Dr Mikle Yeadon's message is simply requesting a full and convincing analysis and is asking why it has not been done yet. He's not the only one, many of us have been calling for this. Mike’s call for a full and proper analysis matches our call. The difference is Mike wishes for independent scientists to provide those results, whereas our call has been for a full official investigation. MIKE YEADON:  “…. Nothing changes if it (Graphene) is or isn’t present.  If it’s absent, it doesn’t mean the “vaccine” makers are exonerated.  If it’s present, they’re not “more guilty”.  Their guilt isn’t in question. It’s definitely criminal..” Surely, if graphene is present, they are more guilty? As an 'undlsclosed' ingredient, graphene isn't accidental. (note: on undisclosed ingredients as Graphene is just carbon meaninundisclosedno specific chemical formulae, and since carbon is in most things, it is possible the Graphene has been hidden in plain sight under/within another ingredient) Has GO been added as an ‘adjuvant’ to increase the ability of the mRNA to penetrate the cells via the 5-lipid liposomal “Trojan-horse’ tech? Maybe. During our early research trying to fathom the vaccine-induced magnetism, we have found countless papers showing that experimental research in this field has indeed used graphene oxide in this way. However, what if graphene has been added for other motives? What if graphene oxide has been added as part of some undisclosed biotech to amalgamate man with machine, as part of the 'internet of things' agenda and human augmentation? Does that sound crazy? Of course, it does. Yet, if you download this government brochure from the UK Government website and read the aims of this joint UK and German Military intel project to “increase the ability of the public to match the human augmentation programmes of our enemies” where they claim “the only issue to going ahead with this urgent upgrade is "the hesitancy of the public”, you might be forgiven for thinking we might just have taken a leap into some futuristic dystopian nightmare. But of course, we don’t know this is true. We just have suspicions. We are guessing. We are researching and attempting to understand all the clues we have found, joining the dots and maybe coming up with false hypotheses - which leads us back to the solidity and foundations that are our original questions: What is causing the vaccine-induced magnetism? What are the ingredients of the vials causing this proven phenomenon? Mike Yeadon concludes his statement with these words. MIKE YEADON:  “…. Meanwhile, I urge us all to be looking outward to what we will do to push these monsters into the sea. Looking at every possible additional way in which crimes might be being committed is helping only the perpetrators…” Again, on this topic, we beg to differ. Battles are fought on many fronts within a war. Land, sea, air, in the open, in secrecy, by force, by guile, by trickery and by illusion. As Mike suggests, the monsters are guilty of crimes on many fronts, but why should we stop there? Would a murder detective on finding a dozen corpses of a mass murderer think that enough evidence had been found, so further investigation could stop? What about other victims? What if the serial killer had undiscovered accomplices? Or, if the serial killer has a cellar full of kidnapped victims? Or that there were many hundred more victims? A full investigation is always needed. A comprehensive picture is required to try and stop such crimes from being repeated in the future. Every angle of this medical criminality needs to be fully investigated - we owe it to our future generations. Mike, would not looking at every possible additional way in which crimes have been being committed, not be helping the perpetrators? Mike, you have witnessed vaccine-induced magnetism. We must find the cause behind it. And right now, these concoctions are being rolled out to our five to eleven-year-olds. The very sector of our society that is at least risk from 'covid'. The very section of society that depends on us to defend them from all forms of criminality. Mike, please back our call for a full investigation. Nearly 1,000 health professionals - made up of Doctors, Nurses and Scientists - have signed our expert's petition. Please use your might and industry contacts to bring the question of graphene to a resolution. CONCLUSION What do we know for sure? We know the adverse events from these C19 vaccines have broken all records with millions of injuries and deaths in the hundreds of thousands. worldwide. All sides agree the reported incidents are just the tip of the iceberg. We know our most healthy sportspeople are suffering greatly. See our sister website www.NOTB-sport) We know for sure people were not are magnetic before vaccination with the mRNA C19 concoctions and after, they are have clearly become magnetic. (watch our films here:) What are the theories? We have the as yet undisputed theory that graphene oxide causes vaccine-induced magnetism. Independent scientists and researchers have risked reputations, careers and their lives to bring to the public's attention evidence pointing towards the greatest crime ever seen against humanity. A theory of GO that has a trail of replicated evidence across nations that although not conclusive, holds strong as the fundamental principle of investigation within science is that theories are accepted until they are proven wrong. In the same way within British law, a man is innocent until proven guilty. It is for the courts to prove a man guilty of a crime. And in this case, it is the medical establishment, and the wider authorities pushing these concoctions, to now prove that graphene derivatives are not in the vaccines. Simple denials published as fact-checks by the pharma sponsored PR media outlets of Reuters, the BBC and Guardian are not valid. Undisclosed ingredients and undisclosed biotech mean the people of the world have been deceived on a scale never before seen. It means they have been tricked into accepting a medical procedure that the vast majority if having been fully informed, would have declined not giving their consent. Sufficient evidence (all the above and more) has been given to the judicial process, the burden is now on the police to investigate. If you back this call for action, please sign our petition here. What if you're confused and or not sure about all this information? There is something very simple we can all do to gain clarity. Although none of us at home can buy a million pound TEM microscope and conclusively prove graphene ourselves, we don’t need to rely on the experts trained to use these machines. Each of us can conduct a vital and groundbreaking experiment, the results of which will shake the world. To conduct this experiment, all we need is curiosity and a few neodymium magnets, costing less than a pint of beer. Once you have bought the neodymium magnets, find a willing participant who has had an mRNA jab. Slide the magnet over the point of injection, copying the methods in this film or this film. Be sure to replicate this basic experiment on the bare minimum of five or more people to be sure of your results. Seeing (and feeling) is believing. You can film and share the results and encourage others to prove this for themselves, in person. With positive results, you will have proven undisclosed ingredients and possibly what will become to be known as the greatest ever crime against humanity. If you can't replicate the results, watch the films another time and try again... because trust me, you will find it. SUMMARY Vaccine-induced magnetism is proven. None of the disclosed ingredients can be magnetic. This proves undisclosed ingredients or undisclosed biotechnology have been used. Are these undisclosed ingredients graphene oxide? Maybe. Maybe not. Either way, we need to know. The push to inject the concoction into 5 to 11-year-olds within the UK has started. We need to apply public pressure. To back the call for an immediate full official investigation and analysis of the vials, please sign our people's petition below. A little back-story history When we first alerted Dr Yeadon to the vaccine-induced magnetism, his reply was straightforward. Mike said, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” We understood this. I had to see it myself and had jumped on a train to investigate a case of vaccine-induced magnetism that was getting debunked by international fact-checkers. It was easy to prove the fact-checkers wrong. Not On The Beeb’s first fact-checking film debunked Reuters, The BBC, CNN and all the other Pharma controlled media outlets that had been enrolled to steer the narrative away from the magnetism. Of course, our films were non-scientific and even though we had personally verified the vaccine-induced magnetism on film many were left in disbelief, including Mike himself. I understand this. If you watch the film you can see that although I was  4ft or so away when Carl demonstrated how the magnet did indeed stick for the camera, I did not believe what I was seeing until I held the magnet and tried myself. Seeing is believing. A couple of weeks later, we made another film in St James Park London with Dr T where we witnessed the majority of those we tested were indeed magnetic. This was published on 7th June. We contacted scientists worldwide, yet few could believe the claims that went against all they knew. Vaccines don’t contain magnetic ingredients. Magnets can’t stick to biological material. Yet, the personal testimonies of 100’s of people worldwide were flooding in. Filmed eyewitness accounts of the most basic and profound experiment that we were all able to perform. Picking up a neodymium magnet and testing it on someone. On the 17th July we published Mike Yeadon's acknowledgement that vaccine-induced magnetism existed. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/mike-yeadon-magnetism PAPERS TO READ Some Papers where Graphene was used as an adjuvant. Graphene Oxide in the Children's Nasal Flu Vaccine https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/graphene-oxide-in-the-children-s-nasal-flu-vaccine Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26814441/ Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32531395/ Graphene Oxide and PEG Polyethylene glycol and polyethylenimine dual-functionalized nano-graphene oxide for photothermally enhanced gene delivery https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23292791/ The LUXEMBOURG PAPER CONFIRMING VACCINE INDUCED MAGNETISM https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/the-luxembourg-report-on-vaccine-induced-magnetism FILMS TO WATCH Vaccine-Induced Magnetism Film 1 - 'Not On The Beeb' investigates the MAGNET CHALLENGE - True or False? Film 2 - Dr T tests the public for vaccine-induced magnetism. Film 3 - Compilation of magnet challenge home videos Film 4 - Dr T delivers a devastating verdict on magnetism Film 5 - Dr T delivers urgent call to action to all health professionals Petition requesting urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines To the British Police, Judiciary, Crown Prosecution Service and members of Parliament. The people of Britain (and the world) request the British police seize multiple sample vials of the C19 vaccines and conduct an immediate open, independent and detailed analysis of the contents. ​ The signatories of this petition back the work of lawyers Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland working alongside Dr Samuel White, Mark Sexton and team submitting evidence under Hammersmith Police crime number: 6029679/21 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public. ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the various batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6 - With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Health expert's petition I, the undersigned, request the British police seize samples of the vaccine and instigate an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are causing widespread serious adverse reactions post-COVID-19 vaccination. ​ Concerning the vaccination of our children, we request an immediate injunction forcing a pause on the school's vaccine programme until we have clear answers from the police investigations.

Human Augmentation – The Dawn of a New Paradigm A think-piece designed to set the foundation for more detailed research and development on human augmentation. This is from the UK government website. QUOTE: "....The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC) has worked in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defence Planning to understand the future implications of human augmentation (HA), setting the foundation for more detailed Defence research and development. The project incorporates research from German, Swedish, Finnish and UK Defence specialists to understand how emerging technologies such as genetic engineering, bioinformatics and the possibility of brain-computer interfaces could affect the future of society, security and Defence. The ethical, moral and legal challenges are complex and must be thoroughly considered, but HA could signal the coming of a new era of strategic advantage with possible implications across the force development spectrum. HA technologies provides a broad sense of opportunities for today and in the future. There are mature technologies that could be integrated today with manageable policy considerations, such as personalised nutrition, wearables and exoskeletons. There are other technologies in the future with promises of bigger potential such as genetic engineering and brain-computer interfaces. The ethical, moral and legal implications of HA are hard to foresee but early and regular engagement with these issues lie at the heart of success. HA will become increasingly relevant in the future because it is the binding agent between the unique skills of humans and machines. The winners of future wars will not be those with the most advanced technology, but those who can most effectively integrate the unique skills of both human and machine. The growing significance of human-machine teaming is already widely acknowledged but this has so far been discussed from a technology-centric perspective. This HA project represents the missing part of the puzzle..." SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/human-augmentation-the-dawn-of-a-new-paradigm DOWNLOAD SOURCE: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/986301/Human_Augmentation_SIP_access2.pdf

