Search Results

The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 3rd Nov 2021 Overall for every 130 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. DATA • Pfizer - 23.5million people - 43.8m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-183 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-105 people impacted • Moderna - 1.5m people - 2.8m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-87 people impacted Overall 1-in-130 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. 💥 Adult Booster or 3rd Doses give = 9,012,676 people Yellow Card Booster Reports 5324 (Pfizer) 76 (AZ) 135 (Moderna) 31 (Unknown) Total = 5566 💥 PLEASE NOTE: MHRA state: “…due to ongoing work on the presentation of the latest data on numbers of vaccines administered, suspected adverse event reporting and incidence rates will be updated as soon as the vaccines administered dataset is available.” Observation - number of doses reported demonstrating number of adults/children receiving vaccines is identical to last week Reports - 128,734 (Pfizer) + 236,386 (AZ) + 17,321 (Moderna) + 1203 (Unknown) = 383,644 people impacted Fatal 597 (Pfizer) 1118 (AZ) 19 (Moderna) 32 (Unknown) TOTAL = 1,766 Thrombosis/Embolism (All types) - 1313 (Pfizer) + 5937 (AZ) + 60 (Moderna) + 43 (Unknown) = 7353 Anaphylaxis - 529 (Pfizer) + 839 (AZ) + 41 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1411 Acute Cardiac - 6714 (Pfizer) + 9814 (AZ) + 774 (Moderna) + 51 (Unknown) = 17,353 Infections - 8589 (Pfizer) + 18,922 (AZ) + 914 (Moderna) + 104 (Unknown) = 28,529 Immune System Disorders - 1833 (Pfizer) + 3082 (AZ) + 332 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 5265 Blindness - 115 (Pfizer) + 298 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 435 Eye Disorders - 6016 (Pfizer) + 14,233 (AZ) + 634 (Moderna) + 68 (Unknown) = 20,951 Spontaneous Abortions - 368 + 11 stillbirth/foetal death/premature baby death (Pfizer) + 213 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) + 36 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 619 miscarriages + 15 foetal deaths Skin Disorders - 25,345 (Pfizer) + 51,627 (AZ) + 7607 (Moderna) + 264 (Unknown) = 84,843 Psychiatric Disorders - 7588 (Pfizer) + 17,646 (AZ) + 1120 (Moderna) + 85 (Unknown) = 26,439 Migraines & Headaches - 28,141 (Pfizer) + 92,667 (AZ) + 3793 (Moderna) + 280 (Unknown) = 124,881 Central Nervous System Haemorrhage (Stroke) - 578 (Pfizer) + 2128 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2735 Nervous System Disorders - 62,659 (Pfizer) + 178,130 (AZ) + 8758 (Moderna) + 671 (Unknown) = 250,218 Vertigo/Tinnitus - 3234 (Pfizer) + 6665 (AZ) + 331 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 10,257 Respiratory Disorders - 15,641 (Pfizer) + 28,351 (AZ) + 1516 (Moderna) + 136 (Unknown) = 45,644 Seizures - 865 (Pfizer) + 1965 (AZ) + 145 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 2987 Paralysis - 360 (Pfizer) + 807 (AZ) + 45 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1218 Epistaxis (Nosebleeds) - 833 (Pfizer) + 2254 (AZ) + 82 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 3179 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 23,576 (Pfizer) + 19,167 (AZ) + 3097 (Moderna) + 151 (Unknown) = 45,991 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT (5th week) Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old *Doses recorded not updated from last week by MHRA • Pfizer - 1,849,486 children (1st doses) plus 315,134 second doses • Pfizer - 1492 Yellow Cards (increase of 167 from last week) • AZ - 11,505 children (1st doses) plus 9,986 second doses resulting in 233 Yellow Cards (static) • Moderna - 17,087 children (1st doses) and 12,408 second doses resulting in 5 Yellow cards (static) • Brand Unspecified - 6 Yellow Cards Total = 1,878,078 children injected Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 1736 SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting OUR INDEPENDENT ADVERSE REACTION SURVEY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/v-survey REPORT MAGNETISM https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetised-survey

6 October 2021 Florian Dagoury, currently the world’s top static breath-hold free diver, has been diagnosed with myocarditis and pericarditis 40 days following his second dose with the Pfizer vaccine. He is known for the fact he officially held his breath for 10 minutes and 30 seconds. The elite Freedriver, of French origin and based in Thailand, experienced a significant decrease in his breath-hold ability and went to a cardiologist who told him that it’s a common side effect of the Pfizer vaccine. He filmed his examination... In his words QUOTE: "...Myocarditis, Pericarditis and Trivial Mitral regurgitation! Thank you Pfizer. Just want to share my annoying experience after vaccination and perhaps have some testimonials from similar stories amount Freedivers. Did you get better? After my 2nd dose I noticed that my heart rate was way higher than normal and my breath hold capacities went down significantly. During sleep I’m at 65-70bpm instead of 37-45bpm. During the day I’m now always over 100bpm instead of 65bpm, even when I sit down and relax. Once I even reach 177bpm while having dinner with friends !!!! 10 days after my 2nd jab, I went to see a cardiologist and he told me it’s a common side effect of Pfizer vaccine, nothing to worry about, just rest it will pass. 40days after 2nd jab, I had no progress so I went to see an other cardiologist and got diagnosed with Myocarditis, Pericarditis and Trivial Mitral regurgitation! Which is basically an inflammation of the heart muscles cause by the immune system and some tiny leaks of blood from the valves that no longer close properly. I’m now struggling to reach 8min breath hold, 150m dyn and I even have a strong urge to breath doing 40m dives. 30% decrease on my diving performance roughly. See his post here https://www.instagram.com/p/CUrJkJ-FuFd/

Dr Campra has released his latest research. This is his short video introduction to the work. Not On The Beeb, courtesy of the Spanish Quinta Columna team, is the first English speaking channel to release his work. Download Dr Campra's Nove 2021 paper here: HISTORY Dr Pablo Campra from Almeria University was the first to deduce that the Pfizer vaccine most probably contained Graphene Oxide flakes. However, this was just a visual match. His initial images of what appeared to be Graphene Oxide went viral worldwide. See our report here where you can download his original paper. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/englis-translation-of-the-graphene-oxide-almeria-paper Graphene Oxide was later backed by The Scientist's Club, A German collective and Dr Young. The theory is that Graphene Oxide flakes are responsible for the vaccine-induced magnetism that we have witnessed internationally. Dr Andrew Goldsworthy (retired) of Imperial College London has explained the possible mechanism here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/dr-andrew-goldsworthy Not On The Beeb has many articles and films linked to vaccine-induced magnetism here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetism including a key petition calling for an urgent investigation. Yet so far, no one has (at least publically) taken the analysis of the vaccines further to provide a definite conclusion Hence Dr Campra's conclusion confirming graphene oxide within the covid vaccines is a major step forwards. His technique has been to use using micro-RAMAN infrared spectroscopy combined with microscope analysis Below are some highlights from the report. (Please download the full paper for proper reading - link at tope of article) ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY Fundamentalsofthemicro-Ramantechnique Due to the characteristics of the sample and to the dispersion of objects with a graphene appearance of micrometric size in a complex matrix of indeterminate composition, the direct application of spectroscopic methods does not allow characterization of the nanoparticles studied here without a previous microscopic localization or fractionation from the original sample. Therefore, microscopy coupled to RAMAN spectroscopy (micro- RAMAN) was selected as an effective technique for an exhaustive screening of micrometric objects visible under the optical microscope. RAMAN infrared spectroscopy is a fast, non-destructive technique that allows the verification of the structure of this material by identifying vibrational modes and phonons generated after excitation with monochromatic laser, generating inelastic dispersion that manifests itself in peaks of infrared emission that are a characteristic signature of the reticular structure of graphene and derivatives. Coupled optical microscopy allows the excitation laser to be focused on specific objects and points located on objects, to reinforce the degree of confidence in identifying the nature of the material, and to obtain complementary information on thickness, defects, thermal conductivity and edge geometry of graphene nanocrystalline structures. Equipment used for micro-Raman spectroscopy RAMAN LASER SPECTROMETER JASCO NRS-5100 Confocal Raman MICROSCOPE with spectrograph, includes: -variety of magnification and working distances from x5 to x100 -up to 8 lasers ranging from UV to NIR -SRI (spatial resolution image) to simultaneously view the sample image and the laser point. -DSF (Dual Spatial Filtration) that optimizes the confocal focus of the image produced by the objective lens to reduce aberration and improve spatial resolution and reduce the effects of matrix fluorescence. The spectra were analyzed with SPECTRA MANAGER software, version 2. JASCO Corporation. Previously, the equipment was calibrated with a silicon standard at 520 cm-1. 1.3. Micro-Raman spectroscopy of graphite and graphene 1. NANOCRYSTALLINESTRUCTUREBANDS -G-band (~1580-1600 cm-1): Indicates a permissible phonon vibration (elementary vibration of the net) in the plane of the aromatic ring (sp2 hybridization), characteristic of the crystalline structure of graphite and graphene. It presents a red shift (lower frequency, in cm-1), as well as higher intensity with a higher number of layers. On the contrary, the higher energy in doped graphene shows as a blue shift (higher frequency in cm-1), along the 1580-1600 cm-1 range (Ferrari et al, 2007). -2D band (~2690 cm) (or G'): Indicates stacking order. It depends on the number of layers, it does not depend on the degree of defects, but its frequency is close to twice that of peak D. Its position oscillates according to the type of doping. The presence of single-layer graphene (SLG) has been associated with the presence of an isolated and sharp 2D peak, increasing in width according to the number of layers (Ni et al., 2008). - The ratio of I2D/IG is proportional to the number of layers of the graphite network. - In graphite G and 2D appear are sharper and narrower than in graphene. 2. BANDS ACTIVATED BY ANOMALIES in the graphitic structure. These bands are generated by elastic dispersion (of the same energy) of load conveyors and by phonon confinement (Kohn's anomaly in phonon dispersion). In graphene oxides (GO) the disorder comes from the insertion of hydroxyl (-OH) and epoxide (-O-) groups. -D band (~1340 cm-1). It shows the density of defects in the crystal network due to functionalization, doping or structural anomalies generating holes or new sp3 (C-C) centers. The intensity of the D-band decreases with the alignment of layers in the graphitic structure. -D' band (~1620 cm-1). It follows a double resonance behavior due to network defects. Sometimes it merges with the G band due to blueshift of the latter. -D+G band (~2940 cm-1) PARAMETERS INTRODUCING FREQUENCY VARIABILITY (cm-1), INTENSITY AND SHAPE OF THE RAMAN BANDS These parameters have not been studied in detail in this report but should be considered in the future for the assignment of bands to vibrational modes. - Degree and type of disorder (doping, breaks, etc.), that cause wider width of the G, D, and 2D peaks by decreasing the phonon lifetime (molecular vibration) - The G-band does not show differences in intensity due to disorder, but the ratio (ID/ IG) does vary with D band changes. - Compression and stretching of the network by doping. There may be blueshifts (>cm) in all bands (up to 15 cm−1 in G and 25 cm−1 in 2D) and band narrowing(up to 10 cm −1) e.g. "back gates" by doping with oxides through deposition - By sheet bending the 2D band also increases, with no change in G, but with blueshifts between 4-12 cm−1 can occur. - Stacking level or number of layers - Functionalization (introduction of functional groups) of the network generates the appearance of new Raman peaks: 746 cm−1 (C–S stretching), 524, 1062, 1102, 1130 cm−1 (skeletal vibrations, CCCC trans and gauche), 1294 (twisting), 1440, 1461 (C–H deformation, scissoring), 2848 and 2884 cm−1 (C–H stretching). - A the same object may show spectral variations depending on the angle of incidence and the layers affected. The edges will show more disorder than the inner crystalline structure (Ni et al, 2008) - Blueshifts dependent on the substrate employed to grow graphene layers (Chen et al, 2008) - Variable intensity of the peaks in the same object according to the laser focus point, due to structural variability with respect to the angle of incidence related to the crystal network (Barros et al., 2005) LIST OF SAMPLES OF VIALS AND OBJECTS SCREENED BY MICRO-RAMAN 1. Samples were obtained from sealed vials of COVID19 mRNA vaccines as outlined in Annex 1. All vials were sealed at the time of processing, except MOD and JAN, which had no aluminum seals. 2. Four different aliquots per vial of 10 μl each were extracted with 50 μl micro- syringe, deposited on optical microscopy slides, and left to dry in aseptic laminar flow chamber at room temperature. They were then stored in a closed slide case and kept cold until micro-Raman analysis. 3. Previous extensive visual screening of drips was carried out under optical microscope (OLIMPUS CX43) in search for objects compatible with graphitic structures or graphene. Magnification from X100 to x600 were used. Object selection criteria were: 1. Location in the remains of the droplet or in the outer area of dragging by drying 2. Two types of grafene-like appearance: two-dimensional translucent objects or dark carbon-like opaque bodies. Obtain RAMAN spectra of the selected objects Processing of the spectral data The list and keys of the objects characterized in this report are set out in Annex 2. Dr Campra's summary, in his words. We present here our research on the presence of graphene in covid vaccines. We have carried out a random screening of graphene-like nanoparticles visible at the optical microscopy in seven random samples of vials from four different trademarks, coupling images with their spectral signatures of RAMAN vibration. By this technique, called micro-RAMAN, we have been able to determine the presence of graphene in these samples, after screening more than 110 objects selected for their graphene-like appearance under optical microscopy. Out of them, a group of 28 objects have been selected, due to the compatibility of both images and spectra with the presence of graphene derivatives, based on the correspondence of these signals with those obtained from standards and scientific literature. The identification of graphene oxide structures can be regarded as conclusive in 8 of them, due to the high spectral correlation with the standard. In the remaining 20 objects, images coupled with Raman signals show a very high level of compatibility with undetermined graphen e structures, however different than the standard used here. This research remains open and is made available to scientific community for discussion. We make a call for independent researchers, with no conflict of interest or coaction from any institution to make wider counter-analysis of these products to achieve a more detailed knowledge of the composition and potential health risk of these experimental drugs, reminding that graphene materials have a potential toxicity on human beings and its presence has not been declared in any emergency use authorization. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The micro-Raman technique applied here has proved to be very effective for the rapid screening of a large number of microscopic objects in the detection of graphene micro-structures dispersed in complex samples. Compared to macro-Raman spectroscopy of whole aqueous dispersions, the combination with microscopy in micro-Raman has the advantage of allowing the association of spectral fingerprints to nanoparticles visible under the optical microscope. This technique allowed us to focus the prospection towards specific objects with graphene-like appearance, reinforcing their spectroscopic characterization with coupled images. In this work, the preliminary selection of objects has focused on two typologies, translucent sheets and opaque carbonaceous objects, due to their visual similarity with similar shapes observable in standards after sonication or in graphene oxide dispersions (see Annex 3 Results). The difference between both typologies is not due to their chemical composition, both derived from graphite, but only to the degree of exfoliation of the starting graphitic material and the number of superimposed layers, assuming a threshold of around 10 layers as a reference limit to consider that material graphite (3D) (Ramos-Fernandez, 2017). Anyhow, it was out the scope of our work to further characterize these structures. A total of 110 objects with graphene-like appearance were selected, mostly located at the edge of the sample droplets after dehydration, inside or outside of the dragging area by drying at room temperature of the original aqueous phase. Out of them, another 28 objects in total were selected for their higher degree of spectral compatibility with graphene materials reported in the literature, considering both spectra and images. The images and RAMAN spectra of these objects are shown in the Annex 3 of this report. It is of interest to note that the samples do not dry completely at room temperature, always leaving a gelatinous residue, whose limit can be observed in some of the photographs shown. The composition of this medium is unknown for the moment as it was not the subject of the present study, as well as that of other typologies of micrometric size objects that could be observed recurrently in the samples at low magnification (40-600X). The Raman spectra of some of these objects were obtained but are not shown in this study because they did not present visual resemblance to graphene or graphite. A limitation in obtaining defined spectral patterns with this technique has been the intensity of the fluorescence emitted by many selected objects. In numerous translucent sheets with a graphene appearance, it was not possible to obtain Raman spectra free of fluorescence noise, so the technique did not allow to obtain specific RAMAN signals with well-defined peaks in many of them. Therefore, in these objects the presence of graphene structures can neither be affirmed nor ruled out. Another limitation of the micro- RAMAN technique is the low quality of the optical image of the equipment, which often prevents the detection of high-transparency graphene-like sheets, which can, however, be observed in optical microscopes with proper condenser adjustment. For these objects an effective alternative for characterization would be to use other complementary microscopy techniques coupled with spectroscopy, such as XPS with good optics or the obtention of electron diffraction pattern of graphene by electronic microscopy (TEM). Considering these selection criteria, the 28 objects found with potential graphene identity have been distributed in 2 groups, according to the degree of correlation with the RAMAN spectrum of reduced graphene oxide pattern used (rGO, TMSIGMA ALDRICH). GROUP 1 included 8 objects whose spectral patterns were similar to the spectrum of the rGO pattern, and therefore the presence of graphene oxide (no 1-8) can be affirmed with certainty. This spectral correspondence can be considered unequivocal and is characterized by 2 dominant peaks in the scanned range (between 1200-1800 cm-1), peaks called G (~1584 cm-1) and D (~1344 cm-1), characteristic of graphene oxides. This characterization by spectral correspondence between the signals of these nanoparticles and the rGO pattern is f u r t h e r reinforced by the microscopic appearance of these objects, all of them with an opaque carbonaceous appearance similar to that of the standard objects, as can be seen in the photographs in the Results annex. Therefore, we can affirm with a high level of confidence that the identification of graphene material in all the analyzed samples of Group 1 IS CONCLUSIVE, and with high probability graphene oxide structures can be assigned to these nanoparticles. These group 1 objects presented a micrometric size in ranges of tens of microns (shown as a blue line in photographs of some of them). In the second group of 20 objects (GROUP 2, no 9-28), RAMAN signals compatible with the presence of graphene or graphitic structures have been detected, showing peaks of RAMAN vibrations around the G band (1585-1600 cm-1), compatible with the G peak of the nanocrystalline structure of graphene or graphite. This vibrational mode is generated by the allowed vibration of the phonon in the plane of the aromatic ring (sp2). Its drifting towards higher frequencies in some objects, tending towards 1600 cm- 1 (blue shift) can be assigned to a wide variety of modifications referred extensively in the literature, such as, for example, the number of graphene layers or doping with functional groups or heavy metals others (Ferrari et al, 2007). Visually, this group includes the two types of appearances observed in the standards: whether opaque micrometric objects with a carbonaceous appearance (no 9, 11, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28) or translucent sheets with graphene-like appearance (no 10, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19 and 20). In the spectra of this group 2, the G peak maxima are accompanied by other dominant peaks of non-determined assignment in this work. A subgroup (2.1.) can be made from of objects whose spectra have the two 2 dominant peaks located in band ranges that could be assigned to the two main vibrational modes of graphene oxide, G (range 1569-1599 cm-1) and D (range 1342-1376 cm-1) (objects no. 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26). Considering both microscopic images and RAMAN signals together, the assignation of the spectra of this group 2.1 to graphenic structures can be done with a high level of confidence. However, although the structural modifications of the network generating spectral signals different than the standard rGO used have yet to be determined. The signals from a second subgroup (2.2) of objects of this Group 2 (no 9, 10, 12, 13, 18, 19, 25, 27, 28) can be considered compatible with the presence of graphene structures due to the presence of maxima in the G-band, although the use of more detailed spectral analysis algorithms would be necessary, since no clear peaks that could be assigned to the vibrational mode D, around 1344 cm-1 in the rGO standard, were not clearly observed. However, the presence of peak D is not a sine qua non condition for the assignment of graphene structures to spectra, and in consequence these objects have been selected for this report as they are showing compatible vibrational maxima in the vicinity of the G-band (range 1569-1600 cm-1). There is still an open debate about the interpretation of this D-band and its variable frequency and shape (Ferrari and Robertson, 2004). As outlined in the methodological introduction, the intensity of the D peak, generally cited around 1355 cm-1, as well as the intensity ratio with the G peak (ID / IG) is indicative of the degree of disorder in the graphene network, introduced by different agents such as doping, introduction of very different functional groups or breaks in the continuity of the network. In ordered graphitic materials this peak D is absent. In some spectra of this subgroup 2.2., other peaks with higher frequencies (blueshift) than the standard appear, whose assignment to vibrational mode D is possible, although this assignment is yet to be determined by processing with algorithms analysis which was beyond the scope of the present work. Therefore, at present, for these spectra we can only state that the absence or drifting (shift) of the D peak with respect to the location of the rGO pattern still requires a structural interpretation according to the models available. According to the literature, both the variations in the shift of the G and D peaks, as well as their variable width and intensity, and the presence of other peaks seen in these spectra could be due to very diverse modifications yet to be determined, including different degrees of disorder, oxidation, doping, functionalization, and structural breaks. The study of these modifications were beyond the scope of this report. Complementary to the range 1200-1800 cm-1, when RAMAN spectroscopy was extended up to 2800 cm-1 for some objects (no 3, 8 and 11), a 2D peak of low intensity and frequency amplitude was detected, being absent in other scanned objects (data not shown). However, both in the rGO standard and some objects with G peak maxima, the intensity of this peak was always been very low compared to the G and D peaks of the spectra. This might be due to the fact that, in graphene oxides, the relative intensity of the 2D peak (~2700 cm-1) with respect to the G and D peaks is greatly reduced. Therefore, in this study we have dispensed generally with analyzing the 2D peak for reasons of greater efficiency and use of limited resources required to scan as many objects as possible within a limited amount of time. In future work, it would be of interest to examine it for all objects, thus estimating the ratio of I2D/2G intensities in those objects where it minimally manifests in this vibrational mode, which would allow for estimates to be made about the number of layers of the structure. The objects shown in this study represent a minority portion of the total micrometric objects visible at low magnification in light-field optical microscopy (100X). These objects were scanned and are not shown in this study because their spectra where not compatible with graphene structures as they lack a band that could be assigned to G vibrational mode peak. It is of great interest to note that many of these objects show RAMAN maxima in the 1439-1457 cm-1 band. Likewise, among the objects in group 2.2, also a prominent peak is frequently found in this band, around 1450 cm-1, in combination with peaks G and D (no 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 28). The assignment of this band around 1450 cm-1 is still pending, since it does not correspond to specific peaks in graphene, but we consider it to be of great importance for the knowledge of the composition of the samples due to the frequent appearance of this vibrational mode. As a working hypothesis, this band is usually assigned to organic methylene groups -CH2- by bending the pair of hydrogens- (scissoring). However, it has also been referred to as a band of moderate intensity associated with aromatic rings, and if so, it could also be associated with graphene (Ferrari and Robertson, 2004). As stated, another possible assignment of this band would be that of a superimposed vibrational mode of some compound other than graphene, more likely, or even of the hydrogel medium remaining after drying, as in all samples there is always a viscous residue remaining after drying at room temperature. This residue could in many cases be manifesting RAMAN vibrations overlapping with the objects that remain embedded in it, but not in those that appear outside the gel at the limits of the drying drag zone. In this sense, it is possible that this vibrational mode of the medium appears overlapped with the G and D peaks of graphene in the spectra of subgroup 2.1. It is beyond the scope of this work to characterize this medium, as well as all the components of the sample. However, there are some substances capable of forming this hydrogel matrix whose RAMAN signals show prominent vibrational modes around this band, such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), methylacrylamide, or the polymer PQT-12 (Mik Andersen, https://corona2inspect.blogspot.com/ pers. com). It is also a fact that some of these substances have been combined with graphene in experimental biomedicine designs that can be found in the scientific literature, for example artificial synapses for PQT-12 (Chen and Huang, 2020), gelatins for neuronal regeneration combining methylacrylamide with graphene (Zhu et al, 2016) or PVA/GO electrospun fibers (Tan et al, 2016). Now, all these hypotheses about the assignment of this peak in the vicinity of 1450 cm-1 remain open. In conclusion, out of a total of 110 scanned objects, unambiguous signals for the presence of graphene oxide have been found in 8 objects, and signals compatible with the presence of graphitic or graphene structures in another 20 objects. The rest of the objects scanned here, out of 110 nanoparticles with graphene-like appearance have not shown signals compatible with graphene, with spectra at times dominated by excess noise caused by excessive fluorescence intensity, so we cannot neither assign nor rule out the presence of graphene structures in them. As a continuation of this line of work, and although our micro-RAMAN analysis has shown conclusive signs of the presence of objects with graphene structure, to consolidate the certainty of identification and to deepen the structural characterization, it would be convenient to carry out complementary analyses using coupled microscopy and spectroscopy techniques such as XPS spectroscopy, or TEM electron diffraction. For the present investigation, most of the samples have been obtained from sealed vials. Also, during the extraction of the samples and their transfer to slides for Raman microscopy, we worked under aseptic conditions under laminar flow chamber. However, the possibility of sample contamination processes during manufacturing, distribution, and processing, as well as the general applicability of these findings to comparable samples, need to be assessed by routine and more extensive monitoring of similar batches of these products. Although the results of this sampling are conclusive with regard to the presence of graphene like structures in some samples analyzed, this research is considered open for continuation and is made available to the scientific community for replication and optimization, considering it necessary to continue with a more detailed and exhaustive spectral study, based on a statistically significant sampling of similar vials, and the application of complementary techniques to confirm, refute, qualify or generalize the conclusions of this report. The samples analyzed are duly guarded and available for future scientific collaboration. THE PAPER'S CONCLUSION: A random sampling of COVID19 vaccine vials has been performed using a coupled micro-RAMAN technique to characterize graphene-like microscopic objects using spectroscopic fingerprints characteristic of the molecular structure. The micro-RAMAN technique allows to reinforce the level of confidence in the identification of the material by coupling imaging and spectral analysis as observational evidence to be considered together. Objects have been detected whose RAMAN signals by similarity with the standard unequivocally correspond to GRAPHENE OXIDE. Another group of objects present variable spectral signals compatible with graphene derivatives, due to the presence of a majority of specific RAMAN signals (G-band) that can be assigned to the aromatic structure of this material, in conjunction with its visible appearance. This research remains open for continuation, contrasting and replication. Further analyses based on significant sampling, using the described technique or others which are complementary would allow us to assess with adequate statistical significance the level of presence of graphene materials in these drugs, as well as their detailed chemical and structural characterization. This is the Orginal paper published by Dr Campra in the early summer 2021 See our article here https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/englis-translation-of-the-graphene-oxide-almeria-paper Download his original report 'The Almeria Paper' here. DISCLAIMER This research has been carried out exclusively by Dr. Pablo Campra, without any type of remuneration by any private or public entity, nor involvement or conformity with its results and conclusions by the institution where he is affiliated. The characterization of the related objects corresponds exclusively to the samples analyzed. It is not possible without significant sampling to know whether these results are generalizable to other samples of similar trademarks. Dr. Pablo Campra is only responsible for the statements written in this electronically signed file, and is not responsible for the opinions or conclusions that may be drawn from its dissemination in media and social networks and not expressed in this document, whose original version, authenticated and signed electronically, can be consulted at the following Researchgate platform: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355684360_Deteccion_de_grafeno_en_va cunas_COVID19_por_espectroscopia_Micro-RAMAN

