Search Results

Texel Island, early June, 2022 “The sky is falling! The sky is falling!” cried Chicken Little. And the sky fell, and no one listened, and all was still. by Arthur Firstenberg author of The Invisible Rainbow A scholarly literature search for “electromagnetic” + “biological effects” produces the astonishing number of 76,400 studies, more studies than for most other environmental threats, yet the world continues on, looking yet blind, listening yet deaf, mistaking silence for comfort, the advancing flames for a bright future. On the Dutch island of Texel, being the south end of a line of islands separating the Wadden Sea from the North Sea, a large breeding colony of seabirds called Sandwich terns (“great terns” in Dutch) made headline news last month by dying. Of the 7,000 birds nesting in the De Petten nature reserve until the end of May, none were left by the middle of June. 3,000 avian corpses were collected, and the rest either died or abandoned their nests. The correspondent who sent me this news, Antonia in the Netherlands, also sent me to a Dutch website that monitors all cell towers and antennas throughout the country. The tern catastrophe was being blamed on “bird flu” and she suspected something else might be going on. When I looked at the website I was floored. The first 35 dead terns at De Petten were found on May 29, 2022. There are three cell towers on the edge of the reserve, and actually in the territory which the terns inhabit. According to the website, 18 new 4G antennas had just been added to those towers – 6 by Vodafone to its 83-foot tower on May 25, 2022, and 12 by KPN to its 108-foot tower on May 29, 2022. The number of frequencies emitted by those two towers had increased overnight from 5 to 11. In addition to having all those antennas right at the reserve, De Petten is located on the northern edge of a waterway that separates the North Sea from the Wadden Sea, and a large number of antennas on both sides of that waterway -- the antennas in Den Helder to the south and the antennas on Texel to the north -- are aimed at that busy waterway, which is intensely used by the ships that continually pass through it. Consequently, according to my research, there are a total of 105 4G antennas within 7 miles of De Petten that are aimed directly at it. Were Texel’s Sandwich terns already in bad shape from all the radiation they had been exposed to in the last few years? And did the sudden increase in both the number of antennas and the number of frequencies finally kill them? I decided to investigate further. What I have discovered, both in the Netherlands and elsewhere, is consistent but not simple. Here are some rough rules: (a) A sudden dramatic increase in the number of antennas and frequencies whose source is within a breeding colony or on its border is lethal. Nesting birds cannot avoid the radiation; they must either abandon their nests or die. (b) The effect of antennas aimed at a breeding colony from a distance depends on the human population. In a sparsely populated region, the antennas emit little radiation and few frequencies because few people are using them. By contrast, cell towers located in major ports are heavily used, both by residents and ships, and emit maximal radiation. The same is true of antennas aimed at heavily used shipping lanes. (c) Distance does not matter as much as terrain and tower height. The radiation from a taller tower travels further. And when there is nothing but water between the tower and the bird colony, the water reflects and amplifies the signal and distance matters very little. (d) 4G towers are generally worse than 5G towers. This is because 4G towers broadcast their radiation in all directions while 5G towers emit most of their radiation in focused beams, aimed directly at people holding 5G phones in their hands. With these rules in mind, let us look at a few other breeding colonies of Sandwich terns and see what has happened to them this year: Another large breeding colony of Sandwich terns made headlines a bit later, and for the same reason: the one at Waterdunen, at the opposite end of the Netherlands, in Zeeland province. Like De Petten, the Waterdunen nature reserve is located on a busy shipping lane at the entrance to a busy port. The largest colony of these birds in the Netherlands, Waterdunen hosted 7,000 pairs of terns that flew up from Africa to breed there this spring. But on June 24, 2022, it was reported that 4,600 dead adult and young Sandwich terns had been collected there during the previous two weeks. By the end of June, this colony no longer existed either. The nature reserve at Waterdunen has 318 heavily-used 4G antennas aimed in its direction from distances of from 0.5 to 8 miles. Most of these emit between 1,000 and 2,000 watts of radiation each. 46 of these antennas are new, having been added to existing towers in April, May and June 2022. One 55-foot tower less than 2 miles down the beach from Waterdunen was upgraded on May 18, 2022 from 6 antennas to 12 and from 2 frequencies to 4. Another, 40-foot tower in the same location was upgraded on June 22, 2022 from 6 antennas to 18 and from 2 frequencies to 6. As Sandwich terns live on fish, those towers are within the foraging area for that colony. Did the same thing happen to all nesting Sandwich terns in the Netherlands? No. Just 20 miles from Waterdunen was a small, healthy colony of terns at a nature reserve called Yerseke Moer. And from April to July, i.e. throughout the 2022 nesting season, this colony thrived and no dead birds were found there. Unlike De Petten and Waterdunen, this reserve is located in a relatively isolated place, is not near a major port and is not on a shipping lane. A total of 35 4G antennas are aimed at this reserve from distances of up to 8 miles. Only two of those antennas have been added since April. Likewise in France, two very large colonies of terns had two completely different experiences. At the Platier d’Oye nature reserve near the port of Calais, a colony of 3,000 Sandwich terns began nesting in April. The first 100 dead birds were discovered on May 20, and within a few weeks the colony was almost completely wiped out. The situation at Platier d’Oye is similar to that further north in Texel: dozens of new 4G and 5G antennas were added near the reserve during the months of May and June. 3 new 4G antennas and 6 new 5G antennas were added to an existing 90-foot cell tower bordering the reserve. Another 6 new 4G antennas and 6 new 5G antennas were added to an existing 140-foot tower about two miles to the southeast. Another 6 new 4G antennas and 6 new 5G antennas were added to an existing 95-foot tower about two miles to the east. At this writing there are the astounding number of 355 antennas of all kinds on 26 towers at 13 locations ranging from 10 feet tall to 255 feet tall within about 4 miles of this nature reserve. An even larger colony -- the largest breeding colony of Sandwich terns in France -- had no disease during the 2022 breeding season. It is called the Polder de Sébastopol and was host to several thousand pairs of nesting birds. But like Yerseke Moer, it is on an isolated island with few human residents. The island’s land area is largely devoted to parks, nature reserves and visitor accommodations. None of the antennas on the two cell towers a half mile west of the Polder are aimed at it. And even though there are a large number of antennas between one and four miles away that are aimed directly at the Polder, no ships pass by offshore and those antennas are little used except by visitors to the reserve walking its trails. Looking at the details and different experiences at particular breeding colonies of these birds, the official story breaks down. How can one make sense of the extermination of so many of these birds in a matter of a few weeks in such widely scattered places? According to the bird conservation organizations, bird flu is so contagious that it spreads among Sandwich terns all over Europe in a matter of days, yet it is so non-contagious that a small colony of terns 20 miles away escapes scotfree. Bird flu travels from one end of the Netherlands to the other in a few days, but not between two Dutch colonies 20 miles apart, and not between the two largest colonies in France? Apparently the conservation organizations also do not think it strange that suddenly and for the first time ever, in 2022, bird flu is (a) killing Sandwich terns and (b) is occurring during their breeding season. In decades of monitoring them, bird flu has never affected Sandwich terns before anywhere in the world. And it has always been a seasonal disease, occurring only in autumn and winter, and has never before affected any types of wild birds in spring and summer until 2022. It has also never affected so many different kinds of wild birds at once – terns, seagulls, avocets, gannets, skuas, guillemots, puffins, oystercatchers, ducks, geese, godwits, pheasants, magpies, sanderlings, storks, cranes, pelicans, herons, swans, loons, sparrows, 5 pigeons, red-winged blackbirds, owls, cormorants, grebes, dunlins, crows, ravens, bald eagles, hawks, falcons, vultures. Both the bird organizations and the authorities are reacting reflexively by wearing masks and hazmat suits when they visit these colonies and handle dead birds. But they should begin questioning the cause of such an unprecedented catastrophe. There is no doubt that sick birds have tested positive for a virus called H5N1. But when every testing laboratory is constantly amplifying fragments of that virus in untold numbers of PCR tests, one has to suspect that the walls, floors, air, equipment, and personnel in the testing laboratories are contaminated with this virus. When one remembers that samples from a goat, a quail and a papaya, sent to the National Health Laboratory of Tanzania, all came back positive for COVID-19, the results of PCR tests, whether for people, birds, or fruit, should be regarded with caution. Yes, both birds and people are getting sick and dying, but there is another obvious factor that is being ignored. The tendency to blame all illness on microorganisms is destroying our world. It is the uncontrolled irradiation of our world that is killing us and wiping out all the birds. Both 4G and 5G antennas are being erected more quickly and in greater numbers than ever before, not only on land but even on the surface of the sea. Wherever there are offshore wind farms, the cell phone companies are placing cell towers on those platforms. Seabirds will soon not only have no place to lay their eggs and raise their young, but they will not even be able to hunt for their food and feed their young without being irradiated. The largest company building cell towers on the surface of the sea is called Tampnet. Here is a map of all their towers and their coverage areas in the North Sea and the Gulf of Mexico: https://www.tampnet.com/coverage-maps. In 1918, at the very height of the Spanish influenza, attempts by medical teams in Boston and San Francisco to demonstrate the contagious nature of the flu met with complete and resounding failure. They collected mucous secretions from the mouths, noses, throats, and bronchi of sick flu patients in various stages of the disease and transferred these secretions to the noses, throats, and eyes of hundreds of healthy volunteers. They injected blood from sick flu patients into healthy volunteers. The had healthy volunteers sit nose to nose with severely ill flu patients while they spoke to each other and then the patient coughed five times directly in the face of the volunteer. None of the volunteers got sick in any way. These experiments were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, and Public Health Reports. Horses also came down with influenza, and similar failure attended attempts to transfer influenza from one horse to another. As a result of these experiments, Lieutenant Colonel Herbert Watkins-Pitchford wrote that he could find no evidence that influenza was ever spread directly from one horse to another. Many are the scientists, over the years, who have observed that influenza, whether in humans, horses, birds, or pigs, is an exceedingly strange disease. No one has ever explained why the flu is seasonal, for example. Or why flu epidemics end. Or why out-of-season epidemics do not spread. Or why flu epidemics explode over whole countries at once, and disappear just as miraculously, as if suddenly prohibited. Or how human influenza can spread around the world in days, and has always done so, even centuries ago when neither airplanes, automobiles, railroads, nor steamships existed. At least 23 scientists over the years, including Richard Shope, the scientist who first identified the flu virus in 1931, have published papers questioning the contagious nature of the flu and/or suggesting an electrical cause for it. Chapters 7, 8 and 9 of my critically important book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life, are devoted to a complete, detailed examination of the history and science of influenza. Chapter 16, the longest chapter in the book, is devoted in part to the effects of electromagnetic radiation on birds. I suggest that all bird conservation organizations should acquire my book and read it carefully. THE INVISIBLE RAINBOW A History of Electricity and Life SHOP Arthur Firstenberg 5g is being rolled out across the country, despite growing evidence that it is disruptive to our health, our safety, and the environment. The Invisible Rainbow is the groundbreaking story of electricity as it’s never been told before—exposing its very real impact on the biosphere and human health. Over the last 220 years, society has evolved a universal belief that electricity is ‘safe’ for humanity and the planet. Scientist and journalist Arthur Firstenberg disrupts this conviction by telling the story of electricity in a way it has never been told before—from an environmental point of view—by detailing the effects that this fundamental societal building block has had on our health and our planet. In The Invisible Rainbow, Firstenberg traces the history of electricity from the early eighteenth century to the present, making a compelling case that many environmental problems, as well as the major diseases of industrialized civilization—heart disease, diabetes, and cancer—are related to electrical pollution. "Few individuals today are able to grasp the entirety of a scientific subject and present it in a highly engaging manner . . . Firstenberg has done just that with one of the most pressing but neglected problems of our technological age."—BRADLEY JOHNSON,MD, Amen Clinic, San Francisco SOURCE: https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Birds-on-Texel-Island.pdf

