VIDEO SUBMISSION HISTORIC DUTCH COURT CASE PROSECUTES THE COVID 'NARRATIVE' - (PART 2)
Before you scroll down to the case, here is a book from Not On The Beeb.
Since the summer of 2020, Not On The Beeb has been documenting the COVID scandal: publishing over 80 adverse event reports and producing countless films and investigations. AI & I: Cracking the COVID Code is the culmination of six years of that work.
64 second video>>>
HISTORIC DUTCH COURT CASE PROSECUTES THE COVID 'NARRATIVE'
LIVESTREAM 22ND OCTOBER
Court Hearing – Livestream
12:30 to 17:30 CEST
11:30 to 16:30 BST
The official livestream link for the court hearing: https://streams.nfgd.nl/livestream-coronazaak-22-oktober-2026
THE EVIDENCE IS IN!
READ THE FULL STORY FIRST, THEN SCROLL DOWN FOR THE BREAKING UPDATE OF 15 OCTOBER!
The plaintiffs asked for their international party experts to appear before the District Court of the Northern Netherlands, to give their evidence orally and under oath.
The Court declined that request.
The judgment of 26 November 2025 did not reject the experts, determine their evidence inadmissible, find their expertise unreliable or conclude that their opinions were wrong. Instead, the Court declined to hear their oral testimony during the substantive hearing—or at a separate hearing—citing, among other considerations, the complexity of the proceedings, the considerable hearing time required and the need to afford the defendants the opportunity to present experts and witnesses in response.
Their evidence, however, could still be placed before the Court.
And so, The Video Plea was born.
Attorney Peter W.H. Stassen devised a powerful and creative response: if the experts could not stand before the three judges in Leeuwarden to explain their evidence, their evidence could be recorded and placed before them.
In a series of specially recorded examinations, the participating experts give an oath for the purposes of the recording, answer structured questions and present their evidence directly, in their own words.
The Court can see them. The Court can hear them. The Court can hear their reasoning.
The Video Plea was submitted to the Court and served upon the defendants on 22 September 2026, alongside further written evidence from several of the experts—exactly one month before the hearing on the merits. It does not consume the precious hours allocated to that hearing; both the Court and the defendants have the material in advance.
The Video Plea was submitted to the Court and every defendant as Exhibit 157, together with further written expert testimony.
The further written expert testimony submitted alongside the Video Plea was accepted. The video was not. The following day, the Court rejected Exhibit 157. No defendant’s attorney had objected to it. No reason was given by the Court for refusing it.
Attorney Peter Stassen objected immediately, and what he told the Court about the evidence it had just refused could not be more significant:
“Exhibit 157 therefore serves not only to clarify my clients’ arguments, but above all to substantiate those arguments. Crucially, this video submission serves as evidence for the claimants’ assertion that Covid-19 is not a disease but a project (Covid-19: The Great Reset) and that the Covid-19 injections are a biological weapon being deployed as part of this project, which is crucial to the project that is still being carried out to this day. It therefore constitutes crucial evidence for the factual basis of the claimants’ assertions that the defendants are implementers of the aforementioned project and, in that capacity, have acted and continue to act unlawfully towards the claimants by inducing them, through deception, to receive a Covid-19 injection.”
This wasn’t peripheral evidence. This wasn’t some irrelevant attachment.
Attorney Peter Stassen made clear, this was evidence intended to substantiate the central allegations and evidence at the heart of their case, sworn testimony addressing their assertion that the Covid-19 injections are a biological weapon, deployed as part of the Great Reset project, and that the defendants themselves are implementers of that project.
And the Court rejected it.
Mr Stassen warned that excluding this evidence was “preventing a fair trial within the meaning of Article 6 of the ECHR.”
And then he went further stating:
“This decision undermines the functioning of the rule of law.”
Peter Stassen is not an attorney who frightens easily. He does not fear the prominent and demonstrably insulated defendants, and he does not fear challenging the judiciary itself. His concern is the truth, the evidence, and his duty to put both before the Court, wherever that leads.
So what exactly was in those four and a half hours that the Court refused to admit?
You don’t have to wonder. You’re about to see it.
So please watch and listen closely. And please share. We need the eyes of the world locked onto this case, and firmly on the Dutch judiciary. They must know they are being watched - because history is being made right now.
