IS IT TIME TO REVERSE THE COVID-ERA WITCH-HUNT?
HEROES OF THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY
Several British COVID-era doctors have faced deregistration or suspension by the General Medical Council (GMC) for dissenting from the COVID pandemic mainstream narrative.
Out of 390,000 doctors on the GMC register, of whom 29,223 are full-time qualified GPs nine feature on the list below.
Doctor | Background | Spoke out | Status | Details |
Dr Jayne Donegan | South London GP, long known for vaccine scepticism, cleared by the GMC in 2007 over MMR court evidence. | April 2019 to February 2020 (pre-COVID) | Struck off | Erased July 2023 |
Mr Mohammad Adil | Pakistan-born consultant colorectal and emergency surgeon with nearly 30 years in the NHS. | April to May 2020 (YouTube videos) | Struck off | Interim suspension 1 June 2020; 6-month suspension June 2022; erased September 2023 |
Dr Sarah Myhill | Private GP in Powys, known for treating chronic fatigue, now a naturopath. | 2020 to 2021 (website promoting vitamins C and D and iodine for COVID) | Suspended | 9 months from January 2023; extended a year in November 2023; gave up registration April 2026 |
Dr Anne McCloskey | Derry GP with a 40-year clean record and a former Aontú councillor. | November 2020 (rally); 22 August 2021 (video on vaccinating young people) | Suspended | 18-month interim suspension 2021; then suspensions from 24 October 2023, February 2025 and November 2025 (12 months) |
Dr Dean Patterson | Guernsey consultant cardiologist, qualified 1992, 20 years on the island and a Great Barrington Declaration signatory. | 2021 (letter to island leaders); February 2024 (open letter to the GMC) | Suspended | 12-month interim suspension 20 February 2026; High Court challenge |
Dr Sam White | Hampshire GP, qualified 2004, who resigned from his practice before the interviews in question. | June 2021 to July 2022 (online interviews) | Struck off | Interim conditions 2021; erased late August 2024 |
Dr David Cartland | Cornwall GP, qualified 2008, who took the vaccine himself and later wrote a book about it. | From around 2021 | Struck off | 26 June 2025 (formal finding: dishonest offers of exemption certificates) |
Dr Ahmad Malik | London consultant orthopaedic surgeon with 25 years in medicine. | December 2022 (viral Twitter video) | Neither | Suspended by his hospitals, not the GMC; gave up registration January 2024 |
Dr Daniel Armstrong | Consultant psychiatrist. | 17 July 2023 (BitChute video) | Struck off | December 2024 |
With only nine doctors honourable enough to stick their head above the parapet and weather the storm, they are 1 in 43,000.
For every one doctor who followed their heart and oath, there are another 43,000 doctors who didn't.
The nine above are very special people who need the public's support in whatever way each of us can.
I'm writing this introduction as my part in supporting these doctors,
Kirsty wrote the main article below.
You might get frustrated, angry, or feel helpless, but there's a lot you can do.
You can write a letter, make a phone call, sign a petition, or throw a few coins or notes into the hat.
Let's remind ourselves of the utter basics: -
primum non nocere “first, do no harm”
All Doctors have a duty embedded within their profession that goes back many centuries.
The Hippocratic Oath (a pledge to act for the patient’s benefit, keep confidences and avoid harm) and the maxim primum non nocere (“first, do no harm”) underpin a UK doctor’s legally binding duties under the GMC’s Good Medical Practice, which is to make patient care their first concern, to be honest and open, to obtain properly informed consent, to respect confidentiality and act to protect patients when they believe they are at risk.
This meant that when it came to the COVID-19 vaccinations, it was the duty of every doctor to do their due diligence and not simply trust the pharmaceutical industry.
It is no secret that the pharma industry is infamous for suspect products and practices, racking up record-breaking claims, as this wiki page clearly shows.
The basic big question here is: should Doctors check the products they vend, or should they trust them blindly?
The products in question are consumed by capsules or IV so using the food industry as a baseline, I ran some quick numbers comparing the known historic fines issues to the food industry against the top five fined industries,
Baseline: Food products (£3.0bn / $3.9bn) = 1.0x
Financial services (£296bn / $389.0bn): 98.8 x food industry
Pharmaceuticals (£91bn / $119.8bn): 30.4 x food industry
Oil and gas (£42bn / $55.6bn): 14.1 x food industry
Motor vehicles (£36bn / $47.4bn): 12.0 x food industry
Utilities and power generation (£35bn / $46.4bn): 11.8 x food industry
So, only the moneylenders and the financial industry as a whole are more 'untrustworthy' than pharma, whose fines are 30.4 X those imposed on the food industry.
