Search Results

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna Franco Giovannini Giampaolo Pisano Abstract The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94% of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing. EXCERPT MALE OF 33 YEARS, WHO FORMERLY WAS AN ATHLETE This individual is a male of 33 years, who formerly was an athlete, apparently healthy before inoculation with an mRNA Pfizer injection. One month after receiving the first dose of the Pfizer “vaccine”, he showed marked asthenia, a constant gravitational headache (i.e., one sensitive to the position and movements of his head and body such that the pain was increased by movement of the head up or down). The headaches were unresponsive to common pain killers. Diffuse rheumatic arthralgia with dyspnea on exertion were noted.Figure 5. A highly structured fibro-tubular configuration of structures that can coalesce together, reaching dimensions ten times their initial size. In (a) and (b) at 40x magnification, we see what appears to be a laminar linkage. In (c), at 120x magnification (3x magnification digitally produced), there is a composite which is 166.54 μm (DeltaPix Software)in length. DOWNLOAD FULL PAPER HERE SOURCE: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47 Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

This is a huge step forwards. Sixteen months after the first graphene within vax findings, the Epoch Times has stepped forwarding published reports on graphene and the 'bad-blood' being caused by the jab. They seem to have gained courage from a peer-reviewed study, that although tame, does open up vital questions. Horrifying, they point out that 94% of the vaccinated have abnormal blood. Abstract The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94% of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing. Peer-Reviewed: 94 Percent of Vaccinated Patients With Subsequent Health Issues Have Abnormal Blood, Italian Microscopy Finds BYJENNIFER MARGULIS AND JOE WANGTIMESEPTEMBER 2, 2022 for EPOCH TIMES Physicians in Italy studied the blood of patients who had been injected with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and found foreign matter long after vaccination, a new study shows. The three doctors, all of whom are surgeons—Franco Giovannini, M.D., Riccardo Benzi Cipelli, M.D., and Giampaolo Pisano, M.D.—examined freshly drawn blood of more than a thousand patients using direct observation under microscopes to see what was happening in the blood. Their results were published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research in August 2022. For this study, the Italian doctors used optical microscopy, that is, regular light microscopes, to examine the blood. Blood cells are easily visible under a microscope. Their shape, type, and how and if they are aggregated—clumped together—can help the skilled physician better understand the patient’s health. In their 60-page peer-reviewed study, the Italian researchers did not draw any conclusions. They just reported case studies from their observations. Although they could not explain what they observed, they noted in the study that what they saw was so strange that they felt the need to alert the medical community. Dark-Field Microscopy The light or optical microscope uses visible light and a series of lenses to magnify small images. Unlike electron microscopy, light microscopy provides a direct image of what is under the lens. With light microscopy, scientists can either use a bright white background behind the cells, with the light shining from behind the slide, or they can use a dark background. This technique, which is called dark-field or dark-ground microscopy, works by blocking the backlighting and bouncing the light around from the side in order to make the slide stand out from the dark background. Dark-field microscopy uses a special aperture to focus the light so the background stays dark. The light will not pass directly through the sample, and no staining is required, so living cells do not need to be killed to be studied. For this research, the doctors used dark-field microscopy. Abnormal Blood Of the 1006 patients, 426 were men and 580 were women. One hundred and forty-one received only one dose of an mRNA vaccine, 453 got two doses, and 412 received three doses in total. The patients ranged in age from 15 to 85. The average age of the patients was 49. All 1,006 patients were seeking healthcare because they were not feeling well: presenting with a wide variety of health issues. On average, the patients whose blood was examined had been vaccinated about one month prior. Of the 1,006 patients, after vaccination, only about 5 percent—just 58 people—had blood that looked normal. The doctors were able to examine the blood of 12 of the patients before they had received any vaccines. At that time, previous to being vaccinated, all 12 patients presented with normal, healthy blood, according to the researchers. The authors did not reveal how many people were vaccinated in total, so the percentage of vaccinated people who developed abnormal blood is unknown. This is a shortcoming of their research. What is known, however, is that 94 percent of the patients surveyed in this study, who developed subsequent symptoms, had abnormal blood. Each of the patients was being reviewed for symptoms, a wide range of which had arisen since their vaccinations. The images are dramatic. Side-by-side pictures of a patient’s blood before and after vaccination show stark differences. Before vaccination, the red blood cells are separate from each other and are round, while the blood drawn after vaccination shows red blood cells that are deformed, and that cluster in coagulation around visible foreign matter that was not present before. Foreign Material Aggregated in the Blood This foreign material seemed to collect itself into structures, sometimes forming crystals and other times forming long tubes or fibers. The foreign-body structures in the patients’ blood, which had not been there before vaccination, certainly look unusual in the photos included in the study. The large shapes seemed to the doctors to have aggregated in the blood, and they observed shapes that suggest the way graphene can self-assemble into structures. Graphene is a form of carbon that occurs when the atoms are arranged in hexagons, making a flat crystal, like a sheet. In this form, though the carbon is not a metal, it behaves chemically like a metallic compound. The two shapes they noticed in the blood stream were crystal-like chunks and tube-like lengths. While the researchers could not confirm that what they saw was graphene, they pointed out that graphene can aggregate into shapes similar to those the doctors observed. Is It Graphene? Graphene has been used in nasal-delivery flu vaccinations, and is being developed for use in other medicines. However, it is not listed as an ingredient in any of the mRNA vaccines. The Italian doctors did not chemically test for graphene. They only speculated that graphene may be a component of the structures. Graphene can self-assemble tiny nano-structures, making it useful for carbon nanotubes and carbon fiber. However, as the authors mentioned, graphene self-assembling into structures in the bloodstream could provide something for blood to clot on, potentially causing large-scale blood clots. These speculations raise more questions than answers, as neither graphene nor other metallic compounds were supposed to have been used in the vaccines. So why did over 950 people experiencing post-vaccination health issues present with foreign material in their blood? This is not the only study to find blood abnormalities post-mRNA vaccination. In a previously published study in the same journal, a Korean team also showed that mRNA-vaccinated blood contained metallic objects that should not have been there. The Korean scientists analyzed samples of centrifuged blood from eight people who had received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against two people who did not receive any COVID-19 vaccines. The team of three South Korean medical doctors, Young Mi Lee, Sunyoung Park, and Ki-Yeob Jeon, explained that: “The preponderance of evidence suggests that the foreign materials found in the COVID-19 vaccine recipients … were injected into their bodies when they received one or more doses of the COVID-19 vaccines.” According to this study: “From the 8 COVID-19 vaccine recipients: 6 plasma samples contained a multilayered disc of unidentified composition; 3 samples contained beaded coil-like materials; 1 plasma sample contained a fibrous bundle of similar appearing beaded foreign material; and a different group of 3 samples had crystal-like formations of foreign material. The various shapes and sizes of foreign materials in the centrifuged plasmas of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals closely resembled the shapes and sizes of foreign materials previously observed directly in the vaccines themselves.” The Italian study, which analyzed over 10 times as many blood samples, appears to confirm the findings from Korea. However, it is difficult to extrapolate from their findings. It would be easier to confirm that the vaccines were indeed the cause of the blood abnormalities if the Italian researchers had also analyzed the blood of a control group of patients presenting with similar unusual symptoms (or lack thereof) who had not been previously vaccinated. Clotting Problems Clotting problems are one of the hallmark complications seen after COVID-19 vaccination. As the subject pool was of people who had been recently vaccinated and subsequently had health problems arise, this new science suggests that these structures in the blood and the abnormal clotting behavior of the blood cells could be a major part of why clinical doctors are seeing so many unusual health issues consequent to mRNA vaccination. Indeed, large clots have even been found in the bodies of the deceased since the vaccine program started. An embalmer in Alabama noticed that large clots of a sort he had never seen in his 20-year career started to become commonplace once the vaccine program started, according to a non-profit Alabama news agency. Richard Hirschmann told 1819 News that he has collected pictures of over a hundred cases of these blood clots. Hirschmann also alerted local labs and has been working with a radiologist, Phillip Triantos, M.D., to better understand why and how patients are presenting with large-scale slow-forming blood clots. Other doctors, including Ryan Cole, M.D., a dermatopathologist (which is a doctor who uses a microscope to examine samples of skin, hair, and nails to diagnose diseases) and founder of the Idaho-based company, Cole Diagnostics, have also seen large blood clots becoming an emerging phenomenon since widespread vaccination campaigns started, according to 1819 News. Microscopes in Medicine It used to be common for medical doctors to have microscopes in their offices and to examine their patients’ blood (and other bodily fluids) themselves, according to Barron Lerner, M.D., author of “The Good Doctor: A Father, a Son, and the Evolution of Medical Ethics.” While medical doctors today, with some exceptions, almost always send tests off to outside laboratories for analysis, Barron Lerner described how senior physicians used to feel it was their duty to teach their younger colleagues and medical students how to do testing themselves: Gram stains to test for bacterial infections, urine analysis under the microscope, and centrifuging blood to check for anemia and other issues. Akin to medical doctors of past eras, the Italian team of doctors who published these new findings explained that they have looked at the blood of patients over their entire careers, including after every other sort of vaccination. But they have never seen foreign bodies of this sort before. Post-market surveillance of medical devices, new medications, and vaccinations is of the utmost importance to ensure safety. These unusual and widespread findings of abnormalities in the blood post-mRNA vaccination should be of global concern. If 94 percent of patients with adverse health problems have occlusions in their blood that were not present before they were vaccinated, these scientists may have uncovered an unanticipated and dangerous side effect of mRNA vaccines. SOURCE: https://www.theepochtimes.com/italian-study-blood-patients-after-mrna-shot_4708049.html?

IMPORTANT UPDATE & ERROR ADMISSION AT END: We have all seen the assurance from the Prime Minister, Government ministers and TV doctors that the vaccine is safe for pregnant women. This is a screenshot from a BBC promotional video using the NHS, JCVI, Royal College, the US's CDC and MHRA to persuade the British public that the vaccine is safe for those pregnant or breastfeeding post jab. But is the C19 jab still considered by the Gov as safe and effective for pregnant women? Before we look at the BBC video, this is the current NHS advice. SOURCE: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/pregnancy-breastfeeding-fertility-and-coronavirus-covid-19-vaccination/ This was backed by more comprehensive information on the jab here as of 31st March PM BACKS JAB FOR PREHNANT WOMEN BORIS'S WIFE EVEN JOINED IN Carrie Johnson ‘feeling great’ after second Covid jab as she reassures pregnant women "...Carrie, 33, is expecting her second child after having a miscarriage earlier this year. She wrote on her Instagram account: “Just had my second jab and feeling great! “I know there are lots of pregnant women who are anxious about getting their Covid vaccine but the evidence is incredibly reassuring.” She continued: “Most importantly, the data shows there is no increased risk of miscarriage, something I was definitely concerned about...." https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1476990/carrie-johnson-pregnant-covid-vaccine-boris-johnson GOVERNMENT QUIETLY CHANGES ADVICE ON JAB FOR PREGNANT WOMEN The government seems to have updated their website on a page tagged "information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-PfizerBiontech-covid-19-vaccine" with some key information that is clearly contradictory to the advice given to the public. Or, at the very least it is contradictory to the NHS and BBC advice. We have been using web archives to try and work out when this advice was published and it now seems possible that the advice has been there all along. Meaning all the propaganda pushing the vaccine is at the very best, dodgy. This is HUGE! Does this mean the health professionals giving the vaccination had not done their due diligence and will be scapegoated? The changes spotted on the UK government website have gone viral. Here is the Government's advice on vaccinating the pregnant or those breastfeeding... advice that not only contradicts the NHS advice but the words of the prime minister, BBC doctors and countless others used in the coercion. This is a direct quote from the main government website on a page listed as designed for health professionals giving the vaccine. SOURCE: http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/information-for-healthcare-professionals-on-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine Let's read that again.... Toxicology conclusions - .In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. TOXICOLOGY LINK https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/summary-public-assessment-report-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine Compare and contrast the two contradictory images below THE ROLE OF THE BBC IN THE COERCION OF MOTHERS The government and pharma's main propaganda outlet is the BBC. This is a screenshot from a BBC video persuading pregnant women that the jab is safe. I have made a transcript of the video, as the tone and words used are interesting in their technique. The full 2.41 minute video is here. BBC GOV PROPAGANDA VIDEO PROMOTING THE JAB FOR PREGNANT WOMEN 9th May 2021 TRANSCRIPT Regarding the jab and pregnancy "....It's understandable to be a little bit confused, a little bit anxious about it and just not sure what to do. If you're pregnant or breastfeeding or just thinking about having a baby, then the advice from the experts is you should be offered the COVID vaccine. I'm Dr. Stephanie Jen Chyi Oii,, I'm a GP and I had my baby during the lockdown. There is a history of having vaccines given to pregnant women, every pregnant woman is recommended to have the flu vaccine and whooping cough vaccine and these are known to be safe in pregnancy. Research from the USA involving more than 90,000 pregnant people who had mainly the Pfizer or Maderna shot found no safety concerns. And now we're beginning to see similar data here in the UK. All the data that we've had so far suggests that there is not an increased risk of miscarriage. And in fact, there is no biological mechanism by which that could happen because we don't think that the vaccine actually crosses the placenta and affects the baby. But in the UK, only the Pfizer and Moderna shots are being recommended so far, but that may change in the future. The experts say you can have your shots at any stage of your pregnancy, as you can become ill with covid at any time. However, a lot of women do feel more vulnerable in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. So I don't think there's any problem in delaying your vaccination till after 12 weeks if you feel more comfortable doing so. So if you decided to wait until after your 12-week scan, then you would still be able to get your second shot before entering the third trimester, which is the period where COVID is more likely to cause the most harm. Your baby's not helping you at that point. Because it's stopping the diaphragm from moving your lungs aren't working in the way that they usually would. And so then if you get an infection of a bad infection on top of that it can cause more significant problems. What if you've already had a dose of Oxford AstraZeneca and you were fine? Well, then the recommendation is you still go get your second dose. Because if you're fine the first time, you should be fine the second time as well. It's okay to have questions about the vaccine, and talking to your GP or your midwife will help you make a decision that's right for you. You know, it's not like pregnant women are being told you must all have the vaccine. Ultimately, it's your decision you do what you feel is right for you and you're making sure you're getting your information from the right resources..." (end of transcript) The video above was transcribed so you can see the clever use of language. See how the word "offered' is used here. Many will hear this as "you should have the vaccine". QUOTE: "...If you're pregnant or breastfeeding or just thinking about having a baby, then the advice from the experts is you should be OFFERED the COVID vaccine..." The word used is 'offered,' meaning the patient is liable for their own choice, yet the feeling of the sentence is different, giving a sense that the vaccine is recommended by experts. The use of images and words is designed to ensure people watching feel convinced the jab is safe. The BBC end their sales pitch with a clever caveat that you might be mistaken for thinking was added by lawyers - "make sure you're getting your information from the right resources." The BBC sales video was released on 9th May 2021, but what are the BBC saying on vaccination during pregnancy now? I did this little search on the BBC website, using the phrase "covid vaccination pregnant" to see what they had on offer for the curious. Here are brief summaries of the two articles found within the search BBC 10th January 2022 Pregnant women are being urged not to delay getting their Covid jab or booster in a government campaign. More than 96% of pregnant women admitted to hospital with Covid symptoms between May and October last year were unvaccinated, according to the UK Obstetric Surveillance System. The campaign will share testimonies of pregnant women who have had the jab on radio and social media. The government said the vaccine was safe and had no impact on fertility. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59930786 BBC 5th August 2022 A mother who lost her baby after getting Covid-19 while she was pregnant has urged other pregnant women to get vaccinated. "We know what you can lose and it's just not worth the risk, so I would urge every pregnant woman to get that vaccine." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-62439289 As seen from these articles, the agenda is clear. There is not one mention of possible negative effects, or any mention of the MHRA injury reports, of which we have published sixty-eight. SUMMARY The BBC to date have hidden all vaccine injury data from the public that we highlighted here They use clever and subtle methods to coerce the public, including even using tragedies as above to push an agenda. The use of language is subtle NLP-based coercion which persuades, yet cleverly limits liability. History shows this BBC video, alongside the ministers and TV doctors proclaiming the vaccine was safe for those pregnant, was not only dangerous disinformation but contradicted the official website advice for Doctors and health professionals. The public have clearly been deceived. 'Not On The Beeb', alongside other vaccine damage awareness organisations, has been warning of the dangers for pregnant women for well over a year. (see links below) The BBC are correct on one thing. When they said, "do what you feel is right for you and you're making sure you're getting your information from the right resources..." Clearly, we must choose our sources of information carefully. WHY THE VACCINE SHOULD BE BANNED FOR PREGNANT WOMEN Pfizer court-ordered, released data reveals the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/why-the-covid-vaccine-should-be-banned-for-pregnant-women NOT ON THE BEEB ARTICLES WARNING OF CONCERNS FOR THOSE PREGNANT 27 August 2021 - NOTB ALERTS ON BREASTFEEDING POST JAB https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/did-a-baby-die-due-to-his-mother-s-vaccine-contaminated-breastmilk 7 September 2021 BREASTFEEDING MOTHER BELIEVES HER 6WK BABY DIED DUE TO VACCINE https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/breastfeeding-mother-believes-her-6wk-baby-died-due-to-vaccine 13 September 2021 NEWBORN SUFFERS 'ADVERSE EVENT' VIA MOTHER'S VACCINATION WHEN PREGNANT See video and article here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/newborn-suffers-adverse-event-via-mother-s-vaccination-when-pregnant 20 August 2021 - HOW TO SEARCH VAERS DATABASE OF VACCINE INJURY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/how-to-unravel-the-secrets-of-the-vaers-data-base To check the 68 UK MHRA injury reports we have published tap 'vaccine injury' into the NOTB search bar CENSORED Could the vaccine be damaging newborn babies? This video on C19 vaccine-induced tremours ends on a very worrying image.... (the video of the baby was published online by a worried aunty clearly pointing at the mother's vaccination profile as most probable culprit) https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/censored NATURAL BIRTHS To learn about natural births watch this interview with Nickita from When Push Comes to Shove https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/doula IMPORTANT UPDATE. As sent by a reader: THANK YOU The gov document is from 2020 but the date is not on it. Instead it is marked "updated 16 Aug 2022". Updating seems to mean simply repeating the original document. Norman Fenton was mislead by this, so you and I are in good company. https://www.normanfenton.com/post/breaking-news-uk-government-says-vaccine-not-safe-for-pregnant-or-breastfeeding-women This FactCheck also explains: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid19-vaccines-women/fact-check-screenshots-do-not-show-pfizer-declaring-vaccines-unsafe-idUSL2N2WX1IL

"The Gates Foundation has become a major force in both traditional and nontraditional media. A recent Seattle Times analysis found the foundation has spent nearly $70 million on direct grants to media organizations, media training and media research, with the goal of boosting and shaping coverage of global health and development." - The Seattle Times, 3rd March 2011 BBC Media Action (formerly known as the BBC World Service Trust) has received funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2011 (a five year grant) and during the financial year 2019-2020. The Guardian newspaper has also received funding from the Gates Foundation, continuously since 2011. Other News Organisations that have received grants from the Gates Foundation include ABC and PBS, both in the US. Sources: https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/about/funding https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/gates-foundation-awards-20-million-to-bbc-world-service-trust https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/gates-foundation-gives-20m-to-bbc-charity-arm/ https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2010/sep/14/about-this-site

