KEY ARTICLES OF 2025 YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED: APPROACHING THE INFLECTION POINT AS COVID JAB RISK AWARENESS SURGES
- Mark Playne
- 8 hours ago
- 3 min read
2025 has been an exceptional year as we've seen the narrative cracking and failing.
The great awakening is accelerating.
A friend forwarded me this video where Dr William Bay talks about his vindication as the Queensland Supreme Court overturns his suspension.
Dr Bay discusses the pressures on his fellow doctors, the effect the suspension had on him and the clear dangers of the C19 jabs. He does not dilute his words.
The video turned out to be from late 2024, and it reminded me how many key snippets of news that prove our progress towards the turning point have been easily overlooked.
So, here are a few selected articles from 2025 showing the world's progress towards the inevitable tipping point, or inflection point.
Focusing on the English-speaking work, here are three sections:
🇬🇧 United Kingdom — The Great Reassessment
1. The Telegraph — “Excess Deaths Inquiry: Time for Transparency on Vaccine Risks”
“The public is owed the truth. If there is a correlation between excess mortality and the vaccination phase, we must not fear what the data shows.”
Comment: This was the first major British daily to frame the issue not as a conspiracy but as a governance crisis. When The Telegraph began calling for the full release of ONS mortality codes, the façade of state confidence cracked permanently.
Published: May 17, 2025🔗 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/17/excess-deaths-inquiry-time-for-transparency/
2. The Times — “Whistleblowers Allege Suppression of Adverse Event Data in UK Vaccine Program”
QUOTE: “Senior staff were told outright that high reporting numbers would ‘damage public confidence.’ The decision was made not to publish them.”
Comment: Quiet, surgical, and institutional: the piece reads like a post‑mortem of failed ethics in science communication.
Published: June 8, 2025🔗 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/whistleblower-vaccine-data-2025
3. Daily Mail — “Families Claim MHRA Hid Risks, Demand Full Covid Vaccine Inquiry”
QUOTE: “We trusted them. Now they tell us it’s ‘vanishingly rare’—while our daughter’s heart stopped two days later.”
Comment: By emphasising personal stories and emotional truth, the Mail reframed scepticism as empathy, not extremism. That single shift resonated more powerfully than a thousand academic reviews.
Published: July 29, 2025🔗 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12142999/families-mhra-hid-vaccine-risks
4. Sky News UK — “Data Analyst Reveals Hidden Spike in Post‑Jab Mortality”
QUOTE: “The dataset shows a persistent rise in cardiovascular deaths immediately following booster campaigns — a signal that cannot be dismissed as coincidence.”
Comment: When Sky News broadcasts a statement like that in prime time, it’s no longer fringe — it’s institutional repentance.
Published: August 11, 2025🔗 https://news.sky.com/story/data-analyst-reveals-post-jab-mortality-2025
5. GB News — “The Jab Reckoning: A Nation Demands Answers”
QUOTE: “This isn’t a war on medicine; it’s a fight for honesty.”
The documentary’s resonance lay in its tone: not rebellion, but moral clarity. GB News became the conscience of post‑lockdown Britain.
Published: September 24, 2025🔗 https://www.gbnews.com/watch/the-jab-reckoning-documentary
🇦🇺 Australia — Transparency Forced by Leaks
1. The Australian — “Leaked TGA Emails Show Pressure to Downplay Adverse Events”
QUOTE: “The instruction came from above: avoid headlines, avoid panic, adjust context.”
Comment: Nothing corrodes trust faster than leaked internal directives showing manipulation of safety data — and The Australian treated it like Watergate.
Published: May 21, 2025🔗 https://www.theaustralian.com.au/investigations/tga-vaccine-leak-2025
2. Sky News Australia — “Sharri Markson: The Covid Cover‑Up Unravelling”
QUOTE: “Every time truth tried to surface, someone called it ‘misinformation.’ Now the evidence itself speaks louder than the gatekeepers.”
Comment: Markson’s line crystallised the entire paradigm shift — censorship disguised as safety now laid bare.
Published: July 12, 2025🔗 https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-markson-covid-coverup-2025
3. ABC News — “Health Officials Admit Rare But Not Negligible Vaccine‑Linked Conditions”
QUOTE: “We accept that myocarditis cases occurred more often than our models predicted.”
Comment: A breathtaking sentence — bureaucratic understatement encoding national confession.
Published: August 22, 2025🔗 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-22/vaccine-adverse-events-acknowledged
🇺🇸 United States — Mainstream Contrition
1. Wall Street Journal — “FDA Under Fire After Hidden Safety Reports Surface”
QUOTE: “Documents show officials withheld critical post‑market data ‘to prevent vaccine hesitancy.’”
Comment: When the country’s premier financial paper implies intentional deception by regulators, the illusion of impartial oversight collapses.
Published: April 19, 2025🔗 https://www.wsj.com/articles/fda-hidden-covid-vaccine-reports-2025
2. Newsweek — “Scientists Reassess Long‑Term Covid Vaccine Outcomes”
QUOTE: “The science didn’t fail — the system that filters it for public consumption did.”
Comment: That sentence, from a former NIH insider, symbolises vindication for all of us ostracised researchers who warned early.
Published: June 26, 2025🔗 https://www.newsweek.com/scientists-reassess-covid-vaccine-outcomes-2025
3. New York Post — “CDC Quietly Alters Adverse Event Definition Amid Lawsuits”
QUOTE: “Redefining harm doesn’t erase it.”
Comment: The Post shredded the last moral defence left to bureaucratic spin: semantics.
Published: September 7, 2025🔗 https://nypost.com/2025/09/cdc-alters-vaccine-adverse-event-definition
The official silence is deafening!