HISTORIC DUTCH COURT CASE PROSECUTES THE COVID 'NARRATIVE'
Bill Gates. Albert Bourla. Mark Rutte.
The State of the Netherlands.
Mass Media. And a Dutch civil case putting the "pandemic" narrative itself on trial.
This case is unique in its pursuit of individual accountability through unprecedented tortious claims, supported by explosive evidence.
As the 22 October substantive hearing approaches, discover the extraordinary case unfolding in Leeuwarden — the evidence and the attempts to silence expert testimony.
Watch. Listen. Decide for yourself.
Not On The Beeb has been documenting what happened since summer 2020, with over 80 adverse event reports and countless films and investigations. AI & I: Cracking the COVID Code brings six years of that research into one place.
This is a 60-second introduction to that book...
Thsi
HISTORIC DUTCH COURT CASE PROSECUTES THE COVID 'NARRATIVE'
A definitive, historic legal proceeding marking an unprecedented confrontation over global pharmaceutical and institutional accountability.
The historic civil lawsuit in the Netherlands is brought by seven Pfizer “vaccine”-injured individuals, represented by attorney Peter W.H. Stassen, seeking individual accountability from global figures like Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Mark Rutte, along with the State of The Netherlands and no fewer than thirteen high-ranking defendants from politics, business, media, and science.
This lawsuit marks an unprecedented confrontation between citizens and global institutions. While defendants cling to the official narrative of “safe and effective” mRNA injections, the plaintiffs’ case presents an uncompromising clash of hard facts substantiated by expert evidence. The divergence is so profound that the plaintiffs' pleadings formally characterise the rollout as the greatest genocide in history, putting the establishment’s preferred pandemic narrative directly on trial.
The core argument in the proceedings is as brief as it is clear: COVID-19 is not a disease but a project known as “Covid-19: The Great Reset.” The defendants in these civil proceedings are being held personally liable with their private assets on the grounds of tort. Through their actions and omissions, they unlawfully misled the plaintiffs, as a result of which the latter received a Covid-19 injection, causing serious damage to their physical integrity and their mental and physical health.
After Bill Gates lost his initial jurisdictional challenge, the court ordered the case to move forward into a highly significant substantive merits hearing scheduled for 22 October 2026. This landmark case marks the first time global architects of the Great Reset are legally compelled to present a formal defence against substantiated allegations of institutional deception and public harm in an open court of law.
Powerful, compelling and explosive evidence has been submitted to the Court in these proceedings (September 22) by Sasha Latypova, Dr Mike Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts andJoseph Sansone. The significance of that evidence extends far beyond the hearing itself. It forms part of an extraordinary evidential record which can be examined, scrutinised and built upon long after these proceedings have concluded. What has been assembled and placed before the Court provides a substantial body of material from which future lawyers, researchers and litigants can draw... in the Netherlands and in jurisdictions around the world.
This case is bigger than one judgment. It will not result in prison sentences, but the evidence placed on the judicial record and the legal ground broken here can have consequences far beyond this courtroom — providing a foundation for future cases and, we hope, inspiring lawyers around the world to stand up and pursue further routes to accountability.
THE DEFENDANTS
Among the defendants in this extraordinary civil lawsuit are Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla and former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, alongside the State of the Netherlands and thirteen other prominent figures from politics, business, media and science. These are not simply individuals named or criticised in the plaintiffs’ case: they are defendants in the proceedings, represented by lawyers, with defendants residing within Dutch municipalities also summoned in person. Following the rejection of Bill Gates’ challenge to the jurisdiction of the Dutch court, the case now advances to the substantive merits hearing in Leeuwarden on 22 October 2026.
What makes these proceedings so extraordinary is the scale of what the court is being asked to confront. The plaintiffs allege intentional and unlawful deception concerning the pandemic and the necessity, safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 injections, and seek to hold the defendants personally liable in civil law for the resulting harm.
Expert evidence from Sasha Latypova, Dr Mike Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts and Dr Joseph Sansone has been submitted in support of the plaintiffs’ case. On 22 October, arguments exist outside the boundaries of mainstream institutional debate are now placed where they cannot simply be dismissed with a headline or a press statement: before a court, in substantive proceedings, with the defendants called upon to answer them.
Mr EVERHARDUS ITE HOFSTRA
2. Mr JAAP TAMINO VAN DISSEL
3. Ms MARIA PETRONELLA GERARDA KOOPMANS
4. Mr MARK RUTTE
5. Ms SIGRID AGNES MARIA KAAG
6. Mr HUGO MATTHEÜS DE JONGE
7. Mr ERNST JOHAN KUIPERS
8. Mr DIEDERIK ANTONIUS MARIA PAULUS JOHANNES GOMMERS
9. Mr WOPKE BASTIAAN HOEKSTRA
10. Ms CORNELIA VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN
Solicitors: Mr R.W. Veldhuis and Mr M.E.A. Möhring
(pharmaceutical industry)
11. Mr ALBERT BOURLA
Lawyer: D. C. Roessingh, LL.B.