As of the 24th of August, there are 2,240 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. Although it appears that there have been 14 new deaths since the last report 28 days ago, there have actually been 19 newly registered vaccine-related fatalities and 5 previously recorded fatalities have been removed from the totals. This is Not On The Beeb's 69th report translating the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The stats are collated up to the 24th of August, but are released to the public a week later, so in this case on the 1st of September. It then takes the NOTB contributors a further few days to sift through and publish our report. TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 83 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.7 m 1st doses = 53,769,032 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,646,995 Boosters = 40,304,702 (30.9m Pfizer, 58,700 AZ & 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 144,720,729 doses BREAKDOWN Here is the breakdown of the most recent report with comments and observations on the data below Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death 172,901 Pfizer 246,183 AZ 40,576 Moderna 1,819 Unknown TOTAL = 461,479 Overall 1-in-116 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Is the 1 in 116 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11 Fatal Pfizer 820 AZ 1,301 Moderna 70 Unknown 49 TOTAL = 2,240 NOTE: Although it appears that there have been 14 new deaths since the last report 28 days ago, there have actually been 19 newly registered vaccine-related fatalities and 5 previously recorded fatalities have been removed from the totals. Blood Disorders - 17,229 (Pfizer) + 7897 (AZ) + 2602 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,793 Anaphylaxis - 667 (Pfizer) + 887 (AZ) + 95 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 1653 Acute Cardiac - 13,733 (Pfizer) + 11,655 (AZ) + 3573 (Moderna) + 119 (Unknown) = 29,080 Eye Disorders - 8248 (Pfizer) + 15,056 (AZ) + 1684 (Moderna) + 99 (Unknown) = 25,087 Blindness - 172 (Pfizer) + 330 (AZ) + 44 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 550 Deafness - 311 (Pfizer) + 440 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 811 Infections - 13,045 (Pfizer) + 20,735 (AZ) + 2648 (Moderna) + 215 (Unknown) = 36,643 Herpes - 2277 (Pfizer) + 2720 (AZ) + 280 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5304 Spontaneous Abortions - 500 + 16 stillbirths/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 239 + 5 stillbirths (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 818 miscarriages Nausea & Vomiting - 21,079 (Pfizer) + 45,635 (AZ) + 7104 (Moderna) + 216 (Unknown) = 74,034 Nervous System Disorders - 82,654 (Pfizer) + 183,800 (AZ) + 21,889 (Moderna) + 953 (Unknown) = 289,296 Paralysis - 536 (Pfizer) + 911 (AZ) + 128 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1586 Seizures - 1166 (Pfizer) + 2107 (AZ) + 305 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 3605 Tremor - 2251 (Pfizer) + 9995 (AZ) + 781 (Moderna) + 51 (Unknown) = 13,078 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4391 (Pfizer) + 7082 (AZ) + 814 (Moderna) + 49 (Unknown) = 12,336 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 843 (Pfizer) + 2401 (AZ) + 76 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3341 Respiratory Disorders - 22,366 (Pfizer) + 30,099 (AZ) + 4706 (Moderna) + 238 (Unknown) = 57,409 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1126 (Pfizer) + 2303 (AZ) + 213 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3654 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,484 (Pfizer) + 18,606 (AZ) + 2706 (Moderna) + 131 (Unknown) = 31,927 Skin Disorders - 34,985 (Pfizer) + 53,687 (AZ) + 13,817 (Moderna) + 399 (Unknown) = 102,888 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,587 (Pfizer) + 20,952 (AZ) + 5307 (Moderna) + 239 (Unknown) = 58,085 Vascular Disorders - 7762 (Pfizer) + 14,083 (AZ) + 1428 (Moderna) + 116 (Unknown) = 23,389 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,200,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,800,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 4075 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,500 children (1st doses) plus 8,700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 266 Yellow Cards (reporting rate 1-in-43) • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 2100 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 35 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 35 Yellow Cards Total = 4,213,600 children injected (under 18s) Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 7,226,800 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4411 For full reports including 363 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions WHAT CHANGED SINCE LAST MONTH? In the 28 days since the previous summary for 27 July 2022 we have received a further: • 425 Yellow Cards for the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech (SEVEN fatal minus TWO removed fatalities = FIVE fatalities) • 187 for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca (FIVE fatal minus ONE removed fatality = FOUR fatalities) • 306 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna (SIX fatalities minus ONE removed fatality = FIVE fatalities) • 28 where the brand was not specified (ONE fatality, minus ONE removed fatality = ZERO fatalities) PFIZER - SEVEN extra deaths minus TWO fatalities removed • Cardiac Disorders x 3 one myocardial infarction one cardiomegaly one cardiac arrest • General Disorders category x 1 o one death • Infections x 1 one sepsis • Neoplasms x 1 one throat cancer • Respiratory Disorders x 1 one chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder Removed Fatalities • Immune Disorders x 1 one anaphylaxis • Pregnancy Conditions x 1 one spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) NOTE: One brain death and one cardiac death noted under ‘death and sudden death’ sub-category but not recorded as fatal ASTRAZENECA - FIVE extra deaths minus ONE fatality removed • General Disorders Category x 1 one adverse drug reaction • Infections x 1 one COVID-19 pneumonia • Neoplasms x 1 one pancreatic carcinoma • Nervous System Disorders x 2 one cerebral infarction one cerebral venous sinus thrombosis Removed Fatalities • Infections x 1 one pneumonia NOTE: Three brain deaths, one cardiac death, one death, one drowning and one hanging noted under ‘death and sudden death’ sub-category but not recorded as fatal MODERNA - SIX extra deaths minus ONE fatality removed • Cardiac Disorders x 2 one pericardial haemorrhage one cardiac arrest • General Disorders category x 1 one death • Infections x 1 one pneumonia aspiration • Nervous System Disorders x 2 one guillain barre syndrome one haemorrhagic stroke Removed Fatalities Nervous System Disorders x 1 o One cerebral haemorrhage BRAND UNSPECIFIED - (ONE fatality, minus ONE removed = zero fatalities recorded) • Muscle & Tissue Disorders x 1 One costochondritis Removed Fatality • Pregnancy Conditions one abortion spontaneous (miscarriage) ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? Child vaccination must be halted until MHRA clarifies its confusing new under-18 fatality reports By Kathy Gyngell August 8, 2022 According to Table 11 of the latest Medicines and Health products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) ‘Coronavirus vaccine – summary of Yellow Card reporting’ update, it appears that six children have died from the vaccine. The MHRA slipped out these shocking figures in a new table last Thursday without any explanation or highlighting in the accompanying text. Nothing about when these children died or what age and sex they were, or what the catalyst was, for example myocarditis or a thromboembolic event and no indication given as to whether there have there been inquests into these Yellow Card reported children’s deaths. All that appeared to be communicated was contained in one new, inadequate and confusing table, copied below, from the sub-section Reports with a fatal outcome: Table 11* /* *: Number of UK reports with a fatal outcome received for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech, COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and Vaccine brand unknown by patient age up to and including 27 July 2022 Table 11* /* *: Number of UK reports with a fatal outcome received for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech, COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and Vaccine brand unknown by patient age up to and including 27 July 2022 It was the first time in the MHRA updates (published regularly since the start of the vaccine rollout) that fatality numbers have been added for under-18s. Though the table is unclear it reads that ‘Brand unspecified’ equals a total of SIX deaths which at first glance looked to include 1 x Moderna plus 5 x Pfizer or AZ (exact numbers retracted), as below: Under 18 AZ – fewer than 5 fatalities – retracted for privacy (could be zero, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 depending on Pfizer total) Pfizer – less than 5 fatalities – retracted for privacy (could be zero, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 depending on AZ total) Moderna – one fatality However another interpretation was that the (website) table is incorrectly aligned in which case the MHRA may have meant it to read: the 1st column Astra-Zeneca ^ (ie 1-4), 2nd column Pfizer also ^, 3rd column Moderna ‘-‘ (ie 0), then 4th column is Brand unspecified =1 and 5th column becomes the total =6. It made more sense as the totals add up correctly across all the different age groups and also that the bottom row total for ‘brand unspecified’ (currently in the Moderna column) for all ages would equal 49 which is the same as in the assets report of individual AEs as of published data 4th Aug. Further searching today indicates that this latter interpretation looks indeed to be the case. The PDF of the Summary text that they publish as well as the web page shows the table, presumably correctly aligned, on P38 here. But this is not all that is unsatisfactory. Looking further at the table it is possible that the child fatality rate could be far worse than indicated as per the (incorrectly) aligned UNKNOWN row (spliced here): It shows 344 non-age classified deaths in the latest update total of 2,226 vaccine associated fatalities. We know that SIX fatalities of the 2,226 are under 18, but what about the 344 UNKNOWN? Under 18 fatalities are not explicitly excluded from this part of the tabulation so could make up some of these numbers too. Why don’t the MHRA know the age breakdown; or why can’t they tell us? We urgently request the MHRA to bring clarity to the information provided here. It is imperative that this data is clear and understandable for the public. There is a broader context for concern. It is the scandalous inadequacy of child vaccine adverse event information published by MHRA since the under-18 rollout began. They say they are monitoring reactions carefully yet provide no evidence to suggest that they are. The MHRA are still not reporting the 4,000-plus child adverse events to the public in the same way they do as with the adult data. No breakdown of categories (whether cardiac, nervous or skin disorder for example) is provided for children. It is as though they are of less importance and there is no need for us to know. There is also a lack of transparency regarding their vaccine-related fatality reporting over all. They still don’t specify whether booster-related figures are included in or excluded from certain totals, or whether there have been any booster-related fatalities for adults and children. Why, apart from just one identified fatality ‘disorder category’ (thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) ) comprising 80 deaths do they not provide any specific or across-the-board age breakdown data? There were also 4 such deaths for Pfizer but no age breakdown was provided beyond an 18-91yrs age bracket. (Up to 27 July 2022, the MHRA reports it had received Yellow Card reports of 32 cases of major thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) in the UK following use of the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech. These events occurred in 13 females, and 18 males aged from 18 to 91 years, and the overall case fatality rate was 13% with four deaths reported.) Their failure to provide age-related data for the ‘Seven suspected myocarditis or pericarditis reports with a fatal outcome reported following the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech and six reports with a fatal outcome following the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca’ is deeply worrying. This is of key concern given the special warnings circulated to healthcare professionals of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in children, raising the question of whether any or all of these 13 myocarditis deaths were in the under-18 age group. We still do not know. But the question now that looms above all others is why have these ‘Under-18’ deaths in the new Table 11 only now been reported and included? We have to assume, if the table says what it appears to say, that all six deaths have not just happened in the last two weeks. Was the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation kept informed as each Card came in? Will it, as it should, demand an urgent moratorium on and halt to the child vaccine programme given this public uncertainty? If these are longer known fatalities then every mainstream media outlet ought to be asking just how long. My concern is whether the MHRA’s stated decision to turn from vaccine watchdog to vaccine enabler has made this body more dismissive of the data they are duty-bound to report and clouded its judgement on what should be a priority – that is to take all Yellow Card reports extremely seriously. The main emphasis of all the accompanying text to their injuries and fatalities tables is to underplay them and say the Yellow Card reports indicate nothing more than ‘a temporal association’ and not causality. Well, it is one heck of a lot of temporal associations, affecting nearly half a million people, to be sanguine about. Dr June Raine, the MHRA’s chief executive, has some serious explaining to do. For, if, as the MHRA themselves state, Yellow Cards are likely to be under-reported by a factor of ten, the real figures are very much higher and if the six child fatalities tabulated are indeed such, then some 60 children may already have died from a vaccine they never needed in the first place and which has demonstrably proved to be neither safe nor effective. SOURCE : https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/child-vaccination-must-be-halted-until-mhra-clarifies-its-confusing-new-under-18-fatality-data%EF%BF%BC/

“I couldn't rest. My heart rate was much higher than usual, without playing any long runs. That is to say, during the break, I felt that I was breathing fast and it did not allow me to think clearly, nor to act logically on what my usual standards are. It was a consequence of doing things too badly for a good game time. A very complicated, not to say catastrophic, start to the match against Fabio Fognini in the second round of the US Open , Rafael Nadal panicked a bit. He confided in his anxiety at a press conference, reported precisely by the Spanish media AS . NADAL: “I couldn't rest. My heart rate was much higher than usual, without playing any long runs. That is to say, during the break, I felt that I was breathing fast and it did not allow me to think clearly, nor to act logically on what my usual standards are. It was a consequence of doing things too badly for a good game time. Many things can explain this. We have had a difficult few months because of things that we have tried to manage as best we can. I am to still be alive and to be able to give myself a chance. These are things that happen in life, injuries or other things, and in the end they are sometimes difficult to deal with. I am happy, I still have hope and confidence. The only way to advance is to win the matches, that's what I did. I hope I will fight well and give myself chances. Even if things are not going very well, I don't give up on my chances because in sport you never know, things change very quickly. What I have to do is what I have always done: be ready”. The Majorcan will face an old acquaintance for a place in the round of 16: a certain Richard Gasquet, who defeated Miomir Kecmanovic in four sets. Translated from : https://www.welovetennis.fr/us-open/nadal-mon-rythme-cardiaque-etait-beaucoup-plus-eleve-que-dhabitude

Pfizer court-ordered, released data reveals the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial. By Dr. Joseph Mercola Story at-a-glance: Since the rollout of the experimental COVID-19 shots, U.S. health officials have adamantly claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women and their unborn babies. Meanwhile, now-released Pfizer court-ordered, released data — which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration wanted to hide for 75 years — reveals the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored study that was widely used to support the claim that the shot is safe during pregnancy misreported the data. The actual miscarriage rate in that paper was 82%. As of Aug. 12, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID-19 jab. For comparison, the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years is 2,239. Israeli research found the Pfizer COVID-19 jab impairs male fertility for three months after each dose, dropping sperm concentration by 15.4% and total motile count by 22.1%, compared to baseline. Since the rollout of the experimental COVID-19 shots, U.S. health officials have adamantly claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women and have been urging all pregnant women to get the jab “to protect themselves and their babies.” To this day, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends the COVID-19 shot for: “… people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future.” The CDC further recommends: “People who are pregnant should stay up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines, including getting a COVID-19 booster when it’s time to get one.” And claims: “Evidence continues to build showing that: COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective. There is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems in women or men.” All the while, they’ve had Pfizer data showing the shots cause shocking rates of miscarriage which, adding insult to injury, have been blatantly miscategorized as a “recovered/resolved” adverse effect. Who in their right mind would consider DEATH a resolved side effect unless they had a depopulation agenda in mind all along? I don’t see how this could be described as anything but a criminal cover-up. The only reason we know any of this is because U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release Pfizer documents at a rate of 55,000 pages per month. The FDA and Pfizer had asked to release the documents at a pace of 500 pages per month, which meant it would take 75 years to disclose them all. Criminal cover-up Dr. Naomi Wolf recently reported that an analysis of Pfizer data revealed that 44% of the women in the trial suffered miscarriages. That statistic turns out to have been the result of a miscalculation, as Pfizer listed the miscarriages in two separate columns, resulting in them being counted twice. We’ve repeatedly found Pfizer’s data collection and reporting to be all over the place, and seemingly on purpose, to make hazards more difficult to ascertain. Wolf admitted the error and took down the original report. However, while fact-checkers are gloating over the perceived victory, there’s plenty of other evidence in the Pfizer material to demonstrate these shots should be banned for all time. In an Aug. 20 Substack article, Dr. Pierre Kory addressed other, “absolutely horrifying,” findings on miscarriages found in the Pfizer data dumps: “… let’s do a dive on just one page of the many thousands. See below, Section 5.3.6, Page 12 of the document called ‘Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.’ “Looking at the first bullet under the header: Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including: “In this paragraph, at first read, it is just a list of adverse events and numbers, detailed in a way that is confusing at best, and obfuscating at worst. I think it is the latter because, if you do some simple arithmetic trying to parse that paragraph, you end up with this: “270 pregnancies were reported in vaccinated women during the first 12 weeks of the vaccine campaign. In 238 of them, ‘no outcome was provided.’ So, they only knew the outcome of 32 pregnancies reported. What happened in those 32 pregnancies they followed up on? “My hands are literally trembling as I write this, but here goes. In these 32 pregnancies, there were: 23 spontaneous abortions 2 spontaneous abortions with intra-uterine death So, 25 of the 32 pregnancies with known outcomes resulted in a miscarriage, a rate of 78%. Note that miscarriage normally occurs in only 12-15% of pregnancies 2 premature births with neonatal death 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death 1 normal outcome “Note that this only adds up to 29 known outcomes, but then they note that ‘two different outcomes were reported for each twin’ and then they talk about ‘fetus/baby cases as separate from mother cases.’ I have no idea how to interpret this explanation of outcomes, so it may have been one or two less (or more) deaths then. “So, of the 32 pregnancies they knew the outcome of, 87.5% resulted in the death of the fetus or neonate. Burying this data in the way and not alerting the world to what they found, is criminal activity …” To be perfectly clear, the failure to record and report the outcomes of 238 out of 274 pregnancies during a drug trial is simply unheard of. It’s shockingly unethical. And the fact that both the FDA and the CDC accepted this, and claim there’s “no evidence” of harm to pregnant women and their babies is proof positive of reprehensible maleficence. There’s no fixing what’s gone wrong at the FDA and CDC. Their credibility with the public is ruined beyond any possible recovery. The CDC can review and reorganize itself all it wants, but it changes nothing. They are, to this day, urging pregnant women to take a shot that they KNOW will cause babies to die. Calling it a dystopia of epic proportions is a profoundly serious understatement. Need more evidence? How about the fact that the CDC-sponsored study published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in April 2021 — which was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected — also obfuscated data to hide a shockingly elevated miscarriage rate. According to this paper, the miscarriage rate within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy was 12.5%, which is only slightly above the normal average of 10%. (Looking at statistical data, the risk of miscarriage drops from an overall, average risk rate of 21.3% for the duration of the pregnancy as a whole, to just 5% between weeks 6 and 7, all the way down to 1% between weeks 14 and 20) However, there’s a distinct problem with this calculation, as highlighted by Drs. Ira Bernstein, Sanja Jovanovic and Deann McLeod, HBSc, of Toronto. In a May 28, 2021, letter to the editor, they pointed out that: “In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 completed pregnancies). However, this rate should be based on the number of women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine receipt and should exclude the 700 women who were vaccinated in their third-trimester (104/127 = 82%).” In other words, when you exclude women who got the shot in their third trimester (since the third trimester is after week 20 and therefore should not be counted when determining the miscarriage rate among those injected before week 20), the miscarriage rate is 82%. (The errors in that NEJM article were also reviewed in a Science, Public Health Policy and the Law paper published in November 2021.) Of those 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred before 13 weeks of gestation, which strongly suggests that getting a COVID shot during the first trimester is an absolute recipe for disaster. So, here was yet another attempt to hide the fact that more than 8 in 10 pregnancies may be terminated as a result of the jab. As of Aug. 12, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID-19 jab. For comparison, the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30 years is 2,239. Birth rates are suddenly plummeting worldwide In addition to miscarriages, we’re also looking at abruptly plummeting birth rates, suggesting the COVID-19 jabs are having an adverse impact on future fertility as well. Kory notes: “They are large drops, and they are occurring, almost like clockwork, approximately 9 months after pregnant women around the world started to be vaccinated.” For example, Germany recently released data showing a 10% decline in the birth rate during the first quarter of 2022. The live birth rate graph for Sweden looks much the same, with a 14% drop: According to Gunnar Andersson, a Swedish professor in demographics at Stockholm University: “We have never seen anything like this before, that the bottom just falls out in just one quarter.” Between January and April 2022, Switzerland’s birth rate was 15% lower than expected, the UK’s was down by 10% and Taiwan’s was down 23%. In Hungary, MP Dúró Dóra has expressed concern about a 20% drop in the birth rate during January 2022, compared to January 2021. The U.S. is also showing signs of a drop in live births. Provisional data from North Dakota show a 10% decline in February 2022, a 13% reduction in March and an 11% reduction in April, compared to the corresponding months in 2021. In a July Counter Signal article, Mike Campbell reported that in the five countries with the highest COVID-19 jab uptake, fertility has dropped by an average of 15.2%, whereas the five countries with the lowest COVID-19 jab uptake have seen an average reduction of just 4.66%. Below is a chart from Birth Gauge on Twitter comparing live birth data for 2021 and 2022 in a large number of countries. Many women report menstrual irregularities post-jab High rates of menstrual irregularities post-jab are also a warning sign that reproductive capacity may be impacted. As of Aug. 12, there were 31,443 VAERS reports of menstrual disorders. Changes include heavier and more painful periods and changes in menses length, as well as unexpected breakthrough bleeding or spotting among women on long-acting contraception or those who are postmenopausal and haven’t had a period in years or even decades. Health officials have tried to brush off the reports, but a study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology — funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institutes of Health’s Office of Research on Women’s Health — confirmed an association between menstrual cycle length and COVID-19 shots. According to the authors, it’s possible that the immune response created by the mRNA shots affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, which plays a well-known role in the timing of a woman’s cycle. The authors stated: “Our findings for individuals who received two doses in a single cycle supports this hypothesis. Given the dosing schedule of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the United States (21 days for Pfizer and 28 days for Moderna), an individual receiving two doses in a single cycle would have received the first dose in the early follicular phase. “Cycle length variability results from events leading to the recruitment and maturation of the dominant follicle during the follicular phase …” Other disturbing evidence A Japanese biodistribution study for Pfizer’s jab also showed the COVID-19 spike protein from the shots accumulate in female ovaries and male testes, and there’s credible concern that the COVID-19 jabs will cross-react with syncytin (a retroviral envelope protein) and reproductive genes in sperm, ova and placenta in ways that may impair fertility and reproductive outcomes. A Pfizer-BioNTech rat study revealed the injection more than doubled the incidence of preimplantation loss (i.e., the risk of infertility), and led to mouth/jaw malformations, gastroschisis (a birth defect of the abdominal wall) and abnormalities in the right-sided aortic arch and cervical vertebrae. As noted by The Exposé: “With this being the case, how on earth have medicine regulators around the world managed to state in their official guidance that ‘Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy’? And how have they managed to state ‘It is unknown whether the Pfizer vaccine has an impact on fertility’? “The truth of the matter is that they actively chose to cover it up. We know this thanks to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request36 made to the Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).” You can read more about that in The Exposé’s July 19 article, “FOIA Reveals Pfizer & Medicine Regulators Hid Dangers of COVID Vaccination During Pregnancy After Study Found It Increases Risk of Birth Defects & Infertility.” We’re also seeing a sudden uptick in infant mortality. The Exposé highlighted data from Scotland, showing neonatal deaths were 119% higher above the annual norm in March 2022. COVID jab affects male fertility too Male fertility is also under attack by these bioweapons. Israeli research published in the journal Andrology found the Pfizer COVID-19 jab temporarily but significantly impairs male fertility, dropping sperm concentration by 15.4% and total motile count by 22.1%, compared to baseline pre-jab. Both eventually recovered, some three months after the last jab, but if you destroy a man’s sperm for three months every time he gets a COVID shot, you’re significantly reducing the probability of him fathering a child for a good part of any given year and the stats reviewed above support this. Remember, the mRNA shots are recommended at three-month intervals for the original series, and boosters are now being recommended at varying intervals thereafter. Amy Kelly, project director for the Daily Clout’s Pfizer document analysis team, reviews this study and other post-jab male fertility concerns (video below). End the COVID shots now, before it’s too late to recover In October 2021, when the FDA was voting on whether to authorize the COVID jab for children aged 5 through 11, Dr. Eric Rubin, an FDA advisory panel member, Harvard professor and editor-in-chief of the NEJM, stated: “We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes … And I do think we should vote to approve it.” So, in this and other instances, they’ve openly admitted that anyone who takes the jab is part of an experiment. Yet at the same time, the FDA and CDC have insisted that the jabs are perfectly safe — all while in possession of data showing they’re anything but! In conclusion, I agree with Kory, who writes: “… when a new medicine or device is introduced, you must first assume any adverse effects or deaths reported to be related to the intervention until proven otherwise. That is what I am doing here. “We must assume the vaccines are impacting fertility unless some other provable or credible explanations for a sudden drop in month to month birth rates. So stop the shots until you can prove they are not … “Too many young people dying, too many becoming disabled, too many pregnancies resulting in fetal or neonatal death as above, and now we find out that if we continue with this vaccine obsession, they will not be replaced. This is a humanitarian catastrophe heaped atop the one caused by dangerous gain-of-function research. “When will the world wake up to this rapidly unfolding horror? For those of us who know what is going on, it is hard not to feel helpless as we are forced to watch increasingly apparent and widespread needless death. But we will continue to try to get these truths out despite the massive censorship and propaganda overwhelming the globe. “We have a moral and ethical obligation and take that responsibility seriously no matter what befalls us. Stop the vaccines, now. And if we can’t stop them, we must try to convince everyone we know to no longer agree to get vaccinated. Their lives and our future depend on it.” Originally published by Mercola. NOT ON THE BEEB ARTICLES WARNING OF CONCERNS FOR THOSE PREGNANT 27 August 2021 - NOTB ALERTS ON BREASTFEEDING POST JAB https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/did-a-baby-die-due-to-his-mother-s-vaccine-contaminated-breastmilk 7 September 2021 BREASTFEEDING MOTHER BELIEVES HER 6WK BABY DIED DUE TO VACCINE https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/breastfeeding-mother-believes-her-6wk-baby-died-due-to-vaccine 13 September 2021 NEWBORN SUFFERS 'ADVERSE EVENT' VIA MOTHER'S VACCINATION WHEN PREGNANT See video and article here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/newborn-suffers-adverse-event-via-mother-s-vaccination-when-pregnant 20 August 2021 - HOW TO SEARCH VAERS DATABASE OF VACCINE INJURY https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/how-to-unravel-the-secrets-of-the-vaers-data-base To check the 68 UK MHRA injury reports we have published tap 'vaccine injury' into the NOTB search bar CENSORED Could the vaccine be damaging newborn babies? This video on C19 vaccine-induced tremours ends on a very worrying image.... (the video of the baby was published online by a worried aunty clearly pointing at the mother's vaccination profile as most probable culprit) https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/censored NATURAL BIRTHS To learn about natural births watch this interview with Nickita from When Push Comes to Shove See full interview here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/doula

