Search

CANADA MOVES TO ALLOW EUTHANASIA AT TIME OF DEATH WITHOUT CONSENT

Mark Playne

12 hours ago

4 min read

...🔣 LINKS | BOOK | JOIN | CHAT | BOOST

CANADA MOVES TO ALLOW EUTHANASIA AT TIME OF DEATH WITHOUT CONSENT

While we watch the organic, peaceful student protests in France get infiltrated by agitators and used by others as cover for robbery and looting. While the agitators and looters get the cameras, whose footage is used by certain political agitators to whip up a feeding frenzy, twisting reality and trying to persuade us the cost-of-living protests are an Islamic insurgency... let's get back to some medical basics.

Something fundamental has shifted in Canada: Euthanasia without consent. (scroll down for that article)

I've witnessed doctors in NHS hospitals tiptoeing around, collecting DNRs from patients who clearly had no idea what they were signing.

DNR is the first step towards assisted suicide.

Assited Suicide is a clever way of saying 'murder by a doctor'.

Yes... of course there are some unique examples where this is needed. The biggest myth in modern medicine, other than antibiotics don't work with alcohol, is that 'died peacefully in sleep' is natural, hiding the reality of 'death by doctor's needle'.

And yes, sometimes it is needed; it can be kinder, yet the overuse is beyond frightening. Most of you reading this will know it's how they achieved many of the C19 death figures, by wiping out the vulnerable in old people's homes via midnight visits of 'visiting doctors' with midazolam.

Put simply, the orthodox medical system can't be trusted with this delicate balance. So, in the same way we don't hand guns to kids or the mentally unstable, in the UK we need to guard against this.

THE ARTICLE

QUOTE: Canada plans to legalise euthanasia through advance requests, raising concerns about consent, dementia patients’ rights and whether earlier decisions should determine the circumstances of death.

Euthanasia for individuals incapable of consent at the point of death is to be introduced under new proposals from the Canadian Government, according to Canada’s justice minister, Sean Fraser.

The proposed legislation would change the law so that individuals who have a progressing incurable illness can give their consent to have their lives ended by euthanasia at some future stage, when, it is assumed, they will no longer be able to give informed consent.

These so-called “advance requests” would mean that people may have their lives ended by euthanasia who, at the point of administration of the fatal drugs, cannot give their consent to it.

The Canadian Government has also announced plans, which have been welcomed by Right To Life, to indefinitely exclude people whose sole underlying medical condition is mental illness from euthanasia and assisted suicide. Access for this group had been scheduled to begin in March 2027.

OPINION

In Quebec, they have just made killing a legal option for the state.

And its targets will be the very generation that brought in abortion.

When you are too ill, too confused or too frightened to say no, they will wheel you into a room, administer the drugs and call it kindness.

They will not be asked again and worse, you will not be able to stop them.

This is the end of the road they began building fifty years ago.

The ultimate irony is that the very generation that accepted the mass killing of the unborn (under Roe v. Wade) is now being lined up for the same logic in their own beds.

They were sold “my body, my choice” and the 'logical choice' to end an inconvenient life.

They had no idea (and I've only recently found out) of the huge medical business in the foetus parts that thrives on and depends on abortions.

The same medical industry behind the organ-donor push, another part of this story.

The admission by a doctor in Israel that Israel had one of the largest skin banks in the world emphasises the horrific reality in plain sight.

A state that handed the power to kill the weak at the beginning of life has simply extended that power to the weak at the end of it... when they choose.

As always, they insisted the slippery-slope idea was a myth.

Canada has shown where this thinking leads, and it's not stopping at the Canadian borders. Ideas like this know no geographical boundaries

Once a society accepts that some lives are not worth living, the only question left is who draws this line, how and when.

First, the unborn.

Then the disabled.

Then the depressed.

Then those who are simply old and costly.

Then the unemployed?

Then the antivaxxers who spread disease?

Then... you and me?

Each day the conveyor belt of life takes us one day closer.

In Quebec, the state no longer needs your consent at the moment of death.

This is not progress.

This is a move away from the very idea of civilisation.

Neanderthals looked after their disabled.

Even trees look after highly disabled, 'amputated' family members.

If Neanderthals and trees can, then we can.

Yes, sometimes there might be a need, but after C19 I think it's been proved that our highly filtered and pharmaceutical-indoctrinated medical profession is the right people to decide.

Personally, I don't trust the average GP to give me a painkiller.

Meanwhile, we must protect all that is precious, including every single life, however inconvenient it may seem.