For those of us who realised relatively early on in the so-called ‘pandemic’ that a sinister plan is afoot, it’s been an agonising, frustrating and exasperating journey. It’s easy to feel isolated and lost as we process just how gullible our fellow humans can be. So many of us have been left broken-hearted after family ignored our concerns, friends turned their backs on us, colleagues eyed us nervously and strangers stared at us blankly when we tried to warn them about the so-called ‘vaccines’ and what they’re doing to people’s health. It’s been a harrowing ordeal to witness my family race to get not one, not two but three jabs apiece so far. All have experienced adverse reactions, some more serious than others, yet none will entertain the idea that such issues were most likely caused by the ‘vaccines’. They’re intelligent people - my father’s a retired scientist, my sister’s doing a PhD, my mother was medically trained - yet none of them has twigged that there’s something very wrong with the ‘vaccines’ and the relentless mainstream narrative that’s been pushing them on us. They refuse to explore the gigabytes of evidence I’ve gathered and refuse to listen when I try to share what I’ve learned. Instead, I’ve been told that I’m a narrow-minded bully, a conspiracy theorist and an ignorant fool. I’ve been met with scoffs, eye-rolls and anger. I’ve been on the receiving end of full-blown tantrums. Granted, my relationship with my family wasn’t too great in the first place but I can now offer nothing but superficial chit-chat, mundane gossip and censored opinions. To do otherwise is to invite ridicule. I scream inside every time I talk to them. I sob and rage at their lack of awareness. I’ve been forced to disengage emotionally and I don’t see a way back. I’ve never felt more alone. I know I’m not the only one. I know that many of you reading this will be going through the same thing, tearing your hair out because you’re dealing with people who’ve lost all rational thought. Even as the words come out of your mouth you know there’s little hope of getting through because the agenda is so remarkable, so evil, so futuristic and so big that we question our own sanity as we try to enlighten others. I’d like to share some of the words an anonymous writer wrote in The Lightpaper for those of us who feel alone as this horror unfolds. It describes everything I’ve been feeling and perhaps it might help you to put your feelings into words, too: “If you find yourself struggling as you try to process all this insanity, you are not alone. No one talks about the darkness that accompanies awakening, or the grief. Not only grieving the life and illusions you once had, but the realisation that almost everything you thought you once knew is a lie. The beliefs you have held, people you have trusted, principles you were taught - all lies. Shattering illusions is rarely an enjoyable experience. There is a considerable amount of discomfort that comes with growth, and the grieving process does not stop there. With these newfound realisations, you then find yourself grieving all over again. Grieving for our children, knowing all too well the broken world they are inheriting. Grieving the loss of many relationships with people who just do not ‘get it’. Feeling alone, being ridiculed and shamed, not only by the masses but often by your very own family and friends too. Some even grieve the loss of their ignorance because ‘ignorance is bliss’ and reality is harsh. There is no way to sugar-coat it - awakening to the realities of this world is brutal. It will have you running through the entire gamut of human emotions. You have to master the art of diving down the darkest of rabbit holes only to come out and still function in daily life, and that is a skill people do not talk about enough. Please know you are not alone, and not only are you not alone, you have an entire tribe standing by you. We may be separated by miles, but we are deeply connected in purpose and in spirit.” There will come a tipping point. It’s already happening; the world is waking up. We may feel alone but we’re not alone and as more and more people wake up the less alone we’ll be. For now we must focus on the long term and push harder than ever to spread the truth despite the disbelief, ridicule and hatred that is sure to come our way in the short-term. The narrative is crumbling and our job is to scatter those crumbs as far and wide as possible. Hold the line and hold your fears. There are more of us than you think. You can read the entire article, “Lonely but not alone on awakening’s tough road” by Anonymous here: https://thelightpaper.co.uk/assets/pdf/Light-15-iFinal.pdf Please explore The Lightpaper here: https://thelightpaper.co.uk/ Don't forget to check out NOTB's website dedicated to sharing the 'vaccine injuries and deaths' plight of sports men and women, both professional and amateur, around the world: https://www.notb-sports.org/ Cookie Taylor 17th February 2022

The aim of the study was to identify any solid inclusions in the vials as were undeclared by the manufacturers. The study was to verify the findings of graphene-related compounds such as graphene oxide, graphene hydroxide by Campara (2021) and report any other biological inclusions that may be interpreted as toxic to human body. UNIT was commissioned by EbMCsquared under UNITC-112980 to 91 to analyse the contents of four vaccine vials and identify if any of the following components were present in these vials – graphene, graphene oxide, parasites, biological filaments. The four vaccines that form the subject of this first investigation by UNIT belonged to Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. The entire process of collection and delivery is reported in ANNEXE 1A The analysis of all four vial contents identified objects that are similar. For ease of nomenclature and related descriptions per vaccine, these inclusions are illustrated and defined individually below- The identified inclusions were- Graphene nanoribbons coated with Polyethylene Glycol Graphene Composite Form 1 Graphene Composite Form 2 Microcrystalline Calcite with Carbonaceous inclusions Graphene Nano Forms with and without fluorescence Graphene nano-objects Graphene nanoscrolls The big questions What is the name of the lab? Who were the scientists involved? Is this report conclusive proof Due to the sensitivity of the subject, names are currently being withheld, so no this is not definite proof. Bare in mind we already have Dr Campra's two reports from Spain. This new British study simply attempts to replicate his original findings. adding huge weight to our calls for an official analysis. Read Dr Campra's Report one and Report two What we have now is enough evidence to generate an official public analysis where all the details of the labs and participants are in the open. If you support this please sign our petition for this CLICK HERE TO PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION READ MORE AND DOWNLOAD THE FULL LAB REPORT HERE: DOWNLOAD AND READ THE CASE BRIEFING HERE: Petition requesting urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines To the British Police, Judiciary, Crown Prosecution Service and members of Parliament. The people of Britain (and the world) request the British police seize multiple sample vials of the C19 vaccines and conduct an immediate open, independent and detailed analysis of the contents. ​ The signatories of this petition back the work of lawyers Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland working alongside Dr Samuel White, Mark Sexton and team submitting evidence under Hammersmith Police crime number: 6029679/21 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public. ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the various batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6 - With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Health expert's petition I, the undersigned, request the British police seize samples of the vaccine and instigate an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are causing widespread serious adverse reactions post-COVID-19 vaccination. ​ Concerning the vaccination of our children, we request an immediate injunction forcing a pause on the school's vaccine programme until we have clear answers from the police investigations.

As the vaccine rollout continues, it’s become clear that all is not well in the world of sport. In fact, things are downright worrying. The staggering increase in heart issues among professional and amateur athletes since day one of the vaccination push - including myocarditis and death - is alarming at best and horrifying at worst. It’s time to face facts: the evidence of a direct link between the Covid-19 vaccines and heart issues is now so overwhelming that it can no longer be ignored. But you don’t have to take our word for it. The UK government website admits to there having been ‘a signal of an increase of cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with both Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines’: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-myocarditis-and-pericarditis-information-for-healthcare-professionals/information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-myocarditis-and-pericarditis-following-covid-19-vaccination The NHS website outlines several side effects of the jabs, including ‘cases of inflammation of the heart (myocarditis) reported after COVID-19 vaccination’: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/safety-and-side-effects/ The FDA accidentally revealed that they were aware of possible side effects in 2020, including ‘acute myocardial infarction’ and ‘myocarditis/pericarditis’: https://truthtellernl.wordpress.com/2021/08/04/fda-accidentally-displays-list-of-covid-vaccine-side-effects-including-death-myocarditis-and-autoimmune-disease/comment-page-1/ The CDC admits on its website that cases of myocarditis ‘have occurred after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults, more often after the second dose and usually within a week of vaccination.’: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html The WHO acknowledges the ‘rare link between the vaccines and myocarditis’: https://www.who.int/news/item/24-11-2021-interim-statement-on-covid-19-vaccination-for-children-and-adolescents The NCBI website recommends that ‘informed consent for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines should include information regarding myocarditis or pericarditis in the week following COVID-19 vaccination: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324414/ Of course, it’s impossible to give true informed consent, given that the contents of the vials are proven to vary considerably both in terms of ingredients and toxicity (https://howbadismybatch.com/), not to mention the fact that ingredients lists have not yet been shared by manufacturers … indeed the FDA requested a term of no less than 75 years (up from the 55 years they originally wanted!) to release redacted versions of all documents relating to the agency’s approval of Pfizer’s vaccine: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-75-years-release-pfizer-vaccine-documents/ The truth will always come out. Even with mainstream media doing their utmost to downplay or censor information that might have spared the declining health - and lives - of countless millions of people, they cannot help but let slip some hard-to-ignore facts of late. And despite dodgy ‘fact-checkers’ with their ‘Debunked!’ headlines and slanderous opinions, the facts are just impossible to deny - or hide - any longer.. Here are a few articles to consider: People warned not to exercise after Pfizer jab after rare side effect: https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/people-warned-not-exercise-after-21068713 Sunderland boss Lee Johnson claims Covid vaccine could be behind goalkeeper Lee Burge’ 'inflamed heart' and says 'it happens a lot after these injections': https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10451985/Sunderland-boss-claims-Covid-vaccine-players-inflammed-heart.html Ex-footballer Matt Le Tissier demands immediate investigation into whether Covid vaccine has contributed to a rising number of footballers’ heart problems: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1537763/heart-problem-Christian-Eriksen-Matt-Le-Tissier-football-aguero-vaccine-vn A quick search through Yellow Card, VAERS and EudraVigilance - all of which are known to be between 90-99% underreported - gives an insight into just how many injuries and deaths have been attributed to the Covid-19 shots overall. Multiply that by the underreporting factor and … well, you get the picture. This is serious and the cause is undeniable. But it seems that unless people are directly affected by an adverse event, cognitive dissonance prevails. “But athletes push their hearts much harder than normal people - that’s why they’re keeling over with heart attacks. It’s not the vaccines!” Athletes weren’t keeling over in high numbers before 2021. “But athletes are probably taking performance-enhancing drugs - that’s why they’re collapsing with heart inflammation. It wouldn’t be the vaccines!” Athletes weren’t collapsing in high numbers before 2021. “But athletes drink those energy drinks - that’s why they’re clutching their chests. It can’t be the vaccines!” Athletes weren’t clutching their chests in high numbers before 2021. And when did the vaccine rollout commence? 2021. But it can’t be the vaccines - can it? DID YOU KNOW? NOTB HAS A WEBSITE DEDICATED TO SPORTS INJURIES AND DEATHS, 2021/2. WE'VE ADDED 140+ CASES BUT THERE ARE HUNDREDS MORE TO ADD. PLEASE SHARE OUR LIST TO HELP SPREAD AWARENESS: https://www.notb-sports.org/properties-1 READ OUR LATEST SPORTS-RELATED POSTS HERE: https://www.notb-sports.org/news Cookie Taylor 10th February, 2022

Vaccine-Induced Magnetism Yesterday evening, on the 7th of February lawyer Lois Bayliss handed to the UK Police the Not On The Beeb petition calling for an investigation into the cause of vaccine-induced magnetism, to the UK police under crime number: 6029679/21 The signatures request an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are making people magnetic post-COVID-19 vaccination. -5,352 People signed the People's Petition - 350 Experts signed the Expert's Petition - Doctors, Nurses, scientists and health professionals signed it I would like to thank everyone who signed it! Deep gratitude Lois said "The police on seeing the size of the petition were clearly shocked". This means this simple show of public support breathes life and everyday realism into the judicial process. We need you to support our new petition to drive the points of the police case home. Sign it here. Graphene Oxide Lois Bayliss also handed in the key research we've been highlighting. Most of this centres around how graphene oxide (GO) is most probably being used as an undisclosed ingredient, and GO is probably the root cause of the magnetism Evidence submitted: The disclosed Pfizer Ingredients The redacted Pfizer ingredients Luxembourg report backing the magnetism findings Dr Andrew Goldsworthy's theory explains how Graphene flakes could be causing the magnetism Dr Campra's initial 'visual-match' report suggesting Graphene Oxide within the vaccine The Scientists Club report confirming Graphene Oxide and contaminants The German team's investigation confirming contaminants UKMFA paper warning of dangers of using the disclosed ingredients of Cationic lipids German lawsuit regarding the disclosed cationic lipid ingredients that are illegal ingredients as certified not fit for human use, Dr Campra's secondary report confirming Graphene Oxide via Raman spectrometry. 46 witness statements of those damaged by the vaccine. The police confirmed all the submitted evidence would be passed to higher authorities within the police service. This is our chance. We also have some ground-breaking news to release soon regarding NEW and damning evidence for the case. Meanwhile, we need to prove the public support for an investigation. We have started a new petition that specifically mentions the key details of the case. We will hand the petition to the police in the near future to back all the other evidence collated by the legal team. We need 100,000 signatures. Please sign. Please share this link like crazy! https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/petition-police NEW PETITION Petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open, public, and independent detailed analysis of the contents. 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? I, the undersigned, request the British police seize samples of the vaccine and instigate an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are causing widespread serious adverse reactions post-COVID-19 vaccination. ​ We also request an immediate injunction on the vaccine programme, most especially for our children, until we have clear answers from the police investigations. NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition

Petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines As many of you are aware we are working with lawyers compiling personal v-injury testimonies and expert witness evidence. This petition will be handed to UK Police under various crime numbers and current investigations. The idea is, to make it very clear to the police that the public back the action and want them to investigate further. The basic request is an injunction to pause the roll-out whilst seized samples are analysed The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? I, the undersigned, request the British police seize samples of the vaccine and instigate an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are causing widespread serious adverse reactions post-COVID-19 vaccination. ​ We also request an immediate injunction on the vaccine programme, most especially for our children, until we have clear answers from the police investigations. NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition

We have a special report on CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE this week. Overall, for every 118 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. Some of my calculations suggest it could be as low as 0.5% The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 25TH JAN 2022 DATA fo doses 1 & 2 Pfizer - 25.6million people - 48.1m doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-158 people impacted Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49.1m doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-103 people impacted Moderna - 1.6m people - 3m doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-46 people impacted DATA for 3rd Dose known as the booster. Total = 37,104,942 jabbed. Booster Yellow Card Reports 27,724 Pfizer 434 AZ 15,367 Moderna 146 Unknown TOTAL = 43,671 BREAKDOWN Reports i.e. number of people who did fill out an adverse reaction with yellow card system NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported 162,207 Pfizer 242,910 AZ 34,857 Moderna 1497 Unknown Total = 441,471 reports of injury or death Fatal 713 (Pfizer) 1211 (AZ) 35 (Moderna) 37 (Unknown) Total = 1996 Blood Disorders - 16,579 (Pfizer) + 7777 (AZ) + 2382 (Moderna) + 62 (Unknown) = 26,800 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 855 (Pfizer) + 3015 (AZ) + 96 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 3991 Anaphylaxis - 642 (Pfizer) + 869 (AZ) + 86 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1599 Acute Cardiac - 11,775 (Pfizer) + 11,020 (AZ) + 2878 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 25,759 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1143 (Pfizer) + 424 (AZ) + 298 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1872 Eye Disorders - 7618 (Pfizer) + 14,741 (AZ) + 1418 (Moderna) + 81 (Unknown) = 23,858 Blindness - 152 (Pfizer) + 314 (AZ) + 27 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 497 Deafness - 281 (Pfizer) + 422 (AZ) + 47 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 755 Spontaneous Abortions - 459 + 1 premature baby death / 15 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 227 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 59 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 750 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 77,706 (Pfizer) + 181,730 (AZ) + 18,871 (Moderna) + 830 (Unknown) = 279,137 Headaches & Migraines - 34,625 (Pfizer) + 93,773 (AZ) + 8961 (Moderna) + 328 (Unknown) = 137,687 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 89 (Pfizer) + 486 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 595 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 736 (Pfizer) + 2282 (AZ) + 43 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 3074 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 1063 (Pfizer) + 988 (AZ) + 142 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 2204 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4010 (Pfizer) + 6868 (AZ) + 660 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 11,948 Seizures - 1049 (Pfizer) + 2040 (AZ) + 246 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3352 Paralysis - 483 (Pfizer) + 863 (AZ) + 95 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 1449 Tremor - 2085 (Pfizer) + 9918 (AZ) + 623 (Moderna) + 50 (Unknown) = 12,676 Transverse Myelitis - 32 (Pfizer) + 111 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 145 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 8856 (Pfizer) + 17,598 (AZ) + 1712 (Moderna) + 97 (Unknown) = 28,263 Infections - 11,214 (Pfizer) + 19,921 (AZ) + 2077 (Moderna) + 144 (Unknown) = 33,356 Herpes - 2118 (Pfizer) + 2662 (AZ) + 236 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 5039 Immune Disorders - 2329 (Pfizer) + 3257 (AZ) + 580 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 6187 Skin Disorders - 32,514 (Pfizer) + 53,019 (AZ) + 12,408 (Moderna) + 320 (Unknown) = 98,261 Respiratory Disorders - 20,547 (Pfizer) + 29,463 (AZ) + 3900 (Moderna) + 188 (Unknown) = 54,098 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1313 (Pfizer) + 2733 (AZ) + 276 (Moderna) + 32 (Unknown) = 4354 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 29,594 (Pfizer) + 20,523 (AZ) + 4741 (Moderna) + 196 (Unknown) = 55,054 Psychiatric Disorders - 9702 (Pfizer) + 18,230 (AZ) + 2269 (Moderna) + 106 (Unknown) = 30,307 Vomiting - 5054 (Pfizer) + 11,619 (AZ) + 1689 (Moderna) + 58 (Unknown) = 18,420 Amnesia & Memory Loss - 461 (Pfizer) + 876 (AZ) + 79 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 1426 Confusion & Disorientation - 1351 (Pfizer) + 2953 (AZ) + 277 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 4602 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Seem at LONDON freedom protest 22nd Jan 2022 Pfizer - 3,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 1,200,000 second doses Resulting in 2858 Yellow Cards (up 104 since last week) AZ - 12,400 children (1st doses) plus 9,200 second doses Resulting in 253 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-49 Moderna - 2000 children (1st doses) and 1200 second doses Resulting in 18 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 15 Yellow Cards Total = 3,014,400 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3144 For full reports including 346 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions 13 REASONS TO NOT VACCINATE 5-11 YEAR OLDS Reason No. 1 - 86% of 12-15-year old Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine in the Clinical Trial Reason No. 2 - 1 in 9 Children suffered a Severe Adverse Reaction leaving them unable to perform daily activities in the Pfizer Clinical Trial Reason No. 3 - Just 17 deaths associated with Covid-19 have occurred in Teenagers & Children since March 2020 Reason No. 4 - The risk of Children developing serious illness due to Covid-19 is extremely low Reason No. 5 - The Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine is experimental and still in Clinical Trials Reason No. 6 - Three Scientific Studies conducted by the UK Government, Oxford University, & CDC, which were published in August have found the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work Reason No. 7 - Public Health England Data shows the majority of Covid-19 Deaths are among the Vaccinated and suggests that the Vaccines worsen disease Reason No. 8 - There had been at least 1.18 million Adverse Reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccines in the UK alone up to September 1st Reason No. 9 - There were more deaths in 8 months due to the Covid-19 Vaccines than there have been due to all other available Vaccines combined since the year 2001 Reason No. 10 - The risk of Myocarditis (Heart Inflammation) in Children due to the Pfizer Vaccine Reason No. 11 - Children have died and are dying due to the Covid-19 Vaccines Reason No. 12 - Who profits from your Child getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? Reason No. 13 - The Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation refused to recommend the Pfizer Vaccine be offered to Children aged 12-15 SOURCE: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/23/13-reasons-why-children-5-to-11-should-not-have-the-covid-vaccine/ PLEASE SEND THIS LEGAL LETTER TO YOUR SCHOOLS NOW! This is an easy, quick and effective action. INSTRUCTIONS There are two options to deliver the letter EMAIL 1 - copy and paste the text into an email ALSO attaching the downloaded letter. 2 - CC the email to Lois loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk 3 - Click send DOWNLOAD THE LETTER HERE A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you have suffered any form of adverse reaction and are a UK citizen please fill in a witness statement for the case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

We have a special report on IMMUNE SYSTEM DISORDERS & INFECTIONS this week. Overall, for every 119 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. Some of my calculations suggest it could be as low as 0.5% The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 19TH JAN 2022 DATA fo doses 1 & 2 Pfizer - 25.6million people - 48.1m doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-159 people impacted Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49.1m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-103 people impacted Moderna - 1.6m people - 3m doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-46 people impacted DATA for 3rd Dose known as the booster. Total = 36,688,441 jabbed. Booster Yellow Card Reports 27,134 (Pfizer) 418 (AZ) 15,055 (Moderna) 141 (Unknown) Total = 42,748 BREAKDOWN Reports i.e. number of people who did fill out an adverse reaction with yellow card system NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported 161,019 (Pfizer) 242,634 (AZ) 34,435 (Moderna) 1490 (Unknown) Total = 439,578 reports of injury or death Fatal 702 (Pfizer) 1200 (AZ) 33 (Moderna) 37 (Unknown) Total = 1972 Blood Disorders - 16,477 (Pfizer) + 7769 (AZ) + 2365 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 26,674 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 842 (Pfizer) + 3004 (AZ) + 89 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 3960 Anaphylaxis - 634 (Pfizer) + 869 (AZ) + 86 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1591 Acute Cardiac - 11,498 (Pfizer) + 10,957 (AZ) + 2817 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 25,358 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1127 (Pfizer) + 424 (AZ) + 292 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1850 Eye Disorders - 7553 (Pfizer) + 14,717 (AZ) + 1396 (Moderna) + 81 (Unknown) = 23,752 Blindness - 148 (Pfizer) + 314 (AZ) + 27 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 493 Deafness - 279 (Pfizer) + 420 (AZ) + 45 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 749 Spontaneous Abortions - 448 + 1 premature baby death / 15 stillbirth/foetal deaths (11 recorded as fatal) (Pfizer)… + 227 + 2 miscarriage related deaths + 5 stillbirth (AZ)… + 59 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna)…. + 4 (Unknown) = 738 miscarriages Skin Disorders - 32,272 (Pfizer) + 52,969 (AZ) + 12,302 (Moderna) + 319 (Unknown) = 97,862 Psychiatric Disorders - 9608 (Pfizer) + 18,208 (AZ) + 2243 (Moderna) + 107 (Unknown) = 30,166 Nervous System Disorders - 77,152 (Pfizer) + 181,571 (AZ) + 18,641 (Moderna) + 830 (Unknown) = 278,194 Headaches & Migraines - 34,427 (Pfizer) + 93,735 (AZ) + 8869 (Moderna) + 329 (Unknown) = 137,360 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 725 (Pfizer) + 2269 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 3049 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 88 (Pfizer) + 485 (AZ) + 12 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 591 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 1043 (Pfizer) + 986 (AZ) + 133 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 2173 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 3987 (Pfizer) + 6856 (AZ) + 648 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 11,530 Seizures - 1046 (Pfizer) + 2039 (AZ) + 242 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3344 Paralysis - 476 (Pfizer) + 859 (AZ) + 95 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 1438 Transverse Myelitis - 31 (Pfizer) + 108 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 141 Vomiting - 5019 (Pfizer) + 11,614 (AZ) + 1679 (Moderna) + 60 (Unknown) = 18,372 Tremor - 2064 (Pfizer) + 9914 (AZ) + 613 (Moderna) + 50 (Unknown) = 12,641 Respiratory Disorders - 20,333 (Pfizer) + 29,385 (AZ) + 3844 (Moderna) + 188 (Unknown) = 53,750 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 29,308 (Pfizer) + 20,469 (AZ) + 4642 (Moderna) + 194 (Unknown) = 54,613 Seem at LONDON freedom protest 22nd Jan 2022 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 3,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 1,100,000 second doses resulting in 2754 Yellow Cards (up 163 since last week) AZ - 12,400 children (1st doses) plus 9,000 second doses resulting in 253 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-49 Moderna - 1900 children (1st doses) and 1100 second doses resulting in 17 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 15 Yellow Cards Total = 3,014,300 children jabbed Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3,039 *MHRA state - ‘Figures for vaccinations by age group in previous weekly summary reports were based on the person’s age calculated at 31 March 2021. From this week onwards, the age definition will move to a new definition, person’s age calculated at the time of vaccination.’ For full reports including 346 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions SPECIAL REPORT FOCUS - IMMUNE SYSTEM DISORDERS & INFECTIONS Immune System Related Reactions - 2306 (Pfizer) + 3246 (AZ) + 570 (Moderna) = 6122 Some people may have reported more than one type of reaction per report. Immune System Disorder Related Fatalities = 6 Below represents some of the most prevalently reported IMMUNE SYSTEM DISORDERS experienced, not exhaustive listed. Sarcoidosis - 20 (Pfizer) + 29 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 51 Hypersensitivity - 1102 (Pfizer) + 1561 (AZ) + 331 (Moderna) = 2994 Allergy to Vaccine - 45 (Pfizer) + 61 (AZ) + 12 (Moderna) = 118 Anaphylaxis - 634 (Pfizer) + 869 (AZ) + 86 (Moderna) = 1589 Autoimmune Disorders - 52 (Pfizer) + 72 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) = 127 BCG Scar Reactivation - 64 (Pfizer) + 38 (AZ) + 50 (Moderna) = 152 Transplant Rejection incl. Corneal Graft & Kidney - 14 (Pfizer) + 10 (AZ) = 24 **INFECTIONS** Infection Related Reactions - 11,080 (Pfizer) + 19,867 (AZ) + 2029 (Moderna) = 32,976 Some people may have reported more than one type of reaction per report. Infection Related Fatalities = 221 Below represents some of the most prevalently reported INFECTIONS experienced, not exhaustive listed. Abdominal & Gastrointestinal Infections incl Appendicitis, Diverticulitis, Gastroenteritis & Abscesses - 116 (Pfizer) + 150 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) = 284 Cellulitis - 198 (Pfizer) + 541 (AZ) + 74 (Moderna) = 813 Breast Abscess & Mastitis - 87 (Pfizer) + 49 (AZ) + 11 (Moderna) = 147 Candida Infections - Local & Systemic - 173 (Pfizer) + 210 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) = 401 Central Nervous System & Spinal Infections incl. Encephalitis & Meningitis - 52 (Pfizer) + 123 (AZ) + 5 (Moderna) = 180 Coronavirus Infections - 2208 (Pfizer) + 1691 (AZ) + 243 (Moderna) = 4142 Dental, Ear & Eye Infections incl. Gingivitis, Abscess, Labyrinthitis & Conjunctivitis - 434 (Pfizer) + 672 (AZ) + 57 (Moderna) = 1163 Herpes - 2106 (Pfizer) + 2652 (AZ) + 226 (Moderna) = 4984 Q fever - 13 (Pfizer) + 113 (AZ) = 7 (Moderna) = 133 Influenza - 1760 (Pfizer) + 6834 (AZ) + 559 (Moderna) = 9153 Lower Respiratory Tract & Lung Infections incl. Bronchitis & Pneumonia - 477 (Pfizer) + 683 (AZ) + 80 (Moderna) = 1240 Female & Male Reproductive Tract Infections Incl Epididymitis, Orchiditis & Endometritis - 30 (Pfizer) + 35 (AZ) + 5 (Moderna) = 70 Sepsis - 80 (Pfizer) + 168 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) = 255 Skin & Soft Tissue Infections - 105 (Pfizer) + 170 (AZ) + 36 (Moderna) = 311 Staphylococcal & Streptococcal Infections - 65 (Pfizer) + 92 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) = 167 Upper Respiratory Tract Infections Incl. Sinusitis, Laryngitis, Nasopharyngitis, Rhinitis & Tonsilitis - 1610 (Pfizer) + 2612 (AZ) + 359 (Moderna) = 4581 Urinary Tract Infections Incl. Cystitis & Kidney - 354 (Pfizer) + 456 (AZ) = 47 (Moderna) = 857 Viral Infections - 436 (Pfizer) + 1282 (AZ) + 94 (Moderna) = 1812 Other adverse event reported associated infections include: Cardiac, Borrelia, Infectious Mononucleosis, Clostridium, Tetanus, Fungal, Hepato-biliary & Spleen, Parasitic, Malaria, Retroviral, Vascular, Syphilis, Lymph Glands, Vaccination Site, Mumps, Measles, Tuberculosis For full reports including 15 pages of psychiatric specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions SEND A LEGAL LETTER TO YOUR SCHOOLS TO STOP YOUR SCHOOL FROM ALLOWING VACCINATION ON PREMISES DOWNLOAD LETTER HERE A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you have suffered any form of adverse reaction and are a UK citizen please fill in a witness statement for the case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