For seven years, we have watched dissenting scientists, doctors, researchers and professionals struggle to have their evidence heard on some of the most consequential questions of our time. We believe evidence should be confronted, scrutinised and answered—not silenced.
The hearing on the merits takes place on 22 October 2026 at 12:30, before a three-judge chamber of the District Court of the Northern Netherlands in Leeuwarden.
Attorney Peter W.H. Stassen's Objection Letter
This is Peter Stassen’s formal and urgent objection to the Court’s rejection of Exhibit 157 – the full expert video submission. Peter challenges the decision on the basis that the evidence was submitted within the deadline set by the Court, no reasons were provided for its rejection, no opportunity was given to rectify any issue, and none of the defendants’ lawyers had objected to its submission. He stresses the importance of the sworn expert evidence to the plaintiffs’ case and argues that excluding it from the proceedings prevents a fair trial under Article 6 ECHR. He therefore asks the Court urgently to reconsider its decision and admit Exhibit 157, or otherwise make an order that properly safeguards the plaintiffs’ right to a fair trial.
DOWNLOAD LETTER HERE>>>
LIVESTREAM 22ND OCTOBER
Court Hearing – Livestream
12:30 to 17:30 CEST
11:30 to 16:30 BST
The official livestream link for the court hearing: https://streams.nfgd.nl/livestream-coronazaak-22-oktober-2026
Back to the book!
AI & I CRACKING THE COVID CODE
PROOF OF DECEPTION BY 'NOT ON THE BEEB'
The AI was trained to defend the narrative. Then it started answering honestly.
One author. One AI built to steer people back to official answers. Nineteen chapters of persistent questioning on PCR, excess deaths, Yellow Card under-reporting, batch variation and suppressed treatments. AI & I: Cracking the COVID Code is a forensic investigation, and also a lesson in how to get the truth out of machines and institutions.
'THE ARCHITECTURE OF DECEPTION'
ON AUDIO
FROM NOT ON THE BEEB
In AI & I: Cracking the COVID Code, Mark Playne questions an artificial intelligence trained on official sources, pharmaceutical language and “approved” frameworks. He does it chapter by chapter, and he does not back down. The AI concedes ground on the PCR test and the cycle thresholds its inventor warned against; on the legal mechanism of Emergency Use Authorisation and why cheap, long-established treatments were sidelined; on the gap between Yellow Card reports and real harm; on the ONS baseline change of February 2024 that halved the official excess-death count; and on batch-to-batch variation in adverse events.
Written as live dialogue, the book reads quickly. It is two things at once: an investigation, and a working manual for questioning AI, experts and authority yourself.
Your judgement matters. Your questions matter.
ON SPOTIFY
ON AUTHOR'S WEBSITE
THE BOOKS
On 22 October 2026, a Dutch court in Leeuwarden hears a civil claim by vaccine-injured citizens against Bill Gates, Pfizer’s Albert Bourla, NATO chief Mark Rutte, the Dutch State and others. The central allegation is that the public was misled.
AI & I: Cracking the COVID Code asks the same question from a different direction.
Mark Playne did not call expert witnesses. He interrogated an AI system trained to favour official narratives, and he kept pressing until it answered on logic rather than deference. The result is a forensic dialogue across 19 chapters that reaches many of the questions now before the Dutch court:
Regulation: how Emergency Use Authorisation law required that no alternative treatment exist, and what happened to the alternatives.
Measurement: the PCR test run beyond its design purpose, and the February 2024 ONS methodology change that removed around 127,000 deaths from the excess count.
Harm: why the Yellow Card scheme, by the regulator’s own estimates, captures only a fraction of injuries, and why the time lag between injection and injury hides the signal.
Product: batch variation in adverse event rates, and the Japanese contamination of 1.6 million Moderna doses.
The witnesses in Leeuwarden speak with credentials. This book shows what an ordinary person can establish with persistence, logic and the right questions. It shows that the gap between the two is smaller than institutions would like.
Readers call it “addictive”, “a wake-up call” and “impossible to put down”. Many buy extra copies for family.
Part 1 ends with a warning. Part 2 asks what is in the vaccines, and what has caused the symptoms we call “flu” for nearly 500 years.
QUOTES
“A riveting read opening up Pandora’s box through dialogue with AI.”