These numbers are public record, so You'd imagine doctors would know this and be cautious? In law, ignorance is not an excuse.
We have a chain of trust where the patient blindly trusts the doctor.
The doctor blindly trusts the pharma industry.
Few vaccines had package inserts, and few patients were warned about the consequences of taking an experimental drug under 'emergency use' protocols that had bypassed basic safety procedures.
Which means true informed consent for the C19 'vaccine' was not obtained in 99.9% of the cases.
Worse, this basic ignorance at a basic level was compounded by the fact that few knew about the UK's MHRA Yellow Card vaccine injury reporting scheme, meaning that few of the injuries or suspected deaths were highlighted. In AI & I: Cracking The Corona Code we proved with some simple maths around the UK's excess deaths since 2021 that the prediction of only 1%-10% of injuries being reported was actually 1%.
Read an intro here>>>
You can also listen to that chapter here>>>
However, as the list above shows, some doctors did follow their oath, did their due diligence and raised their voices.
I'm privileged to have met or worked with several of the names on the list above.
Dr Sarah Myhill and Dr Jayne Donegan are legends in the medical community. I shared multiple UKMFA Zoom meetings with during the height of the COVID-19 narrative.
Dr Sarah Myhill is still a director of the UKMFA alongside retired doctor Liz Evans.
I met Mr Mohammad Adil briefly a few times, including the inauguration of the World Doctors Alliance in Berlin on 10th October 2020. A softly spoken gentleman whose radiating empathy remains etched in my memory.
In late 21-22, I worked for weeks through Christmas and New Year, compiling expert witness testimonies and vaccine-injured statements for solicitor Lois Baylis, who was working with Dr Sam White compiling evidence for the case against the government.
As of 2026, I now know Ahmad Malik quite well, having recorded three episodes for his Doc Malik podcast.
I can personally vouch for each of these wonderful doctors and human beings.
However, on the list above, there is a doctor that I don't know personally, who has had more attention than the others.
The retribution of the industry and aligned bodies has become what looks like a vendetta.
Not only have they suspended him from working as a GP over his pandemic views, they went for an all-consuming 'slam-dunk ', destroying not only his work life but his pastime.
An extraordinary move that comes across as not only unprofessional, but reeks of a deeply personal and vindictive attack.
It's one thing for a medical board to ban a doctor from practising, yet it enters another realm when an industry-aligned action crosses from medicine into a man's pastime.
This doctor is a lifelong football player who, like many players after their prime, moved into refereeing.
This doctor has had, alongside his medical suspension, a DBS slapped on him, effectively banning him from refereeing.
A DBS is is a UK background check that reveals relevant criminal convictions, cautions and, where applicable, whether someone is barred from working with children or vulnerable adults.
A DBS is an essential check that protects the vulnerable and children from sexual or criminal predators.
How could such a service be slapped on a GP who was simply carrying out his oath?
Any normal person reading this will be so shocked they might think there has to be another reason.
Many reasonable and logical minds will think ,"It's not possible he has been banned from working with kids purely over his stance on the COVID-19 medical interventions, " so they might reason, "there must be something else," which is teh horrific nature of such an action.
Why was a DBS given?
Because he might pose a risk!
Read that again.
Not for what he has done but for what he might do.
No, not as a predator, not for violence, not for anything we want our vulnerable protected from, but for what he might say.... yes, banned for words and opinion that he has never expressed to children.
Were they scared he might whisper to young football players that the HPV vaccine was a cervical cancer vaccine just for girls until they decided they could double the market share by giving it to boys too?
Yes, they might be afraid of these words, but this Doctor had never said such a thing.
One of the foundations of UK law is that people are innocent until proven guilty.
'Convicting' someone not for what they have done, but what they might do, is a dystopian nightmare that would have Orwell turning in his grave.
Yet, in 2026 this is the situation this doctor finds himself in.
Worse, the logic becomes circular and self-fulfilling.