This is Not On The Beeb's 67th report translating the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The data concerns injuries and deaths up to the 13th July. The stats are then released to the public a week later, so in this case, on the 13th July Overall 1-in-117 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Here is the breakdown of the most recent report with comments and observations on the data below As of the 13th of July there are 2,213 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 82.4 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.6 m 1st doses = 53,659,403 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,318,928 Boosters = 40,089,839 30.7m Pfizer, 58,100 AZ & 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 144,068,170 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death 172,218 Pfizer 245,903 AZ 40,068 Moderna 1,779 Unknown TOTAL = 459,968 Fatal Pfizer 808 AZ 1,29 Moderna 62 (last week was 64!) Unknown 49 TOTAL = 2,213 Blood Disorders - 17,193 (Pfizer) + 7876 (AZ) + 2580 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,714 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 94 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1648 Acute Cardiac - 13,606 (Pfizer) + 11,600 (AZ) + 3518 (Moderna) + 119 (Unknown) = 28,843 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1363 (Pfizer) + 458 (AZ) + 361 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 2191 Eye Disorders - 8213 (Pfizer) + 15,040 (AZ) + 1654 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 25,001 Blindness - 172 (Pfizer) + 331 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 549 Deafness - 310 (Pfizer) + 437 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 807 Infections - 12,849 (Pfizer) + 20,635 (AZ) + 2592 (Moderna) + 203 (Unknown) = 36,279 Herpes - 2267 (Pfizer) + 2711 (AZ) + 275 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5280 Spontaneous Abortions - 498 + 16 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 238 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 814 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,354 (Pfizer) + 183,624 (AZ) + 21,617 (Moderna) + 939 (Unknown) = 288,534 Headaches & Migraines - 36,074 (Pfizer) + 94,136 (AZ) + 10,060 (Moderna) + 354 (Unknown) = 140,624 Paralysis - 534 (Pfizer) + 909 (AZ) + 123 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1577 Seizures - 1156 (Pfizer) + 2102 (AZ) + 303 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 3585 Immune System Disorders - 2558 (Pfizer) + 3459 (AZ) + 666 (Moderna) + 41 (Unknown) = 6724 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 107 (Pfizer) + 504 (AZ) + 24 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 642 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4367 (Pfizer) + 7067 (AZ) + 803 (Moderna) + 47 (Unknown) = 12,284 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,429 (Pfizer) + 18,580 (AZ) + 2664 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,803 Respiratory Disorders - 22,237 (Pfizer) + 30,051 (AZ) + 4630 (Moderna) + 232 (Unknown) = 57,150 Skin Disorders - 34,817 (Pfizer) + 53,605 (AZ) + 13,699 (Moderna) + 392 (Unknown) = 102,513 Rashes & Eruptions - 11,023 (Pfizer) = 15,259 (AZ) + 5235 (Moderna) + 116 (Unknown) = 31,633 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,528 (Pfizer) + 20,934 (AZ) + 5286 (Moderna) + 239 (Unknown) = 57,987 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,100,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,500,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3952 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 264 Yellow Cards • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1900 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 32 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 34 Yellow Cards Total = 4,113,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,826,700 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4282 For full reports including 363 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11 NIOTES, COMMENTS & OBSERVATIONS In the 14 days since the previous summary for 29 June 2022 we have received a further: • 305 Yellow Cards for the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech, (6 fatal minus one removed = 5) • 132 for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, (4 fatal minus one removed = 3) • 259 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna (2 fatalities removed = minus 2) • 11 where the brand was not specified. (zero fatal) Pfizer - 6 extra deaths minus one fatality removed • General category x 2 - one death, one adverse drug reaction • Infections x 1 - one COVID-19 pneumonia • Injuries x 1 - one wound necrosis • Renal & Urinary Disorders x 1 - one renal failure • Skin Disorders x 1 - one pemphigoid (rare autoimmune blistering of the skin and mucous membranes) Removed Fatality - Nervous system x 1 - one haemorrhagic stroke NOTE: One brain death and one cardiac death noted under ‘death and sudden death’ sub-category but not recorded as fatal AstraZeneca - 4 extra deaths minus one fatality removed • General category x 1 - one adverse drug reaction • Infections x 1 - one COVID-19 pneumonia • Nervous System Disorders x 1 - one cerebral vascular accident • Respiratory Disorders x 1 - one pulmonary embolism Removed Fatality - Vascular Disorders x 1 - one embolism NOTE: Three brain deaths, one cardiac death, one drowning and one hanging noted under ‘death and sudden death’ sub-category but not recorded as fatal Moderna - two fatalities removed • One less cardiac arrest in cardiac disorders • One less death in general disorders Comment on the removed fatalities - if there has been a determination that these fatalities are not vaccine related then does that imply that the others are related, or have not been investigated to be ruled out as unrelated? Bearing in mind - MHRA state - 'The pattern of reporting for all other fatal reports does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths.' A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Some letters need publishing for the public record... Dr Andrew Goldsworthy is the retired Lecturer and Biological Safety Officer (retired) of Imperial College London. When publicising the vaccine-induced magnetism last year, it was Dr Goldsworthy who published with NOTB his theory that single atom-sized graphene Oxide sheets were acting like a paper razor blade and cutting into cell membranes, short-circuiting the electrical potential, in turn causing electromagnetic fields-resulting in magnetism. A theory that went viral internationally, and to date, has not been disproven. This is a recent letter that includes not only a summary of the basics of why the idea of vaccinating young children is preposterous but also includes a ground-breaking theory on the reason behind the epidemic of vaccine-induced blood clots that led to the Brits nicknaming the C19 jab as the 'Clot-shot'. Hi Mark, I was horrified to learn that COVID vaccines are actually being promoted to children to encourage them to have the jab without the informed consent of either the child (who is a minor) or the parents (who have not been informed of the risks). These risks include the formation of strange blood clots leading to cardiovascular disorders (including heart attacks) and possibly long COVID. I would expect similar clots to form in people exposed to electromagnetic fields along with an increased risk of cancer, especially cancer of the blood (Leukaemia). I am pasting an email below that I wrote to a Group of concerned parents to explain the position as I see it. I think you might find it interesting: It is morally wrong even to attempt to vaccinate children against COVID, especially if they may have already had the disease and been asymptomatic (and who can tell if this is not so?). The disease is mild in nearly all children and is likely to give better immunity than the vaccine (which targets only specific parts of the virus). But, the jabs also contain excipients such as polyethylene-glycol (PEG) to assist the uptake of the vaccine that may in themselves be harmful. In this case, it is because they form blood clots by making blood cells fuse together in a very characteristic way where long semisolid strings of fused blood cells can be pulled out of affected blood vessels. These are not ordinary clots where the blood cells become entangled in a mesh of fibrin. They are most likely due to the blood cells fusing together to form a syncytium under the influence of the PEG included in the vaccines. How do I know? The answer is that in the dim and distant past I worked on the possible genetic manipulation of plants using protoplasts (cells with their cellulose outer walls removed). They behave very much like animal cells and have to be kept in an isotonic buffer to stop them from bursting. I was trying to fuse cells of different species to give somatic hybrids that could be grown on to regenerate new cellulose cell walls and ultimately new hybrid plants that could not be formed by regular breeding. But interestingly, from our standpoint, is that one of the ways was to centrifuge the naked protoplasts was in solutions of polyethene glycol. PEG is the same ingredient used in mRNA vaccines. Could these vaccine-induced clots actually be fused cells rather than regular clots? See https://www.onlinebiologynotes.com/protoplast-fusion-methods-and-mechanism/ It would account for their mechanical strength and apparent inability to reverse their formation. The most relevant part is in Section 3 which discusses fusion using PEG. But it is also worth reading Section 4 on electrofusion. Here cells are treated with a weak alternating field between two converging electrodes. The constantly changing field induces opposing charges in the adjacent cells and the cells migrate to the region where the field is strongest and where the electrodes are at their closest. They are then "zapped" with a high voltage pulse, sufficient to break down contiguous membranes and cell fusion can occur. It is possible that this may occur in the peripheral blood vessels in regular "domestic" alternating fields (including WiFi) which could result in abnormal and potentially cancerous cells (leukaemia?) originating where the major blood vessels narrow into capillaries. Food for thought, but until this can be cleared up beyond doubt, it would be morally indefensible to vaccinate our young children against COVID. Best wishes Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Lecturer and Biological Safety Officer (retired) of Imperial College London.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a world-renowned trial lawyer with almost three decades of experience in suing large fraudulent corporations, like Deutsche Bank becoming well known for the Volkswagen emissions scandal. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Fuellmich observed criminal practices committed by media and governments worldwide. He founded the Corona Investigative Committee and began an extensive investigation, during which he interviewed over 150 experts from all fields of science. Many of these experts are recognized as world leaders in their fields of expertise. Together with other lawyers from around the world, Dr. Fuellmich gathered undeniable evidence that this pandemic is a series of unprecedented crimes against humanity. The entities responsible for this global assault on mankind are the same who were responsible for World Wars I and II, as well as many other world crises. Dr. Fuellmich, ten international lawyers, and a judge decided to present the evidence for these crimes against humanity to the public during a grand jury proceeding. Among the eyewitnesses are former members of: The British Intelligence Services The UK Royal Navy The US Marine Corps The World Health Organization The United Nations A former vice-president from Pfizer A Nobel Prize winner for medicine ......and many more high-level experts. WHAT IS A GRAND JURY? In serious criminal cases in the U.S. a grand jury is presented with the evidence at hand to convince them that this evidence is sufficient to bring public charges against the defendants. We, the people of the world, are adopting this model to prove to the public, with the help of witnesses, lawyers, a judge and experts from around the world, that we are dealing with crimes against humanity that span the globe. The allegation is that the world’s governments have come under the controlling influence of corrupt and criminal power structures. The power structures colluded to stage a pandemic that they had been planning for years. To this end, they deliberately created mass panic through false statements of fact and a socially engineered psychological operation whose messages they conveyed through the corporate media. The purpose of this mass panic was to persuade the population to agree to experimental so-called “vaccinations" - which they are not. These have been proven to be neither effective nor safe, but extremely dangerous and even lethal. The investigation serves as a model proceeding to secure indictments against some of the criminally and civilly responsible figureheads of these crimes against humanity. A secondary purpose is to create awareness about the factual collapse of the current hijacked system and its institutions, and, as a consequence, awareness of: - the necessity of the people themselves retaking their sovereignty, - the necessity of first stopping the measures by refusing to comply, - and the necessity of jump-starting the people's own new systems of health care, education, economics and judiciary, so that democracy and the rule of law on the basis of our Constitutions will be re-established. TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY The purpose of this Grand Jury Summary is to make the most important information revealed by the expert witnesses accessible to as many people as possible. We have focused on those facts that reveal what is really going on in our world, to help the public understand the graveness of the current world crisis. Those who want to get the full spectrum of details, please watch the full video sessions here: StopWorldControl.com/jury This document is part one of five Grand Jury Summaries. It contains critical information from Day 2, titled The General Historic and Geopolitical Backdrop to All of This. This may well be the most important session of the entire Grand Jury proceeding, as it exposes how a masterplan has been created to achieve total world domination under the guise of health emergencies. The Opening Statements are not included, as they are not too lengthy and can easily be viewed on our website: StopWorldControl.com/jury DEFENDING HUMANITY We encourage every reader to distribute this Grand Jury Summary within their community. The criminal power structures rely entirely on the ignorance of the people. Once the public becomes informed, they shift from unquestioning compliance to intelligent resistance. Therefore, the single most important action we can all take is to inform others. We must especially educate all those who have a position of influence in our communities. Send this Grand Jury Summary, either in digital or printed form, to school directors and teachers, hospital directors and medical staff, law enforcement officers, lawyers and judges, pastors, mayors and commissioners, local media editors and journalists. There are many cheap online printing services where you can upload this PDF and have it printed in as many copies as you like. Just Google "cheap book printing" and you can start comparing. If many of us would invest some time and resources to print hundreds or even thousands of this document, and distribute it in our communities and country, we could have a tremendous impact. This information really needs to reach all those in a position of public service. These members of our societies are unknowingly the minions of the criminals, as they blindly follow orders that directly lead to the death of millions of people, and the permanent damaging of hundreds of millions of lives. Once all our public servants people understand what is really going on, they will stop being the extensions of the criminal hands, lest they become consciously complicit. If we don’t stand up and act now, we may forever lose the ability to do so, as the World Economic Forum is preparing to install global governance over the flow of information and the internet, and will attempt to forever shut the mouth of all who value the freedom of humanity. If there ever was a time for all to rise and act, it is now. The editor, David J. Sörensen StopWorldControl.com THE CITY OF LONDON FIRST SUMMARY The expert witnesses during session 2 of the Grand Jury are a former officer of the British Intelligence Services (partner agency to the US National Security Agency), and a Canadian investigative journalist. They explain the long history of the aim for world dominance by the British elite. The British Empire still exists, and includes the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, 19 African Countries, and the Caribbean, while they extend their hand into virtually every other nation of the world. Their headquarters are in the City of London, an area of one square mile, which is the financial center of the world. The City of London isn’t governed by the British government but on the contrary reigns supreme over it. The City of London has its own courts and police and has never been challenged in its sovereignty and self-government. It rules over the Crown and over most of the Earth. The British elite believe they have the right to enslave the rest of humanity, which they consider to be their 'livestock'. In their views they own the population - body, mind and soul. Democracy is only an illusion to keep the people at peace, while the City of London calls the shots and pulls the strings. This elite made several attempts at so-called ‘New World Orders’, which all failed. They almost succeeded in reigning in the United States but failed there as well. Now they use the COVID-19 pandemic to further their goal of world domination, using psychological techniques to get the world population to blindly obey their every command, under the guise of 'keeping everybody safe'. Mind control has for a long time been at the heart of their strategy. After three industrial revolutions, a fourth industrial revolution is now emerging that focuses on owning the minds of the people. The deeper purpose of the vaccination programs is to edit the genome of humanity, and thus create a new transhuman race that will behave according to the desires of the oligarchs. This has always been the ultimate desire of tyrants in the past, but only now does technology allow the re-creation of humanity to become the perfect slaves. Our world is threatened by a rebirth of the ancient system of slavery, which has been technologically upgraded to install a whole new level of all encompassing slavery over the entire world population. EXPERT WITNESS ALEX THOMSON (Editors note: I've been listening to Alex since he started with UK Column. An impressive mind with encyclopedic knowledge, clearly making him one of the brightest minds in the world today. Follow him on Telegram here: https://t.me/EastApp) Alex Thomson is a former officer of Britain’s Signal Intelligence Agency, GCHQ, the partner agency of NSA (National Security Agency - USA). He was desk officer for the former Soviet Union and a transcriber of intercepted material. Thomson was part of GCHQ’s cross-disciplinary team for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats, CBRN. As an intelligence officer Alex learned about the British strategy for world domination. He explains the historic background and the current power structure of the British Empire, and how the COVID-19 pandemic plays a key role in their agenda. The following is a summary of the most important information revealed by Alex Thomson. To get all the details, please watch the full session here: StopWorldControl.com/jury The City of London is the financial heart of the British Empire and the dominant power in the world. It readied itself for that situation from roughly 1870. The modern world, the monopolization, the cartelization of the world, begins at that time. Everything that we do in investigating the corruption emanating from British Crown monopolies and City of London money does seem to point back to this period from around 1870, in which there were several revolutions by the British elite. These revolutions all revolved around containing productivity and preventing a growth of intelligence and intellectual property among the native peoples of the British Empire and in competitor nations. There was a revolution in what you might call mind space, which since 2010 has been an explicit term used by the British government’s central department, the Cabinet Office. A revolution in the quality of education offered to British and other Western schoolchildren. A revolution in the theft of intellectual property by the elite. A revolution in the model of healthcare and free access to it. At home, a constitutional revolution from the classic British Liberal democracy model. This all happened since 1870, and in Britain it was largely complete by the crucial year 1947- 1948 when Britain had a unique situation of a National Health Service and was pushing the way towards the military unification of the European continent and the whole of NATO. Britain was leading the world in reinventing how it managed its population. The center node is the City of London, the square mile at the very heart of what is now called Greater London. The City of London: Has a legal status apart from the 32 other London boroughs. Its privileges were entrenched as early as Magna Carta 1215. Its self-government has never been challenged. It has, at many times in its history, had power over the British Crown and hence over a large slice of the Earth during the British Empire. The City of London has control over the Westminster Parliament, notably in the form of an official of the City of London known as the Remembrancer, who sits in the House of Commons where not even the monarch is allowed to enter, and records what is being said against financial interests. The Cabinet Office is a department which was set up in the early 20th century, as the repository of Crown prerogatives. From around 1870, the constitutional revolution has ensured that financiers controlling political parties actually pull believers of Crown prerogatives. Behind the scenes, the model of government Britain still is that of an inner sanctum, the Privy Council, which actually governs in the name of The Crown. It is only for show that parliament and government departments are consulted. OWNING THE MINDS OF HUMANITY The history academic at Georgetown University, Carroll Quigley, former tutor of Bill Clinton, wrote in his book, Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, that there have been four industrial revolutions. Yes, that familiar language coming from the World Economic Forum was being written about in the 1960s already by Quigley. The perspective which is being assumed here is that of who owns the population, first in Britain and then in the British Empire. First revolution: the ownership of land, of agricultural means provides wealth Second revolution: mechanical - industrial Third revolution: in which financial capital dominates the world It's from this period around 1870 onwards that the smart money in the City of London realizes that even that bubble is going to burst. The most efficient way to own the world in the future, will be to own the minds. That is the fourth industrial revolution. Both the British and the German elite were determined to achieve world domination, both industrially and in the mind space. The City of London’s trading model emphasized the importance of controlling, not just military force or physical assets anymore, but the minds of people now known as human resources. This is why science fiction starts speaking about ownership of man’s genetic makeup from this time. The City of London and Britain’s very wealthy soft power institutions continue to regard that battle for the mind as their top priority for world domination, and they regard health as a subsector of that battle. The British elite regard themselves still as the world’s leading power in mind space. The strategy taught in boarding schools, universities or officer training of intelligence agencies is very much the credo of the leading bloodlines of elite families that run the City of London. And it is the modus operandi of the Anglo-American tax exempt foundations and of the thinktanks such as Chatham House, above all, which push the agendas of those bloodlines upon the Western governments. FOCUS ON WORLD DOMINATION A key figure from the year 1870 is that of John Ruskin, seemingly an innocuous figure because he was the first professor of art at Oxford, but he brought the doctrine that the British elite really had a duty to export its own world view to the rest of the world. And his key student whom he inspired was Cecil Rhodes, who became fabulously wealthy in Southern Africa. Cecil Rhodes wrote secret diaries and formed secret societies. In 1891, after 16 years of planning, his main secret society was formed – the Rhodes Scholarships are part of that society. Oxford members of the Rhodes network were the likes of Lord Toynbee and Lord Milner, well-known geo- strategists. In Cambridge there was the future Foreign Secretary, Lord Grey and Lord Esher. In London there was the leading journalist at the time, W.T. Stead, and initiates and members of the Executive Committee of Cecil Rhodes were the above-named men, plus Lord Rothschild. After Rhodes’ death in 1902, other leading English bloodlines that repeatedly plagued the City of London history, such as the Astors, came into the same circle. The outer circle became known as the Round Table Group, still functioning in the United States and seven other countries, set up from 1909 onwards. This group regarded the success of the Canadian Federation, 1867, as its leading case study. Canada was effectively politically unified. In order to prevent there being a spread of different views, different English-speaking democracies in the world, they must instead all be traced back to the City of London’s control. This is very contemporary too because among the many Rhodes scholars that dominate world politics and push the world towards globalism are Bill Clinton and, from the World Economic Forum, the New Zealand Lady Professor Ngaire Woods, who this year became very well known for her saying at the WEF that the elite can do beautiful things if they come together and if the people of the world simply accept that they are in the lead. This vision did not remain the ravings of a particularly wealthy Englishman, but they nativized themselves in the United States in the so-called Eastern Establishment, the Eastern Seaboard, as the United States became the world’s dominant power. The key testimony on this is that of Norman Dodd, given shortly before his death in 1982 to G. Edward Griffin, easily found online as Norman Dodd on the tax-exempt foundations. Dodd was the key staffer for Reese, the congressman from East Tennessee, who in the 1950s on behalf of Congress carried out an investigation into the effect of these tax-exempt foundations in the United States. These foundations implemented the City of London’s and Cecil Rhodes’ vision for world domination. It is not enough to be by far the world’s greatest military and economic power. If your mind space is still controlled by the unexamined assumption that everyone at the top is paid up to liberty, then a club with self-interest is still going to run the world. And even in areas such as healthcare, which Britain first socialized in 1948, you’re going to find that people wrongly and blithely assume that their best interests are kept at heart. The offshoot of the City of London in Manhattan in Wall Street-funded both sides of both world wars. Serious academics such as Anthony Sutton, who was at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University in California, have written whole books about this entitled Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler. There was a whole trail of documents which was recovered by Anthony Sutton. It cost him his tenure at Stanford. What he found was that both the Soviet Union and the Third Reich were brought into being for the interests of the City of London and more particularly, its Wall Street end. Just one example of the total reach of British intelligence in areas which is not constitutionally able or permitted to have, is that MI5, even before the Second World War, was vetting who got onto the airwaves of the BBC, who got promoted and who got transferred. It was set up by the bloodlines to further their private aims. The British Cabinet Office is openly speaking about its control of the world’s thinking and the thinking of the British people. They’re labelling parts of the brain under the label of MINDSPACE. Their document says: “Even if people agree with the behavior goal, they may object to the means of accomplishing it. The different MINDSPACE effects will attract different levels of controversy. There are several factors that determine controversy.” "The goal is therefore to make sure that citizens don't fully realize that their behavior is being changed, or at least how it is being changed." "Clearly, this opens government up to charges of manipulation. People have a strong dislike of being tricked. This dislike has a psychological grounding, but fundamentally it is an issue of trust in government. A lack of conscious control also has implications for consent and freedom of choice. First, it creates a greater need for citizens to approve the use of the behavior change, perhaps using new forms of Democratic engagement." In this model, democracy is the highest good that’s sold, but the levers of manipulating democracy are in the hands of the cartel. Reiner Fuellmich: Is it correct that the City of London is the real powerhouse in the UK? Alex Thomson: Without any doubt. This is something that if you’ve had my background, you learn at boarding school, let alone at university. And by the time you get into the civil service, there is a lot of eyerolling if you ever suggest that the people of Britain, or any other country in the Commonwealth, have self-determination. The City of London is understood to own the population, body, mind and soul. Reiner Fuellmich: Ultimately, it’s the control of the people’s mind that the City of London really wanted, to further their goal of world domination. Is that correct? Alex Thomson: Yes. Reiner Fuellmich: So ultimately what we’re seeing is a very powerful institution – City of London – which bridges the Atlantic because as its fifth column they have Wall Street. Those two powers united are the center of power in this world. Alex Thomson: There are struggles. For a long time there was the completely nontrivial Cold War, with branches of the aristocracy in the City of London being both pro- and anti-Soviet. Union. I could talk for hours just about that. But that is secondary to the determination that there must be only a German block and a Russian block in Eurasia, and that both of these ultimately must be controlled and hemmed in by British or Anglo-American sea power and Anglo-American soft power setting the paradigms for them. Reiner Fuellmich: Another thing that I wanted to clarify is, you mentioned that it is just a few families who really run the City of London. You mentioned the names of Rothschild and Rhodes and Astor. Is it true that it’s just a few families who are trying to dominate the world through the City of London? Alex Thomson: Yes. I have never found better material than that of a writing duo which is Dutch/ German-American. The Dutchman is Robin de Ruiter. His American German co-author is Fritz Springmeier from South Carolina. They have the rather shocking book titled Bloodlines of the Illuminati. But their work is solid. They consistently show that the City of London, Manhattan, the European continent, are very much dominated by a small number of families. Often 13 is given as the top level of these families. Obviously, there are levels below that. The French, for example, often spoke about “les 200 familles,” the 200 bloodlines, that run the deep state. But the senior ones terrorize the junior ones, and the highest you can get up before you disappear into nebulous claims of Satan running the world, which ultimately, I believe he does. But the highest level you can get up to is a level at which Central European Germanic bloodlines have an uneasy truce with British Isles bloodlines, most of whom are now based in the United States. Reiner Fuellmich: And one of the major means through which these very few families are trying to dominate the rest of the world, seems to be through mind space, which sounds like mind control. Does that mean through psychological operations? Alex Thomson: Very much so. No nation got into the game of psychological operations earlier than Britain. As soon as there were formal intelligence agencies in Britain in the Edwardian era, just before the First World War, it was a major concentration. But they borrowed a lot of their insights from Vienna and from Germany, which were leading in the psychological space at the time. This is a transnational interest in both the Anglo and the Germanic areas of world domination at the time, to use the tricks of mind space. And these were largely perfected when America had unchallenged Germany after 1945, using a lot of the Third Reich and Soviet minds who were actually brought over to the United States surreptitiously during Operation Paperclip. Mind control has been regarded - since the days of Edward Bernays and Freud - as the most powerful way of controlling action in the real world. If you have that power, you control people who are more numerous, more intelligent and stronger than yourself. The above is just the start of the doc. Please download an original copy here ENGLISH DANISH TRANSLATION BY CLIFF Hjulskov.© You can send inquiries regarding any errors or other questions to :Cliff-Lind: Hjulskov.© on MeWe Facebook Fazeday GETTR Twitter Go For Freedom In Love of Biology

Fascinating update and insights by New Zealand’s Dr Robin Wakeling. (Video at base of the highlights.) Dr Robin Wakeling confirms that the parasite-looking shapes are NOT parasites. They are though, just as worrying since the structures mistaken as parasites are collapsed red blood cells. He also confirms that even though quadrangular crystals are found in other samples (like cholesterol within urine) the chip-like crystals forming within the vaccines are still a total unknown... These are some of Dr Robin Wakeling's main observations RED BLOOD CELL COLLAPSE Red blood cell membranes that are under stress e.g. toxins and are known to ‘unravel’ and form free colloidal structures. In normal situations, enzymes like Lipases (which break down fats) can cause this breakdown of the blood cell membrane - since the membrane is 50% cholesterol itself. He noticed that red blood cells for those who'd had the Pfizer jab. destruct more often and easily. In a healthy person, one in several hundred show this effect. In the injected, the cells are destructing, the cell membrane is unravelling. SAMPLE OF BLOOD AFTER PFIZER JAB The spherical structure is a healthy blood cell. The squiggly shape above is a collapsed red blood cell. Cholestric Ordering’ ‘Cholestric Ordering’ is wrapping around itself into a helix and mimicking DNA strands. To give an idea of how rare this effect should be, a top NZ blood specialist did not recognise what they were seeing within these images,. Dr Robin Wakeling's background in colloidal chemistry enabled his analysis A way to think of the effect is by imagining the deference between a full parachute and one that has collapsed tangling and twisting upon itself. NO PARASITES The starfish-shaped images have fooled many into thinking they have seen parasites, but they are in fact liquid crustal colloidal structures from the destructed Red Blood Cell membrane. However, the horror remains. Blood cells are robust and should not disintegrate like this, and definitely not on the scale witnessed within the blood of the jabbed. CRYSTAL STRUCTURES FORMING WITHIN THE VACCINE Dr Robin Wakeling points out: Sometimes the crystal formations appear quickly Sometimes nothing forms Sometimes seemingly empty slides when re-examined a day later have then formed these network like structures He notes the long thin aerial-like structures that grow The self assembling structures seem to avoid each other. A COMPARISON - CRYSTALS WITH PERPENDICULAR EDGES FOUND IN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES CHOLESTEROL CRYSTALS FOUND WITHIN URINE COMPARISON: CHOLESTEROL CRYSTALS FOUND WITHIN URINE Dr Robin Wakeling points out that the Pfizer vaccine does have cholesterol, as a declared ingredient, but the Graphene containing AFLURIA QUAD FLU vaccine does not, so he deduces there must be another component causing the identical structures that are found in each. THE VIDEO HOW TO DETOXIFY The big question right now is how to detox from the pollutants, whether jabbed or even jab-free. Whether it’s graphene, metals or cationic lipids via the injection, or fluoride, chlorine or hormones via our water or airborne toxins via exhaust fumes or even aerosolised pathogens. The best course of action is to avoid these in the first place, but achieving 100% avoidance is hard. We filter or distil our water at home but then go out for a coffee or have ice in a cold drink. Some of us avoid the jabs but have close relationships with loved ones who might have made different choices. And few of us in cities can do much about the airborne toxins. We all need to find a natural way to detoxify from these pollutants We also need to find a way to build and maintain our natural immunity. There have always been three steps to investigating the truth about the contents of the c19 jabs. 1 - Investigate 2 - Inform and warn. 3 - Find solutions However unnerving or frightening the revelations of deliberate ‘contamination’ have been, the great news is that all of these toxins can be dealt with by our immune system. This means we don’t need more medications to interfere in the natural processes. We need a way to assist our natural immune systems. The same natural immune systems that have been refined over millennia and passed down by our ancestors. The immune system that over generations kept our genetic lines intact until today, surviving plague, pestilence and pathogen. The fact we are alive today is testimony and proof to that power built within us all. To find out how to boost our immunity and detox naturally click here