We have a special report on PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS orders this week. Over the last week in the UK alone 4,691 people filed an adverse event. This is 670 people a day or one person every two minutes! Overall, for every 119 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. Some of my calculations suggest it could be as low as 0.5% The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 12TH JAN 202 DATA fo doses 1 & 2 • Pfizer - 25.5million people - 47.7m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-160 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49.1m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-103 people impacted • Moderna - 1.6m people - 3m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-48 people impacted DATA for 3rd Dose known as the booster. Total = 36,079,875 jabbed. Booster Yellow Card Reports 26,076 (Pfizer) 399 (AZ) 14,457 (Moderna) 128 (Unknown) = 41,060 BREAKDOWN Reports 158,933 (Pfizer) 242,148 (AZ) 33,630 (Moderna) 1462 (Unknown) = 436,173 Fatal 696 (Pfizer) 1190 (AZ) 30 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) TOTAL FATALITIES REPORTED = 1,954 Blood Disorders - 16,320 (Pfizer) + 7743 (AZ) + 2317 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 26,443 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 832 (Pfizer) + 2997 (AZ) + 83 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 3937 Anaphylaxis - 624 (Pfizer) + 868 (AZ) + 76 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1572 Acute Cardiac - 11,141 (Pfizer) + 10,855 (AZ) + 2642 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 24,724 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1091 (Pfizer) + 417 (AZ) + 276 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1790 Infections - 10,834 (Pfizer) + 19,774 (AZ) + 1968 (Moderna) + 139 (Unknown) = 32,715 Blindness - 144 (Pfizer) + 312 (AZ) + 25 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 485 Eye Disorders - 7452 (Pfizer) + 14,685 (AZ) + 1350 (Moderna) + 81 (Unknown) = 23,568 Deafness - 272 (Pfizer) + 418 (AZ) + 43 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 738 Spontaneous Abortions - 438 including 4 miscarriage related deaths + 1 premature baby death / 15 stillbirth/foetal deaths (11 recorded as fatal) (Pfizer)…. + 227 + 2 miscarriage related deaths + 5 stillbirth (AZ)…. + 53 + 1 stillbirth (not recorded as fatal) (Moderna)…. + 4 (Unknown) = 722 miscarriages Psychiatric Disorders - 9493 (Pfizer) + 18,171 (AZ) + 2181 (Moderna) + 105 (Unknown) = 29,950 Headaches & Migraines - 34,083 (Pfizer) + 93,643 (AZ) + 8681 (Moderna) + 326 (Unknown) = 136,733 Nervous System Disorders - 76,294 (Pfizer) + 181,290 (AZ) + 18,227 (Moderna) + 819 (Unknown) = 276,630 Dizziness - 11,675 (Pfizer) + 24,942 (AZ) + 3240 (Moderna) + 109 (Unknown) = 39,966 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 713 (Pfizer) + 2262 (AZ) + 40 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 3028 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 84 (Pfizer) + 483 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 583 Seizures - 1030 (Pfizer) + 2032 (AZ) + 240 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 3319 Paralysis - 470 (Pfizer) + 857 (AZ) + 88 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1422 Respiratory Disorders - 20,042 (Pfizer) + 29,289 (AZ) + 3708 (Moderna) + 186 (Unknown) = 53,225 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 28,503 (Pfizer) + 20,324 (AZ) + 4479 (Moderna) + 185 (Unknown) = 53,491 Spontaneous Abortions Pfizer - 438 including 4 miscarriage related deaths + 1 premature baby death / 15 stillbirth/foetal deaths (11 recorded as fatal) AZ - 227 + 2 miscarriage related deaths + 5 stillbirth Moderna - 53 + 1 stillbirth (not recorded as fatal) Unknown = 4 TOTAL = 722 miscarriages Seem at LONDON freedom protest 22nd Jan 2022 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 3,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 900,000 second doses resulting in 2591 Yellow Cards (up 120 since last week) • AZ - 12,400 children (1st doses) plus 9,000 second doses resulting in 250 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-50 • Moderna - 1900 children (1st doses)* and 1100 second doses resulting in 16 Yellow cards - Reporting rate 1-in-119 • Brand Unspecified - 11 Yellow Cards Total = 3,014,300 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 2,868 *MHRA state - ‘Figures for vaccinations by age group in previous weekly summary reports were based on the person’s age calculated at 31 March 2021. From this week onwards, the age definition will move to a new definition, person’s age calculated at the time of vaccination.’ For full reports including 344 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions SPECIAL REPORT FOCUS - PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS TOTAL PSYCHIATRIC REACTIONS = 29,845 Some people may have reported more than one type of reaction per report. RELATED FATALITIES = 6 SUICIDES (this number is wildly low!) Anxiety Symptoms - 1465 (Pfizer) + 2400 (AZ) + 322 (Moderna) = 4,187 Paranoia - 27 (Pfizer) - 43 (AZ) + 6 (Moderna) = 76 Confusion & Disorientation - 1322 (Pfizer) + 2942 (AZ) + 270 (Moderna) = 4,534 Delusion - 145 (Pfizer) + 54 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) = 202 Depressive Disorders - 436 (Pfizer) + 753 (AZ) + 89 (Moderna) = 1,278 Emotional & Mood Disturbances including Anger, Distress & Irritability - 508 (Pfizer) + 782 (AZ) + 123 (Moderna) = 1413 Mood Swings - 157 (Pfizer) + 145 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) = 316 Hallucinations - 316 (Pfizer) + 1078 (AZ) + 128 (Moderna) = 1522 Panic Attacks - 531 (Pfizer) + 407 (AZ) + 61 (Moderna) = 999 Abnormal Dreams & Nightmares - 431 (Pfizer) + 838 (AZ) + 89 (Moderna) = 1358 Psychotic Disorders - 31 (Pfizer) + 57 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) = 91 Completed Suicide - 2 (Pfizer) + 4 (AZ) = 6 Suicidal Ideation - 47 (Pfizer) + 119 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) = 183 Delirium - 145 (Pfizer) + 487 (AZ) + 47 (Moderna) = 679 Other vaccine associated reactions include: • Aggression • Bipolar Disorder • Mutism • Head Banging • Dissociative States • Insomnia • Lethargy • Eating Disorders • Fear • Restlessness • Apathy • Tearfulness • Mania • Sexual & Libido Disorders • Enuresis • Disorganised Speech • Alcoholism • Self injurious behaviour • Tics • Mental fatigue • Feeling of despair For full reports including 15 pages of psychiatric specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you have suffered any form of adverse reaction and are a UK citizen please fill in a witness statement for the case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. ​ UPDATE: EXTENDED DEADLINE! The lawyers have won more time and request more witness statements! Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