The GMC ruling (accelerated by an online lynch mob) causes the DBS.
The DBS scares off the FA, who then bans the Doctor from refereeing kids.
The DBS committee thinks, "Well, if the FA has banned him and he's barred from practising..."
The FA thinks, "well, if he has a DBS..."
And the medical board, who barred him in the first place, thinks they can't have a doctor with a DBS and banned by the FA, and that they must have been even more right than they had at first thought.
This is a nightmare loop with no escape, where each 'twitching of the curtain' compounds the next.
Just as in the witch hunts of the Middle Ages, a herbalist who dipped into a lake is innocent if drowned, but if survived, were burnt at the stake as guilty of magic..
When we see this extremism, it is no longer about logic and rules; it's about silencing a voice or belief system.
If I told you the man in question was a GP from Cornwall with conservative family values known for speaking up from his heart, many of you might think I'm talking about the cantankerous Doc Martin, one of TV's most loved characters.
Though cantankerous online, the doctor in question is in the flesh, softly spoken and shy.
As a boy, he had no school detentions.
As a young man, he chose medicine as a career to serve his community.
As an adult, he's had no points on his driving licence.
As doctor during the pandemic he took the C19 vaccine.
As a football player, he never had a yellow or red card.
This is a man who believes in equality, sporting manners and fair play so much that he refereed football matches.
Let's remind ourselves of the type of personality and mind that makes a referee.
A referee has yes on the clock, whistle in hand.
A referee has eyes on the players' hands, feet, ensuring fair play, whistle in hand.
A referee has one eye on the football, the other on the white line marking the area of play, whistle in hand.
Is it surprising that when this doctor saw medical ethics cross the white line, that he blew 'the whistle'?
By blowing that whistle, the doctor was protecting the nation's children.
Yet, he's now been struck off as a doctor ending his career and tagged with a DBS crushing his hobby and passion.
The doctor in question is Dr Cartland.
Below is a deep dive into Cartland's story by Kirsty.
In this story, there is much 'he said/she said," so we need to stay focused on the big picture.
Was David Cartland right to speak out about teh vaccine rollout?
For anyone doubting Cartland's stance around the pandemic, I urge you to listen to this audiobook The Architecture of Deception on Spotify.
The foreword alone by Dr Stowell (a fifth-generation doctor) is unmissable.
(If you porefer reading over listening it is here>>>)
AUDIOBOOK ON SPOTIFY
Dr Carland has written this book outlineing his core belief...
"Do No Harm"
And before we dive into Kirsty's article on Dr Cartland, here is my book on the same subject
FOCUS ON DR DAVID CARTLAND: BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP
This deep dive into Cartland's story is by Kirsty
Freedom advocates argue that these erasures indicate a serious government-inflicted impingement upon free speech. The medical field is informed by scientific inquiry which fundamentally relies upon the ability to question and re-examine scientific results, and reliability is formed only when results are repeated over time by different scientists. The ability to question is therefore a cornerstone of medical science, yet during the pandemic, dissent from the mainstream narrative was quashed, and the slogan, “trust the science,” was perpetuated in effort to inspire civic obedience.
A public advocacy campaign has launched in Cornwall to support the future GMC reinstatement application of Dr David Cartland, a greatly valued local GP whose removal from the medical register has left a community, which already has overstretched medical staff and lengthy medical waitlists, with one less excellent doctor.
This case embodies a critical battlefield involving medical freedom and state overreach. Supporters argue Dr Cartland’s regrettable online reactive comments were used as a “red herring” to distract from vital policy debates over informed consent, free-speech, and to hide a coordinated smear campaign. Cartland claims that the smear campaign was coordinated by government connected groups that were monitoring COVID dissent rather than organically from his actual colleagues. Cartland says it all began in 2022, after an interview he gave with UK Column. There were 265 vexatious complaints about Cartland sent to the GMC, dozens of vexatious complaints to Cornwall and Devon police, DBS, and the FA. The monitoring of domestic citizens by state-linked propagandist units is a matter of established public record.
The campaign, “Reinstate Cartland,” alleges that weaponised regulation has left an overstretched Cornish community stripped of a much-needed doctor who committed no crime and harmed no patients. The campaign is appealing to the public and former patients to help build a formal portfolio of support that will pave the way for Dr Cartland’s return to general practice.