This is Not On The Beeb's 66th report translating the complex UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The data concerns injuries and deaths up to the 29th June. The stats are then released to the public a week later, so in this case, on the 7th July Overall 1-in-117 people injected experience a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Here is the breakdown of the most recent report. As of the 29th of June there are 2,207 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 29th June 2022. (there is a one-week + time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 82 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m 1st doses = 53,577,314 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,126,662 Boosters = 39,931,494 (30.5m Pfizer, 57,900 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,635,470 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports i.e. how many people have reported injury or death 171,913 Pfizer 245,771 AZ 39,809 Moderna 1768 Unknown TOTAL = 459,261 Fatal Pfizer 803 AZ 1,291 Moderna 64 Unknown 49 TOTAL = 2207 Blood Disorders - 17,182 (Pfizer) + 7873 (AZ) + 2567 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,687 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1647 Acute Cardiac - 13,563 (Pfizer) + 11,584 (AZ) + 3499 (Moderna) + 119 (Unknown) = 28,765 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1358 (Pfizer) + 457 (AZ) + 359 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 2183 Eye Disorders - 8197 (Pfizer) + 15,029 (AZ) + 1641 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,961 Blindness - 170 (Pfizer) + 330 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 546 Deafness - 308 (Pfizer) + 435 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 804 Liver Disorders - 280 (Pfizer) + 543 (AZ) + 49 (Moderna) + 10 (Unknown) = 882 Infections - 12,789 (Pfizer) + 20,593 (AZ) + 2565 (Moderna) + 199 (Unknown) = 36,146 Spontaneous Abortions - 498 + 16 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 238 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 814 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,210 (Pfizer) + 183,530 (AZ) + 21,451 (Moderna) + 938 (Unknown) = 288,129 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 832 (Pfizer) + 2391 (AZ) + 72 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3316 Paralysis - 531 (Pfizer) + 907 (AZ) + 121 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1570 Seizures - 1155 (Pfizer) + 2099 (AZ) + 302 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 3580 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,895 (Pfizer) + 81,186 (AZ) + 11,618 (Moderna) + 419 (Unknown) = 136,118 Nausea & Vomiting - 21,004 (Pfizer) + 45,607 (AZ) + 6956 (Moderna) + 215 (Unknown) = 73,782 Muscle & Tissue Disorders - 56,641 (Pfizer) + 104,880 (AZ) + 14,848 (Moderna) + 598 (Unknown) = 176,967 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,403 (Pfizer) + 18,555 (AZ) + 2646 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,734 Respiratory Disorders - 22,191 (Pfizer) + 30,017 (AZ) + 4595 (Moderna) + 233 (Unknown) = 57,036 Skin Disorders - 34,746 (Pfizer) + 53,578 (AZ) + 13,640 (Moderna) + 391 (Unknown) = 102,355 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,506 (Pfizer) + 20,925 (AZ) + 5272 (Moderna) + 238 (Unknown) = 57,941 Vascular Disorders - 7704 (Pfizer) + 14,040 (AZ) + 1400 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 23,258 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 4,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,400,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3901 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 264 Yellow Cards Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1900 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 31 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 33 Yellow Cards Total = 4,013,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,626,700 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4229 For full reports including 363 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

By Aaron Kheriaty For two decades scientists have been quietly developing self-spreading contagious vaccines. The NIH funded this research, in which either DNA from a deadly pathogen is packaged in a contagious but less harmful virus, or the deadly virus’s lethality is weakened by engineering it in a lab. The resultant “vaccines” spread from one person to the next just like a contagious respiratory virus. Only five percent of regional populations would need to be immunized; the other ninety-five percent would “catch” the vaccine as it spread person-to-person through community transmission. This technology bypasses the inconvenience of recalcitrant citizens who may refuse to give consent. Its advocates highlight that a mass vaccination campaign that would ordinarily take months of expensive effort to immunize everyone could be shortened to only a few weeks. Scientists have already shown proof of concept in animal populations: in 2000, Spanish researchers injected seventy rabbits with a transmissible vaccine and returned them to the wild, where they quickly passed the vaccine on to hundreds more, reportedly stopping a viral outbreak. European countries are now testing the technology on pigs. In the wake of the covid pandemic, about a dozen research institutions in the U.S., Europe, and Australia are investigating the potential human uses for self-spreading vaccines. The federal Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), for example, is examining this technology for U.S. military to protect against the West Africa lassa fever, a virus spread by rats to humans. This project, it should be noted, does not require the consent of our military service men and women. In 2019 the U.K. government began exploring this technology to address the seasonal flu. A research paper from Britain’s Department of Health and Social Care advised that university students could be an obvious target group: They do not work so [vaccinating them] will not cause much economic disruption and most have second homes to go to, thereby spreading the vaccine. Researchers admitted a contagious vaccine for an attenuated flu virus would cause some deaths but estimated these would be less than the original influenza virus. As the U.K. government report described: Self-spreading vaccines are less lethal but not non-lethal: they can still kill. Some people will die who would otherwise have lived, though fewer people die overall. As the saying goes, you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. Or in Lenin’s formulation, if you are going to chop down a forest then wood chips will fly. Contagious vaccines are in our future, their champions claim, and are no different than putting fluoride in drinking water. Plus, for those who find jabs unpleasant there are fewer needles required. Government-funded research of lab-engineered viruses to create contagious self-spreading vaccines that bypass the consent of citizens. What could go wrong? Author: Aaron Kheriaty Aaron Kheriaty, former Professor of Psychiatry at the UCI School of Medicine and Director, Medical Ethics at UCI Health, is a Senior Scholar of the Brownstone Institute. SOURCE: https://brownstone.org/articles/contagious-vaccines-a-warning/ The controversial quest to make a 'contagious' vaccine A new technology aims to stop wildlife from spreading Ebola, rabies, and other viruses. It could prevent the next pandemic by stopping pathogens from jumping from animals to people. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/the-controversial-quest-to-make-a-contagious-vaccine

As we reported a couple of weeks ago, the MHRA has now stepped down their release of C19 vaccine injury submitted by UK doctors and patients from a weekly report, to monthly The total weekly cases of vaccine injury are decreasing, yet each death has a devastating impact on the family. We should also remember that for every death reported, at least another nine are not. By Kathy Gyngell For Conservative Woman EASILY missed in the latest Medicines and Regulatory Healthcare products Agency (MHRA) Yellow Card Report is its plan to reduce its updates from weekly to just once a month from August. Either chief executive Dr June Raine and her team have grown accustomed to being paid to have time off as the country’s toll of vaccine victims mounts, or they have no taste for this particular task. It is moot whether this fast-developing ‘drugs regulator for hire’ is fit to carry out this monitoring job at all. Seventeen years ago it stood accused of losing sight of ‘the need to protect and promote public health above all else’ as it sought to win ‘fee income’ from the drugs companies. Today, those fees dominate its income. But there is worse. The appalling quality of its Covid vaccine Yellow Card reporting, plus its consistent failure to respond to the urgent concerns of top doctors and scientists, betray not just a low prioritisation, not just a ‘standard’ conflict of interests but, given its advocacy of crony capitalist mRNA biotech minimally tested novel vaccines, an unauthorised change of role in direct conflict with its regulatory purpose. Speaking at her Oxford alma mater six weeks ago, June Raine openly boasted of her transformation of the MHRA from a watchdog to an ‘enabler’, wonderfully catalysed by the Covid pandemic. An enabler of what? Experimental gene therapies that bypass traditional testing protocols? Her speech which I will comment on in detail tomorrow in these pages is deeply concerning. It exposes her as a fully signed-up Covid cultist or fanatic who believes that Oxford University’s research has saved millions of lives – presented as a given, requiring no proof for which there is none. In it, without conscience, let alone second thoughts, she boasts explicitly of her unilateral decision to ditch the MHRA’s watchdog role and the opportunity Covid presented to tear up the rulebook on efficacy standards. Seemingly oblivious to the AstraZeneca vaccine’s withdrawal by several countries following thousands of reported adverse events and fatalities, she recounts its rollout as a triumph for science. Just weeks later, as if to underline this newly self-appointed ‘enabling role’, we find the once watchdog cheering on another experimental gene therapy, this time for polio. Perhaps we should not be surprised therefore that its latest Yellow Card report is most notable for denying that its own vaccine fatality data has any meaning, though by MHRA admission these statistics are massively under-reported. That perhaps is why, although reported fatalities had reached 2,191 by June 15, the update tells us so little about them. It was for this reason I commissioned an analysis of the data that can be gleaned from the published regulatory agency adverse event tables. This shows that fatalities reported by vaccine type are 794 (Pfizer) + 1,287 (AZ) + 62 (Moderna) + 48 (Unknown) = 2,191 (including six suicides). But what of the vaccines’ relative risk? Is one more to blame than others? To answer that requires a fatality reporting rate. The MHRA is, conveniently, not interested. It states ‘that Yellow Card data cannot be used to derive side-effect rates or compare the safety profile of Covid-19 vaccines as many factors can influence ADR reporting’. Don’t the public have the right to know which factors exactly are so different between brands? It is not so much the inadequacy of the MHRA’s data collection that is the problem, it is the lack of investigation of the data and hence the lack od meaningful reporting that is the issue. They do not reveal, for example, whether or not the child and booster related figures are included in or excluded from certain totals, or whether there have been any child or booster related fatalities. It could insist on this information breakdown. Instead they provide very little from which to draw conclusions that would enable healthcare professionals and the public to make an informed consent decision of risk. All that can be calculated from the data provided is fatality per dose: · Pfizer – 81.9m doses – 794 fatalities = 1 in 103,149 · AZ – 49.06m doses – 1,287 fatalities = 1 in 38,120 · Moderna – 12.5m doses – 62 fatalities = 1 in 201,613 · Brand Unknown = unknown This doesn’t account for some people having one dose and some having four doses, or the booster being a different brand and so on. The overall fatality rate may well be higher per person injected. What is strikingly clear however is that fatalities associated with AstraZeneca are markedly higher than for the other vaccines, a trajectory that surely could have been spotted prior to the administration of all 49million doses. Yet not only has this vaccine not been withdrawn (it is simply not advised for younger age groups), astonishingly 100 AZ boosters were reported to have been administered since the previous week’s reporting. Could this blindspot be anything to do with Dr June Raine’s enthusiasm for Oxford’s role in fighting the Covid plague? The MHRA is also less than transparent about the adverse event ‘categories’ most associated with the fatalities. Again, we had to dig into the regulatory adverse event data tables to find this. Most fall into a conveniently designated ‘General’ category – a lucky dip of multiple organ dysfunction and failure, sudden death, sudden cardiac death and more. The top categories for each vaccine are listed below: Pfizer 250 ‘general’ disorders 164 cardiac disorders 120 infections 95 nervous system disorder (which includes Guillain-Barré syndrome, paralysis, seizure, brain injury, brain stem haemorrhage, transient ischaemic attack) 67 respiratory disorders AstraZeneca 405 general disorders 237 nervous system disorders 209 cardiac disorders 149 respiratory disorders 116 infections 79 vascular disorders Moderna 30 general disorders 12 cardiac disorders 5 nervous system disorders Unknown Brand 16 general disorders 8 cardiac disorders 7 respiratory disorders A complete set of tables for all categories relating to each brand can be found in this associated PDF. What the MHRA does do is denial. In fact it presents a masterclass in this art in its section ‘Comments on safety in specific populations’. Under the sub-heading ‘Safety of Covid-19 vaccines in pregnancy’ it says: ‘Pregnant women have reported similar suspected reactions to the vaccines as people who are not pregnant. Reports of miscarriage and stillbirth are also low in comparison to how commonly these events occurred in the UK outside of the pandemic.’ This rather brutally implies that since women commonly have miscarriages anyway it doesn’t matter if the vaccines cause a few more. ‘A few reports of commonly occurring congenital anomalies and obstetric events have also been received’. So nothing to worry about here either: ‘There is no pattern from the reports to suggest that any of the Covid-19 vaccines used in the UK, or any reactions to these vaccines, increase the risk of miscarriage, stillbirths, congenital anomalies or birth complications.’ Really? How about that in addition to the 20 stillbirths and foetal deaths recorded among the fatalities for all brands, to the week ending June 15, there’s an overall total of 495 spontaneous abortions (Pfizer) + 236 (AZ) + 71 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) reported – a hardly insignificant 809 miscarriages recorded in total. All to be discounted, apparently, though this number has grown significantly in the six months since Sally Beck investigated vaccine related reproductive problems for TCW in January. And what evidence is given of these very sad cases being thoroughly investigated and definitively found to be unrelated to the vaccines? None. And why is no age data provided for example, greater than 24 weeks gestation up to neonate? (MHRA do define stillbirth as greater than 24 weeks, and a miscarriage is less than 24 weeks’ gestation.) Apart from just one identified fatality ‘disorder category’, shockingly no specific or across the board age breakdown data is provided at all. This exception is 81 fatalities ‘from thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts)’ noted in the section ‘Comments on specific safety topics’, and quoted as accepted fatalities, not ‘suspected’, received for the Covid-19 vaccine AstraZeneca. They are set out by age in Table 6, the large majority under 70 years old and 32 of them between 18 and 49. 32 (Pfizer) Yellow Card reports of major thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) are also identified for 13 females, and 18 males between the ages of 18 to 91 years, (no age breakdown provided) with an overall case fatality rate of 13 per cent and four deaths reported. There is no mention in the summary text of the three other categories that have related fatalities recorded in the vaccine brand pdfs under these headings: · Anaphylactoid reactions recorded with related fatalities – 2 (Pfizer) + 2 (AZ) · Immune thrombocytopenia recorded with related fatalities – 1 (AZ) + 3 (Brand Unknown) · Guillain-Barré syndrome recorded with related fatalities – 2 (Pfizer) + 5 (AZ) Shockingly despite more than 4,000 Yellow Card Reports now filed for children (under 18s) – 3,857 for Pfizer and 264 for AstraZeneca – no details are disclosed as to their nature. Are we supposed to take the MHRA’s word when it says they mirror those in the general population? Yet this is put into serious doubt by the discussion text under ‘Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18 years old’ section, in which myocarditis and pericarditis are the only and key child related conditions that the MHRA specifically highlights. Even more culpably the MHRA provides no age-related data for these adverse events, nor for the six separately and untabulated but identified ‘fatal suspected’ myocarditis or pericarditis events associated with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines or for the five fatal events associated with the AZ vaccine, both reported in a later section. Yet a special warning to alert healthcare professionals of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in children is given in the drug formulation documents for Pfizer for 12 years and over dose – and 5-11 years dose which raises the question of whether any or all of these 11 deaths have, in fact, been in the under-18 age group. The MHRA in response to questions on these specific cases has said it has no more information to relay. Yet it is notable that some worrying cases of sudden unexplained death in teens have been reported in the media this year. Also of concern is an ONS identified spike in male teen deaths in 2021 which the MHRA insists was ‘administrative’ and due to delayed death reporting. In conclusion their discussion of the 2191 fatalities can be summed up as an exercise in discounting evidence. They assert that the majority of these reports are in ‘elderly people or people with underlying illness’ yet nowhere have they provided any supporting data for this assertion. They also suggest these deaths are inevitable: ‘Based on age-stratified all-cause mortality in England and Wales taken from the Office for National Statistics death registrations, several thousand deaths are expected to have occurred, naturally, within seven days of the many millions of doses of vaccines administered so far, mostly in the elderly.’ Surely, though, if an elderly individual was expected to die within seven days it would generally be obvious, and a vaccination would likely be clinically inappropriate. Hence, common sense would suggest that an unexpected death of any cause within seven days of a vaccine warrants very careful investigation for indications of linked accelerated exacerbation of a condition or direct side-effect causation from the vaccine administration. Not on Planet MHRA. Then, finally, they essentially denounce the whole Yellow Card reporting of fatal events, saying that ‘a temporal association with vaccination’ does not mean that there is a link between vaccination and the fatalities reported, and that ‘the pattern of reporting for all other fatal reports does not suggest the vaccines played a role in these deaths’. Such denial is surely the most incredible extrapolation from the facts ever. It makes no clinical sense and is at odds with the mounting evidence globally of vaccine fatalities, elevated risks in younger age groups (most notably the highly significant myocarditis risk), and of suppressed immune system response. ) Here is the breakdown of the most recent report. This is Not On The Beeb's 65th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The data concerns injuries and deaths up to the 15th June. The stat are then released to the public a week later, so in this case, on the 24th June. TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.8 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m 1st doses = 53,547,255 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,081,461 Boosters = 39,874,186 (30.5m Pfizer, 57,700 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,502,902 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports 171,590 Pfizer 245,614 AZ 39,514 Moderna 1745 Unknown TOTAL = 458,463 Fatal Pfizer 794 AZ 1287 Moderna 62 Unknown 48 TOTAL = 2191 Blood Disorders - 17,163 (Pfizer) + 7870 (AZ) + 2559 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,657 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1647 Acute Cardiac - 13,508 (Pfizer) + 11,554 (AZ) + 3479 (Moderna) + 117 (Unknown) = 28,658 Eye Disorders - 8169 (Pfizer) + 15,020 (AZ) + 1626 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,909 Blindness - 169 (Pfizer) + 329 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 544 Deafness - 308 (Pfizer) + 433 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 801 Infections - 12,702 (Pfizer) + 20,550 (AZ) + 2538 (Moderna) + 193 (Unknown) = 35,983 Herpes - 2256 (Pfizer) + 2708 (AZ) + 269 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5260 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,844 (Pfizer) + 81,151 (AZ) + 11,506 (Moderna) + 420 (Unknown) = 135,921 Spontaneous Abortions - 495 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 236 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 809 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,068 (Pfizer) + 183,398 (AZ) + 21,278 (Moderna) + 933 (Unknown) = 287,677 Bell’s Palsy - 652 (Pfizer) + 644 (AZ) + 105 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1404 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 106 (Pfizer) + 500 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 633 Paralysis - 527 (Pfizer) + 903 (AZ) + 121 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1562 Seizures - 1151 (Pfizer) + 2091 (AZ) + 300 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3565 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,387 (Pfizer) + 18,540 (AZ) + 2637 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,694 Respiratory Disorders - 22,138 (Pfizer) + 29,990 (AZ) + 4552 (Moderna) + 233 (Unknown) = 56,913 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1118 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 208 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3640 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1454 (Pfizer) + 2792 (AZ) + 347 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 4632 Skin Disorders - 34,672 (Pfizer) + 53,548 (AZ) + 13,572 (Moderna) + 380 (Unknown) = 102,172 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,492 (Pfizer) + 20,910 (AZ) + 5267 (Moderna) + 237 (Unknown) = 57,906 Vascular Disorders - 7680 (Pfizer) + 14,017 (AZ) + 1385 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 23,196 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 4,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,300,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3857 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 264 Yellow Cards Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1900 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 30 Yellow cards Total = 4,013,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,526,700 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4182 SOURCE full report here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/24th-june-2022-uk-vaccine-injury-report SOURCE ARTICLE: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-mhra-the-watchdog-covering-up-the-truth-about-vaccine-deaths-and-injuries/