Amy Kelly examines the Pfizer trial documents and results. Pfizer's own documents showed that they thought vaccine ingredients could be transferred between people via skin to skin contact inhalation and sexual intercourse. They mandated that men participating in the Pfizer trials abstain from sex, or if they were going to have sexual intercourse, they had to use a condom, as well as another means of strong protection. In this video, Project Director Amy Kelly delves into findings so far on male fertility post-mRNA vaccine. As well as effecting sperm count and quality, reproductive toxicity in men was not tested. “Anti-sperm antibodies” from the mRNA is an adverse event following vaccination that treats sperm as “invaders,” and attacks them, leading to male infertility. TRANSCRIPT Hi, my name is Amy Kelly and I am the programme director for the Warren daily cloud Pfizer documents analysis project. I recently wrote a report related to male fertility and the vaccines and I'd like to share some of the information from that with you today. Pfizer's own documents showed that they thought vaccine ingredients could be transferred between people via skin to skin contact inhalation and sexual intercourse. They mandated that men participating in the Pfizer trials abstain from sex, or if they were going to have sexual intercourse, they had to use a condom, as well as another means of strong protection. Pfizer also did not test something called reproductive toxicity. And this has to do with adverse events or negative impacts of the vaccine on reproduction, as well as on the offspring of the men who have been vaccinated. Additionally, Pfizer and all of the medical community and the public health agencies told us that when the vaccine was injected, it stayed in the deltoid muscle. However, their own studies show that the vaccine ingredients and back travel throughout the body in the blood, and then they get into different organs, and they are lodged in there. And at this point, we don't know if those will come out of the body in the organs, or if they are just there permanently. The testes are one of the organs that the lipid nanoparticles and other vaccine ingredients are lodged in. And we don't know what the long-term effects will be from that. Moreover, Pfizer was aware of an adverse event called anti-sperm antibodies that occurs. And what that means is that the body starts seeing sperm as an invader, and it attacks and kills the sperm leading to infertility in men mRNA vaccine ingredients have been shown to cause a cause a staggering decrease in men's fertility up to 22%. And that means both in the sperm concentration as well as something called the total motile count, which has to do with how fast sperm can move around. Despite knowing all of these problems with the vaccine and men's fertility, Big Pharma and the medical community and public health agencies have continued to push men to get vaccinated. And they've also hidden these adverse events and potentially bad side effects from men. And what that means is that men don't have the information they need to give informed consent prior to taking these vaccines, several men's reproductive societies including the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Society for male reproduction, and the Society for male reproduction, and urology have all come out with statements encouraging men to get vaccinated and not highlighting these issues that are known. Even the authors of the study that showed the 22% drop in fertility, still wrapped up the study by saying that men should still get vaccinated. That study was based on just two vaccine doses and did not include boosters. So we are left with so many questions around that. Is the decline going to continue from that? At approximately six months out, there was still a significant decline. How do boosters impact that approximately 29% of the population has received boosters, and it seems there would be even additional negative impacts based on those how are these vaccines going to affect the long-term sexual health and development of the pre-pubescent and adolescent males that have received them? As has been previously documented, there is a baby-die-off. Excuse me baby-die-off going from vaccinated mothers. And we wonder also, how have the vaccination of men impacted that potential are potentially impacted that baby die off public health officials, governments, public health agencies, medical doctors have had this information and yet they have withheld it from men so men cannot make an informed decision. Why did they not raise the alarm and go to men and let them have this information so that they could make a fully informed decision? The public needs to demand answers to things like this and many other questions. There is an assault on human reproduction going on. Both men and women need to demand answers from officials so that we can understand why this information has been withheld from the public.

Written By JANET McCONNAUGHEY NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The U.S. Department of Agriculture has begun scattering millions of packets of oral rabies vaccine from helicopters and planes over 13 states from Maine to Alabama. The major aim is to keep raccoons from spreading their strain of the deadly virus to states where it hasn't been found or isn't widespread, said field trial coordinator Jordona Kirby. The USDA is also continuing tests of a vaccine approved in Canada to immunize skunks as well as raccoons, said Kirby of Wildlife Services, which is part of the agriculture department's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Rabies is spread through an infected animal’s saliva, usually through bites. However, saliva that gets into the eyes, nose or mouth can also infect someone, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Thirteen people in South Carolina were considered potentially exposed in March because they had bottle-fed or given medicine to a sick calf that turned out to have rabies, said Dr. Michael Neault, the state veterinarian. Globally, the virus kills 60,000 people a year, most bitten by dogs, the World Health Organization states. That's about the same number that get shots to prevent rabies in the U.S. after being bitten or scratched by an infected or possibly infected animal, according to the CDC. State and local pet vaccination laws mean the virus is mostly spread by wildlife in the U.S. The national rabies control program started in 1997 in Texas, where coyotes were spreading the canine variant of the virus, Kirby said. She said vaccine drops eliminated that variant in 2004. Three years later, the CDC declared the nation free of canine rabies. That doesn’t mean unvaccinated pets are safe. Canine rabies is among more than 20 variants — seven found in terrestrial mammals and more than 13 in species of bats, said rabies control program coordinator Richard Chipman. A bite from an animal infected with any variant can make any other mammal sick. Scratches occasionally do so, since animals lick their paws. A three-year program in Arizona and New Mexico eliminated a bat rabies strain in foxes, Kirby said. And Texas, with help from USDA, dropped 1.1 million baits along the Mexican border in January to keep coyotes from bringing the canine variant back. Raccoons are the main rabies reservoir in 18 states along and near the East Coast and skunks in 21 others, according to data from 2020, the latest year available. Bats made up 31% of the nearly 4,500 animals found with rabies in 2020. But since nearly all of the 40-plus bat species found in the U.S. eat insects and the rest drink nectar or eat fruit, oral vaccines would be much trickier. Some scientists have speculated that bats could be vaccinated during hibernation, perhaps with a fine mist or with a gel that could be transferred from bat to bat, Chipman said. Early research is testing the idea in vampire bats, which live in Mexico and Central and South America and might spread such a vaccine within a colony by grooming each other. Rabid wildlife isn't just a rural problem. A rabid fox on Capitol Hill was caught less than 24 hours after the first report in April. By then, about a half-dozen people had reported bites or nips to U.S. Capitol Police, but others may have gone to other agencies, a Capitol Police spokesperson said by email. Raccoon rabies campaigns started in August in parts of northern Maine, western Pennsylvania, West Virginia and southwestern Virginia. The 348,000 Raboral V-RG baits in Maine and 535,000 in the three other states are being dropped from planes in rural areas and from vehicles in urban and suburban areas. In all, about 3.75 million packets — coated with a fishmeal attractant or encased in 1-inch (2.5-centimeter) fish meal cubes — will be distributed in nine states, ending when 1.1 million are dropped in Alabama in October. The vaccine has been found safe for more than 60 kinds of animals including domestic dogs and cats. Eating a large number of vaccine packets might give dogs an upset stomach but wouldn't cause any permanent problem, APHIS says. About 3.5 million doses of the experimental vaccine Onrab are being distributed in parts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Tennessee — which also are getting the approved vaccine — plus four other states. Onrab comes in blister packs with green, marshmallow-flavored coating. Wildlife Services hopes it may be approved next year in spite of lingering pandemic-related delays. SOURCE

By Megan Redshaw for CHD A preprint study of adolescents conducted during Thailand’s national COVID-19 vaccination campaign showed what one physician described as a “stunning” association between myocarditis and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. A prospective study in Thailand conducted during the country’s national COVID-19 vaccination campaign for adolescents showed what one physician described as a “stunning” association between myocarditis and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The preprint, accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, involved 314 participants ages 13-18 who were healthy and without abnormal symptoms after receiving their first vaccine dose. Participants with a history of cardiomyopathy, tuberculous pericarditis or constrictive pericarditis and severe allergic reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine were excluded from the study. Although the study included 314 adolescents, 13 were excluded from the findings as they were “lost to follow-up.” Of the 301 remaining participants, 202 (67.1%) were male. Researchers found that 18% of the 301 teens analyzed had an abnormal electrocardiogram, or EKG after receiving their second dose of Pfizer, 3.5% of males developed myopericarditis or subclinical myocarditis, two were hospitalized and one was admitted to the ICU for heart problems. Cardiovascular adverse events observed during the study included tachycardia (7.64%), shortness of breath (6.64%), palpitation (4.32%), chest pain (4.32%) and hypertension (3.99%). Fifty-four adolescents had abnormal electrocardiograms after vaccination, three patients had minimal pericardial effusion with findings compatible with subacute myopericarditis and six patients experienced mitral valve prolapse. Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle that can lead to cardiac arrhythmia and death. According to the National Organization for Rare Disorders, myocarditis can result from infections, but “more commonly the myocarditis is a result of the body’s immune reaction to the initial heart damage.” Pericarditis is inflammation of the tissue surrounding the heart that can cause sharp chest pain and other symptoms. According to the study, the most common symptom was chest pain, followed by chest discomfort, fever and headache. Three patients between the ages of 13 and 18 reported chest pain and biomarkers were evaluated. All three reported the symptoms within 24-48 hours of receiving the second dose of Pfizer. Four patients had no symptoms but had elevated biomarkers. All patients were male and had abnormal electrocardiograms, particularly sinus tachycardia. The clinical course was mild in all cases. The majority of the participants (257/301 or 85.38%) had no underlying diseases prior to being vaccinated. As part of the study, participants received a diary card to record cardiac symptoms. Those who developed side effects from the vaccine could call the principal investigator and be transferred to a medical team at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases for assessment. If the participant developed abnormal EKG, echocardiographic findings or increased cardiac enzymes, the principal investigator scheduled patients for follow-up per the study’s protocol and for day 14 lab assessments. Individuals were monitored with laboratory tests including cardiac biomarkers, ECG and echocardiography at three clinical visits — baseline, day 3, day 7 and day 14 after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The diagnostic criteria for myocarditis were classified as either probable cases or confirmed cases and were based on clinical symptoms and medical tests. The researchers concluded the clinical presentation of myopericarditis after vaccination was “usually mild,” with all cases fully recovering within 14 days and recommended adolescents receiving mRNA vaccines be monitored for side effects. Dr. Tracy Høeg, an epidemiologist, in a tweet said the study is “unique & impressive because of the extensive workup both pre and post vaccination” as the study could “detect pre-existing cardiac abnormalities.” Independent journalist Jordan Schachtel noted in a tweet the cardiac events witnessed during the study occurred after only one shot of Pfizer, as children with heart conditions had been excluded. According to the most recent data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022, there were 1,292 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis in the 12-17 age group. Of the 1,292 reports, 1,145 cases were attributed to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. SOURCE: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-myocarditis-teens-study/?

The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis The COVID-19 vaccination programmes must be stopped immediately. The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis has made its initial findings publicly available in a wide-ranging report: 1. Toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines - without exception. 2. The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes. 3. The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects. 1. In all samples of COVID-19 vaccines, without exception, components were found, using several methods of measurement, that: - are, in the quantities found, toxic according to medical guidelines, - had not been declared by the manufacturers as present in the vaccines, - are for the most part metallic, - are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes, - can only partially be explained as a result of crystallisation or decomposition processes, - cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process. 2. The comparison of blood samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals by means of dark-field microscopy showed noticeable changes in the blood of each person who had been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines. This was evident even if those people hadn’t at that point displayed any visible reaction to the vaccinations. Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated. Using artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis, the difference between the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people was confirmed. 3. The stability of the lipid nanoparticle envelope is closely correlated with the incidence of vaccine side effects and injury. The more stable this envelope, the greater the amount of mRNA that penetrates cells, where the production of spike proteins then takes place. These results correspond with the findings of pathologists who have carried out autopsies on people who died due to vaccine injury. Spike proteins were detected in damaged tissue. Researchers suspect that the spike protein is, in itself, toxic. The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analysing the contents and the effects of the novel COVID-19 vaccines. The group consists of independent scientists, including physicians, physicists, chemists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and alternative health practitioners, supported by lawyers, psychologists, analysts and journalists. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis uses modern medical and physical measuring techniques, the results of which have confirmed and complemented each other: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), Mass Spectroscopy (MS), Inductively Coupled Plasma Analysis (ICP), Bright Field Microscopy (BFM), Dark Field Microscopy (DFM) and Live Blood Image Diagnostics, as well as analysis of images using Artificial Intelligence. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis continues to work in close cooperation with several international groups that are carrying out similar investigations and who have obtained results consistent with our own. The results from our analysis of the vaccines can, consequently, be regarded as cross-validated. There are questions that need to be satisfactorily answered by the vaccine manufacturers and, in Germany, by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (the agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health responsible for the regulation of vaccines in that country). Possible causal links between the vaccines and fatalities need to be investigated. In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the COVID-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately. DOCUMENT: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140176-report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany by Emerald Robinson One of the most important reports in the world has been released by a group of German scientists who call themselves The Working Group For COVID Vaccine Analysis. The members of the group have chosen to remain anonymous at the moment because vaccine critics “have been publicly defamed, ostracized, and economically ruined.” That’s a wise decision — considering the contents of this report. This working group has made several preliminary discoveries that will reverberate around the world. The conclusion of this group’s report is simple and stark: all COVID vaccine programs must be halted immediately. Why? Because every COVID vaccine that was tested was toxic to human beings. To make matters worse: the blood of vaccinated individuals has been corrupted in terrible ways, including deformed red blood cells, blood clots, elevated blood viscosity, and the presence of “novel structures” made of strange materials that “cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.” Let me repeat: all COVID vaccines that were tested contained “substances the purpose of which cannot be determined.” (Figures 4 & 5 from the report) The inescapable conclusion from this report will send shockwaves throughout the world: the COVID vaccines are toxic to humans and they were designed to be toxic. Dangerous substances and toxic metals that were never disclosed by Pfizer or Moderna or AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson are found consistently in blood samples and, therefore, cannot be “accidental contaminants” but rather ingredients that were secretely and deliberately included in the vaccines. I want to highlight four of the group’s discoveries: The first discovery: toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines — without exception. The second discovery: The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes. The third discovery: The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects. The fourth discovery: The vaccines consistently contain substances the purpose of which cannot be determined. Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the COVID-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes. The first discovery: toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines — without exception. From the report: “In all samples of COVID-19 vaccines, without exception, components were found, using several methods of measurement, that: — are, in the quantities found, toxic according to medical guidelines, — had not been declared by the manufacturers as present in the vaccines, — are for the most part metallic, — are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes, — can only partially be explained as a result of crystallisation or decomposition processes, — cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.” What this means: the COVID vaccines are toxic to humans, and they are deliberately toxic. Let me repeat: The vaccines were designed to be toxic to humans. The second discovery: The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes. From page 9 & 10 of the report: “The blood from vaccinated patients (specifically those having had either the BioNTech/Pfizer or the Moderna vaccines) stands out mainly because of the following differences: Novel structures that we have previously only seen in the vaccines themselves directly (sealed vaccines were analysed, at least 3 batches with over 12 vials), e.g. rectangular and square crystal shapes, spirals, etc., these kinds of structures have never been found in human blood before. These structures were most frequently found in the Comirnaty vaccine from BioNTech/Pfizer (size up to 25 μm, erythrocyte has approx. 7.5 μm diameter). There is a clear deformation of the cell membranes of erythrocytes, which we otherwise only encounter in chronically ill people and people with severe degenerative diseases. Blood clots, lamellar structures that can occlude small vessels (size up to 40 μm), are also frequently seen. The blood viscosity (reduced flow capacity of the blood) in vaccinated people is significantly elevated. We normally only see this evidence in people who are at risk of stroke or thrombosis. Observation of the decomposition process (blood from healthy people can live actively on the slide for days) shows a rapid progression, the blood sometimes only lives for a few hours. However, the decay processes of erythrocytes, so-called ghosts/erythrocyte shadows, can also be seen at the beginning, which we normally only see in patients with severe chronic inflammatory processes and chronically ill patients. What is striking is that one does not necessarily have to know whether the patient has been vaccinated or not. This can be recognised by the conspicuous changes in the patient's blood.” What this means: The vaccines contaminate human blood itself — causing blood clots and red blood cell damage and elevated blood viscosity. The third discovery: The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects. According to the report: “The mRNA needs a protective envelope to enter the cells. This protective envelope consists of nanolipids. The nanolipids are stabilised by layers of polyethylene glycol (PEG). The PEG is formed from chains of different lengths.” “Based on the observations, it can be assumed that the PEG quality has a long-term influence on the functioning of the vaccine. Accordingly, batches with a very broad mass spectrum and longer chains would protect the mRNA less effectively. The nanolipids are more unstable and can disintegrate early and before penetrating the cell, thus releasing the mRNA outside the cell.” What happens when mRNA is released outside the cell? “…numerous lipid crystal particles can be observed in the dark field as tiny solids, the occurrence of which in the blood vessels can lead to blockages and consequent damage of many kinds.” The fourth discovery: The vaccines consistently contain substances the purpose of which cannot be determined. Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the COVID-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes. According to the report: “Evidence of alterations in the blood — regardless of the method of blood analysis — resulting from the COVID-19 vaccinations is increasing at an alarming rate and is being increasingly reflected in the relevant statistics.” Let me finish this post with some thoughts on the fourth discovery: the vaccines consistently contain substances the purpose of which cannot be determined. What are these “metallic” substances and “novel structures” meant to do? The key is to remember that the COVID “vaccines” are actually part of a new system of global biometric surveillance. The intellectual guru of the New World Order, professor Yuval Noah Harari, has explained this new system in detail. Perhaps this new system is why the U.S. government wants your children — at no risk from COVID — to take the COVID “vaccines.” Perhaps that’s why Western governments are still busy trying to illegally coerce their own people into getting injected — long after the “vaccines” have failed in every conceivable way. Perhaps this new system is why hostile countries such as China and Russia and Iran developed their own “vaccines” rather than taking ours. That’s why Big Pharma “vaccine” companies were allowed to sign highly suspicious legal contracts with various governments (like this one allegedly between Pfizer and Albania) that essentially held Big Pharma harmless for their “vaccines” while transferring all legal liability to the governments. Under the cover of vaccinating people, we are really preparing to track and control people. The once free nations of the West are testing a new authoritarian system under the guise of public health. Our military and intelligence agencies are not confronting China — they're copying China. A totalitarian nightmare is being imported into America using a needle and syringe. You have been warned. SOURCE: https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/the-covid-vaccines-corrupt-human?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Who is in charge of Britain's Overseas Territories? The Spider's Web: Britain's Second Empire | Documentary Film Michael Oswald's film The Spider's Web reveals how at the demise of empire, City of London financial interests created a web of secrecy jurisdictions that captured wealth from across the globe and hid it in a web of offshore islands. Today, up to half of global offshore wealth is hidden in British jurisdictions and Britain and its dependencies are the largest global players in the world of international finance. Watch our new documentary about an intelligence officer who blew the whistle on fake news and was framed for a murder here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8FDP... Share this documentary with your friends, and ask sites to feature it: https://twitter.com/spiderswebfilmhttps://www.facebook.com/Spiderswebfilm/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6483026/ The Spider's Web was substantially inspired by Nicholas Shaxson's book Treasure Islands you can read an extract of it here: https://www.theguardian.com/theguardi... Translate this documentary here on youtube or contact us for the .srt file contact@independentpov.org Review on Filmotomy: https://filmotomy.com/the-spiders-web... Review on Open Democracy: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/open... Website: www.spiderswebfilm.com German Version: https://youtu.be/1ZZR8vBKqwc Spanish Version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85dsT... French Version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hizj_... Italian Version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwmvX... Subtitles: French, Spanish, German, Italian, Russian, Arabic, Korean, Hungarian, English, Turkish, Portugese, Chinese, Croatian, Japanese. 0:00 Introduction 2:22 The British Empire 4:33 The Eurodollar Market 6:54 The Last Remnants of Empire 9:37 The Corporation of London 13:28 The Bank of Credit and Commerce International 16:53 Trusts 23:27 Who is in charge of Britain's Overseas Territories? 28:35 Global Financial Centers and Empire 37:15 How America Embraced Offshore Finance 42:15 Growth of Offshore Finance and Corruption 48:05 Whistleblowers 54:54 Politicians and Financial Secrecy 1:01:35 Accountants 1:07:20 Protesters Confront Dave Hartnett 1:10:27 Private Finance Initiative 1:13:42 Conclusion

This is another must-watch to help understand the real power brokers This is simply one of the top 5 most important videos ever produced and seen.” “This is the shot that needs to be heard around the Globe!” “Should be required viewing by all humans on earth.” “What a brilliant documentary.” “This is a brilliant piece of work.”