(mass media)
12. Ms GISELLE JACQUELINE MARIE-THÉRÈSE VAN CANN
13. Mr PAUL JANSEN
Solicitor: Mr A. Bekema
(non-governmental organisation (NGO, WEF))
14. Mr FEIKE SIJBESMA
Lawyers: R.W. Veldhuis, LL.B., and M.E.A. Möhring, LL.B.
15. Mr WILLIAM HENRY BILL GATES III
Lawyer: W.H. Heemskerk, LL.B.
(quasi-governmental)
16. Ms AGNES CATHARINA VAN DER VOORT-KANT
Lawyer: Mr A.H. Ekker
(public sector)
17. THE STATE OF THE NETHERLANDS, a legal entity under public law, having its seat in The Hague (“the State”) and with its registered office at Korte Voorhout 8, The Hague (2511 CB);
Lawyers: R.W. Veldhuis, LL.M., and M.E.A. Möhring, LL.M.
THE EXPERTS
Sasha Latypova
Alexandra (Sasha) Latypova, MBA, is a former pharmaceutical research and development executive whose expertise includes clinical development, pharmaceutical regulation, manufacturing and product quality. Her evidence examines the regulatory, manufacturing and legal framework under which the Covid-19 mRNA products were developed and deployed, drawing upon primary regulatory documents, Pfizer manufacturing records, legislation and other documentary material.
Latypova provides evidence that mRNA/DNA platforms are inherently dual-use technologies, but they are structurally and legally deployed as weaponised applications. Latypova's evidence demonstrates that the Covid-19 injections were deployed as medical countermeasures rather than conventionally regulated pharmaceutical products. She presents evidence of failures in Good Manufacturing Practice, product integrity and regulatory safeguards, and argues that emergency frameworks removed or bypassed protections ordinarily applicable to medicines.
Her central conclusion is that the products were developed and deployed through a military and security-led countermeasure framework and are, in her opinion, legally and functionally indistinguishable from biochemical weapons.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Dr Mike Yeadon is a pharmacologist and former pharmaceutical research executive, trained in biochemistry and toxicology with a PhD in respiratory pharmacology. He spent 24 years in pharmaceutical R&D, including as Vice President and Worldwide Head of Allergy and Respiratory Research at Pfizer, and subsequently founded and led Ziarco Pharmaceuticals, which was acquired by Novartis. His expertise encompasses rational drug design, toxicology, immunology and the development and safety assessment of new medicines.
Yeadon asserts that the Covid-19 injections contain multiple design features which would predictably cause toxicity, and concludes that these features demonstrate intentional rather than inadvertent harm. He identifies the use of mRNA, the selection of spike protein and lipid nanoparticle delivery as principal toxicity concerns, arguing that these may cause immune-mediated tissue damage, direct toxicity and effects upon reproductive organs and fertility. He further asserts that the products were inadequately tested gene therapies rather than conventional vaccines and concludes that their design was intended to cause injury, death and reduced fertility, thereby constituting, in his opinion, biochemical weapons.
Catherine Austin Fitts
Catherine Austin Fitts is an American investment banker and financial commentator, formerly a managing director and board member of Dillon Read and a senior US federal housing official, who subsequently founded the Solari Report. Her evidence draws upon her experience of government finance, investment banking and financial systems to examine what she describes as a long-running financial coup and the restructuring of economic and governmental power.
Fitts presents the “Going Direct Reset” as a fundamental re-engineering of the monetary and governance system, arguing that plans developed by central bankers before the Covid-19 pandemic were implemented during it to accelerate the consolidation of financial and political control. She connects this process with central bank digital currencies, digital identity and increasingly centralised technological infrastructure, describing the ultimate direction as one in which money, assets and individual economic participation can be directly controlled. Her wider evidence on plunder, sovereignty and “Mr Global” places the pandemic within a broader transition towards concentrated ownership, digital surveillance and technocratic control rather than treating it principally as a public-health event.
Dr Joseph Sansone
Dr Joseph Sansone, M.S., PhD is a psychotherapist with academic qualifications in psychology and clinical mental health counselling. His evidence has two principal strands: his own psychological analysis of Psychopathic Authoritarianism as applied to the conduct alleged in this case, and his presentation and analysis of the late Professor Francis A. Boyle’s expert opinion concerning biological weapons. Boyle was a professor of international law and drafted the US Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989; Sansone authenticates Boyle’s affidavit and records Boyle’s intention, before his death, to give evidence in this case.