We have a special report on nervous system orders this week. The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 5th Jan 2022 Overall for every 120 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. DATA for doses 1 & 2 • Pfizer - 25.3million people - 47.2m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-162 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49.1m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-103 people impacted • Moderna - 1.6m people - 3m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-50 people impacted 3rd Doses AKA Adult Booster = 34,834,288 Booster Yellow Card Reports 24,402 (Pfizer) 371 (AZ) 13,156 (Moderna) 121 (Unknown) Total = 38,050 BREAKDOWN Reports 156,250 (Pfizer) 241,657 (AZ) 32,133 (Moderna) 1442 (Unknown) Total = 431,482 people Fatal 684 (Pfizer) 1182 (AZ) 29 (Moderna) 37 (Unknown) Total = 1932 Blood Disorders - 16,056 (Pfizer) + 7728 (AZ) + 2228 (Moderna) + 62 (Unknown) = 26,074 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 801 (Pfizer) + 2991 (AZ) + 73 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 3890 Anaphylaxis - 615 (Pfizer) + 863 (AZ) + 76 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1556 Acute Cardiac - 10,703 (Pfizer) + 10,766 (AZ) + 2408 (Moderna) + 83 (Unknown) = 23,960 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1047 (Pfizer) + 414 (AZ) + 256 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1723 Infections - 10,568 (Pfizer) + 19,679 (AZ) + 1861 (Moderna) + 136 (Unknown) = 32,244 Herpes - 2048 (Pfizer) + 2639 (AZ) + 208 (Moderna) + 20 (Unknown) = 4915 Blindness - 142 (Pfizer) + 309 (AZ) + 23 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 478 Eye Disorders - 7310 (Pfizer) + 14,641 (AZ) + 1276 (Moderna) + 82 (Unknown) = 23,309 Deafness - 268 (Pfizer) + 418 (AZ) + 40 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 730 Spontaneous Abortions - 425 + 1 premature baby death + 1 miscarriage related death/ 13 stillbirth/foetal deaths (9 recorded as fatal) (Pfizer) + 229 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 709 miscarriages Skin Disorders - 31,329 (Pfizer) + 52,749 (AZ) + 11,702 (Moderna) + 308 (Unknown) = 96,088 Psychiatric Disorders - 9307 (Pfizer) + 18,117 (AZ) + 2075 (Moderna) + 104 (Unknown) = 29,603 Headaches & Migraines - 33,635 (Pfizer) + 93,545 (AZ) + 8280 (Moderna) + 323 (Unknown) = 135,783 Vomiting - 4914 (Pfizer) + 11,594 (AZ) + 1587 (Moderna) + 59 (Unknown) = 18,154 Nervous System Disorders - 75,192 (Pfizer) + 180,996 (AZ) + 17,398 (Moderna) + 816 (Unknown) = 274,402 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 707 (Pfizer) + 2245 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 2999 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 83 (Pfizer) + 483 (AZ) + 9 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 581 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 1001 (Pfizer) + 978 (AZ) + 119 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2108 Tremor - 2020 (Pfizer) + 9897 (AZ) + 570 (Moderna) + 50 (Unknown) = 13,538 Seizures - 1023 (Pfizer) + 2028 (AZ) + 232 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) = 3299 Paralysis - 463 (Pfizer) + 855 (AZ) + 81 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 1407 Respiratory Disorders - 19,633 (Pfizer) + 29,211 (AZ) + 3489 (Moderna) + 185 (Unknown) = 52,518 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 27,738 (Pfizer) + 20,196 (AZ) + 4211 (Moderna) + 177 (Unknown) = 52,322 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 3,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 900,000 second doses resulting in 2471 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 10,000 second doses resulting in 248 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-47 • Moderna - 21,500 children (1st doses) and 16,000 second doses resulting in 16 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 11 Yellow Cards Total = 3,033,100 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 2746 SOURCE: See Annex One for full reports including 336 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting SPECIAL REPORT FOCUS - NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS Below represents the most prevalently reported NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS AND SYMPTOMS experienced, not exhaustively listed. TOTAL NERVOUS SYSTEM REACTIONS = 273,586 involving likely in excess of 100,000 people. Some people may have reported more than one reaction per report. TOTAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDER RELATED FATALITIES = 293 HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE STILL LIVING WITH THESE SYMPTOMS TODAY? Sleep Paralysis - 29 (Pfizer) + 25 (AZ) + 5 (Moderna) = 59 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 83 (Pfizer) + 483 (AZ) + 9 (Moderna) = 575 Strokes & CNS Haemorrhages - 707 (Pfizer) + 2245 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) = 2986 Cerebrovascular Venous & Sinus Thrombosis - 66 (Pfizer) + 304 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) = 373 Co-ordination & Balance - 629 (Pfizer) + 1332 (AZ) + 92 (Moderna) = 2053 Disturbances of Consciousness - 8932 (Pfizer) + 10,829 (AZ) + 1911 (Moderna) = 19,672 Facial Nerve Disorders including Bell’s Palsy - 1163 (Pfizer) + 1211 (AZ) + 137 (Moderna) = 2511 Headaches - 30,009 (Pfizer) + 85,153 (AZ) + 7512 (Moderna) = 122,674 Sciatica - 119 (Pfizer) + 234 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) = 363 Memory Loss & Amnesia - 438 (Pfizer) + 860 (AZ) + 65 (Moderna) = 1363 Mental Impairment excluding Dementia & Memory Loss - 507 (Pfizer) + 1122 (AZ) + 102 (Moderna) = 1731 Migraine - 3626 (Pfizer) + 8892 (AZ) + 768 (Moderna) = 13,286 Multiple Sclerosis - 63 (Pfizer) + 134 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) = 204 Myelitis Transverse - 30 (Pfizer) + 106 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 138 Dizziness - 11,520 (Pfizer) + 24,909 (AZ) + 3103 (Moderna) = 39,532 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 8526 (Pfizer) + 17,474 (AZ) + 1555 (Moderna) = 27,555 Paralysis & Paresis - 463 (Pfizer) + 855 (AZ) + 81 (Moderna) = 1399 Peripheral Neuropathies - 168 (Pfizer) + 368 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) = 555 Seizures - 1023 (Pfizer) + 2028 (AZ) + 232 (Moderna) = 3283 Speech & Language Abnormalities - 344 (Pfizer) + 667 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) = 1065 Transient Cerebrovascular Event - 171 (Pfizer) + 514 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) = 699 Tremor - 2020 (Pfizer) + 9897 (AZ) + 570 (Moderna) = 12,487 Trigeminal Disorder - 85 (Pfizer) + 160 (AZ) + 4 (Moderna) = 249 Sensory Abnormalities - 3275 (Pfizer) + 6288 (AZ) + 533 (Moderna) = 10,096 Freezing Phenomena - 15 (Pfizer) + 161 (AZ) + 11 (Moderna) = 187 Narcolepsy, Cataplexy & Hypersomnia - 127 (Pfizer) + 251 (AZ) + 24 (Moderna) = 402 SOURCE: For full reports including 25 pages of nervous system specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you have suffered any form of adverse reaction and are a UK citizen please fill in a witness statement for the case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. ​ UPDATE: EXTENDED DEADLINE! The lawyers have won more time and request more witness statements! Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Lois Bayliss is one of the two key lawyers preparing evidence for the potential UK court case under crime reference 6029679/21 obtained from Hammersmith Police station. Below is Lois's letter to present to your child's school. Even though the UK government have pulled back on many restrictions and guidelines, the childhood vaccination rollout is still ongoing. Due to the ongoing police investigation, no vaccinations should take place. This letter puts the headmaster on notice, supplying them with key information. This is an easy, quick and effective action. INSTRUCTIONS There are two options EMAIL 1 - copy and paste the text into an email ALSO attaching the downloaded letter. 2 - CC the email to Lois loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk 3 - Click send! POST OR HAND DELIVERY 1 - Download the letter here 2 - Print it out making sure Lois's email or return postal address is attached 3 - Post the letter recorded delivery so you have proof of receipt. 3b or hand-deliver the letter and make a video record of the exchange as proof of delivery THE LETTER 3rd February 2022 Dear Sir/Madam School Immunisation Service Visit: I write in connection with the visit or any proposed visit of the school immunisation service. As you will be aware whilst children are in school, the school’s legal position is “in loco parentis.” You owe a legal obligation to each child in your care. We ask that you do the following: Write to the SIS and inform them that the vaccination session or any proposed vaccination session is cancelled and that the reason for cancellation is that the SARS CoV2 injection is under police investigation. Should you fail to cancel the immunisation session you will render yourself liable for any losses sustained as a result of the visit and liability could include criminal liability. Informed consent is impossible to obtain as the SIS vaccinators are not: Informing the patient that the roll out of the SARS CoV2 injections are under Police investigation pursuant to crime reference number: 6029679/21. Most parents, if given that information, would decline to give consent for their child. Please ensure this letter is communicated to all parents. Part of the Police investigation revolves around the alleged unlawful suppression of alternative treatments which have a far better safety profile. Informed consent is not possible if there is no discussion around safer alternatives. Informing the patient of how much active ingredient is in each vial. The amount of active ingredient in each vial varies and it is a matter of public record that some batches kill and maim disproportionately. Witness statements will be considered by the Police from bad batch victims. By way of example; one of them is now infertile, others have been suffering with mobility and paralysis of the face and limbs and many others are suffering from serious heart conditions such as myocarditis/pericarditis/myopericarditis. These people have medical evidence which states that the injection caused the infertility, immobility, paralysis and heart conditions. It is a fact that they received bad batches. As informed consent is impossible to obtain, anyone injected on site has suffered a battery, regardless of any injury sustained. Can you come back to me confirming that the visit has been cancelled. Yours faithfully Lois Bayliss Broad Yorkshire Law loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk Please email this letter to schools and CC in Lawyer Lois Bayliss loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk DOWNLOAD LOIS'S LETTER HERE>>> Of course, the above letter can be backed by any evidence you think will persuade your headmaster. This article by the Daily Expose is an eye-opener, the title alone is pure clickbait even for a tired headmaster... Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination than Unvaccinated Children & the ONS is trying to hide it QUOTE: "...The Office for National Statistics has revealed without realising it that children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 vaccination than children who have not had the Covid-19 vaccine. Back on 20th Dec 21, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a dataset containing details on ‘deaths by vaccination status in England’ between 1st Jan and 31st Oct 21. The dataset contains various tables showing details such as, ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19’, and ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for non-COVID-19 deaths’. What the dataset also includes is ‘age-standardised mortality rates by age-group and vaccination status for all deaths’, however they have conveniently left out the data for children, and only included data on age groups over the age of 18. What they also did in the data they included is bunch all young adults together meaning the rates of death are calculated for 18-39 year-olds, a total of 22 years. But for every other age group the rates of death are calculated for a total of 10 years, with 40-49, 50-59 etc. However, on table 9 of the ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’ dataset, the ONS have inadvertently provided enough details on deaths among children and teenagers by vaccination status for us to calculate the mortality rates ourselves, and to put it bluntly, they are horrifying, and make it obvious as to why the ONS chose to exclude children from the mortality rates dataset. What the ONS have done, as can be seen in the above table, is provide an age standardised mortality rate per 100,000 person-years, rather than per 100,000 population. The reason for this is that the size of each vaccination status population has been changing all the time, due to the unvaccinated moving into the one-dose category, and the one-dose vaccinated moving into the two-dose vaccinated category throughout the year. So by doing it this way it provides a much more accurate picture of the mortality rates because it accounts both the number of people and the amount of time a person has spent in each vaccination status....." The article is contuined here https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/

Lois Bayliss, who is one of the two key lawyers preparing evidence for the UK court case under crime reference 6029679/21 obtained from Hammersmith Police station, has drafted a letter putting all those giving the vaccine on notice for potential future vaccine damage claims. Please email this letter to your local GPs, hospitals, pharmacies and vaccination centres and CC in Lois at email address: loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk INSTRUCTIONS There are two options EMAIL 1 - copy and paste the text into an email AND ATTACHING THE DOWNLOADED LETTER (this double method improves comprehension of content) 2 - cc in Lois loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk 3 - Click send! POST OR HAND DELIVERY 1 - Download the letter here 2 - Print it out making sure Lois's email or return postal address is attached 3 - Post the letter recorded delivery so you have proof of receipt. 3b or hand-deliver the letter and make a video record of the exchange as proof of delivery THE LETTER FOA: ALL VACCINATION CENTRES / HUBS ALL DOCTORS, NURSES, CLINICAL STAFF ANYONE ADMINISTERING OR CAUSING TO BE ADMINISTERED SARS-COV-2 VACCINATIONS 4th February 2022 Dear Sir/Madam Immunisation SARs-Cov-2 Injections I write in connection with ANY proposed immunisation service that you might be inclined to provide, either directly or indirectly. As you will be aware whilst caring for patients you have signed an oath: FIRST DO NO HARM! You owe a legal obligation to each patient in your care. We ask that you do the following: Write to the CQC/ LMC /MHRA /GMC / RCN / NHS / JCVI / Rt Hon Sajid Javid and any other relevant authority and inform them that the vaccination programme you are involved in must be cancelled and the reason for cancellation is that the SARS- CoV-2 injections are under police investigation. Should you fail to write to them and assist in the cancellation of the immunisation sessions you will render yourself liable for any losses sustained as a result of the visit and liability could include criminal liability. Informed consent is impossible to obtain as you are not; Informing the patient that the roll out of the SARS-CoV-2 injections are under Police investigation pursuant to crime reference number: 6029679/21. Most people, if given that information, would decline to give consent for treatment. Please ensure this letter is communicated to all patients. Part of the Police investigation revolves around the alleged unlawful suppression of alternative treatments which have a far better safety profile. Informed consent is not possible if there is no discussion around safer alternatives. Informing the patient of how much active ingredient is in each vial. The amount of active ingredient in each vial varies and it is a matter of public record that some batches kill and maim disproportionately. Witness statements will be considered by the Police from bad batch victims. By way of example; one of them is now infertile, others have been suffering with mobility and paralysis of the face and limbs and many others are suffering from serious heart conditions such as myocarditis/pericarditis/myopericarditis. These people have medical evidence which states that the injection caused the infertility, immobility, paralysis and heart conditions. It is a fact that they received bad batches. As informed consent is impossible to obtain, anyone injected on site has suffered a battery, regardless of any injury sustained. Can you come back to me confirming that the immunisation programme you are involved in has been cancelled. Yours faithfully Lois Bayliss Broad Yorkshire Law loisbayliss@broadyorkshirelaw.co.uk DOWNLOAD LAWYER LOIS BAYLISS'S LEGAL LETTER WARNING THOSE GIVING VACCINES HERE>>>

We had our first article on sports injuries on the 4th of November go viral with nearly 300,000 views. You can read it here We opened a telegram group to collect the new incidents. The NOTB sports and injuries group grew to over 1,000 and we qucikly were unable to update the original article. Sports Injuries exploded into the public consciousness. To keep up with the daily tsunami we decided to build a new website to cover the incidents called NOTB-sports.org Cookie, Jan, Dave and Gabriel worked clean through the Christmas New year break to bring this site to you. Thank you! Dave has built forms so volunteers can enter the data. Jan has used python skills to read complex records, extracting key data Gabriel and Cookie have spent days collating the stories. I built the basic site. We need more hands. Writers, copy checkers, web designers/programmers, researchers, film editors and collators. If you'd like to help in any work for NOTB, email me here: mark-NOTB@protonmail.com NEWS - RECENT INCIDENTS The site has a news page featuring articles dedicated to singular cases. Mostly written by Cookie. News Page INCIDENTS COLLATED AND LISTED We have collated 150 incidents so far. We have an unbelievable 600 more to add. See the main page here. Click on the images to open up each incident for more details and source links SAMPLE DETAIL PAGE https://www.notb-sports.org/properties-1/alphonso-davies We hope this site is of use for you. Please send it to friends. Please forward it to sports organisations. Please share widely. Donations for NOTB are gratefully received. Buy me a coffee here Sign up to our main site for a free broad selection of key information in these times. Sign up