INFAMOUS PRO VAXXER DR JOHN CAMPBELL GETS DELETED ON YOUTUBE FOR DARING TO DISCUSS THE REASON BEHIND THE SURGE IN UK EXCESS DEATHS. If John Campbell is catching on, maybe many more are....? Campbell even dares suggest the real numbers might be higher than those reported. Where does he get these figures? Yes, the same as us, the official gov websites. We have been highlighting the real reason since day one.... Watch the video that was deleted by youtube here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/nluYnAcVbzBF/

In his latest set of slides of blood samples taken from both “vaccinated” and unvaccinated people, Dr. Philippe van Welbergen demonstrated that the graphene being injected into people is organising and growing into larger fibres and structures, gaining magnetic properties or an electrical charge and the fibres are showing indications of more complex structures with striations. He also demonstrated that “shards” of graphene are being transmitted from “vaccinated” to vaccine-free or unvaccinated people destroying their red blood cells and causing blood clots in the unvaccinated. Dr. Philippe van Welbergen (“Dr. Philippe”), Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics, was one of the first to warn the public of the damage being caused to people’s blood by Covid injections by releasing images last year of blood samples under the microscope. At the beginning of July 2021, Dr. Philippe, was interviewed on a South African community channel, Loving Life TV. He explained that when his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, even sometimes paralysis and late onset of heavy menstruation (women in their 60s upwards), he took blood samples. Their blood had unusual tube-like structures, some particles which lit up and many damaged cells. Few healthy cells were visible. Until three months earlier, he had never seen these formations in blood. We now know these tube-like structures are graphene. Since then, Dr. Philippe has been a regular guest on Loving Life TV: blowing the whistle on the experimental Covid injection roll-out; providing updates on the increasing damage being done to blood by the experimental Covid injections over time; and, giving updates on the Covid situation in the UK and South Africa. On 12 February 2022, Dr. Philippe returned again to Loving Life TV to release images of his latest slides of blood samples. The live stream was lengthy so Loving Life TV separated it into two parts. Part One is a discussion including answers to the audience’s questions. In Part Two, Dr. Philippe presents the images of his latest blood slides and explains what the images are showing. He discusses nearly 100 blood slides from both “vaccinated” and vaccine-free patients. His slides show that vaccine-free patients have been “infected with vaccine toxins through shedding.” Below is a short clip from Part Two courtesy of The Timeline Post channel on Telegram. https://t.me/The_Timeline_Post/2754 Below is an image of typical healthy red blood cells as seen with a microscope, what blood should look like. There is no coagulation or foreign objects in it. The next image is of a person who has been injected with the experimental Covid drug. The blood is coagulated, the misshapen red blood cells are clumped together. The cell encircled in the image is a healthy red blood cell, one of the few in the image, sitting alongside the graphene fibres. You can see the size of the graphene fibres in relation to the size of a red blood cell. Fibres of this size will block capillaries. You can also see the graphene fibres are hollow and contain red blood cells. A couple of weeks before the video below was made, Dr. Philippe began noticing a magnetic or electrical polarity effect on different sides of the graphene fibres. In the image below, to the right of the fibre the cells are coagulated and on the left-hand side is what looks like a gap or roughly backwards “C” shaped spacing. Dr. Philippe says that this “behaviour” was not seen before but now, all of a sudden, it is being seen in almost every sample. It is an indication that “these things have changed, their reaction with surrounding blood cells has changed … and I don’t know what triggered it,” he said. The image below is of a blood sample from a vaccine-free, or unvaccinated, three-year-old child. It shows pieces or “shards” of graphene that “are the result of shedding,” in other words the graphene has been transmitted from “vaccinated” parents to their unvaccinated child. Below is the image of a blood sample from an eight-year-old unvaccinated child whose blood has been contaminated and destroyed by the transmission of graphene from those around him/her who have had a Covid injection. The child’s right arm and upper right leg are basically paralysed, the child is unable to lift his/her right arm and the thigh is not functioning properly. Dr. Philippe’s presentation is truly eye-opening and horrifying – a must-watch, especially for those who proclaim Covid injections are “safe” and are insisting people be injected. The Covid injections are weapons of genocide and how the people who have designed them are still walking free is incredible. This is Part Two of Dr Philippe’s Live Stream from 12 February 2022 where we discuss nearly 100 blood slides from vaccinated and unvaccinated patients – the unvaccinated patients have been infected with vaccine toxins through shedding. WATCH FULL PRESENTATION HERE: https://lovinglifetv.com/dr-philippe-part-two-the-blood-slides-12-february-2022/ SOURCE: https://expose-news.com/2022/08/24/graphene-transmitted-to-unvaccinated/

It's well known that multi-action kids' jabs are more dangerous than single shots. In the same way that walking into a bar and asking for a shot of tequila will get someone less drunk than lining up a vodka, whisky, tequila, rum and sambuca then downing them in one go. Due to this, some parents asked for each component of the MMR separately, giving the body time to recover in-between - though strangely single shots were soon not available. The MMR is three jabs in one, Measles, Mumps and Rubella. It's sad to note that many child MMR deaths happen around day ten. This article is proposing a 4-in-1 jab that might end up being called the MMRC. Would this nomenclature be a way to disguise the unpopular C19 jab, and the trojan horse it in under deeply ingrained measles scare stories? Worse, the delivery method is nasal, meaning shedding will occur, cross-contaminating jab-free children. Is this intentional? When the nasal flu vaccines are being used in schools many parents keep their children at home for at least three days, so they are safe from the shedding. It's also worth noting that the scientists in this article admit that the normal C19/jab produces no antibodies in the nasal passages, meaning even by the industry's (faulty/dodgy) stats and data, the C19 jab is ineffective. QUOTE: "......New research has advanced COVID-19 vaccine work in several ways: using a modified live attenuated mumps virus for delivery, showing that a more stable coronavirus spike protein stimulates a stronger immune response, and suggesting a dose up the nose has an advantage over a shot. Based on these combined findings in rodent experiments, Ohio State University scientists envision one day incorporating a coronavirus antigen into the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine as a way to produce COVID-19 immunity in kids. "We were pushing to make a vaccine for infants and children with the idea that if we could incorporate the mumps COVID vaccine into the MMR vaccine, you'd have protection against four pathogens – measles, mumps, rubella and SARS-CoV-2 – in a single immunization program." Jianrong Li, senior author of the study and professor of virology in Ohio State's Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Infectious Diseases Institute..." "If infants and children could develop immunity against COVID infection with the MMR vaccine, that would be great – no extra immunization needed." The research is published today (July 27, 2022) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. To create the antigen that stimulates immunity in this vaccine candidate, researchers used a prefusion version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein – the shape it is in on the surface of the virus before the virus infects a cell. The spike was locked into this form by changing six of its amino acids to prolines, an inflexible amino acid. Experiments comparing the six-proline protein, 6P, to a spike protein with two prolines, 2P, showed that the 6P induces significantly more neutralizing antibodies in mice and golden Syrian hamsters than the 2P version. These are the first published results showing the 6P antigen is more effective than the 2P spike protein with which the existing mRNA and adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines were created, the researchers said. "The 6P antigen is about 8 1/2 times better than 2P. That's a big deal – that's a lot more antibody production, which may become important since it looks like the virus is going to keep on evolving," said study co-author Mark Peeples, professor of pediatrics at Ohio State and a researcher at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus. Li, in collaboration with Peeples and Veterinary Biosciences Professor Stefan Niewiesk, previously led development of a measles-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate, but found that the mumps virus genome is even more amenable than measles to insertion of the spike protein gene. The study used a mumps vaccine strain that has been a component of the current MMR vaccine used in children since the 1960s. Once the 6P spike protein gene is inserted into the genome, the recombinant mumps virus replicates more slowly but is genetically stable and grows well in a World Health Organization-approved cell line for vaccine production. In animals, the live attenuated mumps vaccine modified in this way generated high levels of the 6P protein antigen, which triggered a strong immune response. Researchers compared the 6P spike protein vaccine candidate's effectiveness to a 2P version in mumps, and to mumps without the spike protein, in mice engineered to be highly susceptible to mumps infection and in golden Syrian hamsters, a standard animal model for SARS-CoV-2 studies. In all experiments, the 6P vaccine produced the best results: higher concentrations of neutralizing antibodies after vaccination and, after introduction of a SARS-CoV-2 virus challenge a few weeks later, protection from lung damage and significantly fewer viral particles in the lungs and nasal cavity. "We didn't test the omicron variant for this paper, but the 6P vaccine induced neutralizing antibodies and T cell activity against several variants of concern and offered complete protection from disease caused by the parent SARS-CoV-2 virus and the delta variant," Li said. "That's very important and suggests that if we use the 6P spike protein for vaccine protection in the future, we can enhance a vaccine's ability to protect humans." In addition, the Li laboratory developed a rapid recombination system that enables the insertion of any antigen into a mumps or measles virus in a week. "With this technique, the MMR vaccine can be rapidly updated to protect against new SARS-CoV-2 variants as they emerge," said study first author Yuexiu Zhang, a major contributor to this technology in Li's lab. Researchers vaccinated study animals by both injections and by drops into the nose, an attractive needle-free option that, the results suggested, provides superior protection against the coronavirus by inducing not only system-wide antibodies, but a broad response of specialized antibodies called IgA on mucosal surfaces of the airways as well, Li said. "Like most of the injected vaccines, current mRNA and adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines primarily induce antibodies in the bloodstream. Unfortunately, antibodies in the bloodstream do not protect the mucosal site of the airways very well, which is the initial site of infection with SARS-CoV-2. In contrast to injected vaccines, our new intranasal vaccine may be the next generation of COVID-19 vaccine because it can induce robust IgA, which directly neutralizes the SARS-CoV-2 in the nose and airways tissues," said co-author Prosper Boyaka, professor of mucosal immunology and chair of veterinary biosciences at Ohio State. Added Peeples, "Having those antibodies on the surface of the airways could be a real advantage compared to hoping that some of the antibodies in the bloodstream will end up in the respiratory tract." The study findings also suggest that existing immunity to mumps from vaccination or previous infection may slow the initial stimulation of antibodies by the mumps-based COVID-19 vaccine, but does not prevent a strong, protective antibody response. "That finding suggests this candidate can be used not only in infants, but also in adults who have mumps antibodies," Li said. The team began work on this mumps-based vaccine almost a year ago, long before the June 17 federal approval of COVID-19 vaccines for children 6 months or older. Given the MMR's 50-plus-year history as a safe childhood vaccine, the scientists are now evaluating ways to modify the MMR with coronavirus antigens from multiple variants. This study was supported by startup fund and bridge funding from Ohio State's Department of Veterinary Biosciences and College of Veterinary Medicine, a seed grant from Nationwide Children's Hospital and grants from the National Institutes of Health. Jason McLellan of the University of Texas at Austin provided the stabilized spike genes for this study. Additional co-authors include Mijia Lu, Eunsoo Kim, Mohamed Shamseldin, Michelle Chamblee, Jesse Hall, Adam Kenny, Xueya Liang, Jacob Yount and Purnima Dubey of Ohio State; Mahesh K C, Piyush Dravid, Sheetal Trivedi, Supranee Chaiwatpongsakorn, Satyapramod Srinivasa Murthy, Himanshu Sharma and Amit Kapoor of Nationwide Children's Hospital; and Chengjin Ye, Jun-Gyu Park and Luis Martinez-Sobrido of the Texas Biomedical Research Institute. The Ohio State Research Foundation and the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital have filed an invention report for the mumps virus-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220727/Incorporating-a-coronavirus-antigen-into-MMR-vaccine-to-produce-COVID-19-immunity-in-kids.aspx Source: Ohio State University Journal reference: Zhang, Y., et al. (2022) A highly efficacious live attenuated mumps virus-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate expressing a six-proline stabilized prefusion spike. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201616119.

"...They saw a 270% increase in myocardial infarction in 2021, a 300% increase in incidence of Bell’s palsy and of certain neurologic complaints...and a 300% increase in cancer..." Post C19 vaccination push, the risk to young adults of certain serious illnesses or diseases has risen by 3 times. Since the data is inclusive of all young adults independent of vaccine status the actual risk to those vaccinated will be higher than triple. By Kyle Becker In late 2021, a surge in insurance claims had indicated a mysterious spike in deaths among young adults ages 18-49 years old that could not be entirely explained by the Covid pandemic. They saw a 270% increase in myocardial infarction in 2021, a 300% increase in incidence of Bell’s palsy and of certain neurologic complaints.” Insurance companies were reporting an “overwhelming” and “unexplained” increase in claims for 18-49 year-olds, according to a KUSI report. DR KELLY ANALYSING THE DATA KUSI interviewed Dr. Kelly Victory, who explained the concerning rates of increase in reported myocardial infarction, Bell’s palsy, and certain neurological conditions. “This information became available to me or on my radar… following a hearing with Senator Ron Johnson, who was looking at sort of what he calls a second opinion on the entire response to the COVID pandemic,” Dr. Victory said. “The medical data was released by three career military physicians who got the information from the military database that collects what we call ICD codes, which are diagnosis codes. And these physicians had a feeling, they believed based on their own observation, that they were seeing a significant uptick in certain conditions.” “So, they actually went back and called the database from the military on certain conditions over a five year period from 2016 through 2020,” she continued. “So they looked at 2016, ’17, ’18, ’19, and ’20 at the prevalence of certain conditions, including things like heart attack, blood clots, to the long miscarriages, those sorts of things. And they compared it to the incidents of those same things in the calendar year 2021, and saw an alarming increase in certain things. For example, they saw a 270% increase in myocardial infarction in 2021, a 300% increase in incidence of Bell’s palsy and of certain neurologic complaints.” According to one insurance company, there was a 40% increase in deaths among young adults from pre-pandemic levels, despite the prevalence of Covid vaccinations that were supposed to drastically reduce overall mortality rates. “The head of Indianapolis-based insurance company OneAmerica said the death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people,” The Center Square earlier reported. “We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica,” the company’s CEO Scott Davison said during an online news conference. “The data is consistent across every player in that business.” “OneAmerica is a $100 billion insurance company that has had its headquarters in Indianapolis since 1877,” The Center Square added for background. “The company has approximately 2,400 employees and sells life insurance, including group life insurance to employers nationwide.” Davison said the increase in deaths were “huge, huge numbers,” and added that’s it’s “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who were dying, and not just the elderly. Covid-19 is a disease that presents a mortality risk overwhelmingly to the elderly and to at-risk groups, such as the immunocompromised. “And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said. “Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.” In late January, the Epoch Times performed a multivariate analysis of the uptick in excess deaths among young adults to try to ascertain the cause of the spike. “Among those aged 18 to 49, mortality rose dramatically in the first half of 2020, then somewhat plateaued before increasing again in the third quarter of 2021,” analyst Petr Svab reported. “With COVID-19 deaths being excluded and assuming drug overdoses, alcohol, and homicide deaths continued in 2021 at a similar intensity as 2019, there were still about 50,000 excess deaths in the 18-64 age group,” Svab added. In March, the Epoch Times reported that the trend in excess deaths had appeared to “wane,” although a lag in reporting means the numbers are subject to updates and revision. SOURCE: https://beckernews.com/insurance-companies-reported-unexplained-spike-in-young-adult-deaths-amid-covid-vaccine-push-in-late-2021-46193/

This is a rare moment where the `BBC contains vital news, yet with all their resources they can't connect the dots. With 70% of the population jabbed with concoctions that are crushing people's immune systems, this is sadly precisely what we would expect. We have had record-breaking temperatures in the UK so the incidents are being blamed on the weather. This excuse will evapourate once we cross into the Autumn. If the excuse given by the BBC is right the callouts and deaths will reduce. If we are right, and these numbers are due to the effects of the vaccine roll-out, there will be continuing surge in emergency callouts and deaths into the Autumn, peaking with horrific numbers by January. The question is, if we are right and the numbers continue to surge even higher as we progress towards the winter, what then will be the excuse given for these stats by the BBC and other associated government departments? SOURCE OF THE ARTICLE BELOW IS THE BBC Last month saw the highest number of ambulance callouts for life-threatening conditions since records began, NHS England officials say. There were more than 85,000 category one calls, for situations like cardiac arrests and people stopping breathing. The heatwave could have been one reason for increased demand, but experts say hospitals already face immense pressures. Nearly 30,000 patients waited more than 12 hours to be admitted to hospital. The number is up 33% on the previous month and the highest since records began in 2010. Richard Murray, chief executive of The King's Fund said the pressure on hospitals was also being felt right across the health and social care system. He added: "At the end of July, 13,014 people were still in hospital beds despite being medically fit to be discharged, often due to a lack of available social care support. The challenges affecting the NHS cannot be solved without addressing the issues in social care." According to the latest figures one six out of 10 patients faced delays in being discharged from hospital despite being ready to leave. On average 12,900 patients a day spent more time in hospital in July than needed. This is a a 11% rise on the previous month. The latest figures also show there has been progress in reducing the number of people waiting more than 18 months for treatment. In June that number stood at 53,911, down from 75,992 in January. It comes as the number of people waiting longer than two years for routine operations in England has fallen from 22,500 at the start of the year, to fewer than 200, according to separate NHS figures. But 6.7 million people are still waiting for hospital treatment. Prof Sir Stephen Powis, NHS national medical director, said: "While the total backlog will continue to increase for some time, by managing to virtually eliminate two-year waits we are turning a corner in tackling Covid's impact on elective care." He added: "As the country faces another period of high temperatures after last month's record-breaking heatwave, it is vital that anyone who feels unwell seeks advice or an NHS referral through 111 online or their local pharmacy, and only calls 999 if it is a life-threatening emergency." SOURCE: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62504401

Germany's Largest Health Insurer Reveals 1 in 25 Clients Underwent Medical Treatment in 2021 for Covid 'Vaccine' Side Effects. A total of 437,593 vaccine injuries. This is an increase of 3000% compared to any other vaccine pre-2019 They conservatively estimated that as many as 1 in 5,000 injections are expected to cause serious side effects. In 2019, among the 11 million insured, 13,777 medical treatments were required due to vaccine side effects. In 2020 there were 15,044. In 2021, the number shot up to 437,593, an increase of more than 3,000 percent. Based on the figures from Techniker Krankenkasse, as many as 1 in 500 covid vaccine injections are expected to cause serious side effects. The cesspool of vaccine side effects in Germany is finally completely open. According to the Dutch news site, Blckbx, five months after a Wob request, it appears that 437,593 of the 11 million insured persons of the country’s largest Health Insurance fund, Techniker Krankenkasse (TK), had to undergo medical treatment in 2021 for Covid vaccine side effects. That is 1 in 25 and an increase of 3000 percent. This week, TK finally provided facts and figures about the number of treatments they had to reimburse in 2021 due to (serious) side effects of covid vaccines. But unfortunately, it took a lot of struggle and effort to get answers to the Wob request. In 2021, the massive number of 437,593 insured, or 1 in 25, received medical treatment for side effects of vaccination, reports the Techniker Krankenkasse (TK). This number is almost twice as high as all side effects reported by the German federal medical agency Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) and Lareb Germany. Furthermore, it represents an increase of 3000 percent for TK compared to 2019 and 2020. ‘As many as 1 in 500 injections is expected to cause serious side effects The figures also suggest that the number of 1:5000 serious side effects per shot reported by the German ministry last week is, in reality, much higher. Based on the figures from Techniker Krankenkasse, as many as one in 500 injections is expected to cause a serious side effect, and 3.3 million Germans would have had to be treated by a doctor by 2021 because of side effects of the covid shots. Serious side effects include (facial) paralysis, persistent pain, nerve problems, severe skin reactions, heart attacks, strokes, heart muscle inflammation, permanent disability, and death. In the Wob request to the TK health insurance fund, the billing figures from 2019 to 2021 were requested per quarter and per person for the reporting codes T881 – Complications after vaccination (immunization), not classified elsewhere, including rash after vaccination, T88.0 – Post-vaccination infection (immunization), including post-vaccination sepsis (immunization), U12.9 – Adverse reactions to the use of COVID-19 vaccines, unspecified and Y.59.9 – Adverse complications due to vaccines or biologically active substances. Fired Health insurance boss’ estimates confirmed again In February (former), BKK Provita board member Andreas Schöfbeck sounded the alarm because he saw that the number of doctor visits due to the vaccines among the millions of customers of the German health insurer was no less than ten times higher than the official figures. Converted, according to Schöfbeck, no fewer than three million Germans would have had to visit a doctor as a result of vaccination. In a telephone conversation with the WELT newspaper, which asked Schöfbeck questions about the letter he wrote to the Paul Ehrlich Institute, Schöfbeck said that at BKK, ProVita alarm bells started ringing when the health insurer’s case management increasingly came across diagnoses that indicated side effects of the covid vaccination. Therefore, he searched the shared data pool of all BKK health insurance funds for the diagnosis codes T88.0, T88.1, Y59.9, and U12.9. The investigation found that from the beginning of the year 2021 to the middle of the third quarter, 216,695 BKK policyholders had been treated for side effects of vaccines. This number excludes 7,665 cases of complications from other vaccines. In addition, the statistics did not include patients who received more than one treatment. By comparison, up to December 31, 2021, the Paul Ehrlich Institute only registered 244,576 reports of adverse events due to corona vaccines, based on 61.4 million people vaccinated. Schöfbeck was immediately fired for his revelations. 2.5 million doctor visits due to vaccines At the beginning of July, German news channel WELT obtained a letter from the National Association of Physicians of Statutory Health Insurance (KBV) showing that Andreas Schöfbeck’s estimates were probably correct. The KBV letter from mid-June revealed that nearly 2.5 million citizens went to the doctor in 2021 because of the side effects of the corona vaccination. Evidence continues to pile up Both former health insurance fund boss Andreas Schöfbeck, the National Association of Physicians of Statutory Health Insurance (KBV), and now also the Techniker Krankenkasse figures show that the actual number of severe side effects as a result of the experimental covid injections is many times higher than was first officially assumed. Even the health ministry in Germany has admitted that 1:5000 injections lead to hospitalization, permanent disability, or death – a very serious revelation, but probably a very conservative estimate. SOURCE https://www.blckbx.tv/corona/half-miljoen-medische-behandelingen-door-vaccins-bij-%C3%A9%C3%A9n-duits-ziekenfonds SOURCE: https://rairfoundation.com/germanys-largest-health-insurer-reveals-1-in-25-clients-underwent-medical-treatment-in-2021-for-covid-vaccine-side-effects/

There has been some discussion within our telegram chat group as to whether we should forgive, or be kind, to those who fell for the jab propaganda and mass hypnosis. Many of us feel bitter at the way we have been treated by friends family, those distant and the media. But will these feelings serve the future we aspire to? In many ways, it's natural to see someone injured by the vaccine and think, "We warned them..." When we see the celebs who had been actively pushing the vaccine, then become ill and even die, it is easy to think, 'that is their karma' - even if we whisper it to ourselves. Pre-pandemic I knew many within the vaccine injury awareness community AKA anti-vaxxers. 95% more of them are/were ex-pro-vaxxers, who only after suffering an injury or losing a loved one, decided to raise a red flag and warn others. A natural human instinct to guide fellow members of our society away from our own mistakes. I also knew many, like myself, who in wonder at our own inbuilt immune systems, had simply not felt the need for intervention and 'jabs'. The vaccine injury awareness activists - the people dedicating time and resources to helping others - are NOT on the whole members of the second group who stay comparatively silent keeping their stance to themselves. Those fighting hardest to warn others are in the first group. They are the people who believed in their doctors and the 'science' until an injury or death of a loved one, opened their eyes to the horrors of 'adverse events. The jab-free are still in a minority. We win this genocidal medical-propaganda war by bringing and accepting ex-pro-vaxxers into our thinking, realisations and knowledge. The tens of thousands of c19 vaccine-injured will fight hard, and with more determination, to save others from the the fate they suffered, then you or I. We must welcome those who once thought, and maybe even acted against us, with open arms. Only then do we win by becoming the majority. This in turn then creates the mass-non-compliance we need, that will defeat the plandemic and associated agendas overnight. Abuse and ill words of anyone who once thought differently, whether injured by a vaccine, or not, will only slow that process. We need to be kind, accepting and forgiving. We have been divided from our families, loved ones and best friends We didn't start this process of divide and conquer. The leaders of the plandemic did. Let's not fall into their trap. Love will conquer all. THIS 5 MINUTE FILM GIVES A FACE THE THOSE THAT TRUSTED THEIR DOCTORS SEE THE LATEST OFFICIAL VACCINE INJURY STATS HERE 4th AUGUST 2022 https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/4th-august-2022-uk-vaccine-injury-report SEE OUR SHORT FILM ASKING "WHY ARE THE BBC SILENT ON VACCINE INJURY?" HERE.

