Search Results

£72.5-million investment for laser and radio frequency weapons From: Ministry of Defence and Defence Science and Technology Laboratory Publishedm14 September 2021 Three contracts awarded to produce new Directed Energy Weapons advanced demonstrators for British Army vehicles and Royal Navy frigate The MOD has awarded three contracts worth around £72.5-million to UK industry to produce advanced laser and radio frequency demonstrators as part of the Novel Weapons Programme (NWP). Known collectively as Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), these next-generation technologies could revolutionise the battlefield and reduce the risk of collateral damage. The systems are powered by electricity and operate without ammunition, significantly reducing operating costs, increasing platform endurance and providing unprecedented offensive and defensive flexibility to personnel on the frontline. UK’s Dragonfire Laser Directed Energy Weapon Started Trials: SOURCE Awarded to consortia headed by Thales and Raytheon UK, the four-year contracts will create at least 49 new jobs and sustain 249 jobs. The first laser will undergo user testing onboard a Royal Navy Type 23 frigate by detecting, tracking, engaging and countering Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), whilst the British Army’s Wolfhound armoured vehicle will host a laser demonstrator that will investigate capability against UAV and other air threats. The radio frequency demonstrator will also be used by the British Army, hosted on a MAN SV truck to detect and track a variety of air, land and sea targets. This will create around 30 new jobs at Thales in Belfast, Northern Ireland. Minister for Defence Procurement, Jeremy Quin, said: “We are investing £6.6-billion in research and development across Defence over the next four years, reaffirming our commitment to provide the Armed Forces with truly advanced capabilities. “Directed Energy Weapons are a key element of our future equipment programmes and we intend to become a world-leader in the research, manufacture and implementation of this next-generation technology.” Marking a significant step towards the use of high-powered laser and radio frequency weapons across Defence, the investment reaffirms commitments outlined in the Defence Command Paper ensuring UK Armed Forces are equipped with the best possible equipment ready to deal with new and emerging threats. Further supported by an increase of £24-billion of Defence spending over the next four years and an additional £6.6 billion of funding for research and development, this a prime example of how the MOD is using research partnerships with industry to invest in the technology of tomorrow. These innovative capabilities will be integrated onto existing platforms for the Royal Navy and British Army and will undergo user experimentation from 2023 to 2025. The experimentation will focus on operation and maintenance of these new systems and will provide invaluable knowledge, information and experience to assess whether DEW can be fully embedded on other Defence assets in the future. MOD Director Strategic Programmes, Shimon Fhima said: “These technologies have the potential to revolutionise the future battlefield for our Armed Forces, enabling the prosecution of new targets in the land, sea and air domains and allowing commanders to meet mission objectives in new ways. “We must exploit at pace the cutting-edge technologies developed by the talented scientists and engineers across the UK to capitalise on its benefit.” The newly formed Team Hersa brings together the best acquisition skills from Defence Equipment and Support (DE&S) and the best in technical expertise from the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl). Team Hersa will manage delivery of the demonstrators and is responsible for preparing Defence for the introduction of innovative weapons systems, ensuring the UK Armed Forces can successfully integrate the weapons on current aircraft, ships and vehicles. The new contracts will exploit decades of MOD experience developing cutting-edge laser and radio frequency weapons technology and globally recognised strengths in performance testing and evaluation of these systems. Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/725m-investment-for-laser-and-radio-frequency-weapons? FREQUENCIES WE USE THAT HURT US FREQUENCIES THAT HEAL US FURTHER READING This remarkably well-documented and -referenced book is a cornerstone in the sense that it traces the deployment of electricity in our civilization, in terms of its interaction with living organisms, from its initial discovery in the 1740s all the way to our time, and even projected into the future. It should be noted that the title refers to the entire electromagnetic spectrum comprising the colours of the rainbow, including the invisible frequencies such as radio frequencies and the fields generated around conducting wires. https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/invisible-rainbow SHOP

Dr Kinghardt on frequencies: The good, the bad and the ugly. These 15 minutes are a must-watch for anyone running wifi, or experiencing wifi signals. Yes, that's everyone except those living off-grid and living miles from mobile-phone towers and other inhabitants. As many have pointed out, this is a test on humanity with no control group, as nearly everyone is experiencing high doses of these frequencies night and day. Other platforms to watch this: Watch on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v2yn068-dr-klinghardt-on-2.4-ghz-wifi.-do-you-know-what-this-frequency-does.html Watch on Odysee: https://odysee.com/Dr-Klinghardt-2.4GHZ-WIFI:3261eb2d42c9fdfdcddce2d5794b9bdb4f7e2785 Watch on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NotOnTheBeeb/status/1677302048226787328?s=20 SHARE Use this link to share this post https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/dr-klinghardt-on-wifi LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇 GOOD FREQUENCIES THAT HEAL As Dr Klinghardt mentions, some frequencies like those used for WIFI are dangerous, but others heal such as red and infrared. The healing and reboot of the cellular powerhouse AKA mitochondria is so interesting there is s full article here. See more on Red Light Machines at the bottom of this article ROSEMARY OIL Wild rosemary has now been shown to dramatically support a healthy age-prevention response, for the internal body, the skin, and also for healthy enzyme response, including glutathione production. Wild rosemary intake is directly associated with improved overall health and healthy aging/longevity, as demonstrated by the Italian village of Acchioli, where regular rosemary users enjoy robust health and long-life. For optimal results take the Rosemanol daily, along with the aromatic essence, the Essence of Wild Rosemary. ROSEMARY & RADIATION - A STUDY Abstract Several herbs have been screened for their antioxidative activity using the chemiluminescence method. Rosemary contains phenolic diterpenes, phenolic acids and flavonoids which protect cells and their organic constituent molecules from free radical radiation-induced oxidative damage. Effects of 0.1 and 0.2 g/Kg body wt. of Rosemary extract on radiation-induced morbidity and mortality in mice exposed to 10Gy of gamma radiation were studied for the characterization of high-efficiency protection exhibited by Rosemary extract. Conclusions Rosemary extract shows remarkable activity in stabilization of organic substrate. Rosemary extract could offer protection against the effects of ionizing radiation because of their ability to scavenge free radicals. Phenolic diterpenes, caffeic and rosmarinic acids associated with flavonoids in Rosemary extract suppress lipid peroxidation and stop oxidative DNA damage and so it may be useful as radio-protective agent. Chemiluminescence has proved its versatility in fast and accurate assessment degradation study. SOURCE: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275349913_Radio-protective_Potential_of_Rosemary_Rosmarinus_Officinalis_against_Effects_of_Ionising_Radiation

by Peter Geoghegan for Open Democracy 29 April 2022, 10.01am Michael Gove smeared us. Now we have been vindicated by an official inquiry. The levelling up secretary attacked our ‘Clearing House’ reporting. Today, he is the one who looks ‘ridiculous’ The levelling up secretary attacked our ‘Clearing House’ reporting. Today, he is the one who looks ‘ridiculous’ Here at openDemocracy, we are no stranger to smears from politicians. MPs have intentionally spread inaccuracies about our journalism. They have accused us of acting in bad faith. They have even tried to sue us into silence. But in March last year, for the first time that I can recall, a sitting British cabinet minister attacked our journalism in an official government statement. Michael Gove – in a letter headed with the Queen’s insignia – declared that openDemocracy’s revelations about the existence of a secretive Freedom of Information ‘Clearing House’ in his Cabinet Office was “ridiculous and tendentious”. Today, Gove’s words have been exposed for what they always were: a cheap smear designed to distract and obfuscate. But they have failed. A newly published report into the ‘Clearing House’ by the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) – sparked by openDemocracy’s investigations – is a damning indictment of the British government’s attempts to block even basic transparency. PACAC details a culture in the Cabinet Office of secrecy and opacity in which the Clearing House has been vetting Freedom of Information requests from journalists and others and advising departments on how best to frustrate requests deemed sensitive. These aren’t a bunch of opposition MPs aiming a politically-motivated kick at the government. PACAC has a Conservative majority. Its chair, Tory MP William Wragg, didn’t mince his words. “Cabinet Office has dragged its feet for too long on this issue and must act now to remove suspicion around the Clearing House, improve compliance with FOI laws and regain public confidence,” Wragg said today. Neither Gove – now the UK’s levelling up secretary – or his successor as Cabinet Office secretary Steve Barclay have commented at the time of writing. Freedom of information in Britain is broken. This matters. FOI exists for all of us. The right to know belongs to you as much as it does to me. But time and again since openDemocracy first reported on the clearing house in late 2020, the British government has sought to silence our journalism. When a dozen current and former Fleet Street newspaper editors signed an open letter from openDemocracy calling for an inquiry into the FOI, the government published a long rebuttal on the gov.uk website. If I were being kind, I’d call it “ridiculous and tendentious”. (You can read it for yourself here.) The Cabinet Office spent £40,000 of public money on lawyers last year to try to avoid releasing information about the Clearing House to us. It lost, with judge Chris Hughes finding that there was a “profound lack of transparency about the operation”, which might “extend to ministers”. But still the government kept pretending there was nothing to see. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) watchdog, which regulates FOI, offered to audit the Clearing House. The Cabinet Office said no. When MPs launched an investigation into the Clearing House, the Cabinet Office responded by announcing that it was running its own inquiry. It only appointed someone to run the review yesterday, and still has yet to set the terms of reference. (The PACAC report branded this an “unacceptable delay”.) The sunlight of transparency is the best form of political disinfectant. That’s especially the case with Boris Johnson’s government. This is a government mired in cronyism, an administration in which massive COVID contracts are doled out to ‘politically connected’ VIP firms and Tory donors get a hot line to the centre of power. Against this backdrop, it’s hard to see the record low rates of FOI responses in Whitehall as a coincidence. The British government’s attacks on transparency are part of a wider pattern of undermining democracy. Boris Johnson has introduced an elections bill that will make it harder to vote but do nothing to stop flows of ‘dark money’ into British politics, policing legislation that will criminalise peaceful protest, and a nationality and borders bill that can strip British citizenship with the flick of a pen. But we should not get despondent yet. Today’s parliamentary report is hard evidence of something that is all too easy to forget: that change is possible, especially when we act together. Parliament’s inquiry into the Cabinet Office’s clearing house followed dozens of stories on openDemocracy about the perilous state of FOI in Britain, investigations that revealed the inner workings of this secretive unit at the heart of government. But the PACAC probe also came in the wake of a huge mobilisation by our readers and supporters. Last year, nearly 50,000 people signed a petition opposing this government secrecy. More than 4,000 openDemocracy readers responded to a survey on FOI. Readers crowdfunded public opinion polling, which showed that 87% of respondents said they were much less likely to vote for a party with a record of government secrecy. We will keep fighting to make our FOI system fit for purpose. Last month, more than 110 journalists and campaigners signed an open letter urging the new Information Commissioner to do more in holding ministers and departments accountable. At openDemocracy we believe in giving you – our readers – the tools to make change. That’s why we recently introduced a new tool that allows readers to write to their MPs on the back of our stories, something tens of thousands of you have done in a few short months. No wonder Michael Gove and his colleagues in government use smears to block even basic democratic accountability. But today it’s clear who is “ridiculous and tendentious”. And it isn’t us. SOURCE: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/freedom-of-information/michael-gove-smear-freedom-of-information-clearing-house/

Here is the video on 3 seperate platforms

Many of you will remember the great work Lois had been doing helping parents formulate letters to schools and her part in the Metropolitan police case of which many members of NOTB aided in collecting witness statements. She is still being harassed the Solicitor's governing body. OPEN LETTER BY LOIS BAYLISS TO SRA Solicitor's Regulation Authority The Cube 199 Wharfside Street Birmingham B1 1RN 25th July 2023 Dear Sirs OPEN LETTER I refer to your letter dated 21st of April 2023 whereby you confirmed that you would update me by the 21st of July 2023 which said date has now passed. As you will no doubt be aware, I have at all times met with deadlines for responses agreed with the SRA and I am somewhat surprised that the 21st of July 2023 has indeed passed without any acknowledgment or communication from yourself. The fact is, I have received no communication from you since the 21st of April 2023. The SRA is clearly aware of the stress and anxiety these matters can cause to practitioners as evidenced by the fact that you have provided information to these psychological harms with previous correspondence. Given the circumstances, I would propose that matters are moved forward and to this end I suggest we engage in a round table recorded event to discuss the matters of the allegations made against me. The underlying science behind this case is entirely relevant. It is therefore, strongly suggested that the SRA brings its own legal, medical and scientific team to the table, and I will do the same. This will provide a forum for matters to be discussed openly and frankly, from a detailed exchange of research information as well as statistical data which will be relevant to the case as well as any other matters either party should wish to raise. I reserve the right to draw this letter to the attention of the court on the issue of costs as it is quite apparent that the SRA have presented no substantive response in rebuttal of the scientific evidence disclosed by me which in itself is fundamental to driving my motivation, nor indeed have they even commented upon the witness evidence (approximately 1,000 emails) and 100s of signed statements of truth regarding adverse events caused by the Covid19 vaccinations. Furthermore, the SRA have failed to substantively respond to complaints against them raised by me and almost 1,000 complaints from members of the public which have comprised of many elements. Not only is this unacceptable but the published times in which a substantive response ought to be expected has been exceeded. Finally, I would point out that although your investigation against me was initiated in or around February 2022, despite several request from me, you have failed to provide any complaints which have been made against me until April 2023. I am appalled that the SRA has seen fit to deprive me of material disclosure relevant to this case in order that I might properly defend myself prior to the SRA arriving at the decision to refer me to the SDT. This has severely disadvantaged and prejudiced my position which is unacceptable and upon review of the disclosed complaints from April 2023 it is clear you have still failed to provide full material disclosure of the same. As I am sure you are aware, the SRA have previously confirmed in writing to me; “..we are not relying on these complaints” in relation to this action. As I have already indicated, this is clearly nonsensical - but for any complaints, no investigation would have even begun. There is a clear contradiction by the SRA which has yet to be explained. I look forward to hearing from you with extreme urgency in relation to the above. Please note that this is an open letter and will be released immediately into the public domain (as will your response) as it relates to a matter which is of obvious widespread public interest and is a matter of international importance. Yours faithfully, Lois Bayliss Broad Yorkshire Law DOWNLOAD THE LETTER

A group of scientists and doctors have gathered the evidence we have been waiting for and published a paper in the Lancet that was censored within 24hrs. The paper collated 325 autopsies of the vaccinated and found that an incredible 74% of them had indeed died from one of the C19 vaccines These are the paper's authors. Nicolas HulscherBS Paul E. Alexander, PhD Richard Amerling, MD Heather Gessling, MD Roger Hodkinson, MD William Makis, MD Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD Mark Trozzi, MD Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: This landmark paper reviewed the largest number of autopsy reports published to date relating to COVID-19 vaccination, injury and sudden death. They identified 44 papers with 325 autopsy cases and three physicians (including myself) independently reviewed all deaths and found: 74% of all deaths were either caused or contributed to by COVID vaccines 53% of these deaths involved the cardiovascular system 17% of these deaths involved the hematological system 8% of these deaths involved the respiratory system 7% of these deaths involved multiple organ systems The mean number of days from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. AUTHOR'S CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccines should be immediately taken off the market and the entire LNP/mRNA platform should be suspended and thoroughly investigated. SIGN OUR PETITION HERE As you know Not On The Beeb has been calling a withdrawal of the vaccine and calling for an investigation since the summer of 2021 If you have not already done so, please sign our petition Petition requesting urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines To the British Police, Judiciary, Crown Prosecution Service and members of Parliament. The people of Britain (and the world) request the British police seize multiple sample vials of the C19 vaccines and conduct an immediate open, independent and detailed analysis of the contents. ​ The signatories of this petition back the work of lawyers Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland working alongside Dr Samuel White, Mark Sexton and team submitting evidence under Hammersmith Police crime number: 6029679/21 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public. ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publically investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the various batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, most adverse reactions are coming from a few batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6 - With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools 7 - As of December 6th 2022 why has such a product with such a record been authorised for our youngest children between 6 months and 4 years old? ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have releva. nt qualifications, please sign the Health expert's petition I, the undersigned, request the British police seize samples of the vaccine and instigate an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are causing widespread serious adverse reactions post-COVID-19 vaccination. ​ Concerning the vaccination programme, we request an immediate injunction forcing a nationwide pause on the roll-out for all age ranges until we have clear answers from the police investigations. SIGN HERE DOWNLOAD THE PAPER HERE

It's been good news to see Subject Access requests by Nigel Farage have outed the lies of the banks and forced a public apology. You might remember that just a couple of weeks ago both Coutts and NatWest were closing his accounts, apparently due to simple financial decisions on behalf of banking terms and conditions. Farage used the Subject Access legislation forcing the banks to reveal the inner communications, proving Farage's suspicions were correct and indeed the banks had closed his accounts purely due to his political beliefs. Love him or hate him, the banks were breaching Farage's basic rights, since all citizens must have full access to financial services. PayPal are still guilty of closing multiple accounts of freedom-fighting organisations and alternative media outlets including Not On The Beeb, and by association the personal accounts of NOTB founder Mark Playne. NatWest CEO apologises to Nigel Farage over 'deeply inappropriate' Coutts banking fiasco By CHRISTIAN CALGIE - SENIOR POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT , MILLIE COOKE - POLITICAL REPORTER It comes after Coutts bank closed Mr Farage's account after he fell below their £1million wealth threshold but evidence provided by the former UKIP leader suggests the closure was due to his political views. Natwest Bank has formally apologised to Nigel Farage following days of a high-profile media storm. Mr Farage was exited as a customer of Coutts last month and began a campaign to change rules around freedom of speech and a right to a bank account. In a letter to Mr Farage, Alison Rose, the CEO of Natwest - which owns Coutts Bank - said: "I am writing to apologise for the deeply inappropriate comments about yourself made in the now published papers prepared for the Wealth Committee. Alison Rose said the views expressed in the 40-page memo acquired by Mr Farage "do not reflect the view of the bank". She added: "I believe very strongly that freedom of expression and access to banking are fundamental to our society and it is absolutely not our policy to exit a customer on the basis of legally held political and personal views. "To this end, I would also like to personally reiterate our offer to you of alternate banking arrangements at Natwest." In a statement, Mr Farage hit back: "Dame Alison Rose’s apology is a start, but it is no more than that. "She needs to take responsibility as CEO, and is wrong to say the views of her own committee’s report don’t reflect the bank. "I will now defend thousands of other people that have been de-banked on her watch." A source told the Daily Express that a senior executive at Coutts told Mr Farage that the issue had been "taken out of their hands" before the decision to close his account was made. On July 4 Coutts sources briefed the BBC's Simon Jack they hadn't closed Mr Farage's account because of his political views, but because he had fallen below their £1 million wealth threshold. Bombshell evidence revealed by Nigel Farage this week, however, seemed to disprove that claim. Mr Farage submitted a Subject Access Request to the bank, a legal means by which you can force a company to hand over their data about you. The document he received showed an extensive briefing about his pro-Brexit, pro-Donald Trump views, as well as accusing him of having links with Russia. Last night the Telegraph revealed that the BBC's Simon Jack sat next to Natwest chief executive Dame Alison Rose at a dinner in London the night before he published the banks' counterclaims about Mr Farage's wealth being insufficient. Mr Jack and the BBC are yet to apologise or amend their original claims. https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1793367/NatWest-CEO-apologise-Nigel-Farage-Coutts-bank