Sansone presents Boyle’s opinion that the Covid-19 mRNA nanoparticle injections constitute biological weapons, analysing that conclusion against US, Dutch and international biological-weapons law and the alleged gain-of-function origins, genetic payload and nanoparticle delivery system.
Separately, Sansone applies his framework of Psychopathic Authoritarianism to the case, describing an interlocking system of fear, coercion, censorship, conformity, institutional control and diffusion of responsibility. He argues that the alleged conduct exhibits the ‘Dark Tetrad’ traits of sadism, narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy, and that these psychological and social-control mechanisms explain how the programme was implemented, maintained and normalised across institutions and society.
The Evidence Accepted. Their Voices Silenced.
For seven years, we have witnessed a disturbing pattern: dissenting voices silenced, legitimate questions dismissed, and scientists, doctors, researchers and professionals who challenge prevailing narratives denied the platforms on which their evidence can be properly heard.
We believe what has happened in this case forms part of that pattern…
The plaintiffs have assembled a group of international party experts whose evidence addresses central scientific, medical, regulatory, legal and financial issues arising in this case.
Their substantive written evidence—supported by brief video evidence—was submitted to the District Court on 7 December 2025 and forms part of the evidential record in these proceedings.
The plaintiffs also sought permission for the experts to appear before the Court and give their evidence orally and under oath.
That request was denied.
Crucially, the experts themselves and their written evidence were not rejected, nor did the Court determine that their expertise, written evidence or conclusions were inadmissible, unreliable or wrong. What the Court declined was the plaintiffs' request for their party experts to be heard orally during the hearing.
Their evidence therefore remained before the Court, but their voices would not be heard in the courtroom. One must ask—how can evidence of this significance receive full scrutiny if the experts who produced it cannot be questioned before the Court? How can competing accounts be properly tested if dissenting expert voices are confined to the written page?
In advance of the hearing on the merits, Attorney Peter W.H. Stassen has responded by bringing those voices directly into the evidential record. Participating experts have been recorded giving evidence on camera, under oath for the purposes of the recording, answering structured questions and explaining the substance of the evidence already placed before the Court.
AI & I CRACKING THE COVID CODE
PROOF OF DECEPTION BY NOT ON THE BEEB
The AI was trained to defend the narrative. Then it started answering honestly.
One author. One AI built to steer people back to official answers. Nineteen chapters of persistent questioning on PCR, excess deaths, Yellow Card under-reporting, batch variation and suppressed treatments. AI & I: Cracking the COVID Code is a forensic investigation, and also a lesson in how to get the truth out of machines and institutions.
THE ARCHITECTURE OF DECEPTION ON AUDIO FROM NOT ON THE BEEB
In AI & I: Cracking the COVID Code, Mark Playne questions an artificial intelligence trained on official sources, pharmaceutical language and “approved” frameworks. He does it chapter by chapter, and he does not back down. The AI concedes ground on the PCR test and the cycle thresholds its inventor warned against; on the legal mechanism of Emergency Use Authorisation and why cheap, long-established treatments were sidelined; on the gap between Yellow Card reports and real harm; on the ONS baseline change of February 2024 that halved the official excess-death count; and on batch-to-batch variation in adverse events.
Written as live dialogue, the book reads quickly. It is two things at once: an investigation, and a working manual for questioning AI, experts and authority yourself.
Your judgement matters. Your questions matter.
ON SPOTIFY
ON AUTHOR'S WEBSITE
THE BOOKS
On 22 October 2026, a Dutch court in Leeuwarden hears a civil claim by vaccine-injured citizens against Bill Gates, Pfizer’s Albert Bourla, NATO chief Mark Rutte, the Dutch State and others. The central allegation is that the public was misled.
AI & I: Cracking the COVID Code asks the same question from a different direction.
Mark Playne did not call expert witnesses. He interrogated an AI system trained to favour official narratives, and he kept pressing until it answered on logic rather than deference. The result is a forensic dialogue across 19 chapters that reaches many of the questions now before the Dutch court:
Regulation: how Emergency Use Authorisation law required that no alternative treatment exist, and what happened to the alternatives.
Measurement: the PCR test run beyond its design purpose, and the February 2024 ONS methodology change that removed around 127,000 deaths from the excess count.
Harm: why the Yellow Card scheme, by the regulator’s own estimates, captures only a fraction of injuries, and why the time lag between injection and injury hides the signal.
Product: batch variation in adverse event rates, and the Japanese contamination of 1.6 million Moderna doses.