This is Not On The Beeb's 68th report translating the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The data concerns injuries and deaths up to the 27th July. The stats are then released to the public a week later, so in this case, on the 4TH August Overall 1-in-117 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11 Here is the breakdown of the most recent report with comments and observations on the data below As of the 27th of July. there are 2,226 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 82.5 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.7 m 1st doses = 53,704,436 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,470,230 Boosters = 40,186,381 (30.7m Pfizer, 58,300 AZ & 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 144,361,047 BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death 172,476 Pfizer 245,996 AZ 40,270 Moderna 1791 Unknown TOTAL = 460,533 Fatal Pfizer 815 AZ 1297 Moderna 65 Unknown 49 TOTAL = 2,226 Blood Disorders - 17,206 (Pfizer) + 7893 (AZ) + 2587 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,751 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 887 (AZ) + 94 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1650 Acute Cardiac - 13,658 (Pfizer) + 11,621 (AZ) + 3540 (Moderna) + 119 (Unknown) = 28,938 Eye Disorders - 8226 (Pfizer) + 15,043 (AZ) + 1667 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 25,030 Blindness - 172 (Pfizer) + 331 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 549 Deafness - 310 (Pfizer) + 439 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 809 Infections - 12,924 (Pfizer) + 20,669 (AZ) + 2611 (Moderna) + 207 (Unknown) = 36,411 Herpes - 2271 (Pfizer) + 2715 (AZ) + 277 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5290 Spontaneous Abortions - 500 + 17 stillbirths/foetal deaths/miscarriage related death (Pfizer) + 239 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 8 + 1 miscarriage related death (Unknown) = 818 miscarriages Nausea & Vomiting - 21,049 (Pfizer) + 45,630 (AZ) + 7051 (Moderna) + 215 (Unknown) = 73,945 Nervous System Disorders - 82,466 (Pfizer) + 183,693 (AZ) + 21,742 (Moderna) + 941 (Unknown) = 288,842 Headaches & Migraines - 36,102 (Pfizer) + 94,148 (AZ) + 10,104 (Moderna) + 353 (Unknown) = 140,707 Paralysis - 535 (Pfizer) + 910 (AZ) + 125 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1581 Seizures - 1161 (Pfizer) + 2103 (AZ) + 304 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 3592 Tremor - 2242 (Pfizer) + 9990 (AZ) + 773 (Moderna) + 51 (Unknown) = 13,056 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 839 (Pfizer) + 2399 (AZ) + 75 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3334 Bell’s Palsy - 657 (Pfizer) + 644 (AZ) + 108 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1412 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 43,010 (Pfizer) + 81,246 (AZ) + 11,767 (Moderna) + 420 (Unknown) = 136,443 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,448 (Pfizer) + 18,595 (AZ) + 2685 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,858 Skin Disorders - 34,866 (Pfizer) + 53,633 (AZ) + 13,745 (Moderna) + 393 (Unknown) = 102,637 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,552 (Pfizer) + 20,939 (AZ) + 5295 (Moderna) + 239 (Unknown) = 58,025 Respiratory Disorders - 22,282 (Pfizer) + 30,069 (AZ) + 4656 (Moderna) + 232 (Unknown) = 57,239 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,100,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,700,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 4011 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 264 Yellow Cards • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 2000 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 33 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 34 Yellow Cards Total = 4,113,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 7,026,800 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4342 For full reports including 363 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Child vaccination must be halted until MHRA clarifies its confusing new under-18 fatality reports By Kathy Gyngell August 8, 2022 According to Table 11 of the latest Medicines and Health products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) ‘Coronavirus vaccine – summary of Yellow Card reporting’ update, it appears that six children have died from the vaccine. The MHRA slipped out these shocking figures in a new table last Thursday without any explanation or highlighting in the accompanying text. Nothing about when these children died or what age and sex they were, or what the catalyst was, for example myocarditis or a thromboembolic event and no indication given as to whether there have there been inquests into these Yellow Card reported children’s deaths. All that appeared to be communicated was contained in one new, inadequate and confusing table, copied below, from the sub-section Reports with a fatal outcome: Table 11* /* *: Number of UK reports with a fatal outcome received for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech, COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and Vaccine brand unknown by patient age up to and including 27 July 2022 Table 11* /* *: Number of UK reports with a fatal outcome received for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech, COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and Vaccine brand unknown by patient age up to and including 27 July 2022 It was the first time in the MHRA updates (published regularly since the start of the vaccine rollout) that fatality numbers have been added for under-18s. Though the table is unclear it reads that ‘Brand unspecified’ equals a total of SIX deaths which at first glance looked to include 1 x Moderna plus 5 x Pfizer or AZ (exact numbers retracted), as below: Under 18 AZ – fewer than 5 fatalities – retracted for privacy (could be zero, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 depending on Pfizer total) Pfizer – less than 5 fatalities – retracted for privacy (could be zero, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 depending on AZ total) Moderna – one fatality However another interpretation was that the (website) table is incorrectly aligned in which case the MHRA may have meant it to read: the 1st column Astra-Zeneca ^ (ie 1-4), 2nd column Pfizer also ^, 3rd column Moderna ‘-‘ (ie 0), then 4th column is Brand unspecified =1 and 5th column becomes the total =6. It made more sense as the totals add up correctly across all the different age groups and also that the bottom row total for ‘brand unspecified’ (currently in the Moderna column) for all ages would equal 49 which is the same as in the assets report of individual AEs as of published data 4th Aug. Further searching today indicates that this latter interpretation looks indeed to be the case. The PDF of the Summary text that they publish as well as the web page shows the table, presumably correctly aligned, on P38 here. But this is not all that is unsatisfactory. Looking further at the table it is possible that the child fatality rate could be far worse than indicated as per the (incorrectly) aligned UNKNOWN row (spliced here): It shows 344 non-age classified deaths in the latest update total of 2,226 vaccine associated fatalities. We know that SIX fatalities of the 2,226 are under 18, but what about the 344 UNKNOWN? Under 18 fatalities are not explicitly excluded from this part of the tabulation so could make up some of these numbers too. Why don’t the MHRA know the age breakdown; or why can’t they tell us? We urgently request the MHRA to bring clarity to the information provided here. It is imperative that this data is clear and understandable for the public. There is a broader context for concern. It is the scandalous inadequacy of child vaccine adverse event information published by MHRA since the under-18 rollout began. They say they are monitoring reactions carefully yet provide no evidence to suggest that they are. The MHRA are still not reporting the 4,000-plus child adverse events to the public in the same way they do as with the adult data. No breakdown of categories (whether cardiac, nervous or skin disorder for example) is provided for children. It is as though they are of less importance and there is no need for us to know. There is also a lack of transparency regarding their vaccine-related fatality reporting over all. They still don’t specify whether booster-related figures are included in or excluded from certain totals, or whether there have been any booster-related fatalities for adults and children. Why, apart from just one identified fatality ‘disorder category’ (thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) ) comprising 80 deaths do they not provide any specific or across-the-board age breakdown data? There were also 4 such deaths for Pfizer but no age breakdown was provided beyond an 18-91yrs age bracket. (Up to 27 July 2022, the MHRA reports it had received Yellow Card reports of 32 cases of major thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) in the UK following use of the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech. These events occurred in 13 females, and 18 males aged from 18 to 91 years, and the overall case fatality rate was 13% with four deaths reported.) Their failure to provide age-related data for the ‘Seven suspected myocarditis or pericarditis reports with a fatal outcome reported following the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech and six reports with a fatal outcome following the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca’ is deeply worrying. This is of key concern given the special warnings circulated to healthcare professionals of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in children, raising the question of whether any or all of these 13 myocarditis deaths were in the under-18 age group. We still do not know. But the question now that looms above all others is why have these ‘Under-18’ deaths in the new Table 11 only now been reported and included? We have to assume, if the table says what it appears to say, that all six deaths have not just happened in the last two weeks. Was the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation kept informed as each Card came in? Will it, as it should, demand an urgent moratorium on and halt to the child vaccine programme given this public uncertainty? If these are longer known fatalities then every mainstream media outlet ought to be asking just how long. My concern is whether the MHRA’s stated decision to turn from vaccine watchdog to vaccine enabler has made this body more dismissive of the data they are duty-bound to report and clouded its judgement on what should be a priority – that is to take all Yellow Card reports extremely seriously. The main emphasis of all the accompanying text to their injuries and fatalities tables is to underplay them and say the Yellow Card reports indicate nothing more than ‘a temporal association’ and not causality. Well, it is one heck of a lot of temporal associations, affecting nearly half a million people, to be sanguine about. Dr June Raine, the MHRA’s chief executive, has some serious explaining to do. For, if, as the MHRA themselves state, Yellow Cards are likely to be under-reported by a factor of ten, the real figures are very much higher and if the six child fatalities tabulated are indeed such, then some 60 children may already have died from a vaccine they never needed in the first place and which has demonstrably proved to be neither safe nor effective. SOURCE : https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/child-vaccination-must-be-halted-until-mhra-clarifies-its-confusing-new-under-18-fatality-data%EF%BF%BC/ A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

"The War on the Unvaccinated was lost, and we should all be very thankful for that." CORRECTION 8th August: We have now heard that Susan Dunham is Canadian and not vaccinated. Her words remain as clear and as valid as ever. In a surprising turn vaccinated Australian Journalist Susan Dunham has spoken the words we have all been waiting for. This video is the High Wire's Del Big Tree reading Susan's words. The text is transcribed below. We are close to the tipping point, whereby more public figures speak out and the truth of this medical holocaust will be outed into the mass public consciousness. by SUSAN DUNHAM 'If Covid were a battlefield, it would still be warm with the bodies of the unvaccinated.” Thankfully the mandates are letting up, and both sides of the war stumble back to the new normal. The unvaccinated are the heroes of the last two years as they allowed us all to have a control group in the great experiment, and highlight the shortcoming of the Covid vaccines. The unvaccinated carry many battle scars and injuries as they are the people we tried to mentally break, yet no one wants to talk about what we did to them and what they forced ‘The Science’ to unveil. We knew that the waning immunity of the fully vaccinated had the same risk profile as others within society, as the minority of the unvaccinated; yet we marked them for special persecution. We said they had not ‘done the right thing for the greater good’ by handing their bodies and medical autonomy over to the State. Many of the so-called health experts and political leaders admitted the goal was to make life almost un-livable for the unvaccinated, which was multiplied many times by the collective mob, with the fight taken into workplaces, friendships, and family gatherings. Today, the hard truth is none of it was justified as we took a quick slide from righteousness to absolute cruelty. We might blame our leaders and health experts for the push, but each individual within society must be held accountable for stepping into the well-laid-out trap. We did this despite knowing full well that principled opposition is priceless when it comes to what goes inside our bodies, and we let ourselves be tricked into believing that going into another ineffective lockdown would be the fault of the unvaccinated and not the fault of the toxic policy of ineffective vaccines. We took pleasure in scapegoating the unvaccinated because after months of engineered lockdowns by political leaders blinded by power, having someone to blame and to burn at the stake, felt good. We believed we had logic, love, and truth on our side, so it was easy to wish death upon the unvaccinated. Those of us who ridiculed and mocked the non-compliant did it because we were embarrassed by their courage and principles and didn’t think the unvaccinated would make it through unbroken, and we turned the holdouts into punching bags. Fauci, Rachelle Walensky, Biden, Caribbean Ayatollah Gonsalves, unvaccinated spittle Camillo Gonsalves, Gaston Browne, Stop Jack assing yourself Keith Rowley} and the other cast in prominent roles need to be held to account for vilifying the unvaccinated in public and fueling angry social media mobs. The mobs, the mask Nazis, and the vaccine disciples have been embarrassed by ‘betting against’ the unvaccinated because mandates only had the power we gave them. It was not compliance that ended domination by Big Pharma Companies, Bill Gates and his many organisations, and the World Economic Forum…It was THANKS to the people we tried to embarrass, ridicule, mock and tear down. We should all try and find some inner gratitude for the unvaccinated as we took the bait by hating them because their perseverance and courage bought us the time to see we were wrong. So, if mandates ever return for Covid or any other disease or virus, hopefully, more of us will be awake and see the rising authoritarianism that has no concern for our well-being and is more about power and control. The War on the Unvaccinated was lost, and we should all be very thankful for that. DANISH TRANSLATION Krigen mod de uvaccinerede var tabt – “De uvaccinerede vil blive retfærdiggjort.” Del Jeg vil sige det, jeg har ikke skrevet dette, men nogen gjorde det. Susan Dunham, det er dig, dette bør have en plads i enhver lærebog i verden i fremtiden. Og jeg vil læse det for jer, hvad jeg synes, er en af de mest veltalende udsagn om, hvad vi lige har været igennem, og hvad vi alle må erkende, nu er sandheden. Og for dem af jer, der har set The High Wire, denne her er til dig. Lad dette synke ind. “En Menings Udtalelse Fra En Vaccineret Australsk Journalist” – er hvad, det er kaldt. Hvis COVID var en slagmark? Ville den stadig være varm af ligene af de uvaccinerede. Heldigvis, ophører restriktioner efter faldende på begge sider af krigen, faldende tilbage til den ‘nye–normal’. De uvaccinerede er heltene fra de sidste to år, da de tillod os alle at have kontrolgrupper i det Store Eksperiment og fremhæve manglerne ved COVID-vaccinerne. De uvaccinerede bærer mange kamp-ar og skader, da det er de mennesker, vi forsøgte at nedbryde mentalt, alligevel vil ingen tale om, hvad vi gjorde mod dem, og hvad de tvang videnskaben til at afsløre. Vi vidste, at den aftagende immunitet for de fuldt vaccinerede havde samme risikoprofil som andre i samfundet. Som mindretallet af de uvaccinerede, men alligevel har vi stemplede dem til særlig forfølgelse. Ser du, vi sagde, at de ikke havde gjort det rigtige til gavn, for “det fælles bedste” vist “Samfundssind” ved at overdrage deres kroppe og medicinske autonomi til staten. Mange af de såkaldte sundhedseksperter og politiske ledere i Australien indrømmede, at målet var at gøre livet næsten umuligt for de uvaccinerede. Hvilket blev ganget mange gange med den kollektive pøbel, med kampen taget på arbejdspladser, venskaber, og familiesammenkomster. I dag er den hårde sandhed, at intet af det var berettiget, da vi tog den hurtige glidebane fra retfærdighed til absolut grusomhed. Vi lægger måske skylden på vores ledere og sundhedseksperter for skubbet, men hvert individ i samfundet skal holdes ansvarlig for at træde ind i den velanlagte fælde. Vi gjorde dette på trods af, at vi vidste, at deres principielle modstand var uvurderlig, når det kommer til, hvad der injiceres i vores kroppe, og vi lader os narre til at tro, at det at gå ind i en anden ineffektiv lockdown ville være de uvaccinerede skyld og ikke skyldes den giftige politik for ineffektive vacciner, vi glædede os over at gøre de uvaccinerede til syndebukke, efter måneder med konstruerede lockdowns og politiske ledere blændet af magt. At have nogen at bebrejde og vende sig imod, at brænde på bålet, føltes godt. Vi troede, at vi havde logik, kærlighed og sandhed på vores side, så det var let at ønske døden over de uvaccinerede, dem af os, der latterliggjorde og hånede, den ikke-samtykkede gjorde det, fordi vi var flove over deres mod og principper og ikke troede, at de uvaccinerede ville komme helskindet i mål. Og vi forvandlede de udholdende til boksesække, Lambie, Bilstol Andrews, McGowan Gunner og andre Kaster, –af fremtrædende roller, og vi her i Amerika, vi kan tilføje Fauci og resten af dem – Biden, andre i fremtrædende roller, bør forkyndes offentligt for at de bliver holdt til regnskab for at bagvaske de uvaccinerede og give næring til vrede sociale medier, mobberne, de maskerede nazister og vaccine-disciplene er blevet pinligt gjorte ved at byde ind overfor de uvaccinerede, fordi mandater havde den magt, vi gav dem. Det var ikke de samtykkende, der sluttede dominansen af Big Pharma-virksomheder, Bill Gates og de mange organisationer og World Economic Forum, det var ta kket være de mennesker, vi forsøgte at genere, latterliggøre, håne og ødelægge. Vi bør alle prøve at finde en indre taknemmelighed for de uvaccinerede, da vi bed på krogen, ved at hade dem, deres udholdenhed og mod købte os tid til at se, at vi tog fejl. Så hvis nogensinde COVID restriktioner vender tilbage eller anden sygdom eller virus, vil forhåbentlig flere af os være vågne og se den stigende totalitarisme, der ingen bekymringer har for vores velbefindende, men handler mere om magt og kontrol. Krigen mod de uvaccinerede var tabt og vi bør alle være meget taknemmelige – for det. Skrevet af en vaccineret australsk journalist, Susan Dunham.

This example of lateral thinking by WW2 Abraham Wald reminded me of the logical gap we face in the worldwide medical information war of 2022. Just as in Plato's cave, the viewers or shadows never understood the idea a 3D object blocking a light source–forming a 2D shadow on a wall–we are living in an age where people are doing the equivalent of thinking footsteps on a wet beach have been caused by the retreating sea. QUOTE: "During World War II, fighter planes would come back from battle with bullet holes. The Allies found the areas that were most commonly hit by enemy fire. They sought to strengthen the most commonly damaged parts of the planes to reduce the number that was shot down. A mathematician, Abraham Wald, pointed out that perhaps there was another way to look at the data. Perhaps the reason certain areas of the planes weren’t covered in bullet holes was that planes that were shot in those areas did not return. This insight led to the armour being re-enforced on the parts of the plane where there were no bullet holes. The story behind the data is arguably more important than the data itself. Or more precisely, the reason behind why we are missing certain pieces of data may be more meaningful than the data we have. Don’t only listen to what is being said. Listen more to what is not being said..." This classic example of the aeroplane reminds me of the MHRA yellow card report releases. The yellow card data only includes reports by those who successfully linked their illness, injury or the death of a loved one, to the vaccine. The recorded 'adverse reactions' are officially acknowledged as likely to be under 10% of the real numbers. i.e. the real impact could be 10X higher than published. In the same way, the WW2 mathematician Abraham Wald realised they needed to think laterally and see the 'negative' invisible space of what they could not see, to understand the real vulnerable points of the aircraft–in 2022 we need to take the same approach observing the unseen within vaccine injury. The burning question, is how many injuries and deaths caused by the C19 vaccines are NOT linked to the jabs and are instead believed to have occurred due to 'random acts of nature, age or just bad luck? At the moment the majority are staring at footsteps in the sand, not yet realising that the shape of the indentation has been left by a foot-and not by the sea. We are witnessing mass murder in plain (out-of) sight and need to encourage those around us to think like Abraham Wald. Then, with luck, the greatest genocide the world has seen–so great it must be called Humanicide–can be stopped. See the latest official UK data on vaccine injury here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/22th-july-2022-uk-vaccine-injury-report

Last weekend was a blinder as Freedom fighters from all over the UK gathered in a field near Battle to celebrate the summer, freedom and listen to the music of the resistance at the Hope Freedom Festival The irony of such a festival being in Battle, the site of the last invasion of the UK in 1066 wasn't missed. The Right Said Fred Brothers Richard and Fred (I'm too famous for my T-shirt) were the hosts. The Daz band performed their protest classic 99% and countless other artists kept the atmosphere high and the laughs frequent. DJ Danny Rampling pulled off a memorable late night Saturday set that had everyone dancing until the early hours. The best part though was meeting so many people in person who we'd only communicated by messages or video. Thank you to all of you who came to the stand to say hello. Meeting you all one by one made my weekend and summer. This was a small gathering that felt more like a private party - a fire-starter inaugural festival for bigger things to come - not be forgotten. See the full line up here: https://www.hope-hubofpivotalevents.co.uk/collaborators Hope Festival organiser and UK column's Katy-Jo, with Mark at the Not On The Beeb stand. The festival is a fund raiser for Katy-Jo's Hope education projects (You can buy a Not On The Beeb t-shirt here.) The highly respected Brian Gerrish of the leading British alternative media team UK COLUMN visits the Not On The Beeb stand at the Hope Freedom Festival Sussex. UK Column are the longest running and most trusted UK alternative media. They have a long history of digging deep for news and insight where few dare go. To sample UK column and hear about the Hope Festival click on the link below. (Report on Hope Festival is at 35 mins and 54 seconds) https://www.ukcolumn.org/index.php/video/uk-column-news-3rd-august-2022 or watch UK Column on Odysee: https://odysee.com/@ukcolumn:9/ukcolumn-news-030822:a THE UNITED FREE PRESS Mark of Not On The Beeb is a founding member of the UFP. The right of everyone to have access to information and ideas, reiterated in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, underpins the journalist’s mission. The journalist’s responsibility towards the public takes precedence over any other responsibility, in particular towards their employers and the public authorities. Journalism is a profession, which requires time, resources and the means to practice – all of which are essential to its independence. This declaration specifies the guidelines of conduct for free journalists in the research, editing, transmission, dissemination and commentary of news and information, and in the description of events, in any media whatsoever. In recent years we have been witness to a globally coordinated censorship campaign, targeting independent journalists and alternative media outlets the world over. Quality free journalism is under attack and free dissemination of information in the public interest is being suppressed. The United Free Press, Charter of Ethics is a voluntary commitment by free and independent journalists in the United Kingdom to uphold the highest standards of journalistic integrity in the conduct of their work. This alliance of the free press is intended to provide the public with increased confidence in the credibility of free media organisations and independent journalists by providing a common code of ethical conduct. It also sends a message to other mainstream media organisations, that the free press are connected, federated and professionally organised to deliver on our overriding principle of reporting truth, no matter how obfuscated, to the general public. Read more here: https://www.unitedfreepress.org/ WATCH VIDEO OF ORGANISER KATY-JO AND FESTIVAL HIGHLIGHTS Brian Gerrish, David Scott, Debi Evans and Katy-Jo Murfin with today’s UK Column News. Huge thanks to Mikey (on the left) for helping our on the stall. See him as god designed him in the highly entertaining Channel Four TV programme naked-alone-and-racing-to-get-home Respect to Willsy of Resistance GB (on the right) for all his work helping bring footage of the protests to a world wide audience, Not On The Beeb T-shirts featured Freedom Lover T-shirt 100 words for Freedom Star All Festival profits went to support the HOPE Project. H O P E Sussex - Home Of Personalised Education, has formed to serve the interests of home-educating families and the independent tutors who work with them. We are a community of like-minded families who chose to step outside the box to give our children an education and a childhood that aligns with our own beliefs and values, instead of those forced upon us by the mainstream education system. Home education increased by 40% between 2015 and 2018. 2020 and 2021 have seen even more people choosing alternatives to mainstream education because it suits the child and their family for many beneficial reasons. We aim to provide a humane and natural setting for our kids and provide them with a well-rounded and tailored education, focusing on life skills and professional skills, as well as academic skills. We aim to connect with tutors who will deliver the best possible education to all of our communities, including services for families and adult sessions. Collectively we believe in giving our children a wealth of opportunities suited to their individual needs and interests, alongside allowing them the freedom to learn at their own pace. We don’t believe that our children should be confined to a classroom for 6 hours or more a day and we believe that access to nature and the great outdoors should be given in abundance. We will achieve this by providing a venue where home-educators can connect with private tutors, and have cost-effective access to a wide range of sessions. Our Community Venue provides a Community Hub. We will seek funding for parents so they have choice and agency over their child’s learning, and to provide for the professional development of our tutors and volunteers. We will also provide pastoral development in the form of mentoring and peer mentoring, something which is usually missing from home education. We will develop outdoor learning, including forestry and nature learning, growing herbs and vegetables. We will also follow an enterprise approach, involving our youths in the creation of income streams, including organisational and presentation skills. Above all, we provide a safe, natural and community-based environment for kids and families to flourish. We work with parents, tutors and external providers that support our values and bring enrichment to our children’s lives and home learning journeys. “The meaning of life is to find your gift. The purpose of life is to give it away.” — PABLO PICASSO DONATE TO THE HOPE PROJECT HERE: https://www.hopesussex.co.uk/our-mission

