WILL TRUMP'S MIDTERM ELECTION LOSS CAUSE CHANGE?
Will Trump's historic defeat at the 2026 midterms cause any change in the trajectory of the USA?
I don't think so.
Over ten years ago, the last remaining vestige of faith in our western democracy was wiped out by the most obvious fraud I'd ever seen.
Around 2015, I struggled to tell the three main UK politicians apart.
Quite clearly, three reincarnations of the same entity.
Same hairstyles, Same suits. Same policies.
Carbon copies of each other, yet meant to represent three different sets of politics.
Bah humbug
Then something seemed to change in 2017. We had Corbyn in the UK... and he was clearly a threat to the established order. I shocked friends by suggesting Trump was interesting, believing he was also a wild card. Did we finally have some politicians who were not long-term groomed candidates designed to dance to the real rulers' tunes?
Theresa May called a snap general election for June 8, 2017 However, the polls soon weren't going her way. The average person in the street, left or right, northerner or southerner, were getting behind a man genuinely concerned for the interests of the British public. Due to this contender, the Labour Party had an unheard-of surge in membership, breaking all records Corbyn, a breath of fresh air to many, was extraordinarily popular and set for a landslide. Labour membership reached around 570,000–600,000 — Labour's largest membership since the 1950s. Some estimates put the peak higher still, around 640,000 at points. And the Tory's Theresa May was not popular, "Liar Liar" by Captain SKA hit #4 on the UK Singles Chart in June 2017, which is the highest-charting protest song in the UK in over a decade. (At the time, there were reports it was a clear number one hit. ) It was the work of a masked collective fronted by Sean McGinty, who had previously skewered the Tory government as a busker mocking Boris Johnson's "chicken" demeanour. The song (as you can hear below) directly accused then-Prime Minister Theresa May of lying over the "dementia tax", the social care funding policy (the cap on care costs) that the Tories reversed within days after the 2017 general election. The song's central thesis was that she'd promised a manifesto commitment she knew she'd break. She'd also claimed she would never call a snap election and then did just that.
The song was heavily censored There was never an official, documented Ofcom-style gag order on the song, nothing that clean or traceable. But BBC Radio 1, Radio 2, and Capital all refused to add it to playlists, and it was silently kept off key daytime rotations. Radio 1 claimed it didn't fit their "musical fit" criteria for daytime, which was a laughable excuse given the chart placement and public demand.
Meanwhile, BBC Radio 4's Today programme and various news outlets covered the controversy, while the music divisions wouldn't play the record. The illusion of democracy and an even playing field.
Listen to Liar Liar the number 4 hits by clicking on video below LIAR LIAR! |
The establishment could never let Corbyn get in power... most especially due to his stance on the Middle East.
(By 2019, those views derailed him as the real machinery behind the face of UK poloiticsmoved to depose him)
But this song wasn't the only 'threat' or attempt to swing these elections.
In the run-up to the 2017 general election, the UK experienced two terror attacks, all apparently involving Muslim perpetrators.
As I've mentioned in several talks, I predicted both would happen.
Did I have prior knowledge?
Of course not.
Did I spot patterns enabling prediction?
Yes.
What were these attacks?1- Manchester Arena Bombing (May 22, 2017): The attack was claimed by ISIS.2- London Bridge / Borough Market Attack (June 3, 2017): various 'Muslim culprits'.
The election campaign was suspended twice out of respect for the victims.
Is it not astonishing to think that ISIS seemed so keen on influencing British politics?
Surely whichever way the UK vote went, a change in UK leader made zero difference to fighters running around deserts in the Middle East?
So, what did they care and attack on these dates?
And more telling, why has ISIS since lost interest in swinging elections, and (comparatively) in the UK since?
EVENTS AROUND ELECTION
TERROR TIMELINE RE: ELECTION
Look at the grouping around 2017. Look at the gaps during the pandemic.
Yes, it seems ISIS UK operations didn't get enough vaccine certificates for their fighters to travel... ...or the fighters have all been suffering from long COVID? ...or had one too many mRNA boosters?
Or... did a sibling-act simply push ISIS off their pole position in the 'top of the fear charts', meaning they didn't need to release more hits?
I do know, a flock of sheep can't be steered by two shepherds each whistling at their own dogs. |
2017 POSTAL VOTES
However, the wonderful coincidence of 'Muslim Terror' events just before the vote, was not the only factor influencing the ballot box.
The Electoral Commission and watchdog groups flagged a sharp rise in postal vote applications, with some estimates suggesting roughly 20–25% of votes were cast by post. ( I even read 37% at the time) There were also suggestions of vote harvesting, pressure on elderly voters, and missing ballot-integrity checks. MPs and independent observers also raised alarms about the postal voting system. I've spoken with an MP on this matter. He laughed and said that much worse and much simpler cheating happened, He mentioned that is his constituency ballot boxes had vanished and reappeared before official counting. In the years since, I've often asked how many people a person knows ever made a postal vote. Most people reply "none, ever" and others say "max 5%".