This is Not On The Beeb's 65th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. The data concerns injuries and deaths up to the 15th June. The stat are then released to the public a week later, so in this case, on the 24th June. But things are now things are changing, to quote the MHRA "..In line with the wider government’s Living with COVID-19 agenda strategy, the frequency of publication of the updated summary will be changing to every other week, before transitioning to once per month from August. Our robust safety monitoring and surveillance will continue in the normal way between publications and we will continue to communicate promptly on any updated safety information...." Here is the breakdown of the most recent report. As of the 15th of June there are 2191 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 15th June 2022. (there is a one-week + time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.8 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m 1st doses = 53,547,255 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,081,461 Boosters = 39,874,186 (30.5m Pfizer, 57,700 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,502,902 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Reports 171,590 Pfizer 245,614 AZ 39,514 Moderna 1745 Unknown TOTAL = 458,463 Fatal Pfizer 794 AZ 1287 Moderna 62 Unknown 48 TOTAL = 2191 Blood Disorders - 17,163 (Pfizer) + 7870 (AZ) + 2559 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,657 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1647 Acute Cardiac - 13,508 (Pfizer) + 11,554 (AZ) + 3479 (Moderna) + 117 (Unknown) = 28,658 Eye Disorders - 8169 (Pfizer) + 15,020 (AZ) + 1626 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,909 Blindness - 169 (Pfizer) + 329 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 544 Deafness - 308 (Pfizer) + 433 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 801 Infections - 12,702 (Pfizer) + 20,550 (AZ) + 2538 (Moderna) + 193 (Unknown) = 35,983 Herpes - 2256 (Pfizer) + 2708 (AZ) + 269 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5260 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,844 (Pfizer) + 81,151 (AZ) + 11,506 (Moderna) + 420 (Unknown) = 135,921 Spontaneous Abortions - 495 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 236 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 809 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,068 (Pfizer) + 183,398 (AZ) + 21,278 (Moderna) + 933 (Unknown) = 287,677 Bell’s Palsy - 652 (Pfizer) + 644 (AZ) + 105 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1404 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 106 (Pfizer) + 500 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 633 Paralysis - 527 (Pfizer) + 903 (AZ) + 121 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1562 Seizures - 1151 (Pfizer) + 2091 (AZ) + 300 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3565 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,387 (Pfizer) + 18,540 (AZ) + 2637 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,694 Respiratory Disorders - 22,138 (Pfizer) + 29,990 (AZ) + 4552 (Moderna) + 233 (Unknown) = 56,913 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1118 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 208 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3640 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1454 (Pfizer) + 2792 (AZ) + 347 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 4632 Skin Disorders - 34,672 (Pfizer) + 53,548 (AZ) + 13,572 (Moderna) + 380 (Unknown) = 102,172 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,492 (Pfizer) + 20,910 (AZ) + 5267 (Moderna) + 237 (Unknown) = 57,906 Vascular Disorders - 7680 (Pfizer) + 14,017 (AZ) + 1385 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 23,196 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,300,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3857 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 264 Yellow Cards • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1900 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 30 Yellow cards b- 31 Yellow Cards Total = 4,013,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,526,700 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4182 For full reports including 361 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. SOURCE: For full reports including 361 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Did the ONS deliberately mislead the public over the C19 risks to cause fear? Author: George Robinson This table highlights in red where the ONS caused panic by overstating mortality rates in 2020 and by implying wrongly that SARS-CoV-2 might have led to a serious rise. The paragraph numbers refer to the ONS document. The green column identifies each bias and presents a neutral commentary on the data instead. Phrases such as "10 years ago.." are written as of 2020 (when the ONS published the review), not as of today. Summary. The ONS paper unaccountably fails to provide a common sense review of 2020 mortality data because it does not properly integrate the trend in death rates over the last hundred years, or the population growth, or the ages of those who died, or the concept of a 'bonfire effect', or the unsuitability of calendar years to measure irregularly timed Winter-deaths, or the failure of a 5-year rolling average to describe the recent & highly unusual 10-year dip. Instead, inappropriate data points are selected and uncritically presented that happen to paint the most deadly possible picture of 2020. The paper repeatedly sows fear of a pandemic for example by first raising a comparison of 2020 to the Spanish 'Flu in 1918, and then unconvincingly dismissing the notion. Several similar mechanisms of subconscious influence over the reader are deployed, although flashes of guardedly accurate writing also appear, suggesting that despite an overall bias to support the national fear of a CoVid pandemic, there are also undeclared conflicts of interests between more than one contributor. Conclusion. The ONS has created pandemic fear from the 2020 data, whereas a faithful account would reassure the public that the year's data are unremarkable. Author: George Robinson, Engineer advanceheating@gmail.com Ver. 1.2, 12 May 2022 Reference document is on the ONS Blog: "Counting deaths involving coronavirus: a year in review", posted by Sarah Caul on 12th Jan 2021 Document URL is https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2021/01/12/counting-deaths-involving-coronavirus-a-year-in-review Document snapshot 2021 is https://www.dropbox.com/s/9neijo3tds0my3s/21%20OnsSarahCaulReview2020.pdf?raw=1 Introduction.

Take a good long look at this map of Germany, with the colours of each area mapping the incidence of something - yellow meaning less, red meaning more. Very clearly, we can see the colours highlight the old West and east Germany, made clearer by the green line. Do the hot spots map political opinion? Does the map represent the preference for a particular type of German sausage? Or, just maybe, this is a map that calculates the likelihood of finding relics of the Stazi (old german state police) in the attic, or, or finding a classic East German-built Lada car in an abandoned barn? No, none of the above. I'm sure you have probably guessed the reality, however improbable. The map incredulously represents the covid 19 hotspots, which leaves only one burning question. How can a pathogen, that has caused lockdowns and worldwide pandemania, stop transmission at old national borders that have not even existed since the early 90s? by eugyppius This (map above) is the Omicron BA.5 wave in central Europe, and it is attended by a curious phenomenon: Every day, you can see more clearly the borders of the old DDR in the district-level data. I’ve traced these in green just to make the phenomenon clearer. Yes yes, there are systematic demographic differences between East and West Germans, and there are probably some differences in testing rates, but above all, there is an important difference in vaccine uptake. In this map of triple vaccination rates across my country, the old DDR borders are also evident: This map details the vaccination uptake of the German regions East Germans have direct experience with government propaganda and have proven more resistant to the vaccination campaign than Westerners. Their reward, after being much maligned by state media, is now higher levels of natural immunity and lower rates of BA.5 infection, which appears to prefer vaccinated populations. As the effects of vaccine failure grow clearer, you have to wonder how long the pandemicists will be able to publish even simple infection statistics, without raising extremely awkward questions. SOURCE: https://www.eugyppius.com/p/omicron-ba5-prefers-hypervaccinated

Story by Cristina Laila Dr. Simone Gold on Thursday was sentenced to two months in prison for speaking with a megaphone inside of the US Capitol on January 6. In March Dr. Simone Gold pleaded guilty to a class A misdemeanor count, “entering and remaining in a restricted building charge.” Dr Gold: “I was paid a visit by the FBI in a Roger Stone kind of takedown moment, which is quite uncalled for. You know, if anybody wanted to get a hold of me, they could have picked up the phone and called. I’m very easy to find. But there were literally twenty guys with guns blazing, [and they] broke down my door,” Gold narrated. NBC News reported: U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper in Washington, D.C., also sentenced Dr. Simone Gold to 12 months of supervised release after her 60-day prison term and ordered her to pay a $9,500 fine. She can report to prison at a date to be determined. The judge told Gold that her anti-vaccine activism wasn’t a factor in her sentencing. Cooper said Gold wasn’t a “casual bystander” on Jan. 6. The judge also said Gold’s organization has misled supporters into believing her prosecution was politically motivated and trampled on her free speech rights. Cooper called it “unseemly” that America’s Frontline Doctors has invoked the Capitol riot in raising money, including for her salary. “I think that is a real disservice to the true victims of that day,” he said. Dr. Simone Gold was in Washington DC on January 5th and 6th and spoke on the 5th at Freedom Plaza. Dr. Simone later entered the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 and delivered her same medical speech with a bullhorn from inside the U.S. Capitol. Dr. Simone committed no acts of violence. She only wanted to push her medical opinion on the coronavirus. For this Dr. Gold was placed in the front row of the FBI’s most wanted release. Life Site News reported: In a recent interview with Michelle Malkin, Dr. Simone Gold, founder of American Frontline Doctors (AFLD) discussed the lack of authentic informed consent with regards to experimental vaccines, censorship as a “crime against humanity,” and how she was subjected to a massive swat team raid upon her home by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in order to arrest her for being present in the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6th. In describing this incident, Gold said, “I was paid a visit by the FBI in a Roger Stone kind of take down moment, which is quite uncalled for. You know, if anybody wanted to get a hold of me, they could have picked up the phone and called. I’m very easy to find. But there were literally twenty guys with guns blazing, [and they] broke down my door,” Gold said. “It was dramatic and what I want to say is that I weep for our country. If you can pull in a person like me … [and] have the FBI break down your door with 20 guns, shackle you [in] handcuffs [and] drag you off, I mean it was really terrible … I’m telling you America, this can happen to you.” Dr. Simone Gold led a team of doctors called America’s Frontline Doctors, a group that challenged COVID prevention strategy in America, back in July 2020 in Washington DC. The Frontline Doctors from across the country met in Washington DC to dispel the coronavirus’s misinformation and myths. The group was concerned with the disinformation campaign being played out in the far-left American media today. Read More at Gateway Pundit

This is Not On The Beeb's 64th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. However, things are changing. This has just been published by the MHRA MHRA Update on publication frequency The weekly summary of Yellow Card reporting has provided timely and relevant information to patients and healthcare professionals on the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines as they were deployed in the UK throughout the pandemic. In line with the wider government’s Living with COVID-19 agenda strategy, the frequency of publication of the updated summary will be changing to every other week, before transitioning to once per month from August. Our robust safety monitoring and surveillance will continue in the normal way between publications and we will continue to communicate promptly on any updated safety information. Here is the breakdown of the most recent report. As of the 8th of June there are 2,182 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 8th June 2022. (there is a one-week + time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.8 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m 1st doses = 53,515,843 (all brands) 2nd doses = 50,039,615 Boosters = 39,809,826 (30.5m Pfizer, 57,600 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,365,284 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 171,400 (Last week 170,867) AZ 245,530 (last week 245,305) Moderna 39,337 . (last week 38,756) Unknown 1736 ( last week 1,7080 TOTAL = 458,003 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 789 AZ 1286 Moderna 60 Unknown 47 TOTAL = 2182 Blood Disorders - 17,163 (Pfizer) + 7870 (AZ) + 2559 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,657 Anaphylaxis - 666 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1647 Acute Cardiac - 13,508 (Pfizer) + 11,554 (AZ) + 3479 (Moderna) + 117 (Unknown) = 28,658 Eye Disorders - 8169 (Pfizer) + 15,020 (AZ) + 1626 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,909 Blindness - 169 (Pfizer) + 329 (AZ) + 42 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 544 Deafness - 308 (Pfizer) + 433 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 801 Infections - 12,702 (Pfizer) + 20,550 (AZ) + 2538 (Moderna) + 193 (Unknown) = 35,983 Herpes - 2256 (Pfizer) + 2708 (AZ) + 269 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5260 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,844 (Pfizer) + 81,151 (AZ) + 11,506 (Moderna) + 420 (Unknown) = 135,921 Spontaneous Abortions - 495 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 236 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 809 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 82,068 (Pfizer) + 183,398 (AZ) + 21,278 (Moderna) + 933 (Unknown) = 287,677 Bell’s Palsy - 652 (Pfizer) + 644 (AZ) + 105 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1404 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 106 (Pfizer) + 500 (AZ) + 20 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 633 Paralysis - 527 (Pfizer) + 903 (AZ) + 121 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1562 Seizures - 1151 (Pfizer) + 2091 (AZ) + 300 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3565 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,387 (Pfizer) + 18,540 (AZ) + 2637 (Moderna) + 130 (Unknown) = 31,694 Respiratory Disorders - 22,138 (Pfizer) + 29,990 (AZ) + 4552 (Moderna) + 233 (Unknown) = 56,913 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1118 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 208 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3640 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1454 (Pfizer) + 2792 (AZ) + 347 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 4632 Skin Disorders - 34,672 (Pfizer) + 53,548 (AZ) + 13,572 (Moderna) + 380 (Unknown) = 102,172 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,492 (Pfizer) + 20,910 (AZ) + 5267 (Moderna) + 237 (Unknown) = 57,906 Vascular Disorders - 7680 (Pfizer) + 14,017 (AZ) + 1385 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 23,196 Please note this: Footnote 8 - The decrease in these numbers compared to the previous report is due to the incorrect inclusion of breastfeeding and pregnancy-related reports in the previous publication. Details of reports of suspected ADRs relating to exposure during pregnancy and breastfeeding can be found in the earlier sections of this report. CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 4,000,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,300,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3841 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 265 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1800 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 30 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 30 Yellow Cards Total = 4,013,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,526,600 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4166 MHRA states re Under 18s Yellow Cards - Footnote 8 - 'The decrease in these numbers compared to the previous report is due to the incorrect inclusion of breastfeeding and pregnancy related reports in the previous publication.' For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. SOURCE: For full reports including 361 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

The holy grail to end all discussion on vaccine safety has always been a simple vaccinated versus jab-free study. In February 2019 Oregon Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas was challenged by his state local Medical Board to prove his alternative care plan was safer than the standard 70 jab + CDC schedule. He hired an outside expert to analyse his patients data, a pool of resources from 2700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated children. The graphs are measuring office visits against the age of the children per condition. I.e presuming the more times the child visits the doctor about a condition, the worse they were with that condition. On the graphs below, the orange lines represent the vaccinated and the blue line represents the jab-free children. The ADHD graph shows that not one jab-free child made a single visit to the doctor concerning ADHD during the ten years covered by the data. This information is critical to understand where the surge of SEN (Special Educational Need) children has originated. How did the Oregon Medical Board respond when presented with the data, graphs and proof of comparative safety they had requested of Dr. Paul Thomas? Due to the embarrassing truths, the foot soldiers of the pharmafia stripped him of his medical licence, with media hit jobs articles such as this: https://www.wweek.com/news/state/2020/12/05/prominent-anti-vaccine-pediatrician-dr-paul-thomas-has-license-suspended-by-the-oregon-medical-board/ However, as you can see below, the graphs speak for themselves... DOWNLOAD THE ABOVE SLIDES HERE: Dr. Paul Thomas points out that his study might be seen as weak alone. But they are not alone. The work of the US founded Control group (not to be confused with the also superb UK based control group) are below. The graphs speak for themselves. (The full PDF presentations can be downloaded at end) DOWNLOAD THE ALL 21 CONTROL GROUP SLIDES HERE DOWNLOAD DR PAUL THOMAS FULL PDF PRESENTATION HERE (The video is a short clip form the presentation) Find Dr Paul's work here: https://www.doctorsandscience.com/presentations.html An interesting paper mentioned by Dr Paul Thomas by Hooker and Miller. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated pediatric populations. Methods: Using data from three medical practices in the United States with children born between November 2005 and June 2015, vaccinated children were compared to unvaccinated children during the first year of life for later incidence of developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders. All diagnoses utilized International Classification of Diseases–9 and International Classification of Diseases–10 codes through medical chart review. Subjects were a minimum of 3 years of age, stratified based on medical practice, year of birth and gender and compared using a logistic regression model. Results: Vaccination before 1 year of age was associated with increased odds of developmental delays (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.47–3.24), asthma (OR = 4.49, 95% CI 2.04–9.88) and ear infections (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.63–2.78). In a quartile analysis, subjects were grouped by number of vaccine doses received in the first year of life. Higher odds ratios were observed in Quartiles 3 and 4 (where more vaccine doses were received) for all four health conditions considered, as compared to Quartile 1. In a temporal analysis, developmental delays showed a linear increase as the age cut-offs increased from 6 to 12 to 18 to 24 months of age (ORs = 1.95, 2.18, 2.92 and 3.51, respectively). Slightly higher ORs were also observed for all four health conditions when time permitted for a diagnosis was extended from ⩾ 3 years of age to ⩾ 5 years of age. Conclusion: In this study, which only allowed for the calculation of unadjusted observational associations, higher ORs were observed within the vaccinated versus unvaccinated group for developmental delays, asthma and ear infections. Further study is necessary to understand the full spectrum of health effects associated with childhood vaccination.