The witnesses in Leeuwarden speak with credentials. This book shows what an ordinary person can establish with persistence, logic and the right questions. It shows that the gap between the two is smaller than institutions would like.
Readers call it “addictive”, “a wake-up call” and “impossible to put down”. Many buy extra copies for family.
Part 1 ends with a warning. Part 2 asks what is in the vaccines, and what has caused the symptoms we call “flu” for nearly 500 years.
QUOTES
“A riveting read opening up Pandora’s box through dialogue with AI.”
Simon Blair
“Clear, simple yet comprehensive, with surprising logical progress to insights.”
Dr Philip Stowell MB BS FACNEM
“Half way through in two days. Bought two more copies to give to friends.”
Nicola Vowles
AMAZON
Amazon has just deleted another 30 reviews off this book.
Why?
There are reviews we backed up below...
It's much better to buy from us than Amazon.
We print and ship from inside USA, UK, CANADA and AUSTRALIA
AI & I
Cracking The COVID Code
Amazon Reader Reviews
★★★★★
AI & I – A Bold and Unflinching Dialogue
AI & I is unlike any book I've read on recent world events. Rather than a lecture, Mark Playne presents the story as a dialogue with an AI — a kind of Socratic conversation that keeps the pages moving and makes even complex subjects easier to grasp. The book digs deep into the COVID years, asking the awkward questions many people felt but couldn't quite put into words. What I found most powerful was how it validates those gut instincts that "something wasn't right," while also showing how to build an argument logically, step by step. It isn't perfect — a few typos slipped through, and it's certainly not light reading — but the passion, humour, and sheer determination behind the research shine through. For anyone who felt uneasy with the mainstream narrative and is still searching for answers, this book is both vindication and fuel. If you want to sharpen your critical thinking, or simply don't want to feel alone in your doubts, AI & I is well worth downloading.
★★★★★
I'm not the same person I was before I read this.
I thought I was relatively aware of the information around C-19 and have done considerable research and burrowing down rabbit holes. I thought some of the things that I'd heard or read about it were just rumour or scaremongering. I was wrong. The book is fascinating. The level of information is mind blowing. There were parts that I had to skim through because, to be honest, I'd rather have continued my life thinking that I had avoided all the contamination but it turns out that may not be the case. It is a deep dive and concentration is needed to take everything in. It isn't a light read while you drink your bedtime cocoa. I'm immensely glad that I read it. I feel I have gained a great insight into how we, the normal people, are being played and have been for a very long time. I urge people to read this book if only to understand what evil there is in the world.
★★★★★
Definitely gets those brain cogs whirring!
A must read for anyone who is interested in delving deeper into recent events over the last 5 years and has questions about what exactly happened, why things may have happened and having things explained in an easy to understand way. For anyone who had a niggling feeling that something wasn't quite right, whether you went along with the narrative or not, and wants to question more — Mark poses many of those questions to AI with often surprising, in-depth and well articulated answers, backed up by evidence. I am impressed with the way Mark asks his questions so as to get to the heart of the matter, delving beneath the surface of any standard formulaic replies and arriving at a more comprehensive answer. It definitely gets you thinking!
★★★★★
A masterclass in forensic questioning...
Even if you've stood apart and viewed the past five years with an unclouded and discerning eye, there are still things to be learnt in AI & I about the psyop which was the COVID years. Here is the truth, in all its fascinating and horrific nakedness, teased out with tenacity, knowledge, and humour. The odd thing is, this book is actually fun to read. Given that it's a dialogue between an AI and a human about the most evil hoax perpetuated on the world's population, it's hardly the premise for a fun read — but that's the way it plays. Do yourself a favour and buy this book. Hell, do everyone you know a favour and buy this book for them too.
★★★★★
Insightful Socratic questioning about the C19 and contagion narratives
I know that AI can never be genuinely intelligent, but many of the answers its questioner-guided pattern-matching dug up were quite damning of the corrupt medical, government, NGO and corporate establishment narrative over the last 5 years, and for over a century, including revealing real medical word and phrase meanings. Those responsible remain shockingly unpunished and free to continue their evil. The author has stated that subsequent books will be more narrowly targeted and therefore shorter, because this book was a lot to digest.
★★★★★
A Must Read to educate yourself and correct what you've been indoctrinated to believe!
Well, not quite sure how to describe what is a must read that a large percentage of the population will just find too unbelievable to take in! Not easy in changing your perception of the world that you've been led to believe in, but please do read this book — then you will question things more. Then at least you'll be informed as to what is really going on in the world and have some knowledge that the mainstream media is certainly not going to tell you! Mark's understanding and interaction with AI is a masterpiece of dialogue. Well done Mark — this book is a masterpiece. Educate yourself and read this book. It will change your life.
Comments