The Odds Stacked Against Him
Dr Cartland had taken the Covid-19 RNA vaccine and a booster yet issued a few patients — and a planted entrapment contact pretending to be a locum agency rep (the company didn’t exist) — with letters supporting bodily autonomy. They were not vaccine exemption certificates, but letters that could potentially be used for travel where accepted. In addition to the controversial letters, after being systematically attacked, Cartland did admittedly say some regrettable things online, but controversial online comments do not detract from his ability to provide safe and effective medical care to his patients.
Furthermore, questions of impartiality extend into the GMC itself. James Morgan, the GMC administrator acting as Cartland’s purportedly neutral investigation contact, emailed Chief Executive and Registrar Charlie Massey describing Cartland as “a well-known antivaxxer” who promoted “antisemitic & anti-trans views” — allegations Cartland vehemently denies. The correspondence illustrates how hostility towards him had reached inside the regulator.
Image: Email from James Morgan to Charlie Massey
Cartland says threats against him, including an email declaring him a “target” of a malevolent network were read to the tribunal. His request for a closed hearing and subsequent application for vulnerable-witness status were refused. The complainants, however, received anonymity and vulnerable-witness protections, while Cartland was named in full. The GMC also sought to exclude all six of his witnesses. The MPTS ruled their statements inadmissible or irrelevant, while substantial portions of Cartland’s written rebuttal were similarly excluded. He says crucial responses — including a 16- page rebuttal and evidence concerning allegedly fabricated screenshots — were treated as though they had never been received, despite read receipts. That matters because the case was decided on the balance of probabilities. Cartland’s campaigners argue that excluding his witnesses, rebuttals, and contextual evidence left the tribunal with an incomplete evidential picture — circumstances they say warrant scrutiny by the Professional Standards Authority.
Most strikingly, throughout the approximately three-year GMC investigation, Cartland remained free to practise without conditions, suspension, or clinical restrictions, working until the week before the outcome. No patient-safety concern or established clinical harm had resulted in any restriction on his practice. Yet, almost overnight, he was permanently removed from medicine.
The question is therefore not whether aspects of his conduct deserved criticism; it is whether he was given a meaningful opportunity to present his full case before the ultimate professional sanction was imposed. The Reinstate Cartland campaigners say he was not — and that a doctor who committed no crime and posed no demonstrated clinical risk was destroyed by contested allegations, excluded evidence, and regulatory weakness.
Image: Email to Amy Codling and James Morgan
TRAILER FOR OUR AI-EMPOWERED FORENSIC INVESTIGATION:
AI & I: Cracking The COVID code (60 SECONDS)
Coordinated Attack by Proxy and Regulatory Weaponisation
It is established fact that the professional take-down by these types of coordinated operatives is executed through a four-stage "Kill Chain" involving NGO monitoring, clinical "expert" complaints, and regulatory tribunals using an "insight trap" to force guilt admissions.
The process is concluded through strategic civil defamation claims and mandatory DBS safeguarding referrals that impose lifelong civic cancellation.
Because statutory mandates legally prohibit the government from directly targeting UK nationals, the online network is purported to function as an informal proxy mechanism, effectively bypassing state restrictions to suppress dissent through three documented, nonorganic phases:
Algorithmic Suppression: Executing mass-reporting campaigns to artificially trigger social media bans
Reputational Attrition: Orchestrating synchronised digital smear campaigns to fabricate a false public consensus against the practitioner.
Regulatory Weaponisation: Coordinating template-driven misconduct complaints to the GMC and employers. While hundreds of complaints were submitted to the GMC, subsequent analysis revealed that only a handful originated from verifiable, unique individuals, all of whom Cartland claims possessed documented ties, and were inorganic.
The evidence Cartland has gathered demonstrates that the complaints and reputational damage facing him are not organic expressions of patient or colleague concern; rather, they are the product of a highly engineered to force professional and economic ruin.
Regulatory Vulnerability: Weak Systems Allow Malevolence
A sophisticated, state-aligned information operation relies entirely on regulatory frameworks' vulnerability to external manipulation. If a professional regulator such as the GMC, DBS, or FA, accepts highly engineered, non-organic digital campaigns at face value, it demonstrates a profound vulnerability to external manipulation and a critical failure of investigative discernment, allowing the regulatory process itself to be weaponised as an instrument of reputational assassination.