This is another stunning denial by the UK government esp since the publication of this paper proving the link between vaccinations and sudden deaths. The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “Launch a Public Inquiry into excess mortality in England and Wales”. This was the simple petition's simple and urgent premise. The excess deaths are of huge concern to the public and the causes must be established. Some are concerned that these excess deaths may be a result of the Covid 19 vaccines. An urgent investigation is needed to establish the true causes. (Thanks to Daf and Karl for drawing attention to this) Government responded: The Government has no plans for a further public inquiry. It is taking steps to reduce excess deaths. There is no evidence linking excess deaths to the COVID-19 vaccine. The ONS published analysis in February 2023 that showed that the COVID-19 mortality rate has been consistently lower since the COVID-19 vaccine booster introduction in September 2021 for people who have had at least a third dose or booster, compared with unvaccinated people and those with just a first or second dose. When looking at deaths from other causes, mortality rates are broadly consistent between those who have received at least a third dose or booster and those who have not received any. The observed excess deaths are likely caused by a range of factors, but COVID-19 vaccination is not one of them. Safe and effective vaccines have underpinned our strategy for living with COVID-19 and have saved tens of thousands of lives, whilst also significantly reducing the pressure on the NHS. Each candidate COVID-19 vaccine is assessed by teams of scientists and clinicians on a case-by-case basis and is only authorised once it has met robust standards of effectiveness, safety and quality set by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The MHRA has also implemented a proactive vaccine safety surveillance strategy for monitoring the continued safety of all UK-approved COVID-19 vaccines. Antivirals and other treatments provide a necessary additional defence by protecting patients who become infected with COVID-19, particularly those for whom the vaccine may be less effective such as the immunosuppressed. We are preparing for variants of COVID-19 and seasonal flu infections with an integrated COVID-19 booster and flu vaccination programme, minimising hospital admissions from both viruses. We have also launched a COVID-19 Inquiry to examine the UK’s preparedness and response to the pandemic and learn lessons for the future. Throughout the pandemic the Government acted to save lives and livelihoods, prevent the NHS being overwhelmed and deliver a world-leading vaccine rollout, which protected millions of lives across the nation. The Department is committed to supporting the Inquiry. The Inquiry also plans to add a Module on Vaccines and Therapeutics (Module 4). In addition to work to reduce deaths from COVID-19, we are also taking steps to reduce deaths from other diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD). Recent data shows that more people are now receiving an NHS Health Check, a core part of our CVD prevention pathway, than before the pandemic. However, we want to go even further by creating a national digital check. The Department of continues to work with partners to consider what more can be done to improve the prevention, detection, diagnosis and management of CVD and we will set out our plan in the Major Conditions Strategy. Further information: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2023-01-24/hcws514 We know that when people have heart attacks and strokes they need urgent care. That is why we have set an ambition in the recently published delivery plan for recovering urgent and emergency care services for ambulances getting to patients quicker: with improved ambulance response times for Category 2 incidents to 30 minutes on average over 2023/24, with further improvement in 2024/25 towards pre-pandemic levels. Further information:https://www.england.nhs.uk/2023/01/major-plan-to-recover-urgent-and-emergency-care-services/ The NHS has published a delivery plan setting out how the NHS will recover and expand elective services over the next three years. The plan commits the NHS to deliver 9 million additional treatments and diagnostic procedures over the next three years and around 30 per cent more elective activity than it was doing before the pandemic by 2024-25. Through the pathway improvement programme, we will create extra capacity for elective care and improve patient health outcomes. Further information: https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/publication/delivery-plan-for-tackling-the-covid-19-backlog-of-elective-care/ Department of Health and Social Care Click this link to view the response online: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/639085?reveal_response=yes The Petitions Committee will take a look at this petition and its response. They can press the government for action and gather evidence. If this petition reaches 100,000 signatures, the Committee will consider it for a debate. The Committee is made up of 11 MPs, from political parties in government and in opposition. It is entirely independent of the Government. Find out more about the Committee:https://petition.parliament.uk/help#petitions-committee Thanks, The Petitions team UK Government and Parliament

UPDATE 10th JULY: DOJ APPEAL REJECTED! A federal judge on July 10 denied the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to stay a ruling that places limits on government communications with social media firms, rejecting the White House’s argument that such an order could put a damper on law enforcement activity online. SOURCE In a rather surprising development a U.S. District Judge, Terry Doughty, has temporarily blocked the White House, along with a number of federal agencies including the Justice Department, the FBI, the CDC, and others from pressuring social-media companies to censor free speech. (Missouri v. Biden). The case Missouri v. Biden opens with thisquote I may disapprove of what you say, but I would defend to the death your right to say it. Evelyn Beatrice Hill, 1906, The Friends of Voltaire They followed by reminding us of the USA's Founding Father's wisdom. For if men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences, that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter. A US lawsuit followed with this opening: This case is about the Free Speech Clause in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The explosion of social-media platforms has resulted in unique free speech issues— this is especially true in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. If the allegations made by Plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history. In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the Federal Government, and particularly the Defendants named here, are alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment’s right to free speech. DOWNLOAD THE FULL CASE PDF HERE Mark Schneider writes for Protect Our Kids.... "...In a rather surprising development a U.S. District Judge, Terry Doughty, has temporarily blocked the White House, along with a number of federal agencies including the Justice Department, the FBI, the CDC, and others from pressuring social-media companies to censor free speech the government doesn’t happen to like (Missouri v. Biden). It’s fitting that the ruling was issued on Independence Day. Prompting it was government actors openly strong-arming companies like Twitter, Facebook, Google and a raft of other media organizations to censor viewpoints that challenged the government’s Covid narrative. Following Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter, it came out that some 80 FBI agents had been embedded into social-media companies for this purpose. Writes Bret Swanson of the WSJ: “The agents mostly weren’t fighting terrorism but flagging wrongthink by American citizens, including imminent scientists who suggested different paths on Covid policy.” Of course, and as Judge Doughty notes in his Ruling, “the censorship alleged in this case almost exclusively targeted conservative speech.” Regardless of the outcome in Missouri, expect an appeal, then another one, until the Supreme Court is asked to map out the parameters of the First Amendment in our ever more censorial society. In the meantime, another form of censorship is raging across the nation, where dissenting voices are quashed, de-platformed, terminated from their jobs, or simply bullied into submission. I’m referring here to gender ideology. It’s been said that if you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually believe it. Children are especially subject to such manipulation. According to the prevailing narrative in the public schools, we now get to choose our gender. And those who identify with a gender different from the one mistakenly “assigned at birth” must be “affirmed” in their gender choice. If not, according to the narrative, they will suffer a host of mental and emotional consequences that, if left untreated, may result in suicide. Along with the federal government and the nation’s public schools, this narrative is being pushed by the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and most other professional medical organizations. Medical schools too are being pressured to cave to the new orthodoxy or risk losing accreditation. Radicalized state legislators are similarly pushing the narrative. California's AB-957 would make parents who don't go along with their child's gender identity akin to child abusers. The gender narrative relies on two essential claims, both false: 1) Sex is not Binary, and 2), “Gender Affirming Care” (i.e., puberty blockers, cross-sex hormone treatment, gender transition surgery) results in beneficial, healthy, outcomes. Dr. Miriam Grossman, a practicing psychiatrist, author, and speaker, has been on the front lines of refuting the gender narrative before barely anyone knew it was an issue. In light of Judge Doughty’s ruling, Grossman’s remarks in the video below, made last year, are more pertinent than ever. During the Covid pandemic, as Bret Swanson notes, “legions of doctors stayed quiet after witnessing the demonization of their peers who challenged the Covid orthodoxy. A little censorship leads people to watch what they say. Millions of patients and citizens were deprived of important insights as a result.” It’s one thing for private professionals to suppress their opinions on matters of wide public interest; it’s quite another for the government to compel such suppression. This is something new, but “during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth.’ “ U.S. District Judge, Terry Doughty, Missouri v. Biden. Today the same and worse is happening to an entire generation through gender ideology. This has been allowed to happen, in large part, through the silence of medical and other informed professionals who know better. It’s well past time to speak out. As Dr. Grossman exhorts, “We can’t be complicit in the lie by staying silent.” Indeed, we mustn’t..." Mark Schneider SOURCE

The extraordinary testimony of Dr Carrie Madej, as she recounts her small plane crash on June 26th 2022. A story of hope, optimism and survival against the odds. Watch on Twitter https://twitter.com/NotOnTheBeeb/status/1675476250003947521?s=20 Watch on Odysee: https://odysee.com/@NotOnTheBeeb:5/Dr-Carrie-Madej-Plane-crash-interview:c Watch on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v2xlar8-dr-carrie-madej-talks-about-her-suspicious-plane-crash.html Watch on Youtube: https://youtu.be/4pIMG-QegAc MORE CLIPS OF CARRIE Dr Carrie Madej on Dr Buttar's death Watch here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/dr-carrie-madej-in-dr-buttar-s-death Dr Carrie Madej on her childhood Watch here: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/who-is-carrie-madej The full Dr Carrie Madej interview Sign up here to be notified of the release: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/join PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS FOR CARRIE UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

Pine needles have more Vitamin C than lemons or oranges by a whopping 4 to 5 times. Full of vitamins C & A, white pine contains many different acids, essential oils (terpenes, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes), resin, & starch. The pine needles contain a compound referred as alpha or beta-pinene. This compound acts naturally as a decongestant and has anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antimicrobial, and anxiolytic properties. These healing properties when used properly can act as an expectorant, a circulatory stimulant, a mild diuretic, an immune stimulant, and even as emotional support! PINE NEEDLE TEA ANF THE FLU Pine needle tea as a cure for C19 symptoms and fighting long covid has hit the headlines over the last two years. What is the flu? Why does pine needle tea work? What is the role of shikimic acid and where else can we find it? INFLUENCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSES & SOLAR STORMS Influenza comes from Italian, from the Medieval Latin word influentia meaning "influence." The term was shortened to flu in the first half of the 19th century. : It was used to describe epidemics because of the insight that influenza outbreaks were connected to solar flares - AKA, the influence of the stars. More on this here: INFLUENZA & THE SUN SPOT CONNECTION - 1990 https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/influenza-the-sun-spot-connection-1990 WHEN DID INFLUENZA BECOME ANNUAL? https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/when-did-influenza-become-annual FLU SYMPTOMS The cause of flu is up for debate with some arguing it's caused by a virus and others that its clearly caused by EMFs which leave a virus-like residue called exosomes., Irrelevant to the cause, the cures for the symptoms of 'flu' are known. PINE NEEDLES, SHIKIMIC ACID Pine needles and shikimic acid have been widely studied in relation to the flu and are of great interest in 2023 for their anti-clotting and detoxification benefits. Shikimic acid is a naturally occurring compound found in various plant species, including pine needles. It is also the key ingredient used in the production of the antiviral drug called oseltamivir, commonly known as Tamiflu. Many have been making or buying pine needle tea for its curative properties Here are some of the benefits. Respiratory Health In traditional medicine, pine needle extracts have been used to support respiratory health. They are believed to have expectorant properties, helping to alleviate congestion and clear the airways. AntiCoagulant Shikimic acid derivatives have shown promise in inhibiting specific enzymes involved in the clotting cascade, such as thrombin and factor Xa. These derivatives possess anticoagulant activity, which may contribute to their potential therapeutic application in preventing or treating clot-related disorders. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305639160_Anti-platelet_and_anti-thrombogenic_effects_of_shikimic_acid_in_sedentary_population Antiviral Properties: Shikimic acid has demonstrated antiviral properties, particularly against influenza viruses. It works by inhibiting the replication of the virus, thereby reducing its ability to spread and cause illness. Immune System Support: Pine needles are rich in various nutrients, including vitamins A and C. These vitamins play essential roles in supporting a healthy immune system. A robust immune system is crucial in fighting off viral infections, including the flu. Anti-Inflammatory Effects: Pine needles contain certain compounds with anti-inflammatory properties. Inflammation is a common response to viral infections, including the flu. By reducing inflammation, pine needle extracts may help alleviate symptoms such as fever, body aches, and sore throat. Relaxation and Stress Relief The aroma of pine needles is often associated with relaxation and stress relief. Inhalation of pine needle essential oils or spending time in pine forests may promote a sense of calmness, which can be beneficial during times of illness and recovery. Anticancer Potential: Shikimic acid has shown promising anticancer properties in several studies. It has been found to inhibit the growth of cancer cells and induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in various cancer types. A study published in the journal Fitoterapia in 2016 demonstrated the anti-proliferative effects of shikimic acid on human breast cancer cells (PMID: 27742424). Another study published in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry in 2020 investigated the anticancer potential of shikimic acid derivatives against lung cancer (PMID: 31935040). Antioxidant Activity Shikimic acid exhibits potent antioxidant activity, which can help protect against oxidative stress and its associated damage. Oxidative stress plays a role in various diseases, including cardiovascular disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, and aging. A study published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry in 2012 demonstrated the antioxidant activity of shikimic acid extracted from pine needles. (PMID: 23050937). Anti-inflammatory Effects Shikimic acid possesses anti-inflammatory properties, making it potentially beneficial in conditions characterized by chronic inflammation. Research has shown that it can inhibit the production of inflammatory mediators and reduce inflammatory markers. A study published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences in 2020 investigated the anti-inflammatory effects of shikimic acid in a model of acute lung injury (PMID: 33238519). Neuroprotective Effects Shikimic acid has demonstrated neuroprotective properties, indicating its potential for the prevention or treatment of neurological disorders. It has been shown to protect against oxidative stress-induced neuronal damage and inhibit neuroinflammation. A study published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry in 2018 explored the neuroprotective effects of shikimic acid in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease (PMID: 29701487). Anti-diabetic Activity Some studies have suggested that shikimic acid may have anti-diabetic effects. It has been found to regulate glucose metabolism, improve insulin sensitivity, and reduce oxidative stress associated with diabetes. A study published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry in 2015 investigated the anti-diabetic potential of shikimic acid in a rat model of type 2 diabetes (PMID: 25844952). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30227208/ Detoxification It serves as a precursor for the synthesis of various essential compounds, including glutathione, a potent antioxidant involved in detoxification reactions. Glutathione plays a crucial role in neutralizing and eliminating harmful toxins and free radicals from the body. By providing the necessary building blocks for glutathione synthesis, shikimic acid supports the body's detoxification pathways. Additionally, shikimic acid possesses its own antioxidant properties, which further contribute to its detoxifying potential. Through these mechanisms, shikimic acid may help protect cells and tissues from oxidative stress and promote overall well-being. The Process in detail Shikimic acid serves as a crucial precursor in the biosynthesis of glutathione, a tripeptide molecule composed of three amino acids: cysteine, glutamate, and glycine. Glutathione is synthesized through a series of enzymatic reactions within the body. Shikimic acid provides the carbon skeleton required for the production of cysteine, one of the three amino acids involved in glutathione synthesis. Cysteine is derived from the precursor homocysteine, which is generated from methionine through a process called transsulfuration. Shikimic acid's carbon atoms are incorporated into the structure of cysteine, thereby supporting the availability of this essential amino acid for glutathione formation. Furthermore, shikimic acid indirectly influences glutathione synthesis by participating in the production of other molecules that are involved in the process. For example, shikimic acid contributes to the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids, such as phenylalanine and tyrosine, which are necessary for the production of precursors that eventually lead to the formation of glutathione. By providing the necessary carbon backbone and promoting the synthesis of essential amino acids, shikimic acid plays a role in facilitating the production of glutathione. Glutathione, in turn, acts as a critical antioxidant and detoxification agent, helping to neutralize harmful substances and protect cells from oxidative damage. Summary Researchers have found that shikimic acid helped to stop blood clots from forming. It protected people from respiratory infections. It displays anticancer, antiviral and antibiotic properties. It helps the body to detoxify from pollutants PINE POWER by North American Herb & Spice A concentrated source with each teaspoon equivalent to 23 cups of pine needle tea Raw Pine Power Plus is the power of wild harvested Northern American and Canadian white and red pine needles (both high in shikimic acid.) Long utilized as a natural medicine, it is high in vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants. It is high in terpenes including alpha-pinene, D-limonene, Beta-Caryophyllene (BCP) germacrene, and many more. BCP is known to support brain cognition, nervous system function and the body’s healthy response to inflammation. Raw, wild pine and spruce provide support for healthy eyes, respiratory health, immune function and red blood cell production. Terpenes are highly cleansing to the body, especially BCP, which also supports the detoxification of the brain and nervous system. Shikimic acid has been shown as a potent agent for supporting immune and detoxification processes. Taoist priests drank the tea as a regular infusion, believing it aided longevity and increased stamina. This formula is said to aid a sense of well being and is a tonic akin to 23 cups of pine needle tea. You can buy it here and support Not On The Beeb: https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/product-page/pine-power-plus OTHER SOURCES OF SHIKIMIC ACID Here are 20 natural sources of shikimic acid, listed in descending order based on their approximate shikimic acid content: Chinese star anise (Illicium verum) Sweetgum fruit (Liquidambar orientalis) Japanese star anise (Illicium anisatum) Wild celery seeds (Apium graveolens) Magnolia bark (Magnolia officinalis) Bayberry bark (Myrica rubra) Almonds (Prunus dulcis) Pine needles (Pinus species) Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) Elderberry flowers (Sambucus nigra) Chinese cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia) Black cumin seeds (Nigella sativa) Black locust tree bark (Robinia pseudoacacia) Camphor tree bark (Cinnamomum camphora) St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) Mistletoe (Viscum album) Neem leaves (Azadirachta indica) Raspberry leaves (Rubus idaeus) Tea leaves (Camellia sinensis) Eucalyptus leaves (Eucalyptus species)