The lunacy of our voting booths is stunning. Our voting boxes provide pencils! When I tell foreigners, they don't believe me. But it's true. We are not allowed to use pencils in school exams yet we are given them during general elections!? Are the British people really so trusting and gullible? It certainly seems so. The programming is deep. With every news story telling the readers how the British head off overseas to foreign lands to monitor voting in distant elections, it reassures the voter that our system is robust. Hogwash! Meanshile the more savvy UK military personnel are known to take marker pens to vote...
Either way, by hook or by crook or by the magician's handkerchief, there seems to have been deception at the polls which deprived Corbyn of an outright win. |
Back to 2026 and Trump's loss... |
TRUMP'S 2026 MIDTERM LOSS |
|
Personally, I never liked the brash US TV celeb, but still clung to some hope... the last remaining piece of optimism was smashed in 2020/21 when Trump boasted of Operation Warp Speed (pushing the COVID-19 jabs), which proved he was clearly deep state. I've heard a million excuses given over this. He's never apologised, and although placing RFK in the health arena placated many, the lack of real results and actions has disappointed many more. After the next election, Trump's support for Israel and the Gaza holocaust has been jaw-dropping. His proven Zionist alliances have now been seen by the majority to have zero benefit for the US, and this awakening is probably the main reason behind his decline in popularity. His last-minute attempt to win back these key patriotic votes by declaring he'd pull funding for Israel was obviously too little, too late.  |
But there are many other reasons Trump has lost respect. He and close family members have allegedly been spotted betting on the stock market in the moments before Trump made announcements on X and Truth Social that affected the same markets. I spotted this meme this afternoon.  |
Also, the non-release of the unredacted Epstein files points to his complicity while the testimonies of victims, male and female, beg to be heard. And his recent and current threats of using WMD on Iran are pure lunacy. If you've not read Tucker's viral X post... you must... and you can here>>> It starts with these words, "...Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its..." you can read the rest here>>>
Who is Chris Murphy? Chris Murphy, the Democratic senator for Connecticut. On 29 October, speaking at a Middle East Institute event, he called the reported Trump administration plan for Iran “insane” and said he’d been briefed on classified planning for possible renewed US military action after the 3 November midterms. Two days later, on 31 October, he felt numbness in his arm at his son’s hockey game, went to a local hospital, and was moved to Johns Hopkins in Baltimore. His chief of staff said on 1 November that he was awake, alert and responding well to treatment for a stroke.
A coincidence? ... the technology needed to cause strokes and heart attacks exists. Anyone reading my AI & I Cracking the COVID code should be able to connect the dots. Anyway, the threats of using WMD come from a president who was elected on a no-war platform, who has launched a potential world war in the name of stopping WMD from being used. ...and as those in the USA show their feelings via the ballot, it's simply astonishing to see the lag this side of the pond, with Brits, esp. among the truth community, still supporting him, not only pushing the Q nonsense but expecting American white hats to rescue us Brits from our own zionist controlled politicians. Luckily, the last remnants of such optimists are declining and being replaced by realists with their attention correctly focused on the real issues at hand.
However, let's remember all this is all theatre, as we know the left and right wing both belong to the same bird. Nothing will change with the election result, for the better or worse. What's been planned will continue. Real change will only happen when those in charge detect the public opinion changing, proven by the USA now defunding Israel... though I can't help but think that was planned too.
The image at the start of this email, of our three look-alike clowns in 2015, was honest, even if we couldn't see the strings. The three stooges looked the same, spoke the same, and had the same hand controlling them. At least the ties were different... (a comment I kmnow will make many of you think of common purpose!)
To conclude. Democracy is no more than gladiator theatre for the masses. |
AI & I Cracking the 9/11 Code
Paperback | 222 pages | Some colour images
A filmmaker who has spent twenty-five years studying misdirection sits down with an artificial intelligence and asks it, one question at a time, to examine September 11th using nothing but arithmetic, physics and its own reasoning.
Heights, speeds, timings, insurance valuations, air defence protocols and the laws of motion, taken slowly and in order, each answer tested before the next question is asked. The rule is simple and it holds throughout: follow the evidence, say plainly when something cannot be known, and never reach for the comfortable explanation.
The machine has no tribe to please, no career to protect and no prior position to defend. It can go wherever the logic leads. That turns out to matter more than anyone expected.
The early questions seem almost gentle. A phone call. A field in Pennsylvania. A wall that is lower than the aircraft said to have struck it.
Then the numbers begin to accumulate, and the arithmetic stops being polite.
Somewhere in the middle, the machine stops hedging.
What it concludes is not the story you were told.
Comments