Executive leadership of the GMC—including Chief Executive Charlie Massey and Fitness to Practise Director Anthony Omo—have faced scrutiny for structural vulnerability to external manipulation. The British Medical Association (BMA) has formally declared a complete lack of confidence in this senior leadership team. Critics argue they have fostered an adversarial regulatory culture that routinely targets doctors for ethical dissent while failing to implement basic safeguards against coordinated bad-faith complaint stacking, such as the 265 vexatious complaints made against Cartland. The executive team's failure to protect the integrity of its own investigative processes from external manipulation indicates an institutional lack of analytical discernment.
Documented Regulatory and Judicial Extrapolations: Spurious Criminal Referrals
Lawfare targeted Cartland, as evidenced by direct correspondence from civil law enforcement authorities.
As a primary example of this external overreach, Officer Laura Raynor (Collar No. 17027) of the Devon and Cornwall Police issued an official communication confirming that a formal criminal allegation had been lodged against the practitioner by the primary network complainant. Over twenty such vexatious complaints were received by police, yet Cartland says a police officer verbally advised him to report Bottley for harassment as they could see that Cartland was the victim of the harassment rather than the perpetrator.
Following a formal review of one of the submissions, law enforcement authorities concluded that “no further action will be taken.” This document provides authoritative, independent confirmation of two critical facts:
Multi-Jurisdictional Vexatiousness: The network’s operations are not confined to standard regulatory or scientific debate but extend to the deliberate weaponisation of the criminal justice system to maximise professional and psychological attrition.
Absence of Factual Merit: The immediate closure of the file by civil police demonstrates that the complainant’s allegations lacked basic legal or factual thresholds. This authoritative dismissal serves as primary evidence that the complaints submitted to the GMC are part of an engineered, bad faith attempt to manufacture an artificial record of misconduct.
Image: Officer Raynor’s email to Cartland (her email address withheld out of respect)
The Red Herring: Online Behaviour vs. The Core Medical Debate
Some regrettable online comments made by Dr Cartland, in reaction to being systemically harassed, were used as a classic ‘red herring’ during the process by which he lost his registration. By focusing on emotional friction in public forums, regulators successfully sidestepped the real, albeit uncomfortable, debate that independent medicine faces.
The core conflict in his case is about clinical autonomy: institutional policy does not trump an individual doctor’s care for his patients and ability to make decisions based on the Hippocratic Oath to “Do No Harm” and the ethical demand to seek “informed consent”. Dr Cartland advocated for his patient’s bodily autonomy. In Dr Cartland’s
independent clinical judgment, though he was indeed vaccinated himself, this was ethical under the principles of doing no harm and seeking informed consent. Because the vaccines were rolled out under a temporary emergency allowance, long-term side- effects were arguably unknown. Side effects have now been documented—including the risk of myocarditis—so Dr Cartland acted as a clinical shield rather than practising blanket medicine.
By focusing heavily on his online behaviour amid the heavy bombardment of pro- vaccine pandemic propaganda and the systematic attack on him by operatives, the tribunal effectively used a behavioural smokescreen to signal that blind bureaucratic compliance was valued over individual judgement and patient care.
LISTEN TO DAVID CARTLAND HERE
The Human Reality: An Exemplary Doctor Under Immense Strain
Crucially, the GMC’s tribunal itself accepted that all accounts and evidence proved Dr Cartland was a “good doctor” who was liked by his patients. His actual, real-world clinical care was entirely safe and never once challenged. This stands in vast contrast to some doctors who have recently committed heinous crimes against their patients (including rape) and been given only a slap on the wrist from the GMC.
Cartland attests that his words were taken out of context and used against him, resulting in paying out £71,000 and complying with a legal demand to support a charity he finds unethical. Facing total financial ruin, the targeted loss of consecutive jobs, and immense moral distress, Dr Cartland was under profound psychological duress. His regrettable, defensive social media outbursts were a reactive response from a physician backed into a corner, not acts of unprovoked malice.
Official data reveals that an average of one to three doctors die by suicide each year while undergoing a GMC investigation, with a landmark internal review in 2014 uncovering 28 such deaths over an eight-year period. Beyond these fatalities, research shows a widespread psychological crisis, with nearly one in three investigated doctors experiencing active suicidal ideation due to the process. Medical unions heavily criticise the protracted, adversarial nature of these investigations, identifying the immense stress of the regulatory process as a direct driver of severe psychological distress.