The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 28th Oct 2021 Overall for every 131 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. DATA Reports - 124,530 (Pfizer) + 235,341 (AZ) + 17,039 (Moderna) + 1164 (Unknown) = 378,074 people impacted Fatal - 576 (Pfizer) + 1111 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 31 (Unknown) = 1738 Blood Disorders - 12,028 (Pfizer) + 7514 (AZ) + 998 (Moderna) + 47 (Unknown) = 20,587 Thrombosis & Embolism (all types) - 1250 (Pfizer) + 5831 (AZ) + 57 (Moderna) + 41 (Unknown) = 7179 Anaphylaxis - 509 (Pfizer) + 827 (AZ) + 40 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1377 Acute Cardiac - 6188 (Pfizer) + 9610 (AZ) + 716 (Moderna) + 46 (Unknown) = 16,560 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 624 (Pfizer) + 303 (AZ) + 138 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1067 Infections - 8302 (Pfizer) + 18,751 (AZ) + 902 (Moderna) + 101 (Unknown) = 28,056 Herpes - 1716 (Pfizer) + 2546 (AZ) + 94 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) = 4372 Immune System Disorders - 1774 (Pfizer) + 3054 (AZ) + 330 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 5175 Headaches & Migraines - 27,250 (Pfizer) + 92,497 (AZ) + 3723 (Moderna) + 276 (Unknown) = 123,746 Eye Disorders - 5820 (Pfizer) + 14,162 (AZ) + 619 (Moderna) + 64 (Unknown) = 20,665 Blindness - 113 (Pfizer) + 294 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 429 Deafness - 213 (Pfizer) + 380 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 612 Spontaneous Abortions - 360 + 9 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 213 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) + 36 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 611 miscarriages + 13 foetal deaths/stillbirths Skin Disorders - 24,401 (Pfizer) + 51,407 (AZ) + 7536 (Moderna) + 246 (Unknown) = 83,590 Psychiatric Disorders - 7284 (Pfizer) + 17,551 (AZ) + 1098 (Moderna) + 81 (Unknown) = 26,014 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 794 (Pfizer) + 926 (AZ) + 60 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1787 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 552 (Pfizer) + 2115 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2696 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 59 (Pfizer) + 436 (AZ) + 4 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 504 Nervous System Disorders - 60,551 (Pfizer) + 177,413 (AZ) + 8583 (Moderna) + 658 (Unknown) = 247,205 Respiratory Disorders - 15,056 (Pfizer) + 28,199 (AZ) + 1475 (Moderna) + 128 (Unknown) = 44,858 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 640 (Pfizer) + 2853 (AZ) + 22 (Moderna) + 20 (Unknown) = 3535 Seizures - 819 (Pfizer) + 1942 (AZ) + 145 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 2919 Paralysis - 349 (Pfizer) + 792 (AZ) + 44 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1191 Tinnitus/Vertigo - 3116 (Pfizer) + 6608 (AZ) + 327 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) = 10,077 Tremor - 1520 (Pfizer) + 9780 (AZ) + 209 (Moderna) + 41 (Unknown) = 11,550 Nosebleeds - 807 (Pfizer) + 2250 (AZ) + 82 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 3149 Dizziness - 9524 (Pfizer) + 24,570 (AZ) + 1705 (Moderna) + 93 (Unknown) = 35,892 Renal/Urinary Disorders - 960 (Pfizer) + 2620 (AZ) + 118 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 3722 Vomiting - 3812 (Pfizer) + 11,452 (AZ) + 676 (Moderna) + 43 (Unknown) = 15,983 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 22,924 (Pfizer) + 18,970 (AZ) + 3027 (Moderna) + 153 (Unknown) = 45,074 SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting INDEPENDENT ADVERSE REACTION SURVEY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/v-survey REPORT MAGNETISM https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetised-survey

The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 6TH OCT 2021 Overall for every 132 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. DATA • Pfizer - 22.7million people - 42.5m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-188 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 48.9m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-106 people impacted • Moderna - 1.5m people - 2.7m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-90 people impacted Reports - 120,578 (Pfizer) + 234,410 (AZ) + 16,754 (Moderna) + 1136 (Unknown) = 372,878 people impacted Fatal - 562 (Pfizer) + 1106 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 31 (Unknown) = 1719 Blood Disorders - 11,538 (Pfizer) + 7489 (AZ) + 981 (Moderna) + 47 (Unknown) = 20,055 Thrombosis & Embolism (all types) - 1212 (Pfizer) + 5764 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 41 (Unknown) = 7072 Anaphylaxis - 489 (Pfizer) + 823 (AZ) + 40 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1353 Immune System Disorders - 1719 (Pfizer) + 3036 (AZ) + 324 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 5096 Acute Cardiac - 5840 (Pfizer) + 9520 (AZ) + 685 (Moderna) + 47 (Unknown) = 16,092 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 577 (Pfizer) + 292 (AZ) + 129 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1000 Infections - 8038 (Pfizer) + 18,628 (AZ) + 887 (Moderna) + 101 (Unknown) = 27,654 Herpes - 1679 (Pfizer) + 2534 (AZ) + 94 (Moderna) + 15 (Unknown) = 4322 Headaches & Migraines - 26,451 (Pfizer) + 92,358 (AZ) + 3647 (Moderna) + 261 (Unknown) = 122,717 Eye Disorders - 5653 (Pfizer) + 14,087 (AZ) + 609 (Moderna) + 64 (Unknown) = 20,413 Blindness - 110 (Pfizer) + 292 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 424 Deafness - 207 (Pfizer) + 373 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 599 Spontaneous Abortions - 349 + 9 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 207 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) + 35 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 593 miscarriages + 13 foetal deaths/stillbirths Skin Disorders - 23,592 (Pfizer) + 51,214 (AZ) + 7463 (Moderna) + 240 (Unknown) = 82,509 Psychiatric Disorders - 7039 (Pfizer) + 17,468 (AZ) + 1081 (Moderna) + 80 (Unknown) = 25,668 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 768 (Pfizer) + 917 (AZ) + 60 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1752 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 531 (Pfizer) + 2102 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2662 Guillian Barre Syndrome - 55 (Pfizer) + 428 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 491 Nervous System Disorders - 58,668 (Pfizer) + 176,914 (AZ) + 8421 (Moderna) + 646 (Unknown) = 244,649 Respiratory Disorders - 14,560 (Pfizer) + 28,070 (AZ) + 1439 (Moderna) + 124 (Unknown) = 44,193 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 627 (Pfizer) + 2833 (AZ) + 22 (Moderna) + 20 (Unknown) = 3502 Seizures - 788 (Pfizer) + 1931 (AZ) + 141 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 2872 Paralysis - 334 (Pfizer) + 790 (AZ) + 43 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1173 Nosebleeds - 785 (Pfizer) + 2244 (AZ) + 82 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 3120 Dizziness - 9232 (Pfizer) + 24,512 (AZ) + 1672 (Moderna) + 93 (Unknown) = 35,509 Renal/Urinary Disorders - 922 (Pfizer) + 2600 (AZ) + 117 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 3664 Vomiting - 3665 (Pfizer) + 11,436 (AZ) + 663 (Moderna) + 43 (Unknown) = 15,807 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 22,142 (Pfizer) + 18,730 (AZ) + 2947 (Moderna) + 150 (Unknown) = 43,969 SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting INDEPENDENT ADVERSE REACTION SURVEY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/v-survey REPORT MAGNETISM https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetised-survey

The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 13TH OCT 2021 Overall for every 131 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. DATA Reports - 122,542 (Pfizer) + 234,882 (AZ) + 16,921 (Moderna) + 1148 (Unknown) TOTAL = 375,493 people have filed a report. Fatal - 564 (Pfizer) + 1101 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) + 31 (Unknown) = 1715 Blood Disorders - 11,779 (Pfizer) + 7494 (AZ) + 992 (Moderna) + 47 (Unknown) = 20,312 Thrombosis & Embolism (all types) - 1229 (Pfizer) + 5779 (AZ) + 56 (Moderna) + 41 (Unknown) = 7105 Anaphylaxis - 501 (Pfizer) + 825 (AZ) + 40 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1367 Acute Cardiac - 5990 (Pfizer) + 9561 (AZ) + 702 (Moderna) + 46 (Unknown) = 16,299 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 602 (Pfizer) + 297 (AZ) + 138 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1039 Infections - 8147 (Pfizer) + 18,692 (AZ) + 894 (Moderna) + 100 (Unknown) = 27,833 Herpes - 1690 (Pfizer) + 2542 (AZ) + 94 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) = 4342 Immune System Disorders - 1753 (Pfizer) + 3044 (AZ) + 328 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 5142 Headaches & Migraines - 26,852 (Pfizer) + 92,428 (AZ) + 3700 (Moderna) + 271 (Unknown) = 123,251 Eye Disorders - 5749 (Pfizer) + 14,134 (AZ) + 617 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 20,563 Blindness - 112 (Pfizer) + 293 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 427 Deafness - 211 (Pfizer) + 378 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 608 Spontaneous Abortions - 354 + 9 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 212 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) + 35 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 603 miscarriages + 13 foetal deaths/stillbirths Skin Disorders - 24,004 (Pfizer) + 51,316 (AZ) + 7511 (Moderna) + 241 (Unknown) = 83,072 Psychiatric Disorders - 7163 (Pfizer) + 17,510 (AZ) + 1094 (Moderna) + 80 (Unknown) = 25,847 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 781 (Pfizer) + 921 (AZ) + 60 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1769 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 539 (Pfizer) + 2109 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2677 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 59 (Pfizer) + 432 (AZ) + 4 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 500 Nervous System Disorders - 59,600 (Pfizer) + 177,154 (AZ) + 8524 (Moderna) + 645 (Unknown) = 245,923 Respiratory Disorders - 14,792 (Pfizer) + 28,127 (AZ) + 1463 (Moderna) + 123 (Unknown) = 44,505 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 631 (Pfizer) + 2837 (AZ) + 22 (Moderna) + 20 (Unknown) = 3510 Seizures - 800 (Pfizer) + 1932 (AZ) + 144 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 2888 Paralysis - 342 (Pfizer) + 790 (AZ) + 43 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1181 Tinnitus/Vertigo - 3066 (Pfizer) + 6584 (AZ) + 323 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) = 9999 Tremor - 1484 (Pfizer) + 9775 (AZ) + 204 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 11,502 Nosebleeds - 797 (Pfizer) + 2247 (AZ) + 82 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 3135 Dizziness - 9376 (Pfizer) + 24,547 (AZ) + 1688 (Moderna) + 93 (Unknown) = 35,704 Renal/Urinary Disorders - 936 (Pfizer) + 2610 (AZ) + 118 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 3688 Vomiting - 3733 (Pfizer) + 11,445 (AZ) + 671 (Moderna) + 43 (Unknown) = 15,892 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 22,528 (Pfizer) + 18,865 (AZ) + 3003 (Moderna) + 152 (Unknown) = 44,548 SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting INDEPENDENT ADVERSE REACTION SURVEY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/v-survey REPORT MAGNETISM https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetised-survey

The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 28th Oct 2021 Overall for every 131 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. DATA • Pfizer - 23.5million people - 43.8m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-187 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.9m people - 49m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-106 people impacted • Moderna - 1.5m people - 2.8m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-87 people impacted Overall 1-in-131 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. 💥 Adult Booster or 3rd Doses give = 6,995,982 people Yellow Card Reports Following Boosters or 3rd Doses - 4079 (Pfizer) + 62 (AZ) + 81 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 4246 Reports - 126,603 (Pfizer) + 235,875 (AZ) + 17,187 (Moderna) + 1185 (Unknown) = 380,850 people reporting adverse reactions Majority do not know they are meant to report all events, or how to as this information is held from the public. Fatal - 577 (Pfizer) + 1112 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 32 (Unknown) = 1739 Blood Disorders - 12,214 (Pfizer) + 7528 (AZ) + 1005 (Moderna) + 48 (Unknown) = 20,795 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 650 (Pfizer) + 2862 (AZ) + 24 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3557 Anaphylaxis - 517 (Pfizer) + 834 (AZ) + 41 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1393 Acute Cardiac - 6428 (Pfizer) + 9706 (AZ) + 751 (Moderna) + 51 (Unknown) = 16,936 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 668 (Pfizer) + 320 (AZ) + 142 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 1132 Infections - 8439 (Pfizer) + 18,815 (AZ) + 912 (Moderna) + 104 (Unknown) = 28,270 Immune System Disorders - 1801 (Pfizer) + 3069 (AZ) + 332 (Moderna) + 17 (Unknown) = 5219 Blindness - 115 (Pfizer) + 295 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 432 Spontaneous Abortions - 364 + 11 stillbirth/foetal death/premature baby (Pfizer) + 214 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) + 37 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 617 miscarriages + 15 foetal deaths Psychiatric Disorders - 7427 (Pfizer) + 17,595 (AZ) + 1112 (Moderna) + 82 (Unknown) = 26,216 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 62 (Pfizer) + 442 (AZ) + 5 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 576 Nervous System Disorders - 61,595 (Pfizer) + 177,777 (AZ) + 8676 (Moderna) + 668 (Unknown) = 248,716 Respiratory Disorders - 15,341 (Pfizer) + 28,291 (AZ) + 1498 (Moderna) + 136 (Unknown) = 45,266 Seizures - 842 (Pfizer) + 1951 (AZ) + 145 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 2950 Paralysis - 355 (Pfizer) + 800 (AZ) + 44 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1205 Tremor - 1567 (Pfizer) + 9794 (AZ) + 214 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 11,617 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 23,264 (Pfizer) + 19,069 (AZ) + 3059 (Moderna) + 151 (Unknown) = 45,543 💥 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT (4th week) Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 1,849,486 children (1st doses) plus 315,134 second doses • Pfizer - 1325 Yellow Cards (increase of 109 from last week) • AZ - 11,505 children (1st doses) plus 9986 second doses • AZ - 234 Yellow Cards (static) Yellow Card reporting rate of children adversely impacted from Astrazeneca = 1-in-49 • Moderna - 17,087 children (1st doses) and 12,408 second doses • Moderna - 5 Yellow cards (static) • Brand Unspecified - 5 Yellow Cards Total = 1,878,078 children injected Population of 12-17yr olds in UK according to ONS is 4.5million children Total Yellow Card Adverse Events Reported Under 18s = 1569 SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting OUR INDEPENDENT ADVERSE REACTION SURVEY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/v-survey REPORT MAGNETISM https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetised-survey

A new analysis of the Moderna vaccine has been published by Dr John B "a Scientist, lecturer & father | Whistleblower" (1/n) A microscopy analysis of a Moderna #Covidvaccine sample. A fresh sample was analyzed with bright field and phase contrast microscopy. The cold chain was maintained and rigorous hygiene standards were applied. These are the results: (2/n) Particles and structures of different size and light refraction properties are visible in the vaccine when focusing on the border of the drop (yellow asterisk). (3/n) Higher magnification reveals a wide spectrum of structures, including for example a rod-shaped structure (yellow arrow) with a length of about 14 µm (i.e. about twice as long as a red blood cell). (4/n) The smallest particles visible under the microscope have a diameter of around 300 nm. (5/n) Many particles are visible having a diameter in the range of about 0.6-1 µm: (6/n) Rod-shaped structures with and without particles attached were found (yellow arrows). (7/n) Multiple curved structures with a length of about 5-10 µm were detected. These interesting structures often had a thickening at one end or both ends: CONCLUSIONS • The Moderna #Covidvaccine contains particles & objects of different sizes, shapes and light refraction properties • Curved structures with a length of about 5-10 um were only found in the Moderna and not in the Pfizer-BioNTech sample • An open question is which objects are the ingredients of the vaccine and which are contaminants • The particles found do not match the size of mRNA-lipid nanoparticles used in the vaccines (which are 60–100 nm in size; Schoenmaker et al., 2021) Further investigations about the ingredients and purity of the #Covidvaccines are required. Schoenmaker, L., Witzigmann, D., Kulkarni, J. A., Verbeke, R., Kersten, G., Jiskoot, W., & Crommelin, D. (2021). mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: Structure and stability. International journal of pharmaceutics, 601, 120586. SOURCE: Dr John B on Telegram Scientist, lecturer & father | Whistleblower POST https://t.me/DrJohnB/901 CHANNEL https://t.me/DrJohnB

We have some new images for you, courtesy of our dear South Spanish research and a colleague here in the UK (see our first article here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/bottled-water ) Like before, both sets of images feature particles found in bottled water sold under different names within each country, yet are distributed by the same conglomerate. According to the conglomerate, the water sold in Spain is derived from a Spanish spring, whilst the UK version is derived from a UK source. The particles found within both are similar. The two researchers are both professionals within their respective scientific fields. Both were analysing under home conditions, so not within labs. They used different microscopes, hence the two styles of the images. Meanwhile, if you're intrigued to the brands, I'd guess someone in the comments below will figure out the conglomerate and make it clear for everyone. IMAGES COURTESY OF THE SOUTH SPANISH RESEARCHER - Particles found in the water sold in Spain by the conglomerate. IMAGES COURTESY OF THE BRITISH RESEARCHER - Particles found in a popular bottled water sold in the UK by the same conglomerate To make sense of these images please see our previous reports. Dr Campra's Almeria Paper he found what appears to be Graphene Oxide in vaccine samples https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/englis-translation-of-the-graphene-oxide-almeria-paper The Scientists club merged findings from multiple sources https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/what-is-really-in-the-c19-vaccines Our previous article breaking the bottled water story. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/bottled-water MICROSCOPE FUNDING Thank you to everyone who has supported the microscope funding! Support Not On The Beeb's research projects here HOW TO GET CLEAN WATER The best water is spring water direct from a natural source. This water is not only clean, full of minerals but is 'vortexed', in its fourth phase, and highly bioavailable. For most of us, springs are not close by and we need to look at filtration or distillation. Neither option is perfect though. - Filters don't get rid of everything. - Distillers get rid of too much and the water needs to be remineralised. In recent preliminary tests, a water distiller (as seen here) and a Berkey both removed visible contaminants. We have much work to do on this, checking more waters, more filters and using a microscope with a greater ability to see 'invisible' particles. (Support this project here)

