'AI & I' FOREWORD - BY DR PHILIP STOWELL

This is the full, unedited version

Dr. Philip Bradfield Stowell

MB BS (London), FACNEM

Retired GP, Australia / UK / Algeria

I retired in 2022 after 44 years as a general medical practitioner or family doctor, having worked across three continents, firstly in the UK, then briefly in Africa, and finally in Australia. Our family can count more than five generations of doctors. Like my father I was trained at Brasenose College, Oxford, and St Thomas’ Hospital Medical School in London, qualifying in 1977. I emigrated to Australia in 1988, where I remained in practice until retirement. Along the way, I became a Fellow of the Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (ACNEM), and gave talks regularly at their seminars.

Being a doctor is one of the most privileged occupations in the world. It carries immense social and clinical responsibility, you are awarded the profound trust of your patients, and you have a sacred duty to uphold the principles embedded in the Hippocratic Oath:

• Professionalism

• Autonomy

• Privacy

• Informed consent

• And, above all, non-maleficence

‘Primum non nocere’ or ‘First, do no harm’, is a widely known medical maxim and often quoted, but there is a second and perhaps more important guiding principle and it is the Precautionary Principle, which urges humility and caution at every clinical intervention.

Over the decades, I have witnessed a steady erosion of professional independence and the creeping encroachment of bureaucratic and corporate control over the doctor-patient relationship. Guidelines and protocols increasingly replacing thoughtful individualised care.

By early 2020, I sensed something was deeply wrong. The Covid Pandemic was not unfolding naturally; it was being orchestrated. What struck me wasn’t just the clamor of the content but its delivery; synchronised slogans, coordinated and identical media messaging and scripts, and government-sponsored fear and silly distraction campaigns, like ‘Clap for the NHS’. 

Governments in my opinion have a fundamental responsibility to communicate clearly and truthfully with their electorates, and to do so with reassurance, grown up to grown up. That would be real leadership. 

What we actually got from our governments worldwide, was ‘The Narrative’ composed of fear, propaganda and outright lies about everything:- Covid, its origin, its spread, transmissibility, the value of previously lauded effective cheap medications, the “saviour-vaccines”, their safety and efficacy and the data that supported this, the science behind masks and social distancing, or lack of it, the fabricated need to shut down a healthy productive society, the appalling injuries and deaths caused by the vaccines. One has to ask how this was orchestrated because it certainly wasn’t a natural series of events

We got swamped by a series of master classes in misinformation and disinformation. 

They did not, could not, would not tell the truth about any of it. 

And they still can’t! 

This wasn’t leadership; it was theatre. That was when my red line was crossed. I began to question everything I was being told.

We were told to “trust the science,” yet any principled or evidence-based alternative views were mocked, censored, or punished.

We were told the injection stayed in the arm, it doesn’t.

We were told it was safe and effective, the data says otherwise.

We were even told not to aspirate before injecting the gene therapy, a basic step to avoid intravascular delivery.

That advice, in my view, was clinically negligent.

The truth was out there all the time, spoken by respected voices in their fields but not covered by the MSM. Sadly, they were ignored, silenced or destroyed.

Medical colleges turned on their own.

Principled dissenters were deregistered.

Clinical caution became a crime.

Medical curiosity became heresy.

This reversal of the most foundational ethics in medicine paralysed many practitioners. It prevented honest understanding of the illness and crippled any humane response.

The so-called solution, “the vaccine”, was never up for debate.

This new mRNA product was rushed to market under Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA), which is only valid if there are no effective existing treatments. But effective treatments did exist, and Fauci knew it. These cheap and highly effective regimens were lied about and aggressively and falsely discredited to clear the path for what was branded as our “only hope.”

Let’s be clear: this is not a traditional vaccine. It is gene therapy, rebranded by quietly redefining the term “vaccine.” The WHO changed definitions, and with it, public understanding. The speed of approval, lack of long-term data, and unprecedented scale of rollout, despite mounting evidence of harm, revealed a disturbing willingness to prioritise policy over patient safety.

The list of known possible side effects, released by regulatory agencies, was enormous, spanning almost every bodily system. Yet still the message to doctors remained: “Inject, don’t question.” And still the doctors didn’t question.

Even celebrities were recruited to chant, “Get the jab.”

No worries then!

What followed was a pattern of denial and ridicule:

• Menstrual irregularities? Coincidence.

• Miscarriages? Misreported.

• Fatigue, brain fog, cognitive issues, myocarditis, strokes, turbo-cancers? Anecdotes.

• Young athletes collapsing on the field? Irrelevant.

• Babies having heart attacks? That’s always happened! Right?