The Ukraine Recovery Conference has revealed the ulterior motives of the government. By Anthony Webber The Ukraine Recovery Conference on 22nd June was a revelation. Up until now the British public must have wondered what justified their government pouring billions of pounds of their money into a conflict in Ukraine? Why there? As opposed to anywhere else in the world, where there are many conflicts going on, and many more in need of help. After all, the UK was involved in Afghanistan, but the cost ( £1bn annually) was a fraction of the UK’s costs of involvement in Ukraine. Afghanistan was seen as a worthy cause, in that it was protecting human and women’s rights, the education of women, and some freedom and democracy. This cause of 20 years was embarrassingly dumped due to a “deal” with the Taliban, who had never won a major battle, and there was the great betrayal of veterans and the 26 million Afghan people. The Truth It seems that this betrayal was all so that resources could be switched to involvement in Ukraine. This decision seemed to be bizarre as no direct strategic or economic interests were at stake for the UK. The public were told it was to protect “our values” and “freedom and democracy” in Ukraine, but had we not just abandoned doing that in Afghanistan? It soon transpired that there was little of these “values” in Ukraine as their government shut down opposition political parties and media and banned the Russian Orthodox Church. It also became obvious that Azov Neo Nazis had too much political and military control, and that a policy of hatred towards anything Russian was very much fostered. So hardly a country whose government encourages values of love and understanding between those of different languages who live there. There is a petition on this issue which is worthy of signing: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/629895 The mystery of why the UK government became involved in Ukraine at last became clear with the launch of the Ukraine Recovery Fund. This means Blackrock and J P Morgan will be setting up bespoke funds in order to “help” Ukraine. It has been revealed that a number of global corporations are interested in investing in the “recovery” of Ukraine. What they want, is to make a financial killing on the backs of other people’s miseries. To help themselves! The scheme is based on a “partnership” of public and private backing. In reality, this means that the taxpayers take all the risks by underwriting losses which could happen in a conflict or a post conflict situation. Meanwhile, if there are any profits, then these private corporations will take them! This all dates back to ongoing discussions President Zelensky and his associates had with Black Rock hedge fund, a massive corporation which owns both Pfizer and AstraZeneca pharmaceutical companies, who they signed a “memorandum of understanding” with in November. This has led to comments such as “Ukraine is being privatised and sold off to companies like Blackrock, while being enslaved to the IMF ( International Monetary Fund), the US and EU through crippling debt.” ( Going Underground-Twitter comment). It is a fact that Ukraine is heavily in debt and is being propped up by the governments of the UK, USA, and EU. If this support ended, the conflict would end without delay. This petition is well worth signing: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/629895 Control of governments and media by global corporations In this world, large global corporations are able to control government decisions by controlling their key politicians and public servants. It had always been assumed in the past that bribery and corruption was not a problem in the UK. However, we have had instances of it, and it is more likely if there are no checks and balances to prevent it. In the UK, the government have not let go of the means of control of the media they took during the covid “pandemic.” This control has tightened to the extent that it is virtually impossible to obtain any form of debate on the government’s policies on Ukraine and Russia. Globalist corporations involved in the media are compliant in this control because it protects their interests. The control of the media makes it impossible for any government whistleblower to know who to turn to in order to safely provide information. More reasons to sign the petition: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/629895 The Opposition parties are supporting the government, so approaching them would be risky, and a whistleblower would be reticent about even approaching the police. The situation is a bit like when the mafia-controlled Sicily, the whole of the political/legal/police hierarchy had been taken over, and there had to be major effort for good to overcome evil. Some countries are having similar problems combating the control and influence of powerful drug cartels. The threat to governments by the forces of evil and greed cannot be ignored. In the UK we have now had three Prime Ministers pursuing the same policies on Ukraine and Russia, and it could be argued that their predecessors were preparing the ground for conflict in Ukraine before that. Why is no one asking the questions? Who is asking if the current Prime Minister is acting on behalf of the best interests of the British people or the best interests of certain globalist corporations? Currently no one. Not the Opposition, not MP’s not the Select ( Scrutiny) Committees, such as on Public Accounts, Foreign Affairs and Defence. This is exceptionally risky for the wellbeing and security of the nation. If Prime Ministers with Presidential powers ( as they do de facto have in the UK) as well as senior Ministers can make major decisions and then disappear from office, and then receive large sums of money ( or even before), then our whole system of democratic accountability has been lost and we must regain it. This is another reason to sign the petition: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/629895 What then are the real reasons for the UK government taking the side of the Zelensky government in this conflict? Ukraine is a country rich in natural resources and there is a contest for who will own them. The globalist corporations had backed the President Zelensky government and had intents on taking control of these resources. It just so happens that a huge proportion of these resources are in the lands now under Russian control, which are worth trillions of dollars, and this is why so much emphasis is being put into the so- called counter offensive. Those who control the Zelensky government ( and that is a mix of global corporations, corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs and the USA/Uk/EU governments) are determined to win these lands back, irrespective of the massive losses incurred and with no regard to the fact that the citizens of these lands have voted by referenda to become part of Russia. They are solely concerned with corporate profit. It is nothing to do with liberating these lands as the people do not want to be “liberated!” To give an idea of the natural resources of Ukraine, they are: Natural gas and petroleum Untapped lithium Iron ore, coal, manganese, salt, graphite, sulphur, kaolin, titanium, nickel, magnesium, mercury and timber Very fertile black soil, corn, wheat, barley, rapeseed oil, and more. The UK is one of the major governments giving massive military and other aid to the Zelensky government. Without “western” military aid Ukraine would have had to agree a peace deal a long time ago. However, this is more panic aid as the global corporations are terrified of losing their investments. They are not paying a penny for this military intervention on their behalf, but they are making sure the politicians invest their taxpayer’s money on their behalf! So next time Rishi Sunak says that the UK “will stand with Ukraine as long as it takes,” remember that this does not mean the Ukrainian people, as the globalist corporations could not care less about them, but we know it mean their ulterior motives. This government link shows how extensive this latest commitment to Ukraine is: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/global-businesses-pledge-to-back-ukraines-recovery-as-pm-sets-out-major-financial-package https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-boosts-ukraines-recovery-at-major-london-summit https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_3350 It is noticeable how much the UK’s Ukraine commitment is in line with that of the EU’s. There are other related concerns: https://updfund.com/ https://www.intellinews.com/blackrock-launches-ukraine-development-fund-together-with-the-ukrainian-government-278041/ “The Ukraine Development Fund” is a means of channelling money apart from full oversight and is a major money laundering threat. Such risks appear to be ignored. We have to stop this flow of our money into a corrupt system as the likelihood of all these billions being wasted is extremely high. More reasons to sign the very worthy petition which has been no platformed by the mainstream media: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/629895 The government links show the UK government underwriting £2billion of lending to Ukraine. Yet another £240m bilateral assistance A further £250 m investment in Ukraine All on top of supplying weaponry of £5bn and still increasing. All totalling about £15bn plus This expenditure is going on when the government is telling the public that there is not the money available for even basic services Also, when the whole country is affected economically in every single area And they have the gall to make us suffer so that globalist corporations can make fat profits! Without any democratic mandate! This is all to prop up a bankrupt regime! The ulterior motives are that the government expending billions of our money on their Ukraine warmongering is nothing to do with so called “freedom,” “ democracy” and “values.” It is about globalist vested interests, and those are not the interests of the UK and its people! This conflict is about, food, energy, raw materials and security. If we want to protect these then the UK should be neutral. If not, there will be a longer protracted battle for one side owning the natural resources of Ukraine, which the UK will lose out by taking sides. Ukraine is losing this conflict and never had a chance in the first place. The British public have been fed a pack of lies by this government, which is immoral and deceitful. Rishi Sunak promised a government which would be open and transparent and which would earn our trust. He and the government have done none of this and they must resign even if it means yet another Prime Minister before the next election. Please sign and share the petition: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/629895 Anthony Webber Independent Political Commentator anthonywebber@cwgsy.net

Prof. Dolores Cahill on Magnetic Reactions in Vax Recipients Part 1 [VIDEO] In this 2021 article, Europe Reloaded summarises the Dolores Cahil and Not On The Beeb's Mark Playne vaccine-induced Magnetism discussion. ER Editor: We recommend watching this short 14-minute video interview (Part 1) for the visuals and graphics interviewer Mark Playne questions Prof. Dolores Cahill about. Using the list of ingredients for the mRNA BioNTech vaccine (Pfizer), Playne questions Cahill about how the magnetic reaction in some vaccine recipients could arise. Cahill angles her replies around what is listed in the vaccine ingredients. For the past year, she has called for independent lab analyses of the vaccines being pushed on us, offering to be part of this effort. From what we’ve read to date, this phenomenon seems to be happening with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine; the ‘blue tooth’ reaction seems to occur in relation to the AstraZeneca. Both are satisfied that this phenomenon is real, contrary to the debunking done by the MSM. Here’s a summary of the discussion: From a list of ingredients for the mRNA BNT 162b2 vaccine (see video), it’s not clear which one of them would cause this magnetic effect, so further analysis is needed. An UNLISTED ingredient leads to issues of misrepresentation under the law on behalf of the manufacturer. It could be considered fraudulent. Dr. Cahill has been calling for independent lab analysis of these vaccines for over a year. The list of ingredients mentions lipids. They’re supposed to protect the mRNA in the injections because, as compared to DNA, mRNA can be rapidly degraded. Polyethylene glycol is used, which is known to cause anaphylaxis (allergic reactions). But otherwise, these ingredients should not be magnetic. (see video diagram) There are 5 types of lipids: one of them is a charged ionisable lipid which is called CATIONIC LIPIDS (“cationic lipid coated magnetic nanoparticles associated with transferrin for gene delivery 2008”). These lipids are charged when they enter the cell and release their payload of mRNA. Could this charged lipid be holding enough magnetic pull to account for the magnetic phenomenon? Cahill: It isn’t likely, but it can be tested by taking the lipids to the lab and checking their magnetic criteria. It’s up to the regulator and/or independent labs to test for this. So manufacturers should be required to let independent labs test the vaccine components. But no, these lipids shouldn’t account for this magnetism. Playne: when magnets were placed on people’s arms, the magnets were jumping around to get the right polarity. From this it’s been determined that the stuff injected into the arm has a positive charge. So if it’s not lipids, what would we expect it to be? Would it be some form of iron or iron oxide? (see text on screen) Could Spions be used? Cahill: Nanoparticles inside lipids should be listed as components, so if it is iron oxide, for example, it should be listed. Is there any possibility that the naturally-occurring iron in the body is being deployed in some way? Cahill: If so, then the magnets should stick to other parts of body, such as the other, non-vaccinated arm. This isn’t happening. However, a picture was sent to her of an elderly person with a magnet sticking to her lungs, so this isn’t natural. If it’s possible that blood components are being used in some way, then it must still be related to the vaccine ingredients. TO BE CONTINUED … BITCHUTE VIDEO LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XahoaHIrCu0l/ https://www.europereloaded.com/prof-dolores-cahill-on-magnetic-reactions-in-vax-recipients-part-1-video/

Our Telegram groups at Not On The Beeb have been infiltrated so many times, we see it as a joke. Back in the heat of the plandemic propaganda in 2021, each Monday two members (we presume) of the UK's 77th brigade, an offshoot of the main military intelligence unit M15 used to join our telegram group. They would team up, appearing to spontaneously message each other, dismissing our reports, in an attempt to create division and chaos. Their tactics became so transparent that after just a few weeks, we would have them outed and blocked within 20 minutes or so. The pattern would repeat weekly. The laughable part was the regularity. Each Monday they would appear mid-morning, presumably after that week's morning briefing. Their instant stand-out transparency and their comedic attempt at 'banter' caused us much mirth. For the hardened and wisened group admins, outing these infiltrators and their successors has become a bit of a turkey shoot. Each day we have to tackle scores of spammers. Our groups (we have many) are bombarded with invites to other groups such as Q, Trump, DUMBS or groups faked under the names key freedom fighters. These groups are diversionary and we believe run by the other side. We believe them to be diversionary psy-ops in the same vein as Flat-earth and Tartarian empire. Fake theories seeded amongst genuine consprisacy designed to dilute, divert and confuse. I can hear the shouts and chairs scuffling on the floor :) For anyone believing in the integrity of one of the above groups, I'll ask you why have they alone designed bots to spam our telegram groups? It is not humans that spam our groups. The bots are set to spam each time we b]post, often seconds later. The posts are either gumpf grooming 'truthers' to join their ranks or crypto scams. Why have all the trusted telegram groups from CHD to Monotti to British Nurses to Jam for Freedom not done the same? Why don't spam our groups? Groups like Q are designed to ensnare, misdirect, and confuse. Worse, they leave the participants feeling either disempowered or sitting at home doing nothing, falsely feeling safe in the belief that some white hat or yellow-haired superhero is about to fly in and save the world. Genius. Hat's off to those that thought up the white hats. Mind, the highest award for genius to be given to the 'other side', must surely still go to the banking institutions intent on getting rid of cash. Early in the pandemic, I saw a sign within a huge ASDA store explaining that due to hygiene concerns contactless was preferred over cash. To the bewilderment of the masked shoppers passing by, I slow-clapped in appreciation at this pinnacle of propaganda. A response only surpassed when I came across a sign on my local cash point which declaring, "Rest assured. The banknotes in this machine have been quarantined for 72 hours." Aye, the memories... Priceless. 2022 to 2023 with new problems Since Feb 22 we have experienced a new issue within our groups. It is more serious and one we have not as yet overcome. The NOTB channel and groups have been infiltrated by software that secretly deletes our members, leaving no trace within the channel's or group's history. This is a highly effective form of 'shadow banning' where we are not outright closed down, but lead to continue our work to an ever-decreasing group of followers, feeling disillusioned by the ineffectiveness of our efforts. It also targets the most active within our groups and leaves the inactive giving a sense of a silent uninterested mass. Again, genius. How do we know this for sure? Many of those deleted are personal friends or loyal NOTB members that made contact wondering what they had done wrong to get a ban. The dispelled members are of course disgruntled. Offended and silenced within telegram, only a few find alternative ways to contact us. I've even found comments in other groups where our deleted members have said "Don't trust NOTB. They kicked me out for just saying xxx or yyy." Again, genius. Sadly, Telegram has not responded to any of our messages or complaints, so we can only presume they are part of the problem. One thing is for sure, we are best presuming that ANY group we are in, is infiltrated. Never post private or sensitive information. What can we do? We must not give up. They attack our information as they see it as a threat, which means our work is effective. We must continue to post the truth non-stop. Even the hardest of trained agents will absorb what they read. Things seen, can not be unseen. Things read, can not be unread. Dots linked, can not be unlinked. These understandings will refuse to wither and will sprout new cognitive pathways. Famously, youtube's one-man 'fact checker' commentators had to be brought back to base for 'retraining' every 6 weeks or so. The truths of the so-called fake-news they had been employed to seek, had found a way into the operative's psyche. Two plus two equals four, Things that add up, have a symmetry and balance that feels right. Truth has a reality, that lies and propaganda can not own. The truth always wins, just as light always overcomes the dark. You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time. All we need to do, is tip the balance. All we need to do, is keep on keeping on. Join the NOTB Telegram channel here: https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb Here is a key article by Brenda Baletti, writing for RFK's Children's Health Defence. FBI Contractor Created Fake Online IDs to Join Chatrooms Run by Groups Organizing Against Vaccine Mandates An FBI surveillance contractor infiltrated the chatrooms of two airline industry groups opposed to vaccine mandates to collect intelligence on the groups’ organizing activities, investigative journalist Lee Fang reported. By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D. An FBI surveillance contractor infiltrated the chatrooms of two airline industry groups opposed to vaccine mandates to collect intelligence on the groups’ organizing activities, investigative journalist Lee Fang reported. The contractor, Flashpoint, which in the past infiltrated Islamic terror groups, now focuses on “anti-vaccine” groups and other domestic political organizations, according to Fang. In a webinar presentation for clients last year, which Fang analyzed on his Substack, Flashpoint analyst Vlad Cuiujuclu demonstrated his company’s methods for identifying and entering encrypted Telegram chat groups. He explained how the company attempted to join chatrooms of transportation workers resisting the COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Fang described the presentation: “‘In this case, we’re searching for a closed channel of U.S. Freedom Flyers,’ said Cuiujuclu. ‘It’s basically a group that opposed vaccination and masks.’ “As he clicked through a database, Cuiujuclu showed a chat group on Telegram sponsored by Airline Professionals For Justice, another group formed by airline industry workers opposed to the mandate. The forum, he added, provided useful insights, including Zoom links for meetings of the grassroots organization. “‘Private chats,’ said Cuiujuclu, ‘require for you to have an invite link,’ which he noted can often either be found by scrolling through public forums or by ‘engag[ing] the admin of that channel.’” Flashpoint also offers clients artificial intelligence and internet scraping tools. According to Fang, the firm is a leader in the “threat intelligence industry,” a growing number of security and surveillance firms that create fake online identities to infiltrate Discord chats, WhatsApp groups, Reddit forums and dark web message boards to gather information for clients, including corporations and the FBI, to monitor potential threats. Joshua Yoder, president of US Freedom Flyers, said he is aware that Flashpoint infiltrated private chat groups associated with his organization. Yoder told The Defender: “Tradecraft and other strategies are often used to gain inside knowledge of conservative organizations with the intent to disrupt, mislead and otherwise thwart effective campaigns. “Infiltration is a tactic used by the deep state to prevent the truth from being told by attempting to destroy the advancement of the message. The team at US Freedom Flyers has been successful in recognizing these attacks and we have taken decisive actions to protect the organization and our members.” Aviation industry workers were some of the most vocal and organized against COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They wrote an open letter to the aviation industry signed by thousands of organizations, physicians and pilots. They also organized research on the risks of vaccines for pilots, spoke publicly about the “culture of fear and intimidation” around the mandates in the industry, and filed multiple lawsuits in Canada, the Netherlands, and the U.S. US Freedom Flyers brought a lawsuit against Atlas Air, one of the largest air cargo carriers in the aviation industry, in May 2022. Fang told The Defender the targeting of American citizens resisting the vaccine mandates fits into a long history of surveillance being used to subvert democracy. He said: “There is a long sordid history of informants and surveillance contractors working to undermine democratic engagement in this country. “The push against regular citizens opposed to COVID-19 vaccine mandates has come in many forms: censorship, demonization and in this case, surveillance.” The growing market for spying on domestic dissent Flashpoint advertises its surveillance success on its website, providing examples of its work undermining environmental activism, G20 protests and protests against the aviation industry. The webpages describing these activities were taken down after Fang published his investigation, but they can be found on the Wayback Machine internet archive. For example, Flashpoint described its capacity to monitor activists organizing against pollution and the aviation industry. The website said: “By monitoring the situation and assessing tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP’s), Flashpoint was able to assess the impact of upcoming protests, and determine that these groups would likely continue to protest and attempt to impede airport construction and expansion projects through direct action. “Based on this information, Flashpoint customers were able to take actions to help control the impact to business operations, and to ensure the safety of their employees and facilities as well as the safety of those protesting.” Flashpoint was founded by Evan Kohlmann, former NBC News contributor who investigated Islamic terror groups and whom The Intercept described as “the U.S. government’s go-to expert witness in terrorism prosecutions.” Jack Poulson of Tech Inquiry, a group that researches the surveillance industry, told Fang that “Flashpoint has been selling its chatroom infiltration services to companies and governments for years.” But, he said, it has shifted its focus from “surveilling Muslims after September 11” and “followed the money into both the Pentagon’s information warfare programs and the business of monitoring domestic protest groups.” Last year, Flashpoint acquired Echosec Systems, another intelligence contractor, and last month it formalized a partnership with Google Cloud. These acquisitions come in addition to “a steady stream of contracts to Flashpoint in recent years from the FBI, the Department of Defense, Treasury Department, and Department of Homeland Security, among other agencies,” Fang wrote. Fang also spoke to Jay Bhattacharya, M.D., Ph.D., professor of medicine at Stanford University, research associate at the National Bureau of Economics Research and one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration. Bhattacharya said: “This kind of domestic spying violates the implicit protection Americans have in these kinds of settings. “This isn’t terrorism, this doesn’t have anything to do with national security. “This is a private set of employees, workers who are trying to maintain their jobs in the face of unscientific demands for COVID vaccinations.” Originally published by CHD: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fbi-fake-online-ids-chatrooms-vaccine-mandates/

25th January 1990 - Nature. Letters page F. HOYLE N.C. WICKRAMASINGHE University of Wales, School of Mathematics, Senghenydd Road, Cardiff CF2 4AG, UK SIR-Some years ago, Hope-Simpson (1) pointed out a remarkable coincidence between peaks in the sunspot curve , when solar activity is at a maximum, and the occurrence of influenza pandemics associated with antigenic shifts of the virus. He pointed to five coincidences over the period 1919-1968 as shown in the figure below. Using historical evidence on flu-like epidemics as summarized by Beveridge', we extended the comparison before 1919 as shown. The first column ignores the abnormally low sunspot maxima in the years 1816, 1883 and 1905, and the second column includes both "certain" and "possible" pandemics in the judgement of Beveridge'. Although the correspondences between the figure and our table are clearly not precise, they do add credence to the speculation that s Solar activity and influenza activity may have a causal link. The two phenomena, which have irregular periods (with an average period of 11 years), appear to have kept in step over some 17 cycles. Past experience has shown that false correlations of phenomena with the sunspot cycle may look good over a few cycles but go seriously adrift after an appreciable number of cycles. This does not happen for the postulated sunspot-flu connection. Following the broad sunspot peak in 1968-70, the next peak occurred in 1979-80 coinciding closely with the 'Red Flu' pandemic of 1978-79 (see figure). The sunspot relative numbers from May to October 1989 are given as follows: 159, 166, 172, 176, 176, 175. The indications are that a peak has been reached in August/September 1989, and that this peak is the second highest on record . The highest recorded sunspot peak which occurred in 1957 coincided with the Asian flu pandemic of 1957-58. It is tempting to connect the recent flu epidemic in Britain with a maximum or imminent maximum of solar activity. The rise of sunspot numbers towards this peak is possibly amongst the steepest on record. Although the new wave of flu and flu-like illness has not yet assumed pandemic proportions, the chances of this happening within a single complete cycle of terrestrial seasons must be reckoned to be high. In conclusion we note that electrical fields associated with intense solar winds can rapidly drive charged particles of the size of viruses down through the exposed upper atmosphere into the shelter of the lower atmosphere , the charging of such particles being due to the photoelectric effect. This could define one possible causal link between influenza pandemics and solar activity. F. HOYLE N.C. WICKRAMASINGHE University of Wales School of Mathematics Senghenydd Road Cardiff CF2 4AG, UK 1. Hope-Simpson, R.E. Nature275, 86 (1978). 2. Beveridge, W.I.B. Influenza, the Last Great Plague (Heinemann, London, 1977). 3. Hoyle, F. & Wickramasinghe, N.C. Diseases from Space (Oent, London, 19 79) SOURCE: https://www.nature.com/articles/343304b0.pdf?

