top of page
Search
Writer's pictureMark Playne

ANTONIETTA GATTI & STEFANO MONTANARI'S GROUNDBREAKING 2017 REPORT ON VACCINE METAL CONTAMINANTS

2018: Husband-and-wife research team, Dr. Stefano Montanari, and Dr. Antonietta Gatti have been investigating micro- and nano-particles, and their effects on human health, for decades.

The duo has published hundreds of studies, many using their own electron microscope, linking nano-particles to many different health issues and disease.

These particles; found all throughout pharmaceuticals and the environment, have been documented as health hazards, contributing to miscarriage, fetal malformations, and the development of cancer.

The two are very well-versed in their field, with Dr. Gatti being recognized by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization as an expert in nanotechnologies, responsible for several research contracts with various universities, and a member of the European Scientific Commission on Medicinal Products and Medical Devices.

Gatti has been in charge of the laboratory where she and her husband conduct their research, the Laboratory of Biomaterials at the University of Modena for over 30 years.

So it really came as a surprise when, on February 22, 2018, Gatti’s laboratory was raided by the Finance Police on the accusation of a scam related to their electron microscope.

Every inch of their home and lab was searched, and data, computers, and paper documents seized, with no word on their possible return.

This raid came just days before Gatti was scheduled to address the courts in Lanusei with the findings in seized documentation, and during a time period where the couple had a full schedule of conferences and teaching events planned. And, with all copies of their materials taken, the pair would be forced to cancel their schedule.

Source: https://howhesraised.net/2018/09/laboratory-raided-after-baffling-vaccine-discovery/





Key excerpts from the Dr. Stefano Montanari, and Dr. Antonietta Gatti research.


INTRODUCTION

Vaccines are one of the most notable inventions meant to protect people from infectious diseases.


The practice of variolation is century old and is mentioned in Chinese and Indian documents dated around 1000 A.D.


Over time, variolation has been replaced by vaccination, vaccines have been enhanced as to technology, and the vaccination practice is now standardized worldwide. Side effects have always been reported but in the latest years it seems that they have increased in number and seriousness, particularly in children as the American Academy of pediatrics reports.1,2 For instance, the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTaP) vaccine was linked to cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS);3 measles-mumpsrubella vaccine with autism;4,5 multiple immunizations with immune disorders;6 hepatitis B vaccines with multiple sclerosis, etc. The notice of Tripedia DTaP by Sanofi Pasteur reports “Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathia, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea”.


The epidemiological studies carried out did not show a clear evidence of those associations, even if in 2011 the National Academy of Medicine (formerly, IOM) admitted: “Vaccines are not free from side effects, or adverse effects”.7


Specific researches on components of the vaccines like adjuvants (in most instances, Aluminum salts) are already indicated as possible responsible of neurological symptoms8‒10 and in some cases, in-vivo tests and epidemiological studies demonstrated a possible correlation with neurological diseases.10,11 Neurological damages induced in patients under hemodialysis treated with water containing Aluminum are reported in literature.12


Recently, with the worldwide-adopted vaccines against Human Papillomavirus (HPV), the debate was reawaken due to some adverse effects reported by some young subjects.


Specific studies communicated the existence of symptoms related to never-described-before syndromes developed after the vaccine was administered. For instance, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).13


The side-effects that can arise within a relatively short time can be local or systemic.


Pain at the site of injection, swelling and uncontrollable movement of the hands (though this last symptom can also be considered systemic) are described. Among the systemic effects, fever, headache, irritability, epileptic seizures, temporary speech loss, lower limbs dysaesthesia and paresis, hot flashes, sleep disorders, hypersensitivity reactions, muscle pain, recurrent syncope, constant hunger, significant gait impairment, incapacity to maintain the orthostatic posture are reported.


It is a matter of fact that every day millions of vaccine doses are administered and nothing notable happens, but it is also irrefutable that, regardless of the amount of side effects that are not recorded and the percentage of which remains in fact unknown, in a limited number cases something wrong occurs.


No satisfactory explanation or, in many cases, no explanation at all has been given and it seems that those adverse effects happen on a random and stochastic basis.


Those situations induced us to verify the safety of vaccines from a point of view which was never adopted before: not a biological, but a physical approach. So, we developed a new analysis method based on the use of a Field Emission Gun Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope investigations to detect possible physical contamination in those products.