The data below contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 29th Sept 2021. Overall for every 132 of the people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. However, due to the poor training of health professionals very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Worse, even when health professionals do recognise the links, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or, simply don't have the time. It is estimated by official government bodies that only 1-10% of adverse events are reported. DATA • Pfizer 22.5million people 42.1m doses Yellow Card reporting rate 1-in-189 people reporting an adverse event • Astrazeneca 24.9m people 48.9m doses Yellow Card reporting rate 1-in-106 people reporting an adverse event • Moderna 1.4m people 2.6m doses Yellow Card reporting rate 1-in-84 people reporting an adverse event Reports 118,970 (Pfizer) 233,904 (AZ) 16,582 (Moderna) 1118 (Unknown) TOTAL 370,574 people Fatal 552 (Pfizer) 1097 (AZ) 19 (Moderna) 30 (Unknown) TOTAL = 1,698 Blind 107 (Pfizer) 292 (AZ) 16 (Moderna) 4 (Unknown) TOTAL =419 Deaf 205 (Pfizer) 372 (AZ) 17 (Moderna) 2 (Unknown) TOTAL = 596 Paralysis 327 (Pfizer) 786 (AZ) 42 (Moderna) 6 (Unknown) TOTAL= 1161 Anaphylaxis 486 (Pfizer) 820 (AZ) 40 (Moderna) 1 (Unknown) TOTAL = 1347 Acute Cardiac 5734 (Pfizer) 9474 (AZ) 671 (Moderna) 42 (Unknown) TOTAL = 15,921 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) 560 (Pfizer) 288 (AZ) 126 (Moderna) 2 (Unknown) TOTAL = 976 Infections 7902 (Pfizer) 18,572 (AZ) 883 (Moderna) 96 (Unknown) TOTAL = 27,453 Herpes 1666 (Pfizer) 2524 (AZ) 93 (Moderna) 15 (Unknown) TOTAL = 4298 Blood Disorders 11,342 (Pfizer) 7474 (AZ) 972 (Moderna) 47 (Unknown) TOTAL = 19,835 Spontaneous Abortions 346 + 8 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) 207 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) 35 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) 2 (Unknown) TOTAL = 590 + 12 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy 757 (Pfizer) 913 (AZ) 58 (Moderna) 7 (Unknown) TOTAL = 1735 Skin Disorders 23,303 (Pfizer) 51,098 (AZ) 7418 (Moderna) 238 (Unknown) TOTAL = 82,057 Psychiatric Disorders 6970 (Pfizer) 17,425 (AZ) 1070 (Moderna) 77 (Unknown) TOTAL = 25,542 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages 525 (Pfizer) 2094 (AZ) 19 (Moderna) 10 (Unknown) TOTAL = 2648 Guillian Barre Syndrome 53 (Pfizer) 428 (AZ) 3 (Moderna) 5 (Unknown) TOTAL = 489 Nervous System Disorders 57,975 (Pfizer) 176,644 (AZ) 8321 (Moderna) 633 (Unknown) TOTAL = 243,573 BCG Scar Reactivation 46 (Pfizer) 35 (AZ) 30 (Moderna) 1 (Unknown) TOTAL = 112 Respiratory Disorders 14,352 (Pfizer) 29,009 (AZ) 1420 (Moderna) 120 (Unknown) TOTAL = 43,901 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis 618 (Pfizer) 2806 (AZ) 23 (Moderna) 20 (Unknown) TOTAL = 3467 Seizures 789 (Pfizer) 1926 (AZ) 140 (Moderna) 12 (Unknown) TOTAL = 2867 Nosebleeds 782 (Pfizer) 2242 (AZ) 82 (Moderna) 9 (Unknown) TOTAL = 3115 Loss of balance 9123 (Pfizer) 24,486 (AZ) 1654 (Moderna) 91 (Unknown) TOTAL = 35,354 Renal/Urinary Disorders 915 (Pfizer) 2590 (AZ) 116 (Moderna) 23 (Unknown) TOTAL = 3644 Vomiting 3609 (Pfizer) 11,423 (AZ) 657 (Moderna) 42 (Unknown) TOTAL = 15,731 Reproductive/Breast Disorders 21,797 (Pfizer) 18,593 (AZ) 2893 (Moderna) 149 (Unknown) TOTAL = 43,432 Headaches & Migraines 26,145 (Pfizer) 92,289 (AZ) 3610 (Moderna) 266 (Unknown) TOTAL= 122,310 Eye Disorders 5562 (Pfizer) 14,044 (AZ) 601 (Moderna) 62 (Unknown) TOTAL = 20,26 SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting INDEPENDENT ADVERSE REACTION SURVEY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/v-survey REPORT MAGNETISM https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetised-survey

(Reporting up to 22nd Sept 2021) • Pfizer - 22.4million people - 41.8m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-191 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.8m people - 48.8m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-106 people impacted • Moderna - 1.4m people - 2.6m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-86 people impacted Overall 1-in-132 people jabbed have had a report filed. Have you suffered magnetism or one of the adverse reactions listed below? We have an independent survey here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/v-injury-magnetism Reports - 117,297 (Pfizer) + 233,242 (AZ) + 16,361 (Moderna) + 1101 (Unknown) = 368,001 people impacted Fatal - 544 (Pfizer) + 1091 (AZ) + 19 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 1682 Acute Cardiac - 5620 (Pfizer) + 9427 (AZ) + 653 (Moderna) + 41 (Unknown) = 15,741 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 538 (Pfizer) + 286 (AZ) + 119 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 945 Anaphylaxis - 484 (Pfizer) + 820 (AZ) + 40 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1345 Blood Disorders - 11,182 (Pfizer) + 7460 (AZ) + 958 (Moderna) + 45 (Unknown) = 19,645 Infections - 7810 (Pfizer) + 18,506 (AZ) + 868 (Moderna) + 93 (Unknown) = 27,277 Herpes - 1652 (Pfizer) + 2514 (AZ) + 88 (Moderna) + 14 (Unknown) = 4268 Headaches & Migraines - 25,888 (Pfizer) + 92,200 (AZ) + 3563 (Moderna) + 265 (Unknown) = 121,916 Eye Disorders - 5488 (Pfizer) + 14,015 (AZ) + 590 (Moderna) + 61 (Unknown) = 20,154 Blindness - 106 (Pfizer) + 291 (AZ) + 16 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 417 Deafness - 203 (Pfizer) + 372 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 594 Psychiatric Disorders - 6869 (Pfizer) + 17,386 (AZ) + 1055 (Moderna) + 77 (Unknown) = 25,387 Skin Disorders - 23,007 (Pfizer) + 50,986 (AZ) + 7362 (Moderna) + 228 (Unknown) = 81,583 Spontaneous Abortions - 336 + 8 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 205 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) + 34 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 577 + 12 Vomiting - 3563 (Pfizer) + 11,416 (AZ) + 646 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 15,667 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 752 (Pfizer) + 910 (AZ) + 57 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1726 Nervous System Disorders - 57,379 (Pfizer) + 176,299 (AZ) + 8225 (Moderna) + 630 (Unknown) = 242,533 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 531 (Pfizer) + 2082 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2641 Guillian Barre Syndrome - 52 (Pfizer) + 426 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 486 Tremor - 1426 (Pfizer) + 9744 (AZ) + 195 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 11,403 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 624 (Pfizer) + 2793 (AZ) + 28 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3463 Respiratory Disorders - 14,181 (Pfizer) + 27,935 (AZ) + 1396 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 43,626 Nosebleeds - 779 (Pfizer) + 2237 (AZ) + 82 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 3107 Seizures - 794 (Pfizer) + 1918 (AZ) + 141 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 2865 Paralysis - 323 (Pfizer) + 778 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1149 Reproductive/Breast - 21,103 (Pfizer) + 18,325 (AZ) + 2830 (Moderna) + 147 (Unknown) = 42,405 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting

These new images from the microscopy analysis of the Pfizer 'vaccine are some of the best yet. Multiple releases within the last ten days, regarding the key issue of 'undisclosed ingredients', indicate the avalanche has truly started. If we follow the rule of exponential discovery, the kick-up has just started. THE ORIGINAL POST IS ATTRIBUTED TO DR JOHN B (REPOSTED WITH RESPECT TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL HUMANACIDE EMERGENCY) A microscopy analysis of a Pfizer-BioNTech #Covidvaccine sample. The analysis was performed with bright field and phase contrast microscopy and applying rigorous scientific and hygiene standards. Two samples were analyzed from the same vial. These are the results: (2/n) Focusing on the border of the drop (yellow arrow) reveals tiny particles of different sizes and light refraction properties: (3/n) Zooming in, the larger particles were found to have a diameter of about 1 µm. For comparsion: Diameter of a human hair: 70-90 µm (link.springer.com/article/10.168…), human red blood cell: 8 µm (sciencedirect.com/science/articl…), SARS-CoV-2: 90-100 nm (nature.com/articles/s4159…) (4/n) The smaller particles are about 0.5 µm (= 500 nm) in diameter: (5/n) Some particle aggregations were also visible in the liquid: (6/n) Fiber-like structures can also be seen. Their diameter is in the nm-range. (Remember, a human hair has a diameter of about 70-90 µm). Some of them look like a continuous fiber (a, c), some have branches (b, d). (7/n) More fiber-like structures. A ring-like structure was seen once (d). Note from Mark - PLEASE NOTE (d) - this is a recurring theme so far unrecognised. What is it? (8/n) A futher class of particles: comparatively large and with unique light refraction properties. They come in different shapes (e.g rod-like, squares): (9/n) More of these objects: (10/n) And more: (11/n) A few unusually shaped objects were found, e.g. a 45 µm long ribbed structure (b) and a particle of about 10 µm in diameter with some “spikes” attached (d). (12/n) Parts of the liquid crystallized after about 15 min. Encapsulated areas can be seen with crystallized objects of different sizes inside. It’s almost beautiful. (13/n) Sometimes, these encapsulated crystallized areas (white arrow) contained objects with different light refraction properties to the particles surounding them (yellow arrow): (14/n) Oval-shaped encapsulated crystallized structures can be seen: (15/n) These oval-shaped encapsulated crystallized structures have complex internal sub-structures with compartmentalization and particles of different sizes: 16/n) One oval-shaped encapsulated crystallized structure was found attached to a fiber-like object (yellow arrow) with a diameter of about 10 µm: (17/n) Conclusions (1): - The Pfizer-BioNTech #Covidvaccine contains particles and objects of different sizes, shapes and light refraction properties - Complex aggregates and crystallization of these particles and objects were found (18/n) Conclusions (2): - The nature (chemical properties, elemental composition) of these particles and objects is unknown - Careful interpretation of these images is required SOURCE: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1444639912880443396.html Help support Not On The Beeb's fundraiser for a microscope to continue our research into bottled water 'contaminants'