An excerpt from The Invisible Rainbow In 1889, most historians agree, the modern electrical era opened. And in 1889, as if the heavens had suddenly opened as well, doctors in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia were overwhelmed by a flood of critically ill patients suffering from a strange disease that seemed to have come like a thunderbolt from nowhere, a disease that many of these doctors had never seen before. That disease was influenza, and that pandemic lasted four continuous years and killed at least one million people. Influenza is an Electrical Disease. Suddenly and inexplicably, influenza, whose descriptions had remained consistent for thousands of years, changed its character in 1889. Flu had last seized most of England in November 1847, over half a century earlier. The last flu epidemic in the United States had raged in the winter of 1874–1875. Since ancient times, influenza had been known as a capricious, unpredictable disease, a wild animal that came from nowhere, terrorized whole populations at once without warning and without a schedule, and disappeared as suddenly and mysteriously as it had arrived, not to be seen again for years or decades. It behaved unlike any other illness, was thought not to be contagious, and received its name because its comings and goings were said to be governed by the “influence” of the stars. But in 1889 influenza was tamed. From that year forward it would be present always, in every part of the world. It would vanish mysteriously as before, but it could be counted on to return, at more or less the same time, the following year. And it has never been absent since. Like “anxiety disorder,” influenza is so common and so seemingly familiar that a thorough review of its history is necessary to unmask this stranger and convey the enormity of the public health disaster that occurred one hundred and thirty years ago. It’s not that we don’t know enough about the influenza virus. We know more than enough. The microscopic virus associated with this disease has been so exhaustively studied that scientists know more about its tiny life cycle than about any other single microorganism. But this has been a reason to ignore many unusual facts about this disease, including the fact that it is not contagious. In 2001, Canadian astronomer Ken Tapping, together with two British Columbia physicians, were the latest scientists to confirm, yet again, that for at least the last three centuries influenza pandemics have been most likely to occur during peaks of solar magnetic activity—that is, at the height of each eleven-year sun cycle. Pages 80–81 of The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life 1889 - what happened in that year? This 'gold rush' of connecting housing by cables happened as each company competed with the next to get each building on an electricity meter.. The EMF's caused by the currents running through these wires were immense... If the EMFs from solar flares caused influenza, did the EMFs caused by these cables cause Influenza? And if EMFs cause influenza, what caused Covid 19? A virus? Or... electromagnetic frequencies? The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life Read more free excerpts and summaries in several languages

The depopulation agenda manifests in many forms This is an excellent article by Chris Mathews published by the Daily Mail and republished here for the public record. Twelve-year-olds are being taught about anal sex in school while nine-year-olds are told to 'masturbate' for homework: The shocking lesson plans used by teachers in UK classrooms EXCLUSIVE: Schools across Britain taught kids to masturbate and have anal sex Teachers have also 'indoctrinated' children with false claims about biological sex ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN'S LESSON PLANS? Email chris.matthews@mailonline.co.uk Schoolchildren are being taught about anal sex and orgasms before they have reached puberty and set 'masturbation' as homework, secretive lesson plans reveal. Many teachers are 'indoctrinating' children with scientifically false claims about biological sex, presenting gender as fluid and furthering a narrative that people can be born in the wrong body. It comes as the NHS is facing a mass legal action from 1,000 families who claim their children were rushed into taking life-changing puberty blockers' by the Tavistock Centre. MailOnline has found graphic teaching material — including a sex manual for pre-teens — being taught to children in classes around the UK. It follows a concerned mother being denied the right to see the content of the lessons being taught to her 15-year-old daughter in her Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) classes, which became compulsory three years ago. Despite a judge refusing Clare Page the right to see the material, MailOnline can reveal that a wealth of questionable teaching resources are already available online. Colouring books, word searches and cartoon drawings have also been given to young girls and boys by 'activist teachers' in their 'overarching mission to sexualise children in the name of inclusion'. Since September 2020, Relationships Education has been compulsory in primary schools and RSE mandatory in secondary schools. The change left many teaching staff seeking guidance. The void was filled by charities — some harbouring unconventional views on biological sex and sharing material on their websites that references underage sex. MailOnline can reveal that some children are: Taught that from birth until the age of one, babies can 'experience pleasurable sensations' by touching their genitals Given ways for 12-year-old girls to orgasm while masturbating, including pinching or stroking the clitoris Given 'masturbation' homework from a pre-compulsory RSE resource Told that girls as young as 12 can find sexual pleasure from anal, vaginal and oral sex Taught that it's normal to want to masturbate during and even before they hit puberty Informed that it's normal for prepubescent children to be sexually attracted to anyone Told that gender is different from sex but is a much more intrinsic part of who a person is Taught that people can change their sex from being a man to being a woman Also taught that some 'non-binary' humans are neither men nor women Taught that men with the male Y chromosome can actually be women ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN'S LESSON PLANS? Email chris.matthews@mailonline.co.uk Many teachers are 'indoctrinating' children with scientifically false claims about biological sex, presenting gender as fluid and furthering the 'trans' narrative that people can be born in the wrong body. Pictured: A lesson plan from a school in Dorset, for schoolchildren in Year 10, aged 14 to 15 An 'award-winning' teaching pack for children as young as nine who have learning disabilities created before RSE was made mandatory was similarly graphic. One of the lesson plans suggested teachers 'show the group pictures of male and female masturbation' and 'simulate anatomically correct dolls masturbating' A colouring book aimed at children as young as five invited users to colour in Zoë, who is 'non-binary', which according to the book means 'they are neither a boy or a girl'. Another lesson resource, a book called Great Relationships and Sex Education that is 'extremely popular with RSE educators', points children aged 11 to 13 to a 'hands on guide' to masturbation that suggests it can be 'highly pleasurable' to touch your anus, genitals and nipples The Sex Education Forum (SEF), Coram Life Education and Brook are some of the leading charities that create lesson plans for schools, hold PSHE workshops and point teachers towards related educational material. Coram Life Education supports 50,000 teachers. Their PSHE education reaches more than 600,000 pupils each year. Meanwhile, SEF states on its own website that it 'has a long history of successfully influencing policy'. Some teachers and educators believe RSE and Relationships Education are necessary subjects for children to learn. Danielle Baron was a teacher and assistant head for 10 years and has run her own education and coaching company for eight years. She said: 'It is of utmost importance to educate children about navigating relationships, as they are particularly vulnerable, and education and knowledge empowers them to recognise warning signs. 'By providing children with this education and support, we can help them navigate relationships safely and empower them to protect themselves against potential abuse.' A trainee teacher at a multi-academy trust in southeast London who teaches RSE three times a week in 20 minute session said it was 'vital' for it to be compulsory for children to learn about sex and relationships. He said: 'Schools have a role outside of family and religious groups to teach it, informed by science. The kids need to know it. 'Teaching about gender is important. 'Many schools think [RSE is] secondary. Teachers want resources given to them. The issue is that the resources are not good enough. 'Maybe we need a firm curriculum. If it's left up to private groups then potentially different schools give different RSE.' Yet others disagree. Ray Freeman is the director of the National Council of Integrative Psychotherapists. He told MailOnline: 'We need to let children be children. What I fear is more of a political movement, where we have classes of girls saying they are a different sex. 'Sex is biological. Gender is socially constructed. The aggressive movement is mixing the two. 'It's dangerous. Has the world gone mad? 'I think it is psychologically damaging and it can be physically damaging for a young person to be told they are or can be the opposite sex. 'We have a duty to protect our children. How can we if you don't know what they are being taught?' The Family Education Trust's Lucy Marsh told MailOnline 'activist teachers' were on a path to rip children from their families. She said: 'It's an overarching mission to sexualise children in the name of inclusion. 'If you normalise underage sex to children, it's grooming and exposing them to sexual abuse. 'It's a mission to sexualise children and people don't understand there's a huge safeguarding risk in that. It is child indoctrination. 'When you think of cults, the first thing they do is separate people from families. 'They are trying to put a distance between children and their families.' Mrs Marsh has had personal experience of her child being taught shocking sexual material. She said: 'My daughter came home and asked if she was asexual. I said, ''Well I hope you are, because you're 11!'' 'Children come home and become very upset about it. 'We need a full public inquiry into the Department of Education. A lot of these providers are sanctioning underage sex. 'We would like [the government] to press pause on RSE lessons until this investigation is over. Vagina Matters is the top free teaching resource on sexual health charity Brook's website. The book (pictured) aimed at 12 to 14-year-olds girls covers sex, masturbation and orgasms It includes cartoons of a woman's naked breasts, buttocks and vagina (pictured) The guide, for 12 to 14-year-old girls, says: 'You can be sexually attracted to anyone.' It also listed ways to find 'sexual pleasure' that included 'anal sex' and 'oral sex' The guide also normalises sex 'before your first menstruation'. Most girls start to menstruate between the ages of eight and 13. Sex before the age of 13 is legally considered as rape Under an 'advice' heading it added: 'You can use your fingers to play with your clitoris - stroke it, massage it, rub it, pinch or squeeze it lightly' 'We don't think that gender identities need to be taught in school because it's not based on fact or science. 'In primary schools they don't need to be taught the ins and outs of sexual pleasure.' Meanwhile, political activist Laurence Fox told MailOnline: 'Disgusting ideologues are trying to put children down an irreversible path of manipulation. 'The fact they want to hide what they are doing is disgusting. It should alarm every parent. 'This is entirely anti-scientific dribble. It's total warfare on the family in the name of inclusion and kindness.' Although the government's guidance on delivering RSE and Relationships Education does not mention masturbation, it hasn't stopped schools across the country from giving the green light to unorthodox teaching material. Here, MailOnline can reveal the wealth of lesson plans and teaching material being taught in schools across the country: Masturbation, wet dreams and sexual feelings Coram claimed: 'We believe masturbation would come under the statutory requirements to teach.' It said it first taught about masturbation in the summer term of Year 4, 'when most children are already nine years old'. A lesson plan adopted from SEF by Merrywood House Independent Special School, in Surrey, intended to teach boys and girls as young as nine about 'masturbation', 'wet dreams' and 'sexual feelings'. An 'award-winning' teaching pack for children as young as nine who have learning disabilities created before RSE was made mandatory was similarly graphic. One of the lesson plans suggested teachers 'show the group pictures of male and female masturbation' and 'simulate anatomically correct dolls masturbating'. For homework, the lesson plan suggested the children should practice 'shutting the door and being private if [the] person wants to masturbate'. Calverley Primary School in West Yorkshire lists 'wet dream' and 'masturbation' in its agreed vocabulary for nine and 10-year-olds' RSE classes A lesson plan adopted from SEF by Merrywood House Independent Special School, in Surrey, intended to teach boys and girls as young as nine about 'masturbation', 'wet dreams' and 'sexual feelings' Rotherham School Improvement Service also lists 'masturbation' in its 'key vocabulary' for children in Year 6 Similarly, Westfield Primary School, in Surrey, includes 'clitoris', 'masturbation' and 'wet dream' in its Year 6 Sex Education vocabulary list Another lesson resource, a book called Great Relationships and Sex Education that is 'extremely popular with RSE educators', points kids aged 11 to 13 to a 'hands on guide' to masturbation that suggests it can be 'highly pleasurable' to touch your anus, genitals and nipples. The Vagina Matters book, which is the top free teaching resource on Brook's website, advised 12 to 14-year-old girls to 'get to know your body and what you like' by masturbating. It described a woman climaxing, making sounds of pleasure, her muscles tightening and said fluid may squirt from the urethra during female ejaculation. It added that trying out masturbation would 'help you experience sexual pleasure more when you're with a partner or alone'. The teaching resource said: 'Listen to your own body and find out how you like to be stimulated.' Under an 'advice' heading it added: 'You can use your fingers to play with your clitoris - stroke it, massage it, rub it, pinch or squeeze it lightly. 'You can also do the same with your nipples, breasts, inner thighs, ears, neck or other parts of your body that evoke pleasant sensations.' Gender and sex In a different lesson plan from a school in Dorset, schoolchildren in Year 10, aged 14 to 15, were to be told: 'Many transgender children notice a difference between their body and their gender from a young age.' It also defined gender as 'the state of being male or female socially or culturally,' while sex was said to be 'the state of being male or female biologically'. Another school's lesson plan said nine and 10-year-olds needed to learn that gender identity could differ from biological sex and that diversity and inclusion was important in promoting career opportunities. Similarly, an in-house resource created by a London secondary school and taught to children in Year 9 (aged 13 to 14) said a person's gender was not the same as sex and was 'a much more intrinsic part of you'. An in-house resource created by a London secondary school and taught to children in Year 9 (aged 13 to 14) said a person's gender was not the same as sex and was 'a much more intrinsic part of you' A lesson plan created by sexual health charity Brook said one learning objective from a class on gender and stereotypes was to be able to 'identify a range of gender identities, sexual orientations and recognise that how we identify is on a spectrum' This school's lesson plan said nine and 10-year-olds needed to learn that gender identity could differ from biological sex and that diversity and inclusion was important in promoting career opportunities In a TES lesson plan for PSHE, scientifically false claims are made about biological sex and the Y chromosome. The presence of a Y chromosome in a human means that person is a man. Even if they have more X chromosomes than usual, such as being XXY or XXXY, they are still men. However, the TES lesson plan makes the false claim that being XXY (also called Klinefelter's Syndrome) means you can be male or female, or neither. This is false. As the NHS points out, only men can be XXY. A lesson plan created by sexual health charity Brook said one learning objective from a class on gender and stereotypes was to be able to 'identify a range of gender identities, sexual orientations and recognise that how we identify is on a spectrum'. Graphic and vulgar cartoons Teaching material made by Norfolk County Council's Educator Solutions and shared by Mulbarton Primary School, which is near Norwich, includes cartoons of naked toddlers to show to five and six-year-olds. It suggests pupils should point out the penis and vulva but warns teachers not to tell off children for using slang words for genitalia. The RSE resource said: 'If pupils correctly identify that their genitalia are different but use incorrect terminology, do not say that this word is ''wrong'' or ''naughty'', congratulate them for noticing the difference and say we are going to learn the scientific word.' Teaching material made by Norfolk County Council's Educator Solutions and shared by Mulbarton Primary School, which is near Norwich, includes cartoons of naked toddlers to show to five and six-year-olds. Pictured: A naked male toddler, originally not blurred It suggests pupils should point out the penis and vulva but warns teachers not to tell off children for using slang words for genitalia. Pictured: A naked female toddler, originally not blurred Vagina Matters also showed explicit cartoons of a woman's naked breasts, buttocks and vagina. The guide for girls as young as 12 also pointed out where the clitoris was using a graphic diagram. Sex with prepubescent children Vagina Matters is the top free teaching resource on Brook's website. It is a tool aimed at 12 to 14-year-old girls that covers about sex, masturbation and orgasms. It also normalises sex 'before your first menstruation'. Most girls start to menstruate between the ages of eight and 13. Sex before the age of 13 is legally considered as rape. The guide even advises pre-teens different ways of stimulation, from massaging their clitoris with a finger to being penetrated by a penis, licked with a tongue and using sex toys on themselves. The schoolgirls' guide to a vagina also said: 'During puberty, and even before that, it's normal to have the desire to masturbate and to imagine how you would want to be touched by someone else.' The guide, which targets 12 to 14-year-old girls, added: 'You can be sexually attracted to anyone.' In the next paragraph, it listed ways to find 'sexual pleasure'. It said: 'These could include masturbation, fingering, penetration of the vagina with a penis or sex toy, penetration of the anus with a penis or sex toy, [and] using the mouth and tongue to stimulate your partner's genital area.' Sexualised children's games Vagina Matters incorporated a sexually transmitted diseases word search into the sex manual for the young girls. Another guide, this time aimed at primary school children, introduced children as young as five years old to 'trans terminology and the LGB community' with an 'LGBT Colouring And Activity Book'. The colouring book was created by the LGBT Foundation, which defines a woman as 'someone who identifies as a woman' and claims not all people who can menstruate and become pregnant are women. In the colouring book, primary school children were invited to colour in a smiling cartoon figure called John. It said although when John was born 'people thought he was a girl,' he is actually 'a man who is trans'. In scientific terms that translates to John being a woman who thinks her gender is male. The children were also invited to colour in Zoë, a 'non-binary' person, which according to the book means 'they are neither a boy or a girl'. The colouring book also features a word search for children aged five to 11 where they can find different sexualities. This colouring book was created by the LGBT Foundation, which defines a woman as 'someone who identifies as a woman' and claims not all people who can menstruate and become pregnant are women In the colouring book, primary school children were invited to colour in a smiling trans cartoon figure called John The book has 14 pages for children to colour in as they learn about 'trans terminology and the LGB community' The colouring book teaching kids about 'trans terminology and the LGB community' features a word search for children aged five to 11 where they can find different sexualities Vagina Matters also incorporated a sexually transmitted diseases word search into its sex manual for girls as young as 12 Sex Education Forum said it 'provides a range of resources for educators that are informed by the latest evidence on the delivery of effective and age appropriate relationships and sex education lessons.' It added: 'This resource is not a lesson plan, it is a page from a tool the Sex Education Forum created to support educators in designing developmentally appropriate RSE curriculum. 'The tool is made up of questions that children typically ask and informed by issues educators tell us are raised by pupils. It covers questions about life-cycles, my body, feelings and emotions, keeping safe and relationships. 'We recommend that teachers use the tool alongside knowledge of their own pupils and their needs, as well as recommending they share the tool in their parent communications about RSE, in line with good practice.' A Norfolk County Council spokesperson said: 'The characters [cartoon of naked toddlers] are featured within a lesson plan for primary aged school pupils. Schools may choose to use this as part of a broader developmental curriculum. 'The lesson aims to help children learn scientific terms for the private parts of their body and normalise the appropriate use of these as part of good safeguarding practice. 'When this subject knowledge is taught and how is ultimately a decision for the school, which has responsibility of developing a policy and curriculum in consultation with parents that is compliant with statutory guidance.' Merrywood House Independent Special School said: 'Merrywood follows the national curriculum in all areas according to key stages and in line with the RSE statutory guidance. Merrywood is a specialist school supporting pupils with complex needs and is regulated by Oftsed and the Department of Education.' LGBT Foundation said: 'Our LGBTQ+ Activity Book promotes understanding and acceptance of diverse identities and family structures. 'Education is key in the fight for equality. This book supports those teachings, providing fun activities and positive messages that encourage well-being, self-acceptance, and a celebration of diversity among LGBTQ+ individuals and families.' Rotherham School Improvement Service said it 'provides a list of words which children of different ages may use when asking questions to teachers or other adults during RSE and health education lessons.' It added: 'This is in line with DfE advice and relates to a range of subjects, including sex and sexuality. Each school will determine its own approach to RSE and may or may not adopt or utilise this curriculum model.' Westfield Primary School, in Surrey, declined to comment. Brook, Calverley Primary School, Coram Life Education, Hillcrest Primary School, TES and Vagina Matters have not responded to MailOnline's requests for comment. ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN'S LESSON PLANS? Email chris.matthews@mailonline.co.uk SOURCE AND ORIGINAL ARTICLE: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12189041/Twelve-year-olds-taught-anal-sex-school-nine-year-olds-told-masturbate.html LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