The Punishment Did Not Fit the Crime: Workable Alternatives Were Ignored
Under standard medical guidelines, permanent erasure is typically reserved for doctors who present a direct danger to the physical safety of their patients. Because Dr Cartland’s patient care was flawless, the tribunal bypassed several common-sense, protective alternatives that would have protected the public interest without destroying a good doctor's career:
A Total Social Media Ban: Legally blocking him from engaging in public medical debates or posting on public platforms.
A Conditions of Practice Order: Requiring any complex administrative exemptions to be reviewed or co-signed by a senior clinical supervisor.
A Fixed-Term Suspension: A temporary freeze to allow him to step away, seek support for severe mental duress, and complete professionalism retraining.
Instead, the decision to completely de-register him has actively harmed a Cornish community already crippled by shortage of general practitioners. Taking a safe, highly regarded doctor out of the local healthcare system lengthens waiting lists and deprives vulnerable residents of high-quality care.
The FA Must Reconsider: A Football Lover’s Heartbreak
Perhaps the most striking feature is not what occurred, but what did not. There is no suggestion of criminality; no allegation that any child was ever placed at risk; no finding that the doctor was clinically incompetent; nor any determination that he caused harm to a single patient.
Yet, inexplicably, the consequences have been extreme.
Despite no harm towards children, the revocation of his DBS certification has, in turn, precluded him from refereeing football under the FA, without any allegation involving children or any evidence that he presents a safeguarding risk. Cartland told the campaign that the FA received about 20 vexatious complaints against him per month in part of the overall coordinated attack. According to the FA’s own rules, only “unsupervised youth football,” requires a DBS, and as a referee for his children’s football, Cartland was never left unsupervised. Many un-DBS checked parents volunteer to referee when needed. Claire Summer-Evans, the football operations lead and designated safeguarding officer at Cornwall FA, declined to comment on FA policy or speak to the Reinstate Cartland campaigners.
The justification presented for the loss of the DBS is completely speculative: namely, that an individual who dissented from government recommendations might, at some future point, fail to comply with safeguarding policies. There was no threat or crime against children committed, only a speculative conclusion created by the DBS. His DBS case is going to the High Court in January 2027, so the campaign remains hopeful that DBS will reverse their decision due to lack of evidence.
This idea cannot withstand scrutiny and it is difficult to reconcile so severe an interference with the absence of any proven misconduct. The practical effect of the revocation of Dr Cartland’s DBS certification is that a man who has not been convicted of any offence has lost not only the profession to which he devoted a decade of university education and his working life, but also the game that defined his life beyond it—first as a player, then as a referee, and for many years as an active member of his local footballing community. This blow left him ready to hurl himself off a Cornish cliff—which would have been a dire atrocity.
Was Cartland Wrong?
By Mark Playne
Dr David Cartland has a large online following, which has probably an additional factor in his silencing.
Here is one of his posts that went viral.
THE VIDEO
In essence, Homburg argued that official German data showed no more severe respiratory illness than usual in 2020 and 2021, and that mass PCR testing created the illusion of a pandemic.
He said politicians responded to a clinically normal situation with lockdowns and vaccine pressure that weren’t justified, and that the record needs a proper public reckoning.
If in any doubt about the fraudulent use of the PCR, listen to this Chapter 5 of The Architecture of Deception we ask what if the test that defined a pandemic was never designed to diagnose?
Chapter 5 of the audiobook: The PCR & faking a pandemic can be listened to for free here>>>
Was Dr Cartland wrong to inform everyone of his percpetion as confirmed by Prof. Stefan Homburg’s speech at the 2nd Corona Symposium in the Bundestag on 11 November 2023?
Or, has he been hung out to dry for speaking up against his former masters?
How You Can Help Dr Cartland?
Patients can send our campaign coordinator their testimonials in support of Dr
Cartland’s reinstatement (see instructions below)
Everyone can sign our campaign petition (see link below)
Donate to his give-send-go to help pay his ongoing legal fees (see link below)
Send an email of support to the FA (see instructions below)
1. For Patients: Join the Public Reinstatement Dossier
Under UK medical law, a doctor who has been erased can apply for formal restoration to the GMC register. To succeed, Dr Cartland is completely retrenching his focus— stepping away from public social media debates and committing to advanced professionalism training.
