'AI & I' FOREWORD - BY DR PHILIP STOWELL

This is a provisional draft foreword by Dr Stowell for AI & I.

This will be edited for the book to conserve page count and maintain flow, however the content is of such great importance, I believe the full version needs publishing.

Dr. Philip Bradfield Stowell

MB BS (London), FACNEM

Retired GP, Australia / UK / Algeria

"...I retired as a general practitioner after 44 years of practice across three continents—first in the UK, then in Africa, and finally in Australia. I come from a family with five generations of doctors and trained at Brasenose College Oxford and St Thomas’ Hospital Medical School, qualifying in 1977. In 1988 I emigrated to Australia, where I worked in general practice until 2022. Along the way, I gained a Fellowship of the Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (ACNEM), and I have lectured at many of their seminars.

I’ve always believed that being a doctor is among the most privileged occupations in the world. With it comes immense clinical responsibility, the profound trust of patients, and a sacred duty to uphold the principles embedded in the Hippocratic Oath: professionalism, autonomy, privacy, informed consent, and—above all—non-maleficence.

Primum non nocere - First, do no harm is widely quoted, but I believe it should always be accompanied by the oft forgotten Precautionary Principle, which urges caution and humility in every clinical intervention.

From the very beginning of 2020, I sensed something was deeply wrong. The Covid narrative was not unfolding naturally; it was being orchestrated. What struck me was not only the content, but the delivery: synchronised language, identical slogans, and a government-sponsored campaign of fear or silly distractions like clap for the NHS, that bore all the hallmarks of propaganda. It wasn’t leadership—it was theatre.

That was the moment my red line was crossed. I began to doubt everything I was being told.

We were commanded to “trust the science,” yet any alternative views—no matter how principled or evidence-based—were met with ridicule, censorship, and in many cases, professional destruction. Principled dissenting doctors were deregistered. Clinical caution became a crime. Medical curiosity became heresy. This reversal of the foundational ethics of medicine paralysed practitioners and prevented meaningful progress in understanding the illness or responding to it humanely.

The so-called solution—the vaccine—was never up for debate. Even celebrities were paid to join in the chorus of Get the jab. This new mRNA product was rushed to market under Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA), yet by definition, EUA is only valid in the absence of existing treatment options. The truth is, viable treatments did exist, but they were aggressively discredited to clear the path for what was marketed as the only hope.

Let’s be honest: this is  not a traditional vaccine. It is a gene therapy, rebranded by redefining what the term “vaccine” even meant. The World Health Organization quietly changed definitions and the language, and with that, the public’s understanding. The speed of approval, the lack of long-term data, and the unprecedented scale of rollout—despite mounting evidence of harm—revealed a disturbing willingness to prioritise policy over patient safety.

The list of “known possible side effects” released by regulatory agencies was enormous—spanning almost every bodily system. And yet, the message to doctors was: “Inject, don’t question.” We were specifically told in the education about the products not to aspirate before injection, denying any chance to check for intravascular administration—a reckless break with clinical best practice.

What followed was a pattern of denial and ridicule:– Menstrual irregularities? Coincidence.– Spontaneous miscarriages? Misreported.– Fatigue, brain fog, neurocognitive issues, myocarditis, strokes, or so-called “turbo-cancers”? Anecdotes.– Young athletes collapsing on fields around the world? Irrelevant.The data was ignored. The stories were buried. The people were gaslit.

Then came the revelations:- PCR tests were being run at cycle thresholds so high that they guaranteed false positives.- The virus had a survival rate exceeding 99% for most people.- The infamous videos from China—people dropping in the streets—were staged.- Flu disappeared, but Covid numbers somehow took its place.- The injection was found not to stay in the deltoid muscle as claimed but travelled throughout the body—including across the blood-brain barrier.- Reports emerged of magnetism at injection sites—mocked publicly, but never honestly investigated.

At every turn, transparency was absent. The public was kept in the dark. And many doctors, fearful or captured, stayed silent.

In retirement, free from professional constraints, I began to explore more deeply. Many voices challenging The Narrative have emerged—some thoughtful, others extreme—but most point to long-laid plans reaching back decades: to the eugenics movement, Fabian socialism, and early technocratic visions of a controlled society.

In the commercial world—unlike in professional or social life—there is an accepted lack of transparency, typically justified by the protection of proprietary interests. But history shows us the inherent danger in such a protectionist system. Our collective memory is littered with the cost: DDT, thalidomide, mesh implants, Vioxx, amalgam fillings—and outside the medical sphere, the pattern repeats.

Consider asbestos, whose fatal consequences were known but suppressed. Lead in petrol, promoted while damaging generations of children. Glyphosate, now linked to cancer. PFAS, now in our blood. Dieselgate, Boeing 737 Max, Grenfell Tower, Facebook and Cambridge Analytica—each a chapter in the same story: when secrecy shields profit, the public pays.