No words are needed except for Carrie's.... LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

In this key article from the 10th of June, the telegraph exposes thee basics of the BBC censorship protecting the government narrative. This is an important step, but it is far from the full picture. ‘The BBC has a reputation as a truth-teller – but in Covid it did what the Government wanted’ Current and former staff members say debate around lockdown at the corporation was often stifled Telegraph Newspaper Uk - By Gordon Rayner, ASSOCIATE EDITOR 10 June 2023 • 10:00am The BBC is so proud of the fact that it once employed George Orwell that a statue of him stands outside its Broadcasting House headquarters to inspire its staff on their way into work. Carved on the wall behind him is his observation that: “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” Some of those staff have come to ponder what the author of Nineteen Eighty-Four would have made of the BBC’s reporting of the Covid pandemic, and its participation in the Counter-Disinformation Policy Forum, a body set up by the Government to kill off what it deemed to be fake news. Its very name could have fallen from the pages of Orwell’s greatest novel, and the irony is not lost on BBC journalists who were effectively accused of thoughtcrime if they dared to suggest open debates on the Government’s lockdown strategy. There is growing evidence that during the pandemic the BBC morphed from a national broadcaster founded on impartiality into a state broadcaster that stifled voices challenging the authoritarian response to Covid. The Telegraph has spoken to current and former BBC journalists who described a “climate of fear” existing in the corporation during the pandemic, with experienced reporters “openly mocked” if they questioned the wisdom of lockdowns, or called “dissenters”. Some complained to senior managers about the BBC’s blinkered stance, but were ignored. Others communicated via secretive WhatsApp groups to share their frustrations, like members of a resistance movement. Current and former BBC journalists described a 'climate of fear' existing in the corporation during the pandemic CREDIT: Getty While other news organisations made their own assessments of conflicting scientific evidence on coronavirus and the best ways to weigh them up, the BBC was alone among news gatherers in attending the Counter-Disinformation Policy Forum, which was chaired by ministers or civil servants. The BBC has claimed it only attended the meetings as an “observer”, and has played down its significance, but it inevitably leaves the corporation open to accusations that it was taking dictation from the Government, rather than allowing its journalists to scrutinise all of the evidence independently and impartially. “There was open censorship,” says one journalist. “There was no debate about who should and who should not be given airtime, that was very clear. People were saying to me ‘it’s dangerous to ask questions’, which is extraordinary. If you suggested to editors that anything other than the one-way narrative about Covid was even possible, you would be met with a look of abject horror." “We are now talking about the long-term harms caused by lockdowns and they have contributed to that damage by not being critical and not having a debate.” The person sent by the BBC to attend meetings of the Counter-Disinformation Policy Forum was Jessica Cecil, founder of the Trusted News Initiative, which was set up under the then director-general Tony Hall in 2019 – before Covid – to smoke out fake news and warn media partners of untruths circling the globe. Instead of allowing the TNI to do its job by spotting rogue reports, however, the BBC sent Cecil along to the Forum’s Zoom meetings, which began in December 2020. Jessica Cecil was sent by the BBC to attend the Counter-Disinformation Policy Forum They were chaired on some occasions by Dame Caroline Dinenage, the then minister of state for digital and culture, and otherwise by Sarah Connolly, director of security and online harms at the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. Attendees included other officials from the DCMS; an official from the Department of Health and Social Care; representatives of social media firms; academics from six universities and someone from the broadcast regulator Ofcom. It was initially set up to prevent untruths about the Covid vaccines being disseminated online, but at a meeting in January 2021 the group discussed “whether the scope of harms should be confined just to Covid-19/the vaccine”, suggesting it was possible the clampdown on so-called disinformation would go beyond Covid. Its very existence – along with that of the separate Counter-Disinformation Unit within the Government, exposed by The Telegraph last week – was kept under the radar at the time, and it is not difficult to guess why. Robin Aitken, a former BBC journalist and author of the book The Noble Liar: How and Why the BBC Distorts the News to Promote a Liberal Agenda, said it was “alarming” to discover that the BBC took part in the Forum, which he suggested was “a conspiracy against public debate”. He said: “Who knew about it? There is no transparency. The BBC has a worldwide reputation as a truth-teller but something like this unit gives the lie to that, because it shows that when it chooses to, it toes the line and does the job the Government wants it to do. “This whole idea of disinformation is a method of enforcing an orthodoxy on the public debate.” Former BBC journalist and author Robin Aitken said it was 'alarming' to discover that the BBC took part in the Forum CREDIT: Claire Lim The BBC is desperate to play down the significance of the meetings, saying Ms Cecil attended them in an “observer only capacity”, though it failed to explain what that meant. Ms Cecil herself, who has left the BBC and set herself up as a consultant global disinformation specialist, said it was a “BBC matter” and referred The Telegraph to the BBC press office. According to one source who attended the meetings, they quickly became “a round-robin of public affairs people from internet companies telling the minister what a great job they were doing”. Dinenage scrapped the Forum after six months. Nevertheless, the BBC’s decision to attend the Forum was consistent with its decision to back the Establishment line on pandemic response, enforced with grim reports from Covid wards to which it was given extensive access. Regardless of whether it came as a direct result of the secretive Forum (which refuses to publish unredacted minutes of its meetings), there is no doubt that many who questioned the efficacy of lockdowns, masks or school closures was given short shrift. “It was the matter of the greatest importance in our lifetime but there was no debate about it,” said one ex-BBC journalist. “We have to put our integrity and impartiality first and foremost and that did not happen. “People were suggesting eminently qualified experts as alternative voices, but in my experience not one of them was put on air.” The journalist was one of three people who gave evidence in private to Parliament’s all-party group on pandemic response and recovery last November. Their evidence was never made public, but they have agreed to share their experiences with The Telegraph. All of them are too fearful of the repercussions of speaking out to be identified by name. A second witness told the APPG at the time: “Downing Street pursued its lockdown strategy with a reckless disregard for the mental health of the public, lacing its messaging with fear and guilt to ensure broad compliance. “This approach should have sounded alarm bells for every freedom-loving journalist in the BBC; instead, many of my colleagues were cowed. The apocalyptic atmosphere in the newsroom was fuelled by new in-house health and safety rules designed to ‘stop the spread’, many of which were absurd and the sort of box-ticking theatre the BBC is more than adept at.” The source raised their concerns with senior managers including programme editors, but was “openly mocked” by them. BBC reporters were told not to use the word “lockdown” in a memo from a senior editor on the day the first lockdown was announced, but instead to talk about curbs and restrictions, in line with Downing Street policy. The third journalist who spoke to the APPG talked of a “climate of fear” in the BBC of stepping out of line, and shared an email with the committee they had sent to a senior editor pointing out that eminent scientists who had been regarded as trusted sources in the past had been silenced because they challenged the Government line. The Telegraph has seen the email, and the response from the manager, but is not reproducing it because it would risk identifying the source. The journalist told The Telegraph: “The response I got was patronising and humiliating. The gist of it was ‘get back in your box, you can’t have an opinion’.” The same source was astonished at his editor’s reluctance to allow him to report on anti-lockdown marches happening in London, some of which attracted tens of thousands of protesters. They said: “In editorial meetings if you raised the fact that there were lockdown marches going on, you were told, ‘no, that’s not on the agenda’.” Anti-lockdown protesters at Parliament Square in July 2021 CREDIT: Shutterstock Anna Brees, a former BBC news presenter who left the corporation before Covid, was contacted by a like-minded BBC senior editor when Brees tweeted about her lockdown scepticism. An email from the editor, sent in May 2021, said: “I need to know who shares our concerns. It’s impossible to be up front in top level meetings without knowing who’s in with us, and it’s not like you can just come out and ask – try that and people look at you like you have two heads. “So it would be helpful if you let me know if you have the ear of anyone in News … get people to email me or just let me know who they are if I have any allies in the room. I don’t name names.” The editor promised that: “I’ve got a seat at the top table and can organise the pushback.” Brees, author of the book Shame: When Journalists Stopped Listening, says that the attempt to organise the pushback failed because BBC journalists were so worried that it might be a trap to identify dissenters that they were too frightened to contact the editor. The pandemic, and lockdowns, proved to be a ratings hit for the BBC. In 2020 the average audience for the News at Six between mid-March and June leapt from 4.1 million in 2019 to 6.3 million in 2020. This year the figure was down to 3.4 million. As a Left-leaning organisation, it follows that the BBC would be in favour of state intervention, and as a publicly-funded body it may also have been over-eager to show the Government it was doing something to counter fake news. Yet the BBC is not usually slow to pick fights with the Government. Its journalists believe another factor, which mimics the newspeak vocabulary of Nineteen Eighty-Four, is at play: groupthink. “I wasn’t party to any conspiracy but I do believe there was a combination of groupthink with noble cause censorship,” says a current BBC journalist. “The BBC is populated by people who come from a certain background and share certain views. There was a sense that lockdowns were an annoyance, but that they were necessary. About 80 per cent of BBC staff were working from home so they were also initially saving money. “If there had been more people from working class backgrounds, or people who were cooped up in seventh-floor flats with children, there would have been a degree of scepticism about whether lockdowns were worth the cost.” Among the scientists who became unwelcome at the BBC, despite having been accepted as eminent experts in their field before the pandemic hit, was Carl Heneghan, professor of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University. In the early days of the pandemic he was a familiar voice on BBC radio and television, discussing how he thought the pandemic would evolve and what could be done to counter it, but when he began to question government policy he was dismissed by BBC editors as “an outlier”, according to one whistleblower. Prof Carl Heneghan: ‘For the whole of 2021 I was virtually ghosted by the BBC’ CREDIT: Talk TV Prof Heneghan says: “For the whole of 2021 I was virtually ghosted by the BBC. I was sometimes booked to go on programmes but then it would be cancelled or I would be told I wasn’t needed. “I was told by some of the people at the BBC that it was supporting lockdowns and editorially it was not deviating from that line. “It got to the point where the BBC was at times just the broadcast arm of the Government, for example the way they reported death figures without giving any context to them.” Meanwhile others with no medical qualifications were being put on the approved list simply because they were on-message. The APPG examined the case of Devi Sridhar, professor of public health at the University of Edinburgh. In June 2021, when the Pfizer vaccine was approved for use in children aged 12 to 15, Prof Sridhar told the children’s current affairs programme Newsround that the Pfizer vaccine was 100 per cent safe for children. The APPG heard that journalists – aware that no medical expert would ever claim that a vaccine is 100 per cent safe – raised the alarm with managers, pointing out that Sridhar is not a virologist, immunologist or expert on vaccination. Esther McVey MP, co-chairman of the APPG and a former TV presenter, says: “I started at the BBC and the whole thing is to get all sides of the argument and get new insights into the situation and be open-minded, not have the story written for you and fit the facts into that. Given the number of hours of coverage that Covid got, the lack of curiosity was outstanding.” The BBC denies that it did not include “a range of voices and views” in its Covid coverage. The broadcasting regulator Ofcom might have been expected to hold the BBC to account by reminding it of its duty of impartiality, but instead BBC journalists believe Ofcom was part of the problem, if not the cause of the BBC’s blinkered approach to Covid. On March 23 2020, the day Boris Johnson announced the first national lockdown, Ofcom issued guidance on “broadcast standards during the coronavirus pandemic” which had a profound and immediate effect on editors, according to multiple sources. It warned of the “significant potential harm” that could be caused by material that was broadcast, including “accuracy or material misleadingness in programmes in relation to the virus or public policy regarding it”. It said any breach arising from “harmful coronavirus-related programming” would be considered “potentially serious” and could result in a statutory sanction. Boris Johnson addressing the nation as he placed the UK on lockdown CREDIT: PA According to the third witness who gave evidence to the APPG, “many previously questioning journalists became scared to present any thought, idea or opinion other than the official government line”. Ofcom, let’s not forget, also sat on the Counter-Disinformation Policy Forum along with the BBC. Graham Stringer MP, co-chairman, with McVey, of the APPG on pandemic response and recovery, said: “Ofcom seems to have fallen short of its remit and we have seen how its coronavirus guidelines acted as a barrier to critical analysis of the Government’s approach to Covid-19 … “Lockdowns, mask mandates and other restrictions were a leap into the unknown. It is shocking that we didn’t have a robust debate about them on national broadcast channels.” A BBC spokeman said: “We totally reject this characterisation of our Covid coverage; we featured a range of voices during the pandemic, including those sceptical of lockdowns, in line with our duty of due impartiality. “We do not recognise this description of our working environment. Like other news organisations the stories we cover are the subject of robust editorial discussion and debate. The BBC attended the Counter Disinformation Policy Forum in an observer-only capacity. The person who attended was not a BBC News executive and played absolutely no role in editorial decision making.” An Ofcom spokesman added: “Our rules do not prohibit the broadcast of content that challenges public health policy and advice concerning Covid-19. Our guidance reminded broadcasters to be mindful of the potential harm that could be caused by misleading claims about the virus. We’ve also been consistently clear that, given the unprecedented restrictions on public freedoms imposed during the pandemic, the right to freedom of expression, including questioning and challenging government advice and policy, was made all the more vital.” As we now know, the first Spring lockdown is estimated to have saved 1,700 lives, according to a landmark study published earlier this week, set against an as-yet unknown number of people who have died of cancer, heart attacks and other illnesses because care was interrupted or unavailable. Not to mention blighted educations, a rise in childhood mental health problems and the enormous cost to the economy. Aitken said: “The Government was panicked into a lockdown and the BBC instantly shut down the debate about whether lockdown was the right approach. There were rational, very well-qualified people who felt lockdown was wrong, and they weren’t given airtime. That is a betrayal of the BBC’s primary purpose, as the gatekeeper of the national debate.” SOURCE: TELEGRAPH https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/10/bbc-state-broadcaster/ Download full article as a PDF

It is all our fault. This is superb... ...by the BBC too.

This morning I had the pleasure of interviewing Carrie Madej. Few have such a 360' view on the pandemic, hydrogels and all that is happening with UN agenda 2030 and the dystopian transhumanism future. The interview is nearly an hour long and is still being cut. Meanwhile, here is a glimpse. WATCH HERE>>> To make sure you don't miss any of the interviews, join the Not On The Beeb newsletter for more stuff the BBC forgot... LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇 The Better Way Conference. Tickets are sold out but virtual tickets allowing lifetime access are still on sale. THE LAST TICKET? This is from an NOTB member One 'in person' ticket for the sold out Better Way Conference (for the full weekend) now available. Please contact litakhazaka@studiolk.co.uk for details. 50+ speakers, including: ● Dr Pierre Kory ● Mattias Desmet ● Andrew Bridgen ● James Corbett ● Vera Sharav ● Dr Jessica Rose ● Prof Norman Fenton ● Dr Tina Peers ● Patrick Holford ● Dan Astin-Gregory ● Derrick Broze ● Dr Zoë Harcombe ● Richard Vobes ● Robin Monotti ● Veronika Kyrylenko ● Clive de Carle ● Dr Paul Marik ● Dr Sarah Myhill ● Deanna McLeod ● Dr Simon Goddek ● Ramiro Romani ● Dr Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse ● Dr Wai Ching Lee ● Rain Trozzi ● Dr Reiner Fuellmich ● Mark Devlin ● Jemma Cooper ● B. Love ● Dr Marc Cohen ● Dr Beverly Rubik ● Kim Witczak ● Dr Dietrich Klinghardt ● Dr Atsuo Yanagisawa ● Laura Aboli ● Dr Carrie Madej ● Dr Sabine Hazan ● David Fleming ● Reggie Littlejohn ● Dr Meryl Nass ● Darren Deojee ● Fahrie Hassan ● Dr Marivic Villa ● Prof Olle Johansson ● Kathleen Burke ● Feisal Mansoor ● William Keyte ● Jan Wellmann ● Dr André Leu ● Dr Jeremy Birnstingl ● Alex Krainer ● Karen-Ruth Skolmli ● Stephanie Locricchio ● Melissa Ciummei ● Daisy Fretwell ● Rory Duff ● Debra Fry ● Dr Ramiz Ahmed-Man ● Emma Sron ● Christof Plothe, DO ● Shabnam Palesa Mohamad ● Dr Mark Trozzi ● Dr Tess Lawrie ● Master of Ceremonies Neil Oliver 🎟 Tickets: BetterWayConference.org LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

by Elhuyar Fundazioa Graphene is a diamagnetic material, this is, unable of becoming magnetic. However, a triangular piece of graphene is predicted to be magnetic. This apparent contradiction is a consequence of "magic" shapes in the structure of graphene flakes, which force electrons to "spin" easier in one direction. Triangulene is a triangular graphene flake, which possesses a net magnetic moment: it is a graphene nanometer-size magnet. This magnetic state opens fascinating perspectives on the use of these pure-carbon magnets in technology. However, the robust predictions of triangulene magnetism stumbled with the absence of clear experimental proofs, because the production of triangulene by organic synthesis methods in solution was difficult. The bi-radical character of this molecule caused it to be very reactive and difficult to fabricate, and the magnetism appears to be very elusive in those few successful cases. In a new study, published in Physical Review Letters, this challenge was revisited using a scanning tunneling microscope (STM). After assembling a triangular-like piece of graphene on a clean gold surface, high-resolution scanning tunneling spectroscopy measurements revealed that this compound has a net magnetic state characterized by a spin S=1 ground state and, therefore, that this molecule is a small, pure carbon paramagnet. These results are the first experimental demonstration of a high-spin graphene flake. The findings were further complemented with atomic manipulation steps of hydrogen-passivated triangulene side-products occasionally found in the experiment. By controlled removal of these additional hydrogen atoms in the experiments, the spin state of the flake could be modified from a closed-shell, doubly hydrogenated structure, to an intermediate S=1/2 spin state, and finally to the high-spin S=1 state of the ideal molecular structure. The experimental proof of a spin-state in the absence of a magnetic quantization axis (detectable by spin-polarized STM) or magnetic anisotropy (detectable by spin-flip inelastic tunneling spectroscopy) is not simple. In this work, the spin signature was obtained from the underscreened Kondo effect—an exotic version of the standard Kondo effect described in the 1960s—that can arise in high-spin systems. Its observation in a graphene flake on a metal has not been reported before and brings here novel insights to understanding spins interacting with surfaces. SOURCE : https://phys.org/news/2020-05-unraveling-magnetism-graphene-triangular-flake.html LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