The Plandemic: How the Government Manipulates COVID- 19 A Special Interview With David Martin, Ph.D. By Dr. Joseph Mercola Who is Dr. Joseph Mercola? Over the last decade one of the most reliable sources of medical information until he was targeted and had to take his extensive library of articles offline. Who is David E Martin? A polymath - one of the world's greatest investigators specialising in unearthing complex financial fraud If you are quick (the videos only last 48hrs) the video interview is here: The transcript of the video interview is below Dr. Joseph Mercola: Welcome, everyone. This is Dr. Mercola helping you take control of your health, and we're continuing in our coverage of this “Plandemic” with Dr. David Martin, and I suspect many of you have heard of who he is. But for those of you who haven't he'll describe his background briefly in a moment. But he, in my view, has done the best job of really uncovering the paper trail for two decades that led to where we're at now. This includes government grants, patents, funding, the whole nine yards. That this just didn't just happen a year and a half ago. So, he's covered it. He's covered it so well, so eloquently. He was featured in Mickey Willis' “Plandemic 2.” I'm not sure if that's the exact title, but it's the second version after [crosstalk 00:00:49]- David Martin: Yeah, “Indoctrination.” That's right. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah. If you've seen that you know a lot of his work, and we will reread some of that here and give us some good updates, hopefully. But I'm just really excited to have him because he's just an enormous fountain of information. So, welcome and thank you for joining us today. David Martin: You are most welcome. Thanks, Joe. It's lovely to be here. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Okay. So, if you can briefly describe your history, which sounds like you were really working for the federal government as one of their people and you're on all over mainstream media and really well-accepted as an expert in your field. So, just briefly condense that so that we can understand your history and then how and why you made the transition about two years ago? David Martin: Well, yeah, back in 1995 when I finished my doctorate at the University of Virginia, I joined the medical school faculty in radiology and orthopedic surgery, but most notably then I was running the first medical device clinical trials organization for the University of Virginia, a company called IDEAmed. What we did then was we did medical device clinical trials for FDA submission. So I had a very long tradition of working with FDA clinical trials. Did a lot of work in diagnostics and therapeutics of a variety of forms. And in 1998, when I started M.CAM, which is the company that I also founded and have operated since then, we began working very closely with finding ways to bring intellectual property into conventional finance. David Martin: So, our background, in addition to the medical background was figuring out ways to bring innovation to the marketplace and dropping the cost of capital so that innovative companies could get much less expensive capital. It was through that, Joe, that an interesting hole opened up. That was we were starting to audit the United States Patent system. We were asked to do that by Congress. And quite alarmingly, we found an enormous number of patents on biological and chemical weapon violations. Now, that was not something we were looking for. I let people know this was not something we set out to find. This is something that landed in our lap. Dr. Joseph Mercola: How did you identify these? Was it some type of digital scanning system or was it a manual review? David Martin: Yeah, so I developed a technology a decade earlier called Linguistic Genomics, which is a means by which you can look at unstructured text data and find the metaphoric meaning inside of what is being communicated. As you can imagine, if people of ill intent are trying to do something, they often hide what they're doing in plain sight, but they use language that is not conventional. So when you find a patent, for example, on a blast-resistant pathogen from a rocket-propelled grenade, did you hear what I just said? A blast-resistant pathogen from a rocket-propelled grenade. Does that sound like it's a common way to inoculate a population or does that sound like it sounds? Dr. Joseph Mercola: Sounds like it sounds. A bioweapon. David Martin: Yeah. And so, finding a number of bioweapons patents, we started taking into account some very serious things. And I published once a year, I have a copy of the book here. I published once a year, the literal global phonebook of every biological and chemical weapon violation. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Wow. David Martin: That took place anywhere in the world, and it is the who's to it. It's the who, it's the where, it's the who funded it, it's what their addresses are. It was actually quite an interesting document that was what was used by U.S. law enforcement, intelligence communities and elsewhere around the world to track things that were being done inappropriately. And it was in fact, in 1999 when we started detecting that there seemed to be an alarming event around coronavirus, which we're going to get into. Dr. Joseph Mercola: So, was this report directed towards governmental agencies primarily? David Martin: That's exactly right. It was in addition to being directed at government agencies. It was also shared with law enforcement around the world to try to neutralize this into not a single party kind of information disclosure. As a matter of fact, at its peak of circulation we had the regular updates recorded at the Library of Alexandria in Egypt as a neutral party holding this information. So that posterity would know that we built laws around the prohibition of biological and chemical weapons with the full intention of breaking those laws routinely, and having a published record of the who did it, when they did it and who financed it was very important. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Okay, so I interrupted you with a question and you were beginning to tell us about this transition to the coronavirus that you identify. David Martin: Well, in 1999, Anthony Fauci's NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) saw the possibility of using coronavirus as a possible vaccine vector. He actually thought that there would be a way to co-op nature to be able to be used as a way to inoculate a population. And at the time, the disclosed rationale for this was to try to come up with an HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) vaccine. As you're familiar he was obsessed about HIV as well as influenza vaccines. And as a result, what he was looking for was to see if there was a way to make – and now I'm quoting from the funded research, “An infectious replication defective recombinant coronavirus.” Now, it's important for you guys to realize that this was 1999. This was not... We hadn't had SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) yet. We didn't even know SARS was a thing. But in 1999, that project got funded by NIAID. In 2002, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hills Ralph Baric and his colleagues filed a patent on recombinant coronavirus, and a year later the world got SARS. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah. So, I just want to take a step back because you alluded to the Fauci's involvement with HIV. I just want to wonder if you can give a brief comment on that because Robert Kennedy's written a book about him called “The Real Tony Fauci” that highlights his nefarious strategies in the '80s. I mean, he was put into office, longest applied office for 50 years, and set up NIAID. And basically killed hundreds of thousands of peoples with this promotion of AZT (azidothymidine). David Martin: Yes. Dr. Joseph Mercola: So, this pattern that we're seeing with coronavirus is actually a repeat of previous behavior. David Martin: Yes, and as a matter of fact, when he joined NIAID as its director in 1984 appointed by the Reagan administration, it's important to realize that at the time we were transitioning from largely an STD (sexually transmitted diseases) environment in which syphilis and gonorrhea and those types of STDs were the things that we were concerned about, obviously, herpes and things like that. HIV became, as you well know, a political and social hot potato because it was associated in many respects with lifestyle branding, and as a result it became a political issue to essentially identify a class of the population that could be the basis for research without consideration. The notion by Anthony Fauci was people with HIV already had made decisions that somehow entitled them to less humanity. And as a result, the clinical trials around developing both management techniques as well as potential treatments became quite fashionable, but it was done in a very reckless fashion, and numerous people died in clinical trials, and by the way, still are. David Martin: As recently as September of 2020, when the NIAID Advisory Committee met, Anthony Fauci reported on several clinical trials involving three different continents not specified, where in phase one trials the alleged proposed treatment was "unsuccessful" and there were loss of life involved in these trials. So, the fact of the matter is he hasn't stopped this. This was something that he started in 1984. But he has literally been obsessed about this HIV situation as a platform to essentially use humans that he determines to be some form of subhuman for clinical trials. And it is a horrific blight on the United States medical establishment that we have been willing to allow this to go on in the name of science, in the name of health promotion, since 1984, without any significant disruption or check. Dr. Joseph Mercola: All right. Well, thank you for that historical perspective because it's so important and most people have no clue that this is repeat behavior for his motives [crosstalk 00:10:00]. So, when I interrupted you with a question, you were starting to explain how this developed in the late '90s with Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. This is even before we had the first coronavirus epidemic. David Martin: Yeah, the first outbreak, as you know is late 2002 going into 2003 in China. So, SARS as a thing, was not a thing until we made recombinant infectious replication-defective coronavirus. And it's so critical that we understand that I'm not drawing a causal relationship. I'm making an observation that humans and what we call coronavirus seem to cohabitate this earth for hundreds of thousands of years. And then we manipulate that in 1999, we do a number of things to actually start playing around with putting it into different animals, and in different human cell line models. And then in 2003, we have SARS. Like a lot of other things it's an observation worth noting. David Martin: What makes the observation more problematic, obviously, is this was happening during the unfortunate results of the 2001 anthrax attack, which as you know came out of federal labs. The whole notion that somehow or another we had domestic terror by bioweapons from some sort of bad actor became very clear that this was not a bad actor, per se, this was medical and defense research gone bad that got into the public and real people really died. But as you know, Joe, the real benefit, if you will, for the anthrax attack was the passage of the PREP (Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness) Act. [crosstalk 00:11:49]. Dr. Joseph Mercola: It persists till today. That's persistent [crosstalk 00:11:52]- David Martin: Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. Because we didn't have in the 1986 act something that covered medical countermeasures. What we had was childhood vaccines. Inside of the PREP Act, we now have the effective carte blanche removal of liability to manufacturers of medical countermeasures, and that carte blanche liability needed an event horizon to create it, and it turns out that the anthrax scare was the raison d'être to actually get that coverage expanded to medical countermeasures. David Martin: I think most people don't understand that the '86 act is really not overly relevant in the coronavirus situation simply because this is a medical countermeasure under the PREP Act. And as a result, the breadth of coverage and the accountability for responsibility, including the PREP Act, does not have a VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) requirement. So, there's a lot of things that are inside of the PREP Act that made pharmaceutical companies much more capable of instilling terror in the population, coercing a population into taking an untested measure, and doing so with absolute impunity. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Now, so you were compiling this information. And at the time, it sounds like you're still working for the federal government. And I'm wondering if you can, I guess – I want to go into more detail what you've compiled because you've only touched the surface of the paper trail. So, maybe you do that, and then in your response help us understand when you made the transition away from the federal government to informing the public? David Martin: Well, I've always seen that my role as the person who actually took the time and effort to aggregate all of this data. I've always seen a public interest as part of our mission. And so, we did not work for the federal government. The federal government was a beneficiary of the information we provided as were a number of other organizations. As you and your listeners can go back and review, I testified in Congress for the very first time on the audit of the United States Patent System back in the early 2000s. Did a lot of work with the Senate Banking Committee. We were a contractor for the United States Treasury to break open a lot of white collar criminal activity around intellectual property and its abuses, and tax fraud. So, we've had a number of engagements where we were contracted by the federal government to do projects. But the work on bioweapons was something I did because I felt, as a citizen of the world, it was absolutely essential that we have public visibility into the violations of biological and chemical weapons laws and treaties. David Martin: And as a result of that, in the mid-early and mid-2000s, the Bush administration asked me on several occasions to be part of both individual delegations as well as groups of delegations in the biological weapons conventions programs around the world. And so, I was in Slovenia for the EUROTOX Conference. I was in the Islamic Republic of Iran and Tehran for the National Genetic Engineering and Bioengineering conferences that were about the proliferation of these technologies in the early and mid-2000s. And I was doing all those things at the request of the federal government. David Martin: But always, as a public citizen, my goal has always been to make sure that information that we have is shared with the authorities who are in fact charged with accountability. Now, as you well know, the bad news is when other people are doing it we're more than happy to go off and do investigations. When we're doing it, there seems to be a little bit of a blowback, and in 2005 and 2006, a lot of what I uncovered turned out to be the Bush-Cheney administration's abuses of a number of things around the wars in the Middle East. And this "War on Terror," which was kind of like Reagan's War on Drugs. David Martin: The fact of the matter is we were just using conflict as a convenient way to move money around without really having a whole lot of evidence or justification. And so, some of what I uncovered was not warmly received by the Bureau, by intelligence agencies and whatnot. But by and large, without exception from 2001 until the present situation, the information that I have provided has been used in international law enforcement and intelligence operations, and it has been warmly received, which is the reason why this one stands out so remarkably because all of a sudden no one not in the U.S., none of our allies. None of the people who are not really our allies seem to be willing to look at the fact that beginning in 2016 we started seeing very alarming language being used, which was “coronavirus poised for human emergence.” Now, I'm not a- Dr. Joseph Mercola: Where were you seeing this, in the patents? David Martin: This was in patents, but it was also in scientific publications. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Okay. David Martin: And when you start referring to a coronavirus allegedly poised for human emergence after the World Health Organization has declared SARS eradicated, there's something desperately wrong with that picture. As I have said many, many times, and I can't help myself. I have to remind your listeners that the biggest alarm bell was published February 12, 2016, when Peter Daszak, the veterinarian-in-chief who has been the money-laundering agent to get coronavirus research after the gain of function moratorium here in the U.S. moved over to China said, "To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as a pan-influenza or a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process." David Martin: That statement made in 2015, published in the spring of 2016 set off alarm bells very loudly within my organization because when you actually have somebody who is promoting gainer function research, and clearly blurring the line on what is even legal because at that time it was illegal to conduct this kind of research in the U.S. Saying that we needed, "Media to create the hype. And we need to use the hype to our advantage and investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process." Joe, that doesn't sound like public health to me. That sounds like organized crime. That sounds like racketeering, and we need to raise this issue. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah. So, especially in conjunction with the earlier information you uncovered at the patent history. Maybe you can take in this direction is it really provides a very powerful evidence. It would have likely stand up in a court of law of the motivation behind this and the deep historical records that support that. David Martin: Well, listen, from 2002, which is when we have the recombinant coronavirus patent filed by UNC, Chapel Hill. The 4,000-plus patents that were filed on the genome, on vaccines, and on detection since 2002 is quite alarming because you don't file patents on something that you don't intend to commercialize. I mean, it's just not a thing. We don't have an enormous number of patents on a number of other pathogens, but for some reason coronavirus becomes this target, which is commercially, exceptionally rich. And what we find is that a couple things were quite problematic. In 2003, April 28th of 2003, and I want you to listen to the date really important because the April 23rd, 2003 CDC patent on the genome of the SARS coronavirus, which is actually something that I've talked about before. Somehow or another, five days later, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals got a $935,000 grant and filed U.S. Patent 7151163. So this is five days after allegedly the coronavirus has been isolated. Five days later, they file a patent on the treatment of a thing that had been discovered five days earlier. David Martin: Now, call me old-fashioned, but that doesn't sound like my bowtie speaking. That sounds like an inside job because you cannot have a disease identified, a pathogen identified, and a cure for it in five days’ period of time when all of the information was held from the public because when the CDC filed its patent on the genome of coronavirus, it paid to keep that patent secret. So, somebody somewhere knows that this thing was going to turn out to be a moneymaker. Dana Farber had a monoclonal antibody patent system that came out of three NIH (National Institutes of Health) grants. Their patent 7750123 on the monoclonal antibody for SARS-CoV treatment took place in 2003. We have the January 6, 2004 Bioterrorism Conference where the promise of coronavirus as a bioterrorism tool becomes popularized, and all of a sudden we have an enormous number of new treatments being patented. And before long, we have over 4,000 patents and patent applications filed. David Martin: Joe, 4,000 patents and patent applications on a thing where quite literally we're saying it's new. We're saying it's novel. But if we go back in history, we realize that Pfizer filed the first S1 spike protein vaccine patent on coronavirus in 1990, 30 years ago. So, even what we're being told is new, whether it's the pathogen, whether it's the vaccine, whether it's the mechanism of blocking the vaccine using the spike protein, regardless of what part of the story we look at, the patent record is full of thousands, not hundreds, thousands of patents where commercial interests funded by NIAID and funded by the National Institutes of Health have been building the economic cabal around coronavirus. This is not a new thing, hasn't been a new thing. And regrettably, we're being told continuously that somehow or another there's something novel about this experience despite the fact that every single part of what we are told is being detected with PCR and everything we're told that we are intervening with the injections. Every single one of those things has been known and isolated for over 30 years. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah, that's just, it's just so outrageous. Can you compare the number of patents and patent applications with coronavirus, which is over 4,000 to any other pathogen. I mean, what's number two or does this exceed all other pathogens combined? David Martin: Oh, this is an order of magnitude more. I mean, we're not even in the same ballpark. So, when we had Ebola outbreak, for example, it got a lot of national attention. When we had H1N1, if you remember all the bird flus and the avian influenzas and all of those sorts of things. We've had an enormous number of other pathogens that have been identified and have been worked on with respect to diagnostics and therapeutics. Coronavirus runs away as a commercial boom for the industrial and the funding complexes that have supported its promotion. That's why it's so important for us to go back and look at the fact that whether it is the SARS coronavirus, whether it is coronavirus generally, which throughout the '90s was almost exclusively a veterinary concern. It was for dogs. It was for rabbit cardiomyopathy. It was things that were actually involved in veterinary sciences. From then until now, the proliferation of proprietary controls around SARS coronavirus probably exceeds at least by two or three times most other pathogens. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Okay, that's good for perspective. So, I wanted to delve back bit to Fauci because I know you're not a big fan of his as am I. Fauci, with respect to the whole process of the system that's evolved, which started with HIV, of course, and that he's got these principal investigators at all the major universities and Pharma that he assigns in the 50 years he's been in office over $1 trillion in grants, so that these grant money from the federal government, ultimately the U.S. taxpayer, get recycled into creating these patents and patent rewards and compensation and whole structures that reward these people and provide a clear motivation for their behavior. So, that's a poor description of it, but I'm sure you can describe it in far more articulate terms. David Martin: Well, a terrible thing happened in 1980. A law called the Bayh–Dole Act, which was a law signed into law, which allowed the beneficiaries of federal grants to file patents on the work that's derived from federally funded research was passed allegedly to support the notion of entrepreneurship and the development of the biotech and the high-tech industries in the United States. The principle of the Act was this notion that somehow or another, we would benefit our economy by having our scientists become first and foremost entrepreneurs rather than publish their research [crosstalk 00:26:34]- Dr. Joseph Mercola: Which sounds rational, absolutely. David Martin: It sounds like a brilliant idea, sounds like a lovely idea, and it was the worst piece of legislation we could have possibly done for the future of health care in the United States because what it did was it brought the United States Patent Office, the FDA and CDC into an unholy trinity where effectively what they did was they served as the bench science department for private pharmaceutical concerns. So, essentially, what happened is we outsourced the basic research that used to be the responsibility of industry, we outsourced it to the private sector. And the private sector wound up becoming this unbelievably insidious funding loop. Because here's what happens. David Martin: Corporations, Pharma, lobby to get people elected. Once they're elected, the lobbyists flow surprisingly an enormous amount of money into the various NIH programs. In the case of NIAID itself, since Fauci took over, $191 billion has gone through his fingers. Now, is that because he's successful? No, as a matter of fact, objectively, if you look at it, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease on his watch, allergies and infectious diseases have increased over 60 times. David Martin: And somehow or another, he's still the CEO of a failed company that's gotten $191 billion to solve a problem that is getting worse every single year. If it was a company, we would have fired him. But the problem is, it's not a company. What it is, is a money-laundering agency, which actually moves public funds through the hands of a federal agency into the research laboratories, which ultimately are going to conduct research then licensed back to the benefactors, which are the pharmaceutical companies that paid to get people into office in the first place. David Martin: So, this is a revolving door problem, and the Bayh–Dole Act created an insidious incentive that said that the only research that was going to be conducted was going to be research that ultimately would flow back to the pharmaceutical industry and create juggernauts where the risk of R&D was taken by the public and the benefit for that R&D was taken by the private. That's a horrible thing, and that is exactly what Fauci has run. David Martin: It's amazing to realize, and Joe I've mentioned this in the Fauci dossier that I published, that during this pandemic, Congress and the Congressional Budget Office asked for an accounting of NIH owned patents where they had potential commercial interest in the drugs that were being produced. Do you realize that Anthony Fauci lied in that federal filing by failing to disclose any of the NIAID commercial patents associated with anything to do with any of the work he's doing? Not a single disclosure. That is constructive lying to Congress. And he submitted, in the fall of 2020, he submitted a report to Congress at Congress's request to be accountable for the public funds that he benefits from, and his response was to lie and say there wasn't any. David Martin: The evidence is stacked a mile long because inside of the patent filings with the exception of the illegal acts of Moderna in their 141 patents that have been issued. Moderna stands alone as the only recipient of NIAID funding that fails to comply with the law and fails to disclose the federal government interest in their intellectual property. Despite that, and this is where it becomes important. Despite the fact that everyone knew that Moderna failed to disclose the federal government interest in its research Anthony Fauci picked Moderna to be the front runner for an untested, commercially unsuccessful and entirely unproven mRNA vaccine technology in the spring of 2020. David Martin: There was no rational justification for that, and there would have been less rational justification given the fact that Moderna is on record as having violated the federal law, the Bayh–Dole Act 141 times at the time they were picked to be the winner. This is a known, known fact, and it was overlooked entirely and not a single law enforcement agent anywhere in the United States has decided that having a criminal organization supply a product sounds like a bad idea. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah. So, thank you for explaining that so well. Many people ascribe the nickname to Fauci as “Teflon Tony” because he's so effective at displacing, not displacing, but deflecting the accusations directed at him. So, I wonder, there's not many people better qualified to answer this than you and it is pure speculation. I mean, but you can't criticize Fauci for not being spectacularly slippery and sophisticated in his strategies to evade detection. So my guess is that he is a billionaire, a multi-billionaire, probably, because of his relationships with industry and his ability to effectively cover these assets. Do you have any thoughts on that? I mean, it's probably a powerful motivation, but it's pure speculation. There's probably no evidence, and he would hide it. David Martin: Joe, I think it's a fascinating question. I think many of us probably forget that if you, as an unelected and the highest paid public servant in the federal government, if you have the ability to stand in front of the president and dictate the future of the country. It's not money you're after, it's actually something else. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Okay, perfect. What is it? David Martin: I think that this is pure 100% unadulterated, sociopathic tyranny. I think this is a guy who clearly has a contempt for humanity that is probably unrivaled by most, if not all, historical figures. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Wow. David Martin: And the fact of the matter is, if you have the audacity – I mean, let's face it, and Joe you know this. You know this from your own experience. There's a thing called the False Claims Act by the Federal Trade Commission. False Claims Act is when you promote something that doesn't have at least two independent peer-reviewed clinical trials to justify your claims of either safety or efficacy, and everybody in the health care industry knows what this thing is. In April of 2020, the Journal of the American Medical Association official publication said that face coverings and masks should not be worn by a general population because there was, "No evidence that they actually provided any benefit." David Martin: As a matter of fact, the only randomized clinical trial that was done by CR McIntyre actually stated that wearing cloth face coverings increase the risk of influenza-like illness. So the only study we had was it was potentially bad for you. But in contempt for the Federal Trade Commission Act, suddenly we were all supposed to put on a thing, which quite literally the data said not to do. Now, when you have the audacity to not only change your own policy, which he has now admitted to lie, but he goes one step further, and says that the lie was justified. Those are definitional criteria for sociopathic behavior. David Martin: When you not only don't see the error of your ways, but you actually celebrate the corruption that says, "I can have contempt for the truth, and I can do it in the best interest of some sort of self-serving agenda." And the fact of the matter is like Ralph Baric who if you go on to Google Earth, you can see he lives in a modest home. This guy has a modest lab when you look at the pictures of his lab at UNC, Chapel Hill, he has a modest lab. But all of a sudden you realize that he is invited to be what? The guest of honor here, the guest of honor there, he doesn't need billions of dollars to live a billionaire's lifestyle. Ralph Baric and Tony Fauci share a common objective, which is they both have a desire to be most powerful and have 100% immunity from public accountability. And the fact of the matter is most billionaires would aspire to the control and power those guys have because it turns out they have something money can't buy. They have something that can only be acquired through fear and blackmail, which is exactly what they actually trafficking. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Mm-hmm (affirmative). Yeah, well, that is brilliant. I don't really think I've ever heard it put that way before my perspective, but it makes perfect sense. So, thank you for sharing your observations and assessments, that's great. But clearly there are financial motivations. David Martin: Oh, yes, absolutely. Dr. Joseph Mercola: And not necessarily to them. But I think the sociopathic behavior might be more relevant as an explanation, but I'm wondering if you can walk us through the tens, and more likely hundreds of billions of dollars that are going to accrue to the vaccine manufacturers, and what's more egregious and unbelievable beyond sociopathic behavior is that any and every injury and death will never be compensated for. I mean, to me that is one of the most egregious criminal behaviors that they instigated in this. And then, on top of that they are mandated by unconstitutional executive orders to get this vaccine. David Martin: Well, remember that under 21 Code of Federal Regulations, section 50, about 23 and 24, no one can be forced or coerced into a clinical trial of an experimental, even medical countermeasures. So it's not legal to do it. That's very clear. It's black and white, and this clinical trial does not end until 2023 in the first best instance. So, there is no such thing as an approved or even authorized use of a thing that can be compelled on the population. That doesn't mean that people aren't trying to do it. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Excuse me to interrupt, and compounding that to make it even worse is they eliminated all the controls of this trial. Go on. David Martin: So, there is not a clinical trial. That's why if we go back and we look at the 21 Code of Federal Regulations, we see that we have a number of things that fail. We did not have an independent investigational review board. We did not have any of the statutorily required approval processes for the protocol. And the companies themselves made determinations about modifying the protocol midstream. We do not have a clinical trial on this particular injection. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Right. Totally agree. David Martin: It's just really pure and simple. And so, once again, violating the Federal Trade Act. All right, somebody in law enforcement, somebody in the legal community should actually bring them up on the same thing that they throw against clinicians time and time again. There's not a chiropractor, an osteopath anywhere in this country that hasn't had some sort of False Claims Act shakedown from the Federal Trade Commission. But you know what's fascinating? The federal government is doing the same violation. They're telling you a thing works. They're telling you a thing is curative. They're telling you a thing is therapeutic, and they're violating the Federal Trade Act, and no one is doing a single thing. David Martin: But back to your question. What we have is a situation where the deaths are actually considered to be acceptable. I want you to hear that word. Let that settle in, “acceptable death.” I don't know Joe, what world do you have to come from to find that term even remotely speakable. I think the utterance of that phrase is horrific. The idea that we think it is acceptable to have enough deaths to justify an intervention, which has not been proven, has not been tested, and for which a clinical trial was disrupted and interrupted so the clinical trial could never happen. We are killing people willfully, and we are doing it with impunity in the name of what we call a love affair with science. David Martin: The only problem is we've desecrated science in the process, too. Because it turns out that when I did randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials, you know what I had to do? I had to keep the populations blinded. I had to keep the placebo controlled for the whole clinical trial. And the reason I had to do that is because that's what the statute requires. This entire process has been willful acts of harm to humanity. And the only hope, by the way, that we have is a very small note in the Department of Justice opinion that took place under the Trump administration that says that if this was based on felony acts, then the entire emergency use authorization and all its benefits would collapse. David Martin: In other words, if we can show that racketeering, that lying to Congress, that the public coercion under Section 802 of the Patriot Act, if we can show that any felony has occurred, which by the way you know in the Fauci dossier, I outline dozens of evidence of these felony violations. Any one of those would bring this entire thing to its knees because the moment the PREP act protection falls away from Pfizer, and Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson, and AstraZeneca, and others, the moment that protection collapses, I can guarantee you who will not be promoting a vaccine. If they are liable for a single injury or death they'll pull the plug on what they know to be unsafe. That requires law enforcement to do its job. And somewhere there has to be a prosecutor who's willing to do their job. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah. Well, that would make logical rational sense. And you are very well-studied in this and really have a deep, clear thinking process going on. So, I want to ask you the obvious question is what is it that co-opted or captured the federal regulatory agency responsible for this obvious violations of multiple criminal behaviors, why are they not engaging? Is it because industry captured them or there's some other reason that you believe might be a contribution? David Martin: Well, people have talked for years about what's happened at the federal judiciary where the benches have been stacked by people of limited qualification or ideological affiliation or fill in the blank. People have been finger-pointing all along. But the fact of the matter is that the problem is that back when the picture behind me, which by the way is Cornwallis in Washington. I just happened to fly the flag of liberty and the flag of pharma, and I'm letting you decide [crosstalk 00:42:26]. David Martin: The interesting thing is that we have a situation where you and I were taught when we were in school that we had three legs of the government. We had the legislative, we had the executive, and we had the judiciary. And the fact of the matter is that somewhere along the line in probably the 1980s we started having the judiciary undermined while none of us were paying attention. Where courts were routinely being co-opted for political objectives. And when you have the executive branch of the government willfully violating laws and making sure that they can be done with impunity. I mean, go back to Iran-Contra, and people forget that, but those were felonies, those were laws being broken. David Martin: And when we have an executive that says that those crimes can be done with impunity, and then when we go in, and we start doing other things, like we start doing financial fraud, and we start covering up the fact that we're robbing the Social Security Administration, and we're doing all sorts of things. What we do is we undermine the judiciary to the point where right now I genuinely do not think we have three tiers of government. I don't think there is a Department of Justice. Dr. Joseph Mercola: So, they've effectively collapsed the judicial branch? David Martin: That's correct. The judiciary is functionally gone. And whether it happened with the various election scandals, which go back to hanging chads once upon a time. You guys remember the hanging chads conversations in Florida during Bush's election? I mean, when we allow the judiciary to be an arm of the executive then what happens is we've actually lost the three-tiered structure of government. And as a result, the system collapses. And what's happened is because the judiciary was the only thing that had – and Joe, this is really important. The judiciary was the only thing that was explicitly independent. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah, that's right. David Martin: We don't allow judges to get sponsorship in campaign finance. We don't allow judges to be elected. We appoint them, we go through an approval process. We do all sorts of things to try to make sure the judiciary is independent. So, the only risk to the pharmaceutical industry, the only risk to an executive out of control was the judiciary. So, by collapsing the judicial system in the United States, we have effectively made the government a servant of its benefactors. And that is industry and not just any industry. As you know the most lucrative sponsor of government right now is the pharmaceutical industry by almost twice what is paid by Big Oil and defense combined. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Wow. That is one of the best analysis that I've ever heard as to the explanation of why this was allowed to happen, but it makes perfect sense. David Martin: Yeah, I mean, if you follow the money, this is not even an open question. This is a willful act. And not surprisingly, how was it done? It was hidden under the guise of the War on Drugs. How funny? How funny that drug companies actually use the marketing the War on Drugs to pull this off? Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah. So, that really helps a lot. I think it provides a framework for people to easily comprehend and understand what has happened and why it's happened. So, I'd like to, and if you want to fill in more details you can. I mean, you have such a wealth of information you can go on for five to 10 hours and not even skip a beat. I get that. But I want – I can't wait to hear your assessment or predictions of what's going to happen as a result of this collapse of the judicial branch because it looks like they've got everything in place for the implementation of global tyranny. I can't see anything stopping it, and I can't wait to hear your expansion on that on that concept because I think that's the key issue that everyone needs to understand. David Martin: Well, there is a tiny fly in the ointment. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Okay, let's hear it. David Martin: The fly in the ointment is 2000 and probably '28 best case scenario, 2027 in a more worst case scenario. You have to have currency to buy off politicians. You have to have money to politicians work. And what unfortunately took place was that during the last decade and a half, and we can go back to certainly 2008 for most people's memory, so I'll try to keep it civilian. The fundamentals happened before this. But back in 2008, when we had the Global Financial Crisis, what most people failed to understand was we instituted a policy then, which was going to functionally bankrupt our entitlement program in 2028. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid officially empty the trust fund, according to the most recent study that was done by the actuaries at Social Security ministration. They say in 2033, but that assumes that we have a 21% reduction in benefits starting now. You know that that's not happening. So, the best math we have is that the annuities and pension programs of the United States functionally run out of their trust fund in 2028. David Martin: Now, what does that mean? Well, one of the things that people overlook is there's an unholy alliance between the insurance company and what we call health care. Insurance companies are long-dated asset holders. These are the people who have to have money today to cover issues in the future. That's what a long-dated asset holder is. And the problem is that the Fed and the European Central Bank and other central banks have suppressed the value of the return on funds so that the funds are running out of money faster than expected. In other words, what's happening is that 2033 window is shrinking. Now, you know as well as anybody else that for a politician to stand up and say, "I'm going to abolish or significantly alter Social Security," is the death knell to any political aspiration. Tiny problem. Whether they say it or not, the trust fund runs out of money in 2028. David Martin: Now, here comes the kicker — so does the pharmaceutical industry. Because it turns out that the money that's going into that system is actually paying for the drug dependency of this country. And if we go all the way back to 1604 to the establishment of the British East India Company, and the establishment of the Virginia Company, we'll realize that the 400-plus year tradition that we have running where we have built nation states on the back of drug trade is coming to its end. And the good news for all of us is it's going to end around 2028 because we have a convergence that they didn't figure out how to cover up. David Martin: The convergence is that the people with the money, the big pharmaceutical players are the beneficiaries of a system that is going to bankrupt itself by virtue of their actions. This is the Brontosaurus that ate too much because it was the biggest dinosaur. And the great news is they have the brain the size of a pea, just like the Brontosaurus. They are not smart. They're huge. And the best thing we have going for us furry humans is that we actually are nimble. Now, does that mean that we are not going to have an ounce of pain through the process? Absolutely not. There is social disruption that we can't even imagine that's on the horizon in 2026, 2027, and 2028, because as we see 86 million people lose what they thought was going to be their retirement funds. David Martin: As we see 86 million people lose what we thought were going to be the things we were entitled to receive so that we could actually have that sunset of the American Dream. When we see that number now go to 100 million people and the 100 million people are more sick because of what we've injected today. They are more impaired by virtue of the medical countermeasures being used today. Those people who are going to require greater health care then are going to be faced with a bankrupt system incapable of supporting their life and their livelihood. And that is the death knell of this story. David Martin: The great news is, Joe, we're having this conversation in 2021. The best news about this is we have time if people of good conscience get together and say, "We're not going to let that apocalypse arrive because we have time to start building communities that actually care for each other. We have time to start building accountability structures. We have time to start doing things that bring our social fabric together so that when that system designed in the 1930s collapses, we can come back to a rational view of what life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness is." Because until we can reclaim the sovereignty of our health, we cannot celebrate the sovereignty of our life. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Okay, that's interesting. I've got some questions on it because if you look at the World Economic Forum, which many people believe is leading up this conspiracy trend. Obviously, they've had many times addressed the Great Reset. So, I agree with your mathematical inevitability of the collapse. It just cannot be sustained. David Martin: No. Dr. Joseph Mercola: But they can change things and according to the World Economic Forum and everything I know that they're projecting is they are going to implement these CBDCs, the Central Bank Digital Currencies and have the Great Reset, and essentially use this, and essentially abolish the dollar, so it doesn't matter. We're going to do a reset, press Ctrl+Alt+Delete. David Martin: You know the bad news about Klaus Schwab is he's a terrible historian. I love the nefarious actions of our Dr. Evils that are out there in the world. Dr. Joseph Mercola: He couldn’t be a more perfect [inaudible 00:53:16], the absolute perfect bond villain. David Martin: Yeah, I mean, but like a good [James] Bond villain, he's actually ignorant of history. The reason why I'm so optimistic that the Great Reset doesn't have a chance at all to succeed is, oddly enough, the same reason why the picture behind me is the picture behind me. Cornwallis didn't lose to Washington. What happened was there were just too many privateers that made conducting a war from Britain in the United States financially unfeasible. And King George realized that he had a war on too many fronts, and he had to close one of those fronts. I mean, people forget that Napoleon was doing some pretty nasty things in the Mediterranean. He was doing some pretty nasty things in the Atlantic. And it turns out that the same thing is going to happen to Klaus Schwab because the digital currency illusion is the most bizarre and pathetic Dr. Evil plan anybody's ever concocted. David Martin: All you have to look at is the internet failures and the power outages that have already happened across this summer to realize that there is no way that the public is going to ever embrace a system that can be annihilated by something as simple as electromagnetic pulse, or an electromagnetic disruption, or a service disruption. The fact of the matter is as much as people like Klaus Schwab likes to live in their underground lairs under volcanoes with their submarines or whatever he likes to do. The fact of the matter is the digital currency craziness is merely one of those fantastical illusions that unfortunately has a single point failure. We live in a world where actors of both anarchist intent, and very, very laudable privateers and pirates are more than happy to make sure that digital currency never sees the light of day because they will, in fact, hack, crack and disrupt every system that's out there. David Martin: And so, I look at the whole Great Reset as – it's great theater. It sells books. It does, in fact, make you the caricature of the Dr. Evil. I mean, you couldn't ask for a more perfect Austin Powers kind of looking – all he needs is a cat with no hair, and you've got it. But the fact of the matter is the entire illusion is being run because they're out of ideas. And the best thing that you can ever see people is when the incumbency is out of bad ideas they try desperately to force you into a behavior that you would not otherwise accept. All you have to do is just say no. Just don't play along. Dr. Joseph Mercola: I would agree. But I'm wondering there are many people who've studied this very carefully and contend that one of the ulterior motivations for implementation is plandemic is a depopulation strategy. David Martin: There's no question that's the case. Dr. Joseph Mercola: So, along those lines, and I really want to hear your thoughts on the likelihood of anyone who receives the COVID jab dying prematurely quickly within the next few years. I mean, theoretically, there's a potential that the majority of people who got the shot are going to be dead in a few years. So, I'm wondering your thoughts on that, and I'm wondering if, in fact, it is a very highly effective depopulation strategy, and resulting in loss of perhaps half the population or more if that impacts what you just said. David Martin: So, you're on to a very good point. And so, let's unpack the legs of the stool here. First of all, if you've made financial promises to senior citizens, or people who are going to be senior citizens, the fewer promises you have to keep the better. So, the financial interest for depopulation is a compelling and a very thoroughly compelling argument. I spent an entire hour on this at my lecture that I gave at the Church of Glad Tidings in Yuba City. If people want to go online, they can see that. Dr. Joseph Mercola: We'll put a link to it. David Martin: I'm sorry? Dr. Joseph Mercola: We'll put a link to it. David Martin: Yeah, in that show, I actually went through the 1914 forward life insurance cabal that is actually running an enormous amount of what's happening right now. I've gotten to that in nauseating detail, and it turns out that there's an economic incentive to get a lot of people dead before 2028. There's an economic incentive. It's also a political incentive. If you have people over the age of 65 who have taken this shot who are already health compromised in one way or another, the likelihood that we've accelerated their loss of life is exceptionally high. If we look at the previous lipid nanoparticle and mRNA trials that were done in animal studies, we actually are not going to be surprised to see a mass-casualty event. David Martin: So there is no question that what's being done, jumped over animal trials for a very important reason. We've been told it was to save time, but it wasn't to save time. It was actually to put this particular pathogen into humanity, so that a lot of people suffer, and ultimately die of effects that we could have picked up if we had done it the traditional way, which is seven to eight years of safety studies before we decide to put it in the arms of humans. That's not what we did. And if we look at the safety data out of animal studies on mRNA, and on the lipid nanoparticle from Acuitas and Arbutus, there is no question, Joe, that there is going to be a fatality increase because of this. David Martin: Now, what percentage of the population is going to be a function of something that we do not discuss? Because as you are very aware, but your viewers probably not as much, there is a technology called CRISPR, which is the camel’s nose that's been under this tent. And the CRISPR technology, which I've spent a lot of time looking at. We just did a couple shows with the several thousand CRISPR patents include a number of patents on clipping the effects of vaccines from people. So, there is a high probability that we're building a pathogen set that then goes into people so that we can introduce a more expensive technology, which allows us to then go fix the thing that we harm, which means that there's probably going to be an economic class distinction about whether you live or whether you die. David Martin: Now, I am not going to opine on the quality of life. Because if you are constantly dependent on CRISPR this and then vaccine that and then CRISPR this and then vaccine that, that's not much of a life. But the fact of the matter is I think we already see that the CRISPR approvals that have happened in the last even few weeks are pointing out the direction that we're planning on going here. What you are saying though, and I want to come back to this because the depopulation question is not a theoretical. This is something that has been explicitly part of an agenda since the Eugenics Office was started by the U.S. government in 1914 funded by Andrew Carnegie in collaboration, surprisingly, with Booker T. Washington, who's a great patron saint of people who don't want to read history. David Martin: But the fact of the matter is the getting rid of undesirables is actually something that's been around for 100-plus years here in the United States. This is a campaign that includes that, and the fewer people that live to Social Security benefit, and the fewer people who live to the full maturity of their life insurance policies are quite problematic with respect to this particular reset. But I want to point out something that is something I mentioned a few months ago and seemed to be lost on a lot of people. We were told there were excess deaths. We were told that this whole coronavirus thing and COVID thing led to excess deaths. But there's a tiny technical problem. If you want real numbers, go to the people who are the real beneficiaries of death. And who are they? They're life insurance companies. I've got a nasty little secret to tell all of you who believe CDC's (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) numbers. We were told that more people died in 2020 than were supposed to die except for a tiny little problem that fewer life insurance claims were paid. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Smoking gun, the smoking gun. David Martin: Who's numbers are you going to believe? Dr. Joseph Mercola: The smoking gun. David Martin: Whose numbers are you going to believe? Are you going to believe the CDC who's trying to pump and dump this terror campaign of people dying, and therefore you need to have your mask on, you need to socially distance, you need to vaccinate? Are you going to believe those numbers or are you going to believe the numbers of the people who actually pay claims when real human life ends? And it turns out that if you look at the audited financial statements of the world's largest life insurance companies we can find no excess death evidence. Dr. Joseph Mercola: That's a really powerful point. David Martin: Now, here's the question. Is COVID so damn smart that it only kills the uninsured? Is that what we're supposed to believe? Dr. Joseph Mercola: That's right. No. Yeah, that's brilliant. So, I'm wondering if you would care to speculate as to the range of lethality of the vaccine within a three-to-five-year time period? David Martin: Well, here's where it becomes a little hard because what we have is something that was not actually tried. Remember that what we've done is introduced as an alleged vaccine against a pathogen called SARS-CoV-2, we've introduced the synthetic computer simulation of the S1 spike protein. Now, what is so important about that? Let's start with the legal problem. The legal problem is that when we say we have a vaccination against a virus, but we're not doing anything to vaccinate against the virus, what we're doing is we're injecting a simulated code to have the body produce a pathogen that then we hope the body will recognize and then build an immune response to. David Martin: So, this is a ridiculous proposition in the first place. But the vaccine itself has nothing to do with SARS-CoV-2, it has everything to do with the spike protein. And it's been mislabeled and misrepresented by every single clinician who's ever injected anybody with this thing because it does not protect you against a virus, it actually makes you stimulate a protein associated with one of the proteins associated with the model of the virus. And you followed all that you got a Ph.D. in genetics right there. David Martin: But here's the thing. What we don't know is we don't know whether or not the spike protein is going to have secondary effects that are also undesirable. We've already seen the concern that came out of the Booster review where the FDA's own scientists were concerned about myocarditis, they were concerned about Guillain-Barré syndrome, they were concerned about other adverse events. But what we know from a decade of research in dogs and in rabbits is we know that the spike protein is associated with increased cardiac and vascular and respiratory tissue damage. So, it is likely that we don't even have – Joe, at this point in time, it's likely we don't even have an idea other than we know the systems that we're going to watch fail. David Martin: We know we're going to have cardiomyopathy. We know we're going to have vascular damage, and we know we're going to have lung disorder. But what we do not know is whether those are lethal or they are simply morbidity events, meaning that your quality of life will functionally reduce to the fact that you will require some almost consistent palliative care. And what we'll have is probably a mix of actual deaths. David Martin: But the concern I have more egregious to the death as much as it sounds harsh when I say this, I think the malingering morbidity, which is the ongoing nature of people who require around-the- clock medical care is going to be a drain that will infect our economy so deeply that we may not recover. Because if we have people who have to stay at home with children who are sick, if we have people who have to care for elderly parents who are sick, if we have people who are caring for a spouse or a family member who are sick, that means that we do not have the ability to enjoy life and liberty. And the fact is that I think we're going to have a bigger morbidity than mortality event. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah, that's an interesting speculation. Especially, in light of the fact that the strong predictions are that they are going to approve this COVID jab, for infants, this year, which is one of the most reprehensible criminal behaviors in the history of medicine. David Martin: Yeah. Dr. Joseph Mercola: It's just disgusting. David Martin: But bear in mind that this was this was something Congress approved in 2015. And people, you got to remember, these things matter. You need to be paying attention to what happens with your congressmen and women. You need to be paying attention to what happens in the Senate because we have been funding a universal infant pan-influenza vaccine program in Congress since 2015. Anthony Fauci has asked for more appropriations every year. They decided to turn the influenza authorization into a coronavirus authorization, but the fact of the matter is they are trying desperately to get this as an approved dependency that every single infant gets injected with at birth. And this is part of the official records of NIAID and the official records of Fauci's testimony in Congress. See, people before you knew the name Fauci was worth listening to he was sitting in front of congressmen and women advocating for a universal childhood influenza vaccine. And guess what Congress did? They appropriated it. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah. It's so reprehensible because there's absolutely no clinical justification for this. It's even less clinically indicated in hepatitis B vaccine. David Martin: Yeah, I mean, that you're exactly right. There's not a shred of evidence that says that this is anything other than an economic grab to make sure the public is permanently dependent on genetically modified injections. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah. Okay, I can't thank you enough. Deep expression of gratitude for your incredible insights into this window, and we've got to continually expose that brilliant information you're having. I would really like you to expand on what I think is clearly the conclusion, and the most important point here, which is what are we going to do? Hopefully, we can continue to educate, inspire and catalyze a large segment of the 80 million people in United States who have failed and refused to get the jab. So, I think we have to maintain this core of people who are insulated from the devastating morbidities you just described. So, I'd like to hear in detail as much as you want to expand on as to what you believed to be the community solutions that need to be implemented now while we still have some time to perform an effective alternative to global tyranny. David Martin: Well, listen, it starts with conversations like this, Joe. The fact of the matter is you and I have not had the pleasure of meeting each other and whether or not we have entered into lockstep on ideologies or anything else is neither here nor there. What we have to do is we have to engage in respectful conversation where the best and brightest of our minds can actually have open dialogue. It's not surprising that one of the first things they did to implement this plandemic is separate people. And if you want to start I'll tell you exactly where to start. Invite somebody over for dinner and cook a homemade meal that doesn't have genetically altered ingredients in that meal. David Martin: The first thing to do is start informing yourself. Live in a way that says that this is something that matters and I have gone through and I just finished a course that a lot of people have taken on, integral accounting asset management, which is understanding the all in cost of what you're doing. If you have 11% of your retirement funds in Pfizer, can you actually say you're against the jab? I mean, let's start really addressing things people. Let's not pretend like we can turn a blind eye towards “Well, but we like the investment returns we're getting.” If you actually are against the thing be against the thing. David Martin: The point is we have to start being conscious first because the minute we start being conscious we are going to make decisions that say, “We're going to choke off the money supply to the perpetrators of this evil.” And we need to see that as a first step. As a community, we need to actually look at the labels of the food that we put into our mouths because it turns out that the genetic engineering that's happening in our food, which now 70% of what is sold in a grocery store, according to the most recent study that General Mills just published, 70% of what's sold in a grocery store is genetically engineered, 70%. Guess what? Get rid of the artificial sweeteners, get rid of the soft drinks, get rid of the things that are harming you, and start making the life decisions today, which actually show that you're actually concerned about this so that you're not waiting for a solution in the form of a tablet or a supplement or something else. David Martin: Start living correctly now, but do it in community, and community is not, let's all move into a commune somewhere. What I'm saying about community is get to know your neighbor. Engage in respectful dialogue with people who disagree with your point of view. Begin the process of having those conversations. And then what happens out of that is natural networks of economies are built. I have spent two decades of my life rebuilding post-conflict countries around the world. I've done work in 128 countries directly, many of which have gone through civil wars, many of which have gone through genocide. And what I have found, Joe, in every instance is the first step is to build micro-economies. David Martin: Micro economies are things that say as simple as if you have a car that you're not using, let somebody else rent the car. It doesn't have to be an Uber. Use local resources more effectively. Because what will happen out of this is that we'll start realizing that the promise of America, and the promise for humanity was not a car in every garage and a chicken in every pot. The promise of America was people being able to transport themselves, and having an extra seat at the table. That's what the promise of America was. That's what Thanksgiving was about. That's what all of these things are about. David Martin: We need to go back to what our real roots are because the fact is that we have built an illusion that says our success is defined by how much we consume for our singular benefit rather than how much do we steward so that everyone has the ability to experience the best and brightest? Do we all need a boat? Do we all need a car? Do we all need a tiller for our garden? Do we all need? No, we don't. What we need is the best used optimally. David Martin: So simple. But this is going to require a conscious shift in how we see our world. You all do not have to have a multimillion-dollar system that can understand the meaning of patents and do all that kind of thing. You need to know that there's a bald guy with a bowtie that is more than happy to share it with you whenever and however you need it. We don't need 10 of me. We need the one of me. And we don't need the 10 of Joes, we need the one of Joes, but what we need is we need to be in a world in which we see and value the values that people bring to the table and we reciprocate the values that we can share. David Martin: The fact is we have a very unique moment in human history, and it probably is as close to the story of Joseph in Egypt as you can get. You know the seven fat years and then the seven skinny years? Well, guess what? We have a couple years of fat years left. You know what we should be doing? We should be investing in our networks of relationship. We should be investing in our networks of community. We should be building those resilient fibers that hold us together because we know that there is a famine coming. And we are in the unique position right now ladies and gentlemen to actually do something about it. David Martin: So, start with yourself. Make sure that what you put into your body is aligned to your health. Make sure that what you do with your body is aligned to your health. And then as you do that invite other people into living a life that in fact models that behavior so that we start building communities of consciousness. And as we build those communities, we will start building currencies of consciousness. Those currencies are going to be the ability to create the micro, the organic Uber in your town, right? Wouldn't it be nice to actually know that you could borrow a car that wasn't vaccine? That you weren't going to have shedding of a freaking God knows what spike protein. Wouldn't it be great to be the first organic Uber in your town, the first organic Grubhub in your town? There are a bunch of ways that we can solve these problems, and we can do it using the market. We can do it using our consciousness, but we need our consciousness, we need our community, and we know our currency to be organically aligned to humanity again. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Oh, it's great. That's exactly what I was looking for. Couldn't agree more with respect to optimizing your health, and that's what I've been preaching for over nearly a quarter of a century. And helping people understand and that really helped hundreds of millions of people around the world. But the fly in the ointment in what you described, and definitely – I'd like you response to this and then we can sign off – is that in my view this is the most effective propaganda campaign in the history of humanity. And it has created a massive global psychosis that has brainwashed the population so that dialogue you encourage us to have with our neighbors in their community is almost physically impossible. It has progressed to the point where they could have someone, their parent or their sibling die with the jab in their arm and believe it was just a coincidence. That is how bad it is. So, how do you address the most effective propaganda campaign in history that ever existed? David Martin: So, there's probably no better question to end on Joe. How do you ever convince people who bought propaganda to change their mind? Because the decision to buy it wasn't rational. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Absolutely. David Martin: Therefore, we cannot appeal to rationality to change it. But I'll tell you what you can do. You can actually live, and the funny thing about living is, I don't know if you remember the movie “When Harry Met Sally,” but there's a beautiful scene in that movie where they're out at a restaurant- Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yes, a classic. David Martin: And the classic iconic scene where you know the end of it. “I'll have what she's having.” The point is that that's the answer. The answer is live without constraint, without fear. And before long, what you'll find is people are going to say, "Hold on a minute, you mean you're not afraid? You mean, you're not doing something?" I think here's the problem. We see the short-term reflexive effectiveness of propaganda, and we think we've lost, but we haven't lost. Because it turns out people like me, people like you, I'm still traveling the country. I'm going all over the place. I'm doing things, I'm meeting with people. God forbid, I'm shaking hands, I'm doing selfies, I'm interacting with humanity. And it turns out that people are starting to go, "Well, but aren't you afraid?" I don't have to answer that question. The evidence is my life. David Martin: Listen people, propaganda cannot stand against the truth of a life well lived. It can never stand against that truth. What we're trying to do is the wrong energy. We're trying to confront with rationality and irrational reflex. But what we need to be doing is being persistent in showing up and living in a way that people look at and say, "I'll have what he's having. I'll have what she's having." This is your “Harry Met Sally” moment. This is that restaurant scene. This is your moment to be a person who outlasts the half-life of the propaganda reflex. And I've seen way too many people try to engage energetically in the debate where they enter into conflict and what it does is it destroys their well-being, it destroys their life, and they walk away being the miserable angry one. Well, don't be the miserable angry one. Be the one at the table who is the one worth looking at and going, "I'll have what he's having. I'll have what she's having." Live a life that is desirable and you'll see propaganda become emasculated instantaneously. Dr. Joseph Mercola: So, the refinement of your early recommendation, engage in dialogue with people in your community is to do not engage with those who have drunk the Kool Aid. You just can't because you are speaking – you are hitting a head against a brick wall. David Martin: That's exactly right. Dr. Joseph Mercola: It won't work. You’re wasting time and effort. It's going to be highly counterproductive. David Martin: When they hear a picnic in your backyard, and they see lights well past the bedtime curfew. All the time while Governor Northam here in Virginia was telling us that we could not have gatherings. What we did was we continued our workshops. We had people in our house, we had our table full of 15, 20, 25 people, and our official policy was if you signed up for our workshop, for the moment you were in our home we adopted you as family because the legal exemption in Virginia was if you were family then you actually didn't count. So, what we did was we actually adopted everybody for the week or the four days or the five days. If anybody knocked on the door, we just had one of the most inclusive, gender-neutral, socially acceptable, panchromatic, you name it. We had every kind of cousin, uncle, aunt, brother, sister, child, granny. We had everybody and it was all family. And we actually went through the entire shutdown having a table full of fellowship. And you know what? Everybody in the neighborhood said, "I'd love to have what they're having." Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yeah. Well, I don't think there's a better point to end on. I can't thank you enough for sharing your insights. I don't think I've ever heard a more brilliant compilation of explanations and practical implementations of what to do in these challenging times. I mean, you've covered it from end to end. So, I'm just grateful that someone like you exists who's used his intellectual resources for the benefit of people. David Martin: Joe, it's an honor to be with you and I'm looking forward to the day that we get to break bread together and spend some time in each other's company. Dr. Joseph Mercola: All right. Well, thanks so much, and we'll definitely connect. David Martin: Very good. SOURCE: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/10/03/david-martin-covid-fraud.aspx?