This is Not On The Beeb's 63rd report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. As of the 25th of May there are 2,161 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines, in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 25th May 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.6 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.5 m (minus 100k on last weeks figures!) 1st doses = 53,445,102 (all brands) 2nd doses = 49,938,085 Boosters = 39,679,182 (30.4m Pfizer, 57,300 AZ & 9.3m Moderna) TOTAL = 143,062,369 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 171,109 (Last week 170,867) AZ 245,400 (last week 245,305) Moderna 39,055. (last week 38,756) Unknown 1,720 ( last week 1,7080 TOTAL = 457,284 people reported an adverse reaction Currently published - From 25th May 2022 - An approximate 1.7 million first doses and approximately 1.5 million second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have also now been administered…. (Boosters)…. and 9.3 million doses of COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have been given. Total = 12.5m - 25th May 2022 From wayback machine - From 19th May 2022 - An approximate 1.7 million first doses and approximately 1.5 million second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have also now been administered…. (Boosters)…. and 9.4 million doses of COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna have been given. Total 12.6m - 19th May 2022 Fatal Pfizer 778 AZ 1277 Moderna 59 Unknown 47 TOTAL = 2161 Blood Disorders - 17,139 (Pfizer) + 7863 (AZ) + 2547 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,614 Anaphylaxis - 664 (Pfizer) + 885 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1645 Acute Cardiac - 13,407 (Pfizer) + 11,504 (AZ) + 3438 (Moderna) + 114 (Unknown) = 28,463 Eye Disorders - 8130 (Pfizer) + 14,997 (AZ) + 1605 (Moderna) + 94 (Unknown) = 24,826 Blindness - 168 (Pfizer) + 326 (AZ) + 40 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 538 Deafness - 306 (Pfizer) + 433 (AZ) + 55 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 799 Infections - 12,601 (Pfizer) + 20,507 (AZ) + 2507 (Moderna) + 188 (Unknown) = 35,803 Herpes - 2246 (Pfizer) + 2704 (AZ) + 266 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 5244 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,747 (Pfizer) + 81,119 (AZ) + 11,371 (Moderna) + 419 (Unknown) = 135,656 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,941 (Pfizer) + 45,589 (AZ) + 6818 (Moderna) + 215 (Unknown) = 73,563 Spontaneous Abortions - 491 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 236 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 71 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 805 miscarriages Skin Disorders - 34,539 (Pfizer) + 53,508 (AZ) + 13,474 (Moderna) + 376 (Unknown) = 101,897 Nervous System Disorders - 81,800 (Pfizer) + 183,247 (AZ) + 21,019 (Moderna) + 917 (Unknown) = 286,983 Tremor - 2218 (Pfizer) + 9972 (AZ) + 733 (Moderna) + 52 (Unknown) = 12,975 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4323 (Pfizer) + 7029 (AZ) + 785 (Moderna) + 44 (Unknown) = 12,181 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 817 (Pfizer) + 2377 (AZ) + 67 (Moderna) + 20 (Unknown) = 3281 Paralysis - 520 (Pfizer) + 900 (AZ) + 117 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1548 Seizures - 1145 (Pfizer) + 2088 (AZ) + 294 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3548 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,326 (Pfizer) + 18,511 (AZ) + 2604 (Moderna) + 129 (Unknown) = 31,570 Headaches & Migraines - 35,942 (Pfizer) + 94,081 (AZ) + 9839 (Moderna) + 350 (Unknown) = 140,212 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,454 (Pfizer) + 20,897 (AZ) + 5251 (Moderna) + 237 (Unknown) = 57,839 Respiratory Disorders - 22,050 (Pfizer) + 29,960 (AZ) + 4491 (Moderna) + 231 (Unknown) = 56,732 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 3,900,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,300,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3890 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 330 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-35 • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1800 second doses & 2400 boosters resulting in 48 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 31 Yellow Cards Total = 3,913,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,426,600 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4299 For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. SOURCE For full reports including 359 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

This is Not On The Beeb's 62nd report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. As off the 26th April there are 2,148 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 18th May 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.1 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.6 m 1st doses = 53,398,518 (all brands) 2nd doses = 49,895,254 Boosters = 39,585,631 (30.1m Pfizer, 56,600 AZ & 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 142,879,403 doses BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 170,867 AZ 245,305 Moderna 38,756 Unknown 1,708 TOTAL = 456,636 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 773 AZ 1273 Moderna 56 Unknown 46 TOTAL = 2148 Anaphylaxis - 663 (Pfizer) + 886 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1645 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 3,900,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,200,000 second doses & 300,000 boosters resulting in 3761 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.800 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 262 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1700 second doses & 3100 boosters resulting in 30 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 27 Yellow Cards Total = 3,913,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,427,300 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4080 SOURCE For full reports including 359 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 stat for adverse events accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

The New UK Polio Fear campaign has ramped up its marketing efforts targeting parents. This is a copy of one such email being sent to parents. QUOTE: "...Urgent: Poliovirus Dear Parent / Carer Poliovirus has been detected in a number of London sewage samples, the advice from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) is to urge anyone who isn’t up to date with their polio vaccines to get immunised. The combined Tetanus, diphtheria and polio (Td/IPV) booster vaccine is offered to all pupils in Year 9, If your child did not receive their vaccine in the last 2 years, please contact the South Warwickshire school age immunisation team to arrange vaccination. Kind Regards, South Warwickshire Immunisation and Vaccination..." So other than the transparent pharma sales drive, is there a real Polio outbreak, or could there be other factors at play? As a reminder, this is last week's UK government announcement. "...Polio found in UK for first time since 1984 as Government declares national incident. The UK Health Security Agency has declared a national incident after discovering the virus that causes polio in the UK for the first time in nearly 40 years. There are not yet any confirmed cases but the samples found appear to confirm the first “transmission event” in the UK since 1984, when the last case of polio was detected. Parents of children who are not up to date with their polio vaccine course are urged to make an appointment with their GP as soon as possible, but the UKHSA says the risk to the wider population is low..." Samples taken from a sewage treatment works in east London between February and May suggest the virus has spread between a small number of people, possibly in an extended family in the capital...." This needs repeating: There are not yet any confirmed cases but the samples appear to confirm the first “transmission event” ...Parents of children who are not up to date with their polio vaccine course are urged to make an appointment with their GP as soon as possible...." SOURCE: https://inews.co.uk/news/health/polio-found-in-uk-for-first-time-since-1984-as-government-declares-national-incident-1700359 What is vaccine-derived polio? The WHO definition. Oral polio vaccine (OPV) contains an attenuated (weakened) vaccine-virus, activating an immune response in the body. When a child is immunized with OPV, the weakened vaccine-virus replicates in the intestine for a limited period, thereby developing immunity by building up antibodies. During this time, the vaccine-virus is also excreted. In areas of inadequate sanitation, this excreted vaccine-virus can spread in the immediate community (and this can offer protection to other children through ‘passive’ immunization), before eventually dying out. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/poliomyelitis-vaccine-derived-polio How could the polio have been found in London's sewerage system? It is important to understand how these 'polio samples' might have been found. Could children being vaccinated with Polio have shed the Polio virus via faeces as shown in this 2015 paper? Poliovirus vaccine strains detected in stool specimens of immunodeficient children in South Africa. Pavlov DN, Van Zyl WB,, Kruger M, Blignaut L, Grabow WO, Ehlers MM STUDY ABSTRACT "...After exposure to the oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), immunocompetent persons excrete poliovirus (PV) vaccine strains for a limited period. In contrast, immunodeficient individuals remain sometimes chronically infected, and in some cases, PV excretion times as long as 10 years have been reported....The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of OPV (oral poliovirus vaccine) strains in stools of immunodeficient children...These results suggested that immunodeficient patients vaccinated with OPV might excrete potentially pathogenic VDPVs for a prolonged period. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of OPV strains in stools of immunodeficient children from a selected area in South Africa, as a first step toward future research on the prevalence and potential health impact of VDPVs. In a period of 1 year, a total of 164 stool samples of HIV-positive children aged 4 months to 8 years were studied for the excretion of OPV strains. In addition, 23 stool samples from healthy immunocompetent children were analyzed after receiving their OPV immunization. By applying a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in combination with a nested PCR, a total of 54 enteroviruses (EVs) were detected in the stool specimens of the immunodeficient children. Using restriction enzyme analysis, 13 PVs were distinguished from 41 nonpolio EVs (NPEVs). A Sabin-specific RT-triplex PCR confirmed the presence of 7 Sabin PV type 1, 4 Sabin PV type 3, and 2 Sabin PV type 2 isolates. The majority of the NPEV group was made up of 7 coxsackievirus B3 (CBV3), 6 echovirus 11 (ECV11), 5 ECV9, and 3 coxsackievirus A6 (CAV6) isolates. According to the results, two of the immunodeficient patients (P023 and P140) who had received their last OPV immunization more than 15 months before (vaccinated at 14 weeks of age) tested positive for Sabin PVs types 3 and 1, respectively. A 5-year-old immunodeficient patient (P052) who had received her last OPV immunization more than 42 months before (vaccinated at 18 months of age) tested positive for Sabin PV type 1. These VDPVs may circulate in the community, resulting in possible infections in the unvaccinated population. Therefore, the information obtained in this study would be essential for strategies aimed at the protection of both immunodeficient as well as immunocompetent individuals against complications of vaccination with OPV." https://europepmc.org/article/MED/16290028 Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/2263/2410/1/Pavlov_Polioviruses%282006%29.pdf RELEVANT PAPERS Poliovirus vaccine strains in sewage and river water in South Africa https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16917529/ Prevalence of vaccine-derived polioviruses in sewage and river water in South Africa. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15996707/ Molecular evolution of oral poliovirus vaccine strains during multiplication in humans and possible implications for global eradication of poliovirus "...Although there are many advantages in using attenuated OPV strains in the campaign to eradicate poliomyelitis, several studies have demonstrated that there are some disadvantages such as (a) excretion by vaccines of OPV-derived polioviruses with genomic modifications known to increase the neurovirulence, (b) appearance of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) and other adverse effects in vaccinees, (c) occurrence of persistent infections caused by OPV-derived strains in immunodeficient patients with VAPP, (d) transmission of OPV-derived polioviruses to susceptible individuals which develop VAPP, and (e) detection of OPV-derived polioviruses in the environment, which could be a source of infection for humans in the future. Different studies indicate that it is important to consider the possibility of persistent infections and excretion of OPV-derived polioviruses for long periods by humans, and also the survival in the environment of OPV-derived polioviruses excreted by humans, which could be transmitted and circulate in a non-immune population after stopping poliovirus vaccination. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10989702/ Vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV): Impact on poliomyelitis eradication. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19428874/ Vaccine poliovirus shedding and immune response to oral polio vaccine in HIV-infected and -uninfected Zimbabwean infants Background: With prolonged replication, attenuated polioviruses used in oral polio vaccine (OPV) can mutate into vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) and cause poliomyelitis outbreaks. Individuals with primary humoral immunodeficiencies can become chronically infected with vaccine poliovirus, allowing it to mutate into immunodeficiency-associated VDPV (iVDPV). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23661792/

BY ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH INTERNATIONAL An international survey of a health-aware, ‘Control Group’ that includes over 300,000 people who have chosen to avoid COVID-19 vaccination, shows participants place minimal burden on health systems through their strong reliance on natural immunity, self-care and the use of natural health supplements to help prevent or even treat COVID-19. Yet this group faces unfounded discrimination, job losses and mental health issues intensified by its marginalisation by mainstream society. The survey of participants in the ‘Control Group’ includes a sub-group from the over 305,000 participants from more than 175 countries who have joined the citizen-led project and opted to not receive COVID-19 vaccines. The findings just uploaded to the preprint server ResearchGate, show that during the 5-month survey period (September 2021 through to February 2022 inclusive), participants suffered low rates of severe COVID-19 disease, were infrequently hospitalised, and used natural health products extensively both for prevention and for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. Data from these first five months of the Control Group survey were analysed and interpreted by an independent, international team led by Robert Verkerk PhD, a multi-disciplinary scientist and the founder, executive and scientific director of the non-profit Alliance for Natural Health International. Co-authors included three practicing clinicians, Dr Naseeba Kathrada from South Africa, Christof Plothe DO from Germany and Dr Katarina Lindley from the USA. The authors came together to assess the survey data through their collaboration in recent months with the World Council for Health, a non-profit, global coalition of health-focused organizations and civil society groups. The survey findings were based on a sub-cohort of approximately 18,500 Control Group participants who had completed questionnaires on a monthly basis over the first five months of the survey. Among the wide-ranging data collected, the survey captured reasons why participants avoided vaccines, with distrust of governments and pharmaceutical companies as well as concerns over adverse reactions from insufficiently tested vaccines being high on the list. Participants reported extensive mental health problems that may have been compounded by the stigmatisation and discrimination facing those who shunned COVID-19 vaccines. It also found that women, despite being unvaccinated for COVID-19, suffered menstrual and bleeding abnormalities that may have been associated with viral exposure, shedding, spike protein exposure or pandemic-related behavioural changes. Those who never wore masks reported the lowest levels of COVID-19 disease. Given the participants are self-selected and have self-reported, the survey findings need to be interpreted with care when comparing them with national statistics or studies based on randomly selected populations. The UK-based Control Group project was established in mid-2021 as a citizen-led cooperative that aims to evaluate long-term health outcomes among the COVID-19 vaccine-free as well as linking its members to country support networks and online community groups. The full survey report can be downloaded from ResearchGate here. CONTACT For further information about the survey and findings, contact Rob Verkerk PhD using one of the following methods: Telephone: +44 (0)1484 646 600 Email: science@anhinternational.org https://www.anhinternational.org/news/breaking-news-unvaxxed-control-group-first-release-of-survey-data/

This is Not On The Beeb's 61st report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. As off the 19th April there are 2,140 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 11th May 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) TOTAL DATA for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 81.1 m AZ 49.06 m Moderna 12.6 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) 1st doses = 53,337,395 (all brands) 2nd doses = 49,844,562 Boosters = 39,474,656 (30.1m Pfizer, 56,468 AZ & 9.4m Moderna) TOTAL = 142,656,613 doses Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 170,625 AZ 245,206 Moderna 38,464 Unknown 1695 TOTAL = 455,990 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 767 AZ 1272 Moderna 54 Unknown 47 TOTAL = 2140 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old • Pfizer - 3,800,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,200,000 second doses & 300,000 boosters resulting in 3729 Yellow Cards • AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.800 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 • Moderna - 2100 children (1st doses) and 1700 second doses & 3100 boosters resulting in 29 Yellow cards • Brand Unspecified - 27 Yellow Cards Total = 3,813,700 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,327,300 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 404 For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 stat accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

Since nearly all other mammals can make their own VIT C, and humans can't, I'd always wondered how as a species we had survived when the crucial VIT C is often not found in sufficient levels within many diets internationally, or during certain seasons. It was not until my interview with Dr Jimmy Gutman that I learnt that our body can recycle vitamin C using Glutathione. This was especially interesting as I'd noticed since boosting my glutathione levels, I'd noticed lower urge for taking VIT C compared to the quantities I had previously. Having sufficient VIT C levels is critical for all health conditions as I posted here in spring 2020. (This page was made before NOTB, but still contains some good info, especially on making DIY Liposomal VIT C) Having sufficient Glutathione is critical within the context of what we are experiencing in 2022, with approximately two thirds of the UK population alone have accepted the C19 jabs. Detoxing and replenishing glutathione levels has never been more important in the history of the human race. Getting the correct balance between Glutathione and VIT C, two of our greatest anti-oxidants is important, hence the mirroring of this interesting report by Chris Masterjohn PHD below. (see his original article in link at end) Beyond a certain dose, vitamin C can begin taxing glutathione and rendering excess nitric oxide toxic. Here's how to prevent that. by Chris Masterjohn, Phd While I was writing my last post, Protecting Against Spike Protein Toxicity With Sulfur, Selenium, and Sunlight, I came across this paper from 2002 showing that, in dopamine-responsive brain cells, vitamin C worsens nitric oxide toxicity, while glutathione and N-acetyl-cysteine protect against it. The context of this study was an investigation into the damage of dopamine-responsive brain cells in the context of Parkinson’s. However, I believe this paper demonstrates a much more broadly applicable general principle: high doses of vitamin C need to be properly balanced with glutathione support in any context where nitric oxide toxicity might be important. That includes COVID and vaccine-induced spike protein toxicity, and it should be broadly applicable to inflammation in general. I am working on a much more extensive report tying this together with vitamin C research in the context of COVID, general immunity, and cancer. I will likely release this report at the end of next week. For now, I wanted to leave you with my preliminary take-home points so that you can take them under consideration now if you use high-dose vitamin C for any purpose. This post will remain available until the final report is out next week. At that point, it will be integrated into the final report. Since the final report will be contributing to my upcoming Vaccine Guide as well as version 8 of the COVID Guide (the last update I will make before returning full-time to finishing my book), it will be available to everyone for the first 48 hours and become paid-only afterwards. In Figure 7A, we see that in these dopamine-responsive brain cells, a nitric oxide donor (2nd column) increased the percent of cells that were dying compared to the control (1st column), and that neither 200 nor 400 micromoles per liter (μmol/L) of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) had any effect alone (columns 3 and 4), but actually increased cell death in response to the nitric oxide donors (columns 5 and 6). The asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the control, while the crosses indicate a statistically significant difference from the nitric oxide donor alone. So, we see that only 400 μmol/L produced a statistically significant worsening. However, the mean cell death with 200 μmol/L is about 15% higher on a relative basis than with the nitric oxide donor alone. This suggests to me that the effect is beginning slightly under 200 μmol/L but becomes more meaningful after 400 μmol/L. As seen in Figure 4A, by contrast, 600 μmol/L of either glutathione or N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) completely abolishes the increase in cell death: Overall, these results are consistent with the following explanation: As explained in my last post, glutathione prevents excessive S-nitrosylation of proteins, and a deficiency of glutathione can lead nitric oxide to engage in nitration of proteins. S-nitrosylation is a regulatory modification that occurs under inflammatory stress, and nitration may play a regulatory role but is often associated with irreversible damage to proteins. Thus, glutathione shifts nitric oxide away from inflammatory and damaging roles, and toward useful roles like vasodilation. Antioxidant protection occurs in a very defined order: vitamin E is recycled by vitamin C, vitamin C is recycled by glutathione, glutathione is recycled using energy from the pentose phosphate pathway using derivatives of niacin and riboflavin. This is a one-way street. Glutathione recycles vitamin C, but vitamin C does not recycle glutathione. To say “glutathione recycles vitamin C” means that vitamin C oxidizes glutathione. If vitamin C oxidizes glutathione faster than glutathione can be recycled itself, vitamin C will tax the glutathione pool and thereby render nitric oxide more likely to hurt than help. Overall, this paper suggests that vitamin C may begin to meaningfully tax the glutathione pool at concentrations close to 200 μmol/L and begins doing so in earnest by the time we arrive at concentrations of 400 μmol/L. In my final report, I will integrate this with data on oral and intravenous vitamin C in humans. Suffice it to say for now that my review of that literature so far does not contradict using 200-400 μmol/L as benchmark plasma levels where we need to start getting concerned about balancing vitamin C with glutathione. This paper provides a basis for translating this into oral and intravenous doses of vitamin C: A vitamin C-rich diet containing 300 mg per day will generally raise plasma levels to 70-85 μmol/L. Single doses of 1-2 grams will raise plasma levels to 150 to just shy of 200 μmol/L at the 5-hour mark and keep them around or above 100 μmol/L for about ten hours. Dosing 2.5 or 3 grams every four hours will keep plasma levels sustainably at or above 200 μmol/L. Intravenous doses of 3 or more grams consistently reach plasma levels well above 1000 μmol/L and 100 grams intravenously reaches over 15,000 μmol/L. Doses at or below 10 grams keep plasma levels elevated for about two hours, whereas 50 or 100 grams keep them elevated for 4-6 hours. This study did not look at time points earlier than 5 hours, so it might be underestimating the peak concentrations reached. The study also did not look at repeat dosing with less than 2.5 grams, so it is quite possible that repeated dosing with 1 gram would also keep plasma levels at or above 200 μmol/L. In the absence of a specific reason to use high-dose vitamin C, I think it is best to shoot for up to 400 milligrams per day of food-based vitamin C in at least two divided doses. Two studies (here and here) have shown that long-term consumption of 200 milligrams twice a day provides plasma and intracellular levels of vitamin C in the most beneficial range, with plasma levels in the high but sub-100 μmol/L range. They also show that this dose is well below the dose (1000 mg/d) required to raise urinary levels of urate and oxalate. Here is the critical preliminary finding I wish to highlight now: When using repeated doses of one gram or more, or long-term use of greater than 400 milligrams per day, for any concern relating to nitric oxide toxicity that includes anything inflammatory, it is critical to follow best practice for maintaining good glutathione status. For your convenience, I have copied below the glutathione-specific recommendations from the last post: Make sure to consume at least one gram of protein per kilogram of bodyweight or at least a half gram of protein per pound of bodyweight. Consider supplementing with 20-40 grams of whey protein, with anywhere from 500 mg each to 10 grams each of N-acetylcysteine and glycine, or anywhere from 500 mg to 5 grams of glutathione. My personal preference is for whey protein, supported by additional glutathione. I would stay toward 1500 mg of NAC or glutathione without a compelling reason to use higher doses, but consider what I’ve written here the top of the range to experiment with. Keep diabetes well treated, and reverse type 2 diabetes if possible, and reverse any signs of emerging pre-diabetes. Keep any thyroid, adrenal, or other metabolic disorder well treated. Eat a diet that keeps postprandial blood sugar under 140 mg/dL (7.7 mmol/L). Within that constraint, eat freely of whole fruit and unrefined sweeteners, but use moderation and steer very far away from 42% of Calories coming from simple sugar. Within these constraints, any increase in carbohydrate is likely to improve glutathione status by increasing insulin. Don’t start a new milk habit. If you use dairy products habitually, however, no need to stop. Manage your vitamin and mineral status properly, with special emphasis on selenium, thiamin, niacin, riboflavin, iron, magnesium, and calcium. My Vitamins and Minerals 101 Cliff Notes are a great place to start (paid subscribers can access them for free here). I have a comprehensive system for managing nutritional status focused on lab work outlined in the Cheat Sheet, which is 50% off for Masterpass members, and paid subscribers get 50% off the Masterpass membership. When vitamin C is 400 milligrams per day or less, spread throughout meals or at least spread across two divided doses, it is unlikely to tax the glutathione pool. In fact, avoiding suboptimal vitamin C status is actually good for the glutathione pool because it lowers the burden glutathione has to fulfill to keep it recycled. It is still a good thing to support glutathione status. However, it is at doses above this that spike plasma levels to 200 μmol/L or greater where robustly supporting glutathione status might make or break whether vitamin C helps or hurts. At minimum, robustly supporting glutathione status will remove one of the concerns about vitamin C and shift it more clearly to the point of net benefit. Disclaimer I am not a medical doctor and this is not medical advice. My goal is to empower you with information. I will not take a position on whether you should or should not get vaccinated. Please make this decision yourself, consulting sources you trust, including a caring health care professional. SOURCE: https://chrismasterjohnphd.substack.com/p/balancing-vitamin-c-and-glutathione?s=r

