top of page
  • Odysee Films
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Telegram

Leave your comment under this article. Share widely. Buy Me a Coffee



The utter hypocrisy is beyond breathtaking.

After three years of draconian state and social media censorship of independent journalists for warning of the vaccine dangers to the world's children, the European Union, UN, BBC and MSM are up in arms because one of world's richest people Musk has suspended some mainstream media journalists' personal accounts.

What did Musk do?

His 'crime' was to suspend the accounts of those who 'doxxed' him or were associated with it.

'Doxxing' is a new internet phenomenon of intimidation, where people release the personal data of someone they don't like.

Publishing a target's home address, alongside images of their children and names of their schools is very effective at causing stress and anxiety.

Musk banned those accounts.

He caused the outrage by also suspending the accounts of journalists that had published links through to the original doxxers-which of course is effectively doxxing via a third party

Whether Musk's reaction was right or wrong, the backlash has been stunning and eye wateringly hypocritical.

The EU and UN reacted under the banner of free speech.

In an amazing step earlier on Friday, EU commissioner Vera Jourova threatened Twitter with sanctions under Europe's new Digital Services Act which she said requires:

"the respect of media freedom and fundamental rights”.

The UN tweeted that:

"media freedom is not a toy"

Melissa Fleming, the UN's under-secretary-general for global communications said,

"A free press is the cornerstone of democratic societies and a key tool in the fight against harmful disinformation."

This is all being said against the background of multiple mainstream and independent journalists having had their accounts on social media platforms, from Twitter to Facebook to Youtube, restricted or suspended for daring to publish facts and figures contradicting the governmental and industry pro-‘vaccine’ agenda.

The BBC article then goes on to explain the depth of the planned retribution.

“Any sanctions placed on Mr Musk's business over the account suspensions could be applied under the bloc's (EU's) new Digital Services Act, which was approved by the EU earlier this year.

Under the terms of the proposed new law, the EU Commission will be allowed to impose fines of up to 6% of the global turnover of a firm that it finds breaks its rules.”

In extreme cases, the EU could ask a court to suspend a rogue service, but only if it is "refusing to comply with important obligations and thereby endangering people's life and safety”.

This is astounding news. Music to the ears of many of us that have been fighting to provide critical life-saving information regarding vaccine safety and expose the real extent of vaccine-injury.

Now the EU and UN have set these lines in the sand, the question we must ask is, do these rules apply to everyone, or just apply to journalists working for an accredited media agency?

And if so, what about the journalists and frontmen who have lost their jobs due to their ‘free speech’ and have also been de-platformed from multiple social media platforms?

Also, do these rules only apply to Twitter, now that Musk owns it?

Or, do these rules also apply to Facebook, Youtube, Instagram and financial institutions playing the same game like Paypal?

If free speech is so important, then do the UN standards and EU rules apply and protect all of us from social media censorship?

i.e. do we all have the right to free speech or is free speech reserved just for the selected few?

The state of recent censorship has been so desperate, that many of us within the new media space that has risen from the ashes of blatant state-sponsored propaganda and deceit have set up a new media organisation called the United Free Press.

To give a personal example of the level of 'silencing', Not On The Beeb has been heavily censored and shadow banned by YouTube, Facebook and Instagram.

We have been financially de-platformed by Paypal and had our services with email provider Mailerlite withdrawn.

(Interestingly when Toby Young's Free Speech Union made a stand against his Paypal ban the backlash resulted in multiple closing of accounts and a stock price fall.

This is the people-power we have.)

What did we do to attract this censorship?

We stood outside the BBC and asked the simple question to camera:

“Why are the BBC not providing the public with the C19 vaccine injury data?”

To back our question, we published the government’s own MHRA yellow card data on UK vaccine injury.

Why was the resulting film banned and NOTB de-platformed/shadow banned by FB and YT?

Was the official data controversial?

The reported vaccine injury rate in the UK now stands at 1 in 114 people.

The MHRA and CDC have both admitted the real figures on vaccine injury will be approximately 10 times higher than what is reported.

Part of this underreporting is due to ignorance on behalf of the professionals and public who don't realise their obligations due to the C19 vaccine's black triangle status, and half due to logistics. As one Belgian Doctor personally told me admitting her shame:

"Yes, we (Doctors) know there are many (Covid vaccine) injuries. But I don't file them anymore. They take me 30-40 minutes each and many times after entering all the data and pressing enter, I get an error message meaning I'd have to start again. Yes, I have given up."

These failures in reporting mean the real figure will be closer to 1 in 14 people of those accepting the C19 jabs becoming injured.