The wonderful Carrie Madej appeared on the Stew Peters Show (see video below) and has shown her findings of contaminants within the Moderna and J&J vaccines. These findings match the previous releases from Dr Campra, The Scientists Club, Dr Young and the German collective as featured in our recent article. (These were in the Pfizer and AZ vaccines) The findings also match the Not On The Beeb report into 'particles' found in a famous brand of bottled water supplies that we replicated between Spain and the UK. See our exclusive report here However, Carrie found one thing that as far as I am aware, has not been published before. 'Fibres' grouped together to form octopus-like structures that appeared to move and find their way to the edge of the slides. Importantly, she also found the strings of globule like structures that can be seen within the video. (Carrie's images from the vaccine vials are reproduced under the video below.) Carrie Madej starts at 2 min 5 seconds These images courtesy of Carrie Madej, are of the 'contaminants' found in the Moderna and J&J vaccine vials. Octopus-like structure Again, we see 'The Fibres' below. (see our other articles and videos) Note the circles. (The line is the edge of the slide) Note the circles. These images look like the 'flakes' found previously

A Spanish Medical researcher has sent in images from his investigation into bottled water. The sample tested is bottled by a major European company selling in Spain, who then sells it into the Spanish market. The Spanish researcher used an optical microscope with a magnification range of 400X to 800X We have now replicated his results in the UK using a brand of water sold here by the same conglomerate. THESE ARE SPANISH MEDICAL RESEARCHER'S IMAGES This 'strand' appears similar to the fibres we found in the blue surgical face masks. See our video here Same image closer up. From what we've seen in the masks, this appears to be a hollow fibre. This image reminds us of the images that Dr Campra of Almeria University published, that he found in a sample of the Pfizer vaccine, that resemble Graphene Oxide Download Dr Campra's report here This again reminds us of the fibres we found in masks. We believe they are hollow and contain a gel. See our film at the end of this article. Unidentified particles. Unidentified particles. The 'spiral object'. The regular shape of the object is reminiscent of a metal filing from a lathe. The Spanish scientist called it a 'nano-metal particulate'. UK MEDICAL RESEARCHER'S IMAGES OF A UK PRODUCT BY THE SAME CONGLOMERATE We have two things here. 1 - 'Flakes' 2 -Tube-like structure holding 'frogspawn' like globules The water bottle had a blue top. Is this a micro-plastic from the lid? These fibres are again similar to those we saw in the blue surgical face masks. Note the hint of 'frogspawn' like structures within the tube. The fibres in the facemasks appeared flat and dehydrated. The fibres within the water seem cylindrical and hydrated. 'Frogspawn' like structures can clearly be seen, as if they have leaked from these tubes. FIBRES WE FOUND IN THE MASKS These are the fibres we photographed in masks See our video summary here These are pictures under an electron microscope of the fibres found in masks. Although we arranged analysis, labs did not return our messages. This experience was repeated with other researchers overseas. SWABS These are our images of PCR swabs. Please note the objects spilling from the tips. SLOVAK REPORT The Slovak Report shows contamination of the swabs, highlighting the 'leaking frogspawn' type gel. OUR FIRST VIDEO AFTER SEEING THE FIBRES RESPOND TO HEAT & HUMIDITY SEE OUR SUMMARY VIDEO WITH DR T FROM APRIL BELOW WHAT NOW? We are moving to analyse water samples. We are testing UK water sold as smart water. There is only so much we can do as a tiny independent alternative media outlet. Can you help? I'm estimating this newsletter will reach several hundred medical and health professionals. If just 10% of you can help, we will soon have a list of the suspect waters and contents. BTW - We've not named the brand, though I think you can work it out. PLEASE SEND YOUR IMAGES FINDINGS TO ME BY REPLYING TO THIS EMAIL. Please state: 1 - Water brand tested 2 - Microscope used 3 - Any relevant qualification 4 - Whether you'd prefer to remain anonymous or not. Please use wetransfer to send the file to mark@notonthebeeb.co.uk. Then please send me the link by a separate email with the info 1-4 above If I don't reply and say thanks, I've not received your email! How do we ensure clean drinking water? Maybe like me, on seeing the above images the first thought was how to ensure clean supplies of water, then these water distillers might be of interest to you. I've always used filters but I have a feeling we need a higher source of purity. I researched distillers buying what seemed the best in quality/value ratio. I have since set myself up as an affiliate for the same company. Any purchases on NOTB links help support our work and research. Thank you