It has been a sad week as we come to terms with the loss of international freedom fighter and advanced medical practitioner Dr Buttar. Many immediately suggested murder, while others responded with a knee-jerk reaction ‘puppetting’ the indoctrinated phrase calling these claims out as ‘conspiracy’. Could they be right? Of course, and we must remain open-minded. However, I hope everyone pauses for thought when a highly respected doctor feels the need to put the words, "I am of sound mind and not suicidal” on the public record–and then dies. Dr Buttar also made it clear during several recent interviews that he had been poisoned. What could be the motive? Dr Buttar’s work educating respected professionals alongside millions of the public to the true powers of real medicine, was a threat to the pharmaceutical companies. Nothing dents profits more seriously than a competitor with a superior product. Inferior products can outsell a superior product if sufficient resources are thrown at the marketing. The marketing campaign is sealed by controlling the news networks, ‘owning’ the sub-affiliate selling GPs and MDs and stifling all alternative voices. This has been the highly successful modus operandi of big pharma. When the narrative rose exponentially with the onset of the C19 plandemic, a list was drawn up called the Disinformation Dozen. These are from a US perspective, the top twelve most successful influencers contradicting the gov/pharma narrative via the powers of social media. Getting their message out warning of inferior products and educating of cheaper safer alternatives. Effectively, the list is the top twelve people in the USA threatening the narrative and billions in pharma’s profits. Dr Buttar was on this list. When Princess Diana was murdered, the reason was clear to anyone following the news closely as I had been doing. The whole of the British paparazzi seemed to be on the French Riveria snapping Diana and her lover Dodi Fayad on their yacht. I had read a small paragraph two days before, indicating a local nurse, who was touting £25k for an exclusive, was about to spill the beans on something major. I could think of no other story possible than her pregnancy. The abandonment of their holiday and their rush back to England fitted with this theory as a public announcement of an engagement was their only way out. So when someone knocked on my door and said “Di is dead” my reply was simple. “They got her then.” More importantly, just like Dr Buttar, Princess Diana said her life was in danger and predicted her own murder in a car 2 years before she died. It’s only those subject to the Western media that believe the car crash story. travel further afield and everyone from doctors to road cleaners realise the truth. Would the royal family, or those protecting them, let the line to the British throne be tainted by stepbrothers co-joining the Windsors and the infamous Egyptian Fayed family? The timing of Princess Dianna and Dodi’s murder was due to their imminent arrival and probable engagement announcement in the UK. If anyone wonders how an assassination plan could be put into place so quickly, it is believed a previous assassination plan destined for Yassar Arafat that had been archived when he changed his travel plans, was dusted off and used. (If you are interested in finding out more Keith Allen (the father of singer Lilly Allen) has made "Unlawful Killing'. Although I don't agree with all of it, it is the best documentary on Princess Diana's death. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2kOBo33QkA On hearing the rumours of murder, a friend asked the simple question, ‘But, why now?’ Was Dr Buttar's upcoming Advanced Medicine Conference the reason behind the timing of his death? Dr Buttar had lead the team organising the Advanced Medicine Conference that was die to take place this past weekend. A few days after his death earlier last week, they released this announcement. With deepest regret... "...With deepest regret, we are announcing the cancellation of the Advanced Medicine Conference which was scheduled for this Saturday, May 27th thru Monday, May 29th in St. Louis, MO. We understand and have a deep desire to honor Dr. Buttar's legacy, and he would likely want the conference to continue without him, however the family and staff has not yet had time to grieve, prepare funeral arrangements, arrange burial etc. So we feel there is just not adequate time or resources available to do justice to his legacy at this time. We apologize to those of you who have made plans to attend in person or virtually.  If you have purchased admission to the conference, it will be refunded to you in the next 24-48 hours. We appreciate your patience and understanding with this unfortunate situation..." Dr Buttar 0n Dr Ardis's podcast - 8th May In this interview Dr Buttar discusses the history of the Advanced Medical Conference and his previous poisoning. This video was posted on the 8th May This interview of Dr Buttar by Dr Ardis is an important watch to get an overview of the Advanced Medicine Conference and the general impact it had.. This is the description of the interview. "...Dr. Ardis interviews a hero, not only for the last three years through this pandemic, but one who has extended many, many lives and given hope to people all over the world, Dr. Rashid Buttar. God has given Dr. Buttar the gift of healing and you will learn about natural alternative therapies for treating and preventing cancer. Dr. Buttar discusses his 5th annual Advanced Medicine Conference in Kanas City, MO on Memorial Day weekend. Dr. Ardis and many others will be presenting incredible, life-saving information...." Dr Buttar warns CNN host that post jab, he might have a ticking time bomb inside him. Dr Buttar's last tweet Dr Buttar was discussing releasing pre-conference talks for his 5th Advanced Medicine Conference this coming weekend. He was looking to the future. He mentions his views on the possibility of other life forms within our other planets & galaxies. He shares exciting news 27mins in on Regenerative Agriculture progress and an exciting shift in humankind. He ends the message with "See you on the other side!" Please leave your comments under this post

It's clearly time to limit Big Pharma and save the planet! 😊 Big Pharma Emits More Greenhouse Gases Than The Automotive Industry by Jack Marley Rarely does mention of the pharmaceutical industry conjure up images of smoke stacks, pollution and environmental damage. Yet our recent study found the global pharmaceutical industry is not only a significant contributor to global warming, but it is also dirtier than the global automotive production sector. It was a surprise to find how little attention researchers have paid to the industry’s greenhouse gas emissions. Only two other studies had some relevance: one looked at the environmental impact of the U.S. health-care system and the other at the pollution (mostly water) discharged by drug manufacturers. Our study was the first to assess the carbon footprint of the pharma sector.. More polluting More than 200 companies represent the global pharmaceutical market, yet only 25 consistently reported their direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions in the past five years. Of those, only 15 reported their emissions since 2012. One immediate and striking result is that the pharmaceutical sector is far from green. We assessed the sector’s emissions for each one million dollars of revenue in 2015. Larger businesses will always generate more emissions than smaller ones; in order to do a fair comparison, we evaluated emissions intensity. We found it was 48.55 tonnes of CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) per million dollars. That’s about 55 per cent greater than the automotive sector at 31.4 tonnes of CO2e/$M for that same year. We restricted our analysis to the direct emissions generated by the companies’ operations and to the indirect emissions generated by the electricity purchased by these companies from their respective utilities companies. The total global emissions of the pharma sector amounts to about 52 megatonnes of CO2e in 2015, more than the 46.4 megatonnes of CO2e generated by the automotive sector in the same year. The value of the pharma market, however, is smaller than the automotive market. By our calculations, the pharma market is 28 per cent smaller yet 13 per cent more polluting than the automotive sector. Extreme variability We also found emissions intensity varied greatly within the pharmaceutical sector. For example, the emissions intensity of Eli Lilly (77.3 tonnes of CO2e/$M) was 5.5 times greater than Roche (14 tonnes CO2e/$M) in 2015, and Procter & Gamble’s CO2 emissions were five times greater than Johnson & Johnson even though the two companies generated the same level of revenues and sell similar lines of products. We found outliers too. The German company Bayer AG reported emissions of 9.7 megatonnes of CO2e and revenues of US$51.4 billion, yielding an emission intensity of 189 tonnes CO2e/$M. This intensity level is more than four times greater than the overall pharmaceutical sector. In trying to explain this incredibly large deviation, we found that Bayer’s revenues derive from pharmaceutical products, medical equipment and agricultural commodities. While Bayer reports its financial revenues separately for each division, it lumps together the emissions from all the divisions. The company also reports and tracks its emission intensity in terms of tonnes of CO2e produced for each tonne of manufactured goods, whether fertilizer or Aspirin, for example. This level of opacity makes it not only impossible to assess the true environmental performance of these kind of companies. It also raises questions about the sincerity of these companies’ strategies and actions in reducing their contribution to climate change. Climate compliance We also estimated how much the pharmaceutical sector would have to reduce its emissions to comply with the reduction targets in the Paris Agreement. We found that by 2025, the overall pharma sector would need to reduce its emissions intensity by about 59 per cent from 2015 levels. While this is clearly a far cry from their current levels, it is interesting to note that some of the 15 largest companies are already operating at that level, namely Amgen Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Roche Holding AG. If those performance levels are achievable by some, why can’t they be achieved by all? These three leading companies are also the ones with the highest level of profitability and revenue growth in the whole sector. Indeed Roche, Johnson & Johnson and Amgen showed revenue increases of 27.2 per cent, 25.7 per cent and 7.8 per cent respectively between 2012 and 2015, while managing to reduce their emissions by 18.7 per cent, 8.3 per cent and eight per cent respectively. This supports the premise that environmental and financial performance aren’t mutually exclusive. The pharmaceutical industry is responsible for some serious environmental impacts beyond greenhouse gas emissions. For example, the waste water from drug manufacturers in Patancheru, India has left river sediment, ground water and drinking water polluted. Researchers estimated that in a single day, 44 kilograms of ciprofloxacin, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, was released — enough to treat everyone in a city of 44,000 inhabitants. Clearly, there is a dire need for more extensive and sustained research as well as more scrutiny of the pharmaceutical industry’s environmental practices and performance. Healing people is no justification for killing the planet. This article was first published here Published: May 27, 2019 Please leave your thoughts and comments below this article. 👇👇👇

This paper is a smoking gun. We first published this on 8th July 2021 I am re-publishing this again in late May 2023, and copy-pasting more of the key information from the study to make the points on Graphen Toxicity clearer, It's not a short read. As you read, check the toxicity and compare to the symptoms to the Pandemic. QUOTE: "...Graphene and its derivatives are heralded as “miracle” materials with manifold applications in different sectors of society from electronics to energy storage to medicine. The increasing exploitation of graphene-based materials (GBMs) necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of the potential impact of these materials on human health and the environment. Here, we discuss synthesis and characterization of GBMs as well as human and environmental hazard assessment of GBMs using in vitro and in vivo model systems with the aim to understand the properties that underlie the biological effects of these materials; not all GBMs are alike, and it is essential that we disentangle the structure–activity relationships for this class of materials..." https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.8b04758# Graphene Oxide flakes 2023 COPY-PASTE ADDITIONS LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

A new paper was released via the WCH a few days ago. The press release and links are below. Interestingly, the paper points out the similarities between Long Covid and Vaccine Injury. Within the paper's conclusion/discussion, they admit the study is based around the concept of 'the spike protein' being the issue. This leaves the possibility of toxins like graphene oxide and EMFs being responsible for the conditions we have witnessed out in the open. Spike proteins Graphene's atomic structure enabling atom-thick 'sheets' or 'flakes' SPIKE PROTEIN OR GRAPHENE? IS THIS IMPORTANT? Understanding the cause of a symptom is crucial in the same way that someone tackling a fire needs to know the fire's cause. Not all fires are the same. Water can extinguish a wood fire yet can be catastrophic if used to try and quell a chip pan fire. Hence fires have multiple 'cures' depending on their source, as shown in the diagram below. NEW PAPER: Strategies for the Management of Spike Protein-Related Pathology Abstract "...In the wake of the COVID-19 crisis, a need has arisen to prevent and treat two related conditions, COVID-19 vaccine injury and long COVID-19, both of which can trace at least part of their aetiology to the spike protein, which can cause harm through several mechanisms. One significant mechanism of harm is vascular, and it is mediated by the spike protein, a common element of the COVID-19 illness, and it is related to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Given the significant number of people experiencing these two related conditions, it is imperative to develop treatment protocols, as well as to consider the diversity of people experiencing long COVID-19 and vaccine injury. This review summarizes the known treatment options for long COVID-19 and vaccine injury, their mechanisms, and their evidentiary basis..." This is the paper's discussion/conclusion "...The amelioration of symptoms and recovery of large numbers of people worldwide from both long COVID and post-vaccine syndrome and injury requires the use of non-invasive, integrative therapies that can be scaled and administered in a decentralized fashion. It is important to disseminate this knowledge to the lay public so that they can mitigate their individual risks and those of their loved ones. While it is difficult to enumerate the true scale of post-vaccination or post-COVID clotting disorders, there has been an appreciable rise in cardiac incidents [29], strokes (inter-cerebral hemorrhages [338]), and non-COVID excess mortality [339,340]. A significant increase in total mortality due to a vaccine is not unprecedented, as the DTP vaccine administered in Guineau-Bissau in the 1980s increased child mortality by four times compared to unvaccinated mortality [341]. While the magnitude of the impact of both long COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 Vaccine Syndrome or injury is unclear, it is important to prepare for the potential consequences by having information ready for dissemination, as well as to perform research on promising therapeutics to relieve the damage caused by spike protein and other potential mechanisms of harm, such as DNA integration [342]. One limitation of this study is that it focuses on spike-protein related pathology and can leave out other possibilities, such as allergies to vaccine components, or other disease etiologies. (NOTE: Or the possibility of graphene oxide poisoning) Long COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome are multifaceted disorders, with highly varied manifestations; as such, the development of objective diagnostics is important in treating patients. The therapies discussed in this review have a varying evidentiary basis and may serve as starting points for the development of therapies to relieve spike protein-related pathologies in the coming years. Further research requires validating the treatments outlined in this review by randomized control trial (RCT), observational studies, and laboratory studies of biological mechanism. Furthermore, integration of the current research on spike-protein related disorders is helpful. One possibility is the application of systems biology tools to describe the perturbations to different biological pathways influenced by the spike protein. When such a model exists, it is possible to treat the acute manifestations of the disease while still clearing spike protein from the body. Governments and national health services are beginning to come to terms with the sheer magnitude of the task in front of them. This review outlines some of the most promising therapies from an evidentiary and biological mechanistic perspective. We hope that this article be used in the construction of treatment protocols to treat these highly related conditions in their many disease manifestations, prioritizing not only safety and efficacy, but cost and availability to large numbers of people..." WCH PRESS RELEASE New Peer-Reviewed Study Outlines Promising Therapies for Treating Long Covid and C-19 Vaccine Injury An international team of physicians and scientists recently completed the first peer-reviewed research into the available options for treating long Covid and C-19 vaccine injury that will lay the groundwork for a better understanding and potential future treatments for the two conditions. The study was published this week in the MDPI journal, Microorganisms. “We are proud to partner with the World Council for Health on this important paper that I hope is the beginning of more research into these poorly understood conditions,” said Paul Marik, M.D., a co-author of the study and the chief scientific officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. “I’m thankful to my colleagues who treat patients suffering from long Covid or vaccine injury every day. In most cases, these patients have nowhere else to go. This research should educate others on the reality of these conditions and how they can be treated.” “People who are suffering from long Covid or have been harmed by the Covid vaccines are often ignored or have been abandoned by the medical establishment,” said Tess Lawrie, MBBCh, Ph.D.​, a co-author of the study & co-founder of the World Council for Health. “This research shows that there is clear scientific evidence that both long Covid and the Covid vaccines are responsible for spike protein-induced conditions that will require a significant investment of resources before we fully understand these conditions and how to treat them most effectively.” “I am proud of this great research facilitated by our WCH Health and Science Committee,” Lawrie added. "In addition to Dr Marik, I want to express my sincere gratitude to the paper’s lead author, Matthew Halma and co-author, Christof Plothe.” Press release: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/news-releases/treating-long-covid/ LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS UNDER THIS POST 👇👇👇

The news of Dr Buttar's death has sent a wave of shock around the world and naturally, people are asking questions. How can a middle-aged healthy doctor in the prime of his wisdom - a teacher of cutting-edge healing who has saved or improved the lives of many, if not millions - die so suddenly? I have thought about this over the last 24 hrs. With deep respect for the grieving family (see their announcement here) who will be devastated, bewildered and in shock, should be silent? Or, on the other hand as brothers in arms, is not our duty to ask the most important questions? Dr Buttar was one of the Disinformation Dozen, a group of twelve individuals identified as responsible for up to 65% of all anti-vaccine content circulating on social media platforms. The 'Disinformation Dozen' is a blacklist, or hitlist, made public. Those on this list have released critical alternative information skirting the near-strangle grip of the pharma-industrial complex, threatening not only billions in profits, but the humanicidal plans of a tiny minority of superrich madmen. Dr Buttar was not silent about his suspicions regarding the cause behind his recent health issues (see video below), so nor should we. As Dr Buttar said himself: Most intelligent people know that everything is not as it appears! Now, more than ever before, knowing the truth determines if you live or die. Dr Buttar Dr Rashid A Buttar 1966 - 2023 Dr Buttar explains his poisoning after CNN interview in 17th May 2023 interview. Here is the clip of @DrButtar on @LauraLynnTT just a few days ago. He said he had been poisoned by a ratio of 200x of what was in the jab only a few months ago. See Dr Buttar describe his poisoning here. https://rumble.com/embed/v2jzhwa/?pub=4 DR BUTTAR ATTACKED ON CNN Dr Buttar's words will go down in history in this hit piece 20th October 2021 This CNN'hit job will forever remain as evidence of the lies and corruption in this attempt to lose his licence. Dr Buttar - a true hero. WHO ARE THE DISINFORMATION DOZEN? Disinformation Dozen" refers to a group of twelve individuals identified by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a UK/US non-profit organization, in a report published in March 2021. The CCDH claimed these twelve individuals were responsible for up to 65% of all anti-vaccine content circulating on social media platforms, focusing mainly on the COVID-19 vaccine. U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy stated: "Misinformation takes away our freedom to make informed decisions about our health and the health of our loved ones during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health misinformation has led people to resist wearing masks in high-risk settings. It's led them to turn down proven treatments and to choose not to get vaccinated." Imran Ahmed, CEO of CCDH, said: "The 'Disinformation Dozen' are serial offenders. Their posts contain false claims that violate the policies of social media platforms, yet they remain. It is clear that self-regulation is not working." U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar commented: "We need a long-term, whole-of-society strategy to counter the flood of dangerous and misleading information that is pouring into and out of our social media ecosystem." The "Disinformation Dozen" are... (These descriptions were taken via AI searches hence the angle) This list is US-centric missing many key medical activists. The factor here seems to the nominess success at getting information over to the public. It is notable that Del Big Tree, The Highwire TV programme. Polly Tommy and Dr Angdrew Wakefield (now living in the US) who are behind the wonderful film VAXXED are not on is list. Something we all should strive for! :) 1- Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: An attorney, author, and prominent anti-vaccine activist. He's the founder of Children's Health Defense, an organization that has been accused of spreading vaccine misinformation. NOTB RATING RFK is Superb. A lawyer converted from environmental mercury poisoning to the associated mercury and aluminium poisoning via childhood vaccine by a worried parent. Behind the times on the Climate change scam but a new leader of the vaccine-damage awareness movement only equal to Del Bigtree of the Highwire A future US president in the running. Runs the superb Children's Health Defence. A trusted source of childhood vaccine information Is this Kennedy now on a new assassination list? 2 - Joseph Mercola: A physician and alternative medicine proponent. He runs a popular website where he shares health-related content, including controversial views on vaccination. NOTB RATING Mercola is maybe the best all-around source for general medical information. A multi-millionaire via his supplement products. Partner of Erin AKA Health Nut News. Mercola is a trusted source of health information 3 - The Bollingers: Ty and his wife, Charlene, run The Truth About Cancer and The Truth About Vaccines, both platforms used to share alternative views on these topics. NOTB RATING. The Bollingers are a normal couple thrust into the limelight via their go-to source of collated information on the big 'C' via their Truth On Cancer video series. Know anyone that has cancer and needs all the cutting-edge information as quickly as possible? Send them here. 4 - Sherri Tenpenny: An osteopathic physician. A prolific author and speaker known for her controversial stance on vaccines. NOTB RATING: A fearless outspoken Doctor-warrior. There are very few of these. 5 - Rizza Islam: An author and activist, he often shares controversial views on vaccines, especially in relation to the African American community. NOTB RATING: Off my radar previously. See his twitter post regarding Dr Buttar's death below 6 - Rashid Buttar: An osteopathic physician known for spreading controversial theories about vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic. NOTB RATING: See our previous post announcing his death 7 - Erin Elizabeth: A health blogger and partner to Joseph Mercola, she shares similar views about vaccines on her platform. NOTB RATING: Partner of Mercola famous for highlighting the spree of suspicious doctor deaths in the USA. Had made factual mistakes in the past, but well worth keeping on the radar. 8 - Sayer Ji: Founder of the website GreenMedInfo, where he shares alternative views on health, including controversial opinions on vaccines. NOTB RATING: Got to source for all the medical papers regarding supplemements, herbs and non-pharma remedies. Outstanding work. Sayer Ji is greatly under-recognised, probably due to the lack of monetisation of his work and entailing restriction of marketing resources. 9 - Kelly Brogan: A psychiatrist, she promotes alternative health views and has shared controversial opinions on vaccines. NOTB RATING: Unqualified to comment 10 - Christiane Northrup: An OB/GYN, she uses her platform to share alternative health views, including controversial opinions about vaccines. NOTB RATING: Unqualified to comment 11 - Ben Tapper: A chiropractor who has used his platform to share controversial views on vaccines. NOTB RATING: Unqualified to comment 12 - Kevin Jenkins: The CEO of the Urban Global Health Alliance, he uses his platform to share controversial views on vaccines. NOTB RATING: Unqualified to comment SOURCES: The CCDH's report: "The Disinformation Dozen" https://252f2edd-1c8b-49f5-9bb2-cb57bb47e4ba.filesusr.com/ugd/f4d9b9_b7cedc0553604a948726 Rizz Islam on the Dr Butta's deaths and the “Disinformation Dozen” "...BREAKING - One of the Whitehouse listed members of the “Disinformation Dozen” Dr. Rashid Buttar has passed at the age of 57. As one of the 12 myself, I am truly saddened by this news. Brother Buttar was uncompromising and this was my most appreciated trait of his. As we were exposing the lies of Covid-19 that were foisted upon the masses the Black community only had a few voices representing us on this level. @LouisFarrakhan @DrButtar and a few more. His work is powerful and helped many! Never be reasonable with this system! I pray his family receives proper comfort. P.S. I am thankful he expressed this as a poisoning. The people must understand how real this is and brother Buttar more than a medical professional as a VETERAN KNEW just how serious this enemy is. His energy will live on and we all should continue his work of standing for the people. May Allah be pleased..." @unhealthytruth #IntellectualXtremist#DrButtar#DisInformationDozen Erin Healthnut updates her list to include Dr Buttar Dr Buttar's recent live Video on Twitter Advanced Medicine: https://www.advancedmedicine.com/site/ Advanced medicine conference.: https://advancedmedicineconference.com/ SOURCE: https://drbuttar.info/ Please feel free to add your messages in the comments