And so with mRNA injections: we are dealing not only with novel science but with unknowns—genetic material, spike proteins, SV40 fragments, graphene, immune-evasive modRNA. The ingredients list, when examined, is often designed to obscure more than reveal. No transparency. No accountability. No liability. Governments indemnified producers, even as harm unfolded. The public, meanwhile, was left with little more than a mantra: “Safe and effective”. And the other ubiquitous slogan “Anti-vaxxer”. Oddly, we are  the only people not to regret their recent vaccine choices

There has been no public adult conversation—no honest admission of uncertainty—from manufacturers, governments, health departments, or professional colleges. The silence has been deafening. And the longer it continues, the louder the growing evidence becomes.

The dissenters to The Narrative (TN) have been diligently publishing their research, ideas, and clinical observations. Yet, these contributions have been systematically suppressed, ignored by mainstream media, and—when they did manage to surface—often ridiculed. Despite the effort and integrity of many professionals, their warnings never seemed to reach the broader public. Most people, understandably, were simply trying to survive—juggling the burdens of daily life under unprecedented restrictions.

It reminded me of the old “Bread and Circuses” strategy: distract, confuse, frighten, and mislead the population—and you can control them. Wrap it all in the illusion of safety, and many will not only comply, but defend the very system oppressing them. The language of “protecting the vulnerable” masked the deeper reality of manipulation. As Klaus Schwab and his cohorts have made clear in their arrogant and contemptuous tone, the global population are considered “useless eaters” by those who attend elite gatherings like the WEF and Bilderberg and have the arrogance to plan for all humanity.

Changing another person’s mind is never easy. It can be done with brute-force propaganda, yes—but for meaningful change, it must come through personal internal reassessment. To invite someone to question what they’ve believed to be true, safe, or secure requires care, trust, and time. It’s rarely about shouting louder. Often, the most effective approach is simply to ask a question, share an idea, or offer an unfamiliar perspective—and let it sit.

One day, I came across a website called NOTB—Not On The Beeb—which offers coverage of issues that the BBC, now little more than a state mouthpiece, routinely refuses to touch. As a subscriber to their Substack, I was offered a free copy of AI & I. Never one to look a gift horse in the mouth, I dipped in. I found myself drawn into a fascinating record of a conversation—one between the author, Mark Playne, and an AI system that appeared to respond with both intelligence and insight.

At first glance, the book explores how to interact with artificial intelligence and understand its emerging role. But soon, the conversation begins to examine deeper questions: What forces have shaped the events of the past five years? Are there patterns, motives, and designs hidden beneath the headlines? How should we read between the lines?

The text presents a dialogue—direct and uninterrupted—punctuated by occasional commentary from the author. Playne’s questions are carefully constructed and wide-ranging, but he never editorialises. He does not tell the reader what to believe. He simply asks, and records what comes back. The result is a work that is almost shockingly objective given the volatility of its subject matter.

And yet, the implications are staggering.

Whether you accept the ideas presented in this book, or reject them, is entirely your choice. I don’t know whether everything in these pages is true, or metaphorical, or a mix of both—but I do know this: it is far better to engage with these possibilities now than to feign ignorance later. We have already seen the cost of blind trust in institutions that no longer deserve it.

To my former colleagues in medicine, I extend an invitation: please read this book in its entirety. Read it with an open and unguarded mind. Don’t pre-judge it because of your training or because you’re still walking on eggshells to keep your job. Remember what Primum non nocere actually means—and ask yourself whether ignoring potential or theoretical harms, simply because they are politically inconvenient, is still compatible with your oath.

This book doesn’t demand belief. It demands attention. That’s all. It asks nothing more than that you listen, and think. It’s also, I might add, a truly compelling read.

I thank Mark Playne for not only having the idea for this project, but the courage to follow through with it. And I note—without spoiling it—that he has since challenged AI itself to find fault with anything in this book. That exchange, too, is worth seeking out.

THE BOOK 'AI & I'

BOOK SHOP

BOOK SHOP

BOOK DESCRIPTION:

'AI & I'.

The Book That Proves You Were Right All Along.

Remember 2020?

When your gut said "something's off" but everyone called you paranoid?

You weren't crazy.

You were awake.

"AI & I" is your vindication in 599 pages. 

Mark Playne spent five years investigating for Not On The Beeb every question that kept you up at night .

Using AI as his interrogation tool, he systematically dismantles the official narrative with the same critical thinking that made you suspicious from day one. 

This book will make you feel:

→ Relief - Someone else saw what you saw

→ Vindication - Your "conspiracy theories" were pattern recognition

→ Empowerment - Your analytical skills were spot-on

→ Confidence - Trust your instincts more than ever 

You questioned when questioning was forbidden.

You noticed when others chose blindness.

You asked "what if?" when others demanded compliance.

This isn't just validation.

It's a masterclass in critical thinking that makes you different.

You're not the audience.

You're the hero.

MAIN BOOK SHOP:

Many people have had issues buying from our main shop, so we have set up a BACKUP BOOK SHOP: https://payhip.com/BOOKSBYNOTB

If both fail, please make contact to arrange another method: fullybooked@pm.me

MAIN BOOK SHOP:

Many people have had issues buying form our main shop, so we have set up a BACKUP BOOK SHOP: https://payhip.com/BOOKSBYNOTB

If both fail please make contact to arrange another method: fullybooked@pm.me