However, the GMC tribunal must also see that the community actively wants him back in the clinic. To achieve this, we are building a unified, verified legal dossier of patient support.
The GMC handles reinstatement applications as strict legal proceedings where mass, generic petition signatures hold little weight. To make an undeniable impact, we require individual, personalised statements from the people who know his clinical skills best: his past patients.
If you were treated by Dr Cartland and want to advocate for his return to Cornish healthcare, please email reinstate.cartland@protonmail.com your personal patient testimony, to ensure your statement is legally valid and verified by the tribunal, your email must include:
Your full name, current home address, and contact details
Either a summary of how long you were under Dr Cartland’s care or a specific example of his excellent, compassionate bedside treatment
A clear statement that you are aware of his past online disputes but retain absolute confidence in his medical safety and integrity
Additionally, if you are a doctor who had their licence revoked by GMC or a similar body after a coordinated attack by the aforementioned nefarious group and you wish to contribute your story, email reinstate.cartland@protonmail.com.
2. Sign the Petition!
Change.org Petition “Reinstate Dr Cartland to serve Cornwall again”
3. If you wish to donate to support Dr Cartland’s ongoing fight against lawfare, see this link:
Send an email of support for FA ban lift
For parents and colleagues involved in Cartland’s time working as a referee, send an email of support focusing 100% on Cartland’s track record as a reliable referee, his dedication to youth sports, and his current commitment to upholding FA standards directly to our campaign, where we will privately compile these: reinstate.cartland@protonmail.com
In Summary
The logical takeaway is simple: Dr Cartland was a good doctor who faced professional cancellation after he advocated for patients’ bodily autonomy in the face of the Covid-19 vaccine mandates.
Punishing him by keeping him permanently barred from healing patients serves nobody, especially given waitlists to see doctors in Cornwall. It is time to clear the smoke screen, focus on local healthcare needs, and support a path back to general medicine for a doctor who always put his patients first.
The systemic cancellation of Dr Cartland’s livelihood (though he committed no crime) brings medical integrity in England and the organisational integrity of the GMC, DBS,
and FA into question. Public trust in medicine depends on the ethical foundations that guide patient care, which include medical integrity, an effort to ‘do no harm,’ and obtaining ‘informed consent’ to support a patient’s bodily autonomy. Who could oppose bodily autonomy?
Since the COVID-19 vaccines were deployed under temporary authorisation without double-blind, placebo-controlled, longitudinal safety data, exemptions ought to have been especially accessible. Informed consent cannot fully be obtained in this case, as long- term clinical trials have not yet been completed.
Dr Cartland and other doctors in similar situations have displayed medical integrity by placing individual patient welfare above politics—sadly at great cost to themselves. Dr Cartland ought to be reinstated by the GMC, DBS, and FA.
The regulatory GMC exists to protect patients. It must therefore distinguish between a doctor who presents a genuine and ongoing clinical danger and a doctor whose professional conduct, online statements, or political and ethical views have proved controversial. The GMC must also be capable of distinguishing independent evidence from coordinated allegation. Dr Cartland should be given a lawful, evidence-based, proportionate, and meaningful pathway back to medicine.