ANMAT - National Administration of Medicines, Food and Medical Devices of Argentina UPDATE ON STORY We stand corrected. The National health body for Argentina made a simple mistake within papers for needed for evidence within a murder court case. They got 'is' and 'is not' mixed up. Easily done... QUOTE: "...ANMAT clarifies that the COVID-19 vaccine does not contain graphene The information on graphene content arises from an involuntary error in the report attached to the court case and which was already clarified in it. This National Administration clarifies to the population that the COVID 19 AstraZeneca vaccine does not contain graphene among its components. The information on the graphene content arises from a typing error in the Report IF-2021-120912800-APN-DECBR#ANMAT attached to the judicial file and that was clarified in the statement made on Tuesday, January 11 of the current year, in the corresponding judicial cause, by the person in charge of the area. In this way, in point 4 of the report where it says "Graphene is found within its components" it must say "Graphene is NOT found within its components"...end AI translation https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/anmat-aclara-que-la-vacuna-covid-19-no-contiene-grafeno ORiGINAL POST For months, anyone supporting the Graphene Oxide findings of Dr Campra and colleagues have at the best, been labelled conspiracy theorists. Undertandably so, as if the findings are accurate, they can only lead to conclusions of bare-faced crimes against humanity. A simple crime investigation has forced the hands of rhe ANMAT - The National Administration of Medicines, Food and Medical Devices of Argentina - to be the first institution to admit Graphene Oxide is a component within C19 vaccines. 01/17/2022 The Heras News QUOTE: "....Dr. Patricia Aprea, director of Evaluation and Control, had to admit it in a legal case that took place as a result of a post-inoculation death and is being carried out by prosecutor Carlos Insaurralde. By David King Did they become "conspiracy theorists" in the ANMAT? Well no. It happens that this time, pressured by the prosecutor Carlos Insaurralde, they had to admit the inadmissible. Strictly speaking, the National Administration of Medicines, Food and Medical Devices had to respond in this way in a legal case following a complaint for a post-inoculation death. Those in charge of breaking the news, through social networks, were the lawyer Miguel Iannolfi and the geneticist doctor Marcelo Martínez, both of recognized work regarding warning the population about the unique consequences of the alleged vaccines on people's health, as well as the novel compound they contain, that is, graphene, and which was already discovered months ago by the Spanish scientist Pablo Campra. In a short video shared on networks, Iannolfi explained that “something that we had been studying, investigating and that we knew was going to come to light came to light. Thanks to the efforts of prosecutor Carlos Insaurralde, who only did what he did when he received a complaint about a person who died after being inoculated. He did the investigation and the corresponding requests for reports, he pressed and, in the end, the ANMAT ended up answering in a legal case that the inoculum that they are applying to the entire population contains graphene ». Martínez, for his part, in another video where he first expressed solidarity with the recently detained and already released doctor Eduardo Ángel Yahbes (a well-known pediatrician who advises against inoculation), specified that «ANMAT, in document No. IF 2021 120912800 – APN – DECBR # ANMAT references extension report ex2021-45862892, in relation to the cause of death investigation No. ipp015787 of UFI 3 San Martín, Dr. Patricia Inés Aprea, head 1, responds to requests and questions made by the prosecutor, which the Graphene is one of the constituent elements of these compounds.” Next, Martínez concluded that "there is a minimum of 67 scientific publications describing the toxicity of graphene for biological organisms and for humans in particular, therefore, what is the reason for the presence of this element in the inocula? The certificate issued by Dr. Yahbes, like many of us, contains absolutely real information and is supported by numerous scientific research articles. I just gave reference to an official answer, which means that they know about the presence of toxic elements in these compounds». It remains to be seen, now, how the cause that gave rise to this "confession" by the ANMAT progresses and what measures the national authorities have to take, which these days are completely committed to nothing less than inoculating everyone with the toxic in question as to threaten without pause those who decide not to do so. From this continuing, we will be committed to continuing reporting on it. This is a translation of a report on the Argentinian website below. If you know more details or have more links to any part of the story please add them to the comments. Source. AI translation. https://noticiaslasheras.com.ar/argentina-la-anmat-reconoce-que-las-vacunas-contienen-grafeno/

The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 22nd Dec 2021 Overall for every 123 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. MHRA state: “The next publication will be on 13 January 2022 and will contain all data up to 5 January. Robust safety monitoring and surveillance has continued to be carried out during the holiday period. We would ask anyone who suspects they have experienced a side effect linked with their COVID-19 vaccine to report via the Coronavirus Yellow Card website: https://coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/ “ DATA for doses 1 & 2 • Pfizer - 25.1million people - 46.7m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-167 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49.1m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-103 people impacted • Moderna - 1.6m people - 3m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-56 people impacted 3rd Doses AKA Adult Booster = 31,684,926 Yellow Card Reports 20,247 (Pfizer) 303 (AZ) 9843 (Moderna) 107 (Unknown) Total = 30,500 SUMMARY Reports 150,517 (Pfizer) 240,803 (AZ) 28,434 (Moderna) 1401 (Unknown) 421,155 file an injury Fatal 676 (Pfizer) 1176 (AZ) 24 (Moderna) 37 (Unknown) Total = 1,913 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 2,900,000 children (1st doses) plus 744,300 second doses resulting in 2275 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 10,000 second doses resulting in 246 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-47 • Moderna - 20,500 children (1st doses) and 15,600 second doses resulting in 15 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 10 Yellow Cards Total = 2,932,100 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 2546 SOURCE: See Annex One for full reports including 336 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting Have you suffered an adverse event? If you have suffered any form of adverse reaction and are a UK citizen please fill in a witness statement for the case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. ​ UPDATE: EXTENDED DEADLINE! The lawyers have won more time and request more witness statements! Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

In what is becoming an all-too-common tragedy, another football star has died from a heart attack - this time a healthy, fit 25-year-old Guatemalan man. Marcos Menaldo, a defender who played for Deportivo Marquense, was reported to be experiencing chest pains and breathing issues during a training session. Sadly, he collapsed and died shortly after being rushed to hospital, having suffered a massive heart attack. Menaldo’s death comes amid a surge of athletes dropping like flies with heart-related issues - a shockingly steep increase since the Covid-19 vaccine programme began. According to Life Site News, the sudden death or illness in football players and their possible link to the jabs has not gone unnoticed by retired players. After fully-jabbed defender Victor Lindelof was forced to leave a game with chest pains in December, Matt Le Tissier (former England professional) voiced his concerns on social media. “Amazing that another footballer comes off complaining about his heart and yet the media refuse to mention even the slightest hint that it just “could” be the thing that can’t be named #lotsofcoincidences,” he tweeted on 11th December, 2021. Lots of coincidences indeed. You can read News Punch’s article about Menaldo, published on the 5th January, here: https://newspunch.com/another-young-healthy-soccer-star-dies-from-heart-attack/ Menaldo is also mentioned in this interesting article by LifeSiteNews, published on 4th January: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/five-professional-soccer-players-die-from-heart-attacks-fueling-speculation-of-vaccine-side-effects/ SEE THE FULL LIST OF SPORTS CASUALTIES HERE >>>

Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang was ruled out of Gabon’s match with Ghana due to ‘Covid-related’ heart problems, as reported in The Sun on 14th January. Arsenal ace Aubameyang missed his national team's Group C opener against Comoros on Monday after testing positive for Covid-19. In the opposing team, Axel Meye and Mario Lemina were also sidelined from the game at the Ahmadou Ahidjo Stadium, both reportedly suffering with minor heart issues. All three were diagnosed with coronavirus recently and medical examinations showed they are dealing with minor heart problems, said to be as a result of the virus. The Confederation of African Football revealed they didn't want to take any risks. While it’s not confirmed whether or not all three players are vaccinated, we did find a report from the 8th January describing how The Confederation of African Football has set down tough rules: those wanting to enter the stadium must be completely vaccinated. It makes sense, then, that players are most likely vaccinated. You can read The Sun’s article regarding Aubameyang here: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/17328904/arsenal-pierre-emerick-aubameyang-covid-19/ You can read The Star’s article mentioning the CAF’s rules here: https://www.the-star.co.ke/sports/football/2022-01-08-cameroonians-ready-for-football-fun-if-covid-allows/ SEE THE FULL LIST OF SPORTS CASUALTIES HERE >>>

The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 15th Dec 2021 Overall for every 125 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. DATA for doses 1 & 2 • Pfizer - 25million people - 46.4m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-172 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-104 people impacted • Moderna - 1.5m people - 2.8m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-61 people impacted 3rd Doses AKA Adult Booster = 25,477,345 Yellow Card Reports 16,021 (Pfizer) 239 (AZ) 6082 (Moderna) 88 (Unknown) Total = 22,430 SUMMARY Reports 145,446 (Pfizer) 240,065 (AZ) 24,721 (Moderna) 1362 (Unknown) Total = 411,594 people Fatal - 666 (Pfizer) 1164 (AZ) 23 (Moderna) 36 (Unknown) Total = 1889 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT (11th week) Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 2,900,000 children (1st doses) plus 723,900 second doses resulting in 2161 Yellow Cards (up 78 from last week) • AZ - 11,500 children (1st doses) plus 10,000 second doses resulting in 246 Yellow Cards (static) - Reporting rate 1-in-47 • Moderna - 19,700 children (1st doses) and 15,100 second doses resulting in 9 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 10 Yellow Cards Total = 2,931,200 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 2426 SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting OUR INDEPENDENT ADVERSE REACTION SURVEY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/v-survey REPORT MAGNETISM https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetised-survey

The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 6th Dec 2021 Overall for every 128 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. DATA for doses 1 & 2 • Pfizer - 24.8million people - 46m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-175 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-104 people impacted • Moderna - 1.5m people - 2.9m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-67 people impacted 3rd Doses AKA Adult Booster = 19,015,975 Adult Booster or 3rd Doses give = 21,715,504 people Yellow Card Reports - 13,951 (Pfizer) 207 (AZ) 4317 (Moderna) 79 (Unknown) = 18,554 SUMMARY Reports 141,866 (Pfizer) 239,314 (AZ) 22,270 (Moderna) 1333 (Unknown) Total = 404,783 Fatal - 650 (Pfizer) + 1149 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 35 (Unknown) = 1852 Blood Disorders - 13,907 (Pfizer) + 7633 (AZ) + 1366 (Moderna) + 59 (Unknown) = 22,965 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 737 (Pfizer) + 2949 (AZ) + 37 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 3747 Anaphylaxis - 572 (Pfizer) + 848 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1477 Acute Cardiac - 8617 (Pfizer) + 10,329 (AZ) + 1301 (Moderna) + 74 (Unknown) = 20,321 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 875 (Pfizer) + 370 (AZ) + 175 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1427 Infections - 9554 (Pfizer) + 19,315 (AZ) + 1264 (Moderna) + 121 (Unknown) = 30,254 Herpes - 1925 (Pfizer) + 2607 (AZ) + 129 (Moderna) + 20 (Unknown) = 4681 Blindness - 132 (Pfizer) + 306 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 461 Eye Disorders - 6682 (Pfizer) + 14,448 (AZ) + 855 (Moderna) + 75 (Unknown) = 22,060 Deafness - 243 (Pfizer) + 404 (AZ) + 24 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 674 Spontaneous Abortions - 390 + 1 premature baby death/ 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (9 recorded as fatal) (Pfizer) + 216 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 651 miscarriages Skin Disorders - 28,289 (Pfizer) + 52,236 (AZ) + 9069 (Moderna) + 286 (Unknown) = 89,880 Psychiatric Disorders - 8430 (Pfizer) + 17,911 (AZ) + 1429 (Moderna) + 95 (Unknown) = 27,865 Headaches & Migraines - 31,020 (Pfizer) + 93,163 (AZ) + 5427 (Moderna) + 306 (Unknown) = 129,916 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 905 (Pfizer) + 963 (AZ) + 74 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1949 Nervous System Disorders - 69,181 (Pfizer) + 179,722 (AZ) + 11,887 (Moderna) + 742 (Unknown) = 261,532 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 653 (Pfizer) + 2193 (AZ) + 22 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2878 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 69 (Pfizer) + 472 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 554 Tremor - 1847 (Pfizer) + 9861 (AZ) + 375 (Moderna) + 49 (Unknown) = 12,132 Seizures - 938 (Pfizer) + 1996 (AZ) + 179 (Moderna) + 15 (Unknown) = 3128 Paralysis - 411 (Pfizer) + 829 (AZ) + 57 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1303 Haemorrhage (all types) - 3681 (Pfizer) + 5160 (AZ) + 496 (Moderna) + 41 (Unknown) = 9378 Respiratory Disorders - 17,639 (Pfizer) + 28,817 (AZ) + 2190 (Moderna) + 170 (Unknown) = 48,816 Vomiting - 4488 (Pfizer) + 11,544 (AZ) + 1028 (Moderna) + 50 (Unknown) = 17,110 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 25,342 (Pfizer) + 19,640 (AZ) + 3375 (Moderna) + 165 (Unknown) = 48,522 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT (10th week) Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 2,800,000 children (1st doses) plus 589,300 second doses resulting in 2083 Yellow Cards (up 86 from last week) • AZ - 11,500 children (1st doses) plus 10,000 second doses resulting in 244 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-47 • Moderna - 18,700 children (1st doses) and 14,300 second doses resulting in 8 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 9 Yellow Cards Total = 2,830,200 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 2344 DETAILED BREAKDOWN REPORT ON PAIN Lymph Node Pain - 1812 (Pfizer) + 587 (AZ) + 201 (Moderna) = 2600 Vascular Pain - 32(Pfizer) + 136 (AZ) + 5 (Moderna) = 173 Ear Pain - 971 (Pfizer) + 2074 (AZ) + 163 (Moderna) = 3208 Thyroid Pain - 10 (Pfizer) + 18 (AZ) = 28 Eye & Eyelid Pain - 1113 (Pfizer) + 3369 (AZ) + 187 (Moderna) = 4669 Abdominal Pain (lower, upper and gastro) - 4098 (Pfizer) + 10,465 (AZ) + 728 (Moderna) = 15,291 Oesophageal Pain - 13 (Pfizer) + 9 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 23 Lip & Oral Pain - 219 (Pfizer) + 426 (AZ) + 23 (Moderna) = 668 Axillary Pain - 3071 (Pfizer) + 762 (AZ) + 523 (Moderna) = 4356 Chest Pain - 4634 (Pfizer) + 5762 (AZ) + 764 (Moderna) = 11,160 Facial Pain - 200 (Pfizer) + 291 (AZ) + 23 (Moderna) = 514 Hepatic Pain - 27 (Pfizer) + 80 (AZ) + 4 (Moderna) = 111 Bone Pain - 382 (Pfizer) + 1089 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) = 1522 Pain in Jaw - 371 (Pfizer) + 624 (AZ) + 59 (Moderna) = 1052 Spinal Pain - 83 (Pfizer) + 266 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) = 359 Muscle Pain - 10,651 (Pfizer) + 27,198 (AZ) + 1986 (Moderna) = 39,835 Back Pain - 2381 (Pfizer) + 5905 (AZ) + 449 (Moderna) = 8735 Neck Pain - 1884 (Pfizer) + 3148 (AZ) + 255 (Moderna) = 5287 Pain in Extremity - 12,572 (Pfizer) + 22,345 (AZ) + 2528 (Moderna) = 37,445 Groin Pain - 108 (Pfizer) + 233 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) = 355 Bladder & Urethral Pain - 37 (Pfizer) + 70 (AZ) + 6 (Moderna) = 113 Renal Pain - 300 (Pfizer) + 941 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) = 1295 Breast & Nipple Pain - 716 (Pfizer) + 533 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) = 1336 Pelvic Pain - 105 (Pfizer) + 176 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) = 298 Scrotal & Testicular Pain - 81 (Pfizer) + 131 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) = 232 Pleuritic & Pulmonary Pain - 118 (Pfizer) + 282 (AZ) + 15 (Moderna) = 415 Oropharyngeal Pain - 2867 (Pfizer) + 4214 (AZ) + 338 (Moderna) = 7419 Sinus Pain - 217 (Pfizer) + 607 (AZ) + 46 (Moderna) = 870 Pain of Skin - 278 (Pfizer) + 941 (AZ) + 75 (Moderna) = 1294 Types of pain listed here are not exhaustive, and exclude thousands of specific pain reports. TOTAL = over 150,000 reactions listed as types of pain. Some people may have reported more than one type of pain per report. SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting OUR INDEPENDENT ADVERSE REACTION SURVEY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/v-survey REPORT MAGNETISM https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetised-survey

Brazilian footballer Lucas Santana, 18, collapsed during the 17th minute of a junior game after apparently suffering a seizure. The referee spotted the young man clutching his chest and went to the player before requesting medical attention. After first aid was administered on the pitch, the ambulance arrived and he was quickly transported to hospital. He was later released after undergoing tests on his brain and spine. You can read the full report from Euro Weekly News on the 11th January below: https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2022/01/11/brazilian-footballer-collapsing/ SEE THE FULL LIST OF SPORTS CASUALTIES HERE >>>

Alphonso Davies, 21, has been forced to stop training after a heart scare - he was diagnosed with mild inflammation of the heart, which has been put down to him having had a recent bout of Covid-19. Whilst we cannot find confirmation that Davies has received one or more Covid-19 vaccinations, we did find a report naming Bayern Munich’s five unvaccinated players. As Davies is not among those names listed, we can only assume that he is indeed vaccinated. Which begs the question: is it more likely that the usually rare condition of myocarditis was caused by a virus, or by a vaccine that’s known to be causing an explosion of heart-related issues, particularly among young men and more particularly among young, male footballers? Given that all Covid-19 vaccines are still in the trial phase with no long-term data relating to the growing list of side effects, isn’t it a matter of urgency now for the vaccine programme to be halted until the appropriate peer-reviewed studies can be carried out? You can read The Sun’s 14th January article about Davies here: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/17324148/bayern-munich-alphonso-davies-heart-problem/ You can read more about how chest pains are on the increase among footballers here: https://www.planet-today.com/2021/12/more-vaccinated-soccer-players-fall-ill.html Visit our Dedicated Sports Injury Site and see the full collection of injuries listed

Written by Cookie Taylor You may have heard about the four British Airways pilots, who died in quick succession, and how any connection with them having received Covid-19 ‘vaccinations’ was all-too-quickly denied by ‘fact checkers’, mainstream media and the airline itself. No known health conditions that would lead to sudden death were reported. You may also have heard of the voice recording by an anonymous friend of a British Airways pilot, who’d expressed concern that “things are getting crazy” after his fellow pilots died. Social media censored it as best they could but his message was clear: “They’ve had the third BA pilot die in the last seven days, yeah? Third pilot dead in the last week. The first two guys were in their forties and fifties; this guy, mid-thirties, perfectly fit, no underlying conditions. He gets his second jab and he’s dead within days, exactly the same with the first two. Because of this, BA are now in crisis talks with the government about whether to allow vaccinated pilots to fly. The issue with that of course is that about 80%, according to my friend in BA, 80-85% have been injected.” Here is the recording NOTB released on the 18th June 2021 Whether or not they had been recently ‘vaccinated’ has not been confirmed, so we cannot say for certain but it makes sense that if they had not been jabbed, the airline, mainstream media and ‘fact-checkers’ would have been extremely quick to say so, as it would fit their narrative perfectly. Let’s move across the pond. It has been noted that since the rollout of the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’, U.S airline pilots have been dying at an alarming and unprecedented rate - in fact, deaths are said to have increased by a whopping 1,750% since 2020. If reports are correct: 1 pilot died in 2019 Around 5 pilots died in 2020 Over 110 pilots died in 2021 (Jan-Sept) Not only that but most of the deaths occurred after the ‘vaccine’ rollout; 5 deaths were recorded from January to March 2021 when vaccine uptake was low, while 39 deaths occurred in July and 34 in August, straight after ‘vaccine’ mandates were introduced. How do we know all this? It’s thanks to Airline Pilot Magazine ALPA (December 2021 issue), who regularly include a page called ‘In Memoriam’ that lists any pilot deaths they are aware of. The magazine recently issued a statement, explaining, “We report the losses in our magazine as we receive information from the families. The information in one magazine edition does not provide a complete report of the total losses for each of the listed years.” It seems likely, then, that the actual number of pilot deaths is far higher than reported. With ‘vaccine’ mandates being enforced across the globe, an illegal move driven by governments and companies alike, the following video hits home as to the extraordinary pressure that healthy airline pilots must have been under to take part in this mass medical trial. Greg Pearson describes life- and career-changing adverse effects after being injected with “experimental drugs”, including being diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. He said, “I went to the ER where they quickly hooked me up to EKG IVs, did blood work quickly and determined that I was in atrial fibrillation. It’s the major cause of stroke. I could have stroked out at 100 feet while trying to land an aeroplane. I could have just pushed down on that stick before the person next to me could do anything. And it’s all over for a lot of people” He issued a stark warning, too: “There’s a number of pilots out there who are fearful to come forward and speak. They are fearful of retribution. There are guys that are going to work with crushing pains in their chests and their heads. They’re scared that they’re going to lose their careers.” Here is a video of Pearson Time will tell as to the true number of airline pilots who died in the last quarter of 2021 and we’ll have to wait to see how many will tragically pass away over the coming year. One thing’s for sure though: with an exploding list of sports people who’ve either died or experienced health issues since the ‘vaccine’ rollout (over 700 so far) and the thousands of deaths directly attributed to ‘vaccine’ adverse events found on VAERS, Yellow Card and EudraVigilance the cause being the 'vaccine' is undeniable. See our new website listing sports injuries here Reference articles. https://www.worldtribune.com/unreported-4-british-airline-pilots-die-after-getting-covid-jab/ https://www.genocide.news/2021-12-13-us-pilot-deaths-increase-after-covid-vaccine-rollout.html# Cookie Taylor 7th January 2021

The declared ingredients for the Biontec-Pfizer vaccine are basically the mRNA component, sugar, various salts, and the five key lipids used in the liposomal "get the mRNA into the cell" vaccine biotechnology. As we've been pointing out for many months, not one of these ingredients could cause the vaccine-induced magnetism we have witnessed, documented, had verified and filmed. Graphene Oxide has been discovered in the vaccines by Spanish researcher Dr Campra. Imperial College's Dr Andrew Goldsworthy first put the theory forwards of how atom thick graphene flakes could act like razor-bladed slicing through cell membranes inadvertently creating a magnetic field that could then spread cell to cell. During all this investigation of undisclosed ingredients, we missed something obvious, staring us straight in the eyes. Illegal ingredients. Of the five lipids, two are classified by the manufacturer as not fit for human use, The coded lipids known as ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 ALC-0315 is cationic (Please search for detailed NOTB post on this) ALC-0159 is PEGulated DECLARED INGREDIENTS PFIZER COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 The active substance is: 1 - BNT162b2 RNA. The five lipids used. 1 - PEG - polyethylene glycol/macrogol as part of ALC-0159 2 - ALC-0315 (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) 3 - ALC-0159 (polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide 4 - 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine 5 - cholesterol The salts used 1 - potassium chloride 2 - potassium dihydrogen phosphate 3 - sodium chloride 4 - disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate The sugar used 1 - sucrose Solution 1 - H20 - Water After dilution, each vial contains 6 doses, of 0.3 mL with 30 micrograms mRNA each. SOURCE https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/12634/pil This is the German case - so far untranslated. (see Legal Opinion file below that is translated into English) Highlights from the German 'legal opinion' file. (please note this is a first draft translation from German) DOWNLOAD THE FULL CASE FILE HERE. DECLARED INGREDIENT LIST

I had the privilege of listening in on a zoom call with a distinguished group of international doctors, when someone mentioned that one of the five key lipids used in the Pfizer 'vaccine' was cationic. A leading expert guffawed, and in his renowned gruff manner, backed by his deep European accent, blurted out "No way would they use such a thing. That's ridiculous! It would kill people." A few of us nodded. A cationic lipid was indeed being used. Below is a key paper, written under the flag of The UK Medical Freedom Alliance. First, let's remind ourselves of the declared ingredients. DECLARED INGREDIENTS PFIZER COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 The active substance is: 1 - BNT162b2 RNA. The five lipids used. 1 - PEG - polyethylene glycol/macrogol as part of ALC-0159 2 - ALC-0315 (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) 3 - ALC-0159 (polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide 4 - 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine 5 - cholesterol The salts used 1 - potassium chloride 2 - potassium dihydrogen phosphate 3 - sodium chloride 4 - disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate The sugar used 1 - sucrose Solution 1 - H20 - Water After dilution, each vial contains 6 doses, of 0.3 mL with 30 micrograms mRNA each. SOURCE https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/12634/pil Paper by UKMFA (download source paper below article) What is the potential risk of the cationic lipid in the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine? The RNA – ribonucleic acid – being used in the mRNA vaccines would dissipate immediately after being injected if not encapsulated. The encapsulation technique used by Pfizer/BioNTech is a lipid nanoparticle composed of four lipids: ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl) azanediyl)bis (hexane-6,1- diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), ALC-0159 = 2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), and cholesterol.i These lipids all have various roles in stabilising the lipid nanoparticle (LNP), aiding cell entry, and enabling the nanosphere to burst open when it is inside the cell. This article will focus on that first lipid, the opaquely named ALC-0315. A previous piece on this page focused on polyethylene glycol (PEG, with the designation ALC-0159 in the BioNtech vaccine)ii. The PEG is used to prevent the LNPs getting stuck to each other or other surfaces: it “is preferably inserted at the LNP surface as a steric barrier to interactions with surfaces or other LNPs to avoid aggregation during storage”. iii It is possible to react allergically to PEG, or for it to be attacked by antibodies one already has to it: the manufacturers have already warned not to have this vaccine if you have suffered allergic/anaphylactic reactions to PEG in the past. But the cationic lipid ALC-0315 harbours very great risks of its own – possibly far greater – that have not so far received any coverage at all. What is a cationic lipid? ALC-0315 is a cationic lipid, which means it is able to form an aggregate complex with anionic genetic materials such as DNA or RNA.iv Cationic lipids typically have a positively charged head group followed by hydrophobic tails of varying composition v. Anionic means negatively charged. The electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged RNA backbone and the positively charged heads of the cationic lipids keep the mRNA “tethered” until the LNP gets to its intended location (see the figure in this article as an example: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/65).vi Once the entire LNP slips into the cell (enabled by the liposome interaction with the membrane), the cationic lipid interacts with negatively charged phospholipids in the endosomal membrane – the endosome being the “sorting station” that meets the LNP when it has entered the cell – “resulting in membrane destabilization and release of the payload to the cytosol”. vii What happens to the fragments inside the cell? So what happens to the lipid fragments of the LNP inside the cell once the mRNA “payload” has been released to perform its mission of forming the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2? First of all we have to remember that this is happening very many times and in various cells of the body, not just in the muscle tissue into which the vaccine was first injected. Animal trials have shown that LNPs when injected tend to naturally flow with the bloodstream. No biodistribution studies via radiotracker (e.g. Luciferase) appear to have yet been conducted on human beings with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, but it is likely that – as in animal trials – the LNPs distribute throughout the body. A study published in 2017 analysed the biodistribution of LNPs after intramuscular administration in mice. It found delivery of the LNPs to 17 different compartments of the mice apart from muscle within varying periods of time, including heart, testes, kidney, bone marrow and even the brain. viii One also has to remember that it is not in the plasma that the lipid fragments are left to be broken down and disintegrated, but inside the body’s cells, assuming they have been attracted in through the cell membrane as intended, where many other sensitive organelles are to be found. The possible toxicity of this lipid The formulation of Pfizer/BioNTech’s LNP is proprietary, but sources cite the proportion of the cationic lipid ALC-0315 in the lipid envelope at approx. 50% .ix We do not know how many of these LNPs are being injected per 30 mcg (one dose), but this is a point that needs investigation. These cationic lipids have been investigated for over 30 years since cationic lipid-based gene delivery (lipofection) was first published by Felgner’s group in 1987,x but have not found their way into general application because of their toxicity. It is not just cellular biologists with experience of this field who state that cationic lipids are “very, very toxic”.xi A peer-reviewed paper in Toxicology Research from April 2018 states in the opening sentence of its abstract: “cationic lipids still have the problem of toxicity, which has become one of the main bottlenecks for their applications.” xii This finding is reflected throughout the literature on cationic lipids, across the entire three decades. An article as recent as May 2019, “Lipid Nanoparticles for Delivery of Therapeutic RNA Oligonucleotides” says “A major drawback with the use of cationic lipids for gene delivery is the high net positive charge associated with the headgroup as well as induction of immune response ... Furthermore, particles of cationic nature are known to undergo accumulation in the liver, lung, and spleen.” xiii Previously only used in cancer therapy So what is the exact mechanism of this cytotoxicity? “Cellular toxicity of cationic lipids has been linked to increased production of reactive oxygen species.”xiv (Reactive oxygen species, also called free radicals, are unstable molecules that contain oxygen and that easily react with other molecules in a cell; a build-up of these in cells may cause damage to DNA, RNA, and proteins, and may cause cell death.xv). A 2016 article explains: “Several previous reports have suggested that cationic liposomes induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-mediated toxicity in cells.”xvi This study goes on to test whether liposomes containing cationic lipids might perform apoptosis of cancer cells alone, without any cargo. It finds this to be true. Nanoparticles containing cationic monovalent lipids “are able to induce cancer cell death through production of ROS in the absence of any therapeutic cancer reagents.” xvii This was indeed the field that BioNTech specialises in: using lipid nanoparticles in cancer therapy. The company had never produced a vaccine before this mRNA Covid-19 one in association with Pfizer. Placing cationic lipids inside tumour cells to induce cell death is one thing, as apoptosis is intended, but is this acceptable collateral damage when the same technology is used in a vaccine? The potential mechanism of damage is that once the LNP is in the cell and has released its mRNA, the cationic lipid fragments with their positive charge react with the negatively charged organelles and membrane substances in the cell, creating porosity and calcium influx. xviii Mechanism of action on liver cells A detailed analysis of the effect of cationic lipids on liver cells from December 2017 explains the mechanism as follows (CLs meaning cationic lipids): “Pathway analysis showed significant changes in pathways involving amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, lipid metabolism and oxidative stress in the CLs exposure group vs the control group. Metabolites related to the above‐mentioned pathways included phenylalanine, methionine, creatine, oxalacetic acid, glutathione, oxidized glutathione, choline phosphate and several unsaturated fatty acids, indicating that cells were disturbed in amino acid metabolism, energy and lipid supply when CLs exposure‐induced injury occurred. It is concluded that CLs may induce cytotoxicity by enhancing reactive oxygen species in vitro, affect the normal process of energy metabolism, disturb several vital signaling pathways and finally induce cell death. xix Exponential effects due to mitochondrial damage? Every cell (apart from red blood cells) contains multiple mitochondria, our cells’ powerhouses. These process oxygen to make energy, so there is a huge load of oxygen radicals in mitochondria that need to be contained and neutralised. The delicate membranes of the mitochondria which rely on their negative charge for their voltage gradient would soon be compromised by cationic lipids reacting with it. Once the delicate mitochondrial membrane becomes porous from attack by the cationic lipids, the radical oxygen species from inside the mitochondria are no longer contained and the reaction is likely to be exponential, as cells often contain many thousands of mitochondria. Dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra have around 2 million mitochondria each. xx The implications depend on which cells the LNPs happen to land inside, how many of them there are, and which pathways are being impaired by the cell death this free radical attack causes. But certainly a putative link can be made with severe neurological sequelae if cationic lipids should find their way into the basal ganglia, for example, or the substantia nigra. Considerable marker dysregulation noted Around 60% find their way to the liver, as mentioned in the EMA report: “The applicant has estimated the percent of dose distributed to the liver to be ~60% for ALC-0315”xxi. In an animal trial submitted as evidence for authorisation of the vaccine by BioNTech to the EMA, this resulted in high elevations of liver enzymes GGT – “exposure generated increased levels of gGT (>200%)” xxii – indicative of liver damage, and AST, which rises in liver and cardiac inflammation, as well as “slight to moderate increases in ALT and ALP levels, possible indicative of liver effects.” xxiii “Cationic lipids show in vitro toxicity toward phagocytic cells and inhibit in vitro and in situ NO and TNF-a production by activated macrophages.” xxiv Surely it would be prudent for trials to examine and exclude the possibilities of this oxidative and other damage occurring before continuing to roll out this particular vaccine? The official MHRA summary of adverse reactions to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for the UK for just one month, from 19th January to 11th February, lists 70,314 adverse events, ranging from cardiac, hepatic and gastrointestinal disorders through to polyneuropathies, 978 eye disorders (including 9 cases of blindness) and 173 deaths. The mode of action of cationic lipids is just one of the possible risks of these novel genetic therapeutics, but damage via the pathways described in thirty years of literature surely deserves targeted questions and answers. Too much is at stake. i https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/information- for-uk-recipients-on-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine#contents ii https://uploadsssl.webflow.com/5fa5866942937a4d73918723/6011a450fd486937783c2481_Article_on_anapylaxis_in_recipients_of_the _Covid-19_mRNA_vaccines_V4.pdf iii https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/944544/COVID-19_mRNA_Vaccine_BNT162b2__UKPAR___PFIZER_BIONTECH__15Dec2020.pdf iv https://avantilipids.com/product-category/cationic-lipids-transfection v https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/cationic-lipid vi https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/65 Buschmann, M.D.; Carrasco, M.J.; Alishetty, S.; Paige, M.; Alameh, M.G.; Weissman, D. Nanomaterial Delivery Systems for mRNA Vaccines. Vaccines 2021, 9, 65; vii Marco Filice M, Ruiz-Cabello J, Nucleic Acid Nanotheranostics: Biomedical Applications, book, 1st edition Elsevier Feb. 2019, p. 280 Bahl, K. et al. (2017). Preclinical and Clinical Demonstration of Immunogenicity by mRNA Vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 Influenza Viruses. Molecular therapy : The Journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 25(6), 1316–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.035 viii ix German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, Hearing 37, evidence of Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Krueger, https://corona-ausschuss.de/sitzungen/ xi German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, Hearing 37, Op. cit. xii Cui, S et al. (2018). Correlation of cytotoxic effects of cationic lipids with their headgroups. Toxicology Research. 7. 10.1039/C8TX00005K.https://academic.oup.com/toxres/article/7/3/473/5545061 xiii Moss, K et al. (2019). Lipid Nanoparticles for Delivery of Therapeutic RNA Oligonucleotides. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 16. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01290. https://media.ellinikahoaxes.gr/uploads/2021/01/moss2019.pdf, Lipid Nanoparticles for Delivery of Therapeutic RNA Oligonucleotides xiv https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293611/, xv https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/reactive-oxygen-species xvi https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bpb/39/8/39_b16-00264/_pdf/-char/en, xvii xviii xix xx Misgeld, T., & Schwarz, T. L. (2017). Mitostasis in Neurons: Maintaining Mitochondria in an Extended Cellular Architecture. Neuron, 96(3), 651–666 xxi European Medicines Agency Rolling Review, EMA/CHMP/641856/2020EMA/CHMP/641856/2020, 30 Nov 2020. http://radio.rumormillnews.com/pdfs/20201130-BioNTech-Vaccine-Document.pdf xxii Ibid. xxiii Ibid. xxiv x Felgner et al. Lipofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 1987, 84 (21) 7413-7417 Kanasty RL et al. Action and reaction: the biological response to siRNA and its delivery vehicles. Mol Ther. 2012 Mar;20(3):513-24. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.294. Epub 2012 Jan 17. PMID: 22252451; PMCID: PMC3293611. Yun CH et al, Cargo-Free Nanoparticles Containing Cationic Lipids Induce Reactive Oxygen Species and Cell Death in HepG2 Cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2016;39(8):1338-46. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b16-00264. Cargo-Free Nanoparticles Containing Cationic Lipids Induce Reactive Oxygen Species and Cell Death in HepG2 Cells, Ibid. Soenen SJ et al. Addressing the problem of cationic lipid-mediated toxicity: the magnetoliposome model. Biomaterials. 2009 Aug;30(22):3691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.040. Epub 2009 Apr 15. Yu J et al. Metabolomics revealed the toxicity of cationic liposomes in HepG2 cells using UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS and multivariate data analysis. Biomed Chromatogr. 2017 Dec;31(12). Filion MC, Phillips NC. Toxicity and immunomodulatory activity of liposomal vectors formulated with cationic lipids SOURCE PAPER