There is a new Anonymous whistleblowing channel for Nurses & Healthcare workers in Australia on Telegram. They share verified experiences from frontline workers who see firsthand the damage caused by COVID-19 vaccinations. These submissions have been vetted by a collective of health professionals. Some details may be omitted, your identity will be protected. AHPRA has gagged, coerced and threatened anyone who comes forward - let's save some lives. This channel is dedicated to all frontline workers around the world. This is Australia. This is for you. Join here: https://t.me/NursesSpeakOut Read a small selection of the fast-growing testimonies below Whistleblower #0026 Registered Midwife, WA. 28/09/2021 AHPRA Verified ✅ Hello, Thank you so much for the work you are doing. I’m a Registered Midwife in W.A. and until I resigned on Wednesday Sep 21, I had been working at the biggest hospital in the South West region. When RANZCOG and the ACM came out with their guidelines stating the c19 vax was safe for pregnancy, the directive from the hospital was to promote it hard. At the hospital clinic I know of 2 women that received their first doses and they subsequently lost their babies; 1st dose at 34 weeks and 2 days, fetal death in utero at 36 weeks 1st dose 28+2, fetal death in utero 29 weeks I know of other women in the community under 20 weeks as reported to me by midwives that work with General Practice obstetricians; 1st dose 12+6, miscarriage 13 weeks 1st dose 17 +5, miscarriages 18 weeks 1st dose 12 weeks, miscarriage 12+2 Now, I know correlation does not mean causation, but it certainly should be investigated. Only one of the above cases have been reported. I fear many won’t be and they will be lumped into the 1:4 pregnancy loss statistic. It’s not something that is asked (vaccine status) when women come to the hospital with a loss, so many may fall through and be missed. I mentioned it to a doctor and they didn’t see the connection. I’m so sad to leave a job I love, but this isn’t health. This is something entirely different. Whistleblower #0027 RN, Public Hospital, Melbourne, VIC. 27/09/21. AHPRA Verified ✅ I am a Registered Nurse working for a large public hospital in Melbourne. A significant amount of our patients have had the covid vaccine and are presenting to us as transfers from ED, presenting with chest pain, shortness of breath, neurological symptoms , headaches and fevers. These patients are being found to have confirmed mini strokes (TIA), Pulmonary Embolisms, neurological disorders, severe headaches and deranged pathology resulting particularly often in acute kidney injury. The most concerning of these presentations is the fact that majority of these patients range from 20-70 years old. One female patient in her 30’s presented with a body temperature of 40 degrees and has since been found to have multiple bilateral PE’s. There has been no documentation or discussion from Doctors linking these patients symptoms with their recent covid vaccination. These patients were healthy and fully functioning people pre vaccination. We’re also having to palliate patients at a concerning rate due to acute deterioration. Most of these patients are dying from respiratory failure or suffering a massive stroke. All nurses in my clinical area have now been vaccinated besides myself. Some have told me they were coerced into getting it by management. I am counting down the days now until I’m fired for not wanting the vaccine. Our current staffing is awful, I hate to think how bad it will be after October 15th when unvaccinated nurses are mercilessly terminated from employment. I feel for the patients who will fall through the gaps of our already stressed healthcare system. Whistleblower #0028 Registered Midwife, Small Rural Hospital. 28/09/21. AHPRA Verified ✅ Hi, I'm a Midwife in a small rural hospital. We recently admitted a woman who's baby had unfortunately died in utero and was subsequently stillborn. She was in her third trimester and she'd had her 2nd dose of Pfizer just 3 days before she stopped feeling the baby moving. When I questioned my manager if this was going to be reported to the TGA she talked to the doctor and he said no, because there was no evidence of the two being linked. I can't help but wonder...what if nobody else is reporting events like this either because they all think there is no evidence? Whistleblower #0025 Senior Clinical Nurse Specialist, Metropolitan Hospital, NSW. 27/09/21. Hi there, I am a senior Nurse (CNS2) in a metropolitan hospital, NSW. My usual role is in Cardiology. My lengthy career is ending this week, after decades in the acute sector. I have seen many patients both in ED and Cardiology with vaccine SE’s . These are LARGELY under-recognised, and RARELY reported. I have told relatives to make their own TGA reports as reporting in the acute sector is NOT HAPPENING. Doctors are RARELY attributing the various conditions to vaccination, but when you take a history it is very easy to join the dots. Heart attacks (all ages), acute myocarditis / pericarditis, DRASTIC deterioration in EF (ejection fraction – index of heart’s pumping strength), ie worsening in heart failure. I understand that many are presenting with strokes, and other neurological complications. Diabetes has been far more unstable in some, and difficult to manage, with very labile BSLs. I have seen colleagues with gastrointestinal SE, recurrent pneumonias Many non- injected, including myself have experienced symptoms from spike protein transmission (shedding). GI pain (severe), headaches, migraines, sleep disturbance. I have seen bizarre changes in pathology, huge drops in https://t.me/NursesSpeakOut, and derangements in biochemistry (Na, kidney function). I had a secondment in Aged Care and after the vaccination was rolled out in Facilities, saw MANY acute deteriorations, with increases in death rates above normal Loss of speech, loss of mobility, chest infections. My sister in law works in community aged care, and has seen MANY SE as well. Renal Failure, siezures, acute loss of mobility with resultant falls. Many of the elderly she has cared for and knows well have had their death hastened, or had to move into residential care as they now cannot manage at home. Thanks for helping us to get our stories out there. Whistleblower #0023 RN, Regional NSW. 27/09/21. AHPRA Verified ✅ Reported by REGISTERED NURSE from Regional NSW: (1). 62 year old with blood clot on lung post AstraZeneca- ICU admission (2). 35 year old with severe headaches and blood clot on brain- ICU admission 2 weeks- sent home to have MRIs every 2 weeks as followup (3). 27 Year old Male- Pericarditis following Pfizer (4). 19 Year old female- cardiac arrest 3 days post pfizer (deceased) ...and many others. V status not being consistently asked or documented in eMR- medical team not looking to make correlation. Medical team worried about AHPRA and their careers if they speak out. This is not what we signed up for! Whistleblower #0001. 23/09/2021 RN, Community. QLD. AHPRA Verified ✅ Hi, I’m a community RN on the —— , Qld. I am seeing and caring for adversely affected clients who have had the vaccines and are quite literally dying. Our palliative care is increasing at an exponential rate, people are getting diagnosed with terminal conditions and dying quickly. We (community nurses) are seeing 2-3 palliative clients per day each, this is a massive increase from 1-2 each per week. Other palliative clients who haven’t been vaxxed, then their families talk them into the vax, die more quickly than expected. Have noted that those who are vaxxed that their clinically ‘weak’ areas are being exacerbated. Appears to be at 3, 5 then 12 week patterned intervals. Not one of them associate with the C19vax. Had one man in his 70’s in very stable remission with leukemia for years. Within 3 weeks of having ‘the vaccine’ his white cell count dropped so he had neutropenia. He suddenly developed in 24 hours bilateral cellulitis to both legs up to thighs. 9 weeks later, he is dead. Those with rheumatoid arthritis who have been jabbed experiencing related consistency of flare ups. Getting all sorts of skin infections for no obvious reasoning. They’re having constant medication reviews and increasing analgesia. 3 x clients with healing venous ulcers, all 3 had the jab, 3 weeks later all developed septicemia all with hard to treat bacteria. Those with cardiac conditions who were clinically stable on medication for years, suddenly no longer stable. Arrhythmias, unstable blood pressure, syncope, falls, increased hospitalisations. Cancers: seeing massive increase in skin cancers. They’re growing very quickly and aggressively. Cognition: clients who have been vaxxed and predisposed to some memory issues, increasing episodic bouts of confusion with accompanying amnesia and increasing STML. Of my nursing colleagues who have been vaxxed, noticing increasing sick leave being taken. Sincerely, Veronica Community RN Whistleblower #0006 25/09/2021 RN. Aged Care, NSW. Hi, I am (was) a Registered Nurse in Aged Care in NSW. I was terminated from my job there over a week ago now for declining the jab. The facility had a covid clinic where the masses received Pfizer. On the day as they had left over stock the staff were then offered jabs which many of them didn't feel comfortable but got because the management where there on the day saying things like "come on just get it, don't be ridiculous, if you can't trust the science what can you trust" one staff member declined twice, the third time she was pushed into getting it (all on the same day) I seen this as pure bullying and coercion, she submitted and got the jab. The next day a resident died (nobody batted an eyelid) within three days post jab another two residents died. Over the course of the next three weeks we lost in total 6 residents all who had significantly declined overall and not to mention a lot of other residents declining overall and becoming unwell. The second jab clinic, within the first week, we had five people end up in hospital who then died, shortness of breath, heart issues, others the residence getting rashes not being able to lift their arm up, acting as delirious state, within the next week after that another 5 residents died. In total within the 3 months roll out of the jab, we had 14 deaths of vaccinated residents. In a nursing home with 90 residents most of the staff are commenting on how unheard of this amount of death was but when questioned in relation to the jab many were in denial stating it couldn't be from that. Over the course of three months watching the staff who had been injected so many staff off on sick leave a few staff members ended up in the hospital one for heart reasons the other one had blistering rashes all over her body she ended up being admitted twice, mass reports of headaches lasting days to weeks, dizziness, just generally reporting to not feeling right since having it. The fear in the eyes of the staff is something I will never forget. Other staff feeling completely deflated as they could lose there jobs and had to submit to the jab, In which some after were crying to me at how much they just felt defeated. I have many things to say in relation to this, I could write a novel. I know just within the week and a half of not being there they are struggling to fill shifts, which sadly impacts on everyone, residents and staff the only people it doesn't effect is the management. I love being a nurse but I just can't do it in this current situation it no longer aligns with what I believe health to be. It is a sad and devastating time.

1 in 133 of those jabbed within the UK have filed a report a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Independent reports suggest 1 in 3 have suffered side effects, meaning the vast majority of adverse events are NOT reported - including deaths. WHY? - Patients don't connect an illness that happens several days, or even weeks later, later with the vaccine. - Doctors don't connect the dots, si they have been trained to believe vaccines cause no harm. - Worse, even when adverse events are acknowledged, nurses and Doctors don't file reports as they are too busy for the half an hour needed to do the 'paperwork'. Without a shadow of a doubt, the MHRA data are numbers that only represent the tip of the iceberg. (this weeks data is listed below) UPDATED REPORT PUBLISHED 23RD SEPT 2021 MHRA Yellow Card Reporting up to 15th Sept 2021 • Pfizer - 22.2million people - 41.3m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-193 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.8m people - 48.8m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-107 people impacted • Moderna - 1.4m people - 2.5m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-88 people impacted Reports filed - 114,752 (Pfizer) + 231,920 (AZ) + 15,916 (Moderna) + 1088 (Unknown) = 363,676 people impacted Fatal - 534 (Pfizer) + 1083 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 1662 Acute Cardiac - 5481 (Pfizer) + 9366 (AZ) + 618 (Moderna) + 41 (Unknown) = 15,506 Ventricular Arrhythmias & Cardiac Arrest - 127 (Pfizer) + 212 (AZ) + 5 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 345 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 516 (Pfizer) + 281 (AZ) + 104 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 903 Anaphylaxis - 484 (Pfizer) + 818 (AZ) + 39 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1342 Tongue & Face Swelling - 1061 (Pfizer) + 1648 (AZ) + 108 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 2865 Blood Disorders - 11,051 (Pfizer) + 7441 (AZ) + 942 (Moderna) + 45 (Unknown) = 19,479 Infections - 7657 (Pfizer) + 18,399 (AZ) + 847 (Moderna) + 93 (Unknown) = 26,996 Headaches & Migraines - 25,597 (Pfizer) + 92,045 (AZ) + 3498 (Moderna) + 262 (Unknown) = 121,402 Eye Disorders - 5397 (Pfizer) + 13,936 (AZ) + 578 (Moderna) + 58 (Unknown) = 19,969 Blindness - 104 (Pfizer) + 289 (AZ) + 15 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 412 Deafness - 202 (Pfizer) + 371 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 592 Psychiatric Disorders - 6716 (Pfizer) + 17,315 (AZ) + 1035 (Moderna) + 77 (Unknown) = 25,143 Skin Disorders - 22,693 (Pfizer) + 50,796 (AZ) + 7267 (Moderna) + 223 (Unknown) = 80,979 Fatigue, Arthralgia & Myalgia - 34,469 (Pfizer) + 98,859 (AZ) + 4581 (Moderna) + 284 (Unknown) = 138,193 Spontaneous Abortions - 317 + 7 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 200 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) + 31 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 550 + 11 Vomiting - 3503 (Pfizer) + 11,404 (AZ) + 633 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 15,582 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 747 (Pfizer) + 900 (AZ) + 57 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1711 Nervous System Disorders - 56,670 (Pfizer) + 175,813 (AZ) + 8068 (Moderna) + 625 (Unknown) = 241,176 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 530 (Pfizer) + 2060 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2618 Guillian Barre Syndrome - 49 (Pfizer) + 419 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 476 Tremor - 1399 (Pfizer) + 9728 (AZ) + 188 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 11,353 Memory Loss - 302 (Pfizer) + 755 (AZ) + 32 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1096 Dizziness - 8917 (Pfizer) + 24,405 (AZ) + 1616 (Moderna) + 88 (Unknown) = 35,026 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 624 (Pfizer) + 2770 (AZ) + 28 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3440 Respiratory Disorders - 13,981 (Pfizer) + 27,819 (AZ) + 1315 (Moderna) + 113 (Unknown) = 43,264 Nosebleeds - 768 (Pfizer) + 2226 (AZ) + 80 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 3083 Seizures - 779 (Pfizer) + 1905 (AZ) + 136 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 2832 Paralysis - 319 (Pfizer) + 766 (AZ) + 41 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1132 Haemorrhage (All types) - 2864 (Pfizer) + 4857 (AZ) + 369 (Moderna) + 30 (Unknown) = 8120 Vertigo/Tinnitis - 2909 (Pfizer) + 6465 (AZ) + 307 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) = 9707 Reproductive/Breast - 19,128 (Pfizer) + 17,352 (AZ) + 2558 (Moderna) + 138 (Unknown) = 39,176 SOURCE: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting EudraVigilance - European database of suspected adverse drug reactions VAERS - USA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System CAEFISS - Canadian Adverse Events Following Immunization Surveillance System SwissMedic - Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions by Patients Detailed statistics and graphs available: • https://ukfreedomproject.org/covid-19-vaccines-yellow-card-analysis/ • https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-graphs

Since we proved vaccine-induced magnetism in May 2021, Dr T and the Not On The Beeb team have been calling for help from the medical and scientific community in the recognition of undisclosed ingredients and undisclosed biotech. The machinery of creating professional lead proof is gaining momentum. First we had Dr Campra release his findings of what apears to be Graphene Oxide within the Pfzier vaccine. Then, we had the work of The Scientist Club, which Dr Young later made famous. This has now been folllowed by German scientists and doctors presenting their findings via a mini press conference at the Pathological Institute in Reutlingen. Their presentation contains unique and ground breaking video footage of 'contaminants'. Social media and streaming platforms quickly banned the videos (watch below), yet again proving they are colluding with those committing the crimes against humanity that the press conference was exposing. QUOTE: "...Undeclared metal-containing components were found in the vaccine. Visually, vaccine elements are conspicuous by their unusual shape....which are in line with the findings of scientists from Japan and the USA..." The pathologists Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt and Prof. Dr. Walter Lang also declared, that they had performed more than 40 autopsies on people who had died within two weeks of COVID19 vaccination - and approximately one-third of these deaths were due to the C19 vaccine. One minute taster (with voice over by English translator) Six Minute clip (with voice over by English translator) FULL PRESS CONFERENCE (1 hr 23min) (with voice over by English translator) PRESS RELEASE On Monday, 20th September in the pathological institute in Reutlingen, the results of the autopsies of eight people who died after COVID 19 vaccination will be presented. The fine tissue analyses were performed by pathologists Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt and Prof. Dr. Walter Lang. The findings confirm Prof. Dr. Peter Schirmacher's finding that among more than 40 corpses he autopsied who had died within two weeks of COVID19 vaccination, approximately one-third of those deaths were caused by the vaccination. Microscopic details of the tissue changes will be shown during the live-streamed press conference. Prof. Dr. Werner Bergholz will report on the current parameters of the statistical recording of vaccination events. The press conference will also present the results of the analysis of COVID-19 vaccine samples by an Austrian research group, which are in line with the findings of scientists from Japan and the USA. Undeclared metal-containing components were found in the vaccine. Visually, vaccine elements are conspicuous by their unusual shape. The results of the investigation have led to legal and political demands, for example, for the immediate collection of information by the authorities in order to be able to assess the health risk posed to the population by the COVID-19 vaccines. For example, early signals of impaired fertility in vaccinated individuals can be examined by consulting IVF registries. Through the cancer registry, insights can be gained into the development of cancer due to the genetic modifications of the viral RNA. Suspension of COVID-19 vaccination should be considered. SOURCE: https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en/ A FEW OF THE IMAGES PRESENTED AT THE CONFERENCE What are these particles? The above object is referred to by the doctors in the video as a potential chip. The above 'chip' dried out and developed the above structure. A triangular foreign body often found in the various samples tested. Blood test of a vaccinated persons. A fibrous foreign body Blood of a vaccinated person with health problems after vaccination. Erythrocytes not in good condition. A granolucyte is visible. Blood of a vaccinated person. A fibrous foreign body can be seen. Blood of a vaccinated person. An unusual shaped foreign body can be seen. Dried up vaccine. What are the white dots and structure? Blood of a vaccinated person. Foreign body are visible. The AstraZeneca vaccine shows special foreign bodies. Thread-like; like a string of pearls. TO SEE SIMILAR IMAGES SEE OUR WATER REPORT HERE: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/bottled-water A rhombus-shaped foreign body A fibrous foreign body See out water report here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/bottled-water A rectangular foreign body. Rectangles obviously do NOT occur in nature. Films on Vaccine-Induced Magnetism Film 1 - 'Not On The Beeb' investigates the MAGNET CHALLENGE - True or False? Film 2 - Dr T tests the public for vaccine-induced magnetism. Film 3 - Compilation of magnet challenge home videos Film 4 - Dr T delivers a devastating verdict on magnetism Film 5 - Dr T delivers urgent call to action to all health professionals Film 6 - Zach and Gwen with a mind-bending revelation Film 7 - THE Z&NTERVIEW RELATED READING Japan finds magnetic particles in moderna vaccine. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/japan-magnetic Sceintists Club report https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/what-is-really-in-the-c19-vaccines PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE REASONS BEHIND VACCINE-INDUCED MAGNETISM

NEW FILM - 16th Sept Title: 👉CENSORED👈 Distributor: YOU! I've cut this 5 and a half minute short film together using the testimonies that the vaccine injured shared on social media to raise awareness. Our corrupt governments, backed by the bought media, are covering up the true extent of vaccine injuries. And now, they are coming for our children. We must act. I hope you can use it to show teachers, medical professionals and other parents who might still be naive to the risks WATCH HERE Making this film broke my heart in more ways than one. The music is Ludovico Einaudi's 'Fuori Dal Mondo'. We played this at our Mother's funeral seven years ago. She died of cancer caused by the SV40 viral contaminants within her childhood polio vaccines. See Ludovico's music & tour dates. To share on other platforms please download the video and re-upload with a link back to Not On The Beeb, DOWNLOAD: click the three bottom dots bottom right corner of video. Or, use this link to share via the main website. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/censored Or, share this page. These words were released with the newborn featured at the end of the video: "My niece had her second child last month and throughout her pregnancy, she resisted being vaccinated. A month before the baby was born she was told that she would need a cesarean (sic) section and the hospital and doctors insisted that they would not allow her into the hospital unless she had the jab. With such pressure, and the worry of her baby's health, she felt forced to comply and take the CV v@x. Now the baby is in hospital, has uncontrollable intermittent 'jitters' that are worsening and needs a brain scan as they cannot fathom what is causing this 😢 Every test that has been done has come back negative so they are being transferred to the Great Ormond Street hospital to do further investigations." See newborn article here UPDATED REPORT PUBLISHED 16TH SEPT 2021 MHRA Yellow Card Reporting up to 8th Sept 2021 • Pfizer - 22.1million people - 40.8m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-195 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.8m people - 48.7m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-107 people impacted • Moderna - 1.4m people - 2.4m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-90 people impacted Overall 1-in-134 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event. The true number should be 1 in 3 to 1in 10 so this gives an idea f the extent of underreporting. Reactions - 320,570 (Pfizer) + 823,202 (AZ) + 49,771 (Moderna) + 3270 (Unknown) = 1,196,813 Reports - 113,312 (Pfizer) + 231,161 (AZ) + 15,565 (Moderna) + 1074 (Unknown) = 361,112 Fatal - 526 (Pfizer) + 1075 (AZ) + 16 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 1645 Acute Cardiac - 5339 (Pfizer) + 9294 (AZ) + 582 (Moderna) + 40 (Unknown) = 15,255 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 480 (Pfizer) + 267 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 842 Anaphylaxis - 482 (Pfizer) + 816 (AZ) + 39 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1338 Blood Disorders - 10,916 (Pfizer) + 7427 (AZ) + 919 (Moderna) + 46 (Unknown) = 19,308 Infections - 7545 (Pfizer) + 18,321 (AZ) + 825 (Moderna) + 91 (Unknown) = 26,782 Herpes - 1616 (Pfizer) + 2499 (AZ) + 82 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 4210 Headaches - 22,680 (Pfizer) + 83,838 (AZ) + 3029 (Moderna) + 233 (Unknown) = 109,780 Migraine - 2663 (Pfizer) + 8095 (AZ) + 347 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 11,134 Eye Disorders - 5340 (Pfizer) + 13,885 (AZ) + 566 (Moderna) + 58 (Unknown) = 19,849 Blindness - 103 (Pfizer) + 286 (AZ) + 15 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 408 Deafness - 199 (Pfizer) + 369 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 587 Psychiatric Disorders - 6611 (Pfizer) + 17,256 (AZ) + 1011 (Moderna) + 77 (Unknown) = 24,955 Skin Disorders - 22,425 (Pfizer) + 50,653 (AZ) + 7161 (Moderna) + 221 (Unknown) = 80,460 Muscle & Tissue Disorders - 38,603 (Pfizer) + 99,278 (AZ) + 5441 (Moderna) + 373 (Unknown) = 143,695 Spontaneous Abortions - 309 + 6 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 201 + 4 stillbirth (AZ) + 31 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 543 + 11 Vomiting - 3462 (Pfizer) + 11,389 (AZ) + 613 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 15,506 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 739 (Pfizer) + 889 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1690 Nervous System Disorders - 55,949 (Pfizer) + 175,323 (AZ) + 7821 (Moderna) + 621 (Unknown) = 239,714 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 518 (Pfizer) + 2044 (AZ) + 18 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 2590 Guillian Barre Syndrome - 48 (Pfizer) + 403 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 459 Tremor - 1374 (Pfizer) + 9714 (AZ) + 181 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 11,307 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 621 (Pfizer) + 2755 (AZ) + 28 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3422 Respiratory Disorders - 13,797 (Pfizer) + 27,725 (AZ) + 1312 (Moderna) + 113 (Unknown) = 42,947 Seizures - 763 (Pfizer) + 1900 (AZ) + 132 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 2,807 Paralysis - 312 (Pfizer) + 757 (AZ) + 40 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1,115 Haemorrhage (All types) - 2807 (Pfizer) + 4833 (AZ) + 358 (Moderna) + 30 (Unknown) = 8028 Vertigo/Tinnitis - 2860 (Pfizer) + 6427 (AZ) + 301 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) = 9614 Renal/Urinary - 867 (Pfizer) + 2547 (AZ) + 108 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3545 Reproductive/Breast - 18,710 (Pfizer) + 17,181 (AZ) + 2487 (Moderna) + 131 (Unknown) = 38,509 See Annex One for full reports - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting

The Irish Council for Human Rights had produced this excellent 7-minute short film featuring the various perspectives of prominent Irish doctors.