Dr Andrew Goldsworthy, (retired biological safety officer for Imperial College London) has alerted us the potential of a cure for blood-clots caused by 'C19' and the ensuing C19 injections. Note: Vaccine-induced clots that became so widespread, that the AZ vaccine was nicked-named in the Uk The Clot-Shot. This may be the ultimate in anti-clot shots; an artificial blood substitute. It's made from cow haemoglobin but contains no blood cells and does not need to be cross matched. It appears to have been extensively tested but has not yet been given FDA approval. QUOTE FROM MANUFACTURER: "...Hemopure is a hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier (HBOC) ready for immediate infusion, that transports and delivers oxygen from the plasma and expands the circulating volume. The product is supplied in sterile, flexible infusion bags with a fill volume of 250mL. Consisting of 32.5 g purified, glutaraldehyde-polymerized, bovine hemoglobin (Hb) in an iso-oncotic balanced modified Ringer’s lactate, it can be stored at room temperature for at least three years. ​ Hemopure can be administered immediately and is compatible with all blood types; type and cross-match is unnecessary. It does not require warming or reconstitution prior to administration and can be administered through a standard intravenous line. Upon administration, it immediately transports oxygen to tissues served by blood flow and, because of the relatively small molecular diameter, has the potential of transporting oxygen through constricted or partially blocked blood vessels via the movement of plasma through tissues in which red blood cell (RBC) flow is restricted. Hemopure has an oxygen dissociation curve that is right-shifted with a P50 of 40 mmHg, compared to 27 mmHg for corpuscular hemoglobin. This property facilitates the uptake by and off-loading of oxygen from native red blood cells. When administered to anemic volunteers, Hemopure increased their pulmonary diffusion capacity, further demonstrating improved oxygen uptake. Furthermore, in a canine model, Hemopure was shown to enhance oxygen release in skeletal muscle . On a gram-for-gram basis, Hemopure was calculated to be approximately three times more potent than stored or fresh red blood cell hemoglobin at restoring baseline tissue oxygenation following severe acute anemia. It is important to realize, however, that the higher potency of Hemopure is realized only under conditions at which tissue oxygen utilization is near physiological limits (e.g., strenuous exercise) and there is sufficient oxygen content in the blood to allow for a rise in oxygen extraction from blood. The higher potency of Hemopure to oxygenate tissues cannot be realized if the blood oxygen content is low secondary to severe anemia. Under conditions of anemia, it is important to increase the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood by raising the total hemoglobin concentration. ​ In 2001, Hemopure was approved in South Africa for the treatment of adult surgical patients who are acutely anemic, for the purpose of eliminating, delaying, or reducing the need for allogeneic red blood cells. In 2010, Hemopure was also approved in the Russian Federation for the treatment of acute, all-cause anemia. In the US, Hemopure is an investigational new drug that is not approved by the FDA as being safe or effective for any use in humans, and therefore only available through a clinical trial, or expanded access (sometimes called compassionate use). In recent years, Hemopure has been used extensively across the US under the FDA’s Expanded Access Program (EAP), to treat patients with severe, life-threatening anemia for whom blood transfusion is indicated, but not an option, and who have exhausted all other treatment options. Reasons for not being transfused could include unavailability of compatible blood, conditions when blood transfusions are contraindicated, and patient refusal due to religious beliefs. SOURCE: https://www.hbo2therapeutics.com/our-product

Texel Island, early June, 2022 “The sky is falling! The sky is falling!” cried Chicken Little. And the sky fell, and no one listened, and all was still. by Arthur Firstenberg author of The Invisible Rainbow A scholarly literature search for “electromagnetic” + “biological effects” produces the astonishing number of 76,400 studies, more studies than for most other environmental threats, yet the world continues on, looking yet blind, listening yet deaf, mistaking silence for comfort, the advancing flames for a bright future. On the Dutch island of Texel, being the south end of a line of islands separating the Wadden Sea from the North Sea, a large breeding colony of seabirds called Sandwich terns (“great terns” in Dutch) made headline news last month by dying. Of the 7,000 birds nesting in the De Petten nature reserve until the end of May, none were left by the middle of June. 3,000 avian corpses were collected, and the rest either died or abandoned their nests. The correspondent who sent me this news, Antonia in the Netherlands, also sent me to a Dutch website that monitors all cell towers and antennas throughout the country. The tern catastrophe was being blamed on “bird flu” and she suspected something else might be going on. When I looked at the website I was floored. The first 35 dead terns at De Petten were found on May 29, 2022. There are three cell towers on the edge of the reserve, and actually in the territory which the terns inhabit. According to the website, 18 new 4G antennas had just been added to those towers – 6 by Vodafone to its 83-foot tower on May 25, 2022, and 12 by KPN to its 108-foot tower on May 29, 2022. The number of frequencies emitted by those two towers had increased overnight from 5 to 11. In addition to having all those antennas right at the reserve, De Petten is located on the northern edge of a waterway that separates the North Sea from the Wadden Sea, and a large number of antennas on both sides of that waterway -- the antennas in Den Helder to the south and the antennas on Texel to the north -- are aimed at that busy waterway, which is intensely used by the ships that continually pass through it. Consequently, according to my research, there are a total of 105 4G antennas within 7 miles of De Petten that are aimed directly at it. Were Texel’s Sandwich terns already in bad shape from all the radiation they had been exposed to in the last few years? And did the sudden increase in both the number of antennas and the number of frequencies finally kill them? I decided to investigate further. What I have discovered, both in the Netherlands and elsewhere, is consistent but not simple. Here are some rough rules: (a) A sudden dramatic increase in the number of antennas and frequencies whose source is within a breeding colony or on its border is lethal. Nesting birds cannot avoid the radiation; they must either abandon their nests or die. (b) The effect of antennas aimed at a breeding colony from a distance depends on the human population. In a sparsely populated region, the antennas emit little radiation and few frequencies because few people are using them. By contrast, cell towers located in major ports are heavily used, both by residents and ships, and emit maximal radiation. The same is true of antennas aimed at heavily used shipping lanes. (c) Distance does not matter as much as terrain and tower height. The radiation from a taller tower travels further. And when there is nothing but water between the tower and the bird colony, the water reflects and amplifies the signal and distance matters very little. (d) 4G towers are generally worse than 5G towers. This is because 4G towers broadcast their radiation in all directions while 5G towers emit most of their radiation in focused beams, aimed directly at people holding 5G phones in their hands. With these rules in mind, let us look at a few other breeding colonies of Sandwich terns and see what has happened to them this year: Another large breeding colony of Sandwich terns made headlines a bit later, and for the same reason: the one at Waterdunen, at the opposite end of the Netherlands, in Zeeland province. Like De Petten, the Waterdunen nature reserve is located on a busy shipping lane at the entrance to a busy port. The largest colony of these birds in the Netherlands, Waterdunen hosted 7,000 pairs of terns that flew up from Africa to breed there this spring. But on June 24, 2022, it was reported that 4,600 dead adult and young Sandwich terns had been collected there during the previous two weeks. By the end of June, this colony no longer existed either. The nature reserve at Waterdunen has 318 heavily-used 4G antennas aimed in its direction from distances of from 0.5 to 8 miles. Most of these emit between 1,000 and 2,000 watts of radiation each. 46 of these antennas are new, having been added to existing towers in April, May and June 2022. One 55-foot tower less than 2 miles down the beach from Waterdunen was upgraded on May 18, 2022 from 6 antennas to 12 and from 2 frequencies to 4. Another, 40-foot tower in the same location was upgraded on June 22, 2022 from 6 antennas to 18 and from 2 frequencies to 6. As Sandwich terns live on fish, those towers are within the foraging area for that colony. Did the same thing happen to all nesting Sandwich terns in the Netherlands? No. Just 20 miles from Waterdunen was a small, healthy colony of terns at a nature reserve called Yerseke Moer. And from April to July, i.e. throughout the 2022 nesting season, this colony thrived and no dead birds were found there. Unlike De Petten and Waterdunen, this reserve is located in a relatively isolated place, is not near a major port and is not on a shipping lane. A total of 35 4G antennas are aimed at this reserve from distances of up to 8 miles. Only two of those antennas have been added since April. Likewise in France, two very large colonies of terns had two completely different experiences. At the Platier d’Oye nature reserve near the port of Calais, a colony of 3,000 Sandwich terns began nesting in April. The first 100 dead birds were discovered on May 20, and within a few weeks the colony was almost completely wiped out. The situation at Platier d’Oye is similar to that further north in Texel: dozens of new 4G and 5G antennas were added near the reserve during the months of May and June. 3 new 4G antennas and 6 new 5G antennas were added to an existing 90-foot cell tower bordering the reserve. Another 6 new 4G antennas and 6 new 5G antennas were added to an existing 140-foot tower about two miles to the southeast. Another 6 new 4G antennas and 6 new 5G antennas were added to an existing 95-foot tower about two miles to the east. At this writing there are the astounding number of 355 antennas of all kinds on 26 towers at 13 locations ranging from 10 feet tall to 255 feet tall within about 4 miles of this nature reserve. An even larger colony -- the largest breeding colony of Sandwich terns in France -- had no disease during the 2022 breeding season. It is called the Polder de Sébastopol and was host to several thousand pairs of nesting birds. But like Yerseke Moer, it is on an isolated island with few human residents. The island’s land area is largely devoted to parks, nature reserves and visitor accommodations. None of the antennas on the two cell towers a half mile west of the Polder are aimed at it. And even though there are a large number of antennas between one and four miles away that are aimed directly at the Polder, no ships pass by offshore and those antennas are little used except by visitors to the reserve walking its trails. Looking at the details and different experiences at particular breeding colonies of these birds, the official story breaks down. How can one make sense of the extermination of so many of these birds in a matter of a few weeks in such widely scattered places? According to the bird conservation organizations, bird flu is so contagious that it spreads among Sandwich terns all over Europe in a matter of days, yet it is so non-contagious that a small colony of terns 20 miles away escapes scotfree. Bird flu travels from one end of the Netherlands to the other in a few days, but not between two Dutch colonies 20 miles apart, and not between the two largest colonies in France? Apparently the conservation organizations also do not think it strange that suddenly and for the first time ever, in 2022, bird flu is (a) killing Sandwich terns and (b) is occurring during their breeding season. In decades of monitoring them, bird flu has never affected Sandwich terns before anywhere in the world. And it has always been a seasonal disease, occurring only in autumn and winter, and has never before affected any types of wild birds in spring and summer until 2022. It has also never affected so many different kinds of wild birds at once – terns, seagulls, avocets, gannets, skuas, guillemots, puffins, oystercatchers, ducks, geese, godwits, pheasants, magpies, sanderlings, storks, cranes, pelicans, herons, swans, loons, sparrows, 5 pigeons, red-winged blackbirds, owls, cormorants, grebes, dunlins, crows, ravens, bald eagles, hawks, falcons, vultures. Both the bird organizations and the authorities are reacting reflexively by wearing masks and hazmat suits when they visit these colonies and handle dead birds. But they should begin questioning the cause of such an unprecedented catastrophe. There is no doubt that sick birds have tested positive for a virus called H5N1. But when every testing laboratory is constantly amplifying fragments of that virus in untold numbers of PCR tests, one has to suspect that the walls, floors, air, equipment, and personnel in the testing laboratories are contaminated with this virus. When one remembers that samples from a goat, a quail and a papaya, sent to the National Health Laboratory of Tanzania, all came back positive for COVID-19, the results of PCR tests, whether for people, birds, or fruit, should be regarded with caution. Yes, both birds and people are getting sick and dying, but there is another obvious factor that is being ignored. The tendency to blame all illness on microorganisms is destroying our world. It is the uncontrolled irradiation of our world that is killing us and wiping out all the birds. Both 4G and 5G antennas are being erected more quickly and in greater numbers than ever before, not only on land but even on the surface of the sea. Wherever there are offshore wind farms, the cell phone companies are placing cell towers on those platforms. Seabirds will soon not only have no place to lay their eggs and raise their young, but they will not even be able to hunt for their food and feed their young without being irradiated. The largest company building cell towers on the surface of the sea is called Tampnet. Here is a map of all their towers and their coverage areas in the North Sea and the Gulf of Mexico: https://www.tampnet.com/coverage-maps. In 1918, at the very height of the Spanish influenza, attempts by medical teams in Boston and San Francisco to demonstrate the contagious nature of the flu met with complete and resounding failure. They collected mucous secretions from the mouths, noses, throats, and bronchi of sick flu patients in various stages of the disease and transferred these secretions to the noses, throats, and eyes of hundreds of healthy volunteers. They injected blood from sick flu patients into healthy volunteers. The had healthy volunteers sit nose to nose with severely ill flu patients while they spoke to each other and then the patient coughed five times directly in the face of the volunteer. None of the volunteers got sick in any way. These experiments were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, and Public Health Reports. Horses also came down with influenza, and similar failure attended attempts to transfer influenza from one horse to another. As a result of these experiments, Lieutenant Colonel Herbert Watkins-Pitchford wrote that he could find no evidence that influenza was ever spread directly from one horse to another. Many are the scientists, over the years, who have observed that influenza, whether in humans, horses, birds, or pigs, is an exceedingly strange disease. No one has ever explained why the flu is seasonal, for example. Or why flu epidemics end. Or why out-of-season epidemics do not spread. Or why flu epidemics explode over whole countries at once, and disappear just as miraculously, as if suddenly prohibited. Or how human influenza can spread around the world in days, and has always done so, even centuries ago when neither airplanes, automobiles, railroads, nor steamships existed. At least 23 scientists over the years, including Richard Shope, the scientist who first identified the flu virus in 1931, have published papers questioning the contagious nature of the flu and/or suggesting an electrical cause for it. Chapters 7, 8 and 9 of my critically important book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life, are devoted to a complete, detailed examination of the history and science of influenza. Chapter 16, the longest chapter in the book, is devoted in part to the effects of electromagnetic radiation on birds. I suggest that all bird conservation organizations should acquire my book and read it carefully. THE INVISIBLE RAINBOW A History of Electricity and Life SHOP Arthur Firstenberg 5g is being rolled out across the country, despite growing evidence that it is disruptive to our health, our safety, and the environment. The Invisible Rainbow is the groundbreaking story of electricity as it’s never been told before—exposing its very real impact on the biosphere and human health. Over the last 220 years, society has evolved a universal belief that electricity is ‘safe’ for humanity and the planet. Scientist and journalist Arthur Firstenberg disrupts this conviction by telling the story of electricity in a way it has never been told before—from an environmental point of view—by detailing the effects that this fundamental societal building block has had on our health and our planet. In The Invisible Rainbow, Firstenberg traces the history of electricity from the early eighteenth century to the present, making a compelling case that many environmental problems, as well as the major diseases of industrialized civilization—heart disease, diabetes, and cancer—are related to electrical pollution. "Few individuals today are able to grasp the entirety of a scientific subject and present it in a highly engaging manner . . . Firstenberg has done just that with one of the most pressing but neglected problems of our technological age."—BRADLEY JOHNSON,MD, Amen Clinic, San Francisco SOURCE: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Birds-on-Texel-Island.pdf