  
  

The data was ignored. The stories were buried. The people were gaslit. And no evidence whatsoever of the Precautionary Principle let alone Do No Harm.

Then came the revelations:

• PCR tests were run at absurdly high cycle thresholds, virtually guaranteeing false positives.

• The virus had a survival rate of over 99% for most people; like the flu perhaps.

• The infamous Chinese footage of people collapsing in the street, was staged.

• Flu all but vanished, while Covid numbers replaced them almost identically!.

• The injection did not stay in the deltoid muscle but travelled throughout the body, to the testes, ovaries and across the blood/brain barrier.

• Reports of magnetism at injection sites were mocked publicly, never properly investigated.

At every turn, transparency was absent. The public was kept in the dark. And too many doctors, whether fearful, captured or for whatever other reason, stayed silent.

In retirement, freed from professional constraints, and the ever-present threat of AHPRA, I explored more deeply. Many dissenting voices have emerged, some thoughtful, others extreme, but most pointing to long-laid plans: from the eugenics movement to Fabian socialism and early technocratic visions of a managed society.

In the commercial world, secrecy is often accepted to protect “proprietary interest.” But medical history teaches us the danger of such opacity: DDT -Thalidomide - Mesh implants - Vioxx - Amalgam fillings

And beyond medicine:

• Asbestos (known to be fatal, but suppressed)

• Tobacco (who could forget that generational saga)

• Lead in paint and petrol (promoted despite harm to parents and foetuses)

• Glyphosate (now linked to cancer and contaminating the food supply)

• PFAS (now in our blood)

• VW Dieselgate

• Grenfell Tower

• Boeing 737 Max among many others

Each a chapter in the same story: when secrecy shields profit, the public pays, often dearly.

So too with mRNA injections. We are dealing here, not only with novel science, but unknowns: genetic material, spike proteins, HIV and SV40 fragments, nanoparticles, graphene, and immune-evasive modRNA. These products’ ingredients lists seemed designed to obscure, not clarify. 

No transparency. No accountability, No history and this time, No liability.

Governments indemnified vaccine manufacturers long ago, in the mid-80s’s; but with Covid, they signed secret contracts with Big Pharma forbidding any legal redress, for any reason, at any time. Then they hid those contracts, even as evidence of major harm mounted.

The public was left with slogans: “Safe and Effective.” and “Anti-Vaxxer”; that strange insult thrown at the only ones who really don’t regret their recent vaccine decisions.

There has been no public adult conversation about any of this. No honest admission even of uncertainty from governments, regulators, manufacturers, health departments, or colleges. The silence has been deafening. The dogma monotonous and insulting. And the longer it continues, the more irrefutable the evidence grows.

Dissenters to The Narrative have worked diligently, publishing research, ideas, clinical observations wherever they can. But their contributions were hard to find, suppressed, ignored, ridiculed. Despite the effort and integrity of many professionals, their warnings rarely reached the wider public.

Most people, understandably, were just trying to survive, too distracted by the daily juggling of burdens under unprecedented restrictions to appreciate the enormity of what else was happening around them.

It’s the Roman trick of the bread and circuses: feed and entertain, distract, confuse, frighten, and mislead the population, and you can control them. Wrap it all in the illusion of concern for public safety, and many will not only comply, but defend the very system oppressing them. The language of “protecting the vulnerable” masks the deeper reality of manipulation.

As Klaus Schwab and his cohorts have made clear in their own words and their contemptuous tone, the global population is regarded as “useless eaters”; especially by those who attend elite gatherings at Davos, like the WEF and the Bilderberg group as well as a wide range of industry leaders . They claim, having ‘inserted’ their disciples into so many worldwide governments that they now have the means to plan for all humanity.

Changing another person’s mind is never easy. Yes, it can be done through brute-force propaganda, but meaningful personal change comes only through individual, internal reassessment. To invite someone to question what they’ve believed to be true, safe, or secure requires care, trust, and time. It’s rarely about shouting louder. Often, the most effective approach is simply to ask a question, share an idea, or offer an unfamiliar perspective, and let it sit.

Recently, I came across a website called Not On The Beeb or NOTB, which covers the topics that the BBC, now little more than a state propaganda mouthpiece, routinely avoids. As a subscriber to the Substack, I was offered a free (early review) copy of AI & I. Never one to look a gift horse in the mouth, I dipped in.

I found myself drawn into a fascinating record of a conversation between a human and AI. The artificial intelligence system appears to respond with both intelligence and insight. 

At first glance, the book explores how to interact with artificial intelligence and understand its emerging role. But soon, the conversation begins to examine deeper questions: What forces have shaped these events? Are there patterns, motives, and designs hidden beneath the headlines? How should we read between the lines? 