On Saturday there was a protest for the C19 vaccine injured at Trafalgar Square. The protest was headlined by Dr Mike Yeadon, MP Andrew Brigden, UB40's Matt Hoy and Patrick Henningsen from the UK column. It was poorly attended with just 300-500 people. Was this due to protest fatigue? Are people resigned, feeling it's too late for the injured? Poor marketing? (Probably caused by point 4) Division within the UK freedom movement meaning a majority of the injured and a good majority of the freedom movement leaders would attend or back this particular protest? Dr Mike Yeadon started his first protest speech on Saturday at the Trafalgar Square rally for those injured by the c19 vaccine with softly spoken words, before his frustrations lead him to rise in tone delivering the best speech of the day. Although, as Mike admits, he is newly awakened, it was impressive to hear him mention that he no longer believes C19 was a respiratory disease with classic modes of 'infection'. "...I started in 2020 believing that viruses transmitted disease from one person to another - I no longer believe that.." He doesn't mention what he now believes. He does not mention the use of electromagnetic frequencies. But this is a huge step. But for now, three cheers for Dr Yeadon as he tracks his path from his awakening from a 'normie' in 2020 to his realisations today - a must-watch. Scroll down under the video for some more of the images I took... Please leave your comments under this article. See on youtube here: https://youtu.be/U8c7tRZh96Y Images of a tiny proportion of the vaccine injured. Poor turn out Tess Lawrie See the last vaccine injury date here

With great sadness, we have news of the loss of one of the world's top freedom-fighting Doctors. "...The Buttar Family is deeply saddened to announce the passing of Rashid A. Buttar, D.O. Dr. Buttar passed away on May 18th, 2023, at his home, while spending time with his family. Dr. Buttar attended Washington University and graduated with a double major in Biology and Theology. He then went on to earn a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine degree from the University of Osteopathic Medicine and Health Sciences in Des Moines, Iowa. Dr. Buttar was a retired Major in the US Army. He served with the 5th Special Forces group and the 101st Airborne Division. He is survived by his three loving children, Sara, (30) Abie, (24) and Rahan (18). Service arrangements have not yet been made. The family intends to have a private service. The family requests privacy at this time and appreciates your continued support and prayers..." Dr Rashid A Buttar 1966 - 2023 "...Most intelligent people know that everything is not as it appears! Truth will never be suppressed and as the light begins to illuminate the truth, the world will see the facts as they truly are, regardless of the deceptions being espoused by the world’s governments and the mainstream media. Now, more than ever before, knowing the truth determines if you live or die! As a result, this particular time in human history becomes an incredibly important and exciting time to be alive...." Dr Buttar Cause of death? We have no news of the reason behind Dr Buttar's passing, but anyone awake to the work of such freedom fighters will know full well the associated perils of making a stand against the tyranny and corruption of big pharma. Here is a list of over 100. more ground-breaking doctors who suffered suspicious deaths. https://healthnutnews.com/Recap/ UPDATE - Was Dr Buttar Murdered? For our latest post on this death and murder suspicions. please see here TRIBUTE May peace be with you Dr Buttar. Thank you for all your work. The fight for the truth, medical freedom and the continuation of the natural beauty of humankind free from transhumanism will continue, all the more stronger for all that you did. Please leave your comments, thoughts and condolences under this article. No sign-up needed. Not On The Beeb is archived by the National British Library, so your comments and tributes to the great man will be etched into time. Dr Buttar's 17th May live Video on Twitter Cuttings from Dr Buttar's website: https://drbuttar.info/ Who Is Dr Buttar? “Dr. Rashid A. Buttar became an Eagle Scout at the age of 14, becoming the youngest person in the US to get his Eagle in 1980. He then graduated from high school at age 17 and received his undergraduate degree from Washington University in St. Louis. While at Washington University, Dr. Buttar was on a full academic ROTC scholarship and played football as linebacker and defensive end for the WashU Bears. After graduating with a double major in Biology and Theology at age 21, Dr. Buttar attended medical school at the University of Osteopathic Medicine and Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine and Surgery in Des Moines, Iowa, graduating with his medical degree at the age of 25. Dr. Buttar did a rotational internship with an emphasis in General Surgery in Houston, Texas and then later trained in General Surgery at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio, Texas. While serving in the US Army, Dr. Buttar also served as Brigade Surgeon for 2nd Infantry Division stationed in the Republic of South Korea, and later as Chief of the Department of Emergency Medicine at Moncrief Army Community Hospital at Ft. Jackson in Columbia, South Carolina while serving in the US Army. Dr Buttar's Training! Dr. Buttar made the list for promotion to Major in the US Army at the age of 28, becoming the youngest person to make the list for the rank of Major that year in the US Army just prior to finishing his service in the Armed Forces. During his military career, Dr. Buttar had the privilege of serving with and/or being attached to the 2nd Infantry Division, the 101stAir Assault Division and the 5th Special Forces Group. Dr. Buttar is board certified and a Diplomate in Clinical Metal Toxicology and Preventive Medicine, is board eligible in Emergency Medicine and has achieved fellowship status in three separate medical organizations (Fellow of the American College for Advancement in Medicine, Fellow of the American Academy of Preventive Medicine, and Fellow of the American Association of Integrative Medicine). Dr. Buttar now serves as the Medical Director for the Centers for Advanced Medicine. The Centers are located in NC and CA, specializing in the treatment and needs of patients refractory to conventional treatments who have failed the standard approach to their disease process. With a special emphasis on the inter-relationship between environmental toxicity and the insidious disease processes and the “dis-regulation” of the immune system, Dr. Buttar and the Centers have attracted patients from over 90 different countries suffering from autism, cancer, heart disease, stroke and many other conditions too numerous to list. Dr Buttar's Accomplishments Dr. Buttar also served in the past as Visiting Scientist as well as Nutritional Scientist at North Carolina State University and actively taught for well over 20 years as faculty for mainstream medical courses such as Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses for physicians through the American College of Surgeons as well as the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) courses for physicians, nurses and emergency response personnel. In addition, Dr. Buttar served as faculty for the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) courses for over 15 years. Dr. Buttar’s first book, “The 9 Steps to Keep the Doctor Away” released in 2010 became a Wall Street Journal, USA Today and Amazon.com best seller and has since, become an international best seller, now translated into multiple languages. In 2019, Dr. Buttar initiated the Advanced Medicine Conference to allow physicians, researchers and scientists on the cutting edge of medicine to have a platform from which they could introduce their findings to the world. In 2023, the 5th Annual Advanced Medicine Conference will be held. Advanced Medicine: https://www.advancedmedicine.com/site/ Advanced medicine conference.: https://advancedmedicineconference.com/ SOURCE: https://drbuttar.info/ Please leave your comments, thoughts and condolences under this article. No sign-up needed. Not On The Beeb is archived by the National British Library, so your comments and tributes to the great man will be etched into time. TWITTER - NOTB https://twitter.com/NotOnTheBeeb/status/1659861451270414339? TELEGRAM - NOTB https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb/9304 MESSAGES OF CONDOLENCE Thank you for letting us know of Dr Buttar! This is truly tragic and sinister! His good thoughts and works will live on and I send condolences to his family. RIP lovely soul. 💜💜 Theresa I am so shocked, upset and saddened to learn of the terrible news of the passing of one of the earliest and most courageous fighters against the Covid lies Dr Rashid Buttar. Dr Buttar was an inspiration to all who heard his message across the world. My deepest condolences go out to all of his family, friends and all who knew him. The world has lost a most needed hero at this time in history who will be most sorely missed. Rest in peace dear Dr Rashid Buttar, may the lord God bless you always. Nora Really shocked and sad to hear that Dr Buttar has passed away. I stopped watching him quite a while ago but he was one of the doctors that I liked listening to during the last three years. I feel everyone who spoke up showed no fear or at least had great courage and have been like a beacon of light for those of us who somehow escaped the spell that has hypnotised much of the world’s population. Catherine So sad. Why do the good for young. TOP Dr Butter and sincere condolences to his family. I hope the cause of death will be investigated. Wilma My greatest respect and thoughts go to Dr Buttar's family and survivors. Dr Buttar has taught me so much, and I respected him immensely – honour his memory Cliff Yep, very suspicious as the good man didn't have any major health problems. In fact, he was very healthy!!! You guys are spot on... someone killed him!!! Wilma Thank you for sharing this deeply saddening news 💙 I have been following Rashid's work for many years, such a brave soul whom has stood up time and time again to warn about the medical mafia in the face of adversity. Risking it all. I guess they finished him off to shut him up for good! This sad news will kick up a storm by the truthers around the world! I hope! Leah God bless dr butter only god knows why he had to return so early he will never be forgotten in our hearts he built a temple Anon I am shocked and my heart hurts as I am sure his family must be...he was the 1st person who gave me hope when this plandemic started by speaking the truth. The truth was unpalatable of course but I am aware its was possibly more unpalatable to those who created this global mess. Anon To, Sara,Abie and Rahan, I am deeply saddened by the news of your father's sudden demise. May his soul rest in peace. May the Divine Providence give you and all other family members the strength and courage to bear this loss. Your father was a gem of a person. He started spreading the truth when hardly anyone dared to. This is a loss for the entire human race. Please accept my heartfelt condolences. Anon This doctor was responsible for making me see the world through a different lens. He was a wonderful human being and family man. My abiding memory of Dr Buttar is him saying that he’d ”rather take a bullet than the ‘C vaccine’. That is exactly the way I feel. This legend, I have no doubt, was the victim of foul play. Anon How tragic and heartbreaking to learn of this. No doubt evil play at work. L What sad news , my Heart and Thoughts go to Dr. Rashid A Buttar 's family . May he rest in Peace knowing he did his best for humankind , against such bitter odds . May his family take strength in knowing he was an Honourable Brave Man .Bless 🙏 Anon Sending much love to Dr Buttars family. He was a huge source of knowledge , truth & comfort over the last few years. He was a great man & will be truly missed x Anon Please feel free to add your message of condolence in the comments below.

Vax Injury Test Case Class Action Covid UK is now inviting those who have been harmed by any of the Covid vaccines to contact us at: hello@cacuk.uk Please let people know about this. We can only consider cases in England or Wales currently. Claimants should email us with the following details: 1. Date of vaccination/s (include a copy of your vaccination record, if you have it) 2. Details of your injury and when the symptoms started 3. What medical attention you’ve received and whether the cause is confirmed 4. How your injury has impacted your life/ lifestyle 5. Your name, age and a telephone number for us to contact you. A test case is a single case where the outcome would have significance not only for the person bringing it, but for many others too. It tests an area of law to get clarity and establish legal rights or principles. Please note that we will try to contact everyone, but we will of seeking to identify one case that will be most likely to win and set a precedent for everyone else, so please know that while we’re sympathetic to everyone who is suffering, we will need to be selective when deciding which case to proceed with. See more: https://cacuk.uk/green-light-for-vax-injury-test-case/ Telegram: t.me/CACUKsupport Website: https://cacuk.uk/ Subscribe: https://cacuk.uk/join-us