This is Not On The Beeb's 67th report translating the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The data concerns injuries and deaths up to the 13th July. The stats are then released to the public a week later, so in this case, on the 13th July Overall 1-in-117 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Here is the breakdown of the most recent report with comments and observations on the data below As of the 13th of July there are 2,213 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 82.4 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.6 m 1st doses = 53,659,403 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,318,928 Boosters = 40,089,839 30.7m Pfizer, 58,100 AZ & 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 144,068,170 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death 172,218 Pfizer 245,903 AZ 40,068 Moderna 1,779 Unknown TOTAL = 459,968 Fatal Pfizer 808 AZ 1,29 Moderna 62 (last week was 64!) Unknown 49 TOTAL = 2,213 Blood Disorders - 17,193 (Pfizer) + 7876 (AZ) + 2580 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,714 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 94 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1648 Acute Cardiac - 13,606 (Pfizer) + 11,600 (AZ) + 3518 (Moderna) + 119 (Unknown) = 28,843 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1363 (Pfizer) + 458 (AZ) + 361 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 2191 Eye Disorders - 8213 (Pfizer) + 15,040 (AZ) + 1654 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 25,001 Blindness - 172 (Pfizer) + 331 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 549 Deafness - 310 (Pfizer) + 437 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 807 Infections - 12,849 (Pfizer) + 20,635 (AZ) + 2592 (Moderna) + 203 (Unknown) = 36,279 Herpes - 2267 (Pfizer) + 2711 (AZ) + 275 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5280 Spontaneous Abortions - 498 + 16 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 238 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 814 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,354 (Pfizer) + 183,624 (AZ) + 21,617 (Moderna) + 939 (Unknown) = 288,534 Headaches & Migraines - 36,074 (Pfizer) + 94,136 (AZ) + 10,060 (Moderna) + 354 (Unknown) = 140,624 Paralysis - 534 (Pfizer) + 909 (AZ) + 123 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1577 Seizures - 1156 (Pfizer) + 2102 (AZ) + 303 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 3585 Immune System Disorders - 2558 (Pfizer) + 3459 (AZ) + 666 (Moderna) + 41 (Unknown) = 6724 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 107 (Pfizer) + 504 (AZ) + 24 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 642 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4367 (Pfizer) + 7067 (AZ) + 803 (Moderna) + 47 (Unknown) = 12,284 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,429 (Pfizer) + 18,580 (AZ) + 2664 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,803 Respiratory Disorders - 22,237 (Pfizer) + 30,051 (AZ) + 4630 (Moderna) + 232 (Unknown) = 57,150 Skin Disorders - 34,817 (Pfizer) + 53,605 (AZ) + 13,699 (Moderna) + 392 (Unknown) = 102,513 Rashes & Eruptions - 11,023 (Pfizer) = 15,259 (AZ) + 5235 (Moderna) + 116 (Unknown) = 31,633 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,528 (Pfizer) + 20,934 (AZ) + 5286 (Moderna) + 239 (Unknown) = 57,987 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,100,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,500,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3952 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 264 Yellow Cards • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1900 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 32 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 34 Yellow Cards Total = 4,113,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,826,700 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4282 For full reports including 363 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11 NIOTES, COMMENTS & OBSERVATIONS In the 14 days since the previous summary for 29 June 2022 we have received a further: • 305 Yellow Cards for the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech, (6 fatal minus one removed = 5) • 132 for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, (4 fatal minus one removed = 3) • 259 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna (2 fatalities removed = minus 2) • 11 where the brand was not specified. (zero fatal) Pfizer - 6 extra deaths minus one fatality removed • General category x 2 - one death, one adverse drug reaction • Infections x 1 - one COVID-19 pneumonia • Injuries x 1 - one wound necrosis • Renal & Urinary Disorders x 1 - one renal failure • Skin Disorders x 1 - one pemphigoid (rare autoimmune blistering of the skin and mucous membranes) Removed Fatality - Nervous system x 1 - one haemorrhagic stroke NOTE: One brain death and one cardiac death noted under ‘death and sudden death’ sub-category but not recorded as fatal AstraZeneca - 4 extra deaths minus one fatality removed • General category x 1 - one adverse drug reaction • Infections x 1 - one COVID-19 pneumonia • Nervous System Disorders x 1 - one cerebral vascular accident • Respiratory Disorders x 1 - one pulmonary embolism Removed Fatality - Vascular Disorders x 1 - one embolism NOTE: Three brain deaths, one cardiac death, one drowning and one hanging noted under ‘death and sudden death’ sub-category but not recorded as fatal Moderna - two fatalities removed • One less cardiac arrest in cardiac disorders • One less death in general disorders Comment on the removed fatalities - if there has been a determination that these fatalities are not vaccine related then does that imply that the others are related, or have not been investigated to be ruled out as unrelated? Bearing in mind - MHRA state - 'The pattern of reporting for all other fatal reports does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths.' A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Some letters need publishing for the public record... Dr Andrew Goldsworthy is the retired Lecturer and Biological Safety Officer (retired) of Imperial College London. When publicising the vaccine-induced magnetism last year, it was Dr Goldsworthy who published with NOTB his theory that single atom-sized graphene Oxide sheets were acting like a paper razor blade and cutting into cell membranes, short-circuiting the electrical potential, in turn causing electromagnetic fields-resulting in magnetism. A theory that went viral internationally, and to date, has not been disproven. This is a recent letter that includes not only a summary of the basics of why the idea of vaccinating young children is preposterous but also includes a ground-breaking theory on the reason behind the epidemic of vaccine-induced blood clots that led to the Brits nicknaming the C19 jab as the 'Clot-shot'. Hi Mark, I was horrified to learn that COVID vaccines are actually being promoted to children to encourage them to have the jab without the informed consent of either the child (who is a minor) or the parents (who have not been informed of the risks). These risks include the formation of strange blood clots leading to cardiovascular disorders (including heart attacks) and possibly long COVID. I would expect similar clots to form in people exposed to electromagnetic fields along with an increased risk of cancer, especially cancer of the blood (Leukaemia). I am pasting an email below that I wrote to a Group of concerned parents to explain the position as I see it. I think you might find it interesting: It is morally wrong even to attempt to vaccinate children against COVID, especially if they may have already had the disease and been asymptomatic (and who can tell if this is not so?). The disease is mild in nearly all children and is likely to give better immunity than the vaccine (which targets only specific parts of the virus). But, the jabs also contain excipients such as polyethylene-glycol (PEG) to assist the uptake of the vaccine that may in themselves be harmful. In this case, it is because they form blood clots by making blood cells fuse together in a very characteristic way where long semisolid strings of fused blood cells can be pulled out of affected blood vessels. These are not ordinary clots where the blood cells become entangled in a mesh of fibrin. They are most likely due to the blood cells fusing together to form a syncytium under the influence of the PEG included in the vaccines. How do I know? The answer is that in the dim and distant past I worked on the possible genetic manipulation of plants using protoplasts (cells with their cellulose outer walls removed). They behave very much like animal cells and have to be kept in an isotonic buffer to stop them from bursting. I was trying to fuse cells of different species to give somatic hybrids that could be grown on to regenerate new cellulose cell walls and ultimately new hybrid plants that could not be formed by regular breeding. But interestingly, from our standpoint, is that one of the ways was to centrifuge the naked protoplasts was in solutions of polyethene glycol. PEG is the same ingredient used in mRNA vaccines. Could these vaccine-induced clots actually be fused cells rather than regular clots? See https://www.onlinebiologynotes.com/protoplast-fusion-methods-and-mechanism/ It would account for their mechanical strength and apparent inability to reverse their formation. The most relevant part is in Section 3 which discusses fusion using PEG. But it is also worth reading Section 4 on electrofusion. Here cells are treated with a weak alternating field between two converging electrodes. The constantly changing field induces opposing charges in the adjacent cells and the cells migrate to the region where the field is strongest and where the electrodes are at their closest. They are then "zapped" with a high voltage pulse, sufficient to break down contiguous membranes and cell fusion can occur. It is possible that this may occur in the peripheral blood vessels in regular "domestic" alternating fields (including WiFi) which could result in abnormal and potentially cancerous cells (leukaemia?) originating where the major blood vessels narrow into capillaries. Food for thought, but until this can be cleared up beyond doubt, it would be morally indefensible to vaccinate our young children against COVID. Best wishes Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Lecturer and Biological Safety Officer (retired) of Imperial College London.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a world-renowned trial lawyer with almost three decades of experience in suing large fraudulent corporations, like Deutsche Bank becoming well known for the Volkswagen emissions scandal. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Fuellmich observed criminal practices committed by media and governments worldwide. He founded the Corona Investigative Committee and began an extensive investigation, during which he interviewed over 150 experts from all fields of science. Many of these experts are recognized as world leaders in their fields of expertise. Together with other lawyers from around the world, Dr. Fuellmich gathered undeniable evidence that this pandemic is a series of unprecedented crimes against humanity. The entities responsible for this global assault on mankind are the same who were responsible for World Wars I and II, as well as many other world crises. Dr. Fuellmich, ten international lawyers, and a judge decided to present the evidence for these crimes against humanity to the public during a grand jury proceeding. Among the eyewitnesses are former members of: The British Intelligence Services The UK Royal Navy The US Marine Corps The World Health Organization The United Nations A former vice-president from Pfizer A Nobel Prize winner for medicine ......and many more high-level experts. WHAT IS A GRAND JURY? In serious criminal cases in the U.S. a grand jury is presented with the evidence at hand to convince them that this evidence is sufficient to bring public charges against the defendants. We, the people of the world, are adopting this model to prove to the public, with the help of witnesses, lawyers, a judge and experts from around the world, that we are dealing with crimes against humanity that span the globe. The allegation is that the world’s governments have come under the controlling influence of corrupt and criminal power structures. The power structures colluded to stage a pandemic that they had been planning for years. To this end, they deliberately created mass panic through false statements of fact and a socially engineered psychological operation whose messages they conveyed through the corporate media. The purpose of this mass panic was to persuade the population to agree to experimental so-called “vaccinations" - which they are not. These have been proven to be neither effective nor safe, but extremely dangerous and even lethal. The investigation serves as a model proceeding to secure indictments against some of the criminally and civilly responsible figureheads of these crimes against humanity. A secondary purpose is to create awareness about the factual collapse of the current hijacked system and its institutions, and, as a consequence, awareness of: - the necessity of the people themselves retaking their sovereignty, - the necessity of first stopping the measures by refusing to comply, - and the necessity of jump-starting the people's own new systems of health care, education, economics and judiciary, so that democracy and the rule of law on the basis of our Constitutions will be re-established. TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY The purpose of this Grand Jury Summary is to make the most important information revealed by the expert witnesses accessible to as many people as possible. We have focused on those facts that reveal what is really going on in our world, to help the public understand the graveness of the current world crisis. Those who want to get the full spectrum of details, please watch the full video sessions here: StopWorldControl.com/jury This document is part one of five Grand Jury Summaries. It contains critical information from Day 2, titled The General Historic and Geopolitical Backdrop to All of This. This may well be the most important session of the entire Grand Jury proceeding, as it exposes how a masterplan has been created to achieve total world domination under the guise of health emergencies. The Opening Statements are not included, as they are not too lengthy and can easily be viewed on our website: StopWorldControl.com/jury DEFENDING HUMANITY We encourage every reader to distribute this Grand Jury Summary within their community. The criminal power structures rely entirely on the ignorance of the people. Once the public becomes informed, they shift from unquestioning compliance to intelligent resistance. Therefore, the single most important action we can all take is to inform others. We must especially educate all those who have a position of influence in our communities. Send this Grand Jury Summary, either in digital or printed form, to school directors and teachers, hospital directors and medical staff, law enforcement officers, lawyers and judges, pastors, mayors and commissioners, local media editors and journalists. There are many cheap online printing services where you can upload this PDF and have it printed in as many copies as you like. Just Google "cheap book printing" and you can start comparing. If many of us would invest some time and resources to print hundreds or even thousands of this document, and distribute it in our communities and country, we could have a tremendous impact. This information really needs to reach all those in a position of public service. These members of our societies are unknowingly the minions of the criminals, as they blindly follow orders that directly lead to the death of millions of people, and the permanent damaging of hundreds of millions of lives. Once all our public servants people understand what is really going on, they will stop being the extensions of the criminal hands, lest they become consciously complicit. If we don’t stand up and act now, we may forever lose the ability to do so, as the World Economic Forum is preparing to install global governance over the flow of information and the internet, and will attempt to forever shut the mouth of all who value the freedom of humanity. If there ever was a time for all to rise and act, it is now. The editor, David J. Sörensen StopWorldControl.com THE CITY OF LONDON FIRST SUMMARY The expert witnesses during session 2 of the Grand Jury are a former officer of the British Intelligence Services (partner agency to the US National Security Agency), and a Canadian investigative journalist. They explain the long history of the aim for world dominance by the British elite. The British Empire still exists, and includes the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, 19 African Countries, and the Caribbean, while they extend their hand into virtually every other nation of the world. Their headquarters are in the City of London, an area of one square mile, which is the financial center of the world. The City of London isn’t governed by the British government but on the contrary reigns supreme over it. The City of London has its own courts and police and has never been challenged in its sovereignty and self-government. It rules over the Crown and over most of the Earth. The British elite believe they have the right to enslave the rest of humanity, which they consider to be their 'livestock'. In their views they own the population - body, mind and soul. Democracy is only an illusion to keep the people at peace, while the City of London calls the shots and pulls the strings. This elite made several attempts at so-called ‘New World Orders’, which all failed. They almost succeeded in reigning in the United States but failed there as well. Now they use the COVID-19 pandemic to further their goal of world domination, using psychological techniques to get the world population to blindly obey their every command, under the guise of 'keeping everybody safe'. Mind control has for a long time been at the heart of their strategy. After three industrial revolutions, a fourth industrial revolution is now emerging that focuses on owning the minds of the people. The deeper purpose of the vaccination programs is to edit the genome of humanity, and thus create a new transhuman race that will behave according to the desires of the oligarchs. This has always been the ultimate desire of tyrants in the past, but only now does technology allow the re-creation of humanity to become the perfect slaves. Our world is threatened by a rebirth of the ancient system of slavery, which has been technologically upgraded to install a whole new level of all encompassing slavery over the entire world population. EXPERT WITNESS ALEX THOMSON (Editors note: I've been listening to Alex since he started with UK Column. An impressive mind with encyclopedic knowledge, clearly making him one of the brightest minds in the world today. Follow him on Telegram here: https://t.me/EastApp) Alex Thomson is a former officer of Britain’s Signal Intelligence Agency, GCHQ, the partner agency of NSA (National Security Agency - USA). He was desk officer for the former Soviet Union and a transcriber of intercepted material. Thomson was part of GCHQ’s cross-disciplinary team for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats, CBRN. As an intelligence officer Alex learned about the British strategy for world domination. He explains the historic background and the current power structure of the British Empire, and how the COVID-19 pandemic plays a key role in their agenda. The following is a summary of the most important information revealed by Alex Thomson. To get all the details, please watch the full session here: StopWorldControl.com/jury The City of London is the financial heart of the British Empire and the dominant power in the world. It readied itself for that situation from roughly 1870. The modern world, the monopolization, the cartelization of the world, begins at that time. Everything that we do in investigating the corruption emanating from British Crown monopolies and City of London money does seem to point back to this period from around 1870, in which there were several revolutions by the British elite. These revolutions all revolved around containing productivity and preventing a growth of intelligence and intellectual property among the native peoples of the British Empire and in competitor nations. There was a revolution in what you might call mind space, which since 2010 has been an explicit term used by the British government’s central department, the Cabinet Office. A revolution in the quality of education offered to British and other Western schoolchildren. A revolution in the theft of intellectual property by the elite. A revolution in the model of healthcare and free access to it. At home, a constitutional revolution from the classic British Liberal democracy model. This all happened since 1870, and in Britain it was largely complete by the crucial year 1947- 1948 when Britain had a unique situation of a National Health Service and was pushing the way towards the military unification of the European continent and the whole of NATO. Britain was leading the world in reinventing how it managed its population. The center node is the City of London, the square mile at the very heart of what is now called Greater London. The City of London: Has a legal status apart from the 32 other London boroughs. Its privileges were entrenched as early as Magna Carta 1215. Its self-government has never been challenged. It has, at many times in its history, had power over the British Crown and hence over a large slice of the Earth during the British Empire. The City of London has control over the Westminster Parliament, notably in the form of an official of the City of London known as the Remembrancer, who sits in the House of Commons where not even the monarch is allowed to enter, and records what is being said against financial interests. The Cabinet Office is a department which was set up in the early 20th century, as the repository of Crown prerogatives. From around 1870, the constitutional revolution has ensured that financiers controlling political parties actually pull believers of Crown prerogatives. Behind the scenes, the model of government Britain still is that of an inner sanctum, the Privy Council, which actually governs in the name of The Crown. It is only for show that parliament and government departments are consulted. OWNING THE MINDS OF HUMANITY The history academic at Georgetown University, Carroll Quigley, former tutor of Bill Clinton, wrote in his book, Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, that there have been four industrial revolutions. Yes, that familiar language coming from the World Economic Forum was being written about in the 1960s already by Quigley. The perspective which is being assumed here is that of who owns the population, first in Britain and then in the British Empire. First revolution: the ownership of land, of agricultural means provides wealth Second revolution: mechanical - industrial Third revolution: in which financial capital dominates the world It's from this period around 1870 onwards that the smart money in the City of London realizes that even that bubble is going to burst. The most efficient way to own the world in the future, will be to own the minds. That is the fourth industrial revolution. Both the British and the German elite were determined to achieve world domination, both industrially and in the mind space. The City of London’s trading model emphasized the importance of controlling, not just military force or physical assets anymore, but the minds of people now known as human resources. This is why science fiction starts speaking about ownership of man’s genetic makeup from this time. The City of London and Britain’s very wealthy soft power institutions continue to regard that battle for the mind as their top priority for world domination, and they regard health as a subsector of that battle. The British elite regard themselves still as the world’s leading power in mind space. The strategy taught in boarding schools, universities or officer training of intelligence agencies is very much the credo of the leading bloodlines of elite families that run the City of London. And it is the modus operandi of the Anglo-American tax exempt foundations and of the thinktanks such as Chatham House, above all, which push the agendas of those bloodlines upon the Western governments. FOCUS ON WORLD DOMINATION A key figure from the year 1870 is that of John Ruskin, seemingly an innocuous figure because he was the first professor of art at Oxford, but he brought the doctrine that the British elite really had a duty to export its own world view to the rest of the world. And his key student whom he inspired was Cecil Rhodes, who became fabulously wealthy in Southern Africa. Cecil Rhodes wrote secret diaries and formed secret societies. In 1891, after 16 years of planning, his main secret society was formed – the Rhodes Scholarships are part of that society. Oxford members of the Rhodes network were the likes of Lord Toynbee and Lord Milner, well-known geo- strategists. In Cambridge there was the future Foreign Secretary, Lord Grey and Lord Esher. In London there was the leading journalist at the time, W.T. Stead, and initiates and members of the Executive Committee of Cecil Rhodes were the above-named men, plus Lord Rothschild. After Rhodes’ death in 1902, other leading English bloodlines that repeatedly plagued the City of London history, such as the Astors, came into the same circle. The outer circle became known as the Round Table Group, still functioning in the United States and seven other countries, set up from 1909 onwards. This group regarded the success of the Canadian Federation, 1867, as its leading case study. Canada was effectively politically unified. In order to prevent there being a spread of different views, different English-speaking democracies in the world, they must instead all be traced back to the City of London’s control. This is very contemporary too because among the many Rhodes scholars that dominate world politics and push the world towards globalism are Bill Clinton and, from the World Economic Forum, the New Zealand Lady Professor Ngaire Woods, who this year became very well known for her saying at the WEF that the elite can do beautiful things if they come together and if the people of the world simply accept that they are in the lead. This vision did not remain the ravings of a particularly wealthy Englishman, but they nativized themselves in the United States in the so-called Eastern Establishment, the Eastern Seaboard, as the United States became the world’s dominant power. The key testimony on this is that of Norman Dodd, given shortly before his death in 1982 to G. Edward Griffin, easily found online as Norman Dodd on the tax-exempt foundations. Dodd was the key staffer for Reese, the congressman from East Tennessee, who in the 1950s on behalf of Congress carried out an investigation into the effect of these tax-exempt foundations in the United States. These foundations implemented the City of London’s and Cecil Rhodes’ vision for world domination. It is not enough to be by far the world’s greatest military and economic power. If your mind space is still controlled by the unexamined assumption that everyone at the top is paid up to liberty, then a club with self-interest is still going to run the world. And even in areas such as healthcare, which Britain first socialized in 1948, you’re going to find that people wrongly and blithely assume that their best interests are kept at heart. The offshoot of the City of London in Manhattan in Wall Street-funded both sides of both world wars. Serious academics such as Anthony Sutton, who was at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University in California, have written whole books about this entitled Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler. There was a whole trail of documents which was recovered by Anthony Sutton. It cost him his tenure at Stanford. What he found was that both the Soviet Union and the Third Reich were brought into being for the interests of the City of London and more particularly, its Wall Street end. Just one example of the total reach of British intelligence in areas which is not constitutionally able or permitted to have, is that MI5, even before the Second World War, was vetting who got onto the airwaves of the BBC, who got promoted and who got transferred. It was set up by the bloodlines to further their private aims. The British Cabinet Office is openly speaking about its control of the world’s thinking and the thinking of the British people. They’re labelling parts of the brain under the label of MINDSPACE. Their document says: “Even if people agree with the behavior goal, they may object to the means of accomplishing it. The different MINDSPACE effects will attract different levels of controversy. There are several factors that determine controversy.” "The goal is therefore to make sure that citizens don't fully realize that their behavior is being changed, or at least how it is being changed." "Clearly, this opens government up to charges of manipulation. People have a strong dislike of being tricked. This dislike has a psychological grounding, but fundamentally it is an issue of trust in government. A lack of conscious control also has implications for consent and freedom of choice. First, it creates a greater need for citizens to approve the use of the behavior change, perhaps using new forms of Democratic engagement." In this model, democracy is the highest good that’s sold, but the levers of manipulating democracy are in the hands of the cartel. Reiner Fuellmich: Is it correct that the City of London is the real powerhouse in the UK? Alex Thomson: Without any doubt. This is something that if you’ve had my background, you learn at boarding school, let alone at university. And by the time you get into the civil service, there is a lot of eyerolling if you ever suggest that the people of Britain, or any other country in the Commonwealth, have self-determination. The City of London is understood to own the population, body, mind and soul. Reiner Fuellmich: Ultimately, it’s the control of the people’s mind that the City of London really wanted, to further their goal of world domination. Is that correct? Alex Thomson: Yes. Reiner Fuellmich: So ultimately what we’re seeing is a very powerful institution – City of London – which bridges the Atlantic because as its fifth column they have Wall Street. Those two powers united are the center of power in this world. Alex Thomson: There are struggles. For a long time there was the completely nontrivial Cold War, with branches of the aristocracy in the City of London being both pro- and anti-Soviet. Union. I could talk for hours just about that. But that is secondary to the determination that there must be only a German block and a Russian block in Eurasia, and that both of these ultimately must be controlled and hemmed in by British or Anglo-American sea power and Anglo-American soft power setting the paradigms for them. Reiner Fuellmich: Another thing that I wanted to clarify is, you mentioned that it is just a few families who really run the City of London. You mentioned the names of Rothschild and Rhodes and Astor. Is it true that it’s just a few families who are trying to dominate the world through the City of London? Alex Thomson: Yes. I have never found better material than that of a writing duo which is Dutch/ German-American. The Dutchman is Robin de Ruiter. His American German co-author is Fritz Springmeier from South Carolina. They have the rather shocking book titled Bloodlines of the Illuminati. But their work is solid. They consistently show that the City of London, Manhattan, the European continent, are very much dominated by a small number of families. Often 13 is given as the top level of these families. Obviously, there are levels below that. The French, for example, often spoke about “les 200 familles,” the 200 bloodlines, that run the deep state. But the senior ones terrorize the junior ones, and the highest you can get up before you disappear into nebulous claims of Satan running the world, which ultimately, I believe he does. But the highest level you can get up to is a level at which Central European Germanic bloodlines have an uneasy truce with British Isles bloodlines, most of whom are now based in the United States. Reiner Fuellmich: And one of the major means through which these very few families are trying to dominate the rest of the world, seems to be through mind space, which sounds like mind control. Does that mean through psychological operations? Alex Thomson: Very much so. No nation got into the game of psychological operations earlier than Britain. As soon as there were formal intelligence agencies in Britain in the Edwardian era, just before the First World War, it was a major concentration. But they borrowed a lot of their insights from Vienna and from Germany, which were leading in the psychological space at the time. This is a transnational interest in both the Anglo and the Germanic areas of world domination at the time, to use the tricks of mind space. And these were largely perfected when America had unchallenged Germany after 1945, using a lot of the Third Reich and Soviet minds who were actually brought over to the United States surreptitiously during Operation Paperclip. Mind control has been regarded - since the days of Edward Bernays and Freud - as the most powerful way of controlling action in the real world. If you have that power, you control people who are more numerous, more intelligent and stronger than yourself. The above is just the start of the doc. Please download an original copy here ENGLISH DANISH TRANSLATION BY CLIFF Hjulskov.© You can send inquiries regarding any errors or other questions to :Cliff-Lind: Hjulskov.© on MeWe Facebook Fazeday GETTR Twitter Go For Freedom In Love of Biology

Fascinating update and insights by New Zealand’s Dr Robin Wakeling. (Video at base of the highlights.) Dr Robin Wakeling confirms that the parasite-looking shapes are NOT parasites. They are though, just as worrying since the structures mistaken as parasites are collapsed red blood cells. He also confirms that even though quadrangular crystals are found in other samples (like cholesterol within urine) the chip-like crystals forming within the vaccines are still a total unknown... These are some of Dr Robin Wakeling's main observations RED BLOOD CELL COLLAPSE Red blood cell membranes that are under stress e.g. toxins and are known to ‘unravel’ and form free colloidal structures. In normal situations, enzymes like Lipases (which break down fats) can cause this breakdown of the blood cell membrane - since the membrane is 50% cholesterol itself. He noticed that red blood cells for those who'd had the Pfizer jab. destruct more often and easily. In a healthy person, one in several hundred show this effect. In the injected, the cells are destructing, the cell membrane is unravelling. SAMPLE OF BLOOD AFTER PFIZER JAB The spherical structure is a healthy blood cell. The squiggly shape above is a collapsed red blood cell. Cholestric Ordering’ ‘Cholestric Ordering’ is wrapping around itself into a helix and mimicking DNA strands. To give an idea of how rare this effect should be, a top NZ blood specialist did not recognise what they were seeing within these images,. Dr Robin Wakeling's background in colloidal chemistry enabled his analysis A way to think of the effect is by imagining the deference between a full parachute and one that has collapsed tangling and twisting upon itself. NO PARASITES The starfish-shaped images have fooled many into thinking they have seen parasites, but they are in fact liquid crustal colloidal structures from the destructed Red Blood Cell membrane. However, the horror remains. Blood cells are robust and should not disintegrate like this, and definitely not on the scale witnessed within the blood of the jabbed. CRYSTAL STRUCTURES FORMING WITHIN THE VACCINE Dr Robin Wakeling points out: Sometimes the crystal formations appear quickly Sometimes nothing forms Sometimes seemingly empty slides when re-examined a day later have then formed these network like structures He notes the long thin aerial-like structures that grow The self assembling structures seem to avoid each other. A COMPARISON - CRYSTALS WITH PERPENDICULAR EDGES FOUND IN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES CHOLESTEROL CRYSTALS FOUND WITHIN URINE COMPARISON: CHOLESTEROL CRYSTALS FOUND WITHIN URINE Dr Robin Wakeling points out that the Pfizer vaccine does have cholesterol, as a declared ingredient, but the Graphene containing AFLURIA QUAD FLU vaccine does not, so he deduces there must be another component causing the identical structures that are found in each. THE VIDEO HOW TO DETOXIFY The big question right now is how to detox from the pollutants, whether jabbed or even jab-free. Whether it’s graphene, metals or cationic lipids via the injection, or fluoride, chlorine or hormones via our water or airborne toxins via exhaust fumes or even aerosolised pathogens. The best course of action is to avoid these in the first place, but achieving 100% avoidance is hard. We filter or distil our water at home but then go out for a coffee or have ice in a cold drink. Some of us avoid the jabs but have close relationships with loved ones who might have made different choices. And few of us in cities can do much about the airborne toxins. We all need to find a natural way to detoxify from these pollutants We also need to find a way to build and maintain our natural immunity. There have always been three steps to investigating the truth about the contents of the c19 jabs. 1 - Investigate 2 - Inform and warn. 3 - Find solutions However unnerving or frightening the revelations of deliberate ‘contamination’ have been, the great news is that all of these toxins can be dealt with by our immune system. This means we don’t need more medications to interfere in the natural processes. We need a way to assist our natural immune systems. The same natural immune systems that have been refined over millennia and passed down by our ancestors. The immune system that over generations kept our genetic lines intact until today, surviving plague, pestilence and pathogen. The fact we are alive today is testimony and proof to that power built within us all. To find out how to boost our immunity and detox naturally click here