SHOP ON AMAZON HERE>>>
REFERENCES
List of largest pharmaceutical settlements
Dr David Cartland
Total Health — “Dr Dave Cartland: Clinical Expert”
Dr David Cartland — Official Website
UK Column — “David Cartland: The Honest Doctor Who Refuses to Be Silenced”
NotOnTheBeeb — “Dr Cartland Struck Off”
GiveSendGo — Donate
Dr David Cartland, Substack — “The Kill Chain”
David Cartland — Interview
https://open.spotify.com/episode/0fs9n4oXFNNyMLMm89o702?si=jxXDGiBlQ7uRC4 CDD sdYSw&utm_source=copy-link
David Cartland — Interviews
https://open.spotify.com/episode/0cCRqgXO86ihlCEzzKNhrP?si=9HKHsEOKQAKDP VqU qCg4HQ&utm_source=copy-link
Medical Regulation, GMC & Disciplinary Proceedings Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) — Contact https://www.mpts-uk.org?contact-us
MPTS — Dr Sonali Mukherjee-Bose, Tribunal Determination, 6 February 2026
Medical Protection — “GMC Investigations”
Doctors Defence Service — “Defamation of Character Arising from Complaints to GMC” https://doctorsdefenceservice.com/defamation-of-character-arising-from-complaints-to- gmc/
Pulse Today — “Researchers Call for Overhaul of Confrontational NHS ComplaintsProcess” https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/regulation/researchers-call-for-overhaul- ofconfrontational-nhs-complaints-process/
Channel 4 News — “Doctors Found Guilty of Sexual Misconduct Allowed to Keep Practicing” https://www.channel4.com/news/doctors-found-guilty-of-sexual-misconduct-allowed- tokeep-practicing
The Guardian — “UK Doctors Guilty of Sexual Misconduct Are Not Being Struck Off, Research Finds” https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/sep/18/uk-doctors-guilty-of-sexual- misconductare-not-being-struck-off-research-finds
BBC News — Article concerning doctors and professional misconduct https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1729nrvwxpo
GMC — Intimidation tactics
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/25/doctors-referred-regulator- intimidatewhistleblowers-gmc/
Vaccination, Vaccine Safety & Informed Consent
NHS Regional Drug & Therapeutics Centre — “Yellow Card Scheme”
Physicians for Informed Consent — “Physicians for Informed Consent Sends Letter to Medical Board of California...” https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/news/physicians-for-informed-consent-sends- letterto-medical-board-of-california-regarding-science-and-sb-276-limiting-medical- exemptionsto-vaccination/
PubMed Central — Research article, PMC12450757
HART Group — Health Advisory & Recovery Team
Children’s Health Defense — HART Group
Canadian Covid Care Alliance
Stillbirth –- covid vaccines
Stillbirth — Thorp et. Al https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202209.0430/v1.
UK Covid-19 Inquiry — Document INQ000474618
https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/wp- content/uploads/2026/06/30150824/INQ000474618.pdf
77th Brigade — Investigations & Reporting
Action on Armed Violence — “Mission Creep: Freedom of Information Disclosure Proves 77th Brigade Was Deployed on UK Operations During Covid” https://aoav.org.uk/2024/mission-creep-freedom-of-information-disclosure-proves- 77thbrigade-was-deployed-on-uk-operations-during-covid/
The National — “Probe to Look at 77th Brigade Monitoring UK Social Media Posts” https://www.thenational.scot/news/23286961.probe-look-77th-brigade- monitoring-uk-socialmedia-posts/
Forces News — “Army Monitoring UK Citizens’ Social Media Posts to Be Investigated, Ben Wallace Says” https://www.forcesnews.com/politics/army-monitoring-uk-citizens-social-media-posts- beinvestigated-ben-wallace-says
Civil Service World — “Ex-Cabinet Minister Probes Authorisation for Army Unit to Monitor Citizens’ Social Posts” https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/excabinet-minister- probesauthorisation-for-army-unit-to-monitor-citizens-social-posts
Additional SourcesLouise Roseingrave — “Key Complainant in Marcus de Brun...”
BBC News — Article concerning the relevant US case
AJC — “Doctor Sex Abuse...”
Deccan Herald — Report concerning allegations against a doctor
https://www.facebook.com/deccanherald/posts/a-doctor-at-a-private-hospital-here- wasaccused-of-raping-a-female-student-after/1483515210483538/
Climate Skeptic — “The Cancellation of Professor Norman”
Listen to and share his interviews:
• https://open.spotify.com/episode/0fs9n4oXFNNyMLMm89o702?si=jxXD GiBlQ7uRC4CDD sdYSw&utm_source=copy-link
• https://open.spotify.com/episode/0cCRqgXO86ihlCEzzKNhrP?si=9HKHs EOKQAKDPVqU qCg4HQ&utm_source=copy-link
• https://docmalik.com/free-version-515-dr-david-cartland-struck-off- barred-and-banned/
BOOKSHOP
TRAILER FOR OUR AI-EMPOWERED FORENSIC INVESTIGATION
AUDIOBOOK ON SPOTIFY £14.99 (free for premium subscribers)
AUDIOBOOK ON MARKPLAYNE.COM £10
BOOK ON AMAZON OR AUTHOR'S WEBSITE
DR. CARTLAND'S BOOK IS ON AMAZON HERE>>>
Comments