It covers not only Covid, but a number of other events that are coming to define our times: the desperate control of The Narrative, the erasure of dissent, the weaponization of language, and the quiet slide into technocratic government. from PCR testing and mRNA technology to the inherent dangers of EMF and 5G. 

AI & I does not scream or accuse, it reveals and invites. It is an assessment of many of the aspects of the theatre of the last five years.

The text presents a forensic, almost Socratic dialogue between a human author, Mark Playne, and an artificial intelligence system, direct and uninterrupted, except for the occasional short commentary from the author. Playne’s questions are informed, carefully constructed and wide-ranging, but he never editorialises. He does not tell the reader what to believe. He simply asks, and records what comes back. Challenges to these AI responses follow with unexpected answers. The result is a work that is almost shockingly objective given the explosive nature of its subject matter. And further, the implications are staggering.

Whether you accept the ideas and conclusions presented in this book, or not is entirely your choice. I don’t know whether everything in these pages is or will turn out to be true, or metaphorical, or a mix of both, but I do know this: it is far better to engage with these possibilities now than to feign ignorance later. We have seen the cost of blind trust in institutions that no longer deserve it. Why don’t we learn?

For doctors, scientists, thinkers, and citizens alike, the value of this book lies in its method. This book doesn’t demand belief. It demands attention. That’s all. It asks nothing more than that you read, listen, think and then, perhaps investigate further for yourself. This free interchange of ideas is exactly what is missing in so much public discourse today.

It is also, I might add, a truly compelling read.

To my former colleagues in medicine, I extend an invitation to read this book in its entirety. Read it with an open and inquisitive mind. Don’t pre-judge it because of your training or current position, or because you’re still walking on eggshells to keep your job. Question your previous wisdom. Remember what “Primum non nocere” actually means, and ask yourself whether ignoring potential theoretical harms, simply because they are politically inconvenient and / or not in the headlines, is still compatible with your oath. 

To everyone else:

If you’ve ever felt that something wasn’t quite right these days, but couldn’t quite put your finger on it, read this book. 

If you've noticed how often today’s truths contradict yesterday’s, or how quickly people are targeted for asking honest questions, read this book. 

If you suspect that AI, far from being a neutral tool, is being trained to serve particular interests, then read this book. 

It will help you see the lay of the land, help you understand how to get worthwhile results from AI, and how to assess and interpret the flood of data and narratives we are being fed.

AI & I is not about answers. It’s about permission to ask questions. And how we might begin to reclaim our right to do so.

I would like to thank Mark Playne firstly for the invitation to write this foreword. It has been somewhat of a personal catharsis, and also for not only having the idea for this project, but the courage to follow through with it. 

Finally, I , without spoiling it, that he has since challenged AI itself to find fault with anything in this book. That exchange, too, is worth seeking out.

All in all this book ‘Really Makes You Wonder’ 

And finally, if each of us knows just 3 others, among 100 friends or acquaintances, who think as “we” do, then we have, in theory, already won! As it takes but 3.5% of the herd to be active in their conviction to effect a major change.

THE BOOK 'AI & I'

BOOK SHOP

BOOK SHOP

BOOK DESCRIPTION:

'AI & I'.

The Book That Proves You Were Right All Along.

Remember 2020?

When your gut said "something's off" but everyone called you paranoid?

You weren't crazy.

You were awake.

"AI & I" is your vindication in 599 pages. 

Mark Playne spent five years investigating for Not On The Beeb every question that kept you up at night .

Using AI as his interrogation tool, he systematically dismantles the official narrative with the same critical thinking that made you suspicious from day one. 

This book will make you feel:

→ Relief - Someone else saw what you saw

→ Vindication - Your "conspiracy theories" were pattern recognition

→ Empowerment - Your analytical skills were spot-on

→ Confidence - Trust your instincts more than ever 

You questioned when questioning was forbidden.

You noticed when others chose blindness.

You asked "what if?" when others demanded compliance.

This isn't just validation.

It's a masterclass in critical thinking that makes you different.

You're not the audience.

You're the hero.

MAIN BOOK SHOP:

Many people have had issues buying from our main shop, so we have set up a BACKUP BOOK SHOP: https://payhip.com/BOOKSBYNOTB

If both fail, please make contact to arrange another method: fullybooked@pm.me

MAIN BOOK SHOP:

Many people have had issues buying form our main shop, so we have set up a BACKUP BOOK SHOP: https://payhip.com/BOOKSBYNOTB

If both fail please make contact to arrange another method: fullybooked@pm.me