SV40 stands for Simian Virus 40. This was probably the greatest medical scandal in the world, until today. I researched into this many years ago and even heard the voice tape recordings of the scientists involved. (This is not my article. It is reproduced from the SV40 Cancer Foundation.) SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or "Live" Polio Vaccine (OPV) created by Dr. Albert Sabin. Children being fed sugar cubes with the oral polio vaccine. Circa 1961. In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy of the National Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took the material used to grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters. Tumors grew in the hamsters. Her discovery was subsequently validated by Drs. Maurice Hilliman and Benjamin Sweet of Merck. Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However, this law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away or that the contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines for the next four decades) be discarded. As a result, known SV40 contaminated vaccines were injected into children up until 1963. In addition, it has been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990's. Children being fed sugar cubes with the oral polio vaccine. Circa 1961. The Creation of the Oral Polio Vaccine Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta) Type I has the following lineage: • In 1941, Drs. Francis and Mack isolated the Mahoney poliovirus “from the pooled feces of three healthy children in Cleveland.” Dr. Salk then subjected the strain to passages through fourteen living monkeys and two cultures of monkey testicular cultures. • In 1954, the strain (now called Monk14 T2) was given to Drs. Li and Schaeffer who subjected the virus to nine more passages through monkey testicular cultures. • Next, the strain (now called Monk14 T11) underwent fifteen more passages in monkey testicular cultures, eighteen passages in monkey kidney cells, two passages through the skin of living rhesus monkeys, and additional passages through African Green monkey skin and monkey kidney cell cultures. This strain was now called MS10 T43 or LS-c. SV40 colored transmission electron micrograph. • In 1956, Dr. Sabin took this virus and passaged it through seven cultures of African Green Monkey kidney cells. • That same year, the pharmaceutical company, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, passed the strain (now called LS-c, 2ab/KP2) through a rhesus monkey kidney cell culture. • The resulting material was called Sabin Original Merck (SOM) and was provided to Lederle in 1960 as the seed material to manufacture its polio vaccine. Types II and III were created in a similar fashion. SV40 colored transmission electron micrograph. Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta) Much information about SV40 that was readily available 5 or more years ago, has been wiped from the internet, so dig deep. Read more here SOURCE: https://sv40.org/

The VAERS vaccine adverse event reporting system is designed for health professionals or the public to use. The reports vary from almost coded 'doctor speak' with obscure terms for symptoms, to straightforward "My had the jab and collapsed and died." (samples at end of article) However the system is passive, and the CDC themselves estimate that only 1-10% of all the adverse events get reported. This gap between reported numbers and the real figures leads to a great misunderstanding of the true impact of these products. Imagine road safety experts, or an insurance company, trying to calculate the risk of driving with only 1-10% of road traffic accidents on file. On the other side, results are also not verified as being connected to the vaccine. However, when doctors or patients do 'join the dots', we would expect a high rate of accuracy, though the issue remains that most immediate vaccine injury seems to happen not immediately, but in the period of 14 days after the vaccination. The industry of course will deny all connections for as long as possible. The record of the pharmaceutical industry is clear with the billion dollar fines speaking for themselves. Only recently in 2017, it took 600 recognised child deaths in the Philippines before the Sanofi-Pasteur's dengue vaccine was pulled. The Thalidomide scandal of the 50s and 60s left 100,000 pregnancies affected and 10,000 born with deformities, before the drug was pulled. HOW TO ACCESS THE VAERS DATA Concerning the current vaccine rollout, I've had a few deep dives into the VAERS data and it's a sobering experience to see the numbers and then read the individual stories that lie behind the statistics. (scroll to the bottom to see samples) If you'd like to search the information yourself, this video offers a great tutorial on how to access the database via the CDC’s VAERS WONDER System. The results can be narrowed by any factor from age to symptoms to vaccine type, and more. This is a project veritas expose on doctors holding back the true stats by NOT reporting on VAERS LATEST VAERS COVID VACCINE ADVERSE EVENT DATA THROUGH TO AUG 8, 2021 Please are in mind that the CDC previously admitted only 1-10% of all vaccine adverse events are reported in VAERS. 571,830 Total Reports of adverse effects. BROKEN DOWN BY AGE -------------------------------- 0 - 17 YEARS OLD: ▪️21 Deaths ▪️200 Life threatening ▪️71 Permanently Disabled 18 - 29 YEARS OLD: ▪️108 Deaths ▪️726 Life threatening ▪️919 Permanently Disabled 30 - 49 YEARS OLD ▪️447 Deaths ▪️2,565 Life threatening ▪️3,395 Permanently Disabled 50 - 64 YEARS OLD ▪️1,141 Deaths ▪️2,676 Life threatening ▪️3,015 Permanently Disabled 65 + YEARS OLD ▪️6,203 Deaths ▪️3,599 Life threatening ▪️2,923 Permanently Disabled UNKNOWN AGE ▪️4,872 Deaths ▪️3,373 Life threatening ▪️5,721 Permanently Disabled -------------------------------- TOTAL ADVERSE EVENTS: ▪️DEATHS: 12,791 ▪️LIFE THREATENING: 13,140 ▪️PERMANENTLY DISABLED: 16,044 ▪️HOSPITALIZATIONS: 51,242 ▪️ANAPHYLAXIS: 5,282 ▪️BELL'S PALSY: 4,461 ▪️MISCARRIAGES: 1,505 ▪️HEART ATTACKS: 5,590 ▪️SEVERE ALLERGY: 24,305 ▪️SHINGLES: 6,784 SAMPLE REPORTS Patient's testimony compared to a Professional's report... and a very worrying entry. PATIENT'S OWN REPORT VAERS ID:1224121 QUOTE: :...My Husband and I received the same day a strong pain in our left arms. The next day my husband complained about pain in his entire body and weakness, and I had the same. In the evening he collapsed falling out of his wheelchair. He tried for an hour to sit down back in his wheelchair with my help, but he couldn't. He agreed that I call 911. Two nurses took him to Emergency Room at Hospital and didn''t allow me to go with him. In the morning on Saturday, he was transferred to Room at Hospital and the next day to the Intensive Care Room, where he sadly passed away on Tuesday April 13 at 4:22 am..." PROFESSIONAL'S VAERS REPORT VAERS ID:989006 QUOTE: "...After being observed for approximately 20 minutes and patient walked to her car without assistance I was called to assess the patient in the parking lot for troubles breathing. EMS was called as I made my way outside. Upon my arrival patient was leaning out of the car and stating that she could not breath. She was able to tell me that she was allergic to penicillin. Oxygen was immediately placed on the patient with minimal relief. Lung sounds were coarse throughout. She then began to vomit about every 20-30 seconds. Epipen was administered in the right leg with no relief. Patient continued to complain of troubles breathing and vomiting. A second epipen was administered in the patients right arm again with no relief. A few minutes later patient was given racemic epinephrine through the oxygen mask. There appeared to be mild improvement in her breathing as she appeared more comfortable, but still complaining of shortness of breath and vomiting. When EMS arrived patient was unable to transport herself to the stretcher. When EMS and clinical staff transferred patient to the stretcher she became unresponsive. She appeared to still be breathing. She did not respond to verbal stimuli. Per ED report large amount of fluid was suctioned from the patients lungs following intubation in the ambulance. When patient arrived to the ED she was extubated and re-intubated without difficulty and further fluid was suctioned. At that time patient was found to be in PEA, shock was delivered. Shortly thereafter no cardiac activity was found and patient pronounced dead..." A REPORT OF GREAT CONCERN... VAERS ID 1166062 QUOTE: "...Patient received second dose of Pfizer vaccine on March 17, 2021 while at work. March 18, 2021 her 5-month-old breastfed infant developed a rash and within 24 hours was inconsolable, refusing to eat, and developed a fever. Patient brought baby to local ER where assessments were performed, blood analysis revealed elevated liver enzymes. Infant was hospitalized but continued to decline and passed away. Diagnosis of TTP. No known allergies. No new exposures aside from the mother's vaccination the previous day..." (please note the date typo is by the doctor) Below is a snapshot of the single entry. SUPPORT OUR PETITION CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INGREDIENTS CAUSING VACCINE-INDUCED MAGENTISM >> HERE <<

A jab free mother needing a caesarian was blackmailed into accepting a C19 vaccination by her hospital's doctors and her newborn baby is now showing symptoms similar to those we've seen multiple times with adverse reactions amongst adults. Although there is no official diagnosis as yet, do we wait for the medical machinery to catch up? 10,000 babies were born with physical defects before the pregnancy drug Thalidomide was withdrawn. In 2017, 600 children were killed by the Dengue vaccine before it was withdrawn. This video needs sending to every single person that works in any role associated with the C19 vaccine rollout from hospitals to GPs to vaccination centres. And it needs sending to every MP, policeman, pregnant woman and those planning a family. These words were released with the video below. "My niece had her second child last month and throughout her pregnancy, she resisted being vaccinated. A month before the baby was born she was told that she would need a cesarean (sic) section and the hospital and doctors insisted that they would not allow her into the hospital unless she had the jab. With such pressure, and the worry of her baby's health, she felt forced to comply and take the CV v@x. Now the baby is in hospital, has uncontrollable intermittent 'jitters' that are worsening and needs a brain scan as they cannot fathom what is causing this 😢 Every test that has been done has come back negative so they are being transferred to the Great Ormond Street hospital to do further investigations." VIDEO (warning - it is distressing) Note: No official diagnosis is as yet confirmed. It is the job of the industry to prove safety, not for the people or media sites like this to prove the dangers of their products. In the absence of sufficient testing before releasing an experimental product on the public, our warning, even though NOT backed by an official diagnosis, stands until proven otherwise. Other relevant articles of interest. Pfizer trial paper hints at shedding and shows that as pregnant women were excluded from the trials that the real human trials seem to be happening within the unsuspecting wide population post-release. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/pfizer-trial-paper VAERS report one. (Filed by a doctor) Doctor diagnoses death of a 5-month-old baby due to the mother's C19 vaccine the day before. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/did-a-baby-die-due-to-his-mother-s-vaccine-contaminated-breastmi VAERS report two (Filed by the mother concerned) Mother files her own report and reasoning for her infant's death. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/breastfeeding-mother-believes-her-6wk-baby-died-due-to-vaccine

For many, the main reason they call those of us exposing the hoaxes and lies, from 911 to the virus fear-demic of 2021, conspiracy theorists, is that they can't conceive that their elected masters could do them harm. This superb article by Norman Baker, Former Liberal Democrat MP, written for the The Mail On Sunday dispels that illusion. QUOTE: "...On July 26, 1963, passengers boarded a Northern Line tube train at Morden in South London heading for the City. Their short journey to work, perhaps to London Bridge or Bank, seemed the same as any other day. But it was far from ordinary. What those passengers did not know – could not know – was they were an unwitting cast of extras in a secret experiment conducted by government scientists from Porton Down, headquarters for the country’s military research since 1916. As the train wound northwards through the dark tunnels between Colliers Wood and Tooting Broadway, a window was opened and a scented powder puff was thrown out on to the tracks below. This particular powder puff contained not cosmetics but freeze-dried spores from the anthrax family, B globigii bacteria, which can cause eye infections, food poisoning and, more serious still, septicaemia, the cause of deadly sepsis. The Northern Line was chosen because, at 17 miles, the line heading north is the longest tunnelled section on the London Underground, ensuring the spores now wafting along it were trapped, unable to disperse in the wind. Pushed and pulled along the system by passing trains, the spores took 15 minutes to travel ten miles to Camden Town, contaminating all stops on the way. There is no record of precisely why this reckless operation took place, although it was doubtless to gauge the behaviour of biological weapons in the event of an enemy attack. It was certainly important enough to be repeated on the same stretch of the Underground a year later. There is no record, either, of who – if anyone – was made ill by the spores or if anyone complained. But then the health of the London population was clearly not a priority for the military planners in charge. The only certainty is that this was one of many ways that successive governments chose to play with the lives of ordinary people. Barely remembered today, let alone acknowledged, these experiments are, as my continuing research is making clear, a sinister part of our post-war history – and a warning. At first, the British authorities confined their tests to service personnel. In 1951, Porton Down (properly known as the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory) began testing nerve gas on soldiers, including those unwillingly enlisted as part of mandatory National Service. Volunteers were offered a small payment of £2 and three days’ extra leave. The victims were given no meaningful information about the tests. As one Porton Down scientist observed at the time: ‘If you advertised for people to suffer agony, you would not get them [volunteers].’ Many were told the experiments were about finding a cure for the common cold, assured by the medical officer present they were at ‘no risk’. A total of 21,752 soldiers would eventually be exposed to dangerous substances, including LSD . Some 1,500 were exposed to nerve agents, 400 of them to sarin, a substance that is potentially lethal even in minute quantities. The sarin caused a number of serious adverse reactions in early 1953, including one man who fell into a coma. The scientists were asked to reduce the dosage to the possible lowest range, which would have been about 10 to 15 milligrams. But they didn’t, cutting it instead from 300 to 200mg. The servicemen the scientists were dealing with were nothing more than guinea pigs. One week later, another six servicemen were given 200mg of sarin, applied to a cloth on the inside of their left forearms. Within half an hour, one of the men, 20-year-old Ronald Maddison, was on his way to hospital. Within three hours he was dead. Following improper pressure from the then Home Secretary, David Maxwell Fyfe, the coroner’s conclusion made no reference to sarin. But when the inquest was reopened in 2004, the jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing and concluded that a chemical warfare agent was the cause of death. Many of Britain’s post-war experiments were inspired by the Americans, who had no compunction in using civilians and servicemen alike. US officials even used unwitting hospital patients as guinea pigs, shockingly with the consent of their doctors. Between 1953 and 1957, at least 11 terminally ill patients were injected with uranium 235 to test the effects of radioactivity. More than 800 pregnant women were fed a cocktail laced with a radioactive isotope to study the effects on the foetus. The US army, working with the CIA, was especially interested in mind control. In the 1960s, organised experiments were carried out at an addiction clinic in Lexington, Kentucky, where patients were fed the hallucinogenic drug LSD as part of a depraved ‘memory impairment test’. Patients who were black or gay were first in line. The US invited the UK and Canada to participate in its research on people and the UK eagerly agreed to be part of a programme named Artichoke. In 1972, 19-year-old airman Richard Skinner was told he was at Porton Down to help test protective kit. Instead he was injected with a new drug, T3436, designed to incapacitate the brain. He spent almost five hours in conversation with a fire extinguisher. A recent survey of veterans who survived Operation Artichoke – and the range of substances involved – found symptoms including premature ageing, hypertension (high blood pressure), chest problems and, for at least one man whose eyes had been exposed to a nameless chemical, blindness. By 1999, volunteers were still being used in Porton Down’s Chemical and Biological Defence Sector – 71 of them that year. And as recently as 2014, Porton Down was asking for volunteers to test its chemical decontamination showers. In 2002, while an MP, I forced the government to release a report giving details of germ war tests they had conducted. The report, which covered the period 1940 to 1979, ran to 56 pages. It revealed that a trial involving live plague bacteria took place off the west coast of Scotland, near the Isle of Lewis, in 1952. Mid-experiment, a fishing vessel passed through the cloud that was generated. Another test had seen clouds of dangerous Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis viruses released in the Bahamas. These can cause high fever, even death. Mosquitoes spread the disease. In Nigeria, Britain conducted open-air experiments with nerve gas weapons. Indeed, the report revealed that more than 750 secret operations, including the Northern Line experiments, had been carried out with members of the public subjected to mock biological and chemical warfare attacks. It emerged that some four-and- a-half tons of the chemical zinc cadmium sulphide – classed as a chemical weapon in the Second World War – were released into the atmosphere by ship, vehicle and plane. Read full story here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9231773/Ex-MP-NORMAN-BAKER-reveals-day-bacteria-released-tunnel-Northern-Line.html

A second report has appeared on the USA's VAERS Vaccine data base, linking the vaccinated status of a breastfeeding Mother to a child's death. The first such report was filed by a doctor as featured in our article here. This suspected second case of infant-death-by-mother's-vaccine-contaminated-breast-milk, was filed by the mother herself. These are her words. QUOTE: "...On July 17, my baby passed away. I had been breastfeeding my 6 week old baby at the time that I received the first Pfizer vaccine on June 4, 2021. He became very sick with a high fever about 2 weeks after I got the first Pfizer vaccine on June 21. He was treated for 2 weeks with IV antibiotics for a supposed bacterial infection. However, they never found any specific bacteria, and called his diagnosis culture-negative sepsis. At the end of his hospital stay he tested positive for rhinovirus. After the 14 day course of antibiotics, he was home for one week, but exhibited strange symptoms (e.g. swollen eyelid, strange rashes, vomiting). I took him back to the hospital on July 15, where he presented with what they called an atypical Kawasaki disease. He passed away shortly thereafter from clots in his severely inflamed arteries. I am curious if the spike protein could have gone through the breast milk and caused an inflammatory response in my child. They say Kawasaki disease presents very similarly to the Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in children that they are seeing in post Covid infections. (My baby also had unusual birth circumstances, as he was born at 37 weeks, triggered by a maternal appendicitis.) However, if they know that antibodies go through the breastmilk as a good thing, then why wouldn''t the spike protein also go through the breastmilk and potentially cause problems..." The full report can be read here. SOURCE https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1532154&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON

As of the end of last week, there are now 1,612 vaccine-caused reported deaths in the UK. There are 1,609 meters in a mile. A stride is about one meter. Imagine running a mile, knowing that every footstep hitting the ground, represents a person dying. Many sources, inc the governmental health establishments themselves, indicate the real number could be ten times higher, or more. So, imagine finishing that mile, then being asked to run another nine miles - with each stride now representing an unrecorded British vaccine-fatality. That’s the reality. UPDATED REPORT PUBLISHED 2ND SEPT 2021 (due to MHRA ‘processing delays’ it only includes data collected up until 25th Aug 2021) • Pfizer - 21.6million people - 38.9m doses Yellow Card reporting rate 1-in-197 people impacted • Astrazeneca - 24.8m people - 48.7m doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-108 people impacted • Moderna - 1.4m people - 2.2m doses Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-96 people impacted Reports - 109,660 (Pfizer) + 229,913 (AZ) + 14,641 (Moderna) + 1054 (Unknown) = 355,268 (total people filing injuries. They report about 3 each.) Fatal - 509 (Pfizer) + 1060 (AZ) + 15 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 1612 Acute Cardiac - 5003 (Pfizer) + 9163 (AZ) + 523 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 14,727 Pericarditis/Myocarditis (Heart inflammation) - 405 (Pfizer) + 252 (AZ) + 75 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 735 Anaphylaxis - 472 (Pfizer) + 813 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1320 Blood Disorders - 10,557 (Pfizer) + 7394 (AZ) + 861 (Moderna) + 44 (Unknown) = 18,856 Infections - 7299 (Pfizer) + 18,192 (AZ) + 776 (Moderna) + 89 (Unknown) = 26,356 Headaches - 22,056 (Pfizer) + 83,626 (AZ) + 2746 (Moderna) + 232 (Unknown) = 108.660 Migraine - 2547 (Pfizer) + 8044 (AZ) + 304 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 10,924 Eye Disorders - 5162 (Pfizer) + 13,776 (AZ) + 519 (Moderna) + 56 (Unknown) = 19,513 Blindness - 101 (Pfizer) + 283 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 402 Deafness - 189 (Pfizer) + 365 (AZ) + 15 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 571 Psychiatric Disorders - 6312 (Pfizer) + 17,109 (AZ) + 936 (Moderna) + 76 (Unknown) = 24,433 Skin Disorders - 21,748 (Pfizer) + 50,407 (AZ) + 6879 (Moderna) + 214 (Unknown) = 79,248 Spontaneous Abortions - 294 + 6 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 200 + 2 stillbirth (AZ) + 27 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 523 + 9 (figures now imply 11 related maternal deaths) Vomiting - 3337 (Pfizer) + 11,365 (AZ) + 540 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 15,284 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy - 714 (Pfizer) + 874 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1649 Nervous System Disorders - 54,154 (Pfizer) + 174,416 (AZ) + 7173 (Moderna) + 612 (Unknown) = 236,355 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 507 (Pfizer) + 2010 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 2543 Guillian Barre Syndrome - 44 (Pfizer) + 393 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 445 Tremor - 1319 (Pfizer) + 9683 (AZ) + 166 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 11,206 Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis - 616 (Pfizer) + 2729 (AZ) + 28 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3391 Respiratory Disorders - 13,284 (Pfizer) + 27,552 (AZ) + 1198 (Moderna) + 112 (Unknown) = 42,146 Seizures - 734 (Pfizer) + 1880 (AZ) + 124 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 2749 Paralysis - 305 (Pfizer) + 742 (AZ) + 38 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1091 Haemorrhage (All types) - 2677 (Pfizer) + 4766 (AZ) + 335 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 7807 Vertigo/Tinnitis - 2745 (Pfizer) + 6354 (AZ) + 284 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 9408 Reproductive/Breast - 17,786 (Pfizer) + 16,897 (AZ) + 2334 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 37,147 SOURCE: www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting

ENGLISH ITALIAN SPANISH HIGHLIGHT: "...Wherever It (the magnetism) goes, it could wreak havoc with cell permeability and have all sorts of biological effects, including heart failure, premature Alzeimer's disease and, when the mitochondria are affected, chronic fatigue...." Dr Andrew Goldsworthy is a retired lecturer and Biological Safety Officer from Imperial College London. Yesterday, we had an enlightening conversation around the mechanisms of vaccine-induced magnetism Dr Andrew Goldsworthy is not only a true gentleman, but generously and fearlessly offers his knowledge and insights in this statement below. Please read to the end. What could cause this magnetism? Hypothesis by Dr Andrew Goldsworthy The vaccine-induced magnetism hinges around the possibility that a graphene-like compound was used as an adjuvant to increase the rate of uptake of the mRNA. This is based on electron microscopy, where graphene oxide was found to be in the vaccine. See here It has been difficult to obtain further samples for investigation because the manufacturers insist that all unused vials and used syringes have to be returned after the shots are delivered. Why the secrecy? This may be the reason. Follow this link to an open-access review on the toxicity of the graphene family (including graphene oxide). It looks pretty horrific. Also, see this. But how could this have happened since neither graphene or graphene oxide are magnetic? The answer is that both graphene and graphene oxide, can conduct enough electricity across the cell membranes to magnetise nearby superparamagnetic particles such as ferritin and magnetite to cause a widespread magnetisation of people receiving the vaccine. It's just as the iron core of an electromagnet becomes magnetised when an electric current is passed through the coil of wire wound around it. To make this argument more quantitative; the electrical conductivity of graphene on the nano scale is two orders of magnitude greater than copper See here What does this mean for living cells? The answer is that the transmembrane voltage gradient of living cells is of the order of ten million volts per metre (100 mV across a 10 nm membrane). This means that a transmembrane strand of graphene or graphene oxide (from the vaccine) could carry a huge electric current and be likely to magnetise any superparamagnetic materials such as ferritin or magnetite that may be close by. This effect could spread like wildfire across the membrane as each magnetized particle magnetizes its neighbours and then to those of the next cell, so that the magnetic effect increases and Ultimately, it could spread to all parts of the body via the bloodstream, starting with the blood cells themselves, including those white cells needed for our immune system, then the veins, then the heart, followed by the lungs and finally the brain. Wherever It goes, it could wreak havoc with cell permeability and have all sorts of biological effects, including heart failure, premature Alzeimer's disease and, when the mitochondria are affected, chronic fatigue. Another effect is that membrane damage to our sensory cells could make them hyperactive and send false signals to the brain to give symptoms very similar to electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) resulting in headaches whenever we use a mobile phone, pins and needles when straying too close to a WiFi router dizziness and nausea, to name but a few. Perhaps the most serious danger is if you have an MRI scan, when the extremely powerful magnet in the machine would try to pull these magnetised particles out of your body and, in the case of the brain or spinal cord scan, immediate and possibly permanent damage could result. When other parts of the body are scanned, the results may be less noticeable in the short term, but become apparent later as an unexplained "idiopathic" illness. This needs careful monitoring by an independent observer. Best wishes, Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Lecturer and Biological Safety Officer (retired) Imperial College London To learn more about vaccine-induced magnetism explore the films and resources here Please see our urgent MRI warning letter for doctors here https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/mri-scans

Please download the full paper below EXTRACT: Dr Campra Background • Mr. Ricardo Delgado Martín requests PROVISION OF RESEARCH SERVICES to the UAL named: "DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN AQUEOUS SUSPENSION SAMPLE" - On 06/10/2021 1 vial was received by courier, labeled with the following text: - “COMIRNATY™ .Sterile concentrate. COVID-19 mRNA. 6 doses after dilution. - Discard date / time: PAA165994.LOT / EXP: EY3014 08/2021 ” - Origin and traceability: unknown - State of conservation: refrigerated - Maintenance during the study: refrigerated - Coding of the problem sample to be analyzed: RD1 Preliminary observations of the test sample RD1 Description: - Sealed vial, with rubber and aluminum cap intact, of 2 ml capacity, containing a 0.45 ml cloudy aqueous suspension. - RNA extraction and quantification is performed - Presence of uncharacterized nanometric microbiology is observed, visible at 600X in optical microscope Sample processing 1. Dilution in 0.9% sterile physiological saline (0.45 ml + 1.2 ml) 2. Polarity fractionation: 1.2 ml hexane + 120 ul of RD1 sample 3. Extraction of hydrophilic phase 4. Extraction and quantification of RNA in the sample 5. Electron and optical microscopy of aqueous phase Preliminary analysis: extraction and quantification of Rna in the sample 1. RNA extraction: Kit https://www.fishersci.es/shop/products/ambion-purelink-rna-mini-kit- 7/10307963 2. Quantification of total UV absorbance in spectrophotometer NanoDrop™ https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/ND-2000#/ND-2000 3. Specific quantification of Rna by fluorescence QUBIT2.0: https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/references/newsletters-and-journals/bioprobes-journal-of-cell-biology-applications/bioprobes-issues-2011/bioprobes-64-april-2011/the-qubit-2-0-fluorometer-april- 2011.html UV absorption spectrum of the aqueous phase of the RD1 sample (Nano- drop team) Maximum absorption of SAMPLE RD1 (260-270 nm) - RNA. It presents usual maximums at 260 nm. Total concentration estimated by QUBIT2.0 fluorometry: 6 ng / ul - The spectrum reveals the presence of a high quantity of substances or substances other than Rna with maximum absorption in the same region, with a total estimated at 747 ng / ul (uncalibrated estimate) - Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) has absorption maxima at 270 nm, compatible with the spectrum obtained (Thema et al, 2013. Journal of Chemistry ID 150536) - The maximum absorption obtained DOES NOT ALLOW TO DISCARD the presence of graphene in the sample. The minimum amount of RNA detected by QUBIT2.0 only explains a residual percentage of the total UV absorption of the sample. OBJECTIVE: Microscopic identification of graphene derivatives METHODOLOGY: 1. Imaging in optical and electron microscopy 2. Comparison with literature images and reduced graphene oxide standard sample TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (TEM) Electron microscope JEM-2100Plus Voltage: 200 kV Resolution 0.14 nm Magnification up to x1,200,000 2 TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (TEM) Electron microscopy (TEM) is commonly used to image graphene nanomaterials. It has become a fairly standard and easy to use an instrument that is capable of imaging individual layered graphene sheets.