In late Ma, the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) edited their Monkeypox page to alter the narrative in a few key ways. Firstly, they removed a paragraph from the “How do you get Monkeypox?” section. Up until a few days ago, according to archived links, the Monkeypox page said this, regarding person-to-person tranmission [emphasis added]: It’s very uncommon to get monkeypox from a person with the infection because it does not spread easily between people. …this has now been totally removed. Secondly, they’ve removed this paragraph, which was present up until at least November of 2021 (and maybe much more recently, there are no archives between November and May) [emphasis added]: [Monkeypox] is usually a mild illness that will get better on its own without treatment. Some people can develop more serious symptoms, so patients with monkeypox in the UK are cared for in specialist hospitals. The new “treatment” paragraph reads [again, emphasis added]… Treatment for monkeypox aims to relieve symptoms. The illness is usually mild and most people recover in 2 to 4 weeks […] You may need to stay in a specialist hospital, so your symptoms can be treated and to prevent the infection spreading to other people. So, they remove that it will “get better on its own”, and again reinforce the idea of spreading the disease despite this being described as “very uncommon” as recently as last week. They even add a line about self-isolating, which was never mentioned before: as monkeypox can spread if there is close contact, you will need to be isolated if you’re diagnosed with it. Finally, they now include a warning you can get Monkeypox by eating undercooked meat, which will doubtless feed into the anti-meat narrative too (oh, wait, it already is). To sum up, history is being re-written a little here. Before, monkeypox “did not spread easily between people”. Now it does. Before, monkeypox would “get better on its own without treatment”. Now it won’t. It’s early days to say that Monkeypox is going to be the “new Covid”, and maybe this rollout will stall and be forgotten in a couple of weeks, but there’s no doubt they are taking some tips from the Covid playbook so far. CHECK THE INTERNET ARCHIVE HERE: https://web.archive.org/web/20220507132152/https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/monkeypox/ https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/24/the-nhs-just-edited-their-monkeypox-page-to-make-it-scarier/?

By Enrico Trigoso John Pierce Law has filed a lawsuit against Atlas Air, on behalf of US Freedom Flyers (USFF) and Atlas employees, and plans to sue all major airlines, 18 altogether, plus the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT), contending that the vaccine mandates imposed by these agencies on the airlines’ employees infringed on their constitutional, religious, and medical liberties. The lawsuit against Atlas Air was filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida, with over 100 plaintiffs pursuing litigation. “Fundamentally, this case is about whether Americans should be required to choose between their livelihoods and being coerced into taking an experimental, dangerous medical treatment,” reads the lawsuit (pdf). Plaintiffs are mostly unvaccinated pilots, flight attendants, as well as other Atlas staff. “It is also about the safety of America’s airline industry. Should pilots—under federal regulation required to be among the healthiest workers in the United States—who have taken an experimental ‘vaccine’ that is now shown to have potentially deadly, long-term side effects, be allowed to fly massive aircraft in our skies? While those who have (smartly) refrained from such a course be forced out of their jobs?” it states. Atlas Air is one of the industry’s largest cargo carrier companies and the world’s largest operator of the Boeing 747 aircraft. The law firm was founded by Att. John Pierce, who founded the National Constitutional Law Union. He previously represented George Papadopoulos in connection with the 2016 “Russia Hoax,” reaching a dismissal of the DNC’s case and helping secure a presidential pardon. He is also currently representing defendants being charged in connection to the Jan. 6 Capitol breach. “So the complaint has been filed. We’re in the process of serving everyone. And then, we’ll likely be looking for some kind of injunctive relief here soon to make sure that all the COVID-related mandates stop immediately. And then we’ll proceed [with] litigation, motion, practice, and discovery and then onward to trial eventually,” Pierce told The Epoch Times. This week, John Pierce Law plans to file another lawsuit against United Airlines. “We’ll be hitting basically all of them in sequence, and then we’ll be going after the FAA as well. We’re gonna get these vaccine mandate type of rules and COVID restrictions ruled unconstitutional. And we’re gonna get findings that there was discrimination under Title Seven. We’re gonna get punitive damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress and things like that,” Pierce said. “It’s going to require a big fix, ultimately. And that’s probably going to require legislation and kind of getting all the stakeholders at the table, but the first step is civil litigation.” Airlines, which are government contractors, are affected by President Joe Biden’s order from September of last year that states all employees of those companies have to be vaccinated against the Chinese Communist Party virus. Pierce said that as soon as he heard about the airline mandates he predicted that it would be the next big wave of litigations. “[These lawsuits are] absolutely crucial. It’s a very, very red line—If you get to the point where you have to choose between getting an experimental drug shot in your arm and your paycheck, that’s just unAmerican, it’s unconstitutional, it’s outrageous, it’s sickening.” “If that’s not the hill to die on when it comes to liberty, that’s about as close as I can imagine it,” Pierce said. Josh Yoder, a major airline pilot and a spokesperson for Freedom Flyers who recently supported the trucker-led “The People’s Convoy,” says that there has been harassment, threats, intimidation, vaccine injuries, and even “suicides that have come out of these mandates.” “We’re not doing class action. We’re doing individual litigants. And the reason we’re doing it that way is because so many people have been harmed and people have experienced different levels of harm. We have the unvaccinated who have been harassed, threatened, and intimidated into getting vaccinated. Then we have many people as well who got vaccinated against their will, who were coerced and forced into doing it under threat of losing their employment,” Yoder said. “And then, in addition, we have the vaccine-injured, and the numbers of vaccine-injured are growing by the day,” Yoder went on, “It’s just incredible what’s happening with pilots.” Pilots have to maintain a flight physical in order to maintain their licenses. The Epoch Times recently reported that a pilot for American Airlines, one of the top 3 largest airlines in the country, suffered a cardiac arrest between two flights, about 6 minutes after landing. “And so what we’re seeing is many pilots are experiencing health conditions. Specifically, cardiac issues [are] what we’re seeing a lot of. And many of these pilots are afraid to come forward because if they come forward they lose their flight physical, they lose their flight medical. So they’re continuing to fly. We have a lot of pilots that are flying with chest pain and neurological conditions, because if they come forward they lose their careers,” Yoder said. Freedom Flyers is now acting as an advocacy group between the pilots, the FAA, and the companies in order to assist them in coming forward and speaking out on their conditions. “We have a massive team of medical professionals who are helping these people, but we’re asking everyone to come forward. While it’s absolutely devastating to their careers, we need them to come forward because this is the safety of the American public that we’re talking about,” Yoder said. According to a group of attorneys, doctors, and other experts—and a pilot who says his career ended due to adverse reactions from a vaccine—the FAA has been breaking its own rule that states pilots should not fly after having taken medications that have been approved for less than a year, The Epoch Times reported in December. source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/18-major-airlines-faa-and-dot-to-be-sued-over-covid-vaccine-mandates_4484295.html? Enrico Trigoso REPORTER Follow Enrico Trigoso is an Epoch Times reporter focusing on the NYC area.

2,200 famous Spanish personalities have been caught buying false C19 vaccination certificates. The more known they were, the more they were charged. The names of the rich and famous include the president of one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in Spain Why would the president of large pharma company choose not to take a 'safe and effective' C19 vaccine? The “Jenner Operation” has uncovered at least 2,200 famous people with false Covid-19 vaccination certificates after these were bought from a nurse. Amongst those that have been investigated are leading singers, musicians, football stars, business people, politicians and top medical personnel. The scandal involved people being added to the National Immunisation Registry in exchange for money, with many of them familiar faces and household names. The latest of these to be charged is the President of PharmaMar José María Fernández Sousa-Faro, an IBEX 35 company, and one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in Spain. The company is dedicated to researching drugs including cancer, Alzheimer’s and yes... Covid-19. José María Fernández Sousa Faro The 76-year-old businessman, who has not yet been summoned to testify, was included in the lists to reflect that he had received the third dose. The leader of the network was a nursing assistant at the La Paz University Hospital, where he is accused of charging more than €200,000 euros for fraudulently registering 2,200 people as vaccinated in the National Registry against Covid-19. He has been arrested and is currently in custody.... Among those accused are Bruno González Cabrera, a defender who played for Betis, Getafe, Levante and Valladolid. Fabio Díez Steinaker in beach volleyball, runner-up in Europe and fifth in the Sydney Olympic Games. The former Valencian boxer and wrestler José Luis Zapater, alias Titín, who starred in more than a thousand fights. The famous people investigated so far includes: José María Fernández Sousa-Faro, President of Pharma Mar Trinitario Casanova, one of the richest men in Spain Kidd Keo, trap singer in English and Spanish Anier, rap singer Jarfaiter, rap singer Veronica Echegui, actress Bruno Gonzalez Cabrera, soccer player Fabio Díez Steinaker, former beach volleyball Olympian José Luis Zapater, alias Titín, former boxer Camilo Esquivel, recognised and prestigious doctor. According to the police who are investigating the 2,200 over false Covid-19 vaccination certificates, the fee was dependent on your social standing. The more important you were, the higher the price. SOURCE: https://euroweeklynews.com/2022/05/24/2200-prominent-spanish-personalties-investigated-for-false-covid-19-vaccination/ José María Fernández Sousa Faro Fernández-Sousa is Professor of Biochemistry and founded PharmaMar in 1986. He has been in the pharmaceutical industry for over 35 years and was a member of the boards of directors of Antibiotics, Penibérica, Pescanova and Cooper-Zeltia, among other companies. The company he chairs, PharmaMar, is one of the leading Spanish pharmaceutical companies and emerged from the absorption of Zeltia in 2015. In 2021 it made a profit of 92.82 million, and in the first quarter of this year it earn 22 million euros, according to its own data. PharmaMar is listed on the Ibex 35 and is dedicated to researching drugs obtained from marine resources to fight different types of cancer and Alzheimer's. On its website, the company is defined as "a company focused on oncology and committed to research and development that is inspired by the sea for the discovery of molecules with antitumor activity. "Among other drugs, PharmaMar markets Aplidin for patients with multiple myeloma. This drug is now being tested, in the testing phase and pending authorization from the Ministry of Health, to treat precisely covid patients. Last March, the president of PharmaMar said in an interview with El Español that he had suffered from coronavirus and had been treated with his company's drug "with positive results".

WIRELESS RADIATION AND OSTEOPOROSIS Arthur has done it again. After suffering a fracture himself he did a deep dive discovering research that bones are breaking at an unprecedented rate, By Arthur Firstenberg I was astonished by the number of people who contacted me after I broke my arm telling me they had broken theirs too -- some of them this year, and others within the last few years. It occurred to me to wonder: has there been a significant increase in osteoporosis and bone fractures around the world? and if so, is this yet another health effect caused by the use of cell phones and their infrastructure irradiating our bones as well as the rest of our bodies? I remembered reading some fascinating facts about bones in the groundbreaking 1985 book, The Body Electric, written by orthopedic surgeon Robert O. Becker. Bones, he discovered, are semiconductors, and they owe their electrical properties to being doped with tiny amounts of copper. The atoms of copper, he found, bond electrically to both apatite crystals and collagen fibers -- the two main components of bone -- and hold them together, “much as wooden pegs fastened the pieces of antique furniture to each other.” “Osteoporosis,” wrote Becker, “comes about when copper is somehow removed from the bones. This might occur not only through chemical/metabolic processes, but by a change in the electromagnetic binding force, allowing the pegs to ‘fall out.’ It’s possible that this could result from a change in the overall electrical fields throughout the body or from a change in those surrounding the body in the environment.” I also remembered, from the old Soviet Union literature, summarized in my 1997 book, Microwaving Our Planet, that radio frequency radiation redistributes metals throughout the body. With these facts in mind, I have searched the world’s medical literature for studies on the incidence of both osteoporosis and fractures, and the evidence seems fairly conclusive: (1) There has been an enormous increase in the incidence of both osteoporosis and bone fractures of all types throughout the world in children and adults since about 1950; (2) the incidences of both continue to rise, worldwide; (3) most studies published in the past couple of decades have found that osteoporosis in children is correlated with the amount of time spent daily looking at screens; (4) rates of osteoporosis do not correlate with the amount of time children spend sitting but not looking at screens; and (5) these trends are independent of the amount of exercise people get. The authors of these studies have been at a loss to explain their findings, but they are easily explained when one remembers the electrical properties of bones, and the effects that cell phone and computer screens, all emitting radiation, are likely to have on bones and on the copper atoms within them -- and that exposure to radiation from radio, TV, radar, and (more recently) cell tower antennas has increased tremendously since World War II. Here is a sampling of the studies I have collected: Louis V. Avioli reviewed the world’s literature in 1991. During the second half of the twentieth century, he found, both osteoporosis and fracture rates had risen dramatically in the United States, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Spain, Italy, the UK, Belgium, Australia, and elsewhere. The incidence rate of hip fractures in the United States had been increasing by about 40% per decade. (1) M.L. Grundill and M.C. Burger, in 2021, found that the incidence rate of hip fractures in a population in South Africa had more than doubled in men and almost sextupled in women compared to what had been reported in 1968. (2) Emmanuel K. Dretakis et al. found that the annual number of hip fractures in Crete increased 21% in just four years, from 1982 to 1986, while the population over 50 remained the same. (3) Hiroshi Koga et al. examined the records of children aged 6 to 14 in Niigata, Japan. The incidence rate of all fractures more than doubled from the early 1980s to the early 2000s in both girls and boys, and almost tripled in girls in junior high school. (4) ​ P. Lüthje et al. found that the incidence rate of hip fractures throughout Finland quadrupled between 1968 and 1988. (5) ​ In 2012 Ambrish Mithal and Parjeet Kaur found that hip fracture rates had increased two- to three-fold throughout Asia during the previous 30 years. (6) ​ Hiroshi Hagino et al. found that hip fracture rates in Tottori Prefecture, Japan had risen by almost 40% between 1986 and 1992, and by more than 60% in men and about 50% in women between 1986 and 2001. Increases in fracture rates occurred not only in the elderly, but in people in their 30s and 40s. (7) ​ In 1989 Karl J. Obrant et al. did an analysis of fracture trends in Malmö, Sweden, where all X-rays have been saved since the beginning of the twentieth century. They found that the yearly number of fractures in that city had increased seven-fold between 1951 and 1985, and the incidence rate of fractures among children had doubled between 1950 and 1979. “There are signs that there is a deterioration of the quality of the skeleton in successive generations,” wrote the authors. “With the same or even diminished trauma, we sustain more serious and more comminuted fractures today than previously.” The increase had nothing to do with changing estrogen levels, because fracture rates had increased even more in men than in women. The daily consumption of both calcium and Vitamin D had increased during that time. But the incidence of hip fractures was higher in cities than in rural environments where, we know, there was less radiation. (8) Haiyu Shao et al., in 2015, looking at hours per day spent playing video games by Chinese adolescents, found that adolescents with longer video game time were more likely to have lower bone mass density in their legs, trunk, pelvis, spine, and whole body. (9) Anne Winther et al., studying 15- to 18-year-olds in Tromsø, Norway in 2010-2011, found that longer screen time was associated with lower bone mass density in both boys and girls, regardless of the amount of daily physical activity, calcium intake, vitamin D, alcohol consumption, smoking habits, height or weight. (10) Sebastien Chastin, examining youths aged 8 to 22 in the U.S. in 2005-2006, found that screen-based sitting was associated with lower bone mass density in hips and spine. Non-screen-based sitting was not associated with lower bone mass density. (11) Natalie Lundin et al. found that annual incidence rates of pelvic and hip socket fractures in Sweden increased 25% from 2001 to 2016, and that increasing incidence rates were seen in all age groups. (12) Daniel Jerrhag et al. found that the incidence rate of forearm fractures in Sweden was 23% higher in 2010 compared with 1999, and that the increase was greater in men and women 17 to 64 years of age than in the elderly. (13) Michiel Herteleer et al. found that the incidence rate of pelvic and hip socket fractures in Belgium doubled between 1988 and 2006, and rose another 26% by 2018. (14) Neeraj M. Patel found that the annual incidence rate of fractures in children aged 6 to 18 in New York State almost quadrupled between 2006 and 2015. (15) A reader alerted me to research proving that electromagnetic radiation causes osteoporosis. A 2016 study in Turkey by Kunt et al. found that electrical workers had significantly lower bone mass density, as well as an increased tendency to severe osteoporosis, than a control population. The average age of both groups was 38. Sieroń-Stołtny et al., in an astounding experiment in Poland, kept 10 young rats in a plastic cage for 28 days and put one Nokia 5110 mobile phone underneath the cage. The phone operated in silent mode and was only turned on for 15 seconds every half hour between 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. and again between 2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. In other words, the animals were exposed for a total of four minutes per day for 28 days. Ten control animals were in an identical cage but without a mobile phone beneath it. At the end of the experiment, the rats were sacrificed and examined. The vertebrae of the exposed rats weighed on average 12.5% less than the vertebrae of the unexposed rats. The leg bones of the exposed rats had on average 12.44% less calcium and fractured more easily. Most of the calcium loss occurred during the first week of exposure. Blood analysis also indicated that collagen was lost from the bones. In 2013, Ahmet Aslan et al., in Turkey, exposed 30 five-month-old rats, whose legs had been broken, to mobile phone radiation for 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks. At the end of 8 weeks, healing was significantly delayed in the exposed compared to the unexposed rats. In 2011, Fernando Saraví, in Argentina, found that carrying a mobile phone on your hip causes osteopenia in that hip. Men who carried their phone on their right hip had lower bone mass density in their right hip than in their left hip. Men who carried their phone on their left hip had lower bone mass density in their left hip. And from readers: Marie-Reine, in Québec, broke her left humerus in three pieces on April 2. A friend of hers in Nova Scotia broke her humerus in March. Jackie, in Wisconsin, writes that she developed osteoporosis after she moved into a house with radio towers outside her bedroom window. Leonore, in Massachusetts, writes: “A friend who never broke a bone in his life, recently broke his femur when he tripped playing basketball.” Sara, age 55, wonders why she suddenly became susceptible to breaking bones in 2018. She broke a bone in her right foot that year, and then in 2021 she broke a bone in her left foot. “The thing that was so odd about both of these incidents is that I did almost nothing to provoke it. In one case I was trying to keep my sandal from getting sucked off my foot by the current during a rafting trip. All I was doing was flexing my foot. The second time I just tripped while inside my house, walking on a flat surface and I ended up with a fracture.” Denise, age 66, broke her hip on April 19. Her father and mother, in their eighties, both broke hips several years ago, and this March her mother broke her other hip. Marilyn, in California, writes that “Despite a strong exercise history and a strong healthy diet, I have been plagued with two broken hips (femur necks) and a fractured shoulder” since “a cluster of cell towers were installed 100 feet from my bedroom.” WIFI ROUTERS AND MICROWAVE OVENS Don, in Idaho, writes: “This year we relocated our seedlings next to the router in our pantry for convenience. We have experienced an across-the-board failure with them. Skinny plants, some of them dead. This includes tomato seedlings. Your email really struck a chord with me. Thank you!” Carolyn, in France, writes: “This is the first time I have ever heard anyone else say that they had stomach pain from eating restaurant food that had been microwaved! I have realized the same thing -- that foods that I normally eat with no problem, cause me stomach pain, often severe when I eat it in a restaurant in which it has most likely been cooked or reheated in a microwave. I can usually sense it with the first bite I take as well -- it just doesn’t feel right… I have to be so careful about ordering things that will be definitely cooked fresh, and request that nothing be heated in a microwave. Sometimes I forget though, and then I pay for it.” Read Arthurs ground breaking book INVISIBLE RAINBOW Here is a brief book summary https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/invisible-rainbow The last 39 newsletters, including this one, are available for viewing on the Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force. Some of the newsletters are also available there in German, Spanish, Italian, French, Norwegian, and Dutch. References (1) Louis V. Avioli, “Significance of osteoporosis: A growing international health problem,” Calcified Tissue International 49:S5-S7 (1991) (2) M.L. Grundill and M.C. Burger, “The incidence of fragility hip fractures in a subpopulation of South Africa,” South African Medical Journal 111(9):896-902 (3) Emmanuel K. Dretakis et al., “Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Crete,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 63(2):150-151 (1992) (4) Hiroshi Koga et al., “Increasing incidence of fracture and its sex difference in school children: 20 year longitudinal study based on school health statistic in Japan,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 23(1):151-155 (2018) (5) P. Lüthje et al., “Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Finland,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 112:280-282 (1993) (6) Ambrish Mithal and Parjeet Kaur, “Osteoporosis in Asia: A call to action,” Current Osteoporosis Reports 10:245-247 (2012) (7) Hiroshi Hagino et al., “Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Tottori Prefecture, Japan: Trend from 1986 to 2001,” Osteoporosis International 16:1963-1968 (2005) (8) Karl J. Obrant et al., “Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures,” Calcified Tissue International 44:157-167 (1989) (9) Haiyu Shao et al., “Association between duration of playing video games and bone mineral density in Chinese adolescents,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry 18(2):198-202 (2015) (10) Ann Winther et al., “Leisure time computer use and adolescent bone health -- findings from the Tromsø Study, Fit Futures: a cross-sectional study,” BMJ Open 5:e006665 (2015) (11) Gadi Lissak, “Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: Literature review and case study,” Environmental Research164:149-157 (2018) (12) Sebastian FM Chastin et al., “The frequency of osteogenic activities and the pattern of intermittence between periods of physical activity and sedentary behaviour affects bone mineral content: the cross-sectional NHANES study,” BMC Public Health 14:4 (2014) (13) Natalie Lundin et al., “Increasing incidence of pelvic and acetabular fractures. A nationwide study of 87,308 fractures over a 16-year period in Sweden,” Injury 52:1410-1417 (2021) (14) Daniel Jerrhag et al., “Epidemiology and time trends of distal forearm fractures in adults -- a study of 11.2 million person-years in Sweden,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders18, Article number 240 (2017) (15) Michiel Herteleer et al., “Epidemiology and secular trends of pelvic fractures in Belgium: A retrospective, population-based, nationwide observational study,” Bone153:116141 (2021)