Simon Blair
“Clear, simple yet comprehensive, with surprising logical progress to insights.”
Dr Philip Stowell MB BS FACNEM
“Half way through in two days. Bought two more copies to give to friends.”
Nicola Vowles
AMAZON
Amazon has just deleted another 30 reviews off this book.
Why?
There are reviews we backed up below...
It's much better to buy from us than Amazon.
We print and ship from inside USA, UK, CANADA and AUSTRALIA
AI & I
Cracking The COVID Code
Amazon Reader Reviews
★★★★★
AI & I – A Bold and Unflinching Dialogue
AI & I is unlike any book I've read on recent world events. Rather than a lecture, Mark Playne presents the story as a dialogue with an AI — a kind of Socratic conversation that keeps the pages moving and makes even complex subjects easier to grasp. The book digs deep into the COVID years, asking the awkward questions many people felt but couldn't quite put into words. What I found most powerful was how it validates those gut instincts that "something wasn't right," while also showing how to build an argument logically, step by step. It isn't perfect — a few typos slipped through, and it's certainly not light reading — but the passion, humour, and sheer determination behind the research shine through. For anyone who felt uneasy with the mainstream narrative and is still searching for answers, this book is both vindication and fuel. If you want to sharpen your critical thinking, or simply don't want to feel alone in your doubts, AI & I is well worth downloading.
★★★★★
I'm not the same person I was before I read this.
I thought I was relatively aware of the information around C-19 and have done considerable research and burrowing down rabbit holes. I thought some of the things that I'd heard or read about it were just rumour or scaremongering. I was wrong. The book is fascinating. The level of information is mind blowing. There were parts that I had to skim through because, to be honest, I'd rather have continued my life thinking that I had avoided all the contamination but it turns out that may not be the case. It is a deep dive and concentration is needed to take everything in. It isn't a light read while you drink your bedtime cocoa. I'm immensely glad that I read it. I feel I have gained a great insight into how we, the normal people, are being played and have been for a very long time. I urge people to read this book if only to understand what evil there is in the world.
★★★★★
Definitely gets those brain cogs whirring!
A must read for anyone who is interested in delving deeper into recent events over the last 5 years and has questions about what exactly happened, why things may have happened and having things explained in an easy to understand way. For anyone who had a niggling feeling that something wasn't quite right, whether you went along with the narrative or not, and wants to question more — Mark poses many of those questions to AI with often surprising, in-depth and well articulated answers, backed up by evidence. I am impressed with the way Mark asks his questions so as to get to the heart of the matter, delving beneath the surface of any standard formulaic replies and arriving at a more comprehensive answer. It definitely gets you thinking!
★★★★★
A masterclass in forensic questioning...
Even if you've stood apart and viewed the past five years with an unclouded and discerning eye, there are still things to be learnt in AI & I about the psyop which was the COVID years. Here is the truth, in all its fascinating and horrific nakedness, teased out with tenacity, knowledge, and humour. The odd thing is, this book is actually fun to read. Given that it's a dialogue between an AI and a human about the most evil hoax perpetuated on the world's population, it's hardly the premise for a fun read — but that's the way it plays. Do yourself a favour and buy this book. Hell, do everyone you know a favour and buy this book for them too.
★★★★★
Insightful Socratic questioning about the C19 and contagion narratives
I know that AI can never be genuinely intelligent, but many of the answers its questioner-guided pattern-matching dug up were quite damning of the corrupt medical, government, NGO and corporate establishment narrative over the last 5 years, and for over a century, including revealing real medical word and phrase meanings. Those responsible remain shockingly unpunished and free to continue their evil. The author has stated that subsequent books will be more narrowly targeted and therefore shorter, because this book was a lot to digest.
★★★★★
A Must Read to educate yourself and correct what you've been indoctrinated to believe!
Well, not quite sure how to describe what is a must read that a large percentage of the population will just find too unbelievable to take in! Not easy in changing your perception of the world that you've been led to believe in, but please do read this book — then you will question things more. Then at least you'll be informed as to what is really going on in the world and have some knowledge that the mainstream media is certainly not going to tell you! Mark's understanding and interaction with AI is a masterpiece of dialogue. Well done Mark — this book is a masterpiece. Educate yourself and read this book. It will change your life.
Comments