BILL GATES DOCUMENTARY CLIP - VIRUS & VACCINE MANIA

IS BILL GATES THE NERDY "WANNA RULE THE WORLD" BOND VILLAIN IN PLAIN SIGHT?

Video and analysis below...

VIDEO

Bill Gates’s rise was never the fairy tale about a gifted boy starting a tech empire from his garage. Gates was born into comfort and influence. His father, William H. Gates Sr., was a powerful lawyer in Seattle with access to corporate and political circles. His mother, Mary Maxwell Gates, sat on major boards such as United Way and IBM. That connection to IBM later opened the door to Microsoft’s first huge contract. The myth of the garage genius hides what was really a family‑sponsored opportunity leveraged ruthlessly.

When Gates obtained the software that made Microsoft, it was not an act of original creation but of sharp business manoeuvring. He acquired Quick and Dirty Operating System (QDOS) from a small company called Seattle Computer Products. He then rebranded it as MS‑DOS and licensed it to IBM. The genius, if one can call it that, was in the licensing structure: Microsoft kept the rights to sell MS‑DOS to other manufacturers. That gave Gates control of the entire PC operating ecosystem before the rest of the industry even grasped what was happening. It was an early masterclass in monopoly building.

By the 1990s the United States Department of Justice sued Microsoft for abusing its dominance. Prosecutors demonstrated that the company had bullied competitors and manipulated software distribution to crush rivals such as Netscape. During the trial, Gates’s arrogance on the witness stand was so pronounced that even establishment reporters described him as evasive and smug. The court stopped short of breaking up Microsoft, but the proceedings permanently damaged his public image. The groundwork was laid for his supposed moral reawakening through philanthropy.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, established in 2000, presented itself as a charitable organisation combating poverty and disease. In practice it became the instrument of image laundering and influence buying. Its “donations” often circulated back as strategic investments in the same corporations that benefited from its policies. The Foundation channelled billions into companies involved in biotechnology, vaccines and global food systems tied to patented crops. It also quietly financed newsrooms and scientific publications to ensure sympathetic coverage and suppression of serious critique. Beneath the humanitarian rhetoric lay a structure that turned philanthropy into power.

Gates’s activities in India illustrated the pattern vividly. His foundation funded HPV vaccine trials among poor tribal girls in Andhra Pradesh. Reports of deaths and severe side effects led to a parliamentary inquiry which found that informed consent had been bypassed. India’s health officials suspended the programme and critics accused the Gates‑funded partners of ethical violations. The outcome was effectively a ban on Gates’s direct vaccine projects in parts of India. Western media buried the episode but it permanently dented his standing in that region.

It was during these years that Gates recognised vaccination as the perfect instrument of global leverage. Vaccines combine steady demand, government guarantees and moral immunity from criticism. Through entities such as GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, which Gates dominates financially and strategically, his foundation gained enormous sway within the World Health Organisation. This allowed him to shape international health policy in ways that reinforced control while maintaining the façade of benevolence.

The COVID‑19 crisis turned that influence into near domination. Gates became a ubiquitous presence on television, granting interviews as though he were a senior public health official despite having no medical credentials. His foundation had already invested heavily in companies developing mRNA platforms, genomic surveillance, and digital vaccine certification systems. He profited indirectly as the demand for those products exploded. Media groups funded by his foundation promoted the same vaccination agenda globally, creating an echo chamber. By the end of the pandemic, Gates and the corporate beneficiaries around him were significantly richer, and his control over public health policymaking had deepened.

Then came the scandal that even the most loyal public relations teams could not fully absorb. Gates’s association with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender who moved within elite financial networks, exposed another layer of his moral void. He met Epstein numerous times in New York under the cover of philanthropic consultation. His then‑wife later admitted that she found his ongoing contact with Epstein deeply distressing and that it contributed to their divorce. Gates claimed the meetings were purely about charity funding, yet flight logs, emails and testimonies suggest a sustained relationship. Even if one gives him every benefit of the doubt, the judgement involved was catastrophic.

By the mid‑2020s, the veil of saintliness was gone. Gates had fashioned a career from monopolising technology, manipulating regulation, and buying influence. Whether in computing, global health, or media, the pattern remained constant: exploit a structural advantage, control competitors and craft a moral narrative as camouflage. The “philanthropist” exists mainly to sanitise the image of the monopolist. Behind the soft accent and scripted smiles stands one of the most calculating operators in modern history, a man who discovered early that the true currency of empire is not invention but influence.

EPSTEIN FILES

If his money-making greed, as kids worldwide getting damaged and killed by untested, unsafe, non-scientific vaccines, isn't bad enough, your disgust triggers might go off the scale when you read of his conspiracy with Epstein....