This is Not On The Beeb's 66th report translating the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The data concerns injuries and deaths up to the 29th June. The stats are then released to the public a week later, so in this case, on the 7th July Overall 1-in-117 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Here is the breakdown of the most recent report. As of the 29th of June there are 2,207 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 29th June 2022. (there is a one-week + time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 82 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m 1st doses = 53,577,314 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,126,662 Boosters = 39,931,494 (30.5m Pfizer, 57,900 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,635,470 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death 171,913 Pfizer 245,771 AZ 39,809 Moderna 1768 Unknown TOTAL = 459,261 Fatal Pfizer 803 AZ 1,291 Moderna 64 Unknown 49 TOTAL = 2207 Blood Disorders - 17,182 (Pfizer) + 7873 (AZ) + 2567 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,687 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1647 Acute Cardiac - 13,563 (Pfizer) + 11,584 (AZ) + 3499 (Moderna) + 119 (Unknown) = 28,765 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1358 (Pfizer) + 457 (AZ) + 359 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 2183 Eye Disorders - 8197 (Pfizer) + 15,029 (AZ) + 1641 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,961 Blindness - 170 (Pfizer) + 330 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 546 Deafness - 308 (Pfizer) + 435 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 804 Liver Disorders - 280 (Pfizer) + 543 (AZ) + 49 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 882 Infections - 12,789 (Pfizer) + 20,593 (AZ) + 2565 (Moderna) + 199 (Unknown) = 36,146 Spontaneous Abortions - 498 + 16 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 238 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 814 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,210 (Pfizer) + 183,530 (AZ) + 21,451 (Moderna) + 938 (Unknown) = 288,129 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 832 (Pfizer) + 2391 (AZ) + 72 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3316 Paralysis - 531 (Pfizer) + 907 (AZ) + 121 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1570 Seizures - 1155 (Pfizer) + 2099 (AZ) + 302 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 3580 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,895 (Pfizer) + 81,186 (AZ) + 11,618 (Moderna) + 419 (Unknown) = 136,118 Nausea & Vomiting - 21,004 (Pfizer) + 45,607 (AZ) + 6956 (Moderna) + 215 (Unknown) = 73,782 Muscle & Tissue Disorders - 56,641 (Pfizer) + 104,880 (AZ) + 14,848 (Moderna) + 598 (Unknown) = 176,967 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,403 (Pfizer) + 18,555 (AZ) + 2646 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,734 Respiratory Disorders - 22,191 (Pfizer) + 30,017 (AZ) + 4595 (Moderna) + 233 (Unknown) = 57,036 Skin Disorders - 34,746 (Pfizer) + 53,578 (AZ) + 13,640 (Moderna) + 391 (Unknown) = 102,355 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,506 (Pfizer) + 20,925 (AZ) + 5272 (Moderna) + 238 (Unknown) = 57,941 Vascular Disorders - 7704 (Pfizer) + 14,040 (AZ) + 1400 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 23,258 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 4,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,400,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3901 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 264 Yellow Cards Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1900 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 31 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 33 Yellow Cards Total = 4,013,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,626,700 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4229 For full reports including 363 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

By Aaron Kheriaty For two decades scientists have been quietly developing self-spreading contagious vaccines. The NIH funded this research, in which either DNA from a deadly pathogen is packaged in a contagious but less harmful virus, or the deadly virus’s lethality is weakened by engineering it in a lab. The resultant “vaccines” spread from one person to the next just like a contagious respiratory virus. Only five percent of regional populations would need to be immunized; the other ninety-five percent would “catch” the vaccine as it spread person-to-person through community transmission. This technology bypasses the inconvenience of recalcitrant citizens who may refuse to give consent. Its advocates highlight that a mass vaccination campaign that would ordinarily take months of expensive effort to immunize everyone could be shortened to only a few weeks. Scientists have already shown proof of concept in animal populations: in 2000, Spanish researchers injected seventy rabbits with a transmissible vaccine and returned them to the wild, where they quickly passed the vaccine on to hundreds more, reportedly stopping a viral outbreak. European countries are now testing the technology on pigs. In the wake of the covid pandemic, about a dozen research institutions in the U.S., Europe, and Australia are investigating the potential human uses for self-spreading vaccines. The federal Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), for example, is examining this technology for U.S. military to protect against the West Africa lassa fever, a virus spread by rats to humans. This project, it should be noted, does not require the consent of our military service men and women. In 2019 the U.K. government began exploring this technology to address the seasonal flu. A research paper from Britain’s Department of Health and Social Care advised that university students could be an obvious target group: They do not work so [vaccinating them] will not cause much economic disruption and most have second homes to go to, thereby spreading the vaccine. Researchers admitted a contagious vaccine for an attenuated flu virus would cause some deaths but estimated these would be less than the original influenza virus. As the U.K. government report described: Self-spreading vaccines are less lethal but not non-lethal: they can still kill. Some people will die who would otherwise have lived, though fewer people die overall. As the saying goes, you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. Or in Lenin’s formulation, if you are going to chop down a forest then wood chips will fly. Contagious vaccines are in our future, their champions claim, and are no different than putting fluoride in drinking water. Plus, for those who find jabs unpleasant there are fewer needles required. Government-funded research of lab-engineered viruses to create contagious self-spreading vaccines that bypass the consent of citizens. What could go wrong? Author: Aaron Kheriaty Aaron Kheriaty, former Professor of Psychiatry at the UCI School of Medicine and Director, Medical Ethics at UCI Health, is a Senior Scholar of the Brownstone Institute. SOURCE: https://brownstone.org/articles/contagious-vaccines-a-warning/ The controversial quest to make a 'contagious' vaccine A new technology aims to stop wildlife from spreading Ebola, rabies, and other viruses. It could prevent the next pandemic by stopping pathogens from jumping from animals to people. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/the-controversial-quest-to-make-a-contagious-vaccine

As we reported a couple of weeks ago, the MHRA has now stepped down their release of C19 vaccine injury submitted by UK doctors and patients from a weekly report, to monthly The total weekly cases of vaccine injury are decreasing, yet each death has a devastating impact on the family. We should also remember that for every death reported, at least another nine are not. By Kathy Gyngell For Conservative Woman EASILY missed in the latest Medicines and Regulatory Healthcare products Agency (MHRA) Yellow Card Report is its plan to reduce its updates from weekly to just once a month from August. Either chief executive Dr June Raine and her team have grown accustomed to being paid to have time off as the country’s toll of vaccine victims mounts, or they have no taste for this particular task. It is moot whether this fast-developing ‘drugs regulator for hire’ is fit to carry out this monitoring job at all. Seventeen years ago it stood accused of losing sight of ‘the need to protect and promote public health above all else’ as it sought to win ‘fee income’ from the drugs companies. Today, those fees dominate its income. But there is worse. The appalling quality of its Covid vaccine Yellow Card reporting, plus its consistent failure to respond to the urgent concerns of top doctors and scientists, betray not just a low prioritisation, not just a ‘standard’ conflict of interests but, given its advocacy of crony capitalist mRNA biotech minimally tested novel vaccines, an unauthorised change of role in direct conflict with its regulatory purpose. Speaking at her Oxford alma mater six weeks ago, June Raine openly boasted of her transformation of the MHRA from a watchdog to an ‘enabler’, wonderfully catalysed by the Covid pandemic. An enabler of what? Experimental gene therapies that bypass traditional testing protocols? Her speech which I will comment on in detail tomorrow in these pages is deeply concerning. It exposes her as a fully signed-up Covid cultist or fanatic who believes that Oxford University’s research has saved millions of lives – presented as a given, requiring no proof for which there is none. In it, without conscience, let alone second thoughts, she boasts explicitly of her unilateral decision to ditch the MHRA’s watchdog role and the opportunity Covid presented to tear up the rulebook on efficacy standards. Seemingly oblivious to the AstraZeneca vaccine’s withdrawal by several countries following thousands of reported adverse events and fatalities, she recounts its rollout as a triumph for science. Just weeks later, as if to underline this newly self-appointed ‘enabling role’, we find the once watchdog cheering on another experimental gene therapy, this time for polio. Perhaps we should not be surprised therefore that its latest Yellow Card report is most notable for denying that its own vaccine fatality data has any meaning, though by MHRA admission these statistics are massively under-reported. That perhaps is why, although reported fatalities had reached 2,191 by June 15, the update tells us so little about them. It was for this reason I commissioned an analysis of the data that can be gleaned from the published regulatory agency adverse event tables. This shows that fatalities reported by vaccine type are 794 (Pfizer) + 1,287 (AZ) + 62 (Moderna) + 48 (Unknown) = 2,191 (including six suicides). But what of the vaccines’ relative risk? Is one more to blame than others? To answer that requires a fatality reporting rate. The MHRA is, conveniently, not interested. It states ‘that Yellow Card data cannot be used to derive side-effect rates or compare the safety profile of Covid-19 vaccines as many factors can influence ADR reporting’. Don’t the public have the right to know which factors exactly are so different between brands? It is not so much the inadequacy of the MHRA’s data collection that is the problem, it is the lack of investigation of the data and hence the lack od meaningful reporting that is the issue. They do not reveal, for example, whether or not the child and booster related figures are included in or excluded from certain totals, or whether there have been any child or booster related fatalities. It could insist on this information breakdown. Instead they provide very little from which to draw conclusions that would enable healthcare professionals and the public to make an informed consent decision of risk. All that can be calculated from the data provided is fatality per dose: · Pfizer – 81.9m doses – 794 fatalities = 1 in 103,149 · AZ – 49.06m doses – 1,287 fatalities = 1 in 38,120 · Moderna – 12.5m doses – 62 fatalities = 1 in 201,613 · Brand Unknown = unknown This doesn’t account for some people having one dose and some having four doses, or the booster being a different brand and so on. The overall fatality rate may well be higher per person injected. What is strikingly clear however is that fatalities associated with AstraZeneca are markedly higher than for the other vaccines, a trajectory that surely could have been spotted prior to the administration of all 49million doses. Yet not only has this vaccine not been withdrawn (it is simply not advised for younger age groups), astonishingly 100 AZ boosters were reported to have been administered since the previous week’s reporting. Could this blindspot be anything to do with Dr June Raine’s enthusiasm for Oxford’s role in fighting the Covid plague? The MHRA is also less than transparent about the adverse event ‘categories’ most associated with the fatalities. Again, we had to dig into the regulatory adverse event data tables to find this. Most fall into a conveniently designated ‘General’ category – a lucky dip of multiple organ dysfunction and failure, sudden death, sudden cardiac death and more. The top categories for each vaccine are listed below: Pfizer 250 ‘general’ disorders 164 cardiac disorders 120 infections 95 nervous system disorder (which includes Guillain-Barré syndrome, paralysis, seizure, brain injury, brain stem haemorrhage, transient ischaemic attack) 67 respiratory disorders AstraZeneca 405 general disorders 237 nervous system disorders 209 cardiac disorders 149 respiratory disorders 116 infections 79 vascular disorders Moderna 30 general disorders 12 cardiac disorders 5 nervous system disorders Unknown Brand 16 general disorders 8 cardiac disorders 7 respiratory disorders A complete set of tables for all categories relating to each brand can be found in this associated PDF. What the MHRA does do is denial. In fact it presents a masterclass in this art in its section ‘Comments on safety in specific populations’. Under the sub-heading ‘Safety of Covid-19 vaccines in pregnancy’ it says: ‘Pregnant women have reported similar suspected reactions to the vaccines as people who are not pregnant. Reports of miscarriage and stillbirth are also low in comparison to how commonly these events occurred in the UK outside of the pandemic.’ This rather brutally implies that since women commonly have miscarriages anyway it doesn’t matter if the vaccines cause a few more. ‘A few reports of commonly occurring congenital anomalies and obstetric events have also been received’. So nothing to worry about here either: ‘There is no pattern from the reports to suggest that any of the Covid-19 vaccines used in the UK, or any reactions to these vaccines, increase the risk of miscarriage, stillbirths, congenital anomalies or birth complications.’ Really? How about that in addition to the 20 stillbirths and foetal deaths recorded among the fatalities for all brands, to the week ending June 15, there’s an overall total of 495 spontaneous abortions (Pfizer) + 236 (AZ) + 71 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) reported – a hardly insignificant 809 miscarriages recorded in total. All to be discounted, apparently, though this number has grown significantly in the six months since Sally Beck investigated vaccine related reproductive problems for TCW in January. And what evidence is given of these very sad cases being thoroughly investigated and definitively found to be unrelated to the vaccines? None. And why is no age data provided for example, greater than 24 weeks gestation up to neonate? (MHRA do define stillbirth as greater than 24 weeks, and a miscarriage is less than 24 weeks’ gestation.) Apart from just one identified fatality ‘disorder category’, shockingly no specific or across the board age breakdown data is provided at all. This exception is 81 fatalities ‘from thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts)’ noted in the section ‘Comments on specific safety topics’, and quoted as accepted fatalities, not ‘suspected’, received for the Covid-19 vaccine AstraZeneca. They are set out by age in Table 6, the large majority under 70 years old and 32 of them between 18 and 49. 32 (Pfizer) Yellow Card reports of major thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) are also identified for 13 females, and 18 males between the ages of 18 to 91 years, (no age breakdown provided) with an overall case fatality rate of 13 per cent and four deaths reported. There is no mention in the summary text of the three other categories that have related fatalities recorded in the vaccine brand pdfs under these headings: · Anaphylactoid reactions recorded with related fatalities – 2 (Pfizer) + 2 (AZ) · Immune thrombocytopenia recorded with related fatalities – 1 (AZ) + 3 (Brand Unknown) · Guillain-Barré syndrome recorded with related fatalities – 2 (Pfizer) + 5 (AZ) Shockingly despite more than 4,000 Yellow Card Reports now filed for children (under 18s) – 3,857 for Pfizer and 264 for AstraZeneca – no details are disclosed as to their nature. Are we supposed to take the MHRA’s word when it says they mirror those in the general population? Yet this is put into serious doubt by the discussion text under ‘Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18 years old’ section, in which myocarditis and pericarditis are the only and key child related conditions that the MHRA specifically highlights. Even more culpably the MHRA provides no age-related data for these adverse events, nor for the six separately and untabulated but identified ‘fatal suspected’ myocarditis or pericarditis events associated with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines or for the five fatal events associated with the AZ vaccine, both reported in a later section. Yet a special warning to alert healthcare professionals of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in children is given in the drug formulation documents for Pfizer for 12 years and over dose – and 5-11 years dose which raises the question of whether any or all of these 11 deaths have, in fact, been in the under-18 age group. The MHRA in response to questions on these specific cases has said it has no more information to relay. Yet it is notable that some worrying cases of sudden unexplained death in teens have been reported in the media this year. Also of concern is an ONS identified spike in male teen deaths in 2021 which the MHRA insists was ‘administrative’ and due to delayed death reporting. In conclusion their discussion of the 2191 fatalities can be summed up as an exercise in discounting evidence. They assert that the majority of these reports are in ‘elderly people or people with underlying illness’ yet nowhere have they provided any supporting data for this assertion. They also suggest these deaths are inevitable: ‘Based on age-stratified all-cause mortality in England and Wales taken from the Office for National Statistics death registrations, several thousand deaths are expected to have occurred, naturally, within seven days of the many millions of doses of vaccines administered so far, mostly in the elderly.’ Surely, though, if an elderly individual was expected to die within seven days it would generally be obvious, and a vaccination would likely be clinically inappropriate. Hence, common sense would suggest that an unexpected death of any cause within seven days of a vaccine warrants very careful investigation for indications of linked accelerated exacerbation of a condition or direct side-effect causation from the vaccine administration. Not on Planet MHRA. Then, finally, they essentially denounce the whole Yellow Card reporting of fatal events, saying that ‘a temporal association with vaccination’ does not mean that there is a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported, and that ‘the pattern of reporting for all other fatal reports does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths’. Such denial is surely the most incredible extrapolation from the facts ever. It makes no clinical sense and is at odds with the mounting evidence globally of vaccine fatalities, elevated risks in younger age groups (most notably the highly significant myocarditis risk), and of suppressed immune system response. ) Here is the breakdown of the most recent report. This is Not On The Beeb's 65th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The data concerns injuries and deaths up to the 15th June. The stat are then released to the public a week later, so in this case, on the 24th June. TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.8 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m 1st doses = 53,547,255 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,081,461 Boosters = 39,874,186 (30.5m Pfizer, 57,700 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,502,902 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports 171,590 Pfizer 245,614 AZ 39,514 Moderna 1745 Unknown TOTAL = 458,463 Fatal Pfizer 794 AZ 1287 Moderna 62 Unknown 48 TOTAL = 2191 Blood Disorders - 17,163 (Pfizer) + 7870 (AZ) + 2559 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,657 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1647 Acute Cardiac - 13,508 (Pfizer) + 11,554 (AZ) + 3479 (Moderna) + 117 (Unknown) = 28,658 Eye Disorders - 8169 (Pfizer) + 15,020 (AZ) + 1626 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,909 Blindness - 169 (Pfizer) + 329 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 544 Deafness - 308 (Pfizer) + 433 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 801 Infections - 12,702 (Pfizer) + 20,550 (AZ) + 2538 (Moderna) + 193 (Unknown) = 35,983 Herpes - 2256 (Pfizer) + 2708 (AZ) + 269 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5260 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,844 (Pfizer) + 81,151 (AZ) + 11,506 (Moderna) + 420 (Unknown) = 135,921 Spontaneous Abortions - 495 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 236 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 809 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,068 (Pfizer) + 183,398 (AZ) + 21,278 (Moderna) + 933 (Unknown) = 287,677 Bell’s Palsy - 652 (Pfizer) + 644 (AZ) + 105 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1404 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 106 (Pfizer) + 500 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 633 Paralysis - 527 (Pfizer) + 903 (AZ) + 121 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1562 Seizures - 1151 (Pfizer) + 2091 (AZ) + 300 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3565 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,387 (Pfizer) + 18,540 (AZ) + 2637 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,694 Respiratory Disorders - 22,138 (Pfizer) + 29,990 (AZ) + 4552 (Moderna) + 233 (Unknown) = 56,913 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1118 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 208 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3640 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1454 (Pfizer) + 2792 (AZ) + 347 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 4632 Skin Disorders - 34,672 (Pfizer) + 53,548 (AZ) + 13,572 (Moderna) + 380 (Unknown) = 102,172 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,492 (Pfizer) + 20,910 (AZ) + 5267 (Moderna) + 237 (Unknown) = 57,906 Vascular Disorders - 7680 (Pfizer) + 14,017 (AZ) + 1385 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 23,196 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 4,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,300,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3857 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 264 Yellow Cards Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1900 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 30 Yellow cards Total = 4,013,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,526,700 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4182 SOURCE full report here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/24th-june-2022-uk-vaccine-injury-report SOURCE ARTICLE: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-mhra-the-watchdog-covering-up-the-truth-about-vaccine-deaths-and-injuries/

This is Not On The Beeb's 65th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The data concerns injuries and deaths up to the 15th June. The stat are then released to the public a week later, so in this case, on the 24th June. But things are now things are changing, to quote the MHRA "..In line with the wider government’s Living with COVID-19 agenda strategy, the frequency of publication of the updated summary will be changing to every other week, before transitioning to once per month from August. Our robust safety monitoring and surveillance will continue in the normal way between publications and we will continue to communicate promptly on any updated safety information...." Here is the breakdown of the most recent report. As of the 15th of June there are 2191 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 15th June 2022. (there is a one-week + time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.8 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m 1st doses = 53,547,255 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,081,461 Boosters = 39,874,186 (30.5m Pfizer, 57,700 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,502,902 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports 171,590 Pfizer 245,614 AZ 39,514 Moderna 1745 Unknown TOTAL = 458,463 Fatal Pfizer 794 AZ 1287 Moderna 62 Unknown 48 TOTAL = 2191 Blood Disorders - 17,163 (Pfizer) + 7870 (AZ) + 2559 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,657 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1647 Acute Cardiac - 13,508 (Pfizer) + 11,554 (AZ) + 3479 (Moderna) + 117 (Unknown) = 28,658 Eye Disorders - 8169 (Pfizer) + 15,020 (AZ) + 1626 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,909 Blindness - 169 (Pfizer) + 329 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 544 Deafness - 308 (Pfizer) + 433 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 801 Infections - 12,702 (Pfizer) + 20,550 (AZ) + 2538 (Moderna) + 193 (Unknown) = 35,983 Herpes - 2256 (Pfizer) + 2708 (AZ) + 269 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5260 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,844 (Pfizer) + 81,151 (AZ) + 11,506 (Moderna) + 420 (Unknown) = 135,921 Spontaneous Abortions - 495 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 236 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 809 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,068 (Pfizer) + 183,398 (AZ) + 21,278 (Moderna) + 933 (Unknown) = 287,677 Bell’s Palsy - 652 (Pfizer) + 644 (AZ) + 105 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1404 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 106 (Pfizer) + 500 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 633 Paralysis - 527 (Pfizer) + 903 (AZ) + 121 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1562 Seizures - 1151 (Pfizer) + 2091 (AZ) + 300 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3565 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,387 (Pfizer) + 18,540 (AZ) + 2637 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,694 Respiratory Disorders - 22,138 (Pfizer) + 29,990 (AZ) + 4552 (Moderna) + 233 (Unknown) = 56,913 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1118 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 208 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3640 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1454 (Pfizer) + 2792 (AZ) + 347 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 4632 Skin Disorders - 34,672 (Pfizer) + 53,548 (AZ) + 13,572 (Moderna) + 380 (Unknown) = 102,172 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,492 (Pfizer) + 20,910 (AZ) + 5267 (Moderna) + 237 (Unknown) = 57,906 Vascular Disorders - 7680 (Pfizer) + 14,017 (AZ) + 1385 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 23,196 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,300,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3857 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 264 Yellow Cards • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1900 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 30 Yellow cards b- 31 Yellow Cards Total = 4,013,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,526,700 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4182 For full reports including 361 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. SOURCE: For full reports including 361 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Did the ONS deliberately mislead the public over the C19 risks to cause fear? Author: George Robinson This table highlights in red where the ONS caused panic by overstating mortality rates in 2020 and by implying wrongly that SARS-CoV-2 might have led to a serious rise. The paragraph numbers refer to the ONS document. The green column identifies each bias and presents a neutral commentary on the data instead. Phrases such as "10 years ago.." are written as of 2020 (when the ONS published the review), not as of today. Summary. The ONS paper unaccountably fails to provide a common sense review of 2020 mortality data because it does not properly integrate the trend in death rates over the last hundred years, or the population growth, or the ages of those who died, or the concept of a 'bonfire effect', or the unsuitability of calendar years to measure irregularly timed Winter-deaths, or the failure of a 5-year rolling average to describe the recent & highly unusual 10-year dip. Instead, inappropriate data points are selected and uncritically presented that happen to paint the most deadly possible picture of 2020. The paper repeatedly sows fear of a pandemic for example by first raising a comparison of 2020 to the Spanish 'Flu in 1918, and then unconvincingly dismissing the notion. Several similar mechanisms of subconscious influence over the reader are deployed, although flashes of guardedly accurate writing also appear, suggesting that despite an overall bias to support the national fear of a CoVid pandemic, there are also undeclared conflicts of interests between more than one contributor. Conclusion. The ONS has created pandemic fear from the 2020 data, whereas a faithful account would reassure the public that the year's data are unremarkable. Author: George Robinson, Engineer advanceheating@gmail.com Ver. 1.2, 12 May 2022 Reference document is on the ONS Blog: "Counting deaths involving coronavirus: a year in review", posted by Sarah Caul on 12th Jan 2021 Document URL is https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2021/01/12/counting-deaths-involving-coronavirus-a-year-in-review Document snapshot 2021 is https://www.dropbox.com/s/9neijo3tds0my3s/21%20OnsSarahCaulReview2020.pdf?raw=1 Introduction.