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explains Pfizer's new tech to the Davos crowd gathering in Switzerland 22-26 May 2022 "Ingestible pills" A pill with a tiny chip that sends a wireless signal to relevant authorities when the pharmaceutical has been digested. "Imagine the compliance," he says. Understanding that this is a goal - that 'compliance' is the motive - will help us understand the true intentions of what we are witnessing with the C19 v-campaigns. Watch more here: https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2022 To follow the story of the real motives, join Not On The Beeb for the real news Www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/join

SPECIAL REPORT FOCUS - ADVERSE VACCINE IMPACTS AFFECTING TOUCH TOUCH RELATED REACTIONS = MANY 100,000s Some people may have reported more than one type of reaction per report. Our ability to offer and receive touch is fundamental to our experience of being human, to show care and attention, and experience the world. When our sense of touch is disturbed there can be immense impacts on our relationships, communication abilities, mental health, intimate connections, our ability to work, as well as a vast spectrum of influences on our daily activities and life choices. Below represents TOUCH RELATED ADVERSE EFFECTS experienced, not exhaustively listed. Lip Swelling, Ulceration, Oedema & Pain - 996 (Pfizer) + 1108 (AZ) + 237 (Moderna) = 2341 Peripheral Swelling (arms, legs, fingers, toes) - 4459 (Pfizer) + 6078 (AZ) + 2223(Moderna) = 12,760 Dyskinesia & Movement Disorders - 397 (Pfizer) + 612 (AZ) + 72 (Moderna) = 1081 Mononeuropathies incl. Carpal Tunnel & Nerve Compression - 117 (Pfizer) + 157 (AZ) + 13 (Moderna) = 287 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 9327 (Pfizer) + 17,794 (AZ) + 1855 (Moderna) = 28,976 Paralysis - 519 (Pfizer) + 896 (AZ) + 114 (Moderna) = 1529 Peripheral Neuropathies - 214 (Pfizer) + 391 (AZ) + 26 (Moderna) = 631 Sensory Abnormalities - 3597 (Pfizer) + 6383 (AZ) + 659 (Moderna) = 10,639 Tremor - 2206 (Pfizer) + 9963 (AZ) + 711 (Moderna) = 12,880 Hyperhidrosis, Cold Sweats & Night Sweats - 4589 (Pfizer) + 13,000 (AZ) + 1608 (Moderna) = 19,197 Dermatitis & Eczema - 1264 (Pfizer) + 1294 (AZ) + 338 (Moderna) = 2896 Pruritus (stinging, burning & tickling) - 6469 (Pfizer) = 8457 (AZ) + 2573 (Moderna) = 17,499 Psoriatic Conditions - 301 (Pfizer) + 328 (AZ) + 39 (Moderna) = 668 Rashes - 10,916 (Pfizer) + 15,231 (AZ) + 5102 (Moderna) = 31,249 Urticaria (hives) - 2466 (Pfizer) + 2786 (AZ) + 760 (Moderna) = 6012 In addition, several 10,000s of touch related adverse effect types that could significantly impact quality of life including infections, pain, skin conditions, vaccine site injury, muscles and tissue disorders, fatigue conditions and reproductive health. How many adults and children in the UK are experiencing disturbances in their daily lives and their ability to connect with others through TOUCH due to vaccine adverse events? For full reports including 353 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

A breathtaking investigation in the buying of ballots in the world's number one democracy. Here is a clip. IMDB: 2000 MULES: Documentary on the alleged criminal voter fraud and ballot stuffing during the 2020 USA presidential election, which may have changed the legitimate outcome. 2000 MULES is a documentary by Christian, conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza. The movie shows that at least 2000 people were caught red-handed in stuffing standalone ballot drop boxes in swing states during the 2020 presidential election, an illegal practice called ballot harvesting. The movie uses tons of video evidence and GPS data to show that this ballot stuffing augmented Joe Biden’s vote totals in 2020. The Democrat Party’s support for this fraudulent system were aided by about $590 million from Democrat supporters like Marc Zuckerberg, George Soros, Warren Buffet, and others. 2000 MULES is a shocking, disturbing exposé of a Democrat, leftist campaign to get Joe Biden illegitimately elected as President. At the very least, it shows that a full investigation of the ballot trafficking mules, including the sources of their illegal ballots, should occur. 2000 MULES also makes an excellent case for the end of early voting, mail-in ballots and drop-boxes, which mostly have been supported by Democrat Party leaders. It also makes a strong case for a nationwide Voter ID law, which can be geared to people’s driver licenses and state identifications. YOU TUBE You tube banned the film which very clearly shows YouTube's interest. Watch and make up your own mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=B6P7uH7Geo4 BUY THE FILM HERE BUY THE BOOK Watch the film online here https://dinesh.locals.com/post/2083099/2000-mules This is a pirated version on Telegram. If you watch it, please donate to the filmmakers See the full film here: https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb/5319

This is Not On The Beeb's 60th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. (Data published 13th May 2022) FATALITIES There are now 2,132 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 80.8m AZ 49.06 m (down!?) Moderna 12.5m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 142,390,214 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 170,337 AZ 245,089 Moderna 38,197 Unknown 1672 TOTAL = 455,295 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 763 AZ 1272 Moderna 53 Unknown 44 TOTAL = 2132 Blood Disorders - 17,097 (Pfizer) + 7850 (AZ) + 2522 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 27,532 Anaphylaxis - 662 (Pfizer) + 884 (AZ) + 93 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1642 Acute Cardiac - 13,266 (Pfizer) + 11,433 (AZ) + 3356 (Moderna) + 112 (Unknown) = 28,167 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1324 (Pfizer) + 448 (AZ) + 350 (Moderna) + 8 (Unknown) = 2130 Eye Disorders - 8084 (Pfizer) + 14,962 (AZ) + 1569 (Moderna) + 89 (Unknown) = 24,704 Blindness - 166 (Pfizer) + 325 (AZ) + 39 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 534 Deafness - 306 (Pfizer) + 432 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 797 Infections - 12,462 (Pfizer) + 20,439 (AZ) + 2415 (Moderna) + 183 (Unknown) = 35,499 Herpes - 2238 (Pfizer) + 2700 (AZ) + 258 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5223 Nasopharyngitis - 1186 (Pfizer) + 1948 (AZ) + 322 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 3467 Spontaneous Abortions - 490 + 14 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 235 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 68 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 799 miscarriages Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,582 (Pfizer) + 81,065 (AZ) + 11,102 (Moderna) + 410 (Unknown) = 135,159 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,862 (Pfizer) + 45,575 (AZ) + 6672 (Moderna) + 214 (Unknown) = 73,323 Immune System Disorders - 2520 (Pfizer) + 3441 (AZ) + 637 (Moderna) + 36 (Unknown) = 6634 Nervous System Disorders - 81,422 (Pfizer) + 183,026 (AZ) + 20,569 (Moderna) + 897 (Unknown) = 285,914 Bell’s Palsy - 646 (Pfizer) + 639 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1391 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 803 (Pfizer) + 2369 (AZ) + 64 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) = 3252 Paralysis - 519 (Pfizer) + 896 (AZ) + 114 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1540 Seizures - 1135 (Pfizer) + 2083 (AZ) + 275 (Moderna) + 21 (Unknown) = 3514 Paraesthesia & Dysaesthesia (chronic burning sensation, pricking nerve pain) - 9327 (Pfizer) + 17,794 (AZ) + 1855 (Moderna) + 103 (Unknown) = 29,079 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,270 (Pfizer) + 18,466 (AZ) + 2550 (Moderna) + 121 (Unknown) = 31,407 Respiratory Disorders - 21,919 (Pfizer) + 29,894 (AZ) + 4392 (Moderna) + 227 (Unknown) = 56,432 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1101 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 201 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3616 Headaches & Migraines - 35,843 (Pfizer) + 94,040 (AZ) + 9681 (Moderna) + 347 (Unknown) = 139,911 Renal & Urinary Disorders - 1424 (Pfizer) + 2776 (AZ) + 325 (Moderna) + 37 (Unknown) = 4562 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,372 (Pfizer) + 20,867 (AZ) + 5217 (Moderna) + 235 (Unknown) = 57,691 Vascular Disorders - 7607 (Pfizer) + 13,950 (AZ) + 1335 (Moderna) + 107 (Unknown) = 22,999 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4302 (Pfizer) + 7015 (AZ) + 765 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 12,124 Muscle & Tissue Disorders - 56,150 (Pfizer) + 104,623 (AZ) + 14,301 (Moderna) + 574 (Unknown) = 175,648 Skin Disorders - 34,354 (Pfizer) + 53,452 (AZ) + 13,287 (Moderna) + 364 (Unknown) = 101,457 For full reports including 353 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 3,800,000 children (1st doses) plus 2,200,000 second doses & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3683 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8.700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 Moderna - 2000 children (1st doses) and 1600 second doses & 3000 boosters resulting in 28 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 27 Yellow Cards Total = 3,813,600 children jabbed Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 6,226,900 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 4,001 For full reports including 353 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

May, 2022 New Pfizer Documents Released - Part 2 Page 9 • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031111.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031111.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031113.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031113.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031149.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031149.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031186.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031186.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031197.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031197.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031207.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031207.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051047.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051047.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011093.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1001-10011093.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011100.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1001-10011100.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1001 10011135.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1001-10011135.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1003 10031038.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1003-10031038.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051054.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051054.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051069.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051069.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051214.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051214.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051293.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051293.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051347.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051347.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051387.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051387.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1005 10051411.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1005-10051411.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061020.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061020.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061040.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061040.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061052.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061052.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061094.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061094.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061098.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061098.pdf) • 125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001 1006 10061176.pdf (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/125742_S1_M5_CRF_c4591001-1006-10061176.pdf) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058316 to 0058458_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A Supp define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058316-to-0058458_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-Supp-define.xml) Page 10 • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058459 to 0058478_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A Supp define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058459-to-0058478_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-Supp-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058479 to 0058594_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058479-to-0058594_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058595 to 0058614_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058595-to-0058614_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058615 to 0058652_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S Supp define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058615-to-0058652_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-Supp-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058653 to 0058675_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 S Supp define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058653-to-0058675_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-S-Supp-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058676 to 0058794_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 A define.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058676-to-0058794_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-A-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058795 to 0058828_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 A define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058795-to-0058828_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-A-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058829 to 0058954_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S define.xml (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058829-to-0058954_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-S-define.xml) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0058955 to 0058999_125742_S1_M5_bnt162 01 S define 2 0 0.xsl (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0058955-to-0058999_125742_S1_M5_bnt162-01-S-define-2-0-0.xsl) • FDA CBER 2021 5683 0065774 to 0066700_125742_S1_M5_c4591001 A D addv.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0065774-to-0066700_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-addv.xpt) • FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0059000 to -0065773_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adcevd.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0059000-to-0065773_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adcevd.xpt) • FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0066701-to-0123167_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adfacevd.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0066701-to-0123167_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adfacevd.xpt) • FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0123168-to-0126026_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adva.xpt (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0123168-to-0126026_125742_S1_M5_c4591001-A-D-adva.xpt) Source: Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/)