I suspect that these injury stats will steadily worsen, since it will take time for people and doctors to link multiple and varying health issues to the experimental jab.

Another example of censorship is the use of fake yet convincing fact-checkers.

Not On The Beeb released ground-breaking films exposing post-vaccine magnetism. Reuters and multiple fact-checkers tried to jump on us, even though we had clearly proved the phenomena with doctors as witnesses.

The BBC even made a very low-quality disinformation film to try and quell the fire. The BBC film was a series of 'experts' claiming there was no way a vaccine could induce magnetism. Their key mistake? The one thing they didn't do was pick up a magnet and try. A major schoolboy error that would almost be laughable, except for its intention to deceive over a life-threatening issue.

You can see our work on vaccine-induced-magnetism and the associated MRI warning on our website.

The issue is simple.

As the EU puts it, have the social media giants via their censorship endangered people's life and safety?

Were the 55 million British people that accepted the jab told of all they needed to know to make a well-informed choice?

The answer is clearly no.

For instance, the Astra Zeneca jab, known on the street as the Clott-Shot, was quietly banned from the under-18s and slowly withdrawn from the adult population.

This lack of information was from the top down.

Ministers barely knew what they were talking about, showing themselves as self-interested puppets content with fat back pockets and promises of once-retired endless highly paid speaking engagements. In the truly British post-Blair way, sterilised bribes in kind.

TV doctors and famous Youtube nurses who steered the public towards the jab have now done u-turns claiming they were fooled.

Ironical as it was their job to follow due diligence before recommending life-changing jabs they didn't understand, whilst laymen and women all over the country delved deep, read the paperwork and screamed their warnings from the roof tops-and kept screaming whilst muffled by the social media censorship.

Huge public protests topping 100s of thousands were ignored by the BBC.

Protesters with placards detailing the injuries were bundled into the back of police vans and people dropping leaflets door to door were arrested.

State players like MI5 and the 77th brigade wasted the public's money targetting anti-state propagandists.

I know. They tampered with my phones and computer in attempts to stop me from interviewing doctors with different opinions to those 'Doctors' spouting their repetitive teleprompter, scripted, nonsense on the nation's TV channels, hypnotising busy parents into compliance.

Who did the public rely on, other than these TV 'media' stars?

Most GPs didn’t even know, or understand, the ingredients and simply trusted the industry and regulators.

Alongside the industry, the UK government, BBC and other media outlets clearly colluded in the deception that fooled the public, doctors and health professionals alike.

The nation was tricked.

Many of us saw through the hypnotic nonsense.

Some of us were silenced by our fears, confusion and split loyalties.

Some of us were silenced by our families and employers.

Others, like NOTB and the others at the United Free Press, were more worryingly silenced, or muffled, by state and social media censorship.

Although Melissa Fleming, the UN's under-secretary-general for global communications said:

"A free press is the cornerstone of democratic societies and a key tool in the fight against harmful disinformation,"

I think she meant,

"A free Independent press is the cornerstone of democratic societies and a key tool in the fight against harmful effects of highly funded governmental and pharma industry disinformation."

As a basic first step, before the mass prosecutions of the civil servants that failed the electorate, we need to ask EU commissioner Vera Jourova to gain some perspective.

She might be outraged that one of the richest men in the world might be worried about his child's kidnapping when so-called professional journalists effectively point out the location of his children to billions world wide.

Is she not outraged that medical experts and investigative journalists have been silenced when trying to warn of the vaccine dangers affecting hundreds of millions of children world wide... what I and others have called an impending medically induced holocaust?

EU commissioner Vera Jourova must ask the EU courts to immediately suspend or fine heavily rogue services such as Facebook, Youtube and Instagram as they have clearly, in the words of the EU:

"have failed to comply with important obligations (of free speech) and have hereby endangered people's life and safety.”

Under the terms of the proposed new law, the EU Commission will be allowed to impose fines of up to 6% of the global turnover of a firm that it finds breaks its rules.”

These monies can then be used towards compensation for the families of the ill-informed who have been killed or injured.

What can you do to help?

1 - Reply to Vera Jourova on Twitter

2 - Add your name to the over 15,000 people who have already signed our petition calling for a ban and investigation into the C19 'vaccines'.

  • Please sign.

  • Please share this article and the petition widely.

Vaccine Injunction

We are calling for an injunction to pause the vaccine rollout due to the following questions. 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing

We have two petitions running, calling for urgent analysis.

The People's petition and the Doctor's Health/expert's petition


😊 Don´t forget to leave a comment! Scroll back up! 😊

Have you found the above useful?

Do you want to support fearless independent journalism?

NOTB relies on your donations

Not On The Beeb - stuff the BBC forgot...