Dear Prime Minister, I am the Chairman of the Board of the UK Council for Psychotherapy (UKCP), one of the UK's foremost psychological governing bodies. However, I write this open letter in my own capacity. I believe I have a professional obligation to write to you in an attempt to protect the public from any further harm caused by the unethical application of psychological research and practice. I unreservedly condemn the UK Government's use of unethical psychological techniques intended to elicit feelings of fear, shame and guilt, under the guise of behavioural science / insights which were designed to change the public's behaviour without their knowledge and conscious participation. It is now clear that in 2020 the UK Government deliberately chose to artificially inflate the level of fear within the UK population by exaggerating the risk factors of Covid19, and concomitantly downplaying the protective factors. We also witnessed the Government's promotion of social disapproval and guilt messaging. These techniques were embedded into a multi-channel, co-ordinated public health campaign designed to change the public's behaviour without their knowledge. Moreover, in tandem with the mainstream media, the Government also proactively suppressed, censored, and ostracised any healthcare professional or scientist who suggested alternative responses to Covid19, or who simply questioned the messaging and measures being implemented by the Government. Evidence of the recommendation of using unethical psychological techniques to gain behavioural change The Government document titled 'Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures' (Gov.uk, 2020) was written for the Government by the Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours (SPI-B) which is a subgroup of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). The premise of the document was to provide options for changing the behaviour of the UK public without their knowledge. A passage within this document states: "A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened". It makes certain recommendations including: "The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard hitting emotional messaging". "Coercion" "Social disapproval". (Gov.uk, 2020) The recommendations made by SPI-B included ones intended to elicit feelings of fear, shame and guilt. Psychological practitioners know that deliberately trying to frighten someone into change with erroneous or exaggerated information can easily cause long-term psychological damage. We also know that using social disapproval can create splits and divisions within society, and that inducing feelings of guilt can elevate the risk of suicide. SPI-B also included a simple risk assessment matrix which acknowledges that the 'spill over effects' of using media to increase the sense of personal threat and of using social disapproval 'could be negative'. There is also a statement demonstrating there was a conversation regarding the spill over effects, although this does not appear to be fully documented. The risk factors and ethics of using fear, shame, guilt, and coercion would almost certainly have been known to the members of SPI-B because several members were British Psychological Society (BPS) registered chartered psychologists. In an interview with one of the members of SPI-B, BPS registered educational psychologist Dr Gavin Morgan, he refers to the use of fear by his SPI-B colleagues and says: 'Clearly using fear as a means of control is not ethical. What you do as a psychologist is co-construction. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It's not an ethical stance for any modern government… Was it unethical to use fear, I asked? Well I didn't suggest we use fear' But your colleagues did. What do you think of that? He paused. 'Oh God'. 'Another reluctant pause. It's not ethical,' he said (Dodsworth, 2021, pp. 262,263). Like Dr Morgan, any BPS registered psychologists within SPI-B would or should have recognised that recommending the Government uses fear as a means of controlling the public breached their professional code of ethics and conduct. An urgent investigation is required both by the UK Government and the BPS. Two specific points of The British Psychological Society Code of Ethics and Conduct (2021) that may have been broken are (with my underlining): 3.3 Responsibility. Because of their acknowledged expertise, members of the Society often enjoy professional autonomy; responsibility is an essential element of autonomy. Members must accept appropriate responsibility for what is within their power, control or management. Awareness of responsibility ensures that the trust of others is not abused, the power of influence is properly managed and that duty towards others is always paramount. Statement of values: Members value their responsibilities to persons and peoples, to the general public, and to the profession and science of psychology, including the avoidance of harm and the prevention of misuse or abuse of their contribution to society. In applying these values, psychologists should consider: Professional accountability; Responsible use of their knowledge and skills; Respect for the welfare of humans, non-humans and the living world; Potentially competing duties. 3.4 Integrity. Acting with integrity includes being honest, truthful, accurate and consistent in one's actions, words, decisions, methods and outcomes. It requires setting self-interest to one side and being objective and open to challenge in one's behaviour in a professional context. Statement of values: Members value honesty, probity, accuracy, clarity and fairness in their interactions with all persons and peoples, and seek to promote integrity in all facets of their scientific and professional endeavours". Share Evidence that psychological techniques to induce fear, shame, guilt and coercion were used on the UK public The SPI-B document in question (Gov.uk, 2020) demonstrates that the options of eliciting feelings of fear, shame, guilt and the use of coercion was recommended to the UK Government. There is evidence that those options were indeed subsequently deployed on the UK population. In August 2022, you stated: "In every brief, we tried to say: let's stop the fear narrative'. It was always wrong from the beginning. I constantly said it was wrong... It was wrong to scare people like that". (Sunak, R as quoted in The Spectator, 2022). Additionally, leaked WhatsApp messages from the former Health Minister at the time, Matt Hancock, published in The Daily Telegraph in March 2023, confirm that fear and guilt were used: "Hancock: We frighten the pants of everyone with the new strain. But the complications with that Brexit is taking the top line Poole: Yep that's what will get proper bahviour (sic) change Hancock:When do we deploy the new variant" And, "Case: Ramping up messaging - the fear /guilt factor vital" (The Daily Telegraph, 2023a) The above are just two examples where senior Government Ministers recognised that fear and guilt was used as drivers for behavioural change of the UK population without their knowledge. The existing literature It is important to acknowledge that the above-mentioned psychological techniques were used on the UK population without their knowledge or consent, and that this in direct contradiction of long-established and carefully considered behavioural science advice which made clear that, in theory and practice, the consent of the public is paramount. "The use of MINDSPACE (or other 'nudge' type policy tools) may require careful handling - in essence, the public need to give permission and help shape how such tools are used". (Institute of Government, 2010, p. 10) Continuing, the report states: "Policy-makers wishing to use these tools summarised in MINDSPACE need the approval of the public to do so". (Institute of Government, 2010, p. 74) Further literature supports that permission from the public is essential: "If there is one great risk to the application of behavioural insights in policy, it is that the thread of public permission wears too thin. If governments, or indeed communities or companies, wish to use behavioural insights, they must seek and maintain the permission of the public to do so" (Halpern, 2015, p. 365). As there was no approval obtained, the options recommended and deployed were not in alignment with the principles of behavioural science. It is important to highlight that the same kinds of techniques were used on children in relation to mask wearing, social distancing and vaccine uptake, with many techniques continuing into 2022. These techniques violated UNICEF's (2021) recommendations from their ethical tool- kit for behavioural science projects directed at children. The tool-kit states: "A core idea underlying the applied behavioural science approach is that interventions should not restrict choice and should transparently communicate project goals. When designing an intervention, practitioners should determine how transparent it will be to those affected by it. They should ensure that children and parents can easily opt out, and should design feedback mechanisms so that children and their parents can voice concerns, see the outcomes of their objections, and hold decision-makers to account". (UNICEF, 2021) The behavioural science literature also indicates a potential link between the misuse of behavioural psychology and an increased risk of suicide, stemming from an All Party Parliamentary Group Report on the Morse Review into the Loan Charge in 2020. One of the recommendations within the report demands: "An independent assessment and a suspension of HMRC's use of behavioural psychology/behavioural insights, in light of the ongoing suicide risk to those impacted by the Loan Charge". (Loan Charge All-Party Parliamentary Group, 2020) The literature highlights that approval from the public must be sought and maintained. Additionally, all behavioural science projects directed at children must have effective feedback mechanisms and methods of opting out, with decision makers able to be held accountable. There are also existing potential concerns that behavioural science may increase suicide levels. These important ethical aspects and safety signals appear to have been ignored. The lessons of history warn us that in times of existential crisis, whether real or only perceived, our ethics are at risk of being abandoned, and psychological knowledge can become misused by governments: "Under some historical conditions or circumstances and contexts, psychologists and psychological knowledge were in danger of being abused by political powers, largely for clandestine purposes, such as conducting torture or the persecution of political opponents." (Maercker A, Guski-Leinwand S, 2018) It is of grave concern that the actions of the UK Government during the covid era potentially fit into the category of abusing psychological knowledge and being absent of ethics, thus require serious investigation. The impact of psychological pressure on informed consent For the sake of brevity, I will not reiterate the multiple concerns already documented by others surrounding the consequences of the Government's actions around lockdown, hospital discharges, school closures and mask mandates (Amnesty International, 2020), (Byrne S et al, 2023) (Daily Telegraph, 2023b), (Mail Online, 2022), (Office for National Statistics, 2021), (The Guardian, 2021). I do, however, wish to highlight one extremely serious consequence that I believe has occurred as a direct result of the use of unethical psychological techniques/ behavioural insights on the unknowing public: by adopting the techniques used, the Government significantly and materially undermined, if not removed, the UK population's ability to give valid informed consent to taking a Covid19 vaccine. According to Public Health England: "Consent must be obtained before starting any treatment or physical investigation or before providing personal care for a patient. This includes the administration of all vaccines". Also, "It is a legal and ethical principle that valid consent must be obtained before starting personal care, treatment or investigations". Also, "For consent to immunisation to the (sic) valid, it must be given freely, voluntarily and without coercion by an appropriately informed person who has the mental capacity to consent to the administration of the vaccines in question". (Gov.uk, 2021) From the above, it is clear that for medical consent to be valid it must be given without coercion. The Encyclopedia Britannica defines coercion as: "The threat or use of punitive measures against states, groups or individuals in order for them to undertake or desist from specified actions. In addition to the threat of or limited use of force (or both), coercion may entail economic sanctions, psychological pressures, and social ostracism. (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2023). The psychological techniques used by the UK Government fall under that definition of coercion. If follows that according to Public Health England's statements and for the general public at least, consent to immunisation was, invalidated by the behaviour of the UK Government. It is also important to highlight that there have been serious injuries and death directly linked to the Covid19 vaccine. Many of those injured or who have died would not have taken a vaccine if they had not been psychologically pressured, feared being ostracised socially and/or were given accurate information. The removal of the general population's ability to give informed medical consent is of the gravest concern, and a severe and dangerous consequence of using behavioural insights / psychological techniques on an unknowing public. Conclusion The need to hold tightly to professional ethics, in particular to the ethical principle of informed consent, is not just an 'academic' issue. It is a matter of practical and fundamental importance to responsible government. According to Halpern (2015, p. 348) "Behavioural insights, like any other form of knowledge, can be used for good or bad". It is my opinion that the use of behavioural insights and psychological techniques designed to elicit feelings of fear, shame and guilt utilised by the UK Government since March 2020 has been unethical. The consequences are still unravelling but they appear to include serious damage to trust in government and its agencies, the NHS, and the medical and scientific professions. I propose that there be an immediate cessation of the use of all behavioural science techniques designed to elicit feelings of fear, shame and guilt used by the Government pending an urgent, open and independent inquiry. This inquiry should also have as an objective the re-establishment of ethical frameworks necessary to protect the public and to provide accountability. I would welcome a discussion on this most important of matters. Most respectfully Dr Christian Buckland Doctor of Psychology in Psychotherapy and Counselling Amnesty International. (2020, October 4). UK: Older people in care homes abandoned to die amid government failures during COVID-19 pandemic. The British Psychology Society (2021, December) Code of Ethics and Conduct. Byrne S., Sledge, H., Franklin, R., Boland F., Murray D., Hourihane, J. (2023). Social communication skill attainment in babies born during the COVID-19 pandemic: a birth cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child.,108: 20-24 The Daily Telegraph. (2023, March 10a). The Lockdown Files. The Daily Telegraph. (2023, March 23b). I lost my daughter to suicide in lockdown - she was failed by the system. Dodsworth, L. (2021). A State of Fear. How the UK government weaponised fear during the Covid-19 pandemic. London: Pinter and Martin. Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2022, September 28). Coercion. Gov.uk. (2020, May 5). Options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures, 22 March 2020. Gov.uk. (2021, June). PHE Greenbook of immunisation chapter 2 Consent. The Guardian. (2021, Feb 13). Fury at 'do not resuscitate' notices given to Covid patients with learning disabilities. Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit. London. WH Allen and Co. Institute for Government. (2010). MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour for public policy. Loan Charge All-Party Parliamentary Group. (2020, March). Loan-Charge-APPG-Report-into-the-Morse-Review- FINAL.pdf. Maercker A, Guski-Leinwand S. (2018). Psychologists' Involvement in Repressive "Stasi" Secret Police. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 107-119. Mail Online (2022, October 21). Lockdowns - collateral cancer burden 40 thousand tumours missed year pandemic. Office for National Statistics. (2021, May 7). Deaths at home increased by a third in 2020, while deaths in hospitals fell except for COVID-19. The Spectator. (2022, August 27). The lockdown files: Rishi Sunak on what we weren't told. UNICEF. (2021, October 03). Ethical considerations when applying behavioural science in projects focused on children. SOURCE: https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-the-uk-prime-minister?r=dvb3y&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Stand-up comic Phil Zimmerman was a stand-alone comic during the pandemic. He was unique amongst his profession, daring to make his voice heard while others were either blinded by the propaganda, or were aware, but hiding in silence fearful for their own security. A person who says (like most of us) "I told you so", is annoying to those reminded of their mistake. Yet a person who can say "I was wrong," and can mock themselves, is a true human at their best. Meet James McCann of Australia as he nails it with this short 60-second clip... See on youtube here: https://youtu.be/-G4VJrCpyb8 See on Telegram here: https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb/9207 See On Twitter: https://twitter.com/NotOnTheBeeb/status/1658114240132120580?s=20 Please leave your comments under this article. Add any links to other comedians needing coverage.

In this 30-minute presentation and Q&A with world glutathione expert Dr Jimmy Gutman, he explains the complex relationship between cancer and glutathione. He explains the studies which show glutathione precursor supplementation can improve the effectiveness (if this route was chosen) of chemo and radiation. Dr Gutman's paper "Therapeutic Potential of Glutathione Augmentation in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy or Radiotherapy"can be found here What is Cachexia? Cachexia is severe weight loss due to cancer. Tackling it has been an age-long quest and one that has bothered me for personal reasons deeply "...Cancer cachexia is a specific form of cachexia that occurs in patients with various types of malignancies, affecting approximately 50-80% of cancer patients. It is particularly prevalent in patients with advanced stages of cancer and is responsible for a significant proportion of cancer-related deaths. This debilitating syndrome is marked by severe involuntary weight loss due to muscle wasting and the loss of adipose tissue, resulting in physical impairment and reduced tolerance to cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The exact mechanisms leading to cancer cachexia are still not completely understood, but it is believed to involve a combination of tumour-derived factors, host immune response, and systemic inflammation, which collectively contribute to the accelerated breakdown of muscle and fat tissues...." Basically, advanced cancer deprives the body of needed nutrients whereby the patient suffers dramatic weight loss akin to starvation. As you can see in the video above, patients with severe cachexia were divided into two groups. One group were the standard placebo and the other had a few pouches of Immunocal daily. The results are astounding. The next year only 50% of the control group were alive, whereas 80% of the group with supplementation had survived. I personally wish I'd known this years ago. You now have this information. Please share it with those at need. If you'd like some more info in the meantime join our Glutathione group.

This is Not On The Beeb's 75th Adverse event report. MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 22nd FEBRUARY 2023 (Data published 8th Mar 2023) New interactive format Adult & Child - Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent) Government data up to 11th Sept 2022 - UK-wide (latest) • 1st doses received = 53.8 million people • 2nd doses - 50.7m people • 3rd doses - people having one or more booster - 40,622,659 (up to 20th Feb) All boosters = 67.26 million doses • Pfizer - 33.1m(monovalent) & 11.5m (bivalent) • Astrazeneca - 60,900 • Moderna - 13.3m (monovalent) & 9.3m (bivalent) • Novavax - 1,200 Additional all-brand doses given in last 4 weeks - 3230 (Pfizer-mono) + 127,312 (Pfizer-bivalent) + zero (AZ) + 176 (Moderna-mono) + 4335 (Moderna-bivalent) + 200 (Novavax) = 135,253 TOTAL DOSES administered (approx.) = 171.8 million doses including all booster programmes Overall 1-in-112 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event, 1-in-151 reports are classified as SERIOUS*, 1-in-195 reports are a fatality, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports - 176,316 (Pfizer-mono) + 4096 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 247,600 (AZ) + 42,833 (Moderna-mono) + 5108 (Moderna-bivalent) + 57 (Novavax) + 2319 (Unknown brand) = 478,329 people impacted (increase of 776 in 4 weeks) Reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 74.4% 124,617 (Pfizer-mono) + 3126 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 191,644 (AZ) + 30,929 (Moderna-mono) + 3685 (Moderna-bivalent) + 40 (Novavax) + 1670 (Unknown) = 355,711 Over 45,857 of the above serious reports are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 9.6% of all reports Reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 25.1% 50,832 (Pfizer-mono) + 940 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 54,592 (AZ) + 11,816 (Moderna-mono) + 1381 (Moderna-bivalent) + 17 (Novavax) + 581 (Unknown) = 120,159 Reactions - 508,104 (Pfizer-mono) + 10,867 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 877,221 (AZ) + 140,373 (Moderna-mono) + 13,896 (Moderna-bivalent) + 178 (Novavax) + 7217 (Unknown) = 1,557,856 Fatal - 867 (Pfizer-mono) + 30 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1364 (AZ) + 88 (Moderna-mono) + 42 (Moderna-bivalent) + 68 (Unknown) = 2459 (0.5% of reports) (increase of 23 reports with fatal outcome in 4 weeks) Over 386 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 16% of all fatalities CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Last available data set for Under 18s in Nov 2022 • 4,213,500 children (1st doses) - majority Pfizer • 2,910,500 (2nd doses) - majority Pfizer • 485,900 boosters Yellow Card Adverse Events Reported - Below combined 0-19yrs - many categories retracted (^) due to less than 5 reports in line with MHRA duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters” 0-19yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 71.3% 4650 (Pfizer-mono) + 34 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1457 (AZ) + 517 (Moderna-mono) + >7 (Moderna-bivalent) + >32 (Unknown) = 6697 0-19yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA >10 (Pfizer-mono) + zero (Pfizer-bivalent) + <5 (AZ) + <5 (Moderna-mono) + <5 (Moderna-bivalent) + <5 (Unknown brand) = greater than 10 20-29yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 73.2% 19,965 (Pfizer-mono) + 103 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 14,542 (AZ) + 4973 (Moderna-mono) + 127 (Moderna-bivalent) + < 5 (Novavax) + 91 (Unknown) = 39,801 20-29yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA 15 (Pfizer-mono) + <5 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 28 (AZ) + zero (Moderna-mono) + zero (Moderna-bivalent) + zero (Novavax) + zero (Unknown brand) = greater than 43 * MHRA definition of ‘serious’ - patient died, life threatening, hospitalisation, congenital abnormality, persistent or significant disability or capacity, deemed medically significant by MHRA medical dictionary or reporter For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps Compiled by Jenny Brown. ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?

This is Not On The Beeb's 76th Adverse event report. MHRA YELLOW CARD REPORTING SUMMARY UP TO 29th MARCH 2023 New interactive format data Adult & Child - Primary, Third Dose & Boosters (mono/bivalent) Government data up to 11th Sept 2022 - UK-wide (latest) • 1st doses received = 53.8 million people • 2nd doses - 50.7m people • 3rd doses - one or more booster - 40.6m (up to Feb 2023) Additional all-brand doses given in last 5 weeks - 324 (Pfizer-mono) + 9453 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1 (AZ) + 8 (Moderna-mono) + 1655 (Moderna-bivalent) = 11,441 65.7% (15,098,879 out of 22,970,162) people aged over 50 years old (England only) had an Autumn booster since Sept 2022 (UKHSA National Flu & Covid-19 Surveillance Report - week 14) Yellow Card Adverse Event Reports - 176,495 (Pfizer-mono) + 4237 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 247,764 (AZ) + 42,863 (Moderna-mono) + 5165 (Moderna-bivalent) + 66 (Novavax) + 2372 (Unknown brand) = 478,962 people impacted (increase of 633 in 5 weeks) Reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 74.4% of all reports 124,777 (Pfizer-mono) + 3242 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 191,793 (AZ) + 30,959 (Moderna-mono) + 3735 (Moderna-bivalent) + 46 (Novavax) + 1716 (Unknown) = 356,268 Over 45,936 of the above serious reports are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 9.6% of all reports Reports classified as Non-SERIOUS by MHRA = 25.1% 50,848 (Pfizer-mono) + 962 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 54,603 (AZ) + 11,815 (Moderna-mono) + 1389 (Moderna-bivalent) + 20 (Novavax) + 584 (Unknown) = 120,221 Overall 1-in-112 people injected experiences a Yellow Card Adverse Event (assuming one person submits only one report) 1-in-151 reports are classified as SERIOUS* 1-in-194 reports are associated with a fatality, which may be less than 10% of actual figures according to MHRA. Reactions - 508,972 (Pfizer-mono) + 11,257 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 878,138 (AZ) + 140,628 (Moderna-mono) + 14,060 (Moderna-bivalent) + 215 (Novavax) + 7340 (Unknown) = 1,560,610 Fatal - 870 (Pfizer-mono) + 33 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1368 (AZ) + 89 (Moderna-mono) + 41 (Moderna-bivalent) + 72 (Unknown) = 2473 = 0.5% of reports (increase of 14 reports with fatal outcome in 5 weeks) Over 390 of the above fatalities are of ‘Unknown Age’ = 15.8% of all fatalities, and 135 are of ‘Unknown Sex’ = 5.5% of all fatalities CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE SPECIAL REPORT Last available data set for Under 18s in Nov 2022 • 4,213,500 children (1st doses) - majority Pfizer • 2,910,500 (2nd doses) - majority Pfizer • 485,900 boosters Yellow Card Adverse Events Reported - Below combined 0-19yrs - many categories retracted (^) due to less than 5 reports in line with MHRA duty of confidentiality to patients and reporters” 0-19yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 71.4% 4658 (Pfizer-mono) + 36 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 1457 (AZ) + 517 (Moderna-mono) + 7 (Moderna-bivalent) + 33 (Unknown) = 6708 0-19yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA >10 (Pfizer-mono) + zero (Pfizer-bivalent) + <5 (AZ) + <5 (Moderna-mono) + <5 (Moderna-bivalent) + <5 (Unknown brand) = greater than 10 20-29yr old reports classified as SERIOUS* by MHRA = 73.2% 19,975 (Pfizer-mono) + 110 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 14,544 (AZ) + 4973 (Moderna-mono) + 128 (Moderna-bivalent) + < 5 (Novavax) + 91 (Unknown) = 39,821 20-29yr old reports classified as FATAL by MHRA 15 (Pfizer-mono) + <5 (Pfizer-bivalent) + 28 (AZ) + zero (Moderna-mono) + zero (Moderna-bivalent) + zero (Novavax) + zero (Unknown brand) = greater than 43 * MHRA definition of ‘serious’ - patient died, life threatening, hospitalisation, congenital abnormality, persistent or significant disability or capacity, deemed medically significant by MHRA medical dictionary or reporter For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps For full reports - https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps Compiled by Jenny Brown. ARE YOU VACCINE-INJURED? If you are a UK citizen and have suffered any form of adverse reaction, please fill in a witness statement. This is for the ongoing case being presented by Philip Hyland, Lois Bayliss, Mark Sexton, Dr Samuel White and team. Please note this is NOT for financial compensation but for an injunction to pause the rollout, whilst safety is established and investigated. ​ The C19 vaccines are still in stage three trials and are under a black triangle status. PETITION A petition requesting an urgent investigation and analysis of the C19 Vaccines The people of Britain and the world need answers and request the British police immediately seize multiple random samples of the various vaccines and conduct an open public independent detailed analysis of the contents. ​ NOTE>>> If you are a nurse, doctor, health professional, scientist, or have relevant qualifications, please sign the Expert's petition 1 - Why are so many people suffering adverse events and death after COVID-19 vaccinations? ​ 2 - Why are so many of our fittest sportspeople collapsing and suffering myocarditis, heart attacks and death post-vaccination? ​ 3 - Why have the vaccine manufacturers withheld ingredients? Undisclosed ingredients are illegal and involve the deception of the public ​ 4 - Why have independent scientific reports of Graphene Oxide and other contaminants not been publicly investigated? ​ 5 - Why are the batches of the vaccine clearly different? As per VAERS data, 100% of all adverse reactions can be attributed to 5% of the batches. This clearly indicates suspect manufacturing. ​ 6- With all these doubts concerning safety, why is the vaccine rollout continuing in British schools?