A new 'early-stage paper shows thats shedding happens with C19 vaccines. There has been much discussion on shedding. Due to personal observations, I believe it happens. Many papers show scientists have been trying to make vaccines that spread, some with the excuse that this is the way to vaccinate wild populations of animals. I have been mulling on the real reason the western Governments have pulled back on the vaccine drive. We know they want 100% coverage. They achieved 'vaccinating' about two thirds in the UK. One reason that has crossed my mind is, had that achieved their goals? Was two thirds the critical mass they were after? Does having two in every three people jabbed, mean that the other third will also be affected by the vaccine that is more accurately described as a bioweapon against the freewill of humanity? Moreover as anyone who read the Pfizer leaked trial papers, would be forgiven for thinking that Pfizer themselves expected shedding. This is a little reminder from that paper. 8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if: A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention (trial participant) by inhalation or skin contact. Are the findings in the paper below devalued by the paper not being peer reviewed? 2022 is the time of man where we have no time to wait for the authority of 'experts' to catch up and tick boxes. We need peer review, and more importantly replication of these results, however whilst the lumbering monster of official proof stumbles forwards, trying to dodge all industry attempts to derail it - it would be advisable for everyone to take heed and keep healthy. Time to: Power up the immune system. Detoxify. Become immune to fear Destress the mind and body Smile, dance and be happy There are some useful tips and products here. THE PAPER Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity (This paper has not been per reviewed) Authors Ross M. Kedl, PhD*, Elena Hsieh, MD, Thomas E. Morrison, PhD, Gabriela Samayoa-Reyes, PhD, Siobhan Flaherty, PhD, Conner L. Jackson, PhD and Rosemary Rochford, PhD. Abstract. Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated. The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non- immune hosts. Introduction The vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have maintained remarkable efficacy against severe disease and death in those vaccinated regardless of variant emergence, Omicron included 1 . Less appreciated than the systemic immunity generated by the vaccines are the high levels of antibody (IgG and IgA) found within the nasal cavity and saliva of vaccinees. This outcome is found in both humans and primates, and in response to both mRNA and protein-based vaccines 2,3. Respiratory transmission of viral infection is proof that oral/nasal cavity constituents can be communicated through aerosols and/or respiratory droplets. As such, it would stand to reason that antibody present within the oral/nasal environment may also be aerosolized to some degree. Methods A Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay (MMIA) was constructed and performed as previously described 4. Under IRB # 20-1279, serum samples were obtained from first-responder adults in Arapahoe County, CO 5. Antibody was eluted 4 from punches taken from the center of surgical masks anonymously donated by laboratory workers. Nasal swabs were obtained by convenience sampling both parents and their children at the Colorado Tricountry vaccine center in Aurora, CO who were attending vaccine appointments, not limited to SARS-CoV2. Antibody from swab tips was eluted as described for DBS 4. The log transformed IgA and IgG values from the children’s samples were modeled using linear regression with a single binary covariate corresponding to high or low antibody levels from their parent. Residual plots were used to check violations of linear regression assumptions and a Wilcoxon rank sum test was conducted if assumptions were violated. A linear mixed effects model was evaluated to assure that the correlation within household did not significantly contribute to the data or alter the conclusions drawn from the fixed effect linear regression model. Cytometry was performed using a Beckman Coulter Cytoflex cytometer and analyzed using FloJo v.10 software (Treestar, Inc.). Statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 4.0.2). Results The extended mandates for mask wearing in both social and work environments provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the possibility of aerosolized antibody expiration from vaccinated individuals. Utilizing a flow cytometry-based Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay (MMIA) to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (Fig 1A and B) 4,5 and a method previously used to elute antibody from rehydrated dried blood spots (DBS), we identified anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies eluted from surgical face masks worn by vaccinated lab members donated at the end of one workday. Consistent with the results reported by others, we identified both IgG and IgA in saliva from vaccinated individuals (Fig 1C and D). It was therefore not surprising to detect both IgG and IgA following elution of antibody from face masks (Fig 1C and D). Given these observations, we hypothesized that droplet/aerosolized antibody transfer might occur between individuals, much like droplet/aerosolized virus particles can be exchanged by the same route. To evaluate this hypothesis, we obtained nasal swabs from children living in households in which parents or family members had varying degrees of SARS-CoV2-specifc immunity, including those unvaccinated, vaccinated and COVID-19+. Initial comparison of nasal swabs acquired from children living in vaccinated households revealed readily detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG (Fig 1E), especially when compared to the complete deficit of SARSCoV-2-specific antibody detected in the few nasal swabs we obtained from children in nonvaccinated households. We then used the variation in parents’ levels of intranasal IgG as the basis of stratification across all children’s samples. Log transformation of the data from thirty four adult-child pairs established antibody cut-offs for high vs low parental intranasal antibody levels. Evaluation of samples in this fashion revealed that high intranasal IgG in vaccinated parents was significantly associated (p-value = 0.01) with a 0.38 increase in the log transformed intranasal IgG gMFIs within a child from the same household (Fig 1F). This significant positive relationship was observed using either parametric or non-parametric analysis, and adjustments for the correlation within household did not alter the conclusion. Though not statistically significant, a similar trend of elevated IgA was found in the same samples. SOURCE: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full-text ↵Garcia-Beltran, W. F., St Denis, K. J., Hoelzemer, A., Lam, E. C., Nitido, A. D. et al. mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine boosters induce neutralizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Cell 185, 457–466 e454, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.033 (2022). CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar ↵Corbett, K. S., Nason, M. C., Flach, B., Gagne, M., O’Connell, S. et al. Immune correlates of protection by mRNA-1273 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in nonhuman primates. Science 373, eabj0299, doi:10.1126/science.abj0299 (2021). AbstractGoogle Scholar ↵Nahass, G. R., Salomon-Shulman, R. E., Blacker, G., Haider, K., Brotherton, R. et al. Intramuscular SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicit varying degrees of plasma and salivary antibody responses as compared to natural infection. medRxiv, 2021.2008.2022.21262168, doi:10.1101/2021.08.22.21262168 (2021). Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵Schultz, J. S., McCarthy, M. K., Rester, C., Sabourin, K. R., Annen, K. et al. Development and Validation of a Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay Using Dried Blood Spots for SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence: Application in First Responders in Colorado, USA. J Clin Microbiol 59, doi:10.1128/JCM.00290-21 (2021). Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar ↵Sabourin, K. R., Schultz, J., Romero, J., Lamb, M. M., Larremore, D. et al. Risk Factors of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Arapahoe County First Responders-The COVID-19 Arapahoe SErosurveillance Study (CASES) Project. J Occup Environ Med 63, 191–198, doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002099 (2021). CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar ↵Hayek, S., Shaham, G., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Kepten, E., Dagan, N. et al. Indirect protection of children from SARS-CoV-2 infection through parental vaccination. Science, eabm3087, doi:10.1126/science.abm3087 (2022). CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This is Not On The Beeb's 59th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. (Data published 28th Apr 2022) FATALITIES There are now 2,096 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.8 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.2 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 169,660 AZ 244,908 Moderna 37,478 Unknown 1,634 TOTAL = 453,680 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 747 AZ 1263 Moderna 45 Unknown 41 TOTAL = 2087 Blood Disorders - 17,065 (Pfizer) + 7844 (AZ) + 2497 (Moderna) + 63 (Unknown) = 27,469 Anaphylaxis - 658 (Pfizer) + 883 (AZ) + 88 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1632 Acute Cardiac - 13,156 (Pfizer) + 11,403 (AZ) + 3273 (Moderna) + 108 (Unknown) = 27,940 Eye Disorders - 8043 (Pfizer) + 14,932 (AZ) + 1541 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 24,602 Blindness - 165 (Pfizer) + 324 (AZ) + 36 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 529 Deafness - 305 (Pfizer) + 430 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 794 Hepatic (liver) Disorders - 263(Pfizer) + 528 (AZ) + 44 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 840 Infections - 12,355 (Pfizer) + 20,385 (AZ) + 2354 (Moderna) + 174 (Unknown) = 35,268 Spontaneous Abortions - 489 + 1 premature baby death / 1 foetal growth restriction death + 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 235 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 67 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 797 miscarriages Nervous System Disorders - 81,077 (Pfizer) + 182,884 (AZ) + 20,145 (Moderna) + 878 (Unknown) = 284,984 Strokes and CNS haemorrhages - 790 (Pfizer) + 2366 (AZ) + 58 (Moderna) + 16 (Unknown) = 3230 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,421 (Pfizer) + 81,032 (AZ) + 10,878 (Moderna) + 395 (Unknown) = 134,726 Immune System Disorders - 2445 (Pfizer) + 3323 (AZ) + 609 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 6401 Seizures - 1119 (Pfizer) + 2081 (AZ) + 268 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 3487 Paralysis - 515 (Pfizer) + 892 (AZ) + 107 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1525 Pericarditis/Myocarditis - 1314 (Pfizer) + 447 (AZ) + 334 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 2112 Psychiatric Disorders - 10,226 (Pfizer) + 18,451 (AZ) + 2495 (Moderna) + 118 (Unknown) = 31,290 Respiratory Disorders - 21,807 (Pfizer) + 29,859 (AZ) + 4285 (Moderna) + 216 (Unknown) = 56,167 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1096 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 199 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3609 Metabolic Disorders - 2762 (Pfizer) + 8965 (AZ) + 710 (Moderna) + 61 (Unknown) = 12,498 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,794 (Pfizer) + 45,565 (AZ) + 6552 (Moderna) + 206 (Unknown) = 73,117 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 102 (Pfizer) + 495 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 620 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,297 (Pfizer) + 20,849 (AZ) + 5194 (Moderna) + 225 (Unknown) = 57,565 CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old Pfizer - 3,600,000 children (1st doses) + 2,100,000 (2nd doses) & 200,000 boosters resulting in 3558 Yellow Cards AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) + 8,700 (2nd doses) & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 Moderna - 1900 children (1st doses) + 1600 (2nd doses) & 2800 boosters resulting in 26 Yellow cards Brand Unspecified - 26 Yellow Cards Total = 3,613,500 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 5,926,600 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3873 A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

SPECIAL REPORT FOCUS - ADVERSE VACCINE IMPACTS AFFECTING SMELL Olfactory Nerve Disorder (Cranial Nerve I) including anosmia, hyposmia & parosmia - 688 (Pfizer) + 799 (AZ) + 86 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1580 Olfactory Hallucinations - 15 (Pfizer) + 14 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 30 Nasal Congestion & Inflammation - 374 (Pfizer) + 518 (AZ) + 71 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 966 Epistaxis (nosebleeds) - 1096 (Pfizer) + 2302 (AZ) + 199 (Moderna) + 12 (Unknown) = 3609 Intranasal Hypoaesthesia/paraesthesia - 3 (Pfizer) + 1 (AZ) = 4 Nasal Crusting & Dryness - 38 (Pfizer) + 77 (AZ) + 4 (Moderna) = 119 Nasal Odour - 7 (Pfizer) + 2 (AZ) = 9 Nasal Oedema - 8 (Pfizer) + 17 (AZ) + 2 (Moderna) = 27 Nasal Polyps & Ulcers - 4 (Pfizer) + 5 (AZ) = 9 Nasal Pruritus - 13 (Pfizer) + 12 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) = 28 Paranasal Sinus Disorders (excl infections & neoplasms) - 104 (Pfizer) + 141 (AZ) + 22 (Moderna) = 267 Nasal Discomfort & Obstruction - 14 (Pfizer) + 118 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 141 Sinus Pain - 252 (Pfizer) + 612 (AZ) + 75 (Moderna) = 939 Sneezing - 467 (Pfizer) + 532 (AZ) + 58 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 1062 Rhinitis - 56 (Pfizer) + 58 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna) = 122 Nasal Herpes - 5 (Pfizer) + 16 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 22 Nasopharyngitis - 1181 (Pfizer) + 1948 (AZ) + 311 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 3451 Sinusitis - 206 (Pfizer) + 410 (AZ) + 36 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 653 Nasal Injury - 2 (Pfizer) + 2 (AZ) + 1 (Moderna) = 5 This data is from the UK's MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 20TH APR 2022 (Data published 28th Apr 2022) Overall 1-in-117 have reported injuries to the UK's Yellow Card reporting system. Official sources admit under10% of events are reported. * TOTAL Reactions = 1,485,059 * TOTAL Reports = 453,680 people impacted * TOTAL Fatalities = 2096 For full reports including 352 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

This is Not On The Beeb's 58th report translating the complex weekly UK vaccine surveillance report by the MHRA. ARE THE NUMBERS BEING MANIPULATED Of note this week, the MHRA now claim 1,500 less doses of the AZ vaccine were given to the Under 18s. This data was released last week, but were wanted to see if it was a typo that was to be corrected this week. This is a vaccine that after testing on the public, was withdrawn for use in the under 18s 200 doses were also removed from last week's Moderna stats FATALITIES There are now 2,087 reported deaths attributed to the C19 vaccines in the UK alone. TOTAL for 1st & 2nd & 3rd doses Pfizer 79.8 m AZ 49.16 m Moderna 12.2 m TOTAL DOSES = 141 m ( 141,034,573 ) Pfizer Reported adverse events 1 in 156 people AZ Reported adverse events 1 in 102 people Moderna Reported adverse events 1 in 44 people BREAKDOWN Reports This is the number of people who filled out an adverse reaction with the Yellow Card system As mentioned above, this is NOT the real number of people who had reactions, as the majority go unreported Pfizer 168,927 AZ 244,667 Moderna 36,941 Unknown 1620 TOTAL = 452,155 people reported an adverse reaction Fatal Pfizer 746 AZ 1255 Moderna 44 Unknown 42 (which is one less than last week! It must be Easter!) TOTAL = 2087 Blood Disorders - 17,029 (Pfizer) + 7837 (AZ) + 2490 (Moderna) + 65 (Unknown) = 27,421 Anaphylaxis - 657 (Pfizer) + 881 (AZ) + 87 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 1628 Acute Cardiac - 13,054 (Pfizer) + 11,365 (AZ) + 3228 (Moderna) + 103 (Unknown) = 27,750 Eye Disorders - 8016 (Pfizer) + 14,895 (AZ) + 1519 (Moderna) + 86 (Unknown) = 24,516 Blindness - 163 (Pfizer) + 324 (AZ) + 34 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 525 Deafness - 300 (Pfizer) + 428 (AZ) + 52 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 785 Infections - 12,228 (Pfizer) + 20,332 (AZ) + 2319 (Moderna) + 168 (Unknown) = 35,047 Herpes - 2217 (Pfizer) + 2694 (AZ) + 252 (Moderna) + 27 (Unknown) = 5190 Spontaneous Abortions - 489 + 1 premature baby death / 1 foetal growth restriction death + 12 stillbirth/foetal deaths (Pfizer) + 233 + 5 stillbirth (AZ) + 66 + 1 stillbirth (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 794 miscarriages Psychiatric Disorders - 10,179 (Pfizer) + 18,422 (AZ) + 2449 (Moderna) + 117 (Unknown) = 31,167 Skin Disorders - 33,967 (Pfizer) + 53,375 (AZ) + 13,027 (Moderna) + 355 (Unknown) = 100,724 Nervous System Disorders - 80,737 (Pfizer) + 182,740 (AZ) + 19,898 (Moderna) + 871 (Unknown) = 284,246 Guillain-Barré Syndrome - 101 (Pfizer) + 493 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 617 Seizures - 1103 (Pfizer) + 2070 (AZ) + 262 (Moderna) + 19 (Unknown) = 3454 Paralysis - 511 (Pfizer) + 887 (AZ) + 105 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 1514 Headaches & Migraines - 35,671 (Pfizer) + 93,975 (AZ) + 9395 (Moderna) + 338 (Unknown) = 139,379 Vertigo & Tinnitus - 4229 (Pfizer) + 6953 (AZ) + 725 (Moderna) + 39 (Unknown) = 11,946 Respiratory Disorders - 21,683 (Pfizer) + 29,817 (AZ) + 4236 (Moderna) + 216 (Unknown) = 55,952 Immune System Disorders - 2437 (Pfizer) + 3316 (AZ) + 604 (Moderna) + 24 (Unknown) = 6381 Gastrointestinal Disorders - 42,262 (Pfizer) + 80,996 (AZ) + 10,733 (Moderna) + 394 (Unknown) = 134,385 Reproductive/Breast Disorders - 31,195 (Pfizer) + 20,825 (AZ) + 5171 (Moderna) + 222 (Unknown) = 57,413 Nausea & Vomiting - 20,709 (Pfizer) + 45,558 (AZ) + 6464 (Moderna) + 205 (Unknown) = 72,936 For every 117 people jabbed, one person ends up filling in a Yellow Card Adverse Event. Is the 1 in 117 stat accurate? Due to the poor training of health professionals, very few will correctly attribute real vaccine adverse events to the vaccine. Even when health professionals do recognise a link between the injuries and the vaccines, they are often discouraged from filling in the reports, or simply don't have the time. (I have had doctors tell me this personally) It is estimated by official government bodies that under 1 - 10% of adverse events are reported. (This stat existed before C19) This means the real stat is more likely under 1 in 11. The data below compiled by a contributor to NOTB, contains the British MHRA Yellow Card reporting of reported adverse events up to 30th March 2022. (there is a one-week time lag on publication as the MHRA 'prepare' the data.) For full reports including 350 pages of specific reaction listings - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18yrs old PFIZER 3,400,000 (dose 1) 2,000,000 (dose 2) 200,000 (boosters 3424 Yellow Cards * AZ - 11,600 children (1st doses) plus 8,700 second doses & ‘extremely limited boosters’ resulting in 263 Yellow Cards - Reporting rate 1-in-44 * NOTE: 1500 doses (1000 children - 1st doses) removed from last two weeks reporting * Moderna - 1900 children (1st doses) and 1400 second doses & 2500 boosters resulting in 24 Yellow cards * NOTE: 200 children (1st doses) removed from last two weeks reporting * Brand Unspecified - 24 Yellow Cards Total = 3,413,500 children injected Total doses (1st, 2nd & boosters) = 5,626,100 Total Yellow Cards Under 18s = 3735 A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools? ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status.

UNITED FREE PRESS LAUNCH - A NEW ALTERNATIVE TO THE NUJ AND MAIN STREAM MEDIA The United Free Press is a voluntary and independent press standards body, run by its members and dedicated to promoting high-quality journalism and opposing state censorship and misinformation. Alongside providing a code of conduct for its members, the UFP issues Press IDs, enables networking, supports and promotes member content conducts outreach, aids new journalists to the field, promotes decentralised new-tech and combats misinformation within the industry. UNITED FREE PRESS Launch Video: https://www.unitedfreepress.org/ https://youtu.be/k3KgykO49e8 Press Standards The UFP, as its first and foremost principle, helps to maintain fundamental standards in journalism. Members and provisional members are expected to uphold the code in their practice of the profession. Where a journalist has breached the code, please contact the outlet in question first and give a reasonable amount of time to respond. If your complaint has not been resolved in a satisfactory manner, forward your complaint on to us for review. Where a journalist is found to have breached our code, they will be sanctioned. Sanctions for offending journalists may range from simple warnings to cancellation of UFP membership and press accreditation. Press ID Easily recognisable Press IDs will be produced issued to members sometime after launch. Members are generally expected to carry them whilst working, to identify them as press. Journalists 16-18 will receive junior Press IDs. The UFP will seek official recognition of these from UK Police Forces & HM Courts. Networking Networking and support of colleagues helps to enable independent journalists, many of whom may not have had any prior experience in the fields other than as a consumer. By talking and sharing tips and advice, UFP members are able to learn and grow faster than journalists acting alone. Call for Coverage Individually, many journalists can’t cover certain stories due to location, expertise, or time constraints. The UFP will, over time, develop its function to act as a central hub for tips on items to cover so that all members are able to cover as many events, topics, or stories as they can New Tech Support The UFP supports the development of new talent within both journalism and the wider media industry. As such the UFP helps to support journalism and other media (such as musicians, comedians and other groups or individuals) facing censorship in gaining a foothold on platforms which support free speech. It helps in the following ways: Decentralised Platforms Support Vital to a free press and wider media are decentralised platforms resistance to censorship. Where promising creators are moving to LBRY/Odysee (or other decentralised web3 platforms), the UFP will notify members, who can boost outlets to enable them to livestream. The guild will also help with queries about the platform and other new-tech sites. Censorship Awareness Where promising creators (journalistic or non-journalistic) have been censored and cancelled, the UFP will help to raise awareness so that their audiences can move to alternative platforms. Exclusive Content Members, where practicable, try to make exclusive content for platforms supporting free speech and help to signpost to each other’s exclusive content. Journalistic Support & Content Promotion The UFP promotes the best work of its members alongside promising up-and-coming independent journalists and provides some of the training and tools to develop the next generation of journalism. Monthly Round-up The monthly round-up reviews and signposts different videos which represent quality work by members, alongside notable submissions. Featured Submissions Submissions of high quality or promising news-journalism are passed around for their members to promote at their discretion and are also occasionally featured in the monthly round-up. MEMBERS Organisation : Kerry Murray Photography Name : Kerry Social Links : https://www.kerrymurrayphoto.com https://www.instagram.com/kerrymurrayphotography/ https://t.me/freedominpictures Organisation : Oracle Films Name : Phil Social Links : https://www.oraclefilms.com/ https://twitter.com/oraclefilmsuk Organisation : Resistance GB Name : Will & Laura Social Links : https://www.resistancegb.org/ Organisation : One Man Reports Name : Cesar Social Links : https://twitter.com/onemanreports Organisation : Citizen Syd Name : Syd Social Links : https://youtube.com/c/CitizenSyd1 Organisation : SCUM MEDIA Name : Nick Social Links : https://www.wearescum.com/ https://twitter.com/ed_unwa Organisation : CHASING DISSENT Name : Benn & John Social Links : https://chasingdissent.com/ https://twitter.com/cdpressco Organisation : News Fist Name : Chris Social Links : https://odysee.com/@News_Fist https://t.me/News_Fist https://rumble.com/c/c-1562203 Organisation : Ickonic Name : Jemma Social Links : https://www.ickonic.com/ Organisation : REBEL NEWS Name : Lewis Social Links : https://www.rebelnews.com/ https://www.youtube.com/c/RebelMediaTV/videos Organisation : Not on the Beeb Name : Mark & Dina Social Links : https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/ Organisation : Another Alternative Name : Louis Social Links : https://www.youtube.com/c/AnotherAlternative Organisation : Subject Access Name : Heiko Social Links : https://www.youtube.com/c/SubjectAccess Kerry Murray Founder of UFP United Free Press Web: https://www.unitedfreepress.org/ Telegram: https://t.me/UnitedFreePress FB https://www.facebook.com/UnitedFreePress Odysee: https://odysee.com/@UnitedFreePress: Gab: https://gab.com/tags/unitedfreepress Tiktok: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMLpmA6wR/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/UnitedFreePress Twitter: https://twitter.com/UnitedFreePres Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/unitedfreepress/

Australia and Niger both have populations of 25 million. One country has a high covid death rate and the other a low covid death rate. One country also has a high vaccination rate and the other a low vaccination rate. Are the rates connected? Niger Population: 25,789,297 (rise of 6% since pandemic!) 8,908 cases 309 deaths Fully vaccinated: 1,547,552 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 5,000 Doses administered: 2,689,995 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,705 Australia Population: 26,034,737 (rise of 2% since pandemic!) 54,137 cases 6,893 deaths Fully vaccinated: 21,280,501 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 3,000 Doses given: 56,587,064 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,209 The difference in the death rate per dose is 6% which due to errors in reporting is statistically insignificant. (This does not correlate across other nations, so seems a coincidence. More on other nations calc later) Source: https://covid19.who.int/region/wpro/country/au 8,908 cases 309 deaths Fully vaccinated: 1,547,552 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 5,000 Doses administered: 2,689,995 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,705 Australia 54,137 cases 6,893 deaths Fully vaccinated: 21,280,501 Covid death rate per vaccination: 1 in 3,000 Doses given: 56,587,064 Covid death per dose: 1 in 8,209 The difference in the death rate per dose is 6% which due to errors in reporting is statistically insignificant. (This does not correlate across other nations, so seems a coincidence. More on other nations calc later) Source: https://covid19.who.int/region/wpro/country/au