Materials and methods


44 types of vaccines coming from 2 countries (Italy and France) were analyzed. Table 1 groups them in terms of name, brand and purpose.


Some vaccines, in fact a minority, are meant to deal with a single bacterium or virus, while others are multi-valent.


The list of vaccines we analyzed may contain repeated names, because we considered different batches and years of production of the same vaccine: the ones against influenza in particular.


The study was aimed at verifying a possible physical contamination.


To do that, we performed a new kind of investigation based on observations under a Field Emission Gun Environmental Electron Scanning Microscope (FEG-ESEM, Quanta 200, FEI, The Netherlands) equipped with the X-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscope (EDS, EDAX, Mahwah, NJ, USA) to detect the possible presence of inorganic, particulate contaminants and identify their chemical composition.


A drop of about 20microliter of vaccine is released from the syringe on a 25-mm-diameter cellulose filter (Millipore, USA), inside a flow cabinet. The filter is then deposited on an Aluminum stub covered with an adhesive carbon disc.


The sample is immediately put inside a clean box in order to avoid any contamination and the box is re-opened only for the sample to be inserted inside the FEG-ESEM chamber. We selected that particular type of microscope as it allows to analyse watery and oily samples in low vacuum (from 10 to 130 Pa) at a high sensitivity.


When the water and saline the vaccine contains are evaporated, the biological/physical components emerge on the filter and it is then possible to observe them. This type of microscope (low-vacuum observations) prevents the possible sample contamination and the creation of artefacts.


The observations are made with different sensors secondary-electron sensor and BSE: backscattered-electron sensor), and are performed at a pressure of 8.9 e-1 mbar, at energies ranging from 10 to 30kV to detect the particulate matter’s size, morphology and its elemental composition. The method identifies clearly inorganic bodies with a higher atomic density (looking whiter) than the biological substrate. So, organic entities are visible and easy to distinguish from inorganic ones.


The method cannot distinguish between proteins and organic adjuvants (e.g. squalene, glutamate, proteins, etc.) or viruses, bacteria, bacteria’s DNA, endo-toxins and bacteria’s waste, but their comparatively low atomic density allows us to identify these entities as organic matter.


In some vaccines, the organic matter contains white-looking debris named aggregates, while a high concentration or inorganic debris is called a cluster.


Single inorganic particles or organic-inorganic aggregates are identified, evaluated and counted. The counting procedure is repeated three times by three different operators, with an error lower than 10%. When a layer of salts (Sodium chloride or Aluminum) is detected, we record the situation but we do not do body count.





Results


The investigations verified the physical-chemical composition of the vaccines considered according to the inorganic component as declared by the Producer.


In detail, we verified the presence of saline and Aluminum salts, but further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases, whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product (Table 2).


Play Video Figure 1a shows a layer of crystals of Sodium chloride (NaCl) embedding salts of Aluminum phosphate (AlPO4 ) in a drop of Gardasil (anti-HPV vaccine by Merck) as the EDS spectrum (Figure 1b) shows.


Saline is the fluid base to any vaccine preparation and Aluminum salts or Aluminum hydroxide Al(OH)3 are the adjuvants which are usually added.


Looking at the area outside these precipitates but inside the liquid drop, we identified other things: single particles, clusters of particles and aggregates (organic-inorganic composites) that are due to an interaction of the inorganic particulate matter with the organic part of the vaccine.


As can be seen, the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate.


In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing:


Lead

  • Typhym

  • Cervarix

  • Agrippal S1

  • Meningites

  • Gardasil

Stainless steel

  • Mencevax

  • Infarix Hexa

  • Cervarix

  • Anatetall

  • Focetria

  • Agrippal S1

  • Menveo

  • Prevenar 13

  • Meningitec

  • Vaxigrip

  • Stamaril Pasteur

  • Repevax

  • MMRvaxPro


Tungsten, Aluminum, Calcium chloride

  • Prevenar

  • Infarix


Silicon, Gold, Silver

  • Repevax

  • Gardasil


Vivotif, Meningetec

  • Zirconium

  • Hafnium

  • Strontium

Priorix, Meningetec

  • Tungsten

  • Nickel

  • Iron


Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec);


Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax),


Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro)


Lead, Bismuth (Gardasil)


Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found.


The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44.


The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria.


As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction6 occurs and a “protein corona” is formed.7‒10


The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body.