A new report has just been released by The Scientists Club collating research on the real contents of the C19 'vaccines'. This article features a few highlights - to read the full report please download the PDF at the end. NB - In anticipation of the many emails I will get asking about The Scientists Club yes, they are keeping their identities quiet for now. I understand the frustration, but the gravity of the overall situation needs to be understood. In 1920s New York, would someone spilling incriminating evidence about Al Capone, have given their name, photo and home address to a newspaper? Or, would they have required anonymity? Options were to publish without names or, withhold the content. As you can see, I chose the former, and hope you can appreciate the situation. 😁 Here are some of the highlights from the report.... Introduction The Covid-Sars2 pandemic induced industries to develop new drugs that they called vaccines. The mechanism of action of these drugs (as declared by the pharmaceutical industries coupled with what is reported in the products’ data sheet) is clearly proves these products are not vaccines, but nanotechnological drugs working as a genetic therapy. The 'vaccines' have been labelled vaccines to circumnavigate rules on basic 'medicines' which are in place for all drugs most especially novel experimental biotech. The 'vaccines' are patented and the real ingredients held secret from the public and government buyers using taxpayers money. Consumers are kept in the dark from the nanotechnological processes involved, the side effects and from the possible nano-bio-interactions that can happen. By analysis with nano-tech instruments, this study provides information on the real content. Materials and methods Four “vaccines” were analyzed developed for Corona Virus disease (Comirnaty di Pfizer-BioNtech, Vaxzevria by Astrazeneca, Janssen by Johnson & Johnson), Moderna) using different instrumentation and protocols of preparation according to new nanotechnological approaches. Optical Microscope, Dark-Field Microscope, UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscope, Scanning Electron Microscopes, Transmission Electron Microscope, Energy Dispersive Spectroscope, X-ray Diffractometer, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments were used to verify the “vaccines”’ morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results. ANALYSIS: Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System MODERNA A mixed entity (organic-inorganic) identified in a Moderna “vaccine”. It is a Carbon-based substrate where some nanoparticles are embedded. The nanoparticles are composed of Aluminium-Copper-Iron-Chlorine. Many foreign bodies were identified with a spherical morphology with some bubble-shaped cavities. They are composed of Silicon- Lead-Cadmium-Selenium. This highly-toxic composition reminds that of quantum dots (Cadmium selenide). A 100-micron entity that reminds that of graphene. It is composed of Carbon and Oxygen with contamination of Nitrogen, Silicon, Phosphorus, Chlorine. Carbon-based entities in a Moderna “vaccine” (see below) mixed with aggregates filled with Aluminium-silicate particles PFIZER Sharp debris of 20micron of length identified in a Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of Carbon, Oxygen Chromium, Sulphur, Aluminium, Chloride, Nitrogen. A strange foreign body, surely engineered with strange holes on the surface. The white debris are composed of Carbon, Oxygen, Aluminium, Silicon, Calcium, Magnesium, Chlorine and Nitrogen. Debris identified in a Pfizer “vaccine”. The white 2-micron-long particle is composed of Bismuth, Carbon, Oxygen, Aluminium, Sodium, Copper, Nitrogen. An organic (Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen) aggregate with embedded nanoparticles of Bismuth-Titanium-Vanadium -Iron-Copper Silicon-Aluminium embedded in Pfizer “vaccine” The 50-micron long body (see image below) is a mysterious presence in a vaccine. It could be a trypanosoma parasites several variants of which are lethal’ (the bold italic text is missing form original {PDF) JANSSEN Shows an organic-inorganic aggregate (see below) identified in a Janssen “vaccine”. The particles are composed of stainless steel and are glued together with a “Carbon-based glue”. This aggregate is magnetic and can trigger biological problems inside the blood circulation due to possible interactions with other dipoles. (EDITOR'S NOTE: PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO VACCINE INDUCED MAGNETISM HERE: ) ASTRAZENECA An engineered aggregate of Iron-Chromium-Nickel (stainless steel) nanoparticles embedded identified in an Astrazeneca “vaccine” ANALYSIS: XRF Instrumentation ASTRAZENECA Histidine Sucrose, PEG (poly-ethylene glycol) Ethylene alcohol. Only the presence of PEG is declared in the data sheet of this “vaccine”. ANALYSIS: OPTICAL MICROSCOPE - These are the work of Dr Campra from Almeria University see his full report here PFIZER These images were obtained using 100X and 600X optical microscopy (normal microscopes) On the left we see the images obtained from the Pfizer vaccine On the right we see a visual match from known sources. Aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and from reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical microscopy, 100X Aqueous fraction images from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and sonicated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical microscopy, 600X ANALYSIS: ELECTRON MICROSCOPE - These are the work of Dr Campra from Almeria University see his full report here PFIZER TEM microscope observation where particles of graphene in a Pfizer” vaccine” are present. The X-ray diffractometry reveals their nature of crystalline Carbon-based nanoparticles. Aqueous fraction from ComirnatyTM sample. Electronic microscope (TEM), JEM-2100Plus, at 200 kV ANALYSIS: SPECTROPHOTOMETER PFIZER The spectrum was compatible with the peak of rGO at 270nm. Most of this absorbance might be due to graphene-like sheets, abundant in suspension in the sample. This thesis was further supported by high fluorescence from the sample with maximum at 340 nm, in accordance with peak values for Graphene Oxide. SUMMARY The analyzed “vaccines” present components that are not mentioned in the technical data sheet and whose presence does not seem to have to do with the concept of vaccine. Since they are not included in the documentation presented to the Governmental organizations (FDA, EMA, etc.) for the legal approval aimed at the commercialization and the human use, they seem to be a contamination probably due to the industrial process of manufacturing. It seems that nobody controlled the final product before its distribution - that means that consumers are not informed of the real content of the products. Possible side effects may be due to the injection of those contaminants into the body. It must be observed that the components that are not declared but we identified are not biocompatible and some have also a mechanical impact once they are inside the blood circulation, especially in contact with the vascular endothelium. The entities present in Pfizer and Astrazeneca “vaccines”, identified by the ESEM images, can represent a risk for the human body. They can be responsible of the formation of thrombi, since they are thrombogenic. A further risk is represented by the extravasation of the particles with an ensuing possible haemorrhage. Once in the blood circulation, the particles can be carried also to the brain. In this case the patient can suffer from a stroke, and/or a cerebral haemorrhage. If the damage of the endothelium caused by the particles occurs in the heart, there is a high probability of contracting myocarditis. In addition to all that, the toxicity of graphene is well-known. The presence of non-biocompatible organic-inorganic foreign bodies in the blood circulation can be responsible of a nano-bio-interaction that can induce severe health problems. References Graphene Oxide discovery - Dr Campra from Almeria University see his full report https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/englis-translation-of-the-graphene-oxide-almeria-paper Bano, I. et al , 2019. Exploring the fluorescence properties of reduced graphene oxide with tunable device performance, Diamond and Related Materials, Volume 94,59-64,ISSN 0925- 9635 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2019.02.021. Biroju, Ravi & Narayanan, Tharangattu & Vineesh, Thazhe Veettil. (2018). New advances in 2D electrochemistry—Catalysis and Sensing. 10.1201/9781315152042-7. Choucair, M., Thordarson, P. & Stride, J. Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nature Nanotech 4, 30–33 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.365 Kim et al, Seeing graphene-based sheets, Materials Today,Volume 13, Issue 3,2010,Pages 28- 38,ISSN 1369-7021 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70031-6 Xu et al, (2019) Identification of graphene oxide and its structural features in solvents by optical microscopy, RSC Adv., 9, 18559-18564 1-Extracction RNA Kit https://www.fishersci.es/shop/products/ambion-purelink-rna-mini-kit- 7/10307963 2- NanoDropTM https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/ND-2000#/ND-2000 3- QUBIT2.0: https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/references/newsletters-and- journals/bioprobes-journal-of-cell-biology-applications/bioprobes-issues-2011/bioprobes-64-april- 2011/the-qubit-2-0-fluorometer-april-2011.html DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL AND FULL REPORT BELOW NOTE: the original document has been translated, leading to quirky use of English and a couple of confusingly labelled images. SIGN OUR PETITION CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO VACCINE-INDUCED MAGNETISM HERE >>> JAPANESE SUSPENSION OF MODERNA VACCINE DUE TO PARTICLES THAT 'REACT TO MAGNETS' : HERE

Did you think that only COVID vaccines contained graphene? Well, now this nanomaterial has been also found in the flu vaccine Vaxigrip Tetra. La Quinta Columna revealed this information today in its 84th program. This vial's analysis is being carried out by a researcher, for the moment anonymous, who is in contact with the Spanish team. It's impressive that La Quinta Columna's suspicions regarding the composition of the vaccines produced during the last few years have been correct in every way. The analyses that are being carried out confirm that Big Pharma has been exposing people to graphene for a long time, intoxicating them in silence. Orwell City has rushed to get the scoop today and, as usual, brings you the key excerpt from the program. In it, you can see the optical microscopy photographs and note the similarity of the detected nanomaterial to the graphene oxide described in the scientific literature. Read more here watch video

AS children, we all played with magnets. Delighted to see them jump and spin. To test what they stuck to, and what objects they didn’t. And, when we let go of them, no magnet ever stuck to our fingers. When I first saw a video of a magnet sticking to the arm of somebody, I smiled and quickly flicked by to something of real interest. Then someone sent me another magnet video. I hesitated slightly and moved on to something else. That evening, two friends called me to confirm their findings. Anne had been at a dinner party and had waited until the guests were relaxed on their second bottle of wine before pulling her magnet out. Carl had filmed himself attaching a magnet to the arm of his mother and it had gone viral. A quick search on the internet found the usual suspect ‘fact checkers’ debunking this magnet phenomenon - a clear telltale sign of a cover-up. My ‘favourite’ fact checker of all, Snopes, had featured Carl’s video of his mother, calling it fake. There was only one thing to do - I packed my camera, jumped on the train down to the South Coast to find out for myself whether a magnet would be attracted to his mother’s arm, or not.Carl quickly demonstrated the spot of magnetism on his mother. Even though I was inches away, I asked Carl to take the camera so I could try for myself. Feeling a magnet being tugged out of your hand, by a subtle yet defined magnetic force from under the skin of a living human being, is quite a shock.Sensing the magnet being repelled, and trying to flip so that the correct polarity was in contact with the skin, was mind-blowing. We had just established the basics on camera. The magnet had stuck to Carl’s mother’s arm due to an indisputable magnetic attraction. The fact checkers, including Snopes, Reuters, the BBC reality check and Fact Check–alongside a multitude of US main stream TV channels–were deceiving the public. You can see the short documentary we made via the website called ‘The Magnet Challenge - True or False? ’The call out for people to take up the #magnetchallenge using neodymium magnets was working and the videos were appearing on social media from all over the world. Our next step was to take a team to St James Park, London on the day of the 29th of May Freedom protest to ask random people to take part in the Magnet Challenge on film. We were joined by Dr T. As we were setting up, news came in that the BBC had made a joint announcement with the NHS, calling for the banning of neodymium magnets claiming they were now deemed a risk to children. A coincidence? Maybe. However, we suspected that drawing such flack with such precise timing, confirmed that we were over the target. Our walk-about challenge within the park caused mixed reactions. Some were near tears, two young Israelis refused to accept the fact staring them in the face and others laughed it off - even if nervously. Importantly, Dr T., a UK trained doctor, had now verified our findings on camera.You can also see the short film ‘The Magnet Challenge with Dr T’ on our website. DOWNLOAD THE LIGHT NEWSPAPER HERE www.NotOnTheBeeb.co.uk

Sally Beck interviewed DR T and I for this article on our work exposing the syndrome of vaccine-induced magnetism. FACT checkers at the BBC, Reuters and Snopes have been busy debunking the Covid vaccine ‘magnet challenge’. Social media including TikTok, Facebook and Instagram have been awash with videos showing people with magnets sticking to the exact spot on their arms where they had received a Covid jab. See some independently verified examples here. All three companies went to great lengths to explain why a magnet cannot possibly cling to your skin, without experimenting on a single vaccinated person to see what would happen. BBC fact checker Jack Goodman spoke to many who said the magnet challenge worked for them and ‘were genuinely curious as to why’. He didn’t provide them with answers; instead he focused on one TikTok prankster called Emily who admitted she’d licked a magnet as a joke and stuck it to her arm. It has been left to independent associations, doctors and journalists to test the phenomenon. Not On The Beeb founder and award-winning director Mark Playne tracked down a woman called Lorraine whose Instagram post of a magnet sticking to the Pfizer vaccine site on her left arm went viral. The fact-checkers said the video was fake but none of them bothered to visit her and test for themselves. Playne told me: ‘Lorraine’s son Carl demonstrated the spot of magnetism on his mother. Even though I was inches away, I asked Carl to take the camera so I could.... READ MORE HERE

The biosecurity technological panopticon constructed by NSF-led PPP with big tech will create, host and facilitate outer wireless network of the panopticon, while NSF-funded IntraBioNets program builds inner network, through the interoperable biocyber wireless network between humans and the Internet, granting health care providers access to critical, private health information to conduct mass disease surveillance of the population. The system engineers in the outer network formed the Resilient & Intelligent NextG Systems (RINGS), which consist of a public-private partnership (PPP) led by the National Science Foundation (NSF), other federal agencies (including the DoD) and multiple private sector actors, including Apple, Ericsson, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, Qualcomm Technologies and VMware. The RINGS program seeks to “accelerate research in areas that will potentially have a significant impact on emerging Next Generation (NextG) wireless and mobile communication, networking, sensing, and computing systems, along with global-scale services.” A total investment of $40 million includes contributions from each of the private partners. Approximately 40 awards were anticipated, each up to $1 million and up to 3 years in duration. NextG systems are “future versions of today’s cellular, Wi-Fi and satellite networks that are expected to connect billions of people and revolutionize the relationship between users’ devices and cloud services.” The RINGS program initially appears harmless but, when combined with the IntraBioNets program, the spurious gathering of this PPP alludes to a more sinister intent, when hosting an application that can track and monitor the health of living organisms, including humans, and deliver drug treatments back into the body. In 2018, NSF, Division Of Computer and Network Systems (CNS), awarded a $300,000 grant of taxpayer dollars to the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, to fund the IntraNetsBio program. This IntraNetsBio program forms the inner network that connects the RINGS program’s work to the biosensor wireless network in the human body. The goal of the IntraBioNets program was to solve challenges in developing a self-sustainable and bio-compatible network infrastructure that exploits the natural mechanisms of biological communication, on the cellular level, in the human body. The program models biological embedded computing devices that have the capability to gather and transfer information within the biological domain through an interface with the electrical domain of the Internet. Read more here... https://essentialliberties.com/2021/07/01/intrabionets-and-nsf-led-rings-programs-with-big-tech-form-the-wireless-network-to-connect-humans-the-internet/

This is for all MP’s who STILL think that wearing masks is a good idea. Below are over 30 links to published studies and resources that show the risks from masks and that they offer NO protection! Please let your MP’s know if they are still confused about this! Find your MP here If you have not signed our petition calling for an investigation into vaccine-induced magnetism yet, please do. This is urgent. www.NotOnTheBeeb.co.uk/magnetism-land Links on Masks: 1. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.full 2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/ 3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500410/ 4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/ 5. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00173017 6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18331781/ 7. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-35797-3 8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31479137/ 9. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577#T1 10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21477136/ 11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28039289/ 12. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.long 13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20584862/ 14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22188875/ 15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31479137/ 16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27531371/ 17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29855107/ 18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29678452/ 19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25806411/ 20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23108786/ 21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25858901/ 22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5333967/ 23. https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744 24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27531371/ 25. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2 26. https://vimeo.com/424254660 27. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0t84p6H4XA 28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/ 29. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x 30 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness/article/testing-the-efficacy-of-homemade-masks-would-they-protect-in-an-influenza-pandemic/0921A05A69A9419C862FA2F35F819D55? 31. https://m.facebook.com/flx/warn/?u=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs12560-011-9056-7%3Ffbclid

In 1912 the Titanic sinks with 1,502 fatalities making instant world headlines. In 2021, the experimental 'vaccine' roll out kills 1,517 Brits and the BBC brush the numbers under a carpet... The social media giants censor anyone daring to publish these numbers below, obtained from the UK governmental MHRA website. CURRENT 30th July MHRA Yellow Card Reporting which only includes data up until 21st July 2021 (please scroll to bottom to download the full precise lists) * Pfizer - 20.4million people - 33.3m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-215 people impacted * Astrazeneca - 24.7m people - 47.9m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-110 people impacted * Moderna - 1.3m people - 1.6m doses - Yellow Card reporting rate - 1-in-118 people impacted Overall 1-in-140 people experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Industry expected 1 in 10 people to have a reaction meaning real numbers could be 14X higher. To learn about the unexpected and unrecorded side effects of vaccine-induced magnetism see more at www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/magnetism Reports (total people reporting injury) 95,040 (Pfizer) + 224,252 (AZ) + 10,990 (Moderna) + 958 (Unknown) Total = 331,240 (on average having about three of the below reactions) Fatalities 466 (Pfizer) 1018 (AZ) 8 (Moderna) 25 (Unknown jab) Total = 1,517 Acute Cardiac 4020 (Pfizer) + 8814 (AZ) + 320 (Moderna) + 30 (Unknown) Total = 13,184 Myocardial Infarction & Heart Failure 208 (Pfizer) + 467 (AZ) + 11 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) Total = 692 Anaphylaxis 437 (Pfizer) + 793 (AZ) + 27 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) Total = 1258 Blood Disorders 8707 (Pfizer) + 7202 (AZ) + 646 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) Total = 16,593 Infections 6341 (Pfizer) + 17,575 (AZ) + 518 (Moderna) + 84 (Unknown) Total = 24,518 Herpes 1479 (Pfizer) + 2390 (AZ) + 51 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) Total = 3,933 Head pain 19,629 (Pfizer) + 82,697 (AZ) + 1716 (Moderna) + 213 (Unknown) Total = 104,255 Migraines 2164 (Pfizer) + 7857 (AZ) + 197 (Moderna) + 26 (Unknown) Total = 10,244 Eye Disorders 4407 (Pfizer) + 13,339 (AZ) + 339 (Moderna) + 45 (Unknown) Total = 18,130 Blinded 81 (Pfizer) + 266 (AZ) + 9 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) Total = 359 Deaf 167 (Pfizer) + 342 (AZ) + 10 (Moderna) Total = 519 Psychiatric Disorders 5224 (Pfizer) + 16,555 (AZ) + 620 (Moderna) + 69 (Unknown) Total = 22,468 Skin Disorders 19,044 (Pfizer) + 49,260 (AZ) + 5553 (Moderna) + 188 (Unknown) Total = 74,045 Spontaneous Abortions 197 + 7 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 167 + 3 stillbirth (AZ) + 16 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) Total = 381 + 11 Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy 612 (Pfizer) + 811 (AZ) + 37 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) Total = 1,465 Nervous System Disorders 47,255 (Pfizer) + 170,969 (AZ) + 4904 (Moderna) + 551 (Unknown) Total = 223,679 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages 467 (Pfizer) + 1892 (AZ) + 13 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) Total = 2,378 Guillian Barre Syndrome 38 (Pfizer) + 362 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) Total = 407 Loss of balance 443 (Pfizer) + 23,850 (AZ) + 1067 (Moderna) + 80 (Unknown) Total = 32,440 Tremors 133 (Pfizer) + 9581 (AZ) + 109 (Moderna) + 36 (Unknown) Total = 10,859 Pulmonary Embolism 313 (Pfizer) + 1471 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) Total = 1,800 Deep Vein Thrombosis 197 (Pfizer) + 1087 (AZ) + 7 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) Total = 1,299 Respiratory Disorders 11,516 (Pfizer) + 26,785 (AZ) + 824 (Moderna) + 93 (Unknown) Total = 39,218 Seizures 629 (Pfizer) + 1808 (AZ) + 79 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) Total = 2,524 Paralysis 256 (Pfizer) + 693 (AZ) + 25 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) Total = 978 Vertigo/Tinnitis 2367 (Pfizer) + 6074 (AZ) + 207 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) Total = 8667 Muscle & Tissue Disorders 32,555 (Pfizer) + 96,523 (AZ) + 3444 (Moderna) + 323 (Unknown) Total = 132,845 Reproductive/Breast 13,599 (Pfizer) + 15,366 (AZ) + 1688 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) Total = 30,747 Reproductive/Breast 13,599 (Pfizer) + 15,366 (AZ) + 1688 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) Total = 30,747 Online Source DOWNLOAD FULL PDF OF THE ADVERSE REACTIONS PER BRAND UK - ASTRAZENECA ADVERSE REACTIONS UK - PFIZER ADVERSE REACTIONS UK - MODERNA ADVERSE REACTIONS UK - UNSPECIFIED ADVERSE REACTIONS Have you suffered an adverse event? Have you